Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-03825 ~~~ SAlOIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATrORNEYS-AT-LAW 26 W. High Street Carlisle. P A -', "' '-, '.'_~',f,-'_ -_.ii,i CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - .JP06S CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants, NOTICE YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2 LIBERTY AVENUE CARLISLE, PA 17013 (717) 249-3166 II SAlOIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATIORNEYS.AT.Lt\W 26 W. High Street Carlisle, P A CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND NOW, comes Plaintiff by and through its attorneys, SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY, and states as follows: 1. Plaintiff is CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, a corporation, duly organized and doing business at 7360 Kyrene Road, Tempe, Arizona 85283. Plaintiff is the successor in interest to GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY. 2. Defendants STEVEN A FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, are adult individuals, residing at 925 Mount Rock Road, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17241. 3. On November 27, 1998, Defendants entered into a Note wherein they promised to repay a loan to Plaintiff in the amount of $200,000.00, payments to be made monthly in the amount of $2,331.29, on the second day of each month, beginning 2 II "'- SAIDIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATrORNEYS.AT.LAW Z6 W. High Street Carlisle, PA '- . ., ~, L,,) ,,-_k_," ,~ . January 2, 1999, until said sum was paid in full, the last scheduled payment being December 2, 2023. 4. Said Note is in default because the monthly payments of principal and interest on said Mortgage due January 2000, and each month thereafter, are due and unpaid, and by the terms of said Note upon default of such payments for the period of one month, the entire principal balance and all interest due thereon are collectible forthwith. 5. The following amounts are due on said Note: Principal Balance $199,320.60; Interest from 12/02/99 through OS/22/00 (plus $74.54 per diem thereafter) $12,820.88; attorneys fee $9,966.03; late charges $1,740.52; corporate advance $50.00; penalty $13,454.14; costs of suit $225.00; appraisal fee $125.00; title search $200.00; total $237,902.17. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants in the amount of $237,902.17, together with interest at the rate of $74.54, and any other costs and expenses incurred by Plaintiffs in enforcing this Note, including reasonable additional attorneys fees. . SAlOIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for the Plaintiff James D. Flower, Jr. 1.0. #27742 26 West High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-6222 3 Ii 02/14/01 16:31 MCCRBE,WEISBERG&CONWRY,PC .. 914803336457 NO.934 '. . VERIFICATION The undersigned, Diane Alessi, hereby certifies that she is the Lead Foreclosure Specialist of the Plaintiff, Conscco Finance Consumer Discount Company, fi'k!a Green Tree Consumer Discount Company, in the within action,an that she is authorized to make this verification and that the forgoing facts are true and correct to the best of her knowledge, infonnation and belief and further states that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 PA.C.S.~4904 relating to unsw0111 falsification to authorities. D~~- Diane~ Aless; . - -,~w 004 , , is' CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f!kIa GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA : NO. 2001-3825 CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L.FAlLOR DEFENDANTS. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF THE DEFENDANTS TO THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2001, come the Defendants Steven A. Failor and Cynthia L Failor, by and through their attorneys, IRWIN, McKNIGHT & HUGHES, and make the following Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint and support thereof ofthe following: PRELIMINARY OBJECTION FOR FAILURE OF A PLEADING TO CONFORM TO LAW OR RULE OF COURT PURSUANT TO Pa RC.P. 1028 (a)(2). 1. Plaintiff Conseco Finance Consumer Discount Company, flkla, Green Tree Consumer Discount Company, filed a Complaint to the above-referenced docket on or about June 21, 2001, in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. 2. Paragraph 3 of said Complaint alleges that Defendants entered into a Note in which they promised to repay a loan to Plaintiff in the amount of $200,000.00. 3. Pa R.C.P. ~IOI9(i) requires that when any claim is based upon a writing, the pleader shall attach a copy of the writing or the material part thereof. 4. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to set forth or attach the allegedly executed note. 5. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to set forth or attach any writings that support the Plaintiff's allegations or its claim for damages. ~~" ,,~,"._".' "r'__"'_d~,,"'~I,'c~"-,;" ""->.<.",.'" , WHEREFORE, Defendants, Steven A. Failor and Cynthia L. Failor, respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant their Preliminary Objection and to order Plaintiff to attach the Note or other written documentation which supports its allegations and claims for damages, Respectfully submitted, IRWIN, McKNIGHT & HUGHES By ~ S~,-~~ Mark . Schwartz, Esquire - 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, PA 17013 717 -249-2353 Supreme Court J.D. No: 70216 Date: AN,O.'::.:"....- \~ l...-6~' I Attorney for Defendants, Steven A. Failor and Cynthia L. Failor ~~___, ."",_", "~-<_'~"._ ~o _.'-' ",=_'",_ . ""ij;_ CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, flk/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : NO. 2001-3825 CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR DEFENDANTS. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I the undersigned hereby certify that on this 13th day of August, 2001, a copy of the Preliminary Objections of the Defendants to the Plaintiff's Complaint was served by first-class, postage prepaid United States mail in Carlisle, Pennsylvania upon the following: James D. Flower, Jr" Esquire Saidis, Shuff, Flower & Lindsay 26 West High Street Carlisle, Pa 17013 CKNIr & HUGHES ~tI/4w~ ark D. Schwartz, Esquire ""'" ""J~~,{~' j' "_1lliinilb~w.;"'>;"'" , >,;,,;,~, ;;"_~~""ill.;ili~~li'MJ!Jii;wla"'- ,-, - ""'-~~. ,,~, ",-'""'."<->")"'0 '~, ".~ '~"_' "~"=_' _, _~~. <"""- ,0, .",,' -..-. _ "''--'N~ """ .-..........~-~ ,~--,-,~ ,'- lij ,;: ~"j ','I Ii I: ti "I II k ~l ~i ii' '-,- \i: Ii i II ~.' Ill; Ii :!;, r j, ! 0 0 0 c: -n ~~~ :po -J [~ c: --rJ rnr~"', (,-"> ~- z:r' ,":1 zc C] c71::h (.0 ) h ~:C; ~,\ ',-:;' 'I /~. --;J '~,'~ =2 I :c-- :-1( d~C.) (J j ",.-( , rj \'n >c ~:? -"I ''''''.- ~ :....1 :b C' 0-< .~ ~ ,; ,::>. "-. "'. ,--).1._ ~J;,-_~J.~[nJl... ~_~,"', !in I LLL SAIDIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY I ATIORNEVS-AT'LAW 26 W. High Street Carlisle, P ^ .- CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs, STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants. ,'<',.'-, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - 3"'6 Z:5"" CIVIL TERM ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE I, MARK D. SCHWARTZ, ESQUIRE, hereby accept service of the Complaint filed in the above captioned case, on behalf of the Defendants, STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR. - 2"'~ Date: .....j U ~~ ~ ,2001 " BY~ ~ Mark D. Schwartz, Esquire 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, PA 17013 ~bMW;Mi;l_~f,i;W",fl%!1i~liitil!lj;fr~~M~'~t"',",~i..i~':ll,,-:,j,'d;;";~~..,;!,j-;;if;;'~Ji<",;;ft,gi:t,Hl~~~~lii~iIj~~~"~ H ~~,~m _0 ,~ ~^" ,." ,~,'," ^~__', _~ .?7 ~ ,"",-, '-_'_ "h',' ~, ~Iil'".".'"'''' "'w, JUN 2 8 2001 ...,.",_." ,. "'~'-'~'-IIi_ -, I, ;-, ;" .' Ii I'. '. 0 <::) () c <""' -;'1 ~OJ ~ n, (;-) 1 r~,:d Z'"I' zf" I --,roil (J) ,t~ \.0 ,~ --< :~~"- '.,'''--- ;~) 1 ~c:' .-"--' -0 r'-,-, ?;C~, :Z (?~~ --c >c: r;:> ;~5rn Z -, .,.. ...,..., -j 5J -<. -..... -< """~.",,,-~- " . -" ~~ - . -, _.~~ .,,=. ,~_...,," SAIDIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATIOItNEYS-AT-LAW 26 W. High Street Carlisle, P A ~ ;. _. J " " _, _ 4 CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/kla GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - 3825 CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS AND NOW, comes CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY f/kla GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff herein, by and through its attorneys, SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY, and makes the following answer to Defendants, STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR'S, preliminary objections: I. Failure of a Pleading to Conform to Law or Rule of Court 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted in part/Denied in part. Plaintiff admits that it failed to attach the Note alleged in its Complaint to have been executed by Defendants but denies that it failed to set forth the substance of the Note in its Complaint. By way of further answer, SAIDIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATIORNEYS.AT-LAW 26 W, High Street Carlisle. P A prior to filing this Plaintiff's Answer to Defendant's Preliminary Objections, Plaintiff filed a Praecipe attaching a copy of the Note upon which the Complaint is based, to remedy this defect. By way of further answer, however, it should be noted that the companion action which is also styled Conseco Finance Consumer Discount Company f/kla Green Tree Consumer Discount Company v. Steven A. Failor and Cynthia L. Failor, docketed to No. 2001-01486, which was filed the same day and served with this action, attached exhibits including copies of the Settlement Statement for the transaction, the Note, and the Mortgage. Copies of these documents have been in possession of attorneys for Defendants. 5. Admitted, the defect has been remedied as set forth in its answer to Paragraph 4 above. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court to deny the Defendant's preliminary objections to Plaintiff's Complaint, and to award other such relief as is appropriate under the circumstances. SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for the Plaintiff Date: 11-1 ~ - j/ 2 I. il James D. Flower, Jr. I.D.#27742 26 West High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-6222 SAIDIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATIORNEYS-AT-LAW 26 w. liigb Street. CarWile. P A .. ,- ,",_',Lt ,,-<";.,. ,. "lif ~h;-'. ",_", ", ;0 ^ ,_~,_ ,.' ''''_,"_~~.,. .' _ ''-n' " ~_ ATTORNEY VERIFICATION I, James D. Flower, Jr., Esquire, attorney for Plaintiff, verify that the statements made in the foregoing Plaintiff's Answer to Defendant's Preliminary Objections are true and correct and certify that I am authorized to do so. The Plaintiff representative in charge of this case is outside the jurisdiction of the Court and cannot be conveniently obtained. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. S 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Date: /1-/ ~ ~{f / James D. 10 er, SAIDIS, SHUFF, OWER & LINDSAY 26 West High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 3 Ii ;:;;-';;(iiil'.tr.alJ" ~~~Mil1lIUWm~'''1!iI",'h';''-''"~!lfAi''''fu-'~";>WI.1.~<lI&lf:!lll1t_'~"''~'JdI.il 1 ",' , , -" .~ ~~, . ~. ""''''~,'''',___,,~._, 'J_' "~'__" ,-~~ ,~, ~?'. ", , ~.'-',- '~._"'_,,'r',"- 'llllillr""~ I' Ii ! I'" f" " I ~, , l r I I I , i I 0 c.:) C ~s:: -,- ,.<',- ""OCC} ":"! [!l!e:: ,",:.- Z .'.. Zl- -:1i::, GI):~:: (y-, . , ec ""Q ,: ::'y.~ "'" ~?t~ z(; ~.",' --0 r:- t"yfil Pc :z ~ :;< IT> ::0 -< , - ,.~ ._""._-A,J)fl_<,.~"-.-,<;",, ". -~,~"."I~Ulfn~O"-,\~,, ~,j ~!J _~ ),). L, ,c '.r '_/'\ ' SAlOIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATI'O~YS.AT.LAW 26 W. High Street Carlisle. P A , CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants. TO THE PROTHONOTARY: j ~' .'-~ -, . "-.,~ "'-II ;1...-, . ",-d_,"'_, .'~ ",~Io;>':-";"'{-_".~'" '~ '-,~l ", IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - 3825 CIVIL TERM PRAECIPE Attached is the Note which should have been attached as the original exhibit to the Complaint, please incorporate this exhibit into the record. Date: / / ...... / .t - 0/ " SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for the Plaintiff James D. Flower, Jr. 1.0.#27742 26 West High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-6222 NOTE APP # 9807225528 LN # 69-0~44478-3 .' ....h_......~~y:~.~~~3!.!..J.~~~... ...........~~.~!:g.El!..'.........h........ ..h........mr.~~;=;.Y.;~~.I).;~.......... . IOatotl IOtyI !Slatll _... '...... ............_ '. .....~~~..~.~~~;.. .~~S~..~~. ...t!~l'!Y.H*~.I. ..~~~.~y~.~~~~a 17241 II"ro!l-.tyAdd.....1 ...........................................-.... 1, BORROWER'S PROMISE TO PAY tn rewrn for a luan that I have received. I promise to pay U.S. $..~?g.:.q~9.:.Q.q.........._......... (this amount i$ calJec.I ~priJX:ipaJ"). plus interest. [0 the orUtr of the Lender. Tht: Lender is ...?:.~~.~_'!..S~.~!~.~.~~.c:~!'.~.~~y....~..01 ~~:=.~.~!..~:.~~. ~~.~~.. ~..~!!,.. .~..iH-.~;....!'.~...;~~;r..;. ...... ........ ....... ..... .... . I understand that the U:DlJer may t[".uJS~r this Note. The Lender or anyone wb~ ~k~.d;i~.N~.~.b;.;;.;.;~~.~.;;b~.i~ ClUillcd to receive payments under this NOIe is called me ~Note Holder.. 2. INTERE5f Interest will be charged on unpaid pritD.pa1 umil ~ full UUOOnt o( prin:ipall13S been paid. I wilt pay \\\terest at a yearly rate of ......~~.:.~.~~...., %. huero"( will bccharged beginning 011 ............J?~!;~~~~..~.~..~~~.~.................... The interest rate required by this Sec..1iou 2 is the rate I will pay boch before and after any defdult described in Section 6{B) of this Note. . 3. PAYMENTS (A) 5<hcduled Payments 1 will pay principal and interest by making paymentS when scheduled: G I will make: .......~9.9..................... 'paymerus of S..~.:.~:1};:.?~.................................... each on the ......... ... ... ..~.r:H.................. .............. uf eacb .....~9.':'.t;h .......... ................ .................. ..... ... ..... ............ ................. ..... ........... ..... ....... .... beginning on ....>l.<;lR-!-!~;X..~I...t~~.?.... ....... ........ ....... o 1 will make paymenlS as follows: o In addition to the payments described above. l....nll pay a ~ba1loon payment~ of S ........._......................_.. on ......................................... . The Note Holder will deliver or ntail to me notice prior to maturity that the balloon payment is due. This notice will Slate lhe balJuun payment amount and the date that it is due. (Bl Maturity Date and Place of Payments I will matt: these payments as scbcdulcd until l have paid all of [be principal aud interest and any other charges dCSt:ribed below that I may owe ulltler this Note. My scheduled 'payments will be applied to interest before prirx.;paJ. If. em .........p.~.~.~~,.;"..~:...~~~~.........................n...n..... I still owe amounts under this Note. 1 will pay those amounts in full on that date. which is calletl the ~malUtity date. . I wUJ make my schc:dulC1J payments at .....q;t;'!=!~.r:..X~~.~.....?~.~.Q..~.:n~Y.F.~E~..~.9.~!...!~~p.~.~..f!~....~~?~.~.... ..... ..... .... ........... ................. .... ................. ............. .............. ....... ...... ..... ..................... or at a different place \f t~ired by lhe. Note Halder. 4, BORROWER'S RIGHT TO PREPA. Y AND PREPAYMENT PENALTY J have the right to nlake payments of principal III any time before they are due. A paynlCId of principal only is known ,as a .prepayment. . When I make a prcparment. 1 will tell the Note Hulder in writing tlrolt I am doing so. ~ I will pay a prepayment penalty uf ... ~~~ .~RP.;.J;1.~..~.~;~~~~.;.. 29:..~h~.E~!;..l;1np.~~.~m~9.'ll.~..!':~~m:...~l:..~.J:l.~..~~':.!~e J~~~. .l?~;1:~.I:~!'!. J.~. .p.~t~..~~.1;h};!1..~ !!..~.I}~hr::s. ..~;t;9.1p...~h~..~~~.~...C?~n;.~.~.. ~.9..!n:......... ....... ...... .............. ...............................................................................n.................................. if I prepay this Note in full. The Note Holder wH1 use all of DIY prepayments to reduce the amount uf principal that 1 owe under this Nole. Jf t make II partial prepayment, dIm will be DO changes in the due date or in the amuuut of my monthly payment unJ~ the Note Holder agrees in writing to th~ changes. S. LOAN CHARGES If a law. wbich applies. to this !.oan and which sc=cs muimum loan charges.. is finally tmerpteted so that the interest or uther loan charges collected or [0 be collected in connection willi this loan e:tceed the permitted limits. then: (i) any such loan charge shall be reduced by the amount n<<essa.ry to reduce the charge to the permitted limit: and (ii) any sums already collected from me which c:xceedcc.l penuittcd limits will be refunded. to me. TIle Note Holder may chfJOSe to make this refund by reaucmg the principal 1 owe under this Note or by making a uirect paymCDl to me. if a refund reduces principal. Ihe reduction will be treated as a partiai prepayment. 6, BORROWER'S FAILURE TO PAY AS REQUIRED (A) La,. CI1arp for O....d.. Payments If the Note Holder has not receivetl the full amount of any scheduled payment by the end of _.......;.~......... calenUar days after the date it is due. I win pay 3. late charse to the Note Holder. The amount of the charge will be .~.~....q~.9.~.. %d'lftWr9'iV'hIClrR~**'DgOU~.jVfeW" I will pay Ihis lat~ charge promptly but oaly OnQ: on each late payment. '-:'-o~t.ne"'uiiparcr'.payment"of"'nO':O'O, whlchever .1.9 greater. (B) Default . If I do oot pay the full amount of each scbeduled payment on the dare it is tlue. I will be in default. (C) Notice of Default If 1 am i.n default. the. Nute Holder may send me 0\ wrilten ooUce ldUng me that if1 do OOt pa'Y the U'ie.rd.ue amuunt by a certain date. the Note Holder may require me to pay immeuiately the full amount ofprirn:ipal which has nut been paid and all die interes' lhat I owe on that amuunt. That date must be at 1~1 30 days after the date on which the notice is delivered or mailed to me. (0) No Waiver By Note Holder Evt:n if. at a time when I am ill default. the Note Hohler does not require me to pay immediately ill full as described above. thc Note Hol(jer witl still have the right to do so if I am in defdult at a later time. (E) Payment of Note Holder?s Costs and Expenses If the Note: Holder bas required rot: to pay inunediately in full as described above. [he Note Holder will have the right 10 be paid back by me for an of it::; costs and expenses in enforcing this Note: to the extent not prohibited by applicable law. Those expenses include. fot' example. reasonable attorneys' fees. MUlTlPURPOSE FIXED RATE NOTE lMUlTlSTATEl SM>h..5....'....... In_.. S.. Cloud, "'It fo.", (IT.MPFR.MNRE Sf~m.. uno] >JLL (~1~/2' ~ - ~-, ''''' . ",. ~"'- ~. . .;.. , 7. GIVING OF NOTICES Unless applicable law requires a diffi:fl:nt mcchod. allY nouce that muo;t be gi'Yen to me uJK.lcr (his Note will be givtn by delivering it or by mailing it by:fi~t class nwl to me ac lhe Property Address above or at a differem address if I give the Note Holder a notice ormy diffc,rent:address. Any notice tl1a1 must be givep to' the Noce Holdet under this Note will be giveD by mailing it by first class mail to the Note Holder at the atJdrcss Sl3tcd in Section 3(B) on page I of this Noe: or at a differeut ac.ldrcss: if I am I:ivcn a notio: of that different address. 8. OBLIGATIONS OF PERSONS lJNDER THIS NOTE If more than one person sjg~ this Note. lZh ~rslln is ful1)' and persuna.l.ly llbli.gated to kt:ct'I illt of the promises made in Ibis Note, includiug the promise to pay the full amQunt owed. Any pctSon who is a guarantor, SUt':lY or endurser of till..; N()(e i~ also obligated to du thesC:'lbings. Any person woo takes OVCf these ubligaduflS, im:1ulJiull the ubIigario~of' a guarantor. surety or endQrser lIf this: Note, is also obligated to keep all oC the promises made in this Nou::. The Nole Holder may enfuCtc itS tights unc.lcr this NOte against e:w:h person.. individually or against. an of us 'uge\her. Tbis means thal anyone of us may b: Tequi.reQ (u pay:a.lL or lhc amoums uwed under chis Nate. 9. WA.lVERS I and any other person wtw has ubligations. under lhis Note waive the ripts of pmcunnent and l't(Xice of dishuuor. -PfeiCntmenl- means the rigllt to p;!qui~ the Note Hulder tQ demand payment of amounts due. -Notice uf disbonor- nleard the rigbt tG ~{e the Nmc Holder tu givo: notice to othet pemDS that an10UlUS due have not bet:n paid. 10. SECURED NOTE In addition to the pmtccticns given to the Nute Hulder under this Note, a Mongage, Deed of Trust Of Sa=urity Deed (the -Security Instrun~nt"}. datal the same date as this Note. prot.~ the Note Holder from possible lo:s5l:S which might result if 1 do oot keep the prw:nises which I make in this Note. That Security Instrument desl.;ribes 110W and under what conditions I may be required to make immediate payment in full of all amouJUS 1 owe under this Note. Some of those conditions arc described 'as fullows: Transfer of the Property or a Bedef1.dallntenst in Borrower, If allur any part uf the Property or any interest in it is sold 01' transfcmd (or if a beneficial interest in Bonower is said or transferred and Borrower is not a natur"l petSOn) without l.cndet's prior wriuen ~. Lender may, at ilS uption, require immetliate payment in Mlllf aU sums secured by this Se~..urity IttStrumtDt. However. this option shall not be aerci.scd by L.ender if cx.crcise is prohibited by fedcrallaw as of the date of this Security Insaument. If 1..cndcr QCrclSCS thi:s option. Lender shall give Bol'l'OWCr notice of acceleration. 111C notice shall provide a period of not less than, 30 days from 1he dale the notice is deliver=.!. or mailed witbin whh,;h Borrower must pay all sums 5a,.'Urcd by this Security lnmument. Jf Bonuwer fails to pay these sums prior to (be cxpiration of this period. Lender may invoke any reDleWCli permitted by Ihis Security lnsuument without funher nolice or dentaPd on Borrower. 11. BALLOON PAYMENT DISCLOSURE lComplecc the ballooll payment noul.:e below if Ibis Nore: provides for a balloon payment at Section 3(A) on pace 1 ofdlisNote.] THIS LOAN IS PAYABLE IN FULL ."....................................,.....................,.........,.................... .....,......,..,..........,.....................,....,....,....,..,..,.....,........,...,..,...,........,.."...,....... I MUST REPAY THE ENTIRE PRINCIPAL BALANCIl OF TIlE LOAN AND UNPAID INTEREST THIlN Dm:, WHICH MAYBE A LARGE PAYMENT, THE LENDER [S UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO REFINANCE THE LOAN AT THAT TIME. I W[LL, THEREFORE, BE REQUIRED TO MAKE PAYMENT OUT OF OTHER ASSETS THAT I MAY OWN,.OR[ WILL HAVE TO FIND A LENDER. WHICH MAY BE TIlE LENDER I HAVE THIS LOAN WITH. WILLING TO LEND ME THE MONEY; IF I REFINANCE THIS LOAN AT MATUR[TY, I MAY HAVE TO PAY SOME OR ALL OF TIlE CLOSING COSTS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH A NEW LOAN EVEN IF I OBTAIN REFINANCING FROM TIlE SAME LENDER, WITNESS THE HAND(S) AND SEAL(S) OF THE NDERSIGNED. / /J' ~ c:;._~ .. .m..............'..?!~....h............,...................'m..(ScaI) even A Pailor .~ ..... ......., ........... .......... .'...m.....'... .................... m' .... .... ....(SeaI) Cynthia L Failor .&"'tll_ ......~~~.\..~.~.:.h.'.................~ {Sign Original Only/ !lftoI<~SY1OI.......~S1.Clo<xI,MNI'1o,...aT.MI"f'l\o"..NR!'Sl2ltJtlt trup2a121 \ _~tlJ' "'''Jil.Ii~lliWliiWM~_~tii1U~lf.its'lI~'&iil!\ld<i~i.1i'',"i>M',ll~.i.'\.,;4WH,;i:.g~iI.liili.,1 ~,"',~" ~'-w'_~~ ,. ~1Ii o c <'''' ~g~ Z:::!2 (I) ),. -<-" -"- ~C) Pr-. Z C"" :l>'C' Z =< . I, f'" I I t " Ii I i I I I c r,"\ :::;'1 z c::> -< -'0:! ~,~j8 ~/~' 51 ::tl -<: u' -0 :r c- <.n H ~" _ ~ '" ."".',,"_~,".'h~' ~, '~."__''''~^'''',,~".~,e,_d'''_'_> ,', ,_~ , 'd,__''',';,_,'_" __,_' -,'.,_ 'c ,'po ", '''d~.f' ",' ,_'t,~"O(-, '-7h... '''_'~~_'~"''t" ~_ ,- ,--"co, ..,'!,~~.1_e._ )...w~--> ". ,h,'O,~,.". ^.' """,__~",~~""""..""_~",,,,,_ '__0 .:,-.~_~=,' ..: ,:Q.";~, !JJJ",.,..<.. SAlOIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY ATIORNEYS'AT'LAW 26 W. High Street Carlisle, P A .'U"'I ,. CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/k1a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - 3825 CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants. PRAECIPE TO LIST CASE FOR ARGUMENT TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. 1. Matter to be argued: Defendants' Preliminary Objections. 2. Identification of counsel who will argue case: (a) for Plaintiff: James D. Flower, Jr. SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY 26 W. High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (b) for Defendants: Mark D. Schwartz IRWIN MCNIGHT & HUGHES West Pomfret Professional Building 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, PA 17013 3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. 4. Argument Court date: December 12,2001 SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for the Plaintiff Date: j/- /6 ~ 0/ James D. Flo I.D. #27742 26 West High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-6222 II Ii ~-~_~";.,,L","i>>~~.~~Wi;!~fJk~'&~!';""J'~;l;.-!i,~"i,,",''''_iilili~~.li'-'- ",' jL ",.>--"<-..~t"'-"L -", _~--Lli '-, ., ~~'- "..,. ._,~~. __, "~'_O -,~",'7"""_MA~_ ~__ _~__~,_>t"__"'~o""_"""""__~~,,,"_,,,,,__,;;,~',t--" -,.!-',_,<~__,"~, "_~,,,""~_ ,,__,,_,~;V - ""-'.,_ o c: ".. -om mrn z:r zc (f)"C;; !2i:.'; ~8 J>c ~ c..' ,,'; ~; : !I I! [I r,'i II I I" II II , .,.. is <: .~ -- 'T~ , , . ~.; G', .'-, 1 -'~~; (~} 9rJ 6rn --' ?Ii -< ....., :1'::: s::- --.l , ~"",_,._"",,_~-,,"j, i""_.1'__..~. <" ,,~__ ;_.~""."'''-, , . -~ . q-, "". ~" Si\IDIS SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY AtTORNEYS-AT-LAW 26 W. High Street Carlisle, PA .:'L-, CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2001 - 3825 CIVIL TERM vs. STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L FAILOR, Defendants. PRAECIPE TO LIST CASE FOR ARGUMENT TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. 1. Matter to be argued: Defendants' Preliminary Objections. 2. Identification of counsel who will argue case: (a) for Plaintiff: James D. Flower, Jr. SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY 26 W. High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (b) for Defendants: Mark D. Schwartz IRWIN MCNIGHT & HUGHES West Pomfret Professional Building 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, PA 17013 3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. 4. Argument Court date: January 2, 2002 SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for the Plaintiff II Date: 1'--fJ.-O( By II '~'>'''''''7,d;i"Ii~~_~f0r~ti~':l;iWl'''-('i!,;h\W'M,@,;..,,,,;,;aV'~';';N'';'.r.,,-~~,i;G;~~.;;,j~~I~"" "- ~~ 'rr- - c::> c:.'J ,.<\ C'j f i ~1 ~: i ~' : j! [ ~ ! \" Iii U I.i i 1: " " !. I! ~c:;!, --0 ~.;... o C :?:' 'l:JOS f11fl-, ~2i~' (J,~ ,-:; ~~:Z:. ......,.,_..... 'fi'Q "'--"L_ r/~ '3 N ? (::: '':') ~: <'0 ~ N_.'.^~ ~_~ ~~,_""P,~^ ''<','_ _,._?~o'"',~~,_"",.,.~". ,-, .v." .e_ "~,~,',~"~,_,., .,~_ _.,.".. _,_k_.,._,~,,,">,.!",l"~""'_"""~N"'_"'~ ",",",~__",_" " '.;e,i " "",','-"' ,I '~"J,-", -, ',!l CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/kla GREEN : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF V. STEVEN A FAILOR AND CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, DEFENDANTS : 01-3825 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BEFORE BAYLEY. J. AND GUIDO. J. ORDER OF COURT ~ ~ day of January, 2002, the preliminary AND NOW, this objections of defendants to plaintiff's complaint, ARE DISMISSED. Forrest N. Troutman, II, Esquire For Plaintiff Mark D. Schwartz, Esquire For Defendants :saa By th G-, ~ < ~ I. O~,b.2.> Cf-, F "'0' :,,~_~." "~__ ~.<'" ~~=~,~,. - II I II II I' ,I I ~ I" 11i'IIfiil[1 . '~ ,~,";:.:.>...' ".",,,. "",'-, "" ,," <,~_, >;'""",~," ;C".b1""';" ';~''''_ ,_ ,;& '<"U~' ',,',.;f .~~ ,,,",,,' "w-'",cl"'"'-'~' ',",~,.", "'N'""h ~' .,"'_''''~,''1''';' ,"-w '''-'0'''' ."~"" ~~'''' ,. . ,-~ ~.~~. " -~~";;'i<"'~'---""""":Zl' r:1 C" D,t.- ~., ,_:LLI)...n;,:c/r,_ " ,--,", , L 0' I. 'C;!Ci\70T,4FiY '_ ~:f,,~'1 ~ I',,~ ....,' a',F I il I: ':IR " .. Ci ILl'" vJv i::/~;:;: ',' PE:YV~lM? ,c9UN1Y L.~N!,t1 -jj ~~... ,.-.~ . : " ~~~iIf!Iffl~~~"f'l!l,~~~@\""fR<:.11'~\''''';>T;jf,'-~'i''',;,i,'w'';;vr,,,,'m~~','lfP,,;:~~.,!.OO~mh~Jij11!fI."!f;f!'~_'''~~~ ~. "__d,__, -, ,." 1,-,-",', ',,,', ____~",.--__"I'__~'".,~"'>, -- 0' - ''''';;;-)t . APR 2 9 2003 ~/ CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, J1k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA v. : No. 2001-03825 CIVIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR AND CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants AND NOW, this RULE TO SHOW CAUSE Iy- day of ~ , 2003, a Rule is issued upon the Respondents/Defendants to show cause why Express Financial Services, Inc. should not be substituted as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action. ~/~'" i' , This Rule is returnable within 20 days of service. ~~W S~ ~..~I~ .thJcM~ ~~ QN1I.)~ <A4 ~ BY THE gOOR : ?,~;:/ /~/~/ //( ( '~ J. I t6?"OD~ 1'\ R'KS Os:O~-~ ><- " y ,. '"~" " . , ,'" ,'> "I""C" r. -.l ,'. -,,', _0-' .1- _"",) ~..' I '- r.' '." ...,r'. ,r" .".""')'( ii, I ".', \~:,.,,_i~',()u\r'/ tiri.~i H'. \ , \: \B C\J~j:\3b1\}j"U COUNT\' f'ENNS'(l\fl'N!\ . ,.- e', .~. .... _,M',,,""-" , 1~1ll'_~1'l1,,",", ! . {.~I, .~, ,'f'~,f...~" ,."" ,...," "',<,1"",-" - ,. ~',' ---"'0;'- ,. .,.,~.- ,~,..,'= " "---, ,,,,.,-., '\<- ~..;- "~..,." .,- "., j~. ~ CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, flkJa GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL V ANlA v. : No. 2001-03825 CIVIL TERM STEVEN A. F AlLOR AND CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants PROPOSED ORDER AND NOW, this _ day of , 2003, upon consideration of the Petition to Substitute Plaintiff, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Petition is granted and Express Financial Services, Inc. is substituted as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action. BY THE COURT: J. - ~.~ "=. -, , - , " -,'.,.1:",,,,-,,;..,,,,,,, '--. ,-' -~- - d.i_ :~I_ I CONSECOFINANCECONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f7k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL V ANlA v. : No. 2001-03825 CIVIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR AND CYNTIDA L. FAILOR, Defendants PETITION TO SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF NOW COMES Plaintif:fJPetitioner Conseco Finance Consumer Discount Company ("Conseco"), by and through its counsel, Saidis, Shuff, Flower & Lindsay, to respectfully petition this Honorable Court to substitute Express Financial Services, Inc. ("Express") as the plaintiffin the above-captioned action, and in support thereof, avers as follows: 1. On or aboutJune 21,200 I, Conseco filed a Complaint in the above-captioned matter, alleging that the Defendants defaulted on a Note dated November 27, 1998 between Green Tree Consumer Discount Company and the Defendants in the amount of $200,000,00. 2. On or about November 25,2002, Conseco assigned the Note dated November 27, 1998 between Green Tree Consumer Discount Company and the Defendants in the amount of $200,000.00 to Express. A true and correct copy of the Assignment of Bond and Mortgage is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 3. Conseco has transferred all of its interest in the Note to Express. 4. Accordingly, Express should be substituted as plaintiffin the above-captioned action due to the assignment of the aforementioned Note. 5. Express concurs with the Petition to Substitute Plaintiff. .~ _' ".', ~n" ~I -':L>,.'.n, __ ''''i. . 6. Counsel for Express sought concurrence from Defendants' counsel in filing the Petition to Substitute Plaintiff, but he failed to respond. 7. The Honorable Edgar B. Bayley has previously ruled upon Preliminary Objections of Defendants to Plaintiff's Complaint. WHEREFORE, Plaintif:fIPetitioner Conseco Finance Consumer Discount Company respectfully requests that this Honorable Court substitute Express Financial Services, Inc. as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action. Respectfully Submitted SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Dated: B~'~~ J es D. rower, Jr. #2 42 est High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-6222 Attorneys for the Plaintiff :153737 2 ~,..~ .~, '>' .' <. 'I," ,..,.~~ " ,.~;,t . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this~ ~y of ~ 2003, I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Petition to Substitute Plaintiff was served upon all parties of record via United States mail, first-class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Douglas G. Miller, Esquire IRWIN, MCKJ.'lIGHT & HUGHES 60 West Pomtret Professional Building Carlisle, P A 17013 Melissa A. Swauger, Esquire SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.e. P.O. Box 88 Harrisburg, PA 17108 SAlDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Dated: . Flower, Jr, #27742 2 West High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-6222 Attorneys for the Plaintiff - ;}'~'''; '"~"'"--;';ldIl!lIail' IIiIlIlicr"-'~'""''''''"'-''''''HIf.i!jilJiL._~liIllt~~,~iMli~iI1~!!ir iiWl '~IJ.WJ)l!I !cLuj. II ;!JIlIH.J u; ,I,'"J"~,.JJ;,IfJJh,;.IUJ II 1!J~iiL,,,,.,,,,~. . (j c') 0 c: OJ -'1 "'-- no -oi.:[~; -U -~i rnr'l': ~o '-:1 Z:x: '0- Ze '" ,~hJ (I) " 0:> =;Oy f2:~; -V ~3~ )> ~'l :1= ,L:ij Zl._- 1,:;20 :;>0 5 r-'-rn c ,.) :2:: :~ :;2 (,.) ::0 ,< ~,- ,,,,--,'" " ~ ,.- ~ " ~ ^~ ~,= "-,~---~,~_. - -=~,"'"",;-, --><-~-,-~,,-<"-,^,^" .".--- ., -"'....'0) CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f/kla GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : No. 2001-03825 CNIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR AND CYNTHlAL FAILOR, Defendants PROPOSED ORDER AND NOW, this teL day of ~03, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs Petition to Make Rule Absolute, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Petition is granted and Express Financial Services, Inc. is substituted as the plaintiff in the above-c BY THE/cru:;T: /: action. 1. ~ C f\~90? 0\/ \O~ .,<<1_,."" "~ ,~, . ., ",- ~',~.;'" ~, .:l' )-. c~~ c<: 1::'~ cr; :-::1 S w :: ) () z H: , , ;s-( '-J,~. ~, ~ () ,~.=-- , (~ if) C) i-~ Z ,.1 u_ Z -i !-t_ ._r" 'il uJ n. Cl.. ~ ~r-:: u- C0 :=l 0 c::,') C) ~.:41~~*i~.J, 1IJ"",_",><,\,_~" ~~l *,-, '.i>"'~'iiflilJi!~~" "'! __~ . _~=","'~_.~".,o,"". '~"'",.~._o""""'" - "~~- -~ '_ ~._ _~,~_,._",,,, ,,,_ "'<""__0"-' '.' ."0 ,.... '"" _,,, v_~__ -.._~, '__O,s..__ _"'.'= ,- ...~,,_ ~,~." ^ "^-^,~- ~ ...,~-~,^-- -,'----~__""-, '"- ,,",- ".--;....._,,,'~"">;:J<m__"-'_'_'i_,'''e-._^ _<,',,__>:.',;,-,_ , " CONSECOFmANCECONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, flk/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff : m THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLV AN1A v. : No. 2001-03825 CNIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR AND CYNTHIAL. FAILOR, Defendants PETITION TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE NOW COMES Plaintiff/Petitioner Conseco Finance Consumer Disconnt Company ("Conseco"), by and through its counsel, Saidis, Shuff, Flower & Lindsay, to respectfully petition this Honorable Court to make absolute the previous Rule to Show Cause why Express Financial Services, Inc. ("Express") should not be substituted as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action, and in support thereof, avers as follows: I. On or aboutJune 21,2001, Conseco filed a Complaint in the above-captioned matter, alleging that the Defendants defaulted on a Note dated November 27, 1998 between Green Tree Consumer Discount Company and the Defendants in the amount of $200,000.00. 2. On or about November 25,2002, Conseco assigned the Note dated November 27, 1998 between Green Tree Consumer Discount Company and the Defendants in the amount of $200,000.00 to Express. A true and correct copy of the Assignment of Bond and Mortgage is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 3. Conseco has transferred all of its interest in the Note to Express. 4. Accordingly, Express should be substituted as plaintiff in the above-captioned action due to the assignment of the aforementioned Note. ~, . ~= . "'C ~,. ". ~~~"~'''--'',~_- ..''''_. ~ ''''j 5. On April 28, 2003, ConsecofiledaPetition to Substitute Plaintiff, requesting that this Honorable Court substitute Express as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action. 6. Express concurred with the Petition to Substitute Plaintiff. 7. A Rule was signed on May 1,2003, directing Defendants to show cause why Express should not be substituted as plaintiff in the above-captioned action. A copy of this Rule is attached hereto as Exhibit" 1." 8. The Rule was returnable 20 days after service. 9. The Rule was served upon Defendants. 1 o. The Defendants failed to respond to the Rule; therefore, Conseco requests that the Rule be made absolute and Express be substituted as plaintiff in the above-captioned action. 11. The Honorable Edward E. Giudo executed the Rule on May 1, 2003 and the Honorable Edgar B. Bayley previously ruled upon Preliminary Objections of Defendants to Plaintiffs Complaint. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff /Petitioner Conseco Finance Consumer Discount Company respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter the Proposed Order directing that Express Financial Services, Inc. be substituted as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action. Respectfully Submitted SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Dated: ~ ( 4 { 03 By (J i 26 est High Street C lisle, PA 17013 17) 243-6222 Attorneys for the Plaintiff : 155772 2 ,-.~~" _,_,I"~ -"I..,j....~,~ t 1ilIt~'""-~',,~,l~;i . . J"" /,P" APR 2 g'Z003 ~ CONSECO FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, f7k/a GREEN TREE CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : No. 2001-03825 CNIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR AND CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants AND NOW, this RULE TO SHOW CAUSE Jst day of , 2003, a Rule is issued upon the Respondents/Defendants to show cause why Exp ss Financial Services, Inc. should not be substituted as the plaintiff in the above-captioned action. This Rule is returnable within 20 days of service. [;/~ ~..L).f)f k-W ht~ BY THE COURT to )$/ f'Jll~ f.. <d4~JJA- J. ~. ~.,. b~'~"'='_' ___"~,,,OOC>~' ,",,-~.'''~'w.'- ,,",,,-"'-.' ~,<'.A. "'''[ '. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this !L- day of J;..bt<L-. 2003, I hereby certifY that a copy of the foregoing Petition to Make Rule Absolute was served upon all parties of record via United States mail, fIrst-class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Douglas G. Miller, Esquire IRWIN, MCKNIGHT & HUGHES 60 West Pomfret Professional Building Carlisle, PA 17013 MelissaA. Swauger, Esquire SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.e. P.O. Box 88 Harrisburg, PA 17108 SAIDIS, SHUFF, FLOWER & LINDSAY Dated: B / y/ :" J 26 est High Street lisle, P A 17013 (717) 243-6222 Attorneys for the Plaintiff ~~~>~"'~.; '" ;,Jj" "J". "-~, .,",""",,,~"',~, ^_ w ",-,-~", '-, ~~",i<ii!Mi~~l\1,iji;,1:.ikt' - ~'" ~"'~"iiIi;;' , ' IiW '-,,,-~~~,~, "" ~,,'~, ",~-^' ~~"<-" ~,,~ ,.' ~~ . .' (") c ~Ef 2::c' Co '. rs~:; :<.l.., )>- 2::' S3:l~: 2.: -l -< .','"<,,_ ~____ ,~A, <N. .~" '~m'~ _ ,__. ~ " ^~,' -".,~ C) '"'., o ~'11 '= I U') , .,:! ~-":~ ;:::{:' ~'..:.:; ;::); - -;.. :~~ .~J 5;~ ::n -< -,..., 'V <" . c ~ .._~ EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Substituted Plaintiff, : v. NO. 01 - 3825 CIVIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendants. NOTICE TO PLEAD You are hereby notifIed to file a written response to the enclosed Ans wer w ith Ne w Matter within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you. IRWIN, McKNIGHT & HUGHES Douglas . . er, Es uire Supreme ourt LD. No. 83776 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 (717) 249-2353 Attorney for Defendants Date: June 23, 2003 ,-, ~,~ ~ ".,<~ EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Substituted Plaintiff, : v. NO. 01 - 3825 CIVIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendants. ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW this 23rd day of June, 2003, come the Defendants, STEVEN A. FAILOR and CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, by and through their attomeys, Irwin, McKnight & Hughes, and respectfully fIle this Answer with New Matter to the Plaintiffs Complaint, and in support thereof aver as follows: 1. The averments offact contained in paragraph one (1) of the Plaintiff's Complaint are specifIcally denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at trial. 2. The averments offact contained in paragraph two (2) are specifIcally denied. 3. The averments contained in paragraph three (3) are admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that Defendants signed a Note dated November 27, 1998. The terms of the Note speak for themselves, to the extent that the averments made in paragraph three (3) differ from those terms, or to the extent that they conflict with the New Matter defenses raised by Defendants, they are specifIcally denied. 4. The averments contained in paragraph four (4) are conclusions oflaw to which no response is required. To the extent that a response is required, the averments are specifIcally denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at trial. 5. The averments contained in paragraph fIve (5) are conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent that a response is required, the averments are specifIcally denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at trial. WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to enter judgment in their favor and against Plaintiff in this matter, together with reasonable costs and attorney fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just. NEW MATTER 6. The averments of fact contained in the Answers to the Complaint are hereby incorporated by reference and are made part of this New Matter to the Complaint of the Plaintiff. 7. At and around the time that the Note was signed, Defendants were in the process of attempting to subdivide parts of their property located at 525 Mount Rock Road. 8. As part of the loan transaction with Green Tree Consumer Discount Company ("Green Tree"), Defendants had various conversation with Green Tree's representatives concerning their desire to refmance the existing mortgage but have the new mortgage secure only the portion of the property they were going to retain. 2 -, ~-, ~, ~.. =~,~ ,"-""--- ~--lj 9. A mortgage secured against the entire real estate would have made Defendants' plans for subdivision impossible. 10. As with any loan transaction, Defendants were asked to sign numerous documents all prepared by Plaintiff or its predecessors in interest. 11. At the direction of Green Tree's agents, Defendants signed all necessary paperwork prepared by it in order to complete the transaction. 12. Defendants had expressed their concerns regarding the high interest rate, desire to subdivide the real estate, and certain other terms of the Loan Agreement to the agents or representatives of Green Tree. 13. Green Tree, by and through its agents or representatives, agreed that the fmancing would only be a stop gap measure to complete the refmance and that the loan would be reworked shortly after closing to resolve the discrepancies. 14. Plaintiff, or its predecessors in interest, was aware that Defendants were unable to make the monthly payments under the terms of the loan transaction. 15. Despite its prior promises to do so, however, the agents and representatives of Green Tree did not make any effort to work with Defendants to revise the terms of the loan. 3 cii "i II I 'I 16. In fact, the agents or representatives for Plaintiff or its predecessors in interest attached an incorrect legal description to the Mortgage document, and thereby attempted to secure real estate not owned by Defendants at the time. 17. The representations and promises by the agents for Green Tree were false and fraudulent, however, Defendants did not know them to be false. 18. By these false and fraudulent representations, Plaintiff or its predecessors in interest induced Defendants to enter into the loan transaction and Defendants justifIably relied upon the misrepresentations in doing so. 19. Because Plaintiff or its predecessors in interest so engaged in false or fraudulent misrepresentation with regard to the loan transaction, Plaintiff is precluded from seeking damages under the Note, or, in the alternative, Plaintiff's damages must be diminished accordingly. 20. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state claims or causes of action upon which relief can be granted. 21. Plaintiff's Complaint may barred by the defense oflaches. 22. All or some of Plaintiff's claimed damages are attributable to persons and/or causes other than Defendants. 23. Plaintiff's claims may be barred and/or limited by the failure to mitigate or to properly mitigate damages 4 ~ '~o~""'~, \,_ i i i WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to enter judgment in their favor and against Plaintiff in this matter, together with reasonable costs and attorney fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just. Respectfully Submitted, IRWIN, McKNIGHT & HU9HES By: Douglas Supreme ourt ill # 83776 West Pomfret Professional Building 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 (717) 249-2353 Attorney for Defendants Dated: June 23, 2003 5 ,k) " "", ,"--.,~ -~-'"'-',w~"".'""",,,,"'"""-"'_,"~.'~ -~-<' "-:1;1 ~ 1 , I I I I :i I 1,1 , , I I I , i I I I I I I ,I , 'I , I 1 I I I I ! i II 1 , ,\ I I I I :'1 I I ! 'I i I I VERIFICATION The foregoing document is based upon information which has been gathered by our counsel and ourselves in the preparation of this action. We have read the statements made in this document and they are true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief. We understand that false statements herein made are subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifIcation to authorities. s C';J@~~' eYN FAILOR - Date: L.o - ?).?:;;- ,2003 ~: ~~-- -'......&"""~'f-1,_.'<, ""~'~1lli~~""'";'" _oM< " !Zr,"', '., ,~>;~~~_J~t~J,O~.;'J!lt;jl;::\I.PJ.U~,JJ.tl,:t-~", ~'~";<~"-1",,(:,UJ'4tJL'_"'C~.r.J.U<,.t)::JI,,JL ',,, 0> ",,,,'-.""" ,7" 'Y'.",', . ,~..--, -- ,. ,~~,,,,, ~ ".OC r,.' ~, ~ (.:J ~ (~,). s.. "-- --i "0]7' c= a~,;:~ ~ (1 :.z ~1 35~ '" ~f{E9 -<;::.-- v.t ()rS ,<0 ~1 ~(!~ ~'~ ::->>: ,l J ';:~~ ) 0 "'~"m JO'c: :;- 2' z ,"-"' ~ =2 f" ~ , .. ~,x . _ ,'.' ",,,. ~'" (<-,~ ,__,~.. ',.,/o.y/",.1,C>""-~_ _' .,"",~, ,",'_, """'~::, ,- EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICE, INC., : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Substituted Plaintiff v. : No. 2001-03825 CIVIL TERM STEVEN A. FAILOR AND CYNTHIA L. FAILOR, Defendants REPLY OF EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICES. INC. TO ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW COMES the substituted Plaintiff, Express Financial Services, Inc. ("Express"), by and through its counsel, Shumaker Williams, P.C., to state the following Reply to New Matter of Defendants Steven A. and Cynthia L. Failor: 7. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 7 of the Defendants' New Matter. 8. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 8 of the Defendants' New Matter. 9. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 9 of the Defendants' New Matter. 10. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 10 of the Defendants' New Matter. r 11. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 11 of the Defendants' New Matter. 12. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 12 of the Defendants' New Matter. 13. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 13 of the Defendants' New Matter. 14. Denied. Afterreasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 14 ofthe Defendants' New Matter. 15. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth ofthe averment set forth in paragraph 15 ofthe Defendants' New Matter. 16. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge suffIcientto form a belief as to the truth of the averment set forth in paragraph 16 of the Defendants' New Matter. 17. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 17 constitute conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive pleading is required, after reasonable investigation, Express is without information or knowledge 2 ~ ~--- ~ '^ 0" __ . __ __,__V' .~, -'~rl~," ", ~'^ . "-,,,,, _.',',=. '" ."~_ ,_, ....-'^..,,""",'l''''-~'''''"><--\''''d,"' '" ^ , ~i, :t: Ii. r suffIcient to form a belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 17 of the I. I' , I 1 I: j,' Defen.dants' New Matter. j~' , 18. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 18 constitute n ,I; ji.-: conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive I!' I'" 1(' " 1(:: Ii, Ii' i~': pleading is required, said averments are specifIcally denied. 19. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 19 constitute , r,\ l': conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive I' i[" r: pleading is required, said averments are specifIcally denied. 20. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 20 constitute I I',: conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive i" pleading is required, said averments are specifIcally denied. 21. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 21 constitute conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive pleading is required, said averments are specifIcally denied. 22. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 22 constitute conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive pleading is required, said averments are specifIcally denied. 23. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. The averments contained in paragraph 23 constitute conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required. In the event that such a responsive pleading is required, said averments are specifIcally denied. 3 -," -'~ ",-,',.. ,'","". "~',. ; - ,1,' .l""''''~ '. ,." > - c WHEREFORE, Express Financial Services, Inc. respectfully requests that this Honorable i. Ii': I,: , i~ " Court enter judgment against Defendants in the amount of$23 7 ,902.17, together with interest at the !: i!'1 I.! rate of$74.54 and any other costs and expense incurred by Plaintiff in enforcing the Note, including ;i , ~ ; ','J reasonable additional attorneys fees. SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C. ;;! Dated: 1 \ \ ~ \ ~ 7:7 By Jl~C' ~. ~vJe,W~ Laurence W. Dague, J.D. #19715 Anthony J. Foschi, J.D. #55896 Melissa A. Swauger, I.D. #82382 P.O. Box 88 Harrisburg, P A 17108 (717)763-1121 ,:;1 i~,::! li,:i "'I L i;: I: j,' ':< Attorneys for Plaintiff :156947 -ti <" 4 - ";,',",~ 0"'-"'- ,,;- o -" - "." ",-'", ',,~' "' ,0 " ___~ '.-_ ' " "I' , >jj;;:;,~"~'i:.;;":,,:; 1 " 0"-""-"1 r VERIFICATION The undersigned, James J. Pokusa, hereby verifIes and states that: 1. He is counsel for Express Financial Services, Inc.; 2. He is authorized to make this VerifIcation on its behalf; 3. The facts set forth in the foregoing Reply of Express Financial Services, Inc. to Answer with New Matter to Plaintiff's Complaint are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief; and 4. He is aware that any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. 94904, relating to unsworn falsifIcation to authorities. Dated: 7//tI/J3 James ,. <" ,"""'~"" ~,,~", "~', r',,< '0,' ~"''',- -~'" l.,.^ ,.,,'^, ~ ' c ,'. " CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Melissa A. Swauger, Esquire, of the law fIrm of Shumaker Williams, P.C., hereby certifY that I served a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Reply of Express Financial Services, Inc. to Answer with New Matter to Plaintiff's Complaint in the possession of the United States mail, fIrst- class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Dated: 1 ((V;IO ?1 Douglas G. Miller, Esquire IRWIN, MCKNIGHT & HUGHES 60 West Pomfret Professional Building Carlisle,PA 17013 SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C. By Jh~~ q. SVJ(JJJrtfL Melissa A. Swauger, Esquire P.O. Box 88 Harrisburg, P A 17108 (717)763-1121 , ,~ , .,,-,,< I' I: ii I , I i..( I I i h . i: , *~''''''''h-'~'' i<_" 'i' "-';-~~ ~ii~~lIimd-"'''' "^ ~:i:,!,~,~~""~!~~,;l"~U~I~I,,,,1U,:[tLl,,,,~ ,_oj,.','1f-;r~,J ~ ~ ,'." J"'_';~kJ,c<,\l!.*,Jl". '''"-='"~~ N"" -".0;' ~. "_M" ,,"'""'X' ,",,>.",'. ,~- ~ - ..-~ "'-.'", .~~~ C) C s:: .....,.~ '-, d'l;'; -:;;;-... ~t~~ ' -<" i~r~ Z>-, >C~ 2:' -~ --( ~ "0" " ":'j "' >:::: ----; , :~}91~ ,,::.c::: ;:f:1'v =r '> :'q~ - -,_ii;) I~~ ~-:; rn ~~ ,).-.,. ~ =< o :.v 01 1!1