HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-0298r
k.;
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INS. CO.
AS SUBROGEE OF JOHN DANEAU
Plaintiff,
V.
STEVEN COX AND
LUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.
Defendants.
CASE NO: p7 - a4,4' Cu
TYPE OF PLEADING:
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION
FILED ON BEHALF OF:
Plaintiff
COUNSEL OF RECORD OF
THIS PARTY:
MICHAEL J. DOUGHERTY, ESQUIRE
Pa. I.D. #76046
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
325 Chestnut Street
Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
(215) 599-1500
WWR #04928092
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INS. CO.
AS SUBROGEE OF JOHN DANEAU
Plaintiff,
CASE NO:
V. TYPE OF PLEADING:
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION
STEVEN COX AND
LUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.
Defendants.
NOTICE TO DEFEND
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to
defend against the claim set forth in the following pages,
you must take action within twenty (20) days after this
complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written
appearance personally or by an attorney in filing in
writing with the Court your defenses or objections to
to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that
if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and
a judgment may be entered against you by the Court
without further notice for money claimed in the Complaint
or for any other claim or relief requested by the
plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR
LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE
A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE,
GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH
BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU
CAN GET LEGAL HELP:
AVISO
LE HAN DEMANDADO A USTED EN LA
CORTE. Si usted quiere defenderse de estas
demanddeas expuestas en las paginas siguientes,
usted tiene veinte (20) dias de plazo al partir de la
fecha dela demanda y la notificacion. Hace falta
asentar una comparencia escrita o en persona o con
un abogado y entregar a la corte en forma escrita
sus defensas o sus objeciones a las demandas en
contra de su persona. Sea avisado que si usted no
se defiende, la corte tomara medidas y puede
continuar la demands en contra suya sin previo
aviso o notificacion. Ademas, la corte puede
decidir a favor del demandante y requiere que usted
cumpla con todas las provisioner de esta demanda.
usted puede perder dinero o sus propiedadas u
otros drechos importantes para usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABOGADO
INMEDIATAMENTA. SI NO TIENE ABOGADO
O SINO TIENE EL DINERO SUFFICIENTE DE
PAGAR TAL SERVICO, VAYA EN PERSONA O
LLAME FOR TELEFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA
DIRECCION SE ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ADAJO
PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEGUIR
ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
Court Administrator
4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INS. CO.
AS SUBROGEE OF JOHN DANEAU
CASE NO: 0 7 - -2 9 IF
Plaintiff,
V. TYPE OF PLEADING:
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION
STEVEN COX AND
LUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.
Defendants.
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION
AND NOW COMES, Plaintiff by and through its counsel, WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS, CO.,
L.P.A., and hereby files this Complaint against Defendants, jointly and severally. In support thereof, Plaintiff avers
as follows:
1. Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Insurance Company ("Progressive"), is a corporation with a
registered office located at P.O. Box 43258, Richmond Heights, Ohio.
2. Defendant, Steven Cox, is an adult individual with a last known address of 214 Colldin Street,
Belpre, Ohio 45714.
3. Defendant, Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., is a business organization licensed and authorized to
conduct business in the State of New Jersey and having as one of its places of business 342 Schuyler Avenue,
Kearny, New Jersey 07032.
4. Progressive issued a policy of insurance where Progressive agreed to insure a 2004 Fleetwood
("Insured Vehicle"), owned by Plaintiff's insured.
5. On or about February 25, 2005 the motor vehicle owned by Defendant, Luis J. Kennedy Trucking
Co., and operated by Defendant, Steven Cox, did negligently, carelessly and/or recklessly collide with the
Progressive Insured's vehicle at or near Interstate 81 at or near mile marker 21, SOuthampton, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
6. At all times material hereto Defendant, Steven Cox, was acting individually and/or as the agent,
servant, workman and/or employee of Defendant, Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., within the course and scope of his
agency and/or with the express and/or implied consent of Defendant, Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co..
7. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' negligence, the Progressive's Insured vehicle
sustained property damage in the amount of $39,340.14.
8. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, Progressive paid the sum of
$38,840.14. A true and correct copy of the payment and damage documentation is attached hereto and marked as
Exhibit "I".
9. The insured also sustained damages of $500.00 representing his deductible.
10. Pursuant to the insurance policy issued by Progressive and as a result of said aforesaid payment,
Progressive became subrogated to the claim of its Insured against Defendants.
11. Pursuant to Progressive's right of subrogation, Progressive is presently due and owed from
Defendants the sum of $39,340.14.
12. Repeated demands have been made upon Defendants for payment of the aforesaid sum; however,
Defendants have willfully failed and refused to pay the sum due and owing to Progressive.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands Judgment against Defendants jointly and severally the amount of
$39,340.14 and costs.
THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED SHALL BE
USED FOR THAT PURPOSE.
Respectfully
WELTMf NJ)WEINBERO & REIS, CO., L.P.A.
Michael J. Dou herty, Esquire
PA I.D. # 76016
325 Chestnut Street
Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
(215) 599-1500
WWR#04928092
FLEETWOOD SERVICE Fax:25072459$7
Apr 13 2005 13:40 .
Estimate Page: 1
Sullivan RV Service Inc.
2203 Patterson St. Decatur, In. 48733 CLAW
Plione:250-7249404 Fax:250-724-2138 PAGE 1 OF 2
Email - rickQ3ulilvanrv.com
Shop Labor Rate $85.00 per labor hour (1/2 hr. min.) Date: 0+1.12.2005
Fed 113& 33.19821131
Repeir R & R R & I Description part cost labor cost
x FRONT CAP UPPER 1,228.83 $1,440.00
X LOWER FRONT CAP 1,002.34 $1,200.00
X FIREWALL ASM. MFG COMPONET FABER UP 2,451.04 $4,400.00
X ENTRY DOOR / KEYLESS READY 2,602.97 $160:00
X FRONT BRA 497.56 $80.00
X RF FENDER 315.30 $320.00
X RF HEADLAMP ASM 149.39 564.00
X RF MIRROR 612.26 $120.00
X ENTRY DOOR LATCH / TRJ4"RK 109.21 INC
X DOUBLE ENTRY STEP 451.40 $160.00
X ENTRY STEP BOX I LINER - CONSTRUCT FROM COMPONETS 299.21 $760.00
X ENTRY STEP TREADS X 2 60.67 INC
X FRONT SLIDE EXTRUSION 52.33 $72.00
X RfH LOWER SLIDE EXTRUSION END CAP 4.90 INC
X PASS WALL ASM COMPLETE, FLEETWOOD BUILT 13 000.00 $11,600.00
X HOOD 506.16 $160.00
X HOOD HINGE R/H 22.73 INC
X RIS FRONT CAP MOLDINGS 52.94 INC
X STEP SKIRT PROTECTOR 33.06 $16.00
X CARPET FOR STEP BOX 98.21 INC
X STEEL STRAP R/H 12.98 INC
X PASS FRONT HEADLAMP REFLECTOR 5.39 INC
X PARK TURN LAMP R/H 39.17 INC
X. HOOD STABLIM 23.$7 $32.00
X HOOD !CAS STRUT PASS 9.62 INC
X HOOD HINGE UN 22.73 INC
TOTAL PAGE 1 23,744.30 $20,584.00
subtotal parts
state tax 49 6%
Labor cost amount
PLEASE SIGN: Sublet cost
Fmigbt
WasWEcological charge
TOTAL
Name: JOHN DANEAU
Addn:ss• PO BOX 322
CItV. St. & zip DERRY, NH 03038
Phone 60344113-6415
Model: DISCOVERY
Year & Make 2004 FLEETWOOD
V.I.N.
Serial: 770J444"396
The above sedmale is based on our initial inspoctim and dos not cover addWonsl parts and labor which bray
be required after work is opened. Additional repairs neessaoi v dole to worn or detsriorsted releled parts are j
not Covered by this estknate. These repairs WIN be perfon=W vithgoA authorization up bo, but not ww adbrg II
11011 of estinate value. Pad prices are subject to change fawner is resomsibie for Nosnrsru:e during repairs.
' cl? i ?is?1.D9e i 2! aen x ' pug s0E :0 T 5D ST .add
FLEE-NOCD SERVICE Fax:2507245987
Apr 13 2005 131:41 P.04
Estimate Page: 1
Sullivan RV Service Inc.
2203 Patterson St. Decatur, In. 48733 CLAIM #
Phone:260.724-8404 Fax:2W-724-2138 PAGE 1 OF 2
Email - rickQsuliivanrv.com
Shop Labor Rate $85.00 per labor hour (1/2 hr_ min.) Date: 04.122005
Fed 113#36-1902681
Repair R & R R & i Description part cost labor cost
PAINT / PRIME A BASE FRONT CAP UPPER & LOWER 4420.00 $960.00
PAINT I PRIME & BASE WALL 710.00 $19760.00
LAYOUT STRIPE DESIGN & BASE
PREP & CLEARCOAT WALL A FRONT CAP UPPER & LOWER 157.50
600.00 $360.00
$640.00
BUFF TO MATCH BALANCE OF RV 23.00 INC
IT IS UNDERSTOOD UNIT REPAIR ESTIMATE MADE FROM
INTERNET PHOTO'S B FINAL ESTIMATE VAUE WILL HAVE TO
APPROVED BY SULLIVAN RV AFTER PHYSICAL CONTACT WITH
THE DAMAGED VEHICLE.
REPAIR TIME 13 A MIN. OF 4 WEEKS BARING PARTS AVAILABiLTY
OPEN DAMAGE TO SLIDE WALL 3 / OR ASM
OPEN DAMAGE TO RV FLOOR AT STEP OPENING NOT EXSPO SED
OPEN DAMAGE TO RV FLOORING OR DASH COSMETICS
AND ANY INTERIOR COMPONETB DAMAGED, NOT SEEN
OPEN *-*"" DAMAGE TO WIRING AT FIRONALL OR UNDERDASH
" FREIGHT COST ESTIMATED FOR WALL SHIPMENT'*"""'
PAGE 2 TOTALS 1 978.50 720.00
PAGE 1 TOTALS 23744.30 520,684.00
THIS ESTIMATE WRITTEN AT OUR APPROVED FLEETWOOD RATE
subtotal parts 26 719.80
state tax P_ 6% 1,543.19
Labor cost amount 24,304.00
PLEASE SIGN:- Sublet cost
Freight 425.00
Waste/Ecological charge 46.00
TOTAL 52,036.99 1
Name: JOHN DANEAU
Address: PO 13OX 322
City, 3t & zip NH 03038
Phone 603-483-6415
Model: DISCOVERY
Year & Make 2004 FLEETWOOD
V.I.N.:
Serial : 770.144488396
The above ssNrnabe is based on our initial krspsctlon, and does not cover additional parts and labor which may
be required after work is opened. Additional repairs necessary due to worn or deteriorated related parts are
not covered by this andnwae. These repairs will be performed without authorization up to, but not axeeeding
10% of estimate value. Part prices are mdgect to change. Owner is resonsibie for insurance during repairs.
Date: 6/1412005 11:40 AM
Estimate ID: 5050121
Estimate Version: 0
Committed
Profile ID: CUSTOMIZED
PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRAISER
5 Hampshire street Salem, NH 03079
(603) 8803388
Fax: (603) 890-3399
Damage Assessed By: ALEX FRAZIER Appraised For: Scott Patterson x 7048
**,r,rt,r**t,r,t?*,t*,t,r,t**,r,rtt,tNOTICE,t,rt,t***,r,r****,rt*t*,r*+****?,r+********
THIS IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO REPAIR. ALL COSTS OF REPAIRS ARE THE
SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VEHICLE OWNER, WHO ULTIMATELY MUST
AUTHORIZE ALL REPAIRS. NO SUPPLEMENTS WILL BE HONORED WITHOUT THE
PRIOR INSPECTION BY PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRAISERS.
Condition Code: Good Type of Loss: Collision
Contact Date: 5119/2005
Deductible: 0.00
File Number: 5050121
Claim Number: 066473681
insured: John Daneau
Address: contact wife Terry 20 Meadow Lane Auburn, NH
Telephone: Work Phone: (603) 234-7813
Mitchell Service: 811000
Description: 04 FREIGHTLINER DISCOVERY License: DANEAU
VIN: 4UZAAHAK24CM86794
Mileage: 3,000
OEM/ALT: A Search Code: 310AF
Color: TANB
Line Entry Labor Line Rem Part Type/
Part Number Dollar
Amount Labor
Units
Item Number Type Operation Description New 1,285.85' 8.0*
1 800500 BOY ' REMOVE/REPLACE LOWER CAP 0*
5
2 900500 REF * REFINISH/REPAIR LOWER FRONT CAP Existing 016
29-
2 .
18-0-
3 900500 BDY * REMOVE/REPLACE FRONT UPPER CAP New .
, 8
0*
4 900500 REF * REFINISHIREPAIR FRONT UPPER CAP Existing 275
00 * .
0
0*
5 900500 BDY *
* REMOVEIINSTALL WINDSHIELD FIT / LT
STEEL TUBING FOR FRAMING FRONT SECTION Sublet
**Qual Rapt Part .
100.00 * .
1
6 900500 BOY REMOVEIREPLACE
Existing 4 0*
7 900500 BDY *
* REPAIR FRONT FIRE WALL
FRONT WALL SUPPORT TO FIRE WALL Existing 4.0*
8 900600 BOY REPAIR Existing 4.0*
9 900500 REF ' REFINISHIREPAIR INNER STEEL New 628.00 * 16.0"
1o 900500 BOY * REMOVEIREPLACE FRONT STEP ASSY 00 *
86 8
0*
11 900500 BDY * REMOVEIREPLACE FRONT FLOOR COVERING New .
73 *
3
218 .
6
0*
12 900500 BOY * REMOVEIREPLACE ENTRY DOOR ASSY New ,
.
256
90' .
2
0*
13 900500 BDY * REMOVEIREPLACE HEAD LIGHT ASSY New . .
16
0*
14 900500 BOY * REPAIR SIDE WALL FRONT SECTION Existing .
10
0*
15 900500 REF * REFINISHIREPAIR SIDE WALL Existing
New 134.90 * .
4.0*
16 900600 BDY * REMOVEIREPLACE FRONT WALL MOULDING 8
0*
17 900600 BOY * REMOVEIINSTALL SLIDE OUT UNIT Existing .
8
0*
18 900500 BOY * REMOVEIINSTALL DASH BOARD ASSY Existing .
ESTIMATE RECALL NUMBER: 6/14/200511:40:26 5060121
UltraMate is a Trademark of Mitchell International
Mitchell Data Version: APR_05_A Copyright (C) 1994 - 2003 Mitchell International Page 1 of 3
19 900500 BDY ' REPAIR
20 900600 FRM ' REPAIR
21 AUTO ADD'L COST
- Judgement Item
DASH BOARD MOUNTINGS
PULL BODY AS NEEDED
PAINT/MATERIALS
Prior Damage
NOTE A SECOND LOOK WILL BE NEEDED FOR HIDDEN DAMAGE
Add'l
Labor Sublet
1. Labor Subtotals Units Rate Amount Amount
Body 116.0 98.00 0.00 275.00
Refinish 27.0 99.00 0.00 0.00
Frame 8.0 100.00 0.00 0.00
Non-Taxable Labor
Labor Summary 151.0
III. Additional Costs
Non-Taxable Costs
Total Additional Costs
Date: 6114/2005 11:40 AM
Estimate ID: 5050121
Estimate Version: 0
Committed
Profile ID: CUSTOMIZED
Existing 4.0'
Existing 8.0'
486.00 '
Totals 11. Part Replacement Summary
11,759.00 Non-Taxable Parts
2,673.00
800.00 Total Replacement Parts Amount
15,232.00
15,232.00
Amount N. Adjustments
486.00 Insurance Deductible
486.00 Customer Responsibility
1. Total Labor:
II. Total Replacement Parts:
III. Total Additional Costs:
Gross Total:
IV. Total Adjustments:
Net Total:
THIS ESTIMATE HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON THE USE OF AUTOMOBILE PARTS NOT
MADE BY THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER. PARTS USED IN THE REPAIR OF YOUR
VEHICLE BY OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER ARE REQUIRED TO BE AT
LEAST EQUAL IN LIKE KIND AND QUALITY IN TERMS OF FIT, QUALITY AND
PERFORMANCE TO THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER PARTS THEY ARE REPLACING.
Point(s) of Impact
1 Right Front Corner (P)
insurance Co: Progressive Insurance Inspection Site: AT SHOP
Address: 3 Executive Park Drive Inspection Date: 5/27/2005
Bedford, NH 03110
Work Phone: (603) 222-7000
Fax Phone: (603) 624-4242
Body Shop: CAMPERS INN INC.
Address: 35 ROBERT MILLIGAN PARKWAY
MERRIMACK, NH 03054
Telephone: (603) 883-1082
ESTIMATE RECALL NUMBER: 6/14/2005 11:40:26 5050121
UltraMate is a Trademark of Mitchell international
Mitchell Data Version: APR_05_A Copyright (C) 1994 - 2003 Mitchell International
Amount
7,735.77
7,735.77
Amount
0.00
0.00
46,23240--
7,736.77
486.00
0.00
-234,6&R-
5 66
??4Jt i
Page 2 of 3
Date: 61141200511:40 AM
Estimate ID: 5050121
Estimate Version: 0
Committed
Profile ID: CUSTOMIZED
****************************AGREED REPAIR COST***********************
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ABOVE SHOP, IF ONE IS LISTED, AGREES TO
COMPLETE AND GUARANTEE ALL REPAIRS LISTED ABOVE FOR THE AMOUNT LISTED
UNLESS A DIFFERENT AMOUNT IS LISTED HERE $
BY: DATE:
**********************************************************************
****************************ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*******************
VEHICLE IS : REPAIRABLE ( ) A BORDERLINE TOTAL ( ) A TOTAL LOSS ( )
REPAIRS ON THIS VEHICLE SHOULD TAKE DAYS TO COMPLETE
**********************************************************************
DEDUCTIBLES ARE NOT ADDRESSED OR INCLUDED IN THISESTIMATE/APPRAISAL!!
THE REPAIR SHOULD CHECK TO SEE IF THE DEDUCTIBLE IS APPLICABLE TO THE
LOSS AND, IF SO, COLLECT IT FROM THE VEHICLE OWNER PRIOR TO THE
RELEASE OF THE REPAIRED VEHICLE.
THIS REPAIR ESTIMATE/APPRAISAL MAY BE PREPARED BASED UPON THE USE OF
ONE OR MORE AFTERMARKET CRASH PART /OR OTHER PARTS SUPPLIED BY A
SOURCE OUTH THAN THE MANUFACTURE OF YOUR MOTOR VEHICLE. PARTS USED IN
THE REPAIR OF YOUR VEHICLE BY OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER
ARE REQUIREDTO BE ATLEAST EQUAL IN LIKE KIND AND QUALITY IN TERMS OF
FIT, QUALITY, AND PERFORMANCE TO THE REPLACEMENT BY THE PARTS
MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR RATHER THAN YOUR OWN MOTOR VEHICLE
MANUFACTURER.
DAYS TO REPAIR
ESTIMATE RECALL NUMBER: 611412005 11:40:26 5050121
UltraMate is a Trademark of Mitchell International
Mitchell Data Version: APR_05_A Copyright (C) 1994 - 2003 Mitchell International Page 3 of 3
VERIFICATION
I, Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire, attorney for the Plaintiff(s) do hereby swear and
affirm that the averments in the attached Complaint in Civil Action are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge, information and/or belief. These averments are made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §4904 relating to usworn falsification to authorities.
Date: 1I`;L/"
I i?
Michael J. ougherty
WWR#
u
w
v(
VI
0
C'
N
-j
'T7
LA)
O
`n
Fl l
! T;
?' 1
I OLO
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
BY: Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiff(s)
I.D. No. 76046
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 501
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: 215.599.1500
Fax: 215.599.1505
File # 04928092
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE
COMPANY alslo JOHN DANEAU
Cumberland County
Court of Common Pleas
vs.
NO. 07-298 CIVIL TERM
STEVEN J COX and
LUIS J KENNEDY TRUCKING
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
On January 25, 2007 Plaintiff mailed its Complaint in Civil Action to Defendant,
Steven J. Cox, at 714 Colldin Street, Belpre, OH 45714 by certified mail, return receipt
requested and first class, United States mail, postage-prepaid. The certified mail, return
receipt requested was returned unclaimed. The first class, United States mail, postage-
prepaid was not returned. Attached is United States Postal Service Track & Confirm for
certified mail receipt number 7005 3110 0002 0034 9382.
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
BY.
Michael J. Poughe y, Esquire
Attorney for Plainti
r
--- Insured Mail C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Feel ? Yes
2. Article Number 7005 1820-0001 5 015 0478
(Transfer from service W"O
A E3 Agent
? Addressee
rP?
kited Na . Date of Delivery
D114delt
i very address different fro Item 17 13 Yes
1176, enter delivery ad elow: ? No
3y0" sC, u f 3. Service Type
)? ?7C7?? Certified Mail E3 Express Mail
K f\ ?? / 13 Registered Vetum Receipt foLlt" ;lmadi•s
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
??is ? KenhPr•lY
h I due
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540
0
Q
?:t is=;; -+-t
?
? -?
n?t F? ? _??;
^
?
G? (?J = t i::r
_'` °s?t
?-? ?? ?
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Progressive Northern Ins. Co.
As subrogee of John Daneau
Plaintiff
V.
Steven Cox and
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Defendants.
Case No.: 07-298
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER
AND NEW MATTER CROSS CLAIM
: TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT, LOUIS J KENNEDY TRUCKING CO., IMPROPERLY NAMED
LUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.'S ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., by its attorneys Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, P.C.
hereby respond to Plaintiff's Complaint as follows:
1. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as the truth of the averments
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause.
2. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph do not pertain to the
Answering Defendant and, accordingly, no answer is required. To the extent, however,
that an answer may be required, the said allegations are denied because after reasonable
investigation, the answering defendant lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form
a belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in this paragraph and, accordingly, the
said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material, is demanded at the trial of
this cause.
3. Admitted.
4. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause.
5. Denied. Answering defendant specifically denies that it was negligent,
careless and /or reckless at any time material or relevant to plaintiffs cause of action and
that said defendants' alleged negligence, carelessness and/or recklessness in any way
caused or contributed to the alleged accident and/or plaintiffs alleged resulting injuries.
For further answer, answering defendant is advised by counsel and therefore avers that
the allegations contained in the corresponding paragraph of plaintiff s Complaint are
conclusions of law which are automatically deemed denied and are at issue under the
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure without specific denial. Strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial, if material.
6. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments
2
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause.
7. Denied. Answering defendant specifically denies that it was negligent at
any time material or relevant to plaintiffs cause of action and that said defendant's
alleged negligence in any way caused or contributed to the alleged accident and/or
plaintiffs alleged resulting injuries. For further answer, answering defendant is advised
by counsel and therefore avers that the allegations contained in the corresponding
paragraph of plaintiffs Complaint are conclusions of law which are automatically
deemed denied and are at issue under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure without
specific denial. Strict proof thereof is demanded at trial, if material.
8. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause. By way of further answer, the documents attached
as Exhibit 1 to the Complaint are in writing and speak for themselves.
9. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause.
3
10. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause. By way of further answer the insurance policy is in
writing and speaks for itself.
11. Denied. The allegations set forth in this paragraph are conclusions of law
to which no answer is required. To the extent, however, that an answer may be required,
the allegations are denied because after reasonable investigation, the answering defendant
lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments
set forth and, accordingly, the said averments are denied. Strict proof thereof, if material,
is demanded at the trial of this cause.
12. Denied. The averments in this paragraph set forth conclusions of law
which require no answer but which are nevertheless denied.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co. prays this Honorable Court enter judgment in answering
defendant's favor and against all persons or parties with costs.
NEW MATTER
13. Plaintiff's alleged causes of action are barred by the applicable Statute of
Limitations for any acts or omissions occurring more than two (2) years prior to the filing
of the Complaint.
4
14. Nothing done or omitted to be done by answering defendants was the
proximate cause of any injuries to plaintiff.
15. The alleged injuries to plaintiff were caused or contributed to in whole or
in part, by the negligence or want of due care of persons, parties and/or organizations
other than answering defendant and over whom said answering defendant had no control
or right of control or responsibility.
16. If the defendant was negligent in any respect as alleged in the Complaint,
all such allegations being specifically denied, said defendant's negligence was passive
and the injuries sustained by plaintiff were the result of an intervening negligent act of a
third person or persons which was a superseding cause of plaintiff's injuries and,
therefore, the defendant is not liable.
17. The alleged injuries of the plaintiff were the result of plaintiff's own
negligence which exceeded any negligence of defendant, all negligence of the defendant
being expressly denied, and, therefore, pursuant to the Pennsylvania Comparative
Negligence Act (42 Pa. C.S.A. §7102), plaintiff's claim is barred.
18. Because the plaintiff had knowledge of, understood and appreciated the
consequences of plaintiff's actions, plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk and, therefore,
the defendant is not liable.
19. The Complaint, in whole or in part, fails to state a cause of action upon
which relief can be granted.
20. If there is a judicial determination that Pa. R.C.P. 238 is constitutional,
said constitutionality being expressly challenged as in violation of the Due Process of
Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution;
5
42 U.S.C. §1983; Article I, Section 1, 6, 11, 26; and Article V., Section 10(c) of the
Pennsylvania Constitution, then liability for any interest imposed by the Rule should be
suspended during the period of time that plaintiff: (a) fails to convey to the defendant a
settlement demand figure; (b) delays in responding to Interrogatories; (c) delays in
responding the Request to Produce; (d) delays in producing the plaintiff for a physical
examination; and (f) delays in any other discovery request made by the defendant and, as
a result of any delay, the plaintiff should be estopped from obtaining interest because of
any violation of the discovery rules.
21. At all times material hereto, the answering defendants maintained proper
and adequate control of their vehicle, maintained a proper lookout, used due care for the
right, safety and position of others and obeyed the ordinances and statutes of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its local municipalities governing the safe operation
of motor vehicles on streets and highways.
22. Defendant asserts all of the defenses available under the Motor Vehicle
Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa. C.S., § 1701,et seq., and aver that the plaintiff s
remedies are limited exclusively thereto, and therefore, the present action is barred or
limited.
23. Claims of the plaintiff for products, services and accommodations for:
(a) professional medical treatment;
(b) emergency health services;
(c) medical and vocational rehabilitation services;
(d) work income losses, past, present, or future; and
6
(e) Any and all other economic losses are not recoverable from
defendant under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial
Responsibility Law.
24. At all material times, defendants were faced with a sudden emergency.
25. Plaintiff's claims, if any, are barred, in whole or in part due to its failure to
mitigate damages.
26. Plaintiff's alleged damages consist of economic losses not recoverable in
tort.
27. Plaintiff's claims for damages are barred by operation of 75 Pa. C.S.A.
§ 1705.
WHEREFORE, answering defendant prays this Honorable Court enter judgment
in answering defendant's favor and against all other persons or parties with costs.
NEW MATTER CROSSCLAIM PURSUANT TO Pa. R.C.P. 2252(d) AGAINST,
PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT, JOHN DANEAU
28. Answering defendant specifically denies liability for any and all
allegations set forth in plaintiff s Complaint and incorporates by reference herein the
allegations and averments contained in its answer, together with the new matter set forth
herein.
29. If the plaintiffs suffered injuries or damages as alleged in their Complaint,
said injuries or damages were caused solely by the negligence and carelessness of
plaintiff/defendant, John Daneau, as is more particularly set forth in plaintiffs Complaint.
30. Plaintiff/Defendant, John Daneau, is primarily liable for any injuries or
damages, which may have been suffered by plaintiff.
7
31. As a result of the matters alleged in the Complaint, answers thereto, or any
of them, defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., may be held liable to plaintiff for all or part of such injuries or damages as
they may have sustained, in which event, plaintiff/defendant, John Daneau, as the party
primarily liable for such injuries or damages, is liable to defendant, Louis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., by way of contribution
and/or indemnification for all such injuries or damages as they may suffer and said
defendant asserts in this action their right to such indemnity and/or contribution.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., demands; (a) judgment dismissing the Complaint against
it and judgment in its favor together with costs and disbursements; (b) Judgment that, if
there is any liability to plaintiff/defendant, John Daneau is solely liable to plaintiffs; and
(c) If a verdict is recovered by plaintiffs against defendant, then plaintiff/defendant, John
Daneau will be held primarily liable, and that defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.,
improperly named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., will have judgment over and against
the aforementioned defendant by way of contribution and/or indemnification for the
amount recovered by plaintiffs against it with costs and disbursements.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
)1?4 A
By: 4 V(
ton arzano, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant,
Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.,
Improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Dated: 311(,1o2 Trucking Co.
8
VERIFICATION
I, Scott W. Schumacher, hereby state that I am a representative of the Defendant,
Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co. in this
action and verify that the statements made in the foregoing Answer to Plaintiff's
Complaint With New Matter and New Matter Cross Claim Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P.
2252(d) are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. The
undersigned understands that the statements therein are made subject to the penalties of
18 Pa. C.S. §4904 relating to unsworn falsi&
Dated: J X0 L-60
Progressive
9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document upon all parties or their attorney of record as follows by regular First Class
Mail, postage prepaid, on this date:
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Anton'G. Marzano, Esquire
Dated: 3 t (,/,Q 2
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Progressive Northern Ins. Co.
As subrogee of John Daneau
Plaintiff
V.
Steven Cox and
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Defendants.
Case No.: 07-298
MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOERY ANSWERS
MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., by and through their counsel Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer &
Toddy, P.C., hereby moves this Honorable Court for an Order compelling the Plaintiff to
submit full and complete responses to Defendant's Interrogatories and Request for
Production of Documents within ten (10) days from the date of the attached Order.
1. Pursuant to Rule 208.3(a)(2) there has been no other rulings in this matter
on any issue to date.
2. Plaintiff is represented by Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire of Weltman,
Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120, Philadelphia, PA 19106
3. Defense counsel attempted to contacted plaintiff s counsel regarding
counsel's position concerning defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff s Answers to
Discovery by telephone and letter. Plaintiffs counsel has not responded to defense
counsel's requests to contact him. See a true and correct copy of the June 7, 2007 letter
to plaintiffs counsel attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
4. On or about March 20, 2007, Defendant's counsel forwarded to the offices
of opposing counsel, Defendant's Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents to Plaintiffs herein. A true and correct copy of the March 20, 2007 letter is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
5. By letter dated April 26, 2007 defense counsel inquired of plaintiffs'
counsel when plaintiffs' Answers to the outstanding discovery requested would be
produced. See a true and correct copy of the April 26, 2007 letter attached hereto as
Exhibit "C".
6. On May 14, 2007 defense counsel inquired of plaintiff's counsel when
plaintiff's answers to discovery maybe expected. Plaintiffs counsel inquired of defense
counsel whether a copy of his client's Investigative File would be acceptable in lieu of
formal responses to the discovery requests.
7. Defense counsel advised that the Investigative File would be acceptable in
lieu of formal responses, but if any discovery responses were not answered by the
Investigative File answers would be requested.
Defense counsel by letter dated June 7, 2007 again inquired when he may
expect to receive plaintiff's Claims File in response to the discovery request. Defense
counsel further advised that if he did not receive the answers to discovery within five
days of the date of the letter he will have no choice but to file the appropriate motion with
the Court. See a true and correct copy of the June 7, 2007 letter to plaintiff's counsel
attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
9. As of this date, no response or objections have been received from
Plaintiffs for any of the above discovery requests.
2
10. Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4006 a party served with Interrogatories must file
Answers and/or objections to the Interrogatories within thirty (30) days after service.
11. Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4009(b)(2), a party upon whom a Request for
Production of Documents is served, shall serve a written response and/or objection
thereto within thirty (30) days after service.
12. As of this date, no response or objections have been received from
plaintiffs counsel for any of the above discovery requests.
13. Rule 4019 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a
Court may on motion make an appropriate Order, if a party fails to serve sufficient
answers or objections to written Interrogatories under Rule 4005, or if a party fails to
respond to a Request for Production of Documents made under Rule 4009.
14. Defendants are being severely prejudiced and hampered in their ability to
properly pursue and litigate this claim.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., respectfully requests that the Court enter the attached
Order directing Plaintiffs to fully and completely answer Defendants' Interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents within twenty (20) days.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
S AER & TOD Y P.C.
By:
ton G. Marzano, Esquir
Attorney for Defendant,
Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly
named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Date: 71(c/O 7
3
VERIFICATION
I, Anton G. Marzano, Esquire, on behalf of the Defendants state that I am the
attorney in the within matter and I am authorized to state that the facts set forth in the
foregoing Motion to Compel Discovery Answers are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief and that this statement is made subject to the penalties
of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities.
Dated: :7 C& to-)
Progressive/Daneau
-k
ZARWI N + BAUM • I- `VITO
KAPLAN + SCHAER • TODDY + P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ANTON G MARZANO
Member PA & NJ Bar
agmarzano@zarwin.com
June 7, 2007
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Re: Progressive Northern Insurance Co. as Subrogee of John Daneu
vs. Steven Cox and Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
CCP, Cumberland County, No.: 07-298
File No.: 21641
Dear Mr. Dougherty:
This is to inquire when we may receive your Claims File in connection with the
above-captioned matter. We directed Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents to your client by letter dated March 20, 2007. By letter dated April 26, 2007 we
inquired when we may receive your client's Answers to the discovery requests, and if we do
not receive them the appropriate Motion would be filed. On May 14, 2007 we spoke by
telephone with you regarding the discovery issue. At that time, you inquired whether
production of your Investigation File would be acceptable in lieu of formal answers. We
advised that we will accept the Investigation File and if any Interrogatories or Request for
Production of Documents are not covered by the documents produced we will advise you and
request that you answer the discovery requests. To date we have not received your
Investigation File and any answers to discovery. Accordingly, if we do not receive your
answers within five (5) days of the date of this letter we will have no choice but to file the
appropriate Motion with the Court.
V ry truly yours,
nton G. Marzano
AGM:sa
1515 MARKET STREET * 12TH FLOOR ? PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-1981 ` (215) 569-2800 ? FAx (215) 569-1606 * WWW.ZARWIN.COM
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICES: ALLENTOWN ? CONSHOHOCKEN i NEW JERSEY OFFICES: JERSEY CITY + LINWOOD f' MARLTON
s
ZARWI N + BAUM + r' `'VITO
KAPLAN + SCHAER e TODDY* P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ANTON G MARZANO
Member PA & NJ Bar
agmarzano@zarwin.com
March 20, 2007
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Re: Progressive Northern Insurance Co. as Subrogee of John Daneu
vs. Steven Cox and Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
CCP, Cumberland County, No.: 07-298
File No.: 21641
Dear Mr. Dougherty:
Enclosed please find an original and two (2) copies of Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.'s interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents Addressed to Plaintiff regarding the above-captioned
matter.
Kindly respond in accordance with the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure or on
or before Friday, April 20, 2007.
Yr, truly yours,
VOY
?nton G. Marzano
AGM:sa
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Bernie Talty
Lewis J. Kennedy Trucking Company
1515 MARKET STREET '9? 12TH FLOOR 8 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-1981 4 (215) 569-2800 ° FAx (215) 569-1606 WWW.ZARWIN.COM
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICES: ALLENTOWN 4' CONSHOHOCKEN 4 NEW JERSEY OFFICES: JERSEY CITY a LINWOOD f' MARLTON
C
ZARWI N e BAUM + .D EVITO
KAPLAN • SCHAER TODDY* P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ANTON G MARZANO
Member PA & NJ Bar
agmarzano@zarwin.com
April 26, 2007
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire -
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Re: Progressive Northern Insurance Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau
vs. Steven Cox and Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
CCP, Cumberland County, No.: 07-298
File No.: 21641
Dear Mr. Dougherty:
On March 20, 2007, I forwarded to your attention Defendants' Interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents directed to Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Insurance
Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau. To date I have not received your answers to the
Defendant's discovery. Kindly supply me with answers to the requested discovery within ten
(10) days so we may avoid the filing of a Motion to Compel.
V r truly yoOo
nton G. MarAGM: sa
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Bernie Talty
Lewis J. Kennedy Trucking Company
1515 MARKET STREET ® 12TH FLOOR o PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-1981 & (215) 569-2800 # FAx (215) 569-1606 * WWW.ZARWIN.COM
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICES: ALLENTOWN ® CONSHOHOCKEN ® NEW JERSEY OFFICES: JERSEY CITY * LINWOOD b MARLTON
D i
ZARWIN • BAUM • F `VITO
KAPLAN • SCHAER • TODDY + P.C.
• ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ANTON G MARZANO
Member PA & NJ Bar
agmarzano@carwin.com
June 7, 2007
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire: .
Weltman , Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Re: Progressive Northern Insurance Co. as Subrogee of John Daneu
vs. Steven Cox and Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
CCP, Cumberland County, No.: 07-298
File No.: 21641
Dear Mr. Dougherty:
This is to inquire when we may receive your Claims File in connection with the
above-captioned matter. We directed Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents to your client by letter dated March 20, 2007. By letter dated April 26, 2007 we
inquired when we may receive your client's Answers to the discovery requests, and if we do
not receive them the appropriate Motion would be filed. On May 14, 2007 we spoke by
telephone with you regarding the discovery issue. At that time, you inquired whether
production of your Investigation File would be acceptable in lieu of formal answers. We
advised that we will accept the Investigation File and if any Interrogatories or Request for
Production of Documents are not covered by the documents produced we will advise you and
request that you answer the discovery requests. To date we have not received your
Investigation File and any answers to discovery. Accordingly, if we do not receive your
answers within five (5) days of the date of this letter we will have no choice but to file the
appropriate Motion with the Court.
V ry truly yours,
40-
nG. Marzano
AGM:sa
1515 MARKET STREET * 12TH FLOOR • PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-1981 + (215) 569-2800 + FAX (215) 569-1606 + WWW.ZARWIN.COM
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICES: ALLENTOWN • CONSHOHOCKEN • NEW JERSEY OFFICES: JERSEY CITY + UNWOOD + MARLTON
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that service of a true and correct copy of the within Motion to
Compel Discovery was made on the 6th day of July, 2007 to counsel below named by
United States Mail, Postage pre-paid:
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
By:
on G. Mariano, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant,
Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.,
Improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co.
'° ?
?
? ? S
---"? -?
C....
-
?-
?..
?_.. ....-FS
? :. 1
•
~ yw
?
`
•? r
.
--r.
?.?..
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
INSURANCE COMPANY, as CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
subrogee of John Daneau,
Plaintiff
vs.
STEVEN COX and LUIS J.
KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.,
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
07-298 CIVIL
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
ORDER
AND NOW, this day of July, 2007, a rule is issued on the plaintiff to show
cause why the relief requested in the within Motion to Compel ought not to be granted. This rule
returnable twenty (20) days after service.
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Anton G. Marzano, Esquire A.%" ~LL"
1
For the Defendant Kennedy Trucking
: rlm
7- 17- 0 7
1?:;:-
BY THE COURT,
-4
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
BY: Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiff(s)
I. D. No. 76046
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: 215.599.1500
Fax: 215.599.1505
File # 4928092
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INS. CO.
vs.
STEVEN COX, et al
Cumberland County
Court of Common Pleas
No. 07-298
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S NEW MATTER
13 - 31. Denied. Defendant's averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive
pleading is required. As way of further response, after reasonable investigation Plaintiff
is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of Defendant's
averments. Strict proof of same is therefore required at time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands that judgment be entered in its favor and against
Defendant.
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
By
Mic ael J. ougherty, Esquire
Attorney f r Plaintiff
IV
VERIFICATION
I, Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire, attorney for the Plaintiff(s) do hereby swear and
affirm that the averments in the attached Reply to New Matter are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge, information and/or belief. These averments are made subject to
the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
41
Michael J. QfAgherty
Date l? C'7
C- eWa -Y7
I I
Y l
..!
am
:JJ
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Progressive Northern Ins. Co. Case No.: 07-298
As subrogee of John Daneau
Plaintiff
V.
Steven Cox and MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Defendants.
Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby requests that this
Honorable Court enter an Order pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4019 imposing sanctions upon
Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau, for their failure to
obey a Court Order to answer Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly
named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.'s, Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents and in support thereof avers the following:
1. Pursuant to Rule 208.3(a)(2) the Honorable Kevin A. Hess ordered on July
16, 2007 that plaintiff show cause why the relief requested in Defendants' Motion to
Compel should not be granted. See a true and correct copy of the July 16, 2007 Order
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
2. Plaintiff is represented by Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire and August J.
Ober, Esquire of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106.
3. Plaintiff failed to comply with the July 16, 2007 Order.
4. Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J.
Kennedy Trucking Co., served Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents
on Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau, on March 20,
2007.
5. Plaintiff failed to respond or make objection to these requests within thirty
(30) days after service, as required by Rule 4009 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil
Procedure.
6. Defendant's Counsel served a copy of the July 16, 2007 Order upon
Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau, on August 16, 2007.
(See letter to Plaintiff s Counsel dated August 16, 2007 attached as Exhibit `B".)
7. Plaintiff s counsel failed to file an answer to the Motion or response to the
Order of the Court.
8. Pa. R.C.P. 4019(a)(1)(viii) provides, respectively, that the Court may
make an appropriate Order if a party or person otherwise fails to make discovery or to
obey an Order of the Court respecting discovery.
9. Pa. R.C.P. 4019(c)(3) provides that the Court may enter a Judgment of
Non Pros against the Plaintiff as an appropriate sanction against the disobedient party for
failure to comply with discovery rules and Court Order.
10. Pa. R.C.P. 4019(g)(1) provides that the Court may require party to pay
reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the moving party requiring an
Order of Compliance and subsequent Order for Sanctions. Defendant has incurred
attorney's fees and costs of $500.00 in connection with this matter.
2
11. By letter dated September 13, 2007 defense counsel advised plaintiff's
counsel that the appropriate Motion will be filed with the Court if plaintiff s Answers to
the discovery requests were not received by September 21, 2007. See a true and correct
copy of the September 13, 2007 letter attached hereto as Exhibit "C".
12. Since Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John
Daneau, has failed to comply with the July 16, 2007 Order, the Court should enter a
Judgment of Non Pros against the Defendant, and require Plaintiff to pay the reasonable
expenses, attorney's fees, incurred by Defendant in obtaining the Order of Compliance
and this Order for Sanctions.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant its
Motion and order plaintiff to pay counsel fees for the preparation of the Motion and shall
submit full and complete Answers and Responses to Defendant's Interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents within five (5) days of the date of the Order or risk
further sanctions.
BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
& TODDY, P.C.
By:
Ahton G. Marzano, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant,
Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly
named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Date: o
3
VERIFICATION
I, Anton G. Marzano, Esquire, on behalf of the Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co. state that I am the
attorney in the within matter and I am authorized to state that the facts set forth in the
foregoing Motion for Sanctions are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief and that this statement is made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities.
Itey
Anton G. M zan
o
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document upon all parties or their attorney of record as follows by regular First Class
Mail, postage prepaid, on this date:
August J. Ober, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Anton . Mariano, Esquire
Dated: /I t l le?
C
n " k1
..
rr
.mow 7
a 10
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN
INSURANCE COMPANY, as
subrogee of John Daneau,
Plaintiff
VS.
STEVEN COX and LUIS J.
KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
07-298 CIVIL
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
ORDER
AND NOW, this y" day of December, 2007, the motion of Louis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co. for sanctions shall be deemed to be a motion to make rule absolute. The plaintiff
having failed to respond to our order of July 16, 2007, the motion of the defendant, Louis J.
Kennedy Trucking Co. to compel discovery is GRANTED and the plaintiff is directed to respond
to outstanding discovery within thirty (30) days of service hereof.
BY THE COURT,
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
August J. Ober, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Anton G. Marzano, Esquire
For the Defendant Kennedy Trucking
C.oPI es .ng t l?
/2/ Clo 7
:rim
?P r
S 3 :g W S- 3-30 LODZ
. -.{J2RJ
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Progressive Northern Ins. Co. Case No.: 07-298
As subrogee of John Daneau
Plaintiff
V.
Steven Cox and MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Defendants.
Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby requests that this
Honorable Court enter an Order pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4019 imposing sanctions upon
Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau, for their failure to
obey a Court Order to answer Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly
named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.'s, Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents and in support thereof avers the following:
1. Pursuant to Rule 208.3(a)(2) the Honorable Kevin A. Hess ordered on July
16, 2007 that plaintiff show cause why the relief requested in Defendants' Motion to
Compel should not be granted. See a true and correct copy of the July 16, 2007 Order
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
2. The Honorable Kevin A. Hess ordered on December 4, 2007 that plaintiff
is directed to respond to the outstanding discovery within thirty (30) days of service of
the Order. See a true and correct copy of the December 4, 2007 Order attached hereto as
Exhibit "B".
3. Defendant's Counsel served a copy of the December 4, 2007 Order upon
Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau, on December 10,
2007. (See letter to Plaintiff's Counsel dated December 10, 2007 attached as Exhibit
«C„•)
4. Plaintiffs counsel failed to file an answer to the Motion or response to the
Order of the Court.
5. Plaintiff is represented by Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire and August J.
Ober, Esquire of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106.
6. Plaintiff failed to comply with the December 4, 2007 Order.
7. Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J.
Kennedy Trucking Co., served Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents
on Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John Daneau, on March 20,
2007.
8. Plaintiff failed to respond or make objection to these requests within thirty
(30) days after service, as required by Rule 4009 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil
Procedure. It is now over nine (9) months since the discovery was directed to plaintiff
and plaintiff has not provided answers or objections to the requests.
9. Pa. R.C.P. 4019(a)(1)(viii) provides, respectively, that the Court may
make an appropriate Order if a party or person otherwise fails to make discovery or to
obey an Order of the Court respecting discovery.
2
10. Pa. R.C.P. 4019(c)(3) provides that the Court may enter a Judgment of
Non Pros against the Plaintiff as an appropriate sanction against the disobedient party for
failure to comply with discovery rules and Court Order.
11. Pa. R.C.P. 4019(g)(1) provides that the Court may require party to pay
reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the moving party requiring an
Order of Compliance and subsequent Order for Sanctions. Defendant has incurred
attorney's fees and costs of $500.00 in connection with this matter.
12. By letter dated December 10, 2007 defense counsel advised plaintiff's
counsel that the appropriate Motion will be filed with the Court if plaintiff's Answers to
the discovery requests were not received within the time frame set by the December 4,
2007 Order. See a true and correct copy of the December 10, 2007 letter attached hereto
as Exhibit "C".
13. Since Plaintiff, Progressive Northern Ins. Co. as Subrogee of John
Daneau, has failed to comply with the December 4, 2007 Order, the Court should enter a
Judgment of Non Pros against the Defendant, and require Plaintiff to pay the reasonable
expenses, attorney's fees, incurred by Defendant in obtaining the Order of Compliance
and this Order for Sanctions.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly named
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant its
Motion and order plaintiff to pay counsel fees for the preparation of the Motion and enter
a Judgment of Non Pros. In the alternative the Court is requested to order plaintiff to
submit full and complete Answers and Responses to Defendant's Interrogatories and
3
Request for Production of Documents within five (5) days of the date of the Order or risk
further sanctions.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
S R & TOD Y, P.C.
By:
t n G. Marzano, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant,
Louis J. Kennedy Trucking Co., improperly
named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Date: a '?- v U
4
VERIFICATION
I, Anton G. Marzano, Esquire, on behalf of the Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy
Trucking Co., improperly named Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co. state that I am the
attorney in the within matter and I am authorized to state that the facts set forth in the
foregoing Motion for Sanctions are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief and that this statement is made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document upon all parties or their attorney of record as follows by regular First Class
Mail, postage prepaid, on this date:
August J. Ober, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Anton . Marzano, Esquire
Dated: ;- I a,6 16 0
EXHIBIT "A"
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN
INSURANCE COMPANY, as
subrogee of John Daneau,
Plaintiff
vs.
STEVEN COX and LUIS J.
KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
07-298 CIVIL
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
ORDER
AND NOW, this day of July, 2007, a rule is issued on the plaintiff to show
cause why the relief requested in the within Motion to Compel ought not to be granted. This rule
returnable twenty (20) days after service.
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Anton G. Marzano, Esquire
For the Defendant Kennedy Trucking
:rim
TRUE GO-PY i--ROM R fi
Tea mony whereof, i here tuft Sd my ham
A the seal of said COO 81 Colo. Pa.
BY THE COURT,
EXHIBIT "B"
PROGRESSIVE NCRTFIERN
INSURANCE COMPANY, as
subro-ee of John Daneau,
Plaintiff
vs.
STEVEN COX and LUIS J.
KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
07-298 CIVIL
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
ORDER
AND NOW, this y" day of December, 2007, the motion of Louis .l. Kennedy
Trucking Co. for sanctions shall be deemed to be a motion to make rule absolute. The plaintiff
having failed to respond to our order of July 16, 2007, the motion of the defendant, Louis J.
Kennedy Trucking Co. to compel discovery is GRANTED and the plaintiff is directed to respond
to outstanding discovery within thirty (30) days of service hereof.
BY THE COURT,
Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
August J. Ober, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Anton G. Marzano, Esquire
For the Defendant Kennedy Trucking
rlm
yyii
? w 1
. 4t ?_ 4 , yam{ y 7 f? t t* ?a
EXHIBIT "C"
ZARWIN • BAUM • EVITO
KAPLAN • SCHAER • TODDY • P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ANTON G MARZANO
Member PA & NJ Bar
agmarzano@zarwin.com
December 10., 2007
August J. Ober, Esquire
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co.. LPA
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1 120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Re: Progressive Northern Ins. Co. As Subrogee of John Daneall
v. Steven Cox and Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
CCP. Cumberland County, No. 07-298
File No.: 21641
Dear Mr. Ober:
This kill serve to forward to > ou a copy of the December 4, 2007 Order of the
Court ordering plaintiff to respond to the outstanding discovery within thirty days of
service hereof. As you know, your client's answers to the discovery requests are long
overdue. Further, if \ve do not receive VOUr cfient's Answers to the Interrogatories and
formal responses to the Request for Production of Documents Nv;thin the time frame set
by the Order pie will have no other alternative but to File the appropriate Motion.
V y truly yours,
l/ If ., A X/1/l
t k 1 %
Anton G. N/larz.ano
AGM:sa
EnCIOSnl'C
1 515 !', iAi?KET STREET 2TH Ftoc)R t PHIL?-OFLPH!A, G-^ 19102- i GS. 1 q (21 5) '569-2800 « Ft-,x (115) 569-1606 • ???ww.za.?vd!!•.c?:?,
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICES: BETHLEHEM + CONSHOHOCKEN + NEW JERSEY OFFICES: JERSEY CITY + LINWOOD + MARLTON
e:
?}
65
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN
INSURANCE COMPANY, as
subrogee of John Daneau,
Plaintiff
vs.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
07-298 CIVIL
STEVEN COX and LUIS J.
KENNEDY TRUCKING CO.,
Defendants
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
ORDER
AND NOW, this Z*7' day of February, 2008, a brief argument on the defendant's
Motion for Sanctions is set for Thursday, April 17, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom Number 4,
Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, PA.
/Michael J. Dougherty, Esquire
August J. Ober, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
V"Anton G. Marzano, Esquire
For the Defendant Kennedy Trucking
rlm
(20riF-S rn.v
a1zs/o?
?-?T
BY THE COURT,
1 +r-
j
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
BY: AUGUST J. OBER, IV, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiff(s)
I.D. No. 94701
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: 215.599.1500
Fax: 215.599.1505
File # 04928092
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
vs.
STEVEN J COX AND
LUIS J KENNEDY TRUCKING
CUMBERLAND County
Court of Common Pleas
No.: 07-298
PRAECIPE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly dismiss the above matter with prejudice.
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
By v
AUGkf J. OBER, IV, Esquire
A ev for Plaintiff
C? ?
? L?
?
,"? -?
?
?
r
:
,
?
,
+pT?
w.Fm
? ? -:
?" ? 1
f
:
_ f l 4
?!
.rf. +? ?
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Progressive Northern Ins. Co. Case No.: 07-298
As subrogee of John Daneau
Plaintiff
V.
Steven Cox and
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking Co.
Defendants.
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly withdraw Defendant, Luis J. Kennedy Trucking's Motion for Sanctions in
the above-captioned matter, which is scheduled for April 17, 2008 at 2:00 p.m., in
Courtroom Number 4, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
S AER & TODDY, P.C.
By:
nton G. Mariano, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant,
Luis J. Kennedy Trucking
Date: 3 /4 7 / O 1-
VERIFICATION
I, Anton G. Marzano, Esquire, on behalf of the Defendant, Louis J. Kennedy
Trucking state that I am the attorney in the within matter and I am authorized to state that
the facts set forth in the foregoing Praecipe to Withdraw Motion for Sanctions are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief and that this statement is
made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn
falsifications to authorities.
A ton G. Marzano
M
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document upon all parties or their attorney of record as follows by regular First Class
Mail, postage prepaid, on this date:
August J. Ober, IV, Esquire
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 1120
Philadelphia, PA 19106
An G. Marzano, Esquire
Dated: 3I d 7109-
? r.s
c?
.'_)
`.?-'
r_ "Yl
- ??, -_?
?
..? _ _
{ilr_?
'?'
_
_. 1
N
_.._, - 4-
'f..
..' ,,?t
=i
?- r-?s .?
?,..? y