HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-0343NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 87380
35 EAST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 243-6090
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
..
: NO. 2003 - -~ ~/~_~ CIVIL TERM
_.
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR A WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please enter my appearance on behalf of the plaintiff and issue a writ of
summons upon the defendants. The defendants are:
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD.
920 CENTURY DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL
503 NORTH 21sT STREET
CAMP HILL, PA 17011
~~~~, ~QUIRE
S/~lSre[~:;ourt ID. # 87380
35-EaSt High Street, Suite 201 / 202
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
WRIT OF SUMMONS
SHEILA SLATER
Plaintiff
Vs.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD
920 CENTURY DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055
AND
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL
503 NORTH 21sT STREET
CAMP HILL, PA 17011
Defendant
Court of Common Pleas
No. 03-343
In CivilAction-Law
To BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. AND HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL
You are hereby notified that SHEILA K. SLATER
the Plaintiff has / have commenced an action in Civil Action-Law against you which
you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you.
(SEAL)
Date 1/22/03
Attorney:
Name: NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
SUPREME COURT ID # 87380
Address:
CURTIS R. LONG
Prothonotary
v/- -Deputy '
35 EAST HIGH STREET, SUITE 201/202
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 243-6090
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please enter my appearance on behalf of defendant
connection with the above-captioned matter.
Holy Spirit Hospital, only, in
Date: January 30, 2003 By:
ME~ .F~, E~A~ S & WOODSIDE, P.C.
i~a;gl~'~°nel ~qmre No4hFr,
3401 d~nt Street
isbu~g,
Harr: ~ !7110
7i7-232-:
Attorney~r0Defendant Holy Spirit
Hospital
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day, I hereby certify that I am serving a copy of the foregoing document
upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements
of the Pennsylvania Rules for Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of the same in the United
States Mail, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with first-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 East High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Personal & Confidential
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
Neurological Surgery, Ltd.
920 Century Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Risk Manager
Neurological Surgery, Ltd.
920 Century Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
METT
Cr~[;~ S
k WOODSIDE, PC
~e, ~Esquire
Date: JanUary 30, 2003
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
PLEASE ISSUE a Rule upon the Plaintiff to file a Complaint against Defendant Holy
Spirit Hospital within twenty (20) days after service thereof, or suffer judgment of non pros as
provided in Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1037(a).
Date: January 30, 2003 By:
ME~El NS&~)ODSIDE, P.C.
Craig ~ StoI , ~~
ID #1,07 /
3401 Nd[rth l~ront Street
Harrisb gt~/P, A17110
717-23Z-5000
Attorneys for Defendant Holy Spirit
Hospital
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day, I hereby certify that I am serving a copy of the foregoing document
upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements
of the Pennsylvania Rules for Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of the same in the United
States Mail, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with first-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 East High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Personal & Confidential
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
Neurological Surgery, Ltd.
920 Century Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Risk Manager
Neurological Surgery, Ltd.
920 Century Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Date: January 30, 2003
METRE[EV/~S& WOODSIDE, PC
~~. ~tolffe, Esquire
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff
Vo
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
RULE
TO:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 East High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Counsel for Plaintiff
A RULE is hereby issued upon the Plaintiff to file a Complaint against Defendant Holy
Spirit Hospital within twenty (20) days after service hereof, or suffer a judgment of non pros.
DATED:
- PROTHONOTARY (57-
:316683 1
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILASLATER,
Plaintiff,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Vo
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION LAW
:
: JURY TRIJ~ DEi~qDED
PRAECIPE TO ENTER APPEARANCE
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Kindly enter our appearance as counsel on behalf of
Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., in the above-captioned matter.
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Leigh A.J Esquire
Attorney I. . No. 53229
Attorney fo Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PRAECIPE TO ENTER APPEARANCE was served upon counsel of
record this 31st day of January, 2003, by depositing said copy
in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage
prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Holy Spirit Hospital
503 N. 21st Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESS IONAL CORPORATION
B~rb~es~al
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Please issue a Rule upon Plaintiff to file a Complaint
within twenty (20) days from service hereof or suffer judgment
non pros.
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Leigh A. ~J. ~li~lre
Attorney I~. No. 53229
RULE
TO THE PLAINTIFF:
You are hereby ordered and directed to file your Complaint
against Defendants in the above-captioned matter within twenty
(20) days of service of this Rule against you or suffer judgment
non pros. ~ ~
Date: ~~ ~. ~6~5k~ ~/~~'~ ~
' - P~0thonotary, Cun~er~ County
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT was served upon
counsel of record this 31st day of January, 2003, by depositing
said copy in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
postage prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Holy Spirit Hospital
503 N. 21st Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
By:
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2003-00343 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
SLATER SHEILA K
VS
MOORE BARRY B MD ET AL
HAROLD WEARY , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon
MOORE BARRY B MD the
DEFENDANT
at NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY LTD
, at 1206:00 HOURS, on the 27th day of January
920 CENTURY DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055
JANE FOLTZ, ADMINISTP~ATOR
a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS
, 2003
by handing to
ADULT IN CHARGE
together with
and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Service
Affidavit
Surcharge
18 O0
9 66
O0
10 O0
O0
37 66
Sworn and Subscribed to before
me this ~0~{ day of
~ ~ c~DO~ r A.D.
~ ~~on~tary ~
So Answers:
R. Thomas Kline
01/28/2003
HAROLD IRWIN III
By:
%e~puty~ f f
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2003-00343 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
SLATER SHEILA K
VS
MOORE BARRY B MD ET AL
HAROLD WEARY , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL the
DEFENDANT , at 1406:00 HOURS, on the 27th day of January
at 503 NORTH 21ST STREET
CAMP HILL, PA 17011
GREG DONATO, SECURITY
a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS
, 2003
by handing to
SUPERVISOR, ADULT IN CHARGE
together with
and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing 6.00
Service 10.35
Affidavit .00
Surcharge 10.00
.00
26.35
Sworn and Subscribed to before
me this 30~ day of
~~~. X06~ A.D.
So Answers:
R. Thomas Kline
01/28/2003
HAROLD IRWIN III
By: ~ ~ ?-~,
Deputy S~riff
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATsR,
Plaintiff,
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant
Barry B. Moore, M.D
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Kindly file of record the attached Certificate of Service of
the Prothonotary,s Rule to File Complaint.
Date:
By:
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESS IONAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT dated January 31, 2003 entered
by the Prothonotary of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania on
February 3, 2003 was served upon counsel of record this 5th
day
of February, 2003, by depositing said copy in the United States
Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESS IONAL CORPORATION
BY:Bet~. Forbe
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PRAECIPE TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE was served
upon counsel of record this 5th day of February, 2003, by
depositing said copy in the United States Mail at Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class delivery, and
addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Mette, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESS IONAL CORPORATION
Beth . Forbes
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff
Vo
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CML ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TO: PROTHONOTARY
Kindly file of record the attached Certificate of Setwice of the Prothonotary's Rule to
File Complaint.
Date: ~' ' By:
Respectfully submitted,
Cra: ~,,~ ,n~,~j~&i~ire
ID #159
3401 Nor Front Street
Harrisbm 'PA 17110
717-232-5000
Attorneys for Defendant Holy Spirit
Hospital
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
RULE
IN THE C()URT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
TO:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 East High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Counsel for PlainHff
A RULE is hereby issued upon the Plaintiff to file a Complaint against Defendant Holy
Spirit Hospital within twenty (20) days after service hereof, or suffer a judgment of non pros.
DATED:
PROTHONOTAi~ ~ ~ ~7-/O~
:316683 _1
TRUE COPY FROM RECORD
T~r~no~y whe~, i hm~e u~t~ ~t my ~
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day, I hereby certify that a true and correct certified copy of the
foregoing Rule to File a Complaint dated January 30, 2003, was served upon counsel of record
for the plaintiff by letter dated February 4, 2003, addressed to Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, 35 East
High Street, Suite 201/202, Carlisle, PA 17013 by depositing said copy in the United States Mail,
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with first-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Date:
ME' ~,~
ig . ~to~
)ODSIDE, PC
Esquire
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day, I hereby certify that I am serving a copy of the foregoing document
upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements
of the Pennsylvania Rules for Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of the same in the United
States Mail, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with first-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 East High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Michael Navitsky, Esquire
Navitsky, Olson & Wisneski
2040 Linglestown Road, Suite 303
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
Foulkrod Ellis
1800 Linglestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Date:
METT]
IO~DSIDE, PC
i'
Esquire
:328175 _1
CERTIFICATE
PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA
PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
IN THE MATTER OF:
SHEILA K. SLATER
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
TERM,
-VS-
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D., ET AL
CASE NO: 03-343
AS a prerequisite to service of a subpoena for documents and things pursuant
to Rule 4009.22
MCS on behalf of AARON S. JAYMAN, ESQ.
certifies that
(i)
A notice of intent to serve the subpoena with a copy of the subpoena
attached thereto was mailed or delivered to each party at least
twenty days prior to the date on which the subpoena is sought to be
served,
(2) A copy of the notice of intent, including the proposed subpoena, is
attached to this certificate,
(3) No objection to the subpoena has been received, and
(4) The subpoena which will be served is identical to the subpoena which
is attached to the notice of intent to serve the subpoena.
DATE: 06/12/2003
Attorney for DEFENDANT
DEI1-421636 5 1 1 30 --LO 1
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
IN THE MATTER OF:
SHEILA K. SLATER
BARRY B. MOORE,
-VS-
M.D., ET AL
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
TERM,
CASE NO: 03-343
NOTICE OF I~-,-~aTT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE ~S AND
'1'~ ~OK DISC~)VERY PUI~UZ~TT TO RrU.R 4009.21
CAROL R. ROBINSON, D.0.
MEDICAL RECORDS
TO: NATHAN WOLF, ESQ.
CRAIG STONE, ESQ.
MCS on behalf of AARON S. JAYMAN, ESQ. intends to serve a subpoena
identical to the one that is attached to this notice. You have twenty (20)
days from the date listed below in which to file of record and serve upon the
undersigned an objection to the subpoena. If the twenty day notice period is
waived or if no objection is made, then the subpoena may be served. Complete
copies of any reproduced records may be ordered at your expense by completing
the attached counsel card and returning same to MCS or by contacting our local
MCS office.
DATE: 05/23/2003
CC: AARON S. JAYMAN, ESQ.
KEITH RICILqRD
- 3441
- 33898401
Any questions regarding this matter, contact
MCS on behalf of
AARON S. JAYMAN, ESQ.
Attorney for DEFENDANT
THE MCS GROUP INC.
1601 MARKET STREET
#800
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
(215) 246-0900
DE02-227680 5 113 O --CO2
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
SHEILA K. SLATER
VS.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D., ET AL
File No.
03-343
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS OR THINGS
FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.27
TO: Custodian of Records for CAROL K. ROBINSON.
(Name of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to produce the following
documents or things: MEDICAL RECORDS
at The MCS Groun. Inc.. 1601 Market Street Suite g00. Philadelohia. PA 1910~3
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the documents or produce things requested by this subpoena, together
with the certificate of compliance, to the party making this request at the address listed above. You have the right
to seek, in advance, the reasonable cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sought.
If you fail to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena within twenty (20) days a/~er its service,
the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order compelling you to comply with it.
THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOLLOWING PERSON:
NAME: AARON S. JAYMAN. ESO.
ADDRESS: 1800 LINGLESTOWN RD,
SUITE 305
HARRISBURG.. PA 17110
TELEPHONE: 717-213-4200
SUPREME COURT ID #:
ATTORNEY FOR:
Date:
Seal of the Court
BY THE, COURT:
otary/Clerk, C~vil~ivision
Dep/~ty~
51130-01
EXPLANATION OF REQUIRED RECORDS
TO: CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR:
CAROL K. ROBINSON, D.O.
GRAHAM MEDICAL CLINIC, PC
100 S. HIGH STREET
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
RE: 51130
SHEILA K. SLATER
Entire medical file, including but not limited to any and all records,
correspondence to and from the consulting and treating physicians, fries,
memoranda, handwritten notes, history and physical reports, medication/
prescription records, including any and all such items as may be stored in a
computer database or otherwise in electrohic form, relating to any examination,
diagnosis or treatment pertaining to:
Dates Requested: up to and including the present.
Subject :SHEILA K. SLATER
323 SPRING GARDEN STREET, CARLISLE, PA 17103
Social Security #: 16644-7974
Date of Birth: 10-30-1952
SU10-443484 5 · · 3 0 --~',0 ·
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore. M.D.
IN THE COURT OF COb~ON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
and
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PENNSYLVANIA
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER JUDGMENT NON PROS PURSUANT TO
PA.R.C.P. 237.1(a) (2)
TO: Sheila Slater
c/o: Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
DATE OF NOTICE: July 15,
2003
IMPORTANT NOTICE
YOU ARE IN DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU HAVE FAILED TO FILE A
COMPLAINT IN THIS CASE. UNLESS YOU ACT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU
WITHOUT A HEARING AND YOU MAY LOSE YOUR RIGHT TO SUE THE
DEFENDANTS ~ THEREBY LOSE PROPERTY OR OTHER IMPORTANT RIGHTS.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS NOTICE TO A LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
FOLLOWING OFFICE TO FIND OUT W~ERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP:
Lawyer Referral Service
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Leigh A.J.~ll~s~?~squ~ire
Attorney I/~. No. 53229
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER JUDGMENT NON PROS PURSUAI~T TO
PA.R.C.P. 237.1(a) (2) was served upon counsel of record this
15th day of July, 2003, by depositing said copy in the United
States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first
class delivery, and addressed as follows:
35
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
Michael J. Navitsky, Esquire
Navitsky, Olson & Wisneski
2040 Linglestown Road
Harrisburg, PA 17110
FOULKROD ELLIS
PRO~SSIONAL CORPORATION~ l
Beth E. Forbes/ Paralegal
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 87380
35 EAST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 243-6090
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE~ M.D. and,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 2003 - 323 CIVIL TERM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE TO DEFEND
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims
set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this
Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a wdtten appearance personally or by
attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set
forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without
you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for
any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the
Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
32 SOUTH BEDFORD STREET
CARLISLE, PA 17013
1-800-990-9t80 or
(717) 249-3166
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 87380
35 EAST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 243-6090
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE~ M.D. and,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.' CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
NOW comes the plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater, by and through her counsel, Nathan C.
Wolf, Esquire and sets forth this complaint averring as follows:
1. Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater is an adult individual residing at 323 South Spring
Garden Street, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., is a person of the full age of majority
and physician licensed to practice and practicing medicine in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and specializing in the medical field of neurological surgery with offices
and a practice in Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
3. Plaintiff underwent surgery for a posterior cervical laminectomy performed
by Dr. Moore at Holy Spirit Hospital on February 8, 2001.
hands.
The surgery resulted in nerve damage to both of plaintiffs arms and
5. Plaintiffs post-surgical injur!es were diagnosed by Dr. Moore following
Plaintiff's post-operative complaints of her lack of ability to use her hands to move or
grasp objects.
6. Plaintiff continues to have severe neurolog ca deficits in both hands,
despite Dr. Moore's opinion offered on May 1, 2001 in correspondence indicating that
2
plaintiffs problems should improve with time and appropriate therapy. Plaintiffs post-
surgical deficits have been diagnosed by,Dr. Moore has having been directly related to
the surgery he performed.
7. Plaintiff underwent an MRI of her cervical spine on March 15, 2001 at the
Magnetic Imaging Center and these films were read by Dr. Donald R. Buxton, M.D.
8. The MRI films taken at Magnetic Imaging Center of Plaintiff's cervical
spine on March 15, 2001, revealed evidence of post-surgical trauma to the spinal cord.
9. Dr. Buxton identified a large posterior soft tissue defect, which appeared
to correlate with the post surgical site of laminectomy based on his readings of the films.
10. Dr. Moore acknowledged Dr. Buxton's findings regarding the soft tissue
defect in correspondence to Plaintiffs family physician.
11. Plaintiff did not benefit from the medical care she received and, instead,
has therefore suffered permanent bilateral neurological deficit to her upper extremities.
As a result, she cannot use her hands.
12. Plaintiffs believe, and therefore allege, that the Defendant Barry Moore
provided Plaintiff with substandard information regarding the risks involved in the
medical care she was due to receive, that is, his description of the potential for negative
results that were associated with the medical care she was to undergo fell below the
appropriate standard of medical care and this violation of the appropriate standard of
medical care caused, contributed to the cause, or increased the risk of harm to Plaintiff
for all injuries and damages suffered by her as alleged herein.
13. As a result of Defendant's conduct as ,'set forth in the forthcoming
individual Count of this Complaint, Plaintiff has suffered permanent neurological deficit
to both of her upper extremities.
14. Plaintiff requires permanent home nursing care and assistance in her daily
3
15. Plaintiff has incurred and will incur over the remainder of her lifetime
medical and related expenses that she otherwise would not have incurred but for
Defendant's conduct.
16. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to ,'suffer for the remainder of her
lifetime extreme pain, anguish and depression that she otherwise would not have
suffered but for Defendant's conduct.
17. Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer for the remainder of her
lifetime from a loss of life's enjoyments and pleasures, particularly in her active years of
employment and years with her family, which would not have occurred but for
Defendant's conduct.
18. Plaintiff has suffered embarrassment and humiliation which will remain
with her for the remainder of her lifetime which otherwise would not have occurred but
for Defendant's conduct.
19. Plaintiff therefore alleges all damages cognizable under Pennsylvania law
against each Defendant and claim is made therefore.
20. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of earnings and earning capacity as a result
of Defendant's conduct as alleged herein.
21. Plaintiff has suffered scarring and disfigurement as a result of
Defendant's conduct as alleged herein.
COUNT I
Informed Consent
Plaintiff v. Defendant Barry B. Moore, M.D.
22. Paragraphs one through twenty-one of this Complaint are incorporated
herein as if set forth at length.
23. Dr. Moore owed a duty to Plaintiff to explain the need for surgery and its
risks and complications, as well as non-surgical options.
4
24. In August of 2000, Plaintiff was evaluated by Dr. Moore for lower back
pain.
25. During this meeting between Plaintiff and r)r. Moore, Dr. Moore explained
to Plaintiff that she had problems with her cervical spine (her upper back) that should be
treated with surgery before she received surgical treatment for her lower back.
26. Plaintiff expressed concerns to Dr. Moore about the prospect of such a
procedure and described what results plaintiffs grandmother had from a similar surgical
procedure that occurred in the early 1970's.
27. Plaintiffs grandmother suffered from post-surgical paralysis that left her
unable to use her upper extremities.
28. Dr. Moore explained that due to his experience of performing thirty (30)
similar procedures per month and due to medical advancements since the time when
her grandmother's surgery occurred, Plaintiff should not be concerned that she would
suffer the same results as her grandmother.
29. Dr. Moore failed in this duty owed to Plaintiff with respect to providing her
information that she reasonably should have had to decide whether to undergo surgery.
30. Dr. Moore failed to explain to Plaintiff that surgery was simply an option
given Plaintiffs medical condition, complaints, and radiological findings. Surgery was
not necessary, nor was it warranted or appropriate under '/he circumstances.
31. Plaintiff relied implicitly and explicitly on Dr. Ivloore's recommendations.
32. Dr. Moore should have also informed Plaintiff that surgical dsk included
nerve damage that could cause paresthesia or paralysis, but told the Plaintiff that her
fears regarding the risks were not significant because of the Defendant's experience
and the advancements in medical procedures that made the risks associated therewith
minimal at best. Dr. Moore told Plaintiff that she could be paralyzed or suffer from
paresthesia as a result of this surgery. Had Dr. Moore told Plaintiff that surgery was
5
simply an option and was not a necessity, the Plaintiff would have declined to undergo
the operation.
33. Had Dr. Moore told Plaintiff that the surgical risks and complications
included paralysis or paresthesia, Plaintiff would have declined the opportunity to
undergo the operation.
34. Accordingly, Dr. Moore failed to provide Plaintiff with the information
necessary for them to provide an informed consent to the, surgery.
35. The lack of informed consent constitutes a technical battery committed
against Plaintiff that resulted in all damages as alleged herein, and claim is made
therefor.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff pray for judgment against the Det'endant, Barry B. Moore, M.D.,
in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars, exclusive of
interests and costs and for a trial by jury.
Respectfully submitted,
~QUIRE
Law Office of Harold S. Irwin, III
Supreme Court ID. #87380
35 East High Street, Suite 201 / 202
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
6
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, hereby verify that I am a plaintiff in this action and that the
facts stated in the above complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties
of 18 Pa. C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
LA K. SLATER '-~
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax; (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLA'rs~,
Plaintiff,
Vo
BARRY B.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
MOORE, M.D. and
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant:
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3
AND NOW, comes Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D. ("Dr.
Moore"), by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis Professional
Corporation, and files the instant Response to Plaintiff's Motion
for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, and avers the
following in support thereof:
1. Plaintiff initiated the instant action via a Writ of
Summons filed on January 22, 2003.
2. A Complaint was filed seven (7) months later on July
25, 2003 alleging only a claim for lack of informed consent
against Dr. Moore.
3. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, Plaintiff was required to
file a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint or within sixty
(60) days thereafter.
4. Plaintiff did not file a Certificate of Merit with her
Complaint, and thus, was required to file her Certificate of
Merit by September 23, 2003.
5. Rather than filing her Certificate of Merit on
September 23, 2003, Plaintiff filed a Motion to extend the time
for filing a Certificate of Merit pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d)
seeking an additional sixty (60) days within which she may file
her Certificate of Merit.
6. As the basis for said Motion, Plaintiff brought
Court's attention the existence of stipulations currently
circulated among counsel.
to the
7. However, the note to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d) provides, in
relevant part:
In rulin9 upon a motion to extend time, the court
shall give appropriate consideration to the
practicalities of securing expert review. There
is a basis for qranting an extension of timm
within which to file the certificate of merit ~f
counsel for the plaintiff was first contacted
shortly before the statute of limitations was
about to expire, or if, despite diliqent efforts
by counsel, records necessary to review th~
validity of the claim are not available.
(emphasis supplied).
8. In the instant case, Plaintiff fails to satisfy either
basis for the granting an extension of time within which to file
a Certificate of Merit.
9. Plaintiff filed the instant matter in January, 2003,
and then waited seven (7) months until July', 2003 in which to
file her Complaint. Plaintiff,s filing of her Writ of Sun~aons
tolled the statute of limitations, so there is no fear that the
statute was about to expire. Also, on May 17, 2001 and June 25,
2
2001, Plaintiff signed Authorizations for release of her medical
records from Dr. Moore. Thus, the records relevant to review
Plaintiff's informed consent claim have been in her, or her
counsel's possession, for over two {2) years. See Exhibit "A."
10. In addition to the seven (7) months between the filing
of the Writ of Summons and the Complaint, Plaintiff has also
enjoyed an additional sixty (60) days after the filing of her
Complaint to have this case reviewed by an appropriate licensed
professional or to determine expert testimony of an appropriate
licensed professional is unnecessary for prosecution of the
claim.
11. An extension of time for an additional sixty (60) days
within which to file a Certificate of Merit is not warranted
based on these facts and given Plaintiff,s dilatoriness in
complying with the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., respectfully
request that this Honorable Court deny Plaintiff,s Motion for
Extension of Time within which to file a Certificate of Merit.
Date:
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPOP~ATION
[ 53229
Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
3
Exhibit A
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
717/238-6791
F~xXTI7/Z38-5610
June 25, 2001
NEll. J. ROVe'ER
Josmm M. lvLx'zr~o
Tmm¥ S. H,n,c~
DAVID L. LUIZ
JOSEPH M. DORIA
JAMES DECINTI
BarD., B. Moore, M.D.
Neurolog/cal Surgery, Ltc.
920 Century Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Re: Sheila $later
DOB: 10/30/1952
SSN: 166-44-7974
Dear Dr. Moore
We represent the above-named indiv/dual. Enclosed herewith is a properly executed
medical authorization. We would appreciate your forwarding to this office, at your earl/est
convenience, a copy of your entire o(l~ce notes regarding your care of this patient. Please do no__!t
include hospital medical records. Please do not duplex the medical records.
Also, please provide us with a copy of an itemized statement of charges for services
rendered. In addition to providing copies of these materials, please include payment summaries
showing who paid for these services and the mount of each payment.
Please bill our office directly for any copying charges you may incur with regard to rids
request. Please include your Federal I.D. number and/or Social Security number for bookkeeping
purposes. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call me.
Very truly yours,
/kjh
Enclosure
AUTHORIZATION FOR MEDICAL AND/OR HOSPITAL INFORMATION
This is w authoriz~ any physician, hospital, medical at~ndant or others to furnish the law firm of
ANGINO & RoVNER, P.C.. or any representative thereof, any and all information or opinion, which th~,
physical condition ~nd treatment rcnderr, d therefor mad to allow
may r~lucst regarding my
them to see or copy any x-rays or records which you may have regarding the condition or txcatmant. M.v
said attorneys have bc~-n retained by mc to proseeutc a claim against thc insurance carriers or othcm for
injuries s~tained and your full cooperation with my attorneys is rcspeetfidly requested. A photostatic cop.','
of this signed Authorization should be considcrcd as valid as thc original.
This Authorization is also intended to release specific records including thc follo~4ng: DRUG
AzND ALCOHOL ABUSE I~CORD$, PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS, and I-IIV RECORDS.
YOU are further advised to disclose no ini'o,,,~aZion to any insurance adiuster or other oersonS
without written authority from mc to do so (pursumlt to privilege and confidential communication laws).
All uiio/authorizations ate hereby cancelled. See copy of PA Rule of Civil Procedure 4003.6 below
limiting disclosure of information to peranns designated by written consent of the patient.
RELATIONSHIP:
TITI.~ 231. RULES OF CIVIL PROC~DUI~
PART 1.
CHAI:rl?_.R 4000. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVF-,RY
Rul~a 4003.6. Discove~ of Treating Physi~fiam
Infon~.ation may be obtained from file trmfing
physician of a par~ mdy u~n x~tt~ co~
of flint ~ or fl~u~t a m~h~ of ~
not p~l ~ aflom~ from obt~Mng i~on~fion
~m:
fl)
(2)
207406.1XCMGLMLB
Facsimile Cover Sheet
From: STEPHEN J. HOGG, ESQUIRE
Company: ATTORNEY. A T. LA W
Sarry Hco=a
Phone: (717) 245.2698
Fax: (7f7) 245.0829
Date:
Pgs W/Cvr: =
Comments: .e= Shella $later ss#: 166-A4-797A
Please fax to my off,ce the office notes on the above
patient since April 2001 through the present, including
her lest appointment an Nay 1~, 2001, Thank you. If you
haYe any questions, please contact my.o.~f[ce.
Follo~ing is an authorization permitting you to release
th~ information.
AirrH. o_m_Zr-AT O
TO WHOM IT MA¥ CONCERH: DATE:__
This will authorize you to release to my Allorney, Steplml~ J. l-logg,
Esq~lire, Attorney et Law, or his aulherized representalives, medical recc~rds,
hospilal records, clinical abstracts, x-res, reports, doctors reports, office notes,
accident reports, police refmrls, earnings recr~rds, income lax reh.irns or any
other information er material req~ested hy him In c~nnec/lon wilh lhe mRlfers
wl~erein he represents me, and ~o photocopy lbo same.
Thls also includes all sensillve informallon such as Drag and Alcohol
addlclion, Mental Health impairmenls nr HIV records.
The original o~ this al~lherizalion or any photocopy thereof shall constitute
his sufficient Power o~ Attorney for obtaining such information, materiel and
reports.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D., TO
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P.
1042.3 was served upon counsel of record this 24th day of
September 2003, by depositing said copy in the United States Mail
at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
The Honorable J. Wesley Oler, Jr.
Cumberland County Court of Cormmon Pleas
Cumberland County Courthouse
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
FOULKROD ELLIS
P~ESSIONAL CORPORATION
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO, 873~0
64 8OUTH PiTT STREET
CARLIILE PA t?0t3
(717) ~3~0~0
AI'TORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. ELATER,
Plaintiff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNEYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:: NO. 2003 - ~JE~CIVIL TERM
:JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3
NOW comes the plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater, by and through her counsel, Nathan C.
Wolf, Esquire and sets forth this motion averring as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed her complaint in this action on July 25, 2003 against
Defendant Barry B. Moore, M.D.
2. Plaintiff's allegations involve a claim for professional negligence and are,
as such, governed by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 related to Professional Liability Actions, which
requires a plaintiff to file a Certificate of Merit within sixty days of filing its complaint.
3. As of this date, counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants have
exchanged stipulations, which directly impact the scope of the litigation and the
necessity of an expert witness on behalf of the plaintiff.
4. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d), the Court, may grant an additional sixty
days (60) time to plaintiff, upon motion for cause shown, within which to file the
certificate of merit.
5. Based upon the existence of the proposed stipulations, Plaintiff believes
good cause exists for the Court to grant an additional sixty days within which she may
file her Certificate of Merit.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Sheila K. Slater, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court
grant the foregoing motion and exte~,d the time for filing the Certificate of Merit, as
required by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, an additional sixty days from the date the Order of Court
is issued.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
~UlRE
Irwin Law Office
Supreme Court ID. #87380
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOLF, EBQUIRE
AI'rORNEY ID NO. 87380
84 ~OUll1 PIl'r 8TRErr
CARLISLE PA 17013
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER~
Plaintiff
v,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. ,,nd,
Defendlnt
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 2003 - 323 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 upon the following persons
and in the manner indicated:
Date:
SERVICE BY U.S. Mail:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant)
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
~eIRWIN LAW FIC
Sup,~ Court, ID No. 87380
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; NEUROLOGICAL
SURGERY, LTD; and
HOLY SPIRIT
HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, a Rule is hereby issued
upon Defendants to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted.
RULE RETURNABLE within 20 days of service.
Nathan C. Wolff Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
BY THE COURT,
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Craig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
:rc
NAI~IAN C. WOLF, E8QUIRE
ATrORNEY ID NO. 87380
84 8OUTH Prl'r STREET
CARLIBLE PA 17013
(7t7) ~
AI'rORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
8HEILA K. 8LATEK~
Plaintiff
V,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. -,nd,
Defendent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 2003 - 3~3 CIVIL TERM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE AND REQUEST FOR
HEARING PURSUANT TO C.C.R.C.P. 206-2(c)
The undersigned, counsel for the plaintiff, in accordance with the requirements of
C.C.R.C.P. 206-2(c), has sought the concurrence from Foulkred Ellis, Professional
Corporation, as counsel for the Defendant, Dr. Barry B. Moore, M.D. with regard to
Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, which Motion was
filed with the Court on September 23, 2003, and such concurrence was not given to the
motion. Counsel for plaintiff has not yet been able to obtain a response from Craig
Stone, Esquire, counsel for Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, however, a request for
concurrence has been made.
WHEREFORE, in light of the non-concurrence of counsel for Defendant Moore,
counsel for plaintiff requests that the matter be listed for hearing on the motion for
extension of time at a time convenient to the Court.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
S[jpreme Court, ID No. 87380
Attorney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
AI'rORNEY ID NO. 87380
64 SOUTH PITT STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(7~7) 243-8090
AI'rORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
8HEILA K. SLA: .'it,
Plaintiff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D, and,
Defend,,nt
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNBYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
; NO. 2003 - 3~3 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's
Certificate of Concurrence upon the following persons and in the manner indicated:
Date:
SERVICE BY U.S. Mail:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant)
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
IRWIN LAW OFFI/~E
_sN~than ¢. Wolf, £$quire
upmme Court, ID No. 87380
Attorney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT :
HOSPITAL, :
Defendants :
IN THE COURT OF C. OMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, the Response of Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D., to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P.
1042.3, and the absence of a response from Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, PlaintiWs
request is granted to the extent that the Plaintiffis afforded an additional 45 days from the
date of this order to file a certificate of merit.
Nathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Craig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
BY THE COURT,
irc
NATHAN C. WOLF~ ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO, 87380
64 SOUTH pn'T STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. sLATEK,
-' IN THE COURT OF COMMON pLEAS OF
Plaintiff
¥,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and~
Defendant
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, pENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
;~NO. 2003 .~"J-CIVIL TERM
.. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. t042.3
NOW comes the plaintiff, Sheila K. Siater, by and through her counsel, Nathan C.
Wolf, Esquire and sets forth this motion averring as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed her complaint in this action on July 25, 2003 against
Defendant Barry B. Moore, M.D.
2. Plainti~s allegations invoNe a claim for professional negZigence and are,
as such, governed by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 related to Professional Liability Actions, which
requires a plaintiff to file a Certificate of Merit within sixty days of filing its complaint.
3. As of this date, counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants have
exchanged stipulations, which directly impact the scope of the litigation and the
necessity of an expe~ witness on behalf of the plaintiff.
4. On November 6, 2003 the honorable court granted plainti~s motion for an
extension of time and permitted an additional 45 days. PTaintiff requests only additional
30 days upon which a certificate of merit would be filed.
5. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d), the Court, may grant an additional sixty
days (60) time to plaintiff, upon motion for cause shown, within which to file the
certificate of merit.
6. Based upon the fact that the stipulations are as yet unresolved, Plaintiff
believes good cause exists for the Court to grant an additional thirty days within which
she may file her Certificate of Merit.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Sheila K. Slater, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court
grant the foregoing motion and extend the time for filing the Certificate of Merit, as
permitted by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, an additional thirty days from the date the Order of
Court is issued.
Respectfully submitted,
Date:
NATHAN C. WOLF, Es~QUlRE
Irwin Law Office
Supreme Court ID. #87380
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 8'73~0
64 sOUTH piTI' STREET
~UlLISLE PA 'l?01S
ATTORNEY FOR pL.AINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON pLEAS OF
Plaintiff
¥.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:NO. 2003 - 323 CIVIL TERM
I JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 upon the following persons
and in the manner indicated:
Date:
SERVICE BY U.S. Mail:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant)
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
IRWIN LAW OFFICE
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
Supreme Court, ID No. 87380
Attorney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOLF~ E~QUIRE
AITQRNEY ID NO. 87380
64 8OUTH PiTi' ~TRIIET
CARLISLE PA 17013
C7t7) 24a-M)90
A'R'ORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY~ PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE AND REQUEST FOR
HEARING PURSUANT TO C.C.R.C.P. 206-2(c)
The undersigned, counsel for the plaintiff, in accordance with the requirements of
C.C.R.C.P. 206-2(c), has sought the concurrence from Foulkrod Ellis, Professional
Corporation, as counsel for the Defendant, Dr. Barry B. Moore, M.D. and from Craig
Stone, Esquire, counsel for Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, with regard to Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, which Motion was filed with
the Court on December 22, 2003, and such concurrence was not given to the motion.
WHEREFORE, in light of the non-concurrence of counsel for Defendant Moore,
counsel for plaintiff requests that the matter be listed for hearing on the motion for
extension of time at a time convenient to the Court.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
· -' Nath squire
Suprem~ CSurt, ID No. 87380
Attorney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
A'I'I'ORNEY ID NO. 87380
64 8OUTH Pl'l-r 8TREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) ~
AI'I'OIRNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's
Certificate of Concurrence upon the following persons and in the manner indicated:
Date:
SERVICE BY U,S. Mail:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant)
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
IRWIN LAW ~E
..N~Itha n C~. W/olf"FEsq uire
Supreme ~o.~, ID No. 87380
Attorney FoUr Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT
HOSPITAL,
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION ' LAW
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, a Rule is hereby issued
upon Defendants to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted.
RULE RETURNABLE within 20 days of service.
64qathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
~Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
~X~raig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
BY THE COURT,
J esl~ey O~. (Jr ,~
:rc
SHEILASLATER,
Plaintiff,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
: IN THE CO~/RT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLANq) COI/NTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 03-343
: CIVIL ACTION- LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER
AND NOW, this day of , 200
upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion flor Extension of Time
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, and the response thereto by
Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED
that Plaintiff,s Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED and
DECREED that the Judgment entered in favor of Dr. Moore and
against Plaintiff on December 23, 2003 is hereby AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barz¥ B. Moore, M.D,
IN THE COI~RT OF CO~ON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
and
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
: No. 03-343
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL, DEMANDED
PENNSYLVANIA
RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3
AND NOW, comes Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D. ("Dr.
Moore"), by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis Professional
Corporation, and files the instant Response to Plaintiff,s Motion
for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, and avers the
following in support thereof:
1. Plaintiff initiated the instant action via a Writ of
Summons filed on January 22, 2003.
2. A Complaint was filed seven (7) months later on July
25, 2003 alleging only a claim for lack of informed consent
against Dr. Moore.
3. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, Plaintiff was required to
file a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint or within sixty
(60) days thereafter.
4. Plaintiff did not file a Certificate of Merit with her
Complaint, and thus, was required to file her Certificate of
Merit by September 23, 2003.
5. Rather than filing her Certificate of Merit on
September 23, 2003, Plaintiff filed a Motion to extend the time
for filing a Certificate of Merit pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d)
seeking an additional sixty (60) days within which she may file
her Certificate of Merit.
6. On November 6, 2003, the Honorable J. Wesley Oler, Jr.,
granted Plaintiff's Motion to the extent that Plaintiff was
afforded an additional forty-five (45) days to file a Certificate
of Merit. See Exhibit "A."
7. Pursuant to Judge Oler's Order, Plaintiff was required
to file her Certificate of Merit by December 22, 2003.
8. Plaintiff failed to file a Certificate of Merit in the
time set forth in Judge Oler's Order.
9. Accordingly, on December 23, 20013, Dr. Moore timely
filed a Praecipe for Entry of Judgment of Non Pros Pursuant to
Pa.R.C.P. 1042.6 for failure to file a Certificate of Merit. See
Exhibit "B."
10. At the time the Praecipe for Entry of Judgment of Non
Pros was filed, Dr. Moore's counsel was unaware that Plaintiff
had apparently filed an additional Motion for Extension of Time
on December 22, 2003. Dr. Moore's counsel did not receive a copy
of Plaintiff's Motion until December 24, 2003.
11. As the only basis for her current Motion, Plaintiff
once again notes the existence of stipulations circulated among
counsel. However, Dr. Moore's counsel has already indicated
that the proposed stipulations are contrary to law. See Exhibit
12. It is respectfully submitted that no cause exists for
any additional time to file a Certificate of Merit.
13. The note to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d) provides, in relevant
part:
In ruling upon a motion to extend time, the court
shall give appropriate consideration to the
practicalities of securing expert review. There
is a basis for grantinq an extension of tim~
within which to file the certificate of merit if
counsel for the plaintiff was first contacted
shortly before the statute of limitations was
about to expire, or if, despite diliqent efforts
by counsel, records necessary to review th~
validity of the claim are not available.
(emphasis supplied).
14. In the instant case, Plaintiff fails to satisfy either
basis for the granting an additional extension of time within
which to file a Certificate of Merit. Also, Plaintiff has been
afforded more than enough time to secure an appropriate expert.
15. There is no fear that the statute is about to expire in
this case. Also, on May 17, 2001 and June 25, 2001, Plaintiff
signed Authorizations for release of her medical records from Dr.
Moore. Thus, the records relevant to review Plaintiff's informed
consent claim have been in her, or her counsel's possession, for
well over two (2) years. See Exhibit "D."
16. In addition to the seven (7) months between the filin~
of the Writ of Sun~aons and the Complaint, Plaintiff has now
enjoyed an additional one hundred and fourteen (114) days to have
this case reviewed by an appropriate licensed professional or to
3
simply determine that expert testimony of an appropriate licensed
professional is unnecessary for prosecution of the claim.
17. Another extension of time for an additional thirty (30)
Days within which to file a Certificate of Merit is not warranted
based on these facts and given Plaintiff,s dilatoriness in
complying with the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 in addition
to Judge Oler's Order.
18. Therefore, Plaintiff,s Motion fc, r Extension of Time
should be denied and the Judgment of Non Pros entered in favor of
Dr. Moore and against Plaintiff on December 23, 2003 should
remain.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., respectfully
requests that this Honorable Court deny Plaintiff,s Motion for
Extension of Time and affirm the Judgment ,Df Non Pros entered in
favor of Dr. Moore and against Plaintiff on December 23, 2003.
Date:~
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESS :[ONAL CORPORATION
%'e ~~/n~~ Esquire
Atto~n I.~D. No. 5322,9
A~tt ~o~J 3ayman, Esquire
orney I.D. No. 85651
4
Exhibit A
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPI2~IT
HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COI_rNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION- LAW
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 6t~ day of November, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, the Response of Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D., to Plaintiffs Motion for Extension oJ7 Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P.
1042.3, and the absence of a response from Defendant Holy Spirit HoSpital, Plaintiff's
request is granted to the extent that the Plaintiff is afforded an additional 45 days from the
date of this order to file a certificate of merit.
Nathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attomey for Plaintiff
Xdigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
00 Linglestown Road
te 305
sburg, PA 17110
Craig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North From Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
BY ~ COURT,
TRUE COF ' FROM R '
E-CORD
Pratingly
Exhibit B
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
and
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore. M.D.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL~KN/~
~o. 03-343 .~.~ =~,
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS
PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1042.6
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLkND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Enter judgment of non pros against Plaintiff, Shelia Slater
in the professional liability claim against Defendant, Barry B.
Moore, M.D., for failure to file a certificate of merit by
December 22, 2003, on the Order of the Honorable J. Wesley Oler,
Jr., dated, November 6, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto,
in the above-captioned matter.
I, the undersigned, certify that the Plaintiff named above
has asserted a professional liability claim against the Defendant
named above who is a licensed professional, that no certificate
of merit has been filed within the time required by Pa.R.C.P.
1042.3 and the attached Order and that there is no additional
motion to extend the time for filing the certificate pending
before this Court.
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
lis, Esquire
AttOrney liD. No. 53229
AarOn ~._,~aym.an, Esquire
Attoi~ ~=y I.D. No. 85651
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoin§ PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT OF NON PROS PURSUANT TO
PA.R.C.P. 1042.6 was served upon counsel of record this 23rd day
of December, 2003 by depositing said copy in the United States
Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-095;0
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
?
Exhibit C
FOULKROD ELLIS
1800 L[NGLESTOWN ROAD - SUITE 305
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17110
S. WALTER FOULKROD,
LEIGH A.J. ELLIS
ANDREW H. FOULKROD
AARON $. JAYMAN
MICHAEL C, MONG[ELLO
October ~5, 2003
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
TELEPHONE
{717) 213-4200
FAX
{717) 213-4202
E-MAiL
law@foulkrod.com
Re:
Slater v. Moore, et al.
Docket No. 03-343
PEPC #3441
Dear Nathan:
I have now had an opportunity to review the two draft
Stipulations you proposed in the above-referenced matter. I will
not agree to the language that is proposed in your Stipulations
because it is not in accord with the Supreme Court's decision in
Montqomery v. Bazaz-Sehqa], 798 A.2d 742 (Pa.. 2002), which
underscored the battery theory of. info,ned consent and said that
such actions did not sound in negligence.
Again, please consider the Stipulation I forwarded to you on
July 29, 2003, as I believe it is more appropriate under the
circumstances.
I recognize that your Motion for an Extension of Time to
Pile a Certificate of Merit remains outstanding. Pending the
outcome of that Motion, should you not agree on the language in
my Stipulation, I will file preliminary objections to your
Complaint based on Mont~.
As always, if you have any questions, or would like to
discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
ASJ:bef
cc: Craig A.
bcc: Keith E.
Barry B. Moore,
S~rs,
Stone, Esquire
Richard, Claims Examiner (PMSL]iC #338984-01)
M.D.
Certified as a Civil Trial Advocate by the National Board of Triar Advocacy
Exhibit D
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
717/2384791
F~iX 717/238-$610
3une 25, 2'[301
N~ J.
]os~ Id.
}.~lY.s D~CINTI
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
Neurological Surgery, Ltc.
920 Century Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Re: Sheila Slater
DOB: 10/30/1952
$SN: 166-44-7974
Dear Dr. Moore
We represent the above-named individual. Enclosed herewith is a properly executed
medical author4, vation. We would appreciate your forwarding to this office, at your cml/est
convenience, a copy of your entire o£flce notes regarding your .:are of this patient. Please do no._It
include hospital medical records. Please do not duplex the medical records.
Also, please provide us with a copy of an itemized statement of charges for services
rendered. In addition to providing copies of these materials, please include payment summaries
showing who paid for these ser~ces and the amount of each payment.
Please bill our office directly for any copying charges you may incur with regard to this
request. Please include your Federal I.D. number and/or Social Security number for bookkeeping
purposes. If you have any que~ons regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call me.
Very truly yours,
/kjh
Enclosure
ALrI'HORIZATION FOR MEDICAL AND/OR HOSPITAL IN'FORMATION
This is to authorize any physician, hospital, medical attendant or othcr~ to furnish the law firm o£
ANGINO & RoVNEIZ, P.C., or any r~presentariw thereof, anY and. all information or opinion, which th~.,
may n:qu~-'t r~garding my physical condition and la-r, alnmnt r~nder~i therdor and to allo~.'
them to s" or copy any x-rays or records which you ma), have regarding the condition or trealanent. Mx'
said attora~'s have b~n r~ained by rne to pros=cot~ a claim against tt~ insuraan~ oarrier~ or oth=r~ for
injuries suslain~l and your full cooperation with ray altornevs is re,TO,Ceil:flY rraluest~d' A photostatic cop),
of this si_maecl Authorization should be considered a~ valid a~ tho original.
This Authorization is also intended to release sp¢oific r:cords including the following: DRUG
AND ALCOHOL ABUSE RECORDS, PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS, and I-lTV ILECORDS.
You ar~ fi~rther advised to disclose no in/'u,,,ation to ar~v insuranc~ adiuster or other ~¢rsons
without written anthorirv from mc to do ~o (pur~u=t to priviloge :and ¢olu'~d~atial e,,,.,raunir~tion laws).
All larior anthori2ations are hereby concellcd. See copy of PA. P, ule of Civil Procedure 4003.6 below
limiting disclosure of information to persons designated by written consent of the patient.
KELATIONSHIP:
111 i..E 231. RILLES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
pART 1. GENERAL
CI-tAPTER 4000. DEPOSITIONS A~4D DISCOVERY
Rules4003.6. Discowry. of Tainting physi~ans
l.,ffonnalion may be obtained from tho trmting
physician ora ~'my only upon w~ittmt con.sent
of tlmt Imrry or Ihrough a m~cxi of
authoriz..~i by tiffs chapter. This rule ~ahall
not prevent an attorney from obtaining im'onnation
from:
(2)
(3)
the atla'~eV., s climL
an =mploy=: ofti~ anomey's r. lieak or
an osm=ible =:nplo3~= of the attorney's climL
Facsimile Cover Sheet
From: STEPHEN J. HOGG, ESQUIRE
Company: A TTORNEY. A T. LA W
Phone: (717) 245-2698
Fax: (7f7) 245.082§
Date:
Pgs W/Cvr: =
Comments: ~,: Shells Slster ss#: 155-44-797~
pa[lent since April 2001 through the present, including
he= [sst appotn~=ent on Nay 1~, 2001. Thank you. ~¢ you
hays any questions, bless= contact my.o.~fice,
Following is an authorization permlttSng you to release
the informs~fcn.
/'d, ITI-JO_RIZATION
This will authoriza you to release Io my Attorney, Stephen J.
Esqulre~ Altorney at Law, or his at~lhorized representatives, medical recnrds,
hospital records, clinical abslrams, x-ray reports, dcctnrs repods, o~c=
accident reports, police rep~Hs, enrnJngs r=cor~s, Incomo lnx rehJrns or any
o[hor informalJ~n or materl=l reque~lacl hy him in c=nnecJion wilh the
wherein he reproson~s me, and to photocopy Iha same.
This also Jncludas all sensJlive in~ormallon such as Drag and Alcohol
addiclion, Mental Health imp=irmenls nr HIV records.
~e original of this m~ll~ri~ali~n or any ph~tc~c~py thereof shall c~nstltuta
his sufficient Power o~ Attorney for ohlalning such in,f~rm~lion, materiel and
reporls,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. TO
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P.
1042.3 was served upon counsel of record this 31st day of
December, 2003 by depositing said copy in the United States Mail
at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
Irwin Law Office
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Mette, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
PRO~S IONAL CORPORATION
Be~r~ E. Forbes, Paralegal
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER, :
Plaintiff, :
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and :
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL, :
:
Defendants, :
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore. M.D.
IN THE COURT OF CO~ON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS
PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1042.6
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Enter judgment of non pros against Plaintiff, Shelia Slater
in the professional liability claim against Defendant, Barry B.
Moore, M.D., for failure to file a certificate of merit by
December 22, 2003, on the Order of the Honorable J. Wesley Oler,
Jr., dated, November 6, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto,
in the above-captioned matter.
I, the undersigned, certify that the Plaintiff named above
has asserted a professional liability claim against the Defendant
named above who is a licensed professional, that no certificate
of merit has been filed within the time required by Pa.R.C.P.
1042.3 and the attached Order and that there is no additional
motion to extend the time for filing the certificate pending
before this Court.
Respectfully submitted,
SI-mlLA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT
HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 03-343 CML TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, the Response of Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D., to PlaintifFs Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P.
1042.3, and the absence of a response from Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, Plaintiff's
request is granted to the extent that the Plaintiff is afforded an additional 45 days from the
date of this order to file a certificate of merit.
Nathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaimiff
8U0arriigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
0 Linglestown Road
ite 305
sburg, PA 17110
Craig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
:rc
BY TIq~E COURT,
J. ~esley Oler,"Jr., -~ J.
in T~m'tmo~y ~her,~f, i hsr~ unto
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PP~AECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT OF NON PROS PURSUANT TO
PA.R.C.P. 1042.6 was served upon counsel of record this 23rd day
of December, 2003 by depositing said copy in the United States
Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Mette, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Beth E. Forbes, /Paralega~l--
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
AI'rORNEY ID NO. 87380
64 8OUTH PITT STREET
CARLISLE PA 170t 3
(7t7) 243-6090
ATTORNEY FOR pLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. 8LATER,
Plaintiff
Vm
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE
NOW comes the plaintiff, by her attorney, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, and files this
petition for a rule to show cause why the judgment of non pros entered against plaintiff
by the defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., should not be stricken, representing as follows:
1. Plaintiff is Sheila K. Slater, an adult individual residing at 323 South
Spring Garden Street, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
2. Defendant is Barry B. Moore, M.D., a person of the full age of majority and
physician licensed to practice and practicing medicine in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and specializing in the medical field of neurological surgery with offices
and a practice in Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
3. On or about December 22, 2003, Plaintiff filed with this court a motion for
extension of time pursuant to PaR.C.P. 1042.3.
4. Prior to filing her motion with the Court, counsel for Plaintiff attempted to
contact counsel for Defendant Moore, to seek concurrence with the motion in
accordance with the Rules of Court, at which time, Plaintiff's counsel left a detailed
voicemail message indicating a motion would be filed that day even if a response had
not been received from Defendant's counsel.
5. Plaintiff filed her motion for extension of time on December 22, 2003, at or
about 3:57 o'clock, p.m. (A true and correct copy of the time-stamped motion is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A")
6. On or about December 23, 2003, at approximately 9:48 o'clock a.m.,
counsel for the defendant filed a praecipe for entry of judgment non pros with the Court.
(A true and correct copy of the time-stamped praecipe is attached hereto as Exhibit
"B").
7. In Defendant's praecipe, Counsel certified to the Court that there was no
additional motion to extend the time for filing the certificate pending before the Court.
8. On or about December 23, 2003, Prothonotary entered Judgment of Non
Pros in accordance with Defendant's praecipe because Plaintiff's motion had not been
entered onto the docket before the praecipe was filed,
Plaintiff was thereafter served with notice of the entry of judgment non
10. Clearly, there was a motion for extension of time pursuant 1042.3 filed by
the plaintiff before defendant's praecipe was filed and the judgment of non pros was
entered in error.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff requests that your Honorable Court issue a rule to show
cause why the judgment entered in this matter should not be stricken.
January 9, 2004 ~~C.~ _~'Att~~///
tiff
VERIFICA
I verify that I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this petition and
that the facts stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief. I understand that false statements made herein are subject to
the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4094, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
January 9, 2004
~~~~F~ ESQUIRE
SHEILA IL SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY~ PENNSYLVANIA
-' CIVIL ACTION - LAW
-' NO, 2003 - CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAl. DEMANDED
ORDER
AND NOW this day of ,200, upon presentation and
consideration of the Plaintiff's foregoing motion for an extension of time pursuant to
Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, the motion is hereby GRANTED and the Plaintiff is hereby ordered to
file a Certificate of Merit within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, unless a
separate motion for additional time is presented with good cause shown requesting
additional time to file said Certificate.
BY THE COURT:
Distribution:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
AI'TORNEY ID NO. 87380
64 8OUTH PII'F STREET
CARLISLE PA 170"13
(7,~ 7)
A'I'rORHEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATERi
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
.' CUMBERI.AND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: NO. 2003 - 323 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3
NOW comes the plambff, Sheda K. Slater, by and through her counsel, N~ath~ C.~?
Wolf, Esquire and sets forth this motion averring as follows: ~" --'
1. Plaintiff filed her complaint in this action on July 25, 2003 against
Defendant Barry B. Moore, M.D.
2. Plaintiff's allegations involve a claim for professional negligence and are,
as such, governed by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 related to Professional Liability Actions, which
requires a plaintiff to file a Certificate of Merit within sixty days of filing its complaint.
3. As of this date, counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants have
exchanged stipulations, which directly impact the scope of the litigation and the
necessity of an expert witness on behalf of the plaintiff.
4. On November 6, 2003 the honorable court granted plaintiff's motion for an
extension of time and permitted an additional 45 days. Plaintiff requests only additional
30 days upon which a certificate of merit would be filed.
5. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d), the Court, may grant an additional sixty
days (60) time to plaintiff, upon motion for cause shown, within which to file the
certificate of merit.
6. Based upon the fact that the stipulations are as yet unresolved, Plaintiff
believes good cause exists for the Court to grant an additional thirty days within which
she may file her Certificate of Merit.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Sheila K. Slater, respecffully requests that this Honorable Court
grant the foregoing motion and extend the time for filing the Certificate of Merit, as
permitted by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, an additional thirty days from the date the Order of
Court is issued.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
Irwin Law Office
Supreme Court ID. f~87360
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOIP, E~QUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 87380
64 SOUTH PITT STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(7'rJ') ~13,.eooo
A'T'rORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA I~ SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEA8 OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
-' NO. 2003 - 323 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 upon the following persons
and in the manner indicated:
Date:
SERVICE BY U.S. Mail:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road, Suits 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant)
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
IRWIN LAW OFFICE
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
Supreme Court, ID No. 87380
Attorney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suits 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200 Attorneys for Defendant:
Fax: (717) 213-4202 Bsrry B. Moore, M.D.
SHEILA SLATER, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff, :
: No. 03-343
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and :
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendants, : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS
PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1042.6
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Enter judgment of non pros against Plaintiff, Shelia Slater
in the professional liability claim against Defendant, Barry B.
Moore, M.D., for failure to file a certificate of merit by
December 22, 2003', on the Order of the Honorable J. Wesley Oler,
Jr., dated, November 6, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto,
in the above-captioned matter.
I, the undersigned, certify that the Plaintiff named above
has asserted a professional liability claim against the Defendant
named above who is a licensed professional, that no certificate
of merit has been filed within the time required by Pa.R.C.P.
1042.3 and the attached Order and that there is no additional
motion to extend the time for filing the certificate pending
before this Court.
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESS IONi~L CORPOP~ATION
Att~rq~,_y ~:D. No. 53229
Aa r~,nj~.Jayman, Esquire
Attoi'ney I.D. NO. 85651
SHEILA K. SLATE~ :
Plaintiff :
V.
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT
HOSPITAL,
Defendanls
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION- LAW
biO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 6t~ day of November, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiffs
Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. tLC.P. 1042.3, the Response of Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D., to Plaintiff's Motion for Extens{on of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P.
1042.3, and the absence of a response from Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, Plaintifffs
request is granted to the extent that the Plaintiffis afforded an additional 45 days from the
date of this order to file a certificate of merit.
BY THE COURT,
Nathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
S8Uarrigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
00 Linglestown Road
ite 305
isburg, PA 17110
Craig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
TRUE COPY' FROM t~ECORL~
and t~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PP~LECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT OF NON PROS PURSUANT TO
PA.R.C.P. 1042.6 was served upon counsel of record this 23rd day
of December, 2003 by depositing said copy in the United States
Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Mette, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
By: ~
Beth E. Forbes,
NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
A'I'rORNEY ID NO. 87380
64 SOUTH Prl-r STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 243-6090
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Certificate of
Concurrence upon the following persons and in the manner indicated:
Date:
SERVICE BY U.S. Mail:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant)
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FICE
67360
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
V.
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT
HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2004, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion
for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, the Response of Defendant, Barry
B. Moore, M.D., to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P.
1042.3, and Plaintiff's Certificate of Concurrence and Request for Hearing Pursuant To
C.C.R.C.P. 206-2(c), a hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, February 4, 2004, at 1:30
p.m., in Courtroom No. 1, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
BY THECOURT,
?
~Nathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
,~eigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
~raig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
/ esley Ol r, .T ' J.
:rc
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717} 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
IN THE COURT OF CO~ON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
TO PLAINTIFF'S PETITION TO SHOW CAUSE
AND NOW, comes Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D. ("Dr.
Moore"), by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis Professional
Corporation, and files the instant Response to Plaintiff's
Petition to Show Cause, and avers the following in support
thereof:
1. On January 9, 2004, Plaintiff filled a Petition to Show
Cause why judgment entered in favor of Dr. Moore should not be
stricken.
2. On January 13, 2004, Dr. Moore's counsel telephoned
Plaintiff's counsel and advised that they intended to file a
Praecipe withdrawing the judgment of non pros entered on December
23, 2003, against Plaintiff because Plaintiff's Motion for
Extension of Time pursuant 1042.3 was filed before the judgment
was entered in favor of Dr. Moore.
3. On January 14, 2004, Dr. Moore's counsel sent via first
class U.S. mail to the Prothonotary of Cumberland County a
Praecipe to Withdraw Judgment. A true and correct copy of the
Praecipe is attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
4. Therefore, Plaintiff's Petition is moot.
5. However, Dr. Moore continues to oppose Plaintiff's
second Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3
for the reasons set forth in his Response ~shereto, which was
filed on January 5, 2004. A true and correct time-stamped copy
is attached hereto as Exhibit "B."
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., respectfully
submits that in light of the recently filed Praecipe to Withdraw
JudgTaent there is no need for this Honorable Court to issue a
Rule to Show Cause and that Plaintiff's pending Motion for
Extension of Time within which to file a Certificate of Merit
should also be denied.
Date:~
By:
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PR~ONAL CORPOP~TION
Le~ ~llis, Esquire
atto~ne~ ~.D. No. 53229
Aaro% ~% ~ayman, Esquire
Attor~e~.D. No. 85651
2
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 2134~202
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
Vo
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore. M,D.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE TO WITHDP~AW ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Kindly withdraw the judgment of non pros entered on December
23, 2003, against Plaintiff, Sheila Slater and in favor of
Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPO~TION
LE~/~J/~LIS, iESQUIRE
Att~r~y~.D. No..!3229
~ S~ JAYMAN, ESQUIRE
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC_~E
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, was served upon
counsel of record this 14th day of January, 2004, by depositing
said copy in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
postage prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esqui~e
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
FOULKROD ELLIS
P?SSIONAL CORPOP~ATION
B~h E. Forbes, Paralegal
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213 -4202
SHEILA SLAT~K,
Plaintiff,
Vo
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore, M.D,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: No. 03-343
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P.. 1042.3
AND NOW, comes Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D. ("Dr.
Moore"), by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis Professional
Corporation, and files the instant Response to Plaintiff's Motion
for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, and avers the
following in support thereof:
1. Plaintiff initiated the instant action via a Writ of
Summons filed on January 22, 2003.
2. A Complaint was filed seven (7) months later on July
25, 2003 alleging only a claim for lack of informed consent
against Dr. Moore.
3. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3, Plaintiff was required to
file a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint or within sixty
(60) days thereafter.
4. Plaintiff did not file a Certificate of Merit with her
Complaint, and thus, was required to file h.er Certificate of
Merit by September 23, 2003.
5. Rather than filing her Certificate of Merit on
September 23, 2003, Plaintiff filed a Motion to extend the time
for filing a Certificate of Merit pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d)
seeking an additional sixty (60) days within which she may file
her Certificate of Merit.
6. On November 6, 2003, the Honorable J. Wesley Oler, Jr.,
granted Plaintiff's Motion to the extent that Plaintiff was
afforded an additional forty-five (45) days to file a Certificate
of Merit. See Exhibit "A."
7. Pursuant to Judge Oler's Order, Plaintiff was required
to file her Certificate of Merit by December 22, 2003.
8. Plaintiff failed to file a Certificate of Merit in the
time set forth in Judge Oler's Order.
9. Accordingly, on December 23, 2003, Dr. Moore timely
filed a Praecipe for Entry of Judgment of Non Pros Pursuant to
Pa.R.C.P. 1042.6 for failure to file a Certificate of Merit. See
Exhibit "B."
10. At the time the Praecipe for Entry of Judgment of Non
Pros was filed, Dr. Moore's counsel was unaware that Plaintiff
had apparently filed an additional Motion fc, r Extension of Time
on December 22, 2003. Dr. Moore's counsel did not receive a copy
of Plaintiff,s Motion until December 24, 2003.
11. As the only basis for her current Motion, Plaintiff
once again notes the existence of stipulations circulated among
counsel. However, Dr. Moore's counsel has already indicated
that the proposed stipulations are contrary' to law. See Exhibit
12. It is respectfully submitted that no cause exists for
any additional time to file a Certificate of Merit.
13. The note to Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(d) provides, in relevant
part:
In ruling upon a motion to extend time, the court
shall give appropriate consideration Zo the
practicalities of securing expert review. There
is a basis for grantinq an extension of timn
within which to file the certificate of merit if
counsel for the plaintiff was first contacted
shortly before the statute of limitations wan
about to expire, or if, despite diligent efforts
by counsel, records necessary to review tho
validity of the claim are not available.
(emphasis supplied).
14. In the instant case, Plaintiff fails to satisfy either
basis for the grantin9 an additional extension of time within
which to file a Certificate of Merit. Also, Plaintiff has been
afforded more than enough time to secure an appropriate expert.
15. There is no fear that the statute is about to expire in
this case. Also, on May 17, 2001 and June 25, 2001, Plaintiff
signed Authorizations for release of her medical records from Dr.
Moore. Thus, the records relevant to review Plaintiff's informed
consent claim have been in her, or her counsel's possession, for
well over two (2) years. See Exhibit "D."
16. In addition to the seven (7) months between the filing
of the Writ of Summons and the Complaint, Plaintiff has now
enjoyed an additional one hundred and fourteen (114) days to have
this case reviewed by an appropriate licensed professional or to
3
simply determine that expert testimony of an appropriate licensed
professional is unnecessary for prosecution of the claim.
17. Another extension of time for an additional thirty (30)
Days within which to file a Certificate of Merit is not warranted
based on these facts and given Plaintiff's dilatoriness in
complying with the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3 in addition
to Judge Oler's Order.
18. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time
should be denied and the Judgment of Non Pros entered in favor of
Dr. Moore and against Plaintiff on December 23, 2003 should
remain.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., respectfully
requests that this Honorable Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for
Extension of Time and affirm the Judgment of Non Pros entered in
favor of Dr. Moore and against Plaintiff on December 23, 2003.
Date
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPOP~ATION
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. TO
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P.
1042.3 was served upon counsel of record this 31st day of
December, 2003 by depositing said copy in the United States Mail
at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class
delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
Irwin Law Office
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Mette, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Stree~
P.0. Box 5950
Harr±sburg, PA 17110-09.50
By:
Be~C~ E.
FOULKROD ELLIS
PRO~/~SIONJ~_~ CORPOR.ATION
Forbes, t~aralegal
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. TO
PLAINTIFF'S PETITION TO SHOW CAUSE, was served upon counsel of
record this 14th day of January, 2004, by depositing said copy
in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage
prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Beth E. Forbes, Paralegal
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT
HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2004, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
Petition for Rule To Show Cause why the judgment of non pros entered against Plaintiff
by Defendant Barry B. Moore, M.D., should not be stricken, and it appearing that the
judgment was entered while a motion for extension of time filed by Plaintiff was
pending, the praecipe and judgment of non pros are stricken, without prejudice to the
right of Defendant to refile the Praecipe for Entry of Judgment of Non Pros Pursuant to
Pa. R.C.P. 1042.6 in the event that Plaintiff's pending motion for extension is denied.
BY THE COURT,
fi'Nathan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
V~eigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
v/Craig A. Stone, Esq.
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
TeleDhone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: ~
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
- LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Attorneys for Defendant:
B r~. MOOrQ, M_ D~
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
TO: PROTHONOTARy OF CUMBERLAND COUNTy, PENNSYLVANIA
Kindly withdraw the judgment of non pros entered on December
23, 2003, against Plaintiff, Sheila Slater and in favor of
Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D.
Date:
//i Y
Respectfully submitted,
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
~E ESQUIRE
att~r~y~.D. No. 53229
AAR~ JAYMAN, ESQUIRE
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW ENTRY OF JUDGMENT,
counsel of record this 14th day of January, 2004,
said copy in the United States Mail at Harrisburg,
postage prepaid, first class delivery,
was served upon
by depositing
Pennsylvania,
and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
FOULKROD ELLIS
PR~SSIONAL CORPORATION
Beth E. Forbes, ~aralegal
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
~ ~7) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Attorneys for Defendant:
B_~rry~ M,~
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
PENNSYLVANIA
PRAECIPE TO FILE STIPULATION
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNYSLVANIA
Kindly file of record the attached stipulation.
Dated: ~/~/_0f
· - By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Le~Esouire
~ron ~-/Jayrman, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
SHEILA SLATER, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff, :
: No. 03-343
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and :
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendants, : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
STIPULATION
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater, by and through
her counsel, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, and Defendant, Barry B.
Moore, M.D., by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis
Professional Corporation, and hereby stipulate and agree as
follows:
1. Counsel hereby represent and warrant that they are
authorized to enter into this Stipulation on behalf of their
respective clients.
2. The only cause of action asserted by Plaintiff, Sheila
K. Slater in her Complaint against Defendant, Barry B. Moore,
M.D, is for lack of informed consent.
3. No langua§e in Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater's Complaint
shall be construed to imply and/or assert a negligence cause of
action against Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties by their counsel have caused
this Stipulation to be executed and intend to be legally bound
thereby.
Date:
L~Law Of~/~ Harold S.
Nathan C.' wolBY~, Esquire
Sheila K. Slater
Irwin,
III
Date: ~/~
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
~~Esqulre
Att~r~y I.D. No. 53229
Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
Counsel for Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PRAECIPE TO FILE STIPULATION was served upon counsel
record this 5th day of February, 2004, by depositing said copy
in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage
prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
of
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFES~ NAL CORPOP~AT ON
Beth E~. Forbes, P~alegal
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.; and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION LAW
03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2004, upon
consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant
to Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3, the Response of Defendant, Barry B. Moore,
M.D. to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Pa.
R.C.P. 1042.3, and Plaintiff's Certificate of Concurrence and
Request for Hearing Pursuant to C.C.R.C.P. 206-2(c), and following
a conference in chambers of the undersigned judge in which
Plaintiff was represented by Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, and Defendant
Moore was represented by Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire, and pursuant to
an agreement of counsel, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time
is granted to the extent that Plaintiff shall have until February
19, 2004, to file an appropriate Certificate of Merit with respect
to this case, and, in the event that said certificate is not filed
within that time period, upon motion of Defendant Moore a judgment
of non pros will be entered against Plaintiff and in favor of
Defendant Moore without further proceedings and/or argument in
court.
By the Court,
. Wes e~.Q~e~,
Nathan C. Wolfe, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
For the Plaintiff
Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
For the Defendant Moore
pcb
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
1N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
ORDER
AND NOW, this q~'~. day of February, 2004, upon consideration of the Stipulation of
Counsel for Plaintiff and the Defendant Barry B. Moore, M.D. limiting all claims in this matter
to those premised on alleged lack of informed consent sounding in battery and not negligence
and upon consideration of the Stipulation of All Counsel of Record for the voluntary termination
and discontinuance of all claims against the Defendant Holly Spirit Hospital, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
1. All claims, if any, against Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital are voluntarily
terminated and discontinued, with prejudice; and
case; and
3.
Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital shall henceforth be deleted from the caption of the
The action shall proceed without prejudice hereby against the Defendant Barry B.
Moore, M.D. on the stipulated claim.
BY THE COURT:
J{ ~'edle~ Oler, Jr.
390595vl
SHEILA SLATER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA
v. NO. 03-343
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
STIPULATION OF COUNSEL FOR THE VOLUNTARY
DISCONTINUANCE OF CLAIMS
AND NOW, it is hereby stipulated and agreed between counsel of record for the
parties that plaintiff's claims, if any, against defendant Holy Spirit Hospital in the above-
captioned matter are hereby voluntarily terminated and discontinued, with prejudice,
pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 229.
Date:
Date:
Craig A. StOne, -~'qu'l~
HCoOsU;i~aeI f~r Defendant Holy
Spirit
Date:
C-~u'ff'sel for Defendant Barry Moore, M.D.
328247vl
SHE1LA SLATER,
Plaintiff
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.;
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD.;
and HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE TO ENTER JUDGMENT
TO THE PROTHONOTAi~¥:
Please enter judgment in favor of Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital upon the ~rder of Court
dated February ~ _, 2004, approving the Stipulation of All Counsel of Record for the
Voluntary Discontinuance of Claims against Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, with prejudice.
Date: February 4, 2004
By:
tfully ~sybmitted,
;, E~ ~q~& WOODSIDE
Sup. Ct. I.l~.lXo. 15907
3401No~h Front Street
P. O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717)232-5000-Phone
(717) 236-1816-Fax
Attorneys for Defendant
Holy Spirit Hospital
387939vl
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, I, Craig A. Stone, Esquire, hereby certify that I am serving a copy of the
foregoing document upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies
the requiremems of the Pennsylvania Rules for Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of the same
in the United States Mail, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with first-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esquire
Foulkrod Ellis
Suite 305
1800 Linglestown Road
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
Suite 201/202
35 East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Date: February 4, 2004
Michael Navitsky, Esquire
Navitsky, Olson & Wisneski
Suite 303
2040 Linglestown Road
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Craig A. ffto~.~, E~lt~ire
387963vl
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
and
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - I~W
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
STIPULATION
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater, by and through
her counsel, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, and Defendant, Barry B.
Moore, M.D., by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis
Professional Corporation, and hereby stipulate and agree as
follows:
1. Counsel hereby represent and warrant that they are
authorized to enter into this Stipulation on behalf of their
respective clients.
2. The only cause of action asserted by Plaintiff, Sheila
K. Slater in her Complaint against Defendant, Barry B. Moore,
M.D, is for lack of informed consent.
3. No language in Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater's Complaint
shall be construed to imply and/or assert a negligence cause of
action against Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties by their counsel have caused
this Stipulation to be executed and intend to be legal!y bound
thereby.
Date:~
By:
Law Office of Harold S.
Sheila K. Slater
Irwin,
III
Date:
By:
FOULEROD ELLIS
PROFESSIO3~L CORPORATION
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
Counsel for Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
FEB-lO-2004 TUE 03:16 PM FA× NO, P, 02
F~gH RIgK HQ~',If/GFHENT TEL : 717-763-3075 .lan 28'05 12:53 No.O01 P,O2
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of C, pmborland
WRIT OF SUMMONS
VS.
BAP~Y B. MOORE,
NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, LTD
920 CENTURY DRIVE
~C~ICSB~G, PA
HOLY SP~T HOSPITAL'
~3 NORTH 2~~ S~ET
Defeadant
Court of Common Ploas
No, 03.,343
In CMIA~Cion-Law
To BA~.RVB, MOORE, M.D. AND HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL
You are hereby nolificd that SHEILA K. SLATER
the Phllmiff_has /havo e. omm~no~l an ,~'.gon in Civil Action-Law against you which
you ar~ ~oquir~d to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you.
Dam ~/22103
CURTIS R. LONG
Prothonotary
Deputy
Attorney:
N~: NATHAN C. WOLF, ESQUIRE
SUPREME COURT ID # 87380
Address: 3~ EAST HIGH STREET, SUITE 201/20Q
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 243~6090
FEB-lO-2004 TUE 03:16 PM Fh× NO, P, O1
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
3401 NOR'ID FRONT S'fIII~F~T
P.O. IIOX 5950
H^RRlSlaU~G, PA 17118-0950
(717) ~32-51)00 (717) 236-1816
TO: Joyce - Ctmaberland County Prothonotary's Office
FAX NO.: 240-6573
FROM: Craig A. Stone, Esquire
DATE: February 10, 2004
PAGE(S): (INCLU DING COVER 81-1EET) 2
CLiENTNO,: Slater- 6216-9
MESSAGE:
Attached is Writ of Summom'
The hard cody of this tmnsmittai WILL NOT follow,
If there are any problems, please call Susan Ramsay at (717) 232-5000.
NOTICE,
The information contained in this facsimile message is CONFIDENTIAL and intended only for the personal use of the
person named above as addressee. It may contain inlbrmation tha~ is privileged, confidential and exempt fi'om disclosure
under applicable law. If the reader ofthis message is not the intended r~cipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient YOU ARE I, IIgREItY NOTIFIED that any dissen~inafion, distribution, or
copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. It may be a violation of the COnfidentiality sections of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code or of state statutes, and could sobject you to legal action. If yea have received this communication in error,
please notify us by telephone (collect, if necessary), at the number listed above, and return the original message to as at the
address above. Thank you.
NATHAN ~ WOLF, ESQUIRE
AI'rORNEY ID NO. 87380
84 8OUTH PITT STREET
CARl. ISLE PA 17013
AI'rORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
8HEILA K. 8LATEI~
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEA8 OF
Plmlntlff
y.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. '.nd,
Defendant
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
;
: NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
: ,JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF MERIT
PURSUANT TO Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, counsel for the plaintiff, hereby certify that an
appropriate licensed professional has reviewed pertinent records from this matter and
has supplied a written statement setting forth the appropriate standard of care
necessary to obtain informed consent for the surgical procedure at issue in this claim.
IRWIN LAW OFFICE
Date:February 19, 2004 ~~~
~/h~]a n~c. WJ:)~, Esquire
!p.o. 67360
'----AttOrney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
NATHAN C. WOLF, B~QUIRE
AI'rC)RNBY ID NO. B7380
~4 ~OUTH Prl'r STREET
CAR/JSLB PA 170t3
AI'rORNET FOR PLAINTIFF
8HEILA IL m, s a inK,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEA8 OF
Plnlntlff
v.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D,
D®fendnnt
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
;
NO. 2003 - 343 CIVIL TERM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire, have served a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's
Certificate of Concurrence upon the following persons and in the manner indicated:
SERVICE BY U.S. Meil~
Aaron Jayman, Esquire
FOULKROD ELLIS
1800 Lingiestown Road, Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Attorney for Defendant Moore)
IRWIN~
Su~'ern~Court, ID I~o. 87380
Attorney For Plaintiff
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 243-6090
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLAT~,
Plaintiff,
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
Defendant,
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore. M.D,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANT'S MOTION
TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
AND NOW, comes Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D. ("Dr.
Moore"), by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis Professional
Corporation, and moves this Honorable Court to compel discovery
as follows:
1. Plaintiff initiated the instant action via a Writ of
Sun~ons filed on January 22, 2003.
2. To begin evaluating Plaintiff,s claims and preparing a
defense thereto, Dr. Moore served Plaintiff with Interrogatories
and Request for Production on February 4, 2003. Said
Interrogatories and Request for Production are attached hereto as
Exhibits "A" and "B" respectively.
months
4.
Plaintiff,s Complaint was not filed until seven
later on July 25, 2003.
consent against Dr.
(7)
Plaintiff has alleged only a claim for lack of informed
Moore.
5. On February 19, 2004, in light of the fact that
Plaintiff did not respond to either of Dr. Moore's discovery
requests despite the passage over one (1) year, counsel for Dr.
Moore sent a follow-up letter to Plaintiff,s counsel seeking the
discovery. Said correspondence is attached hereto as Exhibit
6. To date, Plaintiff still has not responded to Dr.
Moore,s discovery.
7. In fact, no discovery whatsoever has taken place in
this case since Plaintiff initiated the case.
8. Of particular concern and prejudice to Dr. Moore is
Plaintiff,s failure to provide expert witness discovery to
support her informed consent claim.
9. Dr. Moore's counsel has agreed to schedule the
deposition Dr. Moore and Plaintiff, but needs Plaintiff,s
responses to discovery prior to going forward.
10. Pa.R.C.p. 4005 allows any party to serve on any other
party written interrogatories to be answered by that party.
11. Pa.R.C.P. 4006 requires answers to interrogatories to
be in writing, verified and answered fully, unless objected to,
within thirty (30) days after service of the interrogatories.
12. Pa.R.C.P. 4009.11 allows any party to serve a Request
for Production of Documents and Things upon any other party.
13. Pa.R.C.P. 4409.12 requires the plaintiff to answer
these requests also within (30) days.
14. However, over one (1) year has passed without Plaintiff
responding to either Dr. Moore's Interrogatories or Request for
Production of Documents.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable
Court compel Plaintiff to answer Defendant,s Interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents forthwith.
Respectfully submitted,
Date:%~
By:
FOULKRO~7 ELLIS
PR~ I~ONAL CORPORATION
Atto: ~e~ ~.D. No. 532,29
Aarol S~Jayman, Esquire
Atto~ My I.D. No. 85651
Exhibit A
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 L±n~lestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Attorneys for Defendant:
(717) 213 -4202
SHEILA S LATER,
Plaintiff,
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
and
Barz-v B. Moore, M.D,
: IN 'i'vE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
INTERROGATORIES OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
DIRECTED TO BE ANSWERED BY PLAINTIFF - FIRST SET
TO:
Sheila Slater
c/o: Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that you are hereby required, pursuant to
the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Nos. 4005 and 4006, to
serve upon the undersigned within thirty (30) days from service
hereof your answers in writing and under oath to the
Interrogatories.
These Interrogatories shall be deemed to be continuing
Interrogatories. If, between the time of your Answers to said
Interrogatories and the time of the trial of this case, you or
anyone acting in your behalf learns the identity and whereabouts
of any other witnesses not identified in your said Answers, or if
you obtain or become aware of additional requested information
not supplied in your Answers, you shall promptly furnish the same
to the undersigned by Supplemental Answers.
Introduction
Scope. -- Each interrogatory, including subparts,
constitutes one (1) interrogatory for the purposes of Dauphin
County Local Rule 4005. The subject headings are for
organizational purposes only and do not limit the otherwise
proper use of the interrogatory for other subjects. These
interrogatories are presumptively permissible where relevant,
objections thereto generally will not be indulged.
and
Definitions. -- The following definitions are applicable to
these standard interrogatories:
"Document" means any written, printed, typed, or other
graphic matter of any kind or nature, however produced or
reproduced, including photographs, microfilms, phonographs, video
and audio tapes, punch cards, magnetic tapes, discs, data cells,
drums, and other data compilations from which information can be
obtained.
"Identify', or "Identity,,, means when used in reference
(1) A natural
(a)
(b)
(2)
to ~
person, his or her:
full name; and
present or last known residence and
employment address (including street name and
number, city or town, and state or county);
A document:
(a) its description (e.g., letter, memorandum,
report, etc.), title, and date;
(b) its subject matter;
(c) its author's identity;
(d) its addressee's identity;
(e) its present location; and
(f) its custodian,s identity;
(3) An oral communication:
(a) its date;
(b) the place where it occurred;
(c) its substance;
(d) the identity of the person who made the
communication;
(e) the identity of each person to whom such
communication was made; and
(f) the identity of each person who was present
when such communication was made;
(4) A corporate entity:
(a) its full corporate name;
(b) its date and place of incorporation, if
known; and
(c) its present address and telephone number;
any other context: a description with sufficient
particularity that the thing may thereafter be
specified and recognized, including relevant dates and
places, and the identification of relevant people,
entities, and documents.
"Incident,, means the occurrence that forms the basis of a
cause of action or claim for relief set forth in the complaint or
similar pleading.
"Person" means a natural person, partnership, association,
corporation, or government agency.
"You" means each Plaintiff instituting this action in an
individual capacity and each Plaintiff for whom this action is
being instituted by another in a representative capacity.
Standard Instructions. -- The following instructions are
applicable to these standard interrogatories:
(i) Duty to answer. -- The interrogatories are to be
answered in writing, verified, and served upon the undersigned
within 30 days of their service on you. Objections must be
signed by the attorney making them. In your answers, you must
furnish such information as is available to you, your employees,
representatives, agents, and attorneys. These interrogatories
are deemed to be continuing and as such must be updated when new,
additional or inconsistent information becomes available. Any
objection to the continuing nature of these interrogatories shall
be served within thirty (30) days after service of these
interrogatories.
(2) Claim of privilege. -- With respect to any claim
of privilege or immunity from discovery, you must identify the
privilege or immunity asserted and provide sufficient information
to substantiate the claim.
(3) Option to produce documents. -- In lieu of
identifying documents in response to these interrogatories, you
may provide copies of such documents with appropriate references
to the corresponding interrogatories.
3
101.
General.
Personal information. -- state:
(a) Your full name;
(b) Each other name, if any, which you have used
or by which you have been known;
(c)
The name of your spouse at the time of the
accident and the date and place of your marriage to
such spouse;
(d)
The address of your present residence and
address of each other residence which you
have had during the past five years;
the
(e) Your present occupation and the name and
address of your employer;
(f) Date of your birth;
(g) Your Social Security number;
(h) Your military service and positions held, if
any; and
(i) The schools you have attended and the degrees
or certificates awarded, if any.
4
102 .
Insurance. -- If you are covered by any type of
insurance, including any excess or umbrella insurance,
that might be applicable to the incident in this
matter, state the following with respect to each such
policy:
(a)
(b)
(c)
The name of the insurance carrier which
issued the policy;
The named insured under each policy and the
policy number of each policy;
The type(s) and effective date(s) of each
policy;
(d)
(e)
The amount of coverage provided for injury to
each person, for each occurrence, and in the
aggregate for each policy;
Each exclusion, if any, in the policy which
is applicable to any claim thereunder and any
reasons, if any, why you or the carrier claim
the exclusion is applicable; and
(f) Payments made under said policy.
103 .
Expenses. -- List and describe all expenses,
damages and losses that you have incurred because of
incident.
the
(a)
Please itemize Plaintiff,s medical bills by
identifying the healthcare provider, summary of
service rendered, date(s) of service, and amount
billed;
Please itemize the amount(s) paid by third party
payors, including Plaintiff's medical insurance
carrier(s), to the medical providers listed in
Interrogatory No. 103(a);
(c)
Please itemize the amount(s) paid by Plaintiff(s)
directly to the medical providers listed in
Interrogatory No. 103(a); and
(d)
Please itemize the amount(s) accepted by the
medical providers listed in Interrogatory No.
103(a) as full payment for the service rendered.
(e)
Please itemize amount(s)
Medicaid, Public Welfare,
any other public source.
paid by Medicare,
Public Assistance,
or
6
104.
Please identify any Department of Public Welfare Medical
A
sslstance liens, Medicare/Medicaid liens, liens from any
public source or any other applicable liens.
7
105.
Factual basis for claims and defenses. -- State with
particularity the factual basis for each claim or
defense you are asserting in this case.
106. Witnesses. --
(a) Identify each person who
(1) Was a witness to the incident through
sight or hearing and/or
(2)
Has knowledge of facts concerning the
happening of the incident or conditions
or circumstances at the scene of the
incident prior to, at the time of, or
after the incident.
(b)
With respect to each person so identified,
state that person's exact location and
activity at the time of the incident.
9
107.
Statements. -- If you know of anyone that has given
any statement (as defined by the Rules of Civil
Procedure) concerning this action or its subject
matter, state:
(a) The identity of such person;
(b)
When, where, by whom, and to whom each
statement was made, and whether it was
reduced to writing or otherwise recorded;
and
(c)
The identity of any person who has custody of
any such statement that was reduced to
writing or otherwise recorded.
I0
108.
Reports of incident. -- Identify documents (except
reports of experts subject to Pa. R.C.P. No. 4003.5)
which describe the incident or the cause thereof.
11
109. Demonstrative evidence. -- If you know of the
existence of any photographs, motion pictures, video
recordings, maps, diagrams, or models relevant to the
incident, state:
(a) The nature or type of such item;
(b) The date when such item was made;
(c) The identity of the p~rson that prepared or
made each item; and
(d) The subject that each item represents or
portrays.
12
110. Trial preparation material. -- If you, or someone not
an expert subject to Pa. R.C.P. No. 4003.5, conducted
any investigations of the incident, identify:
(a)
(b)
Each person, and the employer of each person,
who conducted any investigations; and
Ail notes, reports or other documents
prepared during or as a result of the
investigations and the persons who have
custody thereof.
13
111.
Trial witnesses. -- Identify each person you intend to
call as a non-expert witness at the trial of this case,
and for each person identified state your relationship
with the witness and the substance of the facts to
which the witness is expected to testify.
14
112 .
Expert witnesses.
call as a witness at
each expert:
Identify each expert you intend to
the trial of this matter, and for
(a)
(b)
(c)
state the subject matter about which the expert is
expected to testify;
state the substance of the facts and opinions to
which the expert is expected the testify and
a summary of the grounds for each opinion; and
identify the expert's education, training and
experience.
(You may file as your answer to this interrogatory the
report and curriculum vitae of the expert or have the
interrogatory answered by your expert.)
15
113 .
Trial exhibits. -- Identify all exhibits that you
intend to use at the trial of this matter and state
whether they will be used during the liability or
damages portions of the trial.
16
114.
Books, magazines, etc. -- If you intend to use any
book, magazine, or other such writing at trial, state:
(a) The name of the writing;
(b) The author of the writing;
(c) The publisher of the writing;
(d) The date of publication of the writing; and
(e) The identity of the custodian of the writing.
17
115. Admissions. -- If you intend to use any admissions
of a party at trial, identify such admission(s)°
18
116 .
If you have ever asserted a claim or filed suit for any
purpose including, without limitation, a claim for injury,
damage, property damage, or disability, workmen's
compensation or occupational disease to obtain benefits,
please identify the claim or suit, the nature of the
injuries alleged in each such suit, the period during which
you were disabled, and, if said suit has been terminated,
state the results of the trial or settlement, including the
amounts of each recovery or settlement, if any.
19
II.
201.
Personal In_~gj_B~.
Injuries and diseases alleged. -- Identify all
injuries or diseases that you allege you suffered as
result of the incident.
20
202 .
Prior or subsequent injuries or diseases. ~- if,
either prior to or subsequent to the incident, you
suffered any injury or disease in those portions of the
body claimed by you to have been affected by the
incident, state:
(a) The injury or disease you suffered-
(b) The date and place of any accident if such
injury or disease was caused by an accident;
(c)
The identity of hospitals, doctors, or
practitioners who rendered treatment or
examination because of such injury or
disease; and
(d)
The identity of anyone against whom a claim
was made, and the tribunal and docket number
of any claim or lawsuit that was filed in
connection with such injury or disease.
21
203.
Medical treatment. -~ If you received medical
treatment or examination (including X-rays) because of
injury or disease you suffered as a result of the
incident, state:
(a) The identity of each hospital at which you
were treated or examined;
(b)
The date on which each such treatment or
examination at a hospital was rendered, and
the charge by the hospital for each;
(c) The identity of each doctor or practitioner
by whom you were treated or examined;
(d)
The date on which each such treatment oz
examination by a doctor or practitioner was
rendered, and the charge for each; and
(e)
The identity of any documents (except
reports of experts subject to Pa.R.C.P.
No. 4003.5) regarding any medical treatment or
examination, setting forth the author and
date of such document(s).
22
204.
Earnings before the incident. -- For the period of
three years immediately preceding the date of the
incident, state:
The name and address of each of your
employers or, if you were self-employed
during any portion of that period, each of
your business addresses and the name of the
business while self-employed;
(b)
The dates of commencement and termination of
each of your periods of employment or self-
employment;
(c) The nature of your occupation in each
employment or self-employment; and
(d)
The wage, salary, or rate of earnings
received by you in each employment or self-
employment, and the amount of income from
employment and self-employment for each year.
23
205. Earnings after, the incident. -- If you have engaged in
one or more ~ainful occupations subsequent to the date
of the incident, state:
The name and address of each of your
employers or, if you were self-employed at
anytime subsequent to the incident, each of
your business addresses and the name of the
business while self-employed;
(b)
The dates of commencement and termination of
each of your periods of employment or self-
employment;
(c)
The nature of your occupation in each
employment or self-employment;
(d)
The wa~e, salary, or rate of earnings
received by you in each employment or self-
employment, and the amount of income from
employment and self-employment for each year;
and
(e)
The date(s) of any absence(s) from your
occupation resultin9 from any injury or
disease suffered in this incident and the
amount of any earnings or other benefits lost
by you because of such absence(s).
24
206.
Limitation of duties and activities after the incident.
-- If, as a result of this incident, you have been
unable to perform any of your customary occupational
duties or social or other activities in the same manner
as prior to the incident, state with particularity:
(a)
The duties and/or activities you have been
unable to perform;
(b) The periods of time you have been unable to
perform; and
(c) The identity of all persons having knowledge
thereof.
25
207.
Substance impairment. -- If you consumed any alcoholic
beverage, sedative, tranquilizer, marijuana, cocaine,
hashish, or other drug, medicine or pill during the
eight hours immediately preceding the incident, state:
(a) The nature, amount, and type of item
consumed;
(b)
(c)
The amount of time over which consumed;
The identity of any and all persons who have
any knowledge as to the consumption of those
i~ems; and
(d)
The identity of the physician or medical
practitioner or other person who gave,
purchased or prescribed any of said items,
any.
if
26
208.
Physical or mental disability. -- If you were under
any physical or mental disability at the time of the
incident, explain the disability.
27
209. Completely identify all medical records which you believe
tends to support your contentions of lability.
28
210.
Please identify all health care providers, by whom or at
which you received treatment for any reason from the date of
the incident giving rise to this action to the present time
by stating:
(a) the name and address of the health care provider;
(b) the date of each examination, treatment or
surgery; and
(c)
the nature of the sickness or injury for which you
were examined, treated and/or operated upon on
each such occasion.
29
211.
Please identify all health care providers by whom or at
which you received treatment for any reason within the ten
years preceding the date upon which you became a patient of
Defendant(s) by stating:
(a) the name and address of the health care provider;
(b) the date of each examination, treatment or
surgery; and
(c)
the nature of the sickness or injury for which you
were examined, treated and/or operated upon on
each such occasion.
30
IV.
501.
Medical Malpractic~'
Cause of injuries. -- Identify each person that you
claim caused your injury and, with respect to each such
person, state whether you claim that:
(a)
He/she was not qualified to undertake the
type of treatment, surgery, or examination
he/she gave;
(b) He/she failed to diagnose your injury
correctly;
(c) He/she did not obtain proper consent or
authorization;
(d)
(e)
He/she did not maintain proper standards of
hygiene or sterilization;
He/she failed to use modern techniques and
procedures;
(f)
(g)
He/she did not give the correct treatment;
He/she failed to observe proper preoperative,
operative or postoperative procedures,
specifying which; or
(h)
(i)
He/she was otherwise negligent (specifying
the nature of the negligence).
With respect to any of the above which you claim
are applicable, describe in detail the specific
conduct of the party propounding these
interrogatories and all other defendants that you
claim deviated from the standard of care.
31
503.
Professional contacts. -~ Set forth the date(s)
had professional contact with Defendant and
the nature of such contact.
you
32
504.
Informed consent. -~ If lack of informed consent is
pleaded in the complaint, then, with respect to any
conversation of which you are aware in which the nature
of, alternatives to, and/or risks of the procedure in
question were discussed with the plaintiff/patient, set
forth the following:
(a) The date(s) of each conversation;
(b) The substance of each conversation;
(c) The identity of each party to the
conversation;
(d)
The identity of each witness to the
conversation; and
(e)
Whether there were any documents relating to
the nature of, alternative to, and/or risk of
the procedure presented to the plaintiff/patient.
33
Date:
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSION
Leigh A.J.
Attorney
CORPOP~ATION
~lis, ~squire
No. 53229
Attorney f! Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
1800 Linglestown Road
Harrisburg, .PA 17110
(717) 213-4200
Suite 305
34
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing INTERROGATORIES OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
DIRECTED TO BE ANSWERED BY PLAINTIFF - FIRST SET was served upon
counsel of record this 4th day of February, 2003, by depositing
said copy in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
postage prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Beth E. Forbes,~ Paralegal
Exhibit B
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
~ax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILASLATER,
: IN THE
Plaintiff,
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
and
Attorneys for Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS O~
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: No. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OF DEFENDANT,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. DIRECTED TO BE ANSWERED
BY PLAINTIFF - FIRST SET
TO:
Sheila Slater
c/o: Nathan C. Wolfe, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 4009, you are hereby requested to
produce the below listed documents and/or items for purposes of
discovery. This material will be examined and/or photocopied;
photograph negatives will be processed and photographs
reproduced. Said documents or tangible things are to be produced
at the offices of FOULKROD ELLIS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION,
1800 Linglestown Road - Suite 305, Harrisburg, PA 17110, within
thirty (30) days of the date of service hereof and supplemented
thereafter:
1. The entire contents of any investigation file or files
and any and all documents in Plaintiffs, possession which support
or relate to the allegations of Plaintiffs, Complaint (excluding
the mental impressions of Plaintiffs, attorney or his
conclusions, opinions, memoranda, notes or summaries, legal
research or legal theories, and excludin9 the mental impressions,
conclusions or opinions respectin9 the value or merit of a claim
or defense or respectln9 strategy or tactics of a representative
of Plaintiffs, other than their attorney).
2. Any and all statements concernin9 this action or its
subject matter made by a party or its agents, servants or
employees, or by a witness, as defined by Pa. R.C.P. No. 4003.4.
3. Any and all documents containin9 the names and home and
business addresses of all individuals contacted as potential
witnesses.
4. Reports of any and all experts who will testify at trial
includin9 any and all "preliminary,, reports, and all documents
and records reviewed by each such expert includin~ all
correspondence or memoranda.
5. The curriculum vitae of each and every expert who will
be called to testify at trial.
6. Any and all medical records, autopsy reports,
physician,s reports and bills, hospital records or abstracts of
same which relate in any way to the injuries allegedly sustained
by Plaintiff.
7. Copies of your federal and state income tax returns for
the five years immediately precedin~ the events ~ivin~ rise to
this action and for each year subsequent thereto and all
correspondin9 W-2 forms.
8. All documents or other demonstrative evidence which
Plaintiff intends to introduce or use at trial.
9. All documents identified, described, specified or
referenced in Plaintiff,s responses to Defendant,s
Interrogatories __ First Set served upon Plaintiff simultaneously
with this Request for Production of Documents.
10. All medical and related bills incurred which
evidence items of special damage.
11. Any and all releases si~ned by the Plaintiff.
12. In the event this lawsuit involves either a wrongful
death action or a survival action, a copy of the Petition for the
Issuance of the Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration
and a copy of any "Letters, issued by the Re~±ster of Wills, as
well as any Inventory and Appraisement and any proposed or final
Schedule of Distribution and any other Order, Adjudication or
Decree with respect to administration of the Decedent,s estate.
13. In the event a minor or incapacitated person is
entitled to a recovery in this action, a copy of any Petition and
any Order or Adjudication with respect to his/her status of
incapacity.
- 3
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Deign A.J~llis, Esquire'
Attorney ~D. No. 53229
Attorneys~for Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
1800 Linglestown Road
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 213-4200
Suite 305
CERTIFI~TE OF SERyICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and Correct copies of the
foregoing REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUN~NTS OF DEFENDANT, BARRY
B. MOORE, M.D. DIRECTED TO BE ANSWERED BY PLAINTIFF - FIRST SET
was served upon Counsel of record this 4th day of February,
2003, by depositing said copy in the United States Mail at
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid, first class delivery,
and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
35 E. High Street, Suite 201/202
Carlisle, PA 17013
Craig A. Stone, Esquire
Metre, Evans & Woodside
340! North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
eth E. Forbes, Paralegal
Exhibit C
FOULKROD ELLIS
1800 LtNGLESTOWN ROAD - SUITE 306
NARRtSEURG. PENNSYLVANIA 17110
S. WALTER FOULKRDD,
LEIGH A.J. ELLIS
ANDREW H, FOULKROD
AARON S, JAYMAN
MICHAEL C. MONGtELLO
TELEPHONE
{717} 213-4200
FAX
{717) 213-4202
E-MAIL
law@foulkrod.com
February 19, 2004
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Re: Slater v. Moore, et al.
Docket No. 03-343
FEPC ~3441
As always,
Dear Nathan:
Upon reviewing the file, I noticed that we served discovery
requests over one year ago on February 4, 2003 in the above-
referenced matter. To date, we have not received responses.
Please provide your responses in the near future to avoid the
filing of a Motion to Compel.
Also, I will need your responses prior to your client'S
deposition.
I look forward to hearing from you.
ASJ:bef
bcc:
Sinc ,~lY yours,
~S. Jayman
Keith E. Richard, Claims Examiner (PMSLIC $338984-01)
Certified as a Civil Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy
A Pennsylvarda Supreme Court Accredited Agency
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY was served upon
counsel of record this 9th day of March, 2004, by depositing
said copy in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
postage prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 170~3
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROF~SIONAL CORPORATION
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
BARRY B. MOORE, :
M.D.; and HOLY SPIRIT :
HOSPITAL, :
Defendants :
NO. 03-343 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 15t~ day of March, 2004, upon consideration of Defendant's
Motion To Compel Discovery, a Rule is hereby issued upon Plaintiff to show cause why
the relief requested should not be granted.
RULE RETURNABLE within 20 days of service.
-~{athan C. Wolf, Esq.
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
~Leigh A.J. Ellis, Esq.
1800 Linglestown Road
Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
BY THE COURT,
irc
FOULKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestown Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
Fax: (717) 213-4202
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
V.
MOORE, M.D.
Defendant,
BARRY B.
Attorneys for Defendant:
Barry B. Moore. M.D.
: IN THE COURT OF COI~RVlON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 03-343
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.
TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D. ("Dr.
Moore"), by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis Professional
Corporation and answers Plaintiff's Complaint, and avers the
following in support thereof:
1. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Dr. Moore is
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
to the truth of the corresponding averments of Plaintiff's
Complaint, and the same are accordingly denied and strict proof
thereof is demanded at trial.
2. Admitted.
3-10. Denied. Dr. Moore denies the corresponding
paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint in accordance with Pa.R.C.P.
1029(e). Strict proof of the corresponding averments is demanded
at the time of trial.
11. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Dr. Moore is
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
to the truth of the corresponding averments of Plaintiff's
Complaint, and the same are denied and strict proof demanded at
trial.
12.
Complaint
Denied. The corresponding paragraph of Plaintiff's
sets forth conclusions of law which are denied by
operation of law, and accordingly, no response is required. To
the extent a response may be deemed necessary, it is specifically
denied that Dr. Moore "provided Plaintiff with substandard
information regarding the risks involved in the medical care she
was due to receive, that is, his description of the potential for
negative results that were associated with the medical care she
was to undergo fell below the appropriate standard of medical
care and this violation of the appropriate standard of medical
care caused, contributed to the cause, or increased the risk of
harm to Plaintiff for all injuries and damages suffered by her as
alleged herein." To the contrary, Dr. Moore informed Plaintiff
of the risks, alternatives and benefits that a reasonably prudent
person would consider to be material to the decision whether or
not to undergo the procedure and Plaintiff willingly and
knowingly consented to the procedure by Dr. Moore. The
Stipulation filed on February 6, 2004 is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
13-18. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Dr. Moore
is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth of the corresponding averments of Plaintiff's
Complaint, and the same are denied and strict proof demanded at
trial. By way of further response, Dr. Moore denies the
2
corresponding paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint in accordance
with Pa.R.C.P. 1029(e).
19-20. Denied. The corresponding paragraphs of Plaintiff,s
Complaint set forth conclusions of law which are denied by
operation of law, and accordingly, no responses are required.
Dr. Moore also denies the corresponding paragraphs of Plaintiff's
Complaint in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1029(e). Strict proof of
the corresponding averments is demanded at the time of trial.
21. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Dr. Moore is
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
to the truth of the corresponding averments of Plaintiff,s
Complaint, and the same are denied and strict proof demanded at
trial. By way of further response, Dr. Moore denies the
corresponding paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint in accordance
with Pa.R.C.P. 1029(e).
COUNT I
Informed Consent
Plaintiff v. Defendant Barr~ B. Moore, M.D.
22. The foregoing paragraphs are incorporated herein by
reference as if set forth fully herein at length.
23. Denied. The corresponding paragraph of Plaintiff's
Complaint sets forth conclusions of law which are denied by
operation of law, and accordingly, no responses are required. By
way of further answer, Dr. Moore obtained Plaintiff's consent
prior to performing the posterior cervical laminectomy.
Plaintiff was advised by Dr. Moore of the alternatives to
surgery, the nature of the proposed procedure, and the risks and
3
complications that a reasonable patient would consider to be
material to the decision of whether or not to undergo the
procedure and Plaintiff willing and knowingly consented to the
procedure.
24-28. Denied. Dr. Moore denies the corresponding
paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint in accordance with Pa.R.C.P.
1029(e). Strict proof of the corresponding averments is demanded
at the time of trial. By way of further answer, Dr. Moore
advised Plaintiff of the alternatives to surgery, the nature of
the proposed procedure, and the risks and complications that a
reasonably prudent patient would consider to be material to the
decision of whether or not to undergo the procedure, and
Plaintiff willingly and knowingly consented to the procedure.
29. Denied. The corresponding paragraph of Plaintiff's
Complaint sets forth a conclusion of law which is denied by
operation of law, and accordingly, no response is required. By
way of further response, it is specifically denied that Dr. Moore
failed in his duty owed to Plaintiff with respect to providing
her information as she reasonably should have had to decide
whether to undergo the surgery. To the contrary, Dr. Moore
advised Plaintiff of the alternatives to surgery, the nature of
the proposed procedure, and the risks and complications that a
reasonable patient would consider to be material to the decision
of whether or not to undergo the procedure, and Plaintiff
willingly and knowingly consented to the procedure.
30. Denied. The corresponding paragraph of Plaintiff's
Complaint sets forth a conclusion of law which is denied by
4
operation of law, and accordingly, no response is required. By
way of further response, it is specifically denied that Dr. Moore
failed to explain to Plaintiff that surgery was simply an option
given Plaintiff's medical condition, complaints, and radiological
findings and that surgery was not necessary, nor was it warranted
or appropriate under the circumstances. To the contrary, Dr.
Moore advised Plaintiff of the alternatives to surgery, the
nature of the proposed procedure, and the risks and complications
that a reasonable patient would consider to be material to the
decision of whether or not to undergo the procedure, and
Plaintiff willingly and knowingly consented to the procedure.
31. Denied. Dr. Moore is without sufficient knowledge or
information to form an opinion or belief as to the truth of the
corresponding averments of Plaintiff,s Complaint, and the same
are denied and strict proof demanded at trial.
32. Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted
that Dr. Moore told Plaintiff that she could be paralyzed or
suffer from paresthesia as a result of this surgery. The
remaining corresponding allegations of this paragraph of
Plaintiff,s Complaint are denied as conclusions of law as well as
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1029(e) and strict proof is demanded at
trial. By way of further answer, Dr. Moore advised Plaintiff of
the alternatives to surgery, the nature of the proposed procedure
and the risks and complications that a reasonable patient would
consider to be material to the decision of whether or not to
undergo the procedure, and Plaintiff willingly and knowingly
consented to the procedure.
5
33. Denied. Dr. Moore is without sufficient knowledge or
information to form an opinion or belief as to the truth of the
corresponding averments of Plaintiff,s Complaint and the same are
deemed denied and strict proof demanded at trial. By way of
further answer, Dr. Moore advised Plaintiff of the alternatives
to surgery, the nature of the proposed procedure, and the risks
and complications that a reasonable patient would consider to be
material the decision of whether or not to undergo the procedure,
and Plaintiff willingly and knowingly consented to the procedure.
34. Denied. The corresponding paragraph of Plaintiff,s
Complaint sets forth a conclusion of law which is denied by
operation of law, and accordingly, no response is required. It
is specifically denied that Dr. Moore failed to provide Plaintiff
with the information necessary for her to provide an informed
consent to surgery. To the contrary, Dr. Moore advised Plaintiff
of the alternatives to surgery, the nature of the proposed
procedure, and the risks and complications that a reasonable
patient would consider to be material to the decision of whether
or not to undergo the procedure, and Plaintiff willingly and
knowingly consented to the procedure.
35. Denied. The corresponding paragraph of Plaintiff,s
Complaint sets forth a conclusion of law which is denied by
operation of law, and accordingly, no response is required. It
is specifically denied that Dr. Moore failed to obtain
Plaintiff,s consent prior to the surgery constituting a technical
battery. To the contrary, Dr. Moore advised Plaintiff of the
alternatives to surgery, the nature of the proposed procedure,
6
and the risks and complications that a reasonable patient would
consider to be material to the decision of whether or not to
undergo the procedure, and Plaintiff willingly and knowingly
consented to the procedure.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., demands judgment
in his favor and against Plaintiff.
NEW MATTE~
36. The foregoing paragraphs are incorporated herein by
reference as though set forth fully at length.
37. Plaintiff,s Complaint fails to state any claim upon
which relief can be granted as against Dr. Moore.
38. To the extent currently applicable, or to the extent
that it can later become applicable, Dr. Moore pleads the statute
of imitations to preserve this affirmative defense for the
record.
39. At all times and for all purposes material to the
events set out in Plaintiff,s Complaint, Dr. Moore acted
appropriately in obtaining Plaintiff,s informed consent. Dr.
Moore's actions were consistent with the standard of care
applicable under similar circumstances.
40. Plaintiff was advised of the alternatives to surgery,
the nature of the proposed procedure, and the risks and
complications that a reasonable patient would consider to be
material to the decision of whether or not to undergo the
procedure and Plaintiff willingly and knowingly consented to the
procedure performed by Dr. Moore.
7
41. The Doctrine of Informed Consent in Pennsylvania is
based upon a battery. A battery is not a negligent act.
42. To the extent that Plaintiff sustained any injury or
damages claimed in Plaintiff,s Complaint, Dr. Moore in no way
negligently or otherwise caused or contributed to cause any such
injury of damage.
43. Plaintiff,s allegation of lack of informed consent as
against Dr. Moore is without reasonable basis in fact or medicine
and may constitute an abuse of civil process.
44. Dr. Moore hereby asserts and incorporates by reference
any and all defenses which may be applicable to him under the
Pennsylvania Health Care Services Malpractice Act, 40 P.S.
~1301.101, et seq.
45. Dr. Moore raises all affirmative defenses of the
Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act,
also known as Act 13 of 2002 as a limit/bar to Plaintiff,s
claims.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D., demands judgment
in his favor and against Plaintiff.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
By:
FOUL
Attor] ~
Leigh ~j
Attorney
~O~ELLIS
ONAL CORPORATION
quire
565~
E~lis, Esquire
D~] No. 53229
8
VERIFICATION
I, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. have read the foregoing ANSWER AND
NEW MATTER OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE, M.D., TO PLAINTIFF,S
COMPLAINT, which has been drafted by my counsel on my behalf.
The information contained therein is based upon information I
have provided to my counsel but the wording and phraseology is
not mine. The information contained in the ANSWER AND NEW MATTER
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief.
This Verification is made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa.C.S.A. ~4904, relating to unsworn fabrication to authorities
which provides that, if I knowingly make false averments, I may
be subject to criminal penalties.
Date:
BARRY BJMOORE, M. D.
FOLTLKROD ELLIS
Professional Corporation
1800 Linglestow~ Rd., Suite 305
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 213-4200
SHEILA SLATER,
Plaintiff,
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL,
Defendants,
~ttorneys for Defendant:
B r B M ore M.D.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND coUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 03-343
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEbS%AIDED
pP~AECIPE TO FILE STIPULATION
TO: PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNYSLVANIA
Kindly file of record the attached stipulation.
Dated:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPOP~ATION
~~Esquir~
A~,/Jayman, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
SHEILA SLATER, :
Plaintiff, ·
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D. and :
HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL, :
:
Defendants, :
IN THE COURT OF coMMON PLEAS OF
cUMBERLAND COUNTY, pENNSYLVANIA
No. 03-343
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
STIPULATION
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater, by and through
her counsel, Nathan C. wolf, Esquire, and Defendant, Barry B.
Moore, M.D., by and through his counsel, Foulkrod Ellis
Professional Corporation, and hereby stipulate and agree as
follows:
1. Counsel hereby represent and warrant that they are
authorized to enter into this Stipulation on behalf of their
respective clients.
2. The only cause of action asserted by Plaintiff, Sheila
K. Slater in her Complaint against Defendant, Barry B. Moore,
M.D, is for lack of informed consent.
3. No language in Plaintiff, Sheila K. Slater's Complaint
shall be construed to imply and/or assert a negligence cause of
action against Defendant, Barry B. Moore, M.D.
IN WITNESS W-HEREOF, the parties by their counsel have caused
this stipulation to be executed and intend to be legally bound
thereby.
Date:
Law 0ffic~//~ Harold S.
By-
~Na~n~C.' Wo~~, Esquire
A~torney I.D. N?. 87380
C~unssl for plaintiff,
Sheila K. Slater
Irwin,
III
Date:
By:
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
~~Esquire
At~r~y I.D. No. 53229
Aaron S. Jayraan, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 85651
Counsel for Defendant,
Barry B. Moore, M.D.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing PP~AECIPE TO FILE STIPULATION was served upon counsel of
record this 5th day of February, 2004, by depositing said copy
in the United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage
prepaid, first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
64 South Pitt Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
FOULKROD ELLIS
CO PO T ON
BY:Beth E7. Forbes, P~alegal
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that true and correct copies of the
foregoing ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER OF DEFENDANT, BARRY B. MOORE,
M.D. TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT was served upon counsel of record
this 15th day of March, 2004, by depositing said copy in the
United States Mail at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, postage prepaid,
first class delivery, and addressed as follows:
Nathan C. Wolf, Esquire
Attorney at Law
37 South Hanover Street
Suite 201
Carlisle, PA 17013
FOULKROD ELLIS
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
BY:Beth E. Forbes~gal
HAROLD 8. IRWIN, III, ESQ
ATTORNEY ID NO. 29920
64 SOUTH PITT STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 243-~090
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
SHEILA K. SLATER,
Plaintiff
V.
BARRY B. MOORE, M.D.,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: NO. 2003 -,i~3'CIVIL TERM
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE TO SETTLE AND DISCONTINUF
To the Prothonotary:
Please settle and discontinue the above matter, with prejudice.
June 7, 2004