HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-02403
~
....
~
J
J
r()
<3
~
~
(j.~
~
I
I
'I
~
il
.'.~
"
"
,'1
.,j
"
'\
i
.
"~I'
,;t
'.
"I
,
"
"
'.'
,I
\:
,;.i
,
,
,'h
'I
!
"
I
II
!
I
'.. ('J ,H_
r-: l. " ,
,. I.': ..'~
nIt ,
(' 1 ~ ..: , ,
fJ'.' .:,j
"
c..;'1 <?
.l~ ;: (r\
I... ,
.~ : J . .J
- " r
L;: l '.-
,. ....
I , ':1
l_.: l; , :..J
~
~
~
~
....s
~~
~~
;-- '.........
.~
~
.-
~
~.
........' :~
~J
.
, ,
,I
I Iii r
r'l'_' I' 'i'
I,. ~,' ., l' r I ", , .
ii.if" !
,
I
','/,
111
II 'I:
"
!I i '/\
I'
, "
iil
I "I II', I I
,
, I " I , 'N! , , L I II' I !'\
, I 'i' I 1\ 'I.
,
, ,
" !i , Ii- ". , I I
,
I., II, I I' I , I ':\ I, "
.,
,
'II , I I' ! , Ipl I, Ph 'Ii:" II
, ,
, Ii',' ,i\ " I, "
" I' , ,"
,
, , , "\' ! , i
, , " ,.
, , , " , !-IHi '. , , 1 1 , I
" , 1<' ,
''/1' I II
'LI'.lli~) \? :;111,' I j l' J
1'-" "J! ,j)!l
Ill,
',I. : 1 " \ ~", 'J, " 1
Ij,.
j! 1',1,,1',1
I,! ,'1 !,i.l,'j'hL I' rl;'
I!
Il"
'.',llt "(11
fl"'" ,,:'i.
"
'j'l
il
II
I",'"
'I
'1,1
, I ~ ! I
~7 L;f#f~~
30e
C((,
~I.4.-Q. ~\ ~ <
'~
,,~
..,,,
fj~ ('I
i" .. . ~ .....
wr; .'J .)
( )-; .'J: ;:.;'
ft~' (.'- .i;:
I'"i" 1:..1
y( .f;)
Eg" ..."
I !~)
o:~l; , '~
~, .,
F r:=) "
~.~ '
~ .n .~
'" 0
I.
"
"
keep alert and did maintain a proper lookout for the presence of other
automobiles on the roadway;
B. Denied. To the contrary, Plaintiff ThoMas Rayhart did
have the vehicle he was operating under proper and adequate control;
C. Denied. To the contrary, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart did
take the proper evasive action in a timely fashion;
D. Denied. To the contrary, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart was
properly attentive;
E. Missing from Defendant's New Matter.
F. Denied. To the contrary, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart did
not operate his vehicle at a speed in excess of that which the
conditions permitted; and
G. Denied. Answering Plaintiffs are advised by counsel and
therefore avers that the allegations contained in the corresponding
paragraph of the Defendant's New Matter are automatically deemed denied
as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required and
strict proof thereof is demanded at trial, if material. To the extent
I
II
II
II
I
,
,
I, paragraph of the Defendant's New Matter are automatically deemed denied
an answer may be required, Plaintiffs in no way violated any of the
provisions of 75 Pa. C.S.A.
19.
Denied.
Answering Plaintiffs are advised by counsel and
therefore
avers
that the allegations contained in the corresponding
as conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required and
strict proof thereof is demanded at trial, if material. To the extent
I
I
I
I
that an answer may be required, Plaintiffs' Complaint clearly states a
valid claim upon which relief can be granted.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Thomas Rayhart and Lisa Rayhart respectfully
CIRTIFICATI or SIRVICI
"v'fh
I HtREBY CERTIFY that on this ';\0 day of June, 1996, a true and
correct copy of PLAINTIrrs' R_PLY TO HI. MATTIR was mailed first class,
postage prepaid to the following counsel of record:
Karen Durkin, Esquire
John J. McNally, III, Esquire
JAMIS, SMITH . DURKIN
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0650
CORCHIH, GRAHAH, ROSATO . MAUIR, P.C.
\
IYI 'Li~:~/ Ma~er-: ~i~~~{r~
Attorney, 1.0. 65426
The Commons at Valley Forge
suite Seven, P.O. Box 987-23
Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482
(610) 933-3333
Attorney for Plaintiff
"..\
I<.i
~,. N
~I..
1-"' ..
lJJ' .;r ",1:
(~~ I' .'
&: " i~'_ ..' ;' .~
/-r 'I';';
0.,
'f: " ;~
",0
~; I I ! o!._
ii.!11 ....J :ill
(' ;:.:~' ,.to,.
0 - .
'} \1"1 ',1
U 0"1 U "
(
,.
"
".
I!
,i
.....
COUNT OKI - HlaLIalKCI
THONAI RAYHART V. IRIDalT HILLIISH
1. Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart is an aault individual who resides at
RR2/ Lot 211, Creekview Farm, Shermansdale, Pennsylvania.
2. Plaintiff Lisa Rayhart is an adult individual who resides at
RR2, Lot 211, Creekview Farm, Shermansdale, Pennsylvania.
3. Defendant Bridget Hillbish is an adult individual who resides
at 208 Second street, P.O. Box 443, Surnmerdale, Pennsylvania.
4. On or about January 23, 1995, at or about 8:19 A.M., Plaintiff
Thomas Rayhart, who was operating a 1990 Ford Mustang, was traveling
south on Rich Valley Road in silver Spring Township, Cumberland county,
Pennsylvania.
5. At said thle, Defendant Bridget Hillbish was the operator of
a 1993 Chevrolet Cavalier at the intersection of Sherwood Drive and Rich
Valley Road in silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Defendant Bridget Hillbish pulled her vehicle out from the stop sign and
turned left onto Rich Valley Road into the path of Plaintiff Thomas
Rayhart's vehicle.
6. Defendant Bridget Hillbish was negligent and careless in the
operation of said motor vehicle for the following reasons which include,
but are not limited to:
a. making a left hand turn when it was unsafe to do so;
b. failure to keep said motor vehicle under proper control;
c. failure to operate said motor vehicle with due care
for the rights and safety of Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart;
d. failure to yield the right of way to an approaching
vehicle;
2
., ,
.
e. disregarding the rights, safety and position of other
vehicles on the road, including Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart, and/or
f. failure to stop in time to avoid a collision with the
motor vehicle operated by Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart.
7. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Bridget
Hillbish's negligence and carelessness, and not due to any act or
failure to act on the part of Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart, said Plaintiff
suffered great pain and suffering, traumatic anxiety, depression, shock
to his nervous system, and other injuries, some or all of which may be
permanent, including, but not limited to: severe neck and back pain
resulting from acute lumbar and cervical strain and sprain.
8. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Bridget
Hillbish's negligence and carelessness, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart has
been, and may continue to he in the future, unable to attend to his
usual habits, customs, vocation, and enjoyment of life.
9. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Bridget
Hillbish's negligence and carelessness, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart has
been in the past, and may continue to be in the future, required to
undergo medical treatments and procedures.
10. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Bridget
Hillhish's negligence and carelessness, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart has
been in the past, and may continue to be in the future, required to
spend great sums of money for medical treatments and proced'Jres as a
result of his injuries.
11. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Bridget
Hillbish's negUgence and carelessness, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart has
3
.- .
been unable to engage in his occupation and therefore has in the past
and may in the future continue to suffer a loss of income and/or loss of
earning capacity.
12. Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart is entitled to recover damages under
the full tort option provided by the Motor Vehicle Financial
Responsibility Law, Title 75 Pa, C.S.A. S 1705 et. seq.
WHIRlrORI, Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart hereby demands judgment in his
favor and against Defendant Bridget Hillbish in an amount not in excess
of $25,000.00, plus costs and interest.
COUNT TWO - LOSS O' CONSORTIUM
LISA RAYHART V. BRIDGIT HILLBI8H
13. Paragraphs 1 through 12 above are hereby incorporated by
reference the same as if more fully pleaded.
14. Due to the negligence of the defendant Bridget Hillbish,
plaintiff Lisa Rayhart has been deprived of the companionship, care,
service, earnings and consortium of her husband, Plaintiff Thomas
Rayhart.
WHIRlrORI, Plaintiff Lisa Rayhart hereby demands judgment in her
favor and against Defendant Bridget Hillbish in an amount not in excess
of $25,000.00, plus costs and interest.
CORCHIN, GRAHAM, ROSATO' HAUIR, P.C.
By:
, ]1 '. ,\ /. /1 / , II: :
Lisa J. MaUer, e~uire
Attorney I.D. 65426
The Commons at Valley Forge
Suite Seven, P.O. Box 987-23
Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482
(610) 933-3333
Attorney for Plaintiffs
4
/,
"
;"
I,
"
\
/1
,'" I
,
, '
I
"
i'
-
(-
I
II."
(
II..
l
..
H
.,'
,
i
,I
f,
l'i
L.
,1
,
,
\:2J
'.
"0 - .
tr, 1;: '..
r~ .. ".t'
~~,. N .J Trl
, ;,...: ')
~[l. ,". ':.
'.
)1,;, <;Q J ~{l
" "'
ul\. :1"'; '.I~
, ""j
I. ", ./
.
II.. ,n (j
<:.) C.I\
z ~
-
~' ~.
~.
1'!
Q ~ 0(
~ <!d ;;:.
0(
" "
o ::t: Ii .oJ
,.
$ !::: '"
0 ~
0( ~ ,.; '/
...IVJ It
(fl ,;
...
~ '"
'"
0( '"
...
... '"
.
turn onto Rich Valley Road, at which time the vehicle driven at
excessive speed by Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart struck the vehicle of
Defendant Hilbish.
6. Denied. The averments in paragraph six (6) as to
negligence and carelessness are conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
7. Denied. The averments in paragraph seven (7) as to
negligence and carelessness are conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
8. Denied. The averments in paragraph eight (8) as to
negligence and carelessness are conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
9. Denied. The averments in paragraph nine (9) as to
negligence and carelessness are conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
10. Denied. The averments in paragraph ten (10) as to
negligence and carelessness are conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
11. Denied. The averments in paragraph eleven (11) as to
negligence and carelessness are conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
12. Denied. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant is
without knowledge or information sufficient to fo~m a belief as to
the truth of the averments of paragraph twelve (12) and strict
pr.oof of the same is demanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Bridgette Hilbish respectfully requests
judgment in her favor and against the Plaintiffs, together with
costs.
COUNT TWO - LOSS OF CONSORTIUM
~SA RAYHART v. BRIDGETT! HILBISH
13. The answers in paragraphs one (1) through twelve (12) are
incorporated herein by reference.
14. Denied. The averments in paragraph fourteen (14) are
conclusions of law to which no r.esponsive pleading is required and
strict proof thereof is demanded at tr.ial.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Bridgette Hilbish respectfully requests
judgment in her favor and against the Plaintiffs, together with
costs.
NEW MATTER
15. The answers in paragraphs one (1) through fourteen (14)
are incorporated herein by reference.
16. The Plaintiffs' actions are barred or limited pursuant to
the terms of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Responsibility Act, 75
Pa.e.s. S1701 ~ ~., the provisions of which are incorporated
herein by reference.
17. Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart was comparatively negligent to
a degree greater than the causal negligence on the part of the
Defendant, the existence of such negligence being specifically
denied. If it is determined that the Defendant is liable to the
Plaintiffs, the plaintiffs' recovery, if any, should be eliminated
or reduced in accordance with the Pennsylvania Comparative
Negligence Act, 42 Pa.e.S.A. S7102 ~ ~.
18. The negligence of Plaintiff Thomas Rayhart consisted of,
but is not 1 imi ted to:
A. Failing to keep alert and maintain a proper lookout for
thE! presence of other automobiles on the roadway;
B. Failing to have the vehicle he was operating under proper
and adequate control;
e. Failing to take the proper evasive acti.on in a timely
fashion;
D. Fail ing to be properly attentive;
F. Operating his vehicle at a speed in excess of that which
the conditions permitted; and
G. Violating the provisions of the Vehicle Code,
specifically 75 Pa.C.S.A. S3361.
19. Plaintiffs fail to state a valid claim against Defendant
upon which relief can be granted.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Bridgette Hilbish respectfully requests
judgment in her favor and against the Plaintiffs, together with
costs.
COMMONWEAL TH Of PENNSYLVANIA
COURT Of COMMON PLEAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL
FFHlM
JUOICIAL OISTRICT
DISTRICT JUSTICE JUDGMENT
COMMON PL E AS N.
96-2403 Civll Tel'11\
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice 1\ '11\11:0 Ih.llltw .llIpellJlll II..!, filed III thl! JIHlvLl CUUlI III Conlllll"l PII.',I~ .111 .IPlIl',lllltllllltll' jUdUlH1!Ilt. ,t>IHII!'I.t1 II... 1111.' OI5!tICI JustiCl'
on Ihl! d.lll' il/ltl .11 HH! l:dW 1111:"tI0l1l.'d 11l.'luw
""""""'-0" ...-j..-.,'&:.-..';-
208 Second Street, P.O. Box 443
cu.
J'.O~-'3-.~4'.'.~~.' _=.~~--=
..".. ." tQ.'
NA....- 0'" ..".U,AN',
HILLBISH, Bridget
Summerdale
PA
17093
4/16/96
I - .. .
'N ''''I c..... .11 '
.'l'_ho~afl
RAY HART
...
"",."..,..,..'Q;' '-";'~~A'" O. H,iull.'OR."ii.y...o.--....;;-------.---
Bridget HILLBISH
....,.-O'j-~.........,
~.-
CV 19 0000092-96
LT 19
Th,\ hlock will tJl' \1~J'\t'd ONLY .....hell Ihl'l nol.)tloll 1\
R.C.P.JP. No. 1008B
This NUIICl: of Ap~l'JI, whell 1t!f:I!I\lCtl hy lIlt' O''ltrICI Jmllr:I!, will OP"liJlL' il\
a SUPE RSE DE AS 10 Iht! JlHJqlllL'l\t fl)/ PO\~I~!lSIOIl In Ihl'.l LI\I!
/
If fJpJ}f!IIJI/t W,JS CIJfmiJI/t (see PiJ, H.C.P.J.P.
No. lool(6J m iJ('tfon before D/stm:t Jusrice, he
MUST FILE A COMPLAINT within I...",Y 1201
d.ys .lle, It/i''9 his NOTICE 01 APPEAL.
S'~/rr,"u", 0; ProthcJ//rJrJry Of Ot'J}l/ry
PRAECIPE TO ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
(This section of fnrm to hI! IISIHI ONL Y when iJ(JIwll,JOt w,'s DEfENDANT (sl.'e Pa RC.P.J.P_ No, '0010) in action before DlstflctJlJstlce,
IF NOT USED, d,uach from copy of oot/(:11 of I1mJlHJI to be served IIpVII iJppelMeJ.
PRAECIPE: To Pro'hono.ary
Enfer rule upon
Thomas RAY HART
, dppellee(s), to flIe a complaint in this appeal
NoIm" of dpp,./lel/(sl
ICommon Pleas No. 96-~~Ql~J_'{.!L.Term._._) WIthin twenty (20) days dfter serVice 01 rule or suffer entry of jIJdgment of non pros,
-1C:(1/~' .
~~<-<<,;{J
/ .---' Slgn.rur, of dPp,lI.nr or hIS ~rro,n'y or dgtlnr
RULE: To ___'l'h_ol1l.<1_s___I0~!I:\RT_~__________, appelleel,)
N.,mll of oIfJp.flee(sJ
(1) You are nOflfied that,) rule IS hereby entered upon you to file iJ compliJlIlt Itl Ihis .H)peill within twenty 1201 days after the date of
service of this rule upon you by personifl service or by cerllfled or registered mdd.
(2) If you do nOl 'de a complaon. Within .hlS ',me, a JUDGMENT OF NON PROS WI LL BE ENTERED AGAINST yOU.
131
The dale of serVice of this rule if serVice WilS by ma,l IS Ihe dale of mailmg,
+YJs.:./~
I ,.' ..-L:- !.f!.n 1- ___
S,,,,.,ur. p~ono'.,y or O,put'l
D'II:~2.___, 19 ---9.6
AOPC 31200
",
.4
(J i--
.. ~
.~ '~
~~ ~-
(Y-, '~
!I') ^ ~)
\:j:>
.. ~'\ ~ Nl
I',' ! \to
, \."." ':.\.
\,1,: ''l. ~
, , 01 e ~
, , ~
, ,
., , ' ~~ ...)
"
"'I
"I'"""j,,\,,,!
'-HI'I J ^V\!
'I' "'I'! ,I) 'd'l
"11";1 "'\' j ~,-,)",,: IjdJlI~' ""'I i'l h II' ],1 "".rltl",'"
), j utI' ~JI' i'" ~,II.I'" f" ,','
I~~
lit
1'11.) I 'Ill Q]UIWV,III1';
JU ,,,\to
m.II/IClIVHI"IVI
:;1111
r\!H()M~)
, ( ,I;", j'.1 '" ! 111.1', I l.iI~~ 'l .i. )10' 1.1" i'iII11, I,ll! ,\Ij I) ~
')1 (~l.,il(I,'ddl' ,nil ,Iliofn (""till,;! In ",) PiN ,!t'H1!' ,ltll l'II.A'H'd\IHl.l.Il' 111<11,,1111"')'
()j,) 100Ij '/illll"j II llllo\j)'11 ~. I<q)l\ll'i '(lliOj)
t,l) I' '<<'.111 -101 'I' ,I(I/)/ _i1jl II" ."1'/
"1'1 "I ll"1I -!Ill );,11",._ ( WIll ',JI!i111j lil/l'
1IId"iq ~,:ilj;)',1l 111"0-),'1 '"Bplj... 1" \'11 '11""1 L,l,] (i"1 I'" q',q
,i!
i',
'.il!.'!
e,(
'1')
;,;"""01
'11,111'
..lji 111'11" ("ill' ,
,1', I""i " Ii' ,t,
,,, 11,1,,;' /,1 .1/1', "
" lnu Ijl I" "d,', I C'
','/'\1',11,1' ',.j'illl/;,\I,I',j':'Jj {flijllll'l) {\'I r
'Ill " ,'1111' I' 'II ( IL'''lfI " I 1',llI' ,I)' d' I]
"II'iJI'lll'I-111^1I l' lil
\j I 1".1 I' 't I ~J 'I' ,lid II" 'II 'IJ' l~) '11',':1. f V j {,
)ld<l ,', I :'1 'Ii 'Ii l'lj' jj, d d," !'I" \I I
:ll^VCIIJ JV
,,'
III ^LNIl():"}
VINV^ IASNNld jl1 II 1'1'1 )MNnlAl~~ln
f~"j ~I)'I 'lff1/ lI/di'II' i I,H(,) If'}'dlll 1'/,;1 Ii/,h, ';'1; 'ilillll U } i J t,/', ,( I,'; I i'; I J/\/J :VII r'J./ill (J IJ I i }',I J:;r If~ ,) ,',I /. ':" 1.1 ,1', ,1/ \'11 J.j
IN'IVldVIIO:J 3'11~ 01 ~lrw dNV l\1'3ddV JO 3::l110N :10 3:JIMHS :lO :lOOHrI
,
09-3-04
I
GLENN R. ~ARNER
......., 5002 LEN}(~R STREET
MECHANICSB~RG, PA
I
TIi_, 17171 761-Q230
I
GLENN 1\. FARNE~
5002 LENI<ER STlEET
M!CHANICSB~RG,lpA 17055-0000
I
I
I
ntlS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
Judgment: I
00 Judgment was e~lered tor: (Name)
[!] Judgmenr was el1tered against: (Name)
In the amount of $ 8,109.50
o Judgment was e~lered against
LandtordlTenant action in the amount of :; on
The amount of rent per monlh. as established by the District Justice, Is $
o Oamag'l5 will be a55Alilsed on: (Dllte & Tlme)
FAX T17 Tn IITr9
I
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF; CUMBERLAND
MIO.OItL ...
CJ~lUIllt.HUft.
17055-0000
~OOl
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIP,.
PLAINT1FF; N~"'I! III"~ '-OCRl!1SI
1M YHART, THOMAS
RR 2, LOT 211, CREERVIEW
SHERMANSDALE, PA 17090
L
VS.
OEFENDANT;
~Mr ."'\1 AOQI'1lSS
~ILLSI5H, BRIDGET
208 SECOND ST.
P.O. BOX 443
i2UMMERDALE, PA 17093
"I
.
OocketNo.: CV-0000092-96
Dale Filed: 3/13/96
DEFAIIT.T JUDGMENT PLTP'
RAYHART, THOMAS
HILLBISH, BRIDGET
on. (Date of Judgment)
.-
I
o This case dlsmlased without preJudice.
I
,
o Possession gran\ed.
O Possession 'ilranlsd If money judgmalllls not
satisfied by lime of eviction.
o Possession not granted.
o Levy Is stayed for days or 0 generally stayed.
I
o OblBClion to levyl has besn flied and hearing will be held:
Cate: Placa;
Time:
4/16/96
In a
(Oats of Judgment)
Rent in arrears $
Dameges Unjust Detention S
Demages to Propertyl
Resldenli,d Lease: $
Less Amt Due Oefendant - $
Amount of Judgment - $
Judgment Costs $
Interest 011 Judgment $
Marney Fees $
8.000.00
109.50
.00
.00
8,109.50
TOTAL
$
ANY PARTY HAS THE 'fIGHT TO APPEAL A JUDGMENT INVOLVING A RESIDENTIAL I.EASE AND AFFECTING THE
DELIVERY OF POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE OA TE OF JUDGMENT BY FILING A
NOTICE Or: APPEAL ~"H THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF THE COURT OF COM~''!;t!t:tll~l~IYIL ON/SION.
Atff PARTY AGGRIIV!!O SY A JUDGMENT FOR MONEY OR A JU[)GMENT INVOLVI/II(} A1-iONRllihOI!N~L LEASE
MAY APPlEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF ENTRY OF TH!! JUDGMENT BY ~ILJNG A NOTlr;ol GF'APP,EAL WITH TH'
PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF THE COUFlT OF COMMON PLEAS. CIVIL CIVlSI,ON. g " ..... . '"
~ Oatel_ . .'.' i ..' ,- ~ ;'.: '- '."~~;;lctJ.~st~~
I certify that this is a trye anel corr~ct coPy of the record of the ploce(ldlngs cOolainlng the'!lidgni811t-'. l
, <. . . ..
~_i~ Data' _ _~ i >-.;-'., , . OIstrlct..j~;lr~e
My cOmmission explrOSllrst Monday of January. 199fl. . ,.'.....61A'" ...:....,.
I
/lope 319.t8
"
P'lOOF OF SF.:tlVlC'E OF NOTICE OF APpEAL AND H,ULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
i III ~ /dl11d Of ~f:f l i,',' /1/ /:; r (,'I r It. r [) J,VI nlfN ,I,' 1'." /hi l'j, l' '. \ _,\ I n li' !i/ul,'1 ~/.,' !)I)I'I (' 1/' -I/ltl, './1 I'III'I,A ,1lilllll ,IIi/,,' Ijtl_I'~'
COI\1Mt'NVVt:Al Hll)f PlNN'iYlVANIA
Cumberland
COl/NT"'" 01-
"
AFFIDAVIT:
I;', ,,',1" .1!I"lllj'il
,O!
x
,j C ,p, II', I ,'J", l" " i) I /\ lilll.,II, (. ,)II, 'f"; '\ (I II
"""",' ,,,,,,,.' MClY 3 1'.) 96
f'JLI
96-2403
"I",r ii'
'1.1.1."1,,,
.'; IWI.,'
Thomas
,XI I" II,
II'" 11" , I'd. ,to, ~." X)
Rayhart
II). ii'''!
!II:1I1
,'I'II'II,;'I:IJ
Ili'l,",II'II"11 "
l h, r,'
" till
,II' Ilr I' 1 ,.,j '" ".j, ;f,d ',IIJiWi 11,. .<1'1,-11,-, 'Ii.'
~ ( I. ~,
Ilf"l,
May 3
, 96
I,!;
I,."jl
Ii I I, ',-Il.!"1 -', 1"'P'fll'!" 1l'1,,",llh'tl't,'1
I"d !'I"II1,1 ill,'
'.")"'! !I,,; Il'II., (I'
lio d ("11'11 ,,,'
!",,"II1.jl'
",11",'" ':'" 1''11,
';.!it""'I"",
I',
'I I I I ". , Ii HI, I ' r' J, ".~~.!": "!.lJ
r I I I / I jVf'~~;~'I-l',' I
/' .
"\,llll.d 'lf1lll' 1hl' .tPIl.:'I"d'1~ (.,
11'//'.;1 (1./. ili It, '1,1' I"d)
.'
111.1:1 ~ '\/ "'f' ',I, PI' H ,I' r ",'tl", t \'1. ".r,)
~''''Il' II.", .' .JII'.lftl t
~~~~~/H\~\;'\;:,~ Iii ')~\ljl) '~l HII III 111 II))U9~?:
SI"Y;;:'~ <)1 br~
,
r,r!,' ,./ <i'" ,r/
6661 'il ~IW S9lldi3 UllISSIWWOQ ^W
My, ",",,' ,'." "'tlun~Ulljdn90 'UMOI5/6WWIIH' ! I
ollQnd ,(JeION/~J^3W31!lNV'N VlnVd
lV3S lVI~VLON
'",
"
i:
.'1
<,
'J
;
!
I
)
,,-\\
,
\'1
'1
I
'.. (7)
;".' '-':
I' .- :1;
.
{:. j'
1.._,
'- , ,
L (';
fj .::]
i : .c.
I " t..... ;
\ r,t '.J
,
d
. ,
,.
"
~ (1) ?;
c:;
f:': ,...
lLJ(.1 l~ ~ " l ..
.'i ~-','
~F "
(.- ,,,\,"J
(, \.(.:) '. ~iH
,', '.,','
:l'~ N I..:' '\
...",.-"
Li:(l. ,,:, ' , Ill)
.,' :':'.1 U;~ 0..
~ -~
e:~ ,"
~ ~ a
,
'I
"
, ,