HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-02507
I I ;.. c I
c C
::l .
'" !!: c c
u '"
0 c
g E Xl c
'" ~
c
u u ... C ,t
l- I- ra '"
... u.:
~ '"
:;:l ~ C
::l
.~ ~ ~ u.:
u - '"
> ~
u .~ - 'll
.... ~ c: ir
0 -
It1 ... 'C
N u.: c:
I ;0: ..
\C , u.: ]
'" :I:
. E .c E ~ u
C C c ~ E
t:) I- ~ u C C
Z Z ~ 0 .t: U lJJ
PJIm foil,
1 - 2
4 - 37
36
39 - 59
60
6l
62
63 - 66
67 - 70
71 - 75
76
^mnng the Record, illHI Prncl'ctlin~~ enrolled in Ihe l'Hurt III' ('UIllI1Wn Pll'jl\ 111 and fur the
Cl1l1nly Ilf
Cunhar land
No. 3081 C.D. 1996
96-2507 Civil
III the CUltHtHlIl"calth nll'cnn\yl\'lIniil
In Nn.
Telln. II)
j, cuntained thl' Inllu",il1~:
nwy OF
/\ppcurance
I lOCK EI ENTH Y
G. II. IIhRIlIS hSSOCIhTES
VS.
TODD M. nEhM
3
May 8, 1996, Notice of hppeal from District Justice Judgocnt, filed.
May 8, 1996, Praecipe to Enter Rule to File Complaint and Rule to File, fil
May 16, 1996, Proof of Service of Notice of hppeal and Rule to File
Complaint, filed.
June 5, 1996, Complaint, filed.
July 5, 1996, Sheriff's Return of Service, filed.
July 29, 1996, Defendant's Responpe to Complaint and Motion to Dismiss, fi1
hug, 20, 1996, Praecipe for Listing Case for hrgument, filed.
By: Steven E, Grubb, Esq.
Sept. 24, 1996, Motion to Continue hrgument Court. filed.
Sept. 27, 1996, Oruer of Court, filed,
fIND NCkI, this 27th day of September, 1996, the mtion to continue
argument court, IS DENIED.
By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J.
Oct. 16, 1996, Opinion and Order of Court, filed. In Re: Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff's Complaint
.\NO NCkI, this 16th day of October, 1996, the mtion of defendant to
d~iss plaintiff'S complaint, IS DENIED.
By the Oourt, Edgar n. Bayley, J.
Nov. 18, 1996, Notice of hppeal, filed,
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Rule 901 of the Rules of
hppellate Procedure, Todd M, Bearn, defendant above named, hereby appeals to
the Cal100nwealth Court of Pennsylvania from the order entered in the docket
as evidenced by the attached copy of the docket entry.
Respectfully subnitted on this 18th day of November, 1996.
By: Todd M. BeiIll
Nov. 22, 1996, Ccmronwealth Court of Pennsylvania Notice of ^ppeal Ibcket-
ing to Case No. 3081 C.D. 1996, filed,
Nov. 25, 1996, In Re: Mruoorandum, filed.
Being in receipt of a notice of appeal by defendant fDan an order,
supported by a written opinion, entered on October 16, 1996. it is noted
that the order is interlocutory since it denied a mUon of defendant to
diBl11iss plaintiff's canplaint.
ny the Court, Edgar n. Bayley, .l.
GOLDDERG, KATZMAN & SIIIPMAN. p.e.
Sleven E. Gmbb, Esquire' 1.0. 175897
Anorney for Plainllff
320 Market Slreet
P.O. Do. 1268
Harrisburg. PA 17108.1268
(717) 2344161
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO, 96-2507 CIVIL
G. H, HARRIS ASSOCIATES,
Plainliff
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
TODD M. BEAM,
Defendant
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF .JUDGMENT
PROTHONOTARY:
Please enter a judgment by default against Defendant Todd M. Beam, for failure of
Defendant to plead to the allegations of the Complaint. A copy of Plaintifrs 237.1 Notice is
allached hereto, as well as my cover leller to Defendant serving same, Said judgment is in the
amount of $206.80, along with reasonable allomeys' fees, interest and costs of suit.
Respectfully submitted,
GOLDBERG, KATZMAN & SIIIPMAN, P,C.
//dJ
~'?;--/~~../ A./'
By: -;'.,~ c.... ./~
Steven E, Grubb, Esquire
1.0, #75897
320 Markel Street
1'.0, Box 1268
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1268
(717) 234.4161
Allorneys for Plaintiff
DATE:
,-,,'1/1,"
'"
(J'
'0'
>.
,
l.J;
. .
..
"
0'
,..
'"
\,....
I
....,.
'-
i
......
j
,. -J
'~
.;:: '~
...., . \~ '~
., \.. '-' ~. r-- ......
-
,-: - ~
-
.
1.\. ~ C"I
~ .,J "\) -
.-, -<
- '.'
~ -
'..,
I
,.
l
...
-
,-.
"\.. (S"
\:::. .........
j
('
.~
.-
'.. ('I
i ".
I' e
l";
II'
I
\ ,
,. ".,
,
(
.,
\; ~
-
I'
t_; '..
I I :-. E I
E "
" .
a- a- c C
C '"' ~ c
E 5 ID c
= "
c
~ ~ ..... c ~
.:!l ""
""
l:J =
_.
:;1 en " C
.~ :l! I': ""
... to: VI
u ~ ;;- - ]
..... e: u::
0 -
~ un "., '"
N "" c
I ;.0: '"
'" . "" '"
'" :c ~
e .E e ~
ci ci . c - E
CJ f-o ~ ... c c
7- 7- u. C .: '"' w
v
~
l'JIGE tD.
1 - 2
4 - 37
36
39 - 59
60
61
62
63 - 66
67 - 70
71 - 75
76
.-'"
^mnng the Hccnlll, iIIlll Procl'l'dil1l!' l..'nrnlkd in the l'lIurl uf Commun PIL'i1!rl in null for the
cnunty of
Cumberland
No. 3061 C.D. 1996
96-2507 Civil
Term. It} __ b cnntainl'd 1111..' fnlluwing:
in the Cnmmnn\\"callh 01' Ilcl1l1\ylnmiu
In Nn.
COPY OF
lIppearaoce
(lOCK ET ENTIn'
G. II. IIhRRIS hSSOCIhTES
VS.
TODD M. BEhM
3
May 6, 1996, Notice of hppeal fran District Justice Judgment, filed.
May 6, 1996, Praecipe to Enter Rule to File Canplaint and Rule to File, fil
May 16, 1996, Proof of Service of Notice of Appeal and Rule to File
Canplaint, filed.
June 5, 1996, Canplaint, filed.
July 5, 1996, Sheriff's Return of Service, filed.
July 29, 1996, Defendant's Response to Complaint and Motion to Dismiss, fil
hug. 20, 1996, Praecipe for Listing Case for hrgwnent. filed.
By: Steven E. Grubb, Esq.
Sept, 24, 1996, Motion to Continue Argument Court, filed.
Sept, 27, 1996, Order of Court, filed.
hND NOW, this 27th day of September, 1996, the motion to continue
argument court, IS DENIED.
By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J.
Oct, 16, 1996, Opinion and Order of Court, filed. In Re: Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff's Complaint
hND NOW, this 16th day of October, 1996, the motion of defendant to
dismiss plaintiff's complaint, IS DENIED,
By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J,
Nov, 16, 1996, Notice of hppeal, filed.
Notice is hereby given tl~t pursuant to Rule 901 of the Rules of
hppellate Procedure, Todd M, Beam, defendant above named, hereby appeals to
the Comronwealth Court of Pennsylvania fran the order entered in the docket
as evidenced by the attached copy of the docket entry.
Respectfully subnitted on this 16th day of November, 1996.
By: Todd M. Beam
Nov. 22, 1996, Comronwealth Court of Pennsylvania Notice of hppeal lbcket-
ing to Case No. 3061 C.D. 1996, filed.
Nov, 25, 1996, In Re: MGrorandum, filed.
Being in receipt of a notice of appeal by defendant fran an order,
supported by a written opinion, entered on October 16, 1996, it is noted
t1~t the order is interlocutory since it: denied a motion of defendant to
dismiss plaintiff's callplaint:.
By the Court, Fdgar B. Bayley, .1.
.-'
. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSY"'/ANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
._ - _..~. "__ _...n
.-"_--_'0'_'"."
"'''0 U.,. Nu
09-3-01
OJNA"'fl tion
DONALD W. DAIHL
.,,'... 01 WALNUT BOTTOM
P.O. BOX 361
SHIPPENSBURG, PA
'.,....~. 17171 532 -7 67 6
17257-0361
TODD M. BEAM
57 E. CREEK ROAD
NEWBURG, PA 17240
NOTICE r
JUDGMENT/TRANECRIPT
"!AtNlIff I,AVI4,,,,...IJ;IIII',',
IG. H. HARRIS ASSOC.
P.O. BOX 216
DALLAS, PA 10612
L
-,
-'
VS.
nU[NtJANI
fSEAM, TODD M. 'l"VI ~"'IAtllli'I~,'1 -,
57 E. CREEK ROAD
NEWBURG, PA 17240
L ~
DockotNo.: CV-0000040-96'.
Dato Filod: 3/15/96 4
'~.II:]f-' .\ ;l,
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
Judgment:
00 Judgmont was entorod lor: (Namo)
I!J Judgment was entored against: (Name)
Inthe amount of$ 206.00
D Judgment was entered against
Landlordffenanl action in Iho arnounl of $ on
The amount 01 rent per month, as established by tho Dlslrict Jusllco. Is $
D Damages will be assessed on: (Onto & Tlmo)
FOR PLAINTIFF
G. n. HARRIS ASSOC.
BEAM, TODD M.
on: (Dalo 01 Judgmont)
Possession granted.
Possession l;lranlod if monoy judgmont Is nol
satisfied by limo of eviction.
Possession not grantod.
Levy Is stayed for _ days or D gonornlly Slllyod _
D This case dismissed without prejudlco.
D
D
D
D
D Objection to levy has boon fited and hearing will ho hold:
"I~'
. Time:
. r'""
..!L10/96
Ina
(Dato 01 Judgmem)
Ronlln arroars $
Damagos Unjust DOlontlon $
Darnagos 10 Prop OIly/
Rosldontial Loaso : $
Loss Ann Duo Dolondant - $
Amount 01 Judgmont " $
Judgmonl Costs $
Intorost on Judgmont $
AlIornoy Foos $
166.80
40.00
.00
.00
TOTAL
206.00
$
~
.-- --r.......-;-'fO ..
I
_...~.-._---_._--_. .
d______M.___
ANY PAR1Y HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL A JUDGMENIINVOI. VING A RESI/JENTlAL tEASE AND AFFECTING THE
DELIVERY OF POSSESSION OF REAL 1'llOl'EfIlY W/I IIIN If WAYS or II IE DATE OF JUDGMENT BY FILING A
NOTICE. OF APPEAL WITH TilE I'ROIHONOIAlIY/CI.EIlK OF 11113 COUIlT Of COMMON.'~LE(lt', .c'VIL DIVISION.
ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY A JUDGMENT FOR MONEY OR A JUDGMENT INVOLVING A NONRESIDENT)AL LEASE
MAY APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF ENTRY OF THE JUDGMENT BY FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE
!!ROTt-jONOTARY/CLEIjKOF TH~ COURT OF CO!,\MO.f'l PLEA';>, CIVIL DIVISION. .,' . .
I '. '\ ), <-~ /
'1-10- 9 h Dalo'=-.:/l;.i~/~&Lk../....)I.::~'fih~4.:.:L_. Distllcl Justico'
I cortily that thiS Is a Huo 1I1lll';Olluct copy 011110 II!l:orll III tl10 P")C('lJ,III1I1S corlli~1II1g tho judgment. .
___ Dalo . __.._ .. , District Juslico
My r.omllllSHIOIIOxpllOH IIml MOllllay 01 Jalluary. ;'o,,{} SEAL
AOlle Jl!J-~1I
~
,~ ....,
\, ,. II '.
. I, I. .
",.." \..".
. ." <if..
\;,iFJ;, . ~
"
"""
",.
.:.0:..,<,
';..,;":'i;;~
~. "A. apPle.. ~
Ol iDKRO, KATZMAN Be SKIPMAl'l. J.
allO NA..aT 81'..'"
aT.AWJl..II'l~ aqUA..
p, 0. DOX;luaB
JlAH818t.URO~ rBtUUS!rLVA:flA 17100-UIOD
~~r;'/~J~ ~ ':i.j~~iM
,,' to ~/;~ ' ~.,~rrt~p~~",
>1 _: ~ p -", Ii- ;~"~~~
. , .;' '.^~~
-en ~ ~ '<' -', '(,~:1~A
~! . r'r. '" ;'FJ.\<1)Ji'
I) . . ".,;.,,;;,~
',,::: \.'/~~~:,~:i~m
.
.
'.
/
~
~. :
t~1
.1
d~
;'A'
: I
1"
..
..
if N
~ . III "-I~
t; tit.. t; Ln"
lil~r.l!i~ C"iZ
vj:t~-\:i~ tAg
::>-
if.
'~
~' 'I~i"
.., .::t ,
01 :~
If
~ ~.
~CI
u.I""
e...
S~
~=
or: C)o
=:>> LU
~_ c::
'1.1
...
'.
ru
c
:r
:r
00
..0
00
C
1I1
D.
-
.
-
.
~
~
.~ t~
~ ~~
.~~~'
~~s.
E
;;
,
,.....
...,
.. 'i't
~~~
~\
~ ~ 'J~
'. '.
~~~
~~ '"
), ~ . .
~ "'J - . .
~('~
-~ "
'"
.
.
.
.
4.
,
,
Exhibit 0
'.
1'8
~ } t
I '
f ,-,
\ "
I' i'
. .
. ~. .
:. . /
.' "
...
I
"
"
..
,
\
,
. November 1,1995
".
/
;:
TODD BI>AI1
57 EAST CREEK ROAD
NEWBURG PA 17240
,
~
Dear Toddl
,.
In response to your ~etter received in our Office with a post mark of
October 26,1995, concorning your Shippensburg Area School Dis~rict - .
1994 School per capita and occ~pation Tax(s) and penaltyCs) dUG end /~
owing in the Township of lIope~ell. County of Cumberland, in th~ amquntl'
::: :~:h::i::6:~B:~anted by contractual {~reement.with the ShiP~e~'ilb~ ,\ Ii
ArQa School District, whereby they have the specific' authority to "1
. .... a,ppoint .opecial. collector,( s.).,. .2iL.,P~gA..~6...6861 .Iof .delinquent- utxes- .-d .. '"
other taxing districts, 53 P.S. 6901. The TaxCs) for whtch you o~e
fall under the provisions of the Local Tax Collection Lay, Act of:l94 ,
p, L. 1050 No, 394 and the L.ocal Tax Enabling Act of 1965,' P. L ,1257 ,,'
No.5l1. and all current amundments,
'\"
At some point time the Cumberland County Asseasors Office had made 'an
aosuosment on your occupation and listed you as u taxable in Hopewell
._ , Townohip. They pruoented your name along with the other reoidents of
~ record (thODe aDsosoed in time for the preparation of~thu 1994 Tax
., .
- "-'--Ol!~i~ate) for 1I0pewell Township to the Tax Collec.tor there.of, On or
aroun "July 1;1994, you ~ero mailed a Tax Notice" by the'lIopewelll
Townohip Tax Cpllector'for these TaxCs), An interesting provision of \/
Pennsylvania Tax Law.!s ofsilure to receive Notice by mail neither .
excuses nor .exonerates anyone from paying their Taxes, As to why YOu~,
r.ever ramn'Vtld .. Nv.Llvv l.~ ,,,..~.l ~l;i.l..o~O~'r~ ta qty,.~~... '.
our. concern nor Q queation that we can answer. . , .
. I I . .
We will allow you until Monday, November 6,1995. tt send the full
I d
amount now 9ue of 0161.BO. Failure to renpon by his date.deadlin,
will ronult in further collectionn (<f,(oL"tn Ilgainut you and will....mont
certainly increaue thu amount you preauntly OWO.
Sincerely,
~..:
l'
.
,
i.
:,
.
I'
.;
G. II. lIa~riD Aooo21ateo
Dbll"4UUn~ Tax ~~lluctors
"',,] J-/,7-lL '.~
G{ H. lIarria ~
.
"
,
,
I
,."t, I.. I
.
.
,
.
.
.
,
I .
. "
1 j
I .
, I
I
, I
\ I
! (f
t
ft;
I I'
>
,
.
20
I' :1
},
t \ ::
I I:'
Exhibit E
.
.
"
I .
i I
'r' ..; II
: If
'~.~ ~'H
.(' !
. \ I
. I. I'
~ 5
;" ,
,
IJ f
, ,
t "
. ,. ~
J ,
,
,
2-2-'
ExhIbIt F
I
'"
. ,
,
III
,.
I ~.
'I!;
I I
; ! :
-.,
(4) G, II. Harris Associatcs scnt n noticc, "Distraint for Delinquent Taxcs" on January 23, 1996.
(5) Under rulcs provided in State and Fcd~>ra1law, your claim was invalidated on December 2.
1995, since )'ou did not rebut my challenge to your authority as a third-pe.rty collection agent.
to collect this dcbt,
(6) Your claim was specifically rebuttcd with a cite from the Pennsylvania Constitution which
plahtly denics your authority nnd you filled to prove otheiwlse,
Questions
(1) WhBt is tho realnam.e of tile person who isslled the "Distrnint for Delinquent Taxes."
identified on said notice by the initials "M. B, "?
(2) Is G, H. Harris Associates B law finn? If yes. please provide a copy of or identiJying number
of1tc license to practice Jaw in the State oCPcnnsylvania of the person responsible for the
distraint norice of Innuary 23, 199..
(3) Ifnot. under what BUthOrity did the person ideutified by tbe initials "M. B." and/or G. H,
Ha.nis Associates make Q legal determination concerning this alleged debt?
(4) In light of the cite from the Pennsylvania Constitution, by what authority docs G. H, HlUTis
Associates act, who holds the SlUety bond, nod that of the sgent ofG, H, Harris Associates
who issued the "Di5lrnint for Delinquent Tuxes"
(5) Pleasc provide we with the name 3lld address or the residcnt agent who cnn accept ser\'ice of
process,
Page 2 of3
~z
. .
U.S. P~STAGE
~.. SHIPprg~ ~RC,PH
o. Jt1Nl~ ;J
.r.'::a',v:,::,\ tlH uNT96
GOOD $252
ooo<B6<5-Ul
~
'f:{ ~
...\..
1""
,
-
t: 01\
'V
-+
-a d
\II .
fiJ.... -i
=SlO rtl
==,~ ~ ~
=~ ~
--.. '"
_ClC r"'\
rn .... .""
I'-
rn ~ ~
III ~ X
rn -.:. I:)
III --<.~ ,
~
I'-
:r ......,
III :::r. ' .....
a. (j~ ~
.... .
-
-
..
~ ~ y /~
- "1~
~ ~
~~
~~ cs (I..(;
~~t //.,.. '.)
.~
~~. t-t?;/
~f,~
" ~ -(
\wJ
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
,
., ,.
.\
\ exhibit G I
\ ' .
. ,
'. ( t
I
f I:,
11
I iI.
:if~f~': "F'
... . -' ,
, .
..:.: I ' ,,-
-I ..~ ,
~ I .' ,
~~, I .t~ ./.....
I ..... ..
'. f' "
, . ."t
"
. .I', /
--:-. r J'
I;V .""'"
Once again thuoe TaK(o) fall under the proviniono'of the Local TaK
Collection Law and/or the Local TaK Enabling Act. They ara pers~
~aK(s) for which you were sent Noticeo for payment thereof by you.
l~ca' TaK Collector. TaK Collection Law clearl,y Iltates, failure to I I" .
receive notieb~ mail neither'uKcuoco nor cxonerateo anyone from ,I
paying their TaKeo, Your only recourse in this matter io if you havt
.,
a valid receipt of payment fOl theoe aforementioned TaKes for the Ta~
year 1994, either in Hopewell Township or another municapality, I~,
" . ~
Be further advised that the collection of-Taxe~ do nOF fall withir '
the provisions o~.tho Fair Dobt Collection Pra~tices Act, as we a'r~ a
Delinquent TaK Collector/Deputy TaK Collector, not d debt oolleotor.
1
Wo will allow you .u~til ,Wed~es~al.!...tla:ch.~.!~~,f!~.j;~. .1'!!pQl;l,.~~tll~..{)}~.......",,:..,-,,.;,
...,-,_.":J"r"-~--amcSlln'tJ'.i'qw-dil'o-:-orlj16l>,;aO-;-' If' you happen to ignore this eKcellent
op~ortyn!ty, we will proceed with our next Logal Method of .
. Co:flection, whereby we will turn your Account over to the local
District Court. All Court Cost(s) and Fuo(o) incurred will be added
to the amount you now owe.
.....
~I
,
.
,
o.
,
"
.........
\ !r,."
~,
..,
-' .
'iI:,
.....
_.
.-
Accoun~ NumbBr(s) 429177
February 29,1996
.\
Certified . P 257 844 345
TODD M BEAM
57 E CREEK ROAD ~ ~ I I
NEWBURG PA 1724 /' /I -
TLdl ;1
Dear '. i/ '
! .. :1/
,With reference to your lettero of November 2,1995, and January
30,1996, concerning your Shippensburg Area School Diotrict - 1994
School per capita and occupation TaK(o) and penalty(~).~ue and owing
in the Township of lIopewell, Cumberland County, in the amount now due
of $166.80.
. I
Once again we will allow you until
tHe full amount now due of $166.80
against you.
.. ., o.~
'-~.. t
Wednooday; March 6,1996, to pay
b~foru ~u taka .any Legal action
Sinoerely:youro,
~
G. 1I.'ijarris Asoociutcu
Delinquont Tax Collectors
, I
)),lJ:Y-J~ ~
G. -1'1. Ililrriu
..
,
:
'" SO:
~ acomp'lllllml 1 anQl0l2 lor IdlIlllonal"r'VICel.
. lcompallIltfTII3, 4a, and 4b.
I IPl\rlyournalMandldd,... onthl rlveRI arChil fonn IOlhIt WI un ilium llll
eatd 10 ~_u.
IAnKh. t" fotm 10 \he trort 01 \he mal1pllOl, Of on the bldllf apa,.. dOe. nee
'~Retum R~ R~UfIl.:1' on lhe rnaUpllca below IhI al1d. number,
fi 'The Rllum Rte*pt "". Ihow to whom the Mid. W'I d.lIv.,ad &nC!ihe dIll
ii-lid.' T'
i 3. _,~. Addr.ssed to:
J 1';..
2' TQ}lD BEfJ-1
B 57, E CREEK ROAD
NEWBURG PA 17240
~.
.~
..
I a100 w1.h 10 r.e.'.. tho
following ..lVie.. (10' on
.J<lra f..): i
1. Cl Add'.....'. Addr...
2. Cl R.slrlCl.d O.Uv.ry
Consult postma.te, fo, f... i
40. Md. Numb., 2
a:
2 R44 145 G
4b. s.lVie. Tvp. ~
o A.gl.tered 0 C.r1Jft.d '"
o Expre.. Mall 0 Insured oS
o Aetum RBCIllpllor Merc/\andso 0 COO !l
_15
7. O.I:1~Vllry;2_ 9' 6 !
B. Addressee'. Add,... (Only II f/llju..,.d 'll
and I.. ,. paid) ~
~
. ,
"'t;"
~'.-
""
5. ~'Iv y: tint Nomo)
-.16. Slgnatur.: (A ro.... or A~"!'t)
.I X. .
PS Fonn 3811. O.eembe, 1994
I,J',
Domestic Retum Receipt
.
~
.~ ;
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLIIMNIA
c;:i\UN'tY OF: CUMBERLAND
Ua" D.c.No
09-3-01
OJ N.me Uon
DONALD W. DAIBL
Ad...., 81 WALNUT BOTTOM
P.O, BOX 361
SBIPPENSBURG, PA
,......... (717) 532-7676
17257-0361
G, H, BARRIS ASSOC.
P,O, BOX 216
DALLAS, PA 18612
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT
PLAINTIFF: N"" an. AllOAtGS
r.:
G. B. HARRIS ASSOC.
P,O. BOX 216
DALLAS, PA 18612
L
.'
"l
.J
VS.
DEFENOANT:
r;;
BEAM, TODD M.
57 E, CREEK ROAD
NEWBURG, PA 17240
L
WJ.lE and AOQR(SS
"l
.J
Docket No.: CV-0000048-96
Dale Flied: 3/15/96
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
Judgment:
[lil Judgment was enlered for: (Name)
[!] Judgment was entered agaln~t: (Name)
In the amount o. $ 206.80
o Judgment was entBrod against
Landlord/Tenant action In the amount 01 $ on
The amount 01 rent per month, as established by the District Justice, Is $
o Oamages will be assessed on: (Date & Time)
FOR PLAINTTFF
G. H. HARRIS ASSOC.
BEAM, TODD M.
on: (Date of Judgment)
D' This case dismissed without prejudice,
o Possession granted.
O Possession granted II money Judgment Is not
satlslled by time of eviction.
o Possession not granted,'
o Levy Is stayed for _ days or 0 gener ally stayed.
o Objection to levy has been liled and hearing will be held:
'.. . .~ .
~Date~-.' .... -- ','" ~~. ..-. .-.;'- - ~', -'1" ~Iace:"r;.. .. .
"
Time:
4/10/96
Ina
(Date of Judgment)
Rent In arrears $
Damages Unjust Detention $
Damages to Propertyl
Residential Lease: $
Less Amt Due Defendant - $
Amount 01 Judgment co $
Judgment Costs $
Interest on Judgment $
Auorney Fees $
166.80
40.00
.00
.00
TOTAL
206.80
$
-.... _..-;.....,:-:
-, .-'" .~.:~....~,,~-~.,...:~:......~. 'f-"':':~:"
.'
\
I
"
ANY PARTY HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL A JUDGMENT INVOL VING A RESIDENTIAL LEASE AND AFFECTING THE
. . , .
4' DELIVERY OF POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY WIT/;/IN 1.0 DAYS OF THE DA TE OF JUDGMENT BY FILING A '.
':;;'\1'';' \ :'. : . f;lP'TIC~P.f.I.f;,r.~.;WI,!tI,Tt!~ fIJPTH~N~iI0YiCLERI< OF THE COURT OF c"OM~Of'! P.i.fAS.,~IVIL Dry~sioN. '.'
"~:Y,' ,:., ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY A JUDGMENT FOR MONEY OR A JUDGMENT INVOLVING A f'lONRESIDEI':lTIAL LEASE.' ,
., MAY' APPEAL WiTHIN 30 D F ENTRY OF THE JUDGMENT BY FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE .... "
., ,V,.;. ~PROTHONOTARY/CLE OF TH COURT.OF CO 0 LEA ISION,' .' ,', '.
" '(
4;1J-9~ Date
I certify that this Is a true and corract copy ollh
Date
My commission expires first Monday of January,
2PO\l .
AOPC 315.96
,(,'
, District Justice
ainlng th9 judgment. .
, District Justice
SEAL
37
tr. .= "-
Lr. t..
0,[ .,
f ....
~ ',)
8~
~I:
"- -,;:3
c "@
tn ' ,
li. I ~) .
l\; -. a,~
~.
r.: :::1 ill
-, ~
\I. v:>
0 en
~
~
, ~. -,
...
" .
'-'
~ 31 Delegalil1n of rertlllll fJll\WrS JJI'"hihill'd
Thc General Asselllbly ,hall not delegale lo allY 'pecial COlllmlSSlon, IIr1\':\le
corponlllnn or us,ocimion, :lIlY Pl1wer 1,1 muko. ,,\Ipcrvi:',~ or intcrfcIl! with an~
nlllllicipnl inlpr\1VCmellt, mOlley, proJ'crtl' (H effects, whcther held in trust or
othctl\isc. or to Ic\'Y' \n.ws or fJ.:rfornl :lny Illullieil'nl fUllctioll whatcwr,
(Emphasis added)
The P,mnsyll.lIlia Supreme COUll has stated ..It caruK'lt'c denied Ih:!t thc collection of taxes is a
govCllullClllallllllctiOII." 1~!.u\rli.:L_!j.lJ~bc.ill'_~~)lUill_dlLi1L 1.12 A. 2e1. 186 Pa. Super. 366. III
l,ightOll et aL..lippcllnnts. v AbitlUtOlllO\\11sIUJlSlci!1 ~36 POl 3-15, it was statcd:
Dut the cnnstitlllioll makes no such distinction; thc words arc plain IUld must be
gi\'clllheir common or popular mCiUlillg, for in that scnse, the voters llre assumed
to ha\'e understood tltem when Iltey adl1pted thl' constilUtion; Bis.w' \', Snyder.
282 Pa 4~9. 128 A. 80, The seclioll !lwhibits delegating to IIn}' pl'h'ate
corporation "any power too make, sllp~r\'i5e or inlerfl~re with ony I1lwliciplll
improvement, mone)'. propert}' or effccls \\hClher held illtrllSt or otherwise or 10
levy laxes or pelfnrm any municipal f\1I1ctil11l whatever" (emphasis ndded)
It is to be notelj that tlte tCIl11Ic\')' is delinet! inl1lack'; hl\l D/('lllIIwry. FiJih Editio,,:
Lev:.-, \', To assess; raise; executl!; exact: (:\:>;: collcct: galher; take up; seize.
5, When Ihe Defendant first cntercd thi, C:bC, h~ submitted overwhelming evidence 10
District Ju~tice Donald W Dailtl. which \\i1~ lefu,cd. Thi~ cvidence will bc! cntered here a~
EXHIBIT D,
I'DgC 3 Defendanl's I\csponsc ItJ Complaillt nlld ~ ItJIIOn k Il"'llil>
(4) (j,1I. /Jallis lI~~odatc, ,ell I I: 1I00ie-e, "Di,tr..i11t Jllr Ddiotjuenl Tllx~s" on JlIllU1I1)' 23, 199~.
(5) Unucll1llcs provided ill Sttitc IInd Fellcrallll\\', YOUl claim WlIS invalidated on December 2,
1995, ~illCC you did nUl rehllt III)' challenge tll )'OllC lIulhut1ty us a third-pUrlY collection ugelll,
10 collect this debt.
(0) '1'0111' claim was specifically rcullltcu with II citc from thc Penns>'ll'lInill ConstitutiulI which
plnillly dcnics your 1I1IIllllrily unci you fhUed to provc othCl\\'ise.
Questions
(I) Whllt is the relll name oftbe person \\ho Is~ned Illc "Dlstralnt for DelilHIllent Taxes,"
ideutified 011 said lIotice hy the inilials "M. II, "7
(2) Is G, H. Hnrrls Associates o law finn" If yes, pI east! provide /I cnpy ufoI' ideotit)ing number
ufthe license 10 practice law in tbe Slale ufPenosylvlInillllftbe person resJlonsible fur the
distroint notice of JlUllllU)' 23, 199',
(3) Ifllot, noelcr what autbority did the llcrson ielelllified by the initials "M. D," and/or G, H
Hllnis Associates mnke n Il'gnl detcnnillatillll concerning IhL~ alleged debt?
(4) In Iicht of the citc lh)JlIlhe PClIlIsylvallin (:ulIstil1llioll, by whut authority docs G. II. lIarris
Associntes net, who holds t.he slIccty hOlld, IlIld that of the agellt orG, J-l. Harris Associates
who ilsucd the "Vi,lealllt f(lC Dellnn"clIl TlI\c."
(5) Plcase Jlrovide IlIe \\ilh lho name aud addlc" III the rcsidelltllgclIt who l'lIlIllCCCJlI selyice of
Jlruce~~.
Page 2 of'3
E,) Any othcr evidence provin~ thai GJ!. Harris Associatcs was
Ic~ally delJllti7.ed into Ihc govenllllClll suhdivision knowll ;IS the
Shippcnshurg Area School District. 1I subdivisioll of Ihe
Commonwealth of Pennsylvullia.
The plaintiff has failcd \0 evidcnce its autltority undcr the Constitution of the
Commonweltlth of Pcnnsylvania, the Stalc Generul laws, uad the structurc of the
subdivisions of govcOlments, Thereforc, thc plaiatiff lucks aay stallding beforc IUlY
court in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to make clltims for, file compluints
for, lllld/or bring suit for uny division or subdivision of the State, as it has failed to
prove its legal rclationship us un employcc/lIgcnt/deputy of the subdivision of thc
Commonwealth of Pennsylvllnia governlllCl1l, kaown liS the Shippensburg Area
Seltool District.
Whereas: TIle plllintiff has presented no evidence that it is leglllly Clip able of
beillg lln IIgelll deputizcd, delcgllted, or otherwise, of n division of the govemment,
as all local government fulls under gcnernl law of the Constitution of the
Commonwealth of Penllsylvllnin. Therefore, the plailltiff lacks llI1Y standing before
(lilY court in the Commonwealth of Pcnllsylvania to Illllke claims for, file
complaints for, and/or briag suit for any divisioll or subdivision of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as it has failed to present any evidence of its being
a tnle cmploycc/agent/deputy of the Shippcnsburg Arca School District,
Whercas: 'Ille claims of the plaintiff not being established pursuant to the law
and under the rcslrictions of tltc Constillltlon of the Commonwcalth of
Pcnnsylvania. the plaillliff must bc trcated as a wholly separate entity who secks to
illcgally hring suit against the respondent for an nllcgcd claim of a subdivision of
.. Pogo 4
53
Ihc SUltc govcrnmcnt. and ia failing III provc ils authorily and jurisdiclion owr Ihc
rcspondel1l, is IIcllmlly aCliag as a third pany dchl collcctor. suhJecl to all of thc
Provisions of Titlc 15 U,S.C" thc Fnir Dchl Collcction Pnlctices Act. Thcrcforc,
phtintiff lacks any slnnding hcfore any coun in thc Conunonwcnlth of Pellnsylvnniu
10 makc claims, file complaints, and/or hring suit, for IIny division or subdivision of
tltc COIllmonwenlllt of I'cansylvllnia, as the struclurc of thc Constitutiou of thc
Conllllonwcalth of I'cnnsylvllnia cxplicitly dcuies the powcr to dclcgutc
govcrnmcnt powcrs to un~' prlvutc corporulloll. Thc plaintiff Itas failed to
present uny cvldcncc of its ullcgutiolls Ihul It wus Icgally dCPUlizcd, outh of officc,
bond, und Itas failed 10 lIl11ke prcscntmcnt of thc cvidcncc of thc 1I1Icgcd debt
pursuanlto Titlc 15 U,S,C.
Whereas: Hud the plaintiff tlte ability 10 not only be deputized or delcgated the
dutics of collccting the tuxes for Ihe Shippensburg Area School District, undcr the
Constitution of thc Commonwcalth of Pcnnsylvania, it has failed to prove thut the
respondcnt is u "Resident" or the Shippensburg Areu School District who In some
way surrcndered or waived his Commonwealth of PCllnsylvuniu Gtizellship Stutus,
und ul1 of thc protcctions therein, 10 Ihcn become a "Subject" of the Shippensburg
Area School District, ill its eorporutc cupucity us a quasl.mullicipal corpomtion, in
uccordllncc with thc "Cleurficld Doctrine," Sec; (C/clIrfie/d Trust Compall)' v. U.
S., 318 U, S, 363 (/943)) The case of (nllllk of u. s, v. l'/lIlIwr's Balik, 9
Whcato/l 22 U, S, 904,61_. lid, 24), cxplains Iltc Clcarfield Doctrine Ihusly:
"Govenlmel1ls des,'cnd to tltc Icvel of II mcrc private corponltion
and take on thc chamclcr of a mcrc citizcn, whcre private corpornte
commcrcial papcr is conccrncd"",filr the purposcs of suit. such
corporations aud individuals arc rcgardcd as au cmity cntirely
separulc from gOl'crnlllcnl."
.. PODO 6
S'f
us the COl11monwcahh of I'cnnsylvuniu by paymcut of its ofliccrs by thc corpoculc
Coml11onwcllhlt of I'cnnsylvaniu, alld tltc pluilltiff by way of its ullcgco, UIIO
constitlllionully ulluuthorizcd, deputy/agcnt status canllot prosecute tltis matter in
its OWIl privllle court when it is the compluinunt IIcting liS II juristic persall in II
corpornte cupucity to protect IInd enforce its imerests in uny uction IIgainst II
so\'eccign Citiz.cn of I'ennsylvllnill. (See: 7'hl' Clellrfield Dowille SlIprtl. and tlte
CO/l,l'Iillll/cm of Ihl' IIlIired SIII/CS of Alller/CII. Article 3, Sectioll 2, Cluuse I),
Any utlempts 10 prosecule tltis matter in this court, would plainly be doing so
with unclenn hnnds, See; (No11'1I v, lVilllCr.lpoolI. 187 S,IV. 211d. 14.16.17. 182
7'1'1111, 333). (l'all Al/IlI'erp v, I'all AlIlIVl'rp 5 So. 2d, 73,78.80, 242 Ala. 92) .
(I'ace v, lVaimvrighl, 10 So, 2d, 73.78,79.755,756.757,243 AlII, 50/) llIld (People
v. Skaggs. 18/1'. 2d, 390. 400,80 Cal, App, 2d, 83), nnd in violation of the right
of the responde III to due process of luw, und n mnllc10us abuse of legal process.
See; (Capirol E/eclric Co, v. Criswldi, D.C. Md. 157 F. SlIpp. 646,648)
,
I
i
,
I
I
,
i
,\
I
,
!
Sueh nn act would be II criminul offense, IInd would sltock tlte conscience of
the IIvemge individuul, llI1d these criminal lIets agllinst the respondelll, by the
ullegcd IIgent of the Shippellsburg Accll School District, could be II plllinly scen lIS
II cOllspimcy to deprive the respondent of his rights under color of Inw, sce;
(Broll'lI v. V,S,. CA. 1'1'1111, 204 F. 2d, 247), and u deprivation of the right of the
respondent to c(JIllllllrotcclion undcr the In\\'. See; (V,S. v. J1arris, 1'1'1111. / S.
Cr, 60/,106 V.S, 629, 271, Ed. 290)
'1l1ere is no Judiciul or I'mseculoriul irml1ullil)' from criminul behavior hy
govenlmellt officials gmntcd ill substantive law alld this alleged immunity is only a
doelrille pel1uining to COUrlS of law. The court, us lln agent of the corponllc
.. Pooo 7
2901 (/978)) .(Short! I'. 1I001'tml, ./1-1 F, SlIpp, 37Yj ami (Marlillcz \'. Califol'llia
444 V,S, 227.284),
Take noticc of thc fact thai thc court has lakcn a solemn oath 10 uphold thc
Constitutions of thc Unitcd Statcs and the Commonwcllhh of Pcaasylvania, in
which bOlh docul11cnts arc supcrior to any and all subscqucnt laws passcd hy any
Icgislativc IXldy in this stalc, Scc; (VllilCc/ Slales I', IIl11ler 297lJ.S,)
111C respondent hcreby demands that the plaintiff hl1lllediatcly produce its oatlt of
officc, bond, oath of thc ofticial who sworc it into officc and/or dcputizcd it, the
Legislative Act which repcaled Articlc III, Scction 31 of Ihe Constitution of the
Conllllonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Ihc foulldllliollltl instrumcnl, bcaring the uuthorized
signalure of the respondcnt, where he willingly, knuwingly, and volulllarily waived his
rights as a Citizen of Pennsylvania, and evidently became subjcctto lhc jurisdiclion of the
quasi-municipul corpornte govcmmcnt known as the Shippensbnrg Area School District,
the corpornte Commonwealth of Pennsylvunia, alld subscquently its court,
Should the plaintiff fnil in fulfilling lhis demalld for proof of Jurisdiction in
aceordllnce whit lhe dccision of the Supreme Court, in the intereSI of justice, the
respondcnt demands that the plaintiff scek proper redress of Its grievance aglllnst him In n
court of competent neulrlll jurlsdlcllon, which Is thc rigltt of the respondent under the
5th, 6th, 9th, 10th and 141h Amcndmcnts to Ihe Constitution of the Unitcd States, thcreby
ussuring lhe respondent a fuir,just und imparllultriul, Sce; (SlalC \" COIliIlS, 2 NJ, 406.
67 A, 211I1,158) ClIIII (I1Cl)'cs I'. CIliCt/}lo, R. I, & 1'. R. Co" J],C, Millll" 79 F, SlIpp,
821,824), Thm court bcing thc local Federal District Courl in accordance wltlt Articlc 3,
Seclion 2, Clause I.
. rago 9
5'8
---...
This Court Is hereby chllrged tu pro\'e IIl1ul' the IIbu\'e otherwise.
The respondcnt. by way ur speciul uppellCllnec will not be eucrccd itllo uny oml
nrguments cOllceming this muller bcrore this fonnll, und the respondclll relics strictly on
the pupers. AlIllrgllmellls must be preselllcd in writing for tltc rccord und to ullow the
respondent. wlto hus no lonllallegul cdllclltion, IIlIlecwuy to fomllllutc u propcr responsc
in his defense.
I certify thut thc IIbo\'c its truc, corrcct. und complete to thc best or lilY knowledgc,
~J). f"1-- '"R lUA~
Todd M, beulll, Rcspondcnt nppeuring ;.'1 propria persona,
specially and nOI gcncrnlly,
c/o 57 East Creck Road
Newburg. Pennsylvuniu 17240
.. raOD to
'" -" "I
1
,~ ~
, , ,
Ii
c ,
I
O'
\.
l"~.....J
,~
PRAECIPE fOR LISTING CASE fOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and subnitted in duplicate)
TO TilE PROTIlONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY:
Please list the within matter for the next I\r'gUreI1t CaJrt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPTION OF CASE
(entire caption must be stated in full)
(Plaintiff)
t' "., n
" 0) "
: .~ ,
~, ,11
,"'J' . I ,\'j
. , I ~ I ..
. , ,:.1 ',J
i.';' .1,)
~- . ....1 ;.;1
;!; ~ ... ')
.' ::.' ill1
:.. I
t. ~ :~j
-1" -,
r..
\: /
[l.11. JlAHIII:: A::::lII'III'I'I';::.
VB.
'j'[)!lill,1. Ill';r.r".
I Defendant)
No. ;11.,0'(
Civil
19 'l(i
1. state matter to be argued I i.e.. plaintiff's IlDtion for new trial.. defendant's
denurrer to caTq?1.aint. etc.): 1i.!I'<'lIdallt.':; 1"-:;1'01"''' to Corol'Jlllnt IInd 1,lotlon to IJlomisG,
PleunC' HalL' thul the lJpt'tmdHlIl in It (11'0 HI' IJI'I'I~lHinnt unu we lllOe eOlloidcl'ing hin IlPefenuuntlo
llel1j10IW" to COlllpJulnt ';1111 1.lotlun tu illl1mln:;" tin Il l'I'dlmllHu'y Oh,l<>dlon In the IUltlll'" 01' u
UemUl'l'Cl' under' the l'efUmyl vanilL J,uleB or (' t v i 1 h'Oel!thu'l.'.
2. Identify counsel who will argue case:
la) for plaintiff:
Address :
(b) for defendant:
Address:
:.itpVL'tl I;:. {il'ubb, E~itlUll~f~
IjoldlH'l'g. Knt.:~ll1all FI :Hdprnlln. P.(~.
3:'0 MIl'I,d :;t.. 1'.0. Box 12GB
1I111'1'I:lbul'/:. 1'" .I'flOll-J2GB
'1'0<1,1 r.'. HI'IlII1
ly'( EHn L CI'I~I'I~ hond
rkwb\l"I~, I 'j, l'(~111n
3. I will ootify all parties in writing within t'IKl days that this case has
been lis ted for argunen t.
4. Argurent Court Date:
li!'l.ldll'" ;1, !()'l(l
t:ated: 8/IA/'7(;
(P{)
. \,,)
C' .
"
, . , .r;
. ,. .'
\":i .'
",
, ,J; '".'
( 1
"
- J
IJ. , :1
I
...
,. , .'
,
'.. -'
'1
1.\/..0,)
J 11 ),.,
.'
.
."""-,
96.2507 CIVIL TERM
head of the political subdivision which is the employer, or to the
appropriate officer of the Commonwealth If the Commonwealth Is the
employer, with respect to matters which can be remedied by
administrative action, and to the lawmaking body of such political
subdivision or oi the Commonwealth, with respect to matters which
require legislative action, to take the action necessary to carry out such
findings,
Noting that the Shlppensburg Area School District Is authorized to collect
school taxes pursuant to the Local Tax Enabling Act 53 P.S, Section 6901 ill sea"
and the Local Tax Collection Law 72 P.S, Section 5511 ill sea., plaintiff maintains that
the School District has properly authorized it to collect delinquent school taxes
pursuant to 24 P,S. Section 6-686(b) which provides:
The Board of School Directors In such district may annually, on or
before the first day of July in each year, appoint one or more suitable
persons, as delinquent tax collectors In said school district, to collect
any and all school taxes from the collection of which the original tax
collector has been exonerated, In accordance with the laws of this
Commonwealth, and which taxes stili remain unpaid upon any of the
school tax duplicates, other than such unpaid school taxes as shall have
been filed as liens In the office of the prothonotary, or have been
returned to the county commissioners for sale, Such delinquent tax
collector or collectors shall, upon the certification over to him or them of
such taxes so remaining unpaid, proceed to collect the same from the
persons respectively charged therewith, for which purpose he or they
shall have all the authority now vested by the law in any collector of
school taxes for the collection of such taxes. The board of school
directors Issuing the original warrants shall Issue an additional warrant to
the collector or collectors of such delinquent taxes so appointed,
Article 3, !3 31 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania Is a limitation of power of the
General Assembly. it does not, however, limit the General Assembly from delegating
the authority to Impose taxes to school districts, nor does it limit the authority of the
General Assembly to authorize school districts to delegate the administrative function
.2.
c,5"
PYS510
1996-02507
_4.
HARRIS G
Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office Page
--Civil Case Inquiry
HAS! ! (VS) BEAM TODD M
1
Roforence No..: Filed........:
Case Type.. ...: APPEAL - OJ Time..,.... ..:
Judgment, . . . . . : .00 Execution Date
Judge Assigned: BAYLEY EDGAR B Sat/Dis/Gntd..
Jury Trial. . . ,
Hi~her Court 1
Hi her Court 2
.......................,............................... ........................
General Index Attorney Info
HARRIS G H ASSOC PLAINTIFF GRUBB STEVEN E
POBOX 216
DALLAS PA 18612
BEAM TODD M
57 E CREEK ROAD
NEWBURG PA 17240
5/08/1996
9:12
0/00/0000
0/00/0000
DEFENDANT
................................................................................
· Date Entries .
................................................................................
05/08/96
05/08/96
05/16196
06/05/96
06/25/96
APPEAL FROM DISTRICT JUSTICE JUDGMENT
PRAECIPE TO ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
COMPLAINT - CIVIL ACTION
SHERIFF'S RETURN FILED
Lltigant.: BEAM TODD M
SERVED : 6/24/96
DATE RETD: 7/05/96
Costs....: $31,16 Pd By: GOLDBERG, KATZMAN & SHIPMAN 06/25/1996
DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT BY STEVEN E GRUBB ESQ
MOTION TO CONTINUE ARGUMENT COURT
ORDER OF COURT - DATED 9/27/96 - MOTION TO CONTINUE ARGUMENT COURT
IS DENIED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 9/27/96
OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT - DATED 10/16/96 - IN RE MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT - DENIED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J -
COPIES MAILED 10/16/96
..,..............................._,............................................
· Escrow Information .
· Fees & Debits Bea Bal Pvmts/Adi End Bal .
....................**........*.,~.......~....*.,........**.~...................
07129/96
08/20/96
09/24/96
09/27196
10/16/96
APPEAL D.J.
TAX ON APPEAL
SETTLEMEN't'
JCP FEE
35.00 35.00 .00
.25 ,25 .00
5.00 5,00 .00
5.00 5.00 .00
------------------------ ------------
45.25 45,25 .00
................................................................................
· End of Case Information .
................................................................................
rRUE COPY FtlOM RECORD
In l'lt:iUmoflY whereof, I hare untIl :ie! my hand
:,n,llho soal 01 s,1id Coon ill Cclrlisla, Pa.
This !~' day 01 :A 'It;
fWI rs--> .
, Prothonol rv
,',",
,
'( ODD 111 BEAM
57 EASI CRIEK ROM)
NF.WRlIIHi.l'/\ 17240
, Court Reporter
----.-----,...-
()RDER FOR TRANSCRIPT
In accordll1\cc with the requirements uf all ~PP(;:Ilo the Commonwealth Court in enr,e No. 96-
2507 this is an oreler for a transcript ,\1' the proc""dillg~ ill the C01l11 of Commoll Pleus,
Cumbcrland Cowtty, Peruls)'hllllin 011 Octohcr 16, 19%.
Duted 011 tltis j8 (P- dllY ofNo\'elllhcr 1996,
-A~~l~.n~~---_m-
70
ell;'1 (;..':' -:..t 'iT
IN Th", COMr~ONWEALTIl COURT OF PENr.SYLVMIIA
NOTICE OF DOCKETING APPEAL
Docket No: 3081 C.D. 1996 Filed Date: 11/18/96
Re: BEAM v, G,H, HARRIS ASSOCIATES
Lower Court No,: 96-2507
)
':
,.1
.) ,I
..J .
A Notice of Appeal, a copy of which is enclosed, from an order of
your court has been docketed in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
The docket number in the Commonwealth Court is endorsed on this notice,
The Commonwealth Court docket number must be on all correspondence
and documents filed with the Court.
Under Chapter 19 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure,
the Notice of Appeal has the effect of directing the Court to transmit
the certified record in the matter to the Prothonotary of the
Commonwealth Court.
The complete record, including the opinion of the trial judge,
should be forwarded to the Commonwealth Court within forty (40) days
of the date of filing of the Notice of Appeal. Do not transmit a
partial record.
Pa. R.A.P. 1921 to 1933 provides the standards for preparation,
certification and transmission of the record.
The address to which the Court is to transmit the record is set
forth on page 2 of this notice.
NOTICE TO COUNSEL
A copy of this notice is being sent to all parties or counsel
indicated on the proof of service accompanying the Notice of Appeal.
The appearance of all counsel has been entered on the record in the
Commonwealth Court. Counsel has thirty (30) days from the date of
filing of the Notice of Appeal to file a praecipe to withdraw their
appearance pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 907(b).
Appellant or Appellant's attorney should review the record of the
trial court, in order to insure that it is complete, prior to
certification to this Court. (Note: A copy of the Zoning Ordinance
must accompany records in Zoning Appeal cases) .
The addresses to which you are to transmit documents to this Court
are set forth on Page 2 of this Notice.
If you. have special needs, please contact this court in writing as
soon as possible.
Lower Court Judge: Honorable Edgar Bayley Jr.
Attorney: Todd M, Beam
Attorney: Goldberg Katzman Shippmall P,C,
Notic'~B Exit: 11/21/96 Prothonotal'Y
7/
'('100 It '1"' "Ii
'.......,,, _,..... 'II . n ''''''p., p.' ptq"," " ..lpl1Ud '10 .wn "II OJ '.....CUll ""I"JOo po,'I..... "l PlIlO'" (q) (0) q........
"(q) teUt tfftll MS o,(nlouo'lla"d ''11 Aq "Iuno, "'11 ~ ",no' JD It pufnbe.l"IUfltplll '"ulo, ,,,..out 0'....... ..... .". ...t(M
.t')ool( ....lI.q _q\............"......"'lo ..-.q''''............ll'''.'''._II.(IIO pt,"'-' "l PI..... (.) (t) ~........
._ .q\ UJ poPOl.... OIl 01 " ........... po.... . II '''0 POIO\'.o, "l PI"'" ._.) (() q.......
.,..... ..~. VI "Iuno, "11 '0 "''''1' ''II 01 .cruo pet~ t.q I.,.. U"."ph( pNJeJIVI.I' . UO pi"", ...... . (1)(01 C Ifftlil "pun
. 'p.tnIP"1
tq PfI'OIII launo,..., '(q)tOIC 'l"lI lq Pf'II'OII'.'" "uno;l ....IOU.'o AU.. "U 01 pl''''''''' 1tw.''1IUMf.''U)'Idul''..pun
nON
I I
'" '"
.. .. z
I! I! 0
t:: -
~ ~ ..
B =-
f'... III 'II
a
>< 'II
,Q III 5:
~ a::
'" 0 .2
LI.
r\ III t'
tl. I
\ 0
III
~ < <
a::
~ ci tl.
Z
w ci
'C
. Z
~ ...l I ...J
1'- ......, .t
.r>
..... 4-)'- \)' '1\ '..........
...., "\1 . t>-
o.. ~ -r-..
,., \......
I ...,) ("'I
.p 0 \ l.....
,.... "...,
, ''''i , ~ r---
,
., \
:-- ~ ,',-.... r~
'-' v-, ,'-
{" (l'! ~' -~.l
., 0
- r-
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
,40. q6- J?so7 ~~..d. 7i-~
G.H. HARRIS ASSOCIATES
v.
TODD K. BEAM,
Appellant
No. 3081 C.D. 1996
PER CURIAM
ORDER
NOW, December 20, 1996, upon consideration of the above
appeal, and it appearing that the trial court denied defendant's
motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, and that the trial court's
order denying the motion to dismiss is a nonfinal, interlocutory
order, the appeal is quashed.
I."
ArlO ORI'ER Dll
UEe 2 3 1996
(/':'K' /r..,.....,.._
- ~ ~.~<~
t, -.11''''''''1'''' r'......'",
-,. e"
IY' .,
\ ..
..,
".
I)-
t" .
I.
L,
'-,' .
c .-
u_; I .'i
G_ ,
t..
i .,. i
1', I-
v u' J
/0 .JJ','~7
tU....;t f [;.w t.,. ,.,
',),/" {.
lit, ((1,-
JJ
, / '
....'/..JJIC# ,L_ .
'J
J..~"lt"..l,/ :/"'(1 "(];, lut~;;l
~. Thomas Kline. Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law,
says this writ is returned SATISVIED.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Poundage
County
Service
Surcharge
Levy
$18.00
4,14
I. 50
12.40
2.00
20.00
$51l.01
Advance Costs:
Sheriff's Costs:
$150.00
58.04
$ 9 1.96
Ho Answer.s: ./ /'
,/'? ..,.'" "- r'"
1" ~---...'< 1'~
R. Thomas Kline, Sheriff
Sworn and Subscribed to Before Me
This '1'$-
1998, A.D.
Day of
CJ",u..
)114<-</-'
r: J 7 . .
, 11.<.i0~
.
S71U [~
Sheriff
=
CViJ
CViJ
G::::::1
~
M
I"j
l- e>
c.:: "j''1
r- "
....'" .,
OJ
""
Cl ,
!;:: "
.,
uo "
-. "
J"
'>,-0 17
\. C/>!. ,) 0 ;;
ItJ". "i //)1)