HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-02501
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
BEVERLY SHANK,
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
v.
NO. 96-.))"ul CIVIL TERM
CARL ROWE,
Defendant
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 'oIl, day of ,\1\"1 _,1996,
upon consideration of the attached Complaint, it is hereby
directed that the parties and their respective counsel shall
appear before \ " \ "', , the ccmciliator,
at on
the day 0 , 1 96 at <;. '/ ,m" for a
Pre-Hearing Custody Conference, At such conference, an effort
will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or if this cannot
be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by
the Court, and to enter into a Temporary Order. All children age
five or older may also be present at the Conference, Fa~lure to
appear at the Conference may provide grounds for entry of a
temporary or permanent Order.
FOR THE COURT,
-~~__-J' . I~ ')
.-: ('.. / // '(
By: ' "I 'u. '(/~'I ',:~./ (' ~
Custo y Conciliator ~/~
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law (
to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. For
information about accessible facilities and reasonable
accommodations available to disabled individuals having business
before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business
before the court. You must attend the scheduled conference or
hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET I,F.GAL HELP.
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
COURTHOUSE, 4TH FLOOR
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
The father of the children is Defendant, who resides at 165
I~est North Street, Carl isle, PA, He is not married,
4. The relationship of Plaintiff to the child ia that of
natural mother. The Plaint if f currently resides with the child
and her other son,
5. The relationship of the Defendant to the child is that
of natural father. The Defendant currently resides with his
family members.
6. Plaintiff has not participated as a party or witness, or
in any other capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody
of the children in this or another court.
The Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding
concerning the custody of the children in this or any other
court.
The Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the
proceedings who has physical custody of the children or clalms to
have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.
7. The best interests and permanent welfare of the children
will be served best by granting the relief requested because:
a) The Plaintiff is the natural mother of the mInor child;
b) The Plaintiff has had primary physical custody of the
child since birth;
c) The Plaintiff is ready, willing, and able to provide the
child with a home with adequate moral and emotional and
physical surroundings as required to meet the child's needs
and best interest;
I ~ D\l.I;~. '~1 "II ~n .'\IIV.t;.l '11 ~l' 1''''1
2
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff. Beverly Shank, respectfully requests
Your Honorable Court grant Plaintiff primary physical custody of
the minor child, Tiffanie D. Rowe.
Respectfully submitted,
HANFT & VOHS
w~ ~O~iro
Attorney ID No. 65208
11 W. Pomfret Street, Suite 2
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-5373
Attorney for Plaintiff
l.l"'lur....IA......It\II~l\ llIM
4
-,......
'--,.
""'t-
<Q:
~
\j ......
(l. . ........
~ ..
lJ) -.!J
, ;\
'-.1 ;'~ "
l.J) "'J
J..j) ~Jj -~
1"- ::,J,
Mo- , ,:JJ..
'j
~i :;1
U N
H ~
.... ~ en
.... Cl
ill .... J: ~ ,'"
.... g~~~ ~l
~ <:: ><
~~ '... ~
III
~ .... .... o!I~~jfld>~
~ <::
~~ . III <Yo I ' ~ ~
H ~ . 'tl ~ li:~ ~~E
u > tii
~ 0: Z~ ~ c~
.... e
~ .2:
U~ I ~ ~ ~>< ~ ~
\0 0: ~'~ -
:e '" -
1>1 ~
. I1l 8~
~
"'<
0....
~
~~ '"
H
~
~~ l>: N
>- ~ ~
u
ffi
:~ t' o~tf~ ~
n:
.... +l ~ > w R ffi
.....
~'j t: oll~~~I';'''
. ..
U '0 0: Iii ~ .. N
tJl,~ > t: ~ li:ii~ ~[
f,j~
~~ ~21 z z ~ ~ l:o ~
c5
l>: H ~ ~ ~
~ E-<
H
co fj -
~ -
.
.
~
fJ u\ r (, 'qnri
, '..c
BEVERLY SHANK, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff . CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
:
v. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
.
.
CARL ROrofE, . NO. 96-2501 CIVIL TERM
.
Defendant .
.
. CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
.
COURT ORDE1 ;
AND NOW, this 4"'- day of ~
consideration of the attached Custody Conci~iation
ordered and directed as follows:
, 1996, upon
Report, it is
1. The Mother, Beverly Shank, shall have legal and physical
custody of Tiffanie D. Rowe, born June 15, 1995.
2. The Father, Carl Rowe, shall enjoy temporary physical custody
of the minor child at such times and under such circumstances
as agreed upon by the parties.
3. In the event either party desires to modify this Order, that
party may petition the Court to have the case again scheduled
with the Custody Conciliator for a conference.
BY THE COUR!, /
,
/ I
: ( //
",--_/ vJ
Edgar B. Bayle, J.
':-' '~
-,' .,
, 'q
,
I .'1
~" I,l,
I
, ,
-" ,,'
,
!
'lJ ,
I.',
P'
cc: William C. Vohs, Esquire
Carl Rowe OOI)I~~ I'I1'(J..Ll:.I. 7/Q/r,1r,
165 West North Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
BEVERLY SHANK, . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
.
Plaintiff , CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
,
.
v. . CIVIL ACTION - LAW
,
,
.
CARL ROWE, . NO. 96-2501 CIVIL TERM
.
Defendant .
.
, CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
.
PRIOR JUDGE: RONORABLE EDGAR B. BAYLEY
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF PROCEDURE
1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the
following report:
1. The information pertaining to the child who is subject of this
litigation is as follows:
Tiffanie D. Rowe, born June 15, 1995
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on June 20, 1996, with the
following individuals in attendance:
William C. Vohs, Esquire, attorney for the Mother, Beverly
Shank.
3. This case was originally started with the Mother filing a
Petition for Special Relief against the Father. A hearing was
scheduled, and the Defendant failed to appear for the hearing.
Judge Bayley entered an Order granting the Mother custody.
The case was then referred to the Custody Conciliator for a
conference. Attorney Vohs appeared at the conference, but
neither Mother nor Father appeared at the conference.
Attorney Vohs related to the Conciliator that the Father had
called his office indicating that he did not have an attorney
and would not be contesting the existing custody Order.
4, The Conciliator recommends an Order in the form as attached.
7/ F/ tfV
Date
lroy, Esquire
nciliator