HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-03559
~
\.
"
~
.
~
~
\..
~
'"
~
'"
~'.._-
.'
,~,...
."
('
\.
~
-
.
.
.,:)
cl
~
\0
\.c)
0()
I
I
.
"
<:t;
i
AMY MILLER,
Plaintif f
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAB OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 96-35ti9 CIVIL TERM
PROTECTION PROM ABUS~
v.
DAVID MILLER,
Defendant
CONSENT AGRBBHBNT
This Agreement is entered on this .;,:yr/ day of July, 1996,
by the plaintiff, AMY MILLER, Bnd tho defendant, DAVID MILLER.
The plaintiff is represented by Joan Carey of LEGAL SERVICES,
INC.; the defendant is represented by Matthew Eshelman, Attorney.
The parties agree that the following may be entered as an Order
of Court.
1. The defendant, DAVID MILLER, agrees to refrain from
abusiog the plaintiff, AMY MILLER, or placing her in fear of
abuse.
2. The defendant agrees not to harass or ~talk the
plaintiff or the plaintiff's relatives.
3. The defendant, although entering into this Agreement,
does not admit the allegations made in the Petition.
4. The defendant understands that the Protection Order
entered in this matter will be in effect for a period of one (1)
year and can b~ extended beyond its original expiration date if
the Court finds that the defendant has committed an act of abuse
or has engaged in a pattern or practice that indicates risk of
harm to the plaintiff on a continued basis. The defendant
understands that this Order will be enforceable in the same
(-.;
'. ,'J
/. I'
r "
Itl1 l ,
r J- ,
H::'. ,
'.. ,
ll~; i .j
[I' ' .~ .r;j
~ ."" I :>~
~-j,
;:.. r' "J
I. ~< LL
" t.(~
<.. (j\ . , "
AND NOW, t h j s
(1.'M FOB
b day
, GQNTJNUMCI;
of July, 1996, upon consideration
of the attached Motion for Continuance, the hearing scheduled for
July 3, 1996, in Courtroom No.3, of the Cumberland County
Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, has been continued until July
23, 1996, at 1:30 p.m.
The Temporary Protection Order of June 27, 199ti, remains in
effect for one year or pending further order of Court.
Certified copies of this Order for Continuance will be
provided to the Mt. Holly Springs and Carlisle Police Departments
by the plaintiff's attorney.
By the Court.
Joan Carey
Attorney for Plaintiff
J . I'
I':,
'.. '-I
"', .,
(, , "
.
')
, .,
'. J
I,
,
,
'I
,... ."l
'.1 }
.
,...,
Matthew Eshelman
Attorney for Defendant
.... ,,",
r,: \';
I: " "'i
u,,'. ~ , <"
lit .,,-: "I
I',
''OJ ,1'1
,,:;.
."'\' JrjJ
LI' /.1
Ci, ' r d...
I I'
i
" 0 ') C.l
'.' , .
The defendant is ordor~d to rofrain from having nny di~ect
or indirect contact with tho plaintiff including, but not limited
to, telephone and written communications.
The detendant is enjoined from harassing and stalking the
plaintiff and from harassing the plaintiff'S relatives.
The defendant is enjoined from entering the plaintiff'S
place of employment.
The defendant is enjoined from removing, damaging,
destroying or selling any property owned jointly by the parties
or owned solely by the plaintiff.
A violation of this Order may subjeot the defendant tal i)
arrest under 23 Pa. C.S. 56113r ii) a private criminal complaint
under 23 Pa. C.S. 56113.1r iii) a charge of indirect criminal
contempt under 23 Pa. ~.S. 56114, punishable by imprisonment up
to six months and a fine of $100.00-$1,000.00r and iv) civil
oontempt undQr 23 Pa. C.S. 56114.1. Resumption of co-residenoe
on the part of the plaintiff. and defendant shall not nullify the
provisions of the oourt order.
This Order shall remain in effect until modified or
terminated by the Court after notice or hearing and can be
extended beyond its original expiration date if the Court finds
that the defendant has committed another act of abuse or has
engaged in a pattern or practice that indicates continued risk of
harm to the plaintiff.
A hsarin9 shall be held on this matter on the ~~{ day of
July, 1996, at (j 'I') jJ .m., in Courtroom No.-.i., cumberland
county Courthouse, carlisle, Pennsylvania.
The plaintiff may proceed without pre-payment of fees
pending a further order after the hearing.
The Cumberland county Sheriff'a Department shall attempt to
make service at the plaintiff's requost and without pre-payment
of fees, but service may be accomplished under any applicable
rule of civil Procedure.
This Order shall be docketed in the oft ice of the
Prothonotary and forwarded to the SherJ.ff for service. The
Prothonotary shall not send a copy of this Order to the defendant
by md 1.
The appropriate Police Departments in the areas where the
plaintiff lives and works shall be provided with certified copies
of this Order by the plaintiff's attorney. This Order shall be
enforced by allY law enforcement agency where a v iolation occurs
by arrest for indirect crimin~l contempt without warrant upon
probable cause that this Order has been violated, whether or not
the violation is committed in the presence of the police officer.
In the event ~hat an arrest is made, under this section, the
defendant shall be taken without unnecessary delay before the
AMY MILLER,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff
v.
CUMDERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 96- l~q CIVIL TERM
PROTECTION FROM ABUSE
DAVID MILLER,
Defendant
PITITION FOR PROTECTION ORDER
RILIEF UNDER THE PROTECTION FROM ABUSE
ACT, 23 P.S. S 6101 et seq.
A. ABUSB
1. The plaintiff, AMY MILLER, is an adult individual whose
residence is 427 N. Walnut street, Mt. Holly Springs, Cumbe~land
county, Penr.sylvania 17065.
2. The plaintiff is temporarily staying at an undisclosed
location for her own protection and to avoid further abuse as is
more fully set forth herein. This address will be furnished to
the court upon request.
3. The defendant, DAVID MILLER, SSN:UNKNOWN and
DOBI9/30/67, is an adult individual residing at 427 N. Walnut
street, Mt. Holly springs, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania,
17065.
4. The defendant is the husband of the plaintiff.
5. Since approximately 1995, the defendant has attempted
to cause and has intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly caused
bodily injury to the plaintiff, has placed the plainitiff in
reasonable fear of imminent serious bodily injury, and has
knowingly engaged in a course of conduct or repeatedly committed
acts toward the plaintiff under circumstances which have placed
the plaintiff in reasonable fear of bodily injury. This has
inoluded, but is not limited to, the following specific instances
of abusel
a. On or about June 17, 1996, the defendant, while
the parties were in the defendant's vehicle, grabbed
the plaintiff by the neck and repeatedly shook her
head. He also feigned punches at the plaintiff,
stopping his fist with his other hand but brushing the
plaintiff's cheek with his fist, frightening the
plaintiff. He then came over to the passenger side of
the vehicle and wrenched the plaintiff out of the
truck. The defendant pulled the plaintiff from the
truck and threw her approximately four feet into pine
trees, causing the plaintiff to skid across the curb,
scraping her arm and bruising her hip and knee. The
defendant drove away and the plaintiff walked home and
locked the door. The defendant returned to the home
several minutes later and poundod on the door demanding
to be let in or he would finish her off. Fearing for
her safety if she did not open the door, the plaintiff
let the defendant in. Later, the detendant called her
from work and told her that he was going to get drunk
or kill somebody, causing the plaintiff to fear for her
safety. Several days after this incident, the
defendant told the plaintiff that if she would have
gotten up after he threw her, he would have destroyed
her.
b. On or about December 6, 1996, the defendant pushed
the plaintiff from behind with such force that she
skidded across a hardwood floor. The plaintiff
suffered a black eye, swelling, and pain to her face.
c. On or about Labor Day weekend 1995, the defendant
threw the plaintiff to the floor, bruising her knees,
and kicked her in the hip.
d. Whenever the defendant is angry at the plaintiff,
he constantly threatens to beat up the plaintiff, tells
her to stay away from him because he has a gun, admits
that he loses complete control and will "mow" her down,
and threatens that if she doesn't go away, he will make
her go away. The plaintiff is fearful for her safety.
6. On or about June 21, 1996, the plaintiff and her child
left their residence at 427 N. Walnut street, Mt. Holly Springs,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, in order to avoid further abuse.
7. The plaintiff believes and therefore avers that she is
in immediate and present danger of abuse from the defendant
should she return to the home without the defendant's exclusion
and that she is in need of protection from such abuse.
8. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be prohibited
from having any direct or indirect contact with the plaintiff
inClUding, but not limited to, telephone and written
communications.
9. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be enjoined
from harassing and stalking the plaintiff, and from harassing the
plaintiff's relatives.
10. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be restrained
from entering her place of employment.
11. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be enjoined
from removing, damaging, destroying or selling any property owned
jointly by the parties or owned solely by the plaintiff.
B. EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION
12. The home from which the plaintiff is asking the Court
to exclude the defendant is owned ill the names of Amy and David
Miller.
14. The plaintiff desires possession of the home so as to
give the greatest degree of continuity to the life of her child
and to allow him to continue his social activities.
C. RBIHBU~NT FOR COST OF CASB
15. The plaintiff asks that the defendant be ordered to pay
$250.00 to reimburse one of Legal Services, Inc.'s funding
sources for the cost of litigating this case.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of the "Protection
from Abuse Act" of October 7, 1976, 23 P.S. S 6101 ~ ~., as
amended, the plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to grant the
fOllowing relief:
A. Grant a Temporary Order pursuant to the
"Protection from Abuse Act:"
1. ordering the defendant to refrain from
abusing the plaintiff or placing her in fear of
abuse,
2. ordering the defendant to refrain from having
any direct or indirect contact with the plaintiff
including, but not limited to, telephone and
writt~n communications,
3. Ord~ring the defendant to refrain from
harassing and stalking the plaintiff and from
harassing the plaintiff's relatives,
4. Prohibiting the defendant from entering the
plaintiff'S place of employment,
5. Prohibiting the defendant from removing,
damaging, destroying or selling property jointly
owned by the parties or owned solely by the
plaintiffr
6. Granting possession of the home located at
427 N. Walnut street, Mt. Holly springs,
Cumberland county, Pennsylvania, to the plaintiff
to the exclusion of the defendant pending a final
order in this matter;
7. Ordering the defendant to stay away from any
residence the plaintiff may in the future
establish for herselfl
B. Schedule a hearing in accordance with the provisions of
the "Protention from Abuse Act," and, after such hearing,
enter an order to be in effect for a period of one yeart
1. ordering the defendant to refrain from
abusing the plaintiff or placing her in fear of
abuse.
2. Ordering the defendant to refrain from having
any direct or indirect contact with the plaintiff
including, but not limited to, telephone and
written communications.
3. ordering the defendant to refrain from
harassing and stalking the plaintiff and from
harassing the plaintiff's relatives.
4. Prohibiting the defendant from entering the
plaintiff'S place of employment.
5. Prohibiting the defendant from removing,
damaging, destroying or selling property jointly
owned by the parties or owned solely by the
plaintiff.
6. Granting possession of the home located at
427 N. Walnut street, Mt. Holly Springs,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, to the plaintiff
to the exclusion of the defendant.
7. ordering the defendant to stay away from any
residence the plaintiff may in the future
establish for herself.