HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-1911
MARK E. YOHE,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
JENNIFER R. YOHE,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 07 - 19 J I CIVIL TERM
IN DIVORCE
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this complaint and notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the
court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail
to do so the case may proceed without you and ajudgment may be entered against you by the court
without further notice for any money claimed in the complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAYBE ABLE
TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORAMTION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MA Y OFFER LEGAL
SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE. .
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Phone: (717) 249-3166
(800) 990-9108
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable
accommodations available to disabled individuals having business before the Court, please contact
our office. All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before
the Court. All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court.
You must attend the scheduled conference or hearing.
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MARK E. YOHE,
v.
JENNIFER R. YOHE,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 07 - 19 /I CIVIL TERM
IN DIVORCE
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 3301(c) OF THE DIVORCE CODE
I. Plaintiff is Mark E. Y ohe, an adult individual, who is residing at 331 Steelstown Road,
Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17241.
2. The defendant is Jennifer R. Yohe, residing at 331 Steelstown Road, Newville,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17241.
3. Plaintiff and Defendant have both been bona fide residents in the Commonwealth for at
least six months immediately previous to filing of this Complaint.
4. Plaintiff and Defendant were married on September 21, 1996, in Carlisle, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania.
5. There have been no prior actions of divorce or for annulment between the parties hereto in
this or any other jurisdiction.
6. The marriage is irretrievably broken.
7. Plaintiffhas been advised that counseling is available, and that Plaintiff may have the
right to request that the Court require the parties to participate in counseling.
8. Plaintiff requests the Court to enter a Decree in Divorce.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter a Decree in
Divorce and such other Orders as may be just and appropriate.
Date: April 9, 2007
Leslie A. Tomeo, squire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court J.D. # 200198
Attorney for Plaintiff
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
MARK E. YOHE,
v.
JENNIFER R. YOHE,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 07 - CIVIL TERM
IN DIVORCE
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint are true and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. S4904, relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
Date: ~ !tJ,107
~ ) V-------
Mark E. Y ohe', Plaintiff
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MARK E. YOHE,
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 07 - CIVIL TERM
IN DIVORCE
JENNIFER R. YOHE,
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Leslie A. Tomeo, Esquire, attorney for Plaintiff, Mark E. Yohe, hereby certify that I this
day served a copy of the Complaint in Divorce upon the following by depositing same in the United
States Mail, first class postage prepaid, at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
Jennifer R. Y ohe
331 Steelstown Road
Newville, Pennsylvania 17241
Respectfully submitted,
Ringer & Associates
es e A. Tomeo, squire
155 South Hanov r Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court J.D. # 200198
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: April 9, 2007
~ ~. 14
\ ~
~
vJ
-c .......... .~
- ""-l
b ~ \.;.
-t\ 0' ....:<..:.
...j
-.c .<
~
~
~
~,
~,
e;l
~
'\
~
C) f"o,.,)
~:; g 0
-... ."
.:n.. -'
-(; ::;:J
:;;0 in ::TJ
I Tim
U) 7)0
',)(1
v ~:; ....;".}
::1: ~.5::U ~
~:~ (~)
r:-? ~';m ~,
~
a :.0
Ol -<
1A1.nrk ~. ~~
vs Case No. D~-~-11'
~ ~~
~~
Statement of Intention to Proceed
To the Court: crt ~ - ''~}
~ .
~• ~`~~ _ intends to proceed with the above capriotled~atte~r;:a
• ~ ~_ t;
Print Name ~. ILY~~ Sign Name ~ ,_._
s~
Date: ~ Attorney for
Explanatory Comment
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of
inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit
comment.
I. Rule of civil Procedure
New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the
scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously
governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is
tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting
local rules.
This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d
1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required
before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901."
Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The
general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable.
II Inactive Cases
The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the
court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties.
If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of
course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she
will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue.
a. Where the action has been terminated
If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed
under Ru1e230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination
of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file
the notice of intention to proceed.
The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of
the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and
reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff
must make a showing to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or
legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of
termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2).
B. Where the action has not been terminated
An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may
have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a
common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.
0
~~
_~
r.~t ,~
o;yr`
~~
~_~~
_; ~
:`~:: r'7s
.~~
V
WALKER, CONNOR & SPANG, LLC
247 Lincoln Way East
Chambersburg PA 17201 FILED-OFFICE
(717) 262-2185 OF THE PRATHONO TA L v
(717) 262-2187- Fax
VVE 1 8 rn '?)8
Mark E. Yohe, IN THE COURT OF COMMODNMM?ND COUN_[Y
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PAPFNNSYLVANIA
V. NO. 07-1911 CIVIL TERM
Jennifer R. Yohe, CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendant, IN DIVORCE
PRAECIPE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
To the Prothonotary:
Please withdraw the appearance of Karl E. Rominger, Esquire, as counsel for the Plaintiff
in the above-captioned case and enter the appearance of Martha B. Walker, Esquire as counsel
for the Plaintiff.
WALKER, CONNOR & SPANG, LLC
Date: ? 11Z By: z Oartha B. Walker, Esquire
Attorney I.D. #15989
247 Lincoln Way East
Chambersburg, PA 17201
(717) 262-2185
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: ` Z
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
WALKER, CONNOR & SPANG, LLC
247 Lincoln Way East
Chambersburg PA 17201 ,
(717) 262-2185 r-rj CZ,
" c?
r a
f
(717) 262-2187 - Fax
r -- r-,)
--?
PV f
c?
Mark E. Yohe, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PL> CD
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA
..
.. o
;
_F
v. NO. 07-1911 CIVIL TERM S =
Jennifer R. Yohe, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendant, IN DIVORCE
PRAECIPE TO TRANSMIT RECORD
To the Prothonotary:
Transmit the record, together with the following information, to the Court for entry of a divorce
decree:
Ground for divorce: irretrievable breakdown under Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code.
2. Date and manner of service of the Complaint: July 19, 2007 by Acceptance of Service.
3. Date of execution of the Affidavit of Consent required by Section 3301(c) of the Divorce
Code: by Plaintiff, October 18, 2011; by Defendant, September 19, 2011.
4. Related claims pending: Resolved through private Agreement;
5. (a) Date Plaintiff s Waiver of Notice in Section 3301(c) Divorce was filed with Prothonotary:
October 19, 2011.
(b) Date Defendant's Waiver of Notice in Section 3301(c) Divorce was filed with the
Prothonotary: October 4, 2011.
WALKER, CONNOR & SPANG, LLC
BY:
Martha B. Walker' Esquire
Attorney I.D. #15989
247 Lincoln Way East
Chambersburg, PA 17201
(717) 262-2185
Attorney for Plaintiff
Mark E. Yohe
V.
Jennifer R. Yohe
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 07-1911 CIVIL TERM
DIVORCE DECREE
AND NOW, it is ordered and decreed that
Mark E. Yohe
Jennifer R. Yohe
bonds of matrimony.
plaintiff, and
defendant, are divorced from the
Any existing spousal support order shall hereafter be deemed an order for
alimony pendente lite if any economic claims remain pending.
The court retains jurisdiction of any claims raised by the parties to this action
for which a final order has not yet been entered. Those claims are as follows: (If no
claims remain indicate "None.")
None
By ourt,
Att J.
Prothonotary
ce A C?
??? r?
mar ?cd -? ?? ?l? Ga