HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-03132_m
MAXINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
V.
NO. 01 - 3/301, elcx 1
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant : IN DIVORCE
NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in
the following pages, you must take prompt action. You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case
may proceed without you and a decree of divorce or annulment may be entered against you by the
court. A judgment may also be entered against you for any other claim or relief requested in these
papers by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you, including
custody or visitation of your children.
When the ground for the divorce is indignities or irretrievable breakdown of the
marriage "you may request marriage counseling. A list of marriage counselors is available in the
Office of the Prothonotary at the Cumberland County Court House, 1 Courthouse Square, Carlisle,
PA 17013.
IF YOU DO NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR ALIMONY, DIVISION OF PROPERTY,
LAWYER'S FEES OR EXPENSES BEFORE A DIVORCE OR ANNULMENT IS GRANTED, YOU
MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM ANY OF THEM.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE
SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Lawyer Referral Service
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
717-249-3166 or 1-800-990-9108
DATED: 0
-Sandra L. Meilton
Attorney for Plaintiff
MAXINE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION -LAW
V.
: NO. O!- JIJ.7- u '
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant : IN DIVORCE
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 3301(c) OF THE DIVORCE CODE
1. Plaintiff is Maxine D. Pipan, an adult individual who is sui juris and resides at
416 Allendale Way, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant is Cyril F. Pipan, an adult individual who is sui juris and resides at
416 Allendale Way, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. The present whereabouts of
the Defendant, Cyril F. Pipan, to the knowledge of the Plaintiff, is the same.
3. Both Plaintiff and Defendant have been bona fide residents in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least six (6) months immediately previous to the filing of this
Complaint.
4. The Plaintiff and Defendant were married on September 24, 1988, in
Hagerstown, Maryland.
5. There have been no prior actions of divorce or for annulment between the
parties.
6. Plaintiff has been advised of the availability of counseling and the right to
request that the Court require the parties to participate in counseling.
8. The Plaintiff avers that the ground on which the action is based is that the
marriage is irretrievably broken.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the Court to enter a Decree:
A. Dissolving the marriage between Plaintiff and Defendant; and
B. For such further relief as the Court may determine equitable and just.
TUCKER ARENSBERG & SWARTZ
BY: 'JVf
Sandra L. Meilton
P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717) 2344121
Attorney for Plaintiff
39919.1
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section
4904, relating to unswom falsification to authorities.
Maxine Pipan, Plaintiff
Dated:
"IWAa7 tav. aao oommmwmwH ? PFJMI4Y WNM
B6M>BN6M a 1EN71I
VITAL RECORDS
RECORD OF STATE FX E NUMBEq
DIVORCE OR ANNULM ENT
Cumberland CHECK O
E
E3 STATE FU DATE
(
)
N
HUSBAND
1. NAME (FkSQ (Mkldb) aw) 2. qq (Mmth) (Da»
bF Y?
('vri 1
6 Francis Pipa n BIRTH 12 31 63
3. sto
Sfrae(w R.D. city, Bom. W Top. County State A. PLACE (S1918 w FMIg, Couwry)
416 Allendale Way Cam Hill, Cumberland, PA BIRTH Pennsylvania
5. NUMBER 6. MCE 7. USUAL OCCUPATION
,
OF THIS
MARRIAGE 1 WHITE
}q]{y OIACK OTHER(Spe IM
? ?
Pharmacist
Chocha Maxine Donna Pi BIRTH 05 20 59
10. RESIDENCE Street W R.D. Ctty, "V. W TAP. co" Sure Al. PLACE (State w F- Country
416 Allendale Way, Camp Hill, Cumberland, PA elmHNew Jersey
12. NUMBER
OFTHIS
MARRIA AGE 1 6. RACE
WMpE
tI
BLACK oa (Spedfy( 1 .. USUALGCCUPATION
DI'.rMnoi ci-
15. PLAGE DF (C V M (Slate w Fwmpa GROW 16. DATE OF (Month) (Day) (m
THIS THIS
MARRIAGE Ha erstown land MARRIAGE 09 24 88
17X NUMBER OF ITS. NUMBER OF DEPENDENT 16. PIAINRFF 19. DECRY GRANTED tO
CHILDREN THIS CHILDREN UNDER i6 HU A D WIFE Spedty)
O
R HUSBAND WIFE OTHER ( oft
MARRIAGE 2 2
1 pLC}J[
El ?
( ? ?
20. NUMBER OF HUSBAND WIFE SPLIT CU STODY OTHER (Spedth 21. LEWLL GROUNDS FOR
CHILDREN TO I vlv ONORCE OR ANNULMENT
CUSTODY OF LSD
broker
22. DATE OF DECREE (Mon(h) (Day) (Neel) 23. OATS REPORT (MMVS (Dey) (Y
TO VRAL RWORDS
24. SIGNATURE OF
TRANSCRIBING CLERK + T ,_
Pad
wit.
N C)
?j
1 "<
-.0 `.
?? -6q
vl Vi `.'
1
C,
l"
r?
?n
MAXINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : No. 2001-3132
CYRIL F. PIPAN, : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
Defendant : IN DIVORCE
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR EMIMEDIATE RELIEF
AND NOW, tbia"'Wday of April, 2003, comes the Defendant, Cyril F. Pipan,
by and through his attorneys Susan M. Kadel, Esquire, of James, Smith, Dietterick &
Connelly, and responds as follows to the Petition for Immediate Relief:
Admitted.
Admitted. By way of further answer, medical coverage for the parties and
their two children continues to be maintained through Defendant's employer, Giant
Foods.
3. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is unable to ascertain the
truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 3 and proof thereof is demanded.
4. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is unable to ascertain the
truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 4 and proof thereof is demanded. By way of
further answer, medical coverage was provided by Defendant in January of 2003 through
the Defendant's employer, Giant Foods.
5. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is unable to ascertain the
truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 5 and proof thereof is demanded.
6. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is unable to ascertain the
truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 6 and proof thereof is demanded. By way of
further answer, Defendant has no idea who at Giant Foods would have advised her that she
was not enrolled for medical coverage. In fact, the open enrollment period was in
November of 2002 at which time the Defendant again applied for family coverage which
included both children and the Plaintiff.
Admitted.
8. Admitted. By way of further answer, as Defendant never dropped Plaintiff
from his medical insurance coverage there would have been no such notice given.
9. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is unable to ascertain the
truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 9 and proof thereof is demanded.
10. Admitted in part, denied in part. Defendant does have a 401(k) with Rite
Aid Corporation which was acquired during the parties' marriage. Defendant also has a
small TIAA-CREF retirement account which was funded solely prior to the parties'
marriage.
11. Denied. Defendant has never advised Plaintiff that he has made two
withdrawals from his retirement plans in the amount of $10,000.00 each. In fact,
Defendant has made no withdrawals from his retirement plans since the parties' separation.
He previously advised the Defendant that he had taken a $10,000.00 personal loan from his
Credit Union in order to pay personal bills.
12. Denied. Defendant has not taken any funds from his 401(k) since the time of
separation. Further, as the 401(k) is an ERISA based plan, a written spousal consent is
necessary in order for him to withdraw those funds.
13. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that the Rite Aid 401(k) is
marital property subject to equitable distribution and only the increase in value of the
TIAA-CREF, if any, during the parties' marriage is subject to equitable distribution as it
was acquired prior to marriage.
14. Admitted.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Cyril F. Pipan, requests this Honorable Court to deny
Plaintiffs Petition for Immediate Relief.
Respectfully Submitted,
Date: 2, 2UU3 IOtol
S san. adel, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant, Cyril F. Pipan
James, Smith, Dietterick & Connelly
Post Office Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
(717) 533-3280
Attorney I.D. No. 44837
VERIFICATION
I, Cyril F. Pipan, verify that the statements made in the foregoing Pleading are true and
correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.
Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: L111 /0 5 ?
Cyril F. Pipan
F
MAXINE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : No. 2001-3132
CYRIL F. PIPAN, : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
Defendant : IN DIVORCE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Susan M. Kadel, Esquire, of James, Smith, Dietterick & Connelly, attorney for
the Defendant, Cyril F. Pipan, hereby certify that I have served a copy of Defendant's
Answer to Petition for Immediate Relief on the following on the date and in the manner
indicated below:
U.S. MAIL, FIRST CLASS, PRE-PAID
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
Tucker, Arensberg & Swartz
111 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
DATE: 43L -.9
a2W3
JAMES, SMITH, DIETTERICK & CONNELLY
By:
Susan M. Kadel, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant
Post Office Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
(717) 533-3280
PA I.D. No. 44837
?S
?? ,?
?_
r_
?;
:J
?:
?? .?
?
?
?? -
_
,t
_r T5
{? l
l
-
G,7 r
?
j
-. ?w7
a ? -'v
T
MAXINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN NO. 01-3132 MAR 181003
,
Defendant IN DIVORCE
RULE
AND NOW, this _ day of 2003, in consideration
of the Petition for Immediate Relief filed by Plaintiff, a Rule is issued on Defendant as to
why Plaintiffs Petition should not be granted.
RULE returnable r7 - days after service on Defendant and/or his counsel.
Ct T : , ? , by
CUPv`t il.r vv WuNTY
MAXINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
V.
NO. 01-3132
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant : IN DIVORCE
PETITION FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF
AND NOW comes Maxine D. Pipan, Plaintiff, through her attorneys, Sandra L.
Meilton, Esquire, of Tucker Arensberg & Swartz, and hereby petitions this Honorable
Court as follows:
1. The parties are husband and wife and currently engaged in the divorce
action docketed to the above term and number.
2. Until December 31, 2002, medical coverage for the parties and their two
minor children was carried through Defendant's employer, Giant Foods.
3. Plaintiff works part-time as a pharmacist for CVS and has no other health
insurance other than through Defendant's employer.
4. Plaintiff recently received a billing for medical services provided to her in
January, 2003, that should have been covered by health insurance.
5. Plaintiff is also currently being treated for dental work. (See attached
statement for services rendered on March 26, 2003 in the amount of $675.00.)
6. Plaintiff was advised that Giant Foods had an open enrollment period for
medical coverage commencing January 1, 2003 and when Defendant enrolled for said
medical coverage, he did not include Plaintiff as an insured individual under his request for
family coverage.
7. It is Plaintiffs belief that medical coverage for the parties' two children is still
continuing.
8. Neither Plaintiff nor her counsel were notified by Defendant or his counsel
that Defendant dropped Plaintiff from his medical insurance coverage.
9. Because Plaintiff only works on a part-time basis, she does not have the
financial means to pay for health insurance.
10. During the marriage, Defendant had a 401(k) as a result of employment with
Rite Aid Corporation and also has a TIAA-CREF.
11. Defendant advised Plaintiff that he has made two withdrawals from his
retirement plans in the $10,000 (each time).
12. Plaintiff is concerned that Defendant will continue to withdraw funds until
there is nothing remaining.
13. Defendant's retirement plans are marital assets subject to equitable
distribution.
14. On February 18, 2003, Plaintiffs counsel wrote to Defendant's counsel
addressing the issue of the withdrawals and, to date, no written response has been
received.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court to:
(a) Order Defendant to immediately take the steps necessary to have Plaintiff
included as an insured in the family health insurance coverage through Giant Foods,
effective January 1, 2003;
(b) Order Defendant to provide written verification of said health insurance
coverage for Plaintiff and the children effective January 1, 2003;
(c) Order Defendant to reimburse Plaintiff for or be responsible for any medical
and dental related expenses incurred by Plaintiff due to Defendant's actions;
(d) Order Defendant to cease making any withdrawals from any retirement plan,
including, but not limited to, his 401(k) and TIAA CREF account;
(e) Direct Defendant to provide written verification documenting the value of all
of his retirement plans as of the date of separation and current value, and documenting
any and all withdrawals made to any said plan since the date of separation;
(f) Award Plaintiff counsel fees in the amount of $1,000.00 to be paid by
Defendant connection with the filing and hearing of this Petition; and
(g) Any further relief which the Court deems appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandra L. Meilton, I.D. #32551
TUCKER ARENSBERG & SWARTZ
111 N. Front Street, P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, PA 17108
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
VERIFICATION
I, Maxine D. Pipan, acknowledge that the facts stated in the within
document are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
I understand that any false statements herein are made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
r ZZK-- -
Ma ne D. Pipan
(O D 3
DATED:
John W. Maynard, Jr. D.D.S.
1902 Market Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
(717)761-0283
Cyril Pipan
1124 Columbus Ave
Lemoyne, PA 17043
03/26/2003
';?ATtEId? ? . '' x DATE 0'iM? R,EAS?N,
Cyril Tue. - Apr. 22, 1:30 pm PeriodicX, FMX, ProphyAd
Maxine Wed. - May. 28, 2:30 pm SPT
Audrey Wed. - May. 28, 3:30 pm FluoridCh, Sealant, Sealant#3, Sealant#14, Sealant#19,
Alexandra Tue. - Aug. 19, 1 am PeriodicX,4BWX,ProphyAd
DLW I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of I + t?2G 2003, I, Gloria M.
Rine, Paralegal to Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire, for the firm of Tucker Arensberg &
Swartz, hereby certify that 1 have this day served a copy of the within document, by first
class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Susan Kadel, Esquire
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
'jv 0, le,"
Gloria M. Rine
57877.1
G?
c>
C_ u) r;ry
Q
PV ?
i
MAXINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
V.
NO. 01-3132
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant IN DIVORCE
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA)
) SS:
COUNTY OF DAUPHIN )
AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2003, personally appeared before me, a Notary
Public in and for the aforesaid Commonwealth and County, Gloria M. Rine, paralegal to
Sandra L. Meilton, who being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that on
April 2, 2003, she mailed a certified copy of a Petition for Immediate Relief with attached
Rule, by certified mail no. 7099 3400 0016 3623 6252, return receipt requested, to Susan
M. Kadel, Esquire, P.O. Box 650, Hershey, PA 17033, counsel for Defendant, and the
same was received on April 3, 2003, as indicated by the return receipt card which is
attached hereto.
Gloria M. Rine
Sworn to and subscribed
before me this 3rd day
of April, 2003.
Notary Public
(SEAL) Notaziaiseai
Pie Pffi6 Thanas, No?ry Public
City Of Harrisburg. Dauphin Courm,
Iu1Y Common Fig i[es Mar.24, 2IRr?
fNSmber, onOf Nc+fi?rr?. _
e
t
¦ Complete ftenffi 1, 4isind 3. Adso plat-'
item'4 if Restricted Qeliveryis desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
SUSAN KADEL, ESQUIRE
P.O. BOX 650
HERSHEY PA 17033
M
ru
Postage
It
rn
fTl
Certified Fee
.3 Return Receipt Fee
ra (Endorsement Required)
0
C3 Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
3. Service Type
X$Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yas
2. Articl??ml?er(1opy msUUl,b .36?i!252 -
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.99-M-1789
riJ
ui
rut
0
M
0
Ir
0
M1
O
C. Signature
X Aq Agent
? Addressee
D. Is Helivery adtl erem from i 1? ? Vea
If YES, enter Ob ilivery address b ow: 0 N.
Postmark
Here
?3
(to ecompleted by mailep
----------k------------------ '--------
Sa
170 33
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) a.(D/at of DD livery
/1 t 7 WJ
c.
MAXINE D. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
V.
CYR1L F. PIPAN,
Defendant
JN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
:CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:NO. 01-3132
:CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:IN DIVORCE
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
To the Prothonotary:
Kindly enter the appearance of Thomas A. Beckley, Esquire, Elizabeth S.
Beckley, Esquire and Beckley & Madden, of Counsel, on behalf of the Defendant, Cyril
F. Pipan, in the above-captioned matter.
DATED: tU??'
Of Counsel
BECKLEY & MADDEN
212 North Third Street
P.O. Box 11998
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108
(717) 233-7691
omas A. Beckley, Esquire
949k ?__
Eliza eth S. Beckley, Esquir
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Elizabeth S. Beckley, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document was this day served upon the persons and in the manner indicated below.
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Sandra L. Wilton, Esquire
Tucker Arensberg & Swartz
111 North Front Street
P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-0889
DATED: Co 141
Elizaketh S. Beckley
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: DAUPHIN
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania State Constable
n-
Michael P. Maugans
SERVICE OF PROCESS
h?OM 1l^IA/r- A, 7,'Trjj/
vs.
DEFENDANT: NAME and ACORESS
r
mg,
Pager 780-8201 (717) 54541148 L
J
rDateFiled: ocket No.: P/ -,3137
Cis//L ';q q
Served upon C 1/,q, r- 1 P7wW
Describe Document(s): (Person to be Served)
l)
?, ILA %t Q fQa
-7
^9?/B i a/ oC %uc
by handing a copy of
fi n( & D/- 33e?
?ate C, (/, c ? ?jt.l
tox C-l?-YP S?LF
(Person Actually Served) (Relationship)
on z/.?//a/ , at '? ?-r- .M., at
(Date) (Time)
(Location)
For Landlord/Tenant complaints:
Since none of the above found, served by posting a copy of the complaint conspicuously on the
premises on at . M.,
(Date) (Time)
e
at
(Location)
,. .. «..
Miles Traveled: 2re&0V11 lf 2
AOPC 624-95 (Print Name and Title)
? -n
? F _t;rrt
:IiOl
MAXINE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant : NO. 01-3132
ORDER
AND NOW, this " day of 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that
the Petition for Leave to Withdraw as Defendant's Counsel is GRANTED.
Thomas A. Beckley, Esquire, Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, and the Law Firm of
Beckley & Madden are hereby granted leave to withdraw as De
matter.
Counsel in this
J.
zopu,o) 0 ?I
9•za-?? s
i , '? r,cv
;,;i? :.?
- 1i
a t C?i? ?Sl 1'„ ?:
MAXINE D. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
V.
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
NO. 01-3132
PETITION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL
AND NOW comes Thomas A. Beckley, Esquire, Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire,
and Beckley & Madden, Of Counsel, and hereby petitions the Court for leave to withdraw
as defendant's counsel, and in support thereof avers as follows:
1. In May, 2001, at the request of the Defendant to Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire,
Beckley & Madden agreed to represent Defendant in the above-captioned matter.
2. Counsel undertook representation in the above-captioned matter based upon a
written Retainer Agreement with Defendant, whereby Defendant would pay outstanding
invoices on a monthly basis.
3. In early August, 2001, Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, of Beckley & Madden,
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire, Plaintiffs counsel, and Debra Salem of Inner Works, the
parties' family counselor participated in a conference call because Defendant walked out
of a family counseling session.
4. Since that conference call, Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, has tried to contact
the Defendant numerous times both by telephone and by mail; however, the Defendant
has failed and refused to respond to counsel.
5. The parties' are also involved in a custody action for which the
conciliation conference date was rescheduled so Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, sent the
Defendant notice of the same. The Defendant returned the letter to Ms. Beckley
unopened with writing on the envelope. A true and correct copy of the envelope is
attached hereto marked as Exhibit A and incorporated.
6. Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, contacted the Custody Conciliator, Melissa
Greevy, Esquire, explained the situation and requested that she send notice of the new
conciliation date directly to the Defendant.
7. Counsel for the Defendant is unable to communicate with the Defendant
and therefore unable to effectively represent him in this matter.
8. Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, contacted Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire, about
counsels' desire to withdraw from this action and Ms. Meilton indicated that she did not
have any objection.
Wherefore, Thomas A. Beckley, Esquire, Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, and
Beckley & Madden, Of Counsel, respectfully request leave of Court to withdraw as
Defendant's Counsel
DATED: q-111-u(
Of Counsel
BECKLEY & MADDEN
212 North Third Street
P.O. Box 11998
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Respectfully submitted,
comas A. Beckley
? i
4lie4Sec ey
? d
w w
?o
N
.? 0
T• n ?
e
V?
H
0 ?
D? S
P
P
s
? M
d
a ? rj ;
?e
m
M
r ? Z
a
o?
t?
M
V ?yl
$ z
m
m
m
as
5
¦ r-11,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Elizabeth S. Beckley, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document was this day served upon the persons and in the manner indicated below.
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
Tucker Arensberg & Swartz
111 North Front Street
P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-0889
Cyril F. Pipan
1124 Columbus Avenue
Lemoyne, PA 17043
DATED: ?-11 "!
l/
El' abeth S. ec
1
C7 G? ?')
A
y ? Jrn
tv -?
4
MAXINE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: IN DIVORCE
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant : NO. 01-3132
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW
TO: The Prothonotary
Kindly withdraw the appearance of Thomas A. Beckley, Esq., Elizabeth S.
Beckley, Esq. and the law firm of Beckley & Madden as counsel for the Defendant, Cyril
F. Pipan, in accordance with the the attached Order granting leave to do so.
DATED: 9 o - -q
Of Counsel
BECKLEY & MADDEN
212 North Third Street
P.O. Box 11998
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Respect submitted,
m . Beckley
liz eth S. Bec ey
V t
A
MAX NE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: IN DIVORCE
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant : NO. 01-3132
AND NOW, this Z day o l 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that
the Petition for Leave to Withdraw as Defendant's Counsel is GRANTED.
Thomas A. Beckley, Esquire, Elizabeth S. Beckley, Esquire, and the Law Firm of
Beckley & Madden are hereby granted leave to withdraw as Defendant's Counsel in this
matter.
?.s
J.
X
r r
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Elizabeth S. Beckley, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document was this day served upon the persons and in the manner indicated below.
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
Tucker Arensberg & Swartz
111 North Front Street
P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-0889
Cyril F. Pipan
1124 Columbus Avenue
Lemoyne, PA 17043
DATED:
r
Eliz eth S. Bec /ey
j
`err;
r
MAXINE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff, : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : No. 2001-3132
CYRIL F. PIPAN, : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
Defendant, : IN DIVORCE
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please enter the appearance of Susan M. Kadel, Esquire, on behalf of the Defendant,
Cyril F. Pipan, in the above-captioned action.
Date: UoL
<
By:
Susan M. Kadel, Esquire
James, Smith, Durkin & Connelly LLP
Post Office Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
(717) 533-3280
Attorney I.D. No. 44837
1
c3 ? ?
vcc rn ??'-n
n
G
MAXINE D. PIPAN
vs Case No. 01-3132
CYRIL F. PIPAN
Statement of Intention to Proceed
To the Court:
Maxine D. P ip an intends to proceed with the above captioned matter.
Print Name Sandra L. Meilton SignNan-.e ?r-OC`/??Lr°LvTK?
Date: Attorneyfor_ Maxine D. Pipan
Explanatory Comment
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of
inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit
comment.
1. Rule ofcivil Procedure
New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the
scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously
governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is
tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting
local rules.
This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d
1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required
before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901."
Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The
general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable.
It Inactive Cases
The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system The process is initiated by the
court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties.
If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of
course :e.^.irating the matte: Frith prejudice far thil,•,ue to prosecutc." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she
will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue.
a. Where the action has been terminated
If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed
under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination
of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file
the notice of intention to proceed.
The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of
the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and
reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff
must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or
legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of
termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2).
B. Where the action has not been terminated
An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may
have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a
common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.
e ?i?alC? -'S1 - eaMrton.4.3.,u _fe,u c»-:?_+?:_-?trs?a? - * w'nKi' N R
C ?.s
om ? O
n
-; ;=- Q
W
f
MAXINE D. PIPAN
Case No. 01-3132
vs
CYRIL F. PIPAN
To the Court:
Statement of Intention to Proceed
Maxine D. Pipan inte ds to proceed with the above a oned matter., An
lnven F. A nor p ointment or Master will be
filed by Plain iff on or before December 1, 007.
Print Name Sandra L. Me i l t on _ Sign Name ee _f
- -
Date: 1 1/ 1/ 0 7 Attorney for
Maxine D. Pipan
Explanatory Comment
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of
inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit
comment.
1. Rule of civil Procedure
New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the
scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously
governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is
tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting
local rules.
This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d
1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required
before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901."
Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The
general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable.
II Inactive Cases
The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the
court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties.
If the parties do not wish to pi-Irs e the case, they will tak° ^:o action and "the nrothon:,tar-y shall ent-cr an order as Cf
course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she
will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue.
a. Where the action has been terminated
If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed
under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination
of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file
the notice of intention to proceed.
The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of
the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and
reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff
must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or
legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of
termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2).
B. Where the action has not been terminated
An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may
have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a
common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.
C'> *,,?
f
?? ?. `.
Y
<
?' [tj ? y' ff f'f'
? C+,?
Maxine D. Pipan
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Vs.
Cyril F. PiRan
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Docket No. 01 -31 32 Civil Term
Defendant
Defendant
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF MASTER
Maxine D. PiRan Olaintiff) (Defendant), moves the court to appoint a master with
respect to the following claims:
( Divorce ( Distribution of Property
() Annulment ( ) Support
Alimony ( Counsel Fees
( Alimony Pendente Lite ( Costs and Expenses
and in support of the motion states:
(1) Discovery is complete as to the claims (s) for which the appointment of a master is
requested.
(2) The defendant (has) (has not) appeared in the action (personally) (by his attorney,
Susan Kadel , Esquire).
(3) The Staturory ground (s) for divorce (is) (are)
Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code
(4) Delete the inapplicable paragraph(s):
a. The action is not contested.
b. An agreement has been reached with respect to the following claims:
c. The action is contested with respect to the following claims:
All of the above
(5) The action (involvesXdoes not involve) complex issues of law or fact
(6) The hearing is expected to take One Day (hours) (days).
(7) Additional information, if any, relevant to the motion:
Date: 7
Attorney for (Plaintiff) ( efendant)
Print Attorney Name ......... Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
ORDER APPOINTING MASTER
AND NOW, , 20 Esquire
is appointed master with respect to the following claims:
By the Court:
?
?? n
-
_ .?' --?a
? 3 5-S"t
r 7 ?;
Q
4?,-,-
"[i
.?.... n
Y_
?m_. .?3
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
Daley Zucker Meilton Miner & Gingrich, LLC
1029 Scenery Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17109
(717) 657-4795
smeilton@dzmmglaw.com
MAXINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. NO. 01-3132 Civil Term
CYRIL F. PIPAN, CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendant IN DIVORCE
INCOME AND EXPENSE STATEMENT
Attached hereto is the Income and Expense Statement of
Plaintiff submitted pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. No. 1920.31.
,Sandra L. Meil on
Attorney for Plaintiff
INCOME AND EXPENSE STATEMENT OF
MAXINE D. PIPAN
INCOME
Employer: CVS Pharmacy
Address: One CVS Drive, Woonsocket, RI, 02895
Type of Work: Pharmacist
Payroll Number: 0072574
Pay Period (weekly, biweekly, etc.): Weekly
Gross Pay per Pay Period:
Itemized Payroll Deductions:
Federal Withholding
Social Security
Local Wage Tax
State Income Tax
Retirement
Savings Bonds
Credit Union
Life Insurance
Health Insurance
other (specify)
$ 270.72
$ 25.78
16.79
2.71
8.31
Net Pay per Pay Period:
(see attached pay stub)
Other Income:
Interest/Dividends
Pension/Annuity
Social Security
Rents/Royalties
Expense Account
Gifts
Unemployment Comp.
Workmen's Comp.
$ 212.96
Week Month Year
(Fill in Appropriate Column)
Total $ $ $
TOTAL INCOME $ 212.96
EXPENSES
Home
Mortgage/rent
Maintenance
Utilities
Electric
Home repairs
Oil
Telephone/Internet
Water
Sewer/Trash
Employment
Public
Lunch
Taxes
Real Estate
Personal
Income
School Taxes
Insurance
Homeowners
Automobile
Weekly Monthly Yearly
(Fill in Appropriate Column)
$ $ 1905.80 $
100.00
40.00
30.00
400.00
50.18
30.00
66.67 800.00
$ $ $ 818.06
.92 11.00
155.73 1868.75
163.58 1963.00
100.00
Life
Accident
Health
Other
Automobile
Payments
Fuel
Repairs
Maintenance
Registration/Auto Club
Medical
Doctor
Dentist
Orthodontist
Hospital
Medicine
Special needs (glasses,
braces, orthopedic devices)
Education
Private school
Parochial school
College
Books/Miscellaneous
Weekly Monthly Yearly
(Fill in Appropriate Column)
S
100.00
40.00
50.00
6.00 72.00
$ 41.67 $ 500.00
33.33 400.00
25.00
33.33
$ 375.00
25.00 400.00
$ 4500.00
300.00
Weekly Monthly Yearly
(Fill in Appropriate Column)
Personal
Clothing
Food
Barber/hairdresser
Personal care
Hobbies
Laundry/Dry Cleaning
Memberships
Loans
Credit Union
Miscellaneous
Household help
Child care
Papers/books/magazines
Entertainment
Pay TV (Cable)
Vacation
Gifts
N
$ 50.00 $
200.00
25.00
20.00
20.00
15.00
60.00
80.00
10.00
15.00
10.00
Legal fees
Charitable contributions
Other child support
Alimony payments
Other
Harp Lessons
Swimming Lessons
TOTAL EXPENSES
Weekly Monthly Yearly
(Fill in Appropriate Column)
$ $ 600.00 $
4.17 50.00
PROPERTY OWNED
Description
See Inventory and
Checking accounts Appraisement
See Inventory and
Savings accounts Appraisement
See Inventory and
Credit Union Appraisement
See Inventory and
Stocks/bonds Appraisement
See Inventory and
Real estate Appraisement
See Inventory and
Other Appraisement
50.00
5.00
60.00
$ 12942.81
ownership*
Value H W J
TOTAL
*H=Husband; W=Wife; J=Joint
INSURANCE
Hospital
Blue Cross
Other
Medical
Blue Shield
Other
Health/Accident
Disability Income
Dental
Other
Company
H=Husband; W=Wife; C=Child
Policy Coverage*
No. H W C
I understand that the statements made herein are subject to
the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. §4904 related to unsworn falsification
to authorities.
Maxine D. Pipan
I verify that I have reviewed this form with my client and to
the best of my knowledge the answers herein are true and correct. It I/, - 4
aYnd 'L eil on
Attorney for Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of LbA&r- , 2007, I, - V- Jennifer L. Carl, Paralegal for the firm, Daley Zucker Meilton
Miner & Gingrich, LLC., hereby certify that I have, this day,
served the within document on counsel for Plaintiff, by
depositing a copy of the same in the United States Mail, first
class, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, addressed
to:
Susan Kadel, Esquire
P. 0. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
Attorney for Defendant
J n'fer L. Ca Paralegal
f y r... ?
.,
`,_?? `Tl
??
rYi
C.. J ? r
..,
e
,_?
""??_'?
.._.,. J
...? ?
?-' ..A:
... ...., `"C..
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
Daley Zucker Meilton Miner & Gingrich, LLC
1029 Scenery Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17109
(717) 6574795
smeilton@dzmmglaw.com
MAXINE D. PIPAN, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. : NO. 01-3132 Civil Term
CYRIL F. PIPAN, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendant : IN DIVORCE
INVENTORY AND APPRAISEMENT
OF
MAXINE D. PIPAN
I, Maxine D. Pipan, file the following inventory and appraisement of all
property owned or possessed by either party at the time this action was commenced
and all property transferred within the preceding three years.
I verify that the statements made in this inventory and appraisement are
true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. §4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
ell
Maxine D. Pipan, Plaintiff
0
ASSETS OF PARTIES
Plaintiff marks on the list below those items applicable to the case at bar and itemizes the
assets on the following pages. If an item has been appraised, a copy of the appraisal report is attached.
(x) 1. Real property
(x) 2. Motor vehicles
() 3. Stocks, bonds, securities and options
() 4. Certificates of deposit
(x) 5. Checking accounts, cash
(x) 6. Savings accounts, money market and savings certificates
() 7. Contents of safe deposit boxes
() 8. Trusts
() 9. Life Insurance policies (indicate face value, cash surrender value and current
beneficiaries)
() 10. Annuities
(x) 11. Gifts
() 12. Inheritances
() 13. Patents, copyrights, inventions, royalties
() 14. Personal property outside the home
() 15. Businesses (list all owners, including percentage of ownership, and officer/director
positions held by a party with company)
() 16. Employment termination benefits - severance pay, workman's compensation
claim/award
() 17. Profit sharing plans
(x) 18. Pension plans (indicate employee contribution and date plan vests)
(x) 19. Retirement plans, Individual Retirement Accounts
() 20. Disability payments
() 21. Litigation claims (matured and unmatured)
() 22. MilitaryN.A. benefits
() 23. Education benefits
(x) 24. Debts due, including loans, mortgages held
(x) 25. Household furnishings and personalty (include as a total category and attach itemized
list if distribution of such assets is in dispute)
() 26. Other
MARITAL PROPERTY
Plaintiff lists all marital property in which either or both spouses have a legal or equitable interest
individually or with any other person as of the date this action was commenced:
Item Number Description of Property Names of all Owners
18 Rite Aid 401(k) Cyril F. Pipan
18 Ahold USA, Inc. 401(k) Cyril F. Pipan
19 Prudential Retirement Cyril F. Pipan
Plan No. 006742
19 TIAA CREF Cyril F. Pipan
2 1994 BMW Maxine Pipan
2 1996 Ford Cyril Pipan
18 401(k) Maxine Pipan
5 Checking Account Maxine Pipan
5 Checking Account Cyril Pipan
6 Savings Account Maxine Pipan
6 Savings Account Cyril F. Pipan
18 Rite Aid 401(k) Cyril F. Pipan
25 Miscellaneous Household Items Cyril/Maxine Pipan
NON-MARITAL PROPERTY
Plaintiff lists all marital property in which a spouse has a legal or equitable interest which is claimed to be
excluded from marital property:
Name of
Item Number Description of Property all Owners
11 416 Allendale Way Maxine D. Chocha
Camp Hill, PA 17011
PROPERTY TRANSFERRED
Reason for
Exclusion
Gift
Plaintiff lists all property in which either or both spouses had a legal or equitable interest individually or with
any other person and which has been transferred within the preceding three years:
Item Number Description of Property Names of all Owners
11 416 Allendale Way Maxine D. Chocha
Camp Hill, PA 17011
1 14 36' St. BEC LLC
Eldorado Condominium, Unit 302
Ocean City, MD 21842
LIABILITIES OF PARTIES
Plaintiff lists all liabilities of either or both spouses alone or with any person as of the date action was
commenced:
Name of Names of
Description of Debt Creditor All Debtors
Credit Card AAA Financial Services Maxine D. Chocha
Dental Bill John W. Maynard, Jr., D.D.S. Cyril Pipan
Loan Ahold USA, Federal Credit Union Cyril Pipan
YMCA Bill West Shores YMCA Maxine Chocha-Pipan
Mortgage Chase Home Finance Cyril F. Pipan, Jr.
Maxine Chocha-Pipan
Credit Card Discover Maxine Chocha-Pipan
Credit Card Sears Maxine Chocha-Pipan
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of Ot&in, 2007, I, Jennifer L. Carl, Paralegal
for the firm of Daley Zucker Meilton Miner & Gingrich, LLC, hereby certify that I have,
this day, served the within Inventory and Appraisement on Defendant, by depositing a
copy of the same in the United States Mail, first class, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania, addressed to:
Susan Kadel, Esquire
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
Attorney for Defendant
L'_0
Je ni r L. Carl, Para egal
!+.1
?3
?',
? ??
:: -?-?
...Sw) 4
.
%
? t
Y l
.
^; ?
s
{__?) _. i
. •
`
? ?;,
?
.. ^
DEC 1 1 zoo7?
Maxine D. Pipan
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Vs.
Cyril F Pi„,nan
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Docket No. 01-31 32 Civil Term
Defendant
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF TER
Maxine D Pinan nTlaintiff) (Defendant), moves the court to appoint a master with
respect to the following claims:
( Divorce ( Distribution of Property
() Annulment () Support
Alimony ( Counsel Fees
( Alimony Pendente Lite (1 Costs and Expenses
and in support of the motion states:
(1) Discovery is complete as to the claims (s) for which the appointment of a master is
requested.
(2) The defendant (has) (has not) appeared in the action (personally) (by his attorney,
Susan Kadel , Esquire).
(3) The Staturory ground (s) for divorce (is) (are)
_Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code
(4) Delete the inapplicable paragraph(s):
a. The action is not contested.
b. An agreement has been reached with respect 'to the following claims:
c. The action is contested with respect to the following claims:
All o the above
(5) The action (involves)(does not involve) complex issues of law or fact
(6) The hearing is expected to take one Day (hours) (days).
(7) Additional information, if any, relevant to the motion:
Date: 7
Attorney for (Plaintiff) ( efendant)
Print Attorney Name ......... Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
%imunn.arrvll. 1 it v .
AND NOW, 20,
is appointed master with respect to the following claims:
Esquire
By the
J.
r
Lt.... t.:_r
r' } ? J
q aC'??
SJ +? \
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
DALEY ZUCKER MEILTON
MINER & GINGRICH, LLC
1029 Scenery Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17109
(717) 657-4795
smeilton ,dzmmglaw.com
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MAXINE D. PIPAN, Docket No. 01-3132
Plaintiff
V.
CIVIL ACTION-LAW
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant (In Divorce)
NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take prompt action. You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed
without you and a decree of divorce or annulment may be entered against you by the court. A judgment may
also be entered against you for any other claim or relief requested in these papers by the plaintiff. You may
lose money or property or other rights important to you, including custody or visitation of your children.
When the ground for the divorce is indignities or irretrievable breakdown of the marriage,
you may request marriage counseling. A list of marriage counselors is available in the Office of the
Prothonotary at the Cumberland County Court House, 1 Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013.
IF YOU DO NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR ALIMONY, DIVISION OF PROPERTY,
LAWYER'S FEES OR EXPENSES BEFORE A DIVORCE OR ANNULMENT IS GRANTED, YOU MAY
LOSE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM ANY OF THEM.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH
BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 S. Bedford Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Telephone No. (717) 249-3166 or
(800) 990-9108
andra L. Meilton, No. 32551
Daley Zucker Meilton Miner & Gingrich, LLC
1029 Scenery Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17109
Attorney for Plaintiff
Sandra L. Meilton, Esquire
DALEY ZUCKER MEILTON
MINER & GINGRICH, LLC
1029 Scenery Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17109
(717) 657-4795
smeiltonAdzmmglaw.com
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MAXINE D. PIPAN, Docket No. 01-3132
Plaintiff
V. CIVIL ACTION-LAW
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant (In Divorce)
AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 3301(c) AND 3301(d)
OF THE DIVORCE CODE
1. Plaintiff is Maxine D. Pipan, an adult individual who is sui juris and resides
at 120 Highland Drive, Chambersburg, Franklin County, Pennsylvania 17201.
2. Defendant is Cyril F. Pipan, an adult individual who is sui juris and resides at
2508 N. 5t' Street, Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania 17110.
3. Both Plaintiff and Defendant have been bona fide residents in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least six (6) months immediately previous to the
filing of this Complaint.
4. The Plaintiff and Defendant were married on September 4, 1988, in
Hagerstown, Maryland.
5. There have been no prior actions of divorce or for annulment between the
parties.
6. Plaintiff has been advised of the availability of counseling and the right to
request that the Court require the parties to participate in counseling.
7. The Defendant is not a member of the Armed Services of the United States
or any of its Allies.
8. The causes of action and sections of the Divorce Code under which Plaintiff
is proceeding are:
A. Section 3301(c). The marriage of the parities is irretrievably broken.
Ninety (90) days has elapsed from the date of filing this complaint.
B. Section 3301(d). The marriage of the parties is irretrievably broken.
The Plaintiff and Defendant separated on or about May 21, 2001.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to enter a Decree in
Divorce, divorcing Plaintiff and Defendant from the bonds of matrimony.
COUNT II
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
9. Paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Complaint are incorporated herein by
reference as though set forth in full.
10. Plaintiff and Defendant have acquired property, both real and personal,
during their marriage, which are subject to equitable distribution by the Court.
11. Plaintiff and Defendant have been unable to agree as to an equitable division
of said property.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to equitably divide all
marital property.
COUNT III
ALIMONY
12. Paragraphs 1 through 11 of the Complaint are incorporated herein by
reference as though set forth in full.
13. Plaintiff has no adequate means of support for herself and is unable to
support herself through appropriate employment.
14. Plaintiff requires reasonable support to adequately maintain herself in
accordance with the standard of living established during the marriage.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to enter an award of
Alimony in her favor.
COUNT IV
SPOUSAL SUPPORT AND/OR ALIMONY PENDENTE LITE
COUNSEL FEES AND EXPENSES
15. Paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Complaint are incorporated herein by
reference as set forth in full.
16. Plaintiff lacks sufficient funds to support herself and pay Counsel fess and
expenses incident to this action.
17. Defendant is full well an able to pay Plaintiff Spousal Support and/or
Alimony Pendente Lite, counsel fees and expenses incident to this divorce action.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to enter an award of
Spousal Support and/or Alimony Pendente Lite, Plaintiff's counsel fees and the costs of this
proceeding.
Respectfully submitted,
DALEY ZUCKER MEILTON
MINER & GINGRICH, LLC
Date:
By:
San dra L. Meilton, Esquir
Supreme Court I.D. #32551
1029 Scenery Drive
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17109
(717) 657-4795
VERIFICATION
I, Maxine D. Pipan, verify that the statements made in this Complaint are true and
correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa.C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: ---
0
Maxine D. Pipan
t
t+..7
CIO
ON
STACY B. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 88732
WOLF & WOLF
10 WEST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 2414436
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
MAXINE D. PIPAN,
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
V.
Defendant
.? r
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET NO. 01-3132 CIVIL
PRAECIPE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF
COUNSEL OF RECORD
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please withdraw the appearance of SANDRA MEILTON, ESQUIRE, as attorney of record
for. Plaintiff, MAXINE D. PIPAN, in this matter.
2011 .
SANDRA L. MEI TO , ESQUIRE
DALEY ZUCKER M ILTON MINER GINGRICH
1029 SCENERY DRIVE
HARRISBURG, PA 17109
717-657-4795
SUPREME COURT ID NO. 32551
Please enter the appearance of STACY B. WOLF, ESQUIRE, as attorney for the Plaintiff,
MAXINE D. PIPAN, in this matter.
°Z5 j 2011
`9tACY B.' F, ESQUIRE
WOLF & WO
10 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
717-241-4436
SUPREME COURT ID NO. 88.732
?'812 J3 F'?i I= 1
MAXINE D. PIPAN, LATHE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Pla?i SAY AMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IrENN
V.
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant
No. 2001-3132
CIVIL ACTION -LAW
IN DIVORCE
DEFENDANT'S AFFIDAVIT OF CONSENT
1. A Complaint in Divorce under Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code was filed on
May 22, 2001.
2. The marriage of the Plaintiff and Defendant is irretrievably broken, and ninety days
have elapsed from the date of both the filing and service of the Complaint.
3. I consent to the entry of a final decree of divorce after service of Notice of Intention
to request entry of the Decree.
WAIVER OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO REQUEST ENTRY OF A DIVORCE
DECREE UNDER 43301(c) OF THE DIVORCE CODE
1. I consent to the entry of a final Decree of Divorce without notice.
2. I understand that I may lose rights concerning alimony, division of property,
lawyer's fees or expenses if I do not claim them before a divorce is granted.
3. I understand that I will not be divorced until a Divorce Decree is entered by the
Court and that a copy of the Decree will be sent to me immediately after it is filed with the
Prothonotary.
I verify that the statements made above are true and correct. I understand that false
statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904, relating to unworn
falsification to authorities.
Date: C'v-t ,.??. b -12 -1 z
Cyril F. Pipan, Defendant
T
STACY B. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID NO. 88732
10 WEST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 241-4436
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
~~ THE PRBTFia ~'~T"~'t~~~'
112 SEP -!~ PM ~: Q8
CiJMQERl.AND C£ItJ~tY
P~~~~ ~~~~~~~
MARINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN, DOCKET NO.01-3132 CIVIL
Defendant IN DIVORCE
PETITION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
The petition of Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire, respectfully represents the following:
1. The Petitioner entered her appearance by Praecipe on or about March 1, 2011.
2. The Petitioner attended a conference before the Divorce Master on May 7, 2012.
3. Following the Divorce Master Conference, the Petitioner has been attempting to conta
the Plaintiff since May 8, 2012 by mail, phone, and email to discuss the Master's Confe:
and preparation for the Divorce Master Hearing scheduled for Thursday, September 6,
2012 at 9:00 a.m.
4. Despite the Petitioner's attempts to reach the plaintiff by leaving numerous voice mail
messages, and by writing letters and email messages, the Petitioner has only received
return phone message from the Plaintiff since May 8, 2012.
5. The message received from Plaintiff on August 27, 2012 was a message stating the F
would meet with the Petitioner on either Wednesday, August 29, 2012 or on Friday,
31, 2012.
6. The Petitioner notified the Plaintiff by phone that the meeting would be on Wednesday,
August 29, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
7. The Plaintiff did not appear for the August 29, 2012 appointment and despite repeated
phone calls, a letter and an email being sent, the Petitioner has received no communicati
from the Plaintiff.
8. The Petitioner cannot properly prepare for the Divorce Master Hearing on September 6,
2012 without any communication from the Plaintiff and without Plaintiffls documentatio
necessary for the hearing. Good cause thus exists pursuant to Rule 1.1 of the Pennsy
Rules of Professional Conduct fox Petitioner's withdrawal.
9. The continued representation of the Plaintiff without the necessary communication has
resulted and will further result in an inability to adequately and competently represent the
Plaintiff in this matter. Good cause thus exists pursuant to Rule 1.1 of the Pennsylvania
Rules of Professional Conduct for Petitioner's withdrawal.
10. The undersigned counsel believes and therefore avers that no prejudice would be
by her client if the instant motion is granted.
11. Defendant's counsel, Susan Kadel, Esquire, has concurred in the filing of this petition.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Court grant Petitioner leave to withdraw her
for Plaintiff in this action.
Respectfully submitted,
Wolf & Wolf
September ~, 2012
Stacy B. W ,Esquire
10 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-4436
Supreme Court I.D. No. 88732
1 -
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Petition of Plaintifps Counsel for Leave
Withdraw Appearance are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I
understand that false statements made herein may subject to me to the penalties of Pa.C.S. Section
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
September ~, 2012
Stacy B. Wc~lf~ Esquire
MARINE D. PIPAN, IN THE. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN, DOCKET N0.01-3132 CIVIL
Defendant IN DIVORCE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire, hereby certify that I mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Petition of Plaintiff s Counsel for Leave to Withdraw Appearance to the below-listed persons:
Maxine Chocha-Pipan
416 Allendale Way
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Susan Kadel, Esquire
James Smith Dietterick & Connelly LLP
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
Counsel for Defendant
Dated: September ~, 2012
Stacy B. W Esquire
STAGY B. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID N0.88732
WOLF & WOLF
10 WEST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 241-4436
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
~° ~~.~D-C3~r
2~i2 SEP -4 PM 4= 10
CU .PE~h~N Y~ AN A TY
MARINE D. PIPAN, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN, DOCSET N0.01-3]32 CIVIL
Defendant IN DIVORCE
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
NOW comes the plaintiff, Maxine Chocha-Pipan, by her attorney, Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire,
presents the following motion for continuance of the September 6, 2012, Divorce Master Hearing,
representing as follows:
1. Plaintiff is Maxine. Chocha-Pipan (hereinafter "Wife") in the above captioned
currently resides at 416 Allendale Way, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
2. Defendant is Cyril F. Pipan (hereinafter "Husband") who currently resides at 1708 J
Chowning Way, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 17070.
3. A Divorce Master Hearing is scheduled for Thursday, September 6, 2012 at 9:00
4. A Divorce Master Conference was held on May 7, 2012.
5. Since May 7, 2012, the undersigned has had no contact with Plaintiff, despite the
undersigned's repeated attempts to contact Plaintiff by telephone, mail, and email.
6. Despite the undersigned's numerous attempts to contact Plaintiff concerning her
representation and to prepare for the upcoming Divorce Master Hearing, the undersigned has been
communicate with Plaintiff to adequately prepare for the upcoming hearing.
who
to
7. Contemporaneous with the filing of this motion, the undersigned is filing a Petition ~or Leave
to Withdraw Appearance.
The undersigned contacted Susan M. Kadel, Esquire, counsel for Defendant, for
in the filing of this motion and such concurrence was given.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Maxine Chocha-Pipan, respectfully requests that the Court issue
rescheduling the Divorce Master Hearing, currently scheduled for September 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.,
any additional relief that the Court may deem appropriate and just.
Respectfully submitted,
WOLF & WOLF
Dated: September ~, 2012
By: ~_
Stacy B. lf, Esquire
10 West h Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-4436 .
Supreme Court I.D. No. 88732
Attorney for Plaintiff
Order
with
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, do hereby verify I am counsel for Plaintiff, and the facts set forth in this
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that false statements herein are
made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
~ ~,. ~ ~-
September 4, 2012
Stacy B. W I
Counsel for Plaintiff
STAGY B. WOLF, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY ID N0.88732
WOLF & WOLF
10 WEST HIGH STREET
CARLISLE PA 17013
(717) 241-4436
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
MARINE D. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET NO.O1-3132 CIVIL
IN DIVORCE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire, hereby certify this day that I have served a true and correct copy o
Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance upon the following person and in the matter indicated:
SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL:
Maxine Chocha-Pipan
416 Allendale Way
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Susan M. Kadel, Esquire
James Smith Dietterick & Connelly LLP
P.O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
Counsel for Defendant
Respectfully submitted,
WOLF & WOLF
Dated: September 4, 2012
By:~.---" - ~~~
Stacy B. Wo ,Esquire
10 West H' JStreet
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-4436
Supreme Court I.D. No. 88732
Attorney for Plaintiff
-.
MARINE D. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: DOCSET NO.01-3132 CIVIL
IN DIVORCE
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW this S~day of , 2012, upon consideration of the attached Motion,
it is hereby ordered that the Divorce Master Hearing scheduled for September 6, 2012, at 9:00 o'clock a.m.,
be rescheduled to ~ ~~~ir-o.v ~ , 2012, at ~:~ o'clock ~.m.
BY THE COURT:
J•
Distribution:
/ Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire ~ ~ ">i
~ Susan M. Kadel, Esquire
ine Chocha-Pipan
~ M .,,~~
r*iw r:.a
~ --1
ax ""' `~7 '~
'
~~,~ es µ•~, /Pd 9~s~a Z~
..
~~
~ Tt
i
r~
~~ ~+~
~ ~ ~-}
~,
~~
~-~ w fit,.,
-.
MARINE D. PIPAN,
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
v.
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET N0.01-3132 CIVIL
IN DIVORCE
ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL
AND NOW, this ~~day of , 2012, upon consideration of the verified
Petition of Plaintiffis Counsel for Leave to Withdraw Appearance, it is hereby ORDERED and
DECREED that said petition is GRANTED and that the petitioner, Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire, be
permitted to withdraw her appearance of record for the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter.
Distribution:
/ Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire ~
~ Susan M. Badel, Esquire
~
C
-° +„~
'a!'
~#
~
Maxine Chocha-Pipan r
ri.
~ v
' ~~
r-'
-
~
~ tY
f
~ ~
-
~
L'oP`,es ~,~/P~ y/S~i~ cn
~
~~ ~
~, ~
a ,
~ n°
~ -o
~ ~-
-
?
y„c w ~
sr.,
`
:-+
MAXINE D. PIPAN,
Plaintiff
v.
CYRIL F. PIPAN,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 2001-3132
Civil Action -Law
IN DIVORCE
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff, Maxine D. Pipan, in the above-
, captioned matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
i /
'
~` LL/~4" ~~'1 ~4
Mary M as, Esquire
Saidis, Suf ' an & Rogers
Attorney ID #84919
26 West High Street ~ ~ _,
Carlisle, PA 17013 c „~
~' ~'s
(717} 243-6222 ~~ ,o ~ ;~,
i ~ ~ `~r=-
~
Dated: .: -r !~_
r
„~~ D
N
~~,~.'
~ ~ 1
DC
C xs
~- z ~
Z
~, C, C~ t~ ~' ~'
,
~ - --~' '
--t .~- 2~
Law Offices of
_ Saidis
Sullivan
& Rogers
'( West High Street
Carlisle, PA 1?D13