HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-02748
~~ ). L.
.,J ~ ~ r-
~ ~:., ,.,j
I' -
, <;'~ ~ ~ ':#.~
::;- , ~~
' ' ~ v,
it
~
III e ...
r.l ,.. :!
'" ~. to '.
.... < 'n .'
Z ..l . $ ~
<~t-~
. d)C tIl
~ >- . ~. ...
CA.I... ~
...... 0 '"
r.l =0 ~ 0.: l:o
" II ..
~ f- 0 ..
): ~.. z
< " ~
(/) ~ X
..
..l
,
,
.,
. .
~.
W" "iJ mae.
'/! !('
5,..;JIIl~
f';)'1.ft
S' -dllf ft.
,',
r-':"'I; ....'.". i:
' oil
, , "'''
,
, ,
:
'.
'." "
,
U d'",' :L.', J;I,,\
(~,J" (.~ /1f.~~ ~ altf ?t_f.:.:,
'7%-ttu ,?'h.Jto:l ~ ,-ttf
(';17 r1 l:'- 1H,kfJ/ ~ .~4/ D...$.~
"
, '
,.
'..
'.i
,I
, ,
,
1):,'.:'1'.';,(.""
~ I,',' \ ,
,,'1'
".,
I'
\, \
','
"
8. The father of. the chi Id Is t.he De f tHlllcHl t who resiclel:l at the
addres6 set Ollt above. He is mar'!' ip.d to th.. Plaint Iff.
9. The molher of the ch lid is t.he Plaillt.1 f f who resides at t.he
Ilc\dr'8ss sot out. i1boVH. StH! is marT i <?cl t.o the Defp.ndant..
10. 'rhe Plaintiff is the natunll mot.hel' of t.h,. chi 1<1. Pldintiff
currently resides wlt.h hor llIother, Bet.ty Myers, dge 69.
II. The Defendant. is the nat.ural fat.her of t.he child. Defendant
currp.ntly resides with t.he child.
12.
The Plfllnt.iff has not. partlcipflt.ed as fl part.y or in any ot.her
,
I
"
i way in any I it.iqation
Ii othl!r court..
II
concHrning t.he cust.ody of the child in this or any
The Plilint.iff has no inEol'mation of a (!ustody procoH,Hng concerning
the child pending In a court of tllis or any ot.hHI jurisdiction.
Plaintiff knows of no othHr pRrBon not. a party to thi6 action
illready who ha6 physi(~id custody of or claims to have custody or
I
'viBitation rJyhts with the saiel child.
13. The best interests flnd permanent welfare of the child will be
SIH'ved hy gr'anting t.he rellt~r t'f!que:,;t.,~d by' Plaintiff for the following
reasons:
A. Plaintiff hilS heen the primary earetilker for the child
Hinel! hi rtt!;
A. It Is in Uw lH!Bt lnl ~r<'BI',H of tht> child to be in the,
primary custody of the PIa illt iff;
2
!I
II
Ii
II
I
!
COMMONWEALTH OF PP.NNSYLVANIA
I
ICOUNTY OF CUMBP.RJ.AND
I
I
)
( SS.:
)
DERRA ANN BROWN, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says
that the facts set fo~th in the foregoing Complalnt for Custody are true
and correct to the hcst of her knowledge, information, and belief.
{]ji{tt.lt^-^-_ &:.illY'-
DEBRA ANN BROWN
Sworn to and subscribed
befoI'e lIIe t.his I("/~ day
of Mfi'f ' ]996.
I 11!;Jk
.__~ "'f.I\,,,,.., ..fJ '
NotaM' Pub.lic
NuwIiaJ StJaI
~~~ld~
!oIyClm......,ElpuOAug. ~
I
"
'"
4
"
~~
~~I
i~~1 ~
.... ~; fI1~~
... t .-
.... i ,. t, '. ~ ~
....
... .
c > 'il .. .
i~~~ ~~ ~ ;1 tHH
'2l
~ :3 ~ .
. '" '6
~;~ ~ !i: .' I! Yl ~
'"
.
I "
~ ~ ~
1\ \'
, "
,
"
. . . *
'.
, . .
. ..... ..
...,"
.1 U N ~~ i) 18 ~16 (ill:\ ..
.j lHi,: ,S 1q9Gdl1
.
DEBRA ANN BROWN,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENl~SYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 96-2748
CIVIL TERM
GARY J. BROON,
.
.
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
amBR Of' CXXlRT
AND NCM I
consideration of the
directed as follows:
"
this 7. /,,,,l day of '),i._CJ*/
attached Custody conciliation!~epo _' it
, 1996, upon
is ordered and
1. A Hearing is scheduled in Courtroom, No. ~, , of the
Cumber~and County Court House on the_i", 1'. day of i(;j;t'i1,j; (2.. , 1996,
at 'I ,<(' o'clock, nll.m., at which time test y wJ.ll be taken in
this case. At this Hea~ the Mother, Debra Ann Brown shall be deEmed to
be the moving party and shall proceed initially with testimony. Counsel for
the parties shall file with the Court and opposing counsel a memorandum
setting forth each party's position on custody and also setting forth a list
of witnesses who will be called to testify at the Hearing along with Ii
summary of the anticipated testimony of each witness. The memorandum shall
be filed at least ten days prior to the Hearing date.
2. The parties shall submit then~elvas and their minor Child to a
custody evaluation. This evaluation shall be an independent evaluation
performed by a professional selected by legal counsel for the parties. The
purpose of the evaluation shall be to obtain an opinion on the various
custodial disputes that have arisen between the parties.
parties,
schedule:
3. Pending further Order of this Court or agreement of the
the Mother shall have custody of the Child on the following
From June 20, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until June 21, 1996 at 2:30 p.m.
From June 27, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until June 30, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From July 4, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until July 9, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From July 17, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until July 18, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From July 25, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until July 28, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From August 3, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until August 6, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From August 14, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until August 15, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From August 22, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until August 25, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From August 29, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until September 3, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From September II, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until september 12, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From September 19, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until September 22, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From September 28, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until October 1, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From October 9, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until October 10, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From October 17, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until October 18, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
From October 23, 1996 at 9:00 a.m. until October 29, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
The parties shall continue on a similar schedule thereafter with
the Mother having custody of the Child on all of her days off from work plus
additional days when the Mother is working the 11:30 p.m. shift to insure
..
DEBRA ANN BRa'IN,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COOlIION PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 96-2748
CIVIL TERM
GARY J. BROWN,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
QlS'lOOlt' CDlCILlATIaf SlMtARY REP(Rl'
IN AC.CDml\NCB WITH <nmBRLAND aumr RULE OF CIVIL PIll) 't'" IQRB
1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The relevant information pertaining to the Child who is the
subject of this litigation is as follows:
NAME
BIRTHDATE
CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF
Karla Nicole Brown
October 25, 1984
Defendant/Father
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on June 19, 1996 with the
following individuals in attendance: The Mother, Debt ~nn Brown, with her
counsel, Samuel L. Andes, Esquire, and the Father, Gary J. Brown, with his
counsel, Arthur K. Oils, Esquire.
3. After much heated debate mainly between the parties' counsel,
the parties were still unable to agree with respect to a permanent Custody
Order. Therefore a Hearing will be necessary in this matter.
4. The Mother believes that the best interests of the Child would
be served by the Mother having primary physical custody. The Mother
expressed concern that the Father has made disparaging remarks concerning
her in front of the Child and is generally disrupting the Mother-Child
relationship. The Mother currently lives with her Mother approximately one
mile from the Father's residence. She believes that she can provide a
stable home environment for the Child. The Mother feels that she should not
be penalized for leaving the Child in the Father's custody in the marital
residence during the difficult period of the parties' separation in an
effort to avoid confrontation and resolve the custody issue through the
legal process.
5. The Father believes that the best int~rests of the Child would
be served by the Father having primary physical custody. The Father
believes the Child should remain in the marital residence to maintain
stability. Th~ Father stated that he has a very close relationship with the
Child. The t'ather indicated his belief that the Mother does not have
sufficient time to spend with the Child due to time constraints imposed by
her employment as a police officer. The Father expressed concern that the
Mother is improperly involving the Child in this custody dispute by speaking
r@
,
I, '.
~i~ .... .... ~ ! ,I!
.... j
:d ~
~ ~~ ~~ ~ ;11
la
~~~ ~
. . ~ Ili!1
~ g] I
!,~ .
j I"J
~
~ ~
1!':i ~
- -
.-_. _.
-, ....
9.-
. ~"'
-
...
~
~
~
~.
J
DEBRA ANN BROWN,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 96-2748 Civil Term
vs.
GARY J. BROWN,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - I,AW
IN CUSTODY
ORDER Q.F COURT
AND NOW,
,r~aY of September,
1996, upon agreement
this
of counsel, Samuel L. Andes, F.squire, Attorney for Debra Ann
Brown, and Arthur K. Oils, Esquire, Attorney for Gary J. Brown,
it is hereby Ordered that the custody hearing scheduled for
September 25, 1996 is hereby continued.
The parties are
currently participating in a psychological evaluation being
conducted by Arnold T. Shienvold, Ph.D., and it is hereby agreed
between the parties that, upon receipt of the recommendationn
0f Dr. Shienvold, should either party feel the necessi ty for
a hearing, il request to schedule the hearing will be made at
that time, or in the alternative, a stipulated and agreed Order
of Court shall be submitted to this Court.
BY THE COURT:
( I, '~
, , i:"')
\~ ,
,,'''i "
. [ '" I
, "J ),7..1
.. g
- ." .C"
~ , .,~
'.5
.. ...-, , ~1
.," ~-...; i,q
- ,~~,'t
.. .:-::~ J
oj;- :~
, '. ,.i"'~,w,r~~'<'{~;~'i"l;YJ J!,:,;; ',~:~B \~ .' ~)i :,I;\~~::;;'~'~' :~~::?i~31t~ri~l~:f':~:'
.; , "c' -II !/(;,,':"'ll1-,'h.,'tl ~~',v;- \vl-:, . 'l_','(',;",c';_"~It;i'ij"/-!/i~\'D')
,'.1,,> """"'j .d,_,I,-. ". ,-,.' ,. _'..,."", ;..,., "h,.I,'-e'_. l.r, ,.,
W'''1~_':',,'' hi\'_ibl-~ l:jiL'I~/.ik\f!':l' -"~~I:,:;,,:I{I 'J'
,t\'ntnkU1it~~~1;~I"'\\{t!Hiid \'~ll'ii~-;i'VilH;:':':r.~I~I!