The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About97-03637 l':\\\p.~ I\IIn.,....II\lI1l11pl.II111 I,ll' II ,1111.'n.o~rllt\ ~,I'I'17 CAROLE SCOTT DEWALL, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff vs. BOBBY RAHAL HONDA, NO. 97. II. ~ 7 CIVIL ACTION. LAW CIVIL TERM Defendant NOTIC!; II I YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and notice are served by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you, You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff, You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP: II II II I I Ii II Ii Ii i1 ': COURT ADMINISTRATOR, FOURTH FLOOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT HOUSE ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PENNSYLVANIA 17013 (717) 240-6200 FLOWER, MORGENTHAL, FLOWER & LINDSAY, P.C. Attorneys for the Plaintiff By II " ji Carol J Lincls, ,Esquire ID # 44G93 11 E;lst High Slreel Cullsle, PA 17013 1717) 2.13-5513 D'''~~H1]_ C\....p-'iI\Ih:......IIl\.ullIpl;lint Ilk NUII-'17-II.! IlIh .!.I'rn 6. Subsequent to the purchase. PlaintiH discovered that the subject 1995 Acura had been involved in a collision and had sustained extensive damages. in particular: A. Damage requiring the replacement of and painting of the passenger side of the vehicle; B. Damage requiring the replacement of and painting of thB hood of thB vehicle; C. Scarred front brake rotors; D. Missing stabilizer bar; E. Extensive soldering of the internal structure; F. Extensive rusting at joints cracked from impact; G. Repair or replacement of the front fender on the driver's side; and H. Repair to the trunk area, COUNT ,. FRAUD II 7. I in full. I 8, Ii The averments in Paragraphs 1.6 are incorporated herein by reference as if set out Upon information and belief, Defendant or its agent made a false statement of fact when it represented that the subject vehicle sustained minor localized damage. , I' I! 9, Defendant, through its agent, made such statement knowing it was false or in II conscious ignorance of the truth or recklessly, without regard to whethel the statement was true ,I or false, i " " 10, Defendant intended that Plaintiff rely on the statement and the PlaintiH justifiably relied on the statement to her detriment , " ,.:\wp.lil\dClo'....II\l'llnll'lainl file #1711.117.112 ,Iul) 2,1'1')7 11. Plaintiff suffered damages as a result of her reliance on Defendant's misrBpresentation, to wit the difference between the value of the vehicle as sold and its actual value, a difference of $3,500.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to enter judgement for Plaintiff and against Defendant for damages, punitive damages and costs. COUNT /I - NEGLIGENCE II 12. The averments of Paragraphs 1-11 are incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. 13. Defendant, through its agent, in the course of its business, supplied incomplete information regarding prior damage to the subject vehicle. 14. Defendant's agent, in making such incomplete representation, failed to exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating to Plaintiff the information regarding the prior damage to the vehicle. I II I 15, As a result of Defendant's negligent representation, Plaintiff suffered damage. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to enter a judgement for Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $3,500,00 actual damages, punitive damages and costs. COUNT 1/1- MISREPRESENTA TION ,! Ii 16. I! !I in full, " " I 17. Ii The averments of Paragraphs 1-15 are incorporated herein by reference as if set out Defendant's misrepresentation regarding prior damage to the vehicle was material to the transaction, 18, As a result of Defendant's misrepresentation, Plaintiff suffered loss, r;\".p~l\llcw.LlI\rnlllp1.linl file 'J711.117.11~ .Iul~ ~.I"'J7 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to enter a judgement for Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of 53,500.00, punitive damages and costs. COUNT IV - UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PRO TECT/ON LA W 19. ThB averments of Paragraphs 1-18 are incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. 20. Plaintiff purchased the subject vehicle primarily for personal or family use. 21. Defendant violated Section 3 of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S.s201-2(4)(vii)&(xvii). 22. As a result of Defendant's violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Plaintiff suffered actual damages of 53,500.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to enter a judgement for Plaintiff and against Defendant and to award to Plaintiff treble damages, attorneys' fees and costs. I I I I, il II " '. FLOWER, MORGENTHAL FLOWER & LINDSAY, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff By: II ;1 il i: Date: ~ J(lqql " i! (':\v.1l-11I\tlcW;lIl\~.'1mrl.linl file 1.1711."7.0,2 Junlo,2(o.!'I'/7 . VERIFICA TION I, the undersigned, hereby verif'lth;::tthe st3temer.ts made herein are true and CQrrect, 1 understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 94904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities, {1;; , u:..ir-{c/ Jt<i 7~ Alii/ill Carole Scott DeWall - Date: (;, dO <(1 I 1 I I, II II I, iI I: I rI :i ~ j '-'1 e, t lro '" \J1 \. '" ;:,- :J- .. tJ ~ , :~ I 0; . ,.. I " . " ( I "- \ : c.: .. l. C 0 .J i -. ['- r-- C> 0', , ~ RECEIVEO JUL 0 1 1997 Ans.d............ !. ' 1\: ( ,..., '.:~: :;! ': 1 '.1'=-1 .,' l ~." \ . ' ~ '~'I~Hi,J~4',.Jf'~\! r:l Il~: 1"'f-orlrj"Y!.'/:d~lf;: 1-'l!JrJI'1 liF r:l1j'lf;:.:RLt\tn, td-:W,\I,1 (-,~H; ILl. :(11 ['l v '-... , '\!IIIIJ'y :';:I;f!\!, :1\l~lrIA ~1 ! lO!I:, 1-:1, H,\ r:I{ i I~!,: ':r::i~,; :':r'\.JTY .sh(:~'l.f (,f 'tl~!JI Id AU:' (_-,:dJI"lty. 1"~"ln~-'i'l'.';J;il.J, .....~l(' t"_'ln~] ()'J1"i ~::'.. 'fn 'i("(,~ :1.lrI9 ~,-, 103\", 2-3:>3. t!,o,;> 'oI14.hlfl -, in i.\ r r; i '''; -3,S :.,I::>r '.'i?,j llll ,n ~l!lnt1Y H.\!l;\i. HI'~li,I;, thL' def~nj'3n4-". 'elt : ;t ;:l~~.."" HCdJr'.:. ~rl t.:-:.,:' ~~ ~:.J:" d. , l.J '-~~. :1 t_ ,:..-,.... I::-Io,:~l, L ':,~l:o !.' j L::" !1"!"!IAtl.1C~"';PURC), PA l-::"(-r:.5 , CU!1EC!-;LAH:. County. F'cr,n5yl\!~Cl;:'. t'," ~,.-1~i1l'-j0 ~ ;~M:~' L. ,,)1 I~:~ cAU> M/\N,,",,l;I<p' f. ;"'~:~:>;tl~l I tl :-:jrikt1~: ;1 true ~nj ~t.~~'0'f _' ~" ,~, :: .. ~ i " '. . r ,.- Lrt. l. ,I j t'lge+rH:>f .....]tl. NL1rtl_~I. 3nd -, -, - , h::: := -3 r-,.;: t" 1 '~'..:: .i l I ,~,'_". ... '-:' !: 1 = "-i".;' 1:::- r-.' '- - '. ~.': ,:'~:-',~o::-n"".--, t.;-ll:~; ''':'0;'. '" , " . r :: ! t ' _ ~", , . i' ..0' ~ , r I ~ 1 .t;:.: ,,':?~~ r-:-~~;~7-1:-: :':.~_'. '. ::.~~11 ',~ ': 1, A f l'~ .J'.' 1 t. 'I ct,~ lOGe "':.' \> : 11 :::; " ~ ~j(2~L<' 'A-'.~-,6' :':> ~-'.'" :-~:~ --,;p., I , : :, -,7 . " . , ')" " " , ",t,} , , , 'i I {, /' I i.~. 'i - /~ 'It. ,(((I', u 0: " 0 ~ 0 W M 0 '" 6 ~ Ul w Ul w ~ " . . . j ,j; 8 ! z ~ z :<: ~ z M < < '" ~ . . 0 ~ K ~ > 0 . w , m z . z I . ~ 0 z Ul 0 w ~ 0 II ~ ~ Z II .; w << - ~ N . u , ~ M . ~ . . ~ . w I " N 0- W :;: '" CAROLE scon DEWALL, Plaintiff IN TI IE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA v. CIVIL ACTION - LAW BOBBY RAHAL HONDA. Defendant NO. 97-3637 PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of Defendant Bobby Rahal Honda in the above matter. METZGER. WICKERSHAM. KNAUSS & ERB, P.c. By: ~ \-;::: ,,-~_, ,. ..J' Karl R. IIildabrand. Esquire Attorney I.D. No, 30102 3211 North Front Street 1'.0. Box 5300 lIarrisburg.PA 17110-0300 (717) 238-8187 """ /? , Attorneys for Defendant Date: AlIgust~.1997 , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Karl R. i-lildabrand. Esquire. ufthe law firnl Metzger, Wickersham, Knauss & Erb. P.C" hereby certify that I served a true and exact copy ufthe foregoing Praecipe fi.lr Appearance with reference to the foregoing action by First Class Mail. postage prepaid. this L day of August, 1997, on the following: Carol J. Lindsay. Esquire FLOWER. MORGENTlIAL. FLOWER & LINDSAY. P.c. II East High Street Carlisle. PA 17013 METZGER. WICKERSIIAM, KNAUSS & ERB. p,c. By: ~c:?, ~_<:- L , ~ "f/ Karl R, Ilildabrand. Esquire Attorneys for Defendant 1',0. Box 5300 I1arrisburg.PA 17110-0300 (717) 238.8187 I': , '. :-" .- , '. , " " " u " " I 0: " .... u " "" " .... c " ..., m -<: " .... '" " I-< It 0 .... " u "C " I-< W 0 "'~ n c c " ::; '" " .... " " ~. <.l 0 ..:> " " .... " 6 ...,....l " .... " " :. Ul . ....l>< " 0.. C " ..., Ul w w ~ 0..'" " " "" ::> J . 7- " . . . (j, 8 ! z "" " . c Z J 0 ..., " "" " :<: < . '" z :( z . ~ 0.. " n . 0 Ul > " ....l n . 11. . ~ 0 .:. " ....l "" I , 0 w . U>< ..: " ..: -<: ..., . z , lD z I-< ....l " :. Q :. I . . z 4.Z " ..., Z '" Ul 0 0 w OQ 1 " Q 0 "" It . 0 It . Z It 0 " > :I: ..: ... < 0 I-<U "" " I-< < ^' . "" 0 .... " I-< ....l '" U , :;JO- "" " 0 ..: ~ '" . OZf-o '" " U :I: I-< ~ U"-::UC"i " '" ;:i "" . . ....l": I " ..: " It . . ...,'" .... " ..., " Q . ... I ::t:W,..JO\ " ....l >< " "" " " 1-<"''''' " 0 '" . ..., " " ;>:> " '" '" " .... " . "" '" .... 0 " ..: 0 . ..., . ... .... UU Z. " U '" . Q . :;: CAROLE SCOTT DEWALL, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. CIVIL ACTION - LAW BOBBY RAHAL HONDA, Defendant NO. 97-3637 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND NEW MATTER 1. Admi tted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted. 5. Denied. The averments of paragraph 5 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. On the contrary, the Defendant, through its sales agent, advised the Plaintiff that the 1995 Acura in question had been previously damaged in an accident and that repairs had been made to the vehicle. Defendant's sales agent disclosed to Plaintiff all information in his possession regarding the prior damage and Plaintiff made no further inquiry or asked to have the vehicle examined independently. - 1 - {)"'<ul'!'f'nt I\~' :-1" ,\ 6. Denied. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 6 and the averments are therefore denied. 7. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 6 hereof are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Denied. The averments of paragraph 8 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 9. Denied. The averments of paragraph 9 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 10. Denied. The averments of paragraph 10 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. On the contrary, Defendant made full disclosure regarding the prior damage to the vehicle and Plaintiff made no further inquiry or sought to have the vehicle examined independently prior to purchase. 11. Denied. The averments of paragraph 11 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. On the contrary, after full disclosure by Defendant, plaintiff failed to investigate further or conduct an independent inspection on her own behalf prior to purchase. 12. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 11 hereof are incorporated herein by reference. - 2 - 11"l'\lf!n"nl .1.'.'Hli' 13. Denied. The averments of paragraph 13 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 14. Denied. The averments of paragraph 14 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 15. Denied. The averments of paragraph 15 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 16. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 15 hereof are incorporated herein by reference. 17. Denied. The averments of paragraph 17 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 18. Denied. The averments of paragraph 18 are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. 19. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 18 hereof are incorporated herein by reference. 20. Denied. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 20 and ~he averments are therefore denied. 21. Denied. Paragraph 21 states a conclusion of law to which no answer is required. To the extent that an answer is deemed necessary the averments are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. - 3 - D0cumet\t '1~2"60 22. Denied. Paragraph 22 states a conclusion of law to which no answer is required. To the extent that an answer is deemed necessary the averments are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded at trial. NEW MATTER 23. On or about March 4, 1996, Plaintiff purchased a 1996 Honda Civic from Defendant. 24. Subsequent to the purchase of the 1996 Honda Civic, Plaintiff contacted Defendant and indicated that she wished to trade in the 1996 Honda Civic on a vehicle with better acceleration. 25. In September 1996, Defendant's sales representative showed to Plaintiff the 1995 Acura Integra, the vehicle in question. He advised Plaintiff that the vehicle had been previously damaged in an accident and had been repaired. 26. Upon disclosure of the previous damage to Plaintiff, Plaintiff made no further inquiry, made no inspection, and made no request to have the vehicle independently inspected. 27. On September 27, 1996, Plaintiff signed a sales contract, purchased the 1995 Acura Integra, and traded in her 1996 Honda Civic. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "AU, and - 4 - l'lH'\lm...nt 11.';'4.60 31. Under the terms of the contract there were no warranties provided to Plaintiff upon sale of the vehicle other than the factory warranty as specified above and Honda Care Vehicle Service Coverage purchased by Plaintiff. 32. Any damage to the vehicle, as alleged by Plaintiff, was caused by her own negligent conduct ill wrecking the vehicle in an accident shortly after purchase from Defendant. 33. Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her damages. METZGER, WICKERSHAM, KNAUSS & ERB, P.C. By: CJ A-, / / / ~~( C--.c:!.64.~,'-;~-,ft..--~__ Karl R. Hlldabrand, Esqulre Attorney I.D. No. 30102 3211 North Front Street P.O. Box 5300 Harrisburg, PA 17110-0300 (717) 238-8187 --0 Attorneys for Defendant Date: August ~S-, 1997 - () ~. tlo,:umt'llt 1t12:>oIbl1 Elhibit A "" ~ " _ _____.~.J-.,........._....:...~.,,__,.. _.,_ "--', ...."'" x ., STATE SALES TAX (line J X 06) THE ORDER PRICE OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE CANNOT BE INCREASED AFlER THIS ORDER HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE DEALER OR THE AUTHORIZED OEALEIl 5. IlrOlf.TllATION Tlhl TAll'i REPRESENTATIVE UNLESS THE INCREASE 1$ DUE TO THE PASSAGE OF A lAW lnAN:'JIII, t NUJUUIlANLl .. '",ll"m OR REGULATION OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE COMMONWEALTH WHICtl REQUIRES ADDITION OF NEW EQUIPMENT TO CEATAIN VEHICLES CHANG(S IN 6 OOCUMLNT AllY' t l~) TRANSPOATATION OR EXISTING TAX RATES: OR. IN THE CASt OF rOH[lm~ MADE VEHICLES. IS DUE TO A AE.EVAlUATION OF HiE UNITED STAlES DOllAR ........m THE CURRENCY OF THE COUNTRY OF MANUFACTURE. 1 [lAlANCt DWlO ON l"^DlIN THIS ORDEA IS NOT BINDING UPON EITHEA THE DEALEA Of\ TH[ rUnCIlAS! n UNTIL SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED DEALEA REPRE$Et-;T AliVE 'rOU llll III 11 I 1\ MAY CANCEl THIS Of~[1tn AND f1((;[I\':[ A rUlL HlrUNO ANY llt.l[ 111 I dill 6 llf [ & ^^H RECEIPT or A COpy or HilS ORDlA SlCiNt{l [3'1' AN AUltH11II:! (J III All H REPRESENTATIVE 0'1' GIVING WfltTT[N NOlIr:[ Of" CANUllA.TI(1rl III TIll DEALER. 0 PA T lf1l tAX I CERTIFY THAT I AM lEGAL AGE OR OLDER. I AC~NO\""lEDGE REcelPl or A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND I ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS tNCl UOINli THE REVERSE SlOE OF THIS ORDEA . , Riffi.' ml:2l:imr!! 6696 Carlisle Pike lYI'( 00-;u:- 1HANS FACTORT WARRANTY. Tht laaOf)' .....'.:lly totISI,llllu &I of 11'1. .."anl'" ..11'1 r.."""t 10 th. ~ 0Il!\.. htnIlI_. Tht H.I\9fttry' ..",ulIy d'l(l....n..1 "'......nhu. ..tlltl "p'."'" OIlmpllad ioclud>l1g .nt ""'p<4d .-.rTantyolll'*"dlantlb"'tYOlI~oelllor'PIl1ICII"rClllrpo'.,'ndth'Hllafntdh.r.num.IOOfa.ull'lorlZuany oIl'w 1*'10"10 hllJ.l'Tl4lo1 . any ILIbol<ty ~ tonna.;loon "'11'1 lhe UIe of th'l ~rmf~""1 o USED CAR WARRANTY. THE INFORMATION YOU SEE ON THE WtNDOW FORM fOR THIS VEHICLE IS 'ART OF 'tHIS CONTRACT. INFORMATION ON THE WINDOW FORM OVE/lAIDES ANY CONTRARY I>ROV1SIONS IN THE CONTRACT OF SALE. o AS lS: Tm I'fIOtQt ~0CIa ill aold nAS IS" "'Ihovl any "."anlt .nhel ''P'uHd OIlmplll'd TIl. pulCtlUIl .. boMf u-.. ..,11", .lpInM 01 rapllfJOg 01 toIraclong any d.lact 111.1 pr...nt!r .....1. 01 th.t m'r lX~ .., lhe -- _ (b'"OT I.... ;-:_I//t'~/I{S'C"/ UAl~.9/~~(bU'Al"P(~' . PUII?;..- ~ --~L./__... Au~~trJ;-hJ:1-%,In~ CI1'jpf~~. ... --/'2-------- n_ -.. -- . //I(ClfJ)//~..$-6.0 _ I.".if /2Q5:) :7;.Z~Y/ Cgx).~ 6"7;7) ?t:);5Y~;' .L~t7:'7"_7"'S~ rx: ,.lC 110 .. .. .__ ~ PRICE OF VEI11CLE 771, ACCESSORIES EXTENDED~~~Vf .v' TYPE 'b'Y JCOf\ MONTHS Mll[~ Gun Tal AL 1. TOTAL SALE PRICE or V[IUClL Jj~ __ .1&323 2, ALLOWANCE ON THAOL IN 3. TAXABLE BALANCE (Uno 1 ~ Llno;') TOTAL /1,. r fll1/ 1 OLPO~}I' :~RN~~~~RSxJ...!:1L,~ tJC)..t1l::!:P'g!j!.~ .9~lLf,. CA~;" lllJl ON III L IVI m ACCEPTED BY. ___,~__~__._~~_ DAlf__ ('l"-lIl0.1",SlL'1..,;Il':l.'AlPHlSl"'.lj'.l UNPAID CASH BALANCE (:\\l,,,_~I\dcwilll\wmplainl (ile #:\711.')7.02 Seplemhcr IH.II),}7 relied on the representation of Defendant's agent who did not fully disclose the damage to the vehicle. 31. Paragraph 31 contains a conclusion of law to which no response is required. 32. Denied. The damages for which Plaintiff seeks relief were not caused by any negligence on Plaintiff's part, but rather were caused prior to Plaintiff's purchase of the vehicle. 33. Paragraph 33 contains a conclusion of law to which no response is required. If a response is determined to be required, Plaintiff, at all relevant times, acted to mitigate her damages. Respectfully submitted, FLOWER, MORGENTHAL FLOWER & LINDSAY, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff By: ~~- Carol J. u'npsay, Esquire 10 # 44693 11 East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-5513 I i I D""~ /1, /ti'i7 I. II iI II :1 Ii " Ii II II ~ r:\wp$l\dewall\rnmplainl rile ""II.'n.02 ~(llcmhcr IM,P)'J7 CAROLE SCOTT DEWALL, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 97. 3637 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION. LAW Plaintiff vs. BOBBY RAHAL HONDA, Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND now, this // , 1997, I, Carol J. Lindsay, Esquire, I day of ',-, , r1 of the law firm of FLOWER, MORGENTHAL, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys, hereby certify that I served the within REPLY TO NEW MATTER in the United States Mail, First Class, Postage Prepaid, in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed to: II I ,I II Karl R. Hildabrand, Esquire METZGEReWICKERSHAM 3211 North Front Street P. O. Box 5300 Harrisburg, PA 17100-0300 FLOWER, MORGENTHAL FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for Plaintiff By: / III ifi , . , t ~' ~ ; ", Carol J. Lindsay, Esquire I ID # 44693 11 East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-5513 Ii II II II ji Ii !i if ,- r-. ,~. I C.: , , II' . .." l I f-' - , ~. , '- -' c" r' ":0 ~ ,} t~': . tJ.;' ..J (\ . u. , ..-j I,' ,-;.. I v~ " II r- ":':) c: cr- t.' - CAROLE scon DEWALL. PlaintilT IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERI.AND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA v. CIVIL ACTION - LA W BOBBY RAHAL HONDA, Defendant NO. 97-3637 NOTICE OF DEI'OSITION TO: Carole Scott DeWall, PlaintilT c/o Carol 1. Lindsay. Esquire Flower, MorgenthaI. Flower & Lindsay.P.c. 11 East High Street Carlisle, P A 17013 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that counsel for the Defendant. Bobby Rahal Honda. will take the deposition of the below-named individual for discovery and/or use at the trial of this matter on September 24, 1998 at 9:00a.m. at the offices of Mctzger. Wickersham. Knauss & Erb. P.c., 3211 North Front Street, Ilarrisburg.P A, The deposition shall commence as follows: 9:00 a.m, 9:30 a.m. 10:00 a.m. - Thomas Brown - Tim Leiphart Chuek Steiner METZGER. WICKERSHAM. KNAUSS & ERB ~<i2~-p Karl R. Hildabrand. Esquire 1.D,#30102 3211 North Front Street. 1'.0. Box 5300 Harrisburg. I' A 17110-0300 (717)238-8187 Attorney l.,r Dekndant Dated: September _J__. 1<)<)8 cc: Ilughl's. All1right. FolIl <":. Natale Reporting Seniee. Ine, /l""ltl,,",,/ISI.tWIH)