HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-01336
The mother of the child is LISA A. DAVIS, who currently
resides at 6020 Hummingbird Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.
She is not married.
The father of the child is TIMOTHY J. BRECHBIEL, who
currently resides at 1731 Kaylor Road, Hummelstown, Pennsylvania.
He is not married.
4. The relationship of the Plaintiff to the child is that
of mother. The Plaintiff currently resides with the child and
with her roommate, Carla Burk.
5. The relationship of the Defendant to the child is that
of father. He currently resides with his roommate, Michael.
6. The Plaintiff has not participated as a party or
witness, or in another capacity, in other litigation concerning
the custody of the child in this or in another court.
The Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding
concerning the custody of the child in this or in another court.
Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to these
proceedings who has physical custody of the child or who claims
to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.
7. The best interest and permanent welfare of the child
will be served by confirming custody in Plaintiff because
Plaintiff can better care for the child and Plaintiff has been
the primary caregiver for the child since her birth.
Plnintifl'
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
LISA A. DAVIS,
vs.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
TIMOTHY J. BRECHBIEL,
Defendant
NO. 98-1336 CIVIL TERM
JUDGE PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED: None
CUSTODY CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
I. The pertinent information eoneeming the child(ren) who is(are) the subjeet of this
litigation is as follows:
NAME
BIRTHDA TE
CURRENTLY IN
CUSTODY OF
Brianna Caitlin Davis
May 24, 1995
Plaintiff
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on April 23, 1998, and the following individuals
were present: the Plaintiff and her attorney, Charles E. Petrie, Esquire; the Defendant appeared
pro se.
3. Items resolved by agreement: See attached Order.
4. Issues yet to be resolved: See attached Order.
5. The Plaintiffs position on custody is as follows: See attached Order.
6. The Defendant's position on custody is as follows: See attached Order.
7. Need for separate counsel to represent child(ren): Neither party requested.