Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-00961 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW DO & K, INC. ) Plaintiff ) ) Vs ) ) H. EDWARD BLACK & ASSOCIATES, ) P.c. ) Defendant ) No. Cfq - 9(,. J PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Dear Mr. Welker: Please issue a Writ of Summons against the above namcd Defendant. Respectfully submitted, ~ GINGRICH, SMITH, KLINGENSMITH & DOLAN Dated:~ By: o 'fD3 I~ . rnrYL ( Sf-. ;k.1'v-(5/~uv~ f)1 17f{O John M. Smith, Esquire Attomey for Plaintiff Attorney tD. # 19520 222 S. Market St., Suite 201 P.O. Box 267 Elizabethtown, PA 17022 (717) 367-1370 >- cr~ -d ,.-: 1.'.1 ~"', ~. ? ;:"-; Ll.., /;I.J T t [-)r ., 9':.1 " (:> o _:1 '- (.- ;,;:. :+J..... ~~.~;~ , ':i 'f.r) 1;; :!iu -J,L '.:J U /".) 'I', \ ' ......." () "-.) . ..~ I'f .~ ~ rl', -- I'() .......:;. '-r ...\ .,-r-- ,-, r-~ r- , "" ) <:l t'- -- '" ~, -, .::v - \ ("~ '\ 9, ~./'" ~~."., :c ~ !: [)~ ::E (f) Z ~g W N (9 N N 0 Z ~ 0 ~ P<~ . "" (/) J , u g;~ z ~ " < r: ~ :,,;. :>:: <l: ~ < z up, .J z I ~ z ~ ~ul ""::; 0 ~ . a~ :c > ~ . "'I(/) f- a ~ z - ti ~ :,,; U) ~g P< " ~~ ::E . " [)8 :> ~ 0 ~ " "" U) ~ 5 ~ . < z ~ ~I ~ 8 ~~ P<~ :c j , u ~ .~ - 0:: ::r: (9 ~~ z (9 ~ N u_ i:'() c-;. l..\.~ l.... en 0' ,P '~ d () l::: H en ~ IJ) I .jJ I 1tI loll .-! , 'M I I () 0 I ... N , ... 0 N I I I en . N , I en , 11) C I ~ Etj r-- I I .-l , , = ~ I , loll 1tI , I ... . I , 0-1 i~ ~ I rl I ..'< I !~ 'M I () I ~~ir-- ~B '> I ~ 1tI 'M I rl c: l~ u I () III 0 , '< I c: 'M . \0'" I ..... , H '0 .jJ :E N:Sl;; I \D I 1-1 t1.l () C~~~~~ '" I 1tI ~ , I :<: ~ '" I '0 rl I NO, ..... '" I loll 0:1 'M li~il< t: I :> ~ Cl 'M Cl :r: U , @tfb::~ of t4~ ~4triff Marv Jane Snyder Reui Estate Deputy Michael W. Rinehart ^ssislllnt Chief Deputy Ralph G. McAllister Chief Deputy William T. Tully Solicitor Dauphin Counly Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 ph: (717) 255.2660 Iilx: (717)255.2889 Jack Lotwick Sheriff Commonwealth of Pennsylvania DD&K INC vs County of Dauphin H EDWARD BLACK & ASSOCIATES P.C. Sheriff's Return No. 0344-T - -1999 OTHER COUNTY NO. 99-961 ~D NOW: February 26, 1999 at 11:45AM served the within WRIT OF SUMMONS upon H EDWARD BLACK & ASSOCIATES P.C. by personally handing to H EDWARD BLACK, PRESIDENT 1 true attested copy(ies) of the original and making known WRIT OF SUMMONS to him/her the contents thereof at 2403 N FRONT STREET HARRISBURG, PA 17110-0000 Sworn and subscribed to So Answers, Jf!~ Sheri1tt~~~ before me this '~.o~= 1999 PROTHONO'fARY By Deputy Sheriff Sheriff's Costs: $25.50 PD 02/25/1999 RCPT NO 1210/1 MDJ "_.4 ,. "I ~ (~~ ('.: "'L :....~ \--.- N ~:) .< ~ 1) ("~ C',) :.t ,~~ ;.-) ~S , , (1.. ;; , '~l ::.J " , :S(Q '. , , n , , c. Z 1- '-l II.IJ .' C' ID n.. I t:.l > I .. (-~: ) :5 ~.:..:: C) U , >. r-. >- ?~~ .~ L-; .'- [..! ("-" 9 ~}~ (.:1 . :..)::? , , "..:: ") :::1 , ..- r f? .;:..., ~.~? f!l I .r:_ -', ;:-" n /- Ci-. lLl <:.:~ (I "- ,. :;,-:: ~";;: b <.-::) :5 0 u 4, By way of background, it is believed and therefore averred in the winter of 1995-1996 Donald Mowery (hereinafter "Mowery) began investigating the possibility of purchasing a tract of land consisting of approximately 190 acres located in Silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. The property is located adjacent to State Route 114 between US Route II and Interstate 81 in Silver Spring Township, and was at the time, owned by various members of the Heath Allen Family (hereinafter "Allen Tract"), 5. It is believed and therefore averred in approximately January 1996, Mowery began negotiating with the Allen Family for the purchase of the Allen Tract of land. It is believed and therefore averred it was Mowery's intention to purchase the Allen Tract as a site for residential and commercial development assuming he could obtain all necessary approvals on a timely basis and assuming all due diligence was satisfactory. 6. It is believed and therefore averred during negotiations between Mowery and the Allen Family, Mowery initially engaged the services of the Defendant herein, H. Edward Black & Associates (hereinafter "Defendant") to perform various sketch planning services and site analysis to assist Mowery in determining whether development of the Allen Tract was feasible. 7. It is believed and therefore averred the initial services provided by Defendant to Mowery were provided in accordance with the proposal agreed to by the parties thereto. 8. It is believed and therefore averred, that based tipon information provided by Defendant, on April 15, 1996, Mowery entered into an agreement of sale with the Allen Family for the purchase of the Allen Tract. 3 9. It was at this time, on or about March/April 1996, that Plaintiff became aware of the planned purchased by Mowery of the Allen Tract and in turn, expressed an interest to Mowery in purchasing one (l) lot (28,62 acres, more or less and later identified as Lot 16 on the Mowery Plan) in the anticipated subdivision ofthe Allen Tract which subdivision later became known as the Bent Creek Business Center. 10. In discussing with Mowery this proposed purchase, and Plaintiffs intention to develop same as a retirement condominium community, Mowery informed Plaintiff he had contracted with Defendant to perform various design and engineering services and to secure all necessary subdivision approvals and permits inherent in the project. Mowery suggested to Plaintiff it may want to consider contracting with Defendant as Plaintiffs land development plan ofthe lot to be purchased would piggy-back in many respects Mowery's Subdivision Plan and that Plaintiff could, by using Defendant, avoid duplication of effort in many respects and perhaps save on development costs. Plaintiff could not purchase lot 16 and/or record its land development plan until Mowery's Subdivision Plan was approved, properly recorded and Mowery or his designees purchased the Allen Tract. Using the same engineering and surveying company for the development of plans for approval seemed logical and in the best of all involved in the project. I L By on or about March/April 1996, principals of Plaintiff were in contact with Defendant dealing specifically with Defendant's assigned supervisor to the project and Vice President in the person of Craig W. Bachik who at all times relevant hereto was an agent, servant, principal and/or employee of Defendant operating within the scope of his employment with 4 Defendant. 12. On September 19, 1996 Defendant submitted a proposal 10 Plaintiff for services to be rendered, 13. On or about January 20,1997 Defendant submitted a revised proposal to Plaintiff for services which proposal was later signed by Principals of DD&K, Inc. David R, Strong David G. Heisey on March 4, 1997 (hereinafter "Strong" and "Heisey"). Strong and Heisey would later become principals ofDD&K, Inc, the Plaintiff herein. A copy of the agreement for professional services is attached hereto along with Bachik's cover letter relating to the same and incorporated into the agreement. The agreement is marked Exhibit "A." 14. Defendant, even prior to entering into a written professional services agreement with Strong and Heisey, had accepted the undertaking, had commenced work on the project and had prepared two (2) schematic plans illustrating possible development schemes under strict R-2 zoning and under the cluster option contained in the Silver Spring Township Zoning Ordinance. 15, With the contract with Defendant in place, on March 25, 1997, three (3) principals namely, David G. Heisey, Robert H. Kauffinan and Miriam L Kauffinan (one principal) and David R. Strong incorporated DD&K, Inc., entered into a joint venture development agreement (Exhibit "B") for the purpose of acquiring and developing a certain property for a retirement condominium community with said property being known and designated as lot 16 in the plan of subdivision of the Bent Creek Business Center containing approximately 28.62 acres ofland and being situate in Silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. The property is further described in 5 20. Paragraphs I through 19 are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in fulL 21. As part ofits contractual obligations with Plaintiff, Defendant was required to obtain approval of a preliminary and final land development plan, all necessary pennits for development and other approvals necessary for Plaintiff's project which was to build units in and develop a condominium retirement community. 22. As part of its contractual obligations with Plaintiff, Defendant was to perfonn all services as outlined in its proposal and as described in the preceding paragraph, in a professional, competent, diligent and timely manner. 23. As part of its contractual obligations with Plaintiff, Defendant was to perfonn as outlined in its proposal, and as Defendant was aware and advised by Plaintiff, in such a manner that Plaintiff could purchase and settle for Lot No. 16 in the Bent Creek Subdivision plan by or about August 31,1997. 24. Defendant was well aware of such date and as such repeatedly assured Plaintiff that they were "on track" for that time frame and completion of the Plan. In fact, completion had even been discussed and contemplated for earlier than August 31, 1997. 25. Due to Defendant's breaches of contract, the purchase and closing did not occur until almost nine (9) months later on April 15, 1998, With an understood and anticipated closing date of August 31, 1997, Plaintiff reasonably prepared to proceed with the development of their condominium community and had devoted construction, financial and marketing resources and costs 7 for the planned construction of condominium units, to be ready for sale to third party buyers by November 1,1997, 26. Throughout the period oftime between Fall 1996 and the execution of the Contract with Defendant and in to mid to late Spring of 1997, Plaintiffs representatives became concerned that Defendant was not prefonning it's contractual obligations in such a way which would lead to completion of both Mowery's Subdivision Plan and Plaintiffs Land Development Plan in a timely fashion, 27. Nonetheless, and based upon continuing representations of Defendant's employee Bachik that settlement should be able to be held by August 31, 1997, Plaintiff requested and Silver Spring Township issued Building Penn its on April 22 and April 29, 1997 for Units I and 3 and 2 and 4 respectively on Plaintiffs Plan and Plaintiffs initiated construction understanding that they could build but not obtain an Occupancy Pennit until all Plans were recorded. 28, Subsequently, Plaintiffleamed that Defendant was not proceeding diligently and as represented to them by Bachik, and that Defendant was in fact breaching it's Contract with them during this period of time in the following particulars: a. Bachik canceled a meeting with Representative of Plaintiff scheduled for Apri125, 1997 and Plaintiff subsequently leamed it was because required work was not completed. b. On May 6, 1997, based upon Bachik's earlier comments that the Plan had been timely filed with the Township, Plaintiff believing it's Plan would be on the Silver Spring Township Planning Commission agenda that evening, contacted Bachik to confinn the meeting and 8 was advised that the Township "bumped" the DD&K Plan from the agenda because of a heavy schedule. A follow up call to the Township by Plaintiffs representative revealed that no submission of a Plan had ever been made by Bachik to the Township as of May 6, 1997. c, In spite ofBachik's representations to the contrary of an earlier submission, Plaintiffs Preliminary Development Plan was actually not submitted until May 22,1997. d. The Plan was reviewed at a Planning Commission workshop on June 10, 1997 but was not actually considered until the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 1997 at which time 73 separate defects were noted with corrections to be resubmitted for review at a June 24,1997 meeting. e. The revised Plans were not submitted in time for the June 24, 1997 meeting and were not submitted until June 26, 1997 for consideration at the July 10, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. Plaintiff believes and avers this resulted from a lack of diligence by Defendant. f. Additional problems continued to be encountered and a further revised Preliminary Land Development Plan was submitted to the Planning Commission on July 17, 1997. The signature and seal of a Stephen G. Fisher (hereinafter "Fisher"), a Registered Surveyor, was on this revised Plan. g. Subject to complying with certain conditions, which Plaintiffs understood from Bachik would be easy to accomplish and require net too much additional time, the Silver Spring Township's Supervisors at their meeting on August 27, 1997 granted final approval for the 9 Plaintiffs revised Land Development Plan, h. Sometime shortly thereafter in September of 1997 it was discovered that the signature and seal of Fisher was forged on the revised Plan and as such the approval previously made by the Township was revoked and made void by them. L It was subsequently learned that the sarne signature was forged on the Mowery Plan and as a result the settlements and projects of both Mowery and Plaintiff were delayed and Plaintiffwas required to have extensive meetings and planning sessions with the Township officials, which would otherwise had been unnessecary, in order to decide how to proceed, The added adverse effect of this was that the Township was now suspect of anything submitted by Plaintiff for approval by them. J, Plaintiff filrther believes and hereby avers that Defendant breached its Agreement with Plaintiffby entering into a contract which it either knew or should have known it did not at the time have the personnel to fulfill; by failing to proceed diligently at all times; by failing to render proper advice; by failing to apply that degree of professional skill commensurate with the nature and extent of the project which skill it represented that it had; by misrepresenting its activities during the course of the project honestly and forthrightly to Plaintiff and Silver Spring Township Officials; by failing to file all required work product in a timely manner; by failing to consult with Plaintiff and keep Plaintiffinfonned at all times; and otherwise by failing in all respects to represent the Plaintiffs interests in a professional manner and accordance with the contract provisions and the duties which it accepted expressly and impliedly by entering into its Agreement with the Plaintiff. 10 29. PlaintifTbelicves and hereby avers that the foregoing course of events reflect a lack , I i i ! I I I I I i of attention to detail, a failure to proceed diligently, and a lack of proper application of professional expertise all of which conduct was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, but for which, Plan approval would have been obtained well in advance of the contemplated settlement date set forth in Plaintiffs Agreement of Sale with Mowery. Defendant was well aware ofthe Agreement of the parties with regards to the contemplated settlement date. 30, Plaintiff further avers that absent the foregoing breaches of contract it would have been able to settle by the August 31, 1997 date and been able to proceed with this project. 31. As a result of the breaches of contract by the Defendant, Plaintiff has been delayed in pursuing it's project and has suffered losses as will be hereinafter outlined, 32. The elements of Plaintiff s damages caused by Defendant arise out of claims made against the Plaintiff coming from three separate sources, as well as losses sustained by the Corporation itself. They can be outlined and described as follows: a. Claim of Robert H. Kauffman and Miriam I. Kauffman. (Hereinafter "Kauffmans"). Kauffinans are share holders in Plaintiff and also investors in the development of the retirement condominium Community (the "Project"). Based upon the above referenced Exhibit "B",. Kauffinans were to and did invest in the project by paying in to the corporation "seed" money on July I, 1997 in the amount of $50,000.00 and subsequently at the time of closing on April 15, 1998 and additional sum of $450,000.00 was invested. Kauffmans have lost investment earnings on their invested moneys as a result of the delays in the project caused by Defendants in a sum of II money in excess of$72,OOO.OO. These sums are duc the Kauffmans by the Plaintiffby virtue of the said Exhibit "B" and the Note and Mortgage executed by the Plaintiff to the Kauffmans at the time of closing. b. Claim of David G. Heisey, Inc. (Hereinafter "Heisey") This corporation is the builder for the project and responsible for the erection of the condominium units within the Project. With the authority of the Plaintiff given to Heisey as a result of reliance on the Agreement of the Plaintiff and Defendant and representations made by Defendant to Plaintiff, Heisey took various steps to proceed with construction in April/May 1997. Due to the breaches of contract by the Defendant outlined above, it was not possible for an extended period of time through January 1999 to obtain Occupancy Permits for the units which Heisey had constructed meaning that they could not be sold which fwther meant that construction costs had to be carried by Heisey and he could not be paid by Plaintiff. Heisey has made claim against the Plaintifffor a sum of money, his losses, in excess of $495,000.00. c. Claim of David R. Strong (hereinafter "Strong"). Strong's function in the project, in addition to being a shareholder in the Plaintiff, was as the on site marketer and manager. Based upon the Agreement ofthe Plaintiff and Defendant and the representations made by Defendant throughout 1997 the Plaintiff instructed Strong to be prepared to proceed in that capacity at or about September I, 1997. Knowing that instruction would be forthcoming, Strong removed himself from his other income producing projects and entered into and concentrated his efforts on behalf of the Plaintiff. Because the Project was delayed, which resulted solely from the breaches of Contract by 12 35, This Agreement by Defendant, however, did not occur until on or after October 13, 1997 which was the first contact Plaintiff had with Defendant after discovery of the Bachik forgery in early September of 1997, 36, Final approval of the Mowery Subdivision Plan and Plaintiffs Land Development Plan did not occur until Marchi April 1998 at which time those Plans were able to be recorded and settlement was held at which time Plaintiff purchased Lot No. 16 at a settlement held on April 15, 1998, Plaintiffs Land Development Plan was recorded in the Cumberland County Recorder of Deeds Office on April 14, 1998 at Plan Book 76, Page 96, 37. Even though conditional approval of Plaintiffs Plan, absent Defendant's fraud, was received (but subsequently revoked) in late August 1997 it still took Defendant until April to complete the Plan approval process. 38. Plaintiff believes and hereby avers that between September of 1997 and April 1998 Defendant continued to breach its contract with the Plaintiff for reasons set forth in paragraph 28 above generally and specifically including but not necessarily limited to the following: a. Failing to appropriately process, submit and complete in a diligent and timely fashion information for approvals and applications for permits for slope reports, wet lands certifications, storm water management facilities, land disturbance permits, location of on and off site easements for sewer lines and other required facilities. b. Making errors on the legal description and lot line locations for Lot No. 16. c. On the Mowery Plan, placing a sewer line across lands of others without notifying necessary parties that such was done thereby denying public sewer to Plaintiffs Project. 14 39, As a result of the lack of diligence and breaches of contract above set forth further delays resulted in the approval of Plaintiffs Plan until April 1998 which further resulted in Plaintiff being unable to proceed with its project. 40. As a result of improperly placing a sewer line of the Mowery Plan, of which Plan Plaintiff was an intended beneficiary, ultimate delays were experienced by Plaintiff in that the Township refused to issue final occupancy pennits to Plaintiff because the availability of public sewer to the Project was not settled until the easement question was resolved. 41. Based upon the foregoing facts, Defendant breached its contract with Plaintiff and as a result Plaintiff has sustained loss as set forth in paragraph 28 above. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court to award damages in its favor and against Defendant in the amount of$872,750.00 plus costs and interest for the recovery of which this suit is hereby filed. COUNT III - FRAUD 42. Paragraphs 1 through 41 are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth at length. 43, As part ofits contractual obligations with Plaintiff, Defendant was to provide and file with the Township various sets of plans and other documents which were signed and sealed by professional landscape architects, a registered engineer, and a registered land surveyor. In September 1997, shortly after Plaintiffs final land development plan was approved which would have allowed construction to move forward pending Mowery's subdivision plan approval and purchase of the property, Strong contacted Mowery asking that land be staked out in accordance with 15 ,'- <....:--, the Agreement of Plaintiff and Mowery, 43. Mowery, it is believed and therefore averred, then contacted Fisher to stake out Plainti ffs lot. Upon Fisher's reviewing the then proposed subdivision plan and final land development plan of Mowery and Plaintiff respectively, on both of which his signature appeared, Fisher infonned the Township that his signature was forged on those documents. 44, It is believed and therefore averred the forgery was done at the hands of Bachik and that Bachik specifically forged the signature of Fisher, a registered surveyor on Plaintiffs land development plan. 45. Accordingly, when the forgery was brought to the attention ofthe Township, the Plan approval was voided, As a result of said forgery, Plaintiff incurred significant costs which it would not have incurred but for the forgery, including the cost required to resubmit plans for approval and other costs referred to above. By submitting plans with forged seal and/or signature, Defendant was representing to Plaintiff and to Silver Spring Township that said Plans had been reviewed and approved by the individuals indicated on the face of the Plans, 46. In as much as it was later admitted that several seals/signatures were forged, Defendant made misrepresentations to Plaintiff which he knew to be false. 47. Said representations were made fraudulently, with an attempt and intent to deceive. 48. Plaintiff justifiably and substantially relied on the misrepresentations during the course of the project and as a result, Plaintiff has been damaged as aforementioned. Additionally, as a result of the fraudulent misrepresentations referenced above, Plaintiffis entitled to the recovery of punitive damages as a result ofthe improper motives and conduct of Defendant. 16 49, Plaintiff incurrcd significant costs to rc-engineer and redcsign work that should propcrly havc becn pcrformcd by Dcfcndant in the first instance, 50. Plaintiff has incurred significant time, expenses and attorneys fees involved in correcting all Black's errors. Plaintiff has lost significant credibility with several Silver Spring Township officials, which has impacted it's ability to obtain necessary approvals for continued construction, and will do so in the future, 51. The marketability of the condominium units has been adversely impacted in that throughout the time from September of 1997 until January of 1999 purchasers who expressed interest in purchasing a unit informed Plaintiffs representatives that they did not want to buy due to significant adverse publicity which the development received in newspapers of general circulation i~ the area. In fact, some perspective purchasers declined to express continued interest in the property until issues involving sewer availability and occupancy permits were all resolved. Those possible purchasers have been lost and thus sales have been lost. 52. As a result of the fraud of the Defendant as outlined above, Defendant believes and hereby avers it is entitled to punitive damages for the wilful, egregious and wilful misconduct of the Defendant. 53. As a result of the fraud of the Defendant, Plaintiff as sustained loss in amount set forth in paragraph 28 above. 53. As a result of the fraud of the Defendant, Plaintiff believes and hereby avers it is entitled to attorneys fees under Pennsylvania law, 17 ,~ ,. ,'I .OJ i this project: . '. " A. " i: H. Edwnrd Black and . sociates, P.C. will meet with you 10 review program elements associated with the proposed sit development of this parcel. The pUlpose in the programming session will be to confum the number of total dup lell: units desired, tOtal 101 acreage, proposed road alignments, slonn drainage, sanit sewer and other utility requirements. We cOllSider this programming session essentiallo d fining those elements to be included in a refined Sketch Plan. B. H. Edward I3lack and sociates, P.C. will utilize topographic and planimetric survey infonnation already in our posses n, as well as elements a$$ociated with the programming session to derme, in final form, a Sketc lan.for the development of the proposed retirement comxnlmity. The refined Sketch Plan will out!. proposed horizontal and vertical3lTangements ofduplelC units, roadways, driveways, common parking, and walkway areas and will [he basis from which future COllStruction draWings will be developed. , C. MEETTNC .lITH THF. OWNER H. Edward Black an1 Associates, P.C, will present the refined Sketch Plan associated with the proposed retiremeot~. munity to you in order to solieitl'roposed confonnanee with program items prior to presen g plans to the Silver Spring Township. This meeting is intended to solicit comments associated ith the refined sketch plan iIlld to confirm the fact that the development scheme is consistent'Mth anticipated program elements associated with the project. i' At D. REVISED S~EMATIC PT.AN H. Edward 'Black and.Asso-:iates, P .C. will revise the schematic design documents associated with this parcel based upo~ose comments received in item "C" above in preparation for a'Sketch Plan tt".. by fu. ,"", ~.... T,_", ,_ c_.;,. E. SKETCH PJ!N PRESENTATION .. Given the nature of~proposed development as a private retirement community, we consider it essential to meet wiilf the Silver Spring Township Planning Commission to receive input on schematic plans prior. to proceeding with Preliminary Land Development Plan preparation. It is anticipated that this lAeeting would take place as part of the Silver Spring Township Planning Commission's Wor1clHop Meeting to review, and discuss in detail, a proposal for a retirement ~ Ii AI 2 ~ f Iii r " i ~ i ..6 ~ l~ i I of Environme?t Resources, Erosion Control Rules and Regulations, Title 25, Part I(c). Act II, Chapter 102 "Erosion Control" as well as the Silver Spring Township Stonnwater Ordinances, i s. w and Associates, P .C, will provide civil engineering services to calculate the stonnater' off quantities from the site at a pre and post development environment, thereby stzing a ! pipes, swales, roofdrain connections and other structures necessary to convey stonn~ er runoff to the receiving pipes along the proposed road system. We will utilize recogW7. Permsylvania Department of Transportation and Conservation District Standards for $t nnwater Design. 9. i Anticipating th a development of this size will be built in phases, we will work with you to develop a ph ing plan to provide for the logical development of this tract. This will include phasing f proposed grading, roadway improvements and utility connections. The phasing plan wil also be used as a tool to inform Silver Spring Township representatives as to the time e associated with site construction. . 10. MUNT H. Edward Blac and Associates, P.C. will submit Preliminary Land Development Plans to Silver Spring T hip for their review. The plan submission date is 21 days prior to the Planning Co~sion meeting for each month, which is on the second Thursday of each month. Once th' submission has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Township PllIl1I1i1g Commission, it will be forwarded to the Township Board of Supervisors which meets on t,e fourth Thursday of each month. H. Edward Black and Associates, P .C. will make a prin ipal of Out firm available to attend a total offout (4) meetings with Silver Spring Townshi authorities. We suggest that a maximum of two (2) meetings will be with the Township PI ing Commission and that tWo (2) meetings will be' with the Township Board of Superv ors. . G. T AN PREPARATION H. Edward Black and sociates, P.C. will prepare and submit Final Land Development Plans to the Silver Spring To ship Planning Commission, The Silver Spring Township Board of Supervisors, The Cum r1and County Planning Co=ission, and The Cumberland County Soil Conservation District. e Final Land Development Plans will be prepared for the first phase of the development only, d will be based upon conditions of approval of the Preliminary Land . ~ 5 t j 4 t I .( l' , 15:29 FAX ili' 2389325 'POWELL TRACIIT!!AN III 008 .. I Development Plans.~e ~nvision utilizing the Preliminlll)' Land Development Plans as the basiS: for this submission, d incorporating through AUTOCAD methods, minor revisions to title blocks, sheet size (for record ng pwposes) and appropriate phase delineations for, roadways and utilities. The Final plans sublTjitted will follow the same format as the Prelimihlll)' Plan submission. H. Edward B lack and Associates, P.CO will provide a principal of the firm to attend an anticipated three (3) meetings with Sil~er Spring Township Of1:icials, The first meeting would be with the Township Planning CommissiOlj. at their regularly scheduled workshop: the second at their regularly scheduled meeting; and the third at the Board of Supervisors regularly scheduled meeting. , j . , H. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - SURVF;Y STAKF:OTJT H. Edward Black and Associates, P.e. will coordinate the efforts of the Registered Surveyor responsible for the project to provide site layout services associat~d with all streetS, proposed building stakeouts, legal descriptions of individual parcels, and "as-built" dmwings related to post- construction completion. It should be noted that all costs associated with survey stakeout are estimates only, and can only be defmed in final form once the total nubmer of units have been established, the total number of catch basins, lineal feet of pipe, lineal feet of roadway, linea! feet of sanitary sewer, and number of manholes have been determined. It should also be noted that if the development is proposed to be phased over a period of years, that the "as-built" drawings associated with the tocal development may change through time. For t!Us reason, we are happy to provide an estimate associated with these costs, but reserve the right t<l redefine the proposal of services as Final Plans are approved and work progresses. Those individual services are defined as follows: 1. .LA YOUT OF PROPOSED STRF::ETS The services of a professional registered land surveyor will be coordinated by H. Edward Black and Associates, P.C. for the purposes of laying out center lines ofall proposed streets associated with this development This stakeout will include horizontal and vertical controls for the proposed road alignment and the cost associated with these services are limited to the initial stakeout of the proposed alignment It; during the construction process, cont~ols are cWmaged by the contractor, the replacement of those controls are not included in the scope . of this proposal, and shall be considered additional costs related to the project. 2. l'RQf.OSED BUTLDTNG STAKEOUT H. Edward Black and Associates. P .C, will coordinate the efforts of a Professional Registered Land Surveyor to provide vertical and horizontal stakeout for all proposed buildings associated with Phase I of the development, This stakeout will be limited to setting vertical' and horizontal controls for comers of buildings and establishing first floor elevations for each unit. The scope oflhis proposal provides for the initial stakeout of all units, and any grade or location stakes damaged during the construction process that require 6 '. . . . NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the foregoing and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties do agree as follows: 1. Fonnation of Joint Venture: The parties hereto, Heisey, Kauffmans and Strong hereby form a Joint Venture (Venture), upon the terms and conditions herein set forth. 2. Name of Venture: The name of the Venture shall be DD & K, Inc. 3. Purpo~es of the Venture: The purposes of the Venture are as follows: A. To purchase or otherwise acquire the Property. It is the intent of the Joint Venturers that Strong and Heisey shall engage in such negotiations as are necessary to acquire the said Property and shall present to the Joint Venturers, when requested, information and documentation indicating the status of the said Property and the negotiations. B. To develop and improve the Property. C. To operate, maintain, lease, sell or otherwise dispose of the Property, in whole or in part and the improvements made thereon. D. To develop the same in the Condominium form of ownership as a Retirement Community E. To carry on any other activities necessary or incidental to the foregoing purposes, including the establishment of offices and the employment of personnel, contractors and subcontractors. F. The Venture shall not engage in any other business activity without the express written consent of Heisey, Kauffmans and Strong. 2 .t ',' 4. Respnnsihilities of Heisey: A. Consulting and assisting in the preparation of .a Master Plan for the Development of and improvements to the Property, including the selection of architects, engineers and other professionals required to accomplish the stated purposes of the Joint Venture. B. Assisting in the preparation for the development of the Property including the securing of all necessary governmental pennits, the construction of roads and installation of utilities. C. The perfonnance of all conStruction work, including the furnishing of all labor materials and equipment necessary to build finished residential units including grading, leveling, installation of utility lrunk lines, streets, curbs, gutlers and all other onsite improvements. D. Shall furnish periodically as may reasonably be requested by the other parties hereto a written report or reports disclosing in reasonable detail the status and progress of the project including without limitation receipt~ and disbursements, sales figures, construction costs and scheduling current financial requirements. E. To insure that all receipts and documents relating to the Venture be done in the name of the Venture and that all monies received in respect thereof be paid to the account of the Venture. It is agreed by the Joint Venturers that David G. Heisey, Inc., Contractor shall be the exclusive builder for all improvements to be erected on the Property unless David G. Heisey, Inc. 3 ,! ',' otherwise consents thereto in writing. Concerning the price at which units and improvements are to be sold, Heisey shall have the right to reasonably establish the price of any unit or improvement. In the event that the Joint Venturers disagree on the price so determined by Heisey, the price will be set at Heisey's cost of buildin::: the unit or improvements plus 12%. In the event extras are negotiated with any purchaser of .a unit the cost thereof shall be separately determined and paid to David G. Heisey, Inc. 5. Rp.sponsihilitip.s of Strong: Strong shall be responsible for the foIlowing: A. To assist in the preparation of the Plan for the development of and improvements to the Property including the selection of architects and engineers and other professionals required to accomplish the stated purposes of the Joint Venture. B. To assist in the preparation for the development of the Property including the securing of all necessary governmental permits and approvals. C. The sale of improved or constructed residential units including the formulation of advertising and other promotional activities through television, radio and other media as may be necessary. D. The formulation and implementation of the Development Program to include the attraction of prospective buyers and management of completed improvements. E. The operation, maintenance, leasing, sale or other disposition of the property in whole or in part and the improvements thereon. 4 ': ,,' F. The development of an estimated operating statement of profit and loss for each unit to be developed, estimated costs and income and cash flow for each unit. G. ShaIl furnish periodically as may reasonably be requested by the other parties hereto a written report or reports disclosing in r~_~onable detail the status and progress of the project including without limitation receipts and disbursements, sales figures, construction costs, scheduling current financial requirements H. To insure that all receipts and documents relating to the Venture be done in the name of the Venture and that all monies received in respect thereof be paid to the account of the Venture. 6. EmjP.Ct Managers: Heisey and Strong, in accordance with the foregoing list of their duties, shall act as project managers for the Joint Venture. 7. Paymp.nts to ProjP.ct Mangers: A. Except to be reimbursed for any expenses made by him on behalf of the Joint Venture during any stage of the development process, Heisey shall not be entitled to receive, nor shall the Joint Venture be obligated to pay him, any sum of money for acting as a project manager. It is understood and agreed that David G. Heisey is the owner of David G. Heisey, Inc. and as such he will benefit by being the exclusive builder within the Development during the entire term of the project. B. Strong shall be paid by the Joint Venture the sum of Forty Thousand 5 " " ..' to the lien of any bank financing obtained. It is further agreed that the Note and Mortgage will contain terms that reflect that it is binding on the heirs and assigns of Kauffmans but that it shaIl be repaid in any event on or before five (5) years form the date of the obligation. a Pennsylvania Business Corporation which shaIl be the purchaser of the Property and the 9. Incoq'lorntion: It is agreed by the parties hereto that the Joint Venturers shall form Developer.. When the Corporation is formed each of the Joint Venturers, namely Heisey as one party, Kauffmans together as a second party and Strong as the third party shall each be co-equal shareholders of the Corporation. The incorporation documentation shaIl contain a "Buy Sell" arrangement between the shareholders which will provide that if a shareholder becomes deceased or determines to withdraw that the shareholder or their heirs may keep the shares or if they choose not to keep the shares, must offer their shares first to the Corporation and if the Corporation declines to purchase then to any other shareholder. If the Corporation and the other shareholders do not then agree to purchase the deceased or withdrawing shareholder's shares, the shareholder must or the shareholder's Estate/heirs and assigns must remain the owner of the shares until five (5) years from the date of the settlement for the land. Thereafter the shares must first be offered to the Corporation and the shareholders and if the Corporation and shareholders do not wish to purchase them then the withdrawing or deceased shareholder shall be authorized to seIl the shares to any other person. and Strong shaIl be the sole and exclusive Management Representatives to engage in the daily 10. Management Rp-sponsihilities; Throughout the duration of the Venture. Heisey 7 .. management of the Venture on behalf of the parties hereto. At all times. Kauffmans shall have the right and privilege to inquire of Heisey and Strong as to the current status of the Venture and the status of the development of the Property. No other management shall be used without the written consent of all parties hereto. 11. Initial Capital: Initial purchase money capital shaIl be the $500,000.00 to be supplied by Kauffmans and the balance shall be obtained through bank financing to be agreed upon by the Joint Venturers. Any funds which are required to be expended from the date of the execution hereof and the execution of the Agreement of Sale through the date of the settlement and purchase of the land shall be advanced by Heisey and Strong who shall be reimbursed for same at the closing. Kauffmans shaIl be under no obligation to advance any funds except for the $500,000.00 unless losses are sustained in which case they shall pay one-third thereof. 12. Interests in Venture: The parties have agreed herein to form a Corporation in which they will each be one-third owners. As S', :h, the parties shall equally share in the net profits and losses of the Venture in accordance with their equal one-third interest~. 13. Title to Prnperty of the Venhlre: The title to the Property of the Venture shall be held in the name of the Corporation to be formed and to be known as DD & K, Inc. Any and all other property of any kind whether real or personal which shall be owned, held, operated or developed by the Venture shall be owned, held, operated or developed in the name of the said Corporation solely for the benefit of the Venture pursuant to the terms, conditions and provisions 8 ." '.' of this Agreement. 14. Covenants against Assignments: The respective interests in the Venture of the parties shall not be transferred or assigned in whole or in part. 15. Accounting anll Fiscal Year: Accurate books and accounts shall be kept by the Venture showing all of its assets, liabilities, operations, transactions and financial condition. Strong shall keep or cause the books and accounts to be kept. As soon as practible at the end of each fiscal year of the Venture (which shall be January 1 to December 31 of each year) a general accounting of all shall be taken and made by the use of appropriaie accounting standards covering the assets, properties, liabilities and worth of the Venture in its dealings, transactions and operations during the preceding fiscal year. A full report of same shall be furnished to each party to the Joint Venture. 16. Term of Venture: This Venture shall continue until all of the Property acquired by the Venture is developed and sold or otherwise disposed of or until terminated in writing by all of the parties. In the event development of the Property is delayed or terminated by any of the events listed in the next sentence, then the parties shaIl be required to meet and discuss a specific termination date. The events referred to and provided for in the preceding sentence are strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, war, riot, insurrections, terrorism, sequestration by government, civil commotions, fire, flood, earthquake, act of God, or other causes beyond the control of the parties. 17. Contingr.ncip_s: It is agreed to by the parties hereto that in the event Kauffmans cannot obtain bank financing through a refinancing of assets owned by them to obtain the 9 '. .' Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 21. nishihntion.~ on termination; Upon termination of the Venture, a final audit shall be made by a mutually agreeable Accountant and all of the property and assets of the Venture shall be distributed as follows: A. All of the property and assets, if any, other than cash, shall be sold or collected and turned into cash or purchase money obligations within a period of three years from the date of such termination. Heisey, Kauffmans and Strong shall have the right to bid on and purchase any or all of the property and assets being sold, B. All of the debts and obligations of the Venture on which the joint venture is separately and personally liable or on which Heisey, Kauffmans and Strong are separately and personally liable shall be paid in full, C. The remaining cash and other property, if any, shall be distributed to the parties as previously provided. 22. llispnte Rp..~ollltion: Any dispute controversy or claim arising out of or under this Agreement or its performance between the parties hereto shall first be negotiated by the parties, and if an acceptable resolution does not result the exclusive remedy for the resolution of same shall be submission to Arbitration. Each party shaU select an Arbitrator within 15 days after notice by the complaining party. The three Arbitrators so chosen shall meet at the earliest possible agreed upon time to hear the controversy and the decision of a majority of the Arbitrators will be final and 11 " binding upon the parties. If any party fails, refuses or neglects to appoint an Arbitrator any party may petition the Court of Cornmon Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania to appoint an Arbitrator. 23. T .iahility: A. The liability of the Venture or of Heisey, Kauffmans and Strong arising out of any of the activities of the Venture shall be covered by appropriate policies of insurance to be purchased by the Venture. B. In the event that any liabilitY shall not be adequately covered by insurance, the uninsured liability shall be satisfied out of the assets of the Joint Venture. C. Heisey, Kauffmans and Strong shall each be indemnified by the other and held harmless against and from all claims, demands, actions, and rights of action which shall or may arise by virtue of anything done or omitted to be done by the other (through or by agents, employees, or other representatives) outside the scope of, or in breach of the terms of, this agreement provided the other shall be promptly notified of the existence of the claim, demand, action, or right of action and shall be given reasonable opportunity to participate in the defense thereof. D. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to constitute either party the general partner of the other party or the agent of the other party other than in connection with the activities included within the scope of the Venture nor in any manner to limit the parties in the carrying on of their otller respective businesses or activities. 12 . . . . . K:\OG1\lB10G\LOT16~8c.97\July 7, 1997 AGREEMENT OF SALE THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this ,17-.. day of July, 1997, by and between RSM ASSOCIATES, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership (formerly known as Ritner Park Associates), having its principal place of business located at 625 Hamilton Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 ("Seller"); AND DD&K, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, 1898 North Market Street, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania 17022 ("Purchaser"). BACKGROUND Seller desires to sell to Pur' chaser , and Purchaser desires to purchase, that certain tract or parcel of land, situated in Silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, consisting of 28.62 acres, more or less, being known as Lot 16 in the Plan of Subdivision of the Bent Creek Business Center (the "Plan") and being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, together with the improvements located thereon, if any, which parcel of land and improvements are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Property." NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recital, which is made a part of this Agreement, and the mutual promises, agreements and covenants herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Seller and Purchaser agree as follows: 1. Sale and Purchase. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Seller agrees to sell and convey to Purchaser, and Purchaser agrees to purchase and acquire from Seller, all of Seller's right, title and interest in and to the Property. 2. Title. The Property shall be conveyed to Purchaser by special warranty deed, conveying good and marketable title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except for those set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and any liens or encumbrances created after the date of this Agreement which have the prior approval of Purchaser. Seller represents and covenants that Seller presently owns, or will have as of Settlement, good and marketable title in and to the Property (subject to the aforesaid) and is, or will at Settlement, be duly empowered to convey same in accordance with this Agreement. Such title to the Property shall be conclusively evidenced by the availability of title insurance issued at regular rates by a reputable title insurance company authQrized to do business in Pennsylvania. The cost of any and all such title insurance shall be paid by Pur- chaser. Seller agrees, at its expense, to provide a certified survey of the Property which will form the basis for the deed, and which will include metes and bounds descriptions and a certification of the total acreage. It is expressly agreed, however, that if Seller is unable to deliver at Settlement the quality of title represented above and required herein, other than as a result of the wilful misconduct of Seller, Purchaser's sole right and remedy shall be to take such title as Seller can deliver without reduction in purchase price or recovery of damages, or to terminate this Agreement by notice to Seller prior to Settlement, whereupon neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to the other hereunder, except that , Seller shall be liable to Purchaser for Purchaser's actual and reasonable costs and expenses incurred in pursuing purchase of the Property under this Agreement up to a maximum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000), less amounts recovered from Seller under any other basis. 3. Settlement. Settlement hereunder shall take place at the law offices of McNees, Wallace & Nurick, located at 100 Pine Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, or at such other mutually agreeable location in Pennsylvania, on a date and at a time reasonably acceptable to Seller and Purchaser, and within fifteen (15) days after all conditions under Paragraphs 7 and 8 are satisfied or waived, but in no event later than August 31, 1997 (the "Settlement"). The parties may extend the Settlement date at any time by mutual written agreement and Purchaser shall have the option to extend the time for settlement under this Agreement as provided for in subparagraph 8(k) below. At Settlement, the Price shall be paid and Seller and Purchaser shall execute and deliver all documents, instruments and agreements provided for herein and all others reasonably required to consummate the transactions provided for herein, 4. Possession. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Purchaser at the time of Settlement. Prior to Settlement, Purchaser shall have the right to enter upon the Property at reasonable times, with the prior written consent of Seller, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, for the purpose of making such surveys, soil tests, engineering studies and other investigations as Purchaser may reasonably require. Purchaser shall bear all cost, expense, liability and responsibility for entering upon the Property, and for all actions or inaction thereon by or for Purchaser, its agents, contractors and/or representatives, prior to Settlement hereunder and Purchaser shall promptly repair any and all damage to or affecting the Property caused by same. Purchaser shall indemnify, diligently defend and hold Seller (its partners, - 2 - ,. .. .. agents, contractors and representatives) harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, loss, expenses, costs and liabilities resulting from or arising out of or in connection with Purchaser's entry upon the Property and any and all of the aforesaid action or inaction thereon, regardless of when same Occur or when notice thereof is received or given. The indemnification shall be due and payable upon demand. If this Agreement is terminated for any reason, Purchaser shall provide Seller within ten (10) days of termination with copies of all surveys, soil tests and other engineering reports accumulated by or for Purchaser with respect to the Property, without cost or expense to Seller, unless the termination was by Purchaser as a result of Seller's default under this Agreement. 5. Purchase Price. The total purchase price and consideration for the Property shall be Eight Hundred One Thousand Three HundJ:ed Sixty Dollars ($801,360) plus any additional amount payable under (c) below (the "Price"). The Price shall be due and payable as follows: a. The amount of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) (the "Deposit") shall be paid by Certified or Cashier's check made payable to Seller and delivered to Seller Upon execution of this Agreement. This Deposit shall be retained by Seller in a separately designated interest-bearing bank account with the social security number of one of the Purchasers and the Deposit, plus all interest actually earned thereon, shall be applied to the Price at Settlement, or if Settlement does not occur, the Deposit and any interest earned thereon shall be retained by Seller as provided in subparagraph 8(k) below in the case of an extension and shall be held by the Seller in the same account until resolution and payment of all amounts owing to Seller, in the event of a breach by Purchaser, or shall be returned to Purchaser, with any interest thereon actually earned, in the event of termination of this Agreement without breach by Purchaser. Any and all interest shall be kept in the account and added to the Deposit. Seller is not holding the Deposit as an escrow agent or other fiduciary. b. The remaining Seven Hundred Eighty One Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Dollars ($781,360) (less any interest paid to Seller with the Deposit) shall be due and payable in one sum at Settlement and shall be paid by Certified or Cashier's Check made payable to Seller and delivered to Seller at Settlement or by funds wired to Seller's designated account at Settlement, with no wire completed until Bank confirmation to Seller. Payment may be made by wire transfer at Settlement only if Seller is so notified at least two business days prior to Settlement. - 3 - '. I I I J ! 'I I I ! I , I I I J j I I I I I I , I I I i I I I I i I I I ! c. As an additional part of the Price, if the number of units that Purchaser builds or obtains approval to build on the Property exceeds 100, Purchaser shall pay to Seller an amount equal to the additional amount owing by Seller to Silver Spring Township under the agreement with the Township provided for in Section 7(a) below for or with respect to off-site improvements allocated based on estimated additional trip generation attributable to the additional units, up to a maximum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). d. All payments shall be made in immediately available federal funds. 6. Adiustments. Real estate taxes, water, sewer and other current lienable charges, if any, shall be apportioned as of the date of Settlement on the basis of the fiscal year or other period of the applicable charging, assessing or taxing body, Subject to paragraph 7(c) herein, Purchaser shall be responsible for any and all benefit assessments and other fees or charges assessed against the Property subsequent to the date of Settlement, or assessed before Settlement but applicable to any period of time after Settlement, including without limitation any and all sewer and water connection fees, except chat Seller shall be responsible for and shall pay all water and sewer assessments, impact fees, and costs of required improvements, assessed as a result of the subdivision of the Bent Creek Business Center and/or the conveyance provided for herein, except EDU charge and connection fees. Purchaser is to pay all recreational fees and assessments, provided, however, Purchaser may contest any and all such recreational fees and assessments by appropriate proceedings and in good faith, but only if such proceedings stay and prevent any collection or execution for collection of same and provided that said proceedings and nonpayment do not result in any lien, restriction or encumbrance, or any other adverse consequence, for any or all of the properties in or constituting the Bent Creek Business Center other than the Property and then only arising after settlement between Seller and Purchaser. As of the date of execution of this Agreement, Seller represents and warrants that it has no notice or actual knowledge of any Assessments, (as defined in paragraph 7(c) herein) and Seller has no actual knowledge that any such Assessment is pending. Purchaser shall pay all filing fees and recording costs at Settlement, 7. Conditions Precedent for Seller. This Agreement, and performance by Seller hereunder, is expressly conditioned upon satisfaction or written waiver by Seller of the fcllowing condi- tions: a. Seller shall have obtained prior to Settlement a satisfactory executed agreement with Silver Spring Township regarding off-site improvements and all other necessary - 4 - approvals for the sale of the Property pursuant to the terms hereof, if and to the extent not already obtained, with all necessary subdivision plans recorded as required at or before Settlement (subdivision shall be obtained at Seller's sole cost and expense, except costs and expenses attributable to any contemporaneous land use approval sought by Purchaser) . b. Seller shall have acquired good and marketable title (legal or equitable) to the larger tract of real estate that includes the Property subject only to liens and encumbrances satisfactory to Seller and, with respect to the Property, liens and encumbrances permitted in accordance with Paragraph 2 above.. c. There are no material assessments (excluding sewer assessments) or other fees or charges assessed against the Property prior to Settlement (collectively the "Assessments") which would be the responsibility of Seller. Same shall be "material" if same in the aggregate exceed the sum of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00), net of any portion of such assessment paid by Purchaser. d. There is no material adverse change in the assets, business or financial condition of Purchaser prior to Settlement. Purchaser shall notify Seller within five (5) days, and in all events prior to Settlement, of any and all events or circumstances which may constitute or be reason- ably expected to constitute, alone or in conjunction with other facts or circumstances, or to cause alone or with other facts and circumstances, a mc\terial adverse change as described in the preceding sentence. e. All representations of Purchaser herein shall be true and correct in all material respects when made and as of Settlement. Purchaser shall have performed timely all obligations and duties hereunder to be performed by Purchaser at or before Settlement. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, upon the failure of any of the foregoing conditions precedent, Seller shall have the absolute right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to that effect to Purchaser or to waive such condition by settling. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this paragraph 7, Seller and Purchaser shall have no further liabilities or obligations hereunder, except that if Seller has terminated only because of failure of condition 7b. above, then Seller shall be liable to Purchaser for Purchaser's actual and reasonable costs and expenses incurred in pursuing purchase of the Property under this Agreement up to a maximum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000), less amounts recovered from Seller - 5 - .. under any other basis. Seller and Purchi:1fJer agree to cooperate in obtaining, and Seller shall diligently puroue by reasonable efforts any and all actions, thingo or itomn noccooary to satisfy the conditions under 7a and 7b above, in 11 tillloly IlIllnner at Seller's sole cost and expense, 8. Conditions Precedent for PUrCh\lDcr. This ^greement, and performance by Purchaser hereunder, io expreAsly conditioned upon satisfaction or written waiver by purchlloer of the following conditions at or before Settlement: a. Receipt by Purchaser of reasonably satisfactory evidence that it will receive good ilnd marketable title in accordance with paragraph 2 above, which Purchaser shall, diligently pursue beginning within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof and Purchaser must notify Seller of any nonsatisfaction of this condition on or before July 31, 1997; b. Receipt of a survey provided by Seller, disclosing no material encroachments, gaps or other matters which would make the Property different in any material respect than that described in Exhibit "^," attached hereto, and disclosing the location of all utilities, rights-of-way, easements and encroachments on the Property, to the extent known or discoverable with reasonable efforts, which Purchaser shall diligently review and approve or disapprove within fifteen (15) days after receipt; c. Receipt by Purchaser of reasonably satisfactory evidence that the Property is or will in a timely manner be served by water, sewer, storm sewer, gas, telephone, cable television and electric services, which evidence Purchaser shall request from the appropriate parties within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof and Purchaser must notify Seller of any nonsatisfaction of this condition on or before July 31, 1997; d. Receipt by Purchaser of reasonably satisfactory evidence that there are no Environmental Claims or Materials of Environmental Concern, as such terms are defined in paragraph 10 (d), affecting the Property, including without limitation the presence of hazardous or toxic substances or existing or past failure to comply with any local, state or federal law relating to the Property, which study and report Purchaser shall request within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof and Purchaser must notify Seller of any nonsatisfaction of this condition on or before July 31, 1997; - 6 - e. All representations of Seller herein shall be true and correct in all material respects on the date hereof and as of Settlement. Seller shall have performed timely all duties and obligations hereunder to be performed by Seller at or before Settlement; f. The Purchaser shall have obtained a legally binding commitment for construction financing for its proposed construction for the intended use of the Property in an amount not less than $1,200,000, providing for interest at a rate not in excess of 10% per annum, compounded daily or less frequently, and otherwise upon terms reasonably satisfactory to Purchaser and Purchaser must notify Seller of any nonsatisfaction of this condition on or before July 31, 1997; g. The Purchaser shall have received an allocation for the Property of sufficient sewage capacity for its currently intended use of the Property, requiring a payment for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") not in excess of $4,200, and public utilities, including water, electricity, and telephone service in reasonably sufficient capacity for the intended use of the Property. Whenever used in this Agreement, the "intended use of the Property" shall mean the development of approximately 100 units (50 buildings) intended for senior housing condominiums as described and indicated in the plans attached hereto as Exhibit "C"; h. Seller shall have demolished and removed the old house upon the Property and will remove any heating fuel tank located therein, as provided for in Paragraph 11 below; i. The Purchaser shall have received soil tests and other examinations performed by or at the direction of the Purchaser revealing that the Property is reasonably satisfactory for the intended use of the Property. Purchaser shall reC'lest all such soil tests and other examinations within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof and Purchaser must notify Seller of any nonsatisfaction of this condition on or before July 31, 1997; j. The Property shall not have suffered any material adverse damage or change from flooding, erosion or other acts of nature or Acts of God that would prevent or materially interfere with the intended use of the Property; (k) The Purchaser shall have obtained final approval by the Township of the land use development plan for the intended use of the Property, which shall have been submitted by Purchaser not later than fifteen (15) days. after final Township approval of the Plan; provided that if - 7 - the condition in this subparagraph (k) is not satisfied by August 31, 1997, Purchaser may elect to continue this Agreement and defer settlement hereunder to a date not later than November 3D, 1997 by giving notice to such effect to Seller on or before August 31, 1997 and agreeing that the Deposit shall be released and paid to Seller upon notice from Purchaser of such extension with the Deposit treated as a payment for such extension, but applied against the Purchase Price as provided herein if settlement does occur pursuant to this Agreement within such extension period; and (1) On or before August 22, 1997, Seller shall have acquired the larger tract so as to satisfy the condition in subparagraph 7(b) above.or Seller shall have waived such, condition by notice to Purchaser. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, upon the failure of any of the foregoing conditions precedent, with notice thereof to Seller within any stated time period (or if none is stated, then by settlement) Purchaser shall have the absolute right to terminate this Agreement prior to Settlement upon written notice to that effect to Seller, If this Agreement is properly terminated pursuant to this paragraph S, Seller and Purchaser shall have no further obligations or liabilities hereunder. Purchaser and Seller both agree to cooperate in obtaining, and Purchaser shall diligently pursue, by reasonable efforts, any and all actions, things or items necessary to satisfy the conditions precedent under Sa through Sd and Sf, Sg and Si above, in a timely manner at Purchaser's sole cost and expense. 9. Condition of Propertv. Subject to paragraphs 2, 10 and 11 hereof, and without waiver of any conditions precedent, Purchaser represents, warrants and agrees that it has inspected and familiarized itself with the Property, making or having made all inspections, studies and surveys Purchaser and its advisors, contractors, and/or representatives deem necessary or appropriate, and, if Settlement occurs, Purchaser accepts the Property "as-is" and "where-is." EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN, SELLER HAS NOT, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH OTHERS, MADE ANY REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES OR AGREEMENTS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER, CONCERNING THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY, THE USABILITY OR SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR FOR ANY PURPOSE, OR OTHERWISE ABOUT OR CONCERNING THE PROPERTY, ITS USE OR VALUE, AND, IF SETTLEMENT OCCURS, PURCHASER SPECIFICALLY ACCEPTS ANY AND ALL RISKS THAT PURCHASER MAY NOT BE ABLE, FOR ANY REASON, TO USE THE PROPERTY OR ANY PORTION THEREOF FOR ANY PURPOSE INTENDED OR DESIRED BY PURCHASER. - S - 10. Environmental Matters, a. Compliance with LawR. To the best of Seller's actual knowledge the Property is in full compliance with the Environmental Laws (as hereinafter defined). Seller has not received any notice that alleges that the Property is not in such full compliance. b. Pendina Claims. There is no Environmental Claim (as hereinafter defined) pending or threatened against Seller or, to Seller's best actual knowledge, against the Property. c. Environmental Studies, Seller has had prepared on its behalf, by R. E. Wright Associates, a Phase I Study,. ("Report") of the Property, dated June, 1996 (REWEI Report 97228-1-1), and Purchaser hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of that Report. Seller represents and warrants that the Report is the only environmental study, investigation, test, evaluation and analysis prepared by or for Seller with regard to the Property. d, Definitions. (1) "Environmental Claim" as used herein shall mean written notice by any person or entity alleging liability arising out of, based on or resulting from any violation, or alleged violation, of any Environmental Law. (2) "Environmental Laws" as used herein shall mean all federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to pollution or protection of human health from contaminants in the environment or to protecting the environment itself, including without limitation, laws and regulations relating to emissions, discharges, releases or threatened releases of Materials of Environmental Concern, or otherwise relating to the use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or handling of Materials of Environmental Concern. (3) "Materials of Environmental Concern" as used herein shall mean any and all substances which are any of the following: (a) explosives, oil and petroleum products and byproducts, urea formaldehyde, radon, radioactive materials, polychlorinated biphenyls or related or similar materials ("PCBs"), asbestos or material containing asbestos; or (b) defined, designated or listed as a "Hazardous Substance," "Regulated Substance," "Hazardous Material," "Hazardous Waste," "Toxic Waste," "Toxic Material," "Contaminants" or "Industrial Waste," or defined, designated or listed in a similar manner, under the (i) - 9 - " Clean Water Act, 33 U,S.C. Section 1251 et sea.; (ii) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et sea.; (iii) Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C, Section 1801 et seg,; (iv) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.; (v) Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management Act, Pa. Stat, Ann, tit. 35 Section 6018.103; (vi) Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law, Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 35, 691.1 et seq,; (vii) Pennsylvania Hazardous Substances Site Clean-up Act, Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 35, Section 6020.101 ~ seq.: or (viii) any other Environmental Laws. 11. Re resentations Warranties and Covenants of Seller. Seller hereby represents, warrants and covenants to and with , Purchaser, upon which same has relied, as follows: a. To Seller's knowledge, after Seller's review of the records for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania and the tax records for Silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, neither the Property nor any portion thereof has received any special tax assessments of any kind that would result in a recapture of any prior tax savings or reductions as a result of or based on the sale contemplated in this Agreement and/or the intended use of the Property as stated above; b. The Property is, or will on or before November 30, 1997, be served by water and sewer, which lines shall then extend to a border of the Property at no cost to Purchaser. To Seller's knOWledge, even though there is no "reservation" of EDUs, there should now be sufficient EDUs available for the intended use of the Property. Seller shall use reasonable efforts to cause the applicable utilities companies to extend telephone and electrical lines to the Property on or. before such date, at no cost to Purchaser, and shall request, at no cost to Seller or Purchaser, that cable television lines be extended to the Property by such date; c. The Property shall, as of Settlement, be in full compliance with all subdivision and land use development plans and all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders and decrees relating thereto. In addition, Seller shall be in compliance with same as to all or any other parts of the Bent Creek Business Center to the extent any such non- compliance by Seller would materially and adversely affect the Property and/or the intended use of the Property; d. Seller has posted, or will as of Settlement have posted, all required bonds securing all improvements to the Bent Creek Business Center as shown on the final subdivision - 10 - and/or land use development plan for same as approved by Silver Spring Township, with all such improvements to be completed by Seller or caused to be completed by Seller (to the extent within Seller's control) in a timely manner, reasonably satisfactory to the requiring authority; e. No part of the Property is or constitutes wet lands or waters of the United States or waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania such as would prevent or materially interfere with the intended use of the Property. f. As of settlement, Purchaser shall have access to the Property for equipment and by September 30, 1997, Purchaser shall have access to the Property by way of.a , roadway suitable for construction vehicles in all weather. On or before November 30, 1997, Seller shall have constructed a street providing access from the Property to Pennsylvania Route 114, which street shall be constructed on standards as necessary to dedicate same to Silver Spring Township (except for final wearing course layer, to be added later), with a traffic signal installed at such intersection by Seller. Until the road is dedicated to the Township, Seller will maintain the roadway and easement area as needed for construction on Lot 16 and, if same continues after issuance of an occupancy certificate for any building on Lot 16, in a manner consistent with the way that Township maintains its comparable streets and roadways (except that the final wearing course shall, in no event, be required prior to May 31, 1998). Seller shall have also obtained or imposed upon Lot 17 of the Plan an easement for emergency access to Lot 16 in a precise location and upon terms reasonably satisfactory to Seller and Purchaser. All obligations of Seller hereunder to construct, install and/or erect improvements shall be extended to the extent same have been delayed by acts of nature or Acts of God, wars, riots, civil disturbance, labor actions, strikes, boycotts or other forces or factors beyond the reasonable control of Seller. g. No storm water management facilities shown on any subdivision or land use development plan as being located upon the Property will require any maintenance by Purchaser or will same prevent or materially interfere with the intended use of the Property, and to Seller's knowledge no additional storm water management facilities or easements are now expected, except in each case as may be required for storm water management of storm water originating on the Property. h, To Seller's knowledge, there is no fact or condition existing on the Property that is reasonably expected to cause or result in an action or proceeding at - 11 - law or in equity against the Property or any owner thereof or that violates any ordinance, law, rule, regulation, order. or decree applicable to the Property. To Seller's knowledge there is no action, suit or proceeding pending or threatened against or otherwise directly affecting the Property. i. Not later than settlement, Seller shall have demolished and removed the old house located upon the Property, at Seller's cost and expense. In addition, Seller shall have removed any heating fuel tank located therein in compliance with Environmental Laws and remedied any leakage therefrom, up to a maximum cost to Seller of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) . 12. Restrictive Covenants. The development, use and future conveyance of the Property shall be subject to the restrictions, encumbrances and restrictive covenants in the Protective Cove- nants Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto. Purchaser shall execute and deliver to Seller the Protective Covenants Agreement at Settlement. The Protective Covenants shall be recorded and shall run with the land. 13. Realtv Transfer Tax. Purchaser and Seller shall divide equally the payment of any and all realty transfer taxes required to paid as a result of the conveyance set forth herein and same shall be paid as and when due, including without limitation any payment at Settlement. 14. Cure Period. Upon determination by either Purchaser or Seller that the conditions precedent to its obligations hereunder as provided in paragraphs 7 and 8, as applicable, have not been satisfied at the applicable time, Purchaser or Seller, as the case may be, must provide the other party with written notification to that effect. The other party then shall have until fifteen (15) days after notice to cause such condition to occur or breach to be cured (the "cure period"). Failure to give such notice shall not excuse the obligations of the party entitled to receive such notice, unless that other party has been materially adversely effected by the failure of such notification. If no notice has been given at or before Settlement, the conditions precedent shall be deemed to have been satisfied or waived in their entirety. If notice pursuant to this paragraph is given and the recipient of the notice is unable to cause such condition to occur or breach to be cured within the cure period, the party giving notice shall have such rights as are provided under this Agreement for breach hereof or a failure of a condition precedent. The foregoing notwithstanding, no cure peri.od shall extend or delay the last possible Settlement date provided for herein and neither party shall be entitled to a cure period for any failure to settle as and when provided herein. - 12 - " 15. Default, Should either party fail to fulfill and perform in any material respect any of its obligations hereunder, and such is not cured during the "cure period," if any, that party shall be in default hereunder. 16. Remedies on Default. In the event of a default by Seller or Purchaser the non-defaulting party shall be entitled to any and all rights and remedies existing at law or in equity, including without limitation, damages and the equitable remedy of specific performance, and all rights and remedies set forth herein or in any agreement, document or instrument executed pursuant hereto. 17. Authorization and Conflicts, Seller represents and, warrants to Purchaser that Seller is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the execution, delivery and performance under this Agreement and each of the documents, instruments and agreements to be executed hereunder have been duly authorized. Each Purchaser represents and warrants he is an adult individual with full power and authority to enter into and perform under this Agreement. Each of Seller and Purchaser represent and warrant to the other that upon signature this Agreement shall constitute the valid, legal and binding obligation of that party in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Each further represents and warrants to the other that execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement will not violate or be a breach of any organizational documents, or any contracts, agreements, indentures, documents or instruments or any laws, orders or decrees, binding upon same or pending with respect to the party. 18. Eminent Domain. If, prior to Settlement, all or any material portion of the Property is subject to taking by eminent domain or similar proceedings by any governmental entity having jurisdiction over the Property ("Eminent Domain"), Purchaser, at its sole option, exercisable prior to Settlement, may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller given within thirty (30) days after notice of the taking or pending taking, whereupon neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to the other hereunder. If Purchaser opts to proceed to Settlement, the parties shall proceed to Settlement without reduction in the Price and Purchaser shall receive the entire award for such taking. As of this date, and again at Settlement, Seller 'represents and warrants that it has no notice of any Eminent Domain proceeding against the Property and has no reason to believe that a notice of Eminent Domain is forthcoming. 19. Risk of Loss. Risk of loss of the Property shall be borne by Seller until the time of Settlement. If the Property suffers material damage prior to Settlement, either party may terminate this Agreement by written notice to the other given - 13 - within thirty (30) days after the damage occurs, unless such damage is caused by any act or omission of a party hereto, or any agent, employee, invitee, or designee of same, in which case the non-damaging party shall have the option to terminate or to proceed to Settlement without reduction in the Price and Purchaser shall then receive an assignment of any insurance proceeds which would otherwise be payable to Seller, if any. 20. Brokers. Each party represents and warrants to the other that it has not contracted with or involved any real estate broker, agent or similar person with respect to this Agreement, and that no brokerage commission or like fee is due to anyone in connection with this sale or this Agreement as a result of the actions of that party, Any party violating this representation and warranty shall indemnify, promptly defend and hold the other party harmless from and against any and all costs, liabilities, obligations and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred as a result of or arising out of such violation. 21. Leqal Fees, Each party shall pay its own attorneys' fees and expenses with respect to the negotiation, preparation and performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that in the event that either party shall be in default hereunder the non- defaulting party shall be entitled to recover from, and the defaulting party shall pay, all reasonable attorneys' fees, expert fees and court costs incurred by the non-defaulting party in the enforcement of this Agreement and/or in the pursuance of any rights, remedies or damages hereunder, with such costs and expenses allocated equitably and comparatively between the parties by a court of competent jurisdiction in the event that both parties shall be in default hereunder, 22. Notices. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given when delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties at the addresses set forth below. Either party may change its address for purposes of receiving notice, by notice to the other. If to Seller: Donald H. Mowery, General Partner Ritner Park Associates 625 Hamilton Street Carlisle, PA 17013 If to Purchaser: DD&K, Inc. 1898 North Market Street Elizabethtown, PA 17022 Attn.: David G. Heisey, President - 14 - 23. Miscellaneous, a, This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. Purchaser may not assign this Agreement, or any rights or duties hereunder, without the prior written consent of Seller, which consent may be withheld in Seller's sole discretion; provided, however, that Purchaser may assign Purchaser's rights and interests hereunder to a corporation, partnership or limited liability company formed by or for them for the purpose of developing the Property for the intended use of the Property provided that Purchaser remains fully liable hereunder after such assignment. The obligations and liabilities for performance of Purchaser hereunder shall be joint and several as to David Strong and David Heisey. b, This Agreement shall not be amended, modified or rescinded except by a written agreement signed by Seller and Purchaser. No right, power, remedy or privilege hereunder shall be waived except to the extent expressly set forth in writing signed by the party charged with the waiver. No waiver of one event or breach shall waive any future or further event or breach. c, This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the parties with regard to the subject matter hereof, and all other representations, undertakings, discussions and/or agreements of any kind, if any, made prior to or contemporaneously with this Agreement, are superseded by the provisions of this Agreement and are hereby made null and void. d, This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (excepting conflict of laws). Each party agrees and consents to venue and jurisdiction only in the Court of Common Pleas for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and/or the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, for any and all disputes hereunder or otherwise with respect to the Property or this Agreement. e. If any term or provision or portion thereof of this Agreement, or application thereof to any person or circumstance be held invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of said term or provision and of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in effect to the fullest extent permitted by law; and, to this end, the parties hereto agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement are severable. f, Neither party may record this Agreement or any memorandum hereof. Any violation of the preceding sentence - 15 - . ~ ; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year fist above written. WITNESS: SELLER: RSM ASSOCIATES, L.P. a Pennsylvania limited partnership By: RSM Associates, Inc., Sole Gener Partner ~/.f, a/~ . By WITNESS: PURCHASER: DD&K, Inc. iJ ,OK~ - 17 - C, .-! .., .'.1 ... .. U I f- ~<r: >l< ~ 01-< U) VJ~ " VJ Z ~~ ~ W N :3: ~~ (9 N N ~ 0 :5 z 0 ~ >l<VJ ~ '" ~ 0 Z I-< '" :J ~ 1515 ~ OCl Z ~ - < I ~15 f-; '" :L ..; >- < z (i;>l< I-< Z M < z I ~ Z I ..J "'- 0 :5 <r:~ I-< M 0 " ~ D- 8 E;" tiI ~ <D I > ~ . I-< >l< oilCl f- 0 w z ~ 0' z . > < - 0 ~ ~ " 0 g,,:s ~ ?- 0 ~ 0 " " U 8 . z (f) ~ < " f-;8 ~ :5 u " ....l < z 0 g5Cl I-< . co 2 j ~ :> I 0 I-< U w 8j U U Cl Z ~ I-< 0:: tile.:: :3 (9 18tiI Cl Z 2 tiI z~ (9 I-<U Cl ::r:: I ) information to limn a belicf as to their truth, 5. Denied, as after reasonable invcstigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belicf as to thc truth of this avermcnt. 6, Admitted in part, denied in parI. It is admittcd only that Mowery engaged the services of Black for various skctch planning scrvices and site analysis at the request of Mowery, but the averment "initially" is dcnied, All of the remaining aspects of this averment are denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth, 7, Il is admitted only that Black provided services in accordance with a proposal which is writing and speaks for itself. All other averments are denied, 8, It is admitted only that Mowery entered into an agreement of sale with the Allen family for the purchase of the Allen Tract, but the terms and conditions of such agreement of sale are not admitted in this response, It is denied that Black participated in Mowery's purchase of the Allen tract. It is denied that Mowery entered into the agreement based upon information provided by Black, 9, Denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 10, Denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. I], Denied, as many of the allegations contained in Paragraph II are conclusions of law to which no response is required, It is furthcr dcnied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belicf as to the truth of this averment. HB:40561,13246-0B 2 12, Denicd, us after reusonablc investigation Black is without knowlcdgc or information sufficient to form a belief us to the truth of this uvermcnl. ]3. It is admitted that plaintiff has uttachcd to its complaint un Exhibit A which purports to be a rcvised proposal to plaintiff for certain professional services, All other averments contained in Parugraph 13 are denied, as Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to thc truth of those averments, Further, it appears that an additional term to the proposul was addcd by the rcprcsentutives of plaintiff, and this additional term does not appear to be agreed to by Black, Hence, dcnied, 14, It is denied that Black had accepted the undertaking prior to the entering into a written professional services agrcement with Strong and Heisey. All othcr averments are denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledgc or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, 15, Denied, as ufter reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 16, Denied as stated, The rcstatement of the alleged agreement between DD&K and Black is denied, in that any and all terms and conditions of any agreement speak for themselves and do not require paraphruse in this complaint. 17, Denied as stated, The terms and conditions of the agreement between Mowery and Black speak for themselves, and do not rcquire a paraphrase as set forth in the plaintiffs complaint. 18, Denied as a conclusion of law, to which no response is rcquired, 19, Denied as a conclusion of law, to which no response is required, The HB:40561,13246,OB 3 sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of thc avermcnt, and arc thcrcforc denied, As to all other averments, they arc dcnicd, as after rcasonablc investigation Black is without knowlcdgc or information sufficient to form a belicf as to the truth of thosc averments, 26. Dcnied, as aftcr rcasonablc invcstigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficicnt to form a bclicf as to thc truth of this avcrmcnt. 27, Dcnicd, as aftcr rcasonablc investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficicnt to form a belief as to the truth of this avcrment. 28, Dcnied as a conclusion of law, Dcnicd as after rcasonablc investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficicnt to form a belief as to thc truth of this avermcnt: a, Dcnied, as after rcasonable invcstigation Black is without knowlcdge or information sufficicnt to 10 I'm a belief as to thc truth of this averment. b, Denied, as after reasonablc invcstigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficicntto lorm a belicfas to thc truth of this avcrment. c, Denied, as after rcasonable invcstigation Black is without knowlcdge or information sufficicnt to 10rm a bclicfas to thc truth of this avcrmcnt. d, Dcnied, as aftcr rcasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or intormation sufticicnt to form a belicfas to thc truth of this averment. e, Dcnied, as after rcasonable invcstigation Black is without knowledge 01' information sufticicnt to 10rm a belicf as to thc truth of this avcrment. f, Dcnied, as aftcr reasonable invcstigation Black is without knowlcdgc 01' information sufticicnt to 10rm a belicf as to thc truth of this avcrment. g, Dcnied, as aftcr rcasonable invcstigation Black is without knowlcdgc or HB:40561,13246-0B 5 information sufficient to leII'm a belief as to the truth of this avcrment. h, Dcnicd as statcd, It is admittcd only that in September of 1997, Craig W, Bachik, a fonner employce of Black, without thc knowledge 01' approval of Black, affixed the seal and signature of Stcvcn Fisher on ccrtain submissions, without the authority of Stcvcn Fisher, After rcasonable investigation, Black is without information sufficient to dctermine the truth of the allegations made in this subparagraph, and thcrefore denies same, i. Denied as stated, It is admitted only that in Scptember of 1997, Craig W, Bachik, a fonner employee of Black, without the knowledge or approval of Black, affixed the seal and signature of Steven Fisher on certain submissions without the authority of Steven Fisher. Aftcr reasonable investigation, Black is without information sufficient to dctermine the truth of the remaining allegations, and therefore denies same, J, Denied as conclusions of law, Further denied. as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these avermcnts, 29. Denied as conclusions of law, Further denied, as after rcasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, , 30, Denied, as after rcasonablc investigation Black is without knowledge or information suflicientto form a belief as to the truth of thesc averments, Also denied as conclusions of law and as speculative opinions, HB:40561,13246-0B 6 land developmcnt plan occurred in the Spring of 1998, It is admitted that those plans were recorded in thc Cumberland County Recorder of Deeds office, As regards settlement, denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to thc truth ofthesc averments, 38, Denied as conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information suftieientto form a belief as to the truth of these averments; a, further denied as conclusions of law, b, further denied, in that errors arc not defined so as to permit a proper response, e, Denied, Sewers were identified on all plans and submissions, 39, Denied as conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 40, Denied as conclusions ofIaw, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufticient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, 41, Denied as conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of these averments, WHEREFORE, Black requests this Honorable Court to dismiss plaintiffs complaint and to grant such other relief in favor of Black as is appropriate, COUNT III - FRAUD HB:40561,13246-0B 8 42, No rcsponsc rcquircd, 43. Dcnicd as statcd, Thc contract in qucstion, bcing in writing, spcaks for itsclf and hcncc any charactcrizations thcrcof arc dcnicd, As to thc allcgations of Strong contacting Mowery, dcnicd, as aftcr rcasonable invcstigation, Black is without knowlcdgc or information sufficicntto form a belief as to the truth of this avcrmcnt. 43, Denicd, as after rcasonable invcstigation, Black is without knowlcdge or information sufficient to form a bclief as to the truth of this avcrmcnt. 44, Denied as statcd, It is admitted only that in September of 1997, Craig W, Baehik, a former cmployee of Black, without the knowledge or approval of Black , affixed the seal and signature of Steven Fisher on certain submissions, without the authority of Steven Fisher, After reasonable investigation, Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to determine the truth of the remaining allegations and therefore denies same, 45, Denied as stated, Denied as conclusions of law, Denied, as after reasonable investigation, Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 46, Denied. To the contrary, Black did not make any representations to the plaintiff. 47, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required, 48, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required. 49, Denied, as after reasonablc invcstigation, Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to thc truth of this avermcnt. 50, Denicd, as aftcr rcasonablc invcstigation, Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a bclicf as to thc truth of this averment. HB:40561,13246-08 9 51, Dcnicd, as aftcr rcasonablc investigation, Black is without knowlcdgc or information sufficicntto form a bclicf as to thc truth of this avcrmcnt. 52, Dcnicd as a conclusion of law to which no rcsponsive pleading is required, 53, Dcnied, as after reasonablc invcstigation, Black is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a bclief as to thc truth of this avcrment. 53, Denicd as a conclusion of law to which no rcsponsive plcading is required, WHEREFORE, Black requests this Honorable Court to dismiss plaintiffs complaint and to grant such other relief in favor of Black as is appropriate, COUNT IV - NEGLIGENCE 54, No response is rcquired, 55, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no rcsponsivc pleading is required, 56, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required, 57, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required, Denied for the reasons that havc been previously pleaded in the referenced paragraphs, 58, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required, a, Denied as a conclusion of Jaw to which no rcsponsive pleading is required, b, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no rcsponsive pleading is required, c, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required, d, Denied as a conclusion oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required, e, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required, f. Denied as a conclusion of law to which no rcsponsive pleading is required, 59, Denied as a conclusion of law to which no rcsponsive plcading is required, HB:40561,13246-0B I 0 WHEREFORE, Black r~qucsts this Honorablc Court to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and to grant such other relief in favor of Bluck as is appropriate, NEW MATTER 60, Black incorporates all of the above paragraphs as if fully set forth here at length, 61, Plaintiffs claims arc barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of the statute of limitations, 62, Plaintiffs claims arc barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of consent. 63, Plaintiffs complaint fails in whole or in part to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against Black. 64, Black's contract did not contain any expresscd or implied warranties to plaintiff. 65, Black's contract does not covenant or guarantee approval from any public body having jurisdiction over this project. 66, Plaintiff is solely responsible for obtaining approval from any public body having jurisdiction over this project. 67, Black's contract does not covcnal1l or guarnntee a specific date by which each part of the contract had to be completed, 68, Plaintiff is responsible for the delays in the project. 69, The damages alleged in plaintiff's complaint arc economic in nature and are therefore barred by the economic loss doctrine, 70, The damages allcged in plaintiff's complaint were caused or contributed to by the plaintiff, tiB:40561,13246-0a II 71, Plaintiff has not properly mitigated its damages, 72, 1-1, Edward Black, President of Black, was not aware of the alleged wrongdoing of Mr, Bachik, 73, Black, at all times, acted reasonably, prudently and properly and with thc fllllcst degree of care required for the best interests of its clients, 74, Plaintiffs claims are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of estoppel. 75, Plaintiffs claims are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of waiver, 76, Plaintiffs claims are barred in whole or in part by accord and satisfaction, 77, Black discharged its duties or obligations as set forth in the contract. 78, The damages claimed by plaintiff arc and always were risks assumed by the developer and not those assumed by Black, 79, The damages claimed by the plaintiff are uncertain and speculative, 80, The damages claimed by the plaintiff are not reasonably foreseeable, Black did not commit a fraud upon plaintiff, 81. H, Edward Black 01'1-1, Edward Black & Associates did not commit a fraud upon the plaintiff. 82. Alternatively, Black is not responsible for the ti'aud of his agent. COUNTERCLAIM I, Defendant, H, Edward Black & Associates, p,c., is a landscape architecture and engineering firm with a principal place ofbllsiness located at 2403 North Front Street, Harrisburg, P A 17110 2, PlaintiffDD&K, lnc, is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of HB:40561,13246-0B 12 busincss located at 1898 North Market Street, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, 3. Plaintiff entered into a contract with Black for professional design services of Lot No, 16 of Bent Creek Developmcnt located in Silver Spring Township, 4. As a part ofplainliffs contractual obligations with Black, plaintiff was to compensate Black in accordance with the contract. 5, The land development plan for the condominiums at Bent Creek waG approved by the Silver Spring Township Commissioners, 6. Black completed all professional services for the submission orland development plans in a timely and workmanlike manner, 7, To date, plaintiff has not paid Black in total for work done in performing the land development plans required, 8, Black has suffered to its detriment as plaintiff has gained financially through Black's uncompensated labor and professional service, 9, Plaintiff, by not tendering payment as required by the contract, is in breach of contract. 10, Plaintiff is liable to Black in an amount in excess of $ 19,013,57 for completion of the land development plan as stated in the contract. I I, Black has repeatedly demanded payment for the amount due, but plaintiff has not paid sums lawfully due to Black, 12, All conditions precedent to the bringing of this claim have been fulfilled, HB:40561,13246.0B 13 DD&K, INC. IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA v, No, 99-961 Civil Tcrm H, EDWARD BLACK & ASSOCIATES, P,C, Civil Action -Law CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND NOW, on December 15,2000, I hereby certifY that I have served a true and correct copy of the within Answer ofH, Edward Black & Associates. P,C, Containing New Matter and Counterclaim upon the following person(s) via first class U,S, Mail, postage prepaid: \ John M. Smith, Esq, Jeffrey S, Shank, Esq, 222 S, Market Street, Suite 201 P,O, Box 267 Elizabethtown, P A 17022-0267 POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CARRLE, BOWMAN & LOMBARDO, P,C, >>)) By '-z1- C, Grainger Bow I.D, #15706 114 North Second Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 238-9300 Allvl'I1eysfor Ii. Edward Black & Associates HB:40561.13246-0B 15 ~,~ ... ,. ." c. , . j: , ,- ., ~ .- ~r. --.:.J .~ ': ) .. i./~ , '.I" .... '.. LI I ::!- L. , , n ) ':':.1 C) 64, Denied, The allegations contained in paragraph 64 arc conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and the same are therefore denied, 65, Denied, The allegations contained in paragraph 65 are conclusions oflaw to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and the same are therefore denied, 66, Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 67, Denied as to conclusions of law Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 68, The allegations contained in paragraph 68 relating to conclusions oflaw, to which no responsive pleading is required, are denied, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 69, Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 70, Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 77. Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 78. Denied as to conclusions oflaw, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to fonn a belief as to the truth of this averment. 79. Denied as to conclusions oflaw, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 80. Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 8 I. Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to fmm a belief as to the truth of this averment. 82. Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this avemlenl. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM I. Admitted, 2, Admitted, 3. Admitted, 4, Denied as to conclusions of Jaw, 5, Admitted, 6, Denied as to conclusions law, Further denied that plans were submitted in a timely and workmanlike manner. Plaintiff alleges in its suit among other theories of liability, that Defendant did not complete the land development plan in a timely and workmanlike manner, Plaintiff incorporates by reference its complaint in denying said allegations of paragraph 6 of Defendant's Counterclaim, 7, Admitted in part, denied in part, It is admitted only that Plaintiff has not paid Black in total what Black Claims or alleges to be due, All of the remaining aspects of this averment are denied, as after reasonable investigation Plaintiff is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth and by further answer, Plaintiff is not legally obligated to pay Black due to various breaches of contract, fraud and negligence of Black as outlined in Plaintiffs complaint. 8, Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. 9. Denied as to conclusions of law, Further denied, as after reasonable investigation, DD&K is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of this averment. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW ) ) ) ) ) H, EDWARD BLACK & ASSOCIATES, ) P,C" ) ) DD&K, INC" Plainti ff No, 99-961 Civil Term vs Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, John M, Smith, Esquire, hereby certify that I duly served a copy of the foregoing Reply and Answer to the following person by United States first class mail, postage pre-paid addressed as follows; Grainger C, Bowman, Esquire 114 North Second Street Harrisburg, PAl 7 I 0 I Respectfully submitted, GINGRICH, SMITH, KLINGENSMITH & Date: r. 151 /A){J I By; l John M, ith, Esquire, ID #19520 Attome I for Plaintiff 222 South Market Street, Suite 201 Elizabethtown, PAl 7022 (717) 367-1370 1 ., . ,.,;, LI 0:: I ~<I; 0.. ~ I- OH - Vi(/) :;: ~~ ~ ~f-; U) E-< o ~ z ...l>J 3 (/) E-<CO w N <I; ZCO (9 N N 0 o..(/) H . <;; '5 z 0 ~ ~ U U ~_ ~ ~ 15lB 0 zo:::l.t...L... J < ~ I HWWH M 1; Z -' - .; ~ t;J[;2 ~ ;Eo.. ~ ' /:: ''':5 '.D "" <( ~ .; z ~ H <1;<;; 0' '" .J < z I ~ - U I E-< z .. o - [;2 co ~:S;Op::; 0 ~ w ~~ H 0Z c3 "'. E-<", 0' I ~ Q. . tJ 0' ...l I- o !g z H '" . . :5 O<:~ CO'" '[;2 H ~ ffi 0 0:::> <( U", WU~ :> :;: ell 0 " " E-<8 0.. ::SO ~ZZ8 0 H (f) ~ III ~ .J z U < w o H U H < z 0 gjo ~ - UJ o:l (/) < ~ :> >,.- - I -' J ~; U U 0 ...lE-<0<: U w Z '" [;J~c3 H $ 0: 0:: CO CO 0 2 (9 Pe;J ~ ~ ",,,,-< z 2:5 ~ ~O '" (9 HU :c 0 \,