HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-05468
1
~
U
\J
~
'"
'>
)
<)
.,
~
~
.
..
~
,
(
~
;
/
,
I
I
o.
;7.
IIIP ,i~'
v
....
>
-
~
-.J
(il
H ~'-IA\ ~~ij;I1_.1 11')'\,;,\,,(\,1; t "~"l
/t""'J.V 1'1 ,';/'j
'f"". f"':\~ ;',1f"l."f/P ,,,,l!"~~ ,>dl,."1 t ....., j" _,.111' "f' <.
ni";'!"\'
(I )0 ^ VU . ,
'H'.: ~Hn~-HJ (H~1fH:)SHnS qNV i(j]\HH.,-iV,
~IHl
NH{)V6
toll {I " ;; 1.11 ^"!
\.."',tjlll.H._Pf'l.'c ~1-j~,O." \:vp.....n .t~"l.J.,
!.o' 1'.1""'-;i'1 'l ,I' ",',' ':I"tj ,IYl \JJUq-,',
.':1"\"1", V., ""...:
Gl
,j.j! I"l ;;(,.111 jP,...h1'v .11 ,'J~r'N ":"'\!" '.' ll" '.I.i~'(t.id.~11 j,;,':':...... ,I: ._j'.; "oj ':"t... "4' r;'f',.,,,, 1 ..'~i ..i;4.i1d1f ~ll,r
....,. i/o-'l"': ,- td ,.-j,,, ". ,,~p{;.
,,~ I..;
6i
1 <J~',ln 1,,0: , !;~<i I', ',wl.1' J.i"I_l,~l
:;:;,\i,Jt"Jf-'..4J1','1
'"
fii""
, . ~. :.
,I",' '!T,.. .p"l,f,;,,"',.'1 tl....!'),...lj ^q
',; i : i j I' ~. ;';;.1;;" ~l r )1" j' C "'_Ii
,',. " ..,.. ,I'~" ,t, .",1 f n
("
f' ~~ f' ,~
'<<'i) .f> ,-fl;\-, .;(', ""t~'N "ql i" .10.(1(\:1 P
I"'.,'
:l"-"-'",,?:"."';:"jf
'iINo'OIHV
~.. _.
'j(J \J.",no:)
.,tN'Y^ 1 UAl:i\i ld 40 Itl1YJA.\NO.....<'J
--;J..
J ,.{(:'P ),;,J,.F ~. l.j'i' 1';1,:,"
,;.,1:.<,..,
:;,.'.. ;:,"~, _.j ", : "~I . _ .'~ ,; ,l#!
, 3JU.o~ 3:J1M:13S :10 :lOOtf.l
~
" l:' 1.
.. "
iNI\flc1WOO 311:f 01 .'I1nu ON\.' W3c1dt' .W
.,
....
~
'- ~
L \ ~
... ~
"" -
... \:) ~
-' ~ i ''<''0 , ....
t.. - ~
"-' . ~ ~
~ ... "
'\j "" tJ '- '';''
~ -0 ~
-" "" - vo
~ \.-- .. ~-"") "< ..... --
")' - ..... ....."
~ . ..:::r ~
- ~ .. -
~ - ~ '
~ '" - ....... ~J Ir'O
"'... t -
~ " ..... - ,..(""
.~ . ~,....,... rot-"
~ J:
- - ..... '-l(. "'~. - - .
'-. ~
',~. ~
c,
.~
COMMONv.EALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
-..ag G.c No
09-3-04
OJPum. tton
GLENN R. FARNER
...~.. 5002 LENKER STREET
MECHANICSBURG, PA
T~a17) 761-8230
17055-0000
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF :
RAMONA C. CATALDI, ESQ.
3211 N. FRONT ST.
P.O. BOX 5300
HARRISBURG, PA 17110-0300
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT
PLAINTIFF. NAM[ and A[){)R(~
rpHILIPSON, WALTER W
125 KOST RD.
CARLISLE, PA 17013
L
-,
.J
VS.
DEFENDANT:
r;; NAME and AOORESS
FREELAND, RONNIE C, ET AL.
55 COFFEETOWN RD.
DILLSBURG, PA 17019
L
-,
-'
Docket No,: CV-0000266-96
Date Filed: 7/11/96
THIS IS TO NOnFY YOU THAT:
Judgment:
[R] Judgment was entered for: (Name)
[!] Judgment was entered against: (Name)
in the amount of $ 2,368.75
o Judgment was entered against
LandlordfTenant action in the amount of $ on
The amount of rent per month. as eslablished by the District Justice. is $
o Damages wUI be assessed on: (Date & Time)
FOR PlAINTIFF.
PHILIPSON, WALTER W
FREELAND, RONNIE C
on: (Dale of Judgment)
o This case dismissed without prejudice,
o Possession granted,
O Possession Qranted l money judgment is no!
satISfied by time of eviction.
o PossessIon not granted,
o Levy is stayed for_days or 0 generally stayed,
o Objection to levy has been filed and hearing will be held:
Date: P\ace:
Time:
9/16/96
ina
(Date of Judgment)
Rent in arrears $
Damages Unjust Detention $
Damages to Propertyl
Resldentl8l Lease : $
Less Ami Due Defendant - $
Amount of Judgment = $
Judgment Costs $
Interest on Judgment $
Altomey Fees $
2.303.75
65.00
.00
.00
2.368.75
TOTAL
$
ANY PARTY HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL A JlIOGMENT INVOlVING A RESJOENTIAI:~FECnNG THE
DfLNfRY OF POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY WlTH!N 10 DAYS OF THE DA~~ 8{ FILING A
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE PRO THONOTARYICl.ERK OF THE COUR~OF . . PLEAS:tM\.DMSION
ANY PARTY AOGRIEVtD BY A JUDGMENT 'OR UONIY OR A JUDGMtNT VlNQ A HQN('11lOOlTtk LUll
MAY APPEAL WlTHIH 30 D4YS 01' ENTRY 01' nil JUDGUtNT IY fJUNQ A 01' APPI4l\. WITH ~
PAOTHONOTARYiCURK 01' nil COUM 01' COMMON PUAa. CMl. DMSlOI\ _ , \ ':
i _'Jf
o.e '\ :'. , Olstnct ~
I ct!rt"V tIlallhls is IllUe end ~ ccpy of the I1lCOltI olltllt procNdlllgs COl'~lQ the ~!l8i~
0.. .___~'.:'~~ST~ JustiCe
Uy (O","ml'llOl'l elp"ft'I "'" U<,.l<Uy of JilIlIJaIY ,,.. SEAL
A-\.~="~~
-'r ,.-.. .
i :..
! . .
U,'
~'"~ -
,
,
t;) , CJ
C;
~' "
In'"
41:' (
'-
I ...~
'-' L"'; -J
.
COMMON~ALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
~OUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
M.g 0Itt No
09-3-04
DJN.,... HcwI
GLENN R. FARNER
"",'... 5002 LENKER STREET
MECHANICSBURG, PA
'- 017) 761-8230 17055-0000
WALTER W. PHILIPSON
125 KOST RD.
CARLISLE, PA 17013
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT
PLAINTIFF: NAME and AllOAESS
rpHILIPSON, WALTER W
125 KOST RD.
CARLISLE, PA 17013
L
V5.
DEFENDANT:
r- NAME ~ ADORESS
'FREELAND, RONNIE C, ET AL.
55 COFFEETOWN RD.
DILLSBURG, PA 17019
L
Docket No,: CV-0000266-96
Date Filed: 7/11 /9 6
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
Judgment: ,
B Judgment was entered for. (Name)
Judgment was entered against: (Name)
in the amount of $
D Judgment was entered agalnst
LandlordITenant action in the amount of $ on
The amount 01 rent per month, as established by the District Justice. is $
D Damages wm be assessed on: (Date & Time)
ina
(Date of Judgment)
Rent In arrears $
Damages Unjust Detentlon S
Damages to Propertyl
ResldentlaI Lease : S
Less Amt Due Defendant - S
Amount 01 Judgment .. $
Judgment Costs $
Interest on Judgment $
Attorney Fees $
TOTAL
$
--,
--1
--,
--1
DISMI!ijlED W (0 PREJlmICE, Aq,AINST JO~EPH WINTERS
AND THE NAME OF PAULINE FREELAND HAS BEEN REMOVED FROl
THIS COMPLAINT.
on: (Date of Judgment)
00 This case c:lismissecI without prejudice.
D Possession granted.
D Possession anted if money judgment is not
satisfied by ~ of eviction.
D Possession not granted.
D Levy is stayed lor _ days or D generaDy stayed,
D Objec:tlon to ~ has been IiIed and hearing will be held:
Date: Place:
Time:
ANY PARTY HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL A .JUDGAIENT INVOl. VING A RESIDENTIAL LEASE AND AFFECTING THE
DfLNfRY OF POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN fO DA~ OF THE DA TE OF JUlJGAIENT BY FlUNG A
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE PROTHONOTARYICLERK OF THE COURT OF COMMON Pt..EAS, CMl OMSION
AH'I PARTY AGGRlEV!D BY A JUDOMENT FOR MONfY OR A JUDGMENT INVOLVING A NClNRUlOINTW. LUSE
MAY APPEAL WITHIN 3D DAYS Of THE JIJOGUENT BY Fll.INQ A NOTICE Of AI I UL WITH tHE
PAOTHONOTAAYICLERK Of tHE COMMON
~Oate
I Cl!lt1ly ttwl this IS . tNll and
~o.e
My co...lliub, expiIes firtI ~ of~. ,.,
.OPC 3'S"
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
WALTER W. PHILIPSON,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
v.
RONNIE C. FREELAND,
JOSEPH WINTERS, and
RONALD E. BENNER,
Defendants
: NO. 96-5345
.
.
.
.
COMPLAIHT
1. Plaintiff Walter W. Philipson is an adult individual who
currently resides at 125 Kost Road, Carlisle, CUmberland County,
Pennsylvania 17013.
2. Defendant Ronnie C. Freeland is an adult individual Who
currently resides at 55 Coffeetown Road, Dillsburq, CUmberland
County, Pennsylvania 17019.
3. Defendant Joseph Winters is an adult individual who
currently resides at 5419 Laurie Lane, Enola, CUmberland County,
Pennsylvania 17025.
4. Defendant Ronald E. Benner is an adult individual who
currently resides at 10-C Creekside Lane, carlisle, CUaberland
County, Penn.ylvania 17013.
5. At all ti.e. relevant hereto, Jo.eph Winter. perforaed
auto .ervlclnq and aechanical repairs to vehicl.. out of bi. qaraqe
at 5419 Laurie Lane and charged lIlOney tor hi. .ervic...
6. On or about February 22. 1995, Plaintiff entrusted bis
1990 Chevrolet aut<*ebll. to Defendant Joaeph Winter. for the
purpoae of havlnq pre-inspection "palre perfOl1led. and .0
Defendant Winters could take the vehicle to be inspected for
Plaintiff.
7. In exchange for these services, Plaintiff paid Defendant
Winters.
8. On or about February 23, 1995, Defendant Ronnie Freeland
took his 1979 Ford truck vehicle to Defendant Winters' garage for
services and/or repairs.
9. In exchange for that service, Defendant Freeland paid
Defendant Winters.
10. On or about February 23, 1995, at approximately
10 o'clock a.m., Defendant Ronald E. Benner started Defendant
Winters' vehicle and drove the vehicle from the garage to the front
of Defendant Winters' house.
11. He then left the vehicle in front of Defendant Winters'
house vi th the aotor running, and he proceeded to go inside
Defendant Winters' house.
U. Defendant Freeland's vehicle sUpped out of qear and
proceeded to drive down Laurie Lane and hit Plaintiff's vehicle,
vhich vas parked on Laurie Lane.
13. When Defendants Benner and Winters ca_ outside from
Defendant Winters' house, they found Defendant Fr.eland'. vehlcle
had ....hed into Plaintiff'. vehicle, causift9 da_ge to Plaintiff's
vehicle.
-2-
14. Defendants Benner and Winters also discovered, upon
moving Defendant Freeland's vehicle, that the gearshift tube on
said car was broken.
15. When Plaintiff picked up his vehicle from Defendant
Winters' garage on February 23, 1996, his vehicle was damaged, and
Defendant Winters informed him that Defendant Freeland's vehicle
had hit his vehicle, causing the damages.
16. As a result of the aforesaid incident, Plaintiff incurred
necessary repairs to his vehicle in the amount of $2,303.75.
COUN'!' I
NEGLIGENCB
Plaintiff Walter W. Philipson
v.
Defendant Ronnie C. Preeland
17. The alleqations contained in paraqraphs 1-16 of this
C~plaint are hereby incorporated by reference.
18. It is believed and therefore averred that at all times
relevant to this incident, Defendant Freeland was avare or should
have been aware that his vehicle contained a broken gearshift,
causing the car to occasionally slip out of gear.
19. Plaintiff's damages were incurred as a direct and
proximate cause of Defendant Freeland's neqligence, including but
not limited to the fOlloving:
(a) Driving a vehicle with a broken gearshUt which
CAUSed the vehicle to slip out of veer;
-)-
(b) Leaving the vehicle parked at Defendant Winters'
garage for repairs, when he knew or should have known, that the
vehicle may slip out of gear at any time;
(c) Failing to inform Defendant Winters that the vehicle
had a broken gearshift and may slip out of gear; and
(d) Failing to keep his vehicle in a safe condition in
accordance with the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment in his favor and
against Defendant Ronnie C. Freeland in the amount of $2,303.75,
wbich is within the CUmberland County limits for arbitration.
COU!IT II
BREACH OF BAILMElfl'
Plaintiff Walter W. Philip.on
v.
Defendant Jo.eph winters
20. Tbe aUe9ations contained in para9rapbs 1-19 ot thie
Coaplaint are bereby incorporated by reterence.
21. At aU ti_. relevant to tbe incident in question,
Plaintitt entrusted bis vehicle to Defendant Winters te.porarily
tor tb. purpo.. ot pertorain9 pre-inspection repairs and bavinq the
vehicle inspected.
22. Plaintiff coapensated Defendant Winters aonetarily in
exchanqe for Detendant winters' .ervice to plaintiff's vehicl..
-4-
23. Defendant Winters failed to use reasonable and ordinary
care to ensure that Plaintiff's vehicle was redelivered to
Plaintiff in a safe and undamaged condition.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment in his favor and
against Defendant Joseph Winters in the amount of $2,303.75, which
is within the cumberland County limits for arbitration.
COUNT III
NEOLIOBJICE
Walter W. PhilipsOD
v.
Joseph WiDters
24. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1-23 of this
Complaint are hereby incorporated by reference.
25. Plaintiff's damages were incurred as a direct result of
Defendant's negligence, including but not limited to the following:
(a) Failure to ensure that the vehicles left in hie care
were kept in a .afe manner;
(b) Failure to adequately superviee the care of the
vehicle. left In hi. care to avoid collisions between them; and
(e) Violation of 75 Pa.C.B.A. S3701(a).
WHIR!1ORE, Plaintiff reque.ts judgaent in hie favor and
against Defendant Joaeph Winter. in the amount of $2,303.75, wbieb
ia within the cumberland County limit. for arbitration.
-5-
COONT IV
NEGLIGENCE
Plaintiff Walter W. Philipson
v.
Defendant Ronald E. Benner
26. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1-25 of this
Complaint are hereby incorporated by reference.
27. At all times relevant to the incident aforementioned,
Defendant Ronald Benner acted as an agent of Defendant Joseph
Winters in performing repairs, service, and/or maintenance to
vehicles brought to the Winters' garage for repairs and/or
servicing.
28. On February 23, 1995, Defendant Benner vas assisting
Defendant Winters in performing service/repairs to the vehicle.
then at Mr. Winters' garage.
29. On the aforesaid date, Defendant Benner did start the
engine of the Freeland vehicle, parked in fro~ of Mr. Winter.'
home/garage, and leave the engine running while he went into the
Winter.' residence.
30. Plaintiff's da.ages were incurred as a direct and
proxiaate result of Defendant Benner's neqligence, including but
not limited to the following:
(a) In etarting the engine of the Freeland vehicle and
walking into the Winters' hoae;
(b) In leaving the running vehIcle unattended In front
of the Winter.' hoae;
-6-
(c) In failing to take any and all steps necessary to
ensure that the running vehicle would not roll down the street and
hit another vehicle;
(d) In failing to properly supervise the running motor
vehicle;
(e) In failing to secure the emergency brake in such a
manner so as to stop the vehicle from rolling down the street and
hitting another vehicle; and
(f) Violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. 53701(a).
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment in his favor and
against Defendant Ronald E. Benner in the amount of $2,303.75,
which is within the CUmberland County limits for arbitration.
COUH'l' V
RESPOHDEAT SUPERIOR
Walter W. Philipson
v.
Joseph Winters
31. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1-30 are
incorporated herein by reference.
32. At all time. relevant to the incident on February 23,
1995, Ronald I. Benner was acting as the agent of Jo.eph Wint.r. in
..sistinq hi. in his automobile repair/maintenance busin....
JJ. Def.ndants Winter. is liable for the negligent action. of
Defendant ..nn.r on the basis of respond.at superior.
-7-
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment in his favor and
against Defendant Joseph Winters in the amount of $2,303.75, which
is within the CUmberland County limits for arbitration.
Respectfully submitted,
METZGER, WICKERSHAM, KNAUSS , ERB
~.t~
Ram na C. Cata d , Esqu re
Attorney 1.0. No. 66745
3211 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5300
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0300
(717) 238-8187
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Date: october..Z:..L, 1996
-,..
WALTER W. PHILIPSON,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
v.
RONNIE c. FREELAND,
JOSEPH WINTERS, and
RONALD E. BENNER,
Defendants
.
.
. NO.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
96-5345/
96-5468
ORDBR
AND NOW, this .1;~' day of (fIe'"GL.
, 1996, upon
consideration of Plaintiff's Hotion to consolidate, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that Docket No. 96-5345 and No. 96-5468 are consolidated.
BY THE COURT:
/II
. .
E:l r~ ,5
7
,J""(<7
V I
J.
TRue COpy FROM RECORD
., !'!I\U!1\)ftywtwllOf,1 Iwtl.n:o!illtl!.y 1Iot""
,~." !"' *' 01 Solld ~ II t..!""'t ,..
Itft.i.fy*'~ f!t.~.. 19":~
... { ~. ... "''''1
~.
WALTER W. PHILIPSON,
plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
RONNIB C. FREELAND,
JOSEPH WINTERS, and
RONALD B. BENNER,
Defendants
NO. 96-5345
96-5468
MOTZO. '1'0 COH80LIDA'1'1l
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff Walter W. Philipson, by and through
his attorneys, Ramona C. Cataldi, Esquire, and Metzger, Wickersham,
Knaus. , Brb, and files this Petition to Consolidate and in support
thereof aver. the following.
1. On or about september 27, 1996, Defendant Ronnie C.
Freeland filed a Notice of Appeal in the Court of Co_on Pleas of
Dauphin County from the District Justice Judgment which was
rendered on Septembar 16, 1996. (A true and correct copy of that
Notice i. att.ched hereto a. Exhibit A).
2. Thi. matter was given Docket No. 96-5345.
3. on or .bout OCtober 3, 1996, Plaintiff filed a Notice of
Appe.l In the .... matter. The utter was given. new docket
nn."'r, No. 96-5468. (A true .nd correct copy of that Notice i.
attached hereto .. Exhibit B).
4. Although this utter va. given two .eparate docket
nuabar., It 1. the .... c..e .nd the matter Mould be consolidated
to one mnaber.
WALTER W. PHILIPSON, . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
.
plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. NO. 96-5345 CIVIL TERM
RONNIE C. FREELAND, NO. 96-5468 CIVIL TERM V
JOSEPH WINTERS and
RONALD E. BENDER, .
.
Defendants .
.
DEFENDANT FREELAND'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION
TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes the Defendant, Ronnie C. Freeland, by his
attorneys, Snelbaker & Brenneman, P. C. who files the within
Preliminary Objection to Plaintiff's Complaint as follows:
MOTION TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. 1028(al (21 and (31
1. Plaintiff initiated this action by Complaint filed on or
about October 21, 1996.
2. Plaintiff claims in Paragraph 19 that Defendant
Freeland's negligence, "including but not limited to the
following" caused Plaintiff to incur damages.
3. The phrase "including but not limited to the following"
contained in Paragraph 19 is inSUfficiently specific to allow
Defendant Freeland to prepare a defense thereto.
...w O~.
SNI1....kt.R
.
."I:~".""'"
4. The phrase "including but not limited to the following"
faila to plead material facta aa required by Pa.R.C.P. 1019(4).
WHEREFORE, Defendant Ronnie C. Freeland respectfully
requests your Honorable Court to strike the phrase "including but
not limited to the following" from Paragraph 19 of Plaintiff's
Complaint.
SNELBAKER , BRENNEMAN, P. C.
By:
~.,~
~ _:.-e-e
Ph I P H. Spa e, Esquire
44 W. Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
(717) 697-8528
Attorneys for Defendant
Ronnie C. Freeland
Date:
November 11, 1996
....~.
"''''-''It'''
.
"'&""1..'"
-:1-
i
~
i
i
i
,
I
I
I
f
t
..... (OJ ,-
ir:: \I: ~,.
l:, .. "~~~
UJ' - .'..-
(',. ...;,-'. "~...
.....::.\ .,': ;:j
t...
. ..
y . t_j f:l
c - ''>
t , ~',.l
C. .
L:. ..~-
".,~ : )
,-,;,\ I
t. 0:." >.)
WALTER W. PIIILlPSON,
PlalnUff
: IN TilE COURT OF COMMON Pl.EAS OF
: CUMBERI.AND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
RONNIE C. FREELAND,
JOSEPH WINTER. and
RONALD E. BENNER.
Defeadaals.
.
.
: NO. 96-5345 CIVIL TERM/
: NO. 96-5468 CIVIL TERM
TO TIlE PROTIlONOTARY OF SAID COURT:
Kindly enter my appearance for Defendanl Joseph Winler.
HENRY . CO
Attorney for Defi danl Winter
3901 Markel S I
Camp Hill, PA 17011-4227
(717) 737-0464
Pa. S. Ct. No. 06250
cc: Ramona C. Cataldi, Esquire
Philip n. Spare, Esquire
Ronald Ii. Benner
Joseph Winter
OAAllUll f:lltl
9t. SJ"'S
WALTER W. Pili LIPSON,
PlaiD tiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
RONNIE C. FREELAND,
JOSEPH WINTER, aDd
RONALD E. BENNER,
DefeDdaDts.
: NO. 96-5345 CIVIL TERM
: NO. 96-5468 CIVIL TERM
DEDENDANT WINTER'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
WITH NEW MAlTER CROSSCLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANTS
FREELANDA~~BENNER
AND NOW COMES Defendant, Joseph Winter, by and throu&h his attorney, Henry F.
Coyne, Esquire and avers the following answer with new maner cross claims:
J. ADMITTED.
2. DENIED, Defendant is without knowledge or information suffICient to form a
belief u to the truth of the avaments c:ontained In this paral'llph and thmf~ these alleptions
an: speaflQlly denied.
), ADMITTED,
4, I>ENtED, Defendaftt IS WIthout k-kdF or mformatlOl\ sulTlCltllt 10 form a
behtf u to the truth of the avamenl1 rontamed m thiS paraaraph and thmf~ these aIlqalions
art or<<lflCaUy dmttd,
2
5, ADMI1TED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is admitted that Defendant
Winter occasionally perfonned auto servicing and mechanical repairs to vehicles out of his
attached garage for family and friends. However, it is denied that Defendant Winter charged
money for his services or that he was in the business of automobile repair. By way of funher
response, Defendanl Winters merely recouped any money he personally expended while
servicing and repairing the vehicles.
6. ADMI1TED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. II is admitted thaI on or about
Febnwy 22, 1995, Plaintiff delivemi his vehicle 10 Defendant Winter's home to have pre_
inspection repairs perfomed. II is denied thaI the vehicle was mtrusted to Defendant Winter.
7. DEINED, It is denied that Plaintiff paid Defendant Winter for pre-inspection
seMc:cs. Rather, Plaintiff merely reimbursed Defendant Winter for the cosl of pans used in
Plaintiff', vd1ic:1e.
8. ADMI1TED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART It is admitted that on February
23, 1995, Defendant Freeland drove hi, vehicle to Defendant Winter', home. By way of further
-, il is denied that Plaintiff Winter's prage was in 8lI)' way an automobile service pnIge
in the COOI1llC1cia) sense. Rather, the prqe at issue was attached to Defendant Winter', bootc
in a n:sidmtiaI nei&hbol hood,
9. DENIED. See paracraph 7 above.
10. DENIED, Defendant Winter is without IaIowIedae or ilIformation sufficient to
I'onn a Wid' u to the InIth of the ah~...I<.1tS contained ill tIus parqnph and thmforc these
allqa'-s aR ~irlC8lly dented.
]
II. DENIED. Defendant Winter is without knowledge or infonnation sufficient to
fonn a belief as to the truth of the avennents contained in this paragraph and therefore these
allegations are specifically denied.
12. DENIED. Defendant Winter is without knowledge or infonnation sufficient to
fonn a belief as to the truth of the avennenls contained in this paragraph and therefore these
allegations are specifically denied,
13. ADMITTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is admitted that when
Defendants Winter and Benner came outside from Defendant Winter's house they found
Defendant Freeland's car had made conlKt with the: Plaintiff's vehicle. However, it is denied
that Defendants Winter and Benner found that Defendant Freeland's vehicle had slrUUlIed into
Plaintiff's vehicle, Rather, the: door of Defendant Freeland's vehicle had side-swiped Plaintiff's
vehicle.
14, ADMI1TED.
IS, ADMI1TED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is admitted that when
Plaintiffretrieml his vehicle, Defendant Winter mformed him that Defendant Freeland's vehicle
had hit his vehicle, causing damage to Plaintiff's vehicle. However, it is denied that Plaintiff
retrieved his vehicle from Defendant WInter's prage.
16, DENIED, Defendant is wtlhout knowledge or information IIlfTlCient to form a
btMf as to the IrIIth of the a\", "",1\15 contamcd an thIS paragraph and then:fore these aIlqabOlll
an' specifically dnlled,
..
COUNT I
NEGLIGENCE
PlalatlffWalter W. Pblllpson
v,
Defeadant Ronnie C. Freeland
17.19. The allegations contained in paragraphs 17 through 19 are directed to a party
olher than answaing Defendant and thm:fore no responsive pleading is required.
COUNT II
6RLfCH OF BAILMENT
PIalatlffWalter W. PblUpson
v.
nefeadaat Josepb Wiater
20. Defendant illCOlpOl'lles herein by reference the answers in paraaraphs I throu&h
19. above, u though the same were set forth herein allength.
21. ADMITTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. II is Idmitted that Plaintiff
left his vehicle al Defendanl Winters' home for the purpose of Defendant WinlW perflXl1lin&
some pre-inspecIion repain. However, il is denied thai Plaintiff PlnDtnl his vehicle to
Defendanl Winter, Instead, he merely delivered his vehicle to Defendant Winter.. home.
n. DENIED, II is denied thai Plaintiff compensated Defendant Winter monctanly
In ellC'-F for Defendanl Winters' set'\'1U 10 PlalnlllT's vchiek. Rather, ....intiff merely
mmbuncd Defendanl Winter for the II1OIlC)' he pmona1ly npmded Clll puts In IftPIr1DI
l'talIIIifT's vOidot lOr state ~Iioft
23. DENIED. The aIlqauoo In I'aragrarh 2) " a vaauc and pnenl ~'tlftCiUSIOIl DC
18.. l\) ..tIldI1lO l'CSpOlISlt is ~
5
33. DENIED, The allegation contained in paragraph 33 is a conclusion of law to
whIch no response is requircd,
WHERFORE. Defendant Winter respectfully requests that judgment be entered in his
favor and against Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT WINTER'S NEW MAlTER PURSUANT
TO PL R. C. P. 2Z5Zfdl REGARDING DEFENDANT FREELAND
34, Defendant Winter incorporates herein by reference the answers to paragraphs I
through 33. above, as though the same were set forth herein at length,
35. Defendant Winlcr avers by way of defense that if Plaintiff sustained propcny
damages as llleged in his complaint, all of which arc speciflCllly denied, then said damages were
not the mult of any acts and/or omissions on the put of Defendant Winter. Rather, Defendant
Frcecland is primanly liable for any damages which may have been suffered by Plaintiff and
which may be subsequently established II the time of trial because It was Defendant Freeland's
aaion in not informing Defendant Winter of I known. existing defective condition In the scar
mechanism of his vehicle and SllCh negllacnce actually caused the a11qcd damace to P1aintirrs
vehicle. Funhermore. at the time Defendant Freeland delivered his vehick 10 Defendanl
WIlIlcr'S home. Defendanl Freeland was lware thaI his vehlClt had prevIOUSly shppcd oul of
scar when II was placed In the "park.~ posillon. Thmflft. Defendant Frccland WIS on notlclI
that theft ...... . .fcct In his .-dm;1e and )fl he Called to warn Defendant WlIIlcr of this blow1t
and ulIlm& daftamJus condlllon,
36. If as I mIIII of the matter a1kstd III \'Iamt.ffs camplamI and w _wen
Ihrrtto. I~fmdant WlftIn may be hdd IIiIbk f<< III or put of IIkh damaca 1'1 PlaumlT may
J
have suffered and which may be established at the time of trial, then Defendant Freeland. as the
party primarily liable for such damages is liable to Defendant Winter by way of contribution
and/or indemnification for all such damages as he may suffer and he therefore asserts in this
action his right to such indemnification and/or contribution against Defendant Freeland,
WHEREFORE. Defendant Winter demands that judgment be entered against Defendant
Freeland and that Defendant Freeland be held liable to Plaintiff, or alternatively, if Defendant
Winter is determined to be liable to Plaintiff, then Defendant Freeland be held liable over to
Defendant Winter for any Judgment against Defendant Winter.
DEFENDANT WINTER'S NEW MA ITER PURSUANT
TO .... R. C. P. 215Zldl REGARDING DEFENDANT BENNER
37. Defendant Winter incorporates herein by refcrcncc the answers to parapapbs I
throuah 36, above, as though the same were set fonh herein allcnath-
38, Defendant Winter avus by way of l'ut1hcr defense thai if Plaintiff sustained
dunqcI as allqed in P1aintirrs complaint, all of which damaCCS were not the result of any ads
ancUor omissions 011 the pen of Defendant Winter. Rather, Defendant BaIner is primarily liable
for any damaccs wbic:h may have been sulTcrcd by Plaintiff and wbic:h may be sublcqucnlly
ntablilhecl at the time of trial bcc_ il wu DefClldant BaIner's action in parbna Defendant
Frcdand', vehiclc in Defmdant Winlcr's IIItlined driYCWB)', 1caYina the motor nnlm,. fallma
to eapp tilt caleo~)' braU BIId 1eaY1llJ the vducle _~ thai actually CllI*d the
aUqed .... to PIamt,rrs mucic,
3.. If as a mt.dt of tilt mat\Itt allqed 1ft I'laIIIlIrr. COIIIpIaIlll and tilt Bt\SWUI
themD. Ddhlllnl WiI\ln may bt hrld Ital* for ,II or pIl'l of such damata as PIamt,ff may
..~ lIICWI'td BIId wtudt may be mul,tbcd at the lII\1e of lmI. ~ Ot...... Bcmcr as the
..
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Henry F. Coyne, Esquire do hereby certify that on the S" day of November,
1996, a True and Correct Copy of Defendant Winter's Answer to Plaintirrs Complaint
With New Matter Cross Claim Against Defendants Freeland and Benner was served by
depositing the same in the Uniled Stales mail, postage prepaid, to those individuals listed
below:
Ramona C. Cataldi, Esquire
Metzger, Wickersham, Knauss & Em
3211 North Fronl Street
P.O. Box 5300
Harrisburg. PA 17110-{)300
Philip H. Spare
Snelbaker & Brenneman
44 West Main Street
Mccbanicsburg, PA 17055
Ronald E. Benner
IO-C Crecbide Lane
Carlisle. P A 17013
BY:
Henry F. Coyne
Attorney for De Winter
3901 Martet Street
Camp Hin. PA 17011"-221
(717) lJ1~
PI. S, Ct. No. 06250
. i
~~
"1l '.
tll ~
r;t j ~ d::
'0 '"5 r1.
.J.tJ. ~ '
oJ (.. Q
~ J\J
~~~J..D
CO~
. --.---
......
VERIFICATION
I, Walter W. Philipson, hereby certify that the facts set
forth in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct to the best
of my knowledge, information, and belief, and that false statements
herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. 54904
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
t
.
~
Date:
II/ILl /94
I /
--- ~ '., . '.'.
" ;'P:.' f
f r- ;>:
In t,
.. f';~
-
,c :3~
u. , l
';0::
l' In ~'~
c. N
r:;:r . . ;'e
; :~ ,\C
I :...:
\, .r> J
I) \'" U
,'~, ,~.:'~ii';'T'~
.l'/',::'t ';
,,;"''J ..', t
~>:A:~i ;~{~~.,
'.."" .~; i i;
II
.5, ~ 0
oa' 0 ,
1'1' "
.. 0 .:.~
..' .. ~r
~ ..
.. E
F
:lC ..0 c
. . .0 i
:r . . 1'1 ~
~ e ~ ~ .
",.--0 .
ct Z t lD .
W · ... . .
,,030 ..
u:: Q; Q.
- c z ~
~ ;;;
. "
1'1 .
a: .
w i
" C
N .
I:i r
~
..., ....--~
.
. .
.,. ~