Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-07126 1" ~",- ~ -~ ~ i..... "~5;If~:, +. II. MAR 1 9 200ftfl IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Petitioner : No, 2000-07126 Civil Term vs, CATHERINE H, RUDY, Respondent ORDER AND NOW, this 20'" day of A?~ ,2001, upon consideration of the Petition to Set Aside Sheriff s Sale and responses thereto, the Court hereby modifies its Order of March 15,2001 and grants the following: a) Deitchman and Miller, as well as their agents or representatives, shall have prompt and immediate access to the property for an inspection (Sheriff may accompany upon request); 01 -f1.- I Cl " rJ.-.",.. ~,..-., ..i-ft.. -l'I- c..oo ..,.n"- b) the Sheriff s office is directed to release all fund~paid by Miller and Deitchman pending final disposition of this petition; c) fair m ket value r $ an inte d) all interested parties are hereby restrained from adversely affecting Miller and Deitchman's equitable interest in the property, as well as acting or failing to , / act in such a manner that their equitable interests will be adversely affected; "-- L '. : L.. J" .""'~.~ """'2>5 _~'~":I~,jij~" - ~ . . .. e) this matter shall be fast-tracked and a hearing is hereby set on this matje} for ,/;J , /In, 1_ '3 A/Y1 M 1# '7 ',~d~ ,~, 2001 at /, 0 'r-,m, All parties in interest shall be prepared to present their testimony in this matter at that time, '/1/1.. I' . {<\~ L.~ [}O.-D 0.3' ~~S / \ \, \'.. 'be.; bc..~mQAj I-\o."cl d.-elive.~ed. t: 0 u. '" "'.,' . ~ ~, " """.' " "~~'~~~J;;,,,~~ ..~ ,_ .,,, 'mo. ,,- "_,_,, "~",,,,"':;_,"-"'_'~,{,'"'''' , '-'-"'~''l:: lif"liiilJi ""'''''j1fJi1ftJt~[r -"-"tr'Ji.<l')i]t,'-", -""--'~'- Oi~ PI Ci' i.t::'L)-/i'-r-!A ,:.. :~. ::_._~,::.;-"';~~\:r.- ,,,ciiAD'y J1ql '-;1/ (Jf "'h~n,<j ','li1 "0 '.. Pa 12: S I CH\""" , VI,;,,"'''I''j''!' , '<"".... IL;j."'-/:-., ...-,........ PENlVSYLt'ArJ~UlJ7Y "..,1J!lJll8[llJJ"""T'_..,.__~~~:"'i"",!:,~;;-;rr~"'""'::cr.""""r;r-"",,"~~r~,".." ..J,tI]iJl ~F' ~.- - . '~; I .~, , . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Petitioner : No, 2000-07126 Civil Term vs, CATHERINE H, RUDY, Respondent ANSWER TO PETITION TO SET ASIDE SHERIFF'S SALE ON BEHALF OF THE PURCHASERS. DEITCHMAN AND MILLER Parties-in-interest, Anthony Miller and Daniel Deitchman, representing themselves pro se, hereby respond to the Petition to Set Aside Sheriffs Sale in the following manner and show cause below why the sale should not be set aside: 1, Admitted upon information and belief, 2, Admitted upon information and belief, 3-6, Denied. Proof demanded, 7, Denied, Proof demanded as to the date, disposition and authenticity of the check., 8, Denied, Proof demanded, 9, Denied, Proof demanded as to the time of receipt. 10, Denied, Proof demanded, Whether the issuance and time and manner of tender of the check complied with statutory requirements is a conclusion of law to which no answer is required, Inasmuch as a further answer may be required, the check allegedly delivered (Exhibit "A" of Petition) does not comply with part (b)(l) of 41 P,S, Sec. 404 requiring that payment be made in the form of cash, cashier's check or a certified check., 1 L Admitted in part and denied in part, Admitted that a purported representative of the Mortgagor stated upon questioning by the sheriff conducting the sale that there was no .~, - .~ ~. 1 "-,,*' activity on the property prior to the commencement of the bidding. Respondants do not have sufficient information to form a response concerning Lieberman's knowledge at the time of sale, 12, Admitted in part and denied in part, It is admitted that Deitchman and Miller were high bidders for the subject property at the price averred, In addition, costs and taxes were attributed to the sale in addition to the bid amount. 13, Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that the county tax assessment value for the subject property exceeds the bid purchase amount; the remainder of the paragraph contains a subjective assessment to which no response is necessary, 14, Denied that there were any irregularities to the sale, Proof demanded, 15, Denied, It is specifically denied that the funds were received in Homeside Lending's coun$el's office at 9:15 a,m. as stated, It is admitted that Homeside Lending, through their counsel, did not direct the Cumberland County sheriffto stay the sale, The remainder of any factual statements in this paragraph are denied. In addition, the averments in this paragraph are not verified by Federman and should, thus be stricken, 16, Denied that Petitioner had cured the default in accordance with 41 P,S, Sec, 404(b), Proof demanded, CAUSE SHOWN 1. As of the commencement of the March 7, 2001, 10:00 a,m, Sheriffs sale, the County Recorder of Deeds office had no records pertaining to a re-finance on the subject property, 2, According to the pronouncement ofthe Sheriff, at the March 7, 2001, 10:00 a,m, Sheriff s sale, the Sheriff received no notice to stay the sale nor notification that Rudy ..~, "~ " ,~ . ~" 1 ~~~;" intended to cure the default pertaining to the subject property, Numerous other sales set for the same day had been stayed, 3. As of March 12,2001, five days after the Sheriff's sale, there was still no recordation of any mortgage liens or interests other than the mortgage which was subject to the writ of execution herein pursuant to a title search performed on behalf of Miller and Deitchman, An Affidavit concerning the status of title to said property is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 4, Miller and Deitchman had no notice of any intent of Rudy to cure the default, and materially relied upon the Recorder of Deeds' records previously examined by themselves, along with the public statement of the mortgagor's representative at the sale to the effect that there was no action involving the property, prior to bidding on it. 5, In accordance with the Sheriff s rules, Miller and Deitchman tendered the required payment directly after the knock-down of the property, 6, On the afternoon after the sale, March 8, 2001, Miller received a message on his answering machine from the office of counsel for Homeside Lending indicating that there was a problem with the sale, 7, In accordance with the Sheriffs requirements, Miller and Deitchman delivered the entire bid amount plus costs to the Sheriff on the due date, March 9, 200 I, to protect their interests in said property and to avoid forfeiture of the deposit made on March 7, 200 I, (A true and correct copy of the receipt indicating the full amount paid is attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 8, Miller and Deitchman will suffer undue prejudice by the stay of Sheriffs sale remedies entered by the Court on March IS, 2001, because, absent a further Order of the Court, their funds totaling Fifty One Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Two Dollars ($51,842,00), ~~!,-,. will be retained in the Sheriff s account and they will have neither use of those funds nor title to said property for an indeterminate amount of time, 9, Upon information and belief, Rudy is still in possession of the property, 10, Miller and Deitchman have been hindered in their attempts to secure insurance for their equitable interest in the property in that neither they nor their insurer have been granted permission to enter and inspect said premises by either counsel for Homeside Lending, or Petitioner's counsel, Russo, 11, Miller and Deitchman will suffer further losses in their inability to occupy, sell, or lease said premises in light of the March 15,2001 ruling, When bidding on the property, they were informed by the Sheriff that they would receive title within thirty to sixty (30 - 60) days of the sale, The ruling deprives them of their expected possession of the property, which was a material factor in their bid, 12, Miller and Deitchman also face payment of property taxes, utilities and other unknown expenses, as well as the risk of deterioration or destruction of the property while Rudy continues to occupy the property, 13. Miller and Deitchman believe, that based upon comparable properties advertised in the Sunday Patriot News, that a fair market rent for the property is in range of $900,00 - $1,000.00 per month, A true and correct copy of recent advertisements for similar properties in comparable geographic locations is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 14, Miller and Deitchman allege that the Petition and request for Temporary Restraining Order should be stricken since the facts alleged therein were not verified by petitioner, Rudy, in accordance with Pa, R,C,P, Rule 1024, ~ ~-'::,,; 15, Based on the bid price, Rudy is due the excess proceeds and stands to gain a substantial amount of cash from the Sheriff s sale, There is no sworn explanation pursuant to Pa, R.C.P, Rule 1024 in the Petition why the sale will cause Rudy irreparable harm, especially in light of this fact. 16, Moreover, Miller and Deitchman are concerned whether other liens (federal taxes, mortgage, utilities, etc,) will attach to this property during the stay of the .sale in light of the previous foreclosure; the apparent refinance; and Rudy's retention of record title, 17, Miller and Deitchman object to the apparent dual representation by Peter Russo of both Rudy and Chelsea Settlement Services and/or the lender of the alleged re-fmance because of the inherent conflict of interest under the circumstances, 18, Petitioner has not plead any irregularities in the actual sale held on March 7th, 2001. Any irregularities or "missed communications" which may have occurred between the plaintiff and the defendant, and/or Chelsea, the refinance company, and the attorney involved are irrelevant to this petition, and cannot form the basis to set-aside the sale to Miller and Deitchman, 19, If Petitioner proves that the refinance took place as averred in the Petition and the funds came out of recession on March 6, 2001, as stated in Petitioner's Paragraph 6, Petitioner, Rudy, or Chelsea, or Homeside Lending, had adequate time to notify the Sheriff and request a stay of the sale, but failed to do so, 20, The burden of proving cure in accordance with 41 P,S, ~ 404 is on the Petitioner. Where the facts as pled by the Petitioner do not meet the requirements of that statute, the clear language of the statute shall prevail. The Statutory Construction Act mandates that 'il J'-' ~""",'- . "[w]hen the words ofa statute are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit", I Pa,C,S, gI921(b), 21, Miller and Deitchman call the Court's attention to the closely analogous case of First Federal Sav, & Loan Ass'n, of Lancaster v, Swift, 457 Pa, 206, 321 A,2d 895 (1974), attached hereto as Exhibit 4, ("[C]ourts of equity will not relieve a party from the consequences of an error due to his own ignorance or carelessness when there were available means which would have enabled him to avoid the mistake if reasonable care had been exercised" (citations omitted)), WHEREFORE, because it is clear that neither the Sheriff nor Miller and Deitchman were responsible for any of the irregularities described and Petitioner had ample time to cure any default if they so intended where the above-captioned foreclosure proceedings commenced a long time prior to March 7th, Miller and Deitchman respectfully request the following relief: a) reversal of the stay and instruction to the Sheriffto allow the sale to Miller and Deitchman to continue so that all liens are satisfied and the defendant receive the excess proceeds; b) in the alternative, Miller and Deitchman respectfully request: i) access to the property for an inspection; ii) a refund of all or ninety percent (90%) of all funds paid to the Sheriff pending final disposition of this petition; iii) fair market value rent associated with Rudy's possession to be placed in an interest-bearing escrow account pending final disposition of the petition; iv) an order protecting Miller and Deitchman's equitable interest in the property; ~--, , v) that a hearing be promptly scheduled; and vi) reimbursement of costs associated with this petition and/or any other equitable relief the Court deems appropriate, Respectfully submitted, By:a~ A ~~ Ant ony MIller, pro se 103 Locust Street East Berlin, P A 17316 (717-691-8482) By: ~ g D - ,~ Daniel Deitchman, pro se 373 Claremont Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 (717-258-3012) - ,~ " :", ~(- <4lmk- ~ VERIFICATION We, the undersigned, hereby attest to the facts alleged in the foregoing Answer to Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. We acknowledge that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa, C,S,A, Sec, 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities, D&J- Daniel Deitchman 373 Claremont Drive Carlisle,PA 17013 (717-258-3012) Date: 3//<.0 /O~ aj).M 4 ~ Anthony Miller 103 Locust Street East Berlin, P A 17316 (717 -691-8482) Date: J /;~!o, -........ J - I" I. """~,~~~~,,' , RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT ------------------- ------------------- Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Receipt Date Receipt Time Receipt No, 03/07/2001 11:01:07 266585 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) RUDY CATHERINE H Case Number 2000-07126 R Service Info Remarks PAID BY TONY MILLER Total Check.,. + Total Cash.... + Cash Out".." - 2,400,00 .00 .00 Check No. 1323 Receipt total. = 2,400.00 ------------------------ Distribution Of Payment ---------------------------- Transaction Description Payment Amount ADVANCE PAYMENT 2,400.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN 2,400.00 ',,;"1 -'-"'""~H"', RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT ------------------- ------------------- Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Rece~pt Recelpt Receipt Date 03/07/2001 Time 11:00:14 No, 266584 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) RUDY CATHERINE H Case Number Service Info Remarks 2000-07126 R PAID BY DANIEL DEITCHMAN Total Check... + Total Cash,... + Cash Out. .".. - 2,400,00 ,00 ,00 Check No, 6445 Receipt total. = 2,400,00 ------------------------ Distribution Of Payment ---------------------------- Transaction Description Payment Amount ADVANCE PAYMENT 2,400,00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN 2,400,00 " ~ ~, . ,[ ~~ , ~1Ii . ~.~~""",.", RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT =~;~=~~=;;==~~~===~ Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street Carlisle, PA 170].3' Receipt Date 03/12/2001 Receipt Time 09:25:31 Receipt No. 266679 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) RUDY CATHERINE H Case Number 2000-07126 R Service Info Remarks PAID BY TONY MILLER Total Check... + Total Cash.... + 'Cash Out...... _ Receipt total_ ~ 23,521. 00 , .00 .00 23,521. 00 Check No. 1327 -------------------_u__ Distribution Of Payment __________..:_________________ Transaction Description Payment Amount ADVANCE PAYMENT 23,521.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN 23,521.00 - -"~ .' RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT ~=~==;~==~;======~~ Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street ,Carlisle, PA 17013, l" , Receipt Receipt Receipt '-'~Mfl\" Date 03/12/2001 Time 09:24:19 No. 266577 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VB) RUDY CATHERINE H Case Number 2000~07126 R Service Info " Remarks ' l?AID BY DANIEL DEITCHMAN ' Total Check... + 'I'otalCash. ... + Cash Out.._.;. _ Receipt total. ; 23,521. 00 -00 .00 ,23,521.00 Check No, 3447 Transaction Description ADVANCE PAYMENT ------- - - -------- ------- Distribution Of Payinent- ____ _ __~_ _______ ____ _~ _____ Payment Amount 23,521. 00 '23,521.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN ~ -"~ ~.. J , " ' ~ - - ,,~~ - ~ -~- - r.~' 12:16 FROM:GLENDA 761383121 TO: 2583124 PAGE: 1211 Tri.County Abstract Service 3414 Chestnut, Street, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 Telephone (717) 761-8870 . Fal( (717) 761.3830 GUi:NDA M. WETHINGTON March 15,2001 TO; ANTHONY MILLER & DANIEL DElTCHMAN FROM; GLENDA M, WETHINGTON VIA FAX TO: 6918482 IN RE: LIEN SEARCH - CATHERlNE H,RUDY, 914 WERTZVILLE RD., ENOLA, PA Tax. parcel No. 09140836138 THE RESULTS OF THIS LIEN SEARCH ON MARCH 7m and 8''', of2001 show only the mortgage dated and recorded on April 24, 1996, in Mortgage Book 1316, at page 30 in t.he amount of $30,000.00 ; Assigned to MERS on July 20,1999, in Misc. Book 619 at page 748. In the Prothonotary's Office there was of course, the suit for the Mortgage Foreclosure Action filed to No. 7126 of2000. We checked this again on Monday A.M. and still found nothing else, J hereby attest that the foregoing facts aTe true and correct to the best of my knowledge, infonnation and belief. r acknowledge that any false statements herein are made subj.eclto the penalties of 1 g P A, C.S,A, Sec. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. STGNED: 12h -t' aLr .. ~ ~*-.. , / Dated March 15,2001 ;',"-~- -- - " ;1 ----' - '1M. PENNS80llG 'rYIl'.lbi9, . 'roOml ~1/2 t1~i"a..ll\Ily..!!.ml'"'S replace; '2 tat r!'.'l"~ -, 1j'jI-. i ~1I'b1.S1~\,7'1:&S,' \NEW CUMBERLAND' "''''.j ran(~J.S950/mo;AvaiJ,,AIlr.l$t.Ca'1 319"""'K'10~ 0,697-4109.. ,,- , IMECHANICSIl\IIlG' ".." .eatlti'\ lut.Country'8rta,3bl!rdfoom;2tlll batt'l, air, Oit,neat full basem~,nt, 1, cargara~W1!Il/.sePtiC,.J\:QIl"~O.k'- ina.noo $.9011/-00.795-14 , H~14-SUNDAYPATRIOT.NEWS. HARRISiwRG, PA,,'SUNDAY, MARCH 11,2OQl I. ....--- ........ ~~,. ",,- ~- " I .-~l _'>lI~"i-t ~21 A.2c:r 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 1 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF LANCASTER v. Tom SWIFT, Appellant. July 1, 1974. The Court of Common Pleas, civil Division, Lancaster County, No. 15 Equity Docket, William G. Johnstone, Jr., J., granted mortgagee's request to set aside judicial tax sale of mortgaged land, and purchaser at tax sale appealed. The Supreme Court, No. 289, January Term, 1973, Roberts, J., held that the tax sale, held at court's direction in conformity with statutory requirements and with proper notice having been given, could not be set aside in equity by mortgagee on ground of unilateral mistake of fact as to date of sale resulting from its own inattentiveness and failure to utilize its statutory protections. Reversed. Jones, C.J., did not participate. Nix, J., concurred in the result. Eagen, J., filed concurring opinion. Pomeroy, J., filed dissenting opinion in which O'Brien, J., joined. West Headnotes 111 Evidence ~84 157k84 It is presumed that the price received at a duly advertised public sale is the highest and best obtainable. (Per Roberts, J., with one Judge concurring and two Judges concurring in the result.)-- III Taxation ~665 371k665 No finding of unjust enrichment from a tax sale was warranted where a statutorily satisfactory price was obtained at public sale. (Per Roberts, J., with one Judge concurring and two Judges concurring in the result.)-- [3] Equity ~62 Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works b~~ . .1 '--~:"k 321 A.2d 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 2 150k62 When the rights of a party are clearly established by defined principles of law, equity should not change or unsettle those rights; (Per Roberts, J., with one Judge concurring and two Judges concurring in the result.)-- l!l Equity ~62 150k62 Whenever there circumstances, (Per Roberts, result.) uId. is a direct rule of law equity court is as much bound J., wi th one Judge concurring governing the case in all its by it as would be a court of law. and two Judges concurring in the ln Equity ~62 150k62 Where the parties' rights are regulated and legislation, the maxim "equity follows the deference. (Per Roberts, J., with one concurring in the result.)--Id. fixed law" Judge by a comprehensive scheme of is entitled to the greatest concurring and two Judges 1iL Taxation ~689(2) 371k689 (2) Proceedings. Tax sale, held at court's direction and in conformity with the statutory requirements with proper notice and actual notice to mortgagee having been given, could not be set aside in equity by mortgagee, which relied upon unverified information supplied by one who was neither agent nor employee of mortgagee, on grounds of unilateral mistake of fact as to date of sale because of its own inattentiveness and failure to utilize its statutory protections. (Per Roberts, J., with one Judge concurring and two Judges concurring in the result.) 72 P.S. ~ ~ 5860.101-5860.803, 5860.501(a, c), 5860.602, 5860.603, 5860.605, 5860.607(d), 5860.609, 5860.611, 5860.612. [7] Equity ~6 150k6 Courts of equity will not relieve a party from the consequences of an error due to his own ignorance or carelessness when there were available means which would have enabled him to avoid the mistake if reasonable care had been exercised. (Per Roberts, J., with one Judge concurring and two Judges concurring in the result.)-- **896 *208 Harold E. Martin, Lancaster, for appella~t. William E. Chillas, May, Grove, Stork & Blakinger, L. J. Farina, Lancaster, Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ,.-.,- , ~.. ;.,1 1-- ~, ~)cii' 321 A.2d 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 3 for appellee. *207 Before EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ. *208 OPINION OF THE COURT ROBERTS, Justice. The First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lancaster was the holder of a mortgage on a parcel of realty in the city of Lancaster. Taxes became delinquent, and, pursuant to the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, [FNl] the property was sold at a properly advertised and conducted public judicial sale on October 23, 1971. First Federal did not send a representative to the sale. Appellant, Tom Swift, was the successful bidder at the duly-authorized sale and purchased the premises, as statutorily directed, 'free and clear of all tax and municipal claims, mortgages, liens, charges and estates of whatsoever kind, except ground rents, separately taxed.' [FN2] FN1. Act of July 7, 1947, P.L. 1368, as amended, 72 P.S. ss 5860.101-- 5860.803 (1968 & Supp. 1973) . FN2. Id. art. VI, s 612, as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.612 (Supp.1973). On January 7, 1972, First Federal instituted an equitable proceeding to set aside the judicial tax sale. The court, after a hearing, granted the requested relief. First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Swift, 63 Lancaster L.Rev. 567 (Pa.C.P.1973). This appeal followed. [FN3] We reverse. FN3. Swift, believing that appellate jurisdiction was vested in the Commonwealth Court by the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, Act of July 31,1970, P.L. 673, art. IV, s 402(4),17 P.S. s 211.402(4) (Supp.1973), filed a timely appeal in that court. Jurisdiction is properly in this Court pursuant to s 202(4) of the Act, 17 P.S. s 211.202(4) (Supp.1973) , and the Commonwealth Court transferred the case. Id. art. V, s 503(b), 17 P.S. s 211.503{b) (Supp.1973). An appeal so transferred is treated as if timely filed in this Court. Id. *209 First Federal sought equitable relief on the basis of an alleged mistake of fact. Several weeks prior to the October 23 public sale, Robert F. Keener, an employee of the Lancaster Redevelopment Authority, went to the tax claim bureau. Evidently, there had been some discussion between the Authority and Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ',,' "' I.. '" '-,;-1 , 1 ~....,;J 321 A.2d 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 4 First Federal concerning the purchase of the property in question. At the tax bureau, Keener 'asked for the list of the tax sale that was coming up,' without specifying the list for any particular date. The clerk handed Keener the sale list for October 30, 1971. Keener examined the list and discovered that this particular property was not there listed for sale. Keener then gratuitously informed First Federal that the realty would not be sold on October 23. Keener was neither agent nor employee of either the tax claim bureau or First Federal. Without investigating further, First Federal relied on Keener's information and advised its attorney not to appear at the October 23 sale. First Federal concedes it had earlier received official notice of the sale. [1] [2] The chancellor correctly observed that there is no basis at law for setting aside the sale. Proper notice was given, **897 and the sale was held at the court's direction in conformity with the statutory requirements. The court therefore stated that ,(t) here is no reason to disturb the sale unless equitable principles are involved which require the granting of relief to the plaintiff.' It did, however, believe that equity empowered the court to grant relief despite First Federal's unilateral mistake. The chancellor set aside the sale. [FN4] In the *210 circumstances of this case, the grant of equitable relief was error. FN4. The chancellor also was concerned about the purchase price Swift paid for the property. At the hearing, he stated: 'See, the Court has no benefit of any information like the value of the property or anything else. Now, this may be worth (the purchase price). If it's worth (the purchase price), then, this is a good sale. If this was a steal, the Court is going to upset the sale, and make it exempt.' In his opinion, the chancellor translated this concern into an erroneous finding of 'unjust enrichment' and a legal conclusion that '(t)he defendant would receive an unconscionable advantage if the sale were not set aside.' -First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Swift, 63 Lancaster L.Rev. 567, 570 (Pa.C.P.1973). The Real Estate Tax Sale Law provides, however, that at a judicial sale the property is to be sold 'to the highest bidder,' unless, the court sets a minimum price not bid. Act of July 7, 1947, P.L. 1368, art. VI, s 612, as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.612 (Supp.1973). No minimum bid was here set by the court. It is presumed that the price received at a duly-advertised public sale is the highest and best obtainable. Plummer v. Wilson, 322 Pa. 118, 185 A. 311 (1936); Tax Claim Bureau v. Wheatcroft, 2 Pa.Cmwlth. 408, 278 A.2d 172 (1971). A statutorily satisfactory price having been obtained at public sale, the record furnishes no basis for the chancellor's finding of 'unjust enrichment.' Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ,~~ -~ "' "J -"-I . . iW",," 321 A.2d 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 5 ill Even recognizing that a court of equity has broad powers, '(i) t is a mistake to suppose, that a court of equity is amenable to no law, either common or statute, and assumes the rule of an arbitrary legislator in every particular case.' Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law 732 (B. Gavit ed. 1941). When the rights of a party are clearly established by defined principles of law, equity should not change or unsettle those rights. Equity follows the law. Hedqes v. Dixon County, 150 U.S. 182, 14 S.Ct. 71, 37 L.Ed. 1044 (1893); Bauer v. P. A. Cutri Co., 434 Pa. 305, 253 A.2d 252 (1969); Scott v. Waynesburq Brewinq Co., 256 Pa. 158, 100 A. 591 (1917); Abrahams v. Wilson, 134 Pa.Super. 297, 3 A.2d 1016 (1939); see 2 J.Pomeroy, A Treatise on Equity Jurisprudence s 425 (5th ed. S.Symons 1941). Here, the rights of the parties are specifically established by the Real Estate Tax Sale Law. The statute *211 is the sole authority governing the sale of this land for delinquent taxes. See Richards v. Schuylkill County, 20 Pa.D. & C.2d 539 (C.P. Schuylkill County 1959), aff'd per curiam, 399 Pa. 552, 161 A.2d 26 (1960). The statute provides several protections for a mortgagee. Notice must be given, [FN5] and here it was. A mortgagee, as a 'lien creditor of the owner,' may stay the sale by entering into an agreement with the tax bureau for the payment of back taxes. [FN6] First Federal negotiated no such agreement. Prior to sale, 'any lien creditor' may redeem the property. [FN7] First Federal did not. Before a property may be sold at judicial sale, it must first be offered at a 'tax upset sale,' a sale which, unlike a judicial tax sale, does not discharge mortgages. [FN8] Here, in accordance with the statute, the upset sale was publically advertised for three consecutive weeks in newspapers and by posting on the property. [FN9] On the advertised date, the real estate was offered for sale but not then purchased. The' regularity or legality of the proceedings **898 of the (tax) bureau in respect to such (upset) sale' may be challenged. [FNI0] No such challenge was made. The judicial sale was then properly advertised and, by court order, the realty was offered for public sale on October 23. First Federal does not challenge the legality or regularity of this sale. Finally, a mortgagee may bid for and purchase premises on which it holds a mortgage. Despite actual notice, First Federal did not appear or bid at the judicial sale. The record reveals that First Federal failed to avail itself *212 of any of the ample opportunities to protect its interest. FN5. Real Estate Tax Sale Law, Act of July 7, 1947, P.L. 1368, art. VI, ss 602, 611, as amended, 72 P.S. ss 5860.602, 5860.611 (1968). FN6. Id. s 603, as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.603 (1968). FN7. Id. art. V, s 501(a), as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.501(a) (1968). Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works "-.1 ,~;, I , ..- " ,'~ ~ii~*",*-.i,' ~. 321 A.2d 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 6 FN8. Id. art. (1968) . VI, ss 605, 609, as amended, 72 P.S. ss 5860.605, 5860.609 FN9. Id. s 602, as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.602 (1968). FN10. Id. s 607(d), as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.607(d) (1968). On the other hand, after a judicial tax sale the purchaser is statutorily protected. A judicial sale discharges all mortgages and the purchaser takes title 'free and clear of all tax and municipal claims, mortgages, liens, charges and estates of whatsoever kind, except ground rents, separately taxed.' [FN11] Moreover, the Real Estate Tax Sale Law specifically provides that '(t) here shall be No redemption of any property after the sale thereof.' [FN12] FN11. Id. s 612, as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.612 (Supp.1973). FN12. Id. art. V, s 501(c) as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.501(c) (1968) (emphasis added) . [4] [5] The rights of all parties to a tax sale are defined and governed by statute. ' (W) henever there is a direct rule of law governing the case in all its circumstances, the (equity) court is as much bound by it as would be a court of law. Albriqht v. Albriqht, 228 Pa. 552, 77 A. 896 (1910); see 2 J.Pomeroy, supra, s 425 at 189--90. Where, as here, the parties' rights are regulated and fixed by a comprehensive scheme of legislation, the maxim 'equity follows the law' is entitled to the greatest deference. See, e.g., Bauer, supra; Albright, supra; Cloeter v. Superior Court, 86 Ariz. 400, 347 P.2d 33 (1959); Milqram v. Jiffy Equipment Co., 362 Mo. 1194, 247 S.W.2d 668 (1952); In re Adoption of McCauley, 177 Neb. 759, 131 N.W.2d 174 (1964); cf. 1 Pa. S. s 1504 (Special Pamphlet 1973). 121 Moreover, the 'mistake of fact' alleged by First Federal is precisely the sort of mistake which cannot provide a basis for equitable relief. First Federal elected to rely on information volunteered by a person without authority to speak for either the court which ordered the sale or the tax bureau which administered it. It did so at its own risk. The sale had been fully *213 and properly advertised in accordance with the statute. Notice of the judicial sale had also been sent to and received by First Federal, and the realty was correctly listed for sale for October 23. Although the means for determining the accuracy of Keener's gratuitous communication were readily at hand, First Federal admits that it took no steps to confirm this information Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ,,=,""'~.. ~ " ~, ,...' l~lil'lJ<,,", 321 \\.2(1895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 7 with the proper authorities. First Federal may not now successfully contend that its own inattentiveness and failure to utilize its statutory protections entitles it to a decree setting aside a lawful sale. J1l '[C]ourts of equity will not relieve a party from the consequences of an error due to his own ignorance or carelessness when there were available means which would have enabled him to avoid the mistake if reasonable care had been exercised.' Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Crouse, 151 Pa.Super. 259, 263, 30 A.2d 330, 332 (1943). See Stone v. C. 1. T. Corp., 122 Pa.Super. 71, 184 A. 674 (1936); Lessa v. Staler, 75 Pa.Super. 468 (1921); Felin v. Futcher, 51 Pa.Super. 233 (1912); 3 J.Pomeroy, supra, s 856b. Here, First Federal chose to rely on Keener's unverified information rather than avail itself of any of the several statutory procedures designed for its benefit. In these circumstances, First Federal is not entitled to relief, nor may appellant be deprived of the property he lawfully purchased. Decree reversed. Costs on appellee. **899 JONES, C.J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. *207 NIX, J., concurred in the result. EAGEN, J., filed a concurring opinion. POMEROY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which O'BRIEN, J., joined. *213 EAGEN, Justice (concurring). I concur in the result reached by the maj ori ty . However, I am compelled to express my reasons for so doing, because I cannot agree with the majority's analysis of the issue. *214 The majority, first of all, fails to recognize the basic premise, here involved, that 'gross inadequacy of price is sufficient basis, in itself, for setting aside a sheriff's (judicial) sale (See, Peoples Pbqh. Tr. Co. v. Blickle, 330 Pa. 398, 199 A. 213 (1938)) Capozzi v. Antonoplos, 414 Pa. 565, 570, 201 A.2d 420, 422 (1964). There can be no dispute that the price paid by the appellant, Tom Swift, ($5 plus current taxes of $329.46 for a tract of land valued at nearly $6000) is grossly inadequate. The majority, although not recognizing the above stated principle, felt the Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ,.".,1 ,".; ~I =, 'l.~".,,_~ .- -. 321 i\.2d 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 8 need to rule against the appellee on two distinct grounds. Initially, they state 'the rights of the parties are specifically established by the Real Estate Tax Sale Law. The statute is the sole authority governing the sale of this land for delinquent taxes.' [FN1] This statement is clearly an overreading of the legislative intent behind the passage of this Act. [FN2] The majority, itself, states: '(t)he statute provides Several protections for a mortgagee.' (Emphasis *215 added.) Thus, implying, and correctly so, that this legislative enactment was merely an attempt to Partially codify this area of the law. It is my strong belief that the legislature did not attempt to completely fill this area of the law so as to eliminate all remnants of the common law from being applied. FN1. The maj ori ty cites a common pleas court opinion as authority for this statement. Richards v. Schuvlkill County, 20 Pa.D. & C.2d 539, aff'd per curiam, 399 Pa. 552, 161 A.2d 26 (1960). It is granted that the common pleas court stated that '(t) he county having accepted in their entirety the provisions of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law of 1947, supra, as required by that act, it remains and becomes the sole statutory authority governing the sale of lands by the county for delinquent taxes Id. at 541. However, this statement was made in a completely different context than the majority here implies. The statement was made in response to a contention that the Act of 1947 does not apply and that the earlier legislative acts are applicable. Thus, the common pleas court was merely stating that oncecounties have adopted the Act of 1947 it becomes the Sole applicable statutory authority. In no way did the court there, or any other court, state that the Act of 1947 renders all common law in the area void. FN2. Act of July 7, 1947, P.L. 1368, Art. I, s 101 et seq., as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.101 et seq. I do not question the majority's rule of law that 'whenever there is a direct rule of law governing the case in all its circumstances, the (equity) court is as much bound by it as would be a court of law. .,' I merely believe that there is no direct rule of law governing this case. Thus, it is my belief that the 'gross inadequacy' test has not been eliminated from consideration in delinquent tax sales by the Real Estate Tax Sale Law. However, I do not come to the conclusion that we should set aside this judicial sale due to the gross inadequacy of the price. I am in full accordance with the majority, that this "mistake of fact' is precisely the sort of mistake which cannot provide a basis for equitable relief.' I come to this conclusion, despite several cases which indicate that the 'gross inadequacy' principle should be applied even if there is a mistake. Warren Pearl Works v. Rappaport, 303 Pa. 235, 154 A. 587 (1931); and first National Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ,_,"'C tJj~..L:liIllli.l~'.~. ",.:1._l -l~!m;f,_, , :121 11..2.1 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206. 321 A.2d 895) Page 9 Bank of Sunbury v. Rockefeller, 333 Pa. 553, 5 A.2d 205 (1939). These cases are **900 clearly distinguishable from the one now before us, because both of these decisions involved 'mutual' mistakes, while this case revolves around a 'unilateral' mistake of fact. A unilateral mistake of fact has long been recognized as not rendering a contract voidable, Restatement of Contracts s 503 (1932). Therefore, I agree with the majority that a court of equity should not relieve a party from the consequences of its own (unilateral) carelessness. *216 POMEROY, Justice (dissenting). I must di~sent from the holding of the majority that a court of equity is powerless to rectify the manifest unfairness of allowing to stand this $5.00 tax sale of a property worth between $5,000 and $6,000. As Mr. Justice Eagen has correctly stated in his concurring opinion, Supra (with which I agree save for the last, and I believe mistaken, paragraph), gross inadequacy of price has long been recognized as a sufficient basis, in itself, for setting aside a sheriff's sale; the fact that the sale was accomplished in conformity with the procedures of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law [FN1] does not insulate it from timely attack where no competing equities are involved, and the parties can be restored to their original positions. This is such a case. FN1. Act of July 7, 1947, P.L. 1368, s 101, as amended, 72 P.S. s 5860.101 et seq., particularly s 601 and following. The opinion of the Court denies relief on the basis of deference to the maxim that 'equity follows the law' where, as here, a comprehensive statute prescribes the procedures for conducting a tax sale. But the maxim invoked is narrow indeed. As the eminent authority on equity jurisprudence relied on in the Court's opinion states, '(t)he maxim is, in truth, operative only within a very narrow range; to raise it to the position of a general principle would be a palpable error. Throughout the great mass of its jurisprudence, equity, instead of following the law, either ignores or openly disregards and opposes the law.' 2 J.Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence 194, s 427 (5th ed. Symons, 1941) . [FN2] Had *217 the chancellor in this case merely been defining the rights of the parties under the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, he would perforce be confined to the provisions of that statute. But it is equally clear that a chancellor is free to provide traditional equitable remedies with respect to matters not covered by a statute. See 2 J.Pomeroy, op. cit. Supra, s 426a at 193. Here the statute treats of challenges to the regularity and legality of the actions of the Tax Claim Bureau (72 P.S. s 5860.607(q)), but those matters are not in dispute. what is in dispute, as mentioned at the outset, is the validity of the sale in light of the gross disparity between purchase price and value. with that matter the statute does not purport to deal in any way. I, thus, cannot agree that the Real Estate Tax Sale Law operates to oust equity of Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works .~ - "- ~; , , - " I"~ ~'l~~;' . ~ 3211\.2~ 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 10 jurisdiction which traditionally has been within its cognizance. See Capozzi v. Antonoplos, 414 Pa. 565, 570, 201 A.2d 420 (1964); Peoples- Pittsburqh Trust Co. v. Blickle, 330 Pa. 398, 399--400, 199 A. 213 (1938), and cases cited; Delaware County National Bank v. Miller, 303 Pa. 1, 6, 154 A. 19 (1931); Warren Pearl Works v. Rappaport, 303 Pa. 235, 238, 154 A. 587 (1931). FN2. Pomeroy outlines three main areas where the maxim is generally operative: First, 'in the sense of obeying (the law), conforming to its general rules and policy, whether contained in the common or in the statute law', Id., s 425 at 188; second, 'in the sense of applying to equitable estates and interests some of the same rules by which at common law legal estates and interests of a similar kind are governed', Id., s 426 at 191; third, with regard to limitations of actions and procedure for enforcement of decrees, Id., s 426a at 193. Bauer v. P. A. Cutri Co. of Bradford, Inc., 434 Pa. 305, 310, 253 A.2d 252 (1969), cited in the Court's opinion, is an example of the latter type of case. Scott v. Waynesburq Brewinq Co., 256 Pa. 158, 100 A. 591 (1917), also cited in the majority opinion, is an example of the second category. The chancellor in his opinion held that '(e) quity certainly has the power to grant **901 relief in the situation facing us here. In good conscience we could not stand by and seethe plaintiff (appellee) suffer a substantial loss where no one is to be harmed by setting aside the tax sale and directing a new sale to be held.' As the cases above cited make clear, the relief granted by the chancellor was an exercise of his discretion as such. *218 In Delaware County National Bank v. Miller, Supra, we said: 'It has often been said that this will not be done for a mere inadequacy of price, without more; but no case goes so far as to say that a chancellor must confirm a sale where the inadequacy is so great as to shock his conscience, as would be the case here. After all, the ultimate test always is, whether or not the action of the court in setting aside the sale was a gross abuse of discretion (Stroup v. Raymond, 183 Pa. 279, 281, 38 A. 626, 63 Am.St.Rep. 758; Chase v. Fisher, 239 Pa. 545, 548, 86 A. 1094; Lefever v. Kline, 294 Pa. 22, 143 A. 488) , and he would be a strange student of the law who could conclude that a chancellor grossly abused his discretion by refusing to do that which would have shocked his conscience.' 303 Pa. at 6, 154 A. at 21. The Court reiterated this holding in Warren Pearl Works v. Rappaport, Supra, as exactly fitting the appeal in that case. In my view, it equally fits the present appeal. [FN3] FN3. The relief here allowed by the lower court accord with the general principles set forth Restitution, Chapter 6. See especially s 123. was, in in my view, also in the Restatement of Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ~... ,~, c."''' 1 " , 1 "~ll!t,\f~' . ., 321'A.2~ 895. (Cite as: 457 Pa. 206, 321 A.2d 895) Page 11 My brother Eagen, while recognizing the inherent power of equity to set aside a judicial sale because of gross inadequacy of price, concludes that relief in equity is nevertheless unavailable here for the reason that the sale to appellant came about because of a mistake that was not mutual, but unilateral. With respect, I think the emphasis on mutual mistake is misplaced and not supported by the cases cited in the concurring opinion. It is true that, in the law contracts, a unilateral mistake will generally not render a contract voidable, but the case at bar is not a contract case. Here the appellee failed to appear and bid at the sale because of misinformation recei ved from an employee of the Tax Claim Bureau that the property was not listed for sale on the day in question. In Rappaport, Supra, *219 cited by Mr. Justice Eagen, '(t)he mortgagees did not bid at the sale, because they were informed by counsel for the execution creditor (who was not the purchaser at the sale) that their mortgages would not be discharged'. 303 Pa. at 237, 154 A. at 587. In First National Bank of Sunbury v. Rockefeller, 333 Pa. 553, 5 A.2d 205 (1939), also cited in the concurring opinion, certain mortgages were erroneously satisfied 'as the result of a mistake on the part of plaintiff with respect to the legal effect of the sale made by the executrix'. 333 Pa. at 556, 5 A.2d at 206. The Court held that 'a refusal to permit the correction of the mistake so made would grievously penalize and cause undeserved injury to the plaintiff for its careless but innocent error, and at the same time would result in unjust enrichment of the defendants at plaintiff's expense'. Ibid. [FN4] The mistake in Rockefeller was one of law, not of fact. While recognizing that 'literal adherence to the rule that a court of equity will not relieve against a mistake of law' might prevent recovery, the Court felt that an exception was warranted where to grant the relief sought would merely place the parties in the positions held by them beforehand: 'The injustice and hardship which will be suffered by plaintiff afford grounds for granting equitable relief, upon the fundamental principle that no one shall be allowed to enrich himself unjustly at the expense of another by reason of an innocent mistake of law.' **902333 Pa. at 560,5 A.2d at 207. This was the rationale of the chancellor in the case at bar with respect to the innocent mistake of fact made by the appellee. The Court disserves the ancient purpose and function of equity and ignores the precedents which we ourselves have established when it holds that the chancellor erred. FN4. Rockefeller was followed in Norard Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Orinoka Mills, 416 Pa. 454, 206 A.2d 56 (1965). O'BRIEN, J., joins in this dissent. END OF DOCUMENT Copr. @ West 2001 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Gov!. Works ...- ~. ;~ ' .1 " ' il",jlW.lOOli~,,<. "' -- .. . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Daniel Deitchman, hereby certifY that the foregoing Response to Petition and Rule to Show Cause was served upon the following individual(s) or entity(ies) by the manner indicated on the date shown below: Catherine H. Rudy 914 Wertzville Road Enola, P A 17025 (By First Class U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid) Ed Shorpp, Esquire MARTSON, DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO 10 East High Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (By hand-delivery) Peter J. Russo, Esquire 5010 E. Trindle Road Mechanicsburg, P A 17055 (By First Class U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid) Frank Federman, Esquire FEDERMAN & PHELAN 2 Penn Center, Suite 900 Philadelphia, PA 19102 (By First Class U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid) u' Date: 3 II <sJ lOt ~.J;])~I~,~IfJl\IIl~M.;~Mtfk', i~&'-",~;I\:i:~~~j:'M!;j.:ii!,~!;,j"'~h"""',','V",~'" ""0b,~ _h_ ".'t.,~,",'r_fui'd:i4!H~""'Miliiii(~~i!ll~lii~;i~i!I'c\lii~il!!ii~htl!(~"'trm.'ili<i~lli~Jl' -,~-~< , '_'~' ' J.~ ~ ^~, ~ , .N.~_= ,.~,~ ~ -" ,"- . ,- -,,,~ " ,,,~ .'> 1 ,- ~ "idliii ~ ... . . ..,.. 0 C; () C -n g: ~ -[ ""'t1U.; ,...'--.. 92~:H ~L'.. -" ..'w"' -;U ,- Z ; t~, (J) .J"-- 0' I -< L. ~:-) !;2C - -0 ~:.'::, ~:! j ~Q :J!: >-:~~c; 5>~ w 0 rn L- ~ =< ~ m -~, , HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS Plaintiff MAR 1 4 Z001.M' IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant NO. 2000 - 07126 CML TERM TEMPORARY ORDER RESTRAINING DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY AND NOW, the Petitioner having filed a petition and verified that immediate and irreparable loss and damage may result to her before the matter can be heard on motion, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs attached petition, the Defendant, Homeside Lending, and the Sheriff of Cumberland County, are hereby enjoined from all acts or actions of ejectment against the Petitioner, from transferring, encumbering, selling and disposing of the real property or proceeds thereof to therein described property, or alienating any interest that the Petitioner may have in said property, until further Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Cumberland County Sheriffs Office is hereby directed to release those funds received from Daniel Deitchman and Tony Miller, the proposed purchasers of the subject property. BY THE COURT: J. Distribution List: Jennifer C. Deitchman, Esquire Frank Federman, Esquire Peter J. Russo, Esquire Edward L. Schorpp, Esquire . / .i: -"', -_>1';"" ,." '''-,", '-<~~'-"'-<'oC~- -,; > ~'~~i . HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant NO. 2000 - 07126 CML TERM ORDER .. AND NOW, this /) day of JI>1A-u, , 200 I, upon consideration of Petitioner's Petition to Set Aside Sheriffs Sale, all post Sheriffs Sale remedies and actions shall be stayed until further order of court. The Court grants a rule on all parties in interest to show cause why the prayer of said petition should not be granted, and why the sale should not be set aside. Rule returnable z. 0 d..,.. .yf:v r<rru";' . BY THE COURT: 1. y f'{\ {\ _ ~ 6,0 ~<< 6"\ * Distribution List: Jennifer C. Deitchman, Esquire Frank Federman, Esquire Peter J. Russo, Esquire Edward L. Schorpp, Esquire ~ ~ -Cafut r~ - - .-"~ -,- ,,= "--~, - - " - ~.~ '" I'" , 0 ,,-.~, -0.., '. "'" ,- , ',,~,>~,""- "';,-->< l~';~" "". J:",' -, ~,-~~. ',' ~"~']" '~'~!ITl-'L__"~_ . "',~ OF - ,~,;J-~,!;~-:~~jl~D~~'~~I' RY , ',,'. ,; ;,) l'\l' Oi ~1AR 15 Mlll: 28 CUIv'b"C)' "r' C'" '1-...hLi-\;,u UUNTY PENNSYLVANIA . ''L ~,~~ -, lI'If'II...":",,,~_~~!Ili'mIl _'. "1]..,_"..",=_",Ui!._<>_, ,'",? '1""~)[l'!~iIlI'!"l~I\',o;~"l'1~""'H*'!~1:;W;'/~11!""'l'~m:l'l~\7"!j'!~W!1"1J~;~l'>~~ '" 1-_--'- 0 ' , _:h "u ,--b..-ok " "-, - l ~,4. HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant NO. 2000 - 07126 CIVIL TERM ORDER AND NOW, this day of , 2001, upon consideration of Petitioner's Petition to Set Aside Sheriffs Sale petition, this Honorable Court GRANTS the petition and orders the following: The Sheriff sale of 904 WertzvilJe Road, Enola, Pennsylvania shall be set aside in favor of Catherine Rudy. Any remaining funds in the possession of the Cumberland County Sheriffs Office which were received from Daniel Deitchman and Tony MilJer shall hereby be refunded to Daniel Deitchman and Tony MilJer. BY THE COURT: J. Distribution List: Jennifer C. Deitchman, Esquire Frank Federman, Esquire Peter J. Russo, Esquire Edward L. Schorpp, Esquire "' '-,' . "~^I ';.. -,_"- __ >,' _,.^-,,~,'j..' ,,: - ~ HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant NO. 2000 - 07126 CIVIL TERM PETITION TO SET ASIDE SHERIFF'S SALE TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT: The petition of Catherine H. Rudy respectfully represents: 1. Catherine H. Rudy is the owner in fee simple of914 Wertzville Road, Enola. 2. As a result of a mortgage foreclosure action, a writ of execution was issued by this Honorable Court in the above-captioned matter setting 914 Wertzville Road, Enola for Sheriffs sale on March 7, 2001. 3. On March 1,2001, Catherine Rudy completed are-finance of her current mortgage in an effort to cure her default mortgage. 4. On March 1, 2001, Chelsea Settlement Services, Inc., the settlement company for Catherine Rudy, obtained a payoff from the law firm of Federman and Phelan, LLP who represents the Plaintiff in the foreclosure action. 5. On that same day, Chelsea Settlement Services, Inc. and the law firm of Federman and Phelan, LLP discussed several issues including the payment of real estate taxes and hazard insurance. 6. Pursuant to federal law, on March 6, 2001, the loan to re-fmance the existing obligation came out of recession and the loan proceeds were distributed. , , ,~ ,,,-" ','-;" '''',I': ---~-.,,,-,{";\"" , ~'" --~iit!lii:f 7. On March 6, 2001, Chelsea Settlement Services, Inc. issued check number 31974 made payable to Homeside Lending in the amount of Thirty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Eight Dollars and Eighty-eight cents ($34,928.88). A true and correct copy of said check is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 8. The check issued to Homeside Lending was consistent with the payoff amount transmitted to Chelsea Settlement Services, Inc. by the law fIrm of Federman and Phelan, LLP. A true and correct copy of said payoff statement is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 9. Said payoff check was transmitted to via United Parcel Service (No. lZA9835R0140235424) to the law fIrm of Federman and Phelan, LLP and was received at 9:15 a.m. on March 7, 2001. 10. The bidding for the subject property on March 7, 2001, is believed to have commenced sometime after 10:15 a.m. therefore the check issued to Homeside Lending complied with the requirements set forth in 41 P.S. S 404. II. Just prior to the sale of the subject residence, Robert B. Lieberman, Esquire, a representative acting on behalf of the law fIrm of Federman and Phelan, LLP, being unaware of the prior communications between Chelsea Settlement Services, Inc. and the law fIrm of Federman and Phelan, LLP, advise the bidders that there had been no action on this property. 12. The bidding commenced and Daniel Deitclunan and Tony Miller were the top bidders for the subject property at Forty Eight Thousand Dollars ($48,000.00). 13. The subject property's true value far exceeds the Forty Eight Thousand Dollars ($48,000.00) offered by Daniel Deitclunan and Tony Miller. 14. Petitioner alleges that said sale was so irregular as to produce a great sacrifIce of the property to the prejudice of petitioner. ." -""I~'''--'''.--~,'''"'''' T ';" .'_Oc',-. ii'ia"jyj, 15. The Plaintiff in this matter, Homeside Lending, through their counsel. Frank Federman, has no objection to this motion. Counsel for Homeside Lending concurs that the United Parcel package containing the reinstatement funds was received in his office at 9:15 a.m. on the day of the Sheriff s sale. Because of the volume of mail received that morning, the package was not opened and reviewed until after the 10:00 a.m. Sheriff Sale. Had the package been opened prior to the sale, counsel would have directed the Cumberland county Sheriffto stay the sale. 16. The Petitioner had satisfactorily cured any default that may have existed prior to the completion of the sale of the subject residence and but for missed communication, this sale would have never been commenced. WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays that the aforesaid irregular and unfair sale be set aside. Respectfully submitted, ~-Q Peter J. Russo, Esquire 5010 E. Trindle Road Mechanicsburg, P A 17050 (717) 591-1755 Date: Wednesdav. March 14. 2001 .~ "" ~ . , ~ .~ - O.~s-; Vut V.I." V.L .i.llU .Loa. oJ" J. ~~~lo .....LvoaV<JV..LOV ...-L;oUUJ."\,lIH"'.'O;"J.J..l..l..:.......n,j., "t::l......... I:' ' 'L ,,) Federman and Phelan LLP ODe Penn Center at Suburban Station 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 1400 Philadelphia, Pa 19013-1814 215-563-7000 Fax 215-568-0719 Phyllis Levin Legal A..ioQllt Representing Lend." in PeM.yIVltni. & New Jel'sey PAYOFF FIGURE NAME: 03/01101 RUDY, CATHERINE ACCT #: 19275937 ONLY GOOD TO 03/07/01 Principal :Balance Interest Escrow Late: Charge Il!s~ections AppraIsal $28,939.47 $1,939.24 $,98.27 $90.40 $6~.60 $85.00 Attorney Costs Attorney Fee Sheriff's 2% Commission ' $1,862.00 $1.125.00 $725.00 TOTAL $51',928.88 ALL FUNDS MUST BE IN CERTIFIED FUNDS AND MADE PAYABLE TO YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY! ***TB.IS FIBM IS A DEBT COLLECTOR ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A DEBT. ANY INFORMATION llECElVJj:D WILL BE USED JIOR THAT PURPOSE. IFYOV SA. VE RECElVED A DISCHARGE IN BANKRUPTCY. AND TmS DEBT WAS NOT REAFFIRMElD, nus CORRESPONDENCElS NOT AND SHouLD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN A'ITEMPT TO COU.ECT A DEB1', BUT ONLY ENFoRCEMENT OF A LIEN AGAlNST THE PROPERTY."-"''' ,~~~. .-. -'-- ...Htl..;;:,tA ;;:,t.l 'U:Mt.N I tiEHVICt:S, INC. " k - -"'-li.it.~" ~ ~;'~;W'R ~~<UJr l':"'\ :1 ! .... REAL ESTArE CLOSING .... 31974 Buyer/Borrower: Rudy & Seller: , Lender: Alliance Funding, a Division of Superior Bank, FSB Property: 914 Wertzville Road/East SeWement Date: March 1, 2001 Disbursement Date: March 6, 2001 Check Amount $ 34,928.88 Pay To: Homeside L~nding For: Payoff Mortgage and Judgement Acct #19275937 .. '.. . . Chelsea Settlement Services, Inc. ESCROW ACCOUNT 5010 TRINDLE ROAD SUITE 200 MECHANICSBURG. PA 17050 PH: (717) 731-9700 -Thirty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Eight and 88/100 ------------------- PAY TO THE ORDER OF Homeside Lending 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19013-1814 31974 0804722676 .... . :..,. , 319 LEGACY BANK NUMBER 60-1860/31 3 2001012273 Payoff Mortgage and JUdgement ------OA;-1'----------------------- AMUUN-floilars March 6, 2001 $ .....34,928.88 l ,_I:I=_:I:t.'j:l.~::a.'"tltl=-.I-.:I~II.IIII'IL"I:l.\I.I.'[1II.'I.I::lo.....'I~..':..I::I[Il','_','I.U::l.I,"r.,.I;_:III.I."_'I~.,,.,rel.=_u..'jl:l"._; 11'0:11.971.11' I:O:lI.:lI.BbObl: 11'1.000 1.0:lb 211' CHELSEA SETTLEMENT SERVICES. INC, Buyer/Borrower: Rudy & Seller: Lender: Alliance Funding, a Division of Superior Bank, FSB Property: 914 Wertzville Road/East Settlement Date: March 1, 2001 Disbursement Date: March 6, 2001 Check Amount $ 34,928.88 Pay To: Homeside Lending For: Payoff Mortgage and Judgement Acct #19275937 .v\ . ~"1\O\ :, \ ~I'''''' q-\lJ ' II <1of, pO\"\ J 31974 31974 0804722676 WT LTR LBS A98-35R 32/635/~~ SERVICE 1DA PKG ID 40 REFa RUDY 1ZA9835R0140235424 TRACKINGa ( PUB PKG CHG $ 12lo~ $ 0.00 DV $ 0.00 CT $ 0.00 DC $ 0.00 SD $ 0.00 AH $ 0.00 SP $ 0.00 HNDL $ 0.00 HZI'IT $ 0.00 NTFY $N~l~uST CHG $ 12.25 tgt~t PUB PKG CHG $ 12.25 SF400'-' REORDER FROM YOUR LOCAL SAFEGUARD DISTRIBUTOR, IF UNKNOWN, CALL 800.523-2422 GGPZDKOO10000 L99SF047570 . Safeguard. IITHOI)~A Sf~I?r,~ CK7S0~11?~ 1)'99, , " '-", ,~"H "~-, ."_,,, (~",', . HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant NO. 2000 - 07126 CIVIL TERM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Peter J. Russo, hereby certifY that I am on this day serving a copy of the foregoing document upon the person(s) and in the matter indicated below: Service by Telecopier and First-Class Mail, Postage Prepaid, and addressed as folJows: Edward L. Schorpp, Esquire 10 East High Street Carlisle, P A 17013 Frank Federman, Esquire 1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, P A 19013-1813 Jennifer C. Deitchrnan, Esquire 1202 Montrose Circle Mechanicsburg, P A 17050 RespectfulJy S~itted, c-\&\: L- Peter J. Russo, Esquire --- Date: Wednesdav. March 14. 2001 ~j~~:;i"~'!H"--'iJ;,~";'''''';;!!I'<!!to'OO!;t.,-,~"iliI:&i&'~lll.;t'lll~~_04~~,-,.n;'lt:i'~~,'"ill!Wi!L~J!!#.;b'lIt.i"Wilti111i~' :)J. _L j~. :rl=~,. ~~ .~, ,~ .. ',~M ,_~ .~ ,', ~ ~, ~"'_' ". "^ ~, II .L~Iifi;:\;I!.IS~''''' ~I " lti; (') c;:) 0 c ." --, ""0 f;'~ :J:: ..,,'~ mtT ]-Jof< ..o.,----r> L.-,.' :;:{:J i~,j ,,_,.: &is::- .,,-. '\~cq -<.c:, -:;: I (.)".1 ~C) -u ----1::_ '" ~:~_::J :;2.0 :3(' -~.o w 6~h Pc z --j ~ U1 55 &" -< ~r , ,'.,1 ......' ". - 'Q'~ ~'~..-;, . FEDERMAN AND PHELAN, LLP By: F~FEDER1{AN,ESQUIRE IDENTIFICATION NO. 12248 TWO PENN CENTER PLAZA, SUITE 900 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102 (215) 563-7000 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL DIVISION MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 8201 GREENSBORO DRIVE, SUITE 350 MCLEAN, VA 22102 TERM Plaintiff NO. 00 - 'irJ,f.o (L{'--r~ v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 Defendant(s) CIVIL ACTION - LAW MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE NOTICE **THIS FIRM IS A DEBT COLLECTOR ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED A DISCHARGE IN BANKRUPTCY AND THIS DEBT WAS NOT REAFFIRMED, THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT, BUT ONLY ENFORCEMENT OF A LIEN AGAINST PROPERTY. ** You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2 LIBERTY AVENUE CARLISLE, P A 17013 (717) 249-3166 Loan #: 19275937 ., : 1"_ , 1. Plaintiff is MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 8201 GREENSBORO DRIVE, SUITE 350 MCLEAN, VA 22102 2. Plaintiff, is or will be, the owner of legal title to the mortgage that is the subject of this action, and nominee for the entity indicated below, which is the owner of the entire beneficial interest in the mortgage: HOMESIDE LENDING, INC. 7301 BAYMEADOWS WAY JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256 3. The name(s) and last lmown address(es) of the Defendant(s) are: CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 who is/are the mortgagor( s) and real owner( s) of the property hereinafter described. 4. On 4/24/96 mortgagor(s) made, executed and delivered a mortgage upon the premises hereinafter described to PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES CORPORATION which mortgage is recorded in the Office of the Recorder of CUMBERLAND County, in Mortgage Book No. 1316, Page 30. By Assignment of Mortgage dated RECORDED 7/20/99 the mortgage was assigned to PLAINTIFF which Assignment is recorded in Assignment of Mortgage Book No. 619, Page 748. 5. The premises subject to said mortgage is described as attached. 6. The mortgage is in default because monthly payments of principal and interest upon said mortgage due 7/1/00 and each month thereafter are due and unpaid, and by the terms of said mortgage, upon failure of mortgagor to make such payments after a date specified by written notice sent to Mortgagor, the entire principal balance and all interest due thereon are collectible forthwith. A copy of such notice is attached as Exhibit" A." ~'"-' "~- _illMIJ,.,.--. r, ~..L~ , '"'-' ~,,' ,.,0.;\";-.,, " ~~~."' 7. The following amounts are due on the mortgage: Principal Balance Interest 6/1/00 through 10/1/00 (Per Diem $6.74) Attorney's Fees Cumulative Late Charges 4/24/96 to 10/1100 Cost of Suit and Title Search Subtotal $28,939.47 829.02 1,125.00 33.90 550.00 $31,477.39 Escrow Credit Deficit Subtotal 0.00 98.27 $ 98.27 TOTAL $31,575.66 8. The attorney's fees set forth above are in conformity with the Mortgage documents and Pennsylvania Law, and will be collected in the event of a third party purchaser at Sheriff's Sale. If the Mortgage is reinstated prior to the Sale, reasonable attorney's fees will be charged. 9. The Combined Notice has been sent to the Defendant(s) by regular and certified mail as required by 35 P.S. g1680.403c on the date(s) set forth in the true and correct copy of such notice(s) attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 10. The Temporary Stay as provided by the Homeowner's Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program, Act 91 of 1983, has terminated because either: (i.) Defendant(s) have failed to meet with the Plaintiff or an authorized Credit Counseling Agency in accordance with Plaintiffs written Notice to Defendants, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; or (ii.) Defendant(s) application for assistance has been rejected by the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF demands an in rem Judgment against the Defendant(s) in the sum of $31,575.66, together with interest from 10/1100 at the rate of$6.74 per diem to the date of Judgment, and other costs and charges collectible under the mortgage and for the foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged property. l:da~q/~ FRANK FEDERMAN, SQUIRE ______ Attorney for Plaintiff ~>>~-' ~'m . ~ I. d, ~~ ~ .,,, "-iil~'.", ~lil.. ........ . HOMESIDE LENDING,INC. AUGUST 08, 2000 ZLf CATHERINE RUDY 914 WERTZYILLE RD ENOLA PA 11025-1835 RE: LOAN NUMBER' 19215931 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 914 WERTZYILLE RD E PENNSBORO TWP, PA ,11025 ACT 91 NOTl CE TAKE ACTION TO SAVE YOUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE THISTIS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE MORTGAGE ON YOUR HOME IS IN DEFAULT, ANDTUR~E LENDER INTENDS TO FORECLOSE. SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE NA e OF THE DEFAULT IS PROVIDED IN THE ATTACHED PAGES. TTHOESHOYEMEOWNER'S MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM tHEMAP) MAY BE,ABLe TO HeLP A YOUR HOME. THIS NOT CE EXPLAINS HOW THE PROGRAM hORKS. TO SEE IF HEMAP CAN HELP. YOU MUST MEET HITH A CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSEL- INITG AGYOENCY WITHIN 3D DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE. TAKE THIS NOTICE H H U WHEN YOU MEET HITH THE COUNSELING AGENCY. THE NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING HAGAEyNfCjEN.S SERVICING YOUR COUNTY ARE LISTED IN THE ENCLOSURE. IF YOU " Y QUESTIONSf YOU MAY CALL THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGEN.NCCYLTOLL FREE A 1-80v-342-2391. (PERSUNS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING CA A L (711)180-1869.) THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTLIONS~ REPRESENTATIVES AT THE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCY HAY BE AB E Tu HELP EXPLAIN IT. YOU MAY ALSO WANT TO CONTACT AN ATTORNEY IN YOUR AREA. THE LOCAL BAR ASSOCIATION MAY BE ABLE, TO HELP YOU FINO A LAWYER. LA NOTIFICACION EN ADJUNTO ES DE SUMA IMPORTANCIA. PUES AFECTA SU OERRECHO A CONTlNUAR YI~IENOO EN SU CASA. SI NO COMPRENOE EL CONTENIOO DE ESfA NOIIFICACION DB ENGA UNA TRADUCCION, INMEDlAMENTE. LLAMANOO ESTA AGENC A IPeNNSYLYANIA H USING FINANCE AGENCY I SIN CARGOS AL NUMERO MENCIONADO ARRIBA. PUEDES SER ELEGIBLE PARA UN PRESTAMO POR EL PROGRAMt LLEAMAEDO "HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM" EL CUAL PU 0 SALVAR SU CASA DE LA PEROluA DEL OERECHO A REMIOIR SU HIPOTECA. YOU HAYE NOT MADE AND THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS OF POLICY MONTHLY MORTGAGE PAYMENTS FOR AMOUNTS ARE NOW PAST DUE: MONTHS DELINQUENT: PAYMENT AMOUNT: LEGAL FEES: LATE CHARGE BALANCE: PROPERTY INSPECTIONS' RETURN ITEM FEES: TOTAL DUE: THE FOLLOhING MONThS 2 $3B8.4B o 1I.30 o o $7BB.26 HOH TO CURE THE DEFAULT--YOU MAY CURE THE DEFAULT WITHIN THIRTY 1301 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE 8Y PAYING THE. TOTAL AMOUNT PASTTDUE TO THE LENDER. WHICH IS $188.26. PLUS ANY MORTGAGE PAYMENTS AND LA E CHARGES WHICH 8ECOME DUE DURING THE THIRTY 1301 DAY PERIOD. PAYMENTS MUST BE MADE EITHER BY CASH, CASHIER'S CHECK. CERTIFIED CHECK OR M~N"Y ORDER HADE PAYABLE AND SENT TO: ATTN CASHIERING DEPARTMENT HOMESIDE LENDING, INC. 9601 MCALLISTER ~RHY SAN ANTONIO TX 18216 EXH1B\T A CL63 - 062000TG P.O. BOX 41524 SAN ANTONIO TX 18265-1524 I-B11-133-4200 PAGE I we' 4 ~~r 'VUl".""". lENoeR -...;- ~" ~ ~ , I' -> ",- 'lJliJj'ilU~, ..4~ . HOMESIDE LENDINC,INC. CATHERINE RUDY 19275937 STATEMENTS OF POLICY HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM YOU MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WHICH CAN SAVE YUUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE AND HELP YOU MAKE FUTURE MORTGAGE PAYMENTS IFSSYloSUTA<;oMPL Y WITH THE PROVI SIDNS OF THE HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE A hCE ACT OF 19B3 ITHE "ACT"J, YOU MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE: , * IF YOUR OEFAULT HAS BEEN CAUSED BY CIRCUHSTANCES BEYOND YOUR CONTROL, * IF YOU HAVE A REASONABLE PROSPECT OF BEING ABLE TO PAY YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS. AND * IF YOU MEET OTHER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY TEMPORARY STAY OF FoRECLoSURE--UNDER THE ACT YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A TEMPORARY STAY OF FORECLOSURE ON YOUR MORTGAGE'FOR THIRTY 30J DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE. DURING THAT TIME YOU MUST ARRANGE AND ATTEND A "FACE-TO-FACE" MEETING WITH ONE OF TME CONSUMER C"EUIT CUUN- SELING AGENCIES LISTED AT THE END OF THIS NOTICE. ,THIS MEETING MUST OCCUR WITHIN THE NEXT THIRTY (30) DAYS. IF YOU DO NOT APPLY FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE! YOU MUST BRING YOUR MORTGAGE UP TO DATE. THE PART OF THIS NOTICE CALLEu "HOW TO CURE YOUR MORTGAGE DEFAULT" EXPLAINS HOW TO BRING YOUR MORTGAGE UP TO DATE. CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES--IF YOU MEET WITH ONE OF THE CONSUMER CREOIT COUNSELING AGENCIES LISTED AT THE END OF THIS NOTICE, TME LENDER MAY NOT TAKE ACTION AGAINST YOU FGR THIRTY (30) UAYS AFTEK THE DATE OF THIS MEETING. THE NAMES, ADDRESSES AND TELEPMoNE NUMBERS OF DESIGNATED CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ARE SET FORTH AT THE END OF THIS NOIICE. IT IS ONLY NECESSARY TO SCHEDULE ONE FACE-TO-FACE MEETING. ADVISE YOUR LENDER IMMEDIATELY OF YOUR INTENTTONS. APPLICATION FOR MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE--yoUR MORTGAGE IS IN DEFAULT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH LATER IN THIS NOTICE (SEE FOLLOHING PAGES FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE NATURE OF YOUR DEfAULT). Ir YUU HAVE TRIED AND ARE UNABLE TO RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM WITH THE LENDER! YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE HOMEOWNeR'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. TO 00 SO, YOU HUST fILL OUT. SIGN AND FILE A COMPLETED HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION WITH ONE OF THE DESIGNATED CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES LISTED AT THE END OF THIS NOTICE. ONLY CONSUMER CREDIT COUN- SELING AGENCIES HAVE APPLICATIONS FOR THE PROGRAM AND THEY WILL ASSIST YOU IN SUBMITTING A COMPLETE APPLICATION TG THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. YOUR APPLICATION MUST BE FILED UR PoSTMAK~fD WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF YOUR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING. YOU MUST FILE YOUR APPLICATION PROMPTLY. IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO OR IF YOU 00 NOT FOLLOW THE OTHER TIME PERIODS SET FORTH IN THIS LETTER. FORECLOSURE MAY PROCEED AGAINST YOUR HOME IMMEDIATELY ANU YOUR APPLI- CATION FOR MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE WILL BE DENIED. AGENCY ACTloN--AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE ARE VERY LIMITED. THEY WILL BE DISBURSED BY THE AGENCY UNDER THE~!.IGI- BILITY CR TERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE ACT. THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY HAS SIXTY (bO) DAYS TO MAKE A DECISION AFTER IT RECEIVES YOUR APPLICATION. DURING THAT TIMEt NO FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS WILL BE PURSUED AGAINST YOU IF YOU HAVE ME THE TIME REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE. YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED DIRECTLY 8Y THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OF ITS DECISION ON YOUR APPLICATION. NOTE: IF YOU ARE CURRENTLY PROTECTED BY THE FILING OF A PETITION IN BANKRUPTCY, THE FOLLOWING PART OF THIS NunCE IS FOR INFORMATION PUR- POSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT THE DEBT. (IF YOU HAVE FILED BANKRUPTCY YOU CAN STILL APPLY FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE.) CLb3 - Ob20COTG PAGe 3 UF 4 P.O. BOX 47524 SAN AtHONIO TX 762b5-7524 EXHIB1TA 1-877-733-4200 G:t --- LENDER ,~J~ "~~~" ~~ ,.' ~ -. 1-, I " , , .'- , ',. ,j ,~ ,~, ..;, -''-- ~~ . HOMESIDE LENDING, INC. CATHERINE RUDY 19275937 STATEMENTS OF POLICY HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM YOU MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE HHICH CAN SAVE YOUR HOME FROM FORECLOSURE AND HELP YOU MAKE FUTURE MORTGAGE PAYMENTS IFSSYOSU COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE A I TANCE ACT OF 19B3 ITHE "ACT"), YOU MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE: , * IF YOUR DEFAULT HAS BEEN CAUSED BY CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND YOUR CONTROL, * IF YOU HAVE A REASONABLE PROSPECT OF BEING ABLE TO PAY YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS, AND * IF YOU MEET OTHER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY TEMPORARY STAY OF FORECLOSURE--UNOER THE ACT, YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A TEMPORARY STAY OF FORECLOSURE ON YOUR MORTGAGE FOR THIRTY 30) DAYS FROM TME DATE OF THIS NOTICE. DU~ING THAT TIHE YOU HUST ARRANGE AND ATTEND A "FACE-TO-FACE" HEETlNG IIlTH ONE OF THE CONSUHER C"EOIl COON- SELING AGENCIES LISTED AT THE END OF THIS NOTICE. .THIS HEETING MUST OCCUR WITHIN THE NEXT THIRTY 1301 DAYS. IF YOU 00 NOT APPLY FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE. YOU MUST BRING YOUR MORTGAGE UP TO DATE. THE PART OF THIS NOTICE CALLEu "HOW TO CURE YOUR MORTGAGE DEFAULT" EXPLAINS HOW TO BRING YOUR MORTGAGE UP TO DATE. ;1 >1 i , CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES--IF YOU HEET IIITH ONE OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES LISTED AT THE END OF THIS NOTICE, THE LENDER MAY NOT TAKE ACTION AGAINST YOU FGR THI~TY ,(301 OAYS AFTEK THE DATE OF THIS HEETING. THE NAMES, ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF DESIGNATED CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ARE SET FORTH AT THE END OF THIS NOIICE. IT IS ONLY NECESSARY TO SCHEDULE ONE FACE-TO-FACE MEETING. ADVISE YOUR LENDER IMMEDIATELY OF YOUR INTENTIONS. APPLICATION FOR MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE--YOUR MORTGAGE IS IN DEFAULT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH LATER IN THIS NOTICE ISEE FOLLOIIING PAGES FOR SPECIFIC INFORMAIION ABOUT THE NATURE OF YOUR OEFAUl.TI. If YUU HAVE TRIED AND ARE UN BLE TO RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM HITH THE LENOtR. YOU MAVE THE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE HOMEOWNtR'S EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSfSTANCE PROGRAM. TO 00 SO, YOU MUST FILL OUT, SIGN AND FILE A COMPLE EO HOHEOWNER'S EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION WITH ONE OF THE DESIGNATED CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES LISTED AT TME END OF THIS NOTICE. ONLY CONSUMER CREDIT COUN- SELING AGENCIES HAVE APPLICATIONS FOR THE PROGRAM AND THEY WILL ASSIST YOU IN SUBMITTING A COMPLETE APPLICATION TG THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. YOUR APPLICATION MUST BE FILED UR POSTMARKED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF YOUR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING. YOU MUST FILE YOUR APPLICATION PROMPTLY. IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO OR IF YOU 00 NOT FOLLOW THE OTHER TIME PERIOOS SET FORTH IN,THIS LETTER. FORECLOSURE MAY PROCEEO AGAINST YOUR HOME IMMEOIATELY AND YOUR APPLI- CATION FOR MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE WILL BE OENIED. AGENCY ACTION--AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE ARE VERY LIMITED. TMEY WILL BE DISBURSED BY THE AGENCY UNDER THEELIGI- BILITY CRITERIA ESTABLfSHEO BY THE ACT. THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY HAS SIX YlbO) DAYS TO MAKE A OECISION AFTER IT RECEIVES YOUR APPLICATION. OURING THAT TIMEf NO FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS HILL BE PURSUED AGAINST YOU IF YOU HAVE ME TIlE TIME REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE. YOU WILL BE NOTIFIEO DIRECTLY BY THE PENNSYLVAN A HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OF ITS OECISION ON YOUR APPLICATION. NOTE: IF YOU ARE CURRENTLY PROTECTED BY THE fILING OF A PETITION IN BANKRUPTCY, THE FOLLOWING PART OF THIS NUTICE IS FOR INFORMATION PUR- POSES ONLY AND SHOULO NOT BE CONSIDERED AS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT THE OEBT. (IF YOU MAVE FILEO BANKRUPTCY YOU CAN STILL APPLY FOR EMERGENCY MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE.) CLb3 - Ob20COTG P.O. BOX 47524 SAN ANTONIO TX 18265-1524 1-877-733-4200 PAGE 3 Uf 4 EXHIBIT A G:t --.; LENDER ~ ~ . ".~-. -- IljIl,)\ ~~ . HOMESIDE LENDING, INC. 'CATHERINE RUDY 19275937 STATEMENTS OF POLICY HOW TO CURE YOUR MORTGAGE DEFAULT (BRING IT UP TO DATE) NATURE OF THE DEFAULT--THE MORTGAGE DEBT HELD BY THE ABOVE LENDER ON TME PROPERTY LOCATED AT. 914 HERTlVILLE KD E PENNSBURU TWP, PA 17025 IS SERIOUSLY IN DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU HAVE FAILED TO PAY PROMPTLY INSTALLMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST, AS REQUIRED. FOR A PERIOD uf AT LEAST SIXTY (60 DAYS. ASSUMPTION OF MBRTGAGE--YOU 1**)MAY (**IMAY NOT ICMECK ONE! SELL OR TRANSFER YOUR H ME TO A BUYER OR TRANSfEREE HHO HILL ASSUMe THE MORTGAGE DEBT. PROVIDED THAT ALL THE OUTSTANDING PAYMENIS, CHARGES AND ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS ARE PAID PRIOR TO OR AT THE SALE AND THAI THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THE MORTGAGE ARE SATISFIEO. ** PLEASE CHECK YOUR MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS OR CALL OUR ASSUMPTION DEPARTMENT AT 1-877-944-9400 TO DETERMINE IF YOUR LOAN IS ASSUMA8LE. YOU MAY ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT * TO SELL THE PROPERTY TO OBTAIN HONEY TO PAY OfF THE MORTGAGE DEBT OR TO BORROW MONEY FROM ANOTHER LENDING INSTITUTION TO PAY Uff THIS DEBT. * TO HAVE THIS DEFAULT CURED BY ANY THIRD PARTY ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF. * TO HAVE TME MORTGAGE RESTORED TO THE SAME POSITION AS IF NO DEfAULT HAD OCCURRFO, IF YOU CURE TME DEFAULT. (HOWEVER. YOU DO NOT HAVE IHE RIGHT TO CURE YOUR OEFAULT MORE TMAN THREE TINES IN ANY CALENDAR YEAR.) * TO ASSERT THE NONEXISTENCE OF A DEFAULT IN ANY FORECLOSURE PROCEEDING OR ANY OTHER LAWSUIT INSTITUTED UNDER THE MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS. * TO ASSERT ANY OTHER DEFENSE YOU BELIEVE YOU MAY HAVE TO SUCM ACTION BY THE LENDER. . TO SEEK PROTECTION UNDER THE FEOERAL BANKRUPTCY LAH. SINCERELY, R. AGUILAR COLLECTION SUPERVISOR ENCLOSURE CC: FIRST CLASS AND CERTIFIED MAIL NU.___________________ ADDRESSEE 914 WERTZVILLE RD E PENNSBORO TWP. PA 17025 CL63 - 062000TG P.O. BOX 47524 SAN ANTONIO TX 78265-7524 1-877-733-4200 MC: 4 PAGE 4 OF 4 EXHIBIT A G:t l<l<I"lIOUlllIII LENDER ~. ='" ~ ~. ~ , ~"~ .'" - , i_~~" ~ PENNSYL VANIA ROUSING FINANCE AGENCY HOMEOWNER'S EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING AGENCIES (REV. 8/00) CLINTON COUNTY Lycoming-Clinton Counties Commision for Community Action (STEP) 2138 Lincoln Street P,O. Box 1328 Williamsport, PAl n03 (570) 326-0587 FAX (570) 322-2197 CCCS of Northeastern P A 1631 South Atherton St, Suite 100 State College, PA 16801 (814) 238-3668 FAX (814) 238.3669 CCCS of Northeastern P A 201 Basin Street Williamsport, P A 17703 (570) 323-6627 FAX (570) 323-6626 31 W. Market Street POB 1127 Wilkes-Barre. P A 18702 (570) 821-0837 Or (800) 922-9537 FAX (570) 821-1785 COLUMBIA COUNTY 1400 Abington Executive Park Suite 1 Clarks Summit P A 18411 (570) 587-9163 or (800) 922-9537 FAX (570) 587-9134-9135 Commission on Economics Opportunity ofLuzerne County 163 Amber Lane Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702 (570) 826-0510 or (800) 822-0359 FAX (570) 829-1665-{Cal1 Before Faxing) (570) 455-4994 HazellOwn FAX (570) 455-5631-{Call Before Faxing) (570) 836-4090 Tunkhannock CRAWFORD COUNTY BookerT. Washington Center 1720 Holland Center Erie, P A 16503 (814) 453-5744 FAX (814) 5749 Greater Erie Community Action Committee 18 West 9th Street Erie, PA 16501 (814) 459-4581 FAX (814) 456-0161 John F. Kennedy Center, Inc. 2021 East 20th Street Erie, PA 16510 (814) 898-0400 FAX (814) 898-1243 Shenango Valley Urban League, Inc. 601 IndianaAvenue Farrell. PA 16121 (412)981-5310 CCCS of West em Pennsylvania, Inc. 2000 Linglestown Road Harrisburg, PA 17102 (717) 541-1757 CUMBERLAND COUNTY Financial Counseling Services of Franklin 31 West3ni Street' Waynesboro. PA 17268 (717) 762-3285 Urban League of Metropolitan Harrisburg N.6tbStreet Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 234-5925 FAX (717) 234-9459 YWCA of Carlisle 301 "G" Street Carlisle, PA 17013 . (717)243-3818 FAX (717) 731-9589 Community Action Comm of the Capital Region 1514 Derry Street Harrisburg, PA 17104 (717) 232-9757 FAX (717) 234-2227 Adams County Housing Authority 139-143 Carlisle St Gettysburg, P A 17325 (717) 334-1518 FAX 334-8326 PENNSYL V ANJA BULLETIN, VOL. 29, NO. 23, JUNE 5, 1999 EXHIBIT A . . ALL THAT CERTAIN lot or piece oe land situate in East Pennsboro Township, CUmberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a pin on the southerly line oe the State Road, known as Wertzville Road, at the line of landa now or late of R.O. Brashear; thence along the said t.ighws}' North 85 degrees 15 minutes East, 80 feet to a pin; thence along lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, South 4 degrees 45 minutes Bast 470 feet to a pin on the line of lands now or late of Marlin E. Sheeley and wife; thence South 31 degrees 30 minutes West, 9 feet to a pin; thence along lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli. North 44 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West one hundred seventeen and thirty-one hundredths feet to an iron pin; thence along lands now or late of R.O. Brashear, North 4 degrees 45 minutes West, 386.8 feet to an iron pin, the place of BEGINNING. UNDER AND SUBJECT, nevertheless, to easements, restrictions, reservations, conditions, and rights of way of record or visible upon inspection of premises. BEING the same premises which John H. Lusk and Patricia A. Lusk, by their deed to be recorded simultaneously herewith, in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of CUmberland County, granted and conveyed unto Catherine H. Rudy. THE SAID John H. Lusk died November 5, 1994 thereby vesting title unto Patricia A. Lusk, Grantor herein. PREMSIES: 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD , ~L,.....I' _~',c.i.,,~-,',-, -. ~, -", ''''';::e., ~ '~__no~',.,>' '~-- J . . VERIFICATION -- ~ ' , "~O; , I,. I I I, the undersigned hereby verify that I am a representative of the plaintiff and I am authorized to make this verification. I hereby verify that the facts set i\ i; [:'! i t;' r :~ forth in the foregoing complaint are true and correct to the best of my information and belief and that this statement is made subject to f~ the penalties of 18 P A C.S.A. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to the authorities. Name: Title: Company: &Dth Elizabeth A. Gibney Vice President HomeSide Lending, Inc. iO/I1/m ~ ~ , ~~~~~~~K~.l~~~.".~\t~':>!1~-'tiili<i:~i1d~~~iD ~~ . .~' "~~-' ~ ^ ..' "; , , ~ (0 Or- {g, ~ ~ 0 0 C ~ j ~; C) -r ~ :::.--,~ 0 & . , -eel) n "- rnrY' ...... ~ 0 'I -,,"--, 8 (). <- -/ L-- ~ IN () CY (n en e --< ~. ~ r::c:' -v <- Pr"', ~ -'J"'-. '-Q ~ ~2 S,'~) ~~:::'i ._/ :::> 1; .01:..- ---\ -<. ,0 -<. f ~ . ,", - ,_:e-,~;..I!;nmlr!lUt'''''n,",=m, , .. ., _'~I_~,_" .~" <",",,~ -'n,'-' ,~_', , " ~..~'^ . -, 1!'! '-- r '" ~-~. Il~",f: u ., , "- <..I _ ~ _k "', ' " i.r;Vl,\ l'~: ' "~' , ':;,; ",:j(J. Chelsea Settlement Services 5010 East Trindle Road, Suite 200 Mechanicsburg, P A 17050 (717) 731-9700 / (717) 731-7282 Fax PAYOFF REOUEST Date: I 02/22/0 I Company: Fax: F edermanlLevin (215) 405-0180 (215) 563-7000 Phone: Attention: PAYOFF Department Re: Borrower(s): Catherine Rudy Soc. # 201-18-3970 Acct. #: Docket # 2000-07126 Plaintiff: MERS, INC. (pHH Mortgage Services) Property Address: 914 Wertville Road Enola, P A 17025 Weare requesting a payoff good through 03/15/01 for the above referenced mortgage and judgement. PLEASE MAKE SURE PAYOFF NOTES THAT BOTH THE MORTGAGE AND THE JUDGMENT ARE INCLUDED IN TillS PAYOFF. Included with this request is a borrower's authorization. Please fax the payoff to Chelsea Settlement Services at (717) 731-7282 as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Jamie 1. Burch Closing Department EXHIBIT \., ,'\" l ,. {...". ,~ ..,-, J ,,~~ ._~. < I,. ,,~ J",,~~. , U..I .....1 U.1. .1.":t..1.0 l'r\..d- 1.1.1 j <.Ii j .:.0":: - . l,..lHHSea .:>ell.lemelll Lgj UUl , . ,~'!h l~:,: : . ********************* ... TX REPORT ... ********************* .~ :~:WW TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO CONNECTION TEL SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME USAGE T PGS. SENT RESULT 2400 12154050180 FEDERMAN&PHELAN 02/22 14:15 00'45 2 OK Chelsea Settlement Services 5010 East Trindle Road, Suite 200 Mechanicsburg, P A 17050 (717) 731-9700 / (717) 731.7282 Fax PAYOFF REOUEST Date: 02/22/01 Company: Federman/Levin Fax: (215) 405-0180 Phone: (215) 563-7000 Attention: PAYOFF Department Re: Borrower(s): Catherine Rudy Soc. # 201-18-3970 Acct. #: Docket # 2000-07126 Plaintiff: MERS, INC. (PHH Mortgage Services) Property Address: 914 Wertville Road Enola, PA 17025 We are requesting a payoff good through 03/15/01 for the above referenced mortgage and judgement. PLEASE MAKE SURE PAYOFF NOTES THAT BOTH THE MORTGAGE AND THE JUDGMENT ARE INCLUDED IN THIS PAYOFF. Included with this request is a borrower's authorization. Please fax the payoff to Chelsea Settlement Services at (717) 731-7282 as soon as possible, \ 03~~YOl lhv Ll;ll r~A .~u~Vuv~Vv -'"' .--~,'.'.--. ~f#I!'$' 'f" ~;{;> , r~ 'l 'Ji Federman and Phelan, LLP One Penn Center at SUburoan Station 1617 John P. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 215-563-7000 Pax 215-568-0719 i Bmail: mike.thu:rmanllilfedphe-pa.com , 19103 Michael Thurman Legs.l Assistant Ext. 1254 Representing Lenders in Pennsylvania & New Jersey DATE: 2,-) t /0 \ TO: Ptkt- evS>D( €'6Q, FAX: 11'"]- SG 1- 175-b FROM: Michael Thurman ext 294 NAME: ~\J~ \ C:iI-+ne~; ne LOANi IGj'l~5~31 PAGBS: 1 (y ~1j1. )0 '0 f)~ S u. P)'d . ~o 7~l'\ \ S S. ~ \, ATTN: RE: Y\eLA ~e- S~ Q++4\-~~L EXHIBIT .;z ~1IIP~TIOll C:OIll'ADI8Il III 'flits .1ll:BmlILIr _.mu;E III (:ONPmllll'1'lWlL AND plIWlLEDGIlD. I' YOU AlII! 110'1' 'l'HB :mrElOlDlli) Ur:I~ Nl1I' DI.BIMIlIll,noN. l>IIl?:RII!lm!:D OR COPnJ<G XSBX'.l'Ill!Il =_ NOR A!:ot.ONlll) _'l:.1Wl1ll Tm.1l.1ICINIIl AT OlICS I!lll> ilImlIUII TIUI OUQWAto VIA US MUL. ."'P:J,elUJe ... "toed tlLat: tlaie n-. _:I.. a d81:t'C eol1ec:n:o&' ar;ggpdJISJ co colleen: a ~t.. MY l.at_U'" ......10_ ,,1.11 1M! lIB"" Zo.- tIlat _..... U 7"11 _ ..""..:I.,"", .. cU.ss........ I." I>BI>U!Jp/:cy. aDd this debt ""s _t "....ffi..-d. tIo.i. O_~o~.....~. :I.. _c _ _uU DOt " eoae'U'U8d. t.e :be aD a~e.8IIPE t:O C101.1.CC. . ".c, ""t. OA1V eIdo=c_c.. ot . U.. agailLe& pnpe::c.y,-- , OJ/~/Ul InU ii:li r~A ~i~4UaViOV '. ~ ~ ", " 1-'- ~-"-" tliil.iilflij~S~' r J:,UCoNl1tU'lOl.C JU:.~~ "11:;;...... _ n:Slerman and Phelan, L "j>> One Penn Center at Suburban Station 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19103 215-563-7000 Fax 215-568-0719 Email. mike.thurman@fed he- PAYOFF FIGtJR NAME: Rudy, Catherine 19275937 OATE ONLY Good Tbro h 03-07-01 Principal B lance Intereet Late Chargee Escrow Deficit prope~ty ~nspecti Jl.ppraisals 'I'wnshp 02-Apr-20 Hax Insur 02-Ap -2001 $28,939.47 $1,939.24 $510.40 $98.21 $64.50 $85.00 $345.70 $333.00 t~\ ~ '? - - . Attorney A.ttorney $1,862.00 $1,125.00 $725.00 'tOTAL I $3$,607.581 Payoff l'igll:1:'e'. MUST BE VER.IPIED AFTER. D'OE DATE BEFOJU: StJBMI'l''l'IIIl'G PAYMBNT I ALL FtJNDB MUST BE IN FULL AIil'J) IN CERTIFIED FORM FORWARDED '1'0 OUR FIIRK .....P1ea.$e be a4vieec1 t,bat; thi.s i'lDl 1s a deb~ <:oJ1eetol' .ttemptiDW to colleet a deOt.~ Itt1.r info'CDBt.ion reeei~ "ill ..e u.eq ro~ tl>at p""P"... ~f you 1Ia_ ~.CUYe4 .. ~""'IlU... in bankr1op<ey, _ tb~. 4el>t _. not r..fU.....d. thi. cOlrnlBJKmdence is not abd a1;.ou1d bOt. be C!out:zue4 to be aza. ae~,,~ 'to col1ect . d.ebt, but; 0Il1y ",!ol'ceaea't of a J.1en against property... 03/l!--1../Ol \ 1'.I:1l1 .l4:a~ r'!,-.A. ~J.a4U;)O.H*,U 1f1I:< 1(;) ~-,' "'0 "_~~ , ~~, 1" .t;U.t..Km.fu'lsr .I::lCoLJU"'4 ~V"'.L '1"'lj I E){\-\'8\'t I DATE: 03/01l0!} OFEDERM,AN AND PHELAN, LLP One Penn Center at Suburban Station 1617 John F. KenQedy Boulevard Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19}03.1814 PHONE # (215) 563-7000 FAX# (717-591-1756 3 FROM: fETER RUSSj). ESQ. rHYLLISLEVIN TO: RE: NAME: LOAN # : PAGES: RUDY, CATHERINE 19275937 2 ATfACHE>> PLEASE Ji'IM), CORREC, tE>> PAYOFF - ' - - - JNF(I~ATION CONTAJNIlD IN TmSFACllMII.!I: MESSAGE IS CONJ'Il)ENTIIlL ANtI PlUVILEDGED. If YOU AU IIOT THE IMTENDEDREcIPIEIIT Alft'DIIlSEMlNATIOII. DlSTIWl1lTiON OIl.CO'PYlNGIS NEITHER INTEl'fDEP NOll ALLOWED. plJlASE TIlLEPHONE AT OIl,CE Al>U) RETVlll'I nn: OIGINAL VIA us MAIL- THANK YOU. -'PU..EASE lIE ADVISED TBATTBt5 FIRM ISA DEBT COLLECTOkATrEMl'TING TO COLLECT A DIIBr. Al'IY INI'OIJtMATION WILL "SUhD lOB TBATl'tIIIl'OSJ:, , DYOV IiAVElU'oC1t\VJ1;D A DUC_E IN BANlaltlPTCY, AND TBISDEBTWAS'l'iOTIlEAi1'JIlMtD, TillS ~PONDENCEIS NOT AND SHOllLD NOT BE COIlSTRUEDTO BE AN ATl'EMTP TO COLLECT A DEBT. Bur ONLY ENFORCEMENT OF A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPRRTY4.......... 03/0}/Ql .... THU 14: 3~ t)\A ~lb40bUl"U 1:0. " ,(",' '"~"V1 iil.l:*Li .t<.t.1JJ:!,.lOl.tU'l&r.tlJ:..t..n.l'" . "I::<j .......- If!l!l\, ~J; "i, ) Federman I!.nd Phelan LLP ODe Penn Center at Suburban Station 1617 John F. IUDnedy Boulevard Suite 1400 Philadelphia, Pa 19013-1814 215-563-7000 Fax 215-568-0719 Phyllis Levin Legal A..ioUllt Representing Lender's ill PeMsyl""ni. & New JtJ'sey PAYOFF FIGURE ~AME: RUDY, 19275937 CATHERINE ACCT #: 03/01/01 ONLY GOOD TO 03/07/01 , Principal Balance Interest Escrow Late Charge Inspections A~praisa] $28,9'9.47 $1,989.2+ $98.27 $90.40 $6"',50 $85,00 Attorney Costs Attorney Fee Sheriff's 2% Commission $1,862.00 $1,125.00 $725.00 TOTAL $51l,9l/8.88 ALL FUNDS MUST BE IN CERTIFIED FUNDS AND MADE PAYABLE TO YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY! ***TBIS FIRM IS A DEBT COLLECTOkATTEMP'IlNG TO COLLECT A DEBT. ANY INFORMATION llECEIVED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. IF YQU HAVE RECEIVED ADISCBARGE IN BANKRUPTCY. AND THIS DEBT WAS NOT REAF1.l1RMElO, THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS NOT AN/) SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN A'M'EMPT TO COLU!:CT ADEB1', BUT ONLY ENFORCEMENT 0:1 ALIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTy."....." ~" , "...-, , ~ 1-" .k "_'~ ~~ '-"H..L..""L....... ,)LI I LCIVII:.I" I <;!!:nVIl..t;;:" II"\.... r,t'r;': ~'" , :'1,,, 31974 .... REAL ESTA,'~ CLOSING .... 31974 Buyer/80rrower: Rudy & Seller: Lender: Alliance Funding, a Division of Superior Bank, FSB Property: 914 Wertzville Road/East Settlement Date: March 1, 2001 Disbursement Date: March 6, 2001 Check Amount $ 34,928.88 Pay To: Homeside Lending For: Payoff Mortgage and Judgement Acct #19275937 0804722676 EXHIBIT '1 r_"-"etl~",_",''''ll''':I''I.~:.I:II~''''".'I''.IM:I''III'IW".-I""'HIllJ=-!.I":.1:1:.:..:r'''--''''''''I".,,':.I"'','''::I..;1"""]"'0_. 31914'4 ., Chelsell Settlement Services, Inc. ESCROW ACCOUNT 5010 TRINDLE ROAD SUITE 200 MECHANICSBURG. PA 17050 PH: (717) 731-9700 LEGACY BANK NUMBER 60-1860/313 2001012273 -Thirty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Eight and 88/100 Payoff Mortgage and Judgement ------------CATE----------------------------JrnIOUNflollars March 6, 2001 $ ......34,928.88 PAY TO THE ORDER OF ,_I:I=-.,::t.'J:;l:~:a:lIII=_.,=_I:I~.I.IMlllr'I..~..t~I..."'I::Io......'.l.":1II:lliMr".""''II::I"IL''''':1:_:I'I.'.'._"~""Net.=-"_'JI::l"'_, I Homeside Lending 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19013-1814 II' O:llo '1 'i'I.II' 1:0:l1o :l108 1;0 1;1: II" 10000 100:l I; 211' CHELSEA SETTLEMENT SERVICES. INC, 31974 31974 Buyer/Borrower: Rudy & Seller: Lender: Alliance Funding, a Division of Superior Bank, FS8 Property: 914 Wertzville Road/East Settlement Date: March 1, 2001 Disbursement Date: March 6, 2001 Check Amount: $ 34,928.88 Pay To: Homeside Lending For: Payoff Mortgage and Judgement Acct #19275937 0804722676 69-\ , !... n\O\ ":) "'r" q"u, II <' 'iof' f\Ov"> 1 \liT LTR LBS A9B-35R4~~~'~2 SERVICE 1DA PKG IDRUDY 4 REFII NGII 1ZA9835R014023542 TRACKI PUB PKG CHG $ 12i:~~ $ 0.00 DV $ 0.0000 CT $ 0.00 DC $ 0. SD $ 0.00 All $ 0.00 SP $ 0.00 IlNDL $ 0.00 IlZ"T $ 0.00 NTFY $N~+0~UST CIlG $ 12.25 ~g~~t PUB PKG cllG $ 12.25 SF4001-' REORDER FROM YOUR LOCAL SAFEGUARD DISTRIBUTOR,IF UNKNOWN, CALL 80(1-523-2422 GGPZOKOO10000 L99SFG47570 Safeguard" 1;II'f\'I~,\ "f"I?I;<, r;Ki~n~"~:," 'n .. ...--'-........- - , """'"~~ _ -~iIi'iI.(jji."-', ~ UPS Package Tracking Page I of I ."'..!!Etl!!'J',,1!\!!i~,i.l\!,,!I1Lc..o,," ~~i.: , TRACK ' SHIP QUICK CtlST TRANSITTIHE TIlACKlfIll NUNBER J REFERENCE NUMBER _- PICKUP DROP-OFF SUPPLIES Tracking Summary To see a detailed report for each package, please select the Detail button. , ; TRACKING NUMBER 1. lZA9835ROl40235424 STATUS Delivered Delivered on: Delivered to: 011II Signed by: Service Type: Mar 7, 20019:16 A.M. PHILADELPHIA, P A. US HOUSTON NEXT DAY AIR Tracking results provided by UPS: Apr 6, 2001 10:04 A.M. Eastern Time (USA) NOTICE: UPS authorizes you to use UPS tracking systems solely to track shipments tendered by or for you to UPS for delivery and for no other purpose. Any other use of UPS tracking systems and information is strictly prohibited. ~ IQQ..9fX~~ E!It3 Home I Track I Ship I Rates I Transit Time I Pickup I D':9p-off I ~.lli2I'lies ~ S"rvice Guide I !,::j3~sine~s I Cu~tQm~r Scrvi.ce I About UPS I Site Guide I MYUPS,COM Copyright @ 1994-1999 United Parcel Service of America. Inc. All Rights Reserved. 36 USC 380. Jrademark and Tariff Informatiofj .../tracking.cgi?tracknums _ displayed=5&TypeOflnquiryNumber=T &HTML V ersion=4.0&sort_ by4/6/0 I . ..J ;:~I!f;'!I!H!I"~~~~~.,;:;:. E3fB .,- ~ ~~i"; TRACK SHIP QUICK COST TRtlNSITTIME TRAClUIIll NUMBE~ I ~EFERENCE MUMBER - "" ."~ <~ ~ UPS Package Tracking ....', , ~l , ',-~.I . ' 'i~,~:, Page I of I Tracking Detail .e. PICKUP O~OP. OFr SUPPLIES S(~(us: Delivered Delivered on: Mar 7, 2001 9:16 A.M. -Signed by: HOUSTON Location: RECEPTION Delivered to: PHILADELPHIA, PA, US Shipped or Billed on: Mar 6, 2001 Tracking Number: IZ A98 35R 0140235424 Service Type: NEXT DAY AIR PACKAGE PROGRESS Date Time Mar 7, 2001 9:16 A.M. 8:49 A.M. 7:52 A.M. Mar 6, 2001 4:37 A.M. 1:00 A.M. 10:57 P.M. 7:54 P.M. 4:51 P.M. Location AIR SERVICE CENTER I, PA, US AIR SERVICE CENTER I, PA, US AIR SERVICE CENTER I, PA, US PHILA OREGON A V, PA, US PHILA OREGON A V, PA, US HARRISBURG, PA, US HARRISBURG, PA, US US Activity DELIVERY INCOMPLETE ADDRESS, NOT DELlVERED;ADDRESS CORRECTED. DELIVERY RESCHEDlJLED COMPANY OR PERSON UNKNOWN, NOT DELIVERED DESTINATION SCAN ARRIVAL SCAN DEPARTURE SCAN ORIGIN SCAN PICKUP MANIFEST RECEIVED Tracking results provided by UPS: Apr 6, 2001 10:04 A.M. Eastern Time (USA) NOTICE: UPS authorizes you to use UPS tracking systems solely to track shipments tendered by or for you to UPS for delivery and for no other purpose. Any other use of UPS tracking systems and information is strictly prohibited. qr Top ofl'<l~ E!IE3 ~ Home I Irack I Ship I Rates I Transit Ti)ne I !,ickup I Drop-off I Supplies Service .Q!!j<:l~ 1 E-Business I Custom~~yJ!;~ I AJ:l.Qllt UPS I Site Guide I MY UPS.COM Copyright ilJ 1994-1999 United Parcel Service of America, Inc, All Rights Reserved, 36 USC 380. Trademark and Taxifflnfonnation http://wwwapps.ups.comletracking/tracking.cgi 4/6/0 I : . .. JI ", '. , L , , ..Tmwim,,,"' II,ittl:lCliot)'IIVlarcn I~, "::UU'I 1;4'1 P]V1 Larry Phelan 215-563--6945 p,01 i" ~~~\~ ':',.,' '{!.:o , ~, FEDERMAN AND PHELAN, L.L.P. Suite 1400 1617 JFK. Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19103-1814 215-563-7000 Personal Fax: 215-563-6945 Iany.phe1an@fi:dphe-pa.com L..wreIla: T. Phelan Managing PllltIlel' Rcp=cntblg LCDdcra in Pennsylvania and New Jersey March 13, 2001 To: Peter Russo, Esquire Yau are authorized to include the following paragraph in your motion: (#). The plaintiff in this matter, Homeside Lending, through their counsel, Frank Federman, has no objection to this motion. Counsel for Homeside concurs that the United Parcel package COtlt>li:~li1\g the reinstatement funds was received in his office at 9:15 a,m. on the day of the sherifFs sale. Because of the volume of mail received that morning, the pachgc" was not opened and reviewed until after the 1 0:00 a.m. Sheriff sale. Had the package been opened prior to the sale, counsel would have directed the Cumberland County sheriff to stay the sale. ~ tj..~\v,\1. ~ ~ ~ ~~ , "" .._~' "'~0',. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2000-07126 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT VS RUDY CATHERINE H HAROLD WEARY , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT - MORT FORE was served upon RUDY CATHERINE H the DEFENDANT , at 0017:56 HOURS, on the 18th day of October ,2000 at 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 by handing to RICK RUDY ( Adult Son a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT - MORT FORE together with NOTICE and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So Answers: 18.00 9.30 .00 10.00 .00 37.30 1!'"~ -/.t:~it R. Thomas Kline 10/19/2000 FEDERMAN & PHELAN Sworn and Subscribed to before By: -~AAM ~ Deputy Sheriff ' me this ~3~ day of Q~.z.3 2nI1J A. D. qr;" {/ ~ ka;;;- rothonotary I T7 ~-" " "," FROM: GLENDA 7613830 10:2583124 PAGE: 01 Tri.County Abstract Service 3414 Chestnut. Street. Camp HlII, Pennsylvania 17011 Telephone (717) 761-8870 . Fax (lll) 761-3830 GLENDA. M. WIi:'l'HINGTON March 15, 2001 TO; ANTHONY MILLER & DANIEL DEITCHMAN FROM; GLENDA M. WETHINGTON VIA FAX TO: 6918482 IN RE: LIEN SEARCH - CA YHERJNE H. RUDY, 914 WERTZVILLE RD., ENOLA, P A Tax parcel No. 09 140836 138. THE RESUL IS OF niTS LlEN SEARCH ON MARCH 7'" and 8''',of2001 show only the mortgage dated and recorded on April 24,1996, in Mortgage Book 1316, at page 30 in.the amount of$30,000.00; Assigned to MERS OIl July 20,1999, in Misc. Book 619 at page 748. In the Prothonotary's Office there was of course, the suit for the Mortgage Foreclosure A.ction , filed to No. 7126 of2000. We checked this again on Monday A.M. and still found nothing else. I.hereby attest that the foregoing facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. r acknowledge that any false statements herein are made su~ject to the penalties of 18 P A, C.s.A, Sec. 4904 relatin.g to unsworn falsification to authorities. ' SIGNED: ~~ ~>n )(;;k+ / Dated March 15, 2001 ~--,~- ~...x- RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT ------------------- ------------------- Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover-and High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Receipt Receipt Receipt MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) RUDY CATHERINE H Case Number 2,000-07126 R Service Info Remarks PAID BY TONY MILLER Total Check. _. + Total Cash... '. + Cash Out...... - Receipt total. = 2,400.00 .00 .00 2,400.00 Date 03/07/2001 Time 11;01;07 No. 266585 Check No. 1323 ------------------------ Distribution Of Payment ---------------------------- Transaction Description Payment Amount ADVANCE PAYMENT 2,400.00 2,400.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN ~l".s;,'~~" ~ ~ .'. J- " RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT ------------------- ------------------- Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 . Recetpt Recelpt Receipt MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) RUDY CATHERINE H Case Number 2000-07126 R Service Info Remarks PAID BY DANIEL DEITCHMAN Total Check... + Total Cash.... + Cash Out. . . . .. - 2,400.00 .00 .00 Receipt total. 2,400.00 -""~~,' Date 03/07/2001 Time 11:00:14 No. 266584 Check No. 6445 ------------------------ Distribution Of Payment---------------------------- Transaction Description Payment Amount ADVANCE PAYMENT 2,400.00 2,400.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN _"~"'I~~WO'.l . --- ...' I '. RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT ~==~==~=;;=~~~~~~== cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street Carlisle, PA 17013' Receipt Date 03/12/2001 Receipt Time 09:25:31 Receipt ,No. 266579 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) 'RUDY CATHER!NE H Case Number 2000-07125 R Service Info Remarks PAID BY TONY MILl..~ Total Check... + Total Cash.... + . Cash out.... . ;. - Receipt total. = 23,521. 00 . .00 .,00 23,521. 00 Check No. 1327 ---~---------- ..------- -- Distribution Of Payment ______u _.,.~__h_____ -__ --- - - , TransactionDescription Payment Amount ADVANCE PAYMENT 23,521.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN 23,521.00 ,.r.......... ~~, ,~ /IIi!- . < J - , RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT :=~===~~=~~===;=~:= Cumberland County Pennsylvania Hanover and High Street Carlisle, PA 17013, Receipt Receipt Receipt MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRAT (VS) ,RUDY CATHERINE H ',Case Number 2000~07i26 R' Service Info, 'Remarks ' PAJ;D BY DANIEL J)EITCHMAN ' TOtal Check. . . '+ Total Cash. ... + Cash Out.... .. _ Receipt total. = ---------~----~---------. Transaction Description ADVANCE PAYMENT ... '~1-#~- Date 03/12/2001 Time 09:24:19 No. 266677 23,521.00 Check No. ,3447 ' , .00 .00 ,23,521. 00 Distribiu:ionOf paynient ,________~______~- ___~-~----_ 'Payment Amount 23,521.00 FEDERMAN & PHELAN '23,521.00 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE PLAINTIFF MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY No.2000-07126 DEF;J:NDANT(S) CATHERINE H. RUDY Type of Action - Notice of Sheriff's Sale SERVE AT 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 Sale Date: MARCH 7, 2001 " > -\ SERVED Served and made known to CArNEJillJE fl. RUh\f ,Defendant, on the .QIST at fa. .0'clockt,m.,at.9ILJ W$t.VILLE J1IJJ Ef.ltr' U>EJ.JIJ'iAtJ/Jo. PP'17d~,~- day of nf: c, , 200Q., . , Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in the manner described below: v' Defendant personally served. Adult family member with whom Defendant(s) reside(s). Relationship is Adult in charge ofDefendant(s)'s residence who refused to give name or relationship. Manager/Clerk of place oflodging in which Defendant(s) reside(s). Agent or person in charge ofDefendant(s)'s office or usual place of business. an officer of said Defendant(s)'s company. Other: Description: Age 12 Height Sd- CI Weight 1!ld. RaceW Sex ~ Other I, ~IIL 1:1. ~('_~ "'$..... , a competent adult, being duly sworn according to law, depose and state that I personally handed a true and correct copy of the Notice of Sheriff's Sale in the manner as set forth herein, issued in the captioned case on the date and at the address indicated above. (~~?~~'~t~' W NOT SERVED ,200_, at o'clock _.m., Defendant NOT FOUND because: Moved Unknown No Answer Vacant Other: 'j Sworn to and subscribed before me this _ day of , 200 _' Notary: By: Attornev for Plaintiff Frank Federman, Esquire -l.D. No. 12248 One Penn Center Snhurban Station, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, P A 19103 (215) 563-7000 i!/IiI~_~~~~~"''''''''''''~--=';'"'~' "l8"iC-'ll;:;-~~Of_~~~~~iliI"'-"";" ~' <~. -~,_....~~ --~ : , ;i' ,) I (:) c') n C -'1 2': ,- -- J -..::;; ;;~<1 :r~'" . f17"l -'"" Z , ;''";'" Z >.." Sl~:~ r"'_',; (~J G'C~ -"," --;\ ~~~: - - -" ~,,:.; ('') (.0 - " '..-' -, 7' r- ";-0.' ~ " 5:! (..!1 -, 'c___,_J]"!l)I~c,,,_>,_ ,. -"......2'.m"""""'I"'~".",-,_,-.,-" ,"' . ~,~'. ",_,"V, ,..~"'~,~, ,~_" '." ,=,'~_.."",+ ",~.1 1I!~!lllli;:iJc .. . SALE DATE: MARCH 7. 2001 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. No.: 2000-07126 vs. CATHERINE H. RUDY AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129.1 AND RETURN OF SERVICE PURSUANT TO Pa. R.C.P. 405 OF NOTICE OF SALE Plaintiff in the above action sets forth as of the date the Praecipe for the Writ of Execution was filed the following information concerning the real property located at: 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD. EAST PENNSBORO. PA 17025. As required by Pa. R.C.P. 3129.2(a) Notice of Sale has been given in the manner required by Pa. R.C.P. 3129.2(c) on each of the persons or parties named, at that address set forth on the attached Affidavit No.2 (previously filed), and a copy ofthe notice is attached as an Exhibit. A copy of the Certificate of Mailing (Form 3817) and/or Certified Mail Return Receipt stamped by the U.S. Postal Service is attached for each notice. ~~ FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff February 1, 2001 - , , , ,.,Js." " "'.'~~i' .. . MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY Plaintiff, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS v. CIVIL DIVISION CATHERINE H. RUDY NO. 2000-07126 nefendant( s). AFFIDA VlT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129 (Affidavit No. I) MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff in the above action, by its attorney, FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE, sets forth as of the date the Praecipe for the Writ of Execution was filed the following information concerning the real property located at 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD, EAST PENNSB@RO. P A 17025. 1. Name and address ofOwner(s) or reputed Owner(s): NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 2. Name and address of Defendant(s) in the judgment: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate,) Same as above 3. Name and address of every judgment creditor whose judgment is a record lien on the real property to be sold: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None - ......" ,"-~ 4. Name and address of the last recorded holder of every mortgage of record: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 5. Name and address of every other person who has any record lien on the property: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 6. Name and address of every other person who has any record interest in the property and whose interest may be affected by the sale: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 7. Name and address of every other person whom the plaintiff has knowledge who has any interest in the property, which may be affected by the sale: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) Tenant/Occnpant 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 Domestic Relations of Cumberland County 13 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge or information and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties ofl8 Pa. C.S. Sec. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. December 8. 2000 DATE ~~ FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff - " I; """'>'~liireit:i\- . DATE: DECEMBER 8, 2000 TO: ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST AND CLAIMANTS NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNER(S) CATHERINE H. RUDY PROPERTY: 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 Improvements: Residential Property CUMBERLAND COUNTY The above-captioned property is scheduled to be sold at the Sheriffs Sale on MARCH 7. 2001, at 10:00 a.m. in Cnmberland County Courthouse. South Hanover Street, Carlisle, PA. Our records indicate that you may hold a mortgage or judgment on the property, which may be extinguished by the sale. You may wish to attend the sale to protect your interests. A schedule of Distribution will be filed by the Sheriff on a date specified by the Sheriff not later than 30 days after sale. Distribution will be made in accordance with the schedule unless exceptions are filed thereto within 10 days after the filing of the schedule. LH . "'. .... ~I ._1.___.. -O-i . ~r ~ r 5' n _ .... .... .... .... .... .... n . Z u, "'" w ..., .... 0 '" 00 -.J '" u, "'" w ..., .... Cs:: ~ 3 n '" Q.n "," '< 0 "'~ ~ n " o' Q. ~ ,,- N z c 3 '" ~ ?f~ ~ "'1:::1 '-".., z n - "'0 "'i"j " n " 3 .. - '. "'"z ti z Z:: n Q.C i:lil Oi"j ~~ 0 " 3 ~ -'" S ::>:'", > -on "'''' ::>:,.., Q. o - Q. . 0 .~ =.... "'0 ~ - ~ =C"l ~C"l 0-0 . 5\ ~f ~ ...[;J ....C"l .~ n n t""0 '" n . Zt"" &;~ " ~ 0... n <.., !'- i"j.... ::>:,Z " ~ ::>:'0 0'" " Q. ",Z ~ "0 ~ 0 ..,'" ~ [;JO ., 0 m"O ~ i"j S 3 @ ~ i"j"! ... n '2.3 ..,C"l '" n o " .. 0 .., > '15~ C"l:: Q. !!-~ ... Q. ...= i"j " ." . n Flt..: Z . - 2: Z ....g:l '" " ~~ = ~ 0 0 l"ll:::l ::>:' ~ 1;' "'C"l 9 n "'0 ... n ". ::;0 ... 5' OZ '" '" ......, -.J "'< 0 to> lJo Q C) ." @ ;;; 'llI - - .. - _.. - " . - ,-- .. "---:-::-' ..:. -..;o::l', ',' ~>---- v.I" '-:~..-~~~ ;:> t;; <.w~ , . -~,...., n I. I I I I I I I I '" ~--""~. "~(:~;I , ii ! .....Z ..,..... ~Cl..8 = ~ rf> ... ~ .. .. ~ = .. ... 1 .....,"! e: ~ trj ;' c '0 ......i"j .... ~ -= 'g.= -'I'j ... .!' .. Z ... = '" >;- ~w .. ... ~~= -;"~ ONt"" Np >- "'Z 5. - .. ~ o 0~~1tillIifii!.'m4l.,,,",do~~,,,"!",,,_;!!E3,-_';",,il'U~~~~&cU~",,,-Wl."i'"' "\t~'-;'d'!ik,,,,,,_,,'(<~'!!:'~,_E,,,#.fj,if,,;,,,<1Hd;;;M!l-,,~!!,j",,,I~i!i:liifOiiIl711~~_ii~UIlilIliillJ ~-""1liI """Iiij . (") 0 0 C -n s: ...,., --, -0 Cr: n :1:: :D no r r CO ,',", :z :-:C ,,~~ 2: ,- m 2::': 1"'::1 _.' :::' ,.., (J) '- '-_.< P"Q .. <- -,-, J> c:' ,-J ('0') '2: .,>~ > () c.) i._) rn S ~~-1 L- -- =< jJ co -< :) ,,__~lLJI.., ,~.~ .. =H,~_ _,",~~lL" ~ _~ _ "e~ """_"~-_""'~'""""." ~" , ._0 'v~' "" "..",., ,,'- .1 ,0 ~.. ,." ,~ - ~ ",'_J' " " I' :... ~ "' -;ii-'tW,lifi;'e; F:\FILES\DATAFILE\Gendoc.cur\102822res.21tde Created: 03/26/011026:08AM Revised: 03/27/01 03:48:12 PM HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 2000-07126 CNIL ACTION - LAW CATHERINE H. RUDY, Defendant RESPONSEIREPLY OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF TO "CAUSE SHOWN" OF RESPONDENTS DEITCHMAN AND MILLER AND NOW, comes the Cumberland County Sheriff, R. Thomas Kline ("Answering Respondent"), by and through his Solicitor, Edward 1. Schorpp, Esquire, who interprets the "Cause Shown" filed by Respondent Miller and Respondent Deitchman to be in the nature of New Matter, to which Respondent replies as follows: I. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Answering Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment and the same is therefore denied. 2. Aclmitted. 3--4. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Answering Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments and the same are therefore denied. 5. Admitted. 6. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Answering Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment and the same is therefore denied.. 7. Admitted. 8. Denied. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions oflaw requiring no answer. 9-13. r:>enied. Afterreasonab1e investigation, Answering Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth ofthese averments and the same are therefore denied. , ~ .- ,"-, 'c..~"' .~;':~ 14-15. Denied. The averments of these paragraphs constitute conclusions of law requiring no answer herein. 16. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Answering Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments and the same are therefore denied. 17-21. Denied. The averments ofthese paragraphs constitute conclusions oflaw requiring no answer herein. WHEREFORE, Answering Respondent requests that the Petition be dismissed. B~$~~~ Edward L. Scho p, Esqui e Solicitor Ten East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013-3093 (717) 243-3341 Attorney for Answering Respondent Cumberland County Sheriff, R. Thomas Kline Date: March;l8', 2001 ..- .1. ~. 1liIlm2-, . VERIFICATION I verify that the statements contained herein are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. 94904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF <~~ R. Thomas Kline I Dated:M~h'::28: ::Joo1 :I' ~, c_. , ~, 'li;j.A: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Tricia D. Eckenroad, an authorized agent for Martson Deardorff Williams & Otto, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Response to Cause Shown was served this date by depositing same in the Post Office at Carlisle, P A, first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Peter J. Russo, Esquire 5010 East Trindle Road Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Mr. Anthony Miller, pro se 103 Locust Street East Berlin, PA 17316 Frank Federman, Esquire 1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, P A 19013 Mr. Daniel Deitchman, pro se 373 Claremont Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 MARTSON DEARDORFF WILLIAMS & OTTO 6!fgt (J. ~o-J Tricia D. Eckenroad en East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-3341 Dated: March2&", 2001 " :'-'~M~#:W~~!$;~~~~'MEl'~:'f.","",~<~~~tl'i"'7""'-"lidliilll'" "", ", ,.~,~ "",- ,-0 ~*' '<-'=~'''''~' '"M'~.' " "",,~, '__<C" ..' c ~,,"-- ~~ '" J ........ ,~, '--ll!lilIi'AiltI..M (') c: :<""" dj~ ~S~ -<-" c:C:~ ~g ~'C: 2.~ =< L:JBIIllI 'j a ('""'! , ~ ::J~ j" :;::J N CD C j :::_ -n w ~i;'f: ~:, =< (.0 , , ';" 1 ~ "<',. .~'" '0<<' ,-' 'u'--''~,i . E\FILES\DATAFILE\Gendoc,cur\I02822res.ltde Created: mI26/0110:02:55AM Revised: 03/27/01 03:47:27 PM HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 2000-07126 CNIL ACTION - LAW CATHERINE H. RUDY, Defendant .RESPONSE OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF TO PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE AND NOW, comes the Cumberland County Sheriff, R. Thomas Kline ("Respondent"), by and through his Solicitor, Edward 1. Schorpp, Esquire, and responds to the Petition of Catherine H. Rudy as follows: 1. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment, and the same is therefore denied. 2. Admitted. 3-5. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information suff(cient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, and the same ate therefore denied. 6. Denied. The averments ohhis paragraph constitute mixed conclusions oflaw and ~factual averments. The conclusions oflaw are denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the factual averments and the same are therefore denied. 7-9. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, and the same are therefore denied. 10. Denied. The averments of this paragraph constitute mixed conclusions oflaw and ;. factual averments. The conclusions oflaw are denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without kno\vledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the factual averments and the same are therefore denied. c_ '" I"", ";';;"~'""i.:h, 11. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment, and the same is therefore denied. 12. Admitted. 13. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averment, and the same are therefore denied. 14. penied. These averments constitute conclusions oflaw requiring no answer herein. 15-16. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, and the same are therefore denied. WHEREFORE, Respondent prays that the Petition be dismissed. BY~~~ Edward L. Scho p, Esqmre Solicitor Ten East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013-3093 (717) 243-3341 Attorney for Respondent Cumberland County Sheriff, R. Thomas Kline Date: March~, 2001 ~.~ ..< ~-"' I. VERIFICATION I verify that the statements contained herein are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. 94904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF JC~~ Dated: '-?'?~""""~~I ~ ..t\,~!;'rj 'j , ~ , .--, ~ '.ts:'-_I I j CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Tricia D. Eckemoad, an authorized agent for Martson Deardorff Williams & Otto, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Response of Cumberland County Sheriff to Se Aside Sale was served this date by depositing same in the Post Office at Carlisle, P A, first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Peter J. Russo, Esquire 5010 East Trindle Road Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Mr. Anthony Miller, pro se 103 Locust Street East Berlin, P A 17316 Frank Federman, Esquire 1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19013 Mr. Daniel Deitchman, pro se 373 Claremont Drive Carlisle, P A 17013 MARTSON DEARDORFF WILLIAMS & OTTO ~ig,fd wr-"O Ten East High Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717) 243-3341 Dated: March Z8', 2001 ''"~~'llili.'''''' ~""*h~!jjifNl*~!i!!Ei",Ii.\il1M~lli,~i!l!illt;HJJE'rtW-~r ULI1 1!ii~iWl:~j@~M'" , liU .l~~~ ~"~'~,,' w ,,~~~.. .'''''''_ , ~, '.-' ,"'~ ~".", .. . ~ ,- - 0 C' C ~ ::t: -om ~; -;-, S2 ~~~~ N -n Z C (f) :~~: 0) ('; -'< r;:; G ~"'"7:1 -:;:: ~,---; )> c, -.". (j :-2.:("'\ :..,) .,'~.- f' l yc u ~d 7' 15 :--1 -< ;- -< " - .-, ,-" ,-~<,.; 01-,,-" . .- '~ 'aJ;;iiL';;,: PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF EXECUTION - (MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE) P.R.C.P.3180-3183 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, 1Ne. CUMBERLAND COUNTY Plaintiff, v. No. 2000-07126 CATHERINE H. RUDY nefendant( s). TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF THE PROTHONOTARY: Issue writ of execution in the above matter: Amount Due $31.932.88 Interest from 11/22/00 - 03/07/01 $551.25 and Costs (per diem - $5.25) $32.484.13 ~~~ FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE ONE PENN CENTER at SUBURBAN STATION SUITE 1400 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 Attorney for Plaintiff Note: Please attach description of property. No. -!~~,~Rl!i!lt!~~_~~iI!!f'~>jMf-'ib{,,~k~l\"\"~_!"i>!i..lil~l~tA>ili!~iMMI!iltllIU.~ll = ~ ililIIliIlr..~~~~I!'OiIi!I' , ...::1 Z on o~ 0 N 0 00> .... ~~ ~~ U "'" uZ ;;J ><~~ ....00 U .-d ~Z Z": ~ ~~ ~ ~ " Zz 000 ~~~ ~ Or-1 ~:g ~ r-1 = Q '" '" :g~ "",r-1 ... 0 .....0 " < :g ~ U'" == O'!l =:~~ .n or; r-1oo " r-1Noo t? 0 ....~ r-1 "'" ... Z Z 0 .; ~~ S 0 UZ r-1Z ... Z ~~Z N ...~ ~ ~~ '" 5" ~8 r-1r-1~ a 00 r-1 ~~ =:~"'" g. ""'u ~~ =: ot: "'" 00 p, "'" ~~ ~ ... 0 -<~-< " ~~ U~r-1 .... 8~ ~"'" u r-16 ~ o~ ~ .... '" r-1r-1 :g~ U \; '" ~~ ~ r-1 .i:J ~ ~ " ~ - .~ z~ ~ ~ ....u ~,:, ',_" '''~',','""~~-,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,>~,,>_,,,,,,, C__~',~"_I~, _~_,,,o,,_,~_' >":-"~'~,,_, _ "'_~ '~_""',',_Y__,,~.~..<, "'_ -I" . ~. ~" 1;:' DESCRIPTION ALL THAT CERTAIN lot or piece of land situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a pin on the southerly line of the State Road, known as Wertzville Road, at the line of lands now or late of R.O. Brashear; thence along the said highway North 85 degrees 15 minutes . East, 80 feet to a pin; thence along lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, South 4 degrees 45 minutes East 470 feet to a pin on the line of lands now or late of Marlin E. Sheeley and wife; thence South 31 degrees 30 minutes West, 9 feet to a pin; thence along other lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, North 44 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West one hundred seventeen and thirty-one hundredths feet to an iron pin; thence along lands now or late of R.O. Brashear, North 4 degrees 45 minutes West, 386,8 feet to an iron pin, the place of beginning. RECORD OWNER TITLE TO SAID PREMISES IS VESTED IN Catherine H. Rudy, her heirs and assigns, by Deed from Patricia A. Lusk, widow, dated 4/24/96, recorded 4/26/96, in Deed Book 138, Page 141. ,. '~~~'~~~M~-ilM"'''''~~1'.Il!;.I,~~~"",,"~~;fM~i11I~~~ ~ ~-- Wi I", - ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Gv ~ f(i ..p ...... '1 7' t..J ~ 6 & ;--4 ."1 0 8 0 () b.J () D ~ "'- 0- ...... () ...... ?'-- C:> <:) ::S f0 ~ r~ c a ..~ I" ~ , :;;: '=' ::- , -n-ct! :'Tl - ? t! 91G C) '" ., 'f"::':' ~ '"' .~ z"" , .::; (/):;", C,.0 ,~ ~ -<..:c ~~;~~ ~c) -D .:r-;:r-.. Z"''' ::-J'::: <~f5 )'>0 ry C or,'; z: CJ1 ~ =< ::D 0'> -< ::")'~,.JI~!:~;~)l.;-!Ll,.""JJ.JJt>! ~,?",,~,. ,-,;'~," "<';-~' ,_.",,",C, <) ,-,_" '"W, ,'''__,,",,,'_''''?,,-,,' .. '".Y,'" ' ,..,.., ,_~I" ,'~"'" ,~ . ~, "* " l~ilii<::, '\ MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY Plaintiff, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS v. CIVIL DIVISION CATHERINE H. RUDY NO. 2000-07126 Defendant(s). AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129 (Affidavit No.1) MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff in the above action, by its attorney, FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE, sets forth as of the date the Praecipe for the Writ of Execution was filed the following information concerning the real property located at 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD, EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025. 1. Name and address ofOwner(s) or reputed Owner(s): NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 2. Name and address ofDefendant(s) in the judgment: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) Same as above 3. Name and address of every judgment creditor whose judgment is a record lien on the real property to be sold: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None " ~ , - ~ I" ' ~ ~ """"--'-, i ...--- . 4. Name and address of the last recorded holder of every mortgage of record: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 5. Name and address of every other person who has any record lien on the property: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 6. Name and address of every other person who has any record interest in the property and whose interest may be affected by the sale: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 7. Name and address of every other person whom the plaintiff has knowledge who has any interest in the property, which may be affected by the sale: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) Tenant/Occupant 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 Domestic Relations of Cumberland County 13 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge or information and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties ofl8 Pa. C.S. Sec. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. December 8. 2000 DATE ~ K.IA-.- FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff -- ~~~j.- "'~ ""'''''''''''~jj~~~l:,""Mir~'.!lJa.~",M~Rii~.-j,,~~~'' .;]lJf'-1ifI11,,,.L ~"",~_,~~~_,"_,M,,,'~~,"'"~,,<,~",~"~,,~",' ',,' ~~" ~,", ',_'" ,C<Y," -~~. ~...A (') c -o~ lilrr, Z-" Zr C/J)> ~,?: :;;;;U zO >0 c "7 ~ J - - "'j i t , ,-~'" C) t-'" ~ c:::> r1l , , -,4 , ,~ ";."-'; c..:, s5t:' ;]~:Ei ---;',::;C) eill );! :0 -< 32 r:? U1 (T> ~: " - '... I~ ~ ~/' ~"'-;, . MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY Plaintiff, No. 2000-07126 v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant(s). December 8, 2000 TO: CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 **THIS FIRM IS A DEBT COLLECTOR A TTEMPTlNG TO COLLECT A DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. IF YOU HA VB PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED A DISCHARGE IN BANKRUPTCY AND THIS DEBT WAS NOT REAFFIRMED, THIS IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT, BUT ONLY ENFORCEMENT OF A LIEN AGAINST PROPERTY.** Your house (real estate) at 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD. EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025, is scheduled to be sold at the Sheriff's Sale on MARCH 7.2001 at 10:00 a.m. in the Cumberland County Courthouse, South Hanover Street, Carlisle, PA 17013, to enforce the court judgment obtained by MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS. INC. (the mortgagee) against you. If the Sheriffs sale is postponed, the property will be relisted for the June 6. 2001 Sheriffs Sale. NOTICE OF OWNER'S RIGHTS YOU MAY BE ABLE TO PREVENT TillS SHERIFF'S SALE To prevent this Sheriff's Sale, you must take immediate action: 1. The sale will be cancelled if you pay to the mortgagee the back payments, late charges, costs and reasonable attorney's fees due. To find out how much you must pay, you may call: (215) 563-7000. 2. You may be able to stop the sale by filing a petition asking the Court to strike or open the judgment, if the judgment was improperly entered. You may also ask the Court to postpone the sale for good cause. 3. You may also be able to stop the sale through other legal proceedings. ~ ~~~ ,,~ , ~ ~'l~" , You may need an attorney to assert your rights. The sooner you contact one, the more chance you will have of stopping the sale. (See notice on page two on how to obtain an attorney.) YOU MAY STILL BE ABLE TO SAVE YOUR PROPERTY AND YOU HAVE OTHER RIGHTS EVEN IF THE SHERIFF'S SALE DOES TAKE PLACE. 1. If the Sheriffs Sale is not stopped, your property will be sold to the highest bidder. You may find out the price bid by calling (215) 563-7000. 2. You may be able to petition the Court to set aside the sale if the bid price was grossly inadequate compared to the value of your property. 3. The sale will go through only if the buyer pays the Sheriff the full amount due in the sale. To find out if this has happened, you may call (717) 240-6390. 4. If the amount due from the Buyer is not paid to the Sheriff, you will remain the owner of the property as if the sale never happened. 5 . You have the right to remain in the property until the full amount due is paid to the Sheriff and the Sheriff gives a deed to the buyer. At that time, the buyer may bring legal proceedings to evict you. 6. You may be entitled to a share of the money which was paid for your house. A schedule of distribution of the money bid for your house will be filed by the Sheriff within 30 days of the sale. This schedule will state who will be receiving that money. The money will be paid out in accordance with this schedule unless exceptions (reasons why the proposed distribution is wrong) are filed with the Sheriff within ten (10) days after the distribution is filed. 7. You may also have other rights and defenses, or ways of getting your home back, if you act immediately after the sale. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE LISTED BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY REFERRAL CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2 LIBERTY AVENUE CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE CARLISLE, P A 17013 (717) 249-3166 (800) 990-9108 ". '.", ~ ",-,,' lJi.lllMil~_ DESCRIPTION ALL THAT CERTAIN lot or piece of land situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a pin on the southerly line of the State Road, known as Wertzville Road, at the line of lands now or late of R.O. Brashear; thence along the said highway North 85 degrees 15 minutes , East, 80 feet to a pin; thence along lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, South 4 degrees 45 minutes East 470 feet to a pin on the line of lands now or late of Marlin E. Sbeeley and wife; thence South 31 degrees 30 minutes West, 9 feet to a pin; thence along other lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, North 44 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West one hundred seventeen and thirty-one hundredths feet to an iron pin; thence along lands now or late of R.O. Brashear, North 4 degrees 45 minutes West, 386.8 feet to an iron pin, the place of beginning. RECORD OWNER TITLE TO SAID PREMISES IS VESTED IN Catherine H. Rudy, her heirs and assigns, by Deed from Patricia A. Lusk, widow, dated 4/24/96, recorded 4/26/96, in Deed Book 138, Page 141. ,- W\I!~~li.iii!lil>HiU~~~!.~l>'k",,._m~l!I<j~iU~tIi;'~IiI' ,-~~. ~~ (") C <" "1:.1"" m'-- 9fli ~f: 2--' C-'55:; ~7~ ~C':t ~O ;;;0 C 2 =< 'I o a o n-r (--;. ~ ',~,,' "'f! :;~] "",.1"1 :-:;;;:~ <.0 ~ ~~~~; 5;J =0 -< 1;-;> VI 0'1 , I, .-' 'litlil!l.ldllliitSl\iii","' " FEDERMAN and PHELAN By: FRANK FEDERMAN Identification No. 12248 Suite 1400 One Penn Center at Suburban Station Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 563-7000 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DlVISION CATHERINE H. RUDY NO. 2000-07126 Defendant( s). CERTIFICATION FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE, hereby verifies that he is attorney for the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, and that the premises are not subject to the provisions of Act 91 because it is: () an FHA mortgage () non-owner occupied () vacant (X) Act 91 procedures have been fulfilled This certification is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. ~~~~ FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff '~-"'~~~r...p' ........-,.~,_........~,M~gl1.ldl.kJi,-_"!;i;I,"'m",~'1<1""1':,,,;:i'h,{"~i~~@lI~iililj .... ~,.,", I '~~~jMil!. <:) C ,.. V_O; mn', Z:r'-i /(-. S:{ ~,~: ~C~; ~O --0 )>C ~ - . a o a ;rl C") ;l.,':.: w ~-_~{i -1(,) g~~ ~ -I, -< ~ N en 0\ - ~ > 1"-- - ,. .'. ",.ih,,'~'_'"", -" I''''''"'~.~ " HOMESIDE LENDING, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Petitioner IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 00-7126 CIVIL vs. CIVIL ACTION - LAW CATHERINE H. RUDY, Respondent IN RE: PETITION TO SET ASIDE SHERIFF'S SALE ORDER AND NOW, this 'f'*" day of April, 2001, after hearing, the court being satisfied that 10 Pa. Code 7.2 is inapposite to the situation here presented and that the court must be guided by the clear meaning of 41 P.S. 404(a), and that tender was made of the amount necessary to cure default more than an hour prior to the commencement of bidding on the subject project, the within petition to set aside sheriffs sale is GRANTED. The sheriff is flirected to return all funds paid by Messrs. Miller and Deitchman in connection with this matter. BY THE COURT, Frank Federman, Esquire For Homeside Lending, Inc. ~'/1 /-i --^ Q I Kevi . Hess, 1. ~ 1/~ Lj-JO-QI p-KS Peter J. Russo, Esquire For Catherine Rudy Edward Schorpp, Esquire For Cumberland County Sheriff ~ - . = ~ , >'--' ~,~, ~ '..1 ,~ "L,' _,'~ ,,~""" .e_ - , C' '"'i" , ,. ,r._ ~,' !::~Ffi\RY .,,', ,.9 .-"i ~: 1')0 I] .,) <v"" CU:'i;!::::~:'ii_,/',~'-;C.i COUNTY PE:f\l1\jSYLV/,N!A " ~ ,~,'IIl.......,.,,,,,,,,-,,~~~~~~~~~~~, ili "~ ~ .,,.. . '" I , ",_~ ' 1 : Anthony MiUer, Pro Se 103 Locust Street East Berlin, P A 17316 Danie] Deitchman, Pro Se 373 Claremont Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 'b,"_";; .,~"_-:~;, _, .!''Wf. """""ift~ ,. . Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. -vs- Catherine H. Rudy .. ~ L - Iilll'~lil:i_~;>l",,~a_Hc,' In The Court of Common Pleas of Cwnberland County, Pennsylvania No. 2000-7126 Civil R. Thomas Kline, Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, says this writ is returned STAYED. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Poundage Posting Bills Advertising Auctioneer Law Library County Levy Postpone Sale Surcharge Certified mail Mileage Law Journal Patriot News Share of Bills 30.00 11.35 15.00 15.00 10.00 .50 1.00 15.00 20.00 1.10 8.68 237.50 188.25 25.53 578.91 Sworn and subscribed to before me This :15 It' day of 1"<;1 2001, A.D. Ql/~ 0 7h,b,.~ ~ r thonotary pd by atty. 04/17/01 So answers: R. Thomas Kline, Sheriff BYitN~e- Deputy henff f .p t. 3';1/2- tJz- Ru--. //fJ7.:li ~, , ,I ~ " lilItlL,' " MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY Plaintiff, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS v. CIVIL DIVISION CATHERINE H. RUDY NO. 2000-07126 Defendant(s). AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129 (Affidavit No.1) MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff in the above action, by its attorney, FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE, sets forth as ofthe date the Praecipe for the Writ of Execution was filed the following information concerning the real property located at 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD, EAST PENNSBORO. PA 17025. 1. Name and address ofOwner(s) or reputed Owner(s): NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 2. Name and address ofDefendant(s) in the judgment: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) Same as above 3. Name and address of every judgment creditor whose judgment is d record lien on the real property to be sold: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None ,', , i, '~' , , 4. Name and address of the last recorded holder of every mortgage of record: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 5. Name and address of every other person who has any record lien on the property: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 6. Name and address of every other person who has any record interest in the property and whose interest may be affected by the sale: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) None 7. Name and address of every other person whom the plaintiff has knowledge who has any interest in the property, which may be affected by the sale: NAME LAST KNOWN ADDRESS (If address cannot be reasonably ascertained, please so indicate.) Tenant/Occupant 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 Domestic Relations of Cumberland County 13 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge or information and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties ofJ8 Pa. C.S. Sec. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. December 8. 2000 DATE ~evd. KIA-+- FRANK FEDERMAN, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff --- , ~ _ ,,,I ~, , . MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. CUMBERLAND COUNTY Plaintiff, No. 2000-07126 v. CATHERINE H. RUDY Defendant(s). December 8, 2000 TO: CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, PA 17025 "THIS FIRM IS A DEBT COLLECTOR ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBT AlNED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED A DISCHARGE IN BANKRUPTCY AND THIS DEBT WAS NOT REAFFIRMED, THIS IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT, BUT ONLY ENFORCEMENT OF A LIEN AGAINST PROPERTY." Your house (real estate) at 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD. EAST PENNSBORO. PA 17025, is scheduled to be sold at the Sheriff's Sale on MARCH 7. 2001 at 10:00 a.m. in the Cumberland County Courthouse, South Hanover Street, Carlisle, P A 17013, to enforce the court judgment obtained by MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS. INC. (the mortgagee) against you. If the Sheriff s sale is postponed, the property will be relisted for the June 6. 2001 Sheriff s Sale. NOTICE OF OWNER'S RIGHTS YOU MAY BE ABLE TO PREVENT THIS SHERIFF'S SALE To prevent this Sheriff's Sale, you must take immediate action: 1. The sale will be cancelled if you pay to the mortgagee the back payments, late charges, costs and reasonable attorney's fees due. To find out how much you must pay, you may call: (215) 563-7000. 2. You may be able to stop the sale by filing a petition asking the Court to strike or open the judgment, if the judgment was improperly entered. You may also ask the Court to postpone the sale for good cause. 3. You may also be able to stop the sale through other legal proceedings. . I.. .'-liiii..iolatllilDl5lliif", . . . You may need an attorney to assert your rights. The sooner you contact one, the more chance you will have of stopping the sale. (See notice on page two on how to obtain an attorney.) YOU MAY STILL BE ABLE TO SAVE YOUR PROPERTY AND YOU HAVE OTHER RIGHTS EVEN IF THE SHERIFF'S SALE DOES TAKE PLACE. 1. Ifthe Sheriffs Sale is not stopped, your property will be sold to the highest bidder. You may find out the price bid by calling (215) 563-7000. 2. You may be able to petition the Court to set aside the sale if the bid price was grossly inadequate compared to the value of your property. 3. The sale will go through only if the buyer pays the Sheriff the full amount due in the sale. To find out if this has happened, you may call (717) 240-6390. 4. If the amount due from the Buyer is not paid to the Sheriff, you will remain the owner of the property as if the sale never happened. 5. You have the right to remain in the property until the full amount due is paid to the Sheriff and the Sheriff gives a deed to the buyer. At that time, the buyer may bring legal proceedings to evict you. 6. You may be entitled to a share of the money which was paid for your house. A schedule of distribution of the money bid for your house will be filed by the Sheriff within 30 days of the sale. This schedule will state who will be receiving that money. The money will be paid out in accordance with this schedule unless exceptions (reasons why the proposed distribution is wrong) are filed with the Sheriff within ten (10) days after the distribution is filed. 7_ You may also have other rights and defenses, orways of getting your home back, if you act immediately after the sale. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE LISTED BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY REFERRAL CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2 LIBERTY AVENUE CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE CARLISLE, P A 17013 (717) 249-3166 (800) 990-9108 -^ ."-. .-'--" '-1b....::,; . DESCRIPTION ALL THAT CERTAIN lot or piece of land simate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland Couney, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a pin on the southerly line of the State Road, known as Weruville Road, at the line of lands now or late of R.O, Brashear; thence along the said highway North 85 degrees 15 minutes East, 80 feet to a pin; thence along lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, South 4 degrees 45 minutes East 470 feet to a pin on the line of lands now or late of Marlin E. Sheeley and wife; thence South 31 degrees 30 minutes West, 9 feet to a pin; thence along other lands now or late of Mauro Sgrignoli and Feliciana Sgrignoli, North 44 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West one hundred seventeen and thirty-one hundredths feet to an iron pin; thence along lands now or late of R.O. Brashear, North 4 degrees 45 minutes West, 386.8 feet [Q an iron pin, the place of beginning. RECORD OW:'Ii'ER TITLE TO SAID PREMISES IS VESTED IN Catherine H. Rudy, her heirs and assigns, by Deed from Patricia A. Lusk, widow, dated 4/24/96, recorded 4/26/96, in Deed Book 138, Page 141. ,'~I -' ~ 1.'1.'.l', WRIT OF EXECUTION and/or ATTACHMENT '~ ,.:: .::, . ~ ,~.:; COMMONWEALTH c:WPENNSYLV ANIA) COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND) NO. 00-7126 CIVIL' TERM CIVIL ACTION - LAW TO THE SHERIFF OF Cumberland COUNTY: To satisfy the debt, interest and costs due Mortqaqe Electronic Reqistration Systems, Inc. PLAINTIFF(S) from Catherine H. Rudy, 914 Wertzville Road, East Pennsboro, PA 17025 DEFENDANT(S) (1) You are directed to levy upon the property of the defendant(s) and to sell See Leqal Description (2) You are also directed to attach the property of the defendant(s) not levied upon in the possession of GARNISHEE(S) as follows: and to notny the garnishee(s) that: (a) an attachment has been issued; (b) the garnishee(s) is/are enjoined from paying any debt to or.for the account of the defendant(s) and from delivering any property of the defendant(s) or otherwise disposing thereof;' , .. ..,- .', (3) Ifpropertyoftbe de{endant(s) not levied uponan subjectto attachment is found inthe possession of anyone other thana-named garnishee. you are directed to notify him/her that he/she has been added as a garnishee and is enioined as above stated. L.L. and Costs Due Prothy Other Costs $.50 Amount Due S31.932.88 11/22/00 - 3/7/01 - $551.25 Interest (per dciIR $5.25) Atty's Comm % AttyPaid $109.30 Plainliff Paid Date: December 13, 2000 Curtis R. Long d_ ,'~2~;:.1 Deputy ---bY: REQUESTING PARTY: Name Address: Frank Federnan, Esq. One Penn Center at Suburban Station - Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Attorney fOr: Plaintiff Telephone: 215-563-7000 Supreme Court 10 No. 12248 rlli'~;"-"""'~~'~""""""''''"''''.''''iiJi~&j.-l\;1ili~~,,,.'''Wj'..6!i'il.ili:t<:1il!;1!fli;illil~~1Ii~.Uillli'"' -;~ -[..11' ~iII1!lillft""";" . . REA[ ESTATE SALE N&)3 . Uti ~ ..' I....... ;s::LtrotD the sheriff levied upon the defenaam;. interest in the real property situated in~A -J A....ANJL..,~~ ~,f' Cumberland County, Pa., k'1!J;t." lnd numberedas:9.yt.).,A?ud~f.,L ". t..,.. c"..-dJ- ana mo€ . I..d on Exhibit "A" filed with ~ ... -j> ~p . (..1 -s:-~, "p~,~ U', (:. ~ ~~ -:::;. ;J> ~,~ '?{" ~ ~~ .,.,~ .. "''l\ ~ $ Y' lhls writ and oy tnlS n.!\f' lte:A..~. ~JS:~ ciTed herein. '~~''f '" .-~~, , ~, "', ,~ ", ~~__o, ~.,' ~. , I"" ,~ 0 ~ ~ " - ....w, I" '4~!!tL'!F-"~'_ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 8201 GREENSBORO DRNE, SUITE 350 MCLEAN, VA 22102 No.: 2000-07126 vs. CATHERINE H. RUDY 914 WERTZVILLE ROAD EAST PENNSBORO, P A 17025 PRAECIPE TO VACATE JUDGMENT TO THE PROTHONOTARY Kindly mark the judgment that was entered in the above captioned matter on NOVEMBER 27,2000 vacated upon payment of your costs only. ::c_ A h 1C(/{~ . ~an, EsqUire ~ Attorney for Plaintiff June 13, 2001 , -: ,:l~,,'\'"'-" 1iil~li!kj!lO~llffiil";l"t4Jj;ii~lt~f<li"'il,j,;j:i.*-l"~~~:'&cl.~&%"-.;,,lli;;;i,'i\I~~~Jititlil:i!ii~"".:..,~., l'~~_~ .. ai .~ s"i;;"Dr~~~,,, " ,,,_, _ .____~,. ',~" -,'0/',. _~~ " . , ^ ", " -,'," L 7J7:";,~" '.'~ ~"'",,' '."', , ',,~' - ,~ '.iiJl'-. 2 0 C..:' .,1- s: ,- .-" -oeD c:: .'. -Tl rnrn -,.p "ip .~ z::u :i~sj -c ~J> (.;1 2::2: --.':'i(~ <:::0 "0 ~-:k -'\'1 ZQ 3; [:-;;c") -~- (...-1 r:-:' ,;:-,.rT1 J>c: ':::.=4. ::z; N ~> ::<. ~':> ~ .," - ?'^ ~-. ", w ",]jt; " ~~ , '~')'JM."f~~9!i;jj";. ORDER/NOTICE TO WITHHOLD INCOME fOR SUPPORT kt. 00 - "IrQ? (!/ tJ/L State Commonwealth of Pennsylvania iJ.q(!i:fgS '? 79 10 d ~ t/t..,. Co./City/Dist. of CUMBERLAND j)/Z- Date of Order/Notice OS/28/01 30,)),,0- Court/Case Number (See Addendum for case summary) Employer/Withholder's Federal EIN Number BENC~K IMAGING SERVICES EmployerlWithholder's Name 335 BRIDGE ST Employer/Withholder's Address NEW CUMBERLAND PA 17070-2129 o Original Order/Notice @ Amended Order/Notice o Terminate Order/Notice ) RE, CHIARA, CHARLES T. ) Employee/Obligor's Name (Last, First, Mil ) 202-42-7171 l Employee/Obligor's Sodal Security Number ) 3610100656 ) Employee/Obligor's Case Identifier ) (See Addendum for plaintiff names assodated with cases on attachment) l Custodial Parent's Name (Last, First, MI) ) See Addendum for dependent names and birth dates associated with cases on attachment. ORDER INFORMA TlON: This is an Order/Notice to Withhold Income for Support based upon an order for support from CUMBERLAND County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. By law, you are required to deduct these amounts from the above-named employee's/obligor's income until further notice even if the Order/Notice is not issued by your State. $ 530.00 per month in current support $ 0.00 per month in past-due support Arrears 12 weeks or greater? o yes @ no $ 0.00 per month in medical support $ 0 00 per month for genetic test costs $ per month in other (specify) for a total of $ 530. DO per month to be forwarded to payee below. You do not have to vary your pay cycle to be in compliance with the support order. If your pay cycle does not match the ordered support payment cycle, use the following to determine how much to withhold: $ 122.31 per weekly pay period. $ 244.62 per biweekly pay period (every two weeks). $ 265.00 per semimonthly pay period (twice a month). $ 530.00 per monthly pay period. REMITTANCE INFORMATION: You must begin withholding no later than the first pay period occurring ten (10) working days after the date of this Order/Notice. Send payment within seven (7) working days of the paydate!date of withholding. You are entitled to deduct a fee to defray the cost of withholding. Refer to the laws governing the work state of your employee for the the allowable amount. The total withheld amount, and your fee, cannot exceed 55% of the employee's/ obligor's aggregate disposable weekly earnings. for the purpose of the limitation on withholding, the following information is needed (See #9 on pg. 2). If remitting by EfT/EDI, please call Pennsylvania State Collections and Disbursement Unit (SCDU) Employer Customer SelVice at 1-877-676-9580 for instructions. Make Remittance Payable to: PA SCDU Send check to: Pennsylvania SCDU, P.o. Box 69112, Harrisburg, Pa 17106.9112 IN ADDITION, PA YMENTS MUST INCLUDE THE DEFENDANT'S NAME AND THE PACSES MEMBER ID (shown above as the Employee/Obligor's Case Identifier) OR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER IN ORDER TO BE PROCESSED. DO NOT SEND CASH BY MAIL. MAILED (tP-ff;' -0/ 1$ DRO: RJ Shadday xc: defendant Date of Order: June 6, 2001 SelVice Type M /,j - I onH'~'1Y ~ Edgar B. Bayley JlID}E form EN-028 Worker 10 $IATT OMBNo.;0970-0154 Expiration Date: 12/31/00 - .~ "",-..L ~~'~-.~"~-<IliM~i' .. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO EMPLOYERS AND OTHER WITHHOLDERS o If checked you are required to provide a copy of this form to your employee. 1. Priority: Withhoiding under this Order/Notice has priority over any other legal process under State law against the same income. Federal tax levies in effect before receipt ofthis order have priority. If there are Federal tax levies in effect please contact the requesting agency iisted below. 2. Combining Payments: You can combine withheld amounts from more than one employee/obligor's income in a single payment to each agency requesting withholding. You must, however, separately identify the portion of the single payment that is attributable to each employee/obiigor. 3.* R:t.poltil,g till- PayJabdDate 6f'Nitl.l,oIJ:"5. YOtllllust lepolt tilt:: paydah;;,'date of yy;lI.ltoldil,g yvl,d, 5el,J:I'5 tile pdylllellt. Tltt:: payd&.b'date of yy;t1III(:.ldiJl~ ;5 tile dab:, 61. yvl.kl. all16uht VYQ;;> vvitLLelJ hulll tLe (.I 11,....10 yee's VYQ5d. You must comply with the law of the state of the employee's/obiigor's principal piace of employment with respect to the time periods within which you must implement the withholding order and forward the support payments. 4. * Employee/Obligor with Multiple Support Holdings: If there is more than one Order/Notice to Withhold Income for Support against this employee/obligor and you are unable to honor all support Order/Notices due to Federal or State withholding Iimitsl you must foliow the law of the state of employee's/obligor's principai place of employment. You must honor ali Orders/Notices to the greatest extent possible. (See #9 below) S. Termination Notification: You m~st promptly notify the Requesting Agency when the employee/obligor is no longer working for you. Please provide the information requested and return a copy of this Order/Notice to the Agency identified below. WITHHOLDER'S ID: 0457100148 EMPLOYEE'S/OBLlGOR'S NAME: CHIARA. CHARLES T. EMPLOYEE'S CASE IDENTIFIER: 3610100656 DATE OF SEPARATION: LAST KNOWN HOME ADDRESS, NEW EMPLOYER'S NAME/ADDRESS: 6. Lump Sum Payments: You may be required to report and withhold from lump sum payments such as bonuses, commissions, or severance pay. If you have any questions about lump sum payments, contact the person or authority below. 7. Liabiiity: If you fail to withhold income as the Order/Notice directs, you are liable for both the accumulated amount you should have withheid from the empioyee/obligor's income and other penalties set by Pennsylvania State law. Pennsylvania State law governs unless the obligor is employed in another State, in which case the law of the State in which he or she is employed governs. 8. Anti-discrimination: You are subject to a fine determined under State law for discharging an employee/obligor from employment, refusing to employ, or taking disciplinary action against any employee/obligor because of a support withholding. Pennsylvania State law governs unless the obligor is employed in another State, in which case the law of the State in which he or she is employed governs. 9. * Withholding Limits: You may not withhold more than the iesser of: 1) the amounts allowed by the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.c. 91673 (b)l; or 2) the amounts allowed by the State of the employee's/obiigor's principal place of employment. The Federal limit applies to the aggregate disposable weekly earnings (ADWE). ADWE is the net income left after making mandatory deductions such as: State, Federal, local taxesi Social Security taxesi and Medicare taxes. 10. 'NOTE: If you or your agent are served with a copy of this order in the state that issued the order, you are to follow the law of the state that issued this order with resped to these items. If you or your employee/obligor have any questions, contad WAGE ATTACHMENT UNIT by telephone at (717) 240-6225 or by FAX at (7171 240-6248 or by Internet @ Requesting Agency: DOMESTIC REI A TIONS SECTION POBOX 320 CARLISLE PA 17013 Page 2 of 2 Form EN-028 Worker ID $IATT Service Type M OMB No.: 0970-0154 Expiration Date: 12131/00 I~ ' O;N1>l,t""'~_W~i: ,.. ADDENDUM Summary of Cases on Attachment Defendant/Obligor: CHIARA, CHARLES T. PACSES Case Number Plaintiff Name PAMELA S. CHIARA Docket Attachment Amount 00-7887CIVIL $ 530.00 Child(ren)'s Name(s); 879102846~O~~S- PACSES Case Number Plaintiff Name DaB Docket Attachment Amount $ 0.00 Child(ren)'s Name(s); DaB al;~~;~~~~,~~~~;:;:~~i;~~;~~~;ollthe child(ren) .':> ::, ' identified above in any health insurance coverage available through the employee's/obligor's employment. .dl;c~~c~e~,' ;~~~r:;:~ uireJ;~:~r~l;t~:~hil~;;~~),.::::i" identified above in any health insurance coverage available through the employee's/obligor's employment. PACSES Case Number Plaintiff Name PACSES Case Number Plaintiff Name Docket Attachment Amount $ 0.00 Child(ren)'s Name(s); DOB Docket Attachment Amount $ 0.00 Child(ren)'s Name(s); DaB D If checked, you are required to enroll the child(ren) identified above in any health insurance coverage available through the employee's/obligor's employment. D If checked, you are required to enroll the child(ren) identified above in any health insurance coverage available through the employee's/obligor's employment. PACSES Case Number Plaintiff Name PACSES Case Number Plaintiff Name Docket Attachment Amount $ 0.00 Child(ren)'s Name(s); DOB Docket Attachment Amount $ 0.00 Child(ren)'s Name(s); DOB D If checked, you are required to enroll the child(ren) identified above in any health insurance coverage available through the employee's/obligor's employment. D If checked, you are required to enroll the child(ren) identified above in any health insurance coverage available through the employee's/obligor's employment. Addendum Form EN-028 Worker ID $IATT Service Type M OMBNo.:0970-0154 Expiration Date: 12/31/00 "j~""-~~jiW1;:;~!,",IWii,~jj;~~j,~_"~,'&'1:c"....)&~;,th~j~'i!Jilil~&lIil,;p~.;;l!i;@tJJlliliJ;.~-1'iliUlM~1l!!1 ,",," ,,_ ~ , "<~, ""0 ,~,~.,~~ ,~,~ ,""'''~,_,_ v , _~_?,r#, .1 ~~ - ~ ,~ .'~-- l!l1 ,', ~ - () C -7 -vet (2)U\ ~f.' (f),c"" ~C.j ~:~~: ).""'c Z ~ , ^~'. , o L_ c:: ~"''''' 0, ,"- ~ () -n ,-.4 ':;-::; "2J " ',-- :-!~~ '...,.1 ~ ~-.". "::~(::) -'~f1 ~-= ri'l ~~\ .~ Co "< 'f? <=" s;.-