The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-0082CUMBERLAND COUNTY ADULT PROBATION VS. Daniel W. Dayhoff 338 Maple Lane Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTy PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 0 ~' ~ ov,~ CWIL TERM Defendant RE: NO. 02-1676 CRIMINAL TERM PRAECIPE TO ENTER JUDGMENT TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Enter judgment in favor of plaintiff, Cumberland County Adult Probation, and against Defendant in the amount of $19591.04 pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. Section 9728 as set forth in the attached statement of certified case costs and fines. Dennis E. Lebo, Clerk of Court Date: January 6, 2003 Attachment cc: Defendant Probation Clerk of Court E~NTRY OF JUDGMENT AND NOW, this_~h day of 30~ , ~-~judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defen~'orth above, is entered Curtis R. Long, Prothonotary 115239121202 CCS746 Case No. 2002-01676 *STATEMENT OF COSTS* To: Dennis E. Lebo Cumberland County _ 1 Courthouse SQuAre Carlisle, Pa I7013 Paqe 5 ~ 12~z12/200: Clerk of Courts ~YHOFF DANIEL W 38 MAPLE LANE CARLISLE, PA 17013 08/16/02 ~D~POSTING _ t Credit ---~~ ........... ~oca±s lb.00 .... 10/14/02 10/21/02 10/29/02 11/04/02 11/19/02 11/19/02 11/19/02 SHERIFFS COST Totals SHERIFFS COST Totals SHERIFFS COST Totals SHERIFFS COST Totals COURT COSTS Totals SHERIFFS COST Totals OFF F.E. ACT158 Totals 11/19/02 CCC ACT 139 Totals 11/19/02 CVC ACT 139 Totals 11/19/02 DVC - ACT 44 Totals 11/19/02 STATE COST A 15.00 34.14 34.14 2.21 2.21 12.00 12.00 4.42 4.42 22.17 22.17 1.50 1.50 5.00 5.00 25.00 25.00 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 10.13 15.00 15.00 34.14 34.14 2 -21 2.21 12 . O0 12. O0 4.42 4.42 22.17 22.17 1.50 1.50 5.00 5.00 25.00 25. O0 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 10.13 115239121202 CCS746 Case No. 2002-01676 *STATEMENT OF C * To: Dennis E. Lebo Cumberland County - 1 Courthouse SGu~re Carlisle, Pa f7013 Clerk of Pac[e 5' 12~ 12/200~ Courts ~6YHOFF DANIEL W 38 MAPLE LANE CARLISLE, PA 17013 ii/19/02 il/19/02 11/i9/02 11/19/02 11/19/02 11/19/02 12/03/02 12/06/02 12/06/02 12/06/02 12/11/02 Totals STATE COST B Totals JCP FEE Totals DISTRICT ATTY Totals PLEA Totals ~UTOMATION FEE otals NON-DUI CP COST Totals ADMIN. FEE Totals J/S RESTITUTION Totals J/S RESTITUTION Totals J/S RESTITUTION Totals ST - O.S.F. Totals 10.13 15.20 15.20 5.00 5.00 15.00 15.00 125.00 125.00 5.00 5.00 200.00 200.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 480.27 480.27 16424.00 16424.00 1037.50 1037.50 10.13 15.20 15.20 5.00 5.00 15.00 15.00 125.00 125.00 5.00 5.00 200.00 200.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 480.27 480.27 16424.00 16424.00 1037.50 1037.50 115239121202 CCS746 Case No. 2002-01676 ~6~HOFF DANIEL W 3~ MAPLE LANE CARLISLE, PA 17013 *STATEMENT OF COSTS* Pa([e 5~ ******************** 12;12/200; To: Dennis E. Lebo Cumberland County _ Clerk of Courts 1 Courthouse SQuare Carlisle, Pa I7013 12/11/02 CO - O.S.F. Totals Case Totals 1037.50 1037.50 19591.04 .00 1037.50 1037.50 19591.04 ........ You are liable for the above costs Pursuant to T PA CSA 97 ~tle 42 o .... 7-7 ................. ~pald co~ ~ ~t~onota~yJ~lary ~n~ J~dicial ................. uae Sherif~ ~c~su~ an e ....... utho~z~d n ~^~= procedure. .... ~ une col 1 .... ~n. ~1_~ same We trust you will ~ive the above account your prompt attention. A TRUE COPY FROM RECORD Testimony Whereof, I here unto set my hand and the seal of said Court at Carlisle, PA. r / er/and County GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff, ARNOLD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. Defendant. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : NO. 03-82 CIVIL TERM : : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COUNTERCLAIM OF ARNOLD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES~ INC. NOW COMES, Plaintiff, Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company ("Great- West"), by and through its attorneys, Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation, and files this Preliminary Objection to the Counterclaim of Defendant Arnold Transportation Services, Inc. ("Arnold") as follows: PRELIMINARY OBJECTION I: LEGAL INSUFFICIENCY OF A PLEADING (DEMURRER) 1. Great-West commenced this breach of contract and unjust enrichment action by Complaint on February 24, 2003 (the "Action"). 2. As a matter of background, Arnold entered into a contractual relationship with Great-West for the establishment and maintenance of Arnold's self-funded Employee Health and Welfare Benefit Plan (the "Plan"), effective January 1, 1997. (Complaint at ¶ 4). 3. Great-West's claim in the instant action arises out of Arnold's breach of the parties agreement and consists of medical claims satisfied by Great-West on behalf of Arnold's employees under the terms of Arnold's Plan. Complaint on April 7, 2003 (the "Answer"). Arnold filed its Answer, Counterclaims and New Matter to Great-West's 5. In its Answer, Arnold asserts a single counterclaim "in equi.W under Pennsylvania law seeking an accounting of the disputed $47,358.70." (Answer, Counterclaim at ¶ 1) (emphasis added). o · . the plaintiff possesses an adequate remedy at law." Mifflintown, 531 A.2d 1122, 1124 (Pa. Super. 1987). "Pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1530, an equitable accounting is not proper where. Buczek v. First National Bank of 7. Moreover, "[e]quitable jurisdiction for an accounting does not exist merely because the plaintiff desires information that he could obtain through discovery." Buczek v. First National Bank ofMifflintown, 531 A.2d 1122, 1124 (Pa. Super. 1987). 8. Arnold has not asserted in the Action that it is owed any sum or amount from Great-West. 9. Arnold asserts instead simply that "Plaintiff failed to provide Arnold with documentation to support [its claim for the disputed $47,358.70]." 10. Arnold's demand for an equitable accounting is thus in the nature of a defense or off-set as to Great-West's legal claims in the Action. 2 11. Arnold has an adequate remedy at law in this breach of contract and unjust enrichment Action. 12. Arnold can obtain the information it needs to defend against Great-West's claims through the normal discovery process. 13. Arnold's claims in equi ,ty for an accounting thus fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(4). See Buczek v. First National Bank of Mifflintown, 531 A.2d 1122, 1124 (Pa. Super. 1987). WHEREFORE, Great-West respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss Arnold's Counterclaim seeking an Accounting with prejudice and award Great-West its costs, attorneys' fees, and whatever further relief this Court deems just. Respectfully submitted, Date: April 25, 2003 BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By::~ Thomas G. Collins, Esquire I.D. No. 75896 Stephen Moniak, Esquire I.D. No. 80035 One South Market Sc[uare 213 Market Street, 3r~ Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 237-4800 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I am this day serving a copy of the foregoing document upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, by United States mail, first class, postage prepaid upon: James N. Boudreau Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2921 G. Scott Paterno Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP One Commerce Square 417 Walnut Street Harrisburg, PA 17101-1904 Date: April 25, 2003 BUCHANAN INGERSOLL ~AL CORPORATION Thomas G. Collins, Esquire