HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-07870
"" - ~
"
~ A~ ,L., ;t.4&/f:-~6e/Z4-/)
9lA~/q . h0?Z~..y6~~ )
uL~f""'/'l-;? ~!!1 ) ~
j'~4r;e. )
)
)
In The Court of Co~on Pleas of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania ;I
.
t5-/l?1J~'
.
,L d7 /::,
~o-2&i~ - 7370 1!l--.
C'Y,:l ~'-hyI
OATH
We do solemnly swear (or affirm) that we will support, obey and defend
the Constitution of the United States and the Constitut~o~ of this Common-
wealth and that we will discharge the duties of our-office with fidelity.
We, the undersigned arbitrators, having been duly appointed and sworn
(or affirmed), make the following award:
(Note: If damages for delay are awarded, they shall be
separately stated.)
4I1!J/
>4:~~
~~
JJ~)I,7#
I'
he.-- de-~bN'/~
ehV 7%e.. h/95)::5
~../ 1/#P~<f"-;L
tfJ~ ~t!!'.:? >d_.(~;1'~
v
R t!!--S " udk 4-11-
."
applicable. )
. Arbitrator, dissents. (Insert name if
NOTICE OF ENTR .
-4
Date of Hearing:
/~/~/
1/0'/
Date of Award:
. 7t1-
Now, the - day of~ , lI}:l6vI, atj.;l:11, , P..~f., the above
award was entered upon the do~ket and notice thereof given bY-mail to the
parties or their attorneys.
. Arbitrators t compensat"ion
paid upon appeal:
$ ;;lOJo.!lIJ
to be
'(I.,.L.: t.,f 7 J.. '
?'rothonotary
By: C},.." C. 'Ju. dtl.~.
r
Deputy
-'m"'_.
~ - -
~r
~
.~-r<4 .~<f/~
12. Ii -;.Q.lh.~ I~ (~~L ~ )
~~.~lu~
g...
JLd;..u:. ~
II-,.OJ
0-.
~
~ 11_ //,_0/
:0) ^"""""_
T-!\!I'I!Fm_'.~ ::-"~ ,,_!I(W~~~~~~~I~!
(")
c:
?-
'1)'>-
rnG:
~~~':
--,.---,:
~t=-.:_'
~::;. ("~i
~::c.;
.-' c
:;,;:.:
-,
-<
JI - -r
,:=;.
;-,~
;-:3
.-.J
"~fj
:::X~
N
; ,j
0')
':'1:J
-.:::
,~~~J~l'li.WW(5!:'P;">2-~';~"''''''!'-'!:i'~f-'-':'''''C'''~'''''''!'~'''%=!1~''''~'-\'J"'j,",,,,,!';!'F,,,,,,,~,~_j)'~:;"",,."f"l;;"":'f1'"!f'il~~
L.l
U
.rf"
i
J
"
'-.1
, ::~~"~
NOV 0 7 ~~1"\
ROBERT L. HOCKENBERRY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
tJdlb/a HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPING: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff,
vs.
: NO. 2000-7870 CIVIL TERM
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant.
: CIVIL ACTION
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this g!' day of November, 2001, in consideration of a conflict which
exists for arbitrator Mark D. Schwartz, Esquire, and in further consideration of Rebecca R.
Hughes, Esquire, agreeing to serve as an arbitrator in the above-captioned matter, it is hereby
ordered that Mark D. Schwartz, Esquire, is removed and Rebecca R. Hughes, Esquire, is
appointed as arbitrator in the above-captioned matter. The arbitrators for the above-captioned
matter will meet for the purpose of their appointment on Wednesday, November 7,2001, at 9:00
a.m. in the Second Floor Hearing Room of the Old Cwnberland County Courthouse, Carlisle,
Pennsylvania.
By the Court,
Date: / / -6 ?
J.
!-
,2001
cc: Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire, Chairman
Board of Arbitrators
"'."!,-'''''', '---t.""-.,,"" ;-"'_''''''~J",I''_''-,_,_, . ^ .'^"r __,"'1 ~,-'~f7 ,~_____- "
~,~-"-~ "-" - .. -,,--
,,'," ",,- ",,,,,
-"~'" ."'
,
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY,
t1d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAi.'ID COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
NO. 00-7870 CNIL TERM
v.
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CNIL ACTION
DEFENDANT'S ANSWERS TO
REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 4014, you are requested to admit to each of the following Plaintiffs
Request for Admission before the expiration of thirty (30) days after service. Each matter will be
deemed admitted to which no verified answer or objection is addressed. The answer should
either admit or deny the matter or set forth in detail the reason why you cannot truthfully answer.
If object is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. If good faith requires that you qualify your
answer or deny only a part of a particular request for admission, please specify so much of it as is
true and qualify or deny the remainder.
1. Plaintiff advised Defendant orally that seeding work undertaken in late fall of
1999 would likely not fully germinate due to cold weather.
Denied as stated. Plaintiff. stated that seeds mayor may not
germinate.
2. Defendant acknowledged Plaintiffs advice and asked what additional cost would
be incurred during the following spring to bring the seeding work up to acceptable standards.
Denied as stated. Plaintiff stated that seeding could be done in
the fall with a risk that cold weather could interfere with germination.
No other risk was discussed. In fact the seeds did germinate.
Defendant asked what the added cost would be if the seeds did not
germinate due to cold weather and was told the maximum added cost would
be no more than $500.00.
~< ..
~ , ,"
. -
. .
,,- ~
- ,
("" "
...
3. Plaintiff advised Defendant that the additional cost to bring the seeding work up
to acceptable standards in the spring of2000 would likely be $600 to $1,000 ona time and
materials basis.
Denied. See answer to preceeding request for
admission
4. Defendant induced Plaintiff to perform the seeding work in October and Novem-
ber 1999 on the express assurance that Defendant understood that germination problems were
likely to occur and that additional costs would be incurred, at Defendant's expense, the following
spring to bring the seeding work up to acceptable standards.
Denied.
NICHOLAS & FOREMAN, P.C.
~~
/) ...
Brude D. For an, Esquire
Attorney ID #21193
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 236-9391
Attorneys for Defendant
, , ~, -
"I "
.
r'f',
-
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in foregoing Answer to Request for Admissions are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
Dated: :3 Iv ([; (
~>'- J~
~RGE LOI --.....
',__>JJ
.""., ""='""l'" -__;"_1
"" ' - . r -,
.
". I
, ,"
. ,
--~
r""
j"(
I:;
I'
,.'
i--'
,
I"
I:
1-;'
I'
Ii:
,
Ii:,
I::;
i:1
i::i
I',
I'
I,:
i
II'
I::
!:
I::,
I
i,J
I,
; ':. """ , -.', "~-. ,,"- ~"'.---
'~'
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Bruce D. Foreman, Esquire, do hereby certify that on this, the I~ay of March,
2001, I served a true and correct copy of said Defendant's Answers to Request for
Admissions, by sending the same by First Class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed as
follows:
Gary French, Esquire
Keefer Wood Allen & Rahal, LLP
210 Walnut Street
PO Box 11963
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963
NICHOLAS & FOREMAN, P.C.
'/~"7
( ,/1
B' fI />'"
y:' /,
Bruce D. ore an, Esquire
Atty. ID #2119
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, P A 1711 0-1709
(717) 236-9391
,7',--'''"!, ..J,l'Y'"'' ., .f .-' .,~: ., ., - - ..,.--
- ,._"
~-- .'
ROBERT 1 HOCKENBERRY,
tld/bla HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL V AN1A
Plaintiff
NO. 00-7870 CIVIL TERM
v.
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO NEW MATTER
NOW COMES Plaintiff, Robert 1 Hockenberry, t/d/b/a Hockenberry's Landscaping, by
his attorneys, Keefer Wood Allen & Rahal, LLP, and files the following Reply to Defendant's
New Matter:
12. Denied. Plaintiff and Defendant did not reach an accord and satisfaction of the
matter in dispute.
1j
~
H
,
~;
~:
t
~;:
~.-
13. Denied. On the contrary, Defendant has failed to pay to Plaintiff the damages
suffered by Plaintiff in reliance upon Defendant's misrepresentations and breaches of warranties.
14.
Denied. Plaintiff has not released Defendant from liability for his tortious conduct
~"
l;~
~ :
~':
~':
I.
il-:
!~i
t:
Ii'>
if:
1:;
I:':
t~
~J
:1'
Ii:
,
!~
I!:~
or for any other liability, contract, tort or otherwise.
15. Denied. Plaintiff pursued contract claims against Defendant and determined not to
appeal those claims to the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiff's instant case
~:\ --"
....".._ 0.......,.. ......._ ....._
, ,~,,_~_"_^,v___ __. _ ~_~__.._ _~ __~" ,.,~,,~"
."
asserts a tort cause of action, which was in no manner adjudicated by the prior district magistrate
action.
16 Denied. The responding averments of Paragraph 15 are incorporated herein as
though fully set forth
17. Denied. All work requested by Plaintiff was completed in a satisfactory and
workmanlike manner. Despite having been completed entirely in accordance with Defendant's
instructions, and despite Plaintiff's advance warnings that the result could prove unsatisfactory
because of adverse weather conditions, Defendant induced Plaintiff to incur expense and then
rejected the work product for lack of perfection. Defendant's conduct was tortious, and Plaintiff
has suffered compensable damages as alleged in the Complaint.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands that judgment be entered in his favor and against
Defendant as demanded in the Complaint, together with interest and costs of suit.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: December tbL 2000
KEEFER WOOD ALLEN & RAHAL, LLP
~~~
Attorney J.D. No. 25810
21 0 Walnut Street
P.O. Box 11963
Harrisburg, P A 17108-1963
Ph (717) 255-8015
Fax: (717) 255-8050
-2-
'-{
~'c' -,- ,--f'_-'-",c?- <_~''F c_ <-~-~'''''-,~'1''i<, Y", 1'-" , ~_< "_,- -~--F- -
-,- - '__~d'__,~__ ~-"--.
, , - - -~ .- _' "_'C; _",""__;~_+ _, __',~.'
,.~. '~- ~"-- ~ -
~ ',.-"--~~' -
::
1-'
'"
i;i
1~
:.1
:,1
!ii
:::
'j
I,:
,
n
i:i
i:-:f '-".',--
VERlFICATION
I, ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY, hereby certify that the facts in the foregoing Reply to
New Matter are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, and further
state that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. 9 4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: December {)..( , 2000
4t~J ~/'CJ
' 0 J. Hocken erry "
_;<;_--?,r""!~''''7',"",,;'':_..,--,-~._''''T'!''-'''I',,-,,,)',_", ,,,~,~ry"''''I',__~'''' -',"",of ...._' _ I-_'L _--'_"-,,.
-'t-",_","",__", ""_~'_~'_~_"_,'_~-1"-___ _'__,e_"~,,. _ :^"__,~,._ _'., ,,,_,_
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Gary E. French, Esquire, attorney for Plaintiff, hereby certify that I have served the
foregoing paper upon counsel of record this date by depositing a true and correct copy of the
same in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Bruce D. Foreman, Esquire
Nicholas & Foreman
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
II
.fl
11
Ii
"
11
;!
{\
ii
KEEFER WOOD ALLEN & RAHAL, LLP
~~:!lJ -
Dated: February 1, 2001
j;
;
)',
"
i
II
;:
t.;
~,
}~
i
I
ti
t
r
j-'
?i
j-
L
.
t!
"
;:i
.,
,;1
1::
r,i:m},<,V_,
~." ."",___,c<~." ,-_,"._,t,.'~v . =, "..~,,'_r,'I'. . <__='",~ '^~,'<'_"_' _ ".
'"
<., ,,".,,^ ~~.-," " ~, ~
0_=
_ O' .___ _ ~
"
:L.-~ '"
".' .~. ,.-
.-' ~
,,---'"'
I
~-.~co." "-_,
f1i[i:
-;"
G'",,,,_,~" "~-.,>. "-;"~']:;,""'"~"-~~"""""nfi'if.'-ft'-I' "''';4_' ~. ,c,
_ _ _ _. m~
o
s;::
.....~ ~'~~-
H7'-[;
lSi
:,:::'P';.
!lri
C-
?'
~
""".
~ '. ".~~,.." ,
~,
,-~
--
-~
~y,{
,.;:1
C ,
'-..0
I
f\j
S3
i_-'_'
(5~i~~
"b.1
-~,
,'"
-,:::'
C:;:,
~~--
!lPl\it~~_
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2000-07870 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
HOCKENBERRY ROBERT J ET AL
VS
LOIS GEORGE
JODY SMITH
, Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE
was served upon
LOIS GEORGE
the
DEFENDANT
, at 0011:01 HOURS, on the 1st day of December, 2000
at CUMBERLAND CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA 17013 by handing to
GEORGE LOIS
a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE
together with
and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Service
Affidavit
Surcharge
18.00
6.20
.00
10.00
.00
34.20
So Answers:
r~~<
R. Thomas Kline
12/04/2000
KEEFER, WOOD, ALLEN & RABAL
Sworn and Subscribed to before
me this /6"~
day of
By: /1 ~ C ./ g
l.__ r9 ' 011<.Xt:"h,
/ D puty Sheriff
~~ c2trznJ
(}'" f1 ~
Iprothonotary
A.D.
..-/
~
;'1'
^,'"' ,.," , -"'
~"-~I
""
I"
~" ~#
ROBERT 1. HOCKENBERRY,
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
NO. 00-7870 CIVIL TERM
v.
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Gary E. French, Esquire, do hereby certify that on this 17fu day of July, 2001, I served a
true and correct copy of Plaintiffs Answers to Request for Admissions, by sending the same by
First Class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Charles Brown, Esquire
Nicholas & Foreman, P. C.
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, P A 17110
r3&~'=
Atty. ill #25810
21 0 Walnut Street
P. O. Box 11963
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963
(717) 255-8015
Dated: July 17, 2001
h~""'?;, ,
"'0_0' ",__,~,"':,.-e"~!_~';V'('""""?'.,'f . ". . """,~_,
",,--"'--'-"-.
,,-_, ,- = __,-_"'_'~, ~L':'__ "'"_" , _" ""'-
,., ",~", U,",
," """ .
.
---,"
ROBERTL.HOCKENBERRY
tJd/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Plaintiff
NO. 2000-7870 CIVIL TERM
y
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
NOTICE OF HEARING
BY BOARD OF ARBITRATORS
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Board of Arbitrators appointed by the
Court in the above-captioned case will sit for the purpose of their appointment in the above-
captioned action, on Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 9:00 o'clock A.M., in the Second
Floor Hearing Room of the Old Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, at
which time and place you are requested to appear and present such testimony as you may
have in the case.
Date: October 22, 2001
~
fi/ .
stephen . Hey, Esquire, Ch~
Copies To:
Charles Brown, Esquire
Nicholas & Foreman, P.c.
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, P A 17110
Keefer Wood Allen & Rahal, LLP
Gary E. French. Esquire
210 Walnut Street
P.O. Box 11963
Harrisburg, P A 17108-1963
Arbitrators:
James Reid, Jr., Esquire
Shumaker Williams, P.C.
3425 Simpson Ferry Road
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Irwin McKnight & Hughes
Mark Schwartz, Esquire
60 West Pomfret Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Court Administrator's Office
Cumberland County Courthouse
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
'-'1; ,.""_
, .-' t" .~
,-- ~'- .
. ,
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
t1d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
LANDSCAPING,
Plaintiff
NO. 00-7870 CIVIL
V.
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
IN RE: ARBITRATION PANEL
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, August 6, 2001, the Court having been informed that J. Robert
Stauffer, Esquire, requested that he be removed as chairman of the arbitration
panel in the above matter, Steven Tiley, Esquire, is appointed as chairman in his
stead; James Reid, Jr., Esquire, and Mark Schwartz, Esquire, shall remain on the
panel.
By the Court,
Geo~PJ
Steven Tiley, Esquire,Chairman
t~ -f)~
~
Court Administrator
'.,-, -,..< .-.~<,.,,,..,-- ;~'~""-",,"'~"~"-"' " ...-,.,.., '[~-,,-~---,.-- '--r- '. .'.,,-_ "",_,~ ->';Wi< __, , ,.
,,~ ..,," _ -~ ,-" --,
, ,
~ .. c._ _ ~___ > , 0
~~~~;;a~~~~m<l<lk'l\%!;i}&!Ii,'ti~""".:i:iJi(f ~"ff''"~~''''''.~M
-~~IliIiIlf~M.
~ '"
. ~ '
C,C
.,
~"n "1"\::~\(';;:
F!\ ,,"\)''''';,--, ,"J~ -'RY
"r I. _ ~j.~ "'f):'~ ~)T~,'~- U \~ 0 \ fill
c ~.','lA, II: 0 \
0\ r>.I.lG-u
c\Jr~\~~~~Y~\f~~V~NN
'~,; ,).,,-,,,,,,.,,',,r._,,.r,-__,,,,_,,,,,'_<'r"""l"" .\I.V,"" ,-,' ?"
-'...'.
_, "'~'O
~
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY,
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Cw11BERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
NO. 00-7870
CIVIL
XIlG<
v.
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
RULE 1312~1. The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shall be substantially
in the following form:
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
Garv E. French. Esq.
, counsel for the plaintiff/defendant in
the above
1.
2.
action (or actions), respectfully represents that:
The above-captioned action (or actions) is (are) at issue.
The claim of the plaintiff in the action is $ 1,797.07
The counterclaim of the defendant in the action is 0
The following attorneys are
wise disqualified to sit as
interested in the case(s) as counselor are other-
arbitrators:
r.h~rl~Q Rrnwn. F.~q l
Nicholas & Foreman, P.C., 4409 North Front St., Harrisburg, PA 17110
WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3)
arbitrators to whom the case shall be submitted.
AND NOW,
submit~ed,
& RAHAL, LLP
ORDER OF COURT
B
in consideration of the
foregoing
Esq., and
are app
arbitrators
above-captioned action (or actions) as prayed for.
P. J.
'_'~_,7, . ""7" ", ,_ ,.,-, _
-,.,
.
.-.
!'-'~~~~:~~<t~~lW5ili~~~*'~~ ". '~i~i!lOI"""-~-' .i'l'i-r<-''-
, I ~
'.);
n!r
i...1.
-'
P:-i r- .",!
, " (~. ,
curV\~::r:J,~SiL{:',';!A
;'1.
"
,
lr:
'_'H' i
""--..
, ,
~.:: ~ ~
~ ~
m_, ~ ~
c:S ('I)
C_~." -J '"
8 '-...
]; 1\
~
c.J r-i
~
ole". .:",:_~", '_",-~_I. ,_. "'.~,..,~_,~ ,__~t" _~_ """," ",.-"
...,,,
,I
L ~ ,..
'I
>.,
'"
,
Il'
r
:t&;..u.
/,,; f(j f::i":
_ -~C-,~
.' ,
j~:L ~...
,
,
I~lr'
lo-<-cv
,;:: c.:. ;..../~ ','. ::;:
(."r..."...:;;..'....
- I ~"'.. .' t
? ; C<;r:f!;. - t;.. ~ $ ..c~ tf"l
It/:nh~ Idv..... - ?:c.o/4I'f.-7o ,-/;",-,/1>'~
13o{3 . 7/0.; ~/""Ol< ?!UJI'9/'>';. -}b - ~/<I,,~.
<-----
/o/:I/J, &13 - Z:u;;;f/"} -7'o-~-"]o n'>';
J..5:" HIl..S 772NC7oYl. /7JY(IZ
xlJ2'7~~ &'3. 7:50 411. -~- Jj:30 f?/'I.
'-(.0 If!'?) mHOqz, P"/"J/Z
I. K," _!;U'_'-:; ",.w;j.,N/,-/?;-..5';3oP/"r.
/" jc,'ii w (;
?'!>- #I<S 'l7("n'C7o;{ "77/'J/[;
#131193 /.3;.e &': '""If/"; - ?,.- :; :c,-, r?r.-; .
R 1f..1;[ ~ $;.[CD
, J/M9. /3c;:s-?iV"p,-/o-S......c..oI'F/
Cll;:";':; .(7tiN/;: c'/=cp L~!..I')./
}JJ'I/~" /30-:, . )1:3C>/4.'1..7o.:(',>o P.I'7. --;'1.,.wWl"''i
)~:IV~SI'f :5/!/~ !XL^JC I
/;j::It~. &if}. . 9:C;c;(;;:' j"c - l.{:c,," ? /{, (;.."lY'/
SP(utr:;Q !>~ P:ick_'-';:> )..()I'fl)> SJrO<;I()
H~~ J~e -~: oo,q.'1.-7rJ - 'f:r.-O I;>/'i:, ,'~ _ c;~ S7/'d<.
.!'.O/fIC/?~ _ 3 J."""O 'I- /.. '__nU~
&'7;71- /:J:t.<; R1. -/'0 - '1:30 P.0,
:;:/:JI?/ZI'J':)~:5 &)/Z rJ/~ s//UJ.cv
M"!9,? -c;:ccli/>;:-n - -::<.:3<:.1/?I,/,__
S/12/&-/I) 3/ c,,ry'j../f:- ~/::-s.;r/../~-I '-v
- vJ-".J.--
"\
1//,;1'70;
!1oN17i:S OWILO 1'C"J .J()h"N
J ~ Iff? '5 @
f'i-YS.s.
'7 ~ :: I 7'':<~-<..l
/~,c:.'-'
-/ :;-E:0-o
g'() , ""-
loc.~O
~
fY[!:;/V '-< So
PLAINTIFF'S
EXHIBIT
I
7
~;:/
mo-?~ 1ZC"V~_...~~/j'-C7~/ c7/fc'-4\.
-y \ /' ' ~/
2:--O::-':~.._______... m..
'j::ii/<)~ - (;"JS,f'
~ /;./ /99 - Cri 91
;of,sj9'7 -C4SN
7<1/..<f'/Sl' ce-.
Jar f~h1 c~ ?
-:(U. (.:.;:
;C:J.o,00
$:<0 ' C.0
! sc..u .Cv
) .
~r;'~cJ:()
),00<.1 ('-'-
,5,:&4'" c....<.l
I
;:2./;./ /'17
nOA/a:.". c '-<.Ilcel
- ,
I'lfcfl/lt.") ~Ji:C/l:.It/J(:o
,,"..,. ''''\\..of';-
J-Jf'l-_ . ,,,-, ,/~
";,'.:/37"
/ '
s-(, 'I () ,
,
,
1797'
...'
. PLAINTIFF'S
EXHIBIT
z...-.
'/
HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPING
\i7
/lllIllIIlIll
In'rWI
~,"-
Landscape Construction
Trees. Shrubs. Evergreens. Bark Mulch
Railroad Ties
CUSTOMER'S ORDER NO.
R. J. HOCKENBERRY
P,O. Box 582
New Bloomfield, PA 17068
__ (717) 58?~_ N~
I DATE
.. 12/21 /99
1013
NAME
Georep. Lois
STREET
Miller Gap ~oad_
CITY & STATE
,Eno1a, Pa. 17025
SOLD 6Y CASH I C.O.D. I CHARGE I ON ACCT. I MDSE RET'Q PAlO OUT I
QU,6.,NTITY OESCR\?TION I PRIC€, .....MOUNT
12/9/99 . Lawn 'rinn. 1"<-rri'! wnr,," ,
T"chif'i"r annlication 4Qn nn
Total f'r"m nr"i,,,,,,e in",,; ""0 Q<;7 n7 .
Suh-rnrRl ,I ,,17 n7
Monies received to date. - ~I 640 nn
,lJal. Due 797 n7
,
-
I
I
, ,
%.anR.'You
TOTAL .S 7"'7. 07
ALl. CLAIMS AND RETUI1NED GOODS MUST as ACCOMPANIED BY THIS BILL
I OECEIVEO BY
Net 30 Days 1 1/2% lnt€lrest Added Alter 30 Days 18% Annur":'l
PLAINTIFF'S
EXHIBIT
)
'-
ROBERT 1. HOCKENBERRY,
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
Plaintiff
v
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
To: Robert J. Hockenberry
c/o Gary French, Esquire
21 0 Walnut Street
PO Box 11963
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 00-7870 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION
NOTICE TO PLEAD
You are hereby notified to plead to the enclosed New Matter within twenty (20)
days from service hereof or a default judgment may be entered against you.
,,' ..~ - _'<, _0_= ,_ ~ '_f_~~' _
,--~,'- ,-,----,.-- - ~
By
Bruce D. Foreman Esq re
Attorney ID #21193
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1709
(717) 236-9391
Attorneys for Defendant
. ,,~ _ __ .r ~'. ,.,
~ <
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY,
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 00-7870 CIVIL TERM
v
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
AND NEW MATTER
AND NOW, comes the Defendant, George Lois, by his attorneys, Nicholas &
Foreman, P.C., and responds to Plaintiffs Complaint as follows:
I. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Denied as stated; ifrelevant, strict proof thereof is demanded at trial.
5. Denied as stated; if relevant, strict proof thereof is demanded at trial.
6. To the extent that Paragraph 6 of Plaintiffs Complaint is not a legal
conclusion and requires response the same is denied and, if relevant, strict
proof thereof is demanded at trial.
7. Denied as stated; if relevant, strict proof thereof is demanded at trial.
8. Denied as stated; if relevant, strict proof thereof is demanded at trial.
9. To the extent that Paragraph 9 of Plaintiffs Complaint is not a legal
conclusion and requires response the same is denied and, if relevant, strict
proof thereof is demanded at trial.
'-r,,_ .,.
__~".___ ,,'_.'_~,__^,:""'~~ _" '" -.r _~_'_'_ ""_t._,-,,, _ <iT" "'TO. r--
---0<
..
,,=-
10. To the extent of Paragraph 10 of Plaintiffs Complaint is not a legal
conclusion and requires response the same is denied and, if relevant, strict
proof thereof is demanded at trial.
11. To the extent of Paragraph 11 of Plaintiffs Complaint is not a legal
conclusion and requires response the same is denied and, if relevant, strict
proof thereof is demanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully request the Plaintiffs Complaint be
dismissed with costs taxed against Plaintiff.
NEW MATTER
12. Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs Complaint is barred by the defense of accord
and satisfaction.
13. Defendant asserts that Plaintiff s Complaint IS barred by the defense of
payment.
14. Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs Complaint IS barred by the defense of
release.
15. Defendant asserts that Plaintiff s Complaint is barred by the defense of res
judicata and, in support thereof, attaches hereto as Exhibit "A" the Civil
Complaint, Notice of Judgment and Opinion of District Justice Thomas
Placey on the instant case wherein a court of competent jurisdiction restriction
determined the facts of the instant claim.
16. Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs Claim was determined by an unappealed
from award from a District Justice court of competent jurisdiction and
relitigating the same is barred and, in support thereof, Defendant incorporates
Exhibit "A" which shows an award dated August 3, 2000, as of yet still
unappealed from.
17. Defendant asserts that Plaintiff s work, for which payment is claimed, was
never completed and the portion that was completed was not performed in a
professional, workmanlike or satisfactory manner or as was represented by
Plaintiff.
:-'~'.-J -_
0',."'7'-
_ _'I_"_T~
,. I~, ,.-
_ ""p--<"." ~-'--",-
., ~ "
~
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests Plaintiff's Complaint be
dismissed and all costs and attorneys' fees be taxed against Defendant.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: I?.. ~ I . Cfb
NICHOLAS & FOREMAN, P.C.
By rOo ~
BRUCE D. FORE
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg,PA 17110-1709
(717) 236-9391
Atty. ID #21193
';:,,,~~~
, ,"" " . _ " ,'~. 0 ~ '." . _ ~_ ",_, ,.,,",_"_ ,_. " , ,_
, .
- ,.
, -~
,~=
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in foregoing Answer with New Matter are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that false statements herein are made subject
to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated: {'L / 'I - cJQ
JGEti)jf-. ~,r'~
'-".,\;1},,,
-~","--" -~}',",- ~ ,p,- ,~=~,-~-- ". '-~ "^-
-~,~-," - ,~,-, "-
,
,
ROBERT 1. HOCKENBERRY,
tld/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 00-7870 CIVIL TERM
v
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Bruce D. Foreman, Esquire, do hereby certify that on this, the 1-}It day of
December, 2000, I served a true and correct copy of the Answer to Complaint and New
Matter upon Defendant's attorney, by sending the same by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
addressed as follows:
Gary E. French, Esquire
210 Walnut Street
PO Box 11963
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963
NICHOLAS & FOREMAN, P.c.
BY:~~
Bruce D. Foreman, Esquire
Atty. ID #21193
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg,PA 17110-1709
(717) 236-9391
:'0"1
~~. '- 'c___,. 'L_ ".,,_r'1h~, _ --- ,~" r
_.'c'_
-~~ -~I ,,~_ ,""'
.0,,; r.
'.''''' - ~-~-
-
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Mag, DlsI.N'i).:
09-3-04
PLAINTIFF:
r
NAME and ADDRESS
"l
17055
ltoc'cenho..xrv's Lani!SC'1pt"O,'(
P.O. l!ox 51l~
L~ 1l1.oomfi.e1il, P'1. pO~.~
VS.
DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS
r Geor~ T-AJis
Miller G'1ry Roqd l!ox 7~
Enol-'l, Pa. 1.70.~5
L
Docket No.: t..\l-CDDO\~S-DO
Date Filed: 1..\- \ ?rDO
-1
DJ Name: Hon.
THOMAS A. PLACEY
Add"'" 104 S. SPORTING HILL RD.
MECHANICSBURG, FA
Telephone:
(717 )761-8230
I
7 & /..{, II-k$ w.p 12..a?,Q
'Uu,\-e'pA \"1025
AMOU NT
-1
.........
.-' '.
"".:\lU
~ . - . " ,~
"
,
FILING COSTS $
SERVING COSTS $
TOTAL $ S@SO
TO THE DEFENDANT: The above-named plaintiff(s) asks judgment against you for $ 1 .1l7Q. 1 Ii together with
'-(l-"')t costs upon the following claim (Civil fines must include citation of the statute or ordinance
violated) :
For non-p'1vment of lIlIlHSCalJP. servi.ces
I, 'lo~rt J. 1l0c'ce'}l)P.rrv verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and
correct to the best oj my knowledge, information, and belief. This statement is made subject to the penalties of
Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 PA. C.S. ~ 4904) related to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Plaintiff's
Attorney:
Address:
Telephone:
IF YOU INTEND TO ENTER A DEFENSE TO THIS COMPLAINT, NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY AT THE ABOVE
TELEPHONE NUMBER. YOU MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING AND PRESENT YOUR DEFENSE. UNLESS YOU DO,
JUDGMENT WILL BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU BY DEFAULT.
If you have a claim against the plaintiff which is within district justice jurisdiction and which you intend
to assert at the hearing, you must fiie it on a complaint form at this office at least five (5) days before
the date set for the hearing. If you have a claim against the plaintiff which is not within district justice
jurisdiction, you may request information from this office as to the procedures you may follow. If you
are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address
above.
Aope 30BA-9B
.
~
l~ ~"-"
COMMOtlJWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
09-3-04
. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCR.IPT
. CIVIL CASE .
PLAINTIFF: NAME and ADDRESS --,
. f!iOCKENBERRY I S LANDSCAPING
P.O. BOX 582
NEW BLOOMFIELD, PA 17068
L ~
Mag. Disl. No.:
OJ Name: Hen.
THOMAS A. PLACEY
Ad,,,,,,, 104 S. SPORTING HILL RD.
MECHANICSBURG, PA
VS.
T",ph,"" (717) 761-8230 17050
DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS
'LOIS, GEORGE
76 MILLERS GAP RD
ENOLA, PA 17025
L
Docket No.: CV - 0000135 - 00
Date Filed: 4/13/00
-,
THOMAS A. PLACEY
104 S. SPORTING HILL RD.
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050
~
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
Judgment: FOR nRFENDANT
[i] Judgment was entered for: (Name) T.on'l c:lR01U~11.
[i] Judgment was entered against: (Name) HO~K"RNRRRRV '!'l T.ANn!'l~1< PTNc:l
in the amount of $
nn on:
(Date of Judgment)
(Date & Time)
R/n<l/nn
.
o Defendants are jointiy and severally liabie.
o Damages wiJi be assessed on:
O Amount of Judgment SUbject to
Attachment/Act 5 of 1996 $
Amount of Judgment $ .00
Judgment Costs $ .00
Interest on Judgment $ .00
Attorney Fees $ .00
Total $ .00
Post Judgment Credits $
Post Judgment Costs $
------------
------------
Certified Judgment Total $
o This case dismissed without prejudice.
o Levy is stayed for
days or 0 generally stayed.
o Objection to ievy has been filed and hearing will be held:
Date: Place:
.
Time:
ANY PARTY HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY FILING A NOTICE
";''':r,
OF APPEAL WITH THE PROTHONOT ARY/CLE.!l!<:O~!f:lE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PIVILpl~ISION. YOU
MUST INCLUDE A COPY OFTHISNOficEOF JUDGMENTITRANSCRIPT.FORM WITH YOURNOTICE OF APPEAL.
'" ." .,~' j!\ -~ ,~---,_......-_:' ::.-' '. ," -" .
<:~- 'J)" r.lf, .- Date \ '., District J~stice
\
I certify that this is a true and correc(aopy ot the reqord.-of the-9fObeedingS~6~tgL~ing the judgment'
-- .- .~, - (F) Date \ . i! \__-----. , District Justice
I / i --~.
2M4 \
,
!
My commission expires first Monday of January,
SEAL
AOPC 315.99
'JJ
~)ll
'.
, .
"",,'
. .
. .
HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPE,
Plaintiff
~
v.
DISTRICT COURT 09-3-04
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CV-0135-00
FACTS FROM TRIAL
Plaintiff contracted orally to provide Defendant with a landscape
design, general landscape contractor services, and lawn construction (grade,
rake, fertilize, seed and straw) of more than 50,000 square feet. The
construction of the landscape lasted several months, which consisted
partially of work, partially of changes (design and subcontractors), and
partially of downtime awaiting equipment or materials. Plaintiff feels the job
complete per the instructions of Defendant and is seeking final payment of
$1797.07 together with interest.
Defendant avers that the performance was not done in a quality and
business like manner and is seeking a reduction in the form of claim to bring
Plaintiff's work into such standard. Further, Defendant seeks a setoff for the
inappropriately billed items on the invoices for work not actually performed.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff wore many hats in this project, none of which were founded
upon a written contract that would have clearly expressed the parties'
desires and obligations. In reviewing the oral agreement the parties' actions
must be reviewed to determine this desire and obligation. The first hat was
that of an architect in the design of a landscape drawing with projected cost.
This was done and billed at $300.00 for which neither party disputes. The
other hats are in contention.
The second hat was that of a general contractor, which included
obtaining and supervising subcontractors, and getting done what they did
not to comply with the landscape design. Plaintiff made charges to
Defendant for times spent awaiting a subcontractor delivery that never
arrived. Further, upon rescheduling, a charge was made for the supervising
the placement of the material. The later is an appropriate charge given the
supervisor responsibility of Plaintiff; however, the former is not. A charge
must be for work actually done and here, through no fault of Defendant,
Plaintiff was made to wait for a subcontractor, secured by Defendant, to
'~
-w
,~ " - ,
. ,
.._-~- -~ .-
..
bring material that ultimately had to be returned as improper. The amount ' .
of $150.00 is set off against this claim.
.
The third hat worn was as lawn contractor to grade, rake, fertilize,
seed, and straw the approximately 56000 square feet of lawn and pasture
area. A variety of actions, including some extras, were done to
accommodate the setting of the lawn at the earliest practical point.
However, even with Plaintiff's extensive experience in this profession the
seeding was only partially successful. Defendant has redone this work at a
cost of $1600.00. This amount is a setoff against the claim as remedial
measures necessary to bring the work up to standard.
It is noted that the Plaintiff is required to be efficient in the use of time
and materials but that no judgment is being made on that in this case. The
nature of the judgment does not require further evaluation of the efficiency
of use of time and material in the extra work including the straw from the
barn.
Judgment is in favor of the Defendant, with the costs of this action
being placed on Plaintiff. The parties have preViOusly been advised of their
appeal rights and the exhibits are being returned to the presenting party.
3 Aug 2000
Date
,~~--
-'~""-
- ,- I" .." ,.~ p. ~ I
~'" -" .
I
. ,Iacey
DJ.
. ,
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY, tldlb/al
HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
Plaintiff
v.
NO 00 - 7f70
C;(Jtt~~
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION.
11
'I
j
ij
'I,
NOTICE
~~
1:.,
11
!
~j
::j
,,-'
;
to
i:i
,Iii
;;'1
'!i!
t~
~' i
]
'i:]
YOU HA VEBEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth
in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and
Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing
with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned
that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against
you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights
important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
H
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
;:"
le_
::::1
,
,-"!
oj
"I
:-;!
i'l
;::i
'-"I
,
'I
:i
,'.j
'.,
;;j
',~?'
" . -- _'l'_'. r,",,<,~_ ",~. """'. ,,~,_", ,~" , e<.' ,.""_,,, ,__~""r,'''''' "'". '.' ~.__ .,,,,,,=~,~ _.
", <
.~ ....
. L~ . ..~ _ .
, <.-
NOTICIA
Le han demandado a usted en la corte. Si usted quiere defenderse de estas demandas expuestas
en las paginas siguientes, usted tiene viente (20) dias de plazo aI partir de la fecha de la demanda y
la notifcacion. Usted debe presentar una apariencia escrita 0 en persona 0 por abodago y archivar
en la corte en forma escrita sus defensas 0 sus objeciones a las demandas en contra de su persona.
Sea avisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte tomara medidas y puede entrar una orden contra
usted sin previo aviso 0 notificacion y por cualquier queja 0 a1ivio que es pedido en la peticion de
demanda. Usted puede perder dinero 0 sus propiedades 0 ostros derechos importantes para
usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABODAGO IMMEDIATAMENTE. SI NO TIENT
ABOGADO 0 SI NO TIENE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE P AGAR TAL SERVICIO,
VA Y A EN PERSONA 0 LLAME POR TELEFONO A LA OFICINA CUY A DIRECCION SE
ENCUENTRA ESCRIT A ABAJO PARA A VERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEGUIR
ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
if"
~-, ~ "'''"';;,,",,, '>", " ___'~~"~_"E," ~_'.""'I'p, """'," ' ."_",,.,= ",",-_ ~- ,,_, ,~_c, '-'~_'. ",^~~__"" . .~,. , - -,~"'
~--'~ ' - - ~ .* ~,-- ~-
, '
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY, t/dlblaJ
HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
v.
NO (J!J- 1f16 c;.;.,J /~
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
COMPLAINT
NOW COMES, Plaintiff ROBERT 1. HOCKENBERRY, tldlb/a
HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPING, by his attorneys, KEEFER WOOD ALLEN & RAHAL,
LLP, and avers the following Complaint against Defendant:
1. Plaintiff is ROBERT 1. HOCKENBERRY, tldlb/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING, an adult individual residing at 231 South Carlisle Street, New Bloomfield,
Perry County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant is GEORGE LOIS, an adult individual residing at Miller Gap Road,
Box 76, Silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
3. In or about July 1999, Plaintiff orally agreed to do landscaping and seeding work
for Defendant at Defendant's residence.
4. After completing a substantial portion of the landscaping work, Plaintiff advised
Defendant that it was too late in the fall season to seed the new yard areas completed as part of
the work and that it would be best to seed the yard areas during the ensuing spring planting
season.
5. Defendant induced Plaintiff to complete the seeding in the fall of 1999 as originally
scheduled and represented to Plaintiff that he would pay for the entirety ofPlaintitT's work
regardless of the outcome of the planting.
6. Plaintiff relied upon Defendant's representation and seeded the yard areas as
requested by Defendant.
(:::..,t~,., -",. '- "_' ~^?!,~^"',"<r.,,~,''''.,''''''''''--~ _=.1 ._;,," __",,_'~',
,_,to",,,,-, '_"'",,_ ~,_,,~. ,,'~ ,~
~_.,'" "Y__, ,
. -
.'.'"
7. At Defendant's further request, Plaintiff used Defendant's existing stock of straw
to cover the seeding, which straw was of poor quality and detracted from the work performed.
8. Defendant also failed to water the planted seed as instructed by Plaintiff
9. As a result of Defendant's acts of misrepresentation, use of substandard materials
and negligence, the grass seed planted by Plaintiff in Defendant's yard areas did not germinate in
the fall of 1999.
10. Defendant has wrongfully refused to pay Plaintiff for work done.
11. Plaintiff has suffered damages as a result of Defendant's misrepresentation and
negligence in the amount of $1,797.07.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands that judgment be entered in his favor and against.
Defendant in the amount of $1,797.07, together with interest and costs of suit.
Dated: October 3 L 2000
KEEFER WOOD ALLEN & RAHAL, LLP
B
G . French, Esquire
Attorney I.D. #25810
210 Walnut Street
P. O. Box 11963
Harrisburg, P A 17108-1963
Phone: (717) 255-8015
Fax: (717) 255-8050
Attorneys for Plaintiff
'~l__ ,-" _ _ _
-,-- "7"':"'.-,"" ""',,c.".;;"- __',n_''''',-_c~r<?E,_''''_ "F',_-_,,>__'-"~"'- '1"-
_).-O_",_~ ."f"'O",''--'1''/";'"' 00
'c_ ~
~"0' ---,-'~~-___,__
."..c...."........ ,"'_.~'."
..
!
,
OJ
',~
il
".]
;1
j!
:;j
1
:1
,!
-~j
'-;
I
'I
';i
\1
I
-;1
J
~,j
.c:;;: "r,'- ,
. . , . ~
VERlFICATION
The undersigned, Robert 1. Hockenberry, hereby verifies and states that:
1. He is an adult individual trading under the name of Hockenberry' s Landscaping,
Plaintiff herein;
2. The facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct to the best of
his knowledge, information and belief; and
3. He is aware that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of
18 Pa.C.S. ~ 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
/' ?
. ~OCKENBERRY ~
Dated: October 3/ , 2000
. .~" "._,""';"-~.'J:'f'..f.........'."_" -'"
,,~r"," F":,,,~<__,_.-:h'''''_ ',,nA . .~"..,,~~_ ',,'-'T"_F--'.
-~-, -,--, -""_~,-,, fC_""~ -~ -_~_,_ -~-"'p-, ~_,-,~_, "",,,~,_ ""_,_,_'~_,,",,__"_ "''',_ "_""''''''_~ 'Co,",>:,"
diil
", -"
~~-'!L~,_ -
""
t~ ~ -6q.
6"
~
~ a ~.
.... g ~
5 t;::,
0 ,CY
~~
-.;}
~l-
'<
-" - -", "-~,-'''---
.'" ., ", ,,~-
o
c
~~~
:z: :;':,'
ZL""
(f)
-<
r-
<-"
~~J
..:;':.
_-1
-<
ow,
~- ""'_,, '<)A"';' _'_"'~',o,_,,:_,j,_~~
C)
~
C-:J
'><.'::::
:.::J
I
0'\
--0
Y~J
:",."
\D
1'r~"lL Y , ,-"''C-~_'r~_,,,'"
~
ROBERT J. HOCKENBERRY,
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
NO. 00-7870
v.
GEORGE LOIS,
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendant
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly enter the appearance of the undersigned on behalf of the Defendant George Lois
in the above captioned matter.
:;
I::
NICHOLAS & FOREMAN, P.C.
Dated: September 6, 2001
By:
ulNNlh b 8wCMll
Charles Rees Brown
Lb. No. 70612
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, P A 17110-1709
(717) 236 -9391
i:
i'
I
I'
I'-!
ii
"
i" ~
"
II
I'
:.[
ii
'I
:1
:'
Attorney for Defendant
Ie
iilj'
'.':.1
.
, ,
~"-
", .,~" .'~..."m ,. ". ..... "'" ~~"""'+M''1f1'llU IlTilr1GlYlr,m"j'
(") 0 i.=-)
C -Tl
s: (/)
"CO fTl ~
~gj -0 F
~c: I ~_:~l~]
~Z -' ~~
;2Cl -0
?fQ ::;::
L:- rr-
:0;8 N Q'
~ N ~
a-. ~
< ~
Ah<'!I,.","
,~ ,
~~,~-~~ " =
_if!:
':'i1i1!l~"" ,,' -~
,-,
ROBERT 1. HOCKENBERRY,
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S
LANDSCAPING,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 00-7870 CIVIL TERM
v
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Bruce D. Foreman, Esquire, do hereby certify that on this, the 18th day of
December, 2000, I served a true and correct copy of the Answer to Complaint and New
Matter upon Defendant's attorney, by sending the same by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
addressed as follows:
Gary E. French, Esquire
210 Walnut Street
PO Box 11963
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963
By:
Bru e D. oreman, Es
Atty. ID #21193
4409 North Front Street
Harrisburg, P A 17110-1709
(717) 236-9391
. ~oinP1ete lterrui i;-2;-ancf 3~' Als~.complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
. Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we, can return the card to you.
. Attach_ this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
GA-P.'f 1: (i2.CWCtt( 'l.J~.
PD bO'f- 11t:](p3
ij t4-fUIA 5 M6 ,Pt! IlIOB-
, 1'tCt>?
c ~eLf--r~~ c.-
3. Service Type
&-certified Mail
o Registered
o Insured Mail
o Express Mail
.8l Return Receipt f r Merchandise
DC.a.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)' ...J. 0 Yes
2. Article Num~er (C~W ~m ,seryice label) _
: i i Ii iil) i1JOOO I, OttOb i i(DP.:nt j,j(gOS41i~~.)
PS Form 3811, July 1999 ~mestic'Return Receipt
'~ 102&95-99-M-1789
.
-----"----
1,1':: I, :' \r "'1'.-,^,-;' - "'>:T':"f ~~ '" ,,>- , "': 1. ,_,0,,]'.','_,:" :'1,11: 1[1'" ;-,r ~ ~r , ~1'!"'-
f'"
\'OV ~ 7,200,
(~'1-'\
ROBERT L. HOCKENBERRY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
t/d/b/a HOCKENBERRY'S LANDSCAPING: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
Plaintiff,
vs.
: NO. 2000-7870 CIVIL TERM
GEORGE LOIS,
Defendant.
: CIVIL ACTION
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this -2..!:day of November, 2001, in consideration of a conflict which
exists for arbitrator Mark D. Schwartz, Esquire, and in further consideration of Rebecca R.
Hughes, Esquire, agreeing to serve as an arbitrator in the above-captioned matter, it is hereby
ordered that Mark D. Schwartz, Esquire, is removed and Rebecca R. Hughes, Esquire, is
appointed as arbitrator in the above-captioned matter. The arbitrators for the above-captioned
matter will meet for the purpose of their appointment on Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 9:00
a.m. in the Second Floor Hearing Room ofthe Old Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle,
Pennsylvania.
By the Court,
Date:
/I-tit
,2001
~
G~.o\
cc:
Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire, Chairman
Board of Arbitrators
.'.....
a~iilSi-' L~,.' iii. - .- "IN
,. 'r~""!".,~,"', ~, ""'" ~."" '_, _',~...-_
,~''''C~ '_' .-,
~~'if"""""-
__,,~ ,""','Y-_"__o_,~' "d'-, c.'"'_ ,:0- ?->,
,,',^_.
Ai1II1j'
'.-
",'--~
C"'i~ ,I I
:~)TAFiY
"11 "'.")1/ 9
lJ' P'", -",
I ""'.-i:
II: 11r,
(-" '1"i"'~'1 {,"i' ('nl 'I"TY
...,0""_,.-._lt,..., "~:..J ,~;,_, _' \I
FENNSYL\(!\NIA
-.1
..