HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-03780
~
.....
.
~
t-..
l"<)
,
t--
~
,
..
....., 1::
BROUJOS Be. GILROY, P. C,
,ATTORNEYS AT LAw
4 NORTH HANOVER STREET
CARLISLE. PENNSVLVANIA 17013
17171 2.3..157. 7le.tegO
"" '
"
',' . '<'-'
~ ~UL14199l
._......''',''"'~'''''b>'<~Iml>i~~''''~~~.,
r'
J<
.
.
f
f
,;.---.- .-'-- - :'.---'-:2 ".. .
o
\
\
I'erson Address Dates
Linda Meas 228 N. Baltimore Ave, July 6, 1997 to
Ronald W, Meas Carlisle,l'A 17013 present
Sandra Meas
Steve I'orter 384 I'in Oak Lane February 1994 to
Linda Meas Carlisle,l'A 17013 July 6, 1997
Steve I'orler 158 N, Wesl Slreel Approx. 1992 10
Linda Meas Carlisle, I'A 17013 February 1994
Linda Mens 163 N, Wesl Slreel March 28, 1991
Ronald W, Meas Carlisle, PA 17013 Approx, 1992
Sandra Meas
. The molher of the child is Linda Meas, currently residing at 228 N, Baltimore
Streel, Mt. Holly Springs, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17065,
She is not married to Plainliff,
. The father of the child is Steve Porter, currently residing at 384 Pin Oak Lane,
Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17013,
He is not married to Defendant.
4, The relationship of I'lainliff 10 the children is thaI of falher,
The Plaintiff currently resides with the following persons:
Name
Relalionshio
n/a
n/a
5, The relalionship of Defendanllo Ihe children is Ihat of mOlher.
, The Defendant currently resides with the following persons:
Name
Relationship
Ronald W. Meas
Sandra Meas
Matthew Allen Meas
Father
MOlher
Son
f:j::i
~~
~~~ffi :Jj .., ~
~~I~ .... ~ H '" on
.., ~I :; SI.e ...:g
~~H~ c: .g,s).:i ~~
.... ~ - - -
III ~. :: ,'Wi ~
- H 1:; ~ 8
~~u . f,l 'It~ ii .5 .
r.. ~ 8 !!l ~~ pi . I ~ e.o
'1(, e. '" ::
i ~o~ _ ' ... D
- :: - C ll,g
~...:I<O ~ - ~~ ~a.a::;
~M ~ ::"-"''B
=P=tlt:fi ....
HI ... :li
gJgJuli; 8
~ ..:
8~ f@
~ H
...:I
. ., ..
.. .. .
. . . .
C'*SEP f) :3 1997
-'
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY , PENNSYLVANIA
STEVE PORTER,
:
vs.
: NO. 97-3780
CIVIL TERM
Defendant
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: IN CUSIDDY
LINDA MEAS,
CJlU)ER OF CXXlRT
AND tOl, this "3 rJ_ day of
upon consideration of the attached Custody
ordered and directed as follows:
~t' ~t'r , 1997,
Conc liatlon Report, it is
-
1. A Hearing is scheduled in Court Room No..j , of the
Cumberland County Court House, on the olnd day of L:.,f?,-tU A "tin '
1'lrrlWT, at /.' 3() o'clock --.e..m., at which time testimony in'~this case 1 be
taken. At the Hearin9, tile Father, Steve Porter, shall be deemed to be the
moving party and shall proceed initially with testimony. Counsel for the
parties shall file with the Court and opposing counsel a Memorandum setting
forth each party's position on custody, a list of witnesses who will
testify at the Hearing and a summary of the anticipated testimony of each
witness. These Memoranda shall be filed at least 10 days prior to the
Hearing date.
2. The custody provisions of this Court's prior Order dated July
25, 1997 are vacated.
3. Pending the Hearing ano further Order of this Court, the
following custody schedule shall be in effect:
A. The Father., Steve Porter, and the Mother, Linda Meas, shall
have oh~red legal custody of Matthew Allen Meas, born March
28, 1991.
B. The Mother shall have primary physical custody of the Child.
C. The Father shall have partial physical custody of the Child
every week from Wednesday at 3:30 p.m. until the following
Thursday at 12:00 noon. For purposes of this subparagraph,
the parties shall exchange custody at WalMart on the Carlisle
Pike in the parking lot in front of the former Best store.
D. The Father shall have custody of the Child during every
weekend, on alternatin9 Saturdays and Sundays from 9:00 a.m.
until 6:00 p.m., beginning with the Father having custody of
the Child on Saturday, September 30, 1997. The exchanges of
custody under this subparagraph shall take place at the
maternal 9randmother's residence in Mt. Holly Sprin9s, unless
other arrangements are made by mutual agreement of the
parties.
E. On Thanksgiving day in 1997, the Father shall have custody of
STEVE PORTER, . IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
.
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. : NO. 97-3780 CIVIL TERM
:
LINDA MEAS, . CIVIL ACTION - LAW
.
Defendant . IN CUSTODY
.
PRICR JUDGE: J. Wesley Oler
CUSl'OOY CDlCILIATlOO SlN1ARY REPORT
IN ACXXJRDANCE WITH ClJoIBERLAND COONTY RULE OF CIVIL PROCEIXJRE
1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the Child who is the subject
of this litigation is as follows:
NAME
DATE OF BIRTII
alRRENTLY IN CUSl'OOY OF
Matthew Allen Meas
March 28, 1991
Defendant/Mother
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on August 27, 1997, with the
following individuals in attendance: The Father, Steve Porter, with his
counsel, John H. Broujos, Esquire, and the Mother, Linda Meas, with her
counsel, Jennifer Gutshall and Jan Terpening, Paralegals.
3. This Court previously entered an Order on July 25, 1997 in
Protection From Abuse proceedings (Docket No. 97-3815) based upon a Consent
Agreement. The custody provision of the Order provided for shared legal
custody, with the Mother to have primary physical custody of the Child.
The Father was to have partial physical custody of the Child every
Wednesday and Thursday at certain designated times, pending the scheduled
Custody Conciliation Conference. The Father filed this Petition for
Custody requesting primary physical custody of the Child. At this time,
each party believes that he or she should be the primary custodian of the
Child with the right to enroll the Child in his or her school district, and
therefore it will be necessary to schedule a Hearing.
4. The Father's position on custody is as follows: The Father stated
that the Mother moved with the Child fran Carlisle, where the Child has
resided for the past three years, to Enola to live with her boyfriend and
enrolled the Child in kindergarten in the school in Enola without
consulting with the Father. The Father believes that it would be in the
best interest of the Child to reside primarily with him because the Father
continues to reside in Carlisle where the Child has friends and family.
The Father claimed that the Child spends most of his time at the maternal
grandmother's home in Mt. Holly Springs and that actually, since the
Mother's move to Enola, the maternal grandmother has been the primary
caretaker of the Child. The Father indicated that he has a close
relationship with the Child and would be better able to care for the Child
with assistance during his work hours from the Child's paternal grandmother
and aunts. The Father does not believe that it is appropriate for the
Child to be living with the Mother and her boyfriend. The Father denies
all allegations of abuse in connection with the PFA proceedings. The
Father seeks primary physical custody of the Child with liberal periods of
partial custody to the Mother. The Father also seeks an Order permitting
him to enroll the Child in the Cumberland Valley School District where the
Father had enrolled the Child before learning that the Mother had made
arrangements for the Child to attend school in Enola.
5. The Mother's position on custody is as follows: The Mother
believes it would be in the Child's best interest to reside primarily with
her. The Mother acknowledged that she moved the Child to Enola and
enrolled the Child in school there without consultation with the Father.
The Mother explained that she did not want the Father to know her address
due to the issues of abuse addressed in the PFA proceedings. The Mother
believes that she had the right to enroll the Child in school in Enola
because she had primary physical custody of the Child under this Court's
Order dated July 25, 1997 (PFA). The Mother denied that the maternal
grandmother has been the primary caretaker of the Child but indicated that
the maternal grandmother does care for the Child while the Mother is
working. The Mother indicated that she had been taking the Child to the
maternal grandmother's residence for custody exchanges because it was more
convenient for the Father. The Mother expressed concern about the Father's
ability to properly care for the Child and feels strongly that there is no
reason to change the existing custody arrangements whereby she has primary
physical custody of the Child. The Mother seeks to retain primary physical
custody of the Child and proposes that the Father have a partial custody
schedule similar to that set forth in this Court's PFA Order dated July 25,
1997 with some modifications for the Child's kindergarten schedule.
6. The parties were able to agree on adjustments to the Father's
partial custody schedule pending Hearing.
7. The Conciliator recorrmends
attached. /l
1-nJs;.tM2f .;l /:J I 1'197
Date v
entry of an Order in the
~
Dawn S. Sunday, Es~re
Custody Conciliator
form as
I
i
i
! 1;
, ,'~,
I .._',J ...'.;
-~
,.....'
CUMBERLAND COUNTY AREA
AGENCY ON AGING,
Plaintiff
.
.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO 97-3870 civil Term
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v,
BETTY M. HAUSER,
Defendant
.
.
.
.
OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
SERVICES ACT
.
.
ORDER OF COURT
I
AND NOW, this \ ',,1 L day of December, 1997, upon request of
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esq., that the hearing scheduled for December
18, 1997, be continued because the Respondent's son, Robert Hauser,
has not been served with a subpoena, the hearing is CONTINUED to
Friday, January 2, 1998, at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom No.5,
Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT,
Anthony L. DeLuca
Attorney for Plaintiff .
~~~~
Lindsay Dare Baird /l-IIPi{q7
Attorney for Defendant ~-
Office of Aging -/06:.nd ~&t",,"..,n.l..//,.J;'S'lI7
Av
. ( -) ,j I
I / / I / . ../
. y."
/ . ,:" ,
,ii, c~ C' I' ~ t:;
J. ,Wesley Olerf"<:J:r., J.
I!
,.
:rc
.,
,
<.
c. ,.- ,
~;. '-1