Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-03-07 05/02/2007 10:35 0000000000 i ~I I! ) I ) i, I [ < , J l' i r j l j ;' Ii Ii I' I; I! I; I [ . WAYNEF.SHADE AltOJJllEY AT LAW '3 WEST POMFRET STllEBT CARLlSUl. PllNNSVLVAJIlJA 17013 (717)243~O (800) 243.0220 PAGE 01 May 2, 2007 J'J\X (717) 249-(10)7 Re: _~ I r"" Estate ofCbarles E. Paxton' ,__ :'.....:> c::::) ~ -.J ~~ _~ - "J , I c.,:. "T,l ; ii I With I gard to our Petition for Letters of Adminis1ration, c.t.a., in the above \L) Estate, we'd note, initially, that the Testator did not designate Farmers Trust Company, i 'isuccessors or assigns, as substituted executor. He designated only Farmers Trust C : y. Obviously, Farmers Trust Company no looger exists. We would submit that it is, by means, clear that the Testator would have been satisfied to have had a large regi bank. with its main offices in Buffalo, New YorIc, administer his Estate. This is patti arty so where, at the time that he wrote his Will, the headquarters and only office of th that he was designpting as his substituted: executor was located in the very buH' where the office of the attorney who was writing the Will was also located. Under th ircumstances, we would further submit that, if the Testator had intended to include su ' rs or assigns of Farmers Trust Company as substituted executor, it would have been '" easy for the Testator to have said so; but, obviously, the Testator did not say so. the Testator had designated the succeSsors and assigns of Farmers Trost Company ubstituted executor, 20 Pa.C.S. ~31S5(b)(6) expresses a legislative intention to give preil nee to the nominee of a personal representative over other eligible parties with a low I 'ority. At his age, Dallas 1. Paxton would prefer not to have the t'esponsibili of administering his brother's Estate. He would also prefer that his son discharge I i duties on the basis that the T_ would have preferred that 0\lll:0lJle. 1'1 I: 111 ! i i' , 'j 1\1 - 1 i -I ) 05/02/2007 10:35 0000000000 ; [I I !I II I' ! ! PAGE 02 Wayne F. S e, Esquire, to Ms. Glen , amer Strasbaugh May 2, 200 ~l Page 2 11 II t. f i . d suggest that the lack of reference to the successors and assigns of : t Company and the nomination of the Petitioner by the primary executor should be i that we need for you to exercise your discretion in favor of the present Petition. If: u disagree, we would suggest that Ruth P. Paxton did not survive the Testator. . leaves the two brothers ofttle Testator as the sole residuary heirs. The other . Robert L. Paxton, would also .tenounee in favor of the Petitioner. However, he lives in i State of low&, so it would be impractical for him to come to Carlisle to execute the unciatioD. We could have his renunciation and nomination oftb.e Petitioner 1 ~ uted where he lives and acknowledged there. I '~ d ask you to review these thoughts with Kirk and exercise your discretion issuance of Letters of Administration to the Petitioner on the basis of the i Ii i! II I! WFS/cjt I f ! j cc; Mr. i cky L. Paxton ! . I I! il f I: J' n ! 'I 1 i i 1 l; i \ Ii I' ! iloi i i i Very truly yours, ~~ TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 131/17/213137 1313:45 NAME FAX SER.# BROG6F335532 DATE, TIME FAX NO. I NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 131/17 1313:44 991395925 1313:1313:54 133 OK STANDARD ECM Glenda Farner Strasbaugh Register of Wills & Clerk of Orphans' Court Marjorie A. Wevodau First Deputy One Courthouse Square Carlisle, PAl 7013 Kirk S. Sohonage, Esq. Solicitor Phone: (717) 240-6345 Fax: (717)240-7797 OFFICES OF Register of Wills and Clerk of the Orphans' Court County of Cumberland FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: Kirk Sohonage, Esq. FROM: Margie Wevodau COMPANY: PHONE: 717-240-7766 FAX NUMBER: (717) 909-5925 DATE: May 3, 2007 RE: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: o URGENT o FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY o PLEASE RECYCLE