Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-05990r „J GS Y. ^i 1 `r 1 MAY - 5 2000 ) KAREN ANN KRANZEL, Plaintiff vs. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION - LAW ORDER AND NOW, this _ day of OAP 2000, upon receipt of the Conciliator's Report, it appearing that the parties have reached an agreement as to a temporary Order, which was dictated in their presence and approved by them, it is hereby ordered and directed as follows: 1. The Order of March 3, 2000, shall remain in effect, except that it shall be modified over the summer months as follows: A. Father shall have alternating weekends from Friday after school until Monday morning at which time he shall return the child to Mother's residence or the appropriate daycare provider. B. On the week preceding Father's custodial weekend, Father shall have Monday after school until 8:00 p.m.. Wednesdays overnight from after school until Thursday morning at which time he shall return the child to Mother's residence or the appropriate daycare provider. C. On the week following Father's custodial weekend, he shall have the child on Tuesdays from after school until 8:00 p.m., and Thursdays from after school until Friday morning at which time he shall return the child to Mother's residence or the appropriate daycare provider. D. Each party shall be entitled to seven (7) uninterrupted days of summer vacation with the child. The parties shall provide each other with thirty (30) days advance notice as to when they intend to exercise this period of exclusive custody. 2. The parties have reached this temporary Order and understand it does not prejudice either party's rights from raising any issues that they may deem appropriate in the event that a custody hearing is needed. 3. The parties shall reconvene for another custody conciliation conference before Michael L. Bangs, Esquire, on Thursday, August 17, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. BY THE COUI;T EDGAR B. BAYL4Y, J. J. Paul Helvy, Esquire Charles Rector, Esquire LOj2L?? 7/9a tX e4C_ -9.00 P, ?s mlb FlLEO-Or.^.CE 00FIA -9 V 8:09 ti KAREN ANN KRANZEL, Plaintiff VS. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, Defendant JUDGE PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION - LAW The Honorable Edgar B. Bayley CUSTODY CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report: 1. The pertinent information concerning the child(ren) who is(are) the subject of this litigation is as follows: NAME Kyle Andrew Kranzel BIRTHDATE December 2, 1993 CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF Plaintiff 2. A Conciliation Conference was held on April 20, 2000, and the following individuals were present: the Plaintiff and her attorney, J. Paul Helvy, Esquire; the Defendant and his attorney, Charles Rector, Esquire. 3. Items resolved by agreement: See attached Order. 4. Issues yet to be resolved: See attached Order. 5. The Plaintiffs position on custody is as follows: See attached Order. 6. The Defendant's position on custody is as follows: See attached Order. 7. Need for separate counsel to represent child(ren): Neither party requested. 8. Need for independent psychological evaluation or counseling: None requested and the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary. 9. Other matters or comments: The parties shall reconvene for another custody conciliation conference before Michael L. Bangs, Esquire, on Thursday, August 17, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Date: May 1, 2000 Michael L. Bangs Custody Conciliator MAR _1 3 [UUU I KAREN ANN KRANZEL, Plaintiff VS. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM ) CIVIL ACTION - LAW CUSTODY/VISITATION (? 4R4E8 AND NOW, this L-1 day of 2000, upon review of the Conciliator's Report, it appearing that the parties have agreed to the terms and provisions of this Temporary Order which was dictated in their presence and approved by them and their counsel, it is hereby ordered and directed as follows: 1. The parties shall share legal custody of their minor child, Kyle Andrew Kranzel, d.o.b. December 2, 1993. 2. Mother shall have primary physical custody of the minor child subject to periods of partial custody and visitation with Father as follows: A. On alternating weekends from Friday after school until Sunday at 5:00 p.m. This alternating weekend shall commence on February 4, 2000; B. On the week preceding his custodial weekend, the Father shall have the child on Wednesday overnight from after school until the following morning, at which time he shall drop the child back at school; v C. On the weeks following the Father's custodial weekend, he shall have the child on Tuesdays from after school until 8:00 p.m. and Thursdays from after school until Friday morning, at which time he shall drop the child back at school. 3. The parties acknowledge that Kyle is not operating under the current schedule at this time. However, the parties understand that they are attempting to phase in this schedule such that Kyle will be staying with Father in accordance with this schedule. 4. The parties have reached this Temporary Order and understand that it does not prejudice either party's rights from raising any issues that they may deem appropriate in the event that a custody hearing is needed. 5. The parties shall reconvene for another custody conciliation before Michael L. Bangs, Esquire, on (l 2000, at ?C'CCi m, BY THE COURT/./ J. Paul Helvy, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiff Charles Rector, Esquire Attorney for Defendant J / 3 -/ {p?t mlb A ED-OFFICE G= Tr: t"0'??"d?TA9Y 00 MAR 15 AM E: 35 CUNBcRLhN-) COUNTY PENNSY MAMA KAREN ANN KRANZEL, Plaintiff Vs. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION - LAW CUSTODY/VISITATION JUDGE PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED: None. CUSTODY CONCILIATION CONFERmcE 4Ut,iM REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report: 1. The pertinent information concerning the child who is the subject of this litigation is as follows: NAME BIRTHDATE CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF Kyle A. Kranzel December 2, 1993 Plaintiff 2. A Conciliation Conference was held on February 24, 2000, and the following individuals were present: the Plaintiff and her attorney, J. Paul Helvy, Esquire; the Defendant appeared with his attorney, Charles Rector, Esquire. 3. Items resolved by agreement: See attached Order. 4. Issues yet to be resolved: See attached Order. 5. The Plaintiff's position on custody is as follows: See attached order. 6. The Defendant's position on custody is as follows: See attached Order. 7. Need for separate counsel to represent child: Neither party requested. 8. Need for independent psychological evaluation or counseling: None requested and the Conciliator does not believe any is necessary. Date: March , 2000 1 P? Mich el L. Bangs Custody Conciliator G::; KAREN ANN KRANZEL, Plaintiff V. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN CUSTODY ORDER AND NOW, IIJ a attached complaint, it their respective counsel conciliator, at upon consideration of the ,cted that the ?p rties and the on the ? day of 1999, at P.m. for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order. FOR THE COURT, By: 1411?Y?IA4X Custody Conci iator l l The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the scheduled conference or hearing. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Office of the Court Administrator Cumberland County Courthouse - Fourth Floor 1 Courthouse Square Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013-3387 Telephone (717) 240-6200 n 1- 1 le 1v KAREN ANN KRANZEL, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. NO. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant IN CUSTODY COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY 1. The Plaintiff is Karen Ann Kranzel, who presently resides at 51 White Oak Boulevard, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055. 2. The Defendant is Scott Alan Kranzel, who presently resides at 27 Cumberland State Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055. 3. Plaintiff seeks custody of the following child: Name Present Address Age Kyle Andrew Kranzel 51 White Oak Boulevard 5 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 The aforementioned child was not born out of wedlock. The child is presently in the custody of Plaintiff. During the past five (5) years, the child has resided with the following persons at the following addresses: Name Address Dates Karen Ann Kranzel 51 White Oak Boulevard August 13, 1999 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 to present Karen Ann Kranzel 51 White Oak Boulevard December 1993 Scott Alan Kranzel Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 to 8/13/99 The mother of the child is Karen Ann Kranzel, currently residing at 51 White Oak Boulevard, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. She is divorced. The father of the child is Scott Alan Kranzel, currently residing at 27 Cumberland State Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. He is divorced. 4. The relationship of Plaintiff to the child is that of mother. The Plaintiff currently resides with the following persons: Name Relationship Kyle Andrew Kranzel son 5. The relationship of Defendant to the child is that of father. The Defendant currently resides alone. 6. Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the child pending in a court of this Commonwealth. Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings who has physical custody of the child or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child. 7. The best interest and permanent welfare of the child will be served by granting the relief requested. 8. Each parent whose parental rights to the child have not been terminated and the person who has physical custody of the child have been named as parties to this action. - 2 - WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court grant her custody of the child. Dated: September A0 , 1999 Respectfully submitted, J aaul Helvy, ire illian & Ge t 218 Pine Street P.O. Box 886 Harrisburg, PA 17108 (717) 232-1851 Atty. I.D. #53148 Attorneys for Plaintiff - 3 - I?t T !'7 c; m 0 w ? cr ct ii• - 1'. i U 6: N D Id ? r N r . 2 0a yw¢F U W ZJn aWN LC U. E 0 w? o W jo a?3?? J(A zx'c w w CL LL acuC U KAREN ANN KRANZEL, Plaintiff V. SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN CUSTODY DEFFNDANVS AN lVR & O NTFX / + M COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY AND NOW, comes the Defendant, Scott Alan Kranzel, by and through his attorney Charles Rector, Esquire, and respectfully represents the following in support of this Answer and Counterclaim to Complaint for Custody: L-6. Admitted. 7. Denied. Paragraph 7 constitutes a legal conclusion which requires no answer and is denied. To the extent that any further answer is required, it is denied that the welfare of the child will be served by granting primary physical custody to Plaintiff and proof thereof is demanded. 8. Admitted. WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that your Honorable Court deny Plaintiff primary physical custody. Co:auerchdin 9. Paragraphs I through 8 are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth ill full. 10. The best interest and permanent welfare of the minor child will be best served by granting Defendant primary physical custody with periods of temporary physical custody to Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that your Honorable Court grant him primary physical custody in this case. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, S- QA'o Charles Rector, Esquire 1104 Femwood Avenue, Ste. 203 Camp Hill, PA 17011-6912 (717) 761-8101 Date: 1/28/00 I verify that the statements made herein are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Scott Kranzel Date: i ?C- z I, Charles Rector, Esquire, do hereby certify that on the 28'h day of January, 2000, I caused a true and correct copy of the within Answer & Counterclaim to Complaint for Custody to be served upon the following counsel of record by depositing same in first class, United States mail, postage paid, in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania: J. Paul Helvey, Esquire Killian & Gephart, LLP 218 Pine Street P. 0. Box 886 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0886 By: ArYCY?KDr Charles Rector, Esquire 1104 Femwood Avenue, Ste. 203 Camp Hill, PA 17011-6912 (717) 761-8101 Date: 1/28/00 AUG 1 7 20 00 KAREN ANN KRANZEL, ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL, ) Defendant ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION-LAW ORDER AND NOW, this i 6 tt day of , 2000, it being reported to the Conciliator that the parties have reached an agreement which makes further proceedings unnecessary, the Conciliator hereby relinquishes jurisdiction and returns the file to the Court. If either party wishes further proceedings in this action, they should petition the Court anew. FOR THE COURT, goat 1 MICHAEL L. BANGS Custody Conciliator Charles Rector, Esquire J. Paul Helvy, Esquire T? 11'• ?,] ITI ' w SEp 2 now KAREN ANN KRANZEL : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. : NO. 99-5990 CIVIL TERM SCOTT ALAN KRANZEL CIVIL ACTION -LAW Defendant IN CUSTODY ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of , 2010, upon consideration of the attached Custody Agreement hich is incorporated herein by reference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that said Agreement is hereby approved and adopted as an Order of Court with full weight and effect as if it had been set forth in full hereinafter. It is binding and enforceable upon the parties hereto. All prior Orders in this matter are hereby vacated. BY THE COURT: J. 44, ? G3 • ?c ? ? -- Q??SA D ?rY1