Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-06061 III ~ 15! z:) p (!)... .. l~~I~ Hi ~ 01 U Ul R ~ ~ R .'. ... . , . . ...".. WI po HI"'S" CIRTl'" 1HA' 1HI WITHIN 'I A lRUIt ,.NO COR. :UJ uN::: AC~~l~' OAlnc"\. I. ,^W"f,u:rh .'11 ,(JJ.~~h i?":":rf1~:l'\"...~~Z':'ft~~-~r i::1~t:o:.-'::l~ ~~' l'~l"::'fk't _..... IN!U"p"'-',nlU .. -.---AftON#y. ------- ,,"0f\N&'I' MANCKE, WAGNER,'HERSHEY & TULLY . . Kelly Duntee, sister to the Deter.dant, will testity to the lack ot attention the natural mother has paid to ths child, the excellent care that has been provided by the grandparents to the child, and turther testity to the personal problems that the natural mother has, particularly as it relates to her boytriend and the alleged drug usa that the boytriend with whom the natural mother resides. Jineene Nelson will testity as to the grandparents' loving care tor the child. She will also testity to the lack ot concern and care that the natural mother has expressed. Judith Hair will verity the Plaintiffs care ot the child and the lack of care from the natural mother. Finally, Plaintifts may call the natural mother as on cross-examination. II. paOPOSBD aBSOLUTIONI It is proposed that primary physical care and legal custody of the child be vested with the grandparents, Plaintiffs herein, subject to periods of partial custody, which shall, for the time being, be exercised at the home of the Plaintiffs herein. This request is because of the lack of care and concern expressed in the past by the natural mother, her l4Ck of care for herself, and for her irresponsibility that has been exhibited Lee R. Dunfee and Susan Dunfee, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaint ICfs v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Bonnie Dunfee, Defendant NO. 96-6061 CIVIL TERM v. CUSTODY John C. Rohrbaugh, Defendant AND NOW, t his of November, 1997, upon consideration of the attached Motion for Continuance, the matter scheduled for hearing on October 27, 1997, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No.3, by this Court's Order of August 20, 1997, is hereby rescheduled for hearing on March 2, 1998, at 1:30 p.m. The Court Order of August 20, 1997, shall remain in effect pending further Order of Court. P. Richard Wagner Attorney for Plaintiff Joan Carey Attorney for Defendant James J. Kayer Attorney for Defendant C. ...b..t.4.0 tnLa.~(ut II J.) 0 /9'1 . c ~ ,,!. \'. \=\\ct:-C'?:1U; C...... ". ,-\' ,-\1' .t,"''{ :. \.: .,', ,.},..:\ (11 Wi'!::U i.\. \1: l,~ C'..1~.... ' , ,;, ,:'~ ',' ,. Lee Ro Dunfee and Susan Dunfee, IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaint Iffs v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Bonnie Dunfee, Defendant NO. 96-6061 CIVIL TERM v. CUSTODY John C. Rohrbaugh, Defendant MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE The defendant, Bonnie Dunfee, by the through her attorney, Joan Carey of Legal Services, Inc., moves the Court for an Order rescheduling the hearing In the above-captioned case on the grounds that: 1. A custody conciliation was held August I, 1997, with Michael L. Bangs, regarding custody of Kodee Smith (Rohrbaugh) (DOB 2/9/96). 20 After the conciliation conference, this Court issued an Order on August 20, 1997, scheduling a hearing for October 27, 1997, at 1:30 p.m. 3. The parties, by and through their counsel, agree that the hearing be rescheduledo 4. The parties understand that the Order of August 20, 1997, remains In effect pending further Order of Court. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff requests that the Court grant this Motion and reschedule this matter for hearing, with the Order of August 20, 1997, remaining in effect pending further Order of Court. Respectfully submitted, oari'Carey 'Attorney for Bonnie Dunfee LEGAL SERVICES, INC. a Irvine Row Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-9400 .... <:) ~: it' ~l' _':J " 1''';- f~ :;, c.. ~ lo"" ~~i;~ J 4". 'r. '"O( . Ii:? 0.. .~ :"j (1)':" ; ~~ Ea~> C:l .,"(n I.... [~L ,1:Z' ~': '1lL] i ,':!a... ~- .- II. 1- :.:l U eJ'l U ,; .....,"J.. an Q ".0) ':1: . .. .'1> Ii .~ . "'~ t a~'" ~I ~a ~ .~ 'i ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ !;.\lo.. Q c; ~ 'lI"}. .t':l ~~ . r>.C.'.:,;.......; ".".','j 'i '. >.,'. . ...,. ':..J 0';;' ~ 15~<:< . I ~~I f .~~{ ~.i&l.III~.:1,'... '. . ~ft ~;;:" ~ <', ~ :x:......,'" -CC.","."'''',,;C.',_ .. 'j \::/''!:\:. ~.., ,'.)~ ''i''_ . . J> ~:. ~?TH'I\!~I': l~t~T1:JD ~o'A': "lOT COP''' 0' THI OJlt'OIHAL "'-Ia IN ,... ACTtOH ..,.. . ATT'OftHI:'t' l"""'Jlf'Crll ~~19 ~Nf:.1:.r.'n~:;:' ~ aDt'!&::.'I:t MlW..i5"ItD ~,vau .,-,,~-- MAN:::KE, WAGNER. HEilSHEY & TULLY LEE R. DUNFEE and SUSAN E. DUNFEE, his wife, Plaintiffs, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. q6 - 6061 (f,U~( T~ v. BONNIE DUNFEE and JASON SMITH, CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN CUSTODY Defendants. ORDIR AND NOW, this~day of N"~('mh(....- , 19~, upon consideration of the attached Complaint, it is hereby directed that the parties anq their respective counsel appear before Mi' c:.. t:::.<" , the Concil~or, a,t () ~ i'Y\ I , on -/1 hL{,.SrlLH/ , the "-~ayof ~ , 19<'~, at I,:wAM, o'clock --~.m., for a Pre-Hear ng Custody Conference. At such conferen~an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the Court, and to enter into a temporary Order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent Order. FOR THE COURT, By /l1~~ /(~~ custody Conciliator -S9,?"( YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR COURTHOUSE, 4TH FLOOR CARLISLE, PA 17013 (717) 240-6200 . ..., ........... - ,-j~" Fi T},rr:n!'r: (~.~ ~ I . '., -'."' v,_ , ":')~\T( ,,: I ''-''' I ' ...J, ,j I',', ''1, 1'1 , , .It I.., ,." t - "" (;" G..i....... ,.\ o. i'- 0' " 'r "\''')'L' ..'" ~ ,j \J.I;a~\JJ\ /I. I~ ,f)/; ttvlo t'''f-'I /H;.}y ~ ~ ~ /1' 15, yt; '7lt0z, IH~ ~ dtp /1015,9(, I~~-- /1f.~ ~ LEE R. DUNFEE and SUSAN E. . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . DUNFEE, his wife, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVNAIA Petitioners, NO. 9/;. {,tJt.1 C4;J.,- .J.-v-' v. . . : CIVIL ACTION - LAW BONNIE DUNFEE and JASON IN CUSTODY SMITH, Respondents. . . PBTITIOH TO COHrIRM CUSTODY AND NOW, come the petitioners, LEE R. DUNFEE and SUSAN E. DUltFEE, his wife, by and through their attorneys, MANCKE, WAGN~~, HERSHEY & TULLY, and files the following petition to confirm CUstody: 1. Your Petitioners, LEE R. DUNFEE and SUSAN E. DUNFEE, his wife, are adult individuals residing at 2619 Walnut Bottom Road, Carlisle, cumberland county, Pennsylvania. 2. The Respondent, BONNIE DUNFEE, is a minor, having a date of birth as August 15, 1980. 3. The Respondent, JASON SMITH, is an adult individual residing at R.D. #3, Middle Road, Newville, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania. 4. Bonnie Dunfee is the natural daughter of the Petitioners herein. 5. On or about February 9, 1996, a child was born out of wedlock to the Respondent, BONNIE DUNFEE and the Respondent, JASON SMITH. 6. BONNIE DUNFEE and JASON SMITH have never been married. 7. BONNIE DUNFEE resides trom time to time with the Petitioners herein at 2619 Walnut Bottom Road, Carlisle, CUmberland County, pennsylvania, but has from time to time disappeared and resided at places unknown to the Petitioners. 8. The Respondent, BONNIE DUNFEE, has been absent from school a considerable period of time where she is an eleventh grade student at Big springs High School. 9. At all times relevant hereto, since the birth of KODEE SMITH to the Respondent BONNIE DUNFEE and the Respondent, JASON SMITH, KODEE SMITH has been in the primary care of the petitioners herein, LEE R. DUNFEE and SUSAN E. DUNFEE, his wife, who are the maternal grandparents of the child. 10. The primary care taking of the child since the birth of the child has been provided by the Petitioners heroin at their residence at 2619 Walnut Bottom Road, Carlisle, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania. 11. On Monday, October 7, 1996, the Respondent, BONNIE DUNFEE, left her parents' home at 2619 Walnut Bottom Road, Carlisle, Cumberland County, pennsylvania, and disappeared to places unknown to the petitioners herein which resulted in the Petitioners contacting the Pennsylvania State police and reporting BONNIE DUNFEE to be a missing person. 12. Durinq the entire times that BONNIE DUNFEE has vacated the home at 2619 Walnut Bottom Road, carlisle, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania, she has not taken KODEE SMITH with her, but has left the care of KODEE SMITH exclusively with the Petitioners herein. 13. The petitioners are concerned about the stability of their dauqhter, BONNIE DUNFEE, the natural mother of KODEE SMITH, and her frequent absences from the home to places unknown to the petitioners herein. 14. Since the Petitioners have been the primary caretakers of KODEE SMITH, the Petitioners herein believe and therefore aver that it is in the best interest of KODEE SMITH to qrant primary physical custody of KODEE SMITH, born February 9, 1996, unto the Petitioners herein, the maternal qrandparents, subject to periods of partial custody in the Respondents. WHEREFORE, petitioners pray this Court to qrant their request for primary physical custody of KODEE SMITH. Respectfully submitted, JIAJICltll, WA HIlRSHIlY , TULLY ()l'P"'/R~er, Esquire IoD. V31:03 2?Ja~orth Front Street _----airrisburq, PA 17110 - (717) 234-7051 Attorney for Petitioners DATE: VIRII'ICATIOII I verity that the statements made in the toreqoinq document are true and correct. I understand that talse statements herein are made subject to the penalties ot 18 Pa.C.S. seotion 4904, relatinq to unsworn talsitication to authorities. I) J:/dM g;.V/~ ~ 7., Pc-(-- DATE: oc-1 Ir, IIf'lG 3. The parties shall reconvene for another conciliation before Michael L. Bangs, Custody Conciliator, on ThurSday, July 31,1997, at 9:00 a.m. 4. This Order Is In no way intended to prejudice each party's rights to make a claim for primsry custody of the minor child at a later date. BY THE COURT, P. Richard Wagner, Esquire Joan Carey, Esquire John Rohrbaugh 128 Woods Road Newville, PA 17241 ~ ~~ 7/3/'1'1. .~.fl. mlb PLr:Do.',';:::: C~ 71 :~~ ,- ",'1 'r.""'~P,;1Y 97..IlJl. -:J /;/i I.): ~ 5 Ct.}:.:.:.., :'.',... ' ,,' ~.ij\iY Ptt,~:\,:: tl\." .. \ LEE R. DUNFEE and SUSAN DUNFEE, his wife, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs vs, NOo 96-6061 CIVIL TERM BONNIE DUNFEE, Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW CUSTODY JUDGE PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED: None CUSTODY CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1915,3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report: 1. The pertinent Information concerning the child(ren) who is(are) the subject of this litigation is as follows: NAME BIRTH DATE CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF Kodee Smith February 9, 1996 Plaintiff 20 A Conciliation Conference was held on June 5, 1997, and the following individuals were present: the Plaintiff and their attorney, P. Richard Wagner, Esquire; the Defendant appeared with her attorney, Joan Carey, Esquire. 30 Items resolved by agreement: See attached Ordero 40 Issues yet to be resolved: An ultimate custody and visitation schedule with mothero 5. The Plaintiff's position on custody is as follows: Plaintiffs are the maternal grandparants of the minor child and they have essentially taken care of the child since the child's birth, The natural mother Is their 16 year old daughter. The natural mother moved out from the residence In November of 1996 and they heve been the sole primary care takers since then. They believe that their daughter Is not equipped to handle the child at this time. 6. The Defendant's position on custody is as follows: Defendant wants to reacquaint herself with her son and obtain full custody of the child. 7. Need for separate counsel to represent child(ren): Neither party requested. 8. Need for independent psychological evaluation or counseling: None requested and the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary. 9. Other matters or comments: This is a situation where the meternal grandparents will have been with the child since birtho Their daughter is currently 16 years oldo She moved out of the parents' residence in November of 1996. The parties agreed that they will try a period of time to reacquaint the child with the natural mother and to have the Mother work on her parenting skills. The hope is that the parties will work towards a situation where Mother can regain the custody of the child. There was a question at the time of the conciliation concerning the fathero An individual by the name of Jason Smith was identified as the father originallyo LEE R, DUNFEE AND SUSAN DUNFEE, Plaintiffs IN THE COURT Oil COMMON PLEAS OJl CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v, NO, 96-6061 CIVIL TI!I(M CIVIL ACTION. LA W BONNIE DUNFEE, Defendant v, JOHN Co ROHRBAUGH, Additlonul Defendant IN CllS'I'OI> Y ~ ORIJJ<:R (W COUIIT AND NOW, this ~ duy of July, )1)1)7, IIIl' cuurt IIcklluwlrllllhlll lis rccelpt of the lIutllrul father's coullterclaim for panial physlcul custody I It Is hl'f'l'hy utlll'tl'd thut thll fllthcr shull be allowed to panlclpute in the custody cOllclllutloll cOllferl'lIcL' thut hUH IWI'II Hclll'dulcll fur July 31, 1997 at 9:00 aomo at the office of Michael L, BUllgs, Esquire, Cllsllllly ('ullclllnlllr, lucnlrllnt :1()2 South 18th Street, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, IIY Till! COllin, cc: p, Ricllllrd Wagner, Esqllire James J. Kayer, Esqlllre '1_ II 'il _f" foIl" J II .'l ";'..( Joun Curey, ES1lulre . /,.., '-:!J'T; r'~<"~:' -., , '; 'Ii ,....... , - "') 01 11'1 " , , rl ,:, , . ",,,', LEE R, DUNFEE and SUSAN DUNFEE, his wife, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs vs. NO. 96-6061 CIVIL TERM BONNIE DUNFEE, Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW CUSTODY AND NOW, this ORDER 3A<l day of ~6 , 1997.. upon receipt of the Conciliator's Report, it appearing that the parties have agreed to the terms and provisions of this temporllry Order which was dictated In their presence and approved by them and their counsel, It Is hereby ordered and directed as follows: 'I, The maternal grandparents, Lee R. Dunfeo and Susan Dunfee, shall have primary physical custody of the minor child, Kodee Smith (Rohrbaugh), d,Oob, February 9, 1996, 20 The natural Mother of the child, Bonnie Dunfee, shall have periods of partial custody and visitation with the child at a minimum .. three evenings per week from 5:30 p.m, until 9:00 p,m. These periods ef visitation shall occur In tho maternal grandparent's home, but it is the hope and intention that MDther can exercise some periods of visitation with the child outside of the homo. EXIIIIHT "A" 3. The parties shall reconvene for another conciliation before Michael L. Bangs, Custody Conciliator, on Thursday, July 31, 1997, at 9:00 eomo 4, This Order Is in no way Intended to prejudice each party's rights to make a claim for primary custody of the minor child at a later dateo BY THE COURT, 151 J-\u\.89- F. 0 )~A./ p, Richerd Wagner, Esquire Joan Carey, Esquire John Rohrbaugh 128 Woods Road Newville, PA 17241 mlb TRUE COpy FROM RECORD In Tcstim?n'/ ...,+,( rf,ilf, I hore untD set my hand and the seal of said CDurt at Carlisle, Pa. lhls ....;?..~":t. of,..,Mv~,~.., 19..Z1. vJ.&_1t'._f!:'o:,.~!{Y:y..- 02)flE. 0 PrOlllOlo0101 y 5, Tho Plaintiff's position on custody is as follows: Plaintiffs aro tho maternal grandparents of the minor child and they have essentially taken care of the child sinco the child's birth, The natural mother is their 16 year old daughter. The natural moth or moved out from tho residence in November of 1996 and they have been ,he sole primary care takers since then. They believe that their daughter is not equipped to handlo the child at this time, 6, The Defendant's position on custody is I1S follows: Defendant wants to reacquaint herself with her son and obtain full custody of the child, 7. Need for separate counsel to represent child(ren): Noither party requestedo 80 Need for Independont psychological evaluation or counseling: None requested and the Conciliator does not beliove any is necessary, 90 Other matters or comments: This is a situation where the maternal grandparents will have been with the child since birth. Their daughter is currently 16 years oldo She moved out of the parents' residence In November of 1996. The parties agreod that they will try a period of time to reacquaint the child with the natural mother and to have the Mother work on her parenting skills, The hope is that the parties will work towards a situation where Mother can rogain the custody of the child, Thoro was a question at tho timo of tho conciliation concerning the fathor, An individual by the name of Jason Smith was identified as the father originallyo " CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Counterclaim for partial Custody was served on the following person by First-class mail, po~1l1ge prepaid IIddressed to: P. Richard Wagner, Esquire Mancke, Wagner, Hershey & Tully 2233 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Attorney for Plaintiffs and Joan Carey, Esquire Legal Services 8 Irvine Row Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant, Bonnie Dunfee Date: July 8, 1997 Jame Jo 'Ka 'r. ulre LiW y Lor 4 Eo ibert A venue Carl ole, P 17013 (71 ) 243-7922 ~f.t-,~ {)O. ~l.. - l.. OtQ.\ F:U:O-GrFlCE CF T: " .,..,oIT'-'I"'''OT''.R'( -' 'I '''..-lll..'lr 91 ^\jr, 20 I'i: L: 06 {"Ill:: . " j I ',"',1 tl,!-"\.{ UOJ.f"'" ." \.' - -'Ill tr:""''''''''\ \.'/'<!': CI\.',)I..,/', .;, 3. Items resolved by egreement: See attached Order. 4. Issues yet to be resolved: All ultimate custody and visitation schedule. 6. The Plaintiffs' position on custody Is as follows: Plaintiffs, the maternal grandparents, have essentially raised the child since birth. The mother of the child Is their daughter who Is 16 years of age. The natural mother movad out from the rasldence in November, 1996, and they have been the sole primary care takers since then. They believe that their daughter is not equipped to handle the child on her own and will only agree to visitation which occurs In their home. They have concerns about mother's living environment, particularly as it relates to her boyfriend, Jason Smith, who allegedly made statements to them that he Is "hooked on marijuana" and therefore they don't think the child should ba In that environment. 6. The Defendant's position on custody Is as follows: The Mother agreed to have visitation with the child at her parents' home In June of this year with the anticipation that she be entitled to take the child out of the home. The parents never let her take the child out of the home and from her perspective are unwilling to allow her to show that she can care for the chlldo She requested initially that she be given three days per week which would Include two overnights. She was willing to compromise to allow her to have three days per week so long as she could take the child out of the home, Her parents were not willing to agree to her 2 taking tha child out of the home because of their concerns about her boyfrland. She denies that her boyfriend has the problems Indicated and that the child Is not In a safe environment. 7. The Additional Defendant's position on custody is as follows: Father's position is that he wants to acquaint himself with the child. He affectively had no contact with the child until paternity was established. He has started to see the child over at the maternal grandparents' house. Apparently his relationship with the maternal grandparents Is fine for the time being and they will permit him to see the child In accordance with this order. He also stated that the Mother's boyfriend Is physically abusive towards the Mother and that he had concerns about the safety of tha child at Mr. Smith's home. 8. Need for separate counsel to rflpresent child(ren): Neither party requested. 9. Need for independent psychological evaluation or counseling: None requested and the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary. 100 A hearing In this matter will take one day. 11. Other matters or comments: This is a case involving a very young mother with a baby, Her parents effectively have raised the child and have concerns that their daughter, the mother of the child, is not equipped to handle tile 3 child on her own. Naturally, the maternal grandparents are concerned In that they have effectively been the parents of the child, However, their primary and only concern oeems to be that the mother Is living with someone, Jason Smith, who has allegadly told tham that he has a drug problem and in an environment that they do not believe is suitable. Therefore, their concern does not seem to be entirely related to the mother's actual care taking ability, but rether what they perceive aa her lack of resJ:'onsibility In choosing to live in an environment that they do not believe is acceptable and one In which they don't believe that the child would be safe. In other words, since the mother is choosing to live in an environment that they do not accept, they assume that that shows that the mother is not responsible enough to care for her child. The Conciliator unsuccessfully tried to convince the maternal grandparents that the mother be given the opportunity to prove that she is able to care for the child on her own outside the house. The grandparents have effectively taken the position that until they believe the mother shows good sense in choosing a proper living environment, that the child should not be with the mother. The mother's choice of living environments per se should not be the controlling factor if she can show that she can care for the child and the child Is in a safe environmento Without giving her the opportunity to show that, she will never be able to prove that she is in fact ready to take on her role as the mother of this child, 4 As far as the Father Is concerned, he needs to get acquainted with the child before he can start requesting additional time. If the Father shows that he Is willing to take the time necessary to acquaint himself with the child, then his visitation period should be expanded. Date: August 13, 1997 Mich el L. Bangs Custody Conciliator 5 . 1M R. Dunfee IIId Suaan Dunfee. PIaintifti ; lNnm COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBER.I.AND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : ~~I : NO. 96- CIVlL TERM : CUSTODY v. Boonio Dunfee, Doti.rvf.nl v. I John C. Robrbeugb. Doti.rvf.nl ORDRR FOR CONTINTTANCE ANDNOW'-1~lz.of~ ,...._............"'.. alladwJ Motion for Continuance, tho mailer aclIoduIod for heering OIl MaJdJ 2, 1998, iI cootinuod geoera1Iy. This Order- ia eoletod without prejudice to oither party to JP.""""duIe a bamingo Tho Court Order- or August 20, 1997, shall remain in olfoct powvIil18 fiutber Order- orcourto JOlUl Carey Attorney for Defaldant, Boonlo Dunfi!e James J. !Cayer Allomey for Defendant, John Rohrbauah P. Ridwd Wa8D<< Attorney for PlaintiJU (, ,...... "-4J r""..r.:~,.t.. 3/1 to I 11 fi ' ~\r o~ 1'. .... .,. ...... II r~-' (J' f ~ I ":1 <,.;( r ! ll,. -.1" t,.' :. I I',. Cl C.: If; " I (, '!' ,~: , .. r. ") L1 .i "J