Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-05847 ,/ / .- ; I ~I JI I , 1 , , , r-i ::rl 001 \(), COUNT I. JANE PENNEY VS. JOSEPH P. SANDER a.k.a JOSEPH R. SANDER AND MERCEDES BENZ CREDIT CORPORATION 4. plaintiff, JANE PENNEV, incorporates paragraphs 1 through 3 above as fully as though the same were hereinafter eet forth in length. 5. On or about october 10, 1995 plaintiff, JANE PENNEY, was operating her employer's cab northbound on 32nd and Market streets, Township of camp Hill, Cumberland county, Commonliealth of Pennsylvania, when suddenly and without warning the motor vehicle owned by Defendant, MERCEDES BENZ CREDIT CORPORATION, and operated by Defendant, JOSEPH P. SANDER a.k.a JOSEPH R. SANDER, violently rear- ended Plaintiff's motor vehicle while it was stopped for a red light causing serious and permanent injuries to Plaintiff hereinafter referred to. 6. solely as a result of the aforesaid accident, Plaintiff suffered serious physical injuries, including without limitation, cervical, thoracic, lumbar sprain, left shoulder sprain and strain, myofascial pain syndrome involving the right upper fibrotrapezius, left wrist strain and sprain, all of which may be permanent in nature, cause permanent disfigurement and/or loss of use of a bodily function. 7. Further, Plaintiff incurred a severe shock to her nerves and nervous system, great physical pain and mental anguish and was prevented from attending to her usual 2 duties, activities, and avocations all of which may continue for an indefinite time in the near future. 8. This action resulted solely from the negligence and recklessness of the Defendants herein and was due in no manner whatsoever to any act or failure to act on the part of the Plaintiff. 9. The negligence and recklessness of the Defendants consisted of the following: a. Failure to properly operate and control their motor vehicle; b. Driving at an excessive rate of speed under the circumstances; c. Failure to keep a proper lookout; d. Failure to regard the point and position of the plaintiff's motor vehicle then and there being lawfully operated upon said highway; e. Failure to keep constant vigilance of the road, traffic, weather, and road conditions; f. violation of the statutes of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as the ordinances of cumberland county governing the operations of motor vehicles on the streets and highways; g. Failure to use due care under the 3 circumstances; h. Negligence and recklessness at law. 10. As a result of this accident, Plaintiff will be obliged to receive and undergo medical attention and care and to expend various sums of money or to incur various expenses and she may be obliged to continue to expend such , sums and to incur such expenditures for an indefinite period of time in the future. 11. As a further result of this accident, Plaintiff has or may suffer a severe loss of her earnings, and impairment of her earning capacity or power, which such loss of income and/or impairment of her earning capacity or power. 12. As a further result of this accident, Plaintiff has suffered severe physical pain, mental anguish, and humiliation and she may continue to suffer same for an indefinite time in the future. 13. As a direct and reasonable result of this accident aforementioned, Plaintiff has or may hereafter incur other financial expenses or losses which do or may exceed amount which she may otherwise be entitled to recover. 4 ...J N \ \.a ~'r - ~ ~ ~ <:'1 '-.l - ".l. Lr. . ~ I-- A \"} ~" c;' rj;:.. ). ..' ;, 'R f"( ~;[ L.. .' ~ \ '. ;-' p "'\ ~ . ~: ~ .,.. ,') ,'..('\ I"i, LlI' ,.J 1 ;'i r ..::r ~t', 1-- '<oj .. ~ <- t r. '- ,.:...; :1 c. '-' lC. ',<l ::) l..; c." U .~\S\~ " '\Z d - ~ ,. f"'. ~- c-: , : , ;:-,~ c.:; l.~ (-, U.r.. . ),. O. , . f"" -". ,~ -I lL ):~ Lj 0,. if"? ?.11 , LLJ'- , -=-; -'l' , rei l.L,." '. , !~ f, ". .. " , " ~."';i u G. l..J f;: o. ;..-. t:~: ". ~ UJ~ I .~ l ,- (;: ~ '. IL . ~j~. :~~ Cl j) l .' ,- lllL_- .,) 'ill f ~, lu.. l..!. .I U l. , , ) ... Jane Penney v. Defendants 4. The answers to Paragraphs 1 through 3 above are incorporated herein by reforence thereto. 5. Denied as stated. It is admitted that tha vehicle operated by Joseph Sander and owned by Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation struck the rear of Plaintiff's motor vehicle while it was stopped at the location alleged. It is denied that the collision was "violent". As to the balance of the allegations of this paragraph, after reasonable investigation, Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth af these allegations and proof thereof is demanded. 6.-7. Denied. After reasonable investigation. Defendant Is without knowledge or Information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations and proof thereof is demanded. 8,-9. These allegations are denied pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1029. However. in further answer. Answering Defendant admits negligence in connection with the happening of this accident. 10.-13. Denied. After reasonable Investigation. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations and proof thereof is demanded. WHEREFORE. Answering Defendant admits negligence on his part. NEW MATTER 14. Plaintiff's claims are subject to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Act, the limitations of which are incorporated herein by 3 .~ 0' f;; .;z I~ .. ~~~ - . , ::t: ;')-1: a.. '::I~ fr N c.~ I .:~:. ~ - ~6i -- < ,0.; -, ::c: , ~ ,.. B en L. ~ ~ t; co ~~ L. ~ ;'i~::t ~ ~ I: g :> ~ i" d :I ~ k ~ 0: ii ::: Z !I to ~.. " ~ :l o ~ - " . '" a. ~ ~; ,~" , c~:: , -:: IJ.I~'-:.' , (J: -' .:., fi;, -i Cir. e,' (") ,-.,) Ill:. -', . Ii] Li: ' ,.'- ',--L ". ..... ,~ <...J CT' _..1