Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-1792 FX ,,' CHRISTOPHER SMITH Plaintiff v. KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendant AND NOW, this day of - .-'1- ,1-,1, - - '. _; "i~^,,,,_~ ..,' '; ", : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO. 01-1792 ORDER 2001, upon consideration of the Commonwealth Defendants's Preliminary Objections, and any opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: 1. The Commonwealth Defendants' Preliminary Objections are GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. BY THE COURT: J. -,'--,- i~-.j I , , , c---- ~- " n_ '"'_~ ,-- - -,,, - - :-1:...1, '" " ~ ".' . _ -_~.c . , ~ ':;- : CHRISTOPHER SMITH Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendant : NO. 01-1792 RULE vj AND NOW, THIS _ day of ,2001, upon consideration ;:1 of Defendants' Preliminary Objections, a Rule is hereby entered to show cause why said Preliminary Objections should not be granted. Rule returnable BY THE COURT: J. ..."'? ~\J. . { Office of Attorney General Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 "'-'--- ~- ,,,-I,~I. ,; " ~~, ,;,,' -',"~ .' . ,"' -, 'c' Steven e. Gould Deputy Attorney General Direct Dial 717-783-8035 CHRISTOPHER SMITH Plaintiff v. KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and e.O. SERGEANT EW AN, ofthe STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendant : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CML ACTION - LAW : NO. 01-1792 NOTICE TO PLEAD TO: CHRISTOPHER SMITH, EM-4550 P.O. BOX 1000 HOUTZDALE, PA 16698-1000 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED to file a written response to the enclosed Preliminary Objections within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you. By: Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, P A 17120 717-783-8035 - Direct Dial DATED: May 3, 2001 Respectfully submitted, D. MICHAEL FISHER Attorne General STEVEN C. GOULD Deputy Attorney General ID #80156 " ~, ",,\. ~' ,'~" - "",~ ' Office of Attorney General Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 I, -' ,I. ,",'.' ,- '>'-- ""~"-'I1:I'-_, ",.-' ' ,..'~_ ,,,.,tj~,"-_-"-',,",,_,,:,, , '~-',:, Steven C. Gould Deputy Attorney General Direct Dial 717-783-8035 CHRISTOPHER SMITH Plaintiff v. KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, ofthe STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendant : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO. 01-1792 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter my appearance on behalf ofthe Defendants, Kenneth Kyle, Ms. Tyson, Lieutenant Flowers and Sergeant Ewan in the above-captioned action. By: DATED: APRIL 27,2001 Respectfully submitted, D. MICHAEL FISHER Attorney General ~~~ STEVEN C. GOULD ill #80156 Deputy Attorney General '" '.' ',- .,~' --,-, _ J ,~ - <",;',~-'-~"",...,,",;';;'_'," '1",,1',' ",,~"'~"" . ,-~." -'-"'"'~"--jj;~"""",~,., '" -'oA..'. ~, ., \ ,.,~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day serving an Entry of Appearance upon the person( s) and in the manner indicated below: SERVICE BY FIRST CLASS MAIL POSTAGE PREPAID ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: CHRISTOPHER SMITH, EM-4550 P.O. BOX 1000 HOUTZDALE, PA 16698-1000 By: ~--Z~~0I56 Deputy Attorney General Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 717-783-8035 - Direct Dial DATED: APRIL 27,2001 .-..~> <\.Ji! il ~~""~i-~lI&~~~~!",o;~~~,,,~..J-","e.-,-,,--..c.~i_ - (') co 0 c --q s: J:..? -00) -0 i:~ m", ;,Q Z:::D 0) ::::1\2,:1 zr mE:.... (:J. ,0;''1' ~~. '::_~:j~ r;::o -0 ')>C' :Ji; ~2c) z' ~C; ~ (sIn -'yc ::--1 ~ => ~ -< OW t .o''_..L --~,-, . 'j - ~'- ,: '.~' " :-,-,',-,L..I<: ",- ," , ~-", ,;.-~. :"', "._;~.i ~ ';. ,'~-,~ """:;Jt~ ~ ~ , ~ ... Office of Attorney General Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Steven C. Gould Deputy Attorney General Direct Dial 717-783-8035 CHRISTOPHER SMITH Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendant : NO. 01-1792 PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF THE COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS AND NOW the above-named defendants, Kenneth Kyle, Superintendent of SCI-of Camp Hill Diagnostic Center; Ms. Tyson, Unit Manager, Correctional Officer Lieutenant Flowers, and Correctional Officer Sergeant Ewan (hereinafter "Commonwealth Defendants"), by and through the Office of the Attorney General, hereby files preliminary objections to Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Rule 1028 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, and in support thereof avers as follows: 1. The pro se Plaintiff, Christopher Smith, presently an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill (hereinafter "SCI-Camp Hill"), commenced the instant action by Complaint (hereinafter "Complaint") filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County on March 27,2001, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. Plaintiff s Complaint arises out of allegedly being assaulted by another inmate while incarcerated at SCI-Camp Hill on February 12,2001. (See, Complaint). .[ ''''~--.--~-~'' ";--"-,-'~ -'-'L'~I~- ". ~,-~ c" -i-'--:\-i..,;;,.-:"~,",,;._,~,, -- ~ "'1. . 3. Plaintiff alleges that the Commonwealth Defendants ''wantonly, knowingly, deliberately, maliciously and unlawfully allow inmate William Clegg. . . to inflict bodily harm and injuries on this plaintiff. . ." (Complaint paragraph 7). 4. Plaintiff requests punitive damages. I. DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT--NO EXCEPTION 5. The Commonwealth Defendants hereby incorporate paragraphs 1-4 of these Preliminary Objections by reference as though set forth herein at length. 6. Defendants Kenneth Kyle, Ms. Tyson, Correctional Officer Lieutenant Flowers, and Correctional Officer Sergeant Ewan were "Commonwealth Parties" within the meaning of section 8501 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. ~ 8501, when the alleged conduct complained of took place. 7. As Commonwealth parties, they are immune from suit except as specifically waived by the General Assembly. See 1 Pa.C.S. ~ 2310; 42 Pa.C.S. ~ 8501 et seq. 8. There are nine specific instances enumerated in section 8522(b) of the Sovereign Immunity Act, 42 Pa.C.S. ~ 8522(b), where the General Assembly has waived immunity thereby allowing a Commonwealth party to be sued for its negligence. 9. In order to state a cause of action against the Commonwealth Defendants, Plaintiff must allege that the acts complained of fall within one of the exceptions to sovereign immunity set forth in ~~ 8522(b )(1 )-(9). 2 '~ ~. , I, , --- - , -,- ',!il,'~,~ ,_ ,," i' .Co.",-, 0.' '0-";"'-""-"; <" - "~c...~ c 10. Clearly, there is no waiver of sovereign immunity for the allegations of misconduct of the named Commonwealth Defendants in the instant Complaint. I WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant their demurrer to the Complaint for failing to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted pursuant to Rule I 028( a)( 4) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. II. DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT--NOT LIABLE FOR INTENTIONAL ACTS II. The Commonwealth Defendants hereby incorporate paragraphs 1-10 of these Preliminary Objections by reference as though set forth herein at length. 12. Plaintiff s Complaint only sets forth intentional allegations on the part of the Commonwealth Defendants. No ordinary negligence allegations are set forth in Plaintiffs Complaint. 13. As stated above, this action against the Commonwealth Defendants are controlled by the Sovereign Immunity Act, 42 Pa. C.S. 98521 et seq. 14. The Pennsylvania Legislature, in relevant part, has created exceptions to sovereign immunity for "...damages arising out of a negligent act..." See 42 Pa.C.S. 98522(a). 15. When the Sovereign Immunity Act was drafted, liability based on intentional torts Section 8522(b), provides that the defense of sovereign immunity cannot be raised by a Commonwealth party for damages arising out of a negligent act involving the following: (1) Vehic1e liability; (2) Medical-professional liability; (3) Care, custody or control of personal property; (4) Commonwealth real estate and sidewalks; (5) Potholes and sinkholes and other natural conditions of Commonwealth real estate; (6) Care, custody, control of animals; (7) Liquor store sales; (8) National Guard activities and (9) Toxoids and vaccines. 3 .$ ,,'- l~I". ._'k .' ~' ~ ;- ",'od:~' ":,,.; _ ,_, of Conunonwealth parties was considered and rejected. The Joint State Government Commission set forth ten specific areas where sovereign immunity was not waived. A copy of the relevant portion of the Commission's Report is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Commission stated: The task force specifically rejected waiving sovereign immunity for claims arising out of: (1) Intentional torts such as assault and battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of privacy, libel and slander, misrepresentation, deceit, interference with contract rights, fraud and the invasion of privacy Conunission Report, p. IS. 16. Accordingly, Plaintiffs allegations of intentional misconduct cannot form the basis for a civil action against a Commonwealth Defendants acting within the scope of their employment. 17. Moreover, since Plaintiffs alleged injuries were caused by the intentional and criminal acts of a third party, the Commonwealth Defendants are insulated from all liability for the harm caused by such a party. Mascaro v. Youth Study Center, 514 Pa. 353, 361, 523 A. 2d 1118,1123 (1987). WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant their demurrer to the Complaint for failing to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted pursuant to Rule 1028(a)(4) ofthe Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. III. MOTION TO STRIKE FOR FAILURE TO CONFORM TO LAW OR RULE OF COURT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR MORE SPECIFIC PLEADING PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P.I028(a)(2) & (3). 18. The Commonwealth Defendants hereby incorporate paragraphs 1-17 of these Preliminary Objections by reference as though set forth herein at length. 4 ~ .1, "" ,'-"'- ~"I=I ".-' ....tf:-'-. 19. Plaintiffs averments against the Commonwealth Defendants are set forth in Plaintiff s Complaint in only one paragraph. Specifically, in paragraph 7, Plaintiff alleges the following: U7. Plaintiff avers that Defendants, Sergeant Ewan, Lieutenant Flowers, Unit Manager Ms. Tyson, and Superintendent Kenneth Kyle [sic], did wantonly, knowingly, deliberately, maliciously and unlawfully allow inmate William Clegg D.O.C. # EL-8513 to inflict bodily harm and injuries on this plaintiff, Christopher Smith, when knowingly that a conflict existed, and could had been prevented." .;] 20. According to Rule 1019(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff must specifically plead each material fact upon which a claim is based. H 21. Plaintiff violates Rule 1019 by failing to plead any material facts upon which to ~ : base the above-quoted claims. l,; , 22. Plaintiff fails to plead material facts to identify how the Commonwealth i I: i. Defendants caused Plaintiffs injures. 1'.: i 23. Rather than pleading specific facts, the Plaintiff has elected to plead general, open-ended and vague accusations, assumptions and opinion leaving the Commonwealth Defendants uninformed as to what they must defend. 24. These allegations fail to conform to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and must be stricken or, in the alternative, a more specific Complaint must be filed. WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth Defendants request that this Honorable Court enter an Order striking Plaintiffs Complaint or, in the alternative, requiring Plaintiff to file a more specific Complaint. 5 ~ I-.:. " ".' _~,i '~-"-'" "I' -I.,,;, ,-. ',',-_ - ~,i."_k",,'>_._\ ""~,_"-',', ",,,, ,,_ _"~ ,_ _",~:': IV. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION IN THE NATURE OF A MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES 25. The Commonwealth Defendants hereby incorporate paragraphs 1-24 of these Preliminary Objections by reference as though set forth herein at length. 26. In subparagraph "b" of a paragraph captioned "RELIEF REOUESTED" in Plaintiffs Complaint, Plaintiff requests relief requests relief in the nature of punitive damages. 27. As Commonwealth parties within its definition found at section 8501 ofthe Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. S 8501, damages recoverable in this action are specifically limited by the Sovereign Immunity Act, 42 Pa.C.S. S 8528(c). 28. Plaintiffs request for punitive damages in his Complaint is not enumerated as a ;:,i i"! i,; I,,' I:' recoverable damage against a Commonwealth party at section 8528( c) of the Judicial Code, 42 '-c Pa.C.S. S 8528(c). i" [' 29. Accordingly, this Honorable Court should strike the portions of Plaintiffs I:: Complaint requesting the aforementioned relief. WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant their preliminary objection in the nature of a motion to strike Plaintiffs claim for relief in the nature of punitive damages. V. MOTION TO STRIKE THE PORTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BROUGHT AGAINST THE COMMONWEALTH DEFENDANTS IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES 30. The Commonwealth Defendants hereby incorporate paragraphs 1-29 of these Preliminary Objections by reference as though set forth herein at length. 31. In subparagraphs "b" and "c" of a paragraph captioned "RELIEF REQUESTED" 6 ,~, -', ,- , C' -.-~-"- _0_1 " ,- ,~, . -, "","" L"J,,;'--,...; --, - ,- -,' - ~^"- ',;-~-" -.:", - ,;-' -.- " ,. in Plaintiff s Complaint, Plaintiff requests relief against the Commonwealth Defendants in their individual capacities. 32. There is no allegation in the Complaint that the Commonwealth Defendants were i-~ (! acting outside their course and scope of employment. 33. To the contrary, paragraphs 3 through 5 of Plaintiffs Complaint states that all ,--, II I ~, Commonwealth Defendants were employed at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill. :-1 34. A Commonwealth party can only be sued for acts arising within the scope of ;,( r::: his/her employment as a Commonwealth party pursuant to sections 850 I et seq. of the Judicial ; :; Code, 42 Pa.C.S. S 8501 et seq. ;) 35. The portion in Plaintiff's Complaint suing the Commonwealth Defendants in their individual capacities should be stricken pursuant to Rule 1028(a)(2) of the Pennsylvania Rules of i'~ f.~ Civil Procedure, for failing to conform to law or Rule of Court. WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth Defendants respectfully requests this Honorable j Court to strike the portion of Plaintiffs Complaint brought against the Commonwealth Defendants in their individual capacities pursuant to Rule 1028(a)(2) ofthe Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure for failing to conform to law or rule of court. VI. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION IN THE NATURE OF A MOTION TO STRIKE, PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P.I028(a)(2) FOR LACK OF CONFORMITY TO LAW OR RULE OF CONDUCT. 36. The Commonwealth Defendants hereby incorporate paragraphs 1-35 of these Preliminary Objections by reference as though set forth herein at length. 37. Plaintiff attempts to bring his cause of action against several Commonwealth 7 ."'-'- ~--- ", --, ;.' L-I ,.~". ,'" -,',' !"-, , , .' Defendants, but fails to state each cause of action against each defendant in a separate count under a separate heading. 38. Plaintiff is required to set forth each cause of action against each defendant in a separate count under a separate heading pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1020. WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth Defendants respectfully request that Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed, or in the alternative, that he be required to file an amended complaint setting forth each cause of action against each defendant in a separate count under a separate heading. Respectfully submitted, D. MICHAEL FISHER Attorney General By: ,:: :-~ : ~ i:! , Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 717-783-8035 - Direct Dial DATED: May 3, 2001 8 ,,'^'~~ ..~ . ' il- , ~ ,~ - - ,-,' -"'" b ~5. . ,c . . MA~? 2 8 200ltfJ II THE UURT OF COMMOfl PLEAS OrCUMBULAND COUNn. PUUYLYA'UA CIVIL DIYJSIOR t1tRISTOPftU SMITtI, . . Phht.ff Ys. Ro.: () 1- /ll~____ . . KYLE KERMiT". SUPEtUNTUOEIn. 1'1$. nSON. IIJUTMAftAGfR. C.O. tIE#fEfiANT FLOW!RS, and e.o. SfRIUn EMU, of t". STATE teRRECTIGIS .1I5TITITIOI at tAMP Kill. . . . . (") c.' 0 ~ ~l1 . ~ ~~~ ~';,",) ~ N '-,r-'"'; S?~ -oJ _-;so !::=C) -0 ~~c.o..) ;~(~, c' ' / - Q~,'.: ~C) ~.. .'-['n -'C ........ L;.- Z .. ,_-.l , ,~ ;;> 't. line ~... sud fa c..rt. If ,IU whit to defn4 ~,.ftts~ tlte ch'.. n' f.rtll 'Il Ue "'''W'', ,.,.., leu allSt tete .eUe" ..ut. .. d", aft." n.s IIOU.. COIll,"'lIt is urve4 ~, e"t....., ..,Utu .,p.....act 1'.1'....11, or it, IUoruy 11I4 fn '"I fIl WI"U", wlU the cell" ,our defe.1t '1' ob~.ct hili te ttte ch'.., f'. ..I'd' It beu... 'h' un UII "0..'41 a.a "'., '0. I" . J.....eIIt ..t...... Ye. .....ldhte tllU flotfn ..41 collphh' to ,. dt.,..., .nll .ll dft s,e'd ... rohh e.....1 U d.fe"d '0. t. tit.. ..t,... ff ,.. d. aot .... aa .tt....., yo. .1I..1d ...ttct t~e .,.lh UIIO. ......fnth,. for a..tihaco. . . Dltfe,ulu', . . !fW.1L..IUWJ1 Ut.1 S.",tees. he. . ,,,f.. lh Ca..ltsl.. ,.. 17013 (717) 71.....,' ./ I~ /.901 - Dah: Christo"" '.ftb, IN-4SfO '.0. 10. 1000 / .... 14 ".."'110, 'I. If.lI-l"O RECEIVED Office of Attorney General APR 1 9 2001 Torts Litigation ~ I II , " ~ :mh,.. .. . . 1ft THt COUlT OF COMMOI 'lUS 0' eU.IUUJID c;oUlITT. PUlInUAIUA cnll IUYUIOI CMRUTOPtlU SMlTfI. : Phht1ff : v.. . . . . ...; . . lYU kUlInM. SUPUnTfIl8UT. MS. nUl. ,"n '''.Utl. e.o. llEuTt.Alr 'LOWtRS. ..4 e.o. nRIU.' IIIAI. .f tit. IT A Tt CO..ltTIOII IISTlr>>TIO. .t CAMP MILL ' ,.fe,ut."t. : . . . . : : . . : CO,,'UII' .1 FOIMA - To Tit. tltun,""". rJucJg.. Of tit, AI.lon hU enl't: c.... ... ,hhl1tUf tltl'hto,,,... lllith. pl'o" lU'."'tto 'Il. eOlll't w.ttI tllh ch,n UUlI of uU.. .,.,.., ,". .h.. ...... def......ts. Itt '"h re"1'4. ", r..,ee".'" ....,,,: .....,. ,flY ,4! ,'..,. ','4 ,_ ~ ......'...1.".. of tIlh cou,t h hnhd ,......., to t"e '....rl..... ,.,.s of thH ,.......,.... Ilule 1017. llt'.l. I _ ~ _~;,.. " 1-..1 , . " :lZilll;WI~ . . . C~IlU Qf ~U,.w Oft '.brua", 12. 1001. tIlb p"'nt",. Christophe,. SIIlttll WlI .. hllute ., t.State Correctollllllt.tllUOII (s.C. I. ) Callp RUl O'agJlOIUe Canter. Ity Otder of MoIlt,...,., County COW't. .Judge Lawrenc:e A. BrolAI. Thh ph,"t.ff whne a re,"ellt It '- H.ll ... ....ulted by '/IIIlIte WU1... Clegg D.O.C. 'n..asll. Tn', ,ta1nt1ff .uff~.d . Llserat'on .n' Cont~S"" to the upper 1.ft s.d. 0' the ''''..4.ree.'v.., 6 sUtch... I) On IIftUI,.y 24. 2oo1.'lllIIIto Clegg WlI ..stgned t. tll. I'" Novl'n. Un.t. l "oct. . ..de c"1 '21 II tIl', ,1.,nttff'l ce"'. (eell ..te). b) IllIHto (;l-o"...ent" MIIIS.lfwUtI 1ft Irroglnt attttude. Ind tile.... ,....to Cl... started ...It'.1 t.....t. '.....4. tllh plabttff wh.ll tMs pll'nttff ......4 witlt ....,.ct. tIIa' ,.n hI, OIIt ttte cen t. ....tlter hrlllllto .fJtf count thH would cI.ee I confUct be.... th_ lad tile eo,.rect,OII Off'cer. 1M poSl.bly tlley beth MOul' ""... a mhoOllllact. c) TIl.s ,htttt"f. fi. to tllllillto tt..,'1 'h....ts ,... 'rl'Otlll' .tUt.... took 'IIIlilIto C,...'. tIl,...t......ously .... reported tile tt\....t. to Correct'OII Offtcer s......., Sha.. Sgt. .... tll'..... tM.platatiff till' 't .. t'" fer tile Illfft to e...... 4I1Id to "..It to tile .ecoINI .1I1ft SergUlit. aH wtto a reqtlHt te tJle Iklt\Ma.....,. Ms. Tyso". for" ,...hl DOt \lIOVa allYeM f.... cell to cen. TIlts ,'''.ttf, 411. .. ,..t,..t". eI) Thts ,hlntff. w1Iefi *_ $b1ft err'.... r.ported to Ser..at twit" IIld It,..... hts G8Herlll ..bout t....t. Cl'19'. threats. Stl. Ew.1l ...fU'H to ...t.te tilts ,l.t.It". ...... a-o .... till' lie Wlflted botIl 'IIIlilIte. te ttgllt .. ... cou14t1lrow "tb ....te. '" tJle !\el.. e) TIlts ,la'attff th.. t..kllh COIIIIl'I'llt to L,euttNllt 1'1..... U. "....... CUII' Iltted ttlat .... .. IItt tJlere .. ..a ID1OJI4l COlIlfortatll. .nd fer thl. ,'.'lItiff to _1 witl, lit, .. ".,... h....lI. " J , I" '. LI jl~ . " . . .w.tll.L.l.t...wl 2. Pl.lntlff. (brltt.ph.r Smtth t. BOW en l.-at. at the St.t. Correctton Instttutton (S.C.I.) Houtrd.l.. ,.. serving e 1 to t ye.r sentenct f.r theft of llIOyabl. property .1Id l'ilC.trlng stol," propert,. 3. Deftll4lnt. $.r9..8t [Win is a CorrectfOft Otftc,r .t stat. Corr,cUolls In.titvtfon (S.C. I.) C.mp Hil' Di.gnostic Cent.r. .. Dtfall4."t. Utet.It.t\t '1...,. t.. Correettoft Offtcer .t the Stat. Correction I..tttvtfo. (S.e.I.) CeMP Hill Df.,aostle Centtr. I. hfall4.,t. Ms. T,soll t. . Un't Mtl'lllf" It the St.te COI'TeCttOJl Instttutfon (S.C.I.) ,c..p M'" ".,nostlc Center. .. hfetllllflt. Kyl. Kennetll Is th.StlPft',.t.ttekltIt of the Stete Corr.ctfon lutltution (s.e.I.) C'l\lll Htn Dh'ftost'c C.nt.... smu!1 7 .'rlt"tfflv.n-ttt.t..8tf~.t-tf-$e..nt tw.. . HautH... nower.. ..it ..."..... Ms. T,.OII. att4 SU,...h...nt Kylt reftfttttl. dtd .."t,.l,. tnowtDll,. tfetfberltel,. 1IlI11c....ly ." vnlawfully .now illlllltt vnu. Cl... I.O.C. , It.-fill to 'ftfBet '0411, ttOt'lll all4ifljurie. Oft ttais plaintiff. e......... StIlfth. wltet'l Kllew'",')' tfltt . conflict .httlt. aft4 .ould ud ... preYHttlt. .aiU!( mmr.u. ....,..... phiM1f' pre,. that tile feUflW1.. ...H., -. velltell fl"Olll tM d.fe"dafttl "'d fit prey. ttltt tll1 s Non.....l. Court I' grant tJlem: .) A tri.l Ily Jury; , ' I_II ~ili.GIW__,i .. . .' . defu'nU. cap.ctttU. b) 'unttlv, d...,t. .,.tnst e,ch of the four tft botb tbetr lftdlvtd..ls Iftd of,tct.l 1ft ,.ce.s of $10.0eo.oo, c) C..pensatof, damages agatnst e.ch of tbe fOUf defend- uti hi beU tllotr hcltvtdual lIId dUctal capactt"l in the .peciftc a.ount of $10,000.00 e.ch. d) ADd lueb otber r.l1ef as ..y be nece.sary Iftd/.r appropriate in Iceor.ance wIth justice .nd the ,'W. .e.peetfully sub.tttt.. 151 ~t~n. P.O. lox 1000 MoutZd.", pa. 1"'8-1000 ~I . L;L ~ """ ~ .. . . . .tt!i".!fJ~~T; O~ !6~1I1 sw.w. 1. Chrt:topher Smitb, pl...t1ff he,e., certiftes thlt I hive cnse served I true IllHI eO"I"'j~ u" of the fer.,.'ft.. docu.eRt. ~pOR the fol10wtng, on tb'. _' day of. March. 2001. A.D. Curt lOllg Prothonotary 011' Covrthou.e Squlr. Culltll.rlud County Co.rUouse e.rlf$le. ,.. 17013.'3'7 ~~~ Is/ .. , , ' , '".. ell" stofltler III tll. A flut -----.--...-------~----~--------_.-.--~--_._--_._._..--.------q- !UJEUATJ9. I, Cltrhtophel" SmUll. do hereby ve..tf, tttat tile facts tet tont! Ir. tn. uti correct to tile llest of ., per....' h."teCl,.. ,"ferllllith. ClAd ~o11.f.lUId~tlldUiIWTlfllt ustattmel'lU lI....hl .r. a.ele subJect tt 'fl. ,.nalt'es .f llltUhUI I4fU of tile cr'lll" e... (18 h. e.s. I n04). ..,'Uht9 to 1I1IU."t1o. to ..tltor'U... Isl . ~ -~,.. - CltrtsteptJer hI"lt. Affta.t '"- ~~-~i" '~" ;, .., ,j ~ , , I), ..... ~~,. "", , I, __.~IJ -, ""~~" , , negligence per se , with liability attaching if proximate cause is proven; also see Section 497 of the Liquor Code for applicable limitations. (8) NaA:.i.ona.t GUM.d Ac.t.i.vLt.i.e.6--This area of waiver acknow- ledges present provisions of the Military Code, August 1, l~-s,--Pob.- 233,n-No.--9~,-5-1-Pa.C.S.-S 4108, with which it should be read in pari materia. That section provides that The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall be responsible for the payment of all judgments and costs secured against a member of the Pennsylvania Military Forces on State duty who was acting under lawful orders or who in good faith relied on an order which a reasonable person would consider to be unlawful under the circumstances.6 AAea.6 On L.i.ab.i..t.i.ty not Wa.i.ved In developing the eight previously discussed areas of liability in which waiver of sovereign immunity is proposed, the task force considered other areas of potential waiver and determined to retain sovereign immunity. In evaluating the areas rejected, the task force reviewed among other materials the statutory exceptions provided in other juris- dictions. The task force specifically rejected waiving sovereign immunity for claims arising out of: (1) Intentional torts such as assault and battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of privacy, libel and slander, misrepresentation, deceit, interference with contract rights, fraud and invasion of privacy. (2) The improper assessment of taxes. (3) Sei:i\ure and detention of personal property. (4) Product liability. (5) Civil rights and constitutional violations. 6. For a definition of Pennsylvania Military Forces, see 51 Pa.C.S. ~ 102. -15- ,,"-, ","J --', ~-, __,. ,I", '-",--~I""I""--_'"~,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,-, -- '~'_,'''-':''~,~",., C'_ ",,' ~ C '- ~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day serving the Commonwealth Defendants' Preliminary Objections upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below: SERVICE BY FIRST CLASS MAIL POSTAGE PREPAID ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: CHRISTOPHER SMITH, EM-4550 P.O. BOX 1000 HOUTZDALE, PA 16698-1000 By: ~~~ Deputy Attorney General Torts Litigation Section 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 717-783-8035 - Direct Dial DATED: MAY 3, 2001 "'- i" "'1" ~-.. 'Y't , -,j~~~~IJ/lI~~~~~iId~'~ ~..." ii Uk.!.?!. 'HLi,l1 11I111 nl '"_~,' .~ ~H~< ,,' .'_"",,' _ ", '" . -,. .- --~ ~ ., r o C ::-- l;C~, 92S:~ -;'r U:;; C~Cj Z:C) ~~E; .L -'"f -<. ; l- ;"",. ",''''''-'''',",', .. ' . ~ C) r' -j "i ~ ~~ '''''". ~ I -J ;--, -':-J " C\~:~ Q'" 'r> ::v -<. "" .:",) C> III ,,// ,/ / " I ~_ ; LJ '""', f/--? / ;/ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION , CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff Vs. No.: KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT, MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION AT CAMP HILL Defendants PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 1. I am the Plaintiff in the above matter and because of my financial condition am unable to pay the fees and costs of prosecuting or defending the action or proceedings. 2. I am unable to obtain funds from anyone including my family and associates to pay the costs of litigation. 3. I represent that the information below relating to my ability to pay the fees and costs is true and correct: (a) Name: Christopher Smith. EM-4550; Address: P.O. Box 1000. S.C.I. Houtzdale. Pa. 16698-1000. Social Security Number: 194-58-7968. (b) Employment: prison labor. at S.C.I. Houtzdale. (c) Other income in the past 12 month; None (d) Other contributions to household support: None (e) Property owed: None (f) Debts and obligations: _ yes, Court Costs $303.00 (g) Persons dependent upon you for support: None 4. I understand that I have a continuing obligation to inform the court of improvement in my financial circumstances which permits me to pay the costs incurred herein. 5, I verify that the statements in this affidavit are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are subject to penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. ~4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Date: March ~, 2001 /s/ ~ ~_ Pet it i oner I /' / ,/ // / /"'-/ ~-- -" tl .~ -J -l~ I " MAR 2 8 2001tJ/l IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSY~VANIA CIVIL DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff Vs. No.: () J - Fry q :;).. KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT, MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendants NonCE TO gHENg You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within 20 days after this notice complaint is served by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the court your defense or objections to the claims, you must do so because the case can proceed against you and a judgement entered. You should take this notice and complaint to with all due speed and retain counsel to defend matter if you do not have an attorney you should below named organization for assistance. an attorney you in this contact the Legal Services, Inc. 8 Irvine Row Carlisle, Pa. 17013 (717) 766-8475 Date: 3/ ~ /2001 Christopher Smith, EM-4550 P.O. Box 1000 / J.B. 04 Houtzdale, Pa. 16698-1000 )'- ,/ / ,// ,/ ";/ ,/ " ,/ , ,,"', '[~I ~ -- '- .' . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL' DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff Vs. No.: ()/~ /79.2- C,;;;J -r;,M"'--- KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT, MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendants COMPLAINT IN FORMA - NEG~IGENT OR WRONGFUl ACTS AND TORT To The Honorable, Judges Of The Above Said Court: Comes now plaintiff Christopher Smith, pro se litigant to the court with this civil cause of action against the above named defendants. In this regard, he respectfully submits: JURISDICTION Jurisdiction of this court is invoked pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 1017, 1007.1. 1 - / / / // // --', ,- 1,;.,1 4~' ,-/ // / CAllS/; OF ACTION On Febr~ary 12, 2001, this plaintiff, Christopher Smith was an inmate at the State Correct on Institution (S.C. I.) Camp Hill Diagnostic Center, by Order of Montgomery County Court, Judge Lawrence A. Brown. This plaintiff while a resident at Camp Hill was assaulted by inmate William Clegg D.O.C. #EL-8513. This plainti'ff suffered a L'aseration and Contusion to the upper left side of the forehead, receiving 6 stitches. a) On January 24, 2001, inmate Clegg was assigned to the same Housing Unit, L Block, B side cell #26 as this plaintiff's cellie (cell mate). b) Inmate Clegg presented himself with an arrogant attitude, and there, inmate Clegg started making threats towards this plaintiff when this plaintiff expressed with respect, that yelling out the cell to another inmate during count time would cause a conflict between them and the Correction Officers and possibly they both would receive a misconduct. c) This plaintiff, due to inmate Clegg's threats and arrogant attitude took inmate Clegg's threats seriously and reported the threats to Correction Officer Sergeant Shaw, Sgt. Shaw informed this plaintiff that it was time for the shift to change and to speak to the second shift Sergeant, and write a request to the Unit Manager Ms. Tyson, for he could not move anyone from cell to cell. This plaintiff did as instructed. d) This plaintiff, when second shift arrived, reported to Sergeant Ewan and stressed his concerns about inmate Clegg's threats. Stg. Ewan refused to separate this plaintiff and inmate Clegg and that he wanted both inmates to fight so he could throw both inmates in the hole. e) This plaintiff then took his complaint to L'ieutenant Flowers. Lt. Flowers commented that she was not there to make anyone comfortable and for this plaintiff to deal with his own problems himself. J ;/' ,/ / /' ;/ / 7/ . . li iliiilw'i PARTIES TQ sun 2. Plaintiff, Christopher Smith is now an inmate at the State Correction Institution (S.C. I.) Houtzdale, Pa. serving a 1 to 2 year sentence for theft of movable property and ,receiving stolen property. 3. Defendant, Sergeant Ewan is a Correction Officer at State Corrections Institution (S.C. I.) Camp Hill Diagnostic Center. 4. Defendant, Lieutenant Flowers is a Correction Officer at the State Correction Institution (S.C. I.) Camp Hill Diagnostic Center. 5. Defendant, Ms. Tyson is a Unit Manager at the State Correction Institution (S.C.I.) Camp Hill Diagnostic Center. , 6. Defendant, Kyle Kenneth is the Superintendent of the State Correction Institution (S.C.I.) Camp Hill Diagnostic Center. AVERMENTS 7. Plaintiff avers that Defendants, Sergeant Ewan, Lieutenant Flowers, Unit Manager Ms. Tyson, and Superintendent Kyle Kenneth, did wantonly, knowingly, deliberately, maliciously and unlawfully allow inmate William Clegg D.O.C. # EL-8513 to inflict bodily harm and injuries on this plaintiff, Christopher Smith, when Knowingly that a conflict existed, and could had been prevented. REUIEF REQUESTED Wherefore, plaintiff prays that the following relief be granted from the defendants and he prays that this Honorable Court so grant them: a) A trial by jury; /' ,Y / " -i' . / ~/-// / ~/ - ~ ~ . , tU I b) Punitive damages against each of the four in both their individuals and official in excess of $10,000.00; c) Compensatory damages against each of the four defend- ants in both their individual and official capacities in the specific amount of $30,000.00 each; defendants, capacities, d) And such other relief as may be necessary and/or appropriate in accordance with justice and the law. Respectfully submitted, /s/ ~ ~ Christopher Smith, EM-4550 P.O. Box 1000 Houtzdale, pa. 16698-1000 f /"' / y-/ ... // / ,~ I""~, ' I CERTIfICATE Of MAIUINS SERVICE I, Christopher Smith, plaintiff hereby certifies that I have cause served a true and correc;t" copy of the foregoing, document, upon the following, on this _l'6 , day of, March, 2001, A.D. Curt long Prothonotary One Courthouse Square Cumberland County Courthouse Carlisle, Pa. 17013-3387 Isl ~ ~ Christopher Smith, Affiant ---------------------------------------------------------------- VERIfICATION " " i, Christopher Smith, do hereby verify that the facts set forth are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge, information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of section ~4904 of the crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. ~ 4904), relating to falsification to authorit i es. Isl ~ ~ Christopher Smith, Affiant .,J.:Q.... . -" '\'\ -;i:lIfl~=J>l!i""""".,,,~,~--,,",.r+'''''''!\'''*'~'__'''?-4'>~;,-;;'!W.'''nd,,,,";110"'" .' "'-{,'i1,,,.i;':"'U;,IJ.'b~:d".;~"'&li.,....-.JciI~~~ ;r~~~'~<A~ i ~~~~_'-"--!lW.l ',\,~. ''--\, , ", ''"', o ~ , , ::q tx; ,_ CQC': ~-~;.-':. ~~'J ~C) =-'::(1 PC: ,z '~ ~ ,ij._"-",-J.Jnn",l,;}JlL",~,,,,", l.",.,'"".,,___'~" , ~_~, ~__o.. <<A~ C~ :-ct )~Mo ~.;;:} . , ~-'-''''--- --." 'j;;;;:: ~::;eJ :..:.:i() -,-,---1"! ~i?~ c-' -,-I ,~ :-:0 -< ;>.~ ....l '"""!:J f'~ ,':.0':1 00 ",<- -""'-' ~'''" II , " - -,~ -,,,"," OS', MAR 2 8 200'1.00 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff Vs. KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT, MS. TYSON, UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, and C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, of the STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION at CAMP HILL Defendants o R D E R AND NOW, this 1~ day of No.: (J1-179()' Cio;L ~~ 2001 ; upon , consideration of the Plaintiff's Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTEDrei:~t~ ,.. /s/ ~ B >~, lJ..e,,----, ,e-C1,'Pfl" !/' ~., piA)' ~/ /' 11, JUDGE '7;y L~~'D\~ 1.\,0 o ~ ~~ "'?":~'~ '~ );.~... "~~ ~. " I, .' LLI - -~~" rI ... SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR t CASE NO: 2001-01792 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SMITH CHRISTOPHER VS KYLE KENNETH CPL MICHAEL BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon KYLE KENNETH SUPERINTENDENT the DEFENDANT , at 0014:55 HOURS, on the 9th day of April , 2001 at SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN RD CAMP HILL, PA by handing to BEN LIVINGOOD (SUPERINTENDANT) a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 18.00 8.68 .00 10.00 .00 36.68 So A;:~~ R. Thomas Kline 04/10/2001 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this ",<I ~ day of BY:~~ . Deputy r~ff Dfb:l .;2.ov I A. D. Ql" a /h<d",_tf~ r thonotary -,. "~~~ _~..b-, II ~ -..0",,,,-- , '., SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR ( CASE NO: 2001-01792 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SMITH CHRISTOPHER VS KYLE KENNETH CPL. MICHAEL BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon TYSON MS the DEFENDANT , at 0014:55 HOURS, on the 9th day of April , 2001 at SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BEN LIVINGOOD (SUP. ASST.) a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 .00 16.00 ,o;~~ R. Thomas Kline 04/10/2001 Sworn and Subscribed to before By: me this ,;( ,,:!E- day of n,L'P d..MJI A.D. (:}iflt () ~ ,0..; dhZZ thonotary 1"-" ,V~ _ ~. ~,~ , 1,1;.. ~,..",,-,,.,~~,,L;' . . " SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR , CASE NO: 2001-01792 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SMITH CHRISTOPHER VS KYLE KENNETH CPL. MICHAEL BARRICK Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon FLOWERS LIEUTENANT the DEFENDANT , at 0014:55 HOURS, on the 9th day of April , 2001 at SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP BILL, PA 17011 BEN LIVINGOOD (SUP. ASST.) by handing to a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 .00 16.00 An~swe~ ff~ ~ ? - {"..- . R. Thomas Kline Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So 04/10/2001 day of By ~{?~ or Deputy eriff Sworn and Subscribed to before me this ,2<{ ~ t,.~ ;J",.o J A.D. ~. () ~;p,~ 'ft'f' othonotary f'~'"' ' II IJ........ . -___;::0, .. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2001-01792 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SMITH CHRISTOPHER VS KYLE KENNETH CPL. MICHAEL BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon EWAN SERGEANT the DEFENDANT , at 0014:55 HOURS, on the 9th day of April , 2001 at SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 BEN LIVINGOOD (SUP. ASST.) by handing to a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 .00 16.00 So Answers:" ~I ~-~1'- R. Tomas Kline 04/10/2001 Sworn and Subscribed to before By: me this d<lff:' day of ~ ~/ ( A.D. ~~h[f;o~'>~f'1 " ~- 'IJ, ,""',_ ,,"",.e.'(o ",~ _, ~ >e',,- .' '" CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. KYLE KENNETH, SUPERINTENDENT, MS. TYSON,: CIVIL ACTION - LAW UNIT MANAGER, C.O. LIEUTENANT FLOWERS, AND C.O. SERGEANT EWAN, OF THE STATE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION AT CAMP HILL, Defendants NO. 01-1792 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2001, defendant having filed a withdrawal of the within civil complaint against defendants herein, it is ordered that the within action, IS DISMISSED. Steven C. Gould, Esquire Deputy Atto~ney General Christopher Smith Plaintiff ~~o\ o'y"}:. Sheriff prs "",...,,,. - ~ ".f ',,;~:~, ~~~~~!f.(;&lt;;\'l,\l;",,i{~';i,,,,,"j;''-'<bA;*-oiW~'md~!..;.w,ll,I'''M.;;~;M;)'!'j,'_;ili,{lf~l",,,,]!'i<,,--iiit!i~l'jlill!l~diMiMMiliJI'ili1i1ii.i1L .il..lillillMfil $ V1NV/\-1ASN~~jd A! ~;!r~;(-1 ('F,:-,--'Lf"'~;~71!i\If\f"\ . .._ \J .-.,._'" \ " ," _,.' ,;\.,I ;J :5 .,; ",'fl '(] ( ~ ;'-J vII It) AHVl{)i' ",'; ii, "I " .-- iLJJ"'''''''''''~d ~ " --,,-I ,-,,;' ~HI "' ,'" "~ to- --~ "':~ " ,-', , L' I ~ I '_ ,-_ ." .". '" il~"",i,; <' ..... ~~. (}\.- 119;(. ~_'1drzm,g)~:':L~ .__~__~~ 17 - a 1\-:--- ~.~----~-~4~----~-__~---llcl-_~--' r~--:;t&_----~;j;L-~ ~ ~~_~~__~-Q.L_~ ~_.,---~-,_.~~___..11G.__~~__~___,~___~__,_____J~~L___ '_.m~.1::J~_ -----~_c_._~_.,__._cit. _u~, ,.~______-P.~_ " -j" ',""" "ann", ",' ,cl"", "',' "~, - , ~u,. ~~~-.A1\At~_~-~fwLtU:L_-~--.,u,~.---~-.--~~". :~-.~.-----~-----~----.-f'YnIVA---_ci_---Y~-.xt0;.--~---u- . -- - k ~ ,.~.. u 4'VM, ,,_ rvru..., ..>>'v\.. ~ ,. u ,. cu. " '" Wu~__._A!rx~.____k_~~4u .~ut'<LL~--u "'i't:<M-3... ' '^ _ '. p D 0 ~ AA Tf) _ ___ _ H-;; . "--t-.__..'_~.-.,-~..-,--~.,-\....---.L~.,-.-- .,f_V'::"'-~_~_.~___n._.____,._'.' ""'...u___u__ _.....,. -^.._"-~-~------^_._------~---",._,._-~----------~---'-.----_._---~--------~-_._----------"_._-_._.__._--'-"_._-~-_._-~------------,-- -....--- .---..,--.---.,.,.,...,----.---..---------------'....--~--...~r~------,-,.---~~-------- - ---------~- -----------------------------.,-------- ~--------~~- o~ ~B. ______ -----,-----.-----'----------- -~ -~------ --------. .. &;r,-i'!:~~rfJ;~;-!;~3iitJ. i:@{-;;['::;,t-\joffi;;g,{,i;}>?;;"'1J,_;~~;;it8LfKA": _J" : 1,1 , ;;i1i;. _-x ... II ~ I , ~'" :l:; .. ~~ t;:; ~ - , ('- ~.4 S:Q ~ I I~~\~ ~;:: ~ ~, ~ ..$. " )1 y ;>. :fE. !! t"'\ II - ~ '" - J Il ( == I) J r-- t% - 0 - ~ , r- === -- ~ I I. ..f I 0' ~ ~ ~ \r') ~ . - (\ 8 - Q) "= \.4L u ...s ~ ~ ~ qI '"\r J - " 0 ...Q ~ U ~ ..... IJ' - - () ~i j r(l I- '- t~'1 - r':J Cl \,. , ,e! 0;: ! v ~ \." $; (.:1 .;1 () .~O u :1: -.... l......J (;I i- 1''' ..... ~ o o o ~ , CO <J) CO CO ~ o C ., = E '" 1:: ~ '" ., "-., ~ "'0 ~1E 1E o '~IJ,I g ~ ~<( ..J:; 0:: X 0 U WON WCIlCllt- ~ ~ .:::> ~OO <( ~ '-~ ZZD....L '" C o U ., ~ ~ o () ."EjfJ12~{fM~~g:TI,~;~:i,!';:-;$:L~~2W[~~iiJ;;>~'8~%;~i;g1;#3ili1?(,4Xt11f "~~-=.. 1-' - ~-,.~~",~ """"''''.''.. "~ J I".J,...,~ "-'-~'''~!IIll&.-' ," ' .~ a"""iIlIii-""~'-;,,,, __~ '1~) ~~. en - lJq;(, __'_____._____.____~__~~ 17 :9h,___ ----~ ,aJYv\ t~/ .A~rM~~ ~--~--~.... ~~~ L'~. "^^=,:_=-.0.~ ~~~ ~~_.._.._A;rr..~ ~ ~. ~ _~_~~_~~_n "'~-.....~--~-7--~~ ~_..--QJJL..--~-..--~- ,...~-.".,' .li;.n_n_~_____~---~--~_'~~~ _..._::12rr__ ,~'" ...., ". ,. ,. ~____~-J1~-----~----~~,..-c1---~--~-~-. ,~.,'-",....~~-~--,~----:1n:--..-l!Wlt..~---CL.-~~--dL~-.-Jkd--'-"....,~,.. -"..., , ..,- ~-" .. ~-A----~__~---~..-~k-..-~n 4~-~--erfJ----~---~--~-sl-(J_-m--.. , n_~ A 'n~.'..'" n~--~--fYfl&.-..~----M~--n- ..~."k ~--~..__&_~_k____~, ~__n~..-~---~'- ,., ~___"_~_....~-----~--~~---"..,~"'-....-....--------un-- ...... ..__ _".,__._~_.._,,_"_._'_'n_.._n__.._._._..._..,__._.~____..,..~_.._._..____.___._____~~,...-~-~'---.n-------~.. -~....., ----~~~==-~:=~~~=~===-=~==:~~-:~-~====--=--~~~-~-,:','.: :-_:--~:"._..,.,. --- -~---- ~------- _ -~--- ------- - -- --- ------~- -- --- ..._-----~------~- ---~- -~-------- --- --- --- 1