The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About98-06547 t~ 1 . I J ~ lI'I Q ~ .... } ~ c.f ). ~ o CIl - j (. ~ ~ - . .5 . C), ; , t': :,..1 \1')1 .....,i ! ~j ~l ~ i '=J ~ ',. <::1 I'''; le' I- n C.-~ " I. ~ ( ,- :,L ~... \ I " ; . ,- ~ 1.-" ll,l , ~ Le. , t- ,- .- " I - . wr'II" i' ;i"i' .. S , 1 :!J.f:.,.,:,.t')L._,.,; "J I ~ ~ ,!,'l. .'10.1" ,,, P "." I" ",,' J' \.; I ,..' .t. lq I.." I- 'I' , .; ; , I ,,) ~ ,01 ).'" I ,0" -',I,'jilll ". ':,';11 'fl >,"1' !l,li', f' ,; ) " !., Hi', ,. '" , I', , , n:,I'O(l.)frfr ,',',W ': ..,Iii. 1NIVldV,0:J 31LJ 01 JlitH ClNV lV3ddV ;;0 3Jl10N ;0 3:JIMnS 3Q 300l:Jd .:\ IS .i ~:. ;'"',, ,J}I ;,", ,.n ,i'i,;d Sfi/ll '-""' ...,., , '';::':,-'~) .~ ~ v p C\-< '-'- ~ ~ "" -K) r---. ..... \..~ -- 'i~ .......... ..j 'C ~ "<" , r<' (J ~ J,',', ....... ,",Itt..;.;:; lJ " I,' J , 1;( ';\, ,..,I,'; , '.~.... ,'"1'lItJlfI "ij'.l '. i' . "i; "I ,.,I'J' iii":> "'"i')''' ,\1.'1" SIH.l \' 'nl:"'.1' 1 I\"~ "HIO,\\S .,' ;(:._'" ,I>:.'" ."" ....:" ";1. ;1) ',I':' . 'I ' ~, ::1 :JI^\1CII:J:J\1 'HU'_W ^lNnQ:J VINl-J/\USNN1.1 Jt' ;;11113MNmV~'\JOJ COMMONWEALTH OF PENNS~ "NIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND ~ 09-3-05 NOTICE 01- "UDGMENTrrRANSCRIPT CIVIL CASE PLAINTIFF: NANI!'I'llIAQOAfSS fifILSON, CHARLBS . .., 400 PARK HILL DRIVB MBCHANICSBURG, PA 17055 L .J tMg a.M. No: OJ fWnt" HotI GAYLB A. BLDBR _... 507 N. YORK ST. MBCHANICSBURG, PA To.,.... (717) 766 -4575 17055 VS. DEFENDANT: NAME.nc1 ADDRESS 'HEHPT BROS. INC, ET AL. 55 LOCUST PT.ROAD MBCHANICSBURG, PA 17055 L .., ATTORNEY POR PLAINTIPP : BARRY A. KRONTHAL,BSQUIRB 101 PINE STREBT P.O.BOX 932 HARRISBURG, PA 17108-0932 Docket No,: CV- 0000304 -98 Date Filed: 9/29/98 .J . ., THIS IS TO NOT,IFY YOU THAT;... . . Ju'dgment:.' ..,- POR DRFRNDANT [iJ Judgment was entered for: (Name) "'RMP'I' R1l0A TN'" [iJ Judgment was entered against: (Name) WTT,AON. "''''l>.llT,RA in the amount of $ nn on: (Date of Judgment) (Date & Time) 1n/?R/QR . D Defendants are jointly and severally liable, D Damages will be assessed on: Amount of Judgment Judgment Costs Interest on Judgment Atlorney Fees Total $ $ $ $ $ .00 .00 .00 ,DO .00 D This case dismissed without prejudice, D Amount of Judgment Subject to Attachment/Act 5 of 1996 $ D Levy is stayed for _ days or D generally stayed, Post Judgment Credits Post Judgment Costs $ $ ------------ ------------ D Objection to levy has been filed and hearing wil! be held: Certified Judgment Total $ I'"'' Time: ~ "~,, ANY PARTY HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OFTHE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION. YOU MUST INC~UDE tJ~~~THIS NOTICE OF J~DG~ENTfTRANSCRIPT FORM WITH Y,~U~i.~~~~C~ OF APPEAL, ,(. . T _ t-.;- , I Date r ((: f- . , ',' ~ , District,Justice ", . . ,~ I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the record of the proceedings coi:1taining the judgment. 'j--.., , ( C ., ,. ..Jr";'-. :( , Date' ,.-::.' l_ ~ - . ,District Justice '- My commission expires first Monday of January, AOPC 315.96 2002 .' SEAL'" ,."....' l:OMMONwIALl OF 'ENNSYLVANIA COURTdFCOMMON'LEAS ClDbel'lanc1 JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF APPEAL r'.\ " , . " . ........... FROM ""~ 01... __ "~I "~:I -...s ill 9-3-05 . nHf.... U-17-98 DISTRICT JUSTICE JUDGMENT 98- (PJ0 COMMON 'LEAS No, ." TN. CA'. 0.. ~....-.., , -'Mecbanlcsburg . _.u md Drive ...,,;i!i .".". ".-'iF-,"'",; A K%onthal, ~.{!;~ If appellant was Claimant (see Pa, R.C,P,J,P," "F' , . - ,.-.,..,?!; No. TOO1fSJ in action before District Justice. he '6~':' MUST FILE A COMPLAINT within .twentY (20n';~& days after (iling his NOTICE of APPEA~;", ..c'B;', S"na,.,. of P'orhono,.,y", D.puty ." i7...:~~J j~:,. PRAECIPE TO ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE; ...;:1~ i: (Th,i'seciion of form to be used ONL Y when appellant was DEFENDANT (see Pa, R,C.P,J,P, No, 1001(1i'!n'action befor. OistriciJustice'!;,l:~ :;,,ff NOT USED, detach from copy of notice 01 appeal to be served upon appellee), ' ',. .''('\ . 'i_i';'::'.-~.,.',~j.: ..:. ;).;PRAECIPE:. To Prothonotary .1\ . .... .''-;; €,{[:t' Enter rule upon ,appellee!s),to file a complaint in this appeaf';,ii ~;0;';,'" , ' Name of appellee(s} ,', ,~.lc.ommon Pleas No. wi.hin twenty (20) days after service of rule or suffer entry of judgment of non pros,':~ fU ., _,___C-''':: .",';~:.ff~t ~'~,:} . " , '~'~~, '~~~i\~ '~&f.':!";:;::~":'-', Si9!'~t~'!1, ~f ap~ella'!t ,O(,hi~attor?~y or~~,H}f:~~ \,t\)..RULE: . To ,appellee!s) .~ii);Xg _~tjt',d:;:,~";:: ;;;.-;.~~.::'; :'::,:::;~,' .~~~~,~;' ..~" .,"" '..'. "" ..,,'~~ ':;~~J1 1~;:;[,.~2); If V~u donot file a complaint within this time, a JUDGMENT OF NON PROS WILL BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU: ''''. "..,;.,,&~; ~!~i;';(3') The date of s~rvice of this rule if service was bV mail is the date of mailing, "'f;~ (~~ate' ,19_,...;R,i ~~'{. ' S;gnaru," of Prothono,.,.. or D'~UIY.f;.(ij i'r<' ~,!:r.:).:':.>.:... '. ~,,,.,... ~~.~?;; ~!i>: \;;':".'..:": .'::'.. f$ql:~iAOPC'312.90 ~~,:J4t.':t'.1\':;\::';:;"''-' Charles Wilson CV 19 00003011-98 LT 19 ,i;!'.his, pl"ck will be signed :;R,C.,P;J.P, No, 1008B, :.)11.\tr.hi'~'NcUjce of Appeal, when received by the Oistricl Justice. will operate as ~l: '!':;a:SlJ~E,ASEDEAS to the judgment for possession in this case. . Ei."; , ONt Y when this notation is required under Pa. " . - -. ~- "'"1~ -;:;;:;'. .........:::- . ['''~ C'" , t~,;. ;'" '.--..:.........-.. _...~. -. - . . '\ ~" ,1 i, '. . , ~ ;;i '.I,,; ..--.! ., ~"J" t", f i . ~ '. .:-. '~; d' to"PROOF dF' SERVJCE-~OFNOTICE--;;~-A~PEALAND RUL-E--~O;I~LE--Co-MPll~-IN-T~~--'-- ~:;:.::,-:~'lfiljs';p;O{)"~f SClvici' 'MUS r BE FILED WITHIN FIVE (5) DA r,)' i~r lER li/lfltl rill' nutw(' of o1jlPf-'/JI. CIIt'CK ./fJI,ltCi1blt! LJo.'(f~s) -~~'~:,-I_~l\' ";}:;:',"~ .,', . '.' ~,M..'. ..,O~'NW~AL fIr' PENNSYL VANIA . ;~\. .' . . l)rnb-Ut- ' "'ltId Q.UNTYOF_ __~___;n "" ,'S:-;" 1FJJ?f\Y.!T: I herebv Swe<lt or ./IlUnl th.l! I WHit~d . . '~l.'''.i.'.!'.'''..\~...''..~'~.' ,co,~x.,ol 'ih~,'NI"t,\8' .UII~I;"":;' c"';'m'Ci~~F'f#?_'tJ_.fJY},Lnt mIle' J"",e,' d'"';9""'('<I .\~~>~. fdatf.'ofSt.'rvICt!}_~_v._ ,,=,___.___.19_(3__ if" jJ'y PClmJi~li:-.jfI~~R'fi(,'dl (rt!!I.:>\tlll~tl . ~1W~> :- rccuipl jJi~d frCl'IO, ;,J,IlCi"mr~..l!H,' dPpldt'~I'. {fJ.Jmf.'L, ~fJlrn/:--:-,.., _orl):::t_~/".LJ}f..:, ... --- "-"_.-:-._-~----~-::---;-- ",:~r;',.: ':_ . _._I~____--l-' 19 :'l~ L-J by rH!r~'1I1,,1 s.!rv'ce !y hy (C:I~1 t"il'd; (f+.'!PSl':II.'tJl fllild, sf:ndcr's-fcccipt .11lJch~a ;",.-,' IJ~{tH;':,'t] r~~H1d.fllrthl"-( Ih.tt I SCl'Vt'!(j, Ihl!. Fhlle hi F d.> ? COmplitH1r <'l({.tJfHpallY:llV lilt-!': MlOve" Nsr,' /' u( A!;JFO~f 'upon' 'Ihe' .1npCrrCIH~) to i1t~-,,:- ,,; whom the Rule ~v"s <.1tJdrf:s':.f.'d on_______._ .____,_. 19 [J by ~Wr'iO 'iclvicf' i J by .(Cj~rlifierl' (rc~listr:t(l(l) . ~tq::~;')mail:'Sdndcr's-n;'ceiJJt,~ttaCh(>d I)(',elo. <' ..: . '~k,,~'.' -, - ~. 9.....l'l.N..:(A.{(~MEO)A~~/SU. BSCRIBEDBEFOflE ME ~~"','r' ,....[jAYOFj-~OJl,~__. 19_~__. . /t~iiiOrO/fibDl'biilO-)~I~r WJ' m."I'-- .. \\~.;,'l:-,'::;.'< "', -...' v.';:~.,,1. 't. 0';:'0' Wc(al' Notarial Seal .:,,,~;:':;}, :M~Ii~sa'J; VO~ Keyserling, ~rfo;~t7cfa~~i~ ~~~?, ~~to':,=;~b~~9' 21, f~ <;.t__~:.."~', Mcrrcer. PennsylvClniaAssodation of Notaries !J)::1 ~ ~k. .__ f::'1'""'" ., ~i~;;:':::-;,:' !'Iv'" ~~li;~}: ~L,.., r' ~^"" ~}\~, " (fr.:., ~{'~"" ,. ~:;,:: (,;... ~,J '" ,1918-. ;" \';' 0 If.) 0 'c .::I!_. :-;'1,,'. " ..,.. ~- -, -nee g :-C11 CTl[l~ "- ,""":1-p /__/. ZC r-.> -am In.!: 0 ..:.,0. '-:;C S"Cl 2.~c~' -...' .,,--r, .- .=:.: T):D :-.-.CJ ~CJ r>} orn > (::: .--J -/ 1:-.. ~=t ", :.0 -~~ '. -~ ',J ~,." ~" ,- , NOTICIA Le han demandado a usted en la corte. si usted quiere defenderse de estas demandas expuestas en las paginas siguientes, usted tiene viente (20) dias de plazo al partir de le fecha de la demanda y la notificacion. Usted debe presentar una apariencia escrita 0 en persona 0 por abogado y archivar en la corte en forma escrita sus defensas 0 sus objectiones alas demandas en contra de su persona. Sea advisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte tomara medidas y puede entrar una orden contra usted sin previo adviso 0 notificacion y por cualquier queja 0 alivio que es pedido en la peticion de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero 0 es propiedades 0 otros derechos importantes para usted. LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABO GADO INMEDIATAMENTE. BI NO TIENE ABOGADO 0 SI NO TIENE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR AL SERVICIO. VAYA EN PERSONA 0 LLAME POR TELEFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA DIRECCION SE ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEGUIR ASISTENCIA LEGAL. Dauphin County Lawyer Referral Service 213 North Front Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 (717) 232-7356 REYNOLDS & HAVAS A Professio al Corporation OAT" /;;l/1~ "-'--..-- MICHELE J. THORP Attorney I.D. #71117 Attorneys for Plaintiff 101 pine Street Post Office Box 932 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0932 (717) 236-3200 8AIIIl'l It. , KRONTIlAL, ESQUIRE Pa. Suprema Court I,D. No, 55672 MICHJ:LJ: J. THORP Pa, Suprema Court 1.0. No. 71117 RZYNOLDS , HAVAS 101 Pine Street Poat Office Box ~32 Harriabur9, Pennsylvania 17108-0~32 Telephone: rax: [717) 236-3200 [717] 236-6863 Attorney for Plaintiff CHARLES WILSON, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. NO. 98-6547 CIVIL TERM HEMPT BROTHERS, INC. and FISHER BUILDINGS, Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiff, Charles Wilson ("Plaintiff"), is an adult individual currently residing at 400 Park Hill Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 2. Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. ("Defendant Hempt Brothers"), is a corporation with a place of business at 55 Locust Point Road, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 3. Defendant, Fisher Buildings ("Defendant Fisher Buildings"), is a corporation with a place of business at R.R.I, McVey town , Pennsylvania. 1 4. In 1997, Plaintiff hired Defendant Fisher Buildings as a general contractor to build a garage on his property located at 5 Gale Circle, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 5. Defendant Fisher Buildings then subcontracted with Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. to delivery concrete to the jOb site. 6. On or about August 22, 1997, Defendant Hempt Brothers delivered several loads of concrete to Plaintiff's residence. 7. During the course of said delivery, Defendant Hempt Brothers negligently, careless and recklessly damaged a stone wall and shrubbery along Plaintiff's driveway. 8. As a result of the negligence of Defendant Hempt Brothers, Plaintiff suffered the damages herein after described. COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE CHARLES WILSON v. HEMPT BROTHERS. INC. 9. The averments in Paragraphs 1 through 8 hereof are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their entirety. 10. The occurrence of the aforesaid incident on our about August 22, 1997, and the subsequent damages resulting therefrom, were the direct and proximate result of the negligent, careless and reckless conduct of Defendant Hempt Brothers, including but not limited to the negligent driving of a concrete 2 .~ ~ truck owned by Defendant Hempt Brothers and operated by an employee of Defendant Hempt Brothers and the improper delivery of several loads of concrete. 11. As a result of Defendant Hempt Brothers' negligent, careless and reckless conduct, the stone wall along Plaintiff's driveway and adjacent shrubbery were damaged. 12. As a result of the negligent, careless and reckless conduct of Defendant Hempt Brothers, Plaintiff has incurred damages in the amount of $1,692.00. . ~' WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Charles Wilson, demands judgment in his favor and against Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc., in the j amount of $1,692.00, plus interest, costs of suit and any and all other relief which this Court deems proper and just. ) ,\ COUNT I - BREACH OF CONTRACT CHARLES WILSON v. FISHER BUILDINGS AND HEMPT BROTHERS. INC. 13. The averments in paragraphs 1 through 12 hereof ~ ~ are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their entirety. ,'~ ~,. 14. Defendant Fisher Buildings agreed that it would ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ properly and adequately build a garage on Plaintiff's property. 15. Despite this agreement, damage was done to Plaintiff's property. ~ I 16. Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. agreed that it would properly and adequately deliver the concrete to Plaintiff's I ~ home for purposes of building the garage. 3 17. Despite this agreement, Plaintiff sustained damage to his property. 18. As a result of Defendant Hempt Brothers and Defendant Fisher Buildings' breach of contract, Plaintiff sustained damages in the amount $1,692.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Charles Wilson, demands judgment in his favor and against Defendants, Hempt Brothers, Inc. and Fisher Buildings, in the amount of $1,692.00, plus interest, costs of suit and any and all other relief which this Court deems proper and just. & HAVAS onal corporation DATE: 1;)/7/>( By' KRONTHAL 1. D. #55672 MICHELE J. THORP Attorney 1.0. #71117 Attorneys for Plaintiff 101 pine Street Post Office Box 932 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0932 (717) 236-3200 4 ~~ ~ i~ VERIFICATION I, BARRY A. KRONTHAL, have read the foregoing Complaint. The factual statements contained therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I am authorized to make this Verification on behalf of my client, Charles Wilson. . ~. This Verification is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to ,~ averments, I may be sUbject penalties. authorities, which provides that if I knowingly make false DATE:/~;I~9~ A. KRONTHAL, ESQUIRE ~ " , " , . " , CHARLES WILSON, PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA " ,;: V. HEMPT BROTHERS, INC. and FISHER BUILDINGS, DEFENDANTS 98.6547 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 1998, a Rule is entered against ( defendant Hempt Brothers, Inc., to show cause why the motion to strike should not be granted, Rule returnable fifteen (15) days after service. Any answer filed with the Prothonotary by defendant should be accompanied by a brief with both documents to be forwarded by the Prothonotary to chambers, :saa . ;'i '{ .:~ !t . ,,': J~~ "i (',;. /, 1"), ,,( 1'."-1' / l (', ""';y " /--:::, -'f,:,... I ""', , ">, ., ,.....0 "\:'j}. ,j . BARRr A. J<RON~HAL, II:SQUIJU: Pa. Supr~ Court I.D. No. 55672 III:lCI/OLDS , HAVAS 101 P11lOl Str_t Poat Ott1ce Box P32 Harr1aburg, Pannar1van1a 17108-0832 ~e1l1phone: rax: [717] 236-3200 [717] 236-6863 Attorney tor P1a1nt1tt CHARLES WILSON, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff . CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA . . . v. . NO. 98-6547 CIVIL TERM . . . HEHPT BROTHERS, INC. and . . FISHER BUILDINGS, . . Defendants : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MOTION TO STRIKE THE PRAECIPE OF DEFENDANT. HEMPT BROTHERS. INC. 1. On October 28, 1998, judgment was entered by District Justice Elder in the above-referenced matter. 2. Plaintiff, Charles Wilson ("Plaintiff"), filed a timely Notice of Appeal on November 17, 1998. 3. Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. D.J. No. 1005, Plaintiff duly made service of the Notice of Appeal upon the Appellee/Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. ("Defendant") and the District Justice. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed Proof of Service with the Prothonotary. A copy of said Proof of Service is attached hereto, incorporated herein by reference and labeled Exhibit "A". exhibit A exhibit B 4. In 1997, Plaintiff hired Defendant Fisher Buildings as a general contractor to build a garago on his property located at 5 Gale Circle, Camp Hill, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania. S. Defendant Fisher Buildings then subcontracted with Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. to delivery concrete to the jOb site. 6. On or about August 22, 1997, Defendant Hempt Brothers delivered several loads of concrete to Plaintiff's residence. 7. During the cour.se of said delivery, Defendant Hempt Brothers negligently, careless and recklessly damaged a stone wall and shrubbery along Plaintiff's driveway. 8. As a result of the negligence of Defendant Hempt Brothers, Plaintiff suffered the damages herein after described. COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE CHARLES WILSON v. HEMPT BROTHERS. INC. 9. The averments in Paragraphs 1 through 8 hereof are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their entirety. 10. The occurrence of the aforesaid incident on our about August 22, 1997, and the subsequent damages resulting therefrom, were the direct and proximate result of the negligent, careless and reckless conduct of Defendant Hempt Brothers, including but not limited to the negligent driving of a concrete 2 truck owned by Defendant Hempt Brothers and operated by an employee of Defendant Hempt Brothers and the improper delivery of several loads of concrete. 11. As a result of Defendant Hempt Brothers' negligent, careless and reckless conduct, the stone wall along Plaintiff's driveway and adjacent shrubbery were damaged. 12. As a result of the negligent, careless and reckless conduct of Defendant Hempt Brothers, Plaintiff has incurred damages in the amount of $1,692.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Charles Wilson, demands jUdgment in his favor and against Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc., in the amount of $1,692.00, plus interest, costs of suit and any and all other relief which this Court deems proper and just. COUNT I - BREACH OF CONTRACT CHARLES WILSON v. FISHER BUILDINGS AND HEMPT BROTHERS. INC. 13. The averments in Paragraphs 1 through 12 hereof are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their entirety. 14. Defendant FiSher Buildings agreed that it would properly and adequately build a garage on Plaintiff's property. 15. Despite this agreement, damage was done to Plaintiff's property. 16. Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. agreed that it would properly and adequately deliver the concrete to Plaintiff's home for purposes of building the garage. 3 17. Despite this agreement, Plaintiff sustained damage to his property. 18. As a result of Defendant Hempt Brothers and Defendant Fisher Buildings' breach of contract, Plaintiff sustained damages in the amount $1,692.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Charles Wilson, demands judgment in his favor and against Defendants, Hempt Brothers, Inc. and Fisher Buildings, in the amount of $1,692.00, plus interest, costs of suit and any and all other relief which this Court deems proper and just. DATE: 1:>/7/>( & HAVAS onal corporation By' A. KRONTHAL Attorney I.D. #55672 MICHELE J. THORP Attorney I.D. #71117 Attorneys for Plaintiff 101 pine Street Post Office Box 932 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0932 (717) 236-3200 4 VERIFICATION I, BARRY A. KROIlTHAL, have read the foregoing Complaint. The factual statements contained therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I am authorized to make this Verification on behalf of my client, Charles Wilson. This Verification is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities, which provides that if I knowingly make false averments, I may be SUbject penalties. A. KRONTHAL, ESQUIRE DATE: /d/y9R Exhibit C ~:-"': " ~"""it~' .,"" . , ' . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correCI copy of the foregoing PRAECIPE TO STRIKE APPEAL was served on all parties of interest by placing the same in the United States mail. first-class postage pre-paid, at Harrisburg. Pennsylvania on this ,':/A. /; L day of :;t JIb!); I ./. 1998. and addres,sed as follows: . Barry A, Kronthal, Esquire REYNOLDS & HAVAS 10 1 Pine Street P. O. Box 932 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108 Fisher Buildings R.R,1 McVeyrown, Pennsylvania 17051-9801 PETERS & W ASILEFSKI rL.." , ,f- :i: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document upon all counsel and parties of record this _11~day of ~ . , 1998, by placing the same in the united states First Class Mail, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, pennsylvania, addressed as follows: .,' Fisher Buildings R.R.1 McVey town, pennsylvania 17051-9801 James A. Garver, Esquire Peters & Wasilefski 2931 North Front street Harrisburg, PA 17110 , t 1 -r='-f'. ~ - Debora L. Hamm ^... ~\1 ""- "" ~ '" .... - 0' t '~ "" L, '-- '"'' l~' .. -' : r' - , ~~~?, ::,.::. , ) , ~ ,. . ,~ " , C') (~~ '1 " .,'l :ij '::j, L , U:'. 1 , ..- I': c..~ r.:- , L: ,.1 U (.P ,.; . '1 ~, .) ~ t: J:' 'l CHARLES WILSON, Plaintiff IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY,PENNSYLVANIA v. NO, 98-6547 CIVIL TERM HEMPT BROTHERS, INC" and FISHER BUILDINGS, Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER OF DEFENDANT. HEMPT BROTHERS. INC. WITH NEW MATTER PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 22S2(d) TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW, comes Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc ("Hempt"), by and through its attorneys, Peters & Wasilefski. and answers Plaintiff's Complaint and alleges New Matter thereto, along with New Matter pursuant to Pa,R,C,P. 2252(d), as fOllows: L Denied. After reasonable investigation. Defendant, Hemp! i.> without knowledge or information sufficient to lornl a belief as to the truth of said :,l1:lgations, and the same are therefore deemed denied and strict proof thereof is demanded, 2, Admitted, 3. Said paragraph is directed to a defendant other than Defendant, Hempt and, therefore, no response is required of Defendant, Hempt, 4, Denied, Said allegation is specifically denied in acr;ordance with Pa.R,C,P, , -:i 1029(e), 5, Admitted, 6, Defendant, Hempt specifically denies the allegation in Paragraph 6, It is specifically denied that Defendant, Hempt, on or about August 22, 1997, delivered several loads of concrctc to Plaintiffs rcsidcncc, To thc contrary, Dcfcndant, Hcmpt made nn deliveries whatsocvcr of any type of matcrials to Plaintiffs residcncc on Augusl22, 1997. 7.8, Dcnicd, Defendant, Hcmpt spccifically dcnies the allcg,uions in Paragraphs 7- 8, Dcfcndant, Hcmpt is advised by counsel ,\lid therefore avers that said allegations state conclusions of law to which no rcsponsc is requircd under thc Pcnnsylvania Rulcs of Civil Procedure. To the extcnt that a responsc may be required, said allegations arc specifically denied in accordance with Pa,R,C.P, 1029(e), COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE CHARLES WILSON v.IIEMPT BROTHERS, INC. 9, Defendant, Hempt incorporates its answers to Paragraph 1.8 above by reference thereto as though set forth herein at length, 10.12, Denied, Defcndant, Hcmpt specifically dcnies the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 10.12. Defendam, Hempt is adviscd by counsel and therefore avers that said allegations state conclusions of law to which no response is rcquired under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, To thc extent that a response may be required, said allegations are specifically denied in accordance with Pa,R,C.P, 1029(e), WHEREFORE, Defendant, Hempt demands that Judgment be entered in its favor and against Plaintiff. 2 COUNT II - BREACH OF CONTRACT CHARLES WILSON v. FISHER 8UILJ>lNGS ANI> HEl\tI'T BROTHERS. INC. 13, Defendant. Hempt incorporates its answers to Paragraphs 1-12 above by reference thereto as though set herein at length, 14-15, Denied. Said paragraphs are directed to a defendant other than Defendant. Hempt and, therefore, no further response is required of Defendant. Hemp!. 16-18, Denied. Defendant. Hempt specifically denies the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 16-18, Defendant. Hempt is advised by counsel and therefore avers that said allegations state conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, To the extent Ihat a response may be required, said allegations are specitically denied in accordance with Pa,R,C,P, I029(e), WHEREFORE. Defendant. Hempt demands that Judgment be entered in its favor and against Plaintiff. NEW MATIER 19, Defendant, Hempt incorporates its answers to Paragraph 1-18 above by reference thereto as though set forth herein at length, 20, Plaintiff was contributory negligent. 21. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the provision of the Pennsylvania Comparative Negligence Act in that Plaintiff's contributory negligence was quantitatively greater that 50 percent of all other negligence in this matter, 22, Plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of injury, 3 23, The incident and I'laillliff's alleged damages, whkh arc specilkall)' denied, ma)' have heen caused cilher in whole or in pan h)' lhe acts or omissions of third-panics who arc currently not parties lolhis litigation, 24, Plaillliff failed tll mitigate his injuries and damages, 25, Detcndant, Hempl was not negligelll. 26, Delcndant. Hempt had no maintenance duties and/or ohligations cllncerning the premise in question, 27, Defendant. Hempldid not have any contracts or agreements with Plaintiff. 28, Defcndant. Hempt did not manage or operate any aspecl of the premise in question, 29, The incident in qucslion and the alleged damages were caused hy individuals or entities other than Defendant. Hemp!. 30, Defendant. Hempt owed no duty to Plaintiff under the facts and circumstances then and there existing, 31. No act or omission on the part of Defendant. Hempt caused 01' contrihuted to the happening of lhe incident or to any of the alleged injuries 01' damages suflcred by Plaintiff. which arc specifically denied, WHEREFORE, Defendant, Hempt demands that judgment he entered in its lilvor and against Plaintiff. 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true allll correct copy of the foregoing ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER was served on all parties of il1lerest by placing the same in the United States mail; first-class postage pre-paid. at Harrisburg, Pennsylv<mia on this . ' / J . !^- , '. . . '. ' e day of ~:J: . IJ 1-./. 1998, and addressed as follows: Barry A, Kronthal. Esquire REYNOLDS & HA VAS 10 1 Pine Street p, 0, Box 932 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108 Fisher Buildings R,R,1 McVey town, Pennsylvania 17051-9801 PETERS & W ASILEFSKI C~. / / . 'i~/. . f/ - II, . IjJ fJ1tiL! fi\ iffkilfc;L/'- Michelle R":'Erdman '- r-. (',- >. -. - ; .- , 1,,1 V; c.;. "., , Cl L , , .; '" I~. (. I ... f , C. '.. .:...., , >- ('I i:; r" "t C<; 1- .. ~ ) (~ - .... ~'.' , ~, ~" .. , I': ~. , ~;) r \1,. I "jl, ., D'.. t;.." C..,: , I ,. e' .. J..'; L ',~ , ,. t:.:..; i;i. Il. J; t::~ "~ ~, ", () - J l/: ( 0 1Il.J : ~1~IH 1Il r~ iq!' ~I~I~ n. 0( CHARLES WILSON, Plaimiff IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA v, NO. 911-6547 CIVIL TERM HEMPT BROTHERS, INC., allll FISHER BUILDINGS, Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRAECIPE TO WITIIDRA W TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please withdraw Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Inc. 's Praecipe to Strike Plaintiffs Appeal in the above-captioned case, PETERS & W ASILEFSKI -----/ . ~ -' BY: . ;;?y./ ~ {.JAMES A. GARVER, UlRE Attorney LD. #78030 2931 North Front Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110 717/238/7555 DATE: 1z../Z'Z-/fT Counsel for Defendant, Hempt Brothers, Ine, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true allll correct copy of the foregoing I'RAECIPE TO WITIIDRA W was served on all parties of intercst by placing the same in the United States ma'1, first-class postage pre-p;lid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on this ;t;r/1day of , 1998, and addressed as follows: :.' Barry A, Krolllhal, Esquire REYNOLDS & HAVAS 10 1 Pine Street p, 0, Box 932 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108 Fisher Buildings R,R. 1 Box 1878 Williamsburg, Pennsylvania 16693-9801 \ , PETERS & W ASILEFSKI "i ,...." \ ,,', "'i BARRr A, KRONTKAL, ESQUIRE ~., Suprea. Court I,D. No, 55.72 HICHJ:LJ: J. THORP ~.. suprea. Court I,D. No, 71117 RE1nIOLDS , NAVAS 101 ~ine str_t ~o.t Office Box 932 H.rri.~urq, ~enn.ylvania 17109-0932 'relephon.: rax: [7171 236-3200 (717) 236-6883 Attorney for ~l.intiff CHARLES WILSON, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 98-6547 CIVIL TERM v. HEMPT BROTHERS, INC. and FISHER BUILDINGS, Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED REPLY TO NEW MATTER OF PLAINTIFF. CHARLES WILSON AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Charles Wilson ("Mr. Wilson"), by and through his counsel, Reynolds & Havas, a Professional corporation, and hereby files this Reply to New Matter, averring the following in support thereof: REPLY TO NEW MATTER 19. The averments contained in paragraphs 1 through 15 of the complaint are incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in their entirety. 20. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 21. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 22. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 23. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 24. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 25. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 26. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 27. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 28. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 29. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a conclusion of law to which no response is required and they are, therefore, denied. 30. Denied. The averments of this paragraph state a .. 8Almy A. I\IW:'\TIIAI.. ESl}lilllE "., Suprellle C"urll.II, :,\". ~~(,72 MARGOJ./S WEI.Sn:l:,\ I'. 0, 1I0s 932 lI.rrl.bur~.I'A 1711I8-09.'2 Tel."b"".: (717) 975-HII~ '....'h""., (717) '175-H '2~ f:-~IIIII: hkrulI'hulflllllurJ:ull\l'cll'l\lt'IIl,l'UIII .\lIl1rll"~\ rllr I'hllnllrr l'II,'U~1I17_1 CHARLES WILSON, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 98-6547 CIVIL TERM HEMPT BROTHERS, INC. and FISHER BUILDINGS, Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PI{AECIPE TO IlISCONTINLJE TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Kindly mark thc abovc-captioncd action sclllcd. discontinucd and cndcd, DATE: 13! rJ{) IS EDELSTEIN B -~ ---- Bar , Kronthal, Esquire Attorney No, 55672 3510 Trindle Road Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-975-8114