HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-06871
~ ('I >-
.:/ I:;
.:~ ,.,.
\:' I
\..1 , .'
IJ./...
()("o, ,:.1;:' .
0:,; L" ,..
(Lit.'_
iJ ~ I UJ
f.' " N , ,
tC!< :~j 't t./
rlCL
r: -J ,,-,
". ct"
"
<.) VI U
I,
"
>. ('J ..
I'r ...":1
..(
f~'~ .
UI ~ !
,,"
f"
'..
) .
<;]: I.~) ."
rr): (" .~
(r.ltr, ,'.
1,..1
.' :':'.1 "l.
r., -',
LI.. ~"'J ,
Q u' ()
.~ ''''J >.
Lt" ..:J I
....J.
)_:
11.I(j
<'2"
n: <:
l!-r
<.,}( , ')
CI' ~"
LLI1J
til,. ' :", ti:1
. I 1..!...
,. ..
u. U~ ,
0 ()l (J
>- <'I (;~
t:r.; ..;1
-L
I... .. l
LJJ~.',J C,
( ).'
rd'
.- .', I ~.
(!..p, ,
&l~ '~r.:> " ,
-oJe ('-.J "
-::1tll .. i't"j
,...,. ;:.' ''!It.
fJ ioO".
~) m ""j
c,r\ C)
..,.. N 5<
tr;
., ..:t
...' ..
~Ci ...,
'_.~-;':
\:"1"' ".,-, ,"
@,.,
I L~ '::'.1 .'
t') ,
Ctl" c. 01:>
II. L..' ',~i.(J
C-J -,:~
Ll. "
0 r- d
(;'.
. .
~ \CI ~
~ 0
~"r.) .. ::1..r
-
- ~. - "
tit, '.. ~--.
=c; f..J ,~~:'
'1-,:f '<.; i );_i
~.
\,- 'fl ;'~:n
(',
:/<c , ,',I;;
r.t:!-/ _....
~, 1.I.lr,)
.;
I- -, I.:lu.
~-,
& O"J :.:i
o. u
-.
IN TilE COURT OF connON Pl.EA!> OF conllERLANU CUllNT'I, PENNSYLVANIA
KABEL T. LUGU
vs.
No.: 9'/-66'/1
CIVIL ACTION
SAKUEL R. "I LEY
KonON TU AKEND COKPLA [NT IN AJjNULnENT
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURTI
Plaintiff, her attorney Joseph A. Kslasnik, Esquire, respectfully
represents and moves this court as follows:
1, The Plaintiff is KABEL T. LOGO who currently resides at 1417 Beer
Avenue, Hanover, Pennsylvania 17331.
2, The Defendant is SAnUEL R. WILEY who currently resides at 339
Lambeth Walk, York, Pennsylvania 17403.
3. A Complaint under Divorce Code was filed to the above term and
number on D..c:ember 15, 19'37.
4. The Complaint, as filed, contalned only a counl for Annulment, and
not divorce.
5. Pursuant to Pa. R.C,P. 1920.13, Plaintiff wishes to amend the
Complaint to include a count for divorce under 23 Pa. C.S,A. ~3301{c). in that
the marriage is irretrievably broken, which count could have been joined with
the sction ln Annulment.
COUNT 1 - IHHIiTIHt:YAllLY 1II!!!!<t:N
8. Paragraph 1 through 7 hereoi ure incorporated h~rein by relerence a~
though set 10rth in whole.
9. The marriage la irretrievably broken.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests requests the Honorable Court to enter a
Decree ot Divorce on behal1 of the Plainlill and againat the Delendant,
COUNT 11 - AIIIIULKENT
10. Paragrapha 1 through 9 are incorporated by reference as though set
forth in whole.
11. The said marriage between Plainli!1 and Delendant was procured by
the Defendant by fraud and aaid marriage has not been aubsequently confirmed
by the acts of the Plalntitt,
12. Defendant's acts 01 fraud by which the marriage was procured
involved his insiatence and representation lo the Plainti!! thal he had no
other paramoure and/or aexual partnere at the time 01 the marriage. After the
date of marriage the Delendant admitted to Plalnli!I, and/or Defendant
independently discovered that Defendant had maintained a paramour and/or
sexual partner before and contemporaneous with the date of the marriage. and
that such relationship continues presently.
13. There has been no confirmation by cohabitalion or other acts by
the Plaintiff after the removal ot the Impediment to the marriage.
WHEREFURt:, Plaintill requests that lhe marriage between hersel! and the
Delendant be deemed null and void. and that the Gourl enter a decree 01
annulmenl.
Respectfully submitter.,
aO~
seph A. Kalasnik, Esquire
ttorney for Plaintiff
, Hanover Station
1157 Eichelberger Street
Hanover, Pennsylvania' 17331
Sup. Ct. No. 76063
Da ted 13) ;;J. J 1Y