Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-04936 ,I ,I ,t (' : , ,I I " " i'l " ~ , . , .'" 'I 'I' 'I i' I' ~ ~ 'I ~ I ~ I', 'i ' I I I " , ~ I " " , " I \1 J ',I " ! I I' ',1 " , I ~ I, " " " I " ' , , , I' I"~ " i II " i' I'j" !,J I I ' ' I' i'j . , j" ~ " I i " ~'.I , ~ I , ' , , ~ ".f " \ " " ' , " \ I, ~ 'I . I I , 1 ' ' ~ , , " , . ,I' I , , , , , , . , " 1 , , 'I " I , fI , , ' , I ' , " , I' , / , ',' " /' " , I J' i'i ' , " ' I ii, , , '" " I' " , , ' 'fl " " I" 'I, ,I , \ , , 'j .. ,I; ,), , "I ,I , , , , I, I .1" " ,'I ".1 , Ii' , , , ( ,,'I, " , , ~ " " " , ,\ I" ' , "'1\ ,I" " , , I . ~ , ~ , . i'l , ~ , !~ . " ~ L, " ,I ." I . I " , I 'I, '.) ,j' " I' ,,:1', , , , : , , , '\ , , :' :li I,' , , ' i' :1, .1lU0M .OLTI MID I 1M THI COURT O. COKNOM 'LIA' RICIIAltD .OLTI, I CUKBIRLAKD COUNTY, 'A Plaintiff I I h130 , v. I NO. '17 (I, "-,,.,,"L I WAL-IlART 'TORI8, INC., I CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant I JURY TRIAL DEMANDED N OTICE YOU HAVB BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the olaims set forth in tho following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case lIay proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose 1I0ney or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Court Administrator CUllberland County Courthouse, 4th Floor One Courthouse Square Carlisle, PA 17013-3387 (717) 240-6200 NOTICIA La han dQ~dado a usted en 1a corte. si uated quiere detenderse de estas demandas expueetas en las paginas siguientea, usted tiene viente (20) diae de plazo al partir de la tacha de la deaands y ls notiticacion. Uated debe presentar una apariencia escrita 0 en Persona 0 par abogado y archivar en la corte en forlla eacrits aua defensaa 0 aua objectiones alas demandaa encontrs de au peraona. Saa avisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte tOllars medidaa y pued. entrar una orden contra usted sin previa aviao 0 notificacion y por cualquier queja 0 alivio que es pedido en la peticion de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero 0 aua propiedadea 0 otroa derechoa importantes para usted. 4)96.2.IICWII""<'OMPI.Allm_II,I99'1 .BARO. rOLTI AKD I 1M TBB COURT or COHMON I'LEA. RICIlA1U) rOLTS, I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, I'A I'laintif: 0 I ('(I..>-.~I -r;,_ V. I NO. ,/1,) '193( I WAL-KART .TORB., INC. , I CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant I JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ~ AKD MOW, come. the Plaintiffs, SHARON rOLTS and RICHARD rOLTI, by and through their attorneys, SMIGEL, ANDERSON' SACKS, and aver the following: 1. Plaintiffs, Sharon Foltz and Richard Foltz, are hu.band and wife, currently residing at 114 Hill Lane, Cumberland County, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. 2. Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation authorized to do business in Pennsylvania, The address of the Defendant is 6520 Carlisle Pike, Mechanicsburq, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 3. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Wal-Mart storee, Inc. waG in exclusive custody, possession and control of that area de.cribed as premises, and it was the duty of the Defendant to keep and maintain those premises in a reasonably safe condition for those persons lawfully thereon. 4. On September 12, 1995, at approximately 4 p.." Plaintiff Sharon Foltz waG lawfully present inside the .tore of Defendant Wal-Mart Store., Inc" located at 6520 Carlisle Pike, Mechanic.burg, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania, hereinafter referred to ae preai.e. and wae lawfully and carefully proceeding on foot upon said premises. 5. Notwithstanding its duty, the Defendant did, at that aforementioned time and date, and for some time prior thereto, carelessly, recklessly and negligently allow to remain on the said premises a dangerous and defective condition in the form of a mat at or near the "Notions" counter within the store. .. As Plaintiff Sharon Foltz was proceeding upon the premises as aforesaid, she was caused to trip by reason of the afo~esaid dangerous condition, with the result that she suffeced severo and serious injuries and damages as are hereinafter set forth. 7. The injures and damages which are hereinafter set forth were caused solely by and were the direct and proximate result of the negligence of the Defendant in any or all of the following respects: ~. Fail~d to keep the premises in a safe condition for. persone lawfully using same; b. Permitted the dangerous condition to be and remain on the premises when the Defendant knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the danger involved; o. Failed to warn Plaintiff Sharon Foltz of the dangerouB condition created by the above described hazard; - 2 - 4. Failed to r.move the dang_roue condition ot which the O.tendant Wal-Mart Stor.., Inc. kn.w or in the .x.rcis. ot r.asonable car. should have known; .. Permitted persons, and the Plaintift Sharon Foltz in particular, to traverse the premises when the Defendant Wal-Mart Store., Inc. knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known that it was dangerous to do so and involved an unreasonable risk of harm to persons so doing; f. Failed to inspect the premises to discover the dangerou. condition or in inspecting so carelessly as not to have di.covered the condition; g. In maintaining the premises in an improper manner or in employing personnel who were not sutficiently qualitied to maintain the premiae. in a proper manner; h. Permitt.d the mat to remain on tha pr.mis..; i. Failed to provided adequate warnings to its lawful lic.n....; and j. In being oth.rwis. carel..s, reckless and n.glig.nt. .. sol.ly a. a r.sult of the negligence of the O.f.ndant Wal-Mart Stor.., Inc., Plaintitt Sharon Foltz .ustained the tollowing injurie.: a. Injur.d right kn.. - torn medial meniscu.. - 3 - b. Larg. chrondral d.tect ot medial tibial plateau ot right kne.. G. Pain along medial joint line of right knee. 4. Popping s~nsation of right knee. .. Inflammation of right knee. t. Pain in right knee with ambulation. t. As a result of the injuries as aforesaid, Plaintift Sharon Foltz sustained the following damages: e. Plaintiff Sharon Foltz has suffered and will continue to suffer great pain, BUffering, inconvenience, embarrassment, mental anguish and a loss of the enjoyment of life; b. Plaintiff Sharon Foltz has expended and will be required to expend sume of money for medical and surgical attention, hospitalization, medical supplies, surgical appliances, medicinell and attendant services; a. Plaintiff Sharon Foltz'lI general health, strength, and vitality have been impaired. 10. By further reason of the injuries as aforesaid, Plaintiff Richard Foltz has been and will in the future be deprived of consortium, conjugal lIerviees, assistance and compa.\ionship. - 4 - ), Admitted in pllrt and dcnied in pllrt. It is admilled only that on Scptembcr 12, 1994, Wal-Mart maintained and possessed a retail storc in Mechanicsburg. Pennsylvania. Sincc plaintiffs' have not defined what they mean by "area dcscribcd as prcmises", aftcr rcasonablc investigation, Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficicnt to form a bclicf as to whethcr Wal-Mart exclusively controlled the "arca dcscribcd as prcmiscs," The rcmaining allegations in this paragraph are denied as conclusions of law to which no response is required, 4, Denied. Aftcr reasonable investigation, Wal-MIIrt is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belicf as to the truth or falsity ofthe allegation contained in this paragraph, 5. Denied, 6, Denied. 7. a-j, Denied, 8, a-f, Denied, 9, a-c. Denied, 10, Denied, WHEREFORE, defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, hereby demands judgment in its favor and against Plaintiffs on all counts logether with costs, reasonable allorneys' fees and any other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, NEW MATTER 1, On September 12, 1995. Wal-Mart was operating the abovc-referenced prernisea in accordance with the standard of care owed to Plaintiffs and others similarly situated, 2. On or about September 12, 1995, Wal-Mart had no notice of any alleged defective conditions upon its prcrnises, -2- ',- I' ~ rOo, ,.., I' .r', l!,' ~;: ( " t;l \ ".,. I , '.-.: (;'(- ,-., ('":1 ll.jj __J, I" (J: L " '(.;.., I, {'~; (J (Ti " ~: i i~tj , . ....:10 "'-'j G J, , , " " , , " " " ,', I " ",j .:::1 , t, . " .. '< . ~ II 101 Q . rIJ ~ E . 3 w . C .. Z . III 0 ~ .. c ;; z ~ ~ . ~ . VI ~ ~ VI ~ I !oJ [ Z N = Z .. Z " It 3 !oJ E 0 ll. < I- Z . I- ~ g ol <( ii\ II N :J Cl III VI .. it . It rIJ c J: .... "14_" '.."I.... ,...,,,. ....I... .".~ OO.......,.1WWtU'lll..". ~ ..7'96-1.1I1WJ',....,.~ '" New w..cr/~ .11. I'" .IlAJlOII l'aLTS MID I III TH. COURT 01' CONNOII PLBAI aICIlAJlD I'OLTS, I CUKS.RLAND COUNTY, PA PlabUff I I V. I NO. 91 - 49315 I W,u,-KART STORmS, INC., I CtVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant I JURY TRIAL DEKANDED 1. Deniod. The Plaintiffs incorporate herein the allegations contained in their Complaint. a. Denied. It is believed and therefore averrad that the Defendant knew or acting reasonably should have known or anticipated the danger created by the condition more fully described in the Complaint. 3. Th18 reply is required. 4. This reply is required. 5. This reply is required. t. Th18 reply 18 required. 7. This reply is required. paragraph states a conclusion of law to which no paragraph states a conclusion of law to which no paragraph states a conclusion of law to which no paragraph states a conclusion of law to which no paragraph states a concluRion of law to which no >- t"', I ,.. , ..... .. , , ,', , I " , , , , " , . ~ t. I ," , l;. I ,. :"11'~ " i.I~ (T; .':; U', ,; ,\< , 'i',', , ' " " " " , , , '" , " " " " , , , I, , , " , )' " ~ C"l t C'o;, ,.-:' .. :'1. ~ , -, , ~jl" , 1 " )." ,. , , I,', 8" . .:.-~ ';::1 <:y ,. r' "- r- : l~.~ __.I; I U'" , , rr!'" >- i i(:J' , ..1:. ~ q Cl.. ,~ . ~; " l:i II( ::'i I;j u' , , I, " " , , ~ C) 1!; '... .:I ~5.~ ,. .. 1.:/:) (.'i.. '-.i ) ;f~i O:t. " ()~ ,. .... , f ,) ~ ~., ",' '1 C: " I> 1..., C,. 1, :g . , '"1./ 1'...,1 L... hJ 'rl(,l. 1-:; U :8 '1- \',' a u 0\ , , " Iii , , ,-.! , ., " , , ~ \0 ~ q: .:I .~ ,-. M d~ ,~, t'.". . (.) 'j :w: ,~:!t " (".:'1 0.. ::~, ":'"j l.;/f .:l" ',;'~, - ) .. lJi :'p .., -. ~, ."' 'l!.; "J '''.. , , /.1, t:;) 8 (.'I 0 " " " , I'. Ii , , , , " .... i:r ~::~ '~"l :IJ" " '\ . .~. I.::' Cl ,~ 1.1'; ~ '''i~ '3= .,~... ''';' <" :Y.: :,:: ') :>' '1-':;" ~ ) , eo :;:/;{j I ')Il'(. . ~ <.- ;;]fE h.1 ~ c::: ,~ <::> , ,.+- (-' " : I . , ,1'1 " " .,l , , I, " " , " I" ',' ~. Cl l; ;:1'; ~,-;.' 'l:. ,.,-. '(~ r.'- __l( I '3~ " .1;'; ( ~~ (;.\.. i);:J r' ,'1:, :;i~ , " I (~~1 t.) li! !;4: .. , CoI " t.'_. ,,-"'.:) a t...t CJ " .' " , , , , " .. \ " . , , \, >~ .... I::; r~~ "- I~: ':?1 "I. ." , , I "' ~~~ -~..: , c... 1 ~~j ('J T I~.r l l(j" '"' ,)~;;, tI- t" I.., (.,; : Jj(I",j C,l .(Ji'.l-- I '....:L; I!ti' l; ('.1 U C.7J e.) , , , . " ,'. ,I " 3, PlaintiOs l1Ied their Complaint on or about September II, 1997, A true and correct copy of plaintiffs' Compluint is attached hereto us Exhibit "A," 4, Pluintiffs huve not ucted to secure the udvuneement of their case, 5, Indeed, the docket cntries indicate that aner plaintiffs filed their Complaint, defendant filed an Answer and New Matter, and plaintiffs replied to the New Matter on October 30, 1997, A true and correct copy of the docket entries is attached hereto as Exhibit "B," 6, The docket entries further reveal several withdrawal and entries of appearances for defense counscl. Plaintiffs have engaged in no docket activity since filing a reply to the New Matter in October 1997, over four and one-half years ago, 7, Further, with regard to non-docket activity, discovery has becn completc since 1999, Plaintiffn have not requested to depose anyone, and they have niJt submitted expel1 reports either, 8, It is well-settled law that the plaintiffs have the responsibility to move their case along and secure its advancement. Despitc this obligation, plaintiffs have failed to diligently pursue this matter, and plainly, there has been no docket activity for well over two years. 9, Plaintiffs have no compelling reason for the delay in prosecuting the action, This is a simple premises liability matter, and there is no reason why plaintiffs could not gather the evidence nccessary to bring their case to trial. 10. On the other hand, Wal-Mart has suffered aclual prejudice from the delay in prosecution. (j,W~IMul1' .I111'11'1111'l~" 1<14.".,111. ~h~l'''\' ~ldll~,rH t:,\[)S"110!lLlI'I '1L1I'III[l" "'I~I 2 11, Plaintiffs' uction is based on a transient condition which is no longer present, and the longer they delay in bringing the case to trial, the hurder it will be for Wal- Mart to defend al!ainstthe existence of the condition, 12, Further, as the Pennsylvania courts realize, witncsses become unavuilable after significant delays in litigation, and memories fade. For instance, Diane Baker was the Wal-Mart employee who completed the incident report based on plaintiO's description of the incident. 13. Ms, Baker no longer works for Wal-Mart, 14, More importantly, Sherry Pope, another former employee, was identified as a possible eyewitness to the incident. Ms, Pope: has moved out of the area, und defendant is unablc to contact her, 15, Her absence significantly prejudices Wal-Mart's defense of the matter as she is the only employee to have any knowledge of the condition of the mat at the time of the incident. It is quite unlikely thaI any of the present employees will remember the condition of a mat in the fabrics department in 1995, 16. In short, plaintiffs have failed to diligently pursue this matter, und they have no compelling reason for the delay. (i'W'IIM'III\\III\",llltl:tlll",'ul,.,~hllf\lIl,Rlth."JlPI.H"/)~'nlnllIIllMII"III"I....JlII 3 IJIIlIIIII A SEP-16-97 TUE 01:19 P~ FAA f<<), P, 03/11 . I ....0. ro~'. .-D I JI 'II' COIllll' or COIIIlOII 'LBM alOllUQ _1'1, I CUKI~D CDVI'Y, r~ .laiaUU I 10. 1'7- 4 '13" ~L I 1'. I I waL-....,. .'l"Oa.., DlO., , OJIftL :r.e'I'IDII - u.. 11.....\ , ~y PIAL IlIllQJll)ID NOTICE roo ~. .... dUan z. counr. It YQ~ wl.b to defend .?in"~ the clai.. u.~ ro~tb in th4 fOllowing ,.,ea, you .uat t.k. action within twenty (30) day. .Iter thl. Coaplaint an. Nottda are ..rv.d, by enterinw a wcl\~~n .pp..~.nc. ~.r.o".11y or by attorney and f111n9 in writ1h9 vi~ ~h. Court your dat.n... or objection. to the cla1.. .at forth .,&in.t you. You .r. v.~n.4 tnat 1t you rail to do 80 the ca.. aa1 p~oce.d wlthout you and . jUdq..nt ..Y ba .nt.~ed Ayalnat you by the court without rurther notice tor any liloney clG1\1td nth. eo.plaint or tor any ot~.r ci.i. oc ~.li.f requ..tad by the Plaintiff. You a.y loae .oney O~ pcup.r~y vr Q\ha~ ri9ht. i~port~"t to you. YOU SHOULD TAX!! T'lIIG PAPEl\ TO YUVR L1\WY~ AT ONCE. IF YOU IlO !lOT IAVI A LAIIV&II oil CJU<NOT AFFORD OIlE, GO TO 011 TELEPHONE THE OFfICE SET FOR"Y SKLOM '1'0 rIND OUT WHERI YOU CAN CET L1:GAL HELl>w court Adaini.trltor ~rl.nd CQunty courthoU5e. 4~h Floor On. Caurthou.. 6qu~rc CDrllDlc, r^ 1101~'~~'7 (711) HO-6200 I NOTICIA , r.. ban .....da40 . u.tecl e.Q IG corto. IU. u.t.ed IJ,Yle..e d.feod~~>>. d. ..tea dcaend.. .x~elt.. .n 14~ pa91n.. .igui.nt.., uated tien. vi_nl. (10) di.. ~. pl.lo 01 po.ti. ~o 1~ foobo d. 1. 4...n4a Y 1. notltlcaglvn, u.t.d d.b. p~...n~.r una apari.no1a ..Grit. 9 en ..~.on. 0 po~ eb.,ado y arohlvar .n 1. ~ort. .n fo~.a ..arit.. .\l. ckt.n.... 0 e"e obj.ction.a a ,1.. de.and.. .ncon~r. de au p4r.on.. I.. avi...o qua .i u.t.d no .. d.tiende, 1. cort. to..~a ..did.. y pu.da .ntrar un. orden contra uatcd .in prQvio avilo 0 notlficaoion y por eualquter que,. 0 .1~Ylo que U~ ~~~ldo en 1. pa~loion .. d...nda. U.~.d puede p.cder dln.r~ 0 .o~ propla4adee 0 otro. 4.~.cho. l_rortant.. p.~. usted. TAUE COPY FROM Af:OORo InT....., '......... ... ..' "!.... T I~ SEP",'97 TUE 01 '22 P~ FAX NO, p, OBIII . . D. ""v. ohnndnl ....at of ..,lIal tibiAl plat.." oC rlvbt lul... .. P.ln &lD"9 ..4ial :loln~. line oC dvht. )en... .. Popping ..n..tian of rivht kn... '0 Infl....tlan of rivht kn... t. r.~n ~ (~1b\ ~t. wl.ft ..blllation. . . bl rllault at the inJurleu aa ator...id, Phintift Sharan Folta .u.t.ined the tollcwinq 4."9..: a. 'laintiff 8hu"on Folta baa cufter.d ",ut will continue to Duffn 9E'.&t pain, .ufl.ring, lnoonveniAnc., ...............nt, ..ntal af\ll\lhh .,,4 . lna. or t1\. enjoy..nt ot 11t., .. Pl.alntlU IhaJ;lm Foltz bas .x~nded .nd ,,1'.1 b. raquLred to expan4 IU_ of .Oi'.Y for ..dlcAl and .ucql.;;al att.ontion, ho.pit.l hat lon, ..~1G&1 auppU.., cur9'lcal &'ppl ia2'lc.a, MAd' C21n.. and attendant ..rvlce,: G. PI.intiff Sharon 'Qlt.'. general health, .tt.n~h, and vitalIty hlv, be.n Impaired. 10. Dy rluther r...on of the i!,j"'-C'i.. ~. .,cOI'..~id., Plaintiff Rlohlr4 roltl h.. b.... 1..01 will in tto.. ,..t\l.... b. c1opl.'1v.d Of 1 con.g,~!~., con,~,.l aorvio.., ...i.t.ne. .n4 ao.panion.hip. . ,. 0 . " . . . . . . r SEP-16-97 TUE 0\:23 PM FAX 1<<), , 111\1 .' '. ~, Plaintiff. bring thla oct Ion 1,linat Dafandlnt If,l-Mart nor.., :tno, to recovlU d..a,.. In exo... of ~be ~url.dlGtion.l 11.lt ot TVanty-pl~. Tho~..". Dol1.ra ('25,OOO.oo~. 1l..pocUully ."haUtad, SMIGEL, AND:autSON 61 SACKS Dat.. q~'I\ - '1'1- IV, Attorn.y. for PlahUlf. ~ " . , '( ~ il ~ . , I I" ~ I' ! . i \ . I . I" " , , Exhibit B " ", " ' " ,.," PYS510 199'/,0.1936 Cumberland, ('ount Y Pl'othonotary' s Of f ice CIvIL Cd'""' Inquil'y FOLTZ SHARON ET AL (vs) WAL-MART STORES Page 1 INC Ftled.".",.: Time, , ".,.. . : Execution Date Jl,lry Trial.... Dlsposed Date, Higher Crt 1.: Higher Crt 2.: Ht.' t (! l.ell~':e No. . : Cas'~ Type, . . . .: COMPLAINT Judgment. , , , , , .00 Judge Assigned: Disposed Desc,: ------------ Case Comments --.---------- 9/1~/ 199'/ <1: 15 0/00/0000 0/00/0000 ***..*....******.......***..*.........................***..**............***.**. General Index Attorney Info FOLTZ SHARON PLAINTIFF FROMMER JOHN W 114 HILL LANE MECHANICSBURG PA 1705!? FOLTZ RICHARD PLAINTIFF FROMMER JOHN W 114 HILL LANE MECHANICSBURG PA 17055 WAL-MART STORES INC DEFENDANT MCDONNELL PATRICK J 6520 CARLISLE PIKE WINSTON DARYL W MECHANICSBURG PA 17055 ***...............**.......................**.....***.**.....*.****.........*... . Date Entries . ..****.........**....****..***..........**............**...*.............*****.. 9/11/1997 9/15/1997 10/17/1997 10/30/1997 12/24/1997 12/24/1997 3/13/1998 3/13/1.998 5/07/1998 12/14/1998 1/14/2000 1/14/2000 12/08/2000 12/08/2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - FIRST ENTRY - - - - - - . - - - - - - - COMPLAINT - CIVIL ACTION ~------------------------------------------~----------------------- SHERIFF'S RETURN FILED Litigant.: W~L-~RT STORES INC SERVED : 9/12 97 COMPL Costs,..,: $26. 0 Pd By: SMIGEL ANDERSON & SACKS 09/15/1997 ---------------------~--------------------------------------------- DEFENDANT WAL-MART STORES INC ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND NEW MATTER -----------.------------------------------------------------------- PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S NEW ~~TTER ------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - - - - - --- - -- - - -- - -- -- - -.. - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - --- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - -- PRAECIPE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT BY RICHARD L KREMNICK ESQ -----------------------------------------------------------..------- PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT BY PATRICK J MCDONNELL ESQ ------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFICATE PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22 ------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFICATE PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO RULE 4009,22 ------------------------------------------------------------------- P~AECIPE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT BY SILVERMAN COOPERSMITH & FRIMMER - PATRICK J MCDONNELL ESQ ------------------------------------------------------------------- PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR LAW OFFICE OF MCDONNELL & ASSOCIATES BY PATRICK J MCDONNELL ESQ ------------------------------------------------------------------- PRAECIPE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE - FOR DEFT BY COURTNEY A SEDA ESQ ATTY FOR DEFT ------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFT BY DARYL W WINSTON ESQ ATTY FOR DEFT - - - - - - - - - - . . -. LAST ENTRY - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ********..*.......*..***.....*..............*.......'..........**..............** . Escrow Information . · Fees & Debits Beo Bal Pvmts/Adi End Bal . *.*............**...***....*....~........~......~............................... COMPLAINT TAX ON CMPLT 35.00 ,50 35.00 ,50 ,00 .00 , ' -,., ,-. "- 1'1 i;'~ e: ) , I' , " .. i , , , .:,- ,n l , ,j " '\.I '.:- " '~'.j I. I ..., U " , , ," " 471)6~2.8/Pr:JL'ClpL'IJWF/psm May 7, 2002 12: II) PM SHARON FOLTZ AND RICHARD FOLTZ PLAIN'I'IH'S IN TH.: COURT OF COMMON PI.EAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA V. NO. 97-4936 CIVIl. W AL.MART STORES, INC. DEFENDANT CIVIL ACTION -. LAW PRAECIPE TO SETTLE AND DISCONTINUE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please mark the above-captioned case discontinued, Respectfully submitted, Date: ~ "A- I 'Z.~'2.- , BY: SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS -----" , ." , , ....