HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-04722r
c
E
?r6
? V
Q1
V
LESTER F, NTARNER,
PLAINTIVY
V,
RAYMOND FAHNESTOCK,
I/a/d/b/a
RAY'S AUTO SALVAGE/GARAGE,
DEPENDANT
I IN THE COURT' OP COMMON PLEAS ON
I CUMDERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
t ,
96- ?/'o a /f N AI
f
r CIVILACTION • LAW
r
I
r
PRAECIPE FOR A WRIT 011? SUMMONS
TOt LAWRENCE E, WELKEIt, PRO'I'IIONOTARV
Please enter my appearance on behnlf of the plahttlll, Lester K Sumner, and Issue a Writ of
Summons upon the defendant, Raymond I'ahnestock. Please have ilia SharlR serve ilia defendant
at the following address;
Raymond pahnes?ock
Rays Auto Selvage/Garage
4685 Carlisle Road
Gardners, Pennsylvania 17324
Date; August 23, 1996
60 West PonU}et Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(7) 7)249.275)
Supreme Court LD, No. 25476
-4„
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
rlog I r. SrlAl it
court of Rontmott Pit"
M
PAYMOO tAIMIll9= k/d/b/r In .......?lY?,bJf4klAq.r»IrOW.
PAY OS AVID {9 OVMI6/Mmu ....»...»......
t 41384 perlirle herd
Ga twoo PA 17324
1'n ..MX9.A4r FA?14Pk44)fi.!i/.01W.4.ftq!p Auto Selvage/clangs
You are hereby nodfled dint
lwrtrt.i.- strrr?sr .....................t.,......+..........................................
die PlOmM hue ennlnlewed an aedon In ...............................
agahttt you which you are reyufrrd to defend or a default judgment may be entered aonit you,
(BEAL)
pate ...AuMS 2a ................ lB» 9d
.. IrllWMM. Ah-Wekkar .......................
?Prothonotary
Gepu o
R
x
i
r i
i
p
W
ton
4 ,
131IP;It I I' I F! Itl'I'I11iH IIG;IN11.Ali
cptnn>tMM•: 'I+lr?lAA l'?I96-p04'12'f' N
is iill?t?l'Y II11?UMI 1•; Iij?fflUYI.YAN 1 A I
L•'n111J!s:zl'!?ai__1IA>.1'1?U 1.+_..1:?1?.9L..._.._.,.._
M011AIC1• t1AIIHI1:M , tlhwrlt,f or Clwputy Whgriff of
t:UMHMMANl+ 1:131inty, I'Wnnayivunta, who being :Iul.y awarri a,caor+lina
to law, maym, thr within bfiLl'_!1I?.,iiUNU!a1?k ...,.,..._....... _._..._---........ _ wu+a 1401YwIf
upon ._EAl1U!';a '+ +'li_liAY11.?U1L_7:1.Lll!IJ1__lin.L'_L+_n11,1s!_iinLY11131u/!}AJi/16IJ..__..._ __,. thw
dwfwndunt, at. _11JD LDh. IIIIl1Rth, on thw 1Q.ft dny of
19A) at ... 1?rIIl._ .A1i1.1lal.ly.li!?nh._.....__._...._ _ .. .._..... _,....._.__-_.?__..._.__,_......_
___•__._..._._---_.....___...._..........._. ...................!IW1flJ.4,136nN1)_.._.._......,
County, 11annoyl4anta, by handinu to
nA,YJ11111C?•.l:ntlU1G':!!?Sli___.__..____...._.._...._,
a truw and attwaked clipy of thw , 1111Lf '71 ii1JMM?U&i......
.....__. _ _.__.. .._._._?
and tit the aamw time dIrlrrrttriq IJAu al.t,nr iun to th,+ cuntmntw thwrwof,
;hwrtfIa Gnpltsr d? unr?wwl'wr
Olw( .inu lR , ON
IVtaw - ?""??
/lft,iavlt IN 6 'o f ur•ahgrgv '?, N0 R, TIJ:1ili?
', If'7?; TG"'1 qIt+"IIC; 1?+"ItN CIIII'I' C C I 1
Wpau Y *hF. .. _-.
i
!;warn and mubacrtbrl n botur,n nur
11 its d o' Ili
I
I'+ rl6 A, 1).
//1J
/
TRUE COPY FROM RECORD
In Teallmony whctcnf, I hotu unto sel my hind
and IN soot of cold Cou11 III Cnlllsle, Pa.
Thl, ' a` ?ay ollliu?___, 1U'
proly h Maly
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
1.1M'lDt P, STAWN
Court of (;unnnun hleaa
va
RAY") MAHfrxa( t/d/b/a hl
»...
MIS WK) WMAIM/l3gIW0s ....... civiL.IwCJM.r.JAw............
4685 Carlisle hoed
Gardrwre, PA 17324
I•o _. Y!u?sta.PP.!'N'!4@k?? i..?1.??,?/.M.lt9x:? Auto Salvage/garage
Yoll are barb, nollfind dlat
1?saker.F.. $Carrtar .......................................................................
OIL Plaiotfff hue rommenced an acllon hr ...G1.Kik.Aftki4b.:.GPY1 ...............................
agabut you which you ara required to defend or a dofauft judgment may be enwrad against you,
(by,Al.)
Uate ...AUQuat 2? ................ I9.96
t.nwrvnce. A )X91; .......................
pmthonotory
pepu y
J
R
x
e
3
r.W.4,
Ago 27 10
w
Lk STER F, S'I'ARNKIt, I IN T1111 , COURT OF COMMON PLEAN OF
PLAINTIFF I CUMNPRI.AND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V,
I CIVIL, ACTION - LAW
RAYMOND EAIINhNTOCK, t NO, 944722 CIVIL T1-:11tH
t/u/dJilin t
ItAV'S AUTO SALVAGE/GARA(il?, t
I)h:Eh:NI)ANT t
N( TICj-: -1.0 DEFEND
YOU have hell Nucd ill roam, I I'you wish la dclerld ugnhlNt the ldahns get lblill ht the
fallowing pages, you 1111181 11Ihe adoll within twenty (?q) days after 1111s complutm, order and
notice are Nerved, by entcrhlg a wrWen appearance personally or by auomey laid filing fit wrlling
with ?he court your defenses nr otljcethlnN 1U the Claims Nel 14th against you, You are warned
that Ir you fall to da No file cure may proceed without you and it judgment may be entered agalltsf
you by the court without further money cin(nled ill the complaint or fill- any other chlhn or relief
requested by the plahnlll'. 1'0u nary June nl, ne?f ur propo-ty or other rights inlpotyanl it) you,
YOU SIIOUL D TAKE VIIIS PAPER TO YOUR LANIVER AT ONCU:, II' YOU 00 NOT
IIAVL: A LAWI'4:4, Olt CANNOTAFFgltp ONF., (;O 'I'O Olt -1'IZ11,11-TIIONE TIIF.
OFFICC SE-T FORTH RELOW TO FIND OUT WIIFIth: VOU CAN GET LEGAL. l1rLP0
c'umlrcrhmd c'uunly liar Assach111oa
2 I,Ibcrly Avenue
CorIINle, I'cansyNanln 171113
717.249.3164
1-1100-990-910111
Amvrfvmn .lOh Lai abilili.ss
Act of [990
The Court ol'Common fleas oi' Itauphin Counly Is requhvd by law w comply will) file
Anncricans will) L)fenhflitfes Aei of I ??9n. For ill lurnuafoa shout accessible lavilIt fell and reasonable
accommodations avnilahle it) disabled individuals having business belure the court, please contact our
ol'11ce, All arrangements must he made nt (ease 72 hours prior to any hcarhlg or business Won- the
court, YOU mist ntiend the sehedulcd eonl'erepre Or hearhtg.
LESTER It. STAIMIt, I IN TIM,, COURT Oh COMMON PI,I?AS OF
PLAINTIFF I C'UNIRPRLAND COUN'1'1'1 PENNOLVANIA
t
v, t CIVIL, ACTION • I,AW
t
RAYIIIOND hAIINESTOCK, I NO, 964722 CIVIL TERM
I/a/d/h/a I
RAY'S AUTO SALVAGR/C,ARAGh., t
DEVEINIIANT t
CfINIPLAINT
AND NOW, Illis 25111 day of0clober, 1999 c0111eS 11141 11101111111; Lester It. Slurllvrand
nmkeS the following Conlplahtt agahtSl the doll odunl, Raymund Fohoeslock, U0/d/blo (ivy's Auto
Sulvugei0aroge, aS lollows;
1.
The pluhttllris Lester F, Stapler, on adult hu11v1duol who resides at 75 Frost Road,
Gardners, Pennsylvania 17324,
1
The defendant is Itaynlood Foltncstock, wt adult 111dIV1dual who owns and operates an
automotive repair gm-age and sulvoge yard. The defelldollt use's the name of Ray's Auto
Salvage/Garage with an address of 4085 Carlisle Road, Gardners, Pcnnsylvmthl 17324,
3.
On or about August 20, 1994, the pluintlll', Lemer V, Stonier brought his 1983 CIMAC
truck to the del'endunt to have 118 transmission repaired,
4,
'1110 deltoldnnt mpaired 1110 vehlele and uhnroud IN phthltiff lur 1110 repair,
s,
Tho Irommlasiotl did not work and won retumod to II?e delCnd11111 on or oboul August 30,
1994, and again on Ducember 21, 1994, and the plointlll'puid deMid mt lur the oddillonal
repairs, The Irtomofl lion still did not work properly,
6,
The 111011111 W, on or about Morch 16, 1995, look the truck to Westbrook Tmlvollission and
pold the sum of $1,164,72 ?o have the transmission repuh'ed, A copy of sold hill Is attached
hereto and marked m 1101hil' A "
7,
The dclWdunt I'ahncalock breathed ifs duty to the plaintiff lo rcpnir the 1983 GMAC
truck In u workmanlike manner,
8.
The plaintiff seeks dumugcs oguhtst the detendunt hr the amount of $1,164,72 plus the
costs of this actlon and Interest as pcmtflted by low,
3
W119R91roltro IN plolmilT; Lemur It, alurnur, rayuaalu dumuµau In Ilia Amount 0011a
Tbauuond oija hundred Sixty Four and 72/100 ($1,144,72) Dolluru plus Worm its poni hied by
low Atd the Coma orlbis actlIm,
ItaNpullblly Nubmitted,
IRWIN, NIC KNIC;IP1' & IIUC01M
Datat' October 25,1999
By: MuYeus A. Me 1tluYi, M. 6:I
b(1 WrNI . n , reel
Carlisle, I'emisylvamia 17013
(717) 2,19.2353
Supreme Court LI), No, 25476
Anorney I'm- plaimitl',
l.esler (', Starner
4
1 •I ? 1 ( ,
I
{ 1
JJ 1
i
?
1
'
X
??
II'
j(;
VI
Ilf
Ir
jl
'l
I
rl.
)1?
1) a
i
,1
l)
(1 q
) d
I, ? 1
1
Ill O
I
O
1 11 ,
t) rl
O r
I 1
, ) I
? ) E?. o il• 'r
I •
Lll
ll i n: p, r? )
•l U r °i 1 K
V
(17 •? I J
I_.
S
t
1 _ ^ '
VI \
r
a - -
i
Ilia I'orogo11ig complohn Is hosed upon hifimmolim which hos bcon golbared by lily
Counsel uitd ilia In Ilia propormlon of 11118 ucllon, I have rood Ilia slulumu?ils muda In this
complolm and they are true and Corrcel 11) Ilia ball of lily knowledge, Inhnhiiotlon and bullaf,
understood 11141 lulsa smlwnCnls hurcht mule are suhJCet to Iho peoultles of Ili I'll, c,S,A, Saetlon
4904, reluthig Io uoswom lu1s111calloa 11) authorities,
Dotal OMOIR 25 .-0 1999
LESTER F, STARNER
LVA I IOt Ir, I AltNhlt, t IN 1 III? t OURT O COMMON I I.1 AS O
Ir1.AIN'1'IIrF t CUM11FIt1.ANp COUN'I'V, PENNNVI,VANIA
t
v, I CIVII. ACTION • LAW
I
HAVNIOND FAIINFSTOCK, I NO, 96.4722 CIVIL T11,101
1/wldllrlw ?
RAV'N AUTO SAI.VAt31MARAGE4 t
I)UENpANT t
'FS,,RTIFIC.'A,I' OF SERVICE
I, Marcus A, McKnighl, III, I'squirc, herchy ccrtlly that a copy or6ttsehed Co" 181161111
was served upon the Ibllowing by deposhhng n true and correct copy ol'the soma lit Ow ?ttlled
Stoics mall, First Class, postage prepaid in Carlisle, Pannsylwnllu,
on IIIa date relerenCLA helgw and addressed as l'ullowat
Raymund Fubncctuck
Itwy's Auto Halvoge/Goruue
4606 Carlisle Road
P, O, pox 17
Mt, (lolly Springs, PA 17066
IRWIN, McKNIGIIT & IIUCrHpS
By: Nimius A. McKnltellt, Ill, H squlre
60 West Vomfrc cet
Carlisle, VA 17013
(717) 240.2353
Supreme Cou1t LI), No, 25476
Dow October 25, 1999
I-F-STF-K F. S l'ARNlat,
hI.AIN'flhh
RAYMOND FAl INFS'I'OC'K,
?/Itid/b/u
RAN" S AUTO SAI.VAc{I'AIAKA(II(,
DIAT'NDANT
IN TI IF c'c)lllt f (?p c'UNIhION 101J.ess O
; C'uAII?I:ItI.AND c'c?uN I'1', VIiNNh1'I.VANIA
;
C'IVII. AC' l It)N . I.AW
;
N(1, 9a..17Z: C'IVII.'I'IiltNI
ASMACE0, COMPLAINT
AND NOW, this :Ist day ol'Dvvvinh o 1999 conies the Delendow, Agmumd hulmvstock
UWJ/b/o hay's Auto Kulvagetclnruge by and through his Anurney, The i.aty 0111m ul' foul
111-adlbrd c)rr, and lawwl's the abut a captioned Complaint as jbIlutt'tit
Admitted,
.. Admitted,
3. Admitted.
Admitted. By tva) ul'I'uhher anstter, total charge to the Plalmllt'by Dellmduan lur
the rVgtIlleenlent ufn lltied 11'tlllsllllnsiull MIN $6115H,
S, Denied. To the contrary, I'Iahulll'picked up Ills n'uck from the Delendunt un or
about August 30, 1994 and made pa)numt Ill I'll II fur serf lees rendered, i u1111ernun'e, t+hlle it Is
admitted that the Orst time the 11 Jul till11'returned the t chicle lur transmission repairs ovetu'red tilt
December 111. 1994. not December ? 1, 1991 as stated In the C'unlpkgnt, that %urk was dune at no
duIrge. (See rawched and 111a1'ked us Delendant's Exhibit "A")
ci. Denled. I'lalntill'Is Mthout knottledge as to the Imth and vumelly Lif Oils
averment and therefore require, sn'Ict prool'at trial.
I)ur?Iv1l. 'I'u 111v voltp'ory, I )VIV1101111I did rvpuh' Ihv 11111h1111)'s vullIclu by way of
Im111II11)g 11 tlovd II'IIIId111lsAlull ()It of 111111111 rluyusl 31), INS 1, (`ivv 11tl11vhvd ON I)vMidom's I:,shlbit
11") 11), wily of Ibrlhur 1111s11ur,1116- used Irunslllisnlun Inslollvd by IN Oviloldonl on August 30,
1994 hod 11 Ibnllvd 1lorrolll) ol'?hh-1y 00) days,
8, Dolled, Thu I)vlimdom spuelIklllly dvllluA 111111 Ally donm8.e 11lnoun11m111s
$1,14-1,72, plus vosls, I'o ?he vonl ray, In raloOn8 plohnil)'s Fshlbil "A" It nnlsl ho noted Ihot
numerous hems, 111601118 but nut 111111111-1 1o ashoom 1111es,111pvr bhldtm 1116peullo11 sllritars, and
111ovuum pump miv Invlu&d hl Owl rupulr bill.
WIII?REFOR :,111v I)ul'ood11nl rvspvull'ully requests Ibis l lonorobly Court Io disnllss 111v
C'umplulot,
Rvspuull'ully Kubmluvd;
C\ n
raw I )I (II. BRADFORD ORR
1)111111 I.4Z.1Iqq _A _
foul Ilrodlurd Orr, Fsquhw
501:11101 Illplt stivel
Carlisle, l'A 17013
(717)258.8558
lu NO, 7 1784
1XIS 'I?It F, KTARNKIt, t IN 'I'I II: Ct URT Uf CONIAION 11I.1;AS OF
PI.AIN'I'IhF CUAIIIIJU P COUNTY, PIiNNKYI.YANIA
I
t C'IYII. ACTION - I.AW
t
RAYMOND VAI INIFS 'UCK, t NO, 96.4722 C'IYII.'I'I+ItAI
utudib/u t
RAY K AUTO SAINA01:10AKAMo t
Dl"sl'I:NUAN'I'
VERIFICATION
I vurlly 1111111 ant the puthloner and that the statcmenta mudu h? Inc lurugohlg
Putltlon arc true and correct, I understand that lithe atatunnenta herein tire mule aubjuet
?o the punaltlea of Pit, CS. v+' 4904, rulathng to 1111a,v01'n I111SIIIC1111011 to 11utlutritiua,
4
?llt nunt?l ha tnuatue;t --
I.1-I'S R P, STAKNIX I IN'I'I Ili CgllRT OP CUpINION PIXAS (II'
PLAIN'I'll l I CtIpIIII10 ANI) COUNTYt PI.NNRVI.VANIA
I
CIVII. ACTION - I.AW
;
RAYMOND FAIINF-STOCK, NO, 96.4722 CIVII.'I FAM
uIl/dibiu ?
RAY'S AUTO SALVACII-AIARACIF. ;
1)1.:I-'I NDAN'I'
I Paul Brodlurd c)rr, I:Nqulre, hvrehy ve1-111'y that a vopy ol'uuaehvd AnHwur wo aervvd
upon the I'ollowhtg by depoNhInS o true and cornet copy ol'Ihe Nome In Ihv Uhshvd Statua mull,
0 1'61 CIII$$, postap prepaid In Cori Ibig, PennNyl?anIII, un thv date r01:1-untied hvlow and add;vmd
aN Ibllowv
AlurvuN A, Mel:uluhh III, h:Nquh'e
IRWIN, NICNI(;II'I' & IIUMIES
60 West Pnn?I'ro Simi
CurllNle, PA 17013
(717)149.23$3
ruin ssruuroru urr, m4usre
puled; (/? ( 1 1
BRAKL'13
IIIIIE6
' A1311
0244A TO SALVAGE/QARACIE 1.11v
NTATH ZIP
ma OARLI61.11 ROAD, OARONRR6, PA 17074
717-411-5471 r 717,440,6354 r 717 Atl07tltli
'I ?J -
111b1 OIIUI 11 hu
.
?b b W J16 )
hk
MAILING ADOR1111191
45
S
1
PA nAll i, 1Y, n , POnI 1 J
r' `a ? ? e -r l? b Wig Ill)
,
170
PIG, NOX 17, MT. HOLLY
1PRINU MIbAL bn UIh bl IU I'W ,1001, ' II 111)
24 NI, TQWIIIu I Itllp A 4111011 UL bcuil+l ullr Of NUPh HJ n1du
JaJ1 PART NO. NAME Of PAIII
l y/ ji, U .1G -? L -
~
r
rri rt4 Ito
--
J
q, U
4 A-Ly
, . -
OAS. OIL A GHEASC LJUne oblr / _) (' ,
PAWN
61A1L
IbLI'LQ W,r
bl,h
vn?I 1, l
DEFENDANT'S TAX
TOTAL PARTS+ EXHIBIT 1 >t 1 I TOTAL
e
E6TIMATEB ARE FOR LABOR arms .l, n.111.1n an•Ln,Ir.,.l u.n 1. rln II n, n,r, al.ln un l""" PAY THIS
1/Il rl Ml 11.11 .11 •:1 ?I•,•.I, •'l1 I11?\I I•I .I IIr I•ifr .M1 1+11•Ifr lJll 1'.1.11
wnlnruel,Nlur v1.e, 1.u.n•rn•nglr lml.rln,enl.pul "•.n AMOUNT
ONLY, MATERIAL ADDITIONAL
11:4P.,O.rA1.,gn ha rq llvnrn+n,1, •.,?. •.,,, .,..J n111.111 •m L,-11[HmnIn HIIII: Rdl. 11.1 U,IL
Al1)1111;11.111111'rilln1:11µl•111111..1111 n1111.1WO1•µ11•r0., 1111 f=11N 1i11'J111 NII•r• III'll ll11.11l:Ir??11'11 rll]
?.M x1111.1111 A I I, µi1111 •1.11 ?.1I? ,?I•rr•1. 111.111111 111'•1 x11. 1'.11
C..
J
J
WAKEt)
r
?2aWnaur
11111:6
0 SALVAGE/GARAGE I c;lrv
':/ 0;).6 c 0?-Ian..
61i
6TATE ZIP
•vv Ynn?,vr-F nYnMI Y nnwHin9l FA l/VMS
117•?11e•e4 71 • 117•A11e•baee • 717•Ue•711a1 1111
1 _ ??1. jr?
' 4111;PUI111.1, Nlr/b l'IUN101) IU111
?I i?y ?`r,
MAILING ADORe8111
P,O, BOX 17, MT. HOLLY 11PRINGe, PA 170110 irll?j?1hl jv ?n,
n 111 wUUb11 -? tl uli ,I
,-
04 H
wi
A 6
T
0 Rl
11 ?ulblinll VIII MII NJI b.NNgM ( NU111141
r1
o
ng
e
1110 ul e.nnnm nn Nuul •lulw,l
APO) PART NO. NAME OF PAI1T
1 (,"kl? rn OLQ
j7 U-X A, 1A14 GIv' 16 1CL
L
' c tJ
1
L '-
r
OAS. OIL B GREASE I?uunnl.ll
Y11116 ,-) ?' ?
ti P F I:bt C 11
IAOh
I OI II .) 7 ?
TAX
/
7
TOTAL PARTS# `/7 DEFENDANT'S _ TOTAL+(,/ =3 7T
ESTIMATES ARE FOR LABOR of ciiuin nni.11H1 EXHIBIT all rle a.unnrlr n ..n.. 81110 l,n nn 11.1111
PAY THIS
ONLY, MATERIAL ADDITIONAL
.1 ll11811x1u.d1.11
Y
U I/I
I.I I ?111?1 II llil • II11111.1 t M1 NI 111/111, 1.
„r.lllal1 l?.ud111.1.n1.11on.nlll?n111.11111
AMOUNT
1
/U41 .ADtrl,lp 11,11.1
L11 11/1,1 1111 III I111M1 1.1 r( n111111?41111 ,11ui 11p 11.111, g1111111nI r91
111i1i?, l'l 1.1'1.11 N. 1..1 1 1/1'11 111'1111: 11.111'.1 •111
1 11111• ? r11 ?1111M1 111 1.111.1 I•
'
?
? I
??? 'r
i I
I r? i ?
1?1. ! I' .
i ^
i. ? _. i
_
? _
I
?
.i
! r
1 I I
i
I
?
? l
I
I, I '(il I
?
I
I 1-
' ?
I IJ 1 ?
i'
? I I
i
11
I
?..
! ,
'.
i
I. i
?.
I
'
?
i ?..
?I - I ? ?
I
i r
1
I
I
? 1
I
I
I
? I I
?
?
?
. I
i ?
?,
I i
i
i
I ?
i
I
L IBSTOR F, STARNWR, t
Plaintiff t
t
V, t
t
RAYMOND PANNISTOCK, t
t/d/b/a MY'S AUTO r
SAGVAQN/GARAGOO t
Defendant t
IN THM COURT OF COMMON PwAH OF
CUMOORGAND COUNTY, PONSYGVANIA
CIVIL, ACTION • LAW
No, 96.4722 CIVIL, TNRM
oRplER OF COOT
AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2002,
upon consideration of a letter from Plaintiff Ia counsel,
Marcum A, McKnight, III, Esquire, requesting this cape
remain stricken from the trial list and remain active, and
there being no opposition to this request, and the letter
also indicating that the case will be listed for
arbitration, the came is stricken from the purge list, and
shall remain active,
By the court,
sley Ole , 'Jr,
Marcus A, McKnight, III, I3squiVd
For the Plaintiff
Raymond Fahnestock, Defendant
Ray's Auto Salvage/Garage
4686 Carlisle Road I pD
J
Gardners, PA 17324
Court Administrator,
wcy
'
.
I i
? 1
I?r. il'
I
I
I
I I
L
I
i
I
1
I
I
.
I ? i
.
I ??
.
'I
I
i
i
!
'
?
i
I
I I I
I I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
?
I
1 I
i
I
f
I ? ?
?i
I
I ? ::
?
r ! 1
I
I I
i I.
I
? I
? I
?
I ? i.
i?
I.
I
?.
I
I i
.I
I 1 ?
I
I
? i..
I
..
I
I
?
I
I r
I
I
I
JYWO N.1._N'TONAMI PLAM PP.
1 % cusp No, ..,l g9bnh.12Y.,.. .
KAYMOND FAIIN16TOCKr t/J/b/a
_NAY'.B__APTO..IIALYAOUGAIIAOB,....... _
NBFKNNANT
Flglulllalll III' lII1v1111011 Ill ('PIIg1p11
I'll 111t Cowl I:
,.,?L??T?)t l!_, _ tl'l'J1)tNIS)t__.. __ ._ ___... _... _. IIIIrIIJe IU IltuurrJ Nllh lbr buvu eppllullrJ lllpllrC.
prim Numr?l/4,lc?U@_/4,._I?1?Kti?4)1?'r....lil -. Klan t+untu ??
Uptr;_g?l'TkMIlB14._2J.,_2005 Atlom-ylor , pLAjHf1FF
V41110nublry volmlivill
vie supreme court of I'emn>hulnu 1101 pr0nrulgmed new Itula o1' Clsd Illomhor 2)112 pus ¢1111111 tilt Itnu11tutlwl of
Indi0v curs and mneni eJ Itult of ludterul AJnnnisnution 1701 No ablig0l Or Ilia
I. Palo ofJrnll Mw ohoa
NeN Itulr of Cad procedure 210.2 has been nunutgmeJ la gosem ilia Ica ulwolon of 0161040 costs Nllhru Ilia
scups of the I'enns)Iluma Julies of ells ilroceiuru 'Ills ivini iallmt of tiefa colts IJr Iltot'mlly wds pnttiou6ly
gwerncd by Kul- of )udlclol AdmtiuOruhon 1701 and local rules plullmlydied puruam ro It. Nc% Ituld 220 2 It
IallorcJ to ilia needs of clld acno11s. II prollJts d cmnplele ptoccduic unJ o amfonn slaleulJu Inucuce, precntpung
lucol roles,
7111% rule Nils plolnuhgaled In rebpoitec lit ilia Jecwun of the Suplnnc t'uml lit Shop I. lioglc, $51 I'0 360,1111 A.2d
1114 ((771) 111 Nhidl ilia coull held IhOt "prtjudlca w ilia JBlelldolll us o It6411 of dUlay lie pnuccu0ml Is IrqugcJ
before o ease nay be Jlsnilssed puln1ant IQ IocaI roles implanlenruhg It alt ul judicial Adolilt IsIrawou 1001 "
Rule of ludiclal Adnunisnatlan 191111b) has barn anltnJed ro uccommoduie ilia no% rule of ciid procedulr. The
f lnorai puhry of Iho prompt dRpoullon of muuws see fourth lit rubdls uloo tut ofthat rule conlurocs to be upphcublu.
I Inartnv Cases
71m punmse at' Rule 220.2 Is to thminote 1110cwe cases foot ilia judicial 556itnt 'Ilia prurcts is initiated by ilia
mall. Aller ping notice of intent lo lemunale an petiole for moclNlly, ilia cuullu of ilia ploccdmU to % till lite Imrtlas.
If the Immies do not Nnh W pursue the cost, they NIII lake no action 011.1 Ilie Ihorhu11ulary 611011 gill at 1.n older ON of
course tents anng ilia 0antr N1tIt prej44ica fur Iatlua to II Ioircula " If d puny wIAlie6I0 pal but the niubtr, Ilk 1.r All a
well Ills u not Ice of titell lloil to proceed and Iha acuun ¢11011 continue.
u. II'bero the arlivil has bren tornanuled
If the action is lemnnoted Nhen a puny bcheies that it 111001d not hula bean tennntaled. that puny nay loolvcd
under ItuleVOid) Im relief Ilom ilia older of Icnnmonon. An mniple at inch all uccuncnte 1100111 lit Ilea le11nu1u11on
or o truble utllun Nhen ilia dggiiesed puny did 11111 lecana the n031ce of oncol to tem11n01t unit 111111 did not lonely IIIU
ilia notice of intention l1. Inoceed.
no munil ol'the thng of lit it Imin at, to ralnItate the action Is mtpolttnil. III lie Ile llllint is IIIad AIthin thuty Jo)so f
the retry 01.1110 order nllcnnination 011 tilt docktL bab,hs IbIoil Idil2.) prwnlts that tilt coati mull !rum eta pelnlan mid
IeinAata the action If the pennon is Med later than the rhnry,day pcnOJ, rultJn r61on Wilt) rcquties that the plutn1111'
most make u show lit to ilia euun that the Imilloll vial I)rolnlitJ+ Mail and that little is It reasonable tiiplonotlon or
Itgitimntr clicust butt for the failure to Ilia the notice of Interltlnn In proctad pnnr a Ilia Unit yy lit' ilia order of
ttnninution on ilia Juckct and for ilia fallurt to Ilia Ilia pe0uu0 NI1hm ilia IhutpJOy pcnod under aubdnl%IO11 (42)
0. Wien, Meng-Isms hd, nut been letmowt,l!
An action Nhlch has not bean lenntiialed but N11uh cnnlnmas upon the Ming al' u notice nl 11ncnltim In plncecd nay
have been ilia %ub)ecl of utordutue 11day lit Inch an 31rbtiutce, Ilia ugpnaie') puny may pusuc the rtnmdy of u
common Ime non plot Nhlch "its udapcndcnt> of tennumLun under Role 23112
?'
LESTER F. STARNER,
Plaintiff
vs
RAYMOND FAHNESTOCK &
RAY'S AUTO,
Defendants
Case No. 1996-4722 CIVIL TERM
Statement of Intention to Proceed
To the Court:
LESTER F. STARNER intends to proceed with the above captioned matter.
Print Name MARCUS A. McKNIGHT, III Sign Name
Date: OCTOBER 27, 2008 Attorney for
Explanatory Comment
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of
inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit
comment.
1. Rule of civil Procedure
New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the
scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously
governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. Ncw Rule 230.2 is
tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting
local rules.
This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d
1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required
before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901."
Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The
general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable.
II Inactive Cases
The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the
court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties.
If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of
course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she
will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue.
a. Where the action has been terminated
If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed
under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination
of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file
the notice of intention to proceed.
The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of
the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and
reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff
must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or
legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of
termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2).
B. Where the action has not been terminated
An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may
have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a
common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.
C ?' ?..,,
?-
?. z? ?
?
?`',r ? ?r
_.? ?? -??
._ ?--
' 4,
.4
?4
'„'?9Y
LESTER F. STARNER, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
PLAINTIFF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. . CIVIL ACTION - LAW
RAYMOND FAHNESTOCK, . NO. 96-4722 CIVIL TERM
_RAY S/ AUTO SALVAGE/GARAGE CD
,
DEFENDANT
STATEMENT OF INTENTION TO PROCEED
. ~
TO THE COURT:
Lester F. Starner, Plaintiff, intends to proceed with the above-captioned matter.
~
Respectfully Submitted:
IRWIN & McI04IGHT, P.C.
Marcus . M q.
Supreme Co #25476
60 West Pomfret Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Date: October 21, 2011
Lester Starner
vs
Raymond Fahnestock d/b/a Rays Auto Salvage
To the Court:
The Plaintiff intends to proceed with the a.ove captioned m
Case No. 1996-4722
Statement of Intention to Proceed
Uri
Print Name Marcus A. McKnight, III Sign Name
Date: October 21, 2014
Attorney for Plaint -i f f
Explanatory Comment
ere, ty,.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of
inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit
comment.
I. Rule of civil Procedure
New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the
scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously
governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is
tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting
local rules.
This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d
1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required
before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901."
Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The
general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable.
II Inactive Cases
The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the
court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties.
If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of
course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she
will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue.
a. Where the action has been terminated
If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed
under Ru1e230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination
of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file
the notice of intention to proceed.
The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of
the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and
reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty -day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff
must make a showing to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or
legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of
termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty -day period under subdivision (d)(2).
B. Where the action has not been terminated
An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may
have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a
common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.