Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-1778PLAINTIFF CORY A. CORMANY V. DEFENDANT EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON SAMUEL ; , COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER TERRY , DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK : TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE : CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY : SHOLENBERGER JEFFREY KURTZ, , MATHEW : KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL NOTICE IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. O 3- 17-7y C1, I/ CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and by filing in writing with the Court your defense or objection to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. ?',? il, ,r i; YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Court Administrator Cumberland County Court House 1 South Street Carlisle, PA. 17013 PLAINTIFF CORY A. CORMANY V. DEFENDANT EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS JOHN PORTER, , TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL PAUL- GREEN, , FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE : CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY : SHOLENBERGER JEFFREY , KURTZ, MATHEW : KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT AND NOW comes, Cory Cormany, Plaintiff, and sets forth causes of action against the above Defendants, whereof the following is a statement: 1. Plaintiff is Cory Cormany, an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. (1) 2. Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy and Jeffrey Franks are adult individuals residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. 3. Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal is an adult individual residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. 4. Plaintiff Cory Cormany is an adult individual proceeding employment with Advance Personel, Lemoyne, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiff is a taxpayer, a registered voter, and a citizen of the United States of America. 5. Plaintiff Cory Cormany is a high school graduate in attending South Middleton School District. He is also academically achieved through the Pennsylvania State University. 6. Pursuant therefore the foregoing statement, Defendants John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney and Raymond Motter did perpetrate a series of questionable situations and circumstances reportorial the Plaintiff Cory Cormany and the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 7. On April 1st, of the year 1996, Defendant Steve Calaman did corroborate and corrupt criminative offenses directional the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without superior affirmation political the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. (2) 8. Prior therein the foregoing statement, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a criminal and a civil matter substantial Defendant Frank Teaney and the Cumberland County District Attorney. 9. On May 29th, of the year 1996, Defendants Steve Calaman and Jeffrey Franks did solicit to commit and justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, Pursuant the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Corneal. 10. On September 6th, of the year 1996, Defendant Gary Sholenberger did commit and coerce criminative offenses perspicacious the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, prior a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 11. On February 8th, of the year 2000, Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did commit and construe criminative offenses cumulative the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, proceeding a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 12. On May 21st, of the year 2001, Defendant Mathew Kennedy did commit and abscond criminative offenses calumnious the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, prescient a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 13. On September 12th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did waive and consent a guilty ramification objectional Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 14. On September 21st, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a civil complaint with the United States District Court impetuous the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 15. On October 2nd, of the year 2001, Defendant Samuel Coover did (3) aggress and implement criminative offenses destitutional the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without jurisdictional approval influential the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 16. On November 4th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 17. Prior herein and pertinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Curtis Colbertson, instantaneous the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 18. On December 7th, of the year 2001, Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did again solicit to commit and justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany. 19. On December 10th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a commitment, noncertified an official service, to the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 20. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County consequential Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, reliable Defendant Jeffrey Franks. 21. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did (4) pursue a criminal complaint in the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County culpable Defendants Steve Calaman, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey Franks, applicable Defendant Earl Reitz, Jr. 22. On January 3rd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a scheduled release and/or discharge from the Cumberland County Prison careless the order of the court set forth by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas Cumberland County. 23. On February 26th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, communistic Defendant Jeffrey Franks and Att. Edmund Zigmund of the Cumberland County District Attorney, remissible Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 24. On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mathew Kennedy and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 25. On June 7th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, explicit Defendants Samuel Coover, Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal, informative Ptl. Brian Mc Vitti of the North Middleton Police Department. (5) 26. On July 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did appeal a judiciary determination statutory Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 27. On August 29th, of the year 2002, Defendant Mathew Kennedy did provoke and circumvent criminative offenses impermeable the Plaintiff Cory Cormany without electorial authorization, doubtful the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 28. Prescient hereto and pertinent herein, Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did again adjudicate allegations argumentative the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, rhetorical the Plaintiff Cory Cormany. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive The Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 30. On December 2nd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a Post Conviction Collateral Motion relievable the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 31. On December 9th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did file a criminal report with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County allegorical Det. William Deihl et. al., circumstantial Att. Dirk Berry of the Cumberland County Legal Service. 32. On December 23rd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did (6) pursue an obligated release and/or discharge from the Cumberland County Prison mandatory an institutional policy set forth by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas Cumberland County. 33. On January 16th, of the year 2003, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did affirm a Post Conviction Collateral Motion relievable the Plaintiff Cory Cormany in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 34. On March 18th, of the year 2003, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did dispose a Denova Appeal determinative the Plaintiff Cory Cormany in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 35. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered public humiliation as caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. 36. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered mental anguish, emotional distress, imprisonment and loss of employment as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. 37. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered lost wages, benefits, fees and property in the amount or in the potential amount of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00) as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. (7) COUNT ONE CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL REITZ, JR. CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 38. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 39. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 40. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Earl Reitz Jr. did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 41. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 42. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (8) COUNT TWO CORY A. CORMANY V. STEVE CALAMAN CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 43. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 44. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 45. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Steve Calaman did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 46. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 47. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (9) COUNT THREE CORY A. CORMANY V. CURTIS COLBERTSON CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 48. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thity seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 49. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 50. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Curtis Colbertson did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 51. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 52. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (10) COUNT FOUR CORY A. CORMANY V. SAMUEL COOVER CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 53. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thrity seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 54. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 55. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Samuel Coover did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 56. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 57. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (11) COUNT FIVE CORY A. CORMANY V. JOHN ADAMS CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 58. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 59. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 60. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant John Adams did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 61. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 62. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (12) COUNT SIX CORY A. CORMANY V. JOHN PORTER CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 63. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 64. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 65. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant John Porter did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 66. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 67. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (13) CO_ UNTSEVEN CORY A. CORMANY V. TERRY DARR CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 68. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 69. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 70. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Terry Darr did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 71. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 72. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (14) COUNT EIGHT CORY A. CORMANY V. GREG DEIHL CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 73. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 74. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - T. 75. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Greg Deihl did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 76. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 77. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (15) COUNT NIl?TE CORY A. CORMANY V. PAUL GREEN CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 78. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 79. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 80. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Paul Green did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 81. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 82. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (16) COUNT TEN CORY A. CORMANY V. FRANK TEANEY CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 83. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 84. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 85. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Frank Teaney did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 86. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 87. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (17) COUNT ELEVEN CORY A. CORMANY V. RAYMOND MOTTER CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 88. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 89. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - T. 90. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Gary Sholenberger did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 91. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 92. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WIEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (18) COUNT TWELVE CORY A. CORMANY V. GARY SHOLENBERGER CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 93. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 94. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 95. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Raymond Motter did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 96. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional ditress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 97. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (19) COUNT THIRTEEN CORY A. CORMANY V. JEFFREY KURTZ CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 98. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 99. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 100. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 101. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 102. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (20) COUNT FOURTEEN CORY A. CORMANY V. MATHEW KENNEDY CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 103. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 104. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 105. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Mathew Kennedy did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 106. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 107. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (21) COUNT FIFTEEN CORY A. CORMANY V. JEFFREY FRANKS CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 108. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 109. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 110. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Jeffrey Franks did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 111. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 110. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (22) COUNT SIXTEEN CORY A. CORMANY V. PAULA CORREAL CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 111. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 112. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - T. 113. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Paula Correal did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 114. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 115. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (23) VERIFI ATION I, Cory A. Cormany, Plaintiff in the above captioned action, hereby verify and state that the facts set forth in the Complaint against Earl Reitz Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Jeffrey Franks and Paula Correal are true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unsworn verification to authorities. Dated_? ;3 By Cory A. Cormany (24) CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE AND NOW, this c? I day of 2003, I, Cory A. Cormany foregoing the aforesaid matter hereby certify that I have served the foregoing document upon the following by depositing a copy of same in the United States Mail, at Carlisle Pennsylvania, addressed as follows: Cumberland County D. J. Paula Correal Earl Reitz Jr. 1 South Hanover Street Steve Calaman Carlisle, PA 17013 Curtis Colbertson Samuel Coover John Adams D.A. Court House John Porter Jeffrey Franks Terry Dan 1 South Hanover Street Greg Deihl Carlisle, PA 17013 Paul Green Frank Teaney Raymond Motter Carlisle Police Department Co A. Cormany Gary Sholenberger 1883 Douglas Drive Jeffrey Kurtz Carlisle, PA 17013 Matthew Kennedy c/o Cumberland County Prison 53 West South Street 1101 Claremont Road Carlisle, PA 17013 Carlisle, PA 17013 EXHIBITS A. Dockets: Employment and Academic B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. Reports: J. Adams, J. Porter, T. Darr, G. Deihl, P. Green, F. Teaney and R. Motter, C.C.D.A. Civil Complaint: Cumberland County Common Pleas Summons Matter: Det. Franks, D.J. Correal's Office Summons Matter: Ptl. Tilton, D.J. Corral's Office Summons Matter: Ptl. Kurtz, D.J. Correal's Office Summons Matter: Ptl. Kennedy, D.J. Correal's Office Summons Matter: Det. Diehl, D.J. Correal's Office Civil Complaint: United States District Court Cumberland County: Signatories/ Order of the Court Criminal Complaint: Lt. Calaman, et. al., C.C.D.A. Criminal Complaint: Mr. Arafat, et. al., C.C.D.A. M. Criminal Complaint: Mr. Coover, et. al., C.C.D.A. N. Criminal Report: Det. Diehl, et. al., C.C.D.A. 0. Criminal Report: Det. Franks, et. al., C.C.D.A. P. Criminal Report: Det. Diehl, et. al., C.C.D.A. Q. Notification: Bail and Arrest/ Charge, via mail delivery R. Requests: C.C.P. Staffing Personnel S. Papers: Parole and Release Dates and Reasons T. Receipts: Appeal and Commitment U. Summons Matter: Pd. Kennedy, et. al., D. J. Placey's Office V. Motion: Post Conviction Collateral Relief W. Cumberland County: Orders of the Court X. Receipts: Servicing and Delivery Verification (1) EXHIBITS A THROUGH N PROCEEDED (1) .. .. .?? .? ci..: r..rV. f'2r•£%. .ut:a .. .': 1'-?i?':. ;. •r .?,?j ?.,.:Ad_. .. cA?a ...,+. ?Mf:%?:?i:$p.+"Sc r.. ?'T. .. • Lin A a m z? m o € oc C) Z A ?m ? ? ? GVV7 fy e? 'y z O l1 9-I a Lin ?yw c ? ? !lD I .m 0 01 z --o - ?H I `41 Uf cD ` n - 1 a ?? 1 m o in 10 III Q 0 1 ?s c .? N i Ia n cr MM?NdR yl,:? 1 .... ?O N O ?A O O U O i :Ln H !O N loo %0 ?N w A, W Ew a? ?O O ?O O I ,i O O i ob T.. %0 ?j-A Ln ?O ;O i N N i Ln m N w w (09 NOTIFICATION OF BALTIMORE CITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TH REGISTRATION 711is certifies tha ` ere is on file in the Bureau of . .. , 1 12ecords of the Baltimore (pit lth De artFID a record of t o f NAMIC OF cBILDCory Al " ny i DATZ OF BIRTH Aug. j, Male 66:17289 CO MMUKONUIL OF NZALTH 40 ARID REG18TRAR OF VITAL RECORDO PLEASE SEE O1*ER BIDE OF R R 21 091 789 J y z 1Birth Onto pir r( ew, 16 o?,a Z ~ •W" su .?^r C1? EnOw ,OP?w•a. ?.anaa?,. tm OC MLAS 0" CARL7tLE IA 17013 CORY ALISTER CORMANY o 1ra1111ll II III OF INOCULATIONS SEC &. --no rk • nu p yw V go row GORY ?'Ir ??niC?MANY i, ?i + ?? (0-- IA a .Z. j ", ASP 11 i e i a F r .r w.r P•? • r ?.N t ?r r: r? ?t M• eft r ar f?+ M f+ r? -5 ? . cz Z? ? ? _ n+ r? . ?wr vz# r•r )J, • f tx ?. +a r S? t-I w? rr ..r ,? 17 ,= _ ?- gt );t JIM 7?I n _? P z ? r ?Tt z ? ?d >P O 14-1 z ? .? > :7 °"" 17? D 6 w C H d C/I M H 1? H cr V RE: District Attorney Defendant: Cumberland County John Adams Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about February 23, 1991, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 903. Criminal Conspiracy - a person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit a crime if with intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime. 2) 2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury. 3) 2901. Kidnapping - a person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully removes another a substantial distance under the circumstances from the place where he is found, or if he unlawfully confines another for a substantial period in a place of isolation with any of the following intentions: (1) To hold for ransom or reward, or as a shield or hostage. (2) To facilitate commission of any felony or flight thereafter. (3) To inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another. (4) To interfere with the performance by public officials of any governmental or political function. (b) Grading - Kidnapping is a felony of the first degree. A removal or confinement is unlawful within the meaning of this section if it is accomplished by force, threat or deception, or, in the case of a person who is under the age of 14 years or incompetent, if it is accomplished without the consent of a person, guardian or other person responsible for general supervision of his welfare. 4) 3105. Prompt Complaint - a prompt reporting of public authority is not required in a prosecution under this chapter: Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from (i? introducing evidence of the alleged victim's failure to promptly report the crime if such evidence would be admissible pursuant to the rules of evidence. 5) 4305. Dealing in Infant Children - a person is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, if he deals in humanity, by trading, bartering, buying, selling, or dealing in infant children. 6) 5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions. 7) 5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to an offense. 8) 5508. Disrupting Meetings or Processions - a person commits a misdemeanor of the third degree if, with intent to prevent or disturb a lawful meeting, procession or gathering, he disturbs or interrupts it. 903- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2705- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2901 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 3105 - 19725 Dec. 61 P.L. 1482, No. 3341 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4305 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5101 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No.. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5108- 19721 Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5508- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. g? I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated o o By Cory A. Corman 'q 'r 6N INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Conspiracy: In that John Adams did knowingly and intentionally facilitate the commission of a crime promoting a solicitation capable a Defendant. Recklessly Endangering Another Person: In that the Defendant did engage in conduct which did place another person.in danger of bodily injury. Kidnapping: In that the Defendant did relocate and confine a minor child from the rightful guardian substantial a distance and political a deception. Prompt Complaint: In that the Defendant did subject indecent conduct questionable an authority, or guardian, which did fail an official report. Dealing in Infant Children: In that the Defendant did deal in a humanitarian trade by buying a custodial obligation substantial an infant child. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function: In that the Defendant did interfere and pervert a violence breaching an official document affirmative an action, and liable a governmental function. Compounding: In that the Defendant did accept pecuniary benefits considerate an information, and reportorial the suspected commission of a crime. Disrupting Meetings and Processions: In that the Defendant did intentionally prevent and disturb conversations and meetings between two lawful guardians interruptive a minor child. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. 4 -D 21 D- ed Signature Dated .Signa e Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed. Notary Put& Middlesex Twp.. Cumberland Cou(tY 2002 My Commission Exp m June Member, PennsyWarria Association W NOWies $s AFFIDAVIT On January 19, 1991, I, Cory A. Cormany, did proceed established visitation regarding my said minor child at said residential environment, and was denied according to the whereabouts of the said natural child. Proceeding such noncommunicative relation, I did proceed established visitation for my said minor child on February 2, 1991, and did again find the whereabouts hindered. On February 9, 1991, I, Cory A. Cormany, did proceed established visitation regarding my said minor child at said residential environment, and was denied according to the residential vacancy once again. Proceeding such incident Mr. John Adams did inform me by telephone that I was not permitted to contact the said natural child or the opposing guardian. On February 23, 1991, I, Cory A. Cormany, did proceed established visitation regarding my said minor child at said residential environment, and was denied according to the whereabouts of the said natural child. Proceeding such incident Defendant John Adams did physically confront me purposeful the said established time, and did envelope a dangerous altercation. After or about the aforesaid date and time, mentioned in the aforesaid paragraph, the Defendant John Adams did suppress evidential endulgences later verificative my recognition, and knowledge; substantial the civil case number 1:CV-95-0844, and did interfere and deliberately cause and pervert a breach in an official governmental function. The Defendant did prevent and disrupt affirmative meetings and gatherings documented an obstacle, and necessary a maintenance; pursuant the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In February of the year 1991 and through and about November of the year 19915 I, Cory A. Cormany, did visit with my said natural child in and about the contact visitation area at the Cumberland County Prison, permissive and provided the said natural child's mother and my parents. Proceeding such times and events, irrelated the docketed visitation establishments; my said minor child would spend the weekdays with me or my said parents, up and until approximately June of the year 1992. During and through these foregoing time periods the said natural child did complain of incidental situations and circumstances abnormal a consideration, preponderate Mr. John Adams. I did submit correspondences, remissive actions and incidents to the Children and Youth Services of Cumberland County, and further did inform the county district attorney suspicious the Courts of Cumberland County. Such issues did include indecent allegations and conduct accusive both the Defendant John Adams and my parents; appeasable the said natural child's legal guardians. In the year 1993 and pursuant thereto and prior therein, I, Cory A. Cormany, was delivered legal notices regarding my parental rights, and a petition presentable the court of common pleas. I did respond to such formality and did confront Mr. John Adams' Attorney; Mr. Gilroy, pursuant to and prior the case number 64 in Orphans Court Division. Prescient thereto the monetary ramifications certified to my attention through a mail correspondence; my said minor child was to be relocated preparatory the Defendant John Adams. I did infact submit a retaliatory crossclaim to the courts and did appraise criminal propaganda, associated reliant the defendant's attorney and consensual the said minor child's mother; forthright an argument and a conviction, and did attend the official matter costly the order of the court pursuant further action. In December of the year 1994 and through and about a problematic legal judgment, I, Cory A. Cormany, did see and receive enfranchised reminiscences meaningful the said minor child's whereabouts, and indigent an extenuating issue endeavored an employment or affirmative educational dilemma. The Defendant John Adams has continually attempted and solicited situations and circumstances contemptual a deceptive relation mandatory a civil action. Mr. John Adams has procrastinated important objects profligative myself in the years 1995, 1998, 1999 and 2001 beneficial a criminal outcome and suspicious an informative indecent conduct. 1, Cory A. Cormany, on this day of , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Co onwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Cory A. Corman ,-) -- / - O.,-) Dated Witness Notarial Seal Helen O. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 - Defendant: John Porter Unidentified I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about February 19, 1995, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 903. Criminal Conspiracy - a person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit a crime if with intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime. 2) 2701. Simple Assault - a person is guilty of assault if he: (1) attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (2) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or (3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury. 3) 2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury. 4) 4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, parry official or voter. 5) 4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any unlawful act in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the latter in the capacity of a public servant. 6) 5107. Aiding Consummation of a Crime - a person commits an offense if &a he intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into negotiable funds. 7) 5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to an offense. 8) 5508. Disrupting Meetings or Processions - a person commits a misdemeanor of the third degree if, with intent to prevent or disturb a lawful meeting, procession or gathering, he disturbs or interrupts it. 903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2701 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2705- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4702- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4703 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5107- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5108- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5508 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated o x By r" (?:" Tory A. Cormany INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Conspiracy: In that John Porter did engage in conduct which constituted the commission of a crime facilitating an intentional solicitation justifiable a Defendant. Simple Assault: In that the Defendant did knowingly and intentionally and recklessly cause serious bodily injury and imminent fear to another. Recklessly Endangering Another Person: In that the Defendant did demonstrate a reckless disregard for human life associative a weapon. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters: In that the Defendant did threaten harm and did exercise influential recommendations and opinions upon a voter. Retaliation for Past Official Action: In the the Defendant did act out in an unlawful capacity retaliatory an official issue. Aiding Consummation of Crime: In that the Defendant did intentionally attempt to offer a negotiable object in exchange for an objectionable safeguard. Compounding: In that the Defendant did consider to accept and refrain a pecuniary benefit suspicious an official report. Disrupting Meetings and Processions: In that the Defendant did rudely and unlawfully disrupt a secured conversation intentional a civil procession. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. O 2- D ted r" , (i ? IIZZ- Signature 1 -U rp- Dated Signature Notarial Seat Helen O. Sneed. Notary Public W.W"ex Twp.. Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries AFFIDAVIT In and about the month of February, of the year 1995, I, Cory A. Cormany, was committed to the county prison in Cumberland County. Pursuant therein I was to be playing a game of Monopoly in the Housing Unit H at the said Cumberland County Prison. At or about the aforesaid date and time Mr. John Porter did become unruly and did upset and overturn the outcome of the game board. The Defendant John Porter did throw the objects and pieces of the game around and about the unit bellowing and ranting about loss. After an indefinite period of time the Defendant did go off to his assigned cell, and several other unidentified individuals and myself; did pick up the foregoing items and did reset such objects. I did then end up taking the game back to Mr. Porter as he had raved out and commanded as being his said property. Proceeding the aforementioned paragraph, I, Cory A. Cormany, was physically aggressed upon and choked and punched in the lip, causing me to bleed. I was also forced to the floor when I proceeded to return the said "Monopoly Game". In my respect and appreciation, an altercation did occur and both the Defendant John Porter and myself were intervened and taken to a disciplinary lock-up area in the Cumberland County Prison. Through and about the time we were locked down in the said "Holding Area" the Defendant did call through the ventilation system to my attention and assigned cell. Mr. John Porter did inform me that if; I did testify at a scheduled "Disciplinary Hearing" regarding our said altercation, and say something to the effect that I started the alleged fight; he would quote, "hook me up." I was to gather from this aforesaid conversation that the meaning to his slang was to be that; he was going to give me an illicit substance in exchange for a beneficial testimony. The Defendant John Porter did state, "I'll give you a good o-z of some green ...if you say you started the whole thing." I did inform Mr. John Porter that I didn't know what I was going to do pursuant that particular occasion. On another occasion, preceding the disciplinary misconduct hearing at the county prison, the Defendant John Porter did yell through the ventilation shaft again; attempting and reminding me the day before of our alleged conversation mentioned. He said, "Don't forget Cormany, you owe me on the street ...I'll get you back, you know what I mean?" I did not reply and I did not testify at the aforesaid hearing. Mr. John Porter did inquire as to my indifferences pursuant thereto; included the, staff and administration of Cumberland County Prison, and I did ignore his continual questions and exasperations regardless such indulgences. In and about the month of September, of the year 1996, I, Cory A. Cormany, was walking north on North Hanover Street in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, past the old Lone Star Restaurant, when Mr. John Porter, accompanied by another unidenti i f ed individual, did enter out onto the sidewalk noting from within, as I passed the establishment. When the De and shouting Porter recognized me; he did call out somewhat friendly, drawi?n antmy John atten suspicious his reckoning. The Defendant did approach me and did reach o ti to shake my hand, and ask me how I was doing. I did politely out to acknowledgment, in due respect of a social gesture, and did then eco g turn th the Defendant as identified within. I did not, however, iidentify Port e associate, yet he did start talking in spite, "How ya doing Can .. ha s er s been up to...haven't seen ya in a while." I did tell him, "not much" and didn't you really say anything more. The Defendant John Porter did recall his alleged bargain or implication from the county prison as described in the foregoing, and did say, "I guess I owe you...huh Cormany?" I told him not to worry about it, as he did attempt to give me something that looked like a controlled substance. I did reject this assumed gratitude telling him again, "don't worry about it." Proceeding the events described in the aforementioned paragraph the Defendant's associate did withdraw a knife blade as I was beginning to walk north on North Hanover Street in the Borough of Carlisle. The unidentified individual defendant did yell out, "what're ya...a snitch ...huh ah!" I did turn back to the said individual and remarked, "are you talking to me?" The Defendant John Porter did return my statement, telling me to get out of here and did also imply that; his so called "Buddy" would stab me. He did assert, "You'd better get goin...he's crazy and he'll kill ya, if I let...him." I did then shrug the intermediary, and so called confrontation, out of focus and returned and resumed walking northward, somewhat quickly, in remark to the two belligerent Defendants. During my stay in Cumberland County Prison prior thereto the situation previously explained, Mr. John Porter did become most troublesome on another occasion; while I was talking with my father, Dr. Robert Cormany, in the telephone visitation area of the prison. The Defendant John Porter did push me in the back of the head harshly; while I was communicating efforts and problems associated a civil case number 96-1730 in the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County. The Defendant did exclaim, "what?", when I looked around at him, and "don't look at me...I'll kill ya!" The monitoring prison officer at Cumberland County Prison did witness this said incident and did seem to find such tedious ramification humorous. A C.O. Colbertson is identified circumstantial my present disposition, constitutional a conflict, and a deposition; derogatory yet another complaint. is 4 ) I, Cory A. Cormany, on this ),j_ day of , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the C monwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 6:2- a- Cory A. C?=ny? /G Dated 'Z?K? ? A,--.'Z' Witness Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex TwP., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 Defendant: Terry Darr Unidentified I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about October 30, 1997, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 903. Criminal Conspiracy - a person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit a crime if with intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime. 2) 4912. Impersonating a Public Servant - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he falsely pretends to hold a position in the public service with intent to induce another to submit to such pretended official authority or otherwise to act in reliance upon that pretense to his prejudice. 3) 5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person charged' with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions. 4) 5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into negotiable funds. 5) 5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in an official capacity, or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity. 6) 5503. Disorderly Conduct - a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages in fight or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazard or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor. 903- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4912- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5101 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5107- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5301 - 1972, Dec. 69 P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6 1973. 5503 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6, 1973. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C. S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated By__C ?Ory A. Corma '?1 INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Conspiracy: In that Terry Darr did promote the planning and did solicit the facilitation of a crime agreeable a Defendant. Impersonating a Public Servant: In that the Defendant did pretend to induce an official authority reliant a pretensive prejudice. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function: In that the Defendant did impair a physical interference contemptual an official duty and forcible a governmental function. Aiding Consummation of Crime: In that the Defendant did intentionally aid another to accomplish an unlawful act safeguarding a false object. Official Oppression: In that the Defendant did take advantage of an official capacity to a degree that knowingly purported and infringed a right and a privilege liable an impeding immunity. Disorderly Conduct: In that the Defendant did inconvenience and annoy and alarm another in a tumultuous offensive manner. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. ;?' / /I ln?' D ed Signature 4Dted fi" jx"'? Signature Notarial Seat Helen O. Sneed. Notary Public Mid W" Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries AFFIDAVIT i? (O In and about the months of November and December of the year 1997, I, Cory A. Cormany, was in fact assigned to a cell with Mr. Terry Darr in the Cumberland County Prison. Through and about these two aforesaid months, the Defendant Terry Darr did infact subject tobacco product usage careless my knowledge. I did infact witness the Defendant smoking tobacco items and did question him as to where he had resumed such merchandise; since the prison possessed a policy forbidding them. The Defendant Terry Darr did state that he purchased such items through and about another individual and did hide these said "Contrabands" inside our assigned cell previous to their endulgences. Mr. Terry Darr did in fact physically threaten my well being if infact I suggested or disclosed any information important thereof his said "Fancy". In and about the months of February and March, of the year 1998, I, Cory A. Cormany, did endeavor several conversations with Mr. Terry Darr at S.C.I. Camp Hill, a state prison. Terry Darr did inform me that a S.C.I. Captain informed him I was Pardoned by the Governor of Pennsylvania. I did infact inquire as to which said, "Captain" expressed such implication, and did ask the Defendant to specify description and direction. When I pursued to investigate the aforesaid issue alleged; the said "Captain", or C.O., did respond to my question saying, "I don't know what you're talking about." The C.O. did then direct me back to my previously assigned housing unit assumptive a necessary return. Proceeding the events defined in the foregoing paragraph, the Defendant Terry Darr did persist such propaganda true, and continued statement as I were to be quote, "Pardoned." I did infact pursue further question into such potential ramification suspicious of a Ms. Lamas, a corrections counselor, whom I had witnessed deny a commissioned staffing officer an applicative signature, witnessing and sequestering a legal object important my recognition. Ms. Lamas did notify me, seemingly concerned of several legal vouchers, evidentiary a costly faulted imposition, however did not confirm the ramblings of the Defendant Terry Darr sufficient an official pretense. The D.O.C. did subject me detention and assessment, specialized a mental health dilemma, questionable my servitude, and did not release my said person from within the confines of prison pursuant such said; legal object. 0 I, Cory A. Cormany, on this day of E? ?o 2,.,,a of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Commonwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. a C:nL Cory A. Cormany Dated Witness Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 Defendant: Gregory Diehl I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about May 15, 2000, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 903. Criminal Conspiracy - a person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit a crime if with intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime. 2) 2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same, or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose. 3) 2710. Ethnic Intimidation - a person commits the offense of ethnic intimidation if, with malicious intention toward the race, color, religion or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, he commits an offense under any other provision of this article or under Chapter 33 (relating to arson, criminal mischief and other destruction) exclusive of section 3307 (relating to institutional vandalism) or under section 3503 (relating to criminal trespass) or under section 5504 (relating to harassment by communication or address) with respect to such individual or his or her property or with respect to one or more members of such group or to their property. 4) 4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter. (e) 5) 5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions. . 903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2709 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 19 effective June 6, 1973. 2710 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4702 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 61 1973. 5101 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated a I l a By r--I'-5-C2 (?? ory A. Corman X. (i# INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Conspiracy: In that Greg Diehl did solicit and facilitate the commission of a crime agreeable an intentional attempt constitutional a Defendant. Harassment: In that the Defendant did pursue an individual around and about a public place pushing and shoving, and engaging in a series of demands and intromissions which served no legitimate purpose. Ethnic Intimidation: In that the Defendant did intimidate an individual, and did maliciously destroy institutional property while yelling and calling racial and ethnic slurs. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters: In that the Defendant did physically threaten the outcome of an individual opinion, pursuant a right to decide an official action. Obstructing the Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function: In that the Defendant did instigate and pervert a governmental function, and did physically obstruct and criticize an administration submissive an unlawful act. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. 1 /0? bated Signature ,,-2, /?7? ]bated <::::?? ?Sig?natur Notarial Seal Helen O. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp„ Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries AFFIDAVIT On May 15, 2000, I, Cory A. Cormany, was in a backdoor entrance way drinking a beer in the early evening hours after work. At or about the aforesaid date and time Mr. Greg Diehl did proceed argument with a Carlisle Police Officer solicit his garbage. The Defendant Greg Diehl did acknowledge threatening propaganda presentable myself, implying I was to be responsible for his trash. I did infact respond to the said officer in question; when he attempted to confirm such memorabilia, and did deny implication and did return inside. The Defendant was appreciative my generosity regarding a payable sum for a motel room. On October 28, 20015 I, Cory A. Cormany, at approximately the early evening hours, was in my assigned cell writing in Cumberland County Prison. Mr. Greg Diehl did enter the aforesaid cell and did begin cursing and yelling for no real apparent reason quoting, "What ya doing you crazy Jew Bastard!" The Defendant Greg Diehl did proceed to rummage through my personal belongings as to annoy and bother my peace of mind despite my asserting for him to, "Stop." I did warn the Defendant that if he persisted I was going to file a complaint. Proceeding the foregoing Mr. Greg Diehl did begin to kick the sink and did bend one of the lockers. The Defendant did become irrational after I expressed complaint, and I did tell him to "Get out". He replied, "ooohhooo...what's ya goin a do...Cory ...sue me?" I did inform Mr. Diehl of his constitutional rights completing and rehearsing directional the staff station, and did then proceed review. The Defendant Greg Diehl did get very pushy about the ordeal, and did start to bellow pursuant a Mr. Paul Green. I did ignore both individuals exasperate, and did manage to convince them to leave my assigned cell area. A C.O. Teaney, of the Cumberland County Prison, did not seem to notice or mind these two identified individuals violating the rules and regulations set forth by the institution. Prior thereto the foregoing date and time mentioned in the aforesaid paragraph, I did talk about and examine concerns and issues explicit farm labor and agriculture with the Defendant Greg Diehl. Mr. Greg Diehl did try to intentionally interfere with my studies litigated a chartered example. I currently am problem solving official business excitatory an endulgence. The Defendant did scatter and tear papers about while rummaging around my assigned cell prescient such criminal activity. I, Cory A. Cormany, on this J!-, day of FAQ-, , of the year 20021 do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the CoQ onwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ory A. Gorman Dated Witnes Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of ^lritaries RE: District Attorney Defendant: Cumberland County Paul Green Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about October 26th, 2001, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 903. Criminal Conspiracy - a person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit a crime if with intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime. 2) 2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same, or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose. 3) 2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of Criminal Coercion if with intent to unlawfully restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official; or cause an official to take or withhold action. 4) 4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person. 5) 5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to an offense. 0 6) 5508. Disrupting Meetings and Processions - a person commits a misdemeanor of the third degree if, with intent to prevent or disturb a lawful meeting, procession or gathering, he disturbs or interrupts it. 7) 6504. Public Nuisance - whoever erects, sets up, establishes, maintains, keeps or continues, or causes to be erected, set up, established, maintained, kept or continued, any public or common nuisance is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree. Where the nuisance is in existence at the time of the conviction and sentence, the court, in its discretion, may direct either the defendant or the sheriff of the county at the expense of the defendant to abate the same. 903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6 1973 2709- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2906- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4114- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5108- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5508- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 6504- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6, . 1973. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C. S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated By -J-? 0 Cory A. Cormany Z. INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Conspiracy: In that Paul Green did solicit information promotional the intentional commission of a crime planning and facilitating a Defendant. Harassment: In that the Defendant did pursue an individual around and about a public place continually annoying and engaging questions that alarmed and served no legitimate purpose. Criminal Coercion: In that the Defendant did expose secrets to the commission of a crime subjecting an individual to hatred and ridicule, and did unlawfully restrict or create a detriment idealistic the withholding of an official action. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception: In that the Defendant did affect the likeliness of a person purportionate a pecuniary interest. Compounding: In that the Defendant did procrastinate a beneficial consideration suspicious the pecuniary commission of a reported crime. Disrupting Meetings and Processions: In that the Defendant did prevent and disturb a lawful meeting or gathering. Public Nuisance: In that the Defendant did establish and maintain a timely existence of an expensive abatement. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. ;?I. /ojDated C, 6; 0; 7, 0. - K -" '-2? - - -, --" Signature Dated Signature Notaual Seal Helen O. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24,20D2 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries CO?6 AFFIDAVIT On October 26; 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, at or about approximately the early-evening hours, did begin to receive repeated questions and statements from Mr. Paul Green for no real apparent reason. These said verbal inquiries did start in the dayroom area of the Cumberland County Prison and did proceed to my assigned cell as he did follow me about and around the prison housing unit. The Defendant Paul Green did continually ask, annoying me and concerning me, regardless a murder trial proceeded the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, versing a Mr. Housman and a Ms. Markman. On October 27, 2001, I Cory A. Cormany, at or about approximately the middle-morning hours, and thereto the middle-afternoon hours, did reluctantly listen to different peculiarities and redundant propaganda relevant Mr. Paul Green's reasons for being incarcerated, and how he was to be scheming to maintain and erect a likeable benefit probable a release from prison. The Defendant Paul Green did state and display to me a Subpoena for the case number 01-0245 in the common pleas court, saying that he was not going to testify unless he was provided a, "good deal." The Defendant Paul Green did acknowledge that he had information involving a female victim by the name of Leslie White, and that he knew she was gagged and bound with wire, and that she was wrapped in a beige or red colored tent; after her alleged murder in Pennsylvania. Through and about that evening the Defendant did bellow about how he was going to quote, "put one over on the judge." He did also ramble on and additionally accuse several of the attorneys involved, in the aforesaid case, of criminal objections implicative a financial matter, contemptual the said defendants. Mr. Paul Green said, "if they think I'm going to testify to the truth they better come down here and ask you all." It was to my impression and understanding that the Defendant Paul Green was referring, when he made the aforesaid statement, to the other inmates housed in the cell unit at Cumberland County Prison, since he seemed to have criminal knowledge as to the commission of an offense and the requisite intention thereof a question. On October 28, 20011 1, Cory A. Cormany, was in my assigned cell at Cumberland County Prison when Mr. Paul Green did again begin to ask me questions and make statements regarding his current legal disposition. The Defendant Paul Green did say, "I don't care if that Attorney Braught does hold me in contempt ...he can kiss my ass...that bitch is guilty." The Defendant did again begin to ramble on about how he was to be getting out of prison, and how the State Parole Board was considering his application and cooperation, and how he was going to get his wife to verify a new trial so he could get a quote, "Big Pay Off!" I did infact inform Mr. Paul Green that I was getting very tired of ia? having to hear about his said problems, and did mention this before this particular occasion as well. The Defendant Paul Green did also attempt to barter through his wife, and did show me several letters proceeding his commitment at S.C.I., seemingly to believe or think I should care. Proceeding the conversation defined in the aforementioned paragraph, Mr. Paul Green did again boast that evening about several prison officers who exposed information to him substantial my filing a U. S. District Court Complaint, Case No. 1:CV-01-1803. The Defendant Paul Green did continue rhetoric, and did collaborate a Sgt. Teaney; responsible such solicitation relevant my pro-se ramification. The Defendant did obnoxiously rant and rave of my legal endeavor slandering and mocking me. He did infact call my person a "Pig Loving Hypocrite" and did conspire other implications with other prison officers also. On October 29, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, did witness Mr. Paul Green at or-about approximately the early evening hours debating a heated argument with a Mr. Greg Diehl. The Defendant Paul Green was announcing contemptual objects influential an official matter. He did acknowledge deceptive issues costly an agreeable outcome saying, "nope, I didn't give them what they wanted ...and they can all go to hell." The Defendant was alleged to have appeared in court earlier in the day according to rumor and his; say-so. I did sequester question to the unit staff officer proceeding Mr. Paul Green's removal from the housing unit. I was informed he was to be a security risk obvious the matters I had been subjected at that particular time. I, Cory A. Cormany, on this day of , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Co onwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Cory A. Carman ,z,) - i- U-2- Dated Witness Notarial Seat Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, PennsylvPma 4ssocintio^ J? Notaries RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 Y Defendant: Frank Teaney I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about September 12th, 2001, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with intent to commit a specific crime, he does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 2) 2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury. 3) 2902. Unlawful Restraint - a person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in circumstances exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or (2) holds another in a condition of involuntary servitude. 4) 2906. Criminal Coercion a person is guilty of Criminal Coercion if with intent to unlawfully restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official; or cause an official to take or withhold action. 5) 4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person. 6) 4952. Intimidation of Witness or Victims - a person commits an offense if, with the intent to or with the knowledge that his conduct shall obstruct, impede, impair, prevent or interfere with the administration of criminal justice, he intimidates or attempts to intimidate any witness or victim to: (1) 004-?' Refrain from informing or reporting to any law enforcement officer, prosecuting official or judge concerning any information, document or thing relating to the commission of a crime. (2) Give any false or misleading information or testimony relating to the commission of any crime to any law enforcement official, prosecuting attorney or judge. (3) Withhold any testimony, information, document or thing relating to the commission of a crime from any law enforcement official, prosecuting attorney or judge. (4) Give any false or misleading information or testimony relating to the commission of any crime to an attorney representing a criminal defendant. (5) Elude, evade or ignore any request to appear or legal process summoning him to appear to testify or supply evidence. (6) Absent himself from any proceeding or investigation to which he has been legally summoned. 7) 5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into negotiable funds. 8) 5121. Escape - a person commits an offense if he unlawfully removes himself from official detention following temporary leave granted for a specific purpose or limited period. 9) 5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in an official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity. 901 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2705- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 14821 No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2902- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2906- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 3341 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4114- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 148211 No. 3343, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4952- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 14821 No. 3341 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5107- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5121 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 3341 1, effective June 6, 1973. 00-`15 5301 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated By ory A. Corman INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Attempt: In that Frank Teaney did solicit a requisite attempt constituting the commission of a crime substantial a Defendant. Recklessly Endangering Another Person: In that the Defendant did recklessly engage in conduct substantial a risk of bodily injury. Unlawful Restraint: In that the Defendant did incarcerate and unlawfully restrain an individual directional an involuntary servitude and conditional a freedom. Criminal Coercion: In that the Defendant did accuse an individual and did subject hatred and ridicule exposing and withholding official action intentional a freedom. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception: In that the Defendant did affect the disposition of requested information purportionate the likelihood of an interest, and deceptive a person. Intimidation of Witness or Victims: In that the Defendant did intentionally obstruct and prevent the administration of justice relative the commission of a crime, and did submit false or misleading information evidential an investigation and document. Aiding Consummation of Crime: In that the Defendant did accomplish an unlawful objective safeguarding an imposition relevant a negotiable proceed. Escape: In that the Defendant did remove an individual from a detention following a judicial object forceful an unlawful attempt. Official Oppression: In that the Defendant did subject an individual to arrest, detention, assessment, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession and discrimination purportionate an enjoyment and a right and privilege. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. D ted Signature Dated Signature Notarial Seat Helen D. Sneed. Notary Public Middlesex Twp.. Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Associ3tionof.-'ants AFFIDAVIT 00-5a On September 12, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was manipulated and then attacked and mistreated careless Mr. Frank Teaney at the Cumberland County Prison. In an effort to remove and return my presence within and without an arrest warrant or security bond thereafter and therefore a commitment summary at the institution; the Defendant Frank Teaney did physically and verbally instruct criminal offenses nonconsensual my authorization or approval. The Defendant did collaborate an incident involving a Patrol Office Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department, and other prison officers and staffing associates from Cumberland County Prison. Mr. Frank Teaney is alleged to be a Staffing Sergeant at Cumberland County Prison. On November 17, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was studying in the Law Library at Cumberland County Prison when Mr. Frank Teaney did interrogate, or trouble me, regarding incident alleged to have occurred prior to October-2, 2001. I did infact inform the Defendant Frank Teaney that I was yet awaiting an arraignment procession, and that I did not know the outcome of my situation pending my release from prison in a polite response to his insinuating line of question. I did also inform Mr. Frank Teaney that I had not been formally mirandized in interest to his continual assertive attitude, talkative the situations and circumstance surrounding the aforesaid incident, and did infact acknowledge such legal argument forthright to him at or about such said time. The Defendant Frank Teaney did request notification as to the disposition of an official matter applicative my commitment at Cumberland County Prison, and did inform me that I was not permitted to leave the institution unprovoked the verbal obfuscation. I did in turn notify the defendant of his right for and to counsel important the county district attorney. On December 7, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany; was returning from the contact visitation room in the Cumberland County Prison pursuant the said disposition of a summary and misdemeanor hearing. I did then return to my assigned cell and proceeded to prepare a cup of coffee and go and sit in the unit yard. Pursuant my exit into the aforesaid yard, Mr. Frank Teaney did approach me and command me to return to the aforesaid contact visitation room in order to allegedly consult and confer with an appointed ineffective attorney. I did express to the Defendant Frank Teaney that I did not need to endeavor further representation at this said time, and that I was filing criminal charges relevant a potential homicide. I did infact inform the Defendant that I would lock-up, so to speak, if he needed me to; meaning return to secluded isolation. The Defendant Frank Teaney did infact tell me to "shut up" and I did rebut that he could not talk to me in that manner. I did then obey the information conveyed to me and proceeded documentation for the (0? case number 01-2091 and 01-0494 in the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County. On December, 8, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was again studying in the Law Library at Cumberland County Prison when Mr. Frank Teaney did begin to collaborate and ridicule me allegory incident and issues alleged to have occurred pursuant December 7, 2001. 1 did inform the Defendant Frank Teaney that I was yet awaiting a mail response, and that I did not know the outcome of my circumstance pending my release from prison as again in answer to his line of question. I did also state to Mr. Frank Teaney that I had not been formally serviced in inquiry to my current incarcerated status, and that I was yet petitioning the county courts for criminal relief and civil liability. The Defendant Frank Teaney did infact then inform me as to disposition of an official matter objectional my commitment at Cumberland County Prison, and did infact say I was "Dismissed" prior to a summary situation without depository documentation. I did then in turn notify the defendant of my right for and to counsel important the county district attorney. 1, Cory A. Cormany, on this day of , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Co onwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. -4zC-o A. Corm Dated Witness Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsyhvania ASSM3tiO •v ,.^t r•: RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 Defendant: 0 Raymond Molter I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about April 21st, of the year 2002, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with intent to commit a specific crime, he does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 2) 2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose. 3) 3105. Prompt Complaint - a prompt reporting of public authority is not required in a prosecution under this chapter: Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from introducing evidence of the alleged victim's failure to promptly report the crime if such evidence would be admissible pursuant the rules of evidence. 4) 4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter. 5) 4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any unlawful act in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the latter in the capacity of a public servant. 6) 4953. Retaliation Against Witness or Victim - a person commits an offense if he harms another by any unlawful act in retaliation for anything lawfully 0 done in the capacity of witness or victim. 7) 5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into negotiable funds. 8) 5503. Disorderly Conduct - a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages in fight or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazard or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor. 901 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 2709- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 3105 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4702- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 3345 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4703 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4953 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5107- 19725 Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5503 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unworn falsification to authorities. Dated ) `Vo ;'- BY ?T ory A. Co any ? ?(D INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Attempt: In that Raymond Motter did intentionally act toward the commission of a crime constitutional a Defendant. Harassment: In that the Defendant did strike and shove a person subjecting contact which did annoy and seriously alarm people in a public place. Prompt Complaint: In that the Defendant did construe evidence that allegedly prompted an individual to report a crime. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters: In that the Defendant did influence the decisions and opinions of a voter substantial an unlawful harm. Retaliation for Past Official Action: In that the Defendant did unlawfully harm or did cause harm to an individual, circumstantial an official action, in retaliation of a latter capacity. Retaliation Against Witness or Victim: In that the Defendant did unlawfully act out against a witness in retaliation of an official capacity causing or intending to cause harm. Aiding Consummation of Crime: In that the Defendant did intentionally aid another to accomplish an unlawful object and did safeguard the proceeds thereof, and did confess the conversion of a fund. Disorderly Conduct: In that the Defendant did intentionally engage in fight or threatening behavior violent an unreasonable act; that did involve obscene gestures and language physically offensive a condition. I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. 1A I I S ° A ted 6 Signature Dated Signature Notaft Seel Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Wddlesec Twp.. Oidm%nd Cowry My Con neon ExpBes.kly 24.2006 member. Pennpftrarria Assodalon Of Notaries AFFIDAVIT On April 21st, 2002, I, Cory A. Cormany, did converse with the identified Defendant Raymond Motter at a female acquaintance of mine's home, sequestering attention to statements he made pertinent an individual named Kevin Shugharts. Mr. Shugharts evidently procrastinated statements to the Mr. Molter in the Cumberland County Prison important incidents and events heard my said; minor child {Alexandria Christine}. Mr. Kevin Shugharts alleged to the Mr. Raymond Motter, that; [he] had previously smoked (crack) cocaine with an individual identified herein as John Adams (Cory's exwife's husband). During the aforedescribed event stated, the identified individual Kevin Shugharts; did litigate information to the Defendant Raymond Motter regarding the said; minor child, saying: quote a heresay episode, "She's getting to be prime meat", and that; [he], "wouldn't mind tapping [that], when she gets a little older." I did subject and further did interrogate the defendant, questioning the truthfulness of the applied insinuation. I did, on a prior occasion[s], remark and criticize the Defendant Raymond Motter substantial a civil suit I filed against a Carlisle Police Officer in 1994. I had informed Mr. Motter, that; I did infact complain of his said, extra curricular activities (drug usages), and was consequently maced for it. Such aforementioned information did become humorous to him, and did become common knowledge between the defendant and myself; after a given time period. I did conclude that Mr. Raymond Molter had talked indepth with the identified individual Kevin Shugharts on several occasions within the county prison, and had become additionally knowledgeable other illicit transactions, and an official domestic incident as well. It was expressed to me that, "Your daughter must becoming quite a looker Cory. Shugharts says John has big expectations for her." The Defendant Raymond Motter did continue rhetoric, and did speak as though Mr. Shugharts thought there was to be something impressionably wrong with the defined John Adams, and, that; Mr. Shugharts seemed to have problems himself with said; statutory issues. A Ms. Nicole Jastron did witness the conversation abroad in and at `her place' of residence. On June 7, 2002, 1, Cory A. Cormany, did recognize a criminal complaint to the Cumberland County District Attorney. Proceeding the aforementioned date I did file a civil action in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County alleging private and public affairs impermeable the objects of illegal and legal transactions, argumentative several Lawful Acts. I had been subjected a controversial incident regarding the Carlisle Police Department on that same, said; day, I did pursue the civil ramification allegary a summary matter. Coincidental my involvement with the foregoing, I did witness the Defendant Raymond Motter carrying on suspicious activity with an individual identified thereto as; Mr. John Adams. I had been observing Mr. John Adams prior therein the year 1994 circumstantial a visitation/custody obligation documented problematic my said; minor child. I had not ever met the defendant prior to or pursuant to, any interest, included the said; visitation/custody matter, prescient [his] whereabouts officially announced; that, particular year. Prescient the aforedecsribed incident litigated, the identified individual Nicole Jastron; did state deflamatory propaganda to me further her involvement with the Defendant Raymond Molter. Ms. Jastron did say that, "Raymond and I were talking about your daughter the other day." She said, that; she had brought herself to the subject of my visitation/custody arrangements saying she thought my situation [was], "messed up." Ms. Jastron did further the conversation by stating, "Raymond says, well ...you know what they say, old enough' to bleed, old enough to breed." It was my opinion that the aforesaid conversation was to be conclusive `her opinion' regarding the issues and incidents described colorful the Defendant Raymond Motter and Mr. Kevin Shugharts. On September 15th, 2002, I, Cory A. Cormany did converse with the individual Defendant Raymond Motter in the county prison that particular morning relevant the said; minor child, and the object of complaint. I had discussed this topic before with Mr. Motter in or about several other times, but did not seem to communicate a common ground. The defendant did become very upset over the arguments and issues at large, and did physically push and punch me, and did warn at the aforestated date and time, that; [I], "better not" snitch to anybody about what [he] had heard. The Defendant Raymond Motter did also tell me that our conversation in and around the month of April 2002, "was not" any of "their business", in obvious reference to the county administration and the local police; simply conclusive a situation and a circumstance logical an altercation. A C.O. Durnin, of the Cumberland County Prison, did witness and interrupt our said; intermediary, and did inform "us", we needed to "cool it" or else we would be; "locked up" pursuant a prison policy. Pursuant the aforedescribed event stated, the identified individual Nicole Jastron; did litigate information to me by telephone, acknowledging that the Defendant Raymond Motter had been smoking (crack) cocaine in her bathroom prior to his commitment to the county prison. She did continue to inform me that I was to tell the defendant "that", he [was] not to be welcomed in her home any longer, being said; that, the Mr. Molter and Ms. Jastron were allegedly (friends) prior to the said; prison commitment. At or about the time that I relayed the applied message to the defendant, he did become outraged and began yelling obscenities stating, "I hope that John Adams rapes your daughter Cory", and, "I (6 D don't care what Nicole says, she's nothing but a slut anyhow." The contents of the events and issues remarked and criticized leads me to believe the commission of crime has occurred; or is to occur, and that the defendant also is substantial (a) proceeding, applicable the Court of Common Pleas. I did additionally, pursuant the defendant's incarceration, helped the defendant with several legal problems. I was to be incarcerated a reasonable probated violation outstanding a situation and circumstance directly relevant Mr. Raymond Motter. I, Cory A. Cormany, on this :STJ_ day of Q e c r ,, i- , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Commonwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (f5." r-f . Cory A. Cormany ZA' - C Dated Witness NOW" See Helen D. Sneed, Notary Pubkc Mudd W" Twp., Cumberland County My Camtssion Expires July 24, 2006 Member, Pennsylvania Assodadon Of lVoharies 0(__" Johnson, Duffle, Stewart & Weidner By: C. Roy Weidner, Jr. I.D. No. 19530 301 Market Street P. O. Box 109 Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-0109 (717) 761-4540 Attorneys for Defendants CORY A. CORMANY, x. Plaintiff V. FRANK TEANEY, CURTIS COLBERTSON, TRAVIS SHENK, JACK WALLACE, MICHAEL ILE, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 96-1730 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRAEC/PE TO ENTER APPEARANCE AND NOW, this Z& Aay of April, 1996, enter the appearance of the undersigned on behalf of the Defendants in the above-captioned action. JOHNSON, DUFFIE, STEWART & WEIDNER By: _&? C. Roy Weidner, I.D. No. 19530 3P1 Market Street Pbst Office Box 109 Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-0109 (717) 761-4540 Attorneys for Defendants L-a CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND NOW, this,, D-day of April, 1996, the undersigned does hereby certify that she did this date serve a copy of the foregoing entry of appearance upon the other parties of record by causing same to be deposited in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid, at Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows: s. Cory A. Cormany Cumberland County Prison P. O. Box 820 Carlisle, PA 17013 JOHNSON, DUFFIE, STEWART & WEIDNER Sharon L. udy COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA nni xrrv nc• M- WRERLAND Mag. Dist No.. 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL Address: EAST WING COURTHOUSE 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Teleohyne. (717) 2 4 0- 6 5.6 4 17013-0000 CORY A. CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DR. CARLISLE, PA 17013 18 §2709 §§A3 HARASSMENT AND STALKING NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and AODRESS 'CORMANY, CORY ALLISTER - 1883 DOUGLAS DR. CARLISLE, PA 17013 L Ci ?o?l0n %? BCo C:O`7 Dock?iNo.: NT-0000727-96 I Date T=iled: 5/ 2 9/ 9 6 a I V 1Y0 „M J (Charge) This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ .00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: 12/03/96 Place:DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01 EAST.WING - COURTHOUSE Time: 2:00 PM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA .17013-0000 You have the right to be represented by your attorney and have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear, a trial may be held in your absence. If, after the evidence is presented, you are found guilty, t. e ,;,onies you have posted as collateral wiii'Je forfeited and appiied toward the payment of fines and costs imposed as your sentence, and you will receive a notice of your conviction. You have the right to appeal to the Court of Common Pleas within thirty days for a trial de novo. If you are-found not guilty, your collateral monies will be returned to you. If you have any questions, please call the above office-immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. C' At-00 Date k ?4j - My commission expires first Monday of January, 2000 . , District Justice SEAL DATE PRINTED: 9119196 CITATION NUMBER: 286007 DATE ISSUED: 5/29/96 AOPC 611-96 . caul.-,tarry.! S'ti: ,. r CITATION No. tuummunmeatt# of #mtlsyluanin 286007 'ra!rfrh N..gSo=:. .-.i:!wb ngch;f!••>S.1'/iir,'i!V r:y.- SUMMONS DOO(ET MIMOER.Y; % - -? r F C ? T f'.. i (O V (NON-TRAF I ) MAGKTEMAL OISRRRDT No. - v ( J OEFENOANT - FIRST NAME - •' ;- r ' ' •hIDO(E NAME •., LAST NAME A c6p-y O ET ADORE95 1 CRV-TWP-BOFO<:OOMTY.I Ix 114! L,: SpRE •. r mp" /,' ; f?F•i1'IS`" 7.`,l'JJO!. 9TIs .t?AV NATURE OF OFFENSE J1l F' 1 5 rs F T210 501)/7- O , , /? MA J? . F. E +t ('>ir,?13/)?}ti? .?l?l ,d.?%ttrlh }Jt ?'%:+"+Z Sly,.{f. r g / EE DATE TIME PLACE Y COUNT CODE r22• A -- /n / J , ( ' ? F t J t p/ ?) ( /? j ' ? !Y? ??s C-%?r?•l?-si- "'V '.lS,",? Y ? 7? ' J ti L}1.:.\1 `-C r( DAY V STATUTE OR 0R0-mNCE , MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT NO. - - O SEC. AINE ADDRESS t ' '1 _S' c? _--rL'-?--)--------- - - - - „ •} A SUB.SEC ------ - -- - COSTS O TOTAL RECEIPT OF CITATION IS ACKNOWLEDGED•SIGNAT:IRE OF DEFENDANT . N DUE +. k .. DATE ISSUED ? 1 rJ -+ f I VERIFY THAT THE FACTS SET FORTH IN 1}#S CMATIDN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF hIY KNOWLEDGE OR INFORMATION AND BELIEF. THIS VERFICA70N IS MADE SUBJECT TO THE PENALTO:S OF SECTION 4904 OF THE CRIMES - $ CODE 18 PA.C.S. 4904) RELATING TO IGATION TO AUTHORITIES. OFFICER TURF BADGE NO. STATION ADDRESS _ I C ` F I !e CODE SUMMONS WITHIN TEN (TO) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS SUMMONS YOU SMALL A. PLEAD NOT GUILTY BY NOTIFYING THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE IN WRITING AND,FORNMRD AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE FINE ANO COSTS SPECI- FIED. OR IF NOT SPECIFIED. THE SLIM OF SW AS COLLATERAL FOR YOUR APPEARNVCE AT TRIAL OR S. PLEAD NOT GUILTY BY APPEARING BEFORE THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE AND POSTING SUCH COLLATERAL FOR YOUR APPEARANCE AT TRIAL AS THE DISTRICT JUSTICE SMMLL REOUIRE. C r- YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FINE AND COSTS SPECIFIED W THE SUMMONS OR 1HE Rt50 COLLATERAL YOU MUST APPEAR BEFORE THE DISTRICT JUSTICE TO ENTER A PLEA. - OR D. PLEAD GUILTY BY NOTIFYING THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE INWRITING AND FORDING AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE FINE AND COSTS SMCiFIEO IN THIS SUMMONS. E. PLEAD GUILTY BY APPEARING BEFORE THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE IF THE FIE AND COSTS ARE NOT SPECIFIED IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY, YOU (LAY APPEAL WTHIN THIRTY (30) DAB FOR A TRIAL 019 NM IN THE COkIIRT OF COMMON PLEAS.. ALL CMECKI FOR FINE AIO CQSiS OR FOR COLLATEIW+i41ALL IE MADE RIRAEIE TO THE 1AADISTEIIIAL DISIIMGT Nl1A4EE11". RMLUR1E TO RESPOND wrtwd TTRE TUN SPECIFIED NOME SHALL RESULT 04 THE IIEUANCE OF A MMRLRANT FOR YOUR ARREST. __...? .. __._._ _. __. See',, a Side M"worw SUMMONS No. 286007 AOPC 407-86. I fI I r COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND Mag. Dist. 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL :..jdieas: EAST WING = COURTHOUSE 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Teleph..,e. 4117) 2 4 0 - 6 5 64 " 17013-00.00 CORY A. CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DR. CARLISLE, PA 17013 NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANT:. VS. FCORM'1N, CORY NALLISTER 1883 DOUGLAS DR. CARLISLE, PA 17013 DocketNo.: NT-0000726-96 Date Fiied: 5/29/96 _- J 18 52709 SSA3 HARASSMENT AND STALKING _ (Charge) (Charge] This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary. violation(s). The sum of $ .00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: 12/03/96 Place:DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01 EAST-WING--- COURTHOUSE Time: 2:00 PM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE,_PA_ 17013-0000 You have the right to be represented by your attorney and have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time: Should you fail to appear, a trial may be held in your absence. If, after the evidence is presented, you are found guilty, the i?onies you have: posted as collateral wiii ba forfei ep and applied toward the payment of fines and costs imposed as your sentence, and you will receive a notice of your, conviction. You have the right to appeal to the Court of Common Pleas within thirty days for a trial de novo. If you are-found not guilty, your collateral monies will be returned to you. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. ' If you are disabled and require a ce, plea he M aerial District office at the address abover -" Date District Justice My commission expires first Monday of January, 2000 . SEAL DATE PRINTED: 9/19196 CITATION NUMBER: 286009 DATE ISSUED: 5/29/96 AOPC 611-96 - -- `7 $. CITATION No. T=m0nmeaft4 of 0ennsyluattia ? ?aQ? v+?:.': -:- -•.;.d::?w -,,:..tia- - SUMMONS , ------ ----- MA(iRITEPoAL DISTRICT NO (NON-TRAFFIC) - DOCKET NUMBER U <r; DEFENDANT - FIRST NAME 1 T . r - , 'LAST NAME c_ irhlt•' xs STgEET ADOfE , ^ -CRYTWP-BORO.000Ni'}q • (t d SOQE :. :1'3 i '.:ZP CODE - U f Wit" _i fZirlriQ lit - • ,y.' ?+ itt j ,.. _."%?lTL(KLG jifi: #C! LT+7{?:(7 ???JsC{?r _`?? 'lj`6??F?lt7'_i te{[ti {I i. 'N ^? c A r `_ . srt I+s.- Wlt1RE'OF OFFENSE ,? . F'+ L:.R. . ?:1? 1 „??•?' c ,.z?/,??' 'f??l?f 2 y9'Jtt `J? 't''I?r4.c) F N sin u 5c iil? 6' . , T, f:TA- E DATE TIME PLACE COUNTY CODE iz '.:' (?C• ?E"1.?15f t%J?1. ; '?' 7a.,L, .' -: DAY J - - CITY TWP- CODE -- V STATUTE OR ORDINANCE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT NO. -I O., SEG.. FINE ADDRESS - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I SUB. SEC. COSTS r T _ '. O TOTAL RECEIPj.OF CITATION 6 ACKNrDGED SIGNATURE OF DEFENDANT N DUE s r u. i{ DATE ISSUED ! I VERIFY THAT THE FACTS SET FORTH 10HIS CITATION ARE TRUE AND:CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE OR INFORMATgN AND BELIEF. THIS VERIFICATION IS MADE SUBJECT TO THE PENALTIES OF SECTION 4904 OF THE CRIMES '-r ( CODE (18 PA.C.S. 64904) RELATING TO UN FALSIFICATION TO AUTHORITIES. 1i Ol"PICER'S SIGNATURE BAS/ 9 STATION ADDRESS j - - / / [J ! CODE SUMMONS WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS SUMMONS YOU SHALL A. PLEAD NOT GUILTY BY NOTIFYING THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE IN WAITING AND FORWARD AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE FINE AND COSTS SPECI- FIED, OR IF NOT SPECIFIED, THE SUM OF S50 AS COLLATERAL FOR YOUR'APPEARANCe AT TRIAL OR B. PLEAD NOT GUILTY BY APPEARING BEFORE THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE AND POSTING SUCH COLLATERAL FOR YOUR APPEARANCE AT TRIAL AS THE DISTRICT JUSTICE SHALL REQUIRE. _ : ,:._ ,. - ; , ! •, _ C. F YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FINE AND COSTS SPECIFIED IN THE SUMMONS OR THE S50 COLLATERAL, YOU MUST APPEAR BEFORE THE _ DISTRICT JUSTICE-TO-ENTER A PLEA OR D. PLEAD GUSTY BY NOTIFYING THE PROPER DISTRICT JUSTICE IN WRITING AND FORWARDING AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE FINE AND COSTS SPECIFIED _ IN THIS SUMMONS T (AE - E PLEAD GUILTY BY-APPEARING BEFORE-THE PROP?F1 I: i.y JUSfICEFTHE ACOSIS-ARE F YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY, YOU MAY APPEAL WITHIN THRRY (30) DAYS FOR A TROLL DE NOVO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ALL CHECKS FOR FINE AND COSTS OR FOR COLLATEJ?AI. ?UU? BE WADE PAIaBLE TO THE -MAOb'TERIAL DISTRICT NUMBER'. FAILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN TINE TIME SPECFED ABOVE SHALL RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST. . y?cl:a.-H f,.•:.' ..,.._ ::: ..,-r-?;r„3 T+-ie -?.-: ... - ,, . , S89 (??T8V2TSe?Slde ;. _ _ .. ' Ti .. _ MAdsbrYl DlWiCt Tb: -_ D&W ____._.?-_M?__-__ SUMMONS No. Dkbkt Juafte - 2 8 6 0 0 9 •:?4C'?,. :3.' .-.. ??`-.::-?3'x•,3.'. __'._T "'(l AOPC 407-86 DEFENDANT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: C[TMBERLAND ?. 1 NOTICE OF Ma9. oast No.: PRELIMINARY HEARING 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P TPRREAL Address: EAST WING COURTHOUSE 1 COURTH E SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Ta[ephone:-(717) 240-6564 17013-0000 .p- CORY A CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 18 '92701 §§A1 STMIDT.V hoo-Arrrm COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANT: VS. NAME and ADDRESS rCORMANY, CORY ALISTER 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 L J DocketNo.: CR-0000394-96 Date Filed: 9/09/96, OTN: E80'0390-3 - (Charge) - NOTICE TO DEFENDANT A complaint has been filed charging you with the offense(s) set forth above and on the att ached copy of the complaint. A preliminary hearing on these charges has been scheduled for: LDate: 9/18/96 Place: DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01 EAST WING - COURTHOUSE 10:45 AM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE,-PA 17013-0000 If you fail to appear at the time and place above, a warrant will be issued for your arrest. At the preliminary hearing you may: 1. Be represented by counsel; 2. Cross-examine witnesses and inspect physical evidence offered against you; 3. Call witnesses on your behalf other than witnesses to testify to your good reputation only, offer evidence on your behalf and testify; 4. Make written notes of the proceeding, or have your counsel do so, or make a stenographic, mechanical Or electronic record of the proceedings. If you cannot afford to hire an attorney, one may be appointed to represent you. Please contact the office of the district justice for additional Information regarding the appointment of an attorney. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. Date My commission expires first Monday of January, 2000 DATE PRINTED: 9/10/96 COMPLAINT NUMBER: A42645 DATE SIGNED: 9/09/96 , District Justice SEAL AOPC 629-94 (E?) -;? AFFIDAVIT RIDER CONTAINING PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT OF ARREST , FOR Cory Alister Corm any 8/17/66 Sometime around Wednesday, 9/5 but probabley on Thursday, 9/f/96 at 0200 hours in the am., Tracey Gibson claims that her boyfriend who she iv d around at times and has had sexual relations with, struck her in the face and headareah causing a small bump over her left eye, and a black eye to her left eye and some bleeding to her mouth area. This physical abuse occured, allegedly, hours. This officer took a photo of the black eye on Sunday, 9/8/96,oatrthevtime that the incident was reported. Vicitm stated that they have had several fights over the last several days and at the time of the above incident, suspect would not let her get the police. At 2241 hours on Sunday, 9/8/96, vicitm called police for more alleged abuse by the suspect and reported the black eye incident when questioned by poli< As required by law, charges are now being filed for simple assault under the domestic violence law. This incident allegedly occured at 523 S. West St. apt. G (Tracies apt.) I believe this to be sufficient probable cause for the issuance of a warrant for Cory Alister Cormany, 8/17/66, of 1883 Douglas Dr. Carlisle, Pa. 17013 for the following charge. Simple Assault (domestic violence) 2701 a1 Based on information received aad written statement of victim, and physical evidence. C ? r .Z Cuts- ?C C -) c-r c-c S "- it _ ,( --7 'S 10, Exec d this ......9 : h 19....96 .? R nature of f iant) Personally ae m on e?z.0ant 19...9¢ the Affiant above named, who, being duly swoGn (affirmed ccording law, si t ' Affi im y presence and deposed and said thathe facts set forth therei re tr4e rect e of Af nowledge. Information and belief. [SEAL] COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND .r NOTICE OF Mag. Dist. No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL Address: EASTWING - COURTHOUSE 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Telephone: (7 17 ) 240 - 6564 17013 - OOOD L -CORY A. CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DRIVE CARLISLE, PA 17013 18 52701 §B1 SIMPLE Aq0AMT -PRELIMINARY HEARING COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS rCORMANY, CORY ALISTER 1883 DOUGLAS DRIVE CARLISLE, PA'`:17013 L J Docket No.: CR- 0000089 - 00 Date Filed: 2/08/00-. OTN: L 055063-1° - lrge(s) -38 S50 3pL. .§:A DTSORDERLY_.CONDiiCT EN47kf ya.XN ..EI - ING _ A1. HARASSMENT'- Ph-YSICALLS'. BIKE hICR" I3TC;` ` _ -_ NOTICE TO DEFENDANT , ;. A complaint has been filed charging you with the offense(s) set forth above and on the attached copy of the complaint. A preliminary hearing on these charges has been scheduled for: Date: 4/18/00 Place: DISTRICT COURT 09 -2 - 01 Time: EA --WING - COURTHOUSE 11:00AM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 If you fail to appear at the time and place above, a warrant will be issued for your arrest. A-t.-the preliminary hearing you may: 1. Be represented by counsel; 2. Cross-examine witnesses and inspect physical evidence offered against you; 3. Call witnesses on your behalf other than witnesses to testify to your good reputation only, offer.-evidence on your behalf and testify; 4. Make written notes of the proceeding, or have your counsel,do so, or-ma.ce a stenographic, mechanical or electronic c record vi of he _ rvi N c ?.cec u yr . ` - Ilk' I., If you cannot afford to hire an attorney, one may be appointed to represent you. Please contact the office of the district justice for additional information regarding the appointment of an attorney. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. O-D Date My commission expires first Monday of January, 2006 . DATE PRINTED: AnPC R99-97 , District Justice SEAL 2/18/00 COMPLAINT NUMB`$R: DATE COMPLAINT SIGNED: 2/08/00 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY C)P CUMBERLAND Mag. Dist. No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL Address: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Telephone: (7 17 ) 24 0 - 6 5 64 NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS ' CORMANY, CORY A -l 1883 DOIIGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 CORY A. CORMANY L J 1883 DOUGLAS DR DocketNo.: NT-0000777-01 CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date Filed: 5/21/01 8 55505 55 PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violations). The sum of $ .00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: Place: DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01 Time: N:UU AM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear, a warrant may be issued for your arrest. -If-you -have any questions, please call the above office immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. 6/25/01 Date , District Justice My commission expires"first Monday of-January; 2006. SEAL 5/21/01 DG i 1 x r Azriese. an ic, E3 Yes 19. 0-,:.Disorderly C6rKW b Cr iminal Trespass I?. Dess tiesses Ia. Tim 13 Theft of Services 0 Criminal Mischief -Retail T!Mft 0 Other Pu rchase, Consumption, Possession or Transportan on of Liquor or Mail 6 r Brewed Beverages ca"Es com 751.1 to 24. SUB SCC. :±H 28. TOTAL " " 30. Da - 31. 7me 32. Days 5I 6! vL 33. City Os« S DUE 35. ZoM 5? - 0 d o 36. __1 //r/ 3 CGunty t_A 39. Defergaays SignaWro-Atlugwktlgea . tCrteypl O t a 4 X e. / Fdetl F6"E MIO. receiveE F O 42. 1.mity ml dq." III thus es"m are me to" peal of my lmowledge. Inbrmation and belief. This b made ¢- _ d the (18 Pay C_SA 4904) unswom thou to audwowtliea. eubject,[o tl>e d Set0.a 4904 - OFF S TURE - BADGE NUMBER ORRIINNUMBER // 43.S A 9? ?S 44. Olfevne Cade 145, Pmpelly Record No. 48. Systems Code 47. 48, 1 _' 11 Initial Report 11 AIIenYCE l--•? r / / l . ^ 51. Date of /DD/ y1') 52. Sus 53. RaWEenioity SB..Re..ftI Subpoena Lim - ?` -P1,896187-6 1 57. S qv. Ink. A.dge W. DEFENDANT'S COPY . "*'COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND tAag. Cist. No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: non. PAULA P. CORREAL Address:.1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Telephone: (717 ) 240 - 6564 17013-0000 CORY A. CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS ICORMANY, CORY A -1 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 L J Doc, at NO.: NT- 0000778 - 01 Date Filed: 5/21/01 Charge(s): 8 55503 SSA4 DISORDERLY CONDUCT This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: Place: STRICT COURT 09 - 2 01 - Time: AM , 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE L CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 .00 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear, a warrant may be issued for your-arrest. If you-have anyquestions,-please z. call the above office immediately. ? ' - - - - if you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. f= f i a r I i i 1 i - - - DEFENDANT'S COPY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Cot 1NTY nF• CUMBERLAM Mag. Dist. N..- 09-2-01 DJ Name:-Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL Address: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Telephone: (7 17 } 2 4 0 - 6564 17013-0000 CORY A. CORMMY 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA C&5) VS. DEFENDANT:. NAME and ADDRESS rCORMMY, CORY A 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 L J Docket No.: NT-0000779-01 Date Filed: 5/21/01 1 J-01 This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ .`00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: Place: DISTRICT COURT - - Time: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear, a warrant may be issued for your arrest. If you -have any question's, please call the above office immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. G.b r i 1 ? ( i t- On. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ' -CtT TION N . _. e<. _ NON TRAFFIC CITATIO U1V MONS 1. © -Q°? _. .r.is', 2Dban1 '?t3+ .? ?Sx?? S ??` 8i ?. f?a808r n•. ? . a. Addro d MaPsMW OYata1 Olfce ' . 5. DmeYS -s++ 4 -? ? - & Stab 7. DsMtOrtra tsame ! . -- rrda. .. talc _ - .. - /g n f? ? /V l l & bbrtt ap's Adds (Streo Cad.) / ° ` ' • e. mar R ?, tN ? "an 10. ¦ Sax jMy ? 11. 000 of BM l J (MrA oD/v?? ? 2. Stass .' . (R)OkResident _ 1a Typ. of An..e . (010 On-view k pania 11 His Q [ I (M 1 1. 1 I dative Ametion U 11 Unknown (F) 0 Female j' ?J/' .. ? Unlmown (S)XSummoneNCited 1e .?; 17L rawita.yewra .: ie: ?annre t4.na ? -d ?:"" .._ p?.. - n. o.r W.asM : r te. pne ;,fl Yea 0 Yes 19. Ch.W ? Disorderly Conduct ? Criminal Trespass ? Theft of Services ? Criminal Misuhiel, .}? HacasSmeM - ,: ? Public Drunkenness ?-Scattering f?ubbish : - Retail Theft ? Purchase, Consumption, Possession or Transportation of Liquor or Matt or Brewed Beverages . , ..'EF ?ttler . 26 Naara d - - 21. Pa. Cob - 22 MMES CODE ITTLE 18 0 . :- -- - - - k/ :; A 23 SECTM 2 9 27 4: . s 7 VI? 4 a y-.,• ', a,w i - 25: FINE - ± 26. COSTS .-.,. _ ;. 27. J.C.P.. - -. 1.50 - _ 29. 28. TOTAL Qv $ ? La Sxviose Repuwtetl DUE 30. 5f 31. Time 32. Day 39. CA . V-P L r 34. 35. Zane 7 --5' ' - f .1 o oo ?' /J / County Code 39. Defendm s Signabre • Adawv ledges Re ipt of citation , 40. Date ? t -o 47. X Z p Fisd an eta..a«ved a2. 1 vedty VW the fads set foM in this aisadoh are bye to the best of my Ma *dge, i formatbn and belbf. Th is venficatbn is made ea. the perwaies of Section 4904 _ - - -d the Crilles Code. (18 Pa. C.S.A. § 4904rret9tlng to os„orrt bkdaadpn b autlari8 _ OFF 'S SIG ATURf3 - 9ADGE NUMBER ORI NUMBER ,, S I!F- _ 44& 43. SMOM Add- 9 ter. r ?L? 170J ".,W- Coda 45. Pmp" Resod No. 46. Sya w. Code 47. incident No. 49. - ? InNal Repot ? At.nbn lLE 7 -a5 - I 50. Yw;em's Name 51. Date of Bi (M DO / 1^/) 52. 53. RacNEtWi ' 14 IffIg 1,; 1 1100 , 56. Remerka /SnApoerte List - rev. 57. Sw. K ee09e No. AurcaU7-aa (r1ev. Tu/yti) DEFENDANT'S. COPY A COJv;MONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND Mag. Dist. No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL Address: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Leiephone: (717) 240-6564r' '17013 - 0000 NOTICE OF TRIAL (3"1 SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANT: vs. NAME and ADDRESS FCORMANY, CORY.A 1883 DOIIGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 CORY A. CORMANY L J 1883 DOUGLAS DR Docket No.: NT- 0000780 - 01 CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date Filed: 5/21/01 8. X5503§A4 DISORDERLY CONDIICT Char e s : This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ .00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. :.Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: Place: DISTRICT Cc?rrnm _ _ Time: 9:00 AM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear, a warrant may be issued for your arrest. if you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. - If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. DATE PRINTED: AOPC 611-98 6/25/01 CITATION NUMBER: P1896607-6 DATE CITATION SIGNED: .i 5/21/01 y - COMMOI?IWFALTH.OE;PENNSYFVANIA _ CITATION NO. NOWT IUFFIC CITATION s F r31.6r4 / : 2 Ns' 7 9607--6 a « ? .O ? ??J ? ? r a soar ?. PA 8 D". l+M.l? vvnne ?(A) O a4sian c . o.t. «eam ,? lie,eidCtC aew.. CJ Black (M) me Male /oo/ ". five, at As. (H) ? Hispanic Q (R) Resident (I) ? 11 -OnIew Qan Native Amen U ? Unknown (F) ? Female J ?7 (N) ? Noo-Resident ro) v !.tlvarBate :. 1s. P.r.re neatee - tee, Purft we,. U .? Unknown (S) SttmmorterYCitty + 5'es Yes 17. Dal. Nowbd 1e rxee t 19 Cheese t { ?.<Disorderly Conduct - D Criminal Trespass ? :.Theft of Servke s 'D Harassment ? Public Drunks ? Criminal Mischief ? Retail Theft ? Scattering Rubbish ? Other ? Purchase, Co nness nsumption, Possession or Transportation of Liquor or Matt or Brewed Beverages _ 20. N re,r9Olle )?oW ( /C o 21. Pe. CoUe 22. CRIMES CODE TITLE 18 23.0 2y y1 i 27. J.C.P. .: - -- - - x:50 29 zee, TOTAL 30. 32 Day 31. Th's, /// ? ?'° RSpueye,d DUE 33. ' t , O CtH -8«0 34. Z? 7 1(p 36. _ 07- cSc? 37 38 37 A 39. De Deeaanrs Synaare Recap«CCaton . x 4L t 42. I rent hid be 1aW set in mia tllatian are aye, b the base W my ggwle09e,.lnblmeeon anE M8e1. Thie Filed on woe, _.d Of ''. the Crimes Cade (1s8 p Pa c $.A. ; 411 mMVM to - i OFF C. 'S SIGNATURE /} 1a on 1° eulhortliea. is a"biea b III PanaBies of Sactlon 49N ??A'/U Jf BADGE NUMBER 43. Stab Address ` • • / oC r V W V 44. OCense Cade 45. Property Record No. ? 48..Syatema 47. 49. Inpderd No. ,(raj/p,Ia(/ / ?jr ?0/ a5-7p ? k*w P.,- ? AMnuanS/{IaC?E' ? . ??//? "••"?V.f 51..o ate Bid /00!,m 52. I Se,rr? W ? ) / 58. sourly/3ryp},poena List P1.896 07-6 AOPC 407-95 (Rev. 10/96) _ DEPENDANT'S COPY -- COMMONWEALTH OF. PENNSYLVANIA`` COl7NTY nF• CUMBERLAND Mag. Dist. No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORREAL Address: 1 ` COURTHOUSE SQUARE NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE q COMMONWEALTH OF ? I PENNSYLVANIA CARLISLE, PA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS TelepFione 1717 I .240'6564 17013 -000 0 rCORMANY, CORY A -i 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 CORY A. CORMANY L J 1883. DOUGLAS DR Docket No.: NT-0000781-01 CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date Filed: 5/21/01 Y? Char e s : 8 52709 SSA1 HARASSMENT This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. "`Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Date: Place: DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01 Time: 9:00 AM 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 .00 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear, a warrant may be issued for your;arrest. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. 6/25/01 Date My commission expires first Monday of January, 2006. District Justice SEAL DATE PRINTED: 6/25/01 CITATION NUMBER: P1896606-5 DATE CITATION SIGNED: 5/17/01 AOPC 611-98 010 1 AOPC 407-95 (Rev. 10/96) i- +. _? . COIVIMONWFAL'pf,OF PENNSYLVANIA CITATION NO. NON-TRAPP1 'OTATION SUMMONS '? U O 4.Add? d pyllp gliw A" 176 PA Ur, 7 't4w- ?1 ? .Su iw J I,y - ?.? J Wool 8 . tak-s". ' (A) (M Male 3 1YPp aArr. (O) ? On-view I Black (H) ? Hispanic 1 .?Native American U) ? Unknown (F) ? Fefrlai 1 nkno silen- Non- (N) ? f ? Unknown = (Sl w-0n 4. JUVENILE Yes 15. PN Wff d 0 Yes . 10. Pwn'e'wm. 17. 0au Heai.d 18, T111 Disorderly Conduct Al? Harassment ? Criminal Trespass ? Theft of Services ? Criminal Mischief ? P bli D k - u c run enness ? Scattering Rubbish ? Retail Theft ? Purchase, Consumption, Possession or Transportation of Liquor or Malt or Brewed Beverages ? Other ?. 0fa^1° /` r nn 27. P. Coda - CRIMES CODE TITLE 18 a' E . AS ? o d za sE 1d7 za. sEC. K 71 25. FINE 26. COSTS . .. 27. J.C.P.. C 1 JJD 28. TOTAL ? Lm Seivius ttepN DUE 30. ate /r o 31. rune 1 1GY? 32 Day 7" u,e 33. City limo - ye6l's 167 31. 2 35. Zo - IUD 37. my 38. Co/-tV Code 39. DelerxLmrs SWalure - Ackrwwbdpes Receipt of Citation C] taus Y • . A _ Q FAed Fled 4Ma. r.cened W . 42 i :ewft But IM feW set foM in Ihta dration ere Irm to Bro b d ntY 41uwl.dpe, hWnwtipn entl beNe/- 71tia . b augeq b tlu p.nNOes a Section 1806 . of the Cknea Code (18 Pa. C.SA ti 4904)..Ia" to 1.lsworrl falsification W auttNlrides: ' 'OF FIC 'S SIGNATURE _ - - - - BADGE NUMBER ORI NUMBER 7 7 ? -7 Xoaula !AV Ri. Stagn Address ?,! 44- Offer Code 45. .party Record No. 46. Systems Cod. 47. 1B. 1 48. lncide/M No. 01n Report ? Atbnfion LCE ( / / ^•' 50. Victim's Name 51. Dal /DD / VY) SZ 5• 53. RacarEflelicity 56. Ramada / SuEpoeru lM *1 P1896606-5 - 57- a". Iwt a.dg. W. DEFENDANT'S COPY -COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Cnl INTY OF- CUMBERLAND Mag. D,sl No.: 09-2-01 ...• 'nmP.: nOn PAULA P. CORREAL Address: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Telephone: (717 ) 240 - 6564 17013-0000 CORY A. CORMANY 1101 CLAREMONT RD CARLISLE, PA 17013 NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY HEARING COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS rCORMANY, CORY ALISTER 1101 CLAREMONT RD CARLISLE, PA 17013 L J etNo.: CR-0000574-01 Date Filed: 10/02/01 OTN: H 424983-6 Charge(s) L8 55104 55 RESISTING ARREST OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT NOTICE TO DEFENDANT A complaint has been filed charging you with the offense(s) set forth above and on the attached copy of the complaint. A preliminary hearing on these charges has been scheduled for: Date: 12/07/01 Place: DISTRICT COURT 09 -2 - O1 CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON Time: 9.30AM 1101 CLAREMONT ROAD • „ CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000 If you fail to appear at the time and place above, a warrant will be issued for your arrest. At the preliminary hearing you may: 1. Be represented by counsel; 2. Cross-examine witnesses and inspect physical evidence offered against you; 3. Call witnesses on your behalf other than witnesses to testify to your good reputation only, offer evidence on your behalf and testify; 4. Make written notes of the proceeding, or have your counsel do so, or make a stenographic, mechanical or electronic record of the proceedings. If you cannot afford to hire an attorney, one may be appointed to represent you. Please contact the office of the district justice for additional information regarding the appointment of an attorney. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. 10/10/01 Date 1 U U Nhw't = j:Distric't-justice My commission expires first Monday of January, 2006. SEAL DATE PRINTED: 10/10/01 COMPLAINT NUMBER: DATE COMPLAINT SIGNED' ' " . 10/02/01 AOPC 629-97 `' "' Defendant's Name: CORY ALISTERCORMANY POLICE - Ilk Docket Number: CR-574-01 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AFFIDAVIT of PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT RIDER CONTAINING CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT OF ARREST FOR CORY ALISTER CORMANY. DOB: 08.17.1966 SSN: 182.62.5623 ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2001, PTLM. MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, WAS ASSIGNED TO TRANSPORT CORY ALISTER CORMANY TO DISTRICT JUSTICE CORREAUS OFFICE FOR A COURT PROCEEDING. UPON CORMANY'S ARRIVAL TO THE INTAKE / TRANSFER AREA OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, PTLM. KENNEDY INSTRUCTED CORMANY TO PLACE HIS HANDS BEHIND HIS BACK FOR HANDCUFFING. CORMANY REFUSED. ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL FROM THE PRISON WERE CALLED FOR ASSISTANCE IN HELPING TO SECURE CORMANY. ONCE ADDITIONAL HELP ARRIVED CORMANY WAS AGAIN ASKED TO PLACE HIS HANDS BEHIND HIS BACK. AGAIN, HE REFUSED. PTLM. KENNEDY THEN APPROACHED `ORMA ,Y AND GRASSED HOLD OF HIS "121 7 4 RM IN A" ATTEMPT TO HANDCUFF HIM. CORMANY RESISTED AND PULLED AWAY AT THE SAME TIME THROWING HIS HEAD BACKWARDS AND 'HEADBUTTING' PTLM. KENNEDY IN THE FACE. AT THIS POINT PTLM. KENNEDY AND SEVERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS HAD TO USE FORCE TO SUBDUE CORMANY IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET HIM TO RESPOND TO COMMANDS. I, DETECTIVE WILLIAM DIEHL , BEING DULY SWORN ACCORDING TO LAW, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE FOREGOING AFFIDAVIT ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF. Sworn to me and subscribed 10-02-01 My commission expires first of January, 2001 District Justice SEAL AOPC 412C- 11124/99 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CORY A. CORMANY, CASE NO. 1:CV-01-1803 Plaintiff FILED EARL F. REITZ, JR., et al. HARRISBURG, PA ' Defendants SEP, 21 2001 MARY E. D'ANDREA CLERK Per STANDING PRACTICE ORDER` eputy e NOW, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT upon the filing of any ro se civil complaint with this court, the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff. Furthermore, if the U.S. Marshal is directed to effect service of the complaint, a copy of the Order shall be served along with the summons and the complaint. Background This order is intended to fully inform the parties to this action of their briefing and other responsibilities pursuant to Local Rules of Court 7.1 through 7.8#and 7.10, Local Rules 26.4 and 56.1, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Local Rule 7.1 provides that all pre-trial motions must be written, be accompanied by a proposed order, and include a certificate indicating whether the opposing party concurs with the motion. However, no concurrence need be sought in pro se prisoner cases. No more than one motion shall be filed under one cover. A moving party is required by Local Rule 7.2 to serve copies of his or her respective papers upon the opposing party. s-a If allegations of facts are relied upon in support of a motion, Local Rule 7.3 mandates that the relevant documents must be filed with the court within ten (10) days after the motion is filed. Local Rules 7.4 and 56.1 direct a party filing a motion for summary judgment to file an accompanying short and concise statement of material facts. Local Rules 7.4 and 56.1, paragraph 2 direct a party opposing a summary judgment motion to file a separate concise statement of material facts responding to the movant's statement. Local Rule 7.5 requires that any party who files a motion shall be required to file a brief in support of that motion within ten (10) days of the filing of the motion. In the event such a moving party does not file a brief in support of his or her motion within the ten (10) day time frame, Local Rule 7.5 provides that such a party shall be deemed to have withdrawn the motion. In the event the moving.party does file a timely brief in support of his or her motion, Local Rule 7.6 provides that the party against whom the motion and brief thereon is filed must file a brief in opposition to the movin4'party's motion, together with any opposing affidavits; deposition transcripts, or other documents, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the brief thereon. If he or she does not file his or her brief and other documentation within the same time frame, Local Rule 7.6 provides that he or she shall be deemed not to oppose the moving party's motion and the motion may therefore be granted. Local Rule of Court 7.7 allows the moving party to file a reply brief to the responding party's opposing brief within ten (10) days of the 2 s3 filing of the opposing brief. However, a reply brief is not mandatory and the failure to file one will not result in detrimental action. Local Rule 7.8 explains what the "Contents and Length of Pre-trial Briefs" should be. As stipulated in Local Rule 7.10, any motion for reconsideration or reargument shall be filed within ten (10) days after the entry of the judgment order or decree concerned. If no discovery has been initiated in a prisoner case, the parties are directed to file appropriate motions within sixty (60) days after the closing of the pleadings as defined in Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a). If discovery has been initiated by either party prior to that date, the time for filing said motions shall be postponed until thirty (30) days after discovery is closed in conformity with Local Rule 26.4. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) provides that a party who files a motion for summary judgment may file affidavits or other documentation in support of such a motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) also provides that a party may not rely on the allegations set forth in his or her pleadings, such as a complaint, in the face of affidavits or other documentation filed pursuant to Rule 56 which contradict and undermine the facts set forth in such pleadings. Rather, Rule 56 provides that the party opposing a motion for summary judgment should in the face of affidavits or other supporting documentation contradicting or undermining his or her claim, file his or her own affidavits or other substantiating documentation so as to demonstrate that a genuine issue for trial exists and that summary judgment should 3 not be granted. Pursuant to Local Rules 7.6 and 7.8 such contravening affidavits or documentation must be filed within fifteen (15) days of the brief, affidavits and other documentation filed by the moving party in support of his or her motion for summary judgment. If such contravening affidavits or supporting documentation are not filed within this time frame, the motion for summary judgment shall be considered solely upon the affidavits or other supporting documentation filed by the party who filed the motion for summary judgment, and in light of the absence of contravening affidavits or other supporting documentation, summary judgment may be granted. A pro se plaintiff has the affirmative obligation to keep the court informed of his or her address. Should such address change in the course of this litigation, the plaintiff shall immediately inform the court of such change, in writing. If the court is unable to communicate with the plaintiff because the plaintiff has failed to notify the court of his or her address, the plaintiff will be deemed to have abandoned the lawsuit. Attached to this order are copies of Local Rules 7.1 through 7.8 and 7.10, Local Rules 26.4 and 56.1, and a copy of the relevant parts of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: All parties shall follow the requirements of these rules or suffer the consequences of their failure to do such, 4 including possible dismissal of their action. ordered by the court, there will be no hearing. THOMAS I. VANASKIE, Chief Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania A H. O U t,al3 States District Judcre F. MCCLURE, JR. S,y-itgs-'Dstrict Judge N A. RICHARD CAP TO United States District Judge Tt Sed es District Juj e United States District Judge DATED: May 19, 2000 Unless otherwise WILLIAM J. NEAW Unit d States District Judge MAL OLM MUIR U ed State t e e P 71-/- :?? RICHARD P. CONABOY United States Distriict WILLIAM CAT, ELL United ates • istrict ge EDWIN M. KOSIK United States District Judge OY\ STATEMENT The below signed solemnly swear that on or about October 2nd, of the year 2001, Mr. Samuel Coover of the Cumberland County Prison did instruct and inform a violent involuntary ramification submissive an aggressive incident, constitutional a sadistic right, in the Cumberland County Prison. qkmRz) 1p, wlat'3? Print Print R p d;4 I kj Print TMo1y l` Ljh;Lam- Print Sign C'. Sign QLjk --XIL - Sign i Sign Witness Da.t ed Cory A. Cormany Dated NotariESeal Helen D. Sneeublic Middlesex Twp., C County My Commission Ex24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Naar;; s COMMONWEALTH V r, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 01-0092 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY DISORDERLY CONDUCT AFFIANT: PTL. JEFFREY KURTZ CITATION P1899031-1 It 01-0®93 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS AFFIANT: PTL. JEFFREY KURTZ CITATION P1725560-4'r 01-0094 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS AFFIANT: SGT. MICHAEL GUIDO CITATION P1725729-5 01-0095 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE-PUBLIC CONSUMPTION AFFIANT: PTL. WILLIAM D. MILLER CITATION P1899036-6 * 01-0096 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY (1) PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS (2)OPEN CONTAINER AFFIANT: PTL. WILLIAM 'D. MILLER CITATION P1725700-4 CITATION P17256-09-3 01-0097 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY (1) PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS (2)OPEN CONTAINER AFFIANT: PTL. WILLIAM D. MILLER CITATION P1725668-0 CITATION P1725669-1 CORY ALISTER CORMANY IN RE: DEFENDANT FOUND GUILTY & BENCH WARRANT ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2001, the defendant having failed to appear, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 462, the appeals are deemed withdrawn, and the defendant is found guilty on ail charges, the sentence of the Dist-r- -?t 7ust. _._ ~at= sentence of the court being 63 COMMONWEALTH V. CORY ALISTER CORMANY At 01-0092 Criminal Term, sentence of the court is that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution and undergo imprisonment in the Cumberland County Prison for a period of not less than thirty days. At 01-0093 Criminal Term, sentence of the court is that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution and undergo imprisonment in the Cumberland County Prison for a period of not less than thirty days. This sentence-to run consecutive to the sentence imposed at 01-0092. At 01-0094 Criminal Term, sentence of the court is that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution and undergo imprisonment in the Cumberland County Prison for a period of not less than thirty days. This sentence to likewise run consecutive to the foregoing sentences. At 01-0095 Criminal Term, sentence of the court is that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution and a fine of $25.00. At 01-0096 Criminal Term, sentence of the court at Count 1, a count of Public Drunkenness, is that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution and undergo imprisonment in the Cumberland County Prison for a period of not less than thirty days, to run consecutive to the sentences already entered in this case. On Count 2, Open Container, the court notes that the defendant was found not guilty. At 01-0097 Criminal Term, sentence of the court at Count 1, a count of Public Drunkenness, is that the defendant pay the costs :_` prosecution and undergo imprisonment in the Cumberland County Prison for a period of not iess than third, .iT11L)o S=-` . 53 COMMONWEALTH V. CORY ALISTER CORMANY Sentence of the court at Count 2, a count of Open Container, is that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution and a fine of $25.00. A bench warrant is issued for the defendant's arrest and for his immediate commitment to the Cumberland County Prison for the purpose of service of the sentences herein imposed. It is noted that the defendant is not deserving of any credit for time previously served in these cases. By the Court, Kevi . Hess, J. P_lina Andreoli Certified Legal Intern Office of the District Attorney Darrell Dethlefs, Esquire Court-appointed for the Defendant Probation Victim Services DJ Correal Sheriff CCP .bg RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, Pa. 17013 Defendant: Steve Calaman Gary Sholenburger Jeffrey Kurtz Mathew Kennedy Curtis Colbertson Samuel Coover Jeffrey Franks Unidentified I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about February, of the year 1995, and through or about December, of the year 2001, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with intent to commit a specific crime, he does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 2) 2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General rule - a person is guilty of involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the doing of a lawful act in a reckless or grossly negligent manner,' he causes the death of another person. (b) Grading - Involuntary manslaughter is a misdemeanor of the first degree where the victim is under 12 years of age and is in the care custody or control of the person who caused the death involuntary manslaughter is a felony of the second degree. 3) 2701. Simple Assault - a person is guilty of assault if he: (1) attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (2) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or (3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury. 4) 2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury. 5) 2706. Terroristic Threats - a person is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree if he threatens to commit any crime of violence with intent to terroize another or cause evacuation of a building, place of assembly, or facility of public transportation, or otherwise to cause serious public inconvenience or in reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience. 6) 2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if; with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action. 9 7) 3105. Prompt Complaint - prompt reporting to public authority is not required in a prosecution under this chapter: Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from introducing evidence of the alleged victims failure to promptly report the crime if such evidence would be admissible pursuant the rules of evidence. 8) 3126. Indecent Assault - a person who has indecent contact with another not his spouse, or causes such other to have indecent contact with him is guilty of indecent assault a misdemeanor of the second degree if: (1) he does so without the consent of the other person; (2) he knows that the other person suffers from a mental disease or defect which renders him or her incapable of appraising the nature of his or her conduct; (3) he knows that the other person is unaware that a indecent contact is being committed; or (5) the other person is in custody of law or detained in a hospital or other institution and the actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over him. 9) 4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect the pecuniary interest of any person. 10) 4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter. 11) 4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any lawful act in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the later in the capacity of public servant. 12) 5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any unlawful act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental function. 13) 5121. Escape - a person commits an offense if he unlawfully removes himself from official detention following temporary leave granted for a specific purpose or limited period. 14) 5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in a official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purporting capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or 9 enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity. 15) 5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in contemplation of official action by himself or by a governmental unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access in his official capacity and which has not been made public he: (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by such information or official action; (2) speculates or wagers on the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids another to do any of the foregoing. 16) 5501. Riot - a person is guilty of riot, a felony of the third degree, if he participates with two or more others in a course of disorderly conduct: (1) with intent to commit or facilitate the commission-' of A felony or misdemeanor; (2) with intent to prevent or coerce official action; or (3) when the actor or any other participant to the knowledge of the actor uses or plans to use a firearm or deadly weapon. 17) 5503. Disorderly Conduct - a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a.risk__thereof, he_: (1) engage.s_ in fight or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazard or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitiment purpose of the actor. 18) 5726. Action for Removal from Office or Employment - any aggrieved person shall have the right to bring an action in Commonwealth Court against any investigative or law enforcement officer, public official or public employee seeking the officer's, official's or employee's removal from office or employment on the grounds that the officer, official or employee has intentionally violated the provisions of this chapter. If the court shall conclude that such officer, official or employee has in fact intentionally violated the provisions of this chapter, the court shall order the dismissal or removal from office of said officer, official or employee. 901 - 1972, Dec. 2504 - 1972, Dec. 2701 - 1972, Dec. 2705 - 1972, Dec. 2706 - 1972, Dec. 2906 - 1972, Dec. 3105 - 1972, Dec. 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, P. L. P. L. P. L. P. L. P. L. P. L. P. L. 1482, No. 334, 1482, No. 334, 1482, No. 334, 1482, No. 334, 1482, No. 334, 1482, No. 334, 1482, No. 334, effective effective effective effective effective effective effective Tune 6, 1973. June 6, 1973. June 6, 1973. June 6, 1973. June 6, 1973. June 6, 1973. June 6, 1973. 3126 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 4114 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 4702 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 4703 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5101 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5121 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5301 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5302 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5501 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5503 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 5726 - 1978, Oct. 4, P.L. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 1482, No. 831, No. 334, 334, 334, 334, 334, 334, 334, 334, 334, 334, L64, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. 1, effective June 6, 1973. effective in 60 days. I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth_in_ the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated ??I t! lO i By "7" Cory A. Cormany -4: K-S SWORN STATEMENT 1. On or about at approximately mid-day, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was in his assigned cell writing in Cumberland County Prison. 2. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was abruptly and aggressively attacked and thrown to the floor, and then was probed with electronic shocking devices. 3. Proceeding the aforementioned described event, the Defendant Steve Calaman, as identified from another occurrence and accompanied by several unidentified individuals, did pillage the Plaintiff and did ramshackle him causing a riskful and harmful situation and circumstance. 4. On or about May 29th, at approximately mid-afternoon or thereto, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was serviced with summary citations while reading legal textes in his assigned cell at Cumberland County Prison. 5. Proceeding the aforementioned servicing definition, the Defendant Jeffrey Franks, did proceed judiciary statutes corroborating allegation with the Defendant Steve Calaman and another individual without detecting a plaintiff's deposition or investigating a defendant's disposition. 6. Prior thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was tied and fastened to a board, then probed and kicked repeatedly for an indefinite time period, on several occasions, litigating the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. 97-0174. 7. On or about September 6th, at approximately mid-morning, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was committed to the county prison regarding a misdemeanor incident alleged in the Borough of Carlisle. 8. Pursuant the aforementioned commitment status, the Plaintiff was grabbed around the throat and choked close to unconsciousness on two occasions, within a five minute time spand, by the Defendant Gary Sholenburger prescient a preliminary hearing. 9. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant did push the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, by the neck into a corner area, then into a secluded adjacent cell while screaming and yelling loud verbal obscenities verificative a Commitment Lieutenant Over. 10. On or about February 5th, at approximately early-morning, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was walking swiftly home down Irvin Row in the Borough of Carlisle. 11. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was grappled and pummeled in and out of an automobile by several unidentified individuals, and then committed to the Carlisle Hospital. 12. Proceeding the aforementioned commitment process, the Plaintiff was questioned and interrogated without constitutional warning as to his injuries, and was then bondaged and secured without warrant careless the Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz. 13. On or about May 17th, at approximately mid-afternoon, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was summoned a series of allegations regarding a subject matter collaborated in the Borough of Carlisle. 14. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was issued five citations, relevant a babysitting detail, and serviced noncertified through the U.S. Mail. 15. Proceeding thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications, the Plaintiff was grabbed again around the throat and choked by the Defendant Mathew Kennedy, then tackled and pummeled in and out of a secured location, nonconsensual an optional hearing, litigating K1 the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. dr-0yCN, 16. On or about September 12th, at approximately mid-morning, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was pummeled and grappled in and out of an automobile pursuant a choking incident at the Cumberland County Prison. 17. At or. about the aforesaid date.and time, the Defendant Curtis Colbertson, along with several unidentified individuals and a Staffing Sergeant Teaney, did bondage and scratch and protract the Plaintiff, putting him in a prison holding cell. 18. Prior thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did consider a summary issue appeal and did decide a contentional matter therein, communicative a radical situation _and_circumstance, and did later seek medical attention despite such enveloped caution. 19. On or about October 2nd, at approximately early-afternoon or thereto, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was bondaged and forcibly intimidated, then escorted and stripped in a secured holding area in the Cumberland County Prison. 20. At or about the aforesaid date and time, numerous unidentified individuals did proceed the actions described, and did not service the Plaintiff with a court order as he did request prescient such said scheduled activity. 21. Prior the foregoing the Defendant Jeffrey Franks, did proceed judiciary litigations provoking an intentional medium conspiratorial the Defendant Mathew Kennedy and the District Justice No. 09-2-01 relevant an Order. 22. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant Jeffrey Franks did investigate a complaint liable the county district attorney; without depositioning a defendant or dispositioning a plaintiff preponderate an instigation. (Y I Z\I_ I ?) 23. Proceeding the aforementioned scheduled activity, the Defendant Samuel Coover did inform the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany and numerous other unidentified individuals, that there was to be a training exercise using them differentiated an advisory. 24. Pursuant the foregoing the Plaintiff has questioned motive and intent substantial a requisite criminal behavior, and political the conspiratorial allegations enstated during and throughout the eventful occasions defined, wherein the Plaintiff does feel victimized as an individual residence of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 25. The Defendants Steve Calaman, Gary Sholenburger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey Franks have violated constitutional provisions regardless an elector.i_al _inti.a-tive and have influenced propaganda and media_ costly the United States of America. 26. The Plaintiff has suffered and h-as sustained injuries, abusive and negligible treatment, stressful and constant condemnation punishible other obligations and wrongful actions pursuant immunilo.ical criminal ramifications, and-preponderate further civil li_tigatinns constitutional a decisional consideration. I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. !iA Witnessed Cory A. Cor y Dated d) p Helen D. Notarial Seal isSion E ices June 24,2Pgg 0 RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, Pa. 17013 Defendant: I?Iaswadeh Arafat Alonzo Thorton Joe Anilus Kieth Walker Jimmy Hernandez I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about November 4th, of the year 2001, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with intent to commit a specific crime, he does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 2) 4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any unlawful act in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the latter in the capacity of public servant. 3) 5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Functions - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other.governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions. 4) 5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime,'as by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into negotiable funds. 5) 5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to an offense. 6) 5503. Disorderly Conduct - a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with.intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages in fight or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by an act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor. (1) L- 7) 5508. Disrupting Meetings and Processions - a person commits a misdemeanor of the third degree if, with intent to prevent or disturb a lawful meeting, procession or gathering, he disturbs or interrupts it. 8) 6504. Public Nuisances - whoever erects, sets up, establishes, maintains, keeps, or continues, or causes to be erected, set up, established, maintained, kept or continued, any public or common nuisance is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, where the nuisance is in existence at the time of the conviction and sentence, the court, in its discretion, may direct either the defendant or the sheriff of the county at the expense of the defendant to abate the same. 901 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 4703 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5101 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5107 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5108 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5503 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 5508 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. 6504 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973. SWORN STATEMENT 1. On or about November 4th, at approximately 1:00 PM, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, was studing in the Law Library at the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 2. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant Maswadeh Arafat did enter the said Law Library in C.C.P., and did sit down at an adjacent chair, adjacent to the Plaintiff. 3. Prior the aforementioned incident the Defendant did solicit information in a unit staff station responsive a C.O. Albright at the Cumberland County Prison. 4. The Defendant Maswadeh Arafat did remark after the World Trade Center catastrophe saying, "I'm an American too... I needed money, I (2) needed money." 0 5. "I am a.Muslim, we are peaceful people and only kill when we need to'.', the Defendant Maswadeh Arafat said in regards to the foregoing catastrophe questionable the C.O. Albright. 6. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did inform the Defendant that he did not have to make or corroborate such issues, the Defendant replied, "I know, I know... they told me my rights, I am not ashamed." 7. Proceeding the aforementioned incident, the Plaintiff did recognize that the Defendant Maswadeh Arafat was additionally talking about his instant criminal problems as he did request an institutional "Request Slip". 8. In the said Law Library pursuant November 4th, the Defendant Maswadeh Arafat did begin to express concerns and questions to the Plaintiff about his current dilemna, objectional an incarceration; 9. The Defendant did implicate the above listed Defendants Alonzo Thorton, Joe Anilus and Kieth Walker saying, "I told those guys not to talk about what happened... or else they could die." 10. The Defendant Maswadeh Arafat did additionally state that he had been delivered some type of package, however did not have a record for the object in question circumstantial a inquiry. 11. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did conclude a series of tedious and troublesome expressions, finding a ramification of guilt concurrent the Defendant's criminal allegations substantial his said incarceration. 12. The Plaintiff did hear the Defendant say, "I know they hired this Walker guy, but I was out of the country and didn't own the buisness... so how can they...?" i 13. The Defendant Maswadeh Arafat did exclaim when sequestered curious the Plaintiff, "I don't know, I sold the buisness and got (3) the money I needed... when it burned down." 14. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did acknowledge that; he had heard enough regarding the said criminal allegation, yet was continually interrupted by the Defendant. 15. The Defendant did.procrastinate financial and monetary issues costly a reception, and did continue and ramble on about other inmates and his current bail imposition set forth disencumbered a situation. 16. The Defendant Alaswadeh Arafat did ridicule the Defendants Alonzo Thorton, Joe Anilus and Kieth Walker describing said "Payoffs" he was to be involved in diablerie a judicial pretext. 17. Proceeding the aforementioned corroboration the Defendant did solicit information on two other occasions burdensome the Plaintiff, and did also exacerbate useless legal rhetoric time and time again. 18. In the said Law Library reiterative December 31st, the Plaintiff. Cory A. Cormany did listen to a series of conjugational remarks conspiratorial and prescient a violent outcome. 19. The Defendant Jimmy Hernandez did instigate a pecuniary transaction with and to the Defendant Ilaswadeh Arafat allega.ry an illicit narcotic, and timely a seemingly enjoyable benefit. 20. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did witness such capable activity and did proceed a criminal review to the Attorney General's Office of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 21. The Defendant Maswadeh Arafat did procrastinate continual obfuscations and rude literate outbreaks stating in part, "you know I'm good for it we seen keys together, yo know blood." 22. The Defendants did also ramble on solicit other matters pertinent the American Government, relevant the people of the United States that did serve no legitimate purpose sufficient an established nuisance. (4) L-5 23. The Plaintiff did suffer constant and contradictive alarms, stressful demands and requests, constitutional defamation, loud belligerent dictational outbursts and liberal condemnation during and throughout the insidious subjugation described. I, Cory A. Corma.ny, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Witnessed ?-/--0-?- Dated Cory A. Corman of o Dated Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed. Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pehnsylvania Association of Notaries (5) EXHIBITS M THROUGH X CONTINUED (2) RE: District Attorney Defendant[s]: Cumberland County Samuel Coover Court House Square Mathew Kennedy Carlisle, Pa. 17013 Edmund Zigmund Brian McVitti Paula Correal Unidentified I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, de hereby state and swear that at or about August, of the year 1995, and through or about June, of the year 2002, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes. 1) 902. Criminal Solicitation - a person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime with the intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he commands, encourages or requests another person to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such crime or which would establish his complicity in its commission or attempted commission. 2) 2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General rule - a person is guilty of involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the doing of a lawful act in a reckless or grossly negligent manner, he causes the death of another person. 3) 2701. Simple Assault - a person is guilty of assault if he: (1) attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury. 4) 2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which serve no legitimatepurpose. 5) 2902. Unlawful Restraint - a person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in circumstances exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or (2) holds another in a condition of involuntary servitude. 6) 2903. False Imprisonment - a person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he knowingly restrains another unlawfully so as to interferer substantially with his liberty. (1) 7) 2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if; with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action. 8) 4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person. 9) 4501. Definitions "Harm" - loss disadvantage or injury, or anything so regarded by the person affected, including loss, disadvantage or injury to any person or entity in whose welfare he is interested. 10) 4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter. 11) 5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purporting capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right privilege, power or immunity. 12) 5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in contemplation of official action by himself or by a governmental unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access in his official capacity and which has not been made public: (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by such information or official action, (2) speculates or wagers on the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids another to do any of the foregoing. 902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 2504 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 2701 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 2709 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. (2) M'3 2902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. As amended 1974, Dec. 30, P.L. 1129, No. 361, 2, imd. effective. 2903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P. L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 2906 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 4114 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 4501 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 4702 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 5301 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. 5302 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973. SWORN STATEMENT 1. On or about February 18th, of the year 1995, at approximately late-evening or thereto, Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was pummeled and grappled out of house and home at gun point. 2. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was briefly hospitalized and than admitted to the Cumberland County Prison under the supervision of a Warden Reitz Jr., deceptive a said probable cause, and a said authentic warrant of arrest. 3. Proceeding thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications dictated, Defendant Samuel Coover, a prison training official, and other associates did corroborate criminal offenses pursuant a Ptl. Larry Kell of the Carlisle Police Department. 4. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff did file and petition several criminal and civil issues within the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County, verificative the problematic intentions collaborated therein the Case Nos. 96-1730 and 96-1969. 5. Prescient the aforementioned prison commitment, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did summons a complaint, relevant illegal substance abuse and said transactions, a child custody/visitation agreement, and alleged assaults, having occurred in the Borough of Carlisle, litigating the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. 94-1679. (3) 0 6. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany asserts herein that he did witness a Mr. John Adams of the Cumberland County Community at or about the whereabouts of a Mr. Raymond Motter, prior to the said; alleged complaint, associating suspicious activities interested a factual situation circumstantial a Legal Adoption. 7. Pursuant therefor the foregoing procedural ramifications explained, the Plaintiff did withstand a meeting with a Cumberland County District Attorney, presiding Mr. William Gabaig, whom did imply in short; that he should provide quote, "Assistance" for the problems identified and presented withal the Carlisle Police Department. 8. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did witness the aforementioned John Adams, along with his said natural brother, in and about the month of June, of the year 2001, in and around the N. Pitt Street area of the Borough of Carlisle carrying on and about continual activities in a blue mini-van; curious events described important a Mr. Carl Heyward set forth in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. 01-6467. 9. Pursuant therein the foregoing relations described, the Defendant Mathew Kennedy did instantaneously invoke criminal incident regarding the Plaintiff, causative a confusing situation and circumstance, enveloping minor and infant children in the Borough of Carlisle and the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. 10. On or about May 29th, at approximately mid-afternoon or therein, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, did recognize an official obligation liable a criminal allegation. 11. Prior the aforementioned official ramification expected, the Defendant Samuel Coover did manage and administrate the staffing associates of the Cumberland County Prison important said incidents described thereto the Carlisle Police Department and the Courts of Cumberland County. (4) M-5 12. The Defendants did oversee and acknowledge numerous incidents involving the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany beyond a freedom of choice; which did infact cause him pain and suffering, along with emotional and mental and physical duress, costly claimed and reviewed in a U.S. Grievance Action Case No. 1:CV-02-0046. 13. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was serviced with two summary citations after and in which he had been imprisoned for approximately sixteen months in solitary confinement (The Hole), allegedly and in most part; for disobeying said orders and commands set forth by the Cumberland County Prison. 14. Proceeding the aforementioned servicing definition, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, did request a hearing, and an appeal; forthright a District Justice Magisterial No. 09-02-01, and a C.O. Calaman and a C.O. Sanderson of the Cumberland County Prison communistic the Cumberland County District Attorney of Pennsylvania. 15. Prior thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications created, the District Justice alleged; did receive and respond to a civil suit petitioned by the Plaintiff, and did pass and determine judgment, litigating the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. 95-5222. 16. On or about September 6th, at approximately late-evening or thereto, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was pummeled and grappled out of house and home at gun point once again. 17. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, was implicated and than admitted to the Cumberland County Prison excogitive a said probable cause, and a said authentic warrant of arrest. 18. Proceeding therefore the foregoing procedural ramifications implemented, the Defendant Samuel Coover did once again corroborate criminal offenses pursuant a Ptl. Gary Shulenberger and a Pd. David Tilton both of the Carlisle Police (5) M 3 Department. 19. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany asserts herein that he did witness a Ms. Tracy Gibson call and go to the dentist, and request to have, and did have several infected molars extracted, then did proceed complaint pre-emptive a "Tenancy in Common", litigating the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. 96-4435. 20. On or about June 21st, at approximately early-evening or therein, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was once again pummeled and grappled pursuant the county prison, submissive an action and a series of lies. 21. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was attacked and than admitted to the Cumberland County Prison communistic a said probable cause, and a said authentic warrant of arrest. 22. Prior herein and pertinent hereto the foregoing events defined, the Plaintiff did file and petition criminal and civil relief serviceable the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County and the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office, informative unconstitutional situations and circumstances dictated problematic; therefore the Case No. 01-1727. 23. On or about August 6th, at approximately early-afternoon or thereto, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was committed to the county prison significant a civil litigation and a statutory rule, timely the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. 24. Pursuant therein the aforesaid order of the court, the Plaintiff was summoned and than omitted to the Cumberland County Prison excusable a said probable cause, and a said authentic warrant of arrest. 25. Proceeding thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications requested, the (6) M1 Defendant Edmund Zigmund did corroborate criminal offenses substantial the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, and pursuant the Defendant Mathew Kennedy, allegorical a Det. William Deihl, and other associates of the Cumberland County Prison. 26. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff did file and petition several criminal and civil issues within the United States District Court of Pennsylvania, verificative the problematic intentions actecedented therein the Case No. l : CV-01-1803. 27. Pursuant the aforementioned prison commitment, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was summoned a complaint relevant an illegal transport requirement and assumed transactions, a child custody/visitation dilemma, and alleged conducts, having occurred in the Borough of Carlisle, quoting the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. 01-2091. 28. On or about October 2nd, at approximately mid-afternoon or therein, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, did once again recognize an official obligation enumerative a criminal conviction. 29. Prior the aforementioned official ramification forecasted, the Defendant Samuel Coover did manage and administrate the staffing associates of the Cumberland County Prison important said incidents described thereto the Carlisle Police Department and the Courts of Cumberland County. 30. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany asserts herein that he did witness a Mr. Jimmie Hernandez of the Cumberland County Community at or about the whereabouts of a Mr. Carl Heyward, pursuant to his said; alleged commitment, associating suspicious activities interested a factual situation circumstantial a Legal Conviction. 31. Prescient therefore the foregoing procedural ramifications actuated, the (7) Plaintiff did withstand a meeting with a Cumberland County Legal Service Attorney, presiding Mr. Dirk Berry, whom did imply in short; that he should provide quote, "Evidence" for the problems identified and collaborated withal the Carlisle Police Department. 32. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did witness the aforementioned Carl Heyward, along with his said cell mate, in and about the month of January of the year 2002, in and around the Institutional Gymnasium area of the Cumberland County Prison carrying on and about illicit activities in a secluded corner space; curious events described relevant a Mr. John Adams set forth the District Attorney in the Cumberland County Common Pleas Court Case No. 01-2091. 33. Proceeding therein the foregoing transactions described, the Defendant Briam McVitti did instantaneously apply criminal incident regarding the Plaintiff, purposeful a liberal situation and circumstance including firearms and alcohol and ethical instances in the Cumberland County Prison and the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. 34. On or about May 6th, at approximately mid-day or therefor, the Defendant Paula Correal did remand and schedule a hearing and actual proceeding complaisant the North Middleton Police Department and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 35. Prior hereto and pertinent herein the foregoing events defined, the Mr. John Adams did relay messages and propaganda conspicuous illegal transactions, directly verbal the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany at the Garden Cave Tavern, acknowledging social consequences in the North Middleton Township. 36. Pursuant therein the foregoing procedural ramifications potentated, the Defendant Paula Correal did summons a criminal offense informative the Defendant Brian McVitti in the Commonwealth Court of Cumberland County. 37. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff has questioned (8) E9 commitment at Cumberland County Prison and is petitioned or ordered without security or bond and has been deprived of authentic rights and regulations on previous occasions subordinate the District Justice Magisterial No. 09-2-01. 38. Prior the aforementioned immunilogical ramifications and preponderate a civil litigation the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany does acknowledge an orthodox of religion controversial a preferable practical Mosaical Messiahship. 39. The Defendants Samuel Coover, Mathew Kennedy, Edmund Zigmund, Brian McVitti and Paula Correal have violated constitutional provisions regardless an electoral initiative and have influenced propaganda and media costly the United States of America. 40. The Plaintiff has suffered and has sustained injuries, lack of medical treatment ambitious an employable opportunity, stressful and contradictive commands and obligations, loud and unnecessary confinement and consummative condemnation during and throughout these unconstitutional events. I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Witnessed Cory A. Corman Dated a00 By ?lYP. CLlVl11f?1.110f?'?? (9) ? saw, a•?e.?.??.?r ONA RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Court House Square Carlisle, PA 17013 Defendant: William Diehl Paula Correal I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about the said incidents set forth within, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant[s] did commit the following crimes: 1) 901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with intent to commit a specific crime, he does any act which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. 2) 2502. Murder - murder of the first degree - a criminal homicide constitutes murder of the first degree when it is committed by an intentional killing. 3) 2903. False Imprisonment - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he knowingly restrains another unlawfully so as to interfere substantially with his liberty. 4) 2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if, with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official; or cause an official to take or withhold action. 5) 4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person. 6) 4501. Definitions "Harm" - loss, disadvantage or injury, or anything so regarded by the person affected, including loss, disadvantage or injury to any person or entity in whose welfare he is interested. 7) 4952. Intimidation of Witness or Victims - a person commits an offense if, with the intent to or knowledge that his conduct will obstruct, impede, impair, prevent or interfere with the administration of criminal justice he N-a intimidates or attempts to intimidate any witness or victim to: (1) Refrain from informing or reporting to any law enforcement officer, prosecuting official or judge concerning any information, document or thing relating to the commission of a crime., (2) Give any false or misleading information or testimony relating to the commission of any crime to any law enforcement officer, prosecuting official or judge. (3) Withhold any testimony, information, document or thing relating to the commission of a crime from any law enforcement officer, prosecuting official or judge. (4) Give any false or misleading testimony, information, document or thing, relating to the commission of a crime to an attorney representing a criminal defendant. (5) Elude, evade or ignore any request to appear or legal process summoning him to appear to testify or supply evidence. (6) Absent himself from any proceeding or investigation to which he has been legally summoned. 8) 5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to any offense. 9) 5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in an official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity. 10) 5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in contemplation of official action by himself or by a government unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access in his official capacity and which has not been made public; he (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by such information or official action; (2) speculates or wagers on the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids another to do any of the foregoing. 11) 5125. Absconding Witness - a person commits a misdemeanor of the third ?-3 degree if, having been required by virtue of any legal process or otherwise to attend and testify in any prosecution for a crime before any court, judge, justice or other judicial tribunal, or having been recognized or held to bail to attend as a witness on behalf of the Commonwealth or defendant, before any court having jurisdiction, to testify in any prosecution, he unlawfully and willfully conceals himself or absconds from this Commonwealth, or from the jurisdiction of such court, with intent to defeat the end of public justice, and refuses to appear as required by such legal process or otherwise. 12) 5501. Riot - a person is guilty of riot, a felony of the third degree, if he participates with two or more others in a course of disorderly conduct: (1) with intent to commit or facilitate the commission of a felony or misdemeanor; (2) with intent to prevent or coerce official action; or (3) when the actor or any other participant to the knowledge of the actor uses or plans to use a firearm or deadly weapon. 901 - 1972, Dec. 61 P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6 1973 2502- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2906- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4114- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4501 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4952- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5108 - 1972, Dec. 61 P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5301 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5302- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5125 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5501 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1 effective June 6 . 1973 , , . I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C. S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated ?p ta 1401 By ory A. Corman INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Attempt: In that William Diehl and Paula Correal did take substantial steps toward the commission of a crime constitutional a Defendant. Murder: In that the Defendants did intentionally plan a potential homicide problematic an isolated statute that constituted a necessary riskful procedure. False Imprisonment: In that the Defendants did knowingly attempt to unlawfully restrain and interfere with the liberty of an individual. Criminal Coercion: In that the Defendants did restrict freedom of action intentional a criminal offense and deliberate an accusation exposing secrets and subjects contemptual an official hatred. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception: In that the Defendants did deceive an individual purporting a pecuniary interest likely the execution of a testimonial instrument. Harm: In that the Defendants did proceed judiciary affectiveness causing an individual a loss and a disadvantage substantial an important interest. Intimidation of Witness or Victims: In that the Defendants did relate information misleading a judicial object intimidating a person reportorial a testimony and prosecutorial an official action. Compounding: In that the Defendants did refrain the suspected commission of a crime considerate a pecuniary benefit reliant an information. Official Oppression: In that the Defendants did knowingly deny and impede an individual illegally purporting arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment and personal right while taking advantage of an official capacity. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information: In that the Defendants are public servants and are associated with a government unit and do transact interest informative an official action and did access another in such speculation. Absconding Witness: In that the Defendants did process an individual on behalf of the Commonwealth and did willfully conceal a jurisdiction intentional the end of public justice refusing legal obligations. Riot: In that the. Defendants did participate with one or more individuals coercing the commission of a crime including the uses of firearms and knowledgable an official action intentional the case term I:CV-01-1803 and the docket files NT-767-96, NT-727-96, NT-777-01, NT-778-01, NT-779-01, NT- 780-01 and NT-781-01 proceeding CR-574-01 and the case numbers 01-92, 93, 94, 95, 96 and 97. 0 I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendants be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unworn falsification to authorities. I'a 4 4-) 1 Q I Dat Dated Signature Signature Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries AFFIDAVIT On September 12, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was summoned and then attacked and mistreated at the Cumberland County Prison in an attempt to remove my presence pursuant thereafter and therefore a commitment summary. A Ptl. Mathew Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department did forcibly and negligibly corroborate an event without an arrest warrant or security bond including prison officers and staffing associates. I was subjected an arms length contemptual Ms. Paula Correal in Middlesex Township. The Defendant Paula Correal is alleged to be a District Justice Magisterial Number 09-2-01 in Cumberland County. Pursuant the incident described in the aforementioned paragraph I did witness a Corrections Officer Teaney solicit information reportorial the Ptl. Mathew Kennedy, and directional other prison officers and staffing associates. I was not informed or serviced with any information forthright a procedural requirement and was bondaged and confined, against my will, for an indefinite time period. Cumberland County Prison did compile multiple personnel objectional my comprehension; that, did seem to constitute a "Security Breach" functional an emergency situation or circumstance. I was ridiculed and allegated purportionate a disadvantage and indifferent the commission of a crime which did absent and abscond an evidence and a testimony for the Criminal Case Term 01- 2091. On October 16, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was delivered a certified letter criminative Mr. William Diehl and affirmative Ms. Paula Correal. Prior to October 2, 2001, and prescient May 29, 1996, the Defendant William Diehl did prejudicially proceed an investigation pursuant a Det. Jeffery Franks, and the Defendant Paula Correal. On both occasions Defendant Paula Correal did concur Mr. William Diehl and did elude unlawful participation relative the Cumberland County Prison, and orderly a public servant and an official action. Proceeding justification and judgment for incident and issues stated within; I was shot at and beaten out of malice knowledgable the District Attorney of Cumberland County. The Defendant William Diehl is alleged to be a Detective for the District Attorney in Cumberland County. Prior the incident described in the aforementioned paragraph, I did perform a baby-sitting task for a Ms. Nicole Jastron verifiable a Mr. Jerry Engle in the 4th block area of North Pitt Street located in the Borough of Carlisle. I did proceed official interlocutory consent to a Ptl. Patrick O'Leary of the Carlisle Police (9) Department, relevant a hearing, important the potentated outcome of an evidence and an investigation. Cumberland County Prison did proceed multiple sentences objectional my commitment; that, did seem to constitute a "Police Action" colorful an emergency situation or circumstance. I was ridiculed and allegated purportionate a disadvantage and indifferent the commission of a crime which did substantiate and enforce a legality and an attorney for the Civil Case Term 01- 6467. On December 7, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was interrogated and then informed and accused at the Cumberland County Prison in an effort to collaborate an official hatred intentional a lively endangerment and justifiably political a departmental correction, denying me witnesses. An Attorney Dirk E. Berry did acquire representation factual a prison policy and did remand specific instances to a Corrections Officer Teaney prejudicial a documented pecuniary benefit. Mr. William Diehl did sequester an affidavit intimate a prison directive for Ms. Paula Correal. The Defendant William Diehl and the Defendant Paula Correal both did knowingly interfere with my liberty constituting the suspected commission of a crime. I was subjected detention, arrest, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment and propaganda sufficient a privilege and important an enjoyment. Preceding the incident described in the aforementioned paragraph, I did proceed courtesy letters to Ms. Paula Correal and Mr. William Diehl suspicious a defendant, naming; Steve Calaman, Carl Heyward, Frank Teaney, Mathew Kennedy and William Diehl allegory a criminal behavior and a supplemental expectation, and relative a motive and an offense. The Defendant William Diehl and the Defendant Paula Correal both did facilitate the exportation of deadly force jurisdictional a public justice and did expropriate an official action liable a court of law. The Corrections Officer Teaney, identified herein and hereto, did later advise me that I was dismissed pursuant thereafter and therefore a commitment summary, and did not express reason as to why I could not leave Cumberland County Prison and return home to my place of residence. I do currently reside in North Middleton Township and was employed with K-Mart Corporation previous to being condemned to imprisonment. The Cumberland County Prison and the State Correctional Institute of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania both proclaim the ability to execute death upon leaving without valid consideration. I am awaiting detrimental instruments deceptive the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. I, Cory A. Cormany, on this }day of c r , of the year 2001, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Commonwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Cory A. Corm /4 ? (:::;K? Dated ??W?itnes?s?? Nota(W Seat HOW D. Snead. Notary Public Midtle "TvYp., Cun"dand County My Convnission Expires June 24, 2002 141OW, Pennsytyania Association of Nmangs (E) RE: Attorney General U. S. District Court 228 Walnut Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Defendant: Jeffrey Franks Edmund Zigmund I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that at or about May 29th, of the year 1996, and through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes: 1) 902. Criminal Solicitation - a person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime if with the intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he commands, encourages or request another person to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such crime or which would establish his complicity in its commission or attempted commission. 2) 2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury. 3) 2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same, or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose. 4) 3105. Prompt Complaint - a prompt reporting of public authority is not required in a prosecution under this chapter: Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from introducing evidence of the alleged victim's failure to promptly report the crime if such evidence would be admissible pursuant to the rules of evidence. 5) 3126. Indecent Assault - a person who has indecent contact with another not his spouse, or causes such other to have indecent contact with him is guilty of indecent assault a misdemeanor of the second degree if (1) he does so without the consent of the other person; (2) he knows that the other person o-a suffers from a mental disease or defect which renders him or her incapable of appraising the nature of his or her conduct; (3) he knows that the other person is unaware that an indecent contact is being committed; or (5) the other person is in custody of law or detained in a hospital or other institution and the actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over him. 6) 4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any unlawful act in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the latter in the capacity of a public servant. 7) 5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions. 8) 5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into negotiable funds. 9) 5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information relating to an offense. 10) 5121. Escape - a person commits an offense if he unlawfully removes himself from official detention following temporary leave granted for a specific purpose or limited period. 11) 5503. Disorderly Conduct - a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages in fight or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene 0 language, or makes an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor. 12) 5726. Action for Removal from Office or Employment - any aggrieved person shall have the right to bring an action in Commonwealth Court against any investigative or law enforcement officer, public official or public employee seeking the officer's, official's or employee's removal from office or employment on the grounds that the officer, official or employee has intentionally violated the provisions of this chapter. If the court shall conclude that such officer, official or employee has infact intentionally violated the provisions of this chapter the court shall order the dismissal or removal from office of said officer, official or employee. 902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6 1973 2705- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2709- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 3105- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 3126- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4703 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5101 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5107- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5108- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5121 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5503 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5726- 1972, Oct. 4, P.L. 831, No. 164, , . 2, effective in 60 days. I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unworn falsification to authorities. Dated J a GVL, L BY Cory A. Cormany INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Solicitation: In that Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund did attempt to command and request the commission of a crime intentional a specific conduct encouraged a Defendant or establish a complicity promotional the Defendants. Recklessly Endangering Another Person: In that the Defendants did solicit to recklessly engage in conduct that seriously endangered or did endanger another individual person. Harassment: In that the Defendants did attempt to contact and solicit a course of conduct that seriously annoyed a person for no legitimate purpose threatening further physical, mental and emotional harm. Prompt Complaint: In that the Defendants did provide an evidence in which to pursue and construe an authorized report. Indecent Assault: In that the Defendants did solicit a knowledgeable intention capable of an indecent conduct applicative an institution or a legal custody, and a mental illness. Retaliation for Past Official Action: In that the Defendants did solicit a lawful act knowing that the capacity of a latter is harmful a public service. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function: In that the Defendants did obstruct a criminal administration affirmative a governmental function. Aiding Consummation of Crime: In that the Defendants did intentionally aid another to accomplish a crime thereof an official action. Compounding: In that the Defendants did agree to accept a pecuniary benefit considerate an official action, and did not report or enforce a suspected offense. Escape: In that the Defendants did solicit to unlawfully remove an individual from an official commitment pecuniary the order of the court. Disorderly. Conduct: In that the Defendants did annoy and threaten an individual into fight, using gesture and documentation hazardous a physically offensive condition which served no legitimate purpose. Action for Removal from Office or Employment: In that the Defendants are public servants or official employees and did investigate an aggrieved person deliberately violating constitutional provisions intentional the case term 1:CV-95-0844 and the docket files NT-187-00, NT-188-00, NT-189-00, NT-190-00, NT-205-00, NT-748-00, NT-770-00 and NT-839-00 proceeding CR-574-01 and the case numbers 97-0174 and 01-0432. x: s I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. . l ?; G da. Dated Dated Signature Signatu e Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Nntaries AFFIDAVIT On May 29, 1996, I, Cory A. Cormany, did receive a summons preceding an investigation implemented by Mr. Jeffrey Franks, affirmative and pursuant Mr. Edmund Zigmund, and allegary an indecent incident having occurred in Cumberland County Prison. The Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund did solicit to the conspiratorial actions of a C. O. Steve Calaman, and did criticize and engage a reckless disregard for my life. The Defendants did annoy me and service me with complaints, causing and requiring me to appear forcible a court of law; also involving a Ptl. Mathew Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department, less be subjected and obstructed further incident and confinement. The Defendants were employed through the Cumberland County District Attorney complicated reliant a local payroll, and preponderant a governmental unit. Proceeding the actions and events described in the aforementioned paragraph, I did file a complaint with the common pleas court, civil case term number 96-1969. Mr. Jeffrey Franks did pursue a hearing regarding an official duty and did avoid criminal ramifications important the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County. The Defendant Jeffrey Franks did document issues for a Det. William Diehl and did initiate judicial proceedings determinative a D. J. Paula Correal. I had been subjected a differentiating condemnation prior to, and pursuant to, the said judicious matter. On June 21, 1997, I, Cory A. Cormany, did submit to an attack and other criminative compulsions set forth against my person by a Pt1Shane Cohick, a Ptl. Karen Finkenbinder, and a Ptl. Joseph Hogarth also of the Carlisle Police Department. The Defendant Jeffrey Franks did implement unconstiuent presidential findings substantial the Cumberland County District Attorney costing and causing a constitutional dilemma. I was beaten, gagged and bondaged by the aforementioned individuals while I was attempting to throw away a small amount of garbage into a trash dispenser. I did file a complaint in the common pleas court purposeful a relief and a justification; for the criminal case term number 97-1504. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has not officially adjudicated or finalized a decisional consideration pecuniary an interesting benefit or authorized report, substantial the administrative findings set forth within. Preceding the aforesaid litigation, a Ptl. David Tilden, again of the Carlisle Police Department, did break-in; and attack me, in the middle of the night at my house and home without warrant following an alleged criminal report; noteworthy a deceptive informative evidence. Mr. Jeffrey Franks, nor the aforementioned Det. William Diehl, would acknowledge the alleged incident forthright my contacting 0 and complaining of inaccurate facts and propaganda to the District Attorney or the Public Defender's Office of Cumberland County; nor, by a Ms. Tracey Gibson contacting and complaining of the said same situation and circumstance. An Attorney William Gabaig did renounce judiciary issues in and before the defined; "Patrol Officer" did investigate, and did assure on and about the occasion pronounced that he was quote, "not responsible." On October 2, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, did reconcile a certification to the Cumberland County District Attorney concurrent to, and prior to, a criminative incident having occurred in Cumberland County Prison on September 12, 2001. The Det. William Diehl did solicit to the conspiratorial actions of the aforementioned Ptl. Mathew Kennedy; who did circumvent a reckless disregard for my life pursuant the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund. On October 22, 2001, and December 24, 2001, I did approve notarial complaints to the county district attorney questionable the civil case term number 01-6467 and the said; criminal case term number 01-2536. The Defendants did annoy me and did charge me with complaint causing and requiring me to appear again forcible a court of law; also involving the D. J. Paula Correal of the Cumberland County, less be subjected and obstructed further incident and confinement. The Defendants did associate an affirmation through the Cumberland County Clerk of Court responsive a surety issue, and calculated probable a governmental unit. Prior the actions and events described in the aforementioned paragraph, I did file a complaint with the district circuit court case term number 1:CV-01- 1803. The Det. William Diehl of the Cumberland County D.A. did proceed an affidavit illicit an official duty and did avoid criminal allegation and rule of court important Mr. Edmund Zigmund. I had been subjected discriminatory mistreatments reliable such said legal objects, evidentiary Mr. Jeffrey Franks. The Defendant Edmund Zigmund did document issues liable Det. William Diehl and did determine judicial allegation sufficient the Defendant Jeffrey Franks. I had been segregated and confined an argumentative commitment prior to, and again pursuant to, the said judicious matter. The Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund both did solicit and conspire with two official people compiling and attempting criminal behavior, and justifications intentionally retaliatory an official action or incident, pursuant December 7, 2001, and the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County Case Nos. 01-0494 and 01-2091. The Defendant's associates did schedule unlawful movement and prosecution of my innocence and presence from an unlawful detention or institution informative a deceptive benefit, and substantial a potential criminal payment. I suspect an interference politically influential a civil litigation and a criminal conviction costly a governmental function. I additionally safeguard the possibility of a negotiable fund and a deceptive document obligatory a District (OD Justice and a Clerk of Court. Det. William Diehl did solicit the knowledgeable commission of a judiciary procedure promissary a statute and intentional the Declaration of the United States of America. I, Cory A. Cormany, on this G day of &,,, , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Co monwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Cory A. Corman `?? 4, ft Dated ? Witness Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed, Notary Publlc Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries 0 RE: District Attorney Cumberland County Courthouse Square Carlisle, PA 17013 Defendant: William Diehl Mathew Kennedy John Haggerty David Fones Thomas Dick Tammy Rudy Debra Petonyak Frank Teaney Marie Hall Paula Correal Unidentified I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do hereby state and swear that in or about September, 2001, and through or about the month of November , 2002, the above named defendant[s] did commit the following crimes: 1) 902. Criminal Solicitation - a person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime if with the intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he commands, encourages or request another person to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such crime or which would establish his complicity in its commission or attempted commission. 2) 2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General Rule - a person is guilty of involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the doing of a lawful act in a reckless or grossly negligent manner, he causes the death of another person. 3) 2701. Simple Assault - a person is guilty of assault if he: (1) attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily harm. 4) 2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same, or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose. (9::-a 5) 2902. Unlawful Restraint - a person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in circumstances exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or (2) holds another in a condition of involuntary servitude. 6) 2903. False Imprisonment - a person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he knowingly restrains another unlawfully so as to interfere substantially with his liberty. 7) 2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if; with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action. 8) 4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person. 9) 4501. Definitions "Harm" - loss, disadvantage or injury, or anything so regarded by the person affected, including loss, disadvantage or injury to any person or entity in whose welfare he is interested. 10) 4702. Threat or Other improper Influences in Official or Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter. 11) 5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purporting capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise of enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity. 12) 5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a public C-03 servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in contemplation of official action by himself or by a governmental unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access in his official capacity and which has not been made public: (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by such information or official action; (2) speculates or wagers on the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids another to do any of the foregoing. 902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6 1973 2504 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2701 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 3349 , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2709 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 2902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 As amended 1974, Dec. 3 , . 0, P.L. 1129, No. 361, 2, imd effective 2903- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6 1973 2906- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4114- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4501 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 4702- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5301 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 5302- 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 3347 , 1, effective June 6 . 1973 , . I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set- forth in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated Cory A. Corm y py INCIDENT REPORT Criminal Solicitation: In that William Diehl, Mathew Kennedy, John Haggerty, David Fones, Thomas Dick, Tammy Rudy, Debra Petonyak, Frank Teaney, Marie Hall, Paula Correal and several other unidentifiable individuals did engage in conduct which did constitute a complicity intentional the facilitation of a crime promotional a Defendant or Defendants, and specific an established request or command. Involuntary Manslaughter: In that the Defendants did conspire and solicit a reckless disregard lawful the act of causing or resulting in death. Simple Assault: In that the Defendants are guilty of knowingly or recklessly causing, or attempting to cause physical menace, or bodily injury fearful another. Harassment: In that the Defendants did engage, or repeatedly engaged in acts which served no legitimate purpose following a public course of conduct, and did annoy, or subject physical contact offensive another person. Unlawful Restraint: In that the Defendants did knowingly restrain a person or expose a person to risk of bodily injury conditional an involuntary servitude. False Imprisonment: In that the Defendants did knowingly and unlawfully interfere substantially with an individual liberty liable an imprisonment. Criminal Coercion: In that the Defendants did intentionally and unlawfully restrict a freedom of action detrimental another person exposing and subjecting that person to hatred, ridicule and contempt; guilty a criminal circumstance, and did cause official[s] to take and withhold action. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception: In that the Defendants did deceive and cause another to execute instruments pecuniary an official action; that did affect the purportionate likelihood of a person. Definitions "Harm": In that the Defendants did affect and cause a person a loss and a disadvantage circumstantial an injury, and constitutional an individual welfare. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters: In that the Defendants did threaten harm, and did influence decisions, and opinions, and recommendations intentional an unlawful publication, and an official political conclusion. Official Oppression: In that the Defendants did purport to cause or did cause; an actual illegal official capability while taking advantage of criminal conduct detaining, searching, seizing, mistreating, assessing, lieing or arresting and dispossessing a person and a property powerful an infringement and an immunological enjoyment. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information: In that the Defendants did contemplate an official governmental action and did associate official capacity intentional a public service; which did transact a pecuniary interest that did affect a person's property and free enterprise, informative the aiding of another and beneficial themselves. B I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the Defendant[s] be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. 1 -dated /,0.3 la,;z Dated Signature Signature Notarial Se81 Helen D. Sneed, Notary Pudic MiddlesexTWP., Cumberland Courdy My C Tpission Fires July 24, 2006 Member, Pennsylmlis AssoLtia . Of NoWies AFFIDAVIT On or about March 6th, 2002, at approximately 9:30 AM, I, Cory A. Cormany, did appear at the Cumberland County Court House against my free will, for a said; Formal Trial. Prior to such combative and aggressive behavior and action, the Defendant William Diehl did conspire and solicit actions and incidents with the Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Paula Correal. I did not receive any documentation relevant such said "appearance", prior to or pursuant to the incident described; nor did I understand any cause or probable reasoning for such said; appearance[s], as described herein and hereto. The Cumberland County Prison and Cumberland County Sheriff Office did, and have recognized; an official capacity directly reliant the above named defendants. I had been choked, beaten, bondaged, punched and bitten prior to and pursuant to the said; incident[s], directly reliable the Defendants Frank Teaney and Mathew Kennedy. At or about the time of the event described in the aforementioned paragraph; did occur, I did acknowledge an ability to comprehend an official capacity cooperative the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and did seek legal representation respectable a criminal offense[s]. Proceeding such said; legality, I did also acknowledge imprisonment and a mental and physical capacity forthright a forcible obligation and remitant a reliable release and/or financial discharge. The Defendants William Diehl, Mathew Kennedy, Frank Teaney, and Marie Hall did recognize and concur such legal formality, costly the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. On or about June 7th, 2002, at approximately 6:00 PM, I, Cory A. Cormany, did proceed to walk southward along the sidewalk of South Pitt Street after having acquired a nose bleed in the Borough of Carlisle. Prior to having stumbled over an uneven sidewalk corner, and prior to having ingested antihistamines for a summer hay fever condition, the now identified Defendant John Haggerty did stop his marked police vehicle, in the middle of the street, and did quickly get out of the said; automobile, addressing and calling me by name. The Ptl. Haggerty was wearing a police uniform and did then begin towards me in a fast aggressive manner; while holding his hand over his side-arm. I did not seemingly recognize the identified individual at such described time, having never met him in or at any official or unofficial event. At or about the time of the event described in the aforementioned paragraph; did occur, I did immediately sit down, on the edge of the sidewalk, in hopes that the oncoming aggression asserted by the already defined policeman; would not indicate any action or harm unto me. Pursuant such hopeful ambitions, 0 the already identified defendant did tackle me while I was sitting on the curb, and did throw me to the concrete corner (face down), crashing my forehead into the sidewalk, then did knock me into unconsciousness. Prior to the incident remarked therein by the said; policeman, and pursuant to my filing a civil complaint (Term 02-2770) at the local county court house, I did consume approximately four (4) mixed cocktails and had been invited to my second cousin's residence located along Walnut Street in the Borough of Carlisle; about a half a block from the said incident described thereto. Defendant Paula Correal did implement an official capacity, and did adjudicate amounts, seemingly relevant a notification and a magisterial number; after I had been committed and released from the Carlisle Hospital important my recollection, and liable the said injuries described herein and hereto. District Magistrate Correal did impose financial issues pursuant a civil matter circumstantial the North Middleton Police Department and the Cumberland County District Attorney. I did reconcile and file an appeal for the legal matters involved and included the Defendant John Haggerty considerate June 10th, 2002, and reliable July 10th, 2002. On or about August 27th, 2002, at approximately 9:00 PM, I, Cory A. Cormany, did proceed to walk southward along the sidewalk of North Pitt Street with two (2) fellow associates in the Borough of Carlisle. Pursuant such aforesaid date and time, a marked police car (bearing C.P.D. insignias and emergency lighting) did pull over to the curb of the street adjacent to my stance, with its emergency lights activated. Preceeding thereto the aforementioned action, a uniformed police office did hang out of the passenger window and I did hear a yell loudly stating, "Cormany, Cormany...hold it right there!" I did turn my attention, assumptive the calling of my name, and did recognize a uniformed police officer exiting from the passenger side of the said; marked police car, with the window of the automobile down and the door open; while in motion. Pursuant the yelling and calling of my name I did then identify the uniformed police officer as being Defendant David Fones, while he was leaning out of the described; car window. Ptl. Fones did later advise me that I had had too much to drink and did then search my person and property and did retrieve all of my unattachable belongings pursuant to taking me into a said; custody (including a pack of cigarettes and other miscellaneous items). At or about the time Ptl. Fones did search me, and at or about the time he took the pack of cigarettes, as stated in the foregoing paragraph, the policeman did remove a baggie included an organic, or identified, vegetable matter. Proceeding such described time, another police officer, now recognizable as the Defendant Mathew Kennedy; did exclaim, "oh lookie here... marijuana!" I did attempt to inform and explain to the said officer[s] that the contents therein the said; baggie, was in fact not marijuana, but was a substance called "Hemp". I additionally attempted to note to Ptl. Kennedy that the identifiable vegetable matter did contain T.H.C., however was not of a Delta 9 origin (a three leaf plant) knowledgeable my possession. Prior to the matters stated in the aforesaid paragraph, I had been attempting to return a smoking pipe to my second cousin. During and about the time of the said; transaction, my second cousin (Thomas Dick) did deny such said; obligation, in light of the oncoming marked police car that did in fact draw my attention hereto and herein. I had been at a Barbecue Picnic Party with Thomas and his said; girlfriend (Tammy Rudy) preceeding such incident[s] deferred, and did most wantedly want to return home having had to attend work the following morning. Defendant David Fones did rummage through my personal property and belongings claiming that I was fighting with my said; cousin, whom I have known since I was consequently five (5) years of age. I did consume about three (3) mixed drinks included Vodka and Fruit Juice prior to Ptl. Kennedy's involvement, and was not granted or permitted any type of field sobriety test. I also did in fact acknowledge that I was in fact not fighting; when, and at the time, Ptl. Fones did inquire as to my whereabouts pursuant Defendant Mathew Kennedy. Ptl. Kennedy did, for some unknown reason, place an open container of orange juice; that, I had recently purchased at a convenience store; into my now identified tote bag, dumping the contents therein onto my enclosed notebook and change of clothes. On or about August 27th, 2002, at approximately 9:10 PM, I, Cory A. Cormany, did begin to walk northward along the sidewalk of North Pitt Street, preparatory several accomplices, in the Borough of Carlisle. Pursuant to the said actions stated herein, I did presume that I was to be on my way home, having been invited to stay at a second cousin's residence located on Walnut Street in the Borough of Carlisle. Prior to the fact that I did recognize a smoking pipe that did not legally belong to me, and prior to the fact that I had proceeded to my second cousin's residence hereto identified as the Defendant Debra Petonyak: I was abruptly confronted in the 100 block of the North Pitt Street by the Defendants David Fones and Mathew Kennedy. The defendants did forcibly and violently search and seize me and my property negligible my free will; while bearing and carrying firearms and night sticks in hand, and did push and pull me into an already identified police cruiser, and did deliver and commit me to the Cumberland County Booking Center. The Defendants Thomas Dick and Tammy Rudy did acknowledge that there was not to be any fighting or threatening circumstance or situation having had occurred, pursuant to my said; cooperation, seemingly affirmative Ptl. David Fones and Ptl. Mathew Kennedy. I did not resist nor assault any of the defined defendants thereto or therein, and did not wish to be restrained, nor did I wish to remain in the presence of such violent forces. Mr. Thomas Dick and Ms. Tammy Rudy were, at the said time, accompanying me from Ms. Debra Petonyak's home prior to and pursuant to the objects of intervention, prevention and crime. I did not believe; nor have I received, any order therein or thereto my involvement legally substantial the relevance, or the conclusion of a court of law. Pursuant to the matters stated in the aforesaid paragraph, I had been committed to the Cumberland County Prison substantial the objection of law. During and about the time of the said; commitment, I did receive a criminal notice sealed by the Defendant Paula Correal. The Defendant Mathew Kennedy did again implicate me responsible a court of law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. I was scheduled for appearance[s] proceeding November 27, 2002, judicial the District Magistrate Correal. Ptl. Kennedy did allege several misdemeanor and summary offense[s] pertinent to the description of law. Defendant Mathew Kennedy did convey the Defendant David Fones explicit a procedure and necessary an objectionable action. The Ptl. Fones did witness and examine the legal ramifications stated in an affidavit by the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. On or about September 11th, 2002, at approximately 1:30 PM, 1, Cory A. Cormany, did recognize a prison policy while I was exercising in the institutional gymnasium at Cumberland County Prison in Pennsylvania. Pursuant to the said actions stated herein, I did abide by the verbal commands expressed to me by the Defendants Frank Teaney and Marie Hall. The two (2) mentioned defendants are identified herein as prison staff and are reliable hereto a policy. The Defendant Frank Teaney did initially inform me that I must attend an arraignment proceeding , then did later rebut and contradict himself, saying that it was simply to be a hearing. When I unwantedly attended the aforestated, "Hearing" the Defendant Marie Hall did recant and did contradict the said; Sgt. Teaney, claiming that I had to speak with a District Justice wherein and beyond my said; "Freedom of Choice". The C.O. Hall did inform me that I did not have a lawyer (legal representation) when I did inquire as to the presence of an attorney. The District Justice did intentionally cause a guilty determination disagreeable my situation, and I was then notified of such ramification via a video and fax device. I did not, or could not, deny the detailed procession described, and was subjected endangerment and physical harm negligible a potential and possible deadly circumstance allegorical such said; political objects and legal conclusions. On or about September 24th, 2002, at approximately 9:30 AM, I, Cory A. Cormany, did appear at the Cumberland County Court House, forcible my free will, for a said; Parole Hearing. Pursuant to such rhetorical and combative action and propaganda, the Defendant Mathew Kennedy did conspire and solicit actions and incidents with the Defendants David Fones and William Diehl. I did review all documentation relevant such said; "appearance", pursuant to or prior to the (e) incident litigated; but I did not comprehend all causes or probable reasoning for such said; appearance[s], as described hereto and herein. The Cumberland County Prison and Cumberland County Sheriff Office did, and have acknowledged; an official capacity directly explanatory the above named defendants. I had been choked, beaten, bondaged, punched, and bitten pursuant to and prior to the said; incident[s], directly responsible the Defendants Marie Hall and Mathew Kennedy. At or about the time of the event described in the aforementioned paragraph; did occur, I did not recognize an ability to understand an official capacity cooperative the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and did seek legal representation respectable a criminal offense[s]. Preceeding such said; legality, I did also acknowledge endangerment and a mental and physical harm forthright a reliable obligation and remitant a forcible release and/or financial discharge. The Defendants William Diehl, Mathew Kennedy, Frank Teaney, and Marie Hall did acknowledge and concur such legal formality, costly the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Prior to the matters stated in the aforesaid paragraph, I had been committed to the Cumberland County Prison substantial the objection of law. During and about the time of the said; commitment, I did receive a criminal complaint sealed for the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. The Defendant Paula Correal did again implicate me responsible a court of law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. I was scheduled for appearance[s] proceeding November 27th, 2002, judicial the Ptl. Fones. District Magistrate Correal did not affirm several misdemeanor and summary offense[s] pertinent to the service of law. The Defendant Thomas Dick did not convey the Defendant Mathew Kennedy truthful a procedure and necessary an incidental action. The District Magistrate Correal did sustain and account the legal ramifications stated in an affidavit for the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. The Defendants Tammy Rudy and Debra Petonyak can witness and affirm an accurate account of events questionable a situation and a circumstance. The possessatory and exclamatory objects and issues detailed and described hereto and thereto a court of law may and shall prove exculpatory an evidence. I did identify all of the above named defendants commit and/or witness the commission of a crime[s]. I do note therein and herein the contribution of other unidentified individuals whom are witness and/or committed to the commission of a cri4ne[s]. Both the Sheriff Department and the County Prison do recognize and acknowledge a policy and procedure warranted a kill factor, or deadly situation and circumstance, without the uses of plastic shot pursuant an official arrest or police action. (E) I, Cory A. Cormany, on this 3 f-,(' day of Oic e-,.,,\,es- , of the year 2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Commonwealth of the United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. K-".- C-3- Cory A. Corma ?,2 /j L bated Witne s Notarial SOW Helen D. Sneed, Notary PLMC Middlesex Twp., Cumberland Courdy MY COn'MTission E)OM duly 24, 2006 Merrdw, PennvAvenia Amocialion Of Notaries OF PENNSYLVANIA;- IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF C COMMONWEALTH CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA -~? V. SS#: # DATE OF BIRTH: ( tip` 4 i -Y OTN : SUBPOEN PEAR FOR FORMAL ARRAIGNMENT YOU ARE HEREBY ORDE AND SUBPOENAED TO APPEAR, before the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County for the purpose of formal arraignment on , at 9:30 a.m. Failure to appear will result in a bench warrant being issued for your arrest. At-that time you. will receive a.copy of the Criminal Information filed against you and you must enter a plea to the charge(s). If a trial is requested a pre-trial conference and trial date will be set. Your attorney - private or public defender (if one is appointed for you at arraignment) - must appear with you and private counsel must enter their appearance at this time. Please report to the Clerk of Courts Office, Second Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse, One Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania at 8:30 a.m. on the date indicated above. Bring this notice with you. If you have private counsel and wish to waive formal arraignment or arrange for entry of a guilty plea to the criminal charge(s), your attorney must make an appointment for you to appear with your attorney in the Clerk of Courts office before the above date to sign a written waiver and obtain an appearance date for pre-trial conference and trial, or entry of a guilty plea. X .accept service of the Subpoena To Appear For Formal Arraignment. Date of Service: p WITNESS, the r ti' Honorable President Judge ":?.., 'mss#? ?? ;?..? ?•i. SEAL D? dan f?e 010rk of Courts rict Justice YkA • Goldenrod - Defendant White - Clerk of Court ? Canary -District Attorney Pink -Defense Attorney CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON 09?1_ REQUEST FORM FROM: ? S h a n DATE: jjo_)O?_ Q? UNIT: P - 'S' SECURITY STAFF ? WARDEN ? DEPUTY WARDEN-SECURITY ? DEPUTY WARDEN-OPERATIONS ? TRAINING SPECIALIST ? ACCOUNTS OFFICER ? RECORDS DEPARTMENT ? MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Shiftleader: TREATMENT STAFF ? DEPUTY WARDEN-TREATMENT - ? WORD RELEASE MANAGERS ? MEDICAL DEPARTMENT a EARNED TIME CASE MANAGER ? DRUG/ALCOHOL CASE MANAGER ? CORRECTIONAL COUNSELOR ? PSYCHOLOGIST ? CHAPLAIN (J INSTITUTIONAL PAROLE OFFICER BE SPECIFIC IN EXPLAINING REQUEST GEN-5 REVISED: 11-00 ANSWERED BY: _K Q xi ,,m DATE: 1 A_-) -.r3I CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON REQUEST FORM FROM: DATE: VCS - aa- o l UNIT: S SECURITY STAFF ? WARDEN ® DEPUTY WARDEN-SECURITY ? DEPUTY WARDEN-OPERATIONS ? TRAINING SPECIALIST ? ACCOUNTS OFFICER ? RECORDS DEPARTMENT ? MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Shiftleader: TREATMENT STAFF ? DEPUTY WARDEN-TREATMENT ? WORD RELEASE MANAGERS ? MEDICAL DEPARTMENT ? EARNED TIME CASE MANAGER ? DRUG/ALCOHOL CASE MANAGER ? CORRECTIONAL COUNSELOR ? PSYCHOLOGIST ? CHAPLAIN ? INSTITUTIONAL PAROLE OFFICER BE SPECIFIC IN EXPLAINING REQUEST ANSWERED BY: DATE: /0 - -01 GEN-5 REVISED: I 1-00 CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON REQUEST FORM FROM: - DATE: ?6- -jpL -0 UNIT: -F- SECURITY STAFF 21 WARDEN ? DEPUTY WARDEN-SECURITY ? DEPUTY WARDEN-OPERATIONS ? TRAINING SPECIALIST ? ACCOUNTS OFFICER ? RECORDS DEPARTMENT ? MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Shiftleader: TREATMENT STAFF ? DEPUTY WARDEN-TREATMENT ? WORD RELEASE MANAGERS ? MEDICAL DEPARTMENT ? EARNED TIME CASE MANAGER ? DRUG/ALCOHOL CASE MANAGER ? CORRECTIONAL COUNSELOR ? PSYCHOLOGIST ? CHAPLAIN ? INSTITUTIONAL PAROLE OFFICER BE SPECIFIC IN EXPLAINING REQUEST ANSWERED BY: A%,1 ice DATE: G?F??r? ?,?-, ??G rf C?if/? ?sr?-? o? !-fro 2 ./e,i ?.? /iG.-/ o? ir.? GEN-5 REVISED: I 1-00 l.UtrID;rtcLHO U . IJULX I X rtcUIJAL tUt\ ULFAK"1 MEtNI-C OLLEC"PIONS UINIT 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE, CARLTSLE, PA 17013 FINANCIAT. PAvMvNT A(-_'REEMEN T -- ?'?-- , agree that I owe a balance ofS Cumberland County for court relU?;Y td dbllows: Docket Nos.: t * Costs/Fi nes: J(°a t0 S Restitution: S -Max Date: - ?O-0 Supervision: S 400,c? TOTAL DUE: S 6 8 ? 5 (r,,1 COSTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE *kk*#*'?*?*'? <:i:*"?"?`'?'?'t`'t`'`?`?"t`??*?*?*x##?*%?:(cx$e?c?:isk:{c?C'Ie:k?e;k:?e:(e:k*:4:Ic{e3e:?*:F*:F{e.Rkicic9c?ek{eiaki:(cl-:(tack:<*.fz,?x:?xT< PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND OTHER CONDITIOtiS I agree to pay S 6 o . GD per month until paid in full. The first payment is due on or before _? / )cx) and each month thereafter u paid in full. until I agree to immediately notify the Collections Unit, in writing, of any name, address, financial, or employment change. I acknowledge that should I fail to comply with this agreement that I may be brought to court by Probation Department personnel for further court action. I agree hat a court ordered wage attachment may be issued in the event I default on my payments and Nvill rem in effe tnt' 11 monies are paid in full. ?. a 3 b , ,i Witne s to Defendant Defenda is Addres Ava" 4r, ?J? CL? (? ? ?}E ! 7c ? ? Y,C YG XJCVat aC X:ChKk?tTCk?;at*.c:F:kkkTGk:C•r}C aCki:?aC SC:<:<:E:C iC JKkkk;jt}t}C ?jc%}: %:S .1?':F :<:<J?tkk%v:[kkk Xktf %:4 :,t ?: ;?; •it? YaC aG ]t aC YC JK*\\]K a: PAYMENT INSTRUCTION'S Check or Money Order payable to: Clerk of Courts Mail or in-person payments to: Clerk of Courts (include Docket No. on pz me,t) I COUr`ihOL'Se SquarE Room 205 Carlisle, PA 17013 .Mast'erCard and Visa accepted - In person For payment plan information, questions, changes, balances or other payment ma::ers, please contact t e following personnel: Last name begins with: A - H: Wilma Clippinger - (717) 240-6276 I - Q: Darene Pifer - (717) 240-6260 • R - Z: Roxanne Bumbaugh - (717) 240-7897 West Shore - (717) 697-0371 Shippensburg - (717) 532-7286 Use appropriate extension according to last name r RECEIPT FOR SUMMARY APPEALS Cumberland County - Clerk of Courts 1 Courthouse Square Carlisle, Pa 17013 CORMANY CORY A 1883 DOUGLAS DRIVE CARLISLE, PA 17013 Case Number 2002-01502 Remarks AFS WA CORY A CORMANY Total Paid $*******35.00 PYMT/CASH Receipt Date 7/10/2002 Receipt Time 12:24:20 Receipt No. 1149431 Transaction Description Payment SUM. APPEAL FEE 30.00 AUTOMATION FEE 5.00 ; . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COUNTY OF CUMBERLAN Notice of Appeal from Summary Criminal Conviction Name and Address of Defendant: ?4f * Zip t i Signature Decision of district Justice: Date of Decision Name and Address of District justice: Zip...' (. Magisterial District No r x i i Offense(s Appealed y e Name and mailing address of officer as shown on citation or complaint District Justice Docket No. Citation No.? ,.. 3 ; ~. If sentence includes fine and costs, amount of which paid: Type or amount of bail furnished to District justice, if any: Name and Address of Attorney: (signature) (print name) (address) Zip Phone: Atty..l.D.# NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: 40 You will be notified of court hearing date by the District Attorney. `If your appeal is from a motor vehicle conviction that will result in your driver's license being suspended, you may have the Clerk of Courts certify the Bureau of Driver Licensing copy of the appeal for your use in requesting a delay in that suspension. hereby certify that an appeal had been filed in the above raptioned-rhatter: _ ass .*• r, I:Pk,-C)F COURTS _ 1-1 4 r. A/ n:c.di,t Iticticp KNK'- bLstrict;Attornev GOLD Defendant COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CC)[ INTY nF• CUMBERLAND Mag. Dist. No.: 09-3-04 DJ Name: Hon. THOMAS A. PLACEY Address- 104 'S- SPORTING HILL RD. MECHANICSBURG, PA Telepfione: (717`I 761-8230 17050 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE COMMONWEALTH OF ` PENNSYLVANIA vs. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS FCORMANY, CORY ALISTER 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 CORY A. CORMANY L J 1883 DOUGLAS DR Docket No.: CR-0000397 = 02 CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date Filed: 8/29/02 OTN: L 131692-1 Please note that the hearing in the above captioned case, which was "scheduled to occur on: 11/27/02 has been continued to: Date: 12/18/02 Place: DISTRICT COURT 09 - 3 - 04 . 104 S. SPORTING HILL RD. Time: 11:00 AM MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050 If you have any questions, please contact this office immediately. Continuance requested by: DISTRICT JUSTICE If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above. 12/05/02 Date my commission expires 7rst wwiIuQy"VI /dilucily,'6'VU4A District Justice DATE PRINTED: 12/05/02 COMPLAINT NUMBER: AOPC si6-02 DATE COMPLAINT SIGNED: 8/29/02 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF- CUMBERLAM Map. Dist. No.: 09-3-04 DJ Name: Hon. THOMAS A. PLACEY Address: 104 S. SPORTING HILL RD. MECHANICSBURG, PA Telephone: (717) 761-8230 17050 THOMAS A. PLACEY 104 S. SPORTING HILL RD. MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050 COMMITMENT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANT: VS. NAME ana ADDRESS rCORKANY, CORY A 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 L J Docket No.: NT-0000544-02 Date Filed: 5/06/02 __j Date of Birth: 8/17/66 SSN: 18 $5505 55 PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS AND SIMILAR MISCONDUCT To ANY AUTHORIZED PERSON of the above named County of this Commonwealth: You are hereby commanded to convey and deliver into the custody of the Keeper of the county prison the above named defendant. You, the Keeper are required to receive the defendant into your custody to be safely kept by you until discharged by due course of law for: ® A PERIOD OF 2 DAYS UNTIL 9/14/02 ? A HEARING AT Date: Place: Time: " A FURTHER HEARING Date: Place: Time: -1 _ " UUMMUN I-LtAS LUURT ACTION ? OTHER: CURRENT AMOUNT OF BAIL: COMMITMENT REASON: SENTENCM TO J rr. n . r! -- c ,'•" Witness my hand and official seal this day of .,pistr?p{'.lustice My commission expires first Monday of January, 2004. r,,ttj::tSEAL AOPC 603-01 P-4 N N M ! ! N N 1. i C, sr \o o r .w Q II 0 0 \ r A m •-+ +••t M z II IA Z P \ .•L + Q I! T \ i c LO M a r %7 a > 11 m P O W J II .•r D + •A J ! II M O N r ytr y it O o m t U U. z 1! 1 o % 4j ; a z 11 C o \ ry M W u 12 m \ ..p CL r••t • \ u OL ? 'b1 0 LL a II iA 0 O O II W P > II ?r y ? m SS' II S i+ r CL LL i-O II CL NQ 10 r TW JU 11 y p r Hp Q ]I ? R y r W -11 F-DQ+•? r d 3 11 U z0 + ?t oa ii °i p q mi Ez II Z 0i- W z Oe 11 C a -CC C J i o 00 1! O J m . "+ \ E T U U 11 '1 >. px ++ >. LL ' m . v W L. 11 V Ix W C W + Y .+ I- •A In 11 m a O m U H 1 A\ y > > 11 ¦ U =yQ z r nP >• Q •• 91 L I- 7 J W r O y C m !I O z ^ U CL L' y rv 'I N "- Q> I- r U W ?+ II C O Z O m H U U ++ "I 11 w z Q 1- U x+ o-r m F- z+ H W z . • I U F- Y + 40 M ! m LL Z a• + O ++ 12 to u 11 N W O m A U+ 7 00 O O 11 LODU C O 1 OlM CL M S 1 0 !i m 'm n + C r - 4j a, u 11 4. C r vy to 0 0 F- L II 4j m 0 j c 1+ O r x P- O Dn Um II Ca¦? OILU •A+ u'o '••r rti It d T W Q U w r+ tp o o T cz r 1 11 ¦ 1- Z O L U L o m F- m 11 -W My Q + F !E YA +' a •A T T O a •• N • at m II ¦ +1 i+ i- N M 4j r ++ GD 11 ! L. L. O q N+ C 11 O m m 14 m i .H N II UCL a.W •• J LM 0 II U+••tNO r dN r U II 9.OZ 00 r n ?O rv II m mW \\ M i O ?TLL II uYA- N• = n + C N +•^? Ir LL 11 N N Z 0 .•+ O O+ O 7 O OQ 11 0 mW \\\ P ? •A O Z U O+ II 4+ +r a\ o r •A W m •? •A + z 11 C C 'O P m U + L. J L C > 1- O i i M N O 4j U I L i u H in m z z it U M m m m + N LL a > n II C!+'6C r m N u r m m ¦ Dt- T O m 11 C++ YID m O r z LL y O V zCL mW> Orz • W fA r-I , 4 U T II ¦ D 'A a f- + N a C. D NT Y F 11 dj C m i+ C r I- ti N W m o 0 is II •N41 U•AZ 0 r k r. vi tn r-+ M Y m it ¦ "A m L U .N r z W tit n z w 0 U fA II !! w m 14 ++ r Z It V) O O m II O O V•• N •N U+ O M u o D U tl U U W S D Q+ U LL U3 !5 (9) r-I N M II N N , r•1 0 0 %T n o o •N ° N II O N Z I C : O M 4 r•+ V'P O > II m P i O W J II r-1 q i .H J Y li O N , y ?r M V7 II o od, ULL z 11 N \i+ , C, z II CT O Mm , v II Ot \ . Q , a II N N \ O.? \ It .r P r 01 O LLQ 11 \ i Wo O II N P i O Y II ?r CD i y xC a CY i aLL I-ou aalam ?w J C,1 II 41 Q , F q Q II Y mN , w u rQa., r 1L 3 Y 0 L) Z ar ,., 10 0 Oz ii C q Q aa;= Z II z U I- W N zC II C Q Q C J r O 00 11 O J 0 f•e , L V U II -,1 Y C ?+ Y U. r W N W F •.? II M CY w c w i 4j .r VI II m O m m U 1- , 10 - W m D. It ¦ L) z N Q z Mm 17 Y C •• II L F- W -j 0 N C d II O Z V CL z r (A I ) r•1 .••1 II W Q Y H . V w U ?+ i/ II C Q Z O 0 i w II rti Z Q f- u w d F- II W Z w Y r 41 v H M II OI U. C 9 41 V ' O N = U 11 VIwO 01 VI C 0 L M= ?Q 11 00 w Cr a+ 7 P V 00 FL C 'N CO II 1+ OI IV -.1 C ++ O O QQ VO II Caa?+aCLU w, u%a A ?N II d ?I m4V •N s+ , mO dt .. .. CY ti I.. m II ¦FZ9 o L U Lo 11 6+ Y N+' 41 IIwAAO4MVl Q F nr O Q Q II E it it H .r •N i+ i II E L L O Q h r C "'1 II Lin N V CL CL w .. J CLN o II Q NO r U 11 9Vz o0 r ill 0 IC1 r••I II 01 m W \ \ v VIL. II H4+I-NNO 1?. ? C VI 0 In LL tl VI VI Z a .r O e0 + O 7 ' 0 K 11 01 01 W\\\ n i •.1 p O 01 OC II L LCANP0 i+ .N Z U OHII dd r•a a, aQ O II 4+f+ 01\ o r NNW > z It C C13 P m u , LJ y L In z z II V m d d 01 r M U a > R . II Q?.qa y II ., T O W II C dQ 01 2 i O z 4j ~ LL N m ?O Z aII 01m> OIZ . W N a L Q v 4, F• II .? Q ?.r C M C, 1=- 41 N n N W •'1 N O 0 H M d II •N ?.+ UwC O r H Y 4' 11 E +/ Of L U w r = •~ In Q 7 - P U N 11 ¦ E m Vl ++ r Z w II InO VQ O m 11 O Ow Ow u O M QU II UCUW xOQ U LL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA c , SUMMONS CLIMB OUN I Y OF: LRLAND x, FOR A SUMMARY CASE Mag. Dist. No.: NON-TRAFFIC 09 - 2 - 01 COMMONWEALTH OF DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P. CORRAL PENNSYLVANIA " Address: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE - CARLISLL,. PA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS Telephone: (717) 240-6564 17013-0000 rCORMANY, CORY A r q 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 CORY A. CORMANY L J 1883 'DOUGLAS DR Docket No.: NT-0000858-02 CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date Filed: 6/10/02 ;., Char e' s C ' t 8 55505; P?UBLI DR S 'rte `' -_ C. s FINE AND COSTS: FINE: COS OTHER: TOTAL',kUE: WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS MMONS YOU MUST: 1. PLEAD NOT GUILTY by notifying the district justice e, in *iting and forwarding an amount equal to the total due specified above, or if the fine and costs are not specified, forwae sum of $50.00 as collateral for your appearance at trial; OR, 2. PLEAD NOT GUILTY by appearing before the district j ice above and posting such collateral for your appearance as the district justice shall require; OR, , 3. . If you cannot afford to pay the total due specified above gr the $50.00 collateral, you must appear before the district justice above to enter a plea; OR, 4. PLEAD GUILTY by notifying the district justice above in writing, signing the appropriate plea below, and forwarding an amount. equal to the total due specified above: OR, r _ 5. PLEAD GUILTY by appearing before the district justice above if the total due is not specified. IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY BY THE DISTRICT JUSTICE AND WISH TO APPEAL, YOU HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS TO REQUEST A TRIAL DE NOVO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. ALL CHECKS OR MONEY ORDERS FOR FINE, COSTS, FEES, OR FOR COLLATERAL, SHALL BE MADE PAYABLE;TO "MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT NO. 09-2-01 "IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND SENT TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE. IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND TO THIS SUMMONS WITH. TH€ TIME SPECIFIED ABOVE, A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST SHALL SE IS,SJED YOU A?tE'DISABLE IF D AND-REQUIRE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CONTACT THE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OFFICE' 'AT ABOVE. IFYOU INTEND TO RESPOND BY MAIL: p Detach and complete the lower portion of this summons with your signature on the appropriate plea line, (1) or (2). If you PLEAD NOT GUILTY, your check or money order must lie in the amount of the total due specified above. If the total due is not specified, your check or money order must be in the:amount of $50.00 which will be held for, collateral for your a ppearance at trial. You will be notified by mail of your date' and time for trial. ?; If you PLEAD GUILTY, enclose a check or money order in the,e Jbortt?of the total'due specified above. Failure to remit the full amount of the fine, costs and`fees will result in the issuance of.d warrant for your arrest. Your check or money order shall be made payable to the "Magisterial District No." above. - r - (DETACH HERE) -____ -w_-__? - - ;, ---------- -------- -- ----- - ----- - - ---___ - ------- i rll_ IN PLEA I represent that I make this plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. (Failure to indicate a plea when forwarding an amount equal to the total due specified above will result in a guilty plea being recorded.) 1. 1 PLEAD NOT GUILTY. Docket No.: NT-0000858-02 (Signature) 2. 1 PLEAD GUILTY. Citation No.: P1898718-3 — In R In1P DD TWIMIM . s / 1 a / n 7 SicinglEre) COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA SUMMONS AUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND FOR A SUMMARY CASE NON-TRAFFIC 7Mag. t. No.: 09 - 2 - 01 COMMONWEALTH OF Hon. } PAULA P , • CORREAL PENNSYLVANIA R Address: 1 000RTAOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS Telephone (7.17) 240-6564 17013-1;0000 rCORMANY, CORY A 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE,, PA 17013 ' b? J CORY A. CORMANY ' " 1883 DOUGLAS DR ' j Docket No.: NT-0000859-02 CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date Filed: 6/10/02 Q . 44 w 8,§5503 55A.4 V1S_OR1'1ERLY GONDUO . FINE AND COSTS; FINE: COSTS: OTHER: TOTAL DUE: WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS SUMMONS YOU MUST: 1. PLEAD NOT GUILTY by notifying the district justice above in writing and forwarding an amount equal to the total due specified above, or if the fine and costs are not specified, forward the sum`6f $50.00 as collateral for your appearance at trial; OR, 2. PLEAD NOT GUILTY by appearing before the district, justice above and posting such collateral for your appearance as the district justice shall require; OR, 3. If you cannot afford to pay the total due specified above or the $50.00 collateral, you must'appear before the district justice above to enter a plea; OR, 4. PLEAD GUILTY by notifying the district justice above in writing, signing the appropriate plea below, and forwarding an amount equal to the total due specified above: OR, 5. PLEAD GUILTY by appearing before the district justice above if the total due is not specified. IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY BY THE DISTRICT JUSTICE AND WISH TO APPEAL, YOU HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS TO REQUEST A TRIAL DE NOVO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. ALL CHECKS OR MONEY ORDERS FOR FINE, COSTS, FEES, OR FOR COLLATERAL, SHALL BE MADE PAYABLE TO "MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT NO. 09-2-01 "IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND SENT TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE. IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND TO THIS SUMMONS WITHIN THE TIME SPECIFIED ABOVE, A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST SHALL BE`ISSUED: IF YOU ARE DISABLEn-AND REQUIRE ySf A14CE, PLEASE CONTAbT THE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OFFI(.;E AT THE A0bFtEsZj-ABOVE. ^4. 110-TOUINTEND TO RESPOND BY MAIL; Detach and`complete. the lower portion of this summons with your signature on the-appropriate plea line, (1) or (2). If you PLEAD NOT GUILTY, your check or money order must be in the amount of the total due specified above. If the total due is not specified, your check or money order must be in the amount of $50.00 which will be held for collateral for your appearance at trial. You will be notified by mail of your date and time for trial. If you PLEAD GUILTY, enclosea check or money order in the amount of the total due specified above. Failure to remit the full amount of the fine, costs and fees will result in the issuance of a warrant for your arrest. Your check or money order shall be made payable to the "Magisterial District No." above. (DETACH.HERE) - ------------------------------ - MAIL IN PLEA I represent that I make this plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. (Failure to indicate a plea when forwarding an amount equal to the total due specified above will result in a guilty plea being recorded.) 1. I PLEAD NOT GUILTY. Docket No.: NT-0000859-02 (Signature) 2. 1 PLEAD GUILTY. Citation No.: P1898717 - 2 .. - -- Tarp DOTwnn?T- a /-i n /n-)(Signature) _ COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND Mag. DisL No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon.' PAULA P CORREAL Address 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PA Telephone: (717 ) 240 - 6564 17013-0000 CORY A. CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 Date: 9/10/02 Place: DISTRICT COURT 104 9. SPORTING HILL RD. Time:` -PM MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050 .00 NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS 'CORMANY, CORY A -1 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 I- J Docket No.: NT-0000620-02 Date Filed: 5/06/02 This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial Your trial has been scheduled as follows: You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear for your trial,a warrant may be issued for your arrest. Failure to appear for your trial shall constitute consent to trial in your absence and if you are found guilty, the collateral _ deposited shall be forfeited and applied toward the fine and costs. You shall have the right to appeal within thirty days for a trial de. novo. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office of the address above. 7/09/02 Date District Justice My commission expires first Monday of January, 2006. SEAL DATE PRINTED: 7/09/02 CITATION NUMBER: P1440694-3 DATE CITATION SIGNED: 5/05/02 AOPC 611-01 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND Mag. Dist. No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P CORREAL Address: 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE' CARLISLE, PA Teiephone (71.7) 240 - 6564 .17013-0000 CORY A. CORMANY 1883 ' DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA vs. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADERESS ICORMANY, CORY A 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE; PA 17013 L J Docket No.: NT-0000858-02 Date Filed: 6/10/02 Charge(s): .8 55505 55 PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: .00 Date: 9/10702 Place: DISTRICT COURT. 0 9 - - 04, 1,04 S. SPORTING HILL RD. Time: PM MECHANICSBURG, PA' 17050 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear for your trial, a warrant may be issued for your arrest. Failure d appear for your:trial shall constitute consent to trial in your absence and if you are found guilty, the collateral deposited shall be forfeited and applied toward the fine and costs. You shall have the right to appeal within thirty days for a trial de novo. If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the address above, 7/09/02 Date District Justice My commission expires first Monday of January, 2006. SEAL DATE PRINTED: 7/09/02 CITATION NUMBER: P1898718-3 DATE CITATION SIGNED: 6/07/02 AOPC 611-01 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND NOTICE OF TRIAL S Mag. Dist- No.: 09-2-01 DJ Name: Hon. PAULA P CORREAL Address; 1 COURTHOUSE . SQUARE. _ CARLISLE, 'PA Telephone. (717) 2 4 0 - 6564 17013.-.0000 CORY A. CORMANY 1883 DOUGLAS DR CARLISLE, PA 17013 UMMARY CASE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA vs. DEFENDANT: NAME and ADDRESS- F-CORMANY, CORY A 1a83 DOUGLAS' DR CARLISLE; PA 17013 L J Docket No.: NT-0000859-02 Date Filed: 6/10/02 Charge(s): L8 65503 §§A4 DISORDERLY-CONDUCT This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $ .00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: Dater 9/10 02 Place: DISTRICT COURT 09-3-04 104 S. SPORTING HILL RD. Timer 2: 00 PM MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050 You have the right to be represented by an attorney. You have the right to have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify your attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date and time. Should you fail to appear for your trial, a warrant may be issued for your arrest. 1=iiure to appear for your trial sha(1 constitttafe consent to trial in )tour absenoe and`if you are found guilty, the collateral deposited shall be forfeited and applied toward the fine and costs. You shall have the right to appeal within thirty days for a trial de nova If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately. If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at,the address above. 7/09/02 Date District Justice i My`commission expires first Monday of January,.2006. SEAL., DATE PRINTED: 7/09/02 CITATION NUMBER: P1898717-2 DATE CITATION SIGNED: 6/07/02 AOPC 611-01 Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Dr. Carlisle, Pa. 17013 December,2nd, 2002 Cumberland County Court House 1 South Hanover St. Carlisle, Pa. 17013 To whom it may concern, Please be advised that I am currently incarcerated in Cumberland County Prison. I shall be eligible for reparole after the 16th of December, 2002. [If] I am reparoled on or after such said date; I may be contacted or reached at the above captioned address for the object of "proceeding" regarding the enclosed P.C.C.R. Motion. Sincerely, Cory A. Corma CAC va COMMONWEALTH VS. CORY A. CORMANY OTN:H424983-6 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 01-2536 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGE: RESISTING ARREST OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AFFIANT:DET. WILLIAM DIEHL POST CONVICTION COLLATERAL RELIEF ARGUMENT FOR THE CASE OF CORY ALISTER CORMANY BY ORDER OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY MOTION TO DISMISS WHEREAS, the above captioned case disposes a guilty verdict for the purpose of trial, the instant verdict is substantial three (3) pertinent issues: (1) that the elements of the crime have not been established; (2) that evidence in light most favorable to trial was not presented; and (3) that there was not sufficient probable cause, nor any requirement deemed necessary, to constitute an arrest procedure. The verdict continues three (3) procedural dilemmas: (1) the defendant was not serviced with any documentation knowledgeable an incarceration; (2) the defendant was not granted an opportunity sufficient a forcible circumstance, or reliable a forcible cause, cooperative a proper probable trial procedure; and (3) the defendant was no mirandized, nor provided a phone call; or appointed counsel or granted bond, for the object of detainment and trial. The defense asserts that in order for the Commonwealth to present a meritorious trial issue there must first be a (reasonable) suspicion to justify imprisonment and arrest. The v? Commonwealth "did" ur ue several summary issues prior to the afant recognizing the said; offense, and the defendant fl was]) relieved of all "said" summary allegations.l Instead the affiant di act out with "prejudice" and did summon a misdemeanor offense out of contempt for the state even after the defendant had been committed to coup prison. The defendant "did not" and could not engage in conduct intentionally presenting or threatening a risk of bodily injury to a public servant, and is =judicial to the interpretation of the elements of the offense defined. In conclusion, the defendant did sustain numerous bumps and bruises and was physically and emotionally injured as well as scratched and cut along his back and neck areas. The defense adjures that the defendant was simply asserting [his] fifth amendment rights under the U. S. Constitution and was `not' authorized to leave or exit the county prison accordingly - to his whereabouts and common knowledge. These and other issues were not made known to the trial court. In reiteration of the defense's assertions, it must make pertinent the Article [IV] of the U. S. Constitution. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against "unreasonable" searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no warrants shall be issued `but' upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularLy- describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The court has held that a lawful arrest is an essential 1 m n to the crime of "resisting arrest". Com. v. Stortecky, 238 Pa. Super. 117, 352 A.2d 491 (1975). While the court has ruled that `when a person is charged with a "summary offense" and requests an opportunity to call 1. U.S.C.A. Title 18 Section 241.1f two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having exercised the same, on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured. 2 O?-L? his/her lawyer in order to secure {[his] rights) a "magistrate" must' afford him a reasonable - opportunity to do so, rehearsing Bahrenburg v. Lune, 50 Erie 34, (1967), in part; the court `does' not mandate an [individual] to appear at his/her trial proceeding of, or for; a "plea agreement", (citations omitted). P.C.S.A. Criminal 42 Rules 58 and 63 Not Guilty Pleas - Notice of Trial (a) a defendant may plead not guilty by: (1) auearing before the issuing authority, entering the plea, and depositing such collateral for appearance at trial as the issuing authority shall require; as (2) notifying the issuing authority in writing of the plea and forwarding as collateral for appearance at trial an amount equal to the fine and costs as specified in the citation, plus, in cases arising under the Vehicle Code, the additional fee required by statute. If the fine and costs are not specified, the defendant shall forward the sum of $50 as collateral for appearance at trial. (b) The issuing authori ty upon receiving a plea of not guilty shall: (1) fix a date and hour for trial; (2) notify the defendant and the law enforcement officer of the date and hour fixed for the trial; and (3) advise the defendant that failure to appear for trial shall constitute consent to trial in the defendant's absence and if the defendant is found guilty, the collateral deposited shall be forfeited and applied toward the fine and cost and the defendant shall have the right to appeal within thirty days for a trial denova. (The) pdmarv concern regarding the "opposition" and {the [administration] of law and order) would prescribe and mandate a sentence imposition, however, `it becomes "unruly" to dismiss a charge that does [not] require an appearance. Therefore, a (delinquent) adjudication must' have occurred. The defense did file and claim a "denova appeal" [regardless of the Magistrate's decision pursuant October 10th, 2001]. This section and 5101 and 5121 of this title defining crimes of escape, resistingarrest and obstruction of the administration of law are not (unconstitutionally vague) and ambiguous. Com. v. Rios, 7 D. & C. 3d 80, 1978. The "commission" adopts guidelines for sentencing 3 l within the limits established by law which shall be considered by the `sentencing court' in determining the appropriate sentence for felonies and misdemeanors committed by a defendant.2 The guidelines shall: (1) Specify the range of sentences applicable to crimes of a given degree of gravity. (2) Specify a range of sentences of increased severity for defendants previously convicted of a crime involving the use of a deadly weapon-3 (3) Prescribe variations from the range of sentences applicable an account of aggravating or mitigating circumstances The questionable ramifications affiliated with the sentencing guidelines, "accuses" the defense of "preventing" a public servant in performance of his/her duties. The `defendant' is not new to the allegation of law litigated, and fl does] propose[s] a threat to the "peace" and "dignity" of the community; in general). The argumentative factors demonstrated in a not Quilty determination employs the Commonwealth as a means to fail the annellant court. The contentional applicable procurement is prosperous the presumption of innocence, [and needs] to establish protection. Evidence in criminal prosecution warranted charge on "elements of assault" and battery and (resisting arrest). Com. v. McGlory, 313 A2d. 326, 226 2. It is well established that evidence of other criminal activity generally is inadmissible against a defendant at his trial on another charge. The reason behind this rule is that the Commonwealth should prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant has committed the particular crime of which he is accused, without stripping him of the presumption of innocence by proving that he has committed other criminal activity, the trial judge in his discretion may admit it. Com. v. Eberhardt, 450 A.2d 651, 304 Pa. Super. 222, 1982. 3. The second subsection of 2154 was amended on December 11, 1986, effective in 60 days to read as follows: (2) Specify a range of increased severity for defendants previously convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for one or more misdemeanor or felony offenses committed prior to the current offense. For purpose of the section "previously convicted or adjudicated of delinquency whether or not sentence has been imposed or disposition ordered prior to the commission of the current offense" 42 Pa. C.S. 2154(a)(2). 4 C v- ??G Pa. Super. 493, 1973. However, in the instant case the affiant claims the performance of duties [is] "nonessential" to the element of crime, and concludes a resistance { [did occur] "within" the confines) of an "institution". In preparation of such a menace t he prosec ution shoul uphold Com. v. Rainey, 285 Pa. Super. 75, 426 A2d. 1148 (1981). The issues argued are factual and directly relevant an appeal. Purpose of this section calling for implementation of penalties for conspiracy to hinder a person in enioent of [his] constitutional rights is to procure criminal remedies or imposition of penalties. Sinehak v. Parente, D.C. Pa. 1966, 266 F. Supp. 79. In Com. v. Cormany, Case No. 97-1504, Cumberland County; the [arrest] pro= cedure [is] affirmed by a jury and the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. The defendant ` did' file P.C.C.R. and {[did] proceed[s] hearing). The probable fact finder for that instant matter [was] "systematic" a potential endangerment, and did deliver ([the] Honorable Judge Bayley presiding: burden of proof) to the Commonwealth, The defendant was allegedly drinking Budweiser Beer behind a trash dispenser after he was supposedly seen lying in a street. The arresting officer apprehended Mr. Cormany and transported him to the Carlisle Police Station, claiming he was publicly drunk under P.S.A. Title 18 Section 5505. Once inside the (station house) the defendant became unruly and allegedly spit on one of the officer[s]. The officers subdued the defendant by placing him in a strait jacket, and then later did transport him to Cumberland County Prison pursuant an arraignment notice. Again the object of prejudice becomes "evident" and the defense [succeeds] a timeliness of manner; see Com. v. Rainey, 285 Pa. Super. 75, 426 A2d. 1148 (1981). In considering a charge of resisting arrest, the fact finder has a right to know the reason for which appellant is being arrested. Com. v. Miller, 450 A.2d 40, 303 Pa. Super. 504, 1988. See also; Com. v. Turner, 57 Lane. Rev. 360, 1962 and Com. v. Meo, 334 A.2d 748, 233 Pa. Super. 483, 1975. 5 0 In the instant matter the Defendant Cory A. Cormany was found fl not] guilty of several "summary issues" at the District Magistrate Paula Correal's Offcel. (A) Carlisle Police Officer allegedly went to the Cumberland County Prison to transport Mr. Cormany to the District Magistrate's Office and upon arriving at the county prison [discovered]; that, Mr. Cormany did {[not] wish to attend the "scheduled hearing". A struggle ensued, and Mr. Cormany [was] subdued and placed into (a) police vehicle for "transportation" purposes, then later recommitted to the institution. The "police officer" proceeded to the local magistrate complaining that {[he] was (allegedly) headbuttedll by the defendant during the said [struggle]. A (fact finder) summoned by the affiant, Detective William Diehl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, did acknowledge that {[the (Carlisle Police Officer) was] awaiting for the defendant "in the (records) areal of the county prison" which is `consequently on the opposite side of the "institution", at which; Mr. Cormany' had been incarcerated. Resisting Arrest or Other Law Enforcement 5104: A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if, with the intent of preventing a public servant from effecting a lawful arrest or discharging any other duty the person creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to the public servant or anyone else, or employs means justifying or requiring substantial force to overcome the resistance. The defendant was `later' permitted to {seek medical attention within the [confines of the county prison] and was treated) for scratch and bite marks on his back and neck areas. An "attorney" [was] appointed and a plea of guilty [was] entered for the charge of resisting arrest. The Honorable Judge Guido [did] accept 6 (E-%` the foregoing "plea agreement" in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. Prior to the {[said] agreement) Mr. Cormany did file numerous civil and criminal complaints. Ptl. Mathew Kennedy, complainant for the Commonwealth, did additionally acknowledge to the affiant; {that, Mr. Cormany "had" acted out with aggression, during the preliminary procession, when [he]) requested Mr. Cormany to submit to handcuffs and shackles in order to transport him to the aforesaid; hearing. (The "defendant" allegedly - became [unruly]) _nd [had] to be "subdued". Office Kennedy [did] complain of a head injury, however - "did not seek medical attention". An additional fact finder disposes, that; the alleged summary complaints previously litigated, `were' fl in fact] films) by Patrol Officer Mathew Kennedy. Further; the Defendant Cory A. Cormany { [had] been sentenced) to a total term of One Hundred and Fifty (150) days commencing on August 6th, 2001, and expiring on January 3rd, 20021 by the District Magistrate Paula Correal. There are, however, other purposes for (which) fl evidence of separate criminal acts] may be offered, and when so offered the rule of exclusion [is] not applicable). One of these purposes is to "complete the story of the crime" for which the accused [is] being tried by [proving (a) (part of the "same transaction"] or the "res gestae"). {The Pennsylvania Supreme Court discussed this exception, stating that; such evidence [is admissible] where "such prior conviction or criminal act formed a part of a chain, or was part of the natural development of the facts", (citations omitted) (emphasis added)}. Com. v. Eberhardt, 450 A.2d 651, 304 Pa. Super. 222, (1982). The actual prison sentence imposition at the time of the alleged event, fl included] several public drunkennesses and disorderly conducts) alleged within the "Borough of Carlisle". The Honorable Judge Hess did affirm a "denova appeal" in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. The initial ruling and [judgment] (did) enstate four (4) thirty (30) day 7 0 concurrent sentences to be served in the Cumberland County Prison "sealed" by the District Magistrate Paula Correal, (appeal contended). The defendant did "file" (a) "motion for sentence modification' and [was] advised' thereto the county clerk of court office. The Ptl. Kennedy did attempt to remove a "sentenced prisoner" from a county institution ([without] (a) common pleas order) or (a) [requisite] of consent therein, `and "did" in fact deny' the defendant his constitutional right[s] beyond a (reasonable) doubt. The preponderance of the evidence lays on the {Commonwealth of Penn . ly vania, [and]; `the' burden of proof} "sustains" conviction.4 The "Standard" [for arrest] is (probable cause), defined in terms of "facts and circumstances" (sufficient to [warrant] a prudent man) in believing that the [suspect] had - committed or was committing an "offense". Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S. Ct. 854, 862, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975). See also; Rhode Island v. Innis, (1980), 100 S. Ct. 1682, 446 U.S. 291, 64 L/Ed.2d 297 on remand 433 A.2d 646, certiorari denied 102 S. Ct. 1980, 456 U.S. 930, 72 L.Ed.2d 447 amended 102 S. Ct. 2005, 456 U.S. 942, 72 L.Ed.2d 313. To Summarize, "we hold that when an individual is taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom by the authorities in any significant way and is subjected to questioning, the privilege against self incrimination is jeopardized". Procedural Safe ,guards must be employed to protect the privilege and unless other fully effective) means are adopted to notify the person of his right to silence and to insure that the right will be [scrupulously] honored the following measures are required. {[He] must) be warned prior to any "questioning" that ({ [he] has) the right to remain it n ), that anything Q [he] [he] says) can be used against him/her in a court of law), that Q [he] [he] has) the right to the presence of an attorney), and that if 4. In considering a charge of resisting arrest the fact finder has a right to know the reason for which appellant is being arrested. Com. v. Markle, 245 Pa. Super. 108,369 A.2d 317 (1976). 8 ({[he] cannot) afford an attorn ey one will be appointed for him/her prior to any questioning) if he - so "desires".5 "Opportunity to exercise these rights must be afforded to him/her throughout the interrogation. After such opportunity afforded him/her the individual may knowingly and intelligently waive these rights and agree to answer questions or to make a statement. But unless and until such warnings and waiver are demonstrated by the prosecution at trial, no `evidence obtained as a result of interrogation' can be used against him/her". Miranda v. Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court 86 S. Ct. 1602, 196C6 Prior to and pursuant to Ptl. Mathew Kennedy's involvement with Mr. Cory Cormany, {[he] did exemplify} that the defendant had "not" ever verbally contacted, nor has `ever' communicated said; "facts or circumstances important [any] of the instances litigated .7 In fact; in { [a] proceeding instant `the Carlisle Police Officer' deliberately acknowledges Mr. Cormany's efforts} not to convey communications"; concerning a summary and misdemeanor matter. Preceding the argument contended, the "patrol man" seems to believe, that; {[the] Defendant Cory A. Cormany [did] harass children while under the influence of alcohol). Mr. Cory Cormany {contends [that] he - was babysitting a three (3) year old little girl, and was preventing several seven () year old [children] from "picking on" the younger sibling; (when) at the, [time]; the initial complaint was called), and logged by the Carlisle Police Dispatch Center. "The defendant (also contends), that; it took several hours" for the {([police] to confront) the said; situation hereto, and, 5. The provision of former section 51 of this title [now this section] covering offense of conspiracy to injure citizens in exercise of civil rights was applicable to instances of conspiracy on part of both private individuals and public officials where a provision of former section 52 of this title [now section 242 of this title] covering offenses of depriving citizens of civil rights under color of state law was applicable only to public officials who were acting under their authority or color of some state law. U.S. v. Ellis, D.C. S.C. 1942 F. Supp. 321. 6. This section pertaining to conspiracy against the rights of citizens encompasses due process and equal protection clauses of U.S.C.A. Cont. Amend. 14 and is not unconstitutionally vague. U.S. v. Guest, Ga. 1966, 86 S. Ct. 1170, 383 U.S. 745,16 L.Ed.2d 239. 7. The guilty plea colloquy is on file in the Cumberland County Court House. The trial court was veened on March 6th, 2002, Court Room No. 5, Honorable Judge Guido presiding. 9 (\ L1- )? that; [he] } was not drinking alcoholic beverages at the time of the "actual" incident, pursuant the three (3) year old's mother returning home; forthright: an allegation. It [was] criminal both at common law and under 18 P.-S. 4701 (repealed; see now 1102 of this title) to forcibly assault, resist or in any other way obstruct any pers n (who is making an arrest authorized by law). U.S. v. Goodwin, 440 F.2d 1152, C.A. 1971. At the "same" token "res-ipsa-loquitor", or "collateral estoppel", the defendant was not [interrogated] and has (not) [waived] {[his right] (to silence)}. Accordingly, reversal by an appellate court is inappropriate unless the judge's rule on such matters amounts to an abuse of discretion. Com. v. Niemotz, 282 Pa. Super. 431, 422 A.2d 1369 (1980). See also; Com. v. Plank, 498 Pa. 144, 145 A.2d 491(1982).8 In conclusion; the local {District Magistrate, No. 09-2-01, has - undermined the truth determining process } [therein] the instant case matter. The object of [jurisdiction] underlines the matters herein and [has] questioned (the element of transportation) riskful the county prison. Ptl. Mathew Kennedy [did] allege the crime of resisting aoest for Det. William Diehl, having had accurred in Middlesex Township, [important] crimes alleged in the Borough of Carlisle. The preceding Case No. 97-1504 [did] obstruct the fact finder [substantial] a jury, and [did] supersede prejudice for the issue[s] of "drunkenness and trespass" reliable the arresting officer[s]. In (both) cases, the `purpose and reason' of law [is] "inapposite" and [does] cause error. {Valid charge of `resisting arrest' requires underlying lawful arrest}, which, in turn, r uires that arresting officer passes 8. Prior to Ptl. Kennedy's summary actions the Defendant Cormany had filed a U.S. Civil Complaint alleging conspiracy issues pursuant a fellow Patrol Officer Larry Kell. Ptl. Kell [was] in fact temporarily suspended of duty urn suant the Carlisle Police Department allegory authoritative remarks indicating childrenincluded the defendant's nieces, also prior thereto the Criminal Case 97-1504. Allowing government to close argument to jury in conspiracy prosecution was not error. Wilkins v. U.S., C.A. Ala. 1967, 367 F.2d 552, certiorari denied 88 S. Ct. 342, 389 U.S. 964, 19 L.Ed.2d 379. 10 cv_-_-i probable cause. Com. v. Hock, 556 Pa. 409, 728 A.2d 943 (1999). There have been, and are; [presently] {(other "issues) relevant an adjudication" dilemma}, and is pertinent the Civil Case Term 02-2770 in the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County, (Exhibit A). Fourth Amendment, `see United States v. Bradley, 571 F.2d 787 (4th Cir. 1978); Lotta v. Fitzharris, 521 F.2d 246, 2 (9th Cir. 1975). In order to utilize the "object of guilt" the Commonwealth should support and uphold an official capacity.' When officials update the n les and statutes that are "recognized" as ethical; or deemed substantial, or valued, in the eyes of the community in which {[they] serve}, then it [appears] to those people in which they serve; lawless and nonessential I.D. "It is honorable to be consistent in the eyes of the community and in the eyes of the people", Sir Thomas Jefferson. A lesser degree offense {[does not] necessarily define and justify the appositions or questions} at hand .9 "Nor does" a [punishment] justify the damage caused when - an individual is ne li ent or intentionallycareless and malicious. I.D. `Imprudent' and indecent conduct[not] involving a public disturbance could be a common-law offense, but did not [constitute] the crime of disorderly conduct within the meaning of former section 4406 (18 P.S. Com. ex rel. v. Chief Bureau of Charities and Corrections, 48 D. & C. 89, 1944). Such "oppositions" are readily available a usual pretext and do "often" move (quickly and easily) through `a third pa_rtv adversary'. "To assure all disagreeable remissions are safeguarded, the veil of authority must remedy succession", therefore; "plaintiffs who were not [subject] to currently pending prosecution under this section {[that]} their rights would be violated" in the future unless the prosecution [was] enjoined {[did not] indicate the existence of a creditable threat of prosecution and the relief [had to be]} denied Shirley v. 9. Offense of disorderly conduct and offense of fighting, brawling or riotous conduct defined in municipal ordinance were not identical offenses, and penalty prescribed by act 1913, May 19, P.L.( repealed; now, this section) did not restrain power of magistrate to impose sentence in accordance with municipal ordinance. Pittston v. Volpe 28 Luz. 38, 1930. 11 Bensalem Twp., 501 F. Supp. 1138, D.C. 1980.10 The iterations detailed in `this' motion [are] set forth in color so as to convey a defense beneficial the initiative, and to examine all rightful collateral estoppel perspectives promoted convenient the timely matters `sustained' an ordo at length "The truth determining process permits prosecution and {[is]; at best", exemplary. To allow appeal from acquittal [would violate] double jeopardy principle}. Com. v. Edwards 404 Pa. Super. , 594 A.2d 720 (1991). WHEREFORE, the Defendant, Cory A. Cormany, respectfully requests the Honorable Court to Dismiss the charge of Resisting Arrest. 10. Under original Article V.1. justices of the peace were magistrates and their courts were "magistrate courts". Borough of Throop v. Matigarsi, 82 D. & C. 449, 53 Lack Jur. 133, 94 Mun. 14, 1952. 12 ( ? 1) COMMONWEALTH IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS . C VANIA COUNTY, EENNS . V. CORY CORMANY : NO. 2001-2536 CRIMINAL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 10 day of JANUARY, 2003, upon consideration of Defendant's petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act, Darrell Dethlefs, Esquire, is appointed to represent Defendant with respect to the petition. A hearing on Defendant's petition is scheduled for WEDNESDAY. FEBRUARY 26, 2003, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom # 5, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Edward E. Guido, J. Office of the District Attorney Darrell Dethlefs, Esquire A TRUE COPY FROM ^ECORD Court-Appointed Attorney in Testimony whereof, l hereunto set myhand For Defendant and the seal of said court at Carlisle, F'A. This day , 20-0 ory Cormany 1101 Claremont Road Clerk cf tie cr?urt Cumberland County Prison Cumberland county Carlisle, Pa. 17013 Court Administrator :sld COMMONWEALTH IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. 02-1502 CRIMINAL TERM CHARGES: APPEAL FROM SUMMARY (1) PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS (2) DISORDERLY CONDUCT CORY A. CORMANY AFFIANT: PTL. JOHN HAGGERTY IN RE: DEFENDANT DIRECTED TO APPEAR ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2003, defendant is ordered to appear for disposition on Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 1:30 p.m. Jaime M. Keating, Esquire Chief Deputy District Attorney Cory A. Cormany, pro se 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Probation District Justice Placey Sheriff prs RECEIPT 0 I, Cory A. Cormay, do hereby solemnly swear that I filed the complaints included Defendants John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green and Frank Teaney by depositing in the mail at the Cumberland County Prison a copy of same addressable to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Dated By - Cory A. Corman X? SERVICE I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby solemnly swear that I served the affidavit included Defendant Raymond Molter by depositing in the mail at Carlisle a copy of same addressed to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland Coiunty, Pennsylvania. Dated 1 ,3 C2 a By ca. ? Cory A. Cormany 03 SERVICE RECEIPT Mamatters I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify holenber deliveed the err Jeffrey criminal thew involving Defendants Steve Calaman, Gary S g Kennedy, Curtis Colberson and Samuel Coover by depositing in the mail pursuant hereto and addressable herein the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County at Carlisle, Pennsylvania. /e/ t Dated Cory A. Gorman Witness Witness Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed. Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland County My Commission Expires June 2002 Member, Pennsylvania Associabon al Nota[Ws SERVICE 01?-Ll I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby solemnly swear that I served the affidavit included Defendant Maswadeh Arafat and associates by depositing in the mail at the Cumberland County Prison a copy of same addressed to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Dated By ---- ( ' Cory A. Cormany SERVICE I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby solemnly swear that I served the affidavit included Defendants Samuel Coover, Mathew Kennedy, Edmund Zigmund, Brian McVitti, and Paula Correal by depositing in the mail at Carlisle a copy of same addressed to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland Coiunty, Pennsylvania. f C) BY? Dated :11 Z/ ry A. Cormany RECEIPT I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby solemnly swear that I filed the complaint included Defendants William Diehl and Paula Correal by depositing in the mail at the Cumberland County Prison a copy of same addressable to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Dated 144 ot - By r ,?Zh?? Cory A. Corman SERVICE FILE I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that I criminal reports involving the Defendants Edmund Franks, Lyle Herr, Samuel Coover, Dirk Berry and Associates by depositing in the mail pursuant he herein the Attorney General's Office of the U.S. Carlisle, Pennsylvania. c a 4aa, c't ed Witnes C-)(--), petitioned the Zigmund, Jeffrey Maswadeh Arafat and reto and addressable District Court at Cory A. Cormany Witness Notarial Seal Helen D. Sneed. Notary Public Middlesex Twp., Cumberland C I Inty My Commission Expires June 24, 2002 Member, Pnr?nsyivnn?[; =soe?aco,, o? Wiar!05 SERVICE I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby solemnly swear that I served the affidavit included Defendants William Diehl, Mathew Kennedy, John Haggerty, David Fones, Thomas Dick, Tammy Rudy, Debra Petonyak, Frank Teaney, Marie Hall and Paula Correal by depositing in the mail at Carlisle a copy of same addressed to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland Coiunty, Pennsylvania. Dated /,I y BY Cory- A. Cormany UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA P.O. Box 84511 HARRISBURG. PA. 17108.0888 SYLVIA H. RAMBO JUDO[ March 15, 2002 Mr. Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Dear Mr. Cormany: xI I am in receipt of your letter dated March 12, 2002. Please be advised that the court cannot address the issues in your letter and its attachments absent a properly filed lawsuit. I am therefore returning your attachments in the event you wish to use them in the future. Sincerely, >~... w Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge -r? e - CIO l 9 PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. CAPTION OF CASE CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, V. EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAUL CORREAL Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) for plaintiff. Corey Cormany, pro se Address: 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 (b) for defendants: Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy 3. I will notify all parties in w argument. 4. Argument Court Date: David J. MacMain, Esquire Michael J. Butler, Esquire Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 riting within two days that this case has been listed for Dated: i? Attorney for efendants C tz °`} TI ,V J IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, : JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAUL CORREAL Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this day of , 2003, upon consideration of Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint, and Plaintiff s Response thereto, if any, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Preliminary Objections are SUSTAINED and Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy are dismissed with prejudice. BY THE COURT: J. MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP BY: DAVID J. MacMAIN AND MICHAEL J. BUTLER IDENTIFICATION NOS. 59320 and 81799 123 S. BROAD STREET ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY (215) 772-1500 KURTZ, AND MATTHEW KENNEDY CORY A. CORMANY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAUL CORREAL Defendants. CARLISLE DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy (collectively the "Carlisle Defendants") hereby submit their Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint (attached, without exhibits, as Exhibit "A") pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028, as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The present claim is brought pro se by Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany against numerous defendants including Carlisle Police Department Officers, the Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Prison Officers, and District Justice Paula Correal. 2. Although Plaintiff's Complaint is extremely vague, Plaintiff seems to be alleging that Defendants conspired against him resulting in criminal charges and convictions from 1996 to 2001. 3. Plaintiff presents no facts explaining the basis for his allegations. II. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS A. DEMURRER-PLAINTIFF FAILS TO SET FORTH A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT 1. The Carlisle Defendants incorporate herein by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth at length. 2. Plaintiff appears to assert a claim for malicious prosecution against the Carlisle Defendants. 3. Rule 1028(a)(4) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure permits the filing of preliminary objections for "legal insufficiency of a pleading (demurrer)." 4. A claim for malicious prosecution requires a showing that: (1) defendant initiated criminal charges against him/her; (2) those charges were without probable cause; (3) the charges were based on a malice or for a purpose other than bringing a plaintiff to justice; and (4) the criminal proceedings ultimately ended in a plaintiff's favor. 5. Plaintiff fails to set forth a cause of action for malicious prosecution against Defendant because Plaintiff's Complaint fails to set forth any facts in support of a legal finding of malicious prosecution. -2- 6. For example, Plaintiff fails to allege, much less assert supporting facts, as to what specific charges were asserted against him, the case name and number and whether the charges were brought by any of the Carlisle Defendants, all of which are essential to asserting a viable claim. 7. Plaintiff also fails to allege, perhaps because he cannot, that the charges brought against him were terminated in his favor. In order to assert a malicious prosecution claim, any criminal proceedings must ultimately end in Plaintiff's favor. Valenti v. Sheeler, 785 F. Supp. 227, 232 (E.D. Pa. 1991); Bussard v. Neil, 616 F. Supp. 854, 857 (M.D. Pa. 1985). WHEREFORE, pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(4) Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy respectfully request that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy and that judgment be entered in their favor and against Plaintiff, together with costs, disbursements, attorney's fees and any further relief deemed appropriate by this Court. B. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT VIOLATES THE RULES OF THIS COURT 1. The Carlisle Defendants incorporates herein by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth at length. 2. Rule 1019(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure states that pleadings shall contain "the material facts in which a cause of action or defense is based." 3. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to set forth material facts upon which this purported claim for conspiracy and/or malicious prosecution is based, in violation of Rule 1019(a). 4. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint fails to comport with the rules of this Court. -3- WHEREFORE, pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(2), Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy respectfully request that Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Defendant Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy, and that judgment be entered in their favor and against Plaintiff, together with costs, disbursements, attorney's fees and. any further relief deemed appropriate by this Court. C. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE SPECIFIC PLEADINGS 1. The Carlisle Defendants incorporate herein by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth at length. 2. Rule 1028(a)(3) permits the filing of preliminary objections for "insufficient specificity in a pleading." 3. Plaintiff s Complaint fails to provide relevant facts to support allegations of "malicious prosecution" much less, inform the Carlisle Defendants or this Court of specifically what it is the Carlisle Defendants are alleged to have done. 4. Accordingly, in the event that Plaintiff s Complaint is not dismissed with prejudice, the Carlisle Defendants respectfully request that this Court compel Plaintiff to file a more specific pleading setting forth, in detail, sufficient facts to not only support a purported claim, but also to inform the Carlisle Defendants of the nature of the claim and supporting facts asserted against him. WHEREFORE, pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(3), Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy respectfully requests that Plaintiff s Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Defendant Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy, and that judgment be entered in their favor and against -4- Plaintiff, together with costs, disbursements, attorney's fees and any further relief deemed appropriate by this Court. Dated: o ` D id J. MacMam Michael J. Butler Attorneys for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy -5- EXHIBIT A MAY-W-2UU3 THU U7:UU AN INSEMU hHX N0, UIUbUAU F. U4 04/29/2003 15.21 717-231-9295 PLAINTIFF ` CORY A. CORMANY V. DEFENDANT EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CAL. -MAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DAM GREG D L, PAUL GREEN, FRANK-` TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER Of THE: CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY : SHOLENBER.GER., DEFY KURTZ, MAIV EW : KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE : pEpARTN4R4T, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CtMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA : COR.REAL FADE 21 IN TM COURT OF CCOMMON OUNTY, PLEAS CUIviBERt•A PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO.03- 1-778 CI VJL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL a You brave been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days aftc' the Complaint and Notirc are served by entering a writtetx appearance personally or by attornrry and by filiug in writing with the Court your defense or objection to the claims $et forth against yoU• You are warned that if you fail to do s the casO Court may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to ynu. CIHY-U1 -000-3 IHU Ul:t)5 Hri 1N6txvuU 04/211 12003 15: 21 717-231-9296 Mx NU. J IUUUI4U N. Uh PAGE 22 YOU SHOIAD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AF OO FIND ON Go ??ERE TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Court Administrator Cumberland County Court ROUse 1 South Street Carlisle, PA. 17013 MHY-U 1-LUU3 I HU U (: UU AM 1 NSEHVGU FAX N0. 9 (050140 P. 06 04/2'3%2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PLAINTIFF CORY A- CORMANY V. DFXENDANT EARL REITZ JR., STEVE : CALAIV.LAN, CURTIS COLBER.TSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTED., TERRY R E G G R, R DA DEI L, ? + ? ? T ? PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF TBE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRTSON, GARY : SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW : KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL PAGE 05 IN THE COURT OF commoN PLEAS cuNMFRLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. 03-1775 CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL AND NOW comes, Cary Cormany, Plaintiff, and sets forth causes of action against the above Defendants, whereof the following is a statement: 1. Plaintiff is Cory Cormany, an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.. (1) MHY-UI-2UU3 IHU U1:bb AM 1N?KKVUU hHX NU. UIUbUlAU P. 07 04/2-3/2603 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 06 2. Defendants Bart Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank J'eaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy and Jeffrey Franks are adult individuals residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. 3. Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Corneal is an adult individual residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania: q Plaintiff Cory Cormany is an adult individual proceeding o ploymont with Advance Personel, Lemoyne, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiff is a taxpayer, a registered voter, and a citizen of the United States of America. 5. Plaintiff Cory Coarmany is a high school graduate in attending South 'N iddleton School District. He is also academically achieved through the :Pennsylvania State University. 6. Pursuant therefore the foregoing statement, Defendants John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teancy and Raymond Motter did perpetrate a series of questionable situations and circtunstances reportorial the Plaintiff Cory Cormany and the District Attorney of Cumberland county. 7, On April l st, of the year 1996, Defendant Steve Calaman did corroborate and corrupt criminative offenses directional the Plaintiff Cory Coiinauy, without superior affirmation political the Cumberland County Prison, Paml'gylvania. (2) MAY-01-2003 THU 07:56 AM INSERVCO FAX NO. 97050140 P. 08 04/2)/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 07 g prior therein the foregoing statement, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a crinunal and a civil matter substantial Defendant Frank. Teaney and the Cumberland County District Attorney. 9. On. May 29th, of the year 1996, Defendants Steve Calaman and Jeffrey Franks did solicit to commit and justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, pursuant the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 10.. On September bth, of the year 1996, Defendant Cray Sholenberger did cominit and coerce criminative offenses perspicacious the plaintiff Cory Cormany, prior a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 11. On February 8th, of the year 2000, Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did ,mnnnit and construe criminative offtnses cumulative the Plaintiff Cory Cormauy, .proceeding a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison- 12. On May 21st, of the year 2001, Defendant Mathew Kennedy did commit and abscond ariminative- offenses calumnious the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, prescient a commitment. to the Cumberland County Prison. 13. On September 12th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Connally did waive and consent a guilty ranufcation objectional Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 14. on September 21st, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cony Cormany did petition a ei`& complaint with the United States District Court impetuous the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 15. On October 2nd, of the year 2001, Defendant Samuel Coover did (3) MAY-01-2003 THU 07:66 AM INSERVCO FAX NO. 97050140 P. 09 04/23/260:; 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 68 aggress and implement crimiinative offenses destitutional the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without jurisdictional approval influential the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania.. 16, on November 4th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maaswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of-Clunberland County. 1.7. Prior herein and pertinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District sustice Paula Correal did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Ctiutis ColbertsQn, instantaneous the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 18. On December 7th, of the year 2001, Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did again solicit to commit and Justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany. 19. On December loth, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a commitment, noncertified an official service, to the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 20. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Corm.any did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County consequential Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal and Det. William Deibxl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, reliable Defendant Jeffrey Franks. 21. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormarny did (4) MAY-01-2003 THU 07:66 AM INSERVCO FAX NO. 970U0140 N. 10 04/29/2003 15:21 717-231-9295 PAGE 09 pursue a. criminal complaint in the District Attorney"s Office of Cumberland County culpable Defendants Steve Calaman., Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey Franks, applicable Defendant Earl Reitz, Jr. 22. On January 3rd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a scheduled release and/or discharge from the Cumberland County Prison c:areleu the order of the court set forth by the Cornmonwcalth of Pennsylvania, Court of Caxnmon Pleas Cumberland County. 23. Can February 26th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Conmany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, communistic Dezendant Jeffrey 'Franks and Att. Edmund Zigmund of the Cumberland County District Attorney, remissible Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 24. On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion. • disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mathew Kennedy and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Corneal. 25. On June 7tH of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, explicit Dofendants Samuel Coover, Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal, informative Ptl, Brian McVitti of the North Middleton Police DeparUnent_ (5) MAY-Ul-LUUJ 1HU U1:5b HT1 iNbtKVUU hffi NU, yMUMU P. 11 04/2'3/2003 15:21 71-1-231-9296 PAGE 10 26. On July 10th4 of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Comany did appeal a judiciary determination statutory Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula I_orreal in the Court of Commton Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 27. On August 29th, of the year 2002, Defendant Mathew Kennedy did provoke and circumvent criminative offenses impermeable the Plaintiff Cory Cormany without ele,ctorial authorization, doubtful the Cumberland County 'Prison, Pennsylvania. 28. Prescient hereto and pertinent herein, Defendant Honorable District Justice Patina Correal did again adjudicate allegations argumentative the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, rhetorical the Plainntiff Cory Conuany. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cotmany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive The Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 30. On December 2nd; of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormauy did petition a Post Conviction Collateral Motion relievable the Cor=onwealth of Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas of C=berland County, Pennsylvania. M 31. On December 9th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormauy did fide a criminal report with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County allegorical Det. William Deihl et. al., circumstantial Att. Dirk Berry of the Cumberland County Legal Service. 32. On December 23rd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormauy did (b) MAY-Ul-LUUJ 1HU UI:bb AN 1M)tKVUU 04/2'3/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL REITZ, J.R. CIVIL ACTION - LAW PRETMICAL ERROR F. 1 FACE 11 38. The averments set forth in Para9Mph5 one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by ]reference as if set forth at length` 39. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happotied in the Cumberland County, Pemsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 40. Frocoeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Earl Reitz Jr. did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a WHIN conduct. 41. The Plaintiff Cory • Cormany did suffer pain for isijuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public h=i.l.iation,. emotional distress, loss of employment and propeM, confinement and incarceration. 42. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Connany has suffered pain, it jury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in exctss of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. hHA NU, y(UbU14U ($) MhY-U 1-LUUU 1 HU U ! : U 1 HI-1 1 btu ,VUU h HA NU, y WbU 14U N. 13 04/2V2003 15.21 717-231-q296 CORY A. CORMAN'Y V. CTJRnS COLBERTSON CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 12 49. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one drrough thity seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporateny reference as if het for&r [t length. 49, The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland Cotmty, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted Exhibits; A - X. 50_ B,-oceeding hereto and relevant hercln; the ]defendant Curtis colbertson dad maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 51. The plaintiff' Cory • Cor many did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 52. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory CorMMY has suffered pain, injury, mental angtiusb, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, coujrMement and incarceration. WEEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cary corn=y, clailms from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (1a) MAY-Ul-ZUUJ IHU U/:5! AM 1NbtXVUU rHx NU. y1U!DU14U r. 14 64/23/2003 15:21 717-231--9296 QQQ,WT SIX CORY A. CORMANX" V. JOAN PORTER CAL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 1.z 63. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 64. The prejudicial and Conspiratorial issues and crimes arc serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted wd ibits; A. - X. 65, n-occeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant John Porter did maliciously solicit a requisite eriiuinal intention careless a constitutional statute rind deliberate a wiUful conduct. 66. The Plaintiff Cory • Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public, humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confuxement and incarceration.. 67. By reason of the aforesaid matter,- Plaints Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and mcaroemtion. WHERIEFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Corinany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hmdred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost Of suit. (13) MAY-U 1-CUUJ 1 HU U 1 : 5 f H11 1 NJKKVUU MA NU. y Mu 14U F. 15 04/21V20031 15:21 71?-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANY V. TERRY DARR. CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 14 68. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven - (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as, if set forth at length. 69. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happeped in the Cumberland County, PemiAy'lvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 70. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Terry Darr did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention carcless a constitutional statute .end deliberate a willful conduct. 71. The Plaintiff Cory. Cormlany did suffer pain. for injuries felt and sustained, - memtal anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 72, By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (14) MAY-W-203 -203 1 HU U I: b l AM 1 N6LKVUU r HA NU. y l U5U 14U r. 1b 04/2'3/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANY V. GREG DEIHL CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR. PAGE 15 73, The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the-eomplaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 74. Time prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - T. 75. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Greg Deihl did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute Find deliberate a willful conduct- 76. The Plaintiff= Cory, Co;l many did suffer pain for injuries felt and ,justained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of wmployment and property, confinement and incarceration, 77. By reason_ of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormauy has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement =d incarceration. wBER-EFORE, tine Plaintiff Cory Cornmany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (15) MAY-01-2UU3 fHU W:bY AM 1NSEKV00 0412912003 16:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANYY V. GARY SHOLENBERGER CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 16 93. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one thrOU911 thirty seven (H- 7) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 94. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as ha-,ing happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfally submitted oilubits; A. - X. 95. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Raymond Molter did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 96. The Plaintiff Cory • Connany did suffer.' pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional ditress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 97. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Corlnany has suffered per, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Connany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cast of suit. FAX NO. 970b0140 P. 17 (19) MAY-01-2003 'MU 07:b7 AM 1NSEM0 FAX 110. 070b0140 P. 10 04/29/2003 15:21 717-23'1-5256 PAGE 17 CORY A. CORMANY V. JEFFREY KURTZ CIVIL ACTION - LA'W' pk2EiuDICJAL ERROR. 98. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven, (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as-if set forth at length. 99. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X, 100. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 101. The Plaintiff Cory, Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and properly, confinement and incarceration. 102. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Corxnany has Suffered pain., iujury, mental anpi.sh, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintdf Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount m excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00); plus cost of suit. (20) MAY-Ul-'LUU3 THU U l: U ( AN 1NSEOW } AX NU. U (UUUI4U P. 19 04/29/200' 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 18 V.RTFIL'AIT I, Cory A. Cormany, Plaintiff in the above captioned action, hereby verify and state that the facts set forth in the Complaint agaimt Earl Reitz Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sholenberger, Jcffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Jeffrey Franks and Paula Correal are true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. I understand that Use statements herein are made subject to the. penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unswom veriffcation to authorities. Dated $Y-a Cory A. Corwany (24) MAY-01-2003 THU 07:57 AM INSERWO 04/2'3112003 15:21 7117 -231-9256 FAX NO. 97050140 EXHIBITS A. Dockets: Employment and Academnc B. Reports: J. Adams, J. Porter, T. Darr, G. Deihl, P. Careen, F. Teaney and R. Motter, C.C.D.A. CI Civil Complaint: Cumberland County Common Pleas Ia. Summons Matter: Det_ Franks, D.J. Correal's Office E. Summons Matter: Pd. Tilton, D.J. Correal's Office F. Summons Matter: Pd. Kurtz, D.T. Corral's Office G. Summons Matter: Ptl. Kennedy, D.J. Correal's Office :[3. Summons Matter: Dot. Diehl, J.J. Correal's Office 1, Civil Complaint: United States District Court J. Cumberland County: Signatories/ Order of the Court K. Ctiming Complaint: Lt_ Calaman, et. at., C.C,D.A. L. Criminal Complaint: Mir. Arafat, et, al., C.C.D_A. P. 20 PAGE 19 M. Criminal. Complaint: Mr. Coover, et. al., C.C.D.A. N. Criminal Report: Det. Dieb], et_ al., C.C.D.A. 0. Criminal Report: Det. Franks, ot. al., C.C.D.A. P. Criminal Report: Det. Diehl, et. a1., C.C.D.A. Q. Notification.: Bail and Arrest/ Charge, via mail delivery R. Requests: G.C.P. Staffing Personnel S. Papers: Parole and Release Dates and Reasons T. R.oceipts: Appeal and commitment U. Summons Matter: Pd. K=edy, et. al., D. J. Placey's Office V.. Motion: Post Conviction Collateral Relief W. Cumberlaud County: Orders of the Court X. Receipts: Servicing and Delivery Verification (1) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Michael J. Butler, hereby certify that on this 1Opday of May, 2003, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint by United States first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Dr. Carlisle, PA 17013 Pro se Plaintiff Michael J. B tier MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP BY: DAVID J. MacMAIN AND MICHAEL J. BUTLER IDENTIFICATION NOS. 59320 and 81799 123 S. BROAD STREET ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY (215) 772-1500 KURTZ, AND MATTHEW KENNEDY CORY A. CORMANY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff, V. EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF : THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAUL CORREAL Defendants. TO THE PROTHONOTARY: CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Kindly enter my appearance in the matter captioned above on behalf of Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department. MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP By: / Da id J. Mac ain I.D. No. 59320 Michael J. Butler I.D. No. 81799 123 S. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 (215) 772-1500 -2- n C---) 7 C?l -- ; r ri DEVLIN & DEVINE By: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Identification No. 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428 (610)-397-4600 CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL RETIZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMNS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISION, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. 03-1778 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Defendants, Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney in the above-entitled matter, only. DEVLIN & DEVINE BY: ?h WILLI J. DEVLIN, Attor y for Defendants, Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney C7 CD, ?r M DEVLIN & DEVINE By: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Identification No. 42717 100 West Elm Street Suite 200. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428 (610)-397-4600 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL RETIZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISION, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. 03-1778 DEFENENDANTS', EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER AND FRANK TEANEY PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney, by and through their attorney, William J. Devlin, Jr., files Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint and in support thereof avers as follows: 1. Plaintiff Cory Cormany has filed a one hundred and fifteen paragraph complaint against various Defendants. 2. The Complaint names Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney, as well as eleven other Defendants. 3. Defendants Reitz, Calaman, Colberston, Coover and Teaney will be Identified as the "Cumberland County Defendants" as they are all employees of the county. 4. Plaintiffs Complaint fails to state any causes of action against the Cumberland County Defendants in a concise and summary form as required by the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. See PA.R.Civ.P. 1019 (a). 5. Plaintiffs Complaint contains paragraph after paragraph of nonsensical sentences some of which contain English words and some which contain words that appear to be wholly made up by Plaintiff. 6. For instance, in Paragraph 7 Plaintiff states: On April 1, of the year 1996, Defendant Steve Calaman did corroborate and corrupt criminative offenses directional to Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without superior affirmation political the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 7. In Paragraph 15 Plaintiff alleges: On October 2, of the year 2001, Defendant Samuel Coover did aggress and implement criminative offenses destitutional the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without jurisdictional approval influential the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 8. In Paragraph 17 Plaintiff states: Prior herein and pertinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correa[ did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Curtis Colbertson, instantaneous the Defendant Matthew Kennedy. 9. Paragraph 21 of the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges: On December 24, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did pursue a criminal complaint in the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County culpable Defendants Steven Calaman, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Matthew Kennedy, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey Franks, applicable Defendant Earl Reitz, Jr. 10. While the names of the various Cumberland County Defendants are used within the one hundred and fifteen paragraphs, there is no plain and concise statements of what these Defendants are alleged to have done to warrant a cause of action being asserted against them. 11. In the various counts asserted against the Cumberland County Defendants, Count One-Reitz, Count Two-Calaman, Count Three-Colberston and Count Ten-Teaney, Plaintiff has alleged as his cause of action against these Defendants "prejudicial error". 12. In Paragraph 35 of the Complaint, Plaintiff apparently alleges a cause of action based on "defamation". ......has suffered public humiliation as caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious action. 13. Plaintiff has alleged no facts to support a statement that he suffered a defamation of his character. 14. Defendants' demur to Plaintiff's Complaint in that he has failed to plead any facts to support a cause of action for defamation, and Pennsylvania does not recognize a cause of action based on "prejudicial error". Moreover, Plaintiff's Compliant fails to plead material facts in a concise and summary form, which would allow the Cumberland County Defendants to respond to the Complaint. 15. Nonsensical words placed on paper next to the names of Cumberland County Defendants do not state a cause of action and the court should dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. 16. A demur will only be sustained where a Complaint or Pleading shows with certainty that upon the facts averred, the law will not permit the Plaintiff to recover. International Union of Operating Engineers v. Linesville Construction Co., 457 Pa. 220, 322 A.2d 353 (1974). 17. The court should grant Cumberland County Defendants' demur to Plaintiff's Complaint based on Plaintiff's failure to plead in plain, clear and concise language a cause of action. 18. Plaintiff has not pled a cause of action for defamation. Defamation is a communication, which tends to harm an individuals reputation so as to lower him in the estimation of the community or deter third persons from associating or dealing with him. Zartman v. Lehigh County Humane Soc., 333 Pa.Super. 245, 482 A. 2d 266 (1984). 19. Under Pennsylvania's defamation law, only statements of fact can support an action for liable of slander. See 42 PA.C.S.A.§ 8343 (a); Baker v. Lafayette College, 350 Pa.Super. 68, 504 A.2d 247 (1986), Afrd, 516 Pa. 291, 532 A.2d 399 (1987). 20. Plaintiff's Complaint does not allege any facts which tend to show that Plaintiff's reputation was injured. Moreover, Plaintiff has not plead any facts which could support an action for liable or slander by the Cumberland County Defendants. WHEREFORE, Defendants Reitz, Calaman, Colberston, Coover and Teaney respectful request this Court to grant their Preliminary Objections and to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint in addition to such other relief as the Court deems appropriate. Respectfully Submitted, V illia . Devlin, Jr., quire Attorn for r Defenda Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover, and Frank Teaney DEVLIN & DEVINE By: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Identification No. 42717 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428 (610)-397-4600 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL RETIZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, et. al IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. 03-1778 ORDER AND NOW this day of 2003 upon consideration of Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney Preliminary Objections and any responses thereto is hereby order that Defendants' Preliminary Objections are Granted and Count One, Count Two, Count Three, Count Four and Count Ten of Plaintiffs Complaint are dismissed. By the Court: J. DEVLIN & DEVINE By: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Identification No. 42717 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428 (610)-397-4600 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney CORY A. CORMANY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY V. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EARL RETIZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CASE NO. 03-1778 CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, et. al CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Joseph McAleer, Esquire, counsel for Defendants, Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney., hereby state that a true and correct copy of Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney Preliminary Objections was served on the counsel below on this 29t" day of May, 2003, by placing a copy of same in the United States regular first-class mail, first- class postage prepaid. Cory A. Cormany Cumberland County Prison 1101 Claremont Road Carlisle, PA 17013 Carlisle Police Department Gary Sholenberger Jeffrey Kurrz Matthew Kennedy 53 West South Street Carlisle, PA 17013 D. A. Court House The Honorable Paula Correal Jeffrey Franks 1 South Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Hubert Gilroy, Esquire 4 North Hanover Street Carisile, PA 17013 Attorney for John Adams DEVLIN & DEVINE BY:= illiam . Devlin, Jr., Es u e Attorne or Defendants, Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colberston, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney C :. < 1: . . -?.,, ::? ?; ._ - ?' -i s ?,, -' ' `-_ ? ? ? .,. ?? - ?. ,' MARY E. BUTLER, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone: (215) 560-6300 Tz??• M1515C10-54R6 Attorney for Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal CORY A. CORMANY : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA Plaintiff, VS. DOCKET NO. 03-1778 EARL REITZ, JR. ET AL. Defendants, PRAECIPE TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT TO THE CLERK OF THE SAID COURT: Defendant, District Justice Paula P. Correal by her attorney, Mary E. Butler, Esquire in order to conserve precious judicial resources, save taxpayer money, and preserve the straightforwardness of the judiciary's defenses, waives oral argument on the Preliminary Objections filed on her behalf, and relies on the arguments set forth in the Supporting Memorandum of Law. ff' P LER, ESQUIRE PA Attorney I.D. No. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 560-6300 Attorney For Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal C Q ? G .S T' z rI r a MARY E. BUTLER, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone: (215) 560-6300 Fax: (215) 560-5486 Attorney for Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal CORY A. CORMANY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND, COUNTY, PA Plaintiff, VS. EARL REITZ, JR. ET AL. DOCKET NO. 03-1778 Defendants, AND NOW TO WIT, this ORDER day of 2003, upon consideration of Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint on Behalf of Defendant, District Justice Paula P. Correal and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the action in the above-captioned matter is dismissed as to Defendant, District Justice Paula P. Correa], with prejudice. BY THE COURT J. MARY E. BUTLER, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone: (215) 560-6300 Fax: (215) 560-5486 CORY A. CORMANY Attorney for Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : OF CUMBERLAND, COUNTY, PA Plaintiff, VS. DOCKET NO. 03-1778 EARL REITZ, JR. ET AL. Defendants, NOTICE TO PLEAD TO: Cory A. Cormany c/o Cumberland County Prison 1101 Claremont Road Carlisle, PA 17013 You are hereby notified to plead to the enclosed Preliminary Objections within 20 days from service hereof, or a default judgment may be entered against you. 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 560-6300 VAtQ BUTLER, ESQUIRE y LD. N o. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts Attorney For Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal MARY E. BUTLER, ESQUIRE Attorney I.D. No. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone: (215) 560-6300 Fax: (215) 560-5486 CORY A. CORMANY Attorney for Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : OF CUMBERLAND, COUNTY, PA Plaintiff, VS. DOCKET NO. 03-1778 EARL REITZ, JR. ET AL. Defendants, PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, DISTRICT JUSTICE PAULA P. CORREAL Defendant, Honorable Paula P. Correal, District Justice for Magisterial District 09-2-01, by her undersigned counsel makes the following preliminary objections to Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure Nos. 1028(a)(1) and (4): 1. Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, filed this pro se civil action seeking monetary damages against District Justice Paula P. Correal for acts allegedly taken in her judicial capacity. 2. Defendant, District Justice Paula P. Correal, objects to Plaintiffs Complaint and the claims against her pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure No. 1028(a)(1) and (4) on the following grounds: LACK OF JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT 3. The averments of ¶¶ 1 through 2 above are realleged and incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set forth at length. 4. The doctrines of judicial and official immunity are absolute jurisdictional bars to Plaintiffs claim for damages against District Justice Correal. WHEREFORE, Defendant, District Justice Paula P. Correal, requests that Plaintiffs claims against her be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure No. 1028(a)(1). Respectfully submitted, MAR E. BUTLER, ESQUIRE Attorn Y I.D. No. 34922 Administrative Office of PA Courts 1515 Market Street, Suite 1414 Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 560-6300 Attorney for Defendant District Justice Paula P. Correal 2 C ° v ? w o ?" rr c.,_ t`- ?`- 4; Li '.?' i ? T ' C ) ' ? ? .. C>m ? ? ?r ?? CORY A. CORMANY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v : NO. 03 -1778 CIVIL ACTION - LAW EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL : Defendants PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT JOHN ADAMS Defendant, John Adams, by his attorneys, Broujos & Gilroy, P.C., sets forth the following in the nature of preliminary objections: LACK OF JURISDICTION 1 Plaintiff has not served Defendant John Adams as required by Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and this court has no jurisdiction over Mr. Adams as a result of failure of adequate service. Defendant Adams requests this matter be dismissed on that basis. DEMURRER 2 Defendant John Adams demurrers to the complaint and alleges that Plaintiff has failed to set forth a cause of action against Defendant Adams. WHEREFORE, Defendant John Adams requests your Honorable Court to dismiss the complaint filed against him in the above matter. Respectfully submitted, Hubert X. Gilroy, quire Attorney for Def dant John Adams Broujos & Gilr y, P.C. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-4574 Supreme Court ID No. 29943 U?? v c- J' C t? ?G CORY A. CORMANY, PLAINTIFF V. EARL F. REITZ, JR., STEVEN CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DIEHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFERY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, DEFENDANTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTION OF DEFENDANT. PAULA CORREAL TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE BAYLEY, J. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of July, 2003, the preliminary objection of defendant, Paula Correal, to dismiss plaintiffs complaint as to her, IS GRANTED. Plaintiffs complaint IS DISMISSED as to Paula Correal.1 Edgar B. Bayl J. The complaint fails to state a cause of action against defendant Paul and further, it is apparent on the face of the pleading that defendant is from this suit. Correal immune „??,,?:?.r.. ?.,,,?an? l,, r ?.t? , ? ? "1110 f,tJ 0 Cory A. Cormany, Pro se 1883 Douglas Dr. Carlisle, PA 17013 Mary E. Butler, Esquire For Paul Correal :sal DEVLIN & DEVINE By: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Identification No. 42717 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428 (610)-397-4600 Attorney for Defendant, Jeffrey Franks CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL RETIZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISION, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. 03-1778 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Kindy enter my appearance on behalf of Defendant, Jeffrey Franks, in the above- captioned matter. DEVLIN & DEVINE BY: William J. Cv n, Jr., Esquir C7 c? C) - L- T mIQ D CID DEVLIN & DEVINE By: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Identification No. 42717 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428 (610)-397-4600 Attorney for Defendant, Jeffrey Franks CORY A. CORMANY v. EARL RETIZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISION, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CASE NO. 03-1778 PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT, JEFFREY FRANKS Defendant, Jeffrey Franks, by and through his attorney, William J. Devlin, Jr., sets forth the following in the way of Preliminary Objections: LACK OF JURISDICTION Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, has not served Defendant, Jeffrey Franks, as required by the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and this court has no jurisdiction over Mr. Franks. Defendant Franks requests this matter be dismissed on that basis. DEMURRER 2. Defendant, Jeffrey Franks, demurs to the Complaint and alleges that plaintiff has failed to set forth a cause of action against him. 3. Plaintiffs Complaint fails to state any causes of action against Defendant Franks in a concise and summary form as required by the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. Plaintiffs Complaint contains paragraph after paragraph nonsensical sentences some of which contain English words and some of which contain words that appear to be wholly made up by Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Defendant, Jeffrey Franks, respectfully requests this Court to grant his Preliminary Objections and to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint in addition to such other relief as the Court deems appropriate. Respectfully Submitted, William J. vlin, Jr., Es ire Attorney fo Defendant, Jeffrey Franks ? N cm U y ? "7?TI a n9 -:. -Ti r ?a i Ca _ ._ PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be stated in full) CORY A. CORMANY vs_ (Plaintiff) EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERSTON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARK, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER. OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL (Deferldan 1 No 1778 19 2003 Civil 1_ State matter to be argued (i.e_. plaintiffs motion for new trial, defendant's Defendants Earl Rei`P?rnt,Stc.) Calaman, Curtis ColbErston, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney and Jeffrey Franks' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint. 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) for plaintiff. Pro Se Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany Address: 1883 Douglas Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013 (b) for defendant. William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire Address: Devlin & Devine, 100 W. Elm St., Ste. 200, Conshohocken, PA 19428 3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been Listed for aVment. 4- Argient Court Date; Willia J. Devlin, Jy., Esquire meted: 1/8/03 Attorney for De en ants, a z, M Colberston, Coover, Teaney and Franks N O L .4 1- i1 rn {C1 W -1 -c. CJ PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please list the within matter for the next Atgumnt Court. CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be stated in full) CORY A. CORMANY, VS. EARL REITZ, JR., et al, (Plaintiff) (Defendant) No 03-1778 Civil 19 1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT JOHN ADAMS 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) for plaintiff: Cory A. Cormany Address: 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 (b) for defendant: Hubert X. Gilroy, Esquire Address: 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 3. i will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case bas been listed for arguTent. F64 4. Argument Court Date: 'oar 4, 2004 Dated: Attorney or c-n ? a 'J "L. tV ?. J 1 FIQ - MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP BY: DAVID J. MacMAIN AND JESSICA C. GOEBELER IDENTIFICATION NOS. 59320 and 81799 123 S. BROAD STREET ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY (215) 772-1500 KURTZ, AND MATTHEW KENNEDY CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, V. EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAUL CORREAL Defendants. CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Kindly enter my appearance in the matter captioned above on behalf of 995326v1 Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department. MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP By: e - ???? Je ca C. Goebeler I.D. No. 89652 123 S. Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 (215) 772-1500 ? N o ? C-. 'n <:' -., ?. ,_ i? ? ? IZl - _ -? 1 n s.- C_71- ?> ? -n J '?i m NN < J!i - 17 MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP BY: DAVID J. MacMAIN AND JESSICA C. GOEBELER IDENTIFICATION NOS. 59320 and 89652 123 S. BROAD STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 (215) 772-1500 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS GARY SHULENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, AND MATTHEW KENNEDY CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL ACTION V. EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHOLENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL NO. 03-1778 Defendants. CARLISLE DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy (collectively the "Carlisle Defendants") hereby submit their Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028, as follows: 997398v1 I. INTRODUCTION The present claim is brought pro se by Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany against numerous Defendants including Carlisle Police Department Officers, the Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Prison Officers, and District Justice Paula Correal. 2. Although Plaintiffs Complaint is extremely vague (a copy of the Complaint is attached herein as "Exhibit A"), Plaintiff seems to be alleging that Defendants conspired against him resulting in criminal charges and convictions from 1996 to 2001. 3. Plaintiff presents no facts explaining the basis for his allegations. II. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS A. DEMURRER-PLAINTIFF FAILS TO SET FORTH A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS The Carlisle Defendants incorporate herein by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth at length. 2. Plaintiff appears to assert a claim for malicious prosecution against the Carlisle Defendants. Rule 1028(a)(4) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure permits the filing of preliminary objections for "legal insufficiency of a pleading (demurrer)." 4. A claim for malicious prosecution requires a showing that: (1) defendant initiated criminal charges against him/her; (2) those charges were without probable cause; (3) the charges were based on malice or for a purpose other than bringing a plaintiff to justice; and (4) the criminal proceedings ultimately ended in a plaintiff s favor. 5. Plaintiff fails to set forth a cause of action for malicious prosecution against the Carlisle Defendants because Plaintiff's Complaint fails to set forth any facts in support of a legal finding of malicious prosecution. -2- 997398x1 6. For example, Plaintiff fails to allege, much less assert, supporting facts as to what specific charges were asserted against him, the case name and number, and whether the charges were brought by any of the Carlisle Defendants, all of which are essential to asserting a viable claim. Plaintiff also fails to allege, perhaps because he cannot, that the charges brought against him were terminated in his favor. In order to assert a malicious prosecution claim, any criminal proceedings must ultimately end in Plaintiffs favor. Valenti v. Sheeler, 785 F. Supp. 227, 232 (E.D. Pa. 1991); Bussard v. Neil, 616 F. Supp. 854, 857 (M.D. Pa. 1985). WHEREFORE, pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(4), Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy respectfully request that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy and that judgment be entered in their favor and against Plaintiff, together with costs, disbursements, attorney's fees, and any further relief deemed appropriate by this Court. B. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT VIOLATES THE RULES OF THIS COURT 1. The Carlisle Defendants incorporate herein by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth at length. 2. Rule 1019(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure states that pleadings shall contain "the material facts in which a cause of action or defense is based." 3. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to set forth material facts upon which this purported claim for conspiracy and/or malicious prosecution is based, in violation of Rule 1019(a). -3- 997398x1 4. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint fails to comport with the rules of this Court. WHEREFORE, pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(2), Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy respectfully request that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy, and that judgment be entered in their favor and against Plaintiff, together with costs, disbursements, attorney's fees, and any further relief deemed appropriate by this Court. C. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR MORE SPECIFIC PLEADINGS 1. The Carlisle Defendants incorporate herein by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth at length. 2. Rule 1028(a)(3) permits the filing of preliminary objections for "insufficient specificity in a pleading." 3. Plaintiffs Complaint fails to provide relevant facts to support allegations of "malicious prosecution," much less inform, the Carlisle Defendants or this Court of specifically what it is the Carlisle Defendants are alleged to have done. 4. Accordingly, in the event that Plaintiff's Complaint is not dismissed with prejudice, the Carlisle Defendants respectfully request that this Court compel Plaintiff to file a more specific pleading setting forth, in detail, sufficient facts not only to support a purported claim, but also to inform the Carlisle Defendants of the nature of the claim and supporting facts asserted against him. WHEREFORE, pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(3), Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy respectfully request that Plaintiff's -4- 997398v1 Complaint be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as against Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy, and that judgment be entered in their favor and against Plaintiff, together with costs, disbursements, attorney's fees, and any further relief deemed appropriate by this Court. Dated: January 20, 2004 ??ii? - 7? dTl?' vl Da d J. MacMain Jessica C. Goebeler Attorneys for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy -5- 997398v1 EXHIBIT A 1ltH-UI-00011 ItlU UI'UJ nu Inacnvw Inn I1U. 01 UJU IYU 1. ?' 04/29/2003 15:21 717-231-9299 PLAINTIFF CORY A. CORMANY PAGE 21 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. DEFENDANT EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLSERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARK, GR EXY DEUH[L, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE: CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY: SHOLENBERGER., JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL CASE NO. 03-778 CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL c? r s You brave been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and by filing in writing with the Court your defense or objection to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. 11111 V{ LVUJ IIIV VI'JJ 1111 111JL1\YVV i Y\ I1V. JIVJV IYV F. UJ 04/211/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 22 YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. court Administrator Cumberland County Court House 1 South Street Carlisle, PA. 17013 11111 ul cuui uw VI•JJ nit urocnvi.v rnA tru. OWu)UIvu r. U0 94/2'3/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PLAINTIFF CORY A. CORMANY PACE 95 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. r)EFENDANT EARL REITZ JR. , STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL : COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEM, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTE;R OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY : SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURT7: MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE; : DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE : CUMBiERLA)N COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA : CORREAL CASE NO. 03-1778 CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL AND NOW comes, Cory Cotmany, Plaintiff, and sets forth causes of action against the above Defendants, whereof the following is a statement: 1. Plaintiff is Cory Cormany, an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. (1) I'll VI LVVJ III. VI ?v "" "l-'.V 11111 IIV• ViV.iVIIV 1. U l 94/29/2883 15:21 717-231-9296 PAX 86 2. Defendants Fart Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel (:cover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank; Teaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sholenberger, JefTiroy Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy and Jeffrey Franks arc adult individuals residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. 3. Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correa] is an adult individual residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania: 4, Plaintiff Cory Cormany is an adult individual proceeding employment with Advance Personel, Lemoyne, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiff is a taxpayer, a registered voter, and a citizen of the United States of America. 5. Plaintiff Cory Cormany is a high school graduate in attending South Middleton School District. He is also academically achieved through the Pennsylvania State University. 6. Pursuant therefore the foregoing statement, Defendants John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Tcaney and Raymond Motter did perpetrate a series of questionable situations and circumstances reportorial the Plaintiff Cory Cormany and the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 7. On April 1st, of the year 1996, Defendant Steve Calaman did corroborate and corrupt criminative offenses directional the Plaintiff Cory Connany, without superior affirmation political the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. (2) . 1-t v, LUVJ Illu us-ou nit IIIVLI?vv? rrrrr r,v viv?vlly r vv 04/29/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PACE 07 8. Prior therein the foregoing statement, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a criminal and a civil matter substantial Defendant Frank, Teancy and the Cumberland County District Attorney. 9. On May 29th, of the year 1996, Defendants Steve Calaman and Jeffrey Franks did solicit to commit and justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, pursuant the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 10. On September 61h, of the year 1996, Defendant Gary Sholenberger did commit and coerce criminative offenses perspicacious the plaintiff Cory Cormany, prior a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. it. On February 8th, of the year 2000, Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did commit and construe criminative offenses cumulative the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, proceeding a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 12. On May 21st, of the year 2001, Defendant Mathew Kennedy did commit and abscond m*ninative- offenses calumnious the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, prescient a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 13. On September 12th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Colmany did waive and consent a guilty ramification objectional Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 14. on September 21st, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a civil complaint with the United States District Court impetuous the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 15. On October 2nd, of the year 2001, Defendant Samuel Coover did (3) IIn I-Ul-cuuJ mu ul •JU nll itwrrIvuu rnn nU. JIUJUI4U r. Uo 04/23/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 08 aggress and implement criminative offenses destitutional the Plaintiff Cory C:ormany, without jurisdictional approval influential the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania.. 16, On November 4th, of the year 2001, Planttiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of-Cumberland County. 17. Prior herein and perpinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District sustice Paula Corroal did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Curtis Colbertson, instantaneous the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 18. On December 7th, of the year 2001, Defendants Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did again solicit to commit and Justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany. 19. On December 10th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a commitment, noncertified an official service, to the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 20. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County consequential Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal and Det. William DeW of the Cumberland County District Attorney, reliable Defendant Jeffrey Franks. 21. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did (4) IMI UI cuuo If1U UI.DO 1111 11Wr KVUU rnn IYU. OIUUUI4U F. lu 04/29/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 09 pursue a criminal complaint in the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County culpable Defendants Steve Calaman, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey Franks, applicable Defendant Earl Reitz, Jr. 21 On January 3rd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a scheduled release and/or discharge from the Cumberland County Prison careless the order of the court set forth by the Commonwealth of Ponnsylvania, Court of Common Pleas Cumberland County. 23. On February 26th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, communistic Dezendant Jeffrey ' Franks and Att. Edmund Zigmund of the Cumberland County District Attorney, remissible Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 24, On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion •disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mathew Kennedy and Dot. William Deild of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Corneal. 25, On June 7th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, explicit Defendants Samuel Coover, Mathew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal, informative Ptl. Brian MoVitti of the North Middleton Police Department. (s) "I'll-ul-cuw inu ul•UU nu IIWLI\VVu rnn nv. uiwulyu r " 04/213/2003 15:21 717-231-5296 PAGE 10 26. On July 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did appeal a judiciary determination statutory Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula. Correal in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 27. On August 29th, of the year 2002, Defendant Mathew Kennedy did provoke and circumvent criminative offenses impermeable the Plaintiff Cory Connany without electorial authorization, doubtful the Cumberland County 'Prison, Pennsylvania. 28. Prescient hereto and pertinent herein, Defendant Honorable District justice Paula Correal did again adjudicate allegations argumentative the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, rhetorical the Plaintiff Cory Cormany. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive The Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 30. On December 2nd; of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormauy did petition a Post Conviction Collateral Motion relievable the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 31. On December 9th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did fae a criminal report with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County allegorical Det. William Deihl et. al., circumstantial Att. Dirk Berry of the Cumberland County Legal Service. 32. On December 23rd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did (6) 84/2912003 15:21 717-231-9296 PAGE 11 CORY A. CORMANY V. EARL RITZ, JR. CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 38. The avernlents set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length- 39. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 40. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Earl Reitz Jr. (lid maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willfal conduct. 41. The Plaintiff Cory • Cormany did suffer pairs for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation,. emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 42. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, qury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORB, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from. the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. 1-1 (s) 11111 Vl LVVJ IIIU UI•JI 1111 lllul..l?.vu 111(1 IIV. oIUJUIYU f. iJ 04/23/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANY V. CURTIS COLBERTSON CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 12 49. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thity seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated-by reference as if het forth-at length. 49. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as leaving happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 50. Proceeding hereto and relevant hcr'ein; the Defendant Curtis Colbertson did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 51. The Plaintiff Cory • Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 52. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Corrnany has suffered pairs, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (10) 11111 VI LVVJ IIIV VI VI ll?? a?IVLI?. VV •.... 1- V ---- I ... 84/29/2883 15:21 717-231-9296 PAQE 13 COUNT SLR{ CORY A. CORMANY V. JOHN PORTER. CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL. ERROR 63. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 64. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 65. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant John Porter did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute ,md deliberate a willful conduct. 66. The Plaintiff Cory • Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 67. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of Ono Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (l3) 04129/2003 15;21 717-231-9296 PAGE 14 CORY A. CORMANY V. TERRY DARR CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR 68. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 69. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 70. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Terry Darr did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 71. The Plaintiff Cory • Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 72. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (14) Ilm VL LVUJ mu vi.i, it, uwu,rw ? iu,? nv. 04/2'3/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORM.ANY V. GREG DEM CIVIL ACTION - LAW PRERMICLikL ERROR PAGE 15 73. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1-371 of the-Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length. 74. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - T. 75. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Greg Deihl did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute Fmd deliberate a willful conduct. 76. The Plaintiff Cory, Cozmany did suffer pain for injuries felt and rjustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 77. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Colmany has suffered pain, injury, mental augalsh, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (15) IIIII VI LVVJ IIIV VI J, ,u, •n??.u. VV 11111 11V, JIUJVLYV V. 1I 04/213/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANY V. GARY SHOLENBERGER CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 16 93. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven (1=37) of the Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth at length, 94. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted cltbibits; A - X. 95. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Raymond Motter did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 96. The Plaintiff Cory • Cotmany did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional ditress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 97. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered per, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of suit. (19) UMI-U1-cUUJ IMU Uf •01 r1ll IPIJGIIVUU rr1A IVU. Jl UJU14U r. io 04/29/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 CORY A. CORMANY V. JEFFREY KURTZ CIVIL ACTION - LAW PREJUDICIAL ERROR PAGE 17 98. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through thirty seven. (1-37) of the Complaint are-incorporated by reference as-if set forth at length. 99. The prejudicial and conspiratorial issues and crimes are serious as (laving happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully submitted exhibits; A - X. 100. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 101. The Plaintiff Cory. Corrawy did suffer pain for injuries felt and sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. 102. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory _ Cormany has suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration. VMEREFORP, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in an amount in excess of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and 00 Dollars (125,000.00), plus cost of shit. (20) 11111 V• LV VJ IIIV Vi vi •?.. 1?1u L1••VV 11111 IIV. VIVJVIIV I ? IJ 04/2'3/2003 15:21 717-231-5296 PAGE 18 VERMICAIMN I, Cory A. Cormany, Plaintiff in the above captioned action, hereby verify and state that the facts set forth in the Complaint against Earl Reitz Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sholenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy, Jeffrey Franks and Paula Correal are true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unswom verification to authorities. Dated BY? - ?? , •-? Cory A. Cormany (2a) IIHI-UI-CUVJ IMU UI'UI nll IIVJLRVUU 04/29/2003 15:21 717-231-9296 A. B. C. 1). E. P G. L 1. I K L. Dockets: Employment Academic EXHIBITS and M. Reports: J. Adams, J. Porter, T. Darr, G. Deihl, P. Green, F. Teaney and R. Molter, C.C.D.A. Civil Complaint: Cumberland County Common Pleas Sammons Matter: Det. Franks, D.J. Correal's Office Summons Matter: Pd. Tilton, D.J. Correal's Office Summons Matter: Pd, Kurtz, D.J. Cormal's Office Summons Matter: Ptl. Kennedy, D.J. Correal's Office Summons Matter: Det. Diehl, D.J. Correal's Office Civil Complaint: United States District Court Cumberland County: Signatories/ Order of the Court Criminal Complaint: Lt. Calaman, et. al., C.C.D.A. Criminal Complaint: Mr, Arafat, et, al., C.C.D-A. N o. P Q• R. PnA IYV, JIUJUIYV 1. LU PAGE 19 Criminal Complaint: Mr. Coover, et. al-, C.C.D.A. Criminal Report Der. Diehl, et. al., C.C.D.A. Criminal Report: Det. Franks, et, al., C.C.D.A. Criminal Report: Det. Diehl, et. al., C.C.D.A. Notification: Bail and Arrest/ Charge, via mail delivery Requests: C.C.P. Staffing Personnel S. Papers: Parole and Release Dates and Reasons T. Receipts: Appeal and Commitment U. Summons Matter: Ptl. Kennedy, et. al., D. J. Placey's Office V.. Motion: Post Conviction Collateral Relief W. Cumberland County: Orders of the Court X. Receipts: Servicing and Delivery Verification (1) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jessica C. Goebeler, hereby certify that on this 20th day of January, 2004, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy's Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint by United States first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Pro se Plaintiff The Honorable Paula Correal One Courthouse Square East Wing Annex Carlisle, PA 17013 Hubert Gilroy, Esquire Four North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, and Frank Teaney C .1,4,r,7?4 0. Jegica C. Goebeler 997398vl ^? ?. ? -;: a?- ._, ?-- - `' ' ? -?, . - ? _ ; ?, - . r? r? c,_ PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. CAPTION OF CASE CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHULENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL Defendants. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy's Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) for plaintiff: Address: (b) for defendants: Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy Cory Cormany, pro se 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 David J. MacMain, Esquire Jessica C. Goebeler, Esquire Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. 4. Argument Court Date: Dated: January 20, 2004 6--W? 4 Att ney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy Cz r? n C ) ?? ?? ? ..l Il - ?W? r _ .?. _.' r' 1 ., ) _°l f`.5 C 1 MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP BY: DAVID J. MacMAIN AND JESSICA C. GOEBELER IDENTIFICATION NOS. 59320 and 89652 123 S. BROAD STREET ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 GARY SHULENBERGER, JEFFREY (215) 772-1500 KURTZ, AND MATTHEW KENNEDY CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, V. EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHULENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL Defendants. CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Jessica C. Goebeler, being duly sworn according to law, do hereby depose and say: (a) I am counsel for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy (hereinafter "Carlisle Defendants") in the above-captioned action; (b) I am over 18 years of age; (c) I am not a party to this action; (d) I caused a true and correct copy of (1) Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint and (2) Brief in Support of Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint to be mailed to Plaintiff Cory Cormany at 1883 Douglas Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013 by United States first-class mail on January 20, 2004; and (e) I caused a true and correct copy of (1) Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint and (2) Brief in Support of Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint to be mailed to the following co-defendants by United States first-class mail on January 20, 2004: 1) The Honorable Paula Correal at One Courthouse Square, East Wing Annex, Carlisle, PA 17013; 2) Hubert Gilroy, Esquire, counsel for co-defendant John Adam, at Four North Hanover Street, Carlisle, PA 17013; and 3) William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire, counsel for co-defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, and Frank Teane, at 100 West Elm Street, Suite 200, Conshohocken, PA 19428. Je>gt;ica C. Goebeler Sworn to and subscribed before me this ?th day of Mgrch, 2004 Public Notarial Seal County 4MIIIublic nsylvania Assaaatinnz(? 2(106 Notaries CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 24, 2004, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Affidavit of Service by United States first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Pro se Plaintiff The Honorable Paula Correal One Courthouse Square East Wing Annex Carlisle, PA 17013 Hubert Gilroy, Esquire Four North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, and Frank Teaney J`/ZL/w Z' - J sica C. Goebeler r 72) fTl? n) _YIfpT'1 -n -r '_ ?> =mot 7 co -..i -< MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP BY: DAVID J. MacMAIN AND JESSICA C. GOEBELER IDENTIFICATION NOS. 59320 and 89652 123 S. BROAD STREET ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 GARY SHULENBERGER, JEFFREY (215) 772-1500 KURTZ, AND MATTHEW KENNEDY CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff, V. EARL REITZ, JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY, RAYMOND MOTTER OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, GARY SHULENBERGER, JEFFERY KURTZ, MATTHEW KENNEDY, OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,: JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL Defendants. CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-1778 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Jessica C. Goebeler, being duly sworn according to law, do hereby depose and say: (a) I am counsel for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, and Matthew Kennedy (hereinafter "Carlisle Defendants") in the above-captioned action; (b) I am over 18 years of age; (c) I am not a party to this action; (d) I caused a true and correct copy of (1) Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint and (2) Brief in Support of Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint to be mailed to Plaintiff Cory Cormany at 1883 Douglas Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013 by United States first-class mail on January 20, 2004; and (e) I caused a true and correct copy of (1) Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint and (2) Brief in Support of Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint to be mailed to the following co-defendants by United States first-class mail on January 20, 2004: 1) The Honorable Paula Correal at One Courthouse Square, East Wing Annex, Carlisle, PA 17013; 2) Hubert Gilroy, Esquire, counsel for co-defendant John Adam, at Four North Hanover Street, Carlisle, PA 17013; and 3) William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire, counsel for co-defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, and Frank Teane, at 100 West Elm Street, Suite 200, Conshohocken, PA 19428. e. Je ica C. Goebeler Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2_?th day of M ch, 2004 Notary Public Notarial Seal Kathleen IvlcElaney Notary Public City Of Philadelphia, Philadelphia County MY Commission Expires July 23, 2006 Member. Pennsylvania 4ssoraalion Cx Notaries CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 24, 2004, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Affidavit of Service by United States first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Pro se Plaintiff The Honorable Paula Corneal One Courthouse Square East Wing Annex Carlisle, PA 17013 Hubert Gilroy, Esquire Four North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire 100 West Elm Street Suite 200 Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, and Frank Teaney J sica C. Goebeler r7 r_ N ° d S Y r TI j; F? 1 I'`I ?-'r . ? T 1 _ %v rTi nm }'' (,_ ? MITI CJT -t CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARK, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT JOHN ADAMS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 20" day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendant John Adams to Plaintiff's complaint, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they request dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to Defendant Adams. a?n i 71, ?Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se ?William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney, and Jeffrey Franks ?Flubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams ?Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 281h Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz -1 7 Oy .Zp p BY THE COURT, t =.l C. _ C.? 1 {,- [? ?LlJ f V _- ..ay ?I_ I I T _.. C_; CV Cam) ? Aary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT JOHN ADAMS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. OPINION and ORDER OF COURT Oler, J., April 20, 2004. For disposition in this civil case in which a pro se Plaintiff has sued various individuals, including a district justice, are preliminary objections of Defendant John Adams to Plaintiff's complaint. The preliminary objections are in the nature of a demurrer, inter alia. ' Preliminary Objections of Defendant John Adams, filed June 3, 2003. The preliminary objections of Defendant Adams were argued before the above court en banc on February 4, 2004.2 For the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed as to Defendant Adams. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff's complaint in the above-captioned matter was filed on April 21, 2003. It contains 115 paragraphs and 193 pages. Paragraph 1 of the complaint identifies the Plaintiff as "an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. ,3 Paragraph 2 states that Defendant John Adams ... [is an] adult individual[] residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. ,4 Typical of the 113 paragraphs which follow are these: 6. Pursuant therefore the foregoing statement, Defendants John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney and Raymond Motter did perpetrate a series of questionable situations and circumstances reportorial the Plaintiff Cory Cormany and the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 13. On September 12th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did waive and consent a guilty ramification objectional Defendants Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 16. On November 4th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 2 Plaintiff neither submitted a brief nor appeared for argument. 3 Plaintiff's complaint, para. 1. Plaintiff's complaint, para. 2. 2 19. On December 10th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a commitment, noncertified an official service, to the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 24. On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive The Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 30. On December 2nd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a Post Conviction Collateral Motion relievable the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 35. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered public humiliation as caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. 60. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant John Adams did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. DISCUSSION As a general proposition, Pennsylvania courts are not required to entertain submissions which are incoherent, incomprehensible or unintelligible. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Albert, 522 Pa. 331, 561 A.2d 736 (1989); Commonwealth ex rel. Swann v. Shovling, 423 Pa. 26, 223 A.2d 1 (1966). Thus, it has been said that 3 "[p]reliminary objections are certainly appropriate where a pleading is ... incoherent ...." Jackson v. Richards 5 & 10 Inc., 289 Pa. Super. 445, 451, 433 A.2d 888, 891 (1981). More specifically, under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028(a)(2), a pleading which is legally insufficient to set forth a cause of action is susceptible to a preliminary objection. Implicit within this rule is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 18 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Upon consideration of such an objection, the court may properly sustain a demurrer and dismiss the pleading. Id. In this regard, it is well settled that "[p]leadings will be construed against a pleader on the theory that he or she has stated his or her case as best he or she can." 2 Goodrich Amram 2d 1019:7, at 249 (2001). In the present case, a careful reading of Plaintiff's complaint reveals that Defendant Adams is barely mentioned in the pleading and that no intelligible, legally cognizable cause of action has been set forth against him. For this reason, and based upon the foregoing principles of law, the following order will be entered: ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 20`h day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendant John Adams to Plaintiff's complaint, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they request dismissal of Plaintiffs complaint, and Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed as to Defendant Adams. BY THE COURT, /s/ J. Wesley Oler Jr. J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J. 4 Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney, and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28`h Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal 5 CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS REITZ, CALAMAN, COLBERTSON, COOVER AND TEANEY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OI.ER, J. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 19'h day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they seek dismissal of Plaintiffs complaint, and r? i „ „?.?? :? ??? ?? -- ?.'?' Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to Defendants Reitz, Calaman, Colbertson, Coover, and Teaney. Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams BY THE COURT, J. esle Oler Y ., J. Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28`h Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS REITZ, CALAMAN, COLBERTSON, COOVER AND TEANEY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. OPINION and ORDER OF COURT OLER, J., April 19, 2004. For disposition in this civil case in which a pro se Plaintiff has sued various individuals, including a district justice, are preliminary objections of Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney to Plaintiff's complaint. The preliminary objections are in the nature of a demurrer and a motion to strike for failure to plead facts in a concise and summary form in conformity with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a), inter alia.' The preliminary objections contend that "Plaintiff's Complaint contains paragraph after paragraph of nonsensical sentences some of which contain English words and some [of] which contain words that appear to be wholly made up by Plaintiff"z The preliminary objections further maintain that "[n]onsensical words placed on paper next to the names of [the moving Defendants] do not state a cause of action ...."3 These preliminary objections were argued before the above court en banc on February 4, 2004.4 For the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed as to Defendants Reitz, Calaman, Colbertson, Coover and Teaney. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiffs complaint in the above-captioned matter was filed on April 21, 2003. It contains 115 paragraphs and 193 pages. Paragraph 1 of the complaint identifies the Plaintiff as "an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. ,5 Paragraph 2 states that "Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover,... [and] Frank Teaney ... are adult individuals residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. ,6 The preliminary objections ' Defen[]dants', Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed June 2, 2003. Defen[]dants', Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint, para. 5. 3 Defen[]dants', Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Culbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint, para. 15. a Plaintiff neither submitted a brief nor appeared for argument. 5 Plaintiffs complaint, para. 1. e Plaintiffs complaint, para. 2. 2 filed by these individuals suggest that they are all. employees of Cumberland County.7 Typical of the 113 paragraphs which follow in Plaintiffs complaint are these: 6. Pursuant therefore the foregoing statement, Defendants John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney and Raymond Motter did perpetrate a series of questionable situations and circumstances reportorial the Plaintiff Cory Cormany and the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 7. On April 1st, of the year 19'96, Defendant Steve Calaman did corroborate and commt criminative offenses directional the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without superior affirmation political the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 9. On May 29th, of the year 1996, Defendants Steve Calaman and Jeffrey Franks (lid solicit to commit and justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, pursuant the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 13. On September 12th of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did waive and consent a guilty ramification objectional Defendants Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 15. On October 2nd, of the year 2001, Defendant Samuel Coover did aggress and implement criminative offenses destitutional the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, without jurisdictional approval influential the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 16. On November 4th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; ' Defendants', Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Culbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs complaint, para. 3. 3 a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 17. Prior herein and pertinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Curtis Colbertson, instantaneous the Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy. 19. On December 10th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did remand a commitment, noncertified an official service, to the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 21. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did pursue a criminal complaint in the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County culpable Defendants Steve Calaman, Gary Sh[u]lenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mat[t]hew Kennedy, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey Franks, applicable Defendant Earl Reitz, Jr. 24. On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 25. On June 7th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, explicit Defendants Samuel Coover, Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal, informative Ptl. Brian McVitti of the North Middleton Police Department. 4 27. On August 29th, of the year 2002, Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy did provoke and circumvent criminative offenses impermeable the Plaintiff Cory Cormany without electorial authorization, doubtful the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive the Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 35. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered public humiliation as caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. 40. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Earl Reitz Jr. did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 45. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Steve Calaman did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 50. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Curtis Colbertson did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 55. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Samuel Coover did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 5 85. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Frank Teaney did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct.8 DISCUSSION As a general proposition, Pennsylvania courts are not required to entertain submissions which are incoherent, incomprehensible or unintelligible. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Albert, 522 Pa. 331, 561 A.2d 736 (1989); Commonwealth ex rel. Swann v. Shovling, 423 Pa. 26, 223 A.2d 1 (1966). Thus, it has been said that "[p]reliminary objections are certainly appropriate where a pleading is . . . incoherent ...." Jackson v. Richards 5 & 10 Inc., 289 Pa. Super. 445, 451, 433 A.2d 888, 891 (1981). More specifically, under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a), "[t]he material facts on which a cause of action or defiense is based shall be stated in a concise and summary form." Implicit within this rule is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 118 111. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Where a portion of a pleading fails to conform to the rule, it is susceptible to a preliminary objection. See Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2) (failure of pleading to conform to law or rule of court). Upon consideration of such an objection, the court may properly strike the affected pleading. See, e.g., Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Zanella Transit, Inc., 53 Pa. Commw. 359,417 A.2d 860 (1980). Under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028(a)(2), a pleading which is legally insufficient to set forth a cause of action is also susceptible to a preliminary objection. Implicit within this rule as well is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 18 111. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Upon consideration of such an a Plaintiff's complaint, at 2-17. 6 objection, the court may properly sustain a demurrer and dismiss the pleading. Id. In this regard, it is well settled that "[p]leadings will be construed against a pleader on the theory that he or she has stated his or her case as best he or she can." 2 Goodrich Amram 2d 1019:7, at 249 (2001). In the present case, a careful reading of Plaintiff's complaint reveals that it is not stated in a concise and summary form in the sense of being intelligible, nor is any legally cognizable cause of action as against the moving defendants set forth. For these reasons, and based upon the foregoing principles of law, the following order will be entered: ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 191h day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Frank Teaney, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they seek dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to Defendants Reitz, Calaman, Colbertson, Coover, and Teaney. BY THE COURT, /s/ J. W esley Oler, Jr. J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J. Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve 7 Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28t` Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT JEFFREY FRANKS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE 1IOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 19x' day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendant Jeffrey Franks, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they request dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to Defendant Franks. ,, 1?L , Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28th Fl. ,Mtie.?cd Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz ?- da ,o y BY THE COURT, Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT JEFFREY FRANKS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. OPINION and ORDER OF COURT OLER, J., April 19, 2004. For disposition in this civil case in which a pro se Plaintiff has sued various individuals, including a district justice, are preliminary objections of Defendant Jeffrey Franks to Plaintiff's complaint. The preliminary objections are in the nature of a motion to strike for failure to plead facts in a concise and summary form (in conformity with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a)) and a demurrer, inter alia.l In the preliminary objections, Defendant contends that "Plaintiff's Complaint contains paragraph after paragraph [of] nonsensical sentences some of which contain English words and some of which contain words that appear to be wholly made up by Plaintiff." Defendant's preliminary objections were argued before the above court en banc on February 4, 2004.2 For the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed as to Defendant Franks. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff's complaint in the above-captioned matter was filed on April 21, 2003. It contains 115 paragraphs and 193 pages. Paragraph 1 of the complaint identifies the Plaintiff as "an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. ,3 Paragraph 2 states that "Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, John Adams, John Porter, Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Paul Green, Frank Teaney, Raymond Motter, Gary Sh[u]lenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, Mathew Kennedy and Jeffrey Franks are adult individuals residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania. ,4 Typical of the 113 paragraphs which follow are these: 14. On September 21st, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a civil complaint with the United States District Court impetuous the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correa]. Preliminary Objections of Defendant, Jeffrey Franks', filed January 12, 2004. 2 Plaintiff neither submitted a brief nor appeared for argument. ' Plaintiff's complaint, paragraph 1 4 Plaintiff's complaint, para. 2. 2 16. On November 4th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 17. Prior herein and pertinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Curtis Colbertson, instantaneous the Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 20. On December 24th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County consequential Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, reliable Defendant Jeffrey Franks. 23. On February 26th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, communistic Defendant Jeffrey Franks and Att. Edmund Zigmund of the Cumberland County District Attorney, remissible Defendant Mathew Kennedy. 24. On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mathew Kennedy and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive The Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 3 35. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered public humiliation as caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. 110. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Jeffrey Franks did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conducts DICSUSSION As a general proposition, Pennsylvania courts are not required to entertain submissions which are incoherent, incomprehensible or unintelligible. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Albert, 522 Pa. 331, 561 A.2d 736 (1989); Commonwealth ex rel. Swann v. Shovling, 423 Pa. 26, 223 A.2d 1 (1966). Thus, it has been said that "[p]reliminary objections are certainly appropriate where a pleading is . . . incoherent ...." Jackson v. Richards 5 & 10 Inc., 289 Pa. Super. 445, 451, 433 A.2d 888, 891 (1981). More specifically, under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a), "[t]he material facts on which a cause of action or defense is based shall be stated in a concise and summary form." Implicit within this rule is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 118 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Where a portion of a pleading fails to conform to the rule, it is susceptible to a preliminary objection. See Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2) (failure of pleading to conform to law or rule of court). Upon consideration of such an objection, the court may properly strike the affected pleading. See, e.g., Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Zanella Transit, Inc., 53 Pa. Commw. 359,417 A.2d 860 (1980). Under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028(a)(2), a pleading which is legally insufficient to set forth a cause of action is also susceptible to a s Plaintiff s complaint, at 3-22. 4 preliminary objection. Implicit within this rule as well is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 18 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Upon consideration of such an objection, the court may properly sustain a demurrer and dismiss the pleading. Id. In this regard, it is well settled that "[p]leadings will be construed against a pleader on the theory that he or she has stated his or her case as best he or she can." 2 Goodrich Amram 2d 1019:7, at 249 (2001). In the present case, a careful reading of Plaintiff's complaint reveals that it is not stated in a concise and summary form in the sense of being intelligible, nor is any legally cognizable cause of action against Defendant Franks set forth in the pleading. For these reasons, and based upon the foregoing principles of law, the following order will be entered: ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 19`h day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendant Jeffrey Franks, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, the preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they request dismissal of Plaintiffs complaint, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to Defendant Franks. BY THE COURT, /s/ J. Wesley Oler Jr. J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J. Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se 5 William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28th Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal 6 CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTSSHULENBERGER,KURTZ AND KENNEDY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 19`h day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz and Matthew Kennedy, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, it is ordered and directed as follows: ? ? ' ?' ?.? ? ..... ., 'r. ? .. l' _. id::f I' ''O ?.?.. r. i 1. The preliminary objections filed on January 22, 2004, are stricken as duplicative of those filed earlier; 2. The earlier preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they request dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as to Defendants Shulenberger, Kurtz and Kennedy. Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams BY THE COURT, I d;? 0 J. esley Ole J. Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28'h Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal CORY A. CORMANY, Plaintiff V. EARL REITZ JR., STEVE CALAMAN, CURTIS COLBERTSON, SAMUEL COOVER, JOHN ADAMS, JOHN PORTER, TERRY DARR, : GREG DEIHL, PAUL GREEN, FRANK TEANEY,: RAYMOND MOTTER OF: THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON; GARY: SHOLENBERGER, JEFFREY KURTZ, MATHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY FRANKS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 03-1778 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTSSHULENBERGER,KURTZ AND KENNEDY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J. OPINION and ORDER OF COURT OLER, J., April 19, 2004. For disposition in this civil case in which a pro se Plaintiff has sued various individuals, including a district justice, are preliminary objections of Defendants Gary Sh[u]lenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz and Mat[t]hew Kennedy to Plaintiff's complaint. The preliminary objections are in the nature of a demurrer, a motion to strike for failure to plead facts in a concise and summary form in conformity with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a), and a motion for a more specific pleading. i Defendants' preliminary objections have been argued before the above court en banc.2 For the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs complaint will be dismissed as to Defendants Sh[u]lenberger, Kurtz and Kennedy. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiffs complaint in the above-captioned matter was filed on April 21, 2003. It contains 115 paragraphs and 193 pages. Paragraph 1 of the complaint identifies the Plaintiff as "an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. ,3 Paragraph 2 states that "Defendants ... Gary Sh[u]lenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz, [and] Mat[t]hew Kennedy ... are adult individuals residing in the Cumberland County Community, Pennsylvania."4 A brief in support of the preliminary objections filed by these defendants suggests that they are Carlisle Borough police officers. Typical of the 113 paragraphs which follow are these: 10. On September 6th, of the year 1996, Defendant Gary Sh[u]lenberger did commit and coerce criminative offenses perspicacious the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, prior a commitment to the Cumberland County prison. ll. On February 8th, of the year 2000, Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did commit and construe criminative offenses cumulative the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, proceeding a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 12. On May 21st, of the year 2001, Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy did commit and abscond criminative offenses calumnious the Plaintiff Cory Carlisle Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint. z Plaintiff neither submitted a brief nor appeared for argument. 3 Plaintiff's complaint, para. 1. a Plaintiff's complaint, para. 2. 2 Cormany, prescient a commitment to the Cumberland County Prison. 13.On September 21st, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a civil complaint with the United States District Court impetuous the Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 16. On November 4th, of the year 2001, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did listen to and comprehend; a number of detrimental procrastinations continual therefore, a Mr. Maswadeh Arafat and associates complaisant the District Attorney of Cumberland County. 17. Prior herein and pertinent hereto, Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did conspire to the solicitations of the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Curtis Colbertson, instantaneous the Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy. 18. On December 7th, of the year 2001, Defendants Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal did again solicit to commit and justify criminal acts against the Plaintiff Cory Cormany. 23. On February 26th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did service a criminal report to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland county, communistic Defendant Jeffrey Franks and Att. Edmund Zigmund of the Cumberland County District Attorney, remissible Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy. 24. On March 6th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did preconceive a legal conclusion disagreeable a mental/physical health condition, sadistic Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Det. William Deihl of the Cumberland County District Attorney, implicative Defendant Honorable District Justice Paula Correal. 25. On June 7th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did file a criminal complaint with the 3 District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, explicit Defendants Samuel Coover, Mat[t]hew Kennedy and Honorable District Justice Paula Correal, informative Ptl. Brian McVitti of the North Middleton Police Department. 27. On August 29th, of the year 2002, Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy did provoke and circumvent criminative offenses impermeable the Plaintiff Cory Cormany without electorial authorization, doubtful the Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania. 29. On September 10th, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did submit a guilty obligation preemptive The Honorable District Justice Thomas Placey in lieu of a prison sentence. 30. On December 2nd, of the year 2002, Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition a Post Conviction Collateral Motion relievable the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. 35. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered public humiliation as caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of the Defendant's solicit and malicious actions. 95. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Raymond Motter did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 100. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct. 4 105. Proceeding hereto and relevant herein; the Defendant Mat[t]hew Kennedy did maliciously solicit a requisite criminal intention careless a constitutional statute and deliberate a willful conduct.5 To this complaint, preliminary objections were filed on behalf of Defendants Shulenberger, Kurtz and Kennedy on May 14, 2003, and January 22, 2004. The second set of preliminary objections, which is duplicative of the first, will be stricken. DISCUSSION As a general proposition, Pennsylvania courts are not required to entertain submissions which are incoherent, incomprehensible or unintelligible. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Albert, 522 Pa. 331, 561 A.2d 736 (1989); Commonwealth ex rel. Swann v. Shovling, 423 Pa. 26, 223 A.2d 1 (1966). Thus, it has been said that "[p]reliminary objections are certainly appropriate where a pleading is . . . incoherent ...." Jackson v. Richards 5 & 10 Inc., 289 Pa. Super. 445, 451, 433 A.2d 888, 891 (1981). More specifically, under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a), "[t]he material facts on which a cause of action or defense is based shall be stated in a concise and summary form." Implicit within this rule is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 118 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Where a portion of a pleading fails to conform to the rule, it is susceptible to a preliminary objection. See Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2) (failure of pleading to conform to law or rule of court). Upon consideration of such an objection, the court may properly strike the affected pleading. See, e.g., Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Zanella Transit, Inc., 53 Pa. Commw. 359, 417 A.2d 860 (1980). Under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028(a)(2), a pleading which is legally insufficient to set forth a cause of action is also susceptible to a s Plaintiffs complaint, at 1-21 5 preliminary objection. Implicit within this rule as well is a requirement that the pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galesburg Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 18 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Upon consideration of such an objection, the court may properly sustain a demurrer and dismiss the pleading. Id. In this regard, it is well settled that "[p]leadings will be construed against a pleader on the theory that he or she has stated his or her case as best he or she can." 2 Goodrich Amram 2d 1019:7, at 249 (2001). In the present case, a careful reading of Plaintiff's complaint reveals that it is not stated in a concise and summary form in the sense of being intelligible, nor is any legally cognizable cause of action against the moving defendants set forth in the pleading. For these reasons, and based upon the foregoing principles of law, the following order will be entered: ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 191h day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed on behalf of Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Jeffrey Kurtz and Matthew Kennedy, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, it is ordered and directed as follows: 1. The preliminary objections filed on January 22, 2004, are stricken as duplicative of those filed earlier; 2. The earlier preliminary objections are sustained to the extent that they request dismissal of Plaintiffs complaint, and Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed as to Defendants Shulenberger, Kurtz and Kennedy. BY THE COURT, /s/ J. Wesley Oler, Jr. J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J. 6 Cory A. Cormany 1883 Douglas Drive Carlisle, PA 17013 Plaintiff, pro se William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq. Suite 200 100 West Elm Street Conshohocken, PA 19428 Attorney for Defendants Earl Reitz, Jr., Steve Calaman, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover, Frank Teaney, and Jeffrey Franks Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant John Adams Jessica C. Goebeler, Esq. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Avenue of the Arts, 28`h Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19109 Attorney for Defendants Gary Shulenberger, Matthew Kennedy, and Jeffrey Kurtz Mary E. Butler, Esq. Suite 1414 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attorney for former Defendant Paula Correal Curtis R. Long Prothonotary office of the protbonotarp CumbPrranb Countp Renee K. Simpson Deputy Prothonotary John E. Slike Solicitor n3 - 1^17A CIVIL TERM ORDER OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASES AND NOW THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007 AFTER MAILING NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROCEED AND RECEIVING NO RESPONSE - THE ABOVE CASE IS HEREBY TERMINATED WITH PREJUDICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PA R C P 230.2. BY THE COURT, CURTIS R. LONG PROTHONOTARY One Courthouse Square - Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 - (717) 240-6195 - Fax (717) 240-6573