HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-00184
~
I
\. j
.~ I
~ I
~ i
I
J
~ I
.. i
,
I
i
,
i
,
i
I
i
!
!
~
.
'it
~
~
.~
-
~
........
,
.':)
....
,
i
,
I
i
i
~ i
~ I
"/
~
~
~i
...
JOS[:PH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA,
PLAINTIFF
V,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
97-0184 CIVIL TERM
LISA M, ATTINGER and
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR"
DEFENDANTS
: IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 1997, treating the within motion for post-trial
relief as a motion for reconsideration,' the motion to reconsider and modify the order
of May 22, 1997, IS DENIED.2
By the Court, /1
, /1//
1, A post-trial motion Is not authorized to be filed in a custody case. Pa, Rule
of Civil Procedure 1915,10(b),
2, Joseph Shingara was not granted any rights in the order of May 22, 1997,
which specifically vacated paragraph 4 of an order of April 1, 1996, We found that it
was in the best interest of the child, Alyssa M, Allinger, to specifically grant the
paternal grandmother partial physical custody as set forth in paragraph 2 of the order
rather than award all of the alternating weekend custody to the father, Kenneth R.
Herman, Jr., with the father and paternal grandmother then having to work out a
division of their time with Alyssa, The standing of the paternal grandmother to seek
such an award was established by the entry of the order of April 1, 1996,
t
f
"
:r.
I
-4-
"
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA
plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA.
v.
NO. 97-0184 CIVIL TERM
LISA M. ATTINGER and
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this
day of
, 1997,
following a hearing on the merits, and pursuant to the Motion(s)
For post-Trial Relief filed hereto, IT IS ORDERED:
l) The Petition For Custody is dismissed as to
plaintiff, Joseph Shingara, with prejudice;
2) The Petition For Custody is dismissed as
to
I
'i
i
!
plaintiff, Brenda Shingara, without prejudice;
3) Paragraph 4 of the Order of Court dated April 1,
1996, in the action of Plaintiff, Lisa M. Attinger v. Defendant,
Kenneth R, Herman, Jr., is hereby modified as follows:
"Father, Kenneth R, Herman, Jr" shall have partial
physical custody of Alyssa M. Attinger on alternating
weekends, from Friday after school until Sunday at 7:00
p.m., and until Sunday at 8:00 p.m. if there is no school
the following Monday."
BY THE COURT:
EDGAR B. BAYLEY, Judge
I
"
"
~
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA,
v.
NO. 97-0184
LISA M. ATTINGER and
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
CUSTODY
MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIBF
OF DBFENDANT LISA M. ATTINGBR
(Pursuant to Pa.R.C,P. 227.1)
TO THE HONORABLB, THE JUDGBS OF SAID COURT:
1. On May 22, 1997, the Court issued an Order hereto,
providing Plaintiff Brenda Shingara partial custody rights of the
child hereto, Alyssa M. Attinger, from Friday after school until
Saturday at 1:00 p.m" every other weekend, A true and correct
copy of said Order is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
2. The Court provided said partial custody rights to
Plaintiff Brenda Shingara, who is the natural paternal grandmother
of said child.
3. Although not stated in said Order, Defendant Lisa M,
Attinger (hereinafter "Defendant") submits that the Court did not
grant said partial custody rights to the paternal step-grandfather,
Plaintiff Joseph Shingara.
4. At the trial of this matter, Father, Defendant
HeI11lan, had no objection whatsoever in providing part of his
custody rights to either Plaintiff hereto,
5. The May 22, 1997 Order of Court, vacated Paragraph 4
of the existing Order of April 1, 1996, between the parties in that
action, Mother, Plaintiff, Lisa M. Attinger and Father, Defendant,
Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., and provided Plaintiff Brenda Shingara
partial custody rights as stated above.
6. Defendant respectfully submits that the decision of
the Court in granting Plaintiff Brenda Shingara partial custody
rights, pursuant to the Grandparent Visitation Act, is contrary to
said Act, in that Defendant Herman provides adequate custodial time
to Plaintiff Brenda Shingara, pursuant to his own April 1, 1996
Order of Custody; and therefore a modification of said Order,
providing separate and distinguishable custody rights to Plaintiff
Brenda Shingara, is not in the best interests of the child.
7. Defendant respectfully submits, and hereby stipulates
and agrees to a modification of the April 1, 1996 Order, by
granting Kenneth R, Herman, Jr" Defendant in said Order, expanded
visitation, every other weekend from Friday after school until
Sunday at 7:00 p.m., and 8:00 p.m. when there is no school on the
following Monday; and that this modification is in the best
interests of the child.
WHERBFORB, Defendant Lisa M, Attinger, respectfully
requests Your Honorable Court to modify and/or clarify the Order of
Court of May 22, 1997 as follows:
1. The petition for Custody is dismissed as to
Plaintiff Joseph Shingara, with prejudice;
2, The petition for Custody is dismissed as to
Plaintiff Brenda Shingara, without prejudice,
3. The Order of Court dated April 1, 1996, in the case
of Plaintiff, Lisa M. Attinger v. Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., is hereby
modified, sua sponte, and by agreement of Defendant, Lisa M.
Attinger and/or Defendant Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., as follows:
"Father, Kenneth R, Herman, Jr., shall have partial
physical custody of Alyssa M. Attinger on alternating weekends,
from Friday after school until Sunday at 7:00 p.m" and until
Sunday at 8:00 p.m. if there is no school the following Monday."
Rp.spectfully submitted:
James W. Abraham, Esq.
Abraham Law Offices
122 Locust St.
Harrisburg, PA l7101
Attorney for Defendant
Lisa M. Attinger
(717) 232-7825
DATE: 6/2/97
"
CBRTIFICATE OP SBRVICB
I, James W, Abraham, Esquire, the undersigned, do hereby
certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document, by regular mail, upon the following person(s), on the
date indicated below:
James L. Best, Esq.
838 Market St.
Lewisburg, PA 17817
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Kenneth R. Herman, Jr.
RD #3
Sunbury, PA 17801
Defendant, Pro Se
DATE: 6/2/97
/ ___ /J.c,./('
__:~/(f
c.
JAMBS if, ABRAHAM, BSQ.
JOSEPH SHlNOARA and .
/JRENDA SHlNGARA, .
Plaintiffs .
.
I'S. .
.
LISA M. A ITINOER, .
Defendant .
IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PI.EAS
OF CUMIIERIAND COUNTY, PENNA
NO. 97 -184
OV/I. ACTION -IA W
CUSTODY
PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
<).Pc:- ~ 1. /"2-
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs are the grandparents of Alyssa M, Attinger, age 6, The Plaintiff Brenda
Shingara is the biological mother of Alyssa's father, Kenneth R, Herman, Jr,. and the Plaintiff
Joseph Shingara is the step-father of Mr. Herman, The Plaintiffs reluctantly tiled a Petition for
PartiaJ CustodyNisitation by Grandparents on January 13, 1997 to establish a definite and
consistent schedule of time which they may spend with Alyssa and to guarantee written and
telephonic access to Alyssa,
The Plaintiffs will testilY at the trial of this matter that they love Alyssa dearly and have
enjoyed a close relationship with since infancy, The Shingaras will testilY that they have in the
past been close friends and mentors to Ms, Attinger and that they regret that Ms, Attinger's
friendship with them has waned as her relationship with Kenneth R, Herman, Jr,. has deteriorated,
Ms, Attinger has in the past allowed them frequent contact with Alyssa as well as telephonic
access, She now obstructs access as much as she can, The Plaintiffs believe that Alyssa's best
interests and permanent welfare will be promoted by the Court granting them a limited amount of
partial custody to be drawn equally tTom the father and the mother' s time as allotted by the
current Order of Court,
Currently, the Plaintiff has primary physical custody of Alyssa subject to Mr, Herman
having secondary custody every other weekend from Saturday to Sunday, split holidays, and two
nonconsecutive weeks in the summer, The Plaintiffs contend that the amount of time which they
can get with Alyssa through Mr, Herman's limited secondary custody is inadequate,
This matter is set for disposition before the Court as Ms, Attinger completely refused to
.
f
(
\
agree to any Order granting the Plaintitl's partial custody when the issue was broached by the
Conciliator,
2, WITNESSES
Joseph and Urenda Shingara; Lisa M, Attinger,
3, LEGAL ISSUES
(I) Whether the Plaintiffs have standing to assert a claim for partial custody of
Allysa?
(2) Whether the Court should grant the Plaintiff's partial custody of Alyssa?
(3) Whether this action was filed in bad faith?
4, LEGAL ARGUMENT
( I ) Standinx
Grandparents in Pennsylvania have standing to assert a claim in the custody of their
grandchildren by virtue of23 Pa,C,S, ~5312 which states:
~5312 When parents' marria~e b db""lwd or parent. are separaled
In all proceedings for dissolution. subscquentto the commencement of the
proceeding and continuing thercaller or when the parentf hal'e heen separated
for ,fix months or lIIore. the grandparents or grcat,grandparents may petition
the court for an order granting them reasonable partial custody or visitation
rights, or both. to the child, The court shall grant the petition if it finds that
visitation rights would be in the best interests of the child and would not
interfere with the parent child relationship,
The Shingaras assert that Section 5312 gives them standing to make a claim for partial custody of
Alyssa, Bishop v. Piller, 536 Pa, 41, 637 A.2d 976 (1994) (~5312 applies to child bom of dating
relationship even though parents never married and dating relationship was brief)
The Defendant has made an attack on the standing of the Shingaras due to the fact that
Mr, Shingara is a step-grandfather, The Plaintiffs submit that this is not an issue as (I) the statute
does not differentiate between step and biological grandparents. (2) Mrs, Shingara is clearly a
biological grandparent, and (3) the courts have in the past recognized partial custody rights in
step-parents, Rosado I', lJiaz, 624 A.2d 193 (Pa, Super, 1993),
(2) Whether a .\'eparate order (!!partial custody should is,\'//e1
The Court should grant the Shingaras an Order of limited and reasonable partial physical
custody of Allysa M, Attinger because of the strong public policy of encouraging grandparents
contact with their children. their special relationship with Alyssa. because it would be in the best
interests of Alyssa, because they have spent significant time with the child in the past, and because
it would not interfere with the parent-child relationship, The testimony of the Shingaras at the
trial will demonstrate that they have enjoyed a special relationship with Alyssa for years.
notwithstanding the Delendant's mean-spirited comments to the contrary (Defendant's Brief. p,
5) The Shingaras are a stable and positive influence on Alyssa, who has received little stability,
guidance. and good role models from her parents, The benefit of the Shingaras influence on
Allysa will be established through trial. and if the court finds that testimony to be credible, then
these factors would be grounds for making an award of partial physical custody, Under Rowles v.
Rowles, 669 A2d 126 (Pa, 1995), the court must consider every "fact relevant to the physical.
emotional, intellectual, moral, and spiritual well-being of a child" when considering a custody
claim made by a non-parent,
Moreover, there is a statutory preference in favor of continuing contact by grandparents,
23 Pa,C.S, ~5301 and a right to award partial custody to the grandparents when doing so would
be in the child's best interest and would not interfere with the parent,child relationship, The
Plaintiffs are convinced that the Court will find after their testimony that it would be in Alyssa's
best interests for them to have limited and reasonable partial physical custody, The Plaintiffs are
also convinced that granting them very limited time from Ms, Attinger's primary custody would
not interfere with the parent-child relationship,
The Defendant has made a "parade of horribles" argument against granting relief to the
Shingaras wherein he suggested that if they are given partial custody, then other grandparents will
seek it as well and the child will be on a permanent rotation from family to family, This argument
is not well founded as the basis of the Shingaras claim is not just their status as grandparents but
the close and long-standing relationship with Alyssa which will be proven at trial. The Clinton
County case is not on point to the matter ,l7Ihjudice because of the special relationship between
the Shingaras and Alyssa,
The Defendant has also made much of the argument that the Plaintiff's Petition should be
denied because they have adequate time with Alyssa when the child is with her father, The
Shingaras would preliminarily note that this is not a facto under ~5312, Moreover, the Shingaras
cannot count on Mr, Herman making Allysa available to them as matures and likely develops
another family, It is important to point out that the Plaintiffs request that the Court, ifit awards
them partial custody, award them time equally from Ms, Allinger and Mr, Herman's periods of
custody,
There is no doubt that the Shingaras have standing to bring this claim, If the Court finds
their testimony that their relationship with Alyssa is in the child's best interest, then it should
award them limited and reasonable partial physical custody,
3, Defelldall/'s claim for aI/orne)' 's.ree,~
The Defendant has stated and implied that the Shingara have brought this action
frivolously and with the purpose of burdening the Defendant with allomeys fees and should thus
be appropriately sanctioned, This claim is completely without merit. First, the Shingaras have a
clear statutory right to bring this type of Petition before the Court, They have never brought an
action against Ms, Allinger previously and regret the need to do so now, The prior court
proceedings involved Kenneth R, Herman, Jr., and had nothing to do with the Shingaras,
Additionally, the Defendant could have avoided any allomeys fees by agreeing to the Shingaras
having reasonable and limited physical custody, It has been her absolute willingness to consider
this idea that has brought this case before the Court,
Moreover, Pennsylvania ease law and statute permits the recovery of counsel fees in only
the most egregious case oflitigation abuse, There are absolutely no facts which the Defendant
could prove to establish an entitlement to allorneys fees, The claim for counsel fees has injected
an element of rancor and unpleasantness to this case which is unfortunate and which is probably
made to distract allention from the underlying issue, It should be dismissed,
4, PROPOSED RESOLUTION
The Shingaras respectfully request that the Court award them reasonable and limited
secondary physical custody rights to Alyssa M, Allinger, to be taken equally from the mother and
father's time, as well as reasonable telephonic access,
I
I
,
JAM S L. BEST,1.D,
838, arket Street
Lewisburg, P A 17837
(717) 523-0385
Allomey for the Plaintiffs
!L
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO, 97-184 CIVIL TERM
LISA M, ATTINGER,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
CUSTODY
ORDER
AND NOW, this~r:-iJ day of (f fA.! l'
, 1 997, upon receipt
of the Conciliator's Report, it appearing that a hearing is necessary, it is hereby
ordered and directed as follows:
.'\ .\ fnc.'~day of ......\ I'CLLL\
A hearing is scheduled for the " (j. , ::J
1997, at ~ o'clock ~,M" in Court Room Number ~ of
the Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, Both
parties, through counsel, will provide each other and the court with a
list of witnesses ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing along
with a statement as to their expected testimony, Additionally, both
parties will submit their proposal for a reSOlu'JOf the matter.
BY"':JlT'
J.
James L. Best, Esquire
James W. Abraham, Esquire
c."~.... ,0',-........(, <l/~I :2.&-/q'l.
,.,Jy,
mlb
~
5, The Plaintiff's position on custody is as follows: The Plaintiffs are the
paternal grandmother and step-grandfather of the minor child. They filed an action
against the Mother seeking visitation under the Grandparents Act, The would like
to see the child one weekend every other month and some time over the summer
and have some telephone access,
6, The Defendant's position on custody is as follows: Defendant does not
believe that the Plaintiffs have standing to seek visitation under the Grandparents
Act and further believes that they should have visitation when the child is in the
Father's custody,
7, Need for separate counsel to represent child(ren): Neither party
requested,
8, Need for independent psychological evaluation or counseling: None
requested and the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary.
9. A hearing in this matter shall take one-half day,
10. Other matters or comments: The first problem with this case is that the
Plaintiffs filed an action against the Mother alone. The Conciliator suggested to the
Plaintiffs' attorney that they must include the Father in the action if they are
seeking visitation under the Grandparents Act,
The second question is whether they have standing at all to obtain visitation
rights under the Grandparents Act. The Conciliator indicated to Plaintiff's counsel
that they should be prepared to address that issue with the court prior to the
~,
I
I
commencement of any hearing on the case,
If the court determines that the Plaintiffs have standing to pursue
grandparents visitation rights, then it must decide the most equitable way to
provide the grandparents with rights so as to not adversely affect either parent's
custodial arrangement with the child,
Date: April 23, 1997
Michael L. Bangs
Custody Conciliator
4
~
.;.
,'. .,-,
~1\B8ASAMLAw.omCE8 " "..',
, 'iI.'~.is~11ll' ,MAY 121991~'
, .', :,.', (lllI,a>>-'IIII~", .' '" "
as Exhibit "A".
Approximately one (l) year later, in January, 1996,
Father again tried for custody and filed a petition For Contempt
against Defendant and a petition to Modify the December 8, 1994
Order. Both petitions were denied. A true and correct copy of
both Petitions are attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit
liB".
Also in January, 1996, Defendant was contacted by
Children & Youth Services of Cumberland County based on an
"anonymous" complaint regarding the welfare of the child. This
complaint was dismissed as "invalid" on February 22, 1996. A true
and correct copy of the dismissal letter is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C",
Jurisdiction of the action between Defendant and Father
was then transferred to Cumberland County pursuant to the Court's
April 1, 1996 Order which grants primary physical custody to
Defendant, A true and correct copy of said Order is attached
hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "D",
All of the aforementioned Court Orders provide partial
physical custody to Father. Since the December 8, 1994 Order, and
prior thereto, Father and Plaintiffs have either lived together or
within five (5) minutes of each other, and Defendant submits that
the majority of Father's custody time has been routinely spent with
Plaintiffs.
Defendant submits that Father and Plaintiffs have
continuously attempted to file frivolous actions and/or take
2
frivolous measures to take custody rights away from Defendant.
Said petitions and accusations have all been dismissed. Defendant
believes and therefore submits that Father and/or Plaintiffs have
even gone so far as to make false accusations to Children & Youth
since they were not successful at court hearings.
Defendant further submits that the instant action has
resulted from the inability of the Father and/or Plaintiffs to take
custody rights way from Defendant, and constitutes an attempt by
the paternal grandmother to do so under the Grandparents Visitation
Act.
However, as stated by the Custody Conciliator in his
Summary Report, there is a preliminary, genuine question as to
whether Plaintiffs have standing to bring this action in view of
the existing Court Orders between Defendant and Father.
Defendant's position is, that as to Plaintiff Joseph
Shingara, who is llQt the paternal grandfather, said Plaintiff has
no legal standing whatsoever to bring this action; and as to
Plaintiff Brenda Shingara, in view of the aforementioned exising
Order, the Grandparents Visitation Act does llQt entitle said
Plaintiff to partial physical custody rights, separate from and in
addition to, Father's partial custody rights, as discussed below.
II . WITNESSES:
1) Defendant; 2) Marlene Adams, natural maternal grandmother.
3
III. STATEMENT OF QUESTION INVOLVED:
In view of the existing custody order granting Defendant
primary phsyical custody and partial physical custody to Father,
whether Plaintiffs have legal standing, as paternal grandmother and
paternal step-grandfather, to bring a separate custody action which
would entitle Plaintiffs to additional, separate partial physical
custody rights, pursuant to the Grandparents Visitation Act.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: NO.
IV. ARGUMENT:
The Pennsylvania Grandparents Visitation Act, 23
Pa,C.S,A. Section 350l et seq. provides that ".. ,when it is in the
best interest of the child... continuing contact of the
child...with grandparents when a parent is deceased, divorced or
separated". Pa.C,S.A Section 3501.
It is undisputed that the child, since birth, has always
resided with Defendant as the primary physical custodian. Father
has had visitation rights and Plaintiffs have been provided contact
with the child pursuant to Father's rights of custody, by Court
Order, since Decmeber 1994, for well over two (2) years.
The Pennsyvlania Courts have further established that
separate grandparent rights of partial physical custody are
normally awarded when the parent is unavailable or does not have
custody or visitation rights. Bucci v. Bucci, 35l Pa,Super. 457,
506 A.2d. 438 (1986). Also, in the event the child has resided
with grandparents for a period of l2 months, 23 Pa.C.S.A. Section
4
In attempting to analyze and treat plai.ntiff's request
with some degree of fairness and reasonableness the
court is faced with the inescapable given in this case
that the court has only the time of one child which in
the first instance has already been carved up between
the two parents. This in itself usually presents a
difficult task, To recognize plaintiff's claim under
the present circumstances would require the court to
carve up the child's time among three people. It is also
theoretically possible that the maternal grandparents
would have the same rights as the paternal grandparents
which creates a prospect of further division of the
child's time between four different households.,. The
precendent that would be set ina case like this of
allowing partial custody privileges to the grandparents
when they already have access to the child through their
son is on which the court chooses not to set. ~ at
108.
Therefore, Defendant submits that in view of Father's
existing Court Order, Plaintiff Brenda Shingara is not entitled to
a separate custody order, in addition to her son's custody order,
as there is no question that said Plaintiff has access to the child
during her son's custody; such an order would unreasonably "cut
into" Defendant's court-ordered custody time; and would/may entitle
Defendant's Mother, Marlene Adams (listed as a witness hereto), the
natural grandmother, with separate custody rights as well; not to
mention the natural grandfathers on both sides.
Moreover, as the Court states in Earon, "carving up" the
child's custody in this case, three different ways, takes time away
from QQth parents (as noted by the Conciliator) and takes away
custody time from Defendant, who has been the primary physical
custodian since "day one",
Therefore, in view of her son's court order, not only
does Plaintiff Brendan Shingara lack legal standing to bring this
6
action under the Grandparents Act, even if there was standing,
granting the relief requested in Plaintiffs' petition is not in the
best interest of the child, and would set an improper precedent,
V. PROPOSED RBSOLUl'ION:
In view of Plaintiff's lack of standing and/or
entitlement to separate visitation rights of the child, Defendant
proposes that Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed. Further,
Defendant submits this action by Plaintiffs, particularly in view
of the prior court proceedings, constitutes a frivolous action and
has imposed an unreasonable burden on Defendant to defend this
action, as well as an unreasonable burden on This Honorable Court
to hear this case, which Defendant submits entitles Defendant to an
award of attorney fees in the amount of $l,500.00, as well as any
other relief the Court may deem proper.
Respectfully submitted:
~~
James W. Abraham, Esq.
Abraham Law Offices
122 Locust St,
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 232-7825
Attorney for Defendant
DATE: 5/12/97
7
'I"~l 1':". '.~.t'. C(l: ::-:'"11-1
P.2.'.;
J II 1'IIE COUrlT OF' COHHOIl PLEAS
or llorcTIIUHRERLAlW COlHlTY, PF.:NNSYLV AlII A
CIVIL ACTIDll - LAW
KENNETH N. m:IIHAll, JR.,
Phihltft,
CV '301-6301
VA
I.I5^ H. ATTI/lGEIl.
Dwfr.-rHJnnt
CUSTODY
n Il I) E I!
AND /lOW, thin Oth day of D~cembor, 1994, no oxceptlona having
boon fll&d to tho propoHPd Ordor of Court dotod /lov~mb~r 17, 1994
regarding tho Rocomm~ndntion of lh~ Cu~tody HeRring Officer, the
rocomm~ndHtionc ora RCCRpl~d ~nd ~pprov~d and are incorporated by
ro!oronc~ U~ tho Flnal Ord~r of Court.
ThQ Clark or Court chall notify the pRrtieD hereto of the entry
of tho Ord~r in accordaocp with tho law,
Il'{ Tiff. r.mJllT:
to
(:r: :
Eugt:.'l)t;1 nI'CJFf1\HI, Cnq., Ih"BI'tnO
William Wl"'Hl, EA,!,
Hobert 51LvinokJ, Enq.
Plulnliif
D"iandont
Court
Oi11cPl'
~
Extr3ctcu from th
,C yCOl"i's
and 7{'rllfJcd "lls '.
01' I.J-'-<.. '" day
-~' A 0, 197{t
..,..:r~ .. ..,.., <'ii::., l'>" 'il .~.....
,...., " ,..",.rI.;,11., O....~l, J, Ol:.,".
Prot,~'mc.ta=-y ~ Is
l~:/ Com:1S3~":J r; 'Oi .. DATZ I)..., rrI<t<z
'r J... 1 03 Fl1.~t
.','ll,1"y of J:\IIU31Y, 1990"
EXHIBIT
I_L
1,"11 I I C:-' '':'It~ O':l: :r~:(tI'l
r.3/(;
j
{'
~
~'
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF NORTIIUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACflON . LAW
KENNETII R, HERMAN, JR.,
PLATNTlflF
CV - 94 . 634
vs
CUSTODY
LISA M, A TIINGER.
DEFENDANT
PROI'OSED ORDER
AND NOW, this -'~ day of -.-ll.oIJ,em1'r"
, 1994,
IJpon consideration of the Custody Heariuc Officer's Report Recommendation and
Order in accord therewith is herewith proposed,
This Order shaH be entered as II Final Order unless exceptions
thereto are filed by either party within ten (10) d:1ys after the effective dale hereof.
Effective Dnte:--22I!)'(ihdJ{.lyII~ 19ff
BY TIlE COURT:
(3 1lg.,~
~ J.
p.~/6
.l.Olll 1':", ',:"it:. 0'): ,).ltd'l
2. Two nOli-consecutive weeks I~ach year commensurate with Father's
vacation, with three weeks notice in advance to Mother.
3, At s\lch other times as th(~ parties from time to time agree.
Pather shall have partial custody ;lIld Mother shall have physicn! c\lstody for
one half of each of the holidays of New Yenr, Easter, Memorin! Day, July 4th, Labor
Day. Thanksgivlne Day ;tnd Christmas Day,
I'ather shall have partinl custody 01\ father's Day from 10:00 A,M. to 7:00 P.M,
nnd Mother shall havc physical c\lstody on Mother's Day from 10:00 AM, to
7:00 P,M,
The foregoing holiday and spedal day schedules shall supersede and take
precedence over the regular physicn! custody and partial custody times and schedules.
Transportation of the child by any person shall be in a vehicle which is in
good running condition. currently inspected, registered and insured, and driven in a
safe manner by a responsible drivcr with a current valid driver's license. A car
se.."\t must be used when required hy law.
Each parent shall provide his or her address and telephone number to the
other. and in the event of any change shall notify the other within seven (7) days.
Mother and Father shall have reasomlblc telephone calling privileges to and
with each other in legitimate matters concerning the child. and reasonable
telephone calling privileges to and with the child when the child is in the custody
or partial c\lstody of the other. but she/he shall not call after 8:00 P,M. except in
C;L~e of emergency,
The parent having the custody or partial custody of the child shall allow the
child reasonable telephone calling privile~es to and with the other parent, but not C
after 8;00 r,M,
Each pan~nt ~hall bt' I'lItitlcd to r~ceivc from the other parent. ilmlthe other
parent shall promptly provide withollt request, full Wld complete infonnation
conceminr, the child's health. e.ducnlion and welfare. including information from
llny doctor, denti~t. teacher, school, church, babysitter. child care provider, scouting
organiz.'ltion, or any ot!)('.r organization. institution or authority, and copies of all
reports and documents including bllt not limited to birth records, medical nod
dental reports. and school records nod information (report cards, progress reports,
disciplinary reports, schedules of activities and extra-curricular activities. etc.), and
vu~-
\JL- 0"1
GElSINGU1 MEDICAL CENTEll . DANVILLE, PA 17U22
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT FORM
r
I'AIII III :"I-'Tfr.
,\
111U--
"
\ tl, 1,:',,/",'1
"':il:~I.~",~,'J~'Ml, (lIl:--~_~
COMPl(l[UIlV
\
"AI' .~, '~AM[ &AIlIllU.r,~
1111111'011.' 111,";',11 1,1
1\1' Ii 1111" "1111 ffOA~~I(,NII> JMOI)I(lIIIIAt~~I'(lIIIAllciN-T()[n
~ i I t ~ /I ; I I! .' 'j I 'I' I I ..! \ jj I " I I 11 I f (!
i;OMl.'IION~-~--L-=-OU'i'Y AGlCllliHllUAil" - ~ --- J:J1fIIOIUll- -- -L~")(- .-- MAHlIAl-!,iAiu"!i-
,. i , . ,1 J \ I ,'l . I I \ '~ . } , \ I I, " I. ii' ,I I ; I I! ' I I ,
--- -------
UAl'lOYlIl NAM!:
1,"'11,'
[MlIIGUlCY CONTACT
1'1' 1IIIi'II' 1:111111 III
,- ------ ,
1l0MI.: PIlON!:
I" 1:'1,'
-- ~ijilVf'IlV[;ICIANf4AM{iAOUlii~5
"1./'/
IIIIAIHJN
HHlllRING I'tlY51CIAN NAME & ADOfI[SS
fll 'i II.. 1111 I'll,' f, .. "i'1 I , I ~
1.11 I'
I. ,,' I" 1111111, ' ,
1111""1
nidi" I111
1'111 ',I f.', I': II';
,II', I
1'1)
1111!1I1(:
I'll
I PRESENT MYSElF FOA EVAlUATION AND AUTltQRIlI:; GEI5ING[l1 M[CICAl C[Nl[ftn'S f>nor[5510NAlSTAfF, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS TO
PERFORM UPON ME ANY DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES, OLOOD TnANSFU510N5 AND OTHER MWICAL CARr AND TREATMENT AS TilEY OCEM
RESONAOLE AND MECICAll Y NECESSARY FOA MY O[ST INT[ReST
I'ATIUH'S SIGNATURr
IF PATlCNT IS UNCONSCIOUS on PIIVSICAILY UNAlIlt 10 ~;ltiN Olll:j UNDlH 18 'i[Alln or Atil COMPllll T',',( 1000lOWlUG ^,S '~Allr T OJI
GUAflOIANOF TH[AOOVE PEnnQN,ICON5(NT TOTII!: AnoV( , \/ d .# /,,~
PAfI[NTonOUAllDIANSIGNATUtl[. /" f~/;';I'~//I'//./,;:rJI~,.
UP, 35M~ I ;;'~ Z'~ r~101Atlc'''G'i~S ,Nt /l J:: ~
tlx; '3y 0 ~ ;[ v.< ~ ~ vI'j Jw-
~~ ~~&(W~II"~/'
r.. Li"'c-A~:; ~. -pf-, ~ ~ ~f-&F
~v~~~k~~) wf ~, ~{('J 4ll(
n' _ ^- U,,^ M. ./&' 0.0
~p~ ~/~~L -pt'piy~ ~"^'. . -~'
~ '? ',~op__ _, II{S{q'(, . ,,~~ ."
~ ,~~, <} ?;~Ml-u;a-t..- /v.-~,r1v J~~G.
f'&,:^ ~ A~..o. A>-~ ~') ~ ~
1fv^-""0^-C). ,. ~-~. ^ ~ fik.)..9 ~
~ V'~ - ^, . ^().;t. oJ
E ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-()
~ ~a No J(C!, ~+~'.AM-
~ ~ ~iY'. 1~ '
'~DI~GNttl~ ..M-~ 6{S ll~ ~~,: o_
f ' 'JJy.~ ~~.;f~
TREATMENt: S W l;I'Vo-. (. ~ ~-.J,...~ 7
IIII
INSIJI1ANCf.
EMl'lOY[fl PIKitffi-----
wonK PHONE
DISPOSITION
I I Dlsch.rgud
I I Admlllud To:
Service
Room
I 1 Aolorrcd To
~
IICBC
IISMA,6
I JABG
I JUlA
IIPT,PTT
1 j AIllV1il50
II Lipase
IIEKG
1..1 Cardiac Profile
I 1 Trauma ProMo I
[J Trauma Profile II
o
X,RAYS
o Chusl
[] KUB
1:1 C'Spinu
lJ Polvis
[] Obslructio
Serios
,
/'
1
I [)(AMINrD TlI[ rATlOH IUCON5UlTATlOU WITtl on .... WHOWA5 HIE ATTENDING PtlVSICIAN WIIO
W':PIIYS'~'UY PIII:'"' '''~'I( [MU:"'CY n'I""IM:'" ':lUCOIICU""WW'"' TI<< nlA(lIK)STI~ '"nTlI[H'I'[UlICCO~'uJ@Y~ A~
111l5wlnt11:>llJ'lalll,.tTlllo Al1ntl(jtnQl.l1u~ A.212REV.I2J<J3Ik
--
.
.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVll.. AcrION - LAW
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.,
. PLAINTIFF
CV-94-634
vs
LISA M. ATIINGER,
CUSTODY
DEFENDANT
PROPOSED ORDER
AND NOW. this ~ day of -lJ n\JP.m h~.,.. . 1994,
upon consideration of the Custody Hearing Officer's Report Recommendation and
Order in accord therewith is herewith proposed.
This Order shall be entered as a Final Order unless exceptions
thereto are filed by either party within ten (10) days after the effective date hereof.
Effective Date:-:7J l12-<fmkJ f; /99f'
BY TIIE COURT:
8 1l"~&
~ I.
CONTEMI'T OF COlIRT
Lisa M, Allinger is being charged with Contempt of Court for the ti.Jllowing rcasons:
I, In the court order it is stated that. "Father shall have partial custody and Mother shall havc
physicul custody for one half of each of the holidays of New Year, Easter, Mcmorial Day,
July 4th, l~ubor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day, Father shall have partial
cuslody on Father's Day from 10:00 A,M, to 7:00 I',M,"
For the year 1995 the Father has not had partial custody Ii.Jr anyone of the holidays
including Futher's Day,
2. The court order also states, "Two non-consecutive weeks each year commcnsurate with
the Father's vacation, with three weeks notice in advance to Mother,"
The Father did not rcceive two full consecutive weeks with his daughter for the year 1995,
), Stated in the court order, "Mother and Father shall havc reasonable telephone calling
privileges to and with each other in legitimate mailers conccrning the child, and reasonable
telephone calling privileges to and with the child whcn the child is in the custody or partial
custody of the other, but she/he shall not call after 8:00 P,M. except in case of emergency,"
The Father has not received any telephone privileges from the Mother regarding the child,
The Father has not had any telephone privileges to and with the child at any time,
4, "The parent having the custody or partial custody of the child shall allow the child
reasonable telephone calling privileges to and witb the other parent, but not after 8:00 P,M,"
The Mother has not allowed the child to call the Father at any time,
5, "Each parent shall he entitled to receive from the other parent, and the other parent shall
promptly provide without request, full anJ complc\e inli.>nnation concerning the child's
health, education and welfare, including infi.lrmation from any doctor, dentist, teachcr,
school, church, baby siller. child care provider, scouting organization, or any other
organization, institution or authority, and copics of all rcports and documents including but
not limited to birth records, medical and dental reports. and school records and information
(report cards, progress reports, disciplinary reports. schedules ofactivitics and
cxtra-curricular, elc,). and information concerning any out of school activities or functions,
If the information concems dates, timcs and placcs of coming events, it shall be provided
immediately to the other parent so that the other parent will have the opportunity to attend or
partieipatc, The parent rcceiving the information from the other parent shall be rcsponsible
for the costs of obtaining it. including copying costs,"
The Mothcr has not concerned the Father with any details of the child's health or wclfare,
or included him in any of the decisions concerning the child,
MOJ>JFICA nONS
,
I
I. Evcry othcr wcckcnd from 10:00 AM, on Saturday to 7:00 P,M, on Sunday,
2, Fathcr shali havc partial custody and Mothcr shall havc physical custody for one half of cach
ofthc holidays ofNcw Ycar, Easlcr, Mcmorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and
Christmas Day,
- - '-~~
"',\ '/
s"""e<'(>
Modificd to: Evcry othcr wcckcnd from 9:00 ^,M, on Saturday to 9:00 P,M, on Sunday,
Modificd to: Fathcr shall havc partial custody and Mothcr shall havc physical cuslody for
cvcrv othcr holiday ofNcw Ycar, Eastcr, Mcmorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day,
Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day,
t
I
f
l
I
.
I
'\' !":t'~\'
'~1'J.'ti!li :_~~;.
I-')"~~,~\"
'1.,,',1...'((
.', ;~t~~'
:'~!.:~',lr;:'
',;\:.'f/ ~'
.,IHr .
.~~~11+.' : ':
>,1,.'; ~.'.I.,.:: '
,I''''t/"t
"......,
"'j'" i
, . ,~"':le_" ~
, "'I"
, ,;,,;,1. ,{..,
..' I. '
. . ,""'..",-,
. ' ,d'~if~~~''''~l
'\"" ~~'
',-i,,-il~ ,1\
" .,,~ I ~
: ~~.:~~: ,"'I"
!:'f':.~~'1';
,'"".J.~j,ll'!lt
, , "Wi 1101"
"'I' ,~,'
'I' .
"I,. R. HERMAN, 1R.,
,) ~:~:~; rm~\: PLAINTIFF
, ,,1"'j:,":,
,.l,i,\'I'l! ,
",'I'i'I:~ .~
.,.t '
/?Ir'~ ,~
~ \. I', V:~
~il~' j M. ATIINOER
"'3..!lIlO 1'1 '
'~:"''I>'''' I' '
,,';y!' .~
~ II " t"
I. ~ .
"':!~'>; ~
, ;"',/. I~
; ";,,," 19
,"'r\.\ili . .
':' I [riJ" "'~:'
":'1'1~1J; .tl ~I
':'i.~:i'. J}\' ,,:.f
"---:"'.")'iif:,mr.';,
.' -I~!~ ::~;~l:~-, ~i';
. ....:...J....)..
:',<)1, ".:
"
,,;Up,(ln'conslderation of the Custody Hearing Officer's Report Recommendation and
..... .".
I ,',
Order in accord therewith is herewith proposed.
',' .~, ,
This Order shall be entered as a Final Order unless exceptions
,-.,:tPCt:eto are filed by either party within ten (10) days after the effective date hereof,
::,~},,~.~J.
".;';:\IlL';rk":
.' ?}:':;~~"':~
,.,:\!.." "
" "\1;'1:' \',
':,::~;;f~1~~f(~VeDate:-7J ~~~/ ~ Jr;t?~
":'''~l' .""J~,P~ 4 q
~,'f;. ,"n' ,-, ~.
". "'~i.ht, 'Jd:' I.t~,"
1::.':~I(.I.t.,.(:~
',~~I.f t P" I'
, " ..' ''''', '
. ';t;.1l.:,:'
. " ~;t' \:;:j .::. .
,- ,',
:~"l~'J"<;"
. ~~'::'.II!lll:
Ii .":
.:' "I
,"
"
.,' .
.~. J
,
"
.,' :: \:,~, \1~; :',
. : ~::-..~::.~';~"
.,,).,,"# 'l
',."',,,,;.\.....,
", "'\I."
'_"''''...',I!,I.
. ""<!'~""\~~i/~
tl~'\l' .J:,~...'':''
.'., ,,~.r.'
;.: i!I;(."~l"IJj~.
"'~ ,~# I, ii" :.
, ..:,',\(;~;~;;..
,':'",1.: ;
._:~tW.t...
t
~
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF NORTIlUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVll. ACflON - LAW
'~
CV - 94 - 634
YS
CUSTODY
DEFENDANT
PROPOSED ORDER
,
r
,
[
f
I
!
,
AND NOW, this ~ day of -l"Jn"e.mh,,\'"
. 1994,
BY THE COURT: .
{3 1l,f,,.a&
~ I.
..,',"',
"',' ';:,'i I
l,j....W..\1
" ,~I_l.,' l
. ".~ ,i :Jt~ I;; .;
,i", ":"I,!" ~
',,, !,~;,.!'!'( I '
I',' i :;~'#', .
I \,\;./,~ J.
"1,""':'
"I'\~I(~'.....,.
" "~'-"'d'"
"~:,'I,::..:/,,."
",..'r-'
_.',.,',11"','
. ",;t,Z/ "11('14~1
',iJ~ ~I[~;
';;~'.1" ~'l:
\ ,~~ 'If I ~.
"',:,' I,
/'1) I/j'
'\:'," ff.r
I';' .
....,~ .
!,~'j~~ ' ,';,
.1,,,'.\1: t,
{~tJ'.1 ':'t " .' I' .
:ni ' ~ I
;,.(" ~ W!l~'
""'~'~ ,.11".
"'"1:',, ,',l~~'!l','
':~'ll M ''l1.
:.,>II~ "I"
\",.' ATI'lNGER,
';I:S;~ ~. ~:,y, DEFENDANT
,,',~riAi ..
;\I\~:l t~ '~N
,: "\1"\ ~nt
'",',ll/.'. .
..oI,,',tft',\l'l '",
',.'r "J~r"'!':'!'
. :,~y.}'l;/~.;!"I.~;'
',""',' )...t~'d'h'
': ~':, ':/'::~"~:
, 'Pursuant to the Court's order a conference was held on September 19,1994
lQ:30 A.M. in the Fifth Floor Hearing Room of the Northumberland County Human
,SerVices Building at which time and place Mother appeared with her counsel, Wm.
,,' :JlmvCy-Wiest. Father appeared with his counsel, Robert H. Slivinski.
; 11,',7.._ ,'I,/'I
" '.\,:',><"
I,
"j'
~ 1'.
"I
"f
r"l
,.;l
';,,:,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA
CIVn. ACl10N . LAW
~,
),
R. HERMAN. JR.,
PLAINTIFF
CV-94-634
vs
CUSTODY
REPORT
,
r
'1
I
,
"".:,;", The parties are the parents of Alissa M. Attinger born, February 14, 1991.
.' II" ',..!I',J " .
'," 'I'.';' .
, 1\ ,".
,',:,il; j, Father filed a Complaint in this case requesting joint legal custody and
f::/teaSonable partial custody of the child,
'-:::'i~(:');~::
',~' -."-.
, .1'
. l':'~ :':~'.''. .:
RECOMMENDATION
Mother and Father shall share legal custody of the child [the legal right to
:',"?akemajor decisions affecting the best interest of the child, including but not limited
,,';~~! n,tedical. religious and educational decisions].
" ,",'1,rl"..
/',;\:~~l>~'~;;
,.~(~l~j~":jl:l.i. Mother shall have physical custody of the child [the actual physical possession
,(,I~atid:control of the child].
. . " 1,;. \,,\~ttl4-'
:';').;{J:"J.~\
" Father shall have partial custody of the child [the right to take possession of the
, "child away from the custodial parent for a certain period of time] as follows:
'),,:,:::~~','~:;'
j!:' '."
.:;\;/,:y:,.....';:,:,
. ' ~ . . 'r ..,'
, ~ ~~ IJ. ~'l.'
. 1,1 \r ~~~ \.
I ~ .:" 1 .'...'
,,~: ';"'I{'!~"~;:;
. , .,,:;,",:,'
,~,l'-":l. ~:\.. 1
1. Every other weekend from 10:00 A.M. on Saturday to 7:00 P.M. on
Sunday beginning effective September 24,1994.
"
'., '~:
;,','
"':'l'\~ll" "j~'"
,:","j:'!',"f;'\
"1'."".\. ":,:
,';:':li'I' 'jtl}~~l'~'
',';;'1 ~ r-~'
" I'll ft. I~..'
-:i::~r:'t~~\\
, ,-1;~1~~.~1.'11'...
"""'l" ,
. ~ t" t \. ". . ,
" : ::i:,,'" 2. Two non-consecutive weeks each year commensurate with Father's
';::';\i'f{,lJ':' vacation, with three weeks notice in advance to Mother.
'I ":.', 1~'rll{.,l'\I\.
1,,,,,,O'I\\J"~';
.,.'. ::'il,:~,i'{i!\\~\~, 3. At such other times as the parties from time to time agree.
, ,:" ~V~F;'U~~!')"
, ";\I~J/ ~!:~~- ~~"
, ;','r '1/('::: Father shall have partial custody and Mother shall have physical custody for
"\~n.~:~i1If of each of the holidays of New Year, Easter, Memorial Day, July 4th, Labor
, ,;:lJ:D'l!YlmJ:hanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
, .'1 I.tl,'''~~'!..
,-' :.1 ~.I.~'.l~{r
""Itt.'"I,r"k\n./
:,./i~;!,:~~;~:1),: Father shall have p:u:ial custody on Father's Day from 10:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M,
;J,:jli4:~P1~, other shall have phYSical custody on Mother's Day from 10:00 A.M. to
, -":'~}\~~Jl:7t~'l M.
. 'f,;lllt1:< 'J' , '
",;':J ,I' ,,' I) ,
,;i .: ~j I~. d~""'; .
'<:;'~' The foregoing holiday and specin! day schedules shall supersede and take
precedence over the regular physicn! custody and partin! custody times and schedules.
. "I, ,.jJ"/~'F:;.'~"
.....~.~-I..--
"I.?I ~"'" Transportation of the child by any person shall be in a vehicle which is in
, goodrornting condition, currently inspected, registered and insured, and driven in a
)!itf,~anner by a responsible driver with a current vn!id driver's license. A car
"/,seat[lnlust be used when required by law.
';": '''((j'''1
",,;,,>,",:~.\.,~:;..y
, ,', . ,,';: Each parent shall provide his or her address and telephone number to the
,other, and in the event of any change shall notify the other within seven \l) days.
. . ..'..
~.". ." ,,,,'If.IV~','fr.ti ,-'._-
,:,' ',.,: Mother and Father shall have reasonable telephone calling privileges to and
with each other in legitimate matters concerning the child, and reasonable
telephone calling privileges to and with the child when the child is in the custody
,qr Partin! custody of the other, but she/he shall not call after 8:00 P.M. except in
" ',;casc/;of emergency .
."':'~:'.'!'~':;l'\\'::'
""11),\' .'.J:';~:
, ',":';:i,l,~-: The parent having the custody or partial custody of the child shall allow the
,,:child;reasonable telephone calling privileges to and with the other parent, Qut not ·
;,',i~:iuier~B:OO P.M.
'''''''T''V~~,''
'1 ;'..:...:'_::',~~\';,::,~\:",,; ,
" "/"': ,,: ':Each parent shall be entitled to receive from the other parent, and the other
, , parent shall promptly provide without request, full and complete infonnation
concerning the child's health, education and welfare, including infonnation from
any doctor, dentist, teacher, school, church, babysitter, child care provider, scouting
organizatior., or any other organization, institution or authority, and copies of all
1'Cport~ and documents including but not limited to birth records, medical and
,; dental, :reports, and school records and infonnation (report cards, progress reports,
- 'disc;iplinary reports, schedules of activities and extrn-curricular activities, etc.), and
" ,~i(:'~~~i;'~'tl
";""'J.~ ~n'~~I.,."._- .
t~.'~,'i ,r;\J\.{ .
: .',i<:)~,f !;fJ'~!: '
,,'. /....~~ .,to' .
. :I~I"~ {t,"'h~..l."
'......ll...1'..~I.\.t1., .
,};~..t.I.4i: .:.,"~.. ,.,"--:--
,!:/li."frhnt"'.-r. .'1'1,
',I.;I'~', .<it~,(,! II. r',.
'I
",
,.-/
"'f'
'.'\\
..'i
'",,;,
,,' ;,:,,,;If
LISA M. ATTINGER,
Plaintiff
IN TflE COURT OF CC\'IMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 96-380
CIVIL TERM
KENNETH R. IIERMJIN, JR.,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN CUSTODY
OIIDER OF counT
lIND tnoI, this I-ot
upon consideration of the attached
ordered and directed as follows:
day of Or.u;.L
Custody Conciliation Report,
, 1996,
it is
1. The parties shall attend the four hour Seminar for Separating
Parents conducted in Dauphin County and shall encourage the maternal and
paternal grandparents to attend the seminar as well. Each party shall pay
his or her own seminar costs. In addition, the ~,rties shall participate in
a minimum of eight (8) sessions of counseling to be conducted by a
professional counselor selectGd by the parties and their counsGl. The
parties shall schedule the first counseling session to be held within thirty
(30) days of the date of the Custody Conciliation Conference. The purpose
of the counseling shall be to assist the parties in developing and
maintaining communication skills nGcessary to cooperate effectively in
'raising their minor Child. The parties shall share all unreimbursed
counseling costs. '
2. The Mother, Lisa M. Attinger, and the Father, Kenneth R. Herman,
Jr., shall have shared legal custody of Alyssa M. Attinger" born FebruarY
14, 1991. Sharing legal custody requires that the parties consult wfth each
other in making major decisions affecting the best interests of the Child,
including, but not limited to all major medical, religious and educational
decisions.
3. The Mother shall have primary physical custody of the Child.
II. 'I'he ['ather shall have partial physical custody of the Child on
alternating weekends from Saturday at 9:00 a.m. until Sunday at 7:00 p,m.
The Father shall return the Child to the Mother's custody at 8 :00 p.m. on
Sunday evenings when there is no school on the Monday following the Father's
period of weekend custody.
5. The parties shall alternate or share custody of the Child on
holidays as follows:
A. Christmas: The Father shall have custody of the Child in
every year from Christmas Eve morning at 9:00 a.m. until
Christmas Eve at 11:00 p.m. The Mother shall have custody of
the Child every year from Christmas Eve at 11:00 p.m. through
Christmas Day. The rGmainder of the school Christmas vacation
shall be shared Gqually by the parties as arranged by mutual
agreement.
B. New Years: The ['ather shall have custody of the Child in even
EXHIBIT
1_12-
numbered years from New Years Eve at 9:00 a.m. until New Years
Day at 7:00 p.m. The Mother shall have custody of the Child
on the same schedule in odd numbered years,
C. Easter: The Mother shall have custody of the Child on Easter
weekend in even numbered years and the Father shall have
custody of tho Child on Easter woekenu in odd numbered years.
The exchange time for custody on Easter woekend shall be the
same as the reglllnr wookend schedule. The parties agree that
both parties shall insure that the Child attends church on
Easter Sunday in every year.
n. Memorial Dayj~nbo,:" Day: The party who otherwise has custody
of the Child on the wookends proceding ',jl!lIlorial Day and Labor
Day shall also have custody of the Child on the Monday
holiday. When the Father has custody of the Child on Memorial
and Labor Day weokends, he shall return the Child to the
Mother's custody at 7:00 p.m. on the h~li9~Y.
E. ~uly 4th: The Fathor shall have custody of t~e Child on July
4th in even numbered years from 9:00 a,m. unt11 8:00 p.m. and
the Mother shall have custody of the Child on the same
schedule in odd numbored years.
F. Thanksgiving: Tho Father shall have custody of the Child in
even numbered years on Thanksgiving Day from 9:00 a.m. until
8:00 p.m. and the Mother shall have custody of the Child on
Thanksgiving in odd numbered years. In years when the Father
has custody of the Child on a Thanksgiving Day irrrnediately
preceding the Father's regularly scheduled weekend custody,
the Father shall have custody of the Child from Thanksgiving
Day at 9:00 a.m. until the following Sunday at 7:00 p.m.
G. Mother's Day/Father's Day: The Mother shall have custody of
the Child in every year on Mother's Day from 9:00 a.m. until
7:00 p.m. The Father shall have custody of the Child in every
year on Father's Day from 9:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m.
II. Child's birthday: Each party shall have an opportunity to
have a period of extended custody with the Child as close to
the Child's birthday as possible in every year.
6. The Father shall have custody of the Child for two non-consecutive
weeks during each surrrner vacation which shall be scheduled to begin on the
Father's regular periods of weekend cuntody beginning on Saturday at 9:00
a.m. and ending the fOllowing Sunday at 8:00 p.m, The Father shall provide
three (3) weeks advance notice to the Mother to schedule these periods of
summer vacation custody.
7. The parties shall cooperate in oxchanging information concerning
the Child's medical bills, medical coverage and other matters related to the
Child's health, education and general welfare.
8, All exchanges of custody under this Order shall take place at
. ','
": ! "'"
.j. .,1 . ')1
;,' .'..?
I ~. '. _ I, ,
I~) 'I) eU. t''i'? ""':fI<' "" a~ r6h2
/ c}) 9 ) /iJ~t /1'<1.4-/ ~ 4- d:./Iv6,
/"J) ,;I) (~;z/ta/ -ffi ft1. rt:Jar IA-
. -
-1'
-'-.::
.," , ". ~. . . 'P,t"h" {i~;'J
,.' , . '" " ,1'"', ,,'0f;. i!::;,if!. ,;:"",tj" ,'" ,"'
. . ","",~i."., J ". i'.,5, ~ "", . "" " ".. .,Cf "C'. .
'" :'~:,~, '"~~;''' .', , A.. ,. . "."" ", ,. ' "
:; . '.;..... " . '. '. -, /'':';':'>::>'' ,
" ',":',,, :" ','. "',', '" ',..'
,.;oo," "'::"'"
, ,
-- ,_ c_
- - - . -
-:-,:, "
,
~~\
IlEd:'t-f!?'
~~~<-,<~~, - -'" -
,"
,,' "
l'''''";y",, , F' 'Ji
;",; \li' {~:~"".;:., ~ ,,' ':. ,{::;J ;
~ t"'~"':;o~i.~ " " . ";
',. .' ", ':"':', , . " ..':' " ,.' " ",
:::'J:~:'I><;\~_: ,', " , ", ;":"'"
, ~~ ' ,;' " '"i ,,' ":' ~;i. ' ,
.' ',,> :" ~ , ;':";';" :/':" "
' ", ",;::~,~ 'i> " ,',(: 'co, ;';/~'i ',:,
J':: ,"ie:,' ".,., '....::. '. :',' '::""',:.c,: :.'.;,: ~S
',: "co:,:,::;,": ":',,, "<",::.:. "
"':......:';':"f'~':"..-:~;',: <" ,:,<;>',',';~,:,",':.,',
' "c.., ".', ';';,>:': "',' ':>' _':':": "
":'':':'';''''.' ~, ~';"':'::':-"""'" "
;",,' if:::'.' ..'" '5:~>:;';;~";:} ',\;,<. ,./";~
. ",;,~:", ~'.. .. '" .. i~t::?l),:i; ,,:...I?,A
' ""~:}' ,,::.:,.: ',:,J;(c';::,'::"
.. '. .':'" ;' /-'~ ;
"'{':, '::} , ..
'u :,' , , ,"".. "
' i,.., , , ';,.: :;,';
:',,' u, '.., ,'i. ~):
(:,: >, ", ~:;",.)..~,{~! ::.
, ;" .', , , ",;',
""'.. ".' ',: ",'" ,;" ,:
.',,; "/'': :, '~,
, ,~;":c..: ,:..'~ I";'':;'':: "
''', I,,;,,:;,:;':,..," 1')-::', ':: ,i"::,
:,~ E""f ," "
",' 'i< ';;:.~;;~';:.:;!'/.:;/;.' ". .
, 'C~,,:;:~ :;;CiI',:~ : "f'" '
,,:C, '., """";':;:':' :,:,.., :'''''~'o',:::::''''::''".
;C" ", " ;:;, ',.<:~~<,\~,
,,; ::' o,t", L:\,,:.:,. ':',: ,:;..:~:
, ,;1: .,:~~:;",,:,;,: '::";y':/\"" ,
?, ',,' ..' :t/i;i,:)";~:,-;:"" ,C,',,::-' i, ':..,", '::
~";:;~>?J!, " .. ":,:, , , " ; ,
,': ,:' ~:< i,;''", ;'>'"" ,:,,:'i~, >:~
'r;"~5{:'~::":'!:::, ,,;;, ,.'
,:::::c:. /~'f::;'f!::";?'<'::'. ',:':,.. :', '::':,.", ,:,' ,:: "I:"';'" C, . ,;,,;,;
;,' \', ;::, , I'::' '",",'""',, '; ':,';,\::
:' 0',:'~;:"':, ", ,: ,,',' , ,',;,;';;: ":".., ,
' , ." '," .".:, ','" .. ,', - . , ", ": . " "",-c,
7: " ',q....'..":' '.', ":' , .., . '~?t"J," '",
" ',;';,;,"" '," ,", , ". ~:/:~:
'-;'..".: ,,,~ :;, :"'" "'::"''':''~
"'~""..,;,,:< " " :",." ", "
.. "'2:;::;:{~t>'~;it~~;' " ' ", : :L, C , ..
'i '.'" "" ',.. " ,"
,,' "
',"',' ",': ~,:,,', " '"
"
','
IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPII SIIINGARA and
BRENDA SIIINGARA
Plaintiffs
\IS.
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY. 7
NO. q., __ / S I{ (!1..A.~l C
LISA M. ATIINGER,
Defendant
ORDER OF COURT
You, Lisa M. Allinger, have been sued in court for parital custody by the grandparents
of Alyssa M. Allinger.
You are ordered to appear in person at the (Courtroom)(Jury Room) of the Cumberland
County Courthouse, PA on the day of , 1997, at ,_.M.
for
a conciliation or mediation conference
a pretrial conference
a hearing before the court
If you fail to appear as provided by this Order, an Order for Custody, Partial Custody,
or Visitation may be entered against you or the court may issue a warrant for your arrest.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE
THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL
HELP.
Coun Administrator
Cumberland County CounhollJe
Carlise. PA 17013-3387
Telephone: (7/7) 24().6200
BY THE COURT:
Date:
J,
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA,
Petitioner
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
OF PENNSYLVANIA
vs,
LISA M. ATIINGER
Respondent
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
CUSTODY
NO, (11- I f'f G.vJ
-
J~
PETITION FOR PARTIAL CUSTODY
(BY GRANDPARENTS)
I, The Petitioners are Joseph Shingara and Brenda Shingara who currently reside at
RD #3, Box 142B, Sunbury, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania,
2, The Respondent is Lisa M, Allinger who currently resides at 69 Autumn Lane,
Enola, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17025.
3. The Petitioners seek partial custody of the minor child, Alyssa M. Allinger bom
February 14, 1991, currently residing with the Defendant Lisa M. Allinger.
4. The Petitioners are the patemal grandparents of said child, being the parents of
Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., the natural father of the child.
5. The Petitioners desire partial custody of their grandchild of the following reasons:
(a) The natural parents of the child, Ken Herman, Jr. and Lisa M, Allinger
no longer are seeing each other and the minor child is in the custody of the Mother, Lisa M.
Allinger;
(b) The Mother, and the Petitioners are estranged and the Mother, therefore,
is not allowing access of the subject child to the Petitioners;
(c) The Father, Kenneth R, Herman, Jr., enjoys only secondary physical
custody with respect to the child and therefore is not able to allow reasonable and sufficient
visitation to the Petitioners; and
(d) The child has always enjoyed a loving and good relationship with the
Petitioners who desire to maintain the relationship with their grandchild.
~
~
,
,
IN THE COURT OF COKMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN CUSTODY
.'
JOSEPH SHINGARA and,
BRENDA SHINGARA
plaintiff,
NO.
I
vs.
I
LISA M. ATTINGER,
I
Defendant.
.
.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1_ James L. Best, Esquire served a true and correct copy of
the forqoinq Petition for Partial Custodv (Bv GrandDarents on
Defendant throuqh her counsel of record by depositinq the same in
the united States mail, first class, postaqe prepaid, at Lewisburq,
pennsylvania, this ,th day of January, 1997, addressed to the
followinql
Mark T. Silliker, Esquire
204 state street
Harrisburq, PA 17101
BYI
s L. Best, Esquir
rney for plaintiffs
"
LAW orr-ICES
REe .l VED JUN 2 4 1994
ROO[R v, WI[ST
Woo, HARVI:Y WI[5T
CUARll:& H. SAYLOR
ROBI:RTJ....UOLO
WIEST, WIEST, SAYLOR & MUOLO
OA,VIO O. NOON
WILLIA... A, SWINI:HART
ASSOCIA TES
P. O. OOX 791
i!40,i!.... MARKCT STRtET
SUNBURY, PENNSYLVANIA 17801
ARCA coer 7 I'
lee.n 11
(C ~ ~~::IC[
ASHLAND orl"IC[
.7a-.3.ew
....
.....075
June 22, 1994
Robert H. Slivinski, Esquire
III No~th High Street, Suite One
Selinsgrove, PA 17870
Re: Kenneth R. Herman, Jr. v. Lisa M. Attinqer
No. CV-94-634, Northumberland County, PennsylVdnia
Dear Bob:
Enclosed please find a photocopy of a letter which I received June
21, 1994 from Lisa Attinger. I think it spells Qut very clearly wh~t her
hesitations and concerns are about the sole visitation with Ken. *1ndl~
propose this to him with the understanding that he m~y continue to see1
the chlrd~whlnf8h8 is at his mother andstep-father's'home as well."
After consultation with your client, please get back to me and we
will determine if a new conciliation date need be established.
Kindest regards.
Very truly yours,
WIEST, WIEST, SAYLOR. NUOLO
'~~~
\
WHW/cjr
Enclosure
'8603
Mm. Harvey Wiest I
pc: Lisa M. Attinger
.~~~;i~;,;~~~'f' ~:;;'t"'"';ti,,~" H',,~,j~:~~i~;?;~ . v~~~r .;, o' ,:;,::gc~~~""i'i"';~'~~
m~ ~1i1J_ ~ ill!! Ii~..
',,:'" ,;:,'._ ;"c'-', '
<,' c:- "c'" '_,'" ' ': ' .. : ,',
::,:c.: ';' >,
'1~}:'" ,> , " ' , ."
': '~;:,:~~~}!,: ,~ '. '. ..;.. ... P' . ~7.;~;?;.j1, ~ ;:r' t~
:',.. "_:>"c,, ,.",',':,:'", :;'" "-,:,""'.':,; ::::'~f~t:"
_ ,,:: ""c,<' ',,';.':;__' ;:;:
: ",_" \:";:}~' ': , :' " ,', -,: ,c,:' "; , -~ ~:
..', '\;,'." ,"" c', ' ":'- .. ,,: ,,::': ' ,";," ',:: ,
-.:'-' . '~"".. : ' , ,,' ,', ,,' ,:: :~:' -" ,
.. :::' <,..:'.: "~; "..:' ';:'.:,., ,:::c:" __ ,,; '-',}
~<:\ "\c":::~' , ""'e-
'~:~; , ;!flt!i: '.f!, '
-; " ,; :('," ;~~-
,'"
,~{!
'ie-
-<",.,
c';~4
;,-
:;~'.
,:,';
'.'
..
"
~!
;-"'-:
',' ',' ",,-
i,':/.:L,~::,":, ,,'
,:,,;?f;
,
"" .:' "~
><'
'V ,}~ :".,; ';:f'j
: ,,:'q:../' ,':',.:: :;-
", '\'-'.. ;', .(,:,-.: I' "',;>",:-::5'./:'."':,:::-:""
""'-':-':-;',:;:;::";:;"', ..::; ,', ,:: '::", ,: ; ,::"': , , ',' ;':..:,:
"" ~_:;,-::>'O::;" i ,,", '.',':--' ';' .' ..',;:'-;'-
'ic;, : ';,',':: c:,,:,;, ",:i: ~'; ,::{ ";/" <:'~,,;;,
" ,', ,',',': .',';' ':.. :"CoO' -, c ," .."':, '..".0::::"" _ ..
1;'-,;''':'>,-", ",':', '.<:<,': '.'(',"; i;"
;, >:~:,':'i'.::;- :;' p,'. <"'<>
:;:;i',...."..' ," :',::/o'!:..::;;",,-,:, ~:;
',;" " " ,~-..-:;;:
';'"..:".'v;"" ..:';~':;':',
,';,
':;' " :';
'.. '.." ..
'"
, ~~',
JOSEI'll SIlINGARA and : IN 7'I1E COURT OF COMMON l'I./~A.'i
BRENDA SIlINGARA, : CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Petitioner : OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
vs. :
: CIVIL ACTION - LA W
LISA M. ATfINGER : CUSTODY
and KENNETII R. liERMAN, JR. :
Respondent : NO. 97 - 0184
AMENDED PETITION FOR PARTIAL ClJSTODY
(BY GRANDI'ARENTS)
1. The Petitioners are Joseph Shingara and I3renda Shingara who (urrenll) r,'",k ,II
RD #3, 80K 14213, Sunbury, Northumberland Counly, l'ennsylval1la.
2, The Respondents are Lisa M. Allinger whu resldell al bY Autullln LUll'. Lnlll.\
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17025 at the time this action was tiled and who 1I11" reSides
in Harrisburg, Daupin County, PA and Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., who eurrelllly reSides III RIl n
3, Sunbury, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.
3, The Petitioners seek partial custody of the minur child, Alyssa M. Atllnger hurn
February 14, 1991, currently residing with the Defendant Lisa M. Allinger.
4. The Petitioners are the paternal grandparents of said child, being Ihc parents 01
Kenneth R, Herman, Jr., the natural father of the child.
5. The Petitioners desire partial custody of their grandchild of lhe followlIlg reasolls
(al The natural parents of the child, Ken Herman, Jr. and l.isa M. Atllnger nll
longer are seeing C<lch other and the minor child is in the eusllldy of lhc Molhcr. I.lSa M
Allinger;
(b) The Mother, and the Petitioners arc cst ranged and lhe Molllcr. 11l,'rd,II"
is not allowing access of the subject child to the Pelitioners;
(cl The Father, Kennelh R. Herman, Jr., enjoys unly seeondar) ph)",,,1
custody with respect to the child and therefore is not able to allow rcasonable and sulfl,'lcnl
visitation to the Petitioners; and
(b)
It io denied that Ilflff'llllant dl!l11fln pfltitioners
I
t
access to the child, and it ill [urtlllH' (lI'IIn1<1 I:hil\: Palintiffs do
I:'
I
not have acceoo to the child, all t IIf! nal:ural I'ather has the
aforementioned Court Order grant ing 1".1 I.lll' !' parI. i a 1 cuntody rights,
which provides acceoo to the ch 11d I: () P I a i III. if f n,
(c) It io denied that I.hen, ill not reaoonable and
sufficient visitation to Plainti[[1I in I hilt.:
l, the natural Father' n parI. ial cuotody rights are
court ordered;
2, Plaintiffn, an grandparento, are not legally
entitled to a lIoparatfl courl. order in view of
their oon'o (Fal.hor'o) partial cuotody rights;
3. Defendant believolI ilnd therefore avero that
during Fatheldll villll.i1tlon, Father leaves the
child with Plainl.i![o and that Plaintiffs are
actually in CUlll:ody of I.he child at Plaintiffs'
reoidence for t.ho majority of the vioitation
time.
(d) It in admittod I.hal: grandparents enj oy their
relat ionnhip wi th tho child. It is denied that said
relationllhip ill a npecial realtionship, or anything
other than a typical grandparent/child relationship.
(e) Plaintiffn and Father live within 5 minutes of each
other.
WHBRBFORB, Defendant requests Your Honorable Court to
~
'"
dismiss Plaintiff's Petition/Complaint for custody, and award
Defendant court costs, reasonable attorney fees and any othe relief
the Court may deem proper,
NEW MATTBR
6. Defendant incorporates by reference its answers 1
through 6 to the Petition hereto,
7, The Orders of Court of December 8, 1994 and April 1,
1996 (Exhibit "A") specifically grant Defendant primary physical
custody and partial custOdy/visitation rights to the natural
!
t
.r
I
I
,
Father.
8. Since the separation of Defendant and natural Father
in July, 1990, Defendant has been the primary physical custodian of
the child, during which the child has prospered and said custody
and vistitation has been in the best interests of the child,
9, In view of said Order and the partial custody rights
of Father, Plaintiff Brenda Shingara, as natural grandparent lacks
proper standing to request an additional and separate Court Order
providing them with a separate partial custOdy/visitation rights,
in addition to those of Father; and Plaintiff Joseph Shingara has
no standing whatosover as he is not a natural grandparent hereto,
10. The Grandparent Visitation Act is implemented when
the child of the grandparent is unable or unwilling to exercise his
partial custOdy/visitation rights; and since natural Father has
partial custOdy/visitation rights pursuant to the aforementioned
Order, Plaintiffs, are not entitled to a separate Order hereto,
11,
During Father' 0 partial custody/visitation,
Defendant believes and therefore that the child spends the majority
of the Father's vioitation time with Plaintiffs, at Plaintiffs
residence, and that Plaintiffo residence and natural Father's
residence are approximately 5 minutes apart, and Plaintiffs have
every opportunity for reaBonable and sufficient acces to the child,
l2. Since the ionuance of the Court Order on December 8,
1994, approximately one year later, natural Father filed for
contempt againnt Defendant in Northumberland County, which was
dismissed; and alno a Petitition For Modification, which was also
dismissed; and Defendnnt believes and therefore avers, that
Plaintiff Brenda Shin'lllra and/or Father, has falsely and
deliberately reported Dofendant to Cumberland County Children &
Youth and faloely and deliberately alleged sexual assault against
Defendant aB otated in medical records, due to their failure to
gain additional cuntody rights. Plaintiffs are now attempting to
secure their own, noparate, individual partial custody rights. The
Children (. Youth letter dismisBing the allegation as "Invalid" and
medical record II , arc attached hereto as Exhibit "B",
13, The beot interests of the child will be served by
maintaining the current custody order and dismissing Plaintiff's
Complaint in that:
A, oeparate, additional custody rights to Plaintiffs
will detrimentally detract from the custody time of Defendant
and/or natural father;
B. granting of separate, additional partial custody
rightn to either Plaintiff as a grandparent, will entitle other
f
f
,
I
\
"
,
h~t11 1 r:, . ':It. O~: T:::fd'l
P.]/.:,
IN TIll COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF NORTIIUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KENNETII R. HERMAN, JR.,
PLAINTIFF
CV - 94 - 634
vs
CUSTODY
LISA M. ATIlNGER,
DEFENDANT
PROPOSED ORDER
AND NOW, this -'1-t~ d.1Y of ~.e.mj,.r
,1994,
upon consideration of the Custody Hearlne Officers Report Recommendation and
Order in accord therewith is herewith proposed.
This Order shall he entered as n Final Order unless exceptions
Iherelo are filed by either party within ten (10) days afrer the effective date hereof.
Effective D3Ie:-22/!J.<J)"l},l.!f.tu; ~ 19ff
BY TIll COURT:
(3 1?,.a&
L ],
It"dl 1:. "~ll; CO:J~lHI'1
r.5',;.
2, Two nOli-consecutive weeks each year commensurate with Father's
vacallon, with three weeks notice In advance to Mother,
3, At such other times as the parties from time to time agree.
Father shall have partial custody and Mother shall have physical custody for
one half of each of the holidays of New Year, Basler, Memorilll Day, July 4th, Labor
Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
Father shall have partial custody on Father's Day from 10:00 AM, to 7:00 P.M,
and Mother shall have physical custody on Mother's Day from 10:00 A.M. to
7:00 P.M,
The foregoing holiday and special day schedules shall superse1e and take
precedence over the regular physiclll custody and partial custody times and schedules,
Transportation of the child by any person shall be in a vehicle which is in
good running condition, currently inspected, registered and insured, and driven in a
safe manner by a responsible driver with a clUTent valid driver's license. A car
seat must be used when required by law,
Each parent shall provide his or her address and telephone number to the
other, and in the event of any change shall notify the other within seven (7) days,
Mother and Father shall have reasonable telephone calling privileges to and
with each other in legitimate matters concerning the child. and reasonable
telephone calling privileges to and with the child when the child is in the custody
or partial custody of the other, bul she/he shall not call after 8:00 P.M, except in
ca.~e of emergency.
The parent having the custcxly or partial custody of the child shall allow the
child reasonable telephone calling privileges to and with the other parent, but not ·
after 8;00 P.M.
Each parent shall be entitled to receive from the other parent, and the other
parent shall promptly provide without request, full and complete infonnation
concerning the child's health, education and welfare, including infonnation from
any doctor, dentist, tC<lcher, school, church, habysitter. child care provider, scouting
organization, or any other organizatioo, institution or authority, and copies of llll
reports and documents inCluding but not limited to birth records, medical and
dental reports, and school records and infonnation (report cards, progress reports,
disciplinary reports, schedules of activities and extra-<:urricular activities, elc,), and
hOd I l~, 1':lt, O?: 3.h:t1'1
P.6/6
infonnation concernIng any out of school activities or functions. If the Information
concerns dates, times and places of coming events, it shall be provided
Immediately to the other parent so thnt the other parent will have the opportunity
to attend or participate. The parent receiving the information from the other parent
shall be responsible for the costs of obtaining it, including copy costs.
Neither parent shull alienate or attempt to alienate, nor allow others to
alienate or attempt to alicnate, the affection of the child for the other parent, Each
parent shall excrt ev!:l)' reasonable effort to foster a feeling of affection between
thc child and the other parent.
November 7, 1994
pc: Wm, Harvey Wiest, Esquire
Robert H, Slivinski, Esquire
, ,'If
'..J"
LISA M. ATTINGER,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF CCX'1MON PLEAS OF
CUMDERLNND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 96-380
CIVIL TERM
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR"
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN CUSTODY
OODER OF CXXIRT
AND lD'/, this 14t
upon consideration of the attached
ordered and directed as follows:
day of o.J;J"u.L
Custody Conciljation Report,
, 1996,
it is
1. The parties shall attend the four hour Seminar for Separating
Parents conducted in Dauphin County and shall encourage the maternal and
paternal grandparents to attend the seminar as well. Each party shall pay
his or her own seminar costs, In addition, the parties shall participate in
a minimum of eight (8) sessions of counseling to be conducted by a
professional counselor selected by the parties and their counsel. The
parties shall schedule the first counseling session to be held within thirty
(30) days of the date of the Custody Conciliation Conference. The purpose
of the counseling shall be to assist the parties in developing and
maintaining communication skills necessary to cooperate effectively in
raising their minor Child. The parties shall share all unreimbursed
counseling costs.
2. The Mother, Lisa M. Attinger, and the Father, Kenneth R. Herman,
Jr., shall have shared legal custody of Alyssa M. Attinger,. born February
l4, 1991. Sharing legal custody requires that the parties consult wlth each
other in making major decisions affecting the best interests of the Child,
including, but not limited to all major medical, religious and educational
decisions.
3. The Mother shall have primary physical custody of the Child.
4. The Father shall have partial physical custody of the Child on
alternating weekends from Saturday at 9:00 a.m, until Sunday at 7:00 p.m.
The Father shall return the Child to the Mother's custody at 8:00 p.m. on
Sunday evenings when there is no school on the Monday following the Father's
period of weekend custody.
5. The parties shall alternate or share custody of the Child on
holidays as follows:
A. Christmas: The Father shall have custody of the Child in
every year from Christmas Eve morning at 9:00 a.m. until
Christmas Eve at Il:OO p.m, The Mother shall have custody of
the Child every year from Christmas Eve at ll:OO p.m. through
Christmas Day, The remainder of the school Christmas vacation
shall be shared equally by the parties as arranged by mutual
agreement,
B. New Years: The Father shall have custody of the Child in even
numbered years from New Years Eve at 9:00 a,m. until New Years
Day at 7:00 p.m. The Mother shall have custody of the Child
on the same schedule in odd numbered years.
C. Easter: The Mother shall have custody of the Child on Easter
weekend in even numbered years and the Father shall have
custody of the Child on Easter Imekend in odd numbered years.
The exchange time for custody on Easter weekend shall be the
same as the regular weekend schedule, The parties agree that
both parties shall insure that the Child attends church on
Easter Sunday in every year.
n. Memorial Day!.~abo.r Day: The party who otherwise has custody
of the Child on the weekends preceding l.julllorial Day and Labor
Day shall also have custody of the Child on the Monday
holiday, When the Father has custody of the Child on Memorial
and Labor Day weekends, he shall return the Child to the
Mother's custody ~:OO p.m. on the holi_d?y.
E. July 4th: The Father shall have custody of the Child on July
4th in even numbered years from 9:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. and
the Mother shall have custody of the Child on the same
schedule in odd numbered years.
F. Thanksgiving: The Father shall have custody of the Child in
even numbered years on Thanksgiving Day from 9:00 a.m. until
8:00 p.m. and the Mother shall have custody of the Child on
Thanksgiving in odd numbered years. In years when the Father
has custody of the Child on a Thanksgiving Day inrnediately
preceding the Father's regularly scheduled weekend custody,
the Father shall have custody of the Child from Thanksgiving
Day at 9:00 a.m. until the following Sunday at 7:00 p.m.
G. Mother's Day/Father's Day: The Mother shall have custody of
the Child in every year on Mother's Day from 9:00 a.m. until
7:00 p,m. The Father shall have custody of the Child in every
year on Father's Day from 9:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m.
H. Child's birthday: Each party shall have an opportunity to
have a period of extended custody with the Child as close to
the Child's birthday as possible in every year.
6, The Father shall have custody of the Child for two non-consecutive
weeks during each summer vacation which shall be scheduled to begin on the
Father's regular periods of weekend custody beginning on Saturday at 9:00
a,m, and ending the following Sunday at 8:00 p.m. The Father shall provide
three (3) weeks advance notice to the Mother to schedule these periods of
summer vacation custody.
7, The parties shall cooperate in eKchanging information concerning
the Child's medical bills, medical coverage and other matters related to the
Child's health, education and general welfare.
8. All exchanges of custody under this Order shall take place at
J
t
I
CBRTIFICATB OF SBRVICB
I, James W. Abraham, Esquire, the undersigned, do hereby
certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document, by regular mail, upon the following person(s), on the
date indicated below:
James L. Best, Esq,
838 Market St.
Lewisburg, PA l7837
DATE: 5/12/97
~hq;/{'
JAMBS W. ABRAHAM, ESQ.
>- a, ..
c..; r~ :
......
,-
~I<:: l'J
)..
a:l, .,-
<;>l ,..,
fi'
!J'
r;' . >. 'J
.' I.
t-. - ')
'.I. r-
U O' ( )
I
J
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
97-0184 CIVIL TERM
LISA M. ATTINGER and
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.,
DEFENDANTS
: IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
By the Co~, i
AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 1997, IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The motion of Brenda Shingara to modify the order of May 22, 1997, IS
DENIED. Paragraph 2 of the order of May 22, 1997, replaced paragraph 4 of the
order of April 1, 1996, and as such must be read in conjunction with the entire order
of April 1 , 1996.
(2) The motion to clarify the order of May 22, 1997, by more specifically
defining the alternate Friday pick-up time in paragraph 2, IS GRANTED, The pick-up
time shall be at Ihe conclusion of the regular school day. If Friday is not a school
day, the pick-up time shall be at noon.
James L. Best, Esquire
For Plaintiffs
Edgar B. B yley, J.
}
James W. Abraham, Esquire
For Defendant
Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., Pro se
RD # 3
Sunbury, PA 17801
C<.t-u-"-' (>l'-<'<-(.(. {; 1/'1 /q 7
~~ .Y.
:saa
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA,
Plaintiffs
)
.
.
.
.
.
IN 11fE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 97 -- 0184
CUSTODY ACTION
LISA M. ATIINGERand
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.,
Defendants,
Motion for Modification/Correction of Custody Order
1. On May 22, 1997, the Court, per Judge Edgar B. Bayley, ordered that Brenda Shingara
shall have partial physical custody of Alyssa M. Attinger from Friday after school until Saturday at 1:00
p.m. on alternating weekends.
2. The Plaintiff, Brenda Shingara, accepts the basic design of the Court's Order but
respectfully requests that the Court (I) define the time on Fridays when the pick-up of Alyssa will occur
and (2) specifically define her rights to Alyssa during the summer vacation from school.
3. The Plaintiff requests that the Court set a specific time on Fridays rather than relying upon
"after school" because Mrs. Shingara and Ms. Attinger cannot agree upon the meaning for this tenn. Ms.
Allinger construes the same to be at the conclusion of after-school daycare while Mrs. Shingara construes
it to be at the conclusion of the regular school day.
4. The Plaintiff requests that the Court establish a set schedule for partial physical custody in
the summer months as the Order of May 22, 1997 only addressed the school year and as there is little
likelihood that the parties will be able to reach an amicable agreement upon this issue.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Brenda Shingara, respectfully requests that the Court
ModifY/Correct its Order of May 22, 1997, to specifically (I) defme the pick-up time on Fridays during the
school year and to (2) specifically define her periods of partial physical custody during the school year.
~
~
,
.:..
,
I
f.
;
I
l
f
J
I
I
.
Respectfully submitted,
REED & BEST
/
.
B'
A
t. 62069
838 Market Street
Lewisburg, P A 17837
(717) 523-0385
Attorney for the Plaintiff, Brenda Shingara
- 2-
CERTlFICA TE OF SERVICE
I, JAMES L. BEST, JD, do hereby certify that I have served a true and correct
copy of the foregoing Motion for Modification upon the following, by mailing a copy, first
class postage prepaid, at Lewisburg, PA. this 6'h day of June, 1997, addressed as
follows:
James W. Abraham, J.D.
122 Locust Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Kenneth R. Herman, Jr.
RD3
Sunbury, PA 17801
Reed & BesO _ /
B~ (~(
a es L. Best
..
-
INDEX TO WITNESSES
FOR THE PLAINTIFF DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS
1. Brenda K. shingara 4 18 26
2. Joseph Edward Shingara 28 30 32
3. Kenneth R. Herman, Jr. 33 36 38
FOR THE DEFENDANT
1. Lisa Marlene Attinger 39 51 61 62
2. Marlene R. Adams 63 66
2
-
-
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
FOR THE PLAINTIFF
1. Letter
I'iARKED
53
ADMITTED
55
J
..
.
1 May 21, 1997, 1:43 p.m.
2 Carlisle, Pennsylvania
3
4 (Whereupon, the following proceedings
5 were held:)
6 THE COURT: Ready to proceed?
7 MR. BEST: Yes, Your Honor,
8 MR. ABRAHAM: Yes.
9 THE COURT: Go ahead, moving party.
10 MR. BEST: May I call my first witness?
11 THE COURT: Yes,
12 MR. BEST: Call Brenda shingara.
13 Whereupon,
14 BRENDA K, SHINGARA,
15 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
16 DIRECT EXAMINATION
17 BY MR. BEST:
18 Q Mrs, shingara, can you please state your full
19 name and address for the record.
20 A Brenda K. Shingara, R.D. 3, Box 142-B,
21 Sunbury, Pennsylvania,
22 Q That's in Northumberland County?
23 A Yes, it is.
24 Q Mrs. Shingara, how old are you?
25 A Forty-four,
4
-
.
1 Q Are you presently married?
2 A Yes, I am.
3 Q What's the name of your spouse?
4 A Joseph Edward Shingara.
5 Q How long have you been married to Joseph?
6 A Twenty-one years.
7 Q Do you have a son Kenneth?
8 A Yes, I do,
9 Q What is Kenneth's full name?
10 A Kenneth Richard Herman, Jr.
11 Q How old is Kenneth?
12 A Twenty-seven.
13 Q Who is the father of Kenneth?
14 A Kenneth R. Herman, Sr.
15 Q Is that a former spouse?
16 A Yes, it is.
17 Q Are you the grandmother of any children
18 through Kenneth?
19 A Yes, I am,
20 Q How many?
21 A One.
22 Q What's the child's name?
23 A Alyssa Marlene Attinger.
24 Q How old is Alyssa?
25 A six years old.
5
.
.
1 Q Do you recall her date of birth?
2 A February 14th, 1991-
3 Q Mrs. shingara, you and your husband have
4 filed this petition to have a special award of partial
5 custody in your capacity as grandparents, is that correct?
6 A Yes, it is.
7 Q By way of background, could you tell the
8 Court a little bit about the nature and extent of your
9 relationship with Alyssa from the time she was born to the
10 present?
11 A From the time she was born for the first
12 up to the first six months, Lisa Attinger would not let us
13 have any contact whatsoever with her. At the age of nine
14 months she brought her to the house for us to see her for
15 the first time since her birth. After that, we soon became
16 primary caretakers of Alyssa while she was working,
17 Q Now, I need you to be specific about that
18 point. You stated soon after your first contact with
19 Alyssa, which was when the child was nine months old, you
20 became what you called a primary caretaker?
21 A Yes,
22 Q What do you mean by that phrase?
23 A Lisa worked at Penn's Tavern and she would
24 call. I would go and pick her up, and I would baby-sit from
25 the time she would start work until the time she would get
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
off.
Q And how many days a week did you do that?
A six days a week.
Q And from what period of time are we talking
about?
A I really can't -- it was a long time. It
was, like, maybe six months almost,
Q What changed at the end of that six months?
A She moved out of the home and moved to Enola
to go to school, and we helped her move from there to Enola.
We helped her get set up in an apartment. We helped her,
gave her money to go to school to get an education, She
would call, and we would take care of Alyssa,
Q Now, at the time that Miss Attinger and
Alyssa moved to Enola, Cumberland County, how old was the
child?
A I would say about four,
Q Four years old. Now, you testified that you
began to have contact with her at about nine months of age?
A Yes.
Q How would you characterize your relationship
with Alyssa for those first three years of your contact with
her?
A Great, great, When she's around me, there's
actually I don't know how to put it into words, to
7
.1
..
...
t
1 describe it to the Court. We have so much fun. She brings
2 so much joy to me and I do to her. We talk all the time,
3 you know, about anything that comes up. I just don't know
4 how to put it into words.
5 Q And before we delve into what happened after
6 Miss Attinger move1 to this county, you stated that she
7 worked at Penn's Tavern, which is near Sunbury, for about
8 six months. After Miss Attinger --
9 THE COURT: Penn's what?
10
11 BY MR. BEST:
12 Q After Miss Attinger ceased working at Penn's
13 Tavern, did you continue to do any baby-sitting for Alyssa?
14 A Yes, I did, Off and on all the time while
15 she was going to school, On several occasions, I even went
16 to her home and spent the night and took care of Alyssa,
17 Q Is this before she moved to Enola?
MR. BEST: Penn's Tavern, Your Honor.
18
19
A
Q
No.
I'm a little confused, I want to make sure
20 the Court is clear on this point, You testified there was
21 about a three year period in which you had contact with
22 Alyssa before she moved to this county.
23
24
A
Q
Yes.
And for six of those months, Miss Attinger
25 was working at Penn's Tavern?
8
..
..
A She also resided there.
a Where?
A At Penn's Tavern.
a She 11 ved at Penn's Tavern?
A Yes.
a Where was Alyssa living at that point?
A At Penn's Tavern upstairs with Williams which
is the owner of Penn's Tavern.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Q During that period of time, did Alyssa ever
10 spend the night at your house?
11 A Yes, she did,
12 Q How frequently, if you can recall?
13 A Very frequently, There was a time that she
14 was in our home for three weeks straight that her mother did
15 not come and see her but one hour out of that time, and
16 there is a lot of things that happened in between that three
17 week span I care not to throw up in the court.
18 Q That's fine. How was your relationship with
19 Miss Attinger in terms of your being able to ask her to
20 spend time with Alyssa at the time she decided to relocate
21 to Enola?
22 A Great. I could call anytime. I could take
23 her on vacation. I could take her camping, There was a
24 great communication level until she moved down to Enola
25 where her mother moved soon afterwards, and then things
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
started going wrong. Her mom would say no.
Q Was there a change in the amount of contact
you had with Alyssa following the move to Enola?
A Yes.
Q And could you please state what that change
was.
A Less time seeing Alyssa,
Q Could you quantify how much less time?
A It got down to like every other week, and it
was on Kenny's weekend. This all took place after he won
his fatherly rights, and it got less and less in which she
wouldn't let us have any involvement in anything with
Alyssa.
Q Let's break that down. Prior to that time,
did you have involvement in any of Alyssa's activities?
A Frior to that, yes, all,
Q Could you please tell the Court some specific
instances of your involvement with Alyssa and her
activities?
A One time we come down to the day care center
and picked her up for Lisa because she had finals to study
for to take in school. We picked her up. We took her home.
We cared for her, and we brought her back to her home when
her mother called on the same day that she was finished, We
used to go out to eat, You know, we -- constantly we took
10
..
.,
1 her down and played with her at the playground. I just
2 don't know what to say anymore.
3 Q Now, ma'am, at this period in time was Hiss
4 Attinger allowing you to spend time with Alyssa that was
5 independent of any time awarded to your son, Kenneth?
6 A No, no.
7 Q Now, I'm referring back in time prior to
8 deterioration of your relationship.
9 A Before she moved to Enola or in between in
10 the three year span?
11 Q Let me ask you the question this way, Was
12 there some time at which you became limited to your son's
13 periods of partial custody?
14 A Yes.
15 Q When did that occur?
16 A Before Christmas.
17 Q Before which Christmas?
18 A November of '96.
19 THE COURT: What happened then? I'm sorry, I
20 lost track. What happened in November of '96, ma'am?
21 THE WITNESS: We had less time with Alyssa
22 beings the father is having his own quality time with his
23 daughter,
24 THE COURT: Okay.
25 THE WITNESS: Which that's less, you know, we
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.,
get to see her.
THE COURT: Okay.
BY MR. BEST:
Q Just so we're clear, Mrs. Shingar3, my
question is, was there -- at some point in the past, was it
possible for you to have time with Alyssa that was not just
the time that was set aside for Mr. Herman?
A At one time there was up until November and
now there's no from November up to now, there is no phone
calls accepted to talk to Alyssa.
Q Let's just not get ahead of ourselves. I'm
going to get to the present situation, I want you to just
briefly tell the Court how your relationship and involvement
with Alyssa developed and progressed from the time that she
and her mother took up residence in Enola up to that point
in November of '96 when you describe it as a rapid
breakdown,
A I really don't know how to put it into words.
It just
Q Were you seeing Alyssa?
A Yes, I was,
Q On what kind of basis?
A A pretty normal schedule I thought. I
thought it was working out great.
Q Can you tell the Court though how often were
12
..
..
1 you seeing Alyssa during that period ot time?
2 A I would say at least once a week.
3 Q And where would you see her?
4 A In her horne,
5 Q You would corne down to Enola?
6 A We would go down to her home and spend a
7 couple hours in her home with Lisa and Alyssa, and a couple
8 times we got to take her home and bring her home the next
9 day, you know, Everything -- I don't know how to put it
10 into words.
11 Q Did you make phone calls to Alyssa during
12 that period?
13 A Yes, I did, and always before 8:00,
14 Q And were you allowed to speak to Alyssa
15 duri~g those periods?
16 A Yes, I was,
17 Q What happened to change the amount of your
18 contact with Alyssa and your relationship with Miss
19 Attinger?
20 A I really don't know,
21 Q What time do you want to point to as to say
22 when there was a dramatic change in your access to Alyssa?
23 A I don't know months and times.
24 Q You had mentioned November 1996. Why did you
25 mention that?
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
-
A Because from that time on I'm not allowed to
call her. I'm not allowed to do really anything because it
wasn't too long after that there was a paper sent that I was
harassing her. So, therefore, I quit calling because I am
not harassing her.
I was begging her to please let me speak to
my granddaughter or asking her for arrangements to pick her
up. But beings that she sent a letter stating that I was
harassing her, there was no more phone calls. I didn't feel
I was harassing her by asking if I may have my
granddaughter.
Q Ma'am, since November 1996, has Miss Attinger
allowed you to have any time with Alyssa independent of what
is court ordered for Kenneth?
A No, sir.
Q How often does Kenneth have Alyssa?
A Every other week and elected holidays,
Q And have you seen Alyssa every other week?
A One weekend I do, One week I don't,
Q Do you see her every time that your son has
her?
A Yeah. But I don't spend time with her
because he's, you know, in his own home now and he's been
taking her to his home. I might see her for an hour or so,
and then he takes her home, He brings her up, you know,
14
.
..
1 before he heads back to take her home on Sunday for another
2 hour. But as actual quality time to go play and do
3 activities with her, no, sir.
4 Q And do you feel that's different from your
5 prior contact and involvement with her?
6 A Definitely. Like I said before, I was able
7 to take her out in the yard and play with her, enjoy her,
8 and have fun like you do with your grandkids. Now I don't
9 even have that. It's what the parents decide if you get ten
10 minutes, five minutes, you know, that's how I get it.
11 Q Now, do you often provide the transportation
12 for your son's periods of secondary custody?
13 A Sometimes.
14 Q Has there been a change about the evening or
15 time when the child is picked up?
16 A No.
17 Q What day of the weekend does Mr. Herman
18 normally get Alyssa?
19 A Saturday mornings at 9:00,
20 Q Had you ever made it a practice of picking
21 her up on Fridays?
22 A Yes, I did.
23 Q Could you explain that to the Court.
24 A My son works night shift, which he would have
25 to take off of work to the time that Lisa would get off of
15
..
.
1 work. To make arrangements or to pi-ck her up, he would have
2 to miss a whole day's work. We thought it would work out if
3 we could pick her up Fridays. That would be a couple hours
4 that we could take her to eat and spend quality time with
5 her until he would come and pick her up after work.
6 Q And was that ~cceptable to Miss Attinger at
7 one point in time?
8 A At one point in time, yes.
9 Q And when did she cease that?
10 A When we had our last hearing.
11 Q And since that time, she's not permitted you
12 to pick up Alyssa on Friday evenings?
13 A I'm not allowed to see Alyssa. I have tried,
14 attempted to call Alyssa and speak with her, I was not
15 allowed that.
16 Q Does Miss Attinger at this point give you any
17 information about what Alyssa is doing in school or what her
18 activities are?
19 A No, nothing whatsoever.
20 Q Do you feel it would be in Alyssa's best
21 interest for you to spend more time with her?
22 A Yes, I do.
23 Q Could you concisely state why?
24 A Because she's really attached to me. I've
25 been there from day one. If you could see her with me, you
16
..
.
1 could see there's no harm to her or her mother whatsoever.
2 There's love there. I praise her mother. I praise the
3 other grandmother at all times and she knows this.
4 She loves to go to Bible school which we hold
5 at Poe Valley every year, She's already talking about it.
6 We compromised on the birthday. We have her a little
7 summertime birthday party with my husband's nieces and
8 nephews in our yard with cake and ice cream and a normal
9 situation.
10 Being we can't celebrate her birthday in
11 February, we have a little get-together with a Couple kids
12 in the yard. And now she's to the point, she says, grandma,
13 am I going to be able to have that summertime birthday
14 party? And I said, why are you asking this, Alyssa?
15 Because my mommy says, no, my birthday ain't in summertime.
16 Now, I don't know how to answer a child when she comes to me
17 this way.
18 I don't want to turn her against her mother.
19 I don't want to turn her against her grandmother __
20 THE COURT: Hold on a minute. Next question.
21 MR. BEST: I have no further questions at
22 this time. You may cross-examine.
23 THE COURT: Cross-examine.
24
25
17
.
.
1 CROSS EXAMINATION
2 BY MR. ABRAHAM:
3 Q Mrs. Shingara, you are the natural
4 grandmother of Alyssa, correct?
5 A Yes, I am,
6 Q Mr, Shingara is not the natural grandfather,
7 is that right?
8 A No, but he gives all of the love that he can
9 as a natural
10 Q I understand. Let's talk about what you were
11 indicating as far as nine months -- after the child was
12 approximately nine months old, you indicated on direct
13 testimony that there was a period of time in which Alyssa
14 was working at Penn Tavern, is that right?
15 A Lisa was, not Alyssa.
16 Q I'm sorry, Lisa. Lisa was, is that right?
17 A Yes, she was.
18 Q Lisa was also staying in an apartment at Penn
19 Tavern, isn't that right?
20 A Yes.
21 Q And the child was residing with Lisa at that
22 time, isn't that right?
23 A Yes,
24 Q Actually, during this time, as your attorney
25 used the word, you essentially would baby-sit the child when
18
.
.
1 Lisa needed you to do so, is that right?
2
3
A
Yes.
Q
And I believe you testified that there was a
4 time period in which there was some consecutive days. How
5 many days during this six month period would you say she
6 stayed overnight with you?
7
8
9
10
11
12 with me.
13
A
Alyssa?
Q
Yes.
A
I would say pretty much,
Would you say ten days?
Q
A
I would say 50 percent of the time she was
Q
You are talking about three months of the
14 time she stayed with you, is that right?
15
16
A
Yep.
Q
But yet you call yourself a baby-sitter when
17 she needed that baby-sitting, isn't that right?
18
A
Yeah, I would call it that because that's
19 what her mom always called it.
20
Q
Now, your attorney asked you after this six
21 month period if you continued to do baby-sitting for the
22 child, and you answered yes, isn't that right?
23
24
A
Yes.
Q
Now, you are aware of the December 1994 court
25 order that was entered in Northumberland County in this
19
I
f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
case, isn't that correct?
A Exact dates I can't remember but --
Q Okay.
MR, BEST: Judge, just to make a very short
objection to clarify that. Mr. Abraham said in this case.
Actually, that would be pertaining to the case between Miss
Attinger and Mr, Herman.
THE COURT: I assume there is a court order
out there regarding the father?
MR. ABRAHAM: There is. I have a copy.
THE COURT: Is it in the pleadings somewhere?
MR. ABRAHAM: It's in my pretrial memo, sir.
THE COURT: What is the date of the order?
MR, ABRAHAM: December 8th, 1994, Your Honor.
That is, as Mr. Best says, between Mr. Herman and Miss
Attinger.
BY MR, ABRAHAM:
Q At that time, taking you back to December of
1994, you didn't file for any rights of custody independent
of your son, did you?
A We filed a paper for, I took it, under
impression for visitation rights.
Q But the only order you ar~ aware of is an
order giving your son visitation rights, isn't that correct?
A Right,
20
.
.
1 Q What I'm saying is, you didn't apply for
2 separate visitation rights like you did this time, isn't
3 that correct?
4 A No, I did not.
5 Q Now, under that December 1994 order, it was
6 your understanding that your son had evary other weekend
7 custody, isn't that correct?
8 A Yes.
9 Q And isn't it true that since 1994 your son
10 has lived with you, isn't that correct?
11 A '94 and '95, part of '95. He didn't really
12 live the whole, but that was due to a motorcycle accident
13 and he was recovering,
14 THE COURT: wait a minute. The question is,
15 and I will ask it, what period of time did your son live
16 with you?
17 THE WITNESS: 1994 up to, I would say, the
18 end of April in '96,
19 THE COURT: April '96. Next question.
20 BY MR. ABRAHAM:
21 Q Now, during this time period when Mr. Herman,
22 your son, had court ordered visitation, the child would be
23 at your house, isn't that right?
24 A Yes, she would.
25 Q Now, you talked about one time you had picked
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
up the child from a day care facility and you brought the
child back. So you didn't have the child overnight, isn't
that correct?
A No, I did not.
Q Now, you talked about that prior to, let's
say, 1994 you would see the child one time per week. Who
would do all of that transportation?
A We would. My husband or I.
Q So Miss Attinger was cooperative with you at
that time, isn't that right?
A Yes.
Q And she allowed you time with the child if
you requested it and it didn't conflict with her schedule,
isn't that right?
A Yes,
Q Now, you talked about Friday pickups that you
had once in awhile pursuant to your son's custody, is that
right?
A Yes.
Q Isn't that quality time also for Miss
Attinger?
A What, to Alyssa or Lisa?
Q To Lisa.
A What do you mean quality time to her?
Q I believe you testified that when you picked
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
..
up the child on a Friday night that that was quality time
for you. If the child was with Lisa, wouldn't that be
quality time for her?
A I guess,
Q Now, in 1996, I believe it was, are you aware
of the fact that your son filed a petition for contempt and
a petition to modify his order? Are you aware of that?
A Yes, I am.
Q And is it your understanding and do you
recall that the result of that petition for a contempt is
that it was dismissed and that the custody schedule did not
change? Are you aware of that?
A The custody has changed, to my knowledge.
Q But she still gets the child or has the child
every other weekend, is that right?
A Ken does, yes.
Q That's right, Are you aware of a Children
and Youth action that was taken against Miss Attinger at the
same time or about the same time the petition for contempt
and the petition to modify custody was filed in January of
'96?
A Yes,
Q Did you file that complaint at Children and
Youth?
A No, I did not.
23
1
2
3
4
5
~
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
Q Do you know who did?
A No, I do not,
Q You have no idea who made that complaint to
Children and Youth?
A No, I don't.
Q Did your son make that complaint to Children
and Youth?
A I don't know,
MR. BEST: objection. She just answered she
didn't know,
THE COURT: She doesn't know, She did answer
that,
BY MR, ABRAHAM:
Q Did you understand what the result of that
Children and Youth investigation was?
A No, I do not.
Q If I told you that that Children and Youth
action was dismissed, would that --
MR. BEST: I'm going to object to this line
of questioning, Your Honor, I think she said she doesn't
know who made that report,
THE COURT: Overruled. Ask the question. If
I told you, go ahead.
BY MR. ABRAHAM:
Q If I told you that that Children and Youth
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-
.,
action was dismissed, would that surprise you?
A No.
Q Did you take the child back in 1996 to the
Geisinger Medical Center?
A My son took Alyssa to Geisinger Medical
Center, and I went with him.
Q Let me restate that. That's in 1994?
A Yes,
Q In about November of 1994?
A That sounds about right.
Q And then the first court order in this
case -- in the case between the father and the mother in
Northumberland County was entered in December of '94?
A Yes,
Q Now, do you recall that there was a concern
that evidently there was sexual assault involved with the
child?
A Yes,
Q Was that your position?
A We took her up there with marks on her. She
come up, She was crying that there was three mans attacking
her in her room. I consulted a doctor in sunbury that was
familiar with neglect and abused children, I told him I
don't understand what to do,
Q Geisinger never found any sexual assault as a
25
..
.,
1 result of that, isn't that right?
2 A Lisa or Kenneth Herman did never tell me what
3 the results of that day was. until this day I do not know
4 what's in them medical records.
5 Q Mrs. Shingara, most parents -- many
6 grandparents baby-sit their grandchildren, isn't that
7 correct?
8 A Yes.
9 Q And most grandparents will have situations
10 where they go on special trips with their grandchildren,
11 isn't that right?
12 A Yes,
13 Q And most grandparents love their
14 grandchildren, isn't that right?
15 A Yes,
16 MR. ABRAHAM: I have nothing further, Judge.
17 THE COURT: Anything else?
18 MR, BEST: Just one or two fOllOW-Ups, Your
19 Honor.
20 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
21 BY MR, BEST:
22 Q Ma'am, is it your position your relationship
23 with Alyssa was the typical grandparent/grandchild
24 relationship or something beyond that?
25 MR. ABRAHAM: I'll object as leading.
26
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
THE COURT: Sustained. Well, not for that.
I mean, that is an opinion. I mean, she has told me what
her relationship is. What it is I can define.
MR. BEST: That's fine. I have a related
question.
BY MR. BEST:
Q Do you think -- would you characterize your
relationship with Alyssa as that of a baby-sitter?
A No.
MR. ABRAHAM: Object again, Your Honor, asked
and answered.
THE COURT: Overruled because you
cross-examined on that. You got her to say that. She first
told me, of course, that we were the primary caregiver
during this period of time. You turned that into
baby-sitting. I know what it is. I heard her say what she
was doing.
MR. BEST: In that case, I have no further
questions, Your Honor.
You may step down, ma'am,
Joe Shingal'a.
THE COURT:
MR, BEST:
Next.
Whereupon,
JOSEPH EDWARD SHINGARA,
having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
;.
..
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. BEST:
o sir, could you please state your full name
and address.
A Joseph Edward shingara.
o And, Mr. Shingara, what is your age?
A Thirty-eight.
o What is your relationship to Brenda Shingara?
A She's my wife.
o And what is your relationship to Alyssa
Attinger?
A Step-granddaughter.
o You are not her biological grandfather?
A No, I am not.
o Has that fact affected your relationship?
A Not at all.
o Could you describe for the Court your
relationship with Alyssa?
A Very good. I love her very much. She loves
me, I did all of the running to pick her up and drop her
off, bought her mother cars, bought her clothes, her TV's,
VCR's, took her camping, took her to the playgrounds,
shopping, everything, a very good relationship with her.
o So that I don't have to ask you all the same
questions I asked your wife, did you hear her testimony with
28
..
.
1 respect to the nature and extent of your relationship with
2 Alyssa from the time of her birth to the present?
3 A We had her many nights overnight. We would
4 pick her up, bring her home, keep her sometimes until the
5 next morning or whenever Lisa would come for her, I would
6 run to Harrisburg to pick her up at 4:00 in the afternoon
7 when she had the job at Tavern on the Hill, take her home
8 and keep her overnight. We had her all the time.
9 Q Did you hear your wife's testimony regarding
10 how the relationship and the amount of contact has changed?
11 A Yeah.
12 Q Did you agree with what she said?
13 A Well, we get practically no time with her,
14 The only time we get with her now is if Ken brings her up.
15 Q At previous points in time, were you able to
16 call Lisa Attinger and request time?
17 A Many times we would call her and ask her and
18 tell her we were going to go camping over the weekend, could
19 we have Alyssa to take her with. Ninety-five percent of the
20 time she always said yes unless she had other plans.
21 Birthday parties or anything like that it was always yes.
22 Now it's no contact.
23 Q Are you permitted any contact beyond what
24 Kenneth receives at this point and time?
25 A No,
29
Q
Alyssa?
A
Q
interest?
A
..
..
30
.
.
,t
~
f;-
1
A
Yes, I was.
2
Q
Now, during the time in which Lisa Attinger
3 was working at the Penn Tavern, she had her apartment there,
4 isn't that right?
5
A
Yes, they did,
And isn't it also true that the child never
6
Q
7 resided with you while you were living at your residence,
8 she resided with Lisa Attinger, isn't that correct?
9
A
When she worked at Penn Tavern, yes.
18
19 unavailable she would agree or allow the child to spend time
20 with you, isn't that correct?
Q
So isn't it true that when she was
10
Q
And when your wife talks about primary
11 caretaker, she's talking about essentially baby-sitting when
12 Lisa Attinger was not available, isn't that right?
13
A
Not true.
14
Q
What is she talking about?
15
A
She is talking about us picking her up and
16 having her for three, four days at a time while her mother
17 worked or went to school or whatever and keeping her.
21
A
Yes, she would,
22
Q
Now, when you filed this custody action, is
23 that when you are saying the telephone access and those
24 kinds of things stopped?
25
A
All of that stopped before that.
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
Q How long before that?
A A few month.
Q Isn't it true and don't you agree with your
wife that for a long period of time Mr. Herman, the natural
father, lived with you?
A Yes, he did.
Q And when he had visitation under his order,
you had the same visitation under the order, isn't that
correct?
A Yes, we did.
MR. ABRAHAM: I have nothing further, Judge.
THE COURT: Anything else?
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. BEST:
Q Just a point of clarification, Mr. Shingara.
During the period of time that Kenneth, Jr., lived with you,
did Lisa Attinger allow you to have time with Alyssa in
addition to his every other weekend portions of hOlidays?
A Yes, she did, many times.
Q And would you make that request to her?
A Have I?
Q Had you during that period of time?
A Yes, we have.
Q Did she cooperate at that time?
A Yes, she did.
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
Nothing further.
You may step down.
Call Kenneth lierman, Jr.
Whereupon,
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.,
having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
MR. BEST:
THE COURT:
MR. BEST:
BV MR. BEST:
Q
and address.
A Kenneth R, Herman, Jr., R.D, 3, Box 993,
Sunbury, PA, 17801.
Q Mr, Herman, what is your age?
A Twenty-seven.
Q You are the biological father of Alyssa
Mr. Herman, could you state your full name
Attinger?
A Yes, I am.
Q How old was Alyssa when you first saw her?
A I would say six months, seven months.
Q And can you describe what your relationship
with the child has been since that time, since the time of
your first contact?
A Just like a father and daughter,
Q How often are you seeing her right now?
A Every other weekend.
33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
weekend?
residence?
A
Q
A
Q
A
miles.
..
.
Q And during your periods of partial custody
with Alyssa, what do you normally do with her?
A Well, I try to stop up and visit them for an
hour or two a day, and then I have other places I like to go
with her, Knobles and stuff. Now that she's getting older
and I go more with her places I can't always be there, you
know, It's like some weekends go by where I don't get up to
see them, and there is nothing I can really do,
Q Do you have another family as well?
A Yes.
Q Where do they reside?
A Selinsgrove, PA,
Q And what time do you first get her on the
A
Q
A
Q
9:00 usually Saturday morning.
When do you have to take her back?
7:00 Sunday night.
And how far do you live from Miss Attinger's
It's about an hour drive, 50 miles one way.
Now, you have your own residence?
Yes.
How far is that from Mr. and Mrs. Shingara's?
I would say approximately five to eight
34
....
-
1
What's your relationship to that family?
Average family.
No, Is that your natural father's family?
2
3
4
Yes,
5
I take it you like to have contact with them
6
7
Yes.
8
Would you have any objection to the Court
specific order of partial custody to Mr. and Mrs.
9
10
13 it were so inclined to grant our petition, would make half
14 of the time awarded to the Shingaras come out of your
15 allocated time?
16
A
Yes.
17
THE COURT: I am not sure I got which way he
18 answered that. What was the question?
19
MR, BEST: The question, Your Honor, was,
20 would Mr. Herman have any objection if the Court were so
21 inclined to grant our petition if it took an equal amount of
22 time away from him as well as Miss Attinger?
23
THE COURT: You said you have an objection or
24 you don't?
25
THE WITNESS: I said, yes, I wouldn't mind.
35
i
f
.
'""'"
....
1
THE COURT: You would not mind?
THE WITNESS: I would not mind.
THE COURT: If half the time you now get
Alyssa your parents get her your mother gets her?
THE WITNESS: I was trying to work out a
2
3
4
5
6 thing with, like, one weekend out of a month my time and one
7 weekend out of her time would be okay.
8
THE COURT: Okay.
9
MR. BEST: I have no further questions.
10 CROSS EXAMINATION
11 BY MR. ABRAHAM:
12
Q
Mr. Herman, you've had every other weekend
13 visitation since December of 1994, Do you recall that?
14
A
Yes.
15
Q
And do you recall that you had filed for a
16 petition for contempt about a year after you got that order?
17
A
Yes,
18
Q
And that was a result of the fact that there
19 was a snow storm in Harrisburg, and you didn't get your
20 visitation so you filed for contempt, isn't that right?
21
A
There was a couple contempts gathering up at
22 that time just not that, There was probably three or four
23 other contempts. And I personally really wouldn't want to
24 bring that up because it's between Lisa and I on them.
25
Q
Now, do you know who contacted Children and
36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
Youth?
A No, I do not.
Q You didn't contact Children and Youth, did
you?
A No.
Q There was a long period of time in which you
heard your mother and Mr. Shingara testify that you resided
at your mother's house, isn't that right?
Yes,
And that was after December of 1994, isn't
A
Q
that right?
A
Q
A
Q
After '94?
Yes, when you had your first court order.
Yeah.
So during that entire time when you had
visitation they had visitation, isn't that true?
A To a point, yes.
Q And even now that you don't live there you're
only five minutes away, isn't that right?
A About ten.
Q That's probably the furthest distance you've
ever lived away from your parents, isn't that true?
A No,
Q Where else?
A Trevorton, PA.
37
..
.
1 Q How far is that?
2 A Probably about 15, 20 minutes away.
3 Q So now -- so the furthest you've ever lived
4 away from where they live is about 15 to 20 minutes, isn't
5 that right?
6 A Yes, so far.
7 Q And they always have the option when you have
8 the child to drive up to your house, isn't that true?
9 A Yes, if I'm home,
10 Q Now, you talked about your willingness to
11 take half of your time and give it to your grandparents,
12 isn't that right?
13 A Yes,
14 Q So for a long period of time, that's what's
15 been occurring anyway, isn't that true?
16 A Baaically trying to work things out.
17 MR. ABRAHAM: I have nothing further, Your
18 Honor,
19 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
20 BY MR. BEST:
21 Q Just so we're clear, you're not giving Mr.
22 and Mrs, Shingara every other weekend at this point and
23 time, are you?
24 A No, no, not at this time, no. I'm saying I
25 try to get up there for an hour or two a weekend, sometimes
38
..
..
1 five, six hours. I usually try either Saturday or Sunday to
2 get up and visit them with the child, but actual time alone
3 with her, I don't give them none.
4 MR, BEST: Thank you. Nothing further.
5 THE COURT: You may step down.
6 MR. BEST: Those are all of the witnesses we
7 have at this time, Your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Mr. Abraham.
9 MR. ABRAHAM: Lisa Attinger.
10 Whereupon,
11 LISA MARLENE ATTINGER,
12 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
13 DIRECT EXAMINATION
14 BY MR. ABRAHAM:
15 Q State your name for the record, Lisa.
16 A Lisa Marlene Attinger,
17 Q And you are the mother of Alyssa, correct, as
18 we have all heard?
19 A Correct,
20 Q Let's take you back to the birth of this
21 child, Were you and Mr. Herman together at that time?
22 A No, we weren't.
23 Q What was the situation?
24 A We had separated about two months after I
25 found out I was pregnant. We were having real difficulties
39
...
..
1 in our relationship for like six months prior to that. I
2 became very, very ill in my first two months of pregnancy,
3 and so I was at home with my mother. And they would call
4 and they would threaten that they we.e going to take my
5 child away from me.
6 MR. BEST: Objection, This is, you know,
7 they.
8 THE COURT: She separated two months into the
9 pregnancy. That was the question, Next question,
10 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry.
11 THE COURT: That's okay. If you would just
12 angle a little more. I am having trouble hearing you.
13 That is good.
14 BY MR, ABRAHAM:
15 Q Let's go to the time in which you heard Mrs.
16 Shingara testify regarding the Penn Tavern situation. Is
17 that where you were residing?
18 A We had an apartment on top of the restaurant.
19 Q Who's we?
20 A Myself, Alyssa, and my fiance, Mark Williams.
21 Q What kind of contact would the plaintiffs
22 have during the time in which you were at Penn's Tavern?
23 A Well, like I said, when she was about nine
24 months old, I first took her up there, They had been
25 calling, I tried to make amends with them, They had
40
..
..
1 started asking me -- like, I would go and visit for a couple
2 hours, and then they started asking me if they could watch
3 Alyssa while I was working, which my mother and sister had
4 always done, and they were not quite happy that I was, you
5 know, taking on another baby-sitter. But I tried to, you
6 know, let them have her occasionally so they would be happy.
7 Q You heard Mrs. Shingara testify that she was
8 the primary caretaker of Alyssa. Do you agree with that?
9 A That is in no way, shape, or form the truth.
10 Q Why not?
11 A Because she had her -- like, she would call
12 and she would ask me if she could baby-sit. So I would
13 bring her up maybe on a Wednesday evening, and then probably
14 every other weekend because I had my mom and my sister who
15 also had always baby-sat for me, And they wanted to be --
16 they were not happy that I had someone else baby-sitting
17 because they wanted to be with her. So I had to juggle
18 between three sets of baby-sitters essentially.
19 Q They testified that -- the plaintiffs
20 testified that for a significant period of time they had the
21 child overnight, What do you recall as to how often they
22 would have the child overnight?
23 A The most they would have her overnight is
24 like a Friday or Saturday night when we had to work real
25 late because the business was real busy, and I didn't want
41
..
..
1 to go pick her up at 2:30 in the morning when we are getting
2 off work so I would let them keep her until morning.
3 Q You heard Mrs. Shingara say that during the
4 six month time period in which she stated she was the
5 primary caretaker she had the child 50 percent of the time
6 overnight. What is your recollection?
7 A That's not true at all.
B Q How would you place a percentage on the
9 amount of time they had the child?
10 A I would say ten maybe.
11 Q How often would you say your family and your
12 mother had the child during that time period?
13 A I would say my mother was more like 50
14 percent because my mother was a big help for me.
15 Q Now, when you moved to Harrisburg, what year
16 was that?
17 A I moved to Enola January -- I believe I
18 started school in 1994,
19 Q Now, you received, as we submitted in the
20 pretrial statement, a petition for custody in there, and
21 there was a court order entered in Northumberland County. I
22 believe that is your Exhibit A, is that right?
23 A That's right.
24 Q What was the circumstances of that order,
25 very quickly?
42
..
.
1 A Ken would get her every other weekend, and
2 they had designated holidays. He was living with his
3 parents at the time, so his parents could have her then.
4 They would still call for additional time, and, you know,
5 every now and then if I didn't have anything I would let
6 them come pick her up,
7 Q What happened then the following year as to
8 custody?
9 A The following year --
10 Q About a year later, I should say.
11 A In December, there was a big argument around
12 Christmastime about his parents showed up six hours early
13 to pick her up, and we were busy getting -- we were supposed
14 to go shopping, and I was very unhappy about that,
15 Also, there was an instance with the
16 blizzard, and I didn't feel the transportation situation was
17 safe. I asked them if we could please switch weekends, and
18 he was not happy about that either, So we got into some
19 squabbles about custody.
20 Q What happened next?
21 THE COURT: Are we talking December '95?
22 THE WITNESS: '95, right, January '96, about
23 a month later after all of the squabbling, I received a
24 letter from Children and Youth services stating they had
25 received an anonymous complaint concerning the welfare of my
43
.
.
1 child.
2 BY MR. ABRAHAM:
3 Q What was the result of that investigation?
4 A A caseworker came to the house and visited
5 with me and Alyssa and talked to us and talked to Alyssa,
6 and she said she, you know, would get back in contact with
7 me. I received a letter about a month later stating the
8 case was dismissed as an invalid complaint.
9 Q That's Exhibit C of your pretrial memorandum,
10 is that right?
11 A That's right.
12 Q What happened to the petition for contempt
13 and the modification that Mr. Herman filed?
14 A They were both dismissed. At the time I had
15 filed an action -- when I received the modification action,
16 I filed one in Cumberland County because I was tired -- no
17 attorneys from Harrisburg wanted to travel to
18 Northumberland. I was tired of having to travel up there so
19 I changed jurisdiction.
20 Q So the current order in this county is the
21 April 1996 order, is that right?
22 A Um-hum.
23 Q And that, I believe, is your Exhibit 0 --
24 A Right,
25 Q -- to the complaint, Has the child lived
44
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
with anybody else her entire life except you?
A Just me and, you know, my -- we lived with my
mother for a good period of time.
Q And what do you understand the access or time
in which the plaintiffs would have with Alyssa during their
son's visitation since December of 1994?
A I mean, most of the time that Ken had her
they were at his parents' house, When they, in fact, filed
this action, she was spending a week at their house, He was
working when they filed this action against me,
Q You mean a weekend at their house?
A No, he had a week during Christmastime, and
she was there the whole time because I called.
Q So you're talking about, like, during the
summer vacation that's allotted in the order, during
Christmas vacation that's allotted in the order, that kind
of thing?
A (Witness nodded affirmatively)
Q When you would call, where would you call?
Would you call Ken's house or would you call the plaintiffs'
house?
A I would call the plaintiffs' house.
Q Was the child always there?
A Always.
Q You heard the plaintiffs testify in regard to
45
.
.
1 lack of telephone access. What is your recollection as to
2 how often they call and/or how often you allowed her to talk
3 to Alyssa?
4 A When things were good, they would call and
5 there would be no problem. But when things were bad, and
6 like the minute you didn't give them what they wanted, they
7 would call and they would say horrible things to me on the
8 phone, They called me names. I just can't __ I just can't,
9 you know, deal with that kind of stress, I just can't.
10 Q Would this ever occur in the presence of the
11 child?
12 A Well, yeah, they would call and they would be
13 saying I'm an unfit mother on the phone, and of course I
14 would start crying and, you know, my daughter would have to
15 see that too.
16 Q Okay.
17 A Sorry,
18 Q That's all right. Take your time, Now,
19 Lisa, you had provided them some time voluntarily, isn't
20 that right?
21 A Yeah. As long as, you know, they would at
22 least try to be nice to me, you know, and just be civil with
23 me, I was willing to work with them at all times. You know,
24 I tried to give them what they wanted so everybody would be
25 happy, you know. I don't think that -- I think that's what
46
-
..
1 Alyssa would want, you know. She loves both of her
2 grandparents. She loves all of us.
3 Q What is Alyssa's relationship with your
4 mother, Marlene Adams?
5 A Well, she's very very close with my mother.
6 My mother was actually the first person to hold the baby
7 when she was born.
8 Q How often -- strike that. How long did you
9 live with your mother --
10 A I lived
11 Q -- with Alyssa7
12 A I lived with my mother the whole time I was
13 pregnant and a few months afterwards until I recovered from
14 my c-section, and then I moved out on my own in Oalmatia
15 and I started working, I was working as a waitress to try
16 to save up money for college.
17 Then we moved back with my mom when we lived
18 in Enola. Expenses between college got to be too much for
19 me. I just couldn't afford it anymore. I couldn't make my
20 rent, I asked my mom if I could please live with her again.
21 Q Aside from you, is there anybody else who you
22 would consider as a primary caretaker of the child for any
23 period of time?
24 A No, I would consider myself to be the
25 primary caretaker, and my mother would be right up there
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
..
-;:;0;
close to me.
Q How has Alyssa done all these years? How is
she as a child?
A She's very bright.
MR. BEST: I'm going to object. That's an
opinion type question.
THE COURT: Nobody knows better than a mother
how her child is. I will let her tell me. Go ahead.
THE WITNESS: She's a very bright and happy
little girl. She's always singing songs. She's very, you
know, outgoing, very sociable. She loves people.
BY MR, ABRAHAM:
Q What kind of education and/or pre-education
have you involved her in?
A I enrolled her last year in st, Stephen's
Episcopal school in prekindergarten, and they have an after
school day care there right at the school, She's attending
kindergarten there this year, She's doing very well.
THE COURT: She is actually in kindergarten
now?
THE WITNESS: Yeah, she's actually in
kindergarten now,
BY MR, ABRAHAM:
Q
A
Does she enjoy it?
sometimes she does,
Sometimes she doesn't.
48
-
.
1 Alyssa has a problem with rules. She doesn't like nap time,
2 you know, just your typical child stuff.
3
Mrs. Shingara talked about what she
Q
4 considered quality time on Friday evenings. What do you
5 consider quality time or when is that? When do you get a
6 chance for quality time?
7
A
When I'm not working, I try to make my time,
8
you know, quality time. Of course, there's always chores
like housecleaning and things like that. But, you know,
like, you know, some Friday nights, you know, if I didn't
have anything going, you know, I would try to let them have
I
,
I
I
9
10
11
12 her.
13 But on some Friday nights I like to take her
14 to city Island, or sometimes her classmates have birthday
15 parties those nights, For those instances, that's the only
16 reason I didn't want to give them a court order because I
17 don't want to be set carved in stone with it.
18
Q
Now, you heard Mr. Herman testify that he
19 evidently doesn't mind time with -- sharing his time with
20 the grandparents. Why do you think he said that?
21
A
Because he's been doing that all along.
What are your objections to having a court
22
Q
23 ordered separate order for the grandparents? What are your
24 concerns?
25
A
My concerns are that I have a hectic schedule
49
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
as it is. I have my own family that I have obligations to.
They want to be with Alyssa too. I've got a brother, a
sister, my mother, They all are very close to my child
because we lived with them, And I just don't think a child
should be carved up between all these people. I don't
understand why you need to carve a child up like that.
Q Why do you think it is not in the best
interest of Alyssa?
A Because she's got a set schedule, It's a
stable schedule, It's destructive to her.
Q How long has she been on the current schedule
really?
A For ever since the first court order went
into effect.
Q Since December of 1994?
A Yeah.
Q Now, Mr. -- the plaintiffs in their pleadings
have indicated that you have refused to provide any
additional custody time beyond what is set in Mr. Herman's
schedule, is that correct?
A No, that is not.
Q What's incorrect about that?
A Well, I was -- like I said, I was complying
if they called down and asked if they could pick her up
Friday, Sometimes I would say no because I had something
50
...
..
1 going on, and other times I would say that's fine, you Know.
2 Q Do you Know of any reason why Mr. Herman
3 cannot share his custody with the grandparents, his custody
4 time periods?
5 A I don't thinK there is any reason at all.
6 MR. ABRAHAM: Nothing further, Judge.
7 THE COURT: Cross.
8 MR. BEST: I do have some questions.
9 CROSS EXAMINATION
10 BY MR. BEST:
11 Q Ma'am, isn't it a fact that from the time the
12 Shingaras filed this to today's date you have not allowed
13 them any additional time with Alyssa beyond what Mr. Herman
14 gets pursuant to the court order?
15 A NO, that's not true,
16 Q Have you called and offered?
17 A I don't call and offer. They call and --
18 Q Answer my question yes or no.
19 THE COURT: Wait a minute, Don't tell her
20 how to answer.
21 MR. BEST: Excuse me.
22 THE COURT: What don't you do? You do not
23 call and offer?
24 THE WITNESS: I don't call and offer, no.
25 MR. BEST: So that's no,
51
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
.,
BY MR. BEST:
Q Is it your testimony, ma'am, that you dispute
Mrs. Shingara's claim that she was a primary caretaker and
spent 50 percent of Alyssa's time with her for the first
couple of years?
A I absolutely do.
MR. BEST: May I approach the witness, Your
Honor?
THE COURT: Yes.
BY MR. BEST:
Q I show you a photocopy of a two page letter,
Do you recognize the signature at the end of it?
A Yes,
Q And whose signature is that?
A That's my signature.
o Do you recognize this letter?
A Yes.
o And did you, in fact, write that letter?
A Yes, I did.
o Could you please read the highlighted
sentence.
MR. ABRAHAM: I'll object, Your Honor. I'll
ask her to read the entire paragraph.
THE COURT: I will let her read the whole
thing. It is short.
52
,.
..
1 MR. BEST: That's fine, Your Honor.
2 THE COURT: Read a little slow though because
3 she has to write this down,
4 THE WITNESS: Okay.
5 "Dear Bill:
6 Thank you very much for appearing
7 THE COURT: Tell me first of all the date of
8 the letter.
9 THE WITNESS: June 16th, 1994.
10 THE COURT: Go slower.
11 THE WITNESS: This is addressed to Mr.
12 William Harvey wiest, Wiest, Wiest, Saylor & Muolo, P.O. Box
13 791, 240-244 Market Street, regarding Kenneth Herman.
14 "Dear Bill:
15 Thank you very much for appearing on my behalf at
16 the hearing on June 8th, 1994. I apologize for my absence,
17 however, I did not receive notice of the hearing.
18 I made an attempt to speak with Ken concerning
19 this custody action, however, he refused to speak with me on
20 the matter and stated that his attorney advised him not to
21 communicate with me,
22 Ken's proposal is unreasonable and not in the best
23 interest of my daughter, Alyssa. First, he h~s had ample
24 opportunity to visit with her for the last three years,
25 especially since his parents have been Alyssa's primary
53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
..
..
baby-sitters over the last two years, however he chose not
to do so. His visitation has been sporadic because he chose
not to spend time with her when he had full opportunity to
do so.
second, his home is without running water and
toilet facilities and is therefore unfit for my daughter to
inhabit.
Finally, Ken is not even working and cannot
properly provide for my daughter according to the time he
has designated in his proposed visitation in my home for
each of the designated holidays.
All other items that were specified in Ken's
proposal, however, not mentioned or amended here, are out of
the question, Yours truly, Lisa M. Attinger."
BY MR. BEST:
Q Miss Attinger, I take it that letter was
written in the context with your dispute with Kenneth
Herman?
A That's correct.
Q There is a sentence in there that's been
highlighted wherein you state that his parents, the
shingaras, were the primary baby-sitters for the last two
years.
A I said baby-sitters.
Q Is that statement true and correct?
54
..
.
1 A I would say yes.
2 MR. BEST: Your Honor, I would move this into
3 the record as Petitioner's Exhibit No.1.
4 THE COURT: Any objection?
5 MR. ABRAHAM: No objection, Your Honor.
6 THE COURT: It is admitted.
7 BY MR. BEST:
8 Q Miss Attinger, do you dispute the claim of
9 the Shingaras that up until last fall they would frequently
10 call you and ask for additional time with Alyssa and you
11 would grant it?
12 A I don't dispute the fact that they would
13 frequently call, but I would dispute the part that I would
14 frequently grant it,
15 Q How often would you grant it?
16 A I would -- I really can't answer that
17 question, but I don't think it was on a frequent basis, not
18 all the time. I'm saying I didn't grant them all the time
19 they asked for. They would always ask me for time. That's
20 not a question. They were always asking for time. I didn't
21 always say yes.
22 Q How would you characterize your relationship
23 with the Shingaras up to that point?
24 A Our relationship's been sort of sweet and
25 sour. Like I said, I've tried very hard to get along with
55
..
..
1 them. Sometimes they were very good to me. other times
2 they were very, very mean to me,
3 Q There have been times, have there not, where
4 you have been very close to the Shingaras?
5 A 'les.
6 Q They have provided you with various forms of
7 assistance in the past, haven't they?
8 A I guess, if you want to look at it as
9 assistance. Sometimes I've thought of it as almost selling
10 my soul. I've paid dearly for everything they have done for
11 me.
12 Q Would you agree with the Shingaras' testimony
13 that your relationship with them soured sometime in the fall
14 of '96 and has not gotten better since then?
15 A It was sour before that, It was sour when I
16 was dating Kenny. His mother one time threw apples at me.
17 Q Do you disagree with their basic contention
18 that the relationship with you in terms of being able to ask
19 for time with Alyssa got really bad as of late 1996?
20 A Late 1996. I would say it's been bad on and
21 off. I don't think it got, like, anymore -- any worse at
22 that point. It was bad in 1994.
23 Q Ma'am, you heard the testimony that until
24 somewhat recently you were permitting the Shingaras to pick
25 up Alyssa on the Friday evening preceding Mr. Herman's
56
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
period of secondary custody, is that correct?
A Urn-hum.
o Have you, in fact, now prevented them from
doing that?
A I would say only up until, like, the last
conciliation hearing.
o Are you refusing to let them take her on any
Fridays at this point?
A I told Ken that it was best at this point to
wait,
o Isn't it a fact that you have withheld that
as a retaliation for their filing this petition?
A No, no, I just -- I'm actually sometimes
afraid of them.
o Is it also a fact that you do not allow them
to call Alyssa?
A That is not true.
o Are they welcome to call her at anytime?
A I've never stopped them from calling her.
o You've heard their testimony that they are
not permitted to call. You disagree with that?
A I disagree with that.
o Would you agree that Alyssa loves the
shingaras?
A I would agree with that.
57
..
..
1
I.
f"
Q She enjoys going to their home? !.
A Yes, I do.
Q Why do you feel it would be not in Alyssa's
best interest that she have a regular period of time to see
2
3
4
5 the Shingaras?
6
A
Because I think her time is already carved up
7 enough. I think it's destructive. I think it's not fair to
8 the parents, partially because we both have schedules to
9 work around as it is, It's hard enough to work out the
10 schedule we have, and I think she's used to the schedule she
11 has now. She's used to seeing them every other weekend.
12
Q
You are sort of saying it's not in the
13 parents' best interest?
14
A
No, I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying
15 she's stable and content and happy with the schedule as it
16 is now. She hasn't asked to spend anymore time with them,
17 She's happy with what she has.
18
Q
Has she ever told you she doesn't want to
19 spend more time with them?
20
A
No.
21
Q
Is it your testimony that it would be harmful
22 for Alyssa if you would spend one less weekend a month with
23 her and the Shingaras would spend one more?
24
A
Yes.
25
MR. ABRAHAM: I'll object, Your Honor.
58
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
THE COURT: Sustained.
BY MR. BEST:
Q
How do you think it would be more harmful for
her?
MR. ABRAHAM: Objection.
THE COURT: I sustained the objection.
MR. BEST: I need to change the line of
questioning, Your Honor,
BY MR. BEST:
Q You testified that you need time for Alyssa
to spend with your other relations, is that correct?
A That's true.
Q Now, your mother, where does she live?
A My mother lives in Camp Hill.
THE COURT: I'm sorry, where?
THE WITNESS: Camp Hill.
BY MR. BEST:
Q You currently live in?
A Harrisburg,
Q How often does your mother see Alyssa?
A She picks her up about once a week or so,
takes her to the movies for an hour or two and brings her
back.
Q How far a distance is your home from your
mom's?
59
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
A I don't know, maybe -- I really don't know.
I don't know. with the traffic, it's hard to say. It's
probably about a half hour drive with the traffic,
Q So you're saying your mother sees her at
least once a week?
A At least.
Q At least?
A Yeah.
Q sometimes more?
A sometimes.
Q And how would you characterize the
relationship you and your mother have with respect to
Alyssa?
A That's been somewhat shaky.
Q Isn't it a fact that at one point she filed a
grandparent's visitation claim against you in Northumberland
county?
A That is true.
MR. BEST: I have no further questions.
THE COURT: Anything more?
MR. ABRAHAM: Just quickly to address the
letter.
THE COURT: Go ahead,
60
..
..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. ABRAHAM:
Q Lisa, this letter was in regard to a hearing
on Mr. Herman's visitation, is that right?
A Urn-hum.
Q And when you talk about him -- when you talk
about the grandparents as the primary baby-sitter, are you
talking about when he has visitation?
A Also. Well, no, he didn't have visitation at
this time, I'm sorry.
Q So he didn't have court ordered visitation.
A That's right,
Q Did he have any visitation?
A He had it through being at their home.
Q And so when you are talking about primary
baby-sitter, you are talking about their time with the child
during his, quote, visitation or what would have been?
A Both, right,
Q Very quickly, do you consider -- you didn't
dispute it, and you haven't ever disputed the mutual love
that goes on between these parents and the child. Does she
have the same kind of love on the other side?
A Yes.
MR. ABRAHAM:
THE COURT:
Nothing further, Judge.
Anything more?
61
..
.,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RECROSS EXAMINATION
BY MR. BEST:
Q Let me just follow up on this primary
baby-sitter statement. At the time you wrote that, had
anyone been baby-sitting Alyssa at a greater volume and time
than the Shingaras?
A My mother was baby-sitting her almost as
equal amount of time,
Q But you didn't put that in your letter, did
you?
A No, because he didn't have an option to see
my daughter at my mother's house.
MR, BEST: Nothing further,
THE COURT: How old are you?
THE WITNESS: I'm 24,
THE COURT: Are you married now?
THE WITNESS: No, I'm not,
THE COURT: Single?
THE WITNESS: Yes.
THE COURT: You live alone with Alyssa?
THE WITNESS: That's right.
THE COURT: Are you working now?
THE WITNESS: Yes.
THE COURT: Do you work on Fridays?
THE WITNESS: I work until 5:00.
62
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.. .
1 TilE COURT: On Fridays?
2 TilE WI'rNESSI Urn-hum.
3 TilE COURT: And then other weekdays, or do
you work some weokonds?
'I'llI' WITNt:SS: Every weekend when Kenny has
her I work on Saturday mornings. After he picks her up,
then I will work a couple hours overtime.
1'IlE COUR'r: And when she is with you, you do
not work Saturdays?
TilE WITNESS: That's right,
TilE COURT: You may step down.
MR. ABRAHAM: Call Marlene Adams.
Whereupon,
MARLENE R, ADAMS,
having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
TilE COURT: Let me ask you one more question.
Do you work any Friday nights?
MS. ATTINGER: No, I do not.
TilE COURT: Go ahead.
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. ABRAIlAM:
Q
A
Q
A
State your full name for the record.
Marlene R, Adams.
Where do you live, Marlene?
252 East Crestwood Drive, Camp Hill.
63
.
.
1 Q What is your relationship to Alyssa?
2 A I'm her grandmother.
3 Q This is your daughter?
4 A Maternal grandmother.
5 Q What has been your relationship and
6 involvement with Alyssa over the years?
7 A Well, I was there when she was born. We had
8 a bond, She lived with me. We do a lot of things together.
9 Q How long do you recall that Alyssa resided
10 with you when Lisa resided with you? How long a period of
11 time has that been?
12 A Alyssa resided with me at the same time Lisa
13 did.
14 Q How would you characterize what you
15 understand as to the relationship and/or interactions of the
16 plaintiffs and Alyssa?
17 A I'm sorry, will you repeat that?
18 Q How would you characterize the relationship
19 of the Shingaras to Alyssa?
20 A I know Alyssa loves them. Sometimes, you
21 know, she talks to me a lot, She tells me sometimes she
22 likes to go there, Sometimes she doesn't. She's upset with
23 the arguing, She wants a quiet family is what she says.
24 Q How have you -- how do you characterize how
25 well Alyssa is doing under the -- or how poorly Alyssa is
64
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6 sometimes because she wants to spend more time with me, but
7 it'. not always possible.
8 Q In the last two or three years, what is your
9 daily or weekly time or monthly time that you spend with
10 Alyosa?
11 A I pick her up after school and take her to my
12 hOUse. She spends the night with me some nights, and I'll
13 take her home in the morning in time to go to school. I
14 have her on a Saturday, Every other Saturday she'll spend
15 time with me. In September, I'm taking her to Disney World,
16 Q Have you been a baby-sitter as the Shingaras
17 have testified?
18 A Yes, I have been her baby-sitter.
19 Q How often do you baby-sit?
20 A Now?
21 Q Now.
22 A I baby-sit if Lisa has to work a little late
23 or she needs time to do something I'll baby-sit. But I
24 don't really consider it baby-sitting because it's time that
25 I just take with her, you know. I say can I have her on
doing under the current schedule?
A She's doing very well. She seems happy.
Q And has that been your understanding or is
that the way you see it for the last two or three years?
A I have never seen her be upset, maybe with me
65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
..
..
this certain time.
Q But when Lisa has a problem and you're
available, you essentially take care of her, is that right?
A Of course I do.
Q Are you aware of the Shingaras' time with
Alyssa as to baby-sitting and things like that?
A In the past?
Q Yeah.
A I know they did baby-sit her, yes.
Q Are you aware of anything other than that
kind of a relationship between the plaintiffs and Alyssa?
A Just that they are her grandparents. They
have a normal relationship with her,
MR. ABRAHAM: Nothing further, Judge.
CROSS EXAMINATION
BY MR. BEST:
Q Ma'am, did I correctly hear you state that
you usually spend every other Saturday with Alyssa?
A Yeah,
Q You agree that's mutually beneficial for both
of you?
A Yes, I do.
MR. BEST: Nothing further.
MR, ABRAHAM: That's all I have, Judge.
THE COURT: You may step down. Anything
66
.,
.,
1 else?
2 MR. ABRAHAM: We rest, Your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Any further testimony?
4 MR. BEST: No further testimony, Your Honor.
5 THE COURT: The record is closed. Argument
6 off the record, moving party.
7 (Whereupon, argument was held off
8 the record.)
9 THE COURT: I will take the case under
10 advisement and have something down shortly, Thank you.
11 Court is adjourned.
12 (Whereupon, the hearing was concluded
13 at 2:55 p.m.)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
67
..
.
1
CERTIFICATION
2
3 I hereby certify that the proceedings are
4 contained fully and accurately in the notes taken by me on
5 the above cause and that this is a correct transcript of
6 same.
7
,..--
8
. - .--.......
,'--
\..--, -
Pamela R. Sheaffer
Official Court Report
9
10
11
12 The foregoing record of the proceedings on the
13 hearing of the within matter is hereby approved and directed
14 to be filed.
15
16
~1
/
l'1 }~~1
I
17
J.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
68
JOSEPH SHINGARA and
BRENDA SHINGARA,
PETITIONERS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
97-0184 CIVIL TERM
LISA M. ATTINGER and
KENNETH R. HERMAN, JR.,
RESPONDENTS
: IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 1997, following a hearing on the merits, IT IS
ORDERED:
(1) Paragraph 4 of the custody order of April 1, 1996, IS VACATED and
replaced with this order.
(2) The father, Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., and the paternal grandmother, Brenda
Shingara, shall have partial physical custody of Alyssa M. Altinger on alternating
weekends, On such weekends, the paternal grandmother shall have Alyssa from
Friday after school until Saturday at 1:00 p.m, The father shall thereafter have Alyssa
through 7:00 p,m. on Sunday, although Alyssa may be returned to the mother's
custody at 8:00 p.m. on Sunday evenings when there is no school on the following
Monday.
(3) Brenda Shingara and the mother shall forthwith make arrangements as to
where Alyssa may be picked up following school on the Friday of these alternating
weekends.
/
97-0184 CIVIL TERM
James L. Best, Esquire
For Petitioners t~
James W. Abraham, Esquire ~/. /41
For Respondent Lisa M. Attinger 5 )~~
Kenneth R. Herman, Jr., Pro se
RD #3
Sunbury, PA
:saa
-2-