HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-06812
" '
~'
] I
e
I
0 i
I
" I
i
I
~
]
C-'
.~
)
/'
". ,
;'
I'
I
~..
J
I
I
"
" ,
CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Wife and Husband, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PllIintiffs
v.
NO. 97-6812
JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and
MICHAEL GRABARITS, Husband : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
and Wife, and SARAH ANN HALEY,:
Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOT I C..I
YOU KAVD BIIN S~ID IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the
claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action
within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by
attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or
objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned
that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a
jUdgment may be entered against YOll by the Court without further
notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money
or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAU THIS PAPIR TO YOUR LAWYIR AT ONCI. II'
YOU DO NOT KAVI A LAWYJ!R OR CANNOT AJ'I'ORD ONI, GO TO OR
TILIPHONB THI OI'I'ICI SIT I'ORTH BILOW TO I'IND OUT WHBRI
YOU CAN GIT LOCAL IIHLP.
LAWYIR RBI'IRRAL SBRVICB
CUMBIRLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 Lib.rty Av.nu.
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-31U
5. At the aforementioned time and place, it was daylight,
the road surface was dry, and there were no adverse weather
conditions.
6. At the aforementioned time and place, the Plaintiff,
CIIERYL RUDY, was a passenger in a motor vehicle being operated by
her husband, RICHARD RUDY, and travelling south on S.R. 11.
7. At the aforementioned time and place, the Defendant,
SARAH ANN HALEY, was operating a 1989 Ford Taurus owned by JEAN
GRABARITS and MICIIAEL GRABARITS, and approaching a stop sign at
Shady Lane, which intersected with S.R. 11.
8. At the aforementioned time and place, the Defendant,
SARAH ANN HALEY, failed to observe the Rudy vehicle travelling on
S.R. 11, causing her to strike the right front passenger portion
of the Rudy vehicle.
9. At the aforementioned time and place the Plaintiff,
CIIERYL RUDY, was wearing her seat belt.
COUNT I
Q1lIRXL RUDY v. SAR.l\H ANH HALEY
NEGLIGENCE
10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the Plaintiffs' Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as if
set forth in full.
11. The accident was caused solely by the negligence of the
Defendant, SARAH ANll HALEY, and was in no way the fault of the
Plaintiffs, CHERYL RUDY or RICIIARD RUDY.
12. The
consisted of:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
negligence of the Defendant, SARAH ANN HALEY,
Inattentiveness;
Following too closely;
Driving too fast for conditions;
Operating her vehicle at an excessive rate of
speed under the circumstances;
Failing to have her vehicle under proper and
adequate control;
Failing to apply the brakes in time to avoid the
collision:
Negligently applying the brakes;
Failing to observe the Plaintiffs' vehicle
lawfully on the highway:
Failing to operate her vehicle in accordance with
existing traffic conditions and traffic controls;
Failing to keep a reasonable lookout for other
vehicles l.awfully on the road;
Operating her vehicle as to create a dangerous
situation for vehicles on the roadway;
Failing to stop at a stop sign: and
Operating a motor vehicle in violation of the
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code, Section 3323,
which is negligence per se.
13. As a direct and proximate result of the accident, the
Plaintiff, CHERYL RUDY. suffered serious and permanent injuries
whioh include the followingl
A. Neck pain:
B. Back pain;
C. Shoulder painl
D. Headaches I and
E. Herniated disc.
14. As a direct and proximate result of the accident, the
Plaintiff, CHERYL RUDY, has incurred the following medical
expenses to date:
Polyclinic Hospital
2/28/96 - 5/21/96 $ 1,915.00
Leidy Chiropractic
10/10/96 - 6/30/97 $ 8,891.00
Holy spirit Hospital
1/25/96 $ 122.00
Keystone Spine Center
3/27/97 - 6/09/97 $ 763.00
East Pennsboro Ambulance
1/25/96 $ 275.00
Donald A. Bruaw, D.O.
9/08/76 - 3/15/96 $ 100.00
Herd Clinic
11/11/96 - 1/15/97 $ 3,031.00
Alternative Physical Therapy
2/08/97 - 3/24/97 $ 780.00
James R. Hamsher, M.D.
12/17/96 - 10/07/97 $ 356.69
TOTAL: $ 16,233.69
15. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries
sustained in the aocident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL RUDY, may
continue to incur medical expenses in the future.
16. A~ a direct and proximate result of the injuries
sustained in the accident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL RUDY, sustained
a wage loss and may continue to incur additional wage loss in the
future.
17. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries
sustained in the motor vehicle accident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL
RUDY, has been advised and, therefore, avers, that the
aforementioned injuries are permanent in nature and effect.
18. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries
sustained in the motor vehicle accident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL
RUDY, has undergone in the past, and wlll continue in the future,
to undergo great pain and sutfering.
19. As a direct and proximate result of the injurie~
sustained in the motor vehicle accident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL
RUDY, has been obliged to expend various sums of money and to
incur various expenses for the injuries that she has suffered,
and may continue to incur the same in the future.
20. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries
sustained in the motor vehicle accident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL
RUDY, has suffered a permanent diminution of her ability to enjoy
life and life's pleasures.
21. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries
sustained in the motor vehicle accident, the Plaintiff, CHERYL
RUDY, has suffered a loss of earnings and impairment of her
earning power and capacity.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, CHERYL RUDY, demands judgment of
the Defendant, SARAH ANN t~LEY, in an amount in excess of Thirty-
Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) and in excess of the amount
required in compulsory arbitration.
COUNT II
RICHARD RUDY v. SARAH ANN HALBY
LOSS or CONSORT~
22. Paragraphs 1 through 21 of the Plaintiffs' Complaint
are incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as
if set forth in full.
23. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant, SARA
ANN HALEY'S, negligence, the Plaintiff, RICHARD RUDY, has been
forced to incur the loss of society, companionship, and services
of his wife, CHERYL RUDY.
24. The Plaintiff, RICHARD RUDY, will continue to incur the
same losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, RICHARD RUDY, demands jUdgement of
the Defendant, SARAH ANN HALEY, in the amount in excess of the
amount requiring Compulsory Arbitration.
COUNT III
CHBRYL RUDY v. JsAN KARIS ORABARITS Mnd
MICHABL GRABARITS
NBGL~ BNTRUSTMBNT
25. Paragraphs 1 through 24 of the Plaintiffs' Complaint
are incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as
if set forth in full.
26. The negligence of the Defendants, JEAN MARIE GRABARITS
and MICHAEL GRABARITS, consisted of the followingl
A. Failing to accompany a novice driver in their own
personal vehicle while the novice driver was
operating the vehicle I
B. Failing to take adequate precautions to ensure
that the novice driver would operate their vehicle
in a reasonable and prudent manner/
C. Failing to adequately yecure the driving record of
the Defendant, SARAH ANN HALEY/
D. Allowing a novice driver to operate their vehicle
in a negligent manner/
E. Failing to ensure that a novice driver was capable
of operating their automobile under prevailing
weather conditions which existed at the time of
the aocident/ and
F. Negligently entrusting their motor vehicle to a
novice driver.
27. The accident was caused by the negligence of the
Defendants, JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and MICHAEL GRABARITS, and was
in no way caused by the Plaintiffs.
28. Plaintiff incorporates Paragraphs 13 through 21 of her
Complaint relating to damages, by reference, as if set forth in
full.
MiEREFORE, the Plaintiff, CHERYL RUDY, demands judgment of
the Defendants, JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and MICHAEL GRABARITS, in an
amount in excess of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) and
in excess of the amount required in oompulsory arbitration.
COUHT IV
RICIlARD RUDY v, JEMI MARIE ORABARIT8 and
MICIlAEL ORABARITQ
LOSS or CONSORTIUH
29. Paragraphs 1 through 28 of the Plaintiffs' Complaint
are incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as
it set forth in full.
30. As a direot and proximate result of the Defendants,
JEAN HARlE GRABARITS and MICHAEL GRABARITS', negligenoe, the
Plaintiff, RICHARD RUDY, has been foroed to inour the loss of
sooiety, oompanionship, and services of his wife, CHERYL RUDY.
31. The Plaintiff, RICHARD RUDY, will oontinue to inour the
same lossos in the future.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, RICHARD RUDY, demands judgement of
the Defendants, JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and MICHAEL GRABARITS, in
the amount in exoess of the amount requiring compulsory
Arbitration.
Respeotfully submitted,
SCHMIDT AND RONCA, P.C.
By:
Alv
Scott B. Cooper
Attorney at Law
209 state Street
H~rrisburg, PA 17101
Attorney I.D. '70242
(717) 232-6300
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
,I
1
ill
(' A' I': 11<): I 'J',," 1:1".1
CCiI'l11C'1l',o/I-:,\I.TII I iF 11,1.11 " I '; ;.111,\:
CCIlHlTY ,iF r'IJlHiI:hl~,\111
f).li[IY_' 'IIF:FiYI, 1,1 AI
1/,;;,
IJ!j~[\_AI.;IT'; 110,'11 il,\I,II-: 1':1 AI
~Ji_L Ttl.! il'_l-! ;+} ,.; L ~ll,':
j 1,'1 ': '11
"I ,illl 'I
'..'1111
t./1
11,1'. h.
J t'l I j"
',,11l,II,
I~.
lY
Ili'll
n~)t11("'d ..11.'1' 11'/ HIt
t." '",'J
out W',I
IiI
; " I, , " I I. l.l. I L, I ," I ,
, I , . '1111 ! ji) 1 I
Ilil 11',1.: t u
"'_,1'
Iff;" r.'1J t. 1. ';~'. "j I,! 10- ':h ,..!
II : ~' II
tll ~"':<I-'.";-' th,' ',/. I ~,I I;
_~_~~) T Iii-' ',I,il'l-"t:";'I'
'-Jfl ./::.'. 1 !.:.I I ...1;:.1 I lll. 1 " , I I, , I .... I .~ ; , , !'
.,
t. h,,~ I I i 'I,_'h. oo I [ ';c .. " I , I I " I I ,I " . I, I , " : ,
..
'.:-;tI,';lr L f J .
~:~/~ ///
'~p- ~//
c.::--ft;~~?~~:~ "
,-
,
,
[\ (I ,~, t, ,. J. I"i .: I
(. II ~ L. I . 1,1 ii'
';;1.1[" c; I...
[.+"111.'".1 II I., I'IJI t
1;'
,I,
-"fi" !
!i i' r,
,
':;' 1\
'~'w ,', ., 1,,1
....
1')1 j )0 '-
1.'1 1r
j...J.............,
,1 I"
~/)."
lu..4l. ~
,Llfl;
',"
"
111,[' :1
CA':,:''; Net: 1 'Y'!~' (I':,"; I'
CIJI1i'IIJI!\'EALTII l'iF F'l.NIi', YI'I,III [i,:
COUNT' l,iF, ':Ui'IH';hL.\I'Il',
!<L)'i;1 :l
I II] II,' I! 1,:r:I',
R.!JIiL', LLf;;l\YI, 1,:'1 ,,!\l.
.-,'
f.'.
'lE.AI'IAh.IT> Ji',/d! I'I,IU:: F
t 1,1 I. ;:j './,
1;/.., t. L i! Iii i '.1',1' I.
, 11'__ I . ',ill I:. ; " , I,) !. '/I', , I " ,jl. , I I II\l
I I i'. , ,01 ,Ii '.lil' t Lr. I' I , I I,. w 1 I , \ "
, " , " "
lL..JJII_'IlI.i." I'; l J_r~
n,)1l1.;l,j d...f.'_'[l.j':ij'\t-,
'oil I.:
r_T!,:.!-\I.J:.:.J:; IT
~ 1 1 I. II :\ 1:.
bur
WiJ.
,. '
II n J,~ ; ';'
I ,
to-"
it
;'1,
i d : I 1 ~
11 "
I,
p,.' t !i"l
'. '.
di:'ru1. 1.."J:":~ I,h,,' ,J".,'J
'I;
; ~ I., i i
:1,',::.
+./11..
j j ~:j.
t. i,"l ~;.: r,: l ':. 1-. h ':~' ''i J 1. \, ;, I,
'..; I 1. L..~~'J",__ . .! I i"1 ;'1' ,I'! .
Orl
F' t~'.r' \' j I ,'I ~.....
L~'ltLI.L. ':'-/\
:IJ .'
'.....1
11,
l ''If
, ,
t h.:' j L t, l"~hl,,'d r._" ': I j I'll l. L ,.,j,!
i L,t!, [I,!! .
'1l11' !'
I-IiI (l \,' '_In l d.
~':h~..;'r J. s: f '::
, IL~ )
1-'"
/
'.. /f/:'
, ~'~1~7-~T ~-,.,
'.'IIl,i._ I" _lll'.', ,- III 11.1.
::! .,
P(Jck,~,t. l (11..1
Out. n f (: ,: I U 1\ "- 1
':31.1 I ch;Jrl,l"-'
,~). '.] I,',
r.
; ~."..:. ..., ...:
!i:1 ;'1
1\11: i.I_':ll_,,\
1,(,'.
SWI'.l L' 1"1 11)1 t ~] I, l'
I"
,,-,
I 'OJ
J<. ,
_.iC....~_. '-,
tfy. \. [
o r ~:T 'h..,;, ,OAr
"~ t I';-'~'~ '7'1
l :L.'~"""I
I: hi
'li:1 ii'
:. ,'i I II. i ~
;;1 f" !"lli::1
eA";!" JIU: \'.1'1" c."''l.
cnr'INI.'}Il\~FAI I'll I_-)!' r-I~.llrl'-'/L,'//,lll /-
CfJUII'J"i Ill-' ':'IJ~II'r::Ii[ idn,
llJJQyr'lI[liYI. \". AI
..,'
0.!3 1).11 (\J'. T'
1['.1111 !'IMdl-: I:"~
"
i! ~,
~H~". T}I.I; !~i<1
1-: ] 111','
, , ! '..... I, 1. ", , I ! / ',,'r> I II d' " oil ;J I " I
I I , " ; , , , , .1' I I " ,[ , I , I , I t l'jl" . I I Ii I ji
t., I 1. IW J
Ji';-;. I_I. il ij' FIt_i'!'
fI ;:.IIl'; ,I d..- t '.'I'"j '.1 II ,.
,.fl.'
:0'-'
. ['.!! ,',jll;
but
.~ ," I ~.
I : ! 1 -' r~_ 1 ':.'
t_,_,
I,
il.,_
1[",1
! l
jJ L ).,.),
Hi
I~ Ii'. I - '.:: l '.:' ~ - , '
j V i.lj I Jj,
t. h,~' 'ri.E LI,._nl.=W _:,_I;UJlli',l,U
tfI:.I1: ['DIHI!.'.
ii. 1-,
!.tl' ',-'! ii);, li-;'I:
,l, !, ji" Iii t
E!.~Lt.Y,.':!)h!\I!UI tj
~~r~Y.-1.'_~.. .tll~iYF~-! t~.UL;.
!.;i:
; \'1. i\.; , 1
(-j
(.; r j ,.- I \ 1" 1: ., I:.;:.~ t
[J':.I":_'.'"": 1.;'1'..1
,'-:_;',:>l":i
,\{ f ldd'_' L I
S'.! rr:"h,] l'l'e-
III
i,1 I
I
'li,l
"
1\.
~'
--
~??~~ .r"';"~
I': 1, LI'_:";- .--~L,-.,trTr
':' I"". -j - 'llr-J [~, /dlL' !-:i_Ii'lI;\
'I \ \'-"':
r~;"i:' r fj ,-11" 1 :_'_-' j L
~
I'I,! .jO. 'I,
l' .,..' (lY. ,I.."
I J.;\,.,I '.'.' )_)',1'
, : J...d.. .... '7'
q~'M1..,~4-:, (,~
..-'"
'..-.
r.'
.
~-;'
!iHLh'II:I' ,ifl:IU: t.lellll,ll I';I~JI'II''( ClIlJI,nli,/lJ!,/'
ij /'-, ":', l"l 11 "'.I~III.-1 1-11,\ "j 'I ' \
,inrll'\ I'"" ,\11 Fbi r, 1,,;1'1 ",\ 11'11,' I 11, I'!.
(lIEfl.,'l 1'<1111'1; 1'1 (II
1,,1n l
JEAN ~~RIE GRnHARIIS; 1'1 AI
[ll'/I'H ~ l'/~'I;t.. t:lJ :t.C:l';5 J
t'.:{-113F: ':~'/-'I'Jl:: -. t ''':l~l;
E' ;<F' rn ~ l)'f. .1.i-ln"'l';:'<-I::1
n(~T;'rw) I r: '.,~.:.. f.It.'I
-t ,a,nD
NLf5: DD
, nU~Ii"\lII'IS IN L I 'J T I (II: f I UN
'),:,--l',I3I.i'! (CIJI'I/'IF:r:~I,i\l'!n ["I II nn',' )
,lUll'! l'I(.',n II; Cm"\EiI\I'{ I El
, \I,)i,n 131:I]FmTl\ rq,[')E vlHlnlW,lt , ,:',\ l:lll':o..'
-,,,-~-"- ., - .~---,.
.
I'IF:rIJl."., IIAII::I''l.11'1
bfFVEfJ, ../VO.S/:LVhC',
,... '. "11(1(,,,
:$ . DATE ,..'_..__.,/LL''?:fL-- I'"". ,,""
, '
('I'lL
114..iQ i"<,L./);. ,..i I/(,-!,..
C" ,/ I ---
J .4J.i.t..I....I/Ah::N.!."C-::-:(::.,~-J
~I '
" " 'n09.95'c~
111.11.11:;['1,
NMIF (IF n4fJ I'll ULli\L
m::L1; 1 IilNnll {I" ro Dry E~\ni\r' 1. ,....
l.OCI; llllN rlf" ~iER'" 1 CE' ,
I
I --.--..-..'........... '-'" ...... ..... ..---,---. n
15. L~ABLE 10 LU~AT[:
I ( j NUI'IEIF,( (II" (jrl~:I'IF f~,
I
I
I
IU UJCt, rf
Pfl- FI"./II(-',II r (, I I (,':i r nHlvJN i\JILII,EFi!'j,
1. [iii fE 1, T 11'lf.
i}. nr:l iT t. 1 l.l~lL
.:) ~ DiyrF ~-,
111'11:
'I, 1ii',II: " 1I.11F
..... DI-\IT 1.. Ill'W
'e,. p,:\ rL 1, r T I'll'.:
,',r.;CI:F'lliHO' ur
11 HEREBY !\CCFFl ,HCI,') [I.T OF Ill[ I.F:W,I
I [IOCUMEI'>!T. Hllfi 'JEr~'';H:1'' Ifi i\fYFF"IL-n IlrI
I HEFlE'EIY, CHn If: Y rH,., 1 r (\1"1 !\IJI Hili' 1.:'1; n
::')I..l-<\/ICT
F'Hnr:L~'j':~1 ,)::" OUTI I !'oil: I' IJt'l THE f 1'(0/'1 r 1'11' THi'
D['H,)!~ F lif" 1'111: I, [I',; fFJ:i J:iH'F'I'lli>\IH I,:;) mw
Trl /10:; bU.
,~' .............." d'."."'.... ...".,..". '" ".....,..,.,..'., -. .,,,,
PFUNTETf ~IAME OF 111 J rI.llJr-\ [::'FT.I (~\I;F'I~~r' .....
.....".... .,.P..H....
E.I, m.w. n If'll;" nr i',I.ITHOFi I :;~En (,8FI-I1
ll~\T E ,
I rl'I!'
~
,1
'::-U (;l!'~:-~:;~'JC-i~;'[;
" ,/I '" "'" .,;l. /'L__:~ .....'.
/' // /~'/-
111,1' 1 ;1::Ji~6:.I/' ,/~f_?~_.
,.s+I{lRI'>..,;.t-\[, ~;Uf\'"Un[!ul L\f.TLII':f. 1'1, fJI' I
'1:) . 9 {; ^-'
I -' J~. 'J .' /J ".',i' I ( (.
., .IJ~.{.<..J1lL L i J. /zr !,~,~ ~ ,
'-' (1/ /l "1/, ,(;' //, '(')
1-._'vcJLilJl,o.;,/.. ..Lr.. /J,L,\,
.,,",. .- .. 'T
I
.~I'.!J-"" r- ,.....~-.., ",H
,SHI"F(Tr'fl'rlffl \ F I!llill UJlII'I11
/'
1'" 1,1 If 00 VN I ao )
~lit, .(
ObI.." .
· ..Ii -U_'i _I"~ hI,
/' l,i'lIt# ,
,.\
, '
.. ,"J \:-
I)'. j'
-'...
.. -- .tr!'-
..
'1111'1-111'1- DFFII'T 11.'.1111111 I:IlIJi',II'( 1'!llll'll'IIIJU';1
"1':'0':', vi 11111'111. 1 111'1 I; I
I ',l.l[n'l I(H, (1I,LI'"IIrI,lIm 1'1\ 11'll'Il--II',l'l
CHERYL IIUDY; [1 rn
vn
:JFA~1 MI,\Vnf:, 1;lHIHI,,,,U'ci; 11 1<1
I HJC H ~ 1 ",f'~'1 7 .-r: \l ... '.~:r:'l';) J
C (~~'iF ~ ':{7 -'I\le: I '~JI.'~
[XP"LFlr (1';j..J..,n 1.':~I':'ln
r,I,'I"U"; r r"
; ~lU~ltoION[, 1 N C [V I L nc I' I uti
'J6-61:l I E, (CUI'1l'ElII, (,1'11.'1 cot IN IV)
MICHAEL GRA8ARITS
, 1138"" IJErJROfi\ nrn'H: loJIIII'I"ljI.\11 . 1'(,1,:-)""';'
N?\I'IE Of I NDI V! DUI\!.,
1'[fUrll>! I,ll" ";1'1"')'\,:1"
[iEJ'NELt: _,,__._M~5Lfl~I(r.
if;;J;:,jSz,::rt;;,-I
~l):l:t,!.:. HOllFlr; : __h'_'hh
FlELATlDN~:iH!F' ru li I;,F E 1\1[1 AI>! 1 ,
.
1'-1(,.,,,
__.,._. _....f.. _ ___...:....
OA IE; :,___,.J:1..jf /1,__.
1 [~I[ ~
L(~AI[ON OF SERVICE:
UNABL~ 10 LOCAIE~
) NUI'\ElEFl III, ,HIT:!"II" ri'i 1'1) I" (.te(\ i'f' UFFFHr'i\i'1 r 1\ r 1..\'" r I' NUI,IN i\rJnrl[~~;r,;:
I?/~-" //(.;,. ,/)/. --_.-.
1 DAlE I,., I 1111 ;l CI~,fr " I 11'1"
. I.. . "
3 . [lIHE y~< 1 (tolE .-.. l\- el{.l rF" I II'IF
'5 . [11\ IT I, 'r fl'l[ I'" 1I~'11T >', I II'iF
1.\UTF'II'oI'II:I, 1)1' ',rh'\) [1:1
~ HERED\' ,Y.CfT'T c,:"f'<')]I,h: 1.)1' nil: 1111,,1. 1'1"(11,:1.>\', ,\,' 1.1',111 :11'11"[' I)~I nlE I'Filll'lf IJ:' 1'111:;"
DOCUMF.::~n _ I'll r'3 ',\[,"'1 [1':1',' i'i Ii' TEr' I'll' 111'1 r'l, Hill I iF r I,ll-' I \ ,,: r,: 1-' unT, 1'1111""') r (e;1 (,d,m
',) HEFlE:EtY CH': I [f"! (;.If) I I i\r'1 1\1,1'11 ",Ih T Tn 11) no "Iii,
",,,,,.,,,..,., ..,_,. ." ." , " ....d... .
NI\M" OF 1)!.iTI II IHL:L[' "nll'11
" ,." ,,,.,,.,'
"; I mhYfUf,F 01" (.',1 I nl""" r 'FP (',nnIT
r rl"If-.
::j(J fll'ICjt'jl."Ii';
, /). / (I
'//,,/;;;/'," /'IPI, ,/7,)'" "1', ,::,t
... I r / I. . # .
:,>II"'II"))~V"I:IF ' /....
//
/1.
SW'rt (.)I'W /';Uf"';LR ~lH!L;~{;"'.I'Ti'JiI I'll, 111'1
-ALet;J,'tJI. )',,1,, /+I"I'~ , '
~.W.t.All1.H {/:.Jti(X./1 '11
/I
'~rf.(:,rl;tnlf:;t..,\ u~~ t t ! II r (,I! j II: II'I!)'
, ,_,I/'i'l/
~
,
1fH IS
II Oe '(~ ,a9
(/ "
lJtu'
- "
~', d
, .,,'~
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iii
~...
I
I
j f '
,
~,
I
I~
I
I
I
"
~.
~.
I
I
I
I
t
I
.1
I
I
'1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Schmidt and Ronca PC
Anom.)'. ...d Couns.lor. .. Law
J09 $tllte SU'"
Nan......, ,...,.,..... nil)_
711I.1U."00
.....
,.
'--_ u___...
't.:..---.;.
Dr 'J'lfB COURT 01' COHMON PLUS
CUKBBRLAND COUNTY. PIlNNSYLVANIA)'/' (,) I,': (I, vii (Cq'{\,\
CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY,
Wife and Husband,
659 Mountain Road
Enola, PA 17025
JEAN HARlE GRABARITS and
MICHAEL GRABARITS,
1889 Georgia Drive
Whitehall, PA 18052
SARAH ANN HALEY
versus 20 pine Ridge Circle
Enola, PA 17025
Plaintiff(s)
Addresses (ea)
SARAH ANN HALE'i
3532C Vanteylingen Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80917
Defendant(s)
Addreases(es)
PRAECIPE ~OR WRIT 01' SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF SAID COUNTY:
Please issue writ of Summons in the above-captioned action.
3 writ of Summons shall be issued and fOL~arded to
( ) Attorney ( X ) Sheriff.
Supreme Court 10 No. 70242
Date: December 9, 1997 D~ FROM RECORD d
1 RUt CO.- f I b,'rt' 1I11<1 ,;,,1 IlIV han
r . "'''I' I10r. C . I \ P3
In . rl. \(1 ,I \ curl It eM i1 ~, .
I r <:" 0 l nn
Mol Ii.'. "c ' .. 19""",
I O;/,J... J~V of ,...j/<.~' '~\-L
11\1> h,.~. u.. ~ru, f-Jf.:."1"
..,,,. ,..4. . ,} 'protHonotary
YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED PIAINTIF~~S)~}~S/HAVE COMMENCED
AN ACTION AGAINST YOU.
Scott B. Cooper. Esauire
SCHMIDT AND RONCA. P.C.
209 State Street
Harrisbura, PA 17101
(717) 232-6300
Names/Address/Telephone
No. of Attorney
14#~
Signature of Attorney
WRIT 01' SUMMONS
TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT(S):
DATE:
~. lftJ",l't", It>, \(t{11
,
::..Euu lJ ..("., ( t. \.... ,',~ ~
Prothonotary
By .;''.l~ ,~,\,,' (I. . ~ .)~. Il' ......
I) IT
Deputy
( ) Check here if reverse is issued for additional information
SHERIFF'S RETURN - OUT OF COUNTY
CASE NO. 1997-06812 P
COKKONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
COUNTY OF CUKBERLAND
I
1
i
I
I.
I
,
I ~
I.'
RUDY CHERYL ET AL
VS.
QRbBARITS JEAN KARlE ET AL
R. Thom.. K1in. , Shari~~, who baing duly Bworn .ccording
to l.w, ..y., that h. mada a diligant ..arch and inquiry for tha within
namad d.fandant, to wit. GRABARITS KICHAEL
but wa. unabla to loeata
daputizad tha .hari!! ef
te ..rYa tha within WRIT
Him
LEHIGH
OF SUKKONS
in hi. bailiwick. Ha tharafora
County, Pann.ylyania.
On Karch 13th. 1998
tha attaohad rat urn from
, thi. of~ica wa. in racaipt of
LEHIGH County, Pann.ylyania.
Sharif~'. Ce.tB'
Doek.ting
Out o~ Ceunty
SlIrcharga
L.high County
So /
6.00
.00
6.00
l53.00
.6~.~~ SCHKIDT AND RONCA
03/13/1998
Swern and .ub.oribvd to before m.
thiB I i ~ dllY of "","-, ..<1,--
19 (If A.D.
\....11'. (;'1 ~. Iff' lR/(~.
f ro ono ary
C:U"'DT"''''C: ""'I'lfPN _ nil" ,,'" rnllN,.y
r.AQ", Nn. ,qq7-m~A'? p
r.nM"nNW""'''u n.. P..NNc:YIVANTA.
r.nIlNTV nF r.1J"RFRI.ANn
Runv r:HF:RVI. FT AI.
VB.
GRABARITS JEAN "ARIE ET AL
R. Thoma. Klina . Sheri~~, whe being duly .worn according
to law, .ay., that ha mada a diligent .aarch and inquiry for tha within
namad dafandant, to witl GRABARITS JEAN KARlE
but va. unabla to locate Her in hill bailivick. Ha th"rafora
deputized th. .hariff of LEHIGH County, P.nn.ylyania.
to .arva tha within WRIT OF SUlll'lONS
On ft_rch 13th. 1998 . this of~ica va. in r.caipt of
th. at.t.achad rat urn froll LEHIGH County, Pennsylvania.
Shari~~'. Cost.1
Dockating
Out. o~ County
Surcharge
18.00
9.00
6.00
So 8n.~a I '
) " ,
z;;, ,~ ' "'/?'
~ .' ~ ~,/" ..,
::.c ~?':.~ ./c_
R.f ema. JU1ne, $ner1:f:f
.~~.~~ SCHMIDT AND RONCA
03/13/1998
Sworn and .ub.cribed to before ..e
, (I. .
thia I" - day of f~~'-l 0
19 Cfr A.D.
~ LVl-'- ~:2k'~, i Jp'7,
, rot ono IIry'
,
,
-.
':;IIIJ,II"l 1,111 [f'I 1111[1,;11 UII!l'[] Y 1'1]11',1111.111""'-
ii',', ,,} 11(01'111 I UI'I ',; 1
IIULlI'1 1"';, 1,11.1 rill JIoJri 1'1\ 1:: I"l II, [il
CIIEl~YL Fit/II 'I , f 1 (,I
l..JH
JFI\I~ rll\n IF f:iHI1f.in', I. I'.;; FI 111
rll:JC,.~ ~ I '~I"'IU 'C\'O(, r~
I '()!~jl : ''J:':,I l'le --1);:.1(11','-,
E:~F' J h';; ;1-/-'-t~l.iW /,',:"_IU
11[:'I"!..!!:il[",
,
:. WR I T m I ':i:':II.IEI' ~'III'II'lnl'l:i It I 1': I v I L 1',1" 111/1'1
'1'1 "(,H J i" 1'1. 'I [I.. 1 Fr":~1 (1,:1 JrlDI:r ,I I\I'H I r:r IlliTe" I
SERVE, M r L:l-1!\Ll fiFU\I:II.H" I I:.;
AT l \[~(Ii lIl,YNWIJUD 1.lldVF: l'lIl, n,'I1I\II. , I'll 1:}11',,'1
, ---.,-.
FW IUliN O[
,
i
II. NIII'll' or- INDfvrullnL ::il'FI'.)[/.I,.
I
1 i2. m,UH I DNUH I I' III DFF I:I'IUI'~I r J
I :~. [l1\Tf::,_"...~.t9t1 I.
I II. L,OCIH l (IN OF "EfN r IT,
1._..__,.._,_....,. .......,..
I '5.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-;[l \~) r 1..'1::'
Tl'p~ ..Ctlll!>/}.!,1&
0),. Ie
I [1'/1, :. ju,},;J.1.,..
3:) 0 7 Ila'/. AJ ~<?"). 0..
U4./~~4..I/ P1
f IDUF,::; , ,
UNABLE TO LOCATE,
) NlII"mu,( DF (, r r Ei'1f-" I:;i JtiI':;lk/i!fJ/~DI.:FF::I'ID('N I
I, [11\ IE 1, I I I'IE )'),/f'.17?}.\ . @. . c-. S. ,!, D,HT I',
1\ I LlV,iT l'I'.tCI~1t1 I.)[IDRI,:::,,::;,
I' r~I'
3. DATE f" rrrlF
'f" D':, Fl' ~, I [I~f:
5. DATE &
T I~IE
'"'' [1(\ f r, r, rr ME
!\CeLI' [",:\1'1('[ Ill' ':iET") [1'1:
I I HEf~l':ElY ,;C:CEF'T m':FN HF ell-' THE I ':"I.'d,., FT'[)l C'..;'., Wi 1)1,111 U'IUI UN nil. I"FWNT OF THE
I DOCUMENT. Hll::J ':;lRV [CI' l ':i ill:C:F:T' 11: 1'1 1'11'1 1<1.:111'\1_1 01 rr 11,.- I. [::i rrrr I'IF F FNDI,;!"j r (~i) !\rID
I I HEFln,y CET(T 11"''1 H IA r I nl'l 1\1.1 r 1-11.11'. 1:,.'[[1 r i.J /10 ',I)..
I "'.....-'......_"._...".".'.'...m
1 PRINTEr' N,<\I"IF UI"
: [rATE 1
!
{,LlTHOI',' I ,,'1'1.' i\l:iI'l) r
:', I Or,I,'\ 111""[ II'
-.".
(.\1/ ff'II)!! [,:T [I (\ICiFrn
r II"IF,
(:'; I ') I::' f\I I:i {..IJ t' I. { ~":i
4~/ 40h- ~~ ..
11f.1'~f'I,t(F/.u;~
:," .. ~/t:/. .
"-
"IHI'.:I '11"1' i.JF l. FH I CiH ccrllrn y
i S\oJCIF~rl Arm ::'iUh"'ICF11 m,!1 fll' F rll"I" f'IF (11'1
-71I~~/!?/.tZ j.
-~jPrz~14
NOTARIAL SEAL
SUSAN j, SEOORA, NOTARY PUBliC
CITY 0' ALllNTOWN, UHIGH COUNTY. PA
MV COMMI$SION EXPIRES JUNE 25th 2001
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISIon
CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY
Husband and Wife,
Plaintiffs
v.
JEAN MARIE GRABARITS, MICHAEL
GRABARITS and SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
File Ho. 97-68l2
PRAECIPE AND RULE TO FILE
x A COMPLAINT
A BILl. OF PARTICULARS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF SAID COURT:
Issue rule on Plaintiffs
in the above case within t~enty
suffer a judgement of non pros.
to file a Complainr
days after service of the rule or
DATE: ill8/98
......-.'') .
Sic;nature: /1-"CAdV.,( 1./-, /..{.J,f,'I'
Print Name: Richard H. wiK. Esauire
Attorney for: Defendants
Address: 4705 Duke Street
Harrisburq, PA l7l09-3099
Telephone No: (717) 652-8455
Supreme Court 10 No.: 07274
NOW, -111./l10?-
/tj
I
, 19
RULE ISSUED
By:
Deputy
(NOTEI File in duplicate)
~AOT~ON.-U
I
~ ~. t:
r M ::;i ,.
r of'!l
~~ :;;:: "'l~"
r...:,:
u.. '~;';1
"_ I' ~
[ 0'\ :~':n
-.
... .".
W 0: ll':Z
~ ~;~fe
, ~ ~ ~.)
, (>
.....
"
ir, 'I) ?,:;
.", .:J
,.. " (~-~; ~~
t".) -
U':.i< -
'.1.., ..... } ~.~
"..
lJ....'l _t-" r _~ I -::j
~r.
r.. ,'."-
l:i. 4;"') 'II"
l..: N I,":
j-'"..
r--Ll.1 '" '.:lilj
L.,. "::'. !19-
FJ.- .-
- r!j
LJ <<Xl
C; 0\ U
>- ~) '"
0:; t,. r..
.'
~ ,'.
... ('0: ~J .. i~
~8
(ii ~,. ::
~....
t:;-, 0..
~~:, .
.
" -,
N '..
,.. ,-0..:;:;"
u:L1J "'. ',: III
?-; .~t ;.nLl...
:a: :r::':
~ m ::>
O'l u
'- lJ'J ;:~.
b; '" r. ~
" :"_j
f-. (Oi "
tuC? '0. ,
.
s'2'" ~,:: .\ ;-..
p...'" u.
k:l.
~'" : I~,~:-
' ' ,.:J'
et. N ,'\"..
~" ,', .;.~
[i.:I:' c'." "::J
'",: ::!C1_
F :I:
!5 ~ :J
(,)
"
>: LO ..,.
0; C'~ [c.
...
>- ('~ ,.l,.'
~~: () --',-:
-(i ~c: :,) -~:.'
.,. ,;>.. I )':"..i
* .:1' ::(;
~I. N ',b;i
1'-
u:~1 D:' i,:i (:J
..:.J: (~lC.L
~
\5 CO c:
0'\
OHBRYL aUDY an4 RIOHARD RUDY, I IN THB COURT OF OOKMON PLBAS
wife an4 Hu.ban4, I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
plaintiff. I
I
v. I NO. 97-6812
I
JBAH HARIH ORABARITS an4 I
MICIlABL ORABARITS, Hu.ban4 I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
an4 Wif., an4 SARAH ANN HALEY, I
D.fan4anta I JURY TRIAL DBIlANDBD
CERTIFICATB OF SIRVICE
AND NOW, this 7.\-1 day of Apri I
, 1998, I, Scott
B. Cooper, Esquire, attorney for the plaintiffs, hereby certify
that I have, this day, served the PLAI~TIFFS' RESPONSES TO
DEFENDANTS' INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF, CHERYL RUDY -
SET I, by delivering a copy of the same, via hand delivery,
addressed to:
Richard H. Wix, Esquire
WIX, WENGER, & WEIDNER
4705 Duke Street
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
SCHMIDT AND RONCA, P.C.
BY'
/1/"
Soott B. coopar
Attornay at Law
20' Stat. str.at
Barriaburq, PA 17101
(717) 232-6300
Attorney I.D. '70242
"
.... r-.
[I" r=
t:.:; lr:
.~J.i :' , I.',: '.
( (': ~
I.t, , 1_..
I;';);. ,
J'" .~:)
(r '
l. ILl- I
"I
tei, ( i ,,'.
, " LJ
., ,C
10 en ::)
(n ".:)
01 i~;nu..1
CHIRYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY, I IN THB COURT OF COKMON PLBAS
Wif. and Huaband, I CUMBBRLAND COUNTY, PBNNSYLVANIA
P1aintiffa I
I
v. I NO. '17-1812
I
JBAN KARII GRABARITS and I
NICHAIL OIUUlARITS, Hueband I CIVIL ACTION '. LA"
and "if., and SARAH ANN HALBY,I
Delandanta I 'JURY TRIAL DEMANDBD
OBRTIFICATE OF SERVICB
AND NOW, this
l~n
day of
, 1998, I, Scott
Ap(d
B. Cooper, Es~ire, attorney for the Plaintiffs, hereby certify
that I have, this day, served the PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSES TO
DEFENDANTS' INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF, CHERYL RUDY -
SET II, by delivering a copy of the same, via hand delivery,
addressed tc:
Richard H. wix, Esquire
WIX, WENGER, & WEIDNER
4705 DUke Street
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
SCHMIDT AND RONCA, P.C.
BYI
/1/
/ /'
soott B. Coopar
Att.ornay at Law
209 stat. straet
Barrieburq, PA 17101
(717) 232-1300
Attornay I.D. '70242
Gr "(JI ,\....1
CHBRYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY,' IN THE COURT or COMMQN PLEAS
Wif. and Hu.band, , CUMBBRLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
plaintiff. ,
,
v. , NO. 97-6812
,
JBAH KARIB ORABARIT9 Mnd ,
MXCIlABL ORABARITS, Hu.band 'CIVIL ACTION - LAW
and Wif., and SARAH ANN HALEY,I
Def.ndant.. 'JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTlrICATB or SERVICE
1~\-1
AND NOW, this day of
^pli I
, 1998, I, Scott
B. Cooper, Esquire, attorney for the Plaintiffs, hereby certify
that I have, this day, served the PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSES TO
DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, by
delivering a copy of the same, via hand delivery, addressed to:
Richard H. Wix, Esquire
WIX, WENGER, & WEIDNER
4705 Duke Street
HarriSburg, PA 17109-3099
SCHMIDT AND RONCA, P.C.
By'
/~)
Soott B. Coopar
Attorney at Lav
209 State Straet.
Harri.burg, PA 17101
(717) 232-6300
Attorney I.D. '70242
i ';1 "
. (,I
(, C....
, ,I
,
I
<.. j
:,:1
I
I: ,
1..1"': , C
, C
I, ..~:
LI,. ':J .:1
C , (J', U
, ,
at the aforementioned time and place it was day light. To the
ccntrary, at all times relevant hereto, it was not fully light but
in fact dusk at the time of the accident.
6. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is ~li thout
suff icient knowledge to form a be 1 ief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 6. Therefore, each and every averment of
paragraph 6 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
7. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admitted at the
aforementioned t.ime and place, Defendant, Sarah Ann Haley was
operating a 1989 t'ord Taurus on Shady I,ane at its intersection with
SR 11. It. is further admitted that the 1989 Ford Taurus involved
in this accident was owed by Jean Grabarits. The remaining
averments of Paragraph 7 are specifically denied and strict proof
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
8. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admitted that at
the aforementioned time and place, Defendant, Sarah Ann Haley,
after having stopped for the stop sign on Shady Lane, did not
observe a vehicle approaching on SR 11 and that a collision
occurred. After reasonable investigation, Defendants are without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
remaining averments of Paragraph 8. Therefore, the remaining
averments of Paragraph 8 are specifically denied and strict proof
2
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
9. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 9. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 9 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the Defendants' Answer With New
Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
11. The averments of Paragraph 11 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
rasponse is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
11 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
12. The averments of Paragraph 12 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
12 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
13. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 13. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 13 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
dem,anded at the time of trial.
3
.
14. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
suff icient knowledge to for.m a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 14. Therefore, each and every averment of
paragraph 14 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
15. After reasonable inveatigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 15. Therefore, each and every averment of
paragraph 15 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
16. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
suff icient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 16. Therefore, each and every averment of
paragraph 16 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
17. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
avermenta of Parag'raph 17. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 17 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
18. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
suff lcient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 18. Therefore, each and every averment of
4
Paragraph 18 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
19. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to fcrm a belief as to the truth of the
J.~
,
averments of Paragraph 19.
Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 19 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
20. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 20.
Therefore, each and every averment of
paragraph 20 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
21. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without.
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of paragraph 21.
Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 21 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley respectfully request lIour Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
22. paragraphs 1 through 21 cf Defendants' Answer With New
Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
5
23. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 23. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 23 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
24. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
suff icient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 24. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 24 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
25. Paragraphs 1 through 24 of the Defendants' Answer With
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference,
26. The averments of Paragraph 26 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
26 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
27. The averments of Paragraph 27 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
responfle is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
6
27 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
28. Paragraphs 13 through 21 of the Defendants' Answer with
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
29. Paragraphs 1 through 28 of the Defendants' Answer with
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
30. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to for.m a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 30. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 30 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
31. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 31. Ther.efore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 31 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
7
NEW MAT'lIB
32. The Plaintiffs' claims for medical expenses and/or wage
loss are barred, cr should be reduced in accordance with S 1722 of
the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act.
33. The Plaintiffs' claims for non-pecuniary damages may be
barred pursuant to the limited tort option of the Pennsylvania
Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act.
34. Tho Plaintiffs' claims may be barred by tho applicable
statute of limitations.
35. The collision referred to in the Plaintiffs' Complaint
was caused by the carelessness, recklessness and negligence of
Plaintiff, Richard Rudy, in that he:
a) operated his motor vehicle without his headlights lit at
at time when it was prudent to do so;
b) driving too fast for conditions;
c) failure to be alert and attentive at the wheel;
d) failure to apply hill brakes or take proper evasive
measures to avoid the collision.
36. The claims of Plaintiff, Richard Rudy, are barred, or
should be be reduced in accordance with the Pennsylvania
Comparative Negligence Act.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, .Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice.
8
.
NEW MATTBR PURSUANT TO PA R.C.P. ~252(41
JBAN MARIB ORABARITS and MICHAEL ORABARITS,
HU8ban4 and Wif.. and SARAH ANN HALBY v. RICHARD RUDY
37. paragraphs 1 through 31 of the Plainti~fs' Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference without admission or adoption.
38. paragraphs 1 through 37 of the Defendarts' Answer with
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
39. In the event that it is judicially determined that any,
some or all of the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff, then in
that event, the Defendants individually and joil\tly herein demand
contribution and/or indemnity against Additional Defendant, Richard
Rudy.
40. Richard Rudy is hereby joined as an Additional Defendant
in this action for liability over to the Plaintiff and/or
contribution and/or indemnity.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
enter judgment in their favor and against all other parties.
Respectfully submitted,
WIX, WENGER & WEIDNER
C-(r. '1 ( ~\ 1 17 .
By ........,.j..-. . '~J..-.,C--, _
Richard H. Wix, 1.0. No. 07274
4705 Duke street
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
(717) 652-8455
9
CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD
RUDY, Husband and Wife,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
NO. 97-6812 CIVIL TERM
JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and
MICHAEL GRABARITS and
SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
RICHARD RUDY,
AddItional Defendant
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CBRTI~ICATB PRBRBQUISITB TO SIRVICI or A SUBPOENA
PURSUANT TO RULI .009.22
As a prerequisite to service of a subpoena for documents and
things pursuant to Rule 4009.22, Defendant certifies that:
(1) a notice of intent to serve the subpoena with a copy of
the subpoena attached thereto was mailed or delivered to each party
at least twenty days prior to the date on which the subpoena is
sought to be served,
(2) a copy of the notice of intent, including the proposed
subpoena, is attached to this certificate,
(3) no objection to the subpoena has been reneived, and
(4) the subpoena which will be served is identical to the
subpoena whioh is attached to the notice of intent to serve the
subpoena.
Date: '/',).1.18
,-- , ) .
/r".~/"",.( 1-1 [/~/A.y
Richard H. Wix, I.D. #07274
Attorney for Defendant
4705 Duke Street
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
(717) 652-8455
a:JIMJNWEl\LTH OF PrnNSYLVANlA
<XlUN'N O~'. CUMIIDU.J\ND
CHERYL RUDY and R~CHARD RUDY,
Wife and Husband,
, Plaintiffs
File No.
97-6812
v.
JEAN MARIE
GRABARITS,
GRABARTIS and MICHAEL
h/w and SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
SUBPOENA TO PRoo,.,a: [)C()..!oEtfTS OR ni I 1m
FOR 01 S(X)VERY PURSUANT TO RUlE 4009. '22
TO: Gary J. LeidY,~c., 433 North Eno1a Rd.( Eno1a, PA 17025
(Name of Pllf'SOrl or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you lire ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: all m~~1 rec~,rds , notes, correspondence
_.1Ind otheLQocUmentJl_ re1atinq, to Cher,,1 Rudy.
at ~ix, Wenger & Weidner,_j705 Duke S~re~L-Harrisburg, PA 1710~
(Addres'!)
You may deliver' or IMil legible copies of the docunents or produce things request.ed hI
this subpaena, together with the certificate of oompliance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonabl~
cost of preoaring the copies or producing the things sought.
If you fail to produce the documents or th;r.gs required by this subpoena within t~enty
(20) days aft.er its serv~ce. the ;:>art." sprving ~his subpoena may seek a court ,"X'der
compelling you to oomply wit~ it.
nilS SU3POENA WAS ISSUED AT TriE REQUEST a= TriE FOlLCWING PERSON:
NA1'E: n':'chard H. Wix, Esquire__
AODREs..~!_~7~SNBii~e &s~~~~~ER _~_
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
Tc:LEPI-()NE: (71 7 ) 652 - 8 4 5 !S
SUPRen;: <X:UlT 10 It 072 7 4
ATTORNEY FOR: Defendants
DATE:_J. 'iJ_&LCj!jL
S~Of the Court
BY J'i1' ('::IJRT:
( :A V\ t '(.J
---,. - rothonotary!
~
t",>,-e
I~k. ; ~~P:;"M ~
/ f --rr-
(Eff. 1/97)
COt-MlNWEALm OF PrnNSYLVIINIA
CXlllNTY OF CUMBrnlJ\ND
CHERYL RUDY and R~CHARD RUDY,
Wife and Husband,
Plaintiffs
File No.
97-6812
v.
JEAN MARIE
GRABARITS,
GRABARTIS and MICHAEL
h/w and SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
SUBPOENA TO PRcx:o::e DCX:U1:NTS 00 TH I NGS
EQfLQlSOOVERY PURSUAN'L1Q...RULE 4009. 2~
.
.
.
.
TO:Orthopedic Institute of Pennsy!v~nia, 875 Poplar Church Road, Camp Hil!,
(Nirne of Person or Entity) k'i\ l7011
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docur.onts or things: all medica! recqrds, notes, correspondence
- and other Qocumen~_s_~tinq to Chery! Ruqy,
at _~ix, Wenger & Weidner, 4705 Duke St_reet, Harrisburg, PA l7l0~,
(Addl'es~ )
You may deliver' or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things request.eci b)
this subpOena, together with the certificate of compliance, to the party making thi~
request at the address listed above. You have .he right to seek in advance the reasonabl,
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sought.
If yOU fail to produce the documents or th;r.gs required by this subpoena within t~enty
(20) days after its service, the ~arty s~rving this subpoena may seek a court ,~der
cx:rrpelling you to cx:rrply wit~ it.
THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOllCWING PERSON:
NA/'E: Rich,ard H. Wix, Esquire
ADOAE~~t~7~~e&s~~~~~ER
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
TElEPf-PNE:C 71 7) 652 -~.lli
S1.JPREI"E COORT 10 # 07274 _,__
ATTORNEY FOR: DefendantL-
DATE:._j1!'lL15~ IfCfl._,_
" sq/ll of the Court
BY n ~T~ ' , . J 'YG
-.-i:....JIA.Jj-f-/ AW
ProthonotaryA lerk, fivil D, is ~on
f--;" Ae_0/'U''f/
.~ puty
(Eff. 1/97)
~L'rH OF PrnNSYLVI\N1A
CXXJNN OF, OJMOffiUIND
CHERYL RUDY and R~CHARD RUDY,
Wife and Husband,
Plaintiffs
File No.
97-6812
v.
JEAN MARIE
GRABARITS,
GRABARTIS and MICf!.lIEL
h/w and SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
SUBF>a:NA TO PRocxx:e DCX::U-Em...gg TH I NGS
FOR 0 ,sc.oVERY PURSUANT TO R..\.lbU.QQi..Z1
TO: ..!:!9..!Y.. Spirit Hospital, 503 North 21st Street, Camp Hill. FA 17011
iName of Person or Ent ity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things': all mediCil1 rec,9rds , notes, correspon~ce
____~l1d other gocumenj~_~~tin9. to Cheryl Rudy.
at _,!ix, Wenger & W~E.!.._j705~~t_JCeet, Har~ur~-Ll2L09
(Addres,)
You may deliver or mai I legible copies of the docunents or produce things request.ed n)
this subpoena, together with the certificate of compliance, to the party making this
reqlJest at the address listed above. You have _he right to seek in advance the reasonabl~
cost of preoaring the copies or producing the things sought.
I f you fai I to produce the docunents or th ;ngs required by this ,subpoena within t"'enty
(20) days after its serv;ce, the party st"rving ~his subpoerla rn.:~y seek a court .Yder
compelling you to corply wit~ it,
THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE AEClJEST OF TIiE FOlLo.VING PERSON:
/W'E: Rich~ H. Wix, Esquire,_
AOOflE$,,\tl~Mfe & S ~~~~~ER ,_
~~~~, PA 17109-3099
TELEPHONEd 717) 652-8455
SUPREM: COJRT 10 It o 721L.____,
ATTORNEY FOR: Defendants
OATE:,_J1 tiL..iL~CLt
~f the Court f'
BY X ('::lIAT:, ) '_ ?
_.,L.!,J(( LL L-/ K' -. ( . .
--'''1'''' __C-". ;&i-~---
(Eft. 1/97)
.
~ r-. 1''':
co-. '?
W F. ~.., J :
._,' , .'
~k ~,-: , ) !'
w." , , "
~~: " .,
U!li: ,<") " .,! ,
C''''; ,~ ~ ,
~' co' ; ~ \ ':, J
, . c,_ ~'H u..
.u (;;:;
~ C"
U'~ 0
CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD
RUDY, Husband and Wife,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I
l
I
f-
I
I]
I
I,
v.
NO. 97-6812 CIVIL TERM
JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and
MICHAEL GRABARITS and
SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION - {,AW
v.
RICHARD RUDY, :
Additional Defendant: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE TO PLEAD
TO: Cheryl Rudy and Richard Rudy
0/0 Scott B. Cooper, Esquire
SCHMIDT and RONCA, P.C.
209 State street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED to plead to the enclosed New Matter
within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a default judgment
will be entered against you.
Respectfully submitted,
WIle, WE!lGER & WEIDNER
"
,:: - (
._...._<t'_."
o/{ ; ( J-J--.--
DATE:
,y.-:YI- 'if!5
BY:
R chard H.
IDI 07274
4705 Duke street
Harrisburg, PA l7109
(717) 652-8455
Pennsylvania. It is specifically denied that the accident occurred
at approximately 7:24 a.m. To the contrary, Defendants believe and
therefore aver that the correct time of the occurrence was between
6:30 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.
5. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admitted at the
aforementioned time and place, the road surface was dry and there
were no adverse weather conditions. It is specifically denied that
at the aforementioned time and place it was daylight. To the
contrary, at all times relevant hereto, it was not fully light but
in fact dusk-like at the time of the accident.
6. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 6. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 6 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
7. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admitted at the
aforementioned time and place, Defendant, Sarah Ann Haley was
operating a 1989 Ford Taurus on Shady Lane at its intersection with
SR 11. It is further admitted that the 1989 Ford Taurus involved
in this accident was owed by Jean Grabar i ts. The remaining
averments of Paragraph 7 are specifically denied and strict proof
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
8. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admitted that at
r.,
2
the aforementioned time and place, Defendant, Sarah Ann Haley,
after having stopped for the stop sign on Shady Lane, did not
observe a vehicle approaching on SR 11 and that a collision
occurred. After reasonable investigation, Defendants are without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
remaining averments of Paragraph 8. Therefore, the remaining
averments of Paragraph 8 are specifically denied and strict proof
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
9. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a beliet as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 9. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 9 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 of the Defendants' Answer With New
Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
11. The averments of Paragraph 11 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
11 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof. is demanded at
the time of trial.
12. The averments of Paragraph 12 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
3
12 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
13. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 13.
Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 13 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
14. After reasonable invastigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 14. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 14 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
15. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments ~f Paragraph 15. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 15 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
16. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the trut.h of the
averments of Paragraph 16. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 16 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
4
17. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 17. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 17 is specifically denied and strict procf thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
16. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph lB. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 1B is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
19. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 19. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 19 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
20. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
suff icient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 20. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 20 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
21. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 2l. Therefore, each and every averment of
5
Paragraph 21 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
22. Paragraphs 1 through 2l of Defendants' Answer with New
Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
23. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of paragraph 23. Therefore, each a~d every averment of
paragraph 23 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
24. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 24. Therefore, each and every averment of
paragraph 24 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
25. Paragraphs 1 through 24 of the Defendants' Answer with
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
26. The averments of Paragraph 26 constitute a conclusion of
6
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
26 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
27. The averments of Paragraph 27 constitute a conclusion of
law to which no response is required. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph
27 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial.
28. paragraphs 13 through 2l of the Defendants' Answer with
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
29. Paragraphs 1 through 28 of the Defendants' Answer with
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
30. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without
sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments of Paragraph 30. Therefore, each and every averment of
Paragraph 30 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
31. After reascnable investigation,
suff icient knowledge to form a belief as
7
Defendant is without
to the truth of the
averments of paragraph 31. Therefore, each and ever.y averment of.
Paragraph 31 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint with prejudice.
NEW HATTER
32. The Plaintiffs' claims for medical expenses and/or wage
loss are barred, or should be reduced in accordance with S 1722 of
the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act.
33. The Plaintiffs' claims for non-pecuniary damages may be
barred pursuant to the limited tort option of the Pennsylvania
Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act.
34. The Plaintiffs' claims may be barred by the applicable
statute of limitations.
35. The collision referred to in the Plaintiffs' Complaint
was caused by the carelessness, recklessness and negligenoe of
Plaintiff, Richard Rudy, in that he:
a) operated his motor vehicle without his headlights lit at
at tima when it was prudent to do so;
b) driving too fast for conditions;
c) failure to be alert and attentive at the wheel;
8
d) failure to apply his brakes or take proper evasive
measures to avoid the collision.
36. The claims of Plaintiff, Richard Rudy, are barred, or
Sh01Ald be be reduced in accordance with the Pennsylvania
Comparative Negligence Act.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice.
NEW HATTER PURSUANT TO PA R.C.P. 225~
JEAN MARIB ORABARITS and MICHAEL GRAB~L
Hueband and wite. and SARAH ANN ~LBY v. RlQHARD RUDY
37. Paragraphs 1 through 31 of the Plaintiffs' Complaint are
incorporated herein by reference without aomission or adoption.
3B. Paragraphs 1 through 37 of the Defendants' Answer With
New Matter are incorporated herein by reference.
39. In the event that it is judicially determined that any,
some or all of the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff, then in
that event, the Defendants individually and jointly herein demand
contribution and/or indemnity against Additional Defendant, Richard
Rudy.
40. Richard Rudy is hereby joined as an Additional Defendant
in this action for liability over to the Plaintiff and/or
contribution and/or indemnity.
9
Respectfully submitted,
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
r:
1 '
,
!' .
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Jean Marie Grabarits, Michael Grabarits
and Sarah Ann Haley, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to
enter judgment in their favor and against all other parties.
WIX, WENGER & WEIDNER
c-zr:> ' f) (1( I I! '
Le.\...': -' {' f\I-'f--'
By
Richard H. Wix, I.D. No. 07274
4705 Duke Street
Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
(717) 652-8455
10
f,
.
f.' :-'
.' c: I
r-
-', -',
UIl.
~I r
L'..; 1.1..
~")l
I' :n ;
CII'
LU ~,.
-,-It, , - ,; .,j
(J.,', .....1. ,"
~ '-~ ~.:
rl., (I; ~'"I
0 U' ()
- t~
i.Y", c:1
.'
," "
lll~"\ .:1 ,
,
("'..-; )
(.:-,1;.. ..,
\~; I ~ '"",
<"jl.: ,,.., .:";
(.)\ \ ,
\J."~ ' ~)'
.._.1\ ~:~ if')
li' \0..
i .,,-
-.
l(s C".: -.:i
1;," .:)
39. Paragraph 39 is not directed toward answering
Plaintiffs and, therefore, no responsive answer is required. To
the extent a response is deemed required, each and every averment
of this Paragraph is specifically denied and strict proof is
demanded thereof at the time of trial.
40. Paragraph 40 is not directed toward answering
Plaintiffs and, therefore, no responsive answer is required. To
the extent a response is deemed required, each and every averment
of this Paragraph is specifically denied and strict proof is
demanded therecf at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY, Wife and
Husband, respectfully request Your Honorable Court to dismiss the
Defendants' Amended New Matter with prejudice.
I, SCOTT B. COOPER, am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in
the above-captioned matter. I have prepared the above document
for filing in this matter. I certify that I have read the
document, and that there are good grounds to support, and that it
is submitted in good faith.
Respectfully submitted,
SCHMIDT AND RONCA, P.C.
By:
./1/
Scott B. Cooper
Attorney at Law
209 State street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Attorney 1.0. #70242
(717) 232-6300
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
>. '" (
ir; l,
-I
Ii:' ('....
II:
(~~ I
: I~ i
(":,'
T ( " )
",,\,t \....:
b',l'
".'r: ( I, I
It:-' 1(1_
1 -,
1 , l'i") )
( ) . " J
~ .!. 0
b;
~~ ~:J ~ .1"
Ulr;
(J'
G: ~:," #....
('~r I,}..
it., .-:n ;n
f?L ~ ,'-I ::;r
~J ~_, , ,~ ',rei
I..',~ Lt' ~;n..
t... (I)
Ii. ~..o 7:)
0 0' 0
ad ~ j rtU.(
CHERYL RUDY and RICHARD RUDY,
Wife and Husband,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
NO. 97-6812
.j'
I
,
JEAN MARIE GRABARITS and
MICHAEL GRABARITS, Husband CIVIL ACTION - LAW
and Wife, and SARAH ANN HALEY,:
Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
r"':
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
t~
AND NOW, this 17 day of CJ.thJbtt"
, 1998, I, Scott
B. Cooper, Esquire, attorney for the Plaintiffs, hereby certify
that I have, this day, served the PLAINTIFFS' THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL
ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST
FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, by delivering a copy of the same,
via hand delivery, addressed to:
Girard E. Rickards, Esquire
WIX, WENGER, & WEIDNER
~705 Duke Street
Harrisourg, PA 17109-3099
SCHMIDT AND RONCA, P.C.
By:
~
Scott B. Cooper
Attorney at Law
209 state Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 232-6300
Attorney 1.0. .70242
~ ..:I' (>::
u~ '/
I-::' .. ~:')
~Q. ('oj ;". ~_f"
'_ 1_'
, ,<. :'r'" 'J;'f.
rr' .-
~(:, a.. '.:1 ~~~
ro l:rJ
I.'. , 'r'.
I:', <" -,
\ 6:Y'" t"' .:-,':.~~.~
L:
~; c:;.
u. (0 ')
0 (J', u
....- -"1' .-
h:; ,-....' t"-
t:~
('-j (':
1.1.1."
!n)~ -, ,
8~~! b~:
~: ,-
',J (,)
, ' I I
u-:-J'-' ,
fi:t!1 ., ,JIU
,::!
r!:.. "' 'I(.!.,.
_.
U m :.J
c..' W ()
c:x:M-ONWE1U.TH OF PrnNSYLVllNIA
lXXMl"i DF CllABERLANO
CHERYL RUDY and R~CHARD RUDY,
Wife and Husband,
Plaintiffs
File No.
97-6812
v.
JEAN MARIE
GRABARITS,
GRABARTIS and MICHAEL
h/w and SARAH ANN HALEY,
Defendants
SUBPOENA TO PR<XlU::lr !XO.J-ENTS OR TH I ~
fOR D ISO:>VERY PURSUANT TO RUlE 4009.22
.
.
.
TOI Charles R. Hatfield, M.D., 1140 Carlisle Rd~ighland park,~mp
Hill, PA 17011 (Na-ne of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service ')f this subpoena, you are ordered by the COlwt to
produce the following docunents or things: all medical recqrds, notes, corresPo~ce
- and other Qocument_!L rel'!.tinq. to Cheryl Rudv.
at ~ix, Wenger & Weidner, 4705 Duke S~reet, Harrisburg, PA 17~
(Addres~ )
You nuy deliver or nuil legible copies of the docunents or produce things request.eci h)
this subpoena, together with the certificate of CClTpliance, to the party making thi!
request at the address listed above. You have ,he right to seek in advance the reasonabl~
cost of pre~aring the copies or producing the things s~Jght.
If you fail to produce the documents or th;r.gs required by this subpoena within t~enty
(20) days after its serv~ce. the ~arty s~rvin9 this subpoena may seek a court .;rder
CClTpelling you to carply wit:-. it.
THIS SUlPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE Fct.LCWING PERSON:
NA/"El Richard H. Wix, Esqui.~._
ADDRE~~lj1~~N8cr~e&s~?~~~ER
,Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099
TELEPH:lNE:.!2:u.L,65 2-8 4 5 5
SU'REl'E ~T 10 It 07274
ATTORNEY FOR: Defendants
OATE:~JC\bVL. ~ /992.__
Seal of the Court
BY THE COJRT:
/4~-
prothonotTIclerk. C Division
~L2.aad 7p0?/U'4_r-
Deputy
(Elf. 1/97)
-- ~, :~
fr; Cd /..
'. "
t:-: N I "
11'(.' I
(j. .. ,
f~- ;.. ~ ,-
'..
,;,; ,. 'I!
Ll
llJ' I
{.II ::.. :-1,',/
' , c..::.' '-".J...
j -. '. .
I" (lJ ~)
U CII '..J
.'
"
,.. ..::j' ,..
tr; "" E.
.'
~.~: .. :i .,r
I.U~:; N ,
( ).....-- .J:
.,-(
I'.:' w.. .)-~
(1)1 "
I . cr, ,'''1
r.J; I ).......
LJ.! . .1. >:"
EL!t I r-I.: 'Uj
u.. :"Ll.,
.... -=.:: '~j
"~. m
0 U'\ U
:>- \D >-
~~ ..., t::;
.f..
M 5<
c. ~.',
...;:.~ ::t: <.):',
"'(.'
U( c... '~2}
'F
[' 0 ',;~in
M ~~JZ
'1:'-/
rt~~r c.: '0'0
.. I
r.- ~. I.UC.l-
"" ~:::
~ 0'\ :J
0'\ (,)
"
,