HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-01394
.
"-"
't
~
J
,
J
,J
J-
'~
~/
j I
I
... I
JI i ~ I .S j
I
- ~~i I
~ I ~
I j ..... ::l If
,~ 'j I 8ij~
I
~Ji I I .. .-iO
I 1<
... I j~ ~~.-i
en I .~
,., I I
.-i ,
I ~ I r-
~ I Itm I
I
I I
I
I ~i~ I ~ I
I
I ~ I
:i I
I 1
I
Plaintill' applied her braklls to Ulllllllpt to "low or stop hor vuhielo to uvoid colliding
with tho iIlegully (lurked Wutkin" Motor 1';lIuipmollt vllhiclo, but us sho did "0, hor
vohiclll slid on icod or "now on tho rOllllway und bogan to spin l:ountorclockwiso.
9. After Pluintill's vehidll bllKan to "pin, it waH HtrL,,:k by unother tIOuthbound vehiclo
oporuted by Dofondunt 8/11100 I.. .JonkH, whi<:h hud bl'l!ll tr/lvoling bohind Plllilltill's
vohido. Tho collision pu"hed Pluintill's vohiclo into u secOllll collision with u concrete
bridgo llbutmont ulonK tho highwuy.
10. The collision between Plain till's vehicle und tho .Jonks vohiel(l, us woll us Pluintill's
collillioll with tho bridge ubutmont, wus due to tho eombinod negligonce of the
Defenduntl!.
11. The negligenco of Defendllntl! .Jonllthan W, Jllck"on und Wutkins Motor Equipment
consisted of iIlegully purking II vohielo in II munnor that purtilllly blocked the rolldway,
thereby forcing othor southbouml trullk to tuko evusivo uetioll or to try to stop suddenly
in order to uvoid colliding with the truek.
12. 'I'he negligence of Slllloe L. Jonks con"isted of flliling to muintuin control of her vehicle,
failing to oporute hor vohiele in such a munnor as to enllble her to stop within the
u:ll!ured eleur distanee ahelld, flliling to maintain attontioll while operuting a motor
vohiele, and driving u motor vehido too fast for the provlliling eircumstllnees.
13. !Ill a result of the collisions l:llused by the Detimdants' negligence, Pluilltill's vehiele Wlls
damaged in excellll of itll value. theroby cllulling Plaintiff to llulfor loss in tho llmount of
$3,0!)6.95 for the vehiele itl!elf, togothor with 101111 of the use of her vehicle until a
replacemont could hlJ obtained.
WHEREFORE, Pluintill' domundll judgmont aguinllt tho Dofondllntl! for dllmugoll not
in OXceSll 01'$25.000.00, togethor with eosts of suit and lluch additional reliofas tho court
may dOlJm appropriate.
COUNT TWO
14. Tho avormentl! of pllragraphs Olll. through luurtoon of this complaint, inelusivo, llro
horeby reaverred und incorporated by reforenco us if toxtually sot forth at longth.
15. As of 3/1819,1, I'laintilT maintainod liability inlllli'unco on hor vohiclo through
Nutionwido Insurunee, pursuant to the I'onnsylvunia Motor Vehiclo Finuncilll
Hosponsibility LllW (MVFI{L). In that insuralll:o policy Plaintill' had olocted the full tort
option,
~
LAW omcES or DONALD 1l. DOIlEll
3907 Hartzdale Drive, Suite 706
Camp BDI, PA 17011
TWpbone Number: (717) 731-0938
Attomeys for DefeDdant, Penny Sue Martin
EVERT F. JENKS, PLAlNTlFP
VS.
PENNY SUE MARTIN, WATKINS
MOTORS EQUIPMENT. AND
JONATHAN W. JACKSON, DarlNDANT
VS.
SALEY L. JENKS, ADDmONAL DEFENDANT
PENNY SUE MARTIN STROHM,
l'I...uNrDT
VS.
S,4I.1RR F. JENKS. WATKINS MOTOR
EQUIPMENT, AND JONATHAN W.
JACKSON.DEnNDANTS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAs
CUMBEiU.AND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 95-7016 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ArnON - LAw
JuRy TRIAL DEMANDED
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAs
COUNTY, PENNsYLVANIA
No. 96-1394 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ArnON. LAw
JURY T1uAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE or SERVICE
Donald R. Dorer, Esquire, hereby certifies that he is the attorney for the Defendant herein, and that he
caUJed a true and conect copy of the IIltal:hed Order of Court and Stipulation of Counsel
to be served by rellllar first class mail upon:
George F, Douglas, m, Esquire
DouoLAs, DouOLAS &. DoUOLAS
27 West High Street, P.O. Box 261
Carlisle, PA 17013
ATTORNEY FOR: PLAIN'rtFF, EVERT!? JENKS
William A. Addams, Esquire
FOWLER, ADDAMS, SHUOHART &. RUNDLE
28 SQuth Pitt Street, P.O. Boll. 208
Carlisle, PA 17013
ATTORNEY FOR: DEFENDANTS, WATKINS MaTOR
EQUIPMENT AND JONATHAN W. JACKSON
Date: June 10. 1996
Fred H. Hait, Esquire
MCGRAW, HAlT &. DEITCHMAN
4 Liberty A venue
Carlisle, PA 17013
ATTORNEY FOR: PLAINTIFF, PENNY SUE MARTIN STROHM
Barry A. Kronthal, Esquire
REYNOLDS &. HAVAS
101 Pine Street, P.O. Box 932
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0932
ATTORNEY FOR: ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT, SALEY JENKS
onaJd R. Dorer, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant. Penny Sue Martin
4. Denied. Atter reasonable investigation, Ms. Jenks
is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth ot the averments of thi. paragraph and they are,
there tore , denied.
6. - 13. Denied.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Sallee F. Jenks demands judgment
in her tavor and against Plaintiff, Penny Sue Martin Strohm with
costs assessed to Plaintitt.
COUNT II
14. The answers contained in Paragraphs 1 through 13
inclusive hereot are incorporated by reference herein as it set
torth in their entirety,
15. - 17, Denied.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Sallee f. Jenks demands judgment
in her favor and against Plaintitf, Penny Sue Martin Strohm with
costs assessed to Plaintift.
NnnTTD
18. The answers contained in Paragraphs 1 through 17
inclusive hereof are incorporated by reference herein as if set
torth in their entirety.
19. Plaintiff's claims, if any, are barred by the
applicable statute of limitations.
20, The subject collision and Plaintiff's alleged
damages and/or injuries, if any, were solely, directly and
2
proximately cau.ed by plaintiff's own negligent, recklees, and/or
carele.. conduct.
21. Plaintiff's injures and/or damages, it any, were
solely caused by the negligent, reck lese and/or careless conduct
ot person(s) and/or entities over whom Ms. Jenks had no control
and for whom she is not legally liable and/or responsible.
22. Plaintitf'. claims, if any, are barred by the
doctrinee of contributory and comparative negligence and
assumption of the risk.
23. plaintitt has failed to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted.
24, Plaintiff's claims, it any, are barred by her
failure to mitigate her damages.
25. At all times relevant hereto, Ms. Jenks was
responding appropriately under the circumstances then existing to
a sudden emergency.
26. plaintitf is precluded from pleading, introducing
into evidence, or recovering any and all monies payable as
"required benefits" pursuant to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle
Financial Responsibility Law, Act of February 12, 1984, 75 Pat
Cons. stat. 51701 ~ sea.
3
.,.. .....'
c; .:1
~~ , .-
~,( C'J .-1
>'. . :;.
, j
E', ,-
~L r...j , >}l
, '.J
- "-J
G:: l.. '.l..
.'- - ,'S
....
L. .t)
U C' ::.1
.