Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-05062MARIE COOK and IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF RUSSEL COOK :CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. CINDY L. QUEEN N0.2001-5062 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 11TH day of SEPTEMBER, 2001, it appears to the court that the stipulation contains insufficient information regarding the identity or whereabouts of the natural father. Consequently, the parties are directed to join the natural father or to show cause why he should not be joined pursuant to Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1915.6. By the , Edward E. Guido, J. Marie Cook Russel Cook 213 Alters Road Carlisle, Pa. 17013 Cindy Queen (~~n,'A 144 Lake Street - G-A- /~wO'-~- 9-//-0 Laconia, N.H. 03246 Stephanie E. Chertok, Esquire 61 West Louther Street Carlisle, Pa. 17013 :sld f , ~_ MARIE AND RUSSEL COOK, PLAINTIFFS v. CINDY L. QUEEN, DEFENDANT AND NOW, this s~~ ~ ~ zaa~ b~ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA CIVIL TERM IN CUSTODY O P ` 5O1n ~ ORDER OF COURT day of 2001, Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook and Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, having stipulated and agreed with regard to custody of the child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, d.o.b. 6/30/90, it is hereby ordered and decreed as follows: Shared legal custody of the child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, shall be in both of the parties. 2. Primary physical custody of said child shall be in the Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook. 3. Defendant/mother, Cindy L. Queen, shall have such reasonable periods of temporary partial custody/visitation as the parties may from time to time agree. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the child's desire with regard to the extent and timing of any such periods of partial custody/visitation shall be honored. At the present time, the periods of partial custody for Defendant/mother shall include two months during the child's summer vacation from school; one week during the child's Christmas vacation from school, if time allows; and such additional periods of time during the child's other vacations from school, as the parties may agree. 4. Plaintiffs agree not to seek child support at any time from Defendant/mother. In exchange, mother surrenders her right to take the federal dependent's exemption and any child credit for the child. Mother agrees to execute any IRS forms that may be required to accomplish this provision. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to authorize reasonable and necessary medical treatment for the child during their periods of physical custody of her, and they shall be permitted to place her on their health insurance coverage to the degree permitted by the insurance carrier. J 6. Defendant/mother agrees to execute any and all forms required to enable Plaintiffs to secure insurance coverage for the child and to enroll the child in a local school district. 7. All expenses of travel will be born by Defendant for those round trips required to accomplish the periods of partial custody/visitation. 8. It is the intent of all parties that the child not be moved repeatedly as in prior years and this Agreement shall not be modified unless and until careful consideration has been given to the desires of the child in that regard. BY THE COURT, J. ._~ : _-. MARIE COOK AND RUSSEL COOK, PLAINTIFFS v. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA CIVIL TERM CINDY L. QUEEN, IN CUSTODY ~ / .- J~o ~ DEFENDANT STIPULAT N AND NOW this C~ day of , 2001 come Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook, of Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, of Pompano Beach, Florida, and with regard to custody of the Defendant's child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, date of birth 6/30/90, stipulate and agree as follows: Custody of said child shall be as set forth in the foregoing Order of Court, namely, primary physical custody in Plaintiffs, who in effect are foster grandparents of the child, and reasonable partial custodylvisitation in Defendant/mother. 2. It is the desire and intention of the parties hereto that this Stipulation for Child Custody be entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and that it be endorsed as an Order of the Court so as to have the full effect thereof. 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction should either party seek modification of the Order in the future. I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. DATE: ~~~ ' / WITNESS: ~ ' ~~ ~~2Q~,~. Q ~lo~-~ Marie Cook, Plaintiff a n' + i I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. DATE:_1~~ ~ WITNESS: W •~5---~° 4--~~ ~ Russel Cook ,Plaintiff I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation are true and con•ect. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unsworn f~aJlsification to authorities. DATE: `~~/ mot/ WITNESS7/~~ ~ ~ ~' 9 ~! ._~_ Q ,~ ^~ rt~ `_ C~ _ V I ~~ ~_• -~ ~ ~j R i~ ' ~ IV_> f S ~_ ~, .~ ~ ",. - ~~ ~ ~J _~-.~. ~ ,w~xi ~~-a~ - ... 4 MARIE AND RUSSEL COOK, PLAINTIFFS v. CINDY L. QUEEN, DEFENDANT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA N0.2001-5062 CIVIL TERM IN CUSTODY ~/ ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this ~ J ~ day of , 2003, Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook and Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, having stipulated and agreed with regard to custody of the child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, d.o.b. 6/30/90, it is hereby ordered and decreed as follows: Shared legal custody of the child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, shall be in both of the parties. 2. Primary physical custody of said child shall be in the Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook. 3. Defendant/mother, Cindy L. Queen, shall have such reasonable periods of temporary partial custody/visitation as the parties may from time to time agree. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the child's desire with regard to the extent and timing of any such periods of partial custody/visitation shall be honored. At the present time, -the periods of partial custody for Defendant/mother shall include two months during the child's summer vacation from school; one week during the child's Christmas vacation from school, if time allows; and such additional periods of time during the child's other vacations from school, as the parties may agree. ~4. Plaintiffs agree not to seek child support at any time from Defendant/mother. In exchange, mother surrenders her right to take the federal dependent's exemption and any child credit for the child. Mother agrees to execute any IRS forms that may be required to accomplish this provision. ~. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to authorize reasonable and necessary medical treatment for the child during their periods of physical custody of her, and they shall be permitted to place her on their health insurance coverage to the degree permitted by the insurance carrier. 6. Defendant/mother agrees to execute any and all forms required to enable Plaintiffs to secure insurance coverage for the child and to enroll the child in a local school district. 7. All expenses of travel will be born by Defendant for those round trips required to accomplish the periods of partial custody/visitation. 8. It is the intent of all parties that the child not be moved repeatedly as in prior years and this Agreement shall not be modified unless and until careful consideration has been given to the desires of the child in that regazd. J. C~ ~;s O 1-14-03 ~~~`~~~,lzc~Jr'~J-~ ~~~ .~ ~c .4 .,., ~:.. vr~arE ,: r.,~r.~ ~ *. was~N3,t~'v~?s~~.~:s~u".a~~Ki , _ MARIE COOK and RUSSEL COOK Plaintiffs v. CINDY L. QUEEN Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA N0.2001-5062 CIVIL TERM RESPONSE TO ORDER OF COURT TO SHOW CAUSE RESPONSE TO ORDER OF COURT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE NATURAL FATHER SHOULD NOT BE JOINED IN THIS CUSTODY MATTER PURSUANT TO PA. RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1915.6 1. On August 21, 2001, the parties stipulated to a custody arrangement for the Defendant's natural child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, who was born June 30, 1990. See Exhibit A; Exhibit B. 2. KATILIN MARIE QUEEN has known and been shown love and care by the Plaintiffs, husband and wife, since her birth. 3. KATILIN MARIE QUEEN and the Defendant lived with the Plaintiffs for the first three years of KATILIN MARIE QUEEN's life, on-and-off for the next two years of her life, and since then the Plaintiffs have had many periods of custody of the child when the Defendant would leave KATILIN MARIE QUEEN in their caze. 4. The Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, who resides at 806 Mulberry Drive, Martinsburg, West Virginia, 25401, and the Plaintiffs, Mazie and Russel Cook, who reside at 213 Alters Road, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013, desire to have the Plaintiffs legally designated as the child's primary custodians. Exhibit A. 5. On September 7, 2001, the parties requested this Court to enter a Custody Order based upon the August 21 stipulation. See Exhibit C. 6. On September 11, 2001, this Court entered an Order directing the parties "to join the natural father or to show cause why he should not be joined pursuant to Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1915.6." See Exhibit D. 7. This Order was issued because the stipulation contained insufficient information regarding the identity or whereabouts of KATILIN MARIE QUEEN' S natural father. Exhibit D. 8. KATILIN MARIE QUEEN'S Certification of Birth shows that the Father's name was not recorded. See Exhibit B. 9. The Defendant in this matter, Cindy L. Queen, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN' S natural mother, now offers an affidavit to this Court to provide the identity and explain the whereabouts of her daughter's natural father. Queen Affidavit attached as Exhibit E. 10. The "natural father is MARK SPOTTS [sic]". Queen Aff. (emphasis in original). 11. Mark Spotz knew that he was the father of KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, however chose not to support, care for, or have contact with the child. Queen Aff. 12. Mark Spotz has evidenced a settled purpose of avoiding involvement in his Daughter's life. 13. Additionally, Mark Spotz has been convicted of multiple homicides in this Commonwealth resulting in three death sentences. Queen Aff.; Commonwealth v. SpOYZ, 759 A.2d 1280 (Pa. 2000)(affirming the jury's verdict of guilty of first degree murder and sentence of death for the killing of Betty Amstutz); Commonwealth v. Snotz, 756 A.2d 1139 (Pa. 2000)(affinning the jury's verdict of guilty of first degree murder and sentence of death for the killing of Penny Gunnet); Commonwealth v. Snotz, 716 A.2d 580 (Pa. 1998)(affirming the jury's verdict of guilty of first degree murder and sentence of death for the killing of June Ohlinger). 14. Mark Spotz also committed fratricide. Commonwealth v. Spotz, 759 A.2d 1280, 1285 n.6 (Pa. 2000)(stating Mark Spotz was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for the slaying of his brother, Dustin Spotz) . 15. Mark Spotz has also been found guilty of two counts of kidnapping and various crimes of violence. Commonwealth v. Spotz, 756 A.2d 1139, 1146 (Pa. 2000)(listing the jury's convictions of first degree murder, kidnapping, robbery, theft, robbery of a motor vehicle, and more); Commonwealth v. Spotz, 716 A.2d 580, 584 (Pa. 1998) (listing the jury's convictions of first degree murder, aggravated assault, kidnapping, robbery of a motor vehicle, and more). 16. Mark Spotz currently resides on Death Row. Interview with Records Office, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Tel. (610) 489-4151 (January 3, 2003). 17. In addition to his three death sentences, Mark Spotz has been sentenced to a minimum of 35 years and 3 months in prison. Commonwealth v. Spotz, 756 A.2d 1139, 1146 (Pa. 2000)(reiterating the trial court's sentence for convictions of crimes related to the first degree murder of Penny Gunnet as an aggregate consecutive term of 20 years and 9 months to 41 years and 6 months); Commonwealth v. Srootz, 716•A.2d 580, 584 (Pa. 1998)( reiterating the trial court's sentence for convictions of crimes related to the first degree murder of June Ohlinger as fourteen and one-half to twenty-nine yeazs of imprisonment to be served consecutive with the sentence imposed for the slaying of Dustin Spotz). 18. The "position taken by the [R]ules [of Civil Procedure] is that ... a parent whose parental rights have not been terminated [is a] necessary party to a custody determination." Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1915.6 Explanatory Comment - 1994. 19. However, 23 Pa. C.S. §5303 (Award of custody, partial custody, or visitation) requires a Court making a custody decision to consider a parent's criminal conviction if found guilty of criminal homicide. 23 Pa. C.S. §5303(b)(1). 20.23 Pa. C.S. yc5303 also requires a Court making a custody decision to consider a parent's criminal conviction if found guilty of kidnapping. 23 Pa. C.S. §5303(b)(2). 21. Moreover, the paramount and sole pertinent consideration in all custody determinations regarding children is the best interest of the child involved. Garr v. Garr, 2001 Pa. Super. 110, 773 A.2d 183, 187 (2001). 22. Mark Spotz, the natural father who chose not to support, care for, or have contact with his child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, will be incarcerated well past KATILIN'S 47`" birthday --assuming he survives three death penalties. 23. Mark Spotz is a danger to society and his daughter, K?.TILIN MARIE QUEEN. 24. KATILIN MARIE QUEEN is a twelve-yeaz old student in the Big Spring Middle School, and has resided with Plaintiffs, husband and wife, since June 8~' of 2001. 25. ICATILIIJ MARIE QUEEN has been an honors and distinguished honors student the past two years at Big Spring Middle School. 26. KATILIN MARIE QUEEN has an opportunity to spend her adolescent years with a loving nurturing couple who aze eager to help her become a healthy member of society, and who pose no threat to her safety or welfare. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Marie and Russel Cook pray that this-Court enter the attached Order that has been stipulated to by the parties. BY: ~ v ' John C. Porter, Esq. PA Sup. Ct. ID# 90152 Stephanie E. Chertok, Esq. PA Sup. Ct. ID# 52651 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 61 W. Louther St. Carlisle, PA 17013 717-249-1177 VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in this petition are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. ~ a~ Date ~Q/Lc.e, ~ 1,.~-/~ Plaintiff, Marie Cook Exhibit A iVIARIE COOK AND RUSSEL COOK, PLAINTIFFS v. CINDY L. QUEEN, DEFENDANT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUM$ERLAND COUNTY, PA CIVII, TERM IN CUSTODY STIPULATLON r ~ AND NOW this _ ~ ~~ day of '/ , ~(%~ ' 2UU 1 come Plaintiffs, lvfarie Cook and Russel Cook, of Carlisle, Permsylvania, and Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, of Pompano Beach, Plorida, and with regard to custody ofthe Defendant's child, ICATTLIN MARIE QUEEN, date of birth 6r3Ui90, stinuiate and agree as follows: Custody of said child shall be as set forth in the foregoing (:)rder of Court, namely, primary physical custody in Plaintiffs, who in effect are foster grandpazents of the child, and reasonable partial custodyivisitation in Defendantlmother. 2. It is the desire and intention of the parties hereto that this Stipulation for Child Custody be entered in the Court of Common Pleas of` Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and that it be endorsed as an Carder of the f`ourt so as to have the full effect thereof. 3. °1'his Court shall retain jurisdiction should either parry seek modification of the Order in the future. 1. verify that the statements made in the foregoing Sripulation are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of i $ Pa. C.S. section ~19U4, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. DATE:-~~~~f•.~ WITNESS: ~~~Mari~e(C~oo~k, Plaintiff I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation aze true and correct. 1 understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unswom falsification to authorities. DATE:_1~Lz`~ wITNESS:~~ W ~~ ~ Russel Cook ,Plaintiff I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation aze true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. 9 /~7~ DATE: ~~1 ~ v /' WITNESS: Exhibit B a~Two6-30-1990 ruE 0726610-1990 f+u. ' D0.TF 07-03-1990 • ' PaEO - - •. P10. ON+ r(Nar CcuRTroPCUMBERLAND oaT4 OB-03-2000 nlgTn - 16~E0 .. IMO.. pPr Y4RI NAME - S£ii~' FEMALE KATILIN HARIz. pU•EEN .~ - FATHEt2S NAHE -, ,..- INFORMinTIOl7•'`NOTr:'R£CQRDED MOTETER5 MAIDEN NAME CINDY T_EE'•••L1ifEEN ... iymrR 10G111f9 NR11 WRy 1 rrV9 cY%CI [N01%pC YIrlL1119 Olr INY III IM11I'rvrrm9lVRnr9ORpR111M111 LI n W1111, •+R4Vib4NVR 99110 Not 6R, P.4:fM. ROW AW py IM ORnLb Mumby. Vrrrr ]Y, •Yyy f ~ ti~ :nPPIE`. +RRpL3fFP frgf xEWCIRix x+%Cd IrtR PUwI 11707950 d Exhibit C ;;~a Ci ? 20ii'~v` MARIE AND RUSSEL COOK, PLAINTIFFS ~. CINDY L. QUEEN, DEFENDANT AND NOW, this IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA CIVIL TERM o/- SO~a IN CUSTODY ORDER OF COURT day of 2001, Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook and Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, having stipulated and agreed with regard to custody of the child, ICATILIN MARIE QUEEN, d.o.b. 6/30/90, it is hereby ordered and decreed as follows: Shazed legal custody of the child, I{.4TILIN MARIE QUEEN, shall be in both of the parties. 2. Primary physical custody of said child shall be in the Plaintiffs, Mane Cook and Russel Cook. Defendandmother, Cindy L. Queen, shall have such reasonable periods of temporary partial custody/visitation as the parties may from time to time agree. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the child's desire with regazd to the extent and timing of any such periods of partial custody/visitation shall be honored. At the present time, the periods of partial custody for DefendanUmother shall include two months during the child's summer vacation from school; one week during the child's Christmas vacation from school, if time allows; and such additional periods of time during the child's other vacations from school, as the parties may agree. 4. Plaintiffs agree not to seek child support at any time from DefendanUmother. )n exchange, mother surrenders her right to take the federal dependent's exemption and any child credit for the child. Mother agrees to execute any IRS forms that may be required to accomplish this provision. 5. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to authorize reasonable and necessary medical treatment for the child during their periods of physical custody of her, and they shall be permitted to place her on thew health insurance coverage to the degree permitted by the insurance carrier. 6. Defendantlmother agrees to execute any and all forms required to enable Plaintiffs to secure insurance coverage for the child and to enroll the child in a local school district. 7. All expenses of travel will be born by Defendant for those round trips required to accomplish the periods of partial custody/visitation. It is the intent of all parties that the child not be moved repeatedly as in prior yeazs and this Agreement shall not be modified unless and until careful consideration has been given to the desires of the child in that regazd. BY THE COURT, J. MARIE COOK AND RUSSEL COOK, PLAINTIFFS v. CINDY L. QUEEN, DEFENDANT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA CIVIL TERM IN CUSTODY STIPULATIAN ~ nF AND NOW this C~ day of ~ , 2001 come Plaintiffs, Marie Cook and Russel Cook, of Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and Defendant, Cindy L. Queen, of Pompano $each, Florida, and with regazd to custody of the Defendant's child, KATILIN MARIE QUEEN, date of birth 6/30/90, stipulate and agree as follows: Custody of said child shall be as set forth in the foregoing Order of Court, namely, primary physical custody in Plaintiffs, who in effect are' foster gr_andpazents of the child, and reasonable partial custody/visitation in Defendant/mother. 2. It is the desire and intention of the parties hereto that this Stipulation for Child Custody be entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and that it be endorsed as an Order of the Court so as to have the full effect thereof. _ 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction should either party seek modification of the Order in the future. I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation aze true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unswom falsification to authorities. DATE:-~~~ WITNESS: Marie Cook, Plaintiff ,, I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation aze true and convect. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unswom falsificadotr to authorities. DATE:~ WITNESS: \~o ~.~7. Russel Cook ,Plaintiff I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Stipulation aze true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject.to the penalty of 18 Pa. C.S. section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. DATE: `~~ ~ v?~ WITNESS: /' ` Exhibit D ~ ea . .. MARIE- COOK and : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF RUSSEL COOK :CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. CINDY L. QUEEN N0.2001-5062 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 11TH day of SEPTEMBER, 2001, it appears to the court that the stipulation contains insufficient information regarding the identity or whereabouts of the natural father. Consequently, the parties are directed to join the natural father or to show cause why he should not be joined pursuant to Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1915.6. By the , Edward E. Guido, J. Marie Cook Russel Cook 213 Alters Road Cazlisle, Pa. 17013 Cindy Queen 144 Lake Street Laconia, N.H. 03246 Stephanie E. Chertok, Esquire 61 West Louther Street Carlisle, Pa. 17013 :sld Ifl TBS.itEiOWy vdhB~9af, I heie ut'iYC 55i mj' hiaRd and the seal az sai~ Cass, at Catlis~e, Pa. This ~' day~_~c~t?`"w~"'.r~2L Prothoria 9 4 , Exhibit E ~ 4 W e . 717+249+4514 P.02 MAItU~, Cflt)K AND RUSSEL COOK, IN THE COURT OF COMMON 1'1.F,AS I'LAINTIFp'S , OF CUMIIEIt.I.ANA CQUNTY, l'A, v. No. QI-5062 CIVII. TERM CilYilY I,. QUF,F.'N, IN CUSTODY DEFENDANT AFFIDAVIT l3cfore me, i}ae undersigned authority. a Notary Public, in and €'or the said County and State, personally appeared CINDX L. QUEEN, known to me (or satisfactorily proven), wlxt, axing duly sworn. according to law, deposes and says that she is the Defendant in the abave- captioncd custody stipulation proceeding; that she is the natural mother of KAT[L[N Mt1R[[i Q[JN.IiN, d.o.b. 6130190, wha is the subject of said custody stipulation; that the natural f'athcr is MARK 51't)'I"I'S, who has been convicted ofmultiple crimes and homicides in the t'ommonwcalth of Pennsylvania and who is incarcerated in Pennsylvania for these crimes attd, to the best M' her knowledge, received a death sentence for one homicide. Deponent further says that she attd KATIL[N MARIE QUEEN have had no contact with MARK SPt)"I°I'S for years; that MARK SPt?TTS is not involved and never has been involved in the care or support of KATILIN; and that this was by his choice, [n that he did know that he was KA'fl1,.iN'S father. ,', _ SL; ,} DY L ~ EEN -..~ STATE OF I,uEST U 1(Z6-(N l~ COL]L\1'C~ OF S3E12KEl.Cy $wum to and subscribed before me / ivl y commission~c ire5 ra't~ 2(707, this day of ~ f~-Y1 r , rtvratrr Pue~tc 'Jt)t)~ smrEOrwESrwamnna Q / ~7~~^~//)J ~ ~~ ~y{~ ~ / //7~ ~4iAMM~RStA ..~~s~~~J/G.~1'"'yl `~~~ ~N ~ Q _. _701 M¢8T 1ti104'!ry t'nbllc • . .~;~ .~ ~-, ~._, ~;; '. __ ~' ,n _-- - .,, ~~ - oa:2~zw e .~'~"-~ i ,•.• -,.::• '??K'i~ewE:~gx P~fL§„qR*t?nu"'4'+ein.~mvn,~~YYrmeeP'tm:...