HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-01409
i
I
I
~\
i !
~
"
,
:
,
i
\
I
1
,
!
i
"
"'.
.'
,r~'
,.'''/
)
J
I
~
0-
C--"'lAllH Of! 'INNIYLYANlA
'_,or ,_ 'uA'--~"~-"
NOTICI 0' APPIAL
fllOM
_ DlIl.IC'
CUMBEHLAND COUNTY
DISTRICT JUSTlCI JUDGMINT
C_ 'LlA....
C}" - 1~~_J.~~7..t-~
. . -_._---'-------"---'--~'_.,._._--,-~_.._---,._.._-,,-._.
NOTlCI 0' A..IAL
Notice il iii*' """ the appellant hel filed in the above COU't of C_ PIe<u on appeal from the judgment rendered by the o;."ict Jultic. on the
dale ond in the c_ _njo".J bolo..<
- "'-"""-- rAG D." NO ~ 01 OJ
~~~' Randy and Deborah --'-..~_..-~...'..-6..__---'-'- 09-3.~~ (3hUl'!lnterger~.cODI
228 RICHLAND ROAD CARLISLE PA 17013
~il-;;;'T -1"~~;;~NTElU'RI~~~m"._-__-.._-~ HECKENDORN, II'.,~~~ i)-/" "l
-~ ~,~'~~~------l-k=?:;r)~ -
ThD bIocJ. wit be o9lOd ONlY when this notation i. required undo. Po. R.cP.JP."N;;. If appellant k CLAIM.4iNT (see Pa. R.cP.J.P. No.
tOO8l1.
ThD Notic. of A~ when _oi-..d by lho Oi.II;.t Ju.tic., will operate '" 0 lOOt(6) IfIactionbefOte DislTlctJustice, he MUST
SUPERSEDEAS II> the juc9nont to. po.....ion in thi. COI& FILE A COMPLAINT within twenly (20) days after
filing his NOTICE of APPEAL,
>atun, oi Protllot>olaly a;Deputy
(TIlls seclion alllJmJ to be ~ ONLY when awellanl ..... DEFENDANT (see Pa R,C.P.J.P. No.
IF NOT USED, delach /rom c~y of noIice of aweal to be ser.ecJ upon awe/lee i.
.IAICI'I, To Pn>thonotary
V~~ ALLEN ENTERPRISES
IWrne 01 ~,,)
(Canwnan PIoao No. q ~ - I ~ ()~ ~:~ T--.,) within I,..",y (20) day. after
.IAICIPI TO INTlR RULI TO FILl COM.LAINT AND RULI TO FIll
'00' 17 i In acl/Oll before OIstncl J1Jslice,
fntor ..... upon
, "",,",,"(I), ta file 0 complaint in this """"'"
'.of......".uf""...
'1;1
of ncn _
RULI, To VAN JIT,r,FI\I ENTERPRISES
NIIme 01 ~J)
.
. app..ufs~
( I) You .... noHfiod thot 0 ..... iI hereby ..twod upon rou to file 0 c~t in tho appeal within _tv (20) cloyl after the dote of
IIMco of tho ..... upon rou by pononoI ....ice ." by coriifiod ." regis-.! moil.
(2) If rou do not file 0 <ampIoinl within tho limo, 0 JUOOMfNT OF NON PROS WIll BE ENT!RED AGAINST YOU.
(3) Tho dote of -.ic. of tho ..... W _.... ..... by moil iI the dote of moiling.
IlaIo: 'N\OA.., 11+ ,19~,
~A,:L~ 1", 'P' );;C,
d x.~~Jat~
III>>CJIHt4
"
'.
Ii 1
. . ~
. ..
~ .... i
I'~ ~ .
l< ...
. .. 0 al! ,->lId I
B l:ai
Is' . llil
~Ii In fII ...
~ e= 1::1 ! ~ I P I!
~ el
~Id
~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ I i I [i
11:1::1 4 I 'I
!
0;
,,-
....-
C__UWlMfM Of ......YLVANlA
coWl, iif-cOMMON.wi
NOlIeI Of .....1.
fROM
_W Dla'alC'
CUr'4.JiHl..rl>iu -S;];\fi'Y
D'S'.'CT JUSTICI JUDGMINT
C_OU..l-Cf.t1 - 'If_o '!_t;0:~I-L-~
NOTlCI 0' A..,.Al
NoIlce it ~ """ IIMt ~I has filed on ,he aboo.. C""" of Common PIao, an ~ It"'" IIMt Judynent rendoo<.d by IIMt Cistno lY,tic. an IIMt
... and in IIMt c.... .._.ti....lot<I b.olow.
""7;~KN, H;m~~ ir~-;-rJe~Grl~:- ,.,-.------r~~'~;>)~NAf.~r~~:.eC ...r I
TOI~ -~--~.-,.'.--'--'--,--"...,"----,.. '----crji'v-~'-.~- ....- _.. .----SfAjf"-.--.-~.-~-~ ZPCODI
lJd IHCJu.....ND '~)AU <.:AaLLLL ," 11',1..>
-li::;';' -'-r~:~~;~~r,C:;:"~';"!d>;, ,-.-...--:~~CK~~,A),-;:~-;:;...~ 'D,,,,.. J.
CLiiMNO .-.-.,--------,---- " [lieNAitilli5f4mi' frJO...iflilII4'tM~' m7
TIil blodt wiI ~ :~JO:y1 :') tIu noiane;;:;~ ~PI1 R:CPJP~ ~ ~1/;;ni"iaA~~ Pa, R:c.-P.lP. /Va
10011
TIil Notice of Appeo/, when ...,ti...d by IIMt Diot,ic, lY,tico, w,N operute o. 0 100 1 (61,n action before DlstrlCl Justice, he MUST
Sl.I'US2DI!AS lis IIMt i' ,g.....1 "" pos.....", ;n tN. co... FILE A COMPLAINT wlthlll twenty (20) days aftflf
filing his NOTICE of APPEAL.
s.gnil/iJm 01 PiOIhOiiOiiiv-Oi~ly----_.--....
'UlelP. TtHNTI.-.ULlrO'ILICOMPi.Aiiil AND-.ULI TO PILI
(1Ne section 0I1otm to be used ONLY when appeIl8nt was DEFENDANT (see Pa, R.C.P,J.P, No. 1001(7) In action IJeIote Distnct Justice.
IE NOT USED. de/ach from c~y 01 notJce 01 appeal to be served upon __'Iee).
..A.CIPI. To Plothonolay
v <\,~ ALLEN E~frE~'}"I:"E;j
Nim8 oJ ~5)
1<-...... -" 10- ,. 0' ~ ;....-,.... -,"',...... Jl/itt 2!!r J!' -m---:-
~~-!J/Ih._~_
j -- , ,~. __ 1
I!ntw ... upon
. , app....(s), to file Q complaint in this appeal
VAN ALLEN 8N'I'.RpQrSES
ll8mot~"J
, ClPflI".fs~
1Ul.. To
(I) You _ noHfiod that 0 ... i, "-by onNted upon you 10 ~Ie 0 complaint", this appeal wittlin IwWy (20) day, oller IIMt da10t 01
..... of tIu ... upon you by personal _vic. '" by certified Ot owgistonJd mail.
(2) " you do nol file 0 complaint within tIu tirre, 0 JlJDGMENT Of NON PROS WIlL BE ENTERED AG/'JNST YOU.
(3) The ... of _Yic. of this rule ~ _vice "'" by mail ~ the daIle of ~
llaIe: '1'Y\ CV\. I "" ,19 ~ .
~I...J' u . 1;;~:.;c:...J} A.~
"'_ OI~
AIi-c J1'....
caUR T fil E
,
., '," .,', ~ 'J,~"
~
~~a,;,':.;~\
" \., ... ;/-",
Receipt 'tor
certified Mail
~ .. ' " \''''' ,. - ",
Receipt lor
certIfied Mall
~
;,"'\"'\
,1I ~;. ,.1
1'l,,'I,>,."I"
.' ','1,-'"
"I I'" I' .!." ,"'"
Nll III'iutllnt:a (.l',jl:l.l,~'t ,",1;\\lllh;.1
Do n')' It"" tOf lrll'llfl.Jt'nlhll M'lll
I~:'~t! A~l,/dl..t!1
-,~---,----'-_._-,.~- ..--'~-_.., ,----,
~ .Od~.\l~~.!l,5<::h~1~Q~'f~e_~
~ 1".0'. BOl( lSS ~'
4 _~.~~~~1l';I-
ly~~nl~'.P~,L2r; l.~~"
i . t l/~ '
t "~
\
,.----.---
--".'.-'.
._,_..-.--.--d---.---
L~
"
.
. ",
.,.~'
'.' . ~
\
\
'~'.. "
~ ""
'"
/
'-.... v'' ,,/
-"-~
,...
i
tl
~
I'
\'
\
I
,..
10,
The Plaintiff issued separate bills as requested by the Defendant, and received a reply from
K It. R Lehman Contracting that indicated that the Defendants had used up their excavation
allowance by work performed by the Plaintiff and others. Defendant, Keith Lehman, requested
that the balance of $2,S40,QO be paid directly by the Defendant~ Heckendorn. A copy of that
correspondence is attached hereto and is marked as Exhibit "B" and made a pan of this Count.
11.
The Defendants, Randy Heckendorn and Deborah Heckendorn. agreed to pay for the
work as it was being performed by the Plaintiff whether or not it was considered by the parties
within the scope of the contract between Keith Lehman and Defendants, Heckendorn, The
Plaintiff is entitled to payment of the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred Forty and n0/100
($2,S4Q,00) Dollars.
12.
The Defendants, Randy Heckendorn and Deborah Heckendorn, have received the
quantum merit value of the excavation work which the Plaintiff performed on the property of the
Defendants. The Plaintiff is again entitled to the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred Forty and
n0/100 ($2.S40,00) Dollars in payment for Ihe value of those services.
WHEREFORE. the Plaintiff, Van Allen Enterprises, demands the sum of Two Thousand
Five Hundred Forty and no/IOO ($2,540,00) Dollars plus costs and interest as provided by law,
p9
9/3 [
. / cj3
/~~
/ C/_?-
/~6
/c/7
.
.
/cj)tt~
_",),{ d~ ~'...d~ ( ~L.-
;:n,
/ /L,'t-!,.,:
/) /.'
~,~.~'- )
- c: Ie t
/ ..' , '. ,f' '
"L,:-~l(., t<. /,,(-,,<2< '
~. ...11.,..-)
.,;:".,,,
/, .,..,'
"# __l . "t.:..
~;!'dt~t:. L' @ ~~ ~ C
,<2::. J-?~L C7.rLu- /I[ T (f'
, ,
-ccu tl c' t; (,,, ([::.' c;. ,'. ,(' (
~ ,- C
-1 t .
_ C""'''' ./G~4 .....c.t..- '
....., / , " /C; ~. - , ,"
.:,LJc',,,, c:.. ;..., ..1.(. (,
,..-/'c:
.-"J _.J r...
,-{' ~':l.~'-
. /1 v, ,
_"'""Y ""r_(.,
3' ../~<)
o _I'~<)
7 J~'_ '
i ./!.<,)
.../:' (Z" 1< 't 'L.
~{'tc1<-i.<. .
. ,
.-t!cx(')d~<
~; /./ //,
e_ l'G~c.- ,C __'
(?;: cCf C
(fi,' {:- ,., (' (,
(f ~('.(C'
,.
-Xo'(. {:-a <.
_/7 .
I--<'~/C;_
;'3 A<'J.-t.~'t(2(lL' CE: tc'" ('c"
/) I' -'/ J"., . 4" -. L' /-
-;-, _ ~l-J' Vc. ~ c:..::... :;) ..J . c.. C
. ,
/ ".f.i'..~t.!d. .:.( ..<llz;J~L
/ ...../: _ . j:(!d(-t.~ 0:'
',---~. . . "" .
-::t C'i-l -(..- \--
/ ...-e~'td(i cV A...'? Z;'J:,L
/Cj/3 ,,/j~< J ..i;~'( ,Z(~ L' (f rt('J(~
~~lC'- L
-
.. / ~(l(td 7' .c;lc:Jji.L .
/0~ ,.5( .Jd~(' cu,t...i:. <)../:.<1...6. €:- %,CC;
::? jiu --i~ra<1I.'(,. (P 6(:, C' L'
.
.
ti c/~ >u4u )LJ 9 ?P 9t:
'-:-/ . , "', ....- // (' (('
::\. _~"/L Hl.{'l /.'-- x.,.,; 7
- j,.5"3'/.y,,"
~C:c:'c
/ Y'C', c:; (.
7c.c'c
..., . . ,I"
_"'l be;. C' C'
......, ,; , ..
;J-.S c' c.'
'7'/ /' '/
/<'" ~'(.J
~CL' 0-::' /:1';'
r()~. (..'-
. 3' 6 C. tJ (.i'
y.,;)C c'c.:
3t-C,c.C.~
/9.,>6
/ ::L?, /C
/ ,yC.".C:C
...,. /' "
/{.,.v,...
-
,Y,' ,7'5
f:{.' ,C:c..-
<: ..
/y.?c
g,2K
.2 Y'c-.t: ('
39 {,;C;
5';.1/
9' "",
o {" . {. (,.
/_~6. ti()
j'5;;39.'9~
I
Randy Hecken~orn
nct:l'Jber 27
1I~
IN ACCOUNT WITH
VAN ALLEN ENfERPRISES, INe
p, o. BOX 152
CARI.ISLE, PENNA. 17013
2 hrs. Sin le Axle Dumn Truck ~ 35.00
Move Backhoe :0 Site
TEAMS CASH. A"ar 30 daYI
1'''' par month Intarastlddlld.
70 0')
35 00
70 00
19 50
132 10
70 00
ao 75
60 00
19 50
82 40
240 00
39 00
PHONE (7171 243-$528
SePt. 29
Oct. 3
Oct.
Oct.
Oct.
Oct.
6
2 hrs. 3ackhoe ~ 35.00
Labor
Pi e
2 hrs. Backhoe ~ 35.00
1 Load of Stone
1 hr. Loadar
7
12
13
Labor
1 Load of Stone
4 hrs. Loader ~ 60.00
Labor
;: "
Total Due
999 96
October 27
K 'R LcJhman Contracting
2107 Walnut BottomRoad
Carlisle, PA, 17013
II 94
IN ACCOUNT WITH
V' AN ALLEN ENTERPRISES) INe
P. o. lOX 152
CARLISLE, PENNA. 17013
PHONe (71712~.5528
Heckenu>Jrn
TEAMS CASH, Allt' 30 aye
1 Will PI' monlh Inllresl taata.
Sept. 30
Oct. 3
Oct. 4
5
6
7
14
29
Move Loader to Site
2 hrs.Loader @ 60.00
6 hrs. Loader @ 60.00
8 hrs. Loader 60 00
6 hrs. Loader
7 hrs. Loader
6 hrs. Loader
3 hrs
2 Sina1e Axle Loads of Shale @ 40.00
2 hrs. Loader @ 60.00
Tota
60 00
120 00
2 540 00
. .
1 C' ;
:
lU' ... ~
( ~ . "
L. ,
l.. i
c ( ..
C )
,.
l' ,
.-
, .'
, . .,
L (;.'. I
Q
Z
j ...
~~~~~~
o ~"'~:z~
ffi X:Z_
o~~~~E
~ ~ ~=':~~
oJ ,.. Cl. ~ ... 0
- ...;l:I:
~ "'<Cl.
f:!3 u
Q
-
<
rIJ
I VAN ALLEN ENTERPR r SES, INC.,
I Plaintiff
,
I
'I
II
:i
il
i
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
NO, 95-1409 CIVIL TERM
RANDY HECKENDORN and DEBORAH
HECKENDORN, bis wife, and
K.R. LEHMAN, CCNTRACTOR,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DEFENDANT K.R. LEHMAN'S
ANSWER WITH NEW HATTER
AND NOW, comes Defendant K.R. Lehman by and through its
attorneys, Saidis, Guido, Shuff' Masland and answers Plaintiff's
Complaint as follows:
1-14. Admitted.
15. Denied.
The averments contained therein are
conclusions of law to which no response is necessary. To the
extent a response is necessary, it is specifically denied that
Defendants Heckendorn have made any payments whatsoever to
Defendant Lehman for the work detailed in Exhibit "A" to the
Complaint.
16. Admitted.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Lehman prays this Honorable Court to
dismiss the Complaint and enter judgment in favor of Defendant
Lehman together with costs of this action.
SAlOIS, GUIDO, r NEW HATTER
SHUFF "
MASLAND 17, On or about September 29, 1995 at or about the time
26 w. "Iah Slm:.
Cull.le,PA Plaintiff began the work listed in Exhibit "A" attached to ~he
Complaint, Defendant Lehman specifically advised Plaintiff that
any work it was doing from that point forward was beyond the
r!'i
scope of Defendant Lehman's contract and would have to be billed
il
il