HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-02806
~
.......
~
\
\
I
/
/
I
,
i
.
~
purpose of facilitating custody arrangements,
The defendant is enjoined from harassing and stalking the
plaintiff and from harassing the plaintiff's relatives.
The defendant is enjoined from entering the plaintiff's
place of employment and the day care facility of her minor
chi 1dren.
The defendant is enjoined from removing, damaging,
destroying or selling any property owned solely by the plaintiff.
A violation of this Order may subject the defendant to: i)
arrest under 23 Pa.C.S. g6113; ii) a private criminal complaint
under 23 Pa.C.S. g6113.1; iii) a charge of indirect criminal
contempt under 23 Pa.C.S. g6114, punishable by imprisonment up to
six months and a fine of $100.00-$1,000.00; and iv) civil
contempt under 23 Pa.C.S. g6114.1. Resumption of co-residence on
the part of the plaintiff and defendant shall not nullify the
provisions of the court order.
This Order shall remain in effect until modified or
terminated by the Court and can be extended beyond its original
expiration date if the Court finds that the defendant has
committed another act of abuse or has engaged in a pattern or
practice that indicates continued risk of harm to the plaintiff.
Temporary custody of Cody J. Ditzler, is hereby awarded to
the plaintiff, Kimberly A. Huyck.
A hearing shall be held on this matter on the ~A'~y of
~ 1997, at ?:3lJ IY.m., in Courtroom No.2,
Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
The plaintiff may proceed without pre-payment of fees
pending a further order after the hearing.
The Cumberland County Sheriff's Department shall attempt to
make service at the plaintiff's request and without pre-payment
of fees, but service may be accomplished under any applicable
rule of Civil Procedure.
This Order shall be docketed in the office of the
Prothonotary and forwarded to the Sheriff for service. The
Prothonotary shall not send a copy of this Order to the defendant
by mail.
The Middlesex Township and Lower Allen Police Departments
will be provided with certified copies of this Order by the
plaintiff's attorney. This Order shall be enforced by any law
enforcement agency where a violation occurs by arrest for
indirect criminal contempt without warrant upon probable cause
that this Order has been violated, whether or not the violation
is committed in the presence of the police officer. In the event
that an arrest is made under this section, the defendant shall be
taken without unnecessary delay before the court that issued the
order. When that court is unavailable, the defendant shall be
taken before the appropriate district justice. (23 Pa.C.S. g
6113).
By the Court,
Judge
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 97- .) YO (, CIVI L TERM
PROTECTION FROM ABUSE
AND CUSTODY
Kimberly A. Huyck,
Plaintiff
Keith D. Ditzler,
Defendant
PETITION FOR PROTECTION ORDER
AND CUSTODY
RELIEF UNDER THE PROTECTION FROM ABUSE
ACT, 23 Pa.C.S. g 6101 et seq.
A. ABUSE
1. The plaintiff, Kimberly A Huyck, is an adult individual
residing at 341 Maple Lane, Carlisle, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania 17013.
2. The defendant, Keith D. Ditzler, (SSN: unknown)(Date of
Birth: 1/6/69), is an adult individual residing at 517 Pine Hill
Drive, Pine Grove, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania 17963.
3. The defendant is the father of the child.
4. Since approximately 1995, the defendant has attempted
to cause and has intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly caused
bodily injury, to the plaintiff, has placed the plaintiff in
reasonable fear of imminent serious bodily injury, and has
knowingly engaged in a course of conduct or repeatedly committed
acts toward the plaintiff including following the plaintiff,
without proper authorization, under circumstances which have
placed the plaintiff in reasonable fear of bodily injury. This
has included, but is not limited to, the following specific
a. On or about May 18, 1997, the defendant grabbed at
the plaintiff's breasts, blocked her from exiting the
bedroom, and restrained her in the corner. As the
plaintiff attempted to leave the room, the defendant
grabbed her tight around the neck, dropped his hands
around her waist, and tightened his grip as he pulled
her onto the bed. When the plaintiff was allowed to
leave the room, the defendant asked his son to get him
the biggest knife in the kitchen. The plaintiff
returned to the room and found the defendant on the bed
with a butcher knife in his hands striking at his
wrists and poking at his side with the sharp edge
causing the plaintiff to fear for her safety and that
of her children. Later in the day, the defendant
pushed the plaintiff backwards into the counter causing
bruises on her back, knocked a glass and a jar across
the room shattering them over the floor, and broke the
telephone and answering machine as the plaintiff
attempted to telephone for help. The plaintiff and the
children left the residence, called the police, and the
defendant was arrested and charges were filed.
b. On or about March 19, 1997, the defendant
threatened the plaintiff saying that if she called the
police to have him removed from the residence, "she
would regret it," causing the plaintiff to fear for her
2
safety.
c. On or about March 4, 1997, the defendant grabbed
the plaintiff by both of her wrists and shoved her
backwards into the bedroom window causing her to hit
her elbow and shoulder.
d. In or about December 1996, the defendant, refusing
to allow the plaintiff to leave the residence, blocked
the car door so she could not get in. When the
plaintiff was able to get into the car, the defendant
pinned her to the seat, grabbed the keys from the
ignition, and took them into the house. When the
plaintiff asked for her keys, the defendant told her
that she could not leave, grabbed her by the front of
her coat, and threw her onto the bed causing the
plaintiff to fear for her safety.
e. Since 1995, the defendant has grabbed, shoved,
pushed, threatened the plaintiff. The defendant has
thrown several items at the plaintiff such as: ash
trays and snuff can, causing her to have to move to
avoid being hit. The defendant has thrown glasses,
broke several phones, and several answering machine
causing her to fear for her safety.
5. The plaintiff believes and therefore avers that she is
in immediate and present danger of a~use from the defendant and
that she is in need of protection from such abuse.
3
that she is in need of protection from such abuse.
6. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be prohibited
from having any direct or indirect contact with the plaintiff
including, but not limited to, telephone and written
communications, except for the limited purpose of facilitating
custody arrangements.
7. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be enjoined
from harassing and stalking the plaintiff, and from harassing the
plaintiff's relatives.
8. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be restrained
from entering her place of employment and day care facility of
her minor children.
9. The plaintiff desires that the defendant be enjoined
from removing, damaging, destroying or selling any property owned
solely by the plaintiff.
B. EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION
10. The mobile home which the plaintiff is asking the Court
to order the defendant to stay away from is not owned or rented
in the defendant's name.
11. The defendant is currently residing at 517 Pine Hill
Drive, pine Grove, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania.
C. SUPPORT
12. The defendant has a duty to support the minor child.
13. The plaintiff is in need of financial support from the
defendant.
4
or any other jurisdiction.
21. The plaintiff does not know of any person not a party
to this action who has physical custody of the child or claims to
have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.
22. The best interests and permanent welfare of the minor
child will be met if custody is temporarily granted to the
plaintiff pending a hearing in this matter for reasons including:
a. The plaintiff is a responsible parent who can best
take care of the minor child and has provided for the
emotional and physical needs of the child since his
birth.
b. The defendant has shown by his abuse of the
plaintiff that he is not an appropriate role model for
the minor child.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of the "Protection
from Abuse Act" of October 7, 1976, 23 Pa.C.S. g 6101 ~ ~., as
amended, the plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to grant the
following relief:
A. Grant a Temporary Order pursuant to the
"Protection from Abuse Act:"
1. Ordering the defendant to refrain from
abusing the plaintiff or placing her in fear of
abuse.
2. Ordering the defendant to refrain from having
any direct or indirect contact with the plaintiff
7
including, but not limited to, telephone ond
written communications, except to facilitate
custody orrangements.
3. Ordering the defendant to refrain from
harassing and stalking the plaintiff and from
harassing the plaintiff's relatives.
4. Prohibiting the defendant from entering the
plaintiff's place of employment or the day care
facility of her minor children.
5. Prohibiting the defendant from removing,
damaging, destroying or selllnH property owned
solely by the plaintiff.
6. Ordering the defendant to stay away from the
plaintiff's residence located at 341 Maple Lane,
Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and any
other residence the plaintiff may establish,
except for the limited purpose of transferring
custody of the portles' child. The defendant
sholl remain In his vehicle at all times during
the transfer of custody.
7. Granting temporary cuatody of the minor child
to the plaintiff.
B. Schedule a hearing In accordance with the provisions of
the "Protection from Abuse Act," and, after such hearing, enter
an order to be in effect for a period of one year:
8
1. Ordering the defendant to refrain from
abusing the plaintiff or placing her in fear of
abuse.
2. Ordering the defendant to refrain from having
any direct or indirect contact with the plaintiff
including, but not limited to, telephone and
written communications, except to facilitate
custody arrangements.
3. Ordering the defendant to refrain from
harassing and stalking the plaintiff and from
harassing the plaintiff's relatives.
4. Prohibiting the defendant from entering the
plaintiff's place of employment or the day care
facility of her minor children.
5. Prohibiting the defendant from removing,
damaging, destroying or selling property owned
solely by the plaintiff.
6. Ordering the defendant to stay away from the
plaintiff's residence located at 341 Maple Lane,
Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and any
other residence the plaintiff may establish,
except for the limited purpose of transferring
custody of the parties' child. The defendant
shall remain in his vehicle at all times during
the transfer of custody.
9
<)
[;.: en ..... q
i-=4 -" LO
1:,"'-' i~ ,-:'f" n)
, ,
f~' , ~
;-- ~ "
()' "-.
J' ';"~ 0
L." r-. ,
I. N , V
"
e:: \" .-- ,.- ~
~'j
.- ,,l,. d
L~. ,-. ,"
Ll '''' .:.)
.' 1,..>
.
\
1"0
u-
0:,
"
"
C)
~
J
>- Cl
a- ,-
~; ~
- ~.
I..!...I r-~ (:~ -
C1.. .
C4( "
11: ~ tL ~~:
0': .-'
. \, ,,oJ
C C:) --
LI: cr, ".1
,., :~
c,,; , , >- :~
;
( ~''Z 'I)
.~ _i:..~
I.!_ ..~
c., r- .::)
cr (.)
. " .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
" , /'i
~1l~~~ \
,- ,'. .
.
'. .... ," - ~ ' ".--
',.,' 02~
/117
1~
PA9
\
. . \
&..~v;.'~