HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-02279
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA M.
DAVIS, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
V.
W1 .
LEE ROLAND
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. CO - ;Za7? O L( (£/Ln
PRAECIPE TO ISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please issue the Writ of Summons in the above matter and have it served on
Defendant, W. Lee Roland at the following address:
W. Lee Roland
337 West Meadow Drive
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055
-?-?
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
NESTICO, KORPOSH & DRUBY, L.L.P.
By:
Anthon J. Ne Ndb, Esquire
Attorney . N .58868
475 West Governor Road
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
(717) 533-5406
(717) 533-4483
Attorney for Plaintiffs
f
° e
a
1a ?
Crr f??
C-j
T:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
Carl J. Davis and Donna M.
Davis, husband and wife
V&
W. Lee Roland
337 West Meadow Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 1705
--W.-Lee-Roland
Court of Common Pleas
No. ------ QO_2-9.79-_Qi41_L TeIM--------- 19
In ------ Civil _,Ut QD- =-LaIa-----------------
You are hereby notified that
-------- Carl -I_-Davis.and.Domi&-M--Dav-i&,-.husband_ansl ifp---------------
the Plaintiff has commenced an action in ----------Civil- Action ---Law
------------------------
against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you.
(SEAL)
Date ------ gra_14_r200k-__----
Curtis R. Long
------------------------------
Prothonotary
- -- -E----- - - ----
Deputy
F-' (D -,J '
H (D
ak w(?D
C N 0
w N
00 Ln C-4
m C ?
00 rn F-(D ((DD
C) rt
w?n
?o
rf1
CJ
C
n
rt
0
p?
W ?
w•
O ?7 (rp
N (D
m rt O
G (`(DD N
Q R?
?d
J C
om
Ul
5
w w
N- N
C-4
C
¢a
a¢
(D a
0
0
0
I
N
N
c
r
m
I
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2000-02279 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
DAVIS CARL J ET AL
VS
ROLAND W LEE
BRIAN BARRICK Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pensylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS
W LEE
was served upon
the
DEFENDANT , at 0015:28 HOURS, on the 14th day of April , 2000
at 337 WEST MEADOW DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055 by handing to
ROSALIE ROLAND (WIFE)
a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with
and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing 18.00
Service 6.20
Affidavit .00
Surcharge 10.00
.00
34.20
Sworn and Subscribed to before
me this 19 tr' day of
-t /1 A. D.
TProthonotar
So Answers:
,.
R. Thomas Kline
04/18/2000
NESTICO & KORPOSH
By: F/ll?
Deputy Sheriff
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA M.
DAVIS, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
V.
W. LEE ROLAND
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. 00-2279
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims
set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this
Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by
attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims
set forth herein. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without
further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to
you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle PA 17013
NOTICA
LE HAN DEMANDADO A USTED EN LA COURTE. Si usted quiere defenderse
de estas demandas expuestas en las paginas siquientes, usted tiene viente (20) dias de
plazo al partir de Ian fecha de la demanda y la notification. Usted debe presentar una
apariencia escrita o en persona o por abogado y archival en la torte en forma escrita sus
defensas o sus objeciones a law demandas en contra de su persona. Sea avisado que si
usted no se defiende, la torte tomara medidas y puede entrar una orden contra usted
sin previo aviso o notificacaion y per cualguier queja o alivio que es pedido en la
petition de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero o sus propiedades o otros derechos
importantes para usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABODAGO INMEDIATAMENTE. SI NO
TIENE AGOGADO O SI NO TIENCE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR TAL
SERVICIO, VAYA EN PERSONA O LLAME POR TELEFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA
DIRECCION SE ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE
PUEDE CONSEGUIR ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle PA 17013
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA M. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
DAVIS, husband and wife, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiffs
CIVIL ACTION
V.
NO. 00-2279
W. LEE ROLAND V
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
AND NOW, Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, file this
Complaint and allege in support thereof the following:
1. Plaintiffs are Carl Davis and Donna M. Davis, husband and wife,
residing at 120 Locust Lane, Dillsburg, Pennsylvania 17019.
2. Defendant is W. Lee Roland, with an address at 337 West Meadow
Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055.
3. Venue in this court is appropriate because the Plaintiffs reside in
Cumberland County and Defendant has a principle place of business
located in Cumberland County, and regularly conducts business there.
4. Defendant is in the general contracting business.
COUNT 1- BREACH OF CONTRACT
5. The foregoing numbered paragraphs are incorporated herein by
reference.
6. On or about July 11, 1997, Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into a
construction agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Agreement." A
copy of the Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
7. Defendant agreed to construct, and serve as general contractor for the
construction of, a residential dwelling located on premises owned by
the Plaintiffs.
8. Defendant agreed to build and construct a four-bedroom home, and an
attached four-car garage.
9. Defendant agreed to build and construct the project for the total price
of consideration of four hundred sixty-two thousand ($462,000.00)
dollars in accordance with a periodic payment schedule.
10. Defendant agreed to substantially complete said construction project
within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days from the
commencement date.
11. Defendant failed to complete the construction, in accordance of the
Agreement.
12. Specifically, Defendant has failed to complete the following:
a. access to HN.A.C. equipment in attic;
b. installation of dishwasher;
c. installation of "under counter track light;"
d. every window remains partially painted;
e. improperly installed and damaged drywall;
f. no cement flooring exists in the crawl space and the space does not
conform to the building plans;
g. arch in front of dwelling is unfinished;
h. outside trim is cracking at seams;
i. there is a hole at the master shower facet,
j. the locks on the steel doors in the basement and garage do not
operate properly;
k. the wood molding in the dining room is cracked;
1. numerous nail pops and cracks are present throughout the house;
m. the door to the upstairs office and bedroom needs to be trimmed at
the bottom;
n. no credit was provided for brick paid for but not installed by
Plaintiffs;
o. stucco on shingles has not been cleaned or removed;
p. the front door does not close and it is cracked at the frame;
q. waterproofing at window wells is exposed and should not be;
r. an area designed as a basement and excavated as such was instead
constructed as a crawl space;
s. plans reflected that the foundation was to be exposed to a height of
approximately three (3) feet with brick work. Instead, the brick
was begun at the top of the foundation walls;
I. exposed basement was designed and paid for with a brick exterior,
instead, the defendant used a concrete exterior.
13. Plaintiffs have made proper demand for performance.
14. The costs to repair and otherwise correct the damages set forth herein
exceed the jurisdictional limit for cases requiring mandatory
arbitration.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request judgment in their favor in the amount in
excess of the limit established by this Honorable Court requiring mandatory
arbitration together with costs, fees and any other relief this Court may deem
appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
NESTICO & DRUBY, L.L.P.
By.
aura B. Muddy
Attorney I.D. No. 82672
840 East Chocolate Avenue
Hershey PA 17033
(717) 533-5406
(717 533-5717
:nss
Complaint 22702
Mar-25-02 11:54A Crabtree Rohrbaugh 7174580046
Mrir 22 02 01:23p
V ERWICATI
I verify that the statements made in the forg(gag doeumutt are true and correct 1.
understand that false staements herein are mute subject to the PcnOltics Of 18 P"'- C-;
§+4004 relating to unswOm Usification 10 authorities.
i
Date, 7fZlo , i7ev ' -
- l.
P.06
r•.
"" .. .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Maura B. Mundy, of the law firm of Nestico & Druby, L.L.P., hereby
certify that on the 44 day of March, 2002, a copy of the Notice to Defend
was sent via First Class U.S. Mail, postage paid, to the following:
W. Lee Roland
337 West Meadow Drive
Mechanicsburg PA 17055
aura B. Mu dy, EXuir
c? ,., -
:
?
(??i'_ 1
y
]'.?
?, ?
_y
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
DAVIS, husband and wife, : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiffs
VS. : NO. 00-2279
W. LEE ROLAND, : CIVIL ACTION LAW
Defendant : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF SAID COURT:
Please enter my appearance on behalf of Defendant W. Lee Roland in the above-
captioned action.
CALDWELL & KEARNS
By:
L.
Attorney I. P. #271
3631 Nortr tree
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 232-7661
Attorney for Defendant
Dated: ??/mod
-,"
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this // day of 2002, I hereby certify that I have
served a copy of the within document on the following by depositing a true and correct copy of
the same in the U.S. Mails at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, addressed to:
Maura B. Mundy, Esquire
NESTICO & DRUBY, L.L.P.
840 East Chocolate Avenue
Hershey, PA 17033
CALDWELL & KEARNS
By
02-242/38309
,ry
}
0 t
o
f 11
LD R
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA M.
DAVIS, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
V.
W. LEE ROLAND
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. 00-2279
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly file the attached Exhibit "A" which was inadvertently omitted from
Plaintiff s Complaint previously filed.
Respectfully submitted,
NESTICO, DRUBY & HILDABRAND, L.L.P.
By:
Date: I-- L5
Anthony J. Ne h , Esquiie
Attorney I.D. o. 58868
840 East Chocolate Avenue
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
(717) 533-5406
(717) 533-5717
Attorney for Plaintiffs
03/11/81 '!HL 13:U3 tAA 1141! ?:: JU2 ?t?ncinct?u¢nnn?va "'-"-
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
U
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 11th
July , 19 97, by and betveen;
W. LEE ROLAND, an individual, whose
address for all purposes hereunder
is 337 west Meadow Drive, Mechaniceburg,
PA 17059, party of the first part,
hereinafter called "Builder",
AND
Carl J. and Donna M. Davis
whose address for all purposes hereunder
is 113 Fineview Road
Camp it , Whether singular
or plural, male,emale, individual(s),
partners or corporation, party or parties
(as the case may be) of the second part,
hereinafter called "Owner".
WITNESSETH!
day of
WHi REAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of a certain
piece or parcel of land situated in Yonoghan
Township/. Borough, York
County, Pennsylvania,
known and numbered as LOt 8, Locust Lane ,
hereinafter called "Premises"; and
WHEREAS, Builder is a builder and general contractor of
building structures; and
WHEREAS, Owner has requested Builder to construct and
serve as general contractor for tha construction of the building
structure more fully defined hereinbelow on the Premises, said
project generally hereinafter called "Construction Projectm; and
WHEREAS, the parties have negotiated certain terms
GJiJ.l .-82 T. HL' t_6:OS raa iT1'.'?s:+SRnS ruacTnrn rnWnnr?rv ^'""?
?J
concerning said Construction Project which they desire to
document by these :resents;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these presents, the
mutual promises, terms and conditions more fully set forth
hereinbelow, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the
parties mutually agree as follows:
1. The foregoing paragraph and preamble are incorporated
herein by reference thereto.
2. Owner warrants and represents to Builder:
A. That owner owns said Premises in fee
simple and haft unrestricted possession thereof.
B. That Owner has the funds, whether in
present cash or construction loan financing,. tc
pay Builder for all work performed and materials
provided by and/or through Builder in performing
the Construction Project;
C. That Owner has arranged for the iratal-
lation of all public utilities and/or municipal
services necessary to provide all required utility-
type services to said Construction Project, unless
otherwise specifically provided in the Specifications.
D. That there are no building and use restrictions,
covenants or conditions on said Premises except only as
specifically attached hereto as an exhibit to this
Agreement.
-2-
UJr 1y_,PS TFU 15:09 FAX 1717:33S305 cR kI;7-RFF_. FnRPA IT-ru Mh^^'
3. Owner hereby requests and authorizes Builder to build
and construct a 4 Bedroom, 4 car garage
(the Construction Project) on said Premises in 'accordance with
(a) certain plans, drawings and/or pictures, collectively
hereinafter called "Plans", duplicate copies of which have been
'dated and initialed by the parties contemporaneously with the
execution of this Agreement and exchanged between them, and .
incorporated herein by reference thereto, and (b) certain
specifications of materials and type of construction as
contained in a certain set of pages collectively hereinafter
called "specifications,, which'are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference thereto.
4. Builder hereby undertakes and agrees to build and
construct said Construction Project in his eapaeity,as general
contractor, and agrees to provide all work and materials to
complete said Construction Project in accordance with said Plans
and Specifications.
5. Builder agrees to build and construct said
Construction Project for the total price or consideration
of Four Hundred Sixty two thousand ------------- and ^0 100
($462,000.00 ) Dollars, hereinafter called "Contract
Price", which said Contract Price Owner covenants and agrees to
pay to Builder and in accordance with a certain periodic payment
schedule attached hereto entitled "Draw Schedulal, and
-3-
I mWROMRNMORWROM -
CRABTRHE_20HRBACGH rn
Incorporated herein by reference thereto. owner understands and
agrees that prompt payment of all sums required under the Draw
Schedule is necessary for Builder to perform and complete the
Construction ?roject in ar. efficient and orderly manner, and,
therefore, such time of payment is of the essence of 'this
agreement. All payments required hereunder,shail be made to
Builder at his address aforesaid in cash or its equivalent.
e. guilder covenants and agrees to build and construct
said Construction.Project in a good and workmanlike manner,
using workmen and sub-contractors skilled in their respective
trades, with the materials required in and under the
Specifications (but if not so specified, to use materials of the
kind and grade customarily employed in.aimilar construction in
the area of this Construction Project), and in accordance with
all applicable zoning regulations and building codes, and
further in accordance with an_r building restrictions attached
hereto as an exhibit.
7. It is understood and agreed that the foregoing
Contract Price does not include the cost of rack removal if
encountered in any excavation or grading of the Premises. Owrer
covenants and agrees to pay to Builder the actual costs incurred
by Builder for the removal of said rock, including tha cost of
drilling, blasting and physically removing said rock, whether by
explosives or by machines,`(including the extra machine and
labor time incurred by other trades waiting for said rock to
-4-
x
CR.kbTREE ROHRB.4CGH
._?
be removed), all such amounts to be paid to Builder at his
address within ten (10) calendar days after delivery of invoice
therefor to owner.
8• The parties agree that the Plans and Specifications
are complete and sufficient; to form the basis of the
Construction Project. The Construction Project shall not be
changed or modified in any,rsspect except by written agreement
(hereinafter called "Change Order") which shall describe the
changes, indicate any, adjustments to the Contract Price and
payment thereof, and/or the time of completion of the
Construction Project.
9• Unless otherwise specifically provided to the contrary
by written ammendment thereto, Owner hereby authorizes and
empowers Builder to act as Owner's agent and in Owner's name and
expense to procure all governmental building or other permits
necessary to prosecute the Construction Project, and Owner
agrees to reimburse Builder for the fees or other costs charged
by the issuer of any such permit and advanced by Builder, said
sums to be paid within ter. (20) calendar days from delivery of
invoice therefor. to Owner.
10. Builder covenants and agrees to proceed diligently
with his obligation hereunder and to substantiaily complete said
Construction Project within One Hundred Eighty 180
( )
calender day's from the Commencement Date, unless prevented by
acts of God, strikes, non-availability of specified materials or
R. nnu
-5-
05 7.1;98 ?'HT' 15:08 FA-1 17172575805 cR4R71ZFF RnRRRar•r;; r;h ^^'
v
any other matters beyond Builder's control. The Commencement
Date shall not be later than sifteen days ( 15 )
calender days after fulfillment of the last of the following
events: (a) recording of any construction Loan mortgage secured
on said Premises, (b) filing of the Stipulation Against
Mechanics liens required under Paragraph 11 hereinbelow, and (c)
the issuance of all required permits necessary to commence
construction of said Construction Project. If Owner Should fail
to have any required construction loan mortgage recorded within
sixty ( 60 ) calender days from the date hereof, Builder
shall have the right and option to rescind and cancel this
agreement. If any governmenthl permit required as aforesaid is
not obtained within 90 days ( 90 ) calender days from the
date hereof because of the issuer's neglect, failure or refusal
to issue the same, either party shall have the right to rescind
and cancel this agreement. The parties covenant and agree to
use their respective best efforts to fulfill the foregoing
conditions, and each agrees not to interfere with or cause the
failure of fulfillment of any such conditions.
11. Builder covenants and agrees to pay all suppliers of
labor and materials required to be supplied by him hereunder so
as to prevent the entry of mechanics' lien's against the Premises
for such non-payment. The parties agree to enter into and
properly file a Stipulation Against Mechanics, Liens prior to
Builder's commencement of work, said Stipulation to be executed
immediately following and contemporaneously with the execution
-6-
nt.l, .OU 'rift' tRnc -?`?+- ?+. ?e..eane ro aemnrr rnm.n ,..rn ra-?.
and delivery of this Agreement. Owner shall be responsible for
the prop=_r filing of said Stipulation and shall provide Builder
with proof Of filing thereof promptly after such filing.
12. Owner hereby gives and grants Builder unconditional
permission to enter upon aaid Premises at any and all times in
order to perform the Construction Project. Builder shall be
deemed to be in lawful possession of the Premises during his
performance of the'Construction Project. Owner covenants and
agrees not to move into or otherwise occupy said Promises until
3uilder completes the Construction. Project and provides Owner
with his written .statement of substantial completion.
13. owner understands that Builders obligations
hereunder are made on the condition that Builder will have free
and uninterrupted opportunity to perform the Construction
?roject. ,Nhile Owner shall have the right of periodic
inspection of the Premises and Construction Project, owner
specifically agrees to not interfere with or obstruct Builder's
performance hereunder. All questions and communications
concerning said Construction Project shall be directed to
Builder and not to Builders employees or sub-contractors.
14. Builder agrees to obtain and maintain. Workers'
Compensation Insurance for the benefit of his employees and
shall obtain and maintain public liability insurance covering
his operations on said Premises having bodily injurv limits of
One Million
not less than $ per person and $combined single limit
per occurrence, and property damage limits of not less than
-7-
C'4/11/AA 7FT1' I4 w vii 17177 11 dgn5 fAIFTDFF Dl1RDFfi'CII LT nnn
and shall provide a certificate of such
insurance coverage to owner upon request.
15. Owner agrees to obtain and maintain insurance to
protect the parties, respective interests in said Construction
Project against loss from fire, windstorm and other similar
casualty, and to name Builder as a co-insured therein with owner
as their interests may appear.
16. Owner agrees to pay the fees and charges of all public
utilities and municipal services servicing said Premises at aLl
times during the Construction Project, said payments to be made
in a timely manner so as to avoid interruption of service for
non-payment.
17. Owner states, warrants and acknowledges that any and
all realty transfer tax imposed upon this building lot, or parcel
has been.paid in full. Furthermore, if a determination is made
that additional real estate transfer tax is due as a result of
the conveyance of the building lot or parcel to Owner, that Owner
agrees to pay any and all additional real estate tax, interest
and penalties claimed to be due on account of said transaction
and will indemnify and hold harmless Builder and Builders agents
of and from any and all losses, taxes, interest, penalties and
expenditures (including legal fees) arising as a result of
additional real estate transfer taxes imposed upon the transfer
of the building lot or parcel unto owner.
18. Builder warrants and guarantees his work and materials
against defects for a period of one (1) year from the date on
-8-
O3 i11i99 TAT' 15:10 PA.N 17}_72935605
CRABTRE£ ROHRBALGH
I-Ie
which Builder completes his performance hereunder, and delivers
possession of the Construction Project to Owner on the following
terms, conditions and limitations:
A. Owner must deliver written notice to Buyer
specifying all alleged defects within said period of (1)
year.
B. Builder shall not be required to make such
corrections 'until the end of said period of one (1) year
regardless of the number of notices under A above, except
with respect to matters denying normal use of the structure.
C. it is agreed.that the following matters shall not
be deemed to be defects or otherwise the responsibility of
Builder:
(1) Defects covered by warranties of a
manufacturer of materials, equipment or fixtures.
(2) Defects resulting from shrinkage of wood.
(3) Efflorescence on masonry surfaces.
(4) Defects caused by sinkholes, earth
settlement, springs, erosion, wind damage, ground
water seepage and storm water flooding.
19. It is understood that total completion of the
Construction Project may be delayed for reasons beyond Builder's
control. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 10
hereinabove to the contrary, the Construction Project shall be
deemed substantially completed when the same may be occupied by
-9-
® 07.0
Owner and used by Owner for the purposes intended and when
Builder's actual cost to finish any incomplete items (resulting
from causes beyond Builder's control) does not exceed five per
ce'ntum (5%) oz the Contract Price. In the latter event, Builder
shall have the right to give owner written notide of the fact of
substantial completion and certify to owner an itemized list of
the incomplete items and his cost of completion, and Owner shall
be required to,pa_y to Builder the unpaid balance of the Contract
price less a sum af.money equal to one hundred fifty per Centum
(150%) of the certified cost of completion, which latter sum
shall be held by an independent third party in escrow for the
benefit of Builder, which sum shali'be paid to Builder upon
ultimate completion of,the Construction Project., Such ultimate
completion shall be effected promptly''upon the removal of the
impediment(s) to the earlier performance of the unfinished items.
20. This Agreement is is not conditioned upon Owner
obtaining construction loan Financing"for the sum of
If so conditioned, Owner agrees to exert diligent
good-faith effort to obtain a commitment.for such loan no later
than 9GGLSr ?l7 19_j2 (hereinafter talled "Loar.
Commitment Terminal Date"), such commitment to be evidenced by a
letter or other written statement from the lender (hereinafter
called "Loan Commitment Letter"). Owner agrees to deliver to
Builder a true copy of the Loan Commitment Letter promptly upon
receipt thereof by Owner. If Owner does not deliver such copy of
Loan Commitment Letter to Builder by midnight of the Loan
-10-
1'+i 1-'172333805 CRABiREE_20M1BA!GE ZV14
'1?1
commitment Terminal Date, this Agreement shall be deemed to be
rescinded and cancelied without further action or notice by
Builder.
21. Subject to the fulfillment of the condition in
Paragraph 20 above, Owner certifies to Builder that Ovner intends
to obtain the funds necessary for payment of a portion of the
Contract Price from a third-party lender, hereinafter called
"Lender"r the actual identity of which shall be determined from
the Loan Commitment Fetter required under Paragraph 20 above. As
additional security for owner's obligation to pay the Contract
Price to Builder, Owner hereby assigns to Builder the rights of
Owner to receive payments from Leader•on account of said Contract
Price, and owner hereby authorizes and empowers Lender to pay any
portion or all of the construction loan dA rectly to Builder in
order to fu7.fill Ouner's obligation hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement
to be duly executed the day and year fi=st above written.
WITNBSSED BY:
-11-
BUILD£R:
W, /YxD `i 64yG _
W. Leo Roland
OWNER:
( n ividaalJ
(individual)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Anthony J. Nestico, of the law firm of NNeestico, Druby 8v
Hildabrand, L.L.P., hereby certify that on the 9' day of September,
2002, a copy of the Praecipe was sent via First Class U.S. Mail, postage
paid, to the following:
James L. Goldsmith, Esquire
Caldwell and Kearns
3631 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110/)
c? o
rya -:I
9 cn -+
T
??
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. DAVIS,
husband and wife,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiffs
V.
No. 00-2279
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
W. LEE ROLAND,
Defendant
NOTICE TO PLEAD
To: Carl J. Davis and Donna M. Davis, and their attorney,
Anthony J. Nestico, Esquire
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED to file a written response to the enclosed Answer with
New Matter within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against
you.
Date: CT)- By:
Ray J. Michalowski, Esquire
Attorney I.D. #87135
3631 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 232-7661
Attorney for Defendant
Respectfully submitted,
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. DAVIS,
husband and wife,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiffs
V.
No. 00-2279
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
W. LEE ROLAND,
Defendant
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER
AND NOW, Defendant, W. Lee Roland, by and through his attorneys, Caldwell & Kearns,
P.C., files this Answer to Plaintiff s Complaint and avers in support thereof as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted in part, denied in part. Defendant's current address is 104 Lavynndon Lane,
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. The answers to paragraphs 1 through 4 above are incorporated herein by reference as though
more fully set forth below.
6. Admitted in part, denied in part. Admitted that Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into a
Construction Agreement. Denied to the extent that the Agreement attached to Plaintiffs
Complaint is a true and correct copy of the Construction Agreement entered into by the
parties on or about that date. The Agreement attached to Plaintiff s Complaint appears to be
a photocopy of the original Agreement with additional markings and alterations not present
at the time of the signing of the Agreement.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Admitted in part, denied in part. Admitted that the original price for the project was
$462,000. Denied to the extent that change orders, credits and other allowances may have
altered the final price for the project as agreed to by the parties throughout the construction
project.
10. Admitted in part, denied in part. Admitted that Plaintiffs' averment in paragraph 10
paraphrases language from the Construction Agreement reached between the parties. Denied
to the extent that Plaintiffs' averment in paragraph 10 fails to include language from the
Agreement regarding exceptions, allowable delays, and other items which may affect the
timing of the Agreement.
11. Denied. The averments in paragraph 11 are denied as stated. Defendant avers that
construction was substantially completed in accordance with the Agreement and subsequent
modifications of the agreement agreed to by the parties during the construction project.
12. a. Denied. Access to the HVAC equipment in the attic was provided by Defendant or
Defendant's subcontractors.
b. Denied. Dishwasher has been installed by Defendant or Defendant's subcontractors.
C. Denied. Under counter track light was installed by Defendant or Defendant's
subcontractors.
d. Denied. After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
C. Denied. After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
Admitted in part, denied in part. Admitted that cement flooring does not exist in the
crawl space. Denied to the extent that Defendant relied on Plaintiffs verbal
agreement and instructions to construct a crawl space of standard construction in the
small portion of the foundation alluded to in Plaintiffs Complaint.
g. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
h. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
i. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied. By way of
further answer, to the extent that Plaintiffs previously informed Defendant of a desire
to move the master shower faucet 1/16 of an inch, Defendant agreed to make this
change, but Plaintiffs insisted on having the work performed by their own
plumber/subcontractor.
Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
k. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
1. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
M. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
n. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
o. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
P. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
q. Denied After reasonable investigation Defendant is unable to verify the truthfulness
of the averments of this subparagraph and the same are hereby denied.
r. Denied. Plaintiffs agreed to allow the space at issue to be constructed as a crawl
space, rather than an excavated basement.
S. Denied. It is specifically denied that the plans reflected that the foundation was to
be exposed to a height of approximately three feet with brick work.
t. Denied. The exposed basement averred to in this paragraph was the subject of a
change order agreed to by the parties. The change order included a request for a
brick exterior on the back of the exposed basement which was provided. Two very
small portions of the sides of the basement were not covered in brick because
Plaintiff Carl Davis requested that he be allowed to complete that portion of the
project, which included the construction of two small wing retaining walls next to the
basement side walls. Accordingly Defendant granted Plaintiffs a $3,000 credit on the
price of construction.
13. Denied. The averments of this paragraph are specifically denied.
14. Denied. Defendant specifically denies Plaintiffs' characterization ofthe alleged damages and
related repairs as set forth in Plaintiffs' Complaint.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, W. Lee Roland, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court
dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice and enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against
Plaintiffs, together with such costs, fees and any other relief that this Court may deem necessary and
appropriate.
NEW MATTER
15. The answers listed in paragraphs 1 through 14 above are incorporated herein by reference as
though more fully set forth below.
16. The home has been completed in accordance with the written agreement, plans, specs,
change orders and other accommodations and modifications agreed to byboth parties during
the construction of the home.
17. Plaintiffs have materially breached the terms of the Agreement with the Defendant by failing
to pay $3,000 due and owing for work performed in constructing the house.
18. Some of the damages and/or defects alleged by Plaintiffs, if proven, were items Plaintiffs
insisted on dealing with themselves, despite Defendant's offerto address Plaintiff s concerns.
19. Some of the items listed by the Plaintiffs as damages or defects, if proven, were not brought
to the attention of Defendant prior to the initiation of this lawsuit.
20. Some of the damages and defects alleged byPlaintiffs in their Complaint, ifproven, occurred
after Plaintiffs took occupancy of the house and after any potential warranty periods had
expired.
21. Any actual or constructive warranties claimed by Plaintiffs were waived by their failure to
provide final payment for construction of the home.
22. Some of the damages and defects alleged by Plaintiffs in their Complaint, if proven, are due
to changes to the original house plan and specifications which were agreed to during the
construction of the home by all parties to the Agreement.
23. Any changes to the plans and specifications agreed to by the parties, and which reduced the
costs of construction, were either formally credited to Plaintiffs account or balanced by
Defendant's performance of additional work requested by Plaintiffs.
24. As the home neared completion, the parties agreed to allow Mr. Davis to retain $6,000
towards the costs of the home pending completion of the two final projects as noted on
Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
25. Upon resolution of these issues, Plaintiffs were to forward the final $6,000 payment for the
completed construction of the home to Defendant.
26. Plaintiffs chose to deal with the exposed foundation themselves and were accordingly
credited $3,000 towards the price of the home by Defendant.
27. The dining room bay window overhang was addressed by Defendant in accordance with the
Exhibit "A" and applicable building codes.
29. Despite completing this project in a workmanlike manner, Plaintiffs have refused to forward
the remaining $3,000 owed to Defendant for construction of the home, despite Defendant's
proper demands for payment thereby materially breaching the Agreement.
30. Plaintiffs had an opportunity to inspect the home prior to accepting and occupying the
premises. The only issues noted at or before accepting the property were those listed in
Exhibit "A".
31. With the exception of the issues noted on Exhibit "A", which have been resolved as noted
above, Plaintiffs accepted the home in its condition on the date of their occupancy.
32. Plaintiffs' causes of action may be barred in whole or in part by the applicable statute of
limitations.
33. Plaintiffs' cause of action may be barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of accord and
satisfaction.
34. Plaintiffs' cause of action may be barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of release.
35. Plaintiffs' cause of action may be barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of waiver and/or
estoppel.
36. Plaintiffs' cause of action may be barred in whole or in part by the statute of frauds.
37. Plaintiffs' cause of action may be barred in whole or in part by the parole evidence rule.
38. Plaintiffs have failed to state a cause of action by which relief can be granted.
39. Plaintiffs' cause of action may be barred in whole or in part by the terms and conditions of
the Construction Agreement and addenda thereto.
40. Plaintiffs' ability to recover damages may be barred through their failure to mitigate
damages.
41. Plaintiffs' claim for recoverable damages may be contrary to the law of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.
42. Plaintiffs' damages may be barred in whole or in part due to Plaintiffs' failure to reasonably
maintain the home and property.
43. Plaintiff's claims may be barred in whole or in part due to the Doctrine of Economic Loss.
[The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank]
WHEREFORE, Defendant, W. Lee Roland, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court
dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice and enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against
Plaintiffs, together with such costs, fees and any other relief that this Court may deem necessary and
appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
'C) ' C)?
Ray J. Michalowski, Esquire
Attorney I.D. #87135
3631 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 232-7661
Attorneys for Defendant
09/26/2002 12:27 FAX 777 232 2766
CALDWELL & KEARNS
Z010
W Lee Roland, awdes
337 W. Meadow Drive • Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Phone (717) 897-8643 a FAX 9 (717) 697-5889
10 003
Custom Homes
The undersigned agree that there are two-unresolved issues:
(1) Exposed Foundation
(2) Dining Room Bay window overhang
The solution to these:
(1) Construct 2 wing walls of architectural block
(2) Solution needs to address potential moisture problem
upon completion of each above Carl J. Davis will pay $3,000.00 for each
0
y?z Y 9 ?'
EXHIBIT "A"
IvAr-
09/28/2002 12:28 FAX 717 292 2766 CALDWELL & KEARNS
VERIFICATION
Z011
I, W. LEE ROLAND, verify that the averments made in the foregoing document are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that false statements
herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904, relating to unworn falsification to
authorities.
Date: 0 ?-
/'I v 2?
W. Lee Roland
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of t Lam/` 2002, I hereby certify that I have
served a copy of the within document on the following by depositing a true and correct copy of the
same in the U.S. Mails at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, addressed to:
Anthony J. Nestico, Esquire
Nestico & Druby, LLP
840 East Chocolate Avenue
Hershey, PA 17033-1213
CALDWELL & KEARNS
By: de?- M. ? -Y
02-242/46120
C
ifi
?
J E + "C`
(?lS
?' -?
-
?
G? ?
,
,?
f'?
= ^n
?'i
.
.f ^,.7 ?rJ
.? 4Ts --•
.. _ _
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA M.
DAVIS, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
V.
LEE ROLAND
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. 00-2279
REPLY TO NEW MATTER
AND NOW, the Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this
reply to new matter, and aver and support thereof the following:
15. No response required.
16. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required. To the extent that they are deemed to be averments of
fact, it is specifically denied that the home has been completed in accordance with
the written agreement, plans, specs, change orders, and other accommodations and
modifications allegedly agreed to by the parties.
17. The averments in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no response
is required. To the extent that they are deemed to be averments of fact, they are
specifically denied.
18. Denied. It is specifically denied that any damages were caused by any work the
Plaintiffs completed themselves or that Defendant's offered to adequately address
Plaintiffs' concerns.
19. Denied as stated. It is specifically denied that the Defendant was unaware of the
defects and damages to the home prior to the initiation of this lawsuit.
20. Denied. It is denied that the damages and defects alleged by the Plaintiffs in their
Complaint occurred after Plaintiffs took occupancy.
21. Denied as a conclusion of law.
22. Denied as stated. It is admitted that there were changes made to the original house
plan and specifications which were agreed to during the construction of the home. It
is denied that the Plaintiffs consented to any damages or defects in the construction.
23. Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that the Plaintiffs were given some
credits as a result of changes and construction. It is denied that this in any way
eliminates the Defendants' liability for the claims made in Plaintiffs' Complaint.
24. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the parties agreed that the Plaintiffs would retain
$6,000.00 with regard to two specifically referenced defects. It is denied that this list
was comprehensive, or constituted a waiver of claims.
25. Denied. The agreement referenced herein is a matter of record before this Court and
its terms speak for themselves.
26. Denied. It is denied that the Plaintiffs chose to deal with the exposed foundation
issue themselves and it is further denied that the Defendants have been relieved from
their obligations under the contract regarding this matter.
27. Denied. It is denied that this matter has been satisfactorily resolved.
28. The Defendants' pleading did not contain paragraph 28.
2
29. Denied. The allegations set forth in Paragraph 29 constitute a conclusion of law to
which no response is required.
30. Denied as stated. It is admitted that the Plaintiffs had an opportunity to inspect the
home prior to occupying the home. It is denied that the only issues outstanding at
that time were those listed in Defendant's Exhibit "A".
31. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 31 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
32. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 32 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
33. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 33 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
34. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 34 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
35. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 35 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
36. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 36 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
37. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 37 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
38. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 38 constitutes conclusion of law to
which no response is required.
3
39. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 39 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
40. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 40 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
41. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 41 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
42. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 42 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
43. Denied. The averments contained in paragraph 43 constitute conclusions of law to
which no response is required.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Honorable Court enter judgment
in their favor in accordance with the Plaintiffs' Complaint together with such costs, fees, and any
other relief that this Court may deem just and appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
NESTICO,
By:
Date:
Akm
4
Anthony J?N X,-Esquire
Attorney o.``58868
840 E. Chocolate Avenue
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
(717) 533-5406
(717) 533-5717
Attorney for Plaintiffs
L.L.P.
VERIFICATION
I Anthony J. Nestico, Esquire, counsel for Plaintiffs hereby certify that the
verification of the Plaintiffs could not be obtained within the time allowed for the filing
of this pleading. Therefore, I, as counsel, hereby verify that, upon information and
belief, the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct based upon
the information available to me. I understand that false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
Date:
5
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA M.
DAVIS, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
V.
LEE ROLAND
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. 00-2279
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Anthony J. Nestico, of the law firm of Nestico, Druby & Hildabrand, L.L.P., hereby
certify that on the --/f day of May 2003, a copy of the foregoing Reply to New Matter was
sent via First Class U.S. Mail, postage paid, to the following:
Ray J. Michalowski, Esquire
Caldwell and Kearns
3631 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
6
FINN
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. DAVIS,
husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
VS.
LEE ROLAND,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 00-2279
PRAECIPE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly withdraw the appearance of the undersigned on behalf of Plaintiffs, Carl
and Donna M. Davis, with respect to the above-captioned matter.
/in
Res ct y bmitte
r I ??_
Anthony J. Ne , Esq ire
Attorney I.D. No. 58868
Maura B. Mundy, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 82672
Nestico & Druby, L.L.P.
840 East Chocolate Avenue
Hershey, PA 17033
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Davis
Kindly enter the appearance of the undersigned on behalf of Plaintiffs, Carl J. Davis and
Donna M. Davis, with respect to the above-captioned matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Matthew Chabal, III, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 49926
Jarad W. Handelman, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 82629
JAMES, SMITH, DIETTERICK & CONNELLY, LLP
Mailing address: P.O. Box 650
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
Courier address: 134 Sipe Avenue
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17036
(717) 533-3280
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. DAVIS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1, MATTHEW CHABAL, 111, ESQUIRE, do hereby certify that I served a true and
correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe for Withdrawal of Appearance and Praecipe for Entry of
Appearance upon the following by depositing same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid at Hershey,
Dauphin County, Pennsylvania this ?? day of September, 2004.
SERVED UPON:
Ray J. Michalowski, Esquire
Caldwell and Kearns
3631 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Matthew Chabal,111, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 49926
JAMES, SMITH, DIETTERICK & CONNELLY, LLP
Mailing address: P.O. Box 650
Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
Courier address: 134 Sipe Avenue
Hummelstown, Pennsylvania 17036
(717) 533-3280
CIO
-TI
`
''
_ CeJ C)i
3 (? D
RL J. DAVIS and DONNA
DAVIS, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs
Vs.
LEE ROLAND,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO: 2000-2279
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE WITHDRAWING APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT
Prothonotary of Cumberland County
Please note our firm's withdrawal as attorneys for Defendant, W. Lee Roland, upon
e of appearance of SNELBAKER & BRENNEMAN, P.C., as successor attorneys for said
September at 2006
PRAECIPE ENTERING APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT
Prothonotary of Cumberland County
Please enter our appearance as counsel for Defendant, W. Lee Roland, upon the
twal of appearance by Caldwell & Kearns.
SNEL I R & ZBEMAN, P.C.
By
Ric C. Snelbaker
Attorney I.D. # 06355
and
By
Keith 0. Brenneman
LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER &
BRENNEMAN, RC.
Dated: September Rt , 2006
Attorney I.D.# 47077
44 West Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
(717) 697-8528
Attorneys for Defendant
3631 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
N
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this date serving a true and correct copy of the foregoing
vent consisting of Praecipe Withdrawing Appearance on Behalf of Defendant and Praecipe
ing Appearance on Behalf of Defendant upon James, Smith, Dietterick & Connelly, L.L.P.,
V: Jeffrey M. McCormick, Esquire, Attorneys for Plaintiffs by sending the same by first-
mail postage paid addressed as follows:
James. Smith, Dietterick & Connelly, L.L.P.
ATTN: Jeffrey M. McCormick, Esquire
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
R?Ld C. Snelbaker, Esquire
Snelbaker & Brenneman, P.C.
44 West Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0318
(717) 697-8528
Attorneys for Defendant
September 22, 2006
LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER &
BRENNEMAN, P.C.
C)
T7 J Cn
ft1T
F?
CV ?
C"
T
=Ll
n
rn
rL
co ?
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR TRIAL
(Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Please list the following case:
0 for JURY trial at the next term of civil court.
? for trial without a jury.
CAPTION OF CASE
(entire caption must be stated in full)
Carl J. Davis and Donna M. Davis,
husband and wife,
(check one)
® Civil Action - Law
? Appeal from arbitration
(other)
VS.
W. Lee Roland,
VS.
(Plaintiff)
(Defendant)
The trial list will be called on August 19, 2008
and
Trials commence on September 15, 2008
Pretrials will be held on August 27, 2008
(Briefs are due 5 days before pretrtals
No. 00-2279 , Civil Term
Indicate the attorney who will try case for the party who files this praecipe:
Jeffrey M. McCormick, Esquire, James Smith Dietterick & Connelly, LLP
134 Sipe Avenue, Hummelstown, PA 17036
Indicate trial counsel for other parties if known:
Richard C. Snelbaker, Esquire, Snelbaker & Brenneman, P.C.
44 West Mail Street, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
This case is ready for trial. Signed: JaLr
a
Print Name: Jeffrey M. McCormick
Date: May 22, 2008 Attorney for: Plaintiffs
10
a? r-
D co
y
CD
"?
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
DAVIS, husband and wife, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiffs
v CIVIL ACTION - LAW
W. LEE ROLAND,
Defendant 00-2279 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: CASE STRICKEN FROM LIST
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2008, upon
consideration of the call of the civil trial list, and no person
having called the above-captioned case for trial, it is stricken
from the trial list.
By the Court,
/effrey M. McCormick, Esquire
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033-0650
For Plaintiffs
?ichard C. Snelbaker, Esquire
44 West Main Street
P.O. Box 318
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-6249
For Defendant
Court Administrator
:mae
c
A
o/
o
c
x tea
.
27
2-1
1
2,
N
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. DAVIS,
husband and wife,
Plaintiffs,
W. LEE ROLAND,
Defendant.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
: No. 00-2279
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
WITHDRAWAL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly withdraw our appearance in the above-referenced matter as counsel for Plaintiffs,
Carl J. Davis and Donna M. Davis.
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Hershey, PA 17033
Courier: 134 Sipe Avenue
Attorney I.D. No. 82629
JAMES SMITH DIETTERICK & CONNELLY LLP
Mail: P.O Box 650
Matthew Chabal, III, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 49926
Jeffrey M. McCormick, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 95049
Jarad W. Handelman, Esquire
Hummelstown, PA 17036
Phone: (717) 533-3280
Kindly enter our appearance in the above-referenced matter as counsel for Plaintiffs, Carl
J. Davis and Donna M. Davis.
Dated: 4l 0 23 0? Jey M. McCormick, Esquire
Attorney I.D. # 95049
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER LLP
Mail: P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Courier: 305 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Phone: (717) 237-7100
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by
depositing the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on
the -6z day of October, 2008, on all counsel of record as
follows:
Richard C. Snelbaker, Esquire
Snelbaker & Brenneman, P.C.
44 West Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 1 7055-03 1 8
Matthew Chabal, III, Esquire
James Smith Dietterick & Connelly LLP
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
THOMAS, THOMAS & H P
den
J ey M. McCormick, Esquire
m
s:? ._i
?? ?.?.
?-: :` ?.'
_.? ?ti-;
-.,
N ? ? -, ;_.
cS3 ` :.?? is '
?, ?--?=,
r?
?? ?r
?. ?,
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR TRIAL
(Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Please list the following case:
for JURY trial at the next term of civil court.
? for trial without a jury.
OF CASE ----------------- -- ____------ -- -- --- --- - ----------------------------
CAPTION (entire caption must be stated in full) (check one)
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M. DAVIS,
husband and wife,
(Plaintiff)
Civil Action - Law
Appeal from arbitration
(other)
VS. The trial list will be called onDe cember -20, 2008
and
W. LEE ROLAND,
Trials commence on January 26, 2009
(Defendant) Pretrials willbe held on _ January 7, 2009
VS. (Briefs are due S days before pretrbds
No. 00-2279 Term
Indicate the attorney who will try case for the party who files this praecipe:
Jeffrey M. McCormick
Indicate trial counsel for other parties if known:
This case is ready for trial.
Date:
-4zqA$-
Signed: /
Print Name: M. ! ' 1 c Cp r-' n,c N -
r
Attorney for: Plaintiffs
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by
depositing the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on
the day of October, 2008, on all counsel of record as follows:
Richard C. Snelbaker, Esquire
Snelbaker & Brenneman, P.C.
44 West Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0318
THOMAS, THOMAS
M. McCormick, Esquire
9a r
k
;
90 j
W
rQ
, w
CARL J. DAVIS AND DONNA
M. DAVIS, husband and wife,
vs.
W. LEE ROLAND,
Plaintiffs
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,
: No 00-2279 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE ACTION
TO: Prothonotary of Cumberland County
Please cause the record of the above captioned matter to be marked as settled and
discontinued with prejudice.
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFE
By
effrey M. McCormick
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER &
BRENNEMAN, P.C.
ecember 29, 2008
SNELBAKER & BRENNEMAN, P.C.
By
Richard . Snelbaker
Attorneys for Defendant
t
yk
CARL J. DAVIS and DONNA M.: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
DAVIS, husband and wife, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiffs
v
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
W. LEE ROLAND,
Defendant 00-2279 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: CASE STRICKEN FROM LIST
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2008, upon
consideration of the call of the civil trial list, and no person
having called the above-captioned case for trial, it is stricken
from the trial list.
By the Court,
/effrey M. McCormick, Esquire
305 North Front Street
P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17101-1216
For Plaintiffs
,-/Richard C. Snelbaker, Esquire
44 West Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0318
For Defendant
co i E S irt?t?Fc?
Court Administrator , O'd5p pUCfsL
l t i1 ?C?
: mae -?_?
{??
?'?
LL.I_-'
e" } - ??
?"
1:,
Lr.; `"'
i?
t.L w
Ct-r
fv ?.. e :? :`?;)
c.?
C?.3 {„?