HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-05775
~.
~
-
~
It
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
"
-4..
'l;
~
~
~
~
/
e'l
I,
, I . i /..
POST & SCIIELL, P.C,
BY: LA WRENCE F. BARONE, ESQUIRE
\.D. # 68921
101 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PA 17101
(717) 232-5931
FAX: (717) 232-9274
TILDEN BRANDT and
JA Y BRANDT, her husband
ATTORNEYS FOR DEfHNDANTS
JERRY LAUGIIMAN and
COREY CIIESTNUT
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff,
v.
NO, 97-5775
JERRY LAUGHMAN and
COREY CHESTNUT
CIVIL ACTION. LAW
Defendant.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please enter my appearance for Defendants, Jerry Laughman and Corey Chestnut, in the
above-captioned case,
Respectfully fiubmincd.
P T & S HI;1l,P:~
r )
d'~
A RENCE F. BARONE, ESQUIRE
Co un el for Defendants
Date: It \21.; /1\'1
10117/HH2H llrundl
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Denise M, Valente, an employee for the law firm Post & Schell, p,c., hereby state that
a true and correct copy of the foregoing Entry of Appearance was served upon all counsel of rucord by
first class United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows, on the date set forth below:
Bv First Class u.S. Mail:
David Lutz, Esquire
ANGINO & ROVNER, P,C,
4503 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
./ POST & SCHELL, P,C.
~y(~,Jy,
Denise M. Valente
("> Iql
Dated: 1/ (. (;I .
"
q .f) q
f;J ..,
(:'1 ,
"'-I" 1"1 I :')
If, (4) , :f,'j
..,
. I ,I"~
Ii
,I'
."[' .,
... 1'1 .
lIlt I
.. I
.. I
, '.' "
I 'II
, 0' ...." i
i
,
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO. 1997-05775 P
COKKONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
COUNTY OF CUKBERLAND
BRANDT TILDEN ET AL
VS,
LAUGHKAN JERRY ET AL
KENNETH E. GOSSERT . Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
CUKBERLAND County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according
to law, says, the within COKPLAINT
upon LAUGHKAN JERRY
defendant, at 1850.00 HOURS, on the ~ day of November
192Z at SPRING GARDEN ESTATE LOT 8
CARLISLE. PA 17013
County, Pennsylvania, by handing to KYRTLE
OF DEFT & PERSON IN CHARGE
a true and atteRted copy of the COKPLAINT
together with NOTICE
and at the same time direoting ~ attention to the contents thereof,
was served
the
.CUKBERLAND
LAUGHKAN. GRANDKOTHER
.
Sheriff's Costs I
Docketing
Servioe
Affidavit
Surcharge
18,00
3.10
.00
2.00
So anll~r"., ,/.
~ '/ ,,~.
:r ......;;.....".,.'-;..<.c/~
H. ". hamas K~1n., ~n.r1%%
823.1~ ANGINO AND
11/10/1997
by
ROVNER
c~ fu
.J. ..........
U ljOL {J'!,';
ueputy l>her1ff
Sworn and 8ubsoribed to before me
th1s 10 ~ day of "1U.".".J~
19 fl, A.D.
~ 9ro/t;r;~~'(.~.
~
1~~6ft&WOYNii:;:c:t~11~.
t;',,"....:.; .!: ..... ;UOHIORTH 'RClN" ITIlII'" '.. .::.'. .....':.1
;~\"\~'LL:~'_""}-"}:"";~~~{':~'~/;<':'''''~::;: ''':' , ,':i;;:J;fl!~
;""~;"_ri"Y';.T__.,__1;if"""~..~~;..,.~!+'5'Mjo;-,-::';"';'"".l"",,,,\>c:,;;r'~~.f;;"1_tc,,.-r:0!:.,,~\,~- '~_~;;}:0~;~;:,t.,; ,". -, - ",,'
;<-:;;::.,~^""'_.,.,,...,'.... ....<;;Wf~=,"'_'li"<-._~-'=~..""2'_~" --" -~" - ;'~X::::::~~-'t,,;~;.,
"
...
.
.
.,
,
,
,
:......
~
--t.-~._ _
.- ;'.,~..
VS.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO.
l
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY BRANDT, her husband
Plaintiffs
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICIA
Le han demandado a usted en la corte. Si usted quiere
defenderse de estas demandas expuestas en las paginas sugnuientes,
usted tiene viente (20) dias de plaza al partir de la fecha de la
demanda y la notificacion. Usted debe presentar una apariencia
escrita 0 en persona 0 par abogado y archivar en la corte en forma
escrita sus defensas 0 sus objeciones alas demandas en contra de
su persona. Sea avisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte
tomara medidas y puede entrar una orden contra usted sin previa
aviso 0 notificacion y par cualquier queja 0 alivio que es pedido
en la peticion de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero 0 sus
propiedades 0 otros derechos importantes para usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABOGADO IMMEDIATEMENTE. SI NO TIENE
ABOGADO 0 SI NO TIENE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR TAL SERVICIO,
VAYA EN PERSONA 0 LLAME POR TELEFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA DIRECCION SE
ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEGUIR
ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
Court Administrator
4th Floor
Cumberland County Courthouse
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 240-6200
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY BRANDT, her husband
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. (1'7 - .'5"'J 7 y' 0.,;.,( ~.-
vs.
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiffs Tilden and Jay Brandt are adult
individuals who reside at 44 Brandt Lane, Newville, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Jerry Laughman is an adult individual who
resides at Spring Garden Estate Lot 8, Carlisle, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
3. Defendant Corey Chestnut is an adult individual who
resides at 99 Doubling Gap Road, Newville, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
4. The facts and occurrences hereinafter related took
place on or about July 28, 1996, at approximately 8:25 p.m. on
South High Street, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
5. At that time and place, Mrs. Brandt was operating
her 1990 Cadillac, in a northbound direction on South High Street
and was stopped in a line of traffic at the intersection of South
High Street and Main Street.
1
6. At the same time, Defendant Laughman was operating
a 1987 Ford XLT pick-up truck in a northbound direction on South
High Street and was stopped in front of Mrs. Brandt's vehicle.
7. Defendant Chestnut owned the 1987 Ford XLT pick-up
truck.
8. Defendant Chestnut provided Defendant Laughman
permission to drive his pick-up truck when he knew or should have
known that Defendant Laughman's operating privileges were suspended
and that Defendant Laughman was intoxicated and unable to safely
operate the vehicle.
9. Defendant Laughman reversed his vehicle and caused
the rear of the pick-up truck to collide with the front portion of
Mrs. Brandt's stationa~y vehicle.
10. Defendant Laughman was intoxicated when he reversed
his vehicle on South High Street that resulted in the collision
with Mrs. Brandt's vehicle.
11. Defendant Laughman knew or should have known that
operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated would endanger persons
operating and occupying motor vehicles on South High Street.
COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE
Tilden and Jav Brandt v. Jerrv Lauqhman
12. Paragraphs 1 through 11 of the Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference.
13. The foregoing accident and all of the injuries and
damages set forth hereinafter sustained by Plaintiffs Tilden and
2
Jay Brandt are the direct and proximate result of the negligent,
careless, wanton and reckless manner in which Defendant Laughman
operated his motor vehicle as follows:
a. failure to keep alert and maintain a proper
watch for the presence of other motor vehicles behind him;
b. failure to apply his brakes in sufficient time
to avoid striking the front of Plaintiffs' vehicle;
c. failure to keep a proper watch for vehicles
behind him when he reversed his vehicle;
d. failure to keep proper and adequate control
over his vehicle; and
e. driving his vehicle upon the highway in a
manner endangering persons and property and in a reckless
manner with careless disregard to the rights and safety of
others b}' driving a vehicle while extremely intoxicated and in
violation of the Motor Vehicle Code of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
COUNT II - PUNITIVE DAMAGES
Tilden and Jav Brandt v. Jerrv Lauqhman
14. Paragraphs 1 through 13 of the Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference.
15. Before the subject motor vehicle accident, Defendant
Laughman was consuming alcoholic beverages.
16. Defendant Laughman knew or should have known that he
was intoxicated and unable to safely operate a motor vehicle.
17. Defendant Laughman knew or should have known that
his conduct of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
constituted outrageous conduct and a reckless indifference to the
rights of others on the highway.
3
lB. Defendant Lau3hman knew or should have known that
operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated created a high degree
of risk of injury to other persons on the highway and in fact, he
did cause a collision resulting in serious personal injury.
COUNT III - NEGLIGENCE
Tilden and Jav Brandt v. Corev Chestnut
19. Paragraphs 1 through lB of the Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference.
20. Defendant Corey Chestnut provided permission to
Defendant Laughman to operate his 19B7 Ford XLT pick-up truck when
Defendant Chestnut knew and/or should have known that Defendant
Laughman's operating privileges were suspended and that Defendant
Laughman was intoxicated and unable to safely operate the vehicle.
21. Notwithstanding the fact that Defendant Chestnut
knew and/or should have known that Defendant Laughman did not
possess a valid driver's license and was intoxicated, Defendant
Chestnut provided Defendant Laughman permission to drive his
vehicle and negligently entrusted his vehicle to Defendant
Laughman.
22. Defendant Chestnut knew or should have known that it
was foreseeable that Defendant Laughman would cause a motor vehicle
accident inasmuch as Defendant Laughman was intoxicated and that
prior to the aforesaid July 2B, 1996, motor vehicle accident,
Defendant Laughman'S operating privileges had been suspended.
4
COUNT IV - PUNITIVE DAMAGES
Tilden and Jav Brandt v. Corev Chestnut
23. Paragraphs 1 through 22 of the Complaint are
t"';'
incorporated herein by reference.
24. Before the subject motor vehicle accident, Defendant
Chestnut knew and/or should have known that Defendant Laughman was
,
~ ,
, -
consuming alcoholic beverages.
25. Defendant Chestnut knew and/or should have known
,
I'
I
J
i
i
I
,
I
I
I
,
!
I
I
i
(
,
I
!
that Defendant Laughman, because of his intoxicated state, was
unablp. to safely operate Defendant Chestnut's motor vehicle.
26. Defendant Chestnut knew or should have known that
Defendant Laughman was intoxicated when granted permission to
operate his motor vehicie and such conduct constituted outrageous
conduct and a reckless indifference to the rights of others on the
highway.
27. Defendant Chestnut knew or should have known that
Defendant Laughman, operating his motor vehicle while intoxicated,
created a high degree of risk of injury to other persons on the
highway and in fact, he did cause a collision resulting in serious
personal injury.
CLAIM I
Tilden Brandt v. Jerrv Lauahman and Corev Chestnut
28. Paragraphs 1 through 27 of the Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference.
....
5
29. Plaintiff Tilden Brandt sustained painful and severe
injuries which include but are not limited to C6-C7 radiculopathy,
cervical spine/strain, right shoulder pain, low back pain, upper
back muscle contusion, cervical muscle contusion, and possible
reflex sympathetic dystrophy, as well as carpel tunnel syndrome.
30. By reason of the aforesaid injuries sustained by
Mrs. Brandt, she was forced to incur liability for medical
treatment, medications, hospital treatment, physical therapy, and
similar miscellaneous expenses in an effort to restore herself to
health, and claim is made therefor.
31. Because of the nature of her injuries, Mrs. Brandt
has been advised and, therefore, avers that she may be forced to
incur similar expenses in the future, and claim is made therefor.
32. As a result of the aforementioned injuries, Mrs.
Brandt has undergone and in the future will undergo physical and
mental suffering, inconvenience in carrying out her daily
activities, loss of life's pleasures and enjoyment, and claim is
made therefor.
33. As a result of the aforesaid injuries, Mrs. Brandt
has been and in the future will be subject to humiliation and
embarrassment, and claim is made therefor.
34. Mrs. Brandt continues to be plagued by persistent
pain and limitation and, therefore, avers that her injuries may be
of a permanent nature, causing residual problems for the remainder
of her lifetime, and claim is made therefor.
6
CLAIM II
Jav Brandt v. Jerrv Lauahman and Corev Chestnut
35. Paragraphs 1 through 34 of the Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference.
36. As a result of the aforementioned injuries sustained
by his wife, Tilden Brandt, Plaintiff Jay Brandt has been and may
in the future be deprived of the care, companionship, consortium,
and society of his wife, all of which will be to his great
detriment, and claim is made therefor.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Tilden and Jay Brandt demand judgment
against Defendants Jerry Laughman and Corey Chestnut in an amount
in excess of Twenty-five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars for
compensatory and punitive damages exclusive of interest and costs
and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory
arbitration.
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
Date: ID \J6lll
(~' ,Il (!t"
W'\ '\ '("
avid L. utz
I.D. #35956
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 238-6791
Counsel for Plaintiffs
7
VERIFICATION
We, Tilden and Jay Brandt, Plaintiffs, have read the foregoing
COMPLAINT and do hereby swear or affirm that the facts set forth in
the foregoing are true and correct co the best of our knowledge,
information and belief. We understand that this Verification is
made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4904,
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
WITNESS:
. .
<~~_;:. ._.IJT-)
~. ,~..Jj
-
~tMrc) ~ &-~
Tilden Bran t .
;/4 -!~t
rl rd ~,_-I~
~andt
Dated: tJc1;'. 7, /9'17
~ (~ r-:>
. ~
c--:-. }t ,
- I ....
.;:;:;
~
i">
\.....0
-..l,J4::)
\N~
'-\..
~
~
~
c:J
CJ
C' :.~ ;')
,
;-"j
.
,
-
. .
. -~'l
i -.
l....
" .~'\
- ;
,
:._1 ,Ill
. ;
~:.
.:1
f .' ~..",
[
~\ ~
'-.i', ~~
~ \' \,,'\
r:'
vs.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 97-05775 Civil
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY BRANnT, her husband
Plaintiffs
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
i
I .
t
PLAINTIFFS' REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT CHESTNUT
To: Corey Chestnut, by and through his attorney
Lawrence F. Barone, Esquire
Post & Schell, P.C.
101 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Please take notice that you are hereby required, pursuant to
Rule 4014 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 36), to serve upon the undersigned within
thirty (30) days from service, your response to the admission(s}
requested herein:
1. Do you admit that on July 28, 1996, you owned a 1987
Ford XLT pick-up truck?
Admit
Deny
2. Do you admit that you provided Jerry Laughman
permission to operate your 1987 Ford XLT pick-up truck?
Admit
Deny ____
124160/MTG
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino &
Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
CHESTNuT upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class
United States mail addressed as follows:
Lawrence F. Barone, Esquire
Post & Schell, P.C.
101 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Attorney for Defendants
I~ '0/.~.1
G"
,
I 4-
lfl/ll/ L'
peraets
( "
,
Mary T.
Dated: )).~r- en
n .0 0
~.;:; ...J -:1
.:.... .~ J
.. ,1' ..
'n
[ . 'J I I~
I "
C; ! ;)
~ .. .~
.';",:! ,
-n
, I ~ i
f"j , n
.. "
..- .": ~1
:..: I ..., =<
~
:-;.
(717) ltIN781
~;,~,jJ::'\
"
,!ft~;' ,
"~:~:~t~;)i)'._:~,;'7"-:;~f':';:':_-- .",- .' "~,,:--,_,:;:,,,'-<-.:_Y ','.
.. . NGINO ':ROVMJR.P.C~.b{2i"
,:~!" ;'i" tlOllT" '''OIfT ITRUT: ',:':\,),
'. '.'. "A"Rl"URG, PA 17110:'.": '"
1-,', ','--'
--:;:
-
1;;. ....-,;..:.,""i-i,"'rFvi~i..-,.,~.:i"",..,"
".,~-~-," -..,.
"-,:,"-
,
...
.
~
,
f
....- --~:.--- .
\
;..
~
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY B~~DT, her husband
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 97-05775 Civil
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PLAINTIFFS' REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT LAUGHMAN
To: Jerry Laughman, by and through his attorney
Lawrence F. Barone, Esquire
Post & Schell, P.C.
101 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
please take notice that you are hereby required, pursuant to
Rule 4014 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal
Rules of civil Procedure 36), to serve upon the undersigned within
thirty (30) days from service, your response to the admission(s)
requested herein:
1. Do you admit that on July 28, 1996, you were
operating Corey Chestnut's 1987 Ford XLT pick-up truck?
Admit
Deny _
2. Do you admit that on July 28, 1996, you were
operating Corey Chestnut's 1987 Ford XLT pick-up truck on South
High Street, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania?
Admit
Deny _
12H62/MTG
3. Do you admit that on July 28, 1996, at approximately
8:25 p.m., you were involved in a motor vehicle accident with Mrs.
Tilden Brandt?
Admi t Deny
4. Do you admit that at the time of the subject motor
vehicle accident you were intoxicated?
Admit
Deny
Date: p ,q.Q7
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
~LU"
1.0. 1135956
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 238-6791
Counsel for plaintiff
(', '" 0
c: -I on
"., "'I
. , 1 ., -!
, " .')
I -n
:)
(...: , , .-.,
.-. " ,
- 'J
.' "
f'., 'J' "
"
.' r- ::. ~
:) I" '-,
~
..::
>. -^.ti#~;,/~j;cr.,,;~;, ,:~~/:-.::~-- ,<: { f)it. ;' y~,-;': .,-~:>S~~;-;>: -:"; ,bi' r. j_'c~',
""'"!KGINOAROVNEI 'p C'~ ;.;!,.;"
..': >.,?,'" ~,::;:r;f'450' NO~~ 'RONT aT~II; ,.....<':c.
.:",,~':.:~.',:.'. .. ". HARRISaURG, ",\ 17110
~}~:xt:~~:.,,~,~,,-<,<., pm....
....,;i'~1~~t
"':
,.
...
.
~
,
"
1
!
,
..
I
j......
,,;..:;;..--:..,....-
\
-+--'"
..,.- -,J-C-_".:C'-...
.. -
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY BRANDT, her husband
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 97.05775 Civil
vs.
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT COREY CHESTNUT - SET 2
Plaintiffs request that Defendant Corey Chestnut admit, pursuant to the provisions of
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, the matters set forth below.
The facts set forth below shall be deemed admitted unless Defendant Corey Chestnut
serves upon Plaintiffs' attorney, a sworn answer or objection within thirty (30) deys after
Defendant Corey Chestnut is served with this Request for Admissions.
If an objection is made to any fact whose admission is requested, the reason for that
objection shall be stated.
Each answer shall admit or deny the matter or set forth in detail the reason(s) why an
admission or denial cannot truthfully be made.
A denial 01 any matter shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission.
When good faith requires Defendant to qualify his answer. or deny only a part of the
matter of which an admission is requested, the Defendant shall specify so much of the
requested admission as is truth and qualify or deny the remainder.
Defendant may not give lack of knowledge or information as e reason for failure to
admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information
, . . ' . _._~..
. ,
, .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Candice M. Baker, an employee of the lew firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby
certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR
ADMISSIONS DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT COREY CHESTNUT - SET 2, upon all counsel of
record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows:
Lawrence F. Barone, Esquire
Post & Schell, P.C.
101 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Attorney for Defendants
..."
Dated:
rLL{:2n.~
\...0"" Candice M. Baker
n In 0
(~.. r.1:l ~O'I
, ..,
'"1:"1_1: 1-. 'I'~
[');, ",,:)
';;, .nl
.. :}'?
,.> <.-',..,
r-.:; -'J '::iJ
., -. ::1.: !;:"1
, , , ljl 11
" ~,.. :...l
.. ,;
t:" ~~
=< 'Jl
'n
,;t'~.4~:.j:.:~t~t:L<>,;,~ '~':fi&\.~~~;;',';"';z.~,><. ,.\,
~~~~;~:~>
':~_;_c""
~ ~, , '"" _, _. "'. i~'
,,)~:!dJ~' ~~,. ;j,}; T . . ~,;V' i,\ '>' j' .t.'~ - r ~,' :~~w ., ~ ~ "N~Jta
.....J'_~ -J'J, <4h-' : . . ~t.- ,~:d .. j:,c<' . f ~,.,,", ,",'{~~.:d,~",:;- ("\-Pi:
\i'ANGINO'(, ROVNlI, P.Ct~..:::,~,:~:.
4.01 IoI0ATII'..OrtrITII.lr.. _ :, ,;:
' 'HA....I..U..II, I'A I7t to
,.......;
, 1717)"""
,
~; ~:::,~t~"",,::
, :' \~~:~~
..~ "-H:\IH~ii,
>:::'_I"i;/v~,;;~'~',€~:;:v1~~Iii~~V'
-ff....
t
.".
.
.
,
"
!
i
I
I
"
\
\
!
,..-.
~
,.-- ~ .--.- -
/-."--:"'. "-'.:":'.
,.
-'-,'
.-
\
./.-:
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY BRANDT, her husband
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANI.l\.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. S7-05775 civil
vs.
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Defendants
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' NEW MATTER
5. through 15. Denied.
The Defendants have failed to set
forth factual allegations that require the plaintiff to admit
and/or deny said allegations. The factual allegations contained in
the Plaintiff's Complaint are herein incorporated by reference.
All of the allegations contained in the Defendants' New Matter are
all conclusions of law to which no response is necessary.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiff pray that the Defendants' New Matter
be dismissed.
Date: ,~ d.l.e-~~
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
Qtrtu'"
I. D. 1135956
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 238-6791
Counsel for Plaintiff
126B62/MTG
-....'
.
,
~
q
,.t" n
;.:> "
,- ::;1
" . - ~\.,
,If;;'
r....') ',rl1
C)
._J ,
'()
" , '-1'
:rJ
:CJ
i} :".Id
"',
I'~ ~.> ~I.
",
"
,
,
i
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
TILDEN BRANDT and
JAY BRANDT, her husband
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 97-05775 civil
JERRY LAUGHMAN and COREY
CHESTNUT,
Defendants
,JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE
To the Prothonotary of Cumberland County:
please mark the above-captioned action settled, satisfied, and
discontinued.
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
Date: C;, l~ Ji'i
cc Lawrence Barone, Esquire
~ Lutz
I.D. #35956
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 238-6791
Counsel for Plaintiffs
,/
121919/MTG
OR\G\NAL
'-.
"
L
~ '\
I
r,!
, ,-
L;
./
"
".
,-;
:-J
J u ! I I ~ , 00
".i'Oall