Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-01070loo ? LARIIV 1), 9I?RIN(MR 111111. t IN `11111? coll1g, OF CO 4AN At y1?RINORIJ, hie ivlfu, ! t? MM?N I I RM OF I'I010111'1>i t MIII11iLANJ) COl.IN I Y, PRNMYI,VANIA I CIVII• ACTION - I?AW `1'IMOTIIV Mt All,XN'AND10i mul I Or ' `?-y- PATRICIA At AI44XANDIM,111.4 lvllu, "()"111111, UVARMAN, , ,. MARIh DVARMAN, 01111 t1011N At DVARMAM'01/0p1 I OVARMAN FARM PARTNIMMI I Ito i IUIiY'1'filAl. pI3MANp1:U n NWnnsyivl1ni01'minurship, 1 ho?411{11111tH' t , pltnr_lgg FOR A WRIT grsUmmONS 1'Q CI)RTIS Rt IaONGt PRO111110NQ'1'AItVi ,. 1 I11a0su 0111111 plY 0ppo1ua0au 0p0iIlHL llto- oil 000111(al' 1110 p101n(if1H, mid (saltu 0 W111; at' Sunnnans Qy0In1 Mdaf'0r1uttdnn(a,n '1'intalhy M, Alox1l"'I' 1011"1 61100111 A, Aloxmllor,111H Wifo, JIpscph I- A0t 13, pylm11ltnt,011d Jahn A, Dynr111011, 1/( 1/13/11 py0rlnllll 00;711 Pnrltialshlp, u I'uiinl+ylv10d0 (1101,8111 )t Plunyu (111,0011110 S1101-11'1'ta 1lurvo Illu ?fo'I?ndOnts 1iv 1u11aWSt 4'11110tby Mt Aloxb11dor 1100;1010 At Alux011dul, ttasoph It, Ay111v11u11 710(x Rued M01Io 111 I)y111,011111 COMisIO, PA 1700 101111 A, Dyonolilt, ny01'mml I? 01,111, 1'01?h1orHblp 16 110111'8 Rand CI1111H1o, PA 1701.1 Ruspoatfill ly e0bnlftlnd, IRWIN, MORNIGHT & 11UGIII!)S 13yt f , ?ry 1 ?? . l GO Wos(.1 al ),()I M01?0nH A, Me Cnlp ll, l ldro ? ? „ SU'oot cal'110 , PA '71113: _ t (717) 249.2,153 i.. Suprnnlu C0111-1 I,D, Not 25476 1)11.101 hubl'u0ry' 24, 1999 Atlarnoy tilt hlnfhNl'ttc .. , it . (1 1?4?n?anwpl?l? of >?©i?unaylvauia County of Cumberland Nsrry P'; sp,ri.n4lar and JAn M Springer, him wife ya " Tlmoi:l?y M, Aloxoncler pad nat:riala At Al.enancler, his wife 7 Kqt v, Road aprli.plta PA . 17013 aopwph II, Dyarman Marie Of Pyarman of gntnlnnll,h(FAA anNrt o ,john A, Pypx'"m 1 /dib/a prm Partnership ' .,.___ 14?_,n _-_.99-: 07.0.. Ci~VJ1,1,-Tex1p4 NO.. r Pynrman .. 1E Bear.e Road Carl.i.ela PA 17013 iMbthy M, Alexander, Pai?r.i T ai.,a A,' Alexander, his wife, Joseph . ti, PYarman, Marie Of Pyarma n, John At Pyarman,, i;/d/b/a Pyarmnn „ Par P r c+re i „ yy%? VYIl aliya(Io?lan?ntA, Spri.nfler, husband and wife - -- ------------ Action Law ^ ci Vil n illo Plhhltl((e I1nVerotllllloncndanalctlnn 111 ---- , . Summo s -- . . ............ ...................... ••--n _ aga11151 -y6u which you 01'e required to de(ond or i% do(auh ludgmont quay be olltered Agelliek'you, - u „ (sl:Atl) CURT,TS LONG Prothonotary 99 Pabruary '24 , l !?42G:4«.«.««h . C ? - 2G? ? t [o _ .n a .? y,?. I i Data - ° -,_ _ n__.. „. Deputy .: ,,: fir SHPARIP 0 !tPTUIRN REGUl,F)kt p?Sl. NO1 1999-01070 h C0 OIIW}7F?1'1'll OP PLNN 9YINANTA 1 CO? T Ob C M13tuRLA p SP T. CIR LARRY p IST I)L_ Va, i.iE ,1 DIi112' TT.MOTIIY M U`1' AL_._ _ pA N KPLL, I3heriVf.' or Deptll:y Sheriff: of CUM13!hjl LAND County', PenilPylvapia who bei119 dl.lly eWorll ACaot;clinfl .to laW, Hayes' t11e Wit.hl.il }JJZ '' OIL SUMMONS W1a eoryed tlpoll ALWXANDI]R TIMO'PIIY' M r--- t1}e r.: defendant, at 11130 IIOUIRp, oil the let day of 1ta„re. , ? 199 ?t ?' KUTZ ROAD CARL10LD, PA 170,13 CUM[ RLAND County';' PennQylvania, by 1landinU to PA'I'RTCTA AI,I7XANDrR- a true and attepted Copy of t1le WItTT Ole SUMMONS and at the aaille time directl.ng Ner attelltion to t1le Contentp tlleroof, Sheri f H Coates I $o ailewerel p4o4??ovc`? tce 13:10 S Aifdavit 00_??'r??"rC rt- puraharge 0,00 liisfillc?Ztl.1 , 1Sc53.*ifT` f,12?9,lLi?TRWTN, MCKNTOIIT & I1UdI1U7p // GG .. 03 0 /1999 -!r?Iev-91iT Sworn and Hubocribed.to before me thiA _ZtL_ day, of 1P A, D,, 1 Ill 0ULAl2 cl?rMM3lu NN14O1 ID9a-(1,:10,7NN0NNp l COl1p YwOj?lr? N M1O31?It 10 01), CIh I.11R I) V;3, ?Lil_XANIIIr,R 1IMO '?Y I:,i AID -PAWN KIII-114 CUM1314(zi'!lNp. C^ l:lll(, po --_-._r ahgi if:f or Uop?ll.y '91jeriff of y? 111?oylyalli.ar Who being d1 LP laW, 11y 0Worp apoordil?p qay , 4110 Wi Oli ll w12I'r ! op su MONS ui?p17 ALVXANWi I? PA'1'RICIA n - - Was served 11 defellcialll:, a? - il_ tiou(zNl pn Llle?3 L_, G11e ?? day 0, F; arall . 1999 At 7 xUI ROAD _ _r.. Cou174y, Pe111113ylVallia,------- by OURLA D y Ilal?dincl to p`V, TCIA ATOWXANDRIR r a lrie and acuogc'od dory of the WRIT v -- ?t alld at L11e aalllo Lillie diroatillg Her etLLol7l ia11 to the ao11Lo1?,Lp thereof, 9ilorJEf?p CpdL•o! ; IJ?(iYYh 1: 119 G,00 8o allf3Wers1 1. .1.1 ip 1 avic 00 aura large 00 p 100 R-. l,llalii?IC17-tiz-?lT??^^J.-L-Px--,-r---------_, , 11?! `ou-IRWI?j? Mc?cNlaiPr ; 03 0? 199 liual{us by . ?x t y' aWorll alld pubeoribed to before me ii this _IL.7 - , day of ' . ?.. 19 r--??_ A,u, - i { 1 Id, ?lllaltl ll'l s {tl"VURN - l21?gllt 1111 I' p?yt? Nol l.fl?fl?Olp7p h ,. ,: c?'?MMMn W?? r??r n1, ?M gYr?V>,Nr:nl_ co T, o c mh !"It .,Fl? E RINopR LARRY -D VT AL VS, I A_NDRR TIMOTHY M G7' AL DAWN ItL1LI, -1,. Sizer.tff 0I: DepLi? y S)lerl.ff of CUMOERLANu'Coullty t'ennayl.vatlia, Wllo being duly PWprll Acoord llg to-law, ea p, the :WillI'll RIT OG 9Ul11v]ON8 Waa served t4non _ uYARMAN JOa17Plt rl tile defelldant, at:. 17167 HOURS, oll the 9Ch day of arch 1999 al: 16 fiCARa .ROAD CAR14I914S PA 17013 CUMBIRMLAND coLnlCy hon11py1,Yap1a, by llanditlg to ARIA OYARMAN A. t:r"e atld attested cony, of tile WRIT OP „aU oNa Alld E14 411e name. Lime directing L ex attentioll to the colltelits, thereof, aller i.f CoSta l So anaWer. 1 Doc? in 6 00 aa Y I,?,? w'.• Olt AffaviLd 3;10 00 gUro?large 11,00 R 7-Pit-1?1?I?,-R1Tif 1 71n-Tlt I ,' & MC CNIC3IIT' 'rlualira 03?0p/199? by ,.? bt , eWorn and eubecl,ibed Co before 1pe this s day of 71in. 19, A,u,._ ?. 2 6 ? r?YbLl" nt' fl TL571i?'?.'yc" 1 11 11 1 ? ... ... fillllit 1' rl.1I, fl Rlu1 URN, i0101.llanlt ;J14 Nol l.it99-0aa7li t' COMPOwN"1' I1M°?i1R? 7lN 13Y1IVAN in l RT qrR 1.171R12Y`U_liJ!1' (1T? _ .?? t?1?XANDWIZ '1'T O'1' ?Y fd'1' L ,: DAWN 101.4., - _. fJhalrl,lf fi or '1)eptll:y paler. i f 'of C14M13 RLAN1) collnt:y,' PonnpyTwill.i.ci, who being duly awo111 agcor'dinp tp law., pays,: Ella within Rzlr_oc BI.iMMONs Wap served Upo11 I)YARM 1ART.W 13 Chi dofelldallt, It - 17i S 7 NOUNS, o11 tale 9X11 day of colt 1999 at 16 AWARS J70AW _ ? C RLT_LW, PA 17013 CU (1WRLA D County, Pennsylvania',' by lumclinU to,MARIE nYARMAN A C1'lle aild aC4eeLed copy of the _WRTT OP SUMMONS and at tile aalita ti-Me di'i^ecting Nor cittentinn to late contento t hereof, 9heriff•' Coet:e l 13o mioWerd 1aa)ooykQficiellg 6 00' l??,,+a' Affidavit: 00 at-lrcharcge ©, 00 It TSilTSr3-TC1aTfb, l ?! oU'GR iN, MCKNIOtIT & llUO11Q19 0305/1999 by 19Worn +mcl subeeribecl, to 'before Me 1 this _ day of '71i4G,.(_. 19 ? 111D1 Ta11SC ,_ '. is 1• I111i4R:It? 1?' ? S l2l'l'UI2N - RliC3U1.?A1t I c?M?'lMU N(al. 1.999-o.to'lorth cqn11lA??MO4ale?ta?Yt VnNI A i 2J;IL11at,2RY p lu?l' All. V13 i H ANI)11I2. rM.O`?l'lY-M-lil'' 7t G_ D11WN 141 .d, ____ ___ "£thQlra. f: t of laopltl.y ?hel'i f: f; of 06011MAND Co1.1n1:y, I'etlilay.l.mli.at W11o Uaa•Ilg dtl:l.y Pworll aoaardill9.. 11 to law, Pllyp, .1:110 WiU11111 VZ1'I' O' SU MONA WaE1 pervgd . llP011 PYARMAN jOOI A 'I' ll 13 A PYAR A G 2 PAl2I't1fl"Il p _ the defendant, at __ 1,71117 llcimRj 011 tile Y1:11 clay of arol 1999 aq _1G 13LIAIZO ROAD CARLIgL_ ..PA 17013 ---- ,CU DW TTJAIgD +- COMIt:y, 11e11nEfYlVaniar by 112111ding to MAT11' UYYRMAN a true "alld"Lit teated copy of C11e RST OIL SUM MOJS And at tho aatlle t:ilpe c1.-treating ller Attelll:i.011 to tale contents, tllareol, Slleri.ff L'119 Coptp I Sa allp ()ookQ, 6 00 =?ti.ryr.%c r?2 Servv?ae ,00 Affldavft , 014rallarge $ . 00 1 N R i ?t ,110MA13 1t]1ai? B1iZ?TTt `;7 ?1 lT0-o 32?05%7.999NIC1 iT & I1UOIIES by , nrn Q Q Sworn and puboaribed to before dllo this 1"? day of 19`Y2_ A , Q , " t? C?r?Vf4al'i ..? ,1- . LARRY Pt 4 PAN A, t IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF SPRINpRR, t CUMt1RRLANP COUNTY, P8NN$0VANIA Plaintiffs t t° vi t CIVIL ACTION - UAW t , TIMOTHY M, & PATRICIA t AURXANPPR, JOSEPH lit & t MARTR Bt PYARMAN,` t JOHN A, PYARMAN, t/d/U/a t DYARMA14 FARM 0ARTNRRS1JTP,t Pefen4atltp t -No, 99,1070 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT ANP NOW, this Rand day Of Oatobar,-2002, upon conpiderat•ion of a letter from Martine A, McKnight, TIT, Require, otl,'behalf o£ Plaintiff, requesting that the cape be stricken from the purge list; and there being no objection presented in opetl court to the' request, the request is granted, the cape is etricken from the purge list, and the cape shall remain active,... By the Court, /Marcus A, McKnight, III, Re 11 ze For the Plaintiff I J Timodiy M, Alexander 1 ?? c.nf Patricia A, Alexander 7 Kula Road v Carlisle, PA 17011 Defendants n .-1t-% Is LAliliY_,L.r, H4'..lilNl?It!i..11n1.___ _ JAN At R?'1iINcil'slir Ili•t? wife, 1'I,A1N'I'IIt1H 1's Case No, _.19p0^IQ7Q TINR'i'NY Mt AI,rXANIlRR anti 1'A9'IIi?IA 111 ALRKANPRR, hin Wifpl ,IpRopl d. uYARMAN, __MARII IIYARMAN_ md_,iQ1RLA,._.ilYAIUTAN. I:/;I/I) " PYANNAN h?RN PARTNR?iNHi1', A ponnuylYnnin Pulapprullip, NitltRNI)ANTH tilnlpn?9ut nt'tlUpNllun In th'nvupfl IT, the Collin 1,04Y 1)t HpI±TNcJRit earl It?? ?, 8PIj1[ygf itt?h A_? ur____ __.. Intatlds lu l,lnpuu(I Oil (Ila above pnptlolto(I li ntlyl., 114.1111 Nn nnptlARfJllll__AnKNIQII'T.r_.d.Il _:141un No' nw pale 1111E"l?!;l`iRi(lt_.8.1,? 2QQ5 r111hfnpy fiir.l!1,A1NT7.i?La.____. ?. ,, 1':Sph111nlnl')' ('blllillo11l Do Suplvlno comm ornvansy p"N lilts pnanulgaled non' RuN or civil Proce(pn'a 2112 gnvoning 11taooly epsus 111111 omoldpd Rule or ARINI0I Adiaobnnhoa will. Two pspevra of Ilia loan thnme ynd lornmttino,lpllong of poni111U116 .. loril li Ithly (,rell'if lG'PC('(lprn „ . . New Itnle of Civil 1'n,cudury 210,2 has beep tromulNaled to 8avopl ilia wily iohon of inactive cases within the scope of 1110 l'onasylv(ulill 11411's of Civil proceJoro, 'rho teriabinllan of tlo;o cases for ituiallVlly Was prpviausly gavernod by Italo of Judiobil Adodnislrallon 1901 and loea111403 pramalywell par3nont to 16 Now little 21(62 Is In(Iorv d to illy heeds of pivll noib,as, It provldos it voloplolo propedoto 0111 a'unl11mo statewide l tnptlco, proongthng level talus, ,. Ills rata was pl'onallgtled In responso III Illo duolstali of the `11111101110 Coati III Shop V. litiglo, 551 pa, 1611,710 A,24 1104 (4998) Ill which (ha ennrl hold final "proJudieo to ilia defendant ON a rosnh ordcloy fu prosovurion is legflired boroto it apse only be dis11111set pulannni to banal loNs lmNunlantlns Rnlo or,IudN01 Athnlnisfrntlon Not," Rate ol'Jadlciel Administration 19010) Iles been aliulldud to IIpUOlamodalu Idle how redo nrovll provodum. Ito, ilmomi pulley orllw prompt disposition of outtbrs set fallh ht sabdlvlidelt (n) of 111111 rata voollanws to ba applicable, 11 hlac(Aw C'?ttes ,. . 1ll,110 11111 plate of, Allot giving Role nopaul of intent in ilamlmne lilt action For ?inactwily, Iho cout a of lho lla'ucedi a Is sv1I1lI(1110 pnillos. plastio 09 w 1111111 ilia ollontl ord imi08 111) inimam whh prpinsficotor tY111oro toknosOeplo(tu lire paaly wiehps In I nrmo1melmuner, he at sl o will nw a n amp or biblit wn to pmaird and the outton sbnll oononoe, it, Where Iha nMlon hos been ter m faateil 11' 1110 action Is lorndnated when n ploiy believes 111111 II should not have bull lenalnoled, tint pally luny proceed hodor Ralo230(d) f'er taller frolo file order of donthulton An example ors ich (1n occarrellce udg111 bo Ilia tenninfit foil ofa viable action whoa file aggriovod party did not tecolvo the nunea orinleln Io wwh one mnl ly s did not Ihncly No Ilia notice orl11lantloll to plowed, 'ilia f mina orlhe nwit; ormit p0hWill In relnslolo ilia action is impo110116 If Ilse petition Is Idled wililin tliltly days of ilia entry of Iho tailor of tatalloatlon on ilia dockol, subdivislon (11)(2) provides Ibal Iho color most grunt Ilia peliriolt and iommitie the oetlun. If the puduou is filed Inter loan Me Ihhlyday period, suhdivisiail (d)(1) te(pdros find Ilia pIn111Nff total make it sholy (it to ilia coed that ilia tnhllan was promptly 1110 and 111111 Ilona Is it r0nsonoble explanation or lugllimnto oxc11se both Pot ilia 111111110 to Idle 1110 native or intention b; proceed pilot to ilia entry of ilia older of lunninellot] pn Ilia doelrot and forAllo (11111110 In Ills Ilia petition %VIIII11t 1110Itltyday palled iwder sabd ivisimr(d)(2). 11, 11'1are the action has not bun bA'B1 anal All hullos which lilts not bceu Ieunlliatvd bat wbioh conllnu0s upon file Nang of it netfee of hdemlon In ;trucopd niay z hnva bun Iha 311bf eel of Inordinate delay, Ili slvh fill Instance. ilia pin rioved pally may pureuo Inn tmitetly of p annation law non pros tv111e11 exits independently of lalnllmdlun under hide 210,2. j i rr ,• r r f I' Ir ? I I YT / 67 r, r' r, I . n " I11?1?. (l ?II?11. . 1 . Y. .. I ,r r ., .• - .. rr LARRY D. SPRINGER & JAN A. SPRINGER, Plaintiffs vs TIMOTHY M. ALEXANDER, PATRICIA A. ALEXANDER, JOSEPH H. DYARMAN, MARIE B. DYARMAN, JOHN A. DYARMAN, & DYARMAN FARM PARTNERSHIP, Defendants Statement of Intention to Proceed Case No. 1999-1070 CIVIL TERM To the Court: LARRY D. SPRINGER & JAN A. SPRINGER intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Print Name MARCUS A. MCKNIGHT, III Sign. Name • l Date: OCTOBER 27, 2008 Attorney for PLAINTIFFS Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. I. Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. Ncw Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition, of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable. II Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2. ti LARRY SPRINGER and : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF JAN SPRINGER, . PLAINTIFFS : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. . CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO. 1999 -1070 CIVIL TERW ALEXANDER et al. and DYA,RMAN et al., • ~ DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF INTENTION TO PROCEED _ TO THE COURT: Larry Springer and Jan Springer, Plaintiffs, intend to proceed with the above-captioned matter. ' Respectfully Submitted: IRWIN & McKNIGHT, P.C. ~ Mare s A. Mc ' t, III, Esq. Supreme Court ID#25476 60 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Date: October 21, 2011 Larry D. Springer & Jan A.Springer vs Case No. 1999=1070 Timothy M. Alexander. Patricia Alexander Joseph H. Dyarman, Marie Dyarman & John A. Dyarman Statement of Intention to Proceed To the Court: The Plaintiff . !T) co trig= Zv tv ©C) Gd Z G? "dp f W• -4 intends to proceed with the abo , e captioned matter( . Print Name Marcus A. McKnight, III Sign Name Date: October 21. 2014 Attorneyfor Plaintiff Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. I. Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(13) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable. II Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Ru1e230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty -day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff must make a showing to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty -day period under subdivision (d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.