HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-01164
'"''
"
~
~
I
*
Plly )~Irr,(\~') Plaintiff
~ \\",1,...... )~<o ,t\<\'l
V
:IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
:CUHBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
:CIVIL ACTION - LAW
*
-
I i ~L" L
., - (' ,,<
J
Defendant
.
.
:NO. (I (, "" (! CIVIL
:CUSTODY/VISITATION
19
ORDER OF COOR1'
("'""dl S - f,r (,
AND NOW, this (date)' I , upon consideration of the
attached complaint, it is hereby directed the partie~ and _
their respective counsel appear before ,( L _ ~<', c; f.>S-
the conciliator, at ",t).;>' Jstl, 5 (... "
on the ~day of , , 191 ,at cJ'(.JCJ .1''1
M., for a Prehearing Custody Conference. At such conference,
an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or if
this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be
heard'by the court, and to enter into a tltlllporary order. Either
party may bring the child who is the subject of this custody
action to the conference, but the childlchildren'R attendance is
not mandatory. Failure to appear at the conference may provide
grounds for entry of a temporary or penllanent order.
FOR THE COURT:
By: ~/VJ;/.(<dl /l &'''J~ ~S<;.
Custody Conciliato:"~/I
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER ORCANNO,T AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE
SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
COURTHOUSE, FOURTH FLOOR
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717 )240-6200
.
L. SheddAn.
5. r;l-p C''ll&tion.hip ot the defendant: to the ohild 11 that of
paternal moth.r.
The de tend ant currently re.ide. with the following perlon.,
Todd t~n9 pre.ent hu.band and Victoria !. Sheridan daughter.
,. Plaintiff ha. not partioipated al a party or witne.., or
in another capaoity, in other litigation concerning the cu.tody
of th'3 child in thll or another oourt.
Plaintiff has no information of a cu.tody prooeeding concerning
the child pendin., in a COUJ;t o~ tilis Common\~e~lth.
Plaintiff doe. not know of a perlon not a party to the
proceedings who hat phydcd eustody of the ehild or claims
to hav~ cU9tody or visitation riqhta with res~eat to thl child.
7. The best inl:e:n.t and permanent weltare of the child will
be "erved by granting the rf01H3t requested because on January
29, 199~ my ex-wito Tin3 Long contacted my present wite Barbara
L. Sheridan a~d info~ed h~r she had to take J~ssica H. Sheridan.
Barbsra L. Sheridan alone; with Tina tong want and had a p.Jper
notarizod to give QY wite nnc I tempoC'3ry custody until I Jerry
C. Sheridan could !il~ for f~ll custody.
Also my daughter has accusad my ex-wife ',3' llusband Todd Lon9
of IROl'!JtLl'. her 'lihon they liv'3cl in uta!'.. '1'1103::8 13 a criminal
court cas'l pending.
Also JeJsica M. Sha::id~~ ha3 n3V~: tini~h3d a full year of 3chool
while in Tina :on95 cU3tody. She now ha3 3 le~=ning disability.
~ina Long has neglected Jessica ~!. Shoridan in ilIany way., my
wit'!! an:! I no'~ ha'le hor in coun3~linc; for ....hat has happened
to her in Utah. Ne also are soJe:t1n9 help for h9C' learning
disability throug1l h'31:' school where sha now attand3 in Carliale.
When her mother ':'1na Lone; mov'9d to l'tah about a year aqo, she
too!( Jessica L~. Sheridan ....Hh her against m'l ,...1,hes I wsnt."
Jessica ~I. S'heric.iall to llv'J iI:.th mo and illY presant wife Barbal'a
L. Sheridan 1n Carlisle. I hays always taarad :or Jessica'.
safaty Ilod no'" I fear even more if she goes ~ack to Utah with
Tina Long.
t"t r"o al!lO :'JUY th3t my '.'IEe ane! I iove Je33icJ. :t. Sheridan
vel''} ,t'u.:::h, and ,",e 1:;cing 1n l=ri3,:m does not and will not change
that ,.:!~~. ~ly wH'i dnd I il!l'1l! 3lw."ys ,.,antcc the blOl.Jt for Jessica
and !!lways will.
In closin<J I truly f'J3r !:or the :J:lf:lty :md :oJel::3re of Jes,;ica
M. .ba.l4a" lf lb. ..tu.nl to tha oUltoeSy of ha. pat..nal .otha.
'11.. 1.Oft9.
I. 'aoh ,...nt who.. pI..ntal .lghtl to the ohl1d have Dot bean
t.nlnated aA4 the penon who ha. phyl10al oUltody of the ohUd
hav. been naae4 .. pa.tl.1 to tnl. actlon.
WIle.eto.., the pldntUfI nque.t. the oou.t to 9nnt oUltoeSy
. of the chUd.
/( (.
'"....J .
Attorney for plaintiff
,
/1,('
1 vedfy that the Itatement. molde ln 1:1\11 Complaint U8 t.1&e
and OO.I'IOt. I undll'.tanel that fal.. .tatamenta her.aln ..rEi made
subject to tha penall:ie. of 18 pa.C.S. 14904 r.a1ating to un,wOl'n
falsificatlon to authc.ltl...
/
,
C'li,~/t~. __
/
>. r-
, '",.
, ,
1I , , '-I .
"
c;:
I .
( ;
,
("~
1-:
~.J r
C:.
,
1 ,
\ '. , - ;
..
,.
.
~
~
~
ct.
l(
\-\
.",
~
-Ji'}..
0-
~,
"'
~
-..J
)
c:
~
rr
-
UJ ~
o -
J~H
I ~ ~ ;l
.... >0 ! In
"'S-S
3d~
(;) ~ g =
... ..
:t ~
APR 11199fp~,,-
.
5. The Plaintiff's position on custody is as follows: The Plaintiffs nBBd to
have an order establishing primary physical custody so that they can have the child
on health insurance and take care of the child's needs. The child had relocated to
live with the step-mother in January, 1996.
6. The DefBndant's position on custody is as follows: The Defendant wants
to provide the Father and step-mother with primary physical custody of the child.
ThB Conciliator was contacted by telephone and was sent the letter which is
attached to this report. There arB no other issues to be resolved.
7. Need for separate counsel to rBpresent child: Neither party requBsted and
the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary.
8. Need for independent psychological evaluation or counseling: Neither
party requested and the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary,
9. Other comments: The child in this case, Jessica M. Sheridan, is currently
twelve years old. She was residing with her Mother and step-father in Utah. Her
step-father was recently arrested for statutory rape and involuntary deviate sexual
intercourse as a result of claims made by Jessica that he has repeatedly forced her
to have sexual relations with him since she was six years old. The child was
removed from the Mother's care.
2