The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About96-05425 ~ ~ , . ~ , l / ! c :::> ~ ~ q - \. " ..Q , ~ c.J ~ - o. j .:) I i ~ I , ! ! I truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. 5. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. 6. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. 7. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. 8. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. 9. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. ..(~I "..U 1ttP'l -;2- COUNT I 10. Answering defendants hereby incorporate by reference their responses to paragraphs 1 through 9 of plaintiff's Complaint as if set forth at length herein. 11. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. By way of further response, to the extent the allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law, no response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 12. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. 13. After reasonable investigation, answering defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in this paragraph, thus these allegations are denied with strict proof demanded at trial. By way of further response. to the extent the allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law, no response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. WHIaIIORI, answering defendants, Subaru of America, Inc. and CUmberland Valley Motors. demand that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice with costa and fees assessed against plaintiff. ;;1'i\!'i\i tiM -)- COUNT II l4. Answering defendants hereby incorporate by reference their responses to paragraphs 1 through 13 of plaintiff's Complaint as if set forth at length herein. WHEREFORE, answering defendants, Subaru of America, Inc. and Cumberland Valley Motors, demand that plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice with costs and fees assessed against plaintiff. NEW MATTBR 15. Defendants discharged each and every obligation, if any. which they may have owed to the plaintiff, and otherwise defendants owe no duty to the plaintiff. 16. The damages alleged in the Complaint were not proximately caused by any act or omission by defendants. 17. Any damages sustained by the plaintiff as alleged in the Complaint may have been caused or contributed to by the plaintiff's own negligent acts or omissions and/or the negligent acts or omissions of persons or entities other than defendants. 18. The negligent acts and/or omissions of individuals or entities independent of defendants may have constituted intervening. superseding causes of the damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff in the Complaint. 19. The Subaru vehicle in question may have been substantially altered after it left the possession, custody. and control of defendants. ';:'>i.!h.!t tiP! '4- 20. The Subaru vehicle in question may have not been properly maintained and/or may have been misused or abused. 21. If it is determined that any warranties, whether express or implied, exist between defendants and plaintiff, defendants deny that they breached any such warranties. 22. The condition of the subject vehicle as described in the Complaint does not substantially impair the vehicle's use, value, or safety. 23. If it is determined that plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the purchase price of the vehicle in question, then answering defendant3 are entitled to a recoupment of the vehicle. 24. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a caUSi! of action for which recovery may be sought against defendants. WRBRBFORB, defendants. Subaru of America, Inc. and CUmberland Valley Motors, demand that the Complaint against them be dismissed and that they be awarded their costs. Respectfully submitted, aIn AND 1fILLI>>IS, By: Fill"'" _f'!i -5- CBRTIFICATB OF SBRVICB I, Thomas M. Hinchey, Esquire, do hereby certify that service of a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendants', Subaru of America, Inc. and Cumberland Valley Motors, Answer with New Matter to Plaintiff's Complaint was made on this 22nd day of November, 1996, to the below listed counsel by United States mail, postage prepaid. Carol J. Lindsay, Esquire FLOWER. MORGBHTBAL. FLOWER " LINDSAY. P.C. 11 East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 ~~#~ omas M. Hlnchey, Esquire nlUH. WI"\ .' , ':,..;,J . c^... ~ \.... ,....~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~'>.... "K .... ~ ",..:s- ~. ~'o~ ,.. ( . ~.: . Ci; c.!" ~: l. . . , . f":) ""- - ~ 01"'<. - ~ (':\wp.4iI\rjl\nlPo'U'tlm ' me , 2."4-%-0.\ 6. On May 25, 1995, the Plaintiff, while driving on Bloserville Road in Upper Frankford Township, Cumberland County. Pennsylvania, applied the brakes which failed to respond. This episode was accompanied by an especially strong odor of burning rubber. 7. On February 7. 1996. on Creek Road in North Middleton Township. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff again applied the brakes as she was approaching an intersection, and the brakes, once again. failed to respond. 8. Plaintiff attempted to have the problems described in Paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 above corrected on the following occasions: A. On March 2. 1995. the 7,500 mile service; B. On May 25. 1995 at 15.684 miles; C. On November 10. 1995 at 22,579 miles; and D. On February 12. 1996 at 26.376 miles. 9. All referenced repairs were attempted by authorized Subaru repair faCilities. 10. 11. 12. driven, COUNT I . THE AUTOMOBILE LEMON LAW The averments of Paragraphs 1 . 9 are incorporated herein as if set out in lull. Plaintiff has comphed With all requl/'ements of 73 P.S. 1951, et. seq. The SUbject vehiCle cont.nues to emtt the smeR of burning rubber, tnll!l'tTlittently. when ) ,:',"RANCf ~~H r f_ .//1 !:H _.______..'_ .. __ ___ A.;! ,r 0 A tJ { 171 { L U '')!'.)(.I< ~ _~_,._~~_.._.____' At'[\~fS~:,or AGlNr ~r lllCENSE 2 'R,,-:'-',,~,-...,----~~Tf';;-''^'' -, ___f{{)J:"..!i!.Ji.fl_.-_~ I ~ I ,'(/)' f.i I,~!. t n _J;?1';2LoDl~:~:"'" '--11 ~1;'f7 ~ :; co/-I iOA'[(U"'"'__~ 0"'5 '!.'lJ-'';f2J ! I ! Y 'It ...p~ i r;c il.2J.2..'-J ..fR'ftHiS"- cl SO ITlW: IN.'" -1 T't'P( Of (O\'E~"\J[ 1""'- 800ll y COlll!)J()fII S __ :(lEOVCf!81f lPtJ\./Av """" OAtr,U,Gf; ,,:, i , ., ~ I ... I. f;.... "~ I , I " ,," f IJ -,,- ;".. -- /' , '-"'...J~/'-- .~.il,.[-~iS- 0 F." r.., j _, _I 'I. ); .-, -'I' j ", J .. . ",' . . '. "'Y'A -- -~-_., - -... --.- .---. -- ;lll'-, Ptl1lt\I , ,; /.' rf t- :C~'_~_lTt';iill-/. L [: ,,2. I PtlASE ENTER MY ORDER ~or~ THf FOllOWING M"w ~C'R C mUCt< o USED DOlMO i'EAR/rJj M"'.5V6/i/' U 800'5/[/ itRIM I 'WARRANTY ~F"CTOR'l' '..f "",()I>t,lA'1CIolYOlo S(f t,.. To'l hrd""~I, .~UI(~ l~~ .f"'!.d ,,,-I'."T '-.r 1":'.(,,,.,TOI",' ~f()RtU.'~ ON 'HE wtJiOOW.',-'ROJI;" ,I 0\1"(># 'i ,,~.. (,.-...Tl>....R. f>l.lil'..,,,~Y'o', ,~. '..1. ,,<,..'l.l.l., '\.,1 ,_"", ~EG1STERfD OWNER~Sl 1z"o;tC ~f"R IMAI(E I !M\Jl'h I BO(I'" lGVW I , Is.ERI". "0 I , 1~A'6 (;(It()H '-"lE....GE ',"i'i.E"oO PIl,', (~L YOUR DEAL .~ASE ~NIT PA1CE '~~~l;~~~S.~\~~~::~~:~~R __~i g Qa_.l!!P-_ rACTQRY ( p _ \ OPTIONS f.v'ou~ O"-~'l.-~,-L- .It :3 ti 12 LI >,,; c .' L' "-, /' -:sJ----------- :" i; ti. !J-IS_~:_0_Cr'_ T _._=Z~j~t.[_Z :,. .f2f) --...---.-.------+-.---........-- ---..----- "Df-;lt"A.;;"STAllEO ,}J;'Tl0NS ....'t. , .,.--_._---~-------_... -~------_.,...._-- ..---,.+..---.-- ,.-.....--..-- S\)i!!O!.Al;Sli_~ :;-/ .~_._.._..._~..._'_ ~~ __+__V__.___ __. .. -.- ,tSS !J4~ ~ ~J.QihA"'~{:E, ii<.,X':i,) t~~ l<l (\lvS 0Ni. ~ l"': v '.u.A~H.M(A.,'~T t .I( l o vI.} () i" -r lj:4,.;,.a...lil!.... ( ,..... ..) (t,./ t -- . ',' t "!.f f't4"f".RA.'O\)I\t . .(1( r1~ . ~.!,' i~'! S <lW' H~.--i,,,,,.r(A ,,~~i'i"-.{~ f4.~ ('I. .:l,"~-{"",. ~r "... 'I 'l~ 1 .' '."t'. \ ~ "..<;~ t'~ "II' .". "'.:. n ,1'''~, l'~ I '.,'f .,.~ ~'''i''(t " 1"., ., , l.. ' ",;tl. J'~ ".., i'*'~ ! ..... . ~ . ,,",.;l. ~ ,\tt.... '. r "j." rt'~M CUMBERLAND VALLEY roro~ 6714.20 CARLISLE PIKE. MECHANICSBURG. PA. 17055 PHONE . (717) 697.9448 BMW SUBARU DODGE BA~_;.S_!,,-,_.,,_ ~.__1.1~~~!I.!,~.C~~~_{.~:_ ADDRESS j.J U t:, ~ V I II 'i" I,; ClTY)./,,\tv;tle iS1ii'r"r T[!lMS ,I,.tOS I '~ 7.);) ~ PAYOFF DATA BA~I< IP"O'" 1 so ADDRESS ell'/' STATE L 'Pf~ 1010.1 $ I GCOO IUNHL IA(~ I _.1.__ ..........--.-. ItJATE i JI2. i~2J/'2 S-; juCE Sf 1 Cow;>RH.r"'sl..... ,____ ,-- , ----~----- "-'-'.-_-~-----1 r-' j ".~~-_._~ ,C'fOL1{:Tt&\.f ;JSE Of Vl:till.LE t\USINESS 0 \'tHiCtE SAH.THUTURES n ~, eo'H PlE.ASl~E Giles '.He.\G L; "~SJvt AESH,AI"'~ ["J THEn ,"AU ;:: ~ wO R " ~, QA ACy 00 The Ironl ..... bKk 01 this 0nIef compriM ilia entire ag_nl af'fecttng 'htt; purctla.. and no other agreetne'11 or uflOetS!.1nc1lng c. ii")' nature concemlli} S3f"@hasbeenmacteOf'e"lte-redlOto 01 .11I be 'ecot}l'l,zea Il1ave read th@ mafler pflnted on the baCk hereof ana "9'H to ,t as a pitn Of ttw; Older thfi same as It It w(>ill? Pl;filttd aoo:-. m~ SiQn.lh.lftt I (@f11ty thaI I .1m 0' legat age and ~eer ;lCio.n()tItltH.1f)e '(I(:elCl 01 if cop, Of th!s (}IcHor TH!S ORDER SHAll N01 BECOIvIE BINDING UN1'l ACCEPrED B' DfAlfA OR HI$AUTHOHIZrO RfPRESENTATI\lE AND IN l>'[ E V[Nr 01 A rIME SAlE. DEAlHl SHALL NOr BE OOLtGATEO TO SELL UNfit APPliO,Al or tHE TtRUS H[REOllS GIVEN By A. BANK 00 fiNANCE CClt.U'ANY WilLiNG rQPURCHASE ARETAlllt;STAlLMENTCQNH1ACr Bf T"fE N THE PARflES HERETO BASED ON SlICH TERIoIS f urThe',,"OJ'~ I &Ql'M' fha! fNo $lOve ~~~ \/iltli( t.; tlt'-'~9 ~.)t""'" ~ ~l,./t',,~~ to ~dP()t.F~ oil the t:mtt Of ~~'"fH'r anQ '" d ~a''t .;k:,(f~ ""('.5"'It!' f'l"l-!i-to.iq@ su~twlK1 ~'h,j!\<(..,ti ~"'-Ya1\Or (If" ~s- d{re~Sl.Y~~ t10ilvllJ ~f' ,~~.ttd i>fl(luO<'\Q h'~' ~,~ ftf-.IP$.YolW mar .a~ ~ l';)oJtI ,,, ....;!o*..vx'F d~ <;"\0.... ...... I .t<::t~ ~' two "''''~;,1 l,,~ .~ t''ti ~.; p.;t;()" ,"'~liJ.M s'~."" ~"\" .s ,'~l c~~'1~1 to" t-\fo' thl~ ~^;P.'t!,.~ t>~l" 11' ~... ..\P"""'t c-'~' ..:-It''ii.i''''.... ,:<1 ~__~ at ""!t ~~""""~ t'\'.. ~ ~,..,..,;; ~'''" t"'~ ior>.$'tw~;~~~~",....."q~,"'t'!'l.tQt'-s It...!;u~uf' nu~ "'-l" '0;0..' ".....1 ~ ~'"l{:'*'fl"\~~1 Ai!;:;; "'" ~\.,. pI,~v;.->;:~, (1' ,- 'I .. . .' i, '" .,. ,.. 'I" ./ t , .. -', ". ~... ..,l't " . . nova/reply to new matter . G. COLETA NOVA, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW VB. CUMBERLAND VALLEY MOTORS and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.. NO. 96-5425 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants : 15. Denied that Defendants have discharged each and every obligation. By way of further answer. Defendants have failed to replace the vehide in question pursuant to Pennsylvania's Lemon Law. 16. Denied. By way of further answer. Plaintiff's damages are proximately caused by Defendants' sale of a vehicle with a nonconformity which substantially impairs its use. safety and value. 17. Denied. By way of further answer. at all relevant times. Plaintiff has acted without negligence. 18. Denied. By way of further answer. there were no intervening or superseding causes of the damages alleged. 19. Denied. The Subaru was not altered. substantially or otherwise, after it left the possession of the Defendants. 20, Denied. By way of further answer, the Subaru vehicle was maintained by ! Defendants or their agents. TRUE COPY FROM RECORD In TI'St1mQny \1lMoo. IIWrI Uft4 set my tIIIld ,lrd the SUI ot s.u1 Court at CarflslI. ~. ) ~~-'V2.(QY c1~~ ,l~~-:' '\ .~' . e'L,.. 5- ~. - I U/0 V ERr F reA T I 0 N I, t. GIIRrI/ Ut.LtJ#IA , being duly sworn, deposes and says that the deponent is an authorized agent of defendant, cumberland Valley BMW d/b/a CUmberland Valley Motors, and that the deponent verifies the forgoing Answer with New Matter to Plaintiff's Complaint for and on behalf of CUmberland Valley Motors aud is duly authorized so to do; that certain of the matters stated therein are not within the personal knowledge of the deponent; that the facts stated therein have been assembled by authorized employees and counsel of CUmberland Valley Motors and the deponent is informed that the facts stated therein are true. 11J& for CUmberland Valley Motors Date: II . ~5'- '1' I :~UJ!i.!t ..,\ . ~ UI ".~ ... L"~ I- ,-'J~ lU<"'''"'' - -' '.;) ~r . '.... . .' . ~~ -.. -, " 9~ 1.::j '. C. r- ;:1 c.;\ :~ ~l - -. 4... ....: " , ~oa.... " ,... ] .;...; m , '\ -,~ N'-,;: 1; 1.'1'_ I '1~- .' i!i~ ,N\lrH ;ii. . . n ' :! ; If" ;.t~~~-:,... \':~d-, 1,";,: 1 [.I' .i I Y UF !. U~jk! UL.ANI.- r1; t';!\ , ., .LeA 'J_.,_ ..~ i,J!"l~' i_L; ~.~c~t.'. \" A ~ L r ....---... .,,; '1 ~. HA; .~ ;.. I'-'r.. , <' .. . ...-::! >-7,;:< 2. t! .- t \~UMFL~: ~ AN[ )\;f'! f.. I. F-~", .' " , .~ , ~-... .. ;,":Cl.. -I. :- -'! "1 f';:l .i ~~.... .~':;l"--i. " . . ,...... w :.. ~ . ..: '.. :.~.: \..,. "'.,i.:=: :..~; r J:-< ", .~\~.~.~~;.:..._y ri;.... " ... ,;..c . ;q. ~ ~ ~\ j :oJ;"L ~, ;j t +. :C,:'C.,' ..--;::.' ...'. -II, ;.;.,'., -. ....1' " _c. ";.' ..;. ~. , ,. ;~ f. ~.~ ,. '.1 ,'~ ,. " , ~> "C t. :,-, ., . ,~- - ~ .-. ~ ,k ----",,"'. -,,-- ~.., -:. ......-.._.<....s...._..:..."'~. .,' " "./.. ,. i ...' ~.~. ,,' ",;,~ . ~y;'.4~---I- "V w :Jl.w," ~(T:i-_ 'iI... -+,'-'- G. '. .\w.C.......- , ~t''' SHERIFF'S RETURN - SUMMONS/COMPLAINT ~v 0MLt{ /!;( ;01(J . SERVED AND MADE KNOWN TO 1IJff)j/L ;f/11J;1# c (/T11l;lr leA f.l'-- ;:::::: ;~::: "o&mk/;J)j ~"t)J/j5 NO. .t t#7J3 t?r4 ~ 1t TERM, Ii NovA o Defendant ~ndant Company by ''"21'''' ~}'"" of 0' "'Oi, """,ICoopl"". In"'" i, th, ....., '"p..... ",'''' on _ ~I!~_ -_ , 19 ~ , at //a> o'clock, Lu., E.s.T.ID.S.T. at /bJ5 / .tJP-.-d!'" , , in ~ty of Ph}ladelphia, Stale of Pennsylvania, to tJ;r Mf- ;) 1. dUL~1f ,.. . '/ :fi/(t1/ Q OJ !h~ afN"~,,iti tlt'rt''':!n~t. pt'rsonalIy; o (2) an adult member of the family of said defendant, with whom said defer.dant resides, who stated that hls!herrelatlonshlp to said defendant Is that of o (3) an adult person in rnarf,je of defendant's residence; the said adult person having refused, upon re. quest, to give his/her name and relationship to said defendant; o (4~ manager/clerk of the place of lodq.inC) in which said defendant resides; ~ oC}ent or person fer the ~ilile being in charge of defendant's ollice cr usual place of business. o (5) the ___ and officer of said defendant Conpany; So Answers, JOHN p, Gt'tllt:!O. SIImfl By/. r;h!~ffl I ,- t't},,!, \#:to..;"1" . ".~ '(' # ,.),! P- I . ;:1r:sy "::~l:: .G. Caleta Nova .- .,::. Subaru of America In~. :ie. 96-5425 Civil Tp-rm ':1 .-- ~cw, Oct. 3. 1996 ~_ !. SE:!:~~ O? C::'.~:::'=.!...A..."-i-:) CO~":'!. ?-L, := =-.:.! C:;:-.:.::: ::.: !L.:: ci Philadelphia c....-=-"7 = ="-= ~, ','f.::-~ = . . :"'7":::::"-::' . . . :--'1' == ~ == :-:"-= . '-- - = cl :.:.: -.. -- .."t.-- '-- rJ.l6~. -...<:.~ C"'...~~ = C:::::a:'.:=i C':='7. r:.. . So -......:.sa -... . .Q..::1c::z.'.... cr ::~. .ee ~-. ~~ :.: o"==, \,[. ::: .~.:. ::: ':'i":'::' ~~ . .. ~ , - --c:::; == :L J... .. I "'-r: Iliiii_ == :.-t .. .. ::::! :::.C..~ i::::w: = ::: :-._~ .....-; ---- !o a.=w=. n.=s e! c..u."l'. h. ::,:=_~'=l tJ_ cem snv.a ~\C:t : '__ --' _.L_- . ".J_ _ __ _~..:c:'~ . A:::_'..,".':7 --- 1 ,--~ .J~' 4~' 1 ~':.,::; 0::;: ,:.? :::.!3.:510 FLO' 1Ef.' r'OP':,EIITH...L FL P;:;'ljE 0: 'I q ., ': ij " j; II II G. COLETA NOVA, Ii Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. LAW va. :1 CUMBERLAND VALLEY MOTORS and !I SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., NO. 98-5425 CIVIL TERM !: Defendants : ,I , :, II NOIlC..E...OfJ:IEABINJLQE.J30ARO.Qf AR8JIBA TORS You are hereby notified that the Board of Arbitrators appointed bV the Court in the above I: captIOned case WI" sit for the purpose of their appointment on __Twsd.u-. _ Octob.er.20. 19ia.. ~:30 8.m.. In the Second Floor Heenng Room of the Old Court House. Cumberland County, II " Ii :, Carlisle. Penns~1veOla. ': " r BO OF ARBITRATION ~~~ J Robert Slautfe~rjlman Ii II ..:. L"P~L~ J {1 '. ,I lJavoQ A 8.1r G. e~UlIe I' ~ , 'IV..t Souln ~tr'" I, C3ihSle,I'A lN13 "rt>fltator L'M M.1I'! CoYne [squn 3901 rAar\et ~'1Atel r.amll Mill PA 11011 1.It4lflltOl' Carol J L'llOIa1, Uquwe " 11 Lnl H'VII SIrIIet ~ CiI.ltile, PA 11013 'I Attorney tor I'laIntl1f \ '''.:e 01 C""lt Mmll1l$lr.... \,;~m~~ Counlv Court Houu Ga'"A''' "... 1!1) 1 J 0yIIn W8IIl... I::tqu<.e tllOO One lltletty P!tIce ~;IlI'M, I'A 190)'13~~ "*",lPY fQr ~1I " ., ,. ... v. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNlY. PENNSYLVANIA NO. 96.5425 CIVIL TERM G. COLETA NOVA CUMBERLAND VALLEY MOTORS and SUBARU OF AMERICA Q.BQJ;R QF COURI AND NOW. May 6, 1998. the appointment of James Rower, Jr., Esquire, to the arbitration panel in the above.captioned case is vacated, and David Baric, Esquire Is appointed in his stead. By the Court, P.J. J. Robert Stauffer, Esquire David Baric, Esquire Usa Coyne, Esquire :ssg Robert Said/s, Esquire Christopher Houston. Esquire Samuel Milkes, Esquire Michael Hanft, Esquire :ssg , r r i t G. COLETA NOVA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA I t . v. . . : NO. 96.5425 CIVIL TERM CUMBERLAND VALLEY MOTORS and SUBARU OF AMERICA QBPER OF COURT AND NOW. May 6, 1998, the appointment of James Rower, Jr., Esquire, to the arbitration panel in the above-captioned case is vacated, and David Baric, Esquire Is appointed In his stead. By the Court, P.J. J. Robert Stauffer, Esquire David BarIc, Esquire Usa Coyne, Esquire _ ~..,.,..wJ.J. .J' /,:l)9I' . ~I ,.L ~ :ssg Robert SaIdIs. Esquire Christopher Houston, EsquIte Samuel Milkes. Esquire Mk:haeI Hanft. Esquire :ssg ,..."r:.n,_r",r."r'r"'': ri:..'.\.' '_' 1'..'- . ._. .A"'-'{ ,.~ -r', ''C-- :.... - . .,'\ ...." : ' .. .,.. c.sr~': \ \ r.. \: ?Q c....}:,'::=, , r:'\\. . '\ f" ~. _.i .-,' \' 1 . ~:\ ' 'v 'c--o F':.FO~:.::!~f:;E rc:.,., "_. ...,.._,.,''( ...., I . . ......,.;..!.~.., 9IHi"1'-:S 4:11/: /2 c;,...., ", .....~( Uj....._.... .. . '.~ -'.A..,." Fi3~;.,;3, Ll/'" ., G.COLETA NOVA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. . . : NO. 96.5425 CIVIL TERM CUMBERLAND VALLEY MOTORS and SUBARU OF AMERICA RE' A QBQE~ OF COURT AND NOW. May 5, 1998, the appointment of Roger Irwin, esquire, as chalnnan of the arbitration panel for the above case Is hereby vacated and J. Robert Stauffer, Esquire, Is appointed In his stead; James Rower, Jr., Esquire, and Usa Coyne, Esquire, shall remain on the panel. By.the~ (f~~~') P.J. Roger Irwin. EsquIre J. Robert Stauffer, EsquIre James Flower, Jr., EsquIre Usa Coyne. EaqWe :SIQ mUE COPY FROM RECORD IA le,~;m!\ll'f .'Wrtef. I Mr.l'l\t-~ ~.llty 'lar4 ..... I,.. ..oc...,t ..... t~~,,,, '\ ,...., .'~ ". r~-.;A" ...r.;, ~ ,1 .o4f;fU _.~.t- II ,';..L~"'''..:.Jl r.. '~day ~~.....".~ 1uL. . - r. \... . [1M , .. .... Ilf"W ~ . r ) r ,.... ~-. , .. . , , -g c' -a. .,.. .. (1) ":T 00 .. (j m ", -::r (j :J \.l) ~ .,. oj <::4- , ~ v . . . ( '.~ ~ . .4 (~ t 41 4. e-- (,., \.~ ~ g ~ rf) c{) t- . 0 Q t-: 4l '"ll ,,, ~ ... '" .. ~ ... '-' 1_.. ~ :~. .', , i : . ! - _:.. I , c-: I ~,,' U ." ('. I L' .' I:, !I. r.; . . r ~ , .... ~ 0- J ;J' "'" - j g "I -'0 'l ~'-2 r. ~ '... , \~1 ..J .. t J <-;d ... ", c >..n.'..1 - "::l ""1<;J ~~ .....,,'() tSbc-'>fo-Ib! - .,...."nJ '\.0 ~c;;.'1 ~\~ - r;\ii~'t)~ ,'-"'<\~ 3 ' .C'