HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-05197
..~
\,
\)
~
~
~
~
t"-
o-. :
~ I
~;
<3'.1
~l
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
:
i
I
I
I
I
i
.
I
I
,
,
,
i
.~
~'.
,
~
~
~
cl
,..' ,'. - .
.....;i
. . ~s
. 0.. .
.~ - ~
,. ~ ~.tI
,~~ ~ ~:,
o
'0
lJt
t.i
:)-
-0,..
~
~
':It
.:J.
t>
... .'-' ,','" '. .--~'
Ii ... .. .. ". ,'~.'_ c-'. -
... i I . c. ^. n' ,."
I! .',."""."-
..
I~ .. '! .
c :: ,-
, .
.... "-, ~
~ j! n"
... ! .~
u I I-U
. . I
""
. I
< . . ihJ
~ 1"
l::a4.
,
~... ~,.. ,",'
, .. ., S tf'l J 'tfIJ tJ"
of
The mother of the child is Kimberly J, Wells, curremly residing at 1356 Grandview Court,
Carlis'e. Pennsylvania. She is umnarried,
The father of the child is David A. Pillenger. currently residing at 316 Juniper Street. Carlisle.
Pennsy'vania, He is urunarried.
4. The relationship of the Plainliff to the child is that of poIential father, The Plaintiff currently
resides with the following person: Melissa Nicole Pinenger
5, The relationship of the Defendant to the child is that of mother. The Defendant currently
resides with the following persons: Samantha Wells. daughter. Me'issa Piuenger. daughter. Ale.under
Stoner. son. JazeD Stoner. daughter. and Mike Hess. boyfriend.
6. Plaintiff bas DOt panicipated as a pany or witness. or in another capacity, in odler 'irivtioo
concemina the custody of the child in this or another COlIn.
Plaintiff bas no information of a CUSlody proceeding concemina the child pendm, in a COlIn of this
Commoawealrh.
Plaintiff does DOt know of a person DOt a pany to the proc.ecdiDp who bas pbysicaJ custody of the
child or claims to hn-e custody or visitation ri&hts wilh respect to the child.
7. The best irUrest and pemta/leIII we'fare of the child will be served by I~ the relief
requested for the following reasons:
A. A Ctlun 0nJrr of custody and ItnIaIlted visicalion is desired 10 tIw the P1aimiff and
the child may p/.uI their 1CheduIeI accordingly. and 10 tIw "'1' ilIA Jenwldillp and lIllIlIIIt
e~ rqardm, custody and visiration CIII be avoided, and Ibo 10 dial _ dUId is not used
. a ... -) . 'live fashioa
B A Cwet onJmd ~~"lll of custody ill mpaInd 10 avoid ~. .,~
lIcu~ - flInia ~ JIIftlQI ".........~ ftlt tlIMody IIllIllIft'Ott
.
"'..'"
}~,.J
DAVID A. PITTENGER,
Plaintiff
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 96 - 5197 CIVIL TERH
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
KIMBERLY J. WELLS,
Defendant
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this I~ -- day of tJ,~....~...
con.ideration of the attached Cu.tody Conciliation
ordered and directed a. follow.:
, 1996, upon
Report, it i.
1.
A hearing i. .cheduled in CourtrOOlll t4 O,f the Cumberland
County Courthouse on the ....;C{/; day of f ,,. " "Iu' , j ,
199L, at C;, ,30 .4-..., at which time testilllOny will be
taken in the above case. At this hearing, the Plaintiff,
David A. Pittenger, shall proceed initially with testimony.
Coun.el for the partie. shall file with the Court and oppo.ing
couns.l a memorandum setting forth the hi. tory of custody in
this cas. and the issue. currently before the Court. Such
memorandum shall be filed at lea.t ten (IO) days in advanc. of
tbe bearing date.
P.nding further order of this Court, the following tUlpOrary
order i. entered:
2.
A. David A. Pittenger shall enjoy vi.itation with Alexander
Q. Stoner, born July 20, 1993, froll every Honday morning
at 7:30 a.~. until every Wedne.day evening at 6:00 p...
"h. Hoth.r, ICl.w.rly J. Well., shall drop off Alexand.r
at tb. Plaintiff's IIIOther's home on Honday 8IOrning at the
.... time tb. Hother is dropping off the other child of
the ~rti.., H.liasa. The parti.s .hall, bet_.n
th....lv.., ..k. arranq...nts for how the exchange of
cu.tody 1. handled on Wedn.sday evening.
B. Plaintiff's attorn.y is dir.cted to s.rv. a copy af thi.
Ord.r and the attached Custody Conciliation R.port on th.
Ifother, Kimberly J. Well., by regular _il and certified
_il. If the certified _il i. not received by the
Hother, Plaintiff's attorn.y i. directed to have this
order s.rved by the Sh.riff ar SOlIe other COIlpet.nt adult
pursuant to, applicable 'enn.ylvania Rules af Civil
Procedu....
ee: '.1111 It. Orr, "~j...
<'.,.... ...._~..A 1I/1'f._~ "
., tit: court, ,I
/~, ~~ , 7/4-t-
K~;vr A, Hu., J.
~
r:; (~) -
".'. -
. " , ..,'(
~v~.. t': 1 $0-...
).. ,- .~
f' "'- ;;">
;~>:- ..... 1
.q...
g -
.') ~~~,
L,: , .
;:... , )1
j. ...
~.
. '1
'-" '. v
DAVID A. PITTENGER,
Plaintiff
.
.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 96 - 5197 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
v.
,
:
,
:
,
:
:
ICIMBERLY J. tiBLLS,
Defendant
PRIOR JUDGE: HONORABLE ICBVIN A. HESS
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE fiITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF PROCEDURE
1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits tbe
following report:
1. Tbe inforJ:UJtion pertaining to the child who is subject of this
litigation is as follows:
Alexander O. Stoner, born July 20, 1993
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on October 31, 1996.
Present were the Father, David A. Pittenger, with his
attorney, Paul Orr, Esquire. rhe Hother did not .ttend.
Attorney Orr indic.ted th.t notice of the he.ring w.s sent to
the Hather. Father also indic.ted that he h.d a conversation
with the Hother and th.t Hother acknowledged that she knew the
he.ring was scheduled, but she was not going to attend.
J. Pl.intiff and Defend.nt lived together for. period ot t1.e
but separated in July. Plaintitf h.s .nother child with the
Detend.nt and b.s custody ot tb.t child pursu.nt to an order
entered .t Docket No. 91-1973. F.ther h.s custody of tbat
cblld trOla Ifond.y IIOrninq at 7:30 .... tbrough Friday .t 6,00
p.a. Plaintift is the pri..ry custodian. He is not paying
support tor th.t child because he is the pri..ey custodi.n.
f. Hotber is now su~sting that the Pl.intift is not tbe parent
ot Alexander. Pl.intiff lived with the IIOther .nd Alex.nder
tor a period of 17 8Onths. rhe Hather has two otber cbildren
besid.. the otber cbild of the Plaintilt. Pl.intitt ud
extensive cOlltact with Alexander vhUe be Hved with the
Notber during those 11 aonths. Plaintiff would provide, on
occasion, exclusive care for tbe alnor child.
5. It would appear Uat a be.rln9 should be sc:lleduled. but it
would also appNr that 'ather should be .fforded SGIN tIP' of
tlNltpOrary custody with tA. ailtOr child pendi129 the hearinf.
6. If Hoth.r 'in.ly ~Jiev.. that Pla.ntilf is not the rat~r.
'athe, ia ~illjn. to underqo blood t..ts with the Hot"-r and