HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-2828`~ ,
.•~ ~ ~.
~. o ~ ~ a ~ a s Cu,.~.t ~...,
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
CARY L. JARVIS, DEC 2 81983
Complainant,
v• IN CHANCERY NO. C-81-1567
PATRICIA L. JARVIS,
Defendant .
DECREE OF DIVORCE
A VINCULO MATRIMONII
THIS CAUSE, came on this day to be heard upon the
Complainant's Bill of Complaint, the Defendant having been duly
served; the Answer and Cross-Bill filed by the Defendant; upon
evidence taken before Ldward T. Caton, duly appointed
Commissioner in this cause on the 12th day of July, 1983; upon
the Report of the aforesaid Commissioner which has been filed
herein and to which Exceptions have been taken, together with the
other papers filed herein, and the matter was argued by co~~.
UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, and it appearing to`^~'C~ourt
from the Report of of the aforesaid Commissioner and /~
independently of the admissions of either party in the pleadings
or otherwise. that the parties were married on the 5th day of
September, 1980, in Virginia Beach, Virginia; that on the diate
this suit was instituted, the Complainant and Defendant were
domiciled in and were then and had been bona fide residents of
the Commonwealth of Virginia for at least six months preceding
the commencement of this suit; that both parties are over the age
of eighteen years and that neither party is a member of the Armed
Forces of the United States; that both parties are sane.; that
`J~
. ,
neither party is incarcerated in a penal institution at this
time; that there were no children born of the marriage; that the
parties last lived together as man and wife in the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia; that on the 5th day of July, 1981, the
parties hereto physically separated with the intention to
discontinue permanently the marital cohabitation; that the
parties have remained separate and apart continuously and without
interruption and without anv cohabitation for a period of more
than one year, and that no reconciliation has taken place, and
that none is probable.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED
that the Exceptions to the Report of the Commissioner, filed by
the Complainant be and they hereby are overruled, and the Report
of the Commissioner in Chancery be and the same is hereby
confirmedin part and modified in part which will more fully
appear herein; and that the Complainant, Cary L. Jarvis, be and
he hereby is awarded a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from the
Defendant, Patricia L. Jarvis, severing the bonds of matrimony
heretofore existing between them upon the grounds that the
parties have lived separate and apart continuously, without
interruption or cohabitation, for a period of more than one year,
pursuant to Section 20-91 (9) of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended;
It is ORDERED that in accordance with the Report of
the Commissioner, Complainant return. to Defendant her diamonds
which he was holding as collateral for a loan of $1,000.00 made
by Complainant to Defendant, and that said $1,000.00 loan be and
• , ,.
. ,
it hereby is considered a lump sum payment as spousal support and
that said Report of the Commissioner be modified to provide that
since neither party proved fault against the other that both are
entitled to spousal support, but neither has established or shown
a need for such, no award is made to either party at this time,
but rather is reserved to a Court of competent jurisdiction.
Complainant is hereby ORDERED to pay the sum of Two
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($25G.00) unto the Defendant's attorney,
Philip H. Myers, and all other costs of these proceedings.
And this cause is hereby removed from the docket.
Dated:
Enter this Decree:
Judge
,t.~~16rt~ Frl1~t,
~.C.
.q. -
~` ..
.d.
n ~a
~~',HER VIRGINIP~ LAW, THE C!R • .
~~~~ ~.1UHIFY OR VACATE THlS DES` ~~ ~~ ~~~
1-c+„F ~VTY t1NE (21) CAWS ~R~!~~ Tit G,; ~ ;,.
Eh~TRY; ANO, iN A~;` ~ iCsl'd, EIT~Er~ t~~.
MAY APPEAL THE Elr~~~'~' pF THIS ~EGI~;EE
Wt,~~lte THIRTY (3U) U~;YS Fi;C3N; IES ENTRY
We ask for this:
. ... ,wwar.R+Mr..-vsxr.~~~..wwrrl+~.w.;v+ Y'r.
. ,
~:
VZBGIIIIA: I~~d THE CIRCUIT COUF;T OI~ :~~, i~L;'Y vF '~'IRCIr~1IA BEACH
CARS' L. ~I.ANVIS,
Compidinant.,
~,~
' I!! C'HAi1C~;RY '~i) . C t= 1 1 ',~~'1
r'A"T'RICIA L. JA!?VIS,
Defendant.
DECRr,~ Or i~IvORCE
A VIPdCULO i~9ATRIi~IC~1~E}
THIS C~US~ ~ Ca:ilE,' O1'1 tn1:~ a<'y" ~~; iaE }leaf"d i.lpGll the
Complainant's Bill of Gorripla.int, the De~e.ndant h~vinq ~c~en duly
served; the Anst~,er ~~nd Grass-Bill filed icy t_}7e D~i`endant; t,pon
evidence taken before c3ward 'I'. Catr.~n, «u1y appoin ec~
Commissioner in this cause On t;he l:~ti;~ day c;f July, ? `~~~:~; upon
thc.> Report of t.ht~ ,_irr~resaid Commissic,i~er i~tii.ch 1;~3~ been filed
he~re:.n ~rnd to vahich B;;ceptioi7s h:-1ve hc~~~n t,_ik~n, tc~7ethe~~ ~~:.;it-}, ?.:'i~,
„trc:.r p~~p~~rs filt~d 1i~~rr'ii~, ~~nd t~:hi_ rnatt~~~i°~ ~~<.~s ~ai,~7l,;ect by ~~c>l.ti~s~:_l.
UPC~i~7 C~JI`dS Ihi=Rte"i'I~~i'd ~'Hr r -r~~~ ,ai..;ci i ± ~i ~~~a f ~ `Q
- p;'^ ~sr~;iu tc~/~G~~iii^t
> rom tie }-iE? orr <,r ~~f ~ i~
p .ill' elf J! E~,S~:~:1~1 i~~ (-;i_i ~5-101"lE'Y' cii'ld
i ndcr.~e~r~~lent l y c;T Ft~~~• ~3<it~ i ::_ i ~~ri~a c~i c~ i C1~irrr~ }~~ii^i°~~ ~ ~ ,
r ,~ _ ,.
~~tLp[_.c';Tl~)C-'r, `_it~{), ] I"; [ y_i71Y;t:.1 'ci. ~ :' ~ ! i1.:;1 :~1~Li~„ ~.~ t:~' (.j~:: t (..
<i
a-
,. -llL ~ ~~~ ~° , , t _...
_ -, ~- ~ 1 t
;E`rE'
i } ~ C~ '
,._ _ _ -i i.i J-: 1 ., _.! i. ?:.. ifs.! :l :.7 ~', Y
,ti.~,,
_;~~ ~. -;
~~ - - ~:: :._V.3 A_. -..^L~:< .dY•.PKYUQ!w .,.~nroM-.i n....~..._, .q.-., ,_.. ~... _... ~, ....
a
~~
:either part.~~ ~.~; ir,car^er ~te~d .ir. ~ ~~n ~1_ i r^stitu ~ i.Cn ~t thi s
tlmC t}"lat r.nere l'JE'Y'P_ ?":O C:il.L~Y'C~1~ ~r.t1 )i tt;t? I`I~~]"'1^~ 1:;73; "}lcit ..'~~'
3
s
3
pdr~.leS ldSt. 11VCC( tO~IC~'~.!;er dS I'la'1 ~3nd L~d;.~P In I7 E' ~~1.t~i 01
Virginia Beach. Virq,~ ;_a; ti~at ~~n ~},~_ _,t?~ cloy b' Ju,y, 1.1131, '~f~e
9. parties hereto physir_a1_~.y s~~p hated ~,,~i ~ r:~~ the i i,ter,t~.ion to
}.
disconti~~ue permanently the ~~<<~rital coh~3t~itation; t}~~at the
~_
p~?,' _i~_ i..~,~lf, rE.^, xl.;ci~l 5~j~«:'~iLc~ a;~;. (i~J_ '~Y`.t]illii;ll~l'y% ,:slid .Jithi'~U?
interruption and without ~~~~~ c~~hal- itat~ ol.~ >~r~,,~ „ pE~~~i.~d ~f :rare
~~ than one year, ar~d that n~-> rec°one7l~iation has taken ?dace, and
i
~~ that none is probable.
a
I'dOV,', Tl-iERFF'ORE, ~ t ~_s 1;~1.'cDGED, ORDERED and LIECREc.D
that the Exceptions t:o tsar, Report- r,~_ tt:e Cornmissicnei~ filed kw
the Complainant be and tl~ley h~~rei~y ~~~-~~ overruled, and the Repc,rt
of the Commissioner in C}~1~~z7cci ~,' r:~e.> .r~c3 t,i~c same is hc: rc.by
confi rmedin pert aa~d mr~difi ~~d in r~;. ':;i~l~ch ',:~i i 1 m~ ;~,~>
p = ~ 1'ul-1v
appear herein; and ghat t._he~ Complz:~n~ah~t , C"ary l,. !~~rvi_~, ~~:~ ,.,nd
hF' }~erE'by 1S j:':8Y'C~C'Q ~ dLVC~YCi., ~d ~;~ .'1.1.10 l~~at1'1Ri~:)T7:11 i t"(~i1°i "~li',
1~eff~ndant,, l~dtrl.ClE7 ~~. ~''Cjt'`J:1~ -!"v'i'T;'1!~ il'lf' bC~naS c;f iT1i9ti:Y"'1;'lOn`~~
,:
.5. r._._ Vii'. ~%i1i~~ _=n ~};~1~ ti}~~:.
pat"t1~~S ~7~VC? 11'.~e?d ^ F'~JcSC~dt <` ~3f]'7 ,:;r~r", ~ ~~rl' lI1.C~i]Sr;l'y ~ .';J th~)U2.
°~~ 11"]t-k'i~rLi~%':.10I~ Cir CQEli9f~t l i~1 1 C?C; !'C' ; {?i'!'i C)Cl ~~;~ !1:C I`E"' t..}'?;3 Y1 G7~t' ,'~, l_.
~~ f~l]Y'SUdJI' ."i) ~t?<-•:C;n :. (;-':.: { ~, , ; l ~ 1 !
~~i~
,~.,~r„pdctC~ ,
~,
,.
I .- ~, ~, . I I f
,.~ _.. :, ..: :., ~~~ ~~ ,. ~„ ~ _ r
t
i hereby is considered a l~.zmp ~1_i-- .. ~~,~ er~t: as spousa:! sup;~ort ~~nd
that sai i Report of t}~e CommiSSi~~rF~r~ _: ~oc+ ~;_,~,d to r,rovide that
since neither party proved fa~at ,=~_,ai~:: th.~~ other r~,at both are
entitled to spoasal support, but rei_t;-~er '-,~~s _~~+~.zbli_shed or sl;cwn
a need f~~r such , no a~aard ~ ~~ade ± ~, F . r.i~er tarty ,.zt t 1~:i s time ,
but rather i s reserved to a Ccurr r-;f co~;~~etem-. j ur~i sd~ ~•t i on .
~.Oi~~pia171cti"] . 1 'iL !mot ~~)% ~_... L~ ~ pa" .`;~_° Sia?"~ Of ~'~ }
~C
iilriCl7"'P<; ~ i r=ty i~n1_~ d.'S l ` ~~ .'~' ~ _. t ,
~p H . I~~fyers , ~~nd al ~ ,:r,er s~ = ~?f `h~,._ , i~ roc, ~~~~ - ~ ~~~
1 ~~ ~
:~~nd this cause is !.ere;, ~_~,;~,wed from t~i~e ocket.
rated : ~ ~? ,~ ~ ~'~ ~~_~ ~IAY ~ ~ 2007
?~~cic-~
X~~~rY
OP' RECORD IN MY CUS'tiODY
TINA E. SINNEN, CLERK
~.'~ f ~ ask fo r t ~~ i s : CIRCUIT Cp~T, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
~_~;.:
'i
,-
/ '7 /~~'G ~ f - ..
,r
o ;~
-
-
~,
4~; - (~ j ~'-1
- It
_
['~ ,..
~ ~ j ~
~ ~
~
~ -{
~!
-~;~- "~
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNT'',
PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
Vs
Defendant
File No. ~ ~ ' ~ ~
IN DIVORCE
NOTICE TO RESUME PRIOR SURNAME
Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiff /defendant in the above matter,
[select one by marking "x")
prior to the entry of a Final Decree in Divorce,
- or wafter the entry of a Final Decree in Divorce dated -~ ~-c a ~ , ~ ~I~3
hereby elects to resume the prior surname of ~'~ yi c' ~ ,and gives this
written notice avowing his /her intention pursuant to the provisions yif 54 P.S. 704.
Date: ~ ~~ ~ 7 ~~'~~
Signature
a.~.-~
Signature of name being esumed
F
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA )
COUNTY OF ~~.~,~r~~~(
On the ~ d ~ day of cz 2007 before me, the Prothonotary or the
notary public, personally appeared the above affiant known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within document and acknowledged that he /she executed the
foregoing for the purpose therein contained.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand hereunto set my hand and official
seal.
arv~
.. Prothonotary or Notary Public
o~a~ y aavrsm s3a~o r~ssiwwo~ ~w
3SQ01Wlf10~ Al.MI~J a~ewrp 3
a17Wtd Atllll,~ ~liYlONON1AYd
1V~8'1YIllIf10N~
[a ~,,
c ~' ~
4-
G.f Yi
~ ~. V
y
'~ r
~r
i ~
_ ~ '
v ~ -
-~~.. -,,,,
.. -.- i'rw
_~
r. l
~ ~ ~:
O ^.
.. , _ a , .. ,.... . , . ,.~. ,w ,._.,.. .i -........~
A :'t~ut'r.`~ .~::A ~ :i??=i~6F'%dfiC t