HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-3386IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK
9 Watson Drive
Carlisle, PA 17013,
Plaintiffs
vs.
:. CIVIL ACTION-LAW
:. NO. 07- 33 R6 CIVIL TERM
CODY L. STRAYER
74 McAlister Church Road :. MOTOR VEHICLE CASE
Carlisle, PA 17013,
Defendant :.
PRAECIPE TO ISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please issue a Writ of Summons in the above matter against Cody L. Strayer in an
amount in excess of $50,000.00.
Date: June 7, 2007
Roger M. Morgenthal, squire
I.D. No. 17143
Attorney for Plaintiffs
2515 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1150
Telephone: (717) 909-4383
C. O
-C-,
.ca c-
`
Fri --?
NJ FT,
`?
rn
g
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
WRIT OF SUMMONS
Court of Common Pleas
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK
9 WATSON DRIVE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
Plaintiff
Vs. No 07-3386
CODY L. STRAYER
74 MCALISTER CHURCH ROAD
CARLISLE, PA 17013 In CivilAction-Law
Defendant
To CODY L. STRAYER,
You are hereby notified that PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK AND JAMES R.
FAHNESTOCK the Plaintiff(s) has / have commenced an action in Civil Action-Law
against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered
against you.
S/ 'e -
(SEAL) Curtis R. Long, Prothonotary
4-
Date JUNE 7,2007 BY
Deputy
Attorney: ROGER M. MORGENTHAL, ESQUIRE
Name:
Address: 2515 NORTH FRONT STREET
HARRISBURG, PA 17110-1150
Attorney for: Plaintiff
Telephone: 717-909-4383
Supreme Court ID No. 17143
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2007-03386 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
FAHNESTOCK PATRICIA A ET AL
VS
STRAYER CODY L
RICHARD SMITH
Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon
STRAYER CODY L
the
DEFENDANT , at 1200:00 HOURS, on the 12th day of June , 2007
at 74 MCALISTER CHURCH ROAD
CARLISLE, PA 17013
CAROLYN BLAIN, GRANDMOTHER
by handing to
ADULT IN CHARGE
a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS
together with
and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing 18.00
Service 4.80
Postage .41
Surcharge 10.00
.00
4I1E'6Z `?" 33.21
Sworn and Subscibed to
before me this
day
of ,
So Answers:
R. Thomas Kline
06/12/2007
ROGER MORGENTHA
By.
Deputy Sheriff
A.D.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
(Jury Trial Demanded)
Filed on Behalf of the Defendant
Counsel of Record for This Party:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Pa. I.D. #83058
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE and SKEEL, L.L.P.
Firm #911
1017 Mumma Road, Suite 300
Lemoyne, PA 17043
(717) 901-5916
#16203
A.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
(Jury Trial Demanded)
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
TO: THE PROTHONOTARY
Kindly enter the Appearance of the undersigned, Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire, of the
law firm of Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P., on behalf of the
Defendant, Cody L. Strayer, in the above case.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Respectfully submitted,
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & SKEEL, L.L.P.
By:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
A-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing PRAECIPE
FOR APPEARANCE has been mailed by U.S. Mail to counsel of record via first class
mail, postage pre-paid, this 1ST day of April, 2008.
Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire
2515 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1150
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & SKEEL, L.L.P.
By:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
c', n?
r` ?:?
-
'-
-
-
??_? ?
? ---?
, ? :-i
:
,
. r
r
N
?_
??
_. y
_? -.'
..
't .
""`
?.. `rr
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
PRAECIPE FOR RULE
TO FILE COMPLAINT
(Jury Trial Demanded)
Filed on Behalf of the Defendant
Counsel of Record for This Party:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Pa. I.D. #83058
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE and SKEEL, L.L.P.
Firm #911
1017 Mumma Road, Suite 300
Lemoyne, PA 17043
(717) 901-5916
#16203
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
(Jury Trial Demanded)
PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
TO: The Prothonotary
Kindly rule the Plaintiffs, Patricia A. Fahnestock and James R. Fahnestock, to file a
Complaint in Civil Action within twenty (20) days.
Respectfully submitted,
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & SKEEL, L.L.P.
By:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing PRAECIPE
FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT has been mailed by U.S. Mail to counsel of record
via first class mail, postage pre-paid, this 15t day of April, 2008.
Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire
2515 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1150
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & SKEEL, L.L.P.
By: '
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
(Jury Trial Demanded)
RULE
AND NOW, this .1 rd day of A6 2008, upon
consideration of Defendant's Praecipe for Rule to File a Complaint, a Rule is hereby
granted upon Plaintiffs to file a Complaint within twenty (20) days of service, or suffer
judgment Non Pros.
Rule issued this an°I day of kori ( 12008.
onot
Distribution to:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P.
1017 Mumma Road, Suite 300
Lemoyne, PA 17043
Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire
2515 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1150
r. 3 ..1
"' ...-{
1µw - '.i,.3
ā_ ??,l i--
? r.? ??
? v,
r
{?`?
-. ..-, y
__%.
w
_:-i ...?
?: C,, ? ,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
NO. 07-3386
Defendant (Jury Trial Demanded)
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this complaint and notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the
court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you
fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the
court without further notice for any money claimed in the complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 LIBERTY AVENUE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire
Attorney ID# 17143
Attorney for Plaintiff
4431 North Front Street, 3rd Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and :
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs
VI.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
(Jury Trial Demanded)
COMPLAINT
AND NOW comes Plaintiffs, Patricia A. Fahnestock and James R. Fahnestock, by and
through their attorney, Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire, of Smigel, Anderson & Sacks LLP, to
make the following Complaint against Defendant Cody L. Strayer:
1. Plaintiff Patricia A. Fahnestock is an adult individual who resides at 9 Watson
Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013.
2. Plaintiff James R. Fahnestock is an adult individual who resides at 9 Watson
Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013.
3. Plaintiff Patricia A. Fahnestock and Plaintiff James R. Fahnestock are wife and
husband.
4. Defendant Cody L. Strayer is an adult individual who resides at 74 McAlister
Church Road, Carlisle, PA 17013.
5. The facts and occurrences hereinafter related took place on June 13, 2005 on
Crossroad School Road, Carlisle, West Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
2
6. At that time and place, Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock was operating her motor
vehicle, a 2003 Chevy Monte Carlo, northbound on Crossroad School Road.
7. At that time and place, Defendant Cody Strayer was operating his motor vehicle,
a 1993 Ford Probe, southbound on Crossroad School Road.
8. Defendant Cody Strayer was operating his motor vehicle southbound at a high
rate of speed and as he attempted to negotiate a right hand curve on Crossroad School Road, he
lost control of his vehicle and traveled into the northbound lane of Crossroad School Road,
directly into the path and colliding with the right side of Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock's vehicle.
9. The collision caused Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock's vehicle to leave her lane of
traffic and travel across the southbound lane of Crossroad School Road, finally coming to rest on
the shoulder of the southbound lane. .
10. As a result of the collision, Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock suffered severe injuries
and damages as are hereinafter set forth.
COUNTI
Negligence
Patricia Fahnestock v. Cody L. Strayer
11. Each and every preceding paragraph of this Complaint is incorporated herein by
reference as if the same were more fully set forth herein.
12. The foregoing incident and all the injuries and damages set forth hereinafter are
the direct and proximate result of the negligence, careless, wanton and/or reckless manner in
3
which Defendant Cody Strayer operated his vehicle in that he:
a. Failed to drive his vehicle at a reasonably safe speed so as to be able to
negotiate a curve in the roadway in violation of 75 Pa. C.S. §3361 of the Motor Vehicle
Code;
b. Failed to operate his vehicle on the right side of the roadway in violation of 75
Pa. C.S. §3301 of the Motor Vehicle Code;
c. Failed to have his vehicle under proper control;
d. Inattentively operated his motor vehicle and failed to maintain a sharp lookout
for the presence of other motor vehicles on the road;
e. Failed to apply brakes in such a manner so his vehicle could be stopped in
time to avoid the collision with Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock's vehicle; and
f. Failed to drive in a reasonable and safe manner as to be able to avoid
damaging Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock and her vehicle in violation of 75 Pa. C.S. §3714
of the Motor Vehicle Code;
g. Operated his vehicle on the left side of the roadway when approaching and/or
entering a curve in the roadway when he knew or reasonably should have known that
vehicles such as Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock's may be approaching from the opposite
direction, in violation of 75 Pa. C.S. §3306 of the Motor Vehicle Code; and
4
h. Failed to exercise caution or care in operating his vehicle on Crossroad School
Road on the date of the incident; and
i. Failed to maintain his vehicle in a reasonable state of repair which would
enable him to operate his motor vehicle safely on the roadway;
13. Solely as a direct and proximate result of the negligent acts of Defendant Cody
Strayer, Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock sustained the following injuries, all of which are or may be
of a permanent and serious nature:
a. Left knee contusion with pain, swelling and stiffness;
b. Left knee debridement;
C. Left knee arthritis with possible future surgical intervention;
d. Cervical pain and stiffness;
e. Low back pain and stiffness radiating into the thigh region; and
f. Chronic pain
14. By further reason of the collision, Plaintiff Patricia Fahnestock has been damaged
as follows:
a. She has been afflicted with pain, suffering, and inconvenience;
b. Her general health, strength, and vitality have been impaired;
C. She has suffered a loss of life's pleasures;
d. She has and may continue to be required to spend money for medicine,
therapy and medical care/treatment;
e. She may continue to suffer loss of income and impairment of earning
capacity; and
5
f. She has and may continue to be limited in her normal activities.
WHEREFORE Plaintiffs Patricia A. Fahnestock and James R. Fahnestock respectfully
request this Honorable Court to enter judgment against the Defendant in an amount which
exceeds the jurisdictional amount requiring arbitration referral by local rule.
COUNT II
Loss of Consortium
James R. Fahnestock v. Cody L. Strayer
15. Each and every preceding paragraph of this Complaint is incorporated herein by
reference as if the same were more fully set forth herein.
16. As a result of the aforementioned injuries sustained to his wife, Plaintiff Patricia
Fahnestock, Plaintiff James Fahnestock has been and may in the future be deprived of the care,
companionship, consortium, and society of his wife, all of which have been to his great
detriment, and a claim is made therefore.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Patricia A. Fahnestock and James R. Fahnestock respectfully
requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment against the Defendant in an amount which
exceeds the jurisdictional amount requiring arbitration referral by local rule.
Respectfully submitted,
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
Roger M. Morgent 1, Esquire
Attorney ID# 17143
Attorney for Plaintiff
4431 North Front Street, 3`d Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
6
VERIFICATION
The undersigned hereby verifies that she is the named Plaintiff in the foregoing action,
that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct to the best of her
knowledge, information and belief, and further states that false statements made herein are
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: Z/hdk?r
Patricia A. Fahnestock
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Roger M. Morgenthal, attorney for Plaintiffs, hereby certify that on this date, a true and
correct copy of the foregoing Complaint has been served upon the person(s) indicated below by
depositing a copy of the same in the United States Mail, postage pre-paid, and addressed as
follows:.
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, LLP
1017 Mumma Road, Suite 300
Lemoyne, PA 17043
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
Roger . Morgenthal, Esq ire
Attorney ID# 17143
Attorney for Plaintiff
4431 North Front Street, 3`a Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
DATED: Y 3 010 r
8
?? h J
Cā
C
cf.a
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
TO: Plaintiffs
You are hereby notified to file a written
Response to the enclosed Answer and
New Matter within twenty (20) days
From service hereof or a judgment
May be entered against you.
lL 4? 17. 1()t
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock,
Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P.
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER
(Jury Trial Demanded)
Filed on Behalf of the Defendant
Counsel of Record for This Party:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Pa. I.D. #83058
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE and SKEEL, L.L.P.
Firm #911
1017 Mumma Road, Suite 300
Lemoyne, PA 17043
(717) 901-5916
#16203
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
(Jury Trial Demanded)
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER
AND NOW, comes the Defendant, Cody L. Strayer, by and through her counsel,
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P., and Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire,
and files the following Answer and New Matter and in support thereof avers as follows:
1. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant has insufficient information
as to the truth or falsity of said averments, therefore said averments are denied and
strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
2. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant has insufficient information
as to the truth or falsity of said averments, therefore said averments are denied and
strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
3. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant has insufficient information
as to the truth or falsity of said averments, therefore said averments are denied and
strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
4. Admitted.
5. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant has insufficient information
as to the truth or falsity of said averments, therefore said averments are denied and
strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
6. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant has insufficient information
as to the truth or falsity of said averments, therefore said averments are denied and
strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that the Defendant was
negligent in the operation of his vehicle on the date, time, and place of the subject
accident. The remainder of the allegations in paragraph 8 are denied generally pursuant
to Pa.R.C.P. 1029 (d) and (e). Strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
9. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant has insufficient information
as to the truth or falsity of said averments, therefore said averments are denied and
strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
10. Paragraph 10 states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
To the extent, however, that a response is deemed necessary, said averments are
denied generally pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1029(d) and (e). Strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
COUNT 1- NEGLIGENCE
11. In response to paragraph 11, the Defendant reiterates and repeats all her
responses in paragraphs 1 through 10 as if fully set forth at length herein.
12. Paragraph 12 and all of its subparts states a legal conclusion to which no
response is required. To the extent, however, that a response is deemed necessary,
said averments are denied generally pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1029(d) and (e). Strict proof
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
13. Paragraph 13 and all of its subparts state a legal conclusion to which no
response is required. To the extent, however, that a response is deemed necessary,
said averments are denied generally pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1029(d) and (e). Strict proof
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
14. Paragraph 14 and all of its subparts state a legal conclusion to which no
response is required. To the extent, however, that a response is deemed necessary,
said averments are denied generally pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1029(d) and (e). Strict proof
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
COUNT II - LOSS OF CONSORTIUM
15. In response to paragraph 15, the Defendant reiterates and repeats all her
responses in paragraphs 1 through 14 as if fully set forth at length herein.
16. Paragraph 16 states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
To the extent, however, that a response is deemed necessary, said averments are
denied generally pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1029(d) and (e). Strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Cody L. Strayer, respectfully requests this Honorable
Court enter judgment in his favor and against the Plaintiffs with costs and prejudice
imposed.
w
NEW MATTER
17. The motor vehicle accident in controversy is subject to the Pennsylvania
Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and this Defendant asserts, as affirmative
defenses, all rights, privileges and/or immunities accruing pursuant to said statute.
18. Some and/or all of Plaintiffs' claims for damages are items of economic
detriment which are or could be compensable pursuant to either the Pennsylvania Motor
Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and/or other collateral sources and same may not
be duplicated in the present lawsuit.
19. To the extent that the Plaintiffs have selected the limited tort option or are
deemed to have selected the limited tort option then this Defendant sets forth the
relevant provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law as a
bar to the Plaintiffs' ability to recover non-economic damages.
20. This Defendant pleads any and all applicable statutes of limitation under
Pennsylvania Law as a complete or partial bar to any recovery by Plaintiffs in this
action.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Cody L. Strayer, respectfully requests this Honorable
Court enter judgment in his favor and against the Plaintiffs with costs and prejudice
imposed.
Respectfully submitted,
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & SKEEL, L.L.P.
By:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
VERIFICATION
Defendant verifies that he is the Defendant in the foregoing action; that the
foregoing ANSWER AND NEW MATTER is based upon information which he has
furnished to his counsel and information which has been gathered by his counsel in the
preparation of the lawsuit. The language of the ANSWER AND NEW MATTER is that of
counsel and not of the Defendant. Defendant has read the ANSWER AND NEW
MATTER and to the extent that the ANSWER AND NEW MATTER is based upon
information which he has given to his counsel, it is true and correct to the best of his
knowledge, information and belief. To the extent that the content of the ANSWER AND
NEW MATTER is that of counsel, he has relied upon counsel in making this Affidavit.
Defendant understands that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of
18 Pa.C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
o v ver
#16203
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing ANSWER
AND NEW MATTER has been mailed by U.S. Mail to counsel of record via first class
mail, postage pre-paid, this day of , 2008.
Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire
4431 North Front Street, Third Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1778
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & SKEEL, L.L.P.
By: L ?) Ch 4k-x?
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
Q
6 C--'
iV
W
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
(Jury Trial Demanded)
PLAINTIFFS' ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S NEW MATTER
AND NOW COMES, Plaintiffs Patricia A. Fahnestock and James R. Fahnestock, by and
through their attorneys, Smigel, Anderson & Sacks, LLP, to file the following Answer to
Defendant's New Matter and avers in support as follows:
NEW MATTER
17. Denied. The averments of this paragraph contain conclusions of law to which no
response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, the averments are specifically denied.
18. Denied. The averments of this paragraph contain conclusions of law to which no
response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, the averments are specifically denied.
19. Denied. The averments of this paragraph contain conclusions of law to which no
response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. To the extent that a
response is deemed required, the averments are specifically denied.
20. Denied. The averments of this paragraph contain conclusions of law to which no
response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. To the extent that a
46
response is deemed required, the averments are specifically denied.
Respectfully submitted,
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
Date: June 3, 2008 4"16C
Ro r M. Morgenthal, Esquire - ID# 17143
Darryl J. Liguori, Esquire - ID # 91715
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire - ID # 206405
4431 North Front Street, 3rd Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs :
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant (Jury Trial Demanded)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jessica E. Mercy, attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter,
hereby certify that I this day served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document upon the
person(s) indicated below by depositing a copy of the same in the United States Mail, postage
prepaid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and addressed as follows:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, LLP
1017 Mumma Road, Suite 300
Lemoyne, PA 17043
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
Date: June 3, 2008
Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire - ID# 17143
Darryl J. Liguori, Esquire - ID # 91715
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire - ID # 206405
4431 North Front Street, 3rd Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
r
Q
Ll?_?s.-1"mar= t' Gr
-1Jr 5ERLAQ COUU'
PEINNSDYLVAhIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMOF
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
? PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
end CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
MOTION TO STRIKE CASE LISTED FOR
TRIAL
(Jury Trial Demanded)
Filed on Behalf of the Defendant
Counsel of Record for This Party:
Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire
Pa. I.D. #83058
John A. Lucy, Esquire
Pa. I.D. #203948
SUMMERS, McDONNELL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE and SKEEL, P.C.
Firm #911
100 Sterling Parkway, Suite 306
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
(717) 901-5916
#16203
IN THE COURT OF COMMO
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant.
I PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
ind CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
(Jury Trial Demanded)
LI
AND NOW, comes the
Summers, McDonnell, Hudoc
and files the following Motion
as follows:
1. This case arises
13, 2005.
)efendant, Cody L. Strayer, by and through his counsel,
Guthrie & Skeel, P.C., and Kevin D. Rauch, Esquire,
Strike Case Listed for Trial and in support thereof avers
out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on June
2. As a result of the accident, the Plaintiffs filed a Complaint alleging that the
Defendant negligently caused hysical injuries to the Plaintiff, Patricia Fahnestock, and
that her husband, James Fahn stock, sustained a loss of consortium.
3. In his Answer to he Complaint, the Defendant admitted liability in causing
the accident.
4. In a letter dated
counsel that she intended to lic
counsel advised that the case
December 9, 2011, Plaintiffs' counsel advised Defense
t this matter for trial during the May 2011 term. Defense
would not be ready for trial until Ms. Fahnestock's
operative photographs were c
the Independent Medical Exan
attached as Exhibit "A".)
5. Upon receiving
Plaintiffs' counsel via letter dal
ned and reviewed by Nicholas S. Sotereanos, M.D.,
liner. (A copy of the correspondence between counsel is
the operative photographs, Defense counsel notified
January 20, 2011, that he had forwarded the films to
Dr. Sotereanos and was awaiting an addendum to the IME report. (A copy of the
correspondence between counsel is attached as Exhibit "B".)
6. On March 9, 2011, Plaintiffs' counsel filed a Praecipe for Listing Case for
Trial, without any additional communication with Defense counsel regarding listing the
case for trial following the Decomber 9, 2011, letter.
7. In the meantime counsel of record for the Defendant, Kevin D. Rauch,
Esquire, has become attache for a trial in Adams County during the week of May 2,
2011.
8. Additionally, counsel for the Defendant, John A. Lucy, Esquire, who
attended the video deposition Of the Plaintiffs' medical expert, has become attached for
a trial in Cumberland County during the May 2011 term.
9. As such, Defense counsel is unavailable for trial during the May 2011
term, and requests this matter Oe continued until the July 2011 term.
10. Plaintiff's counsel does not concur in the relief sought.
WHEREFORE, for the easons set forth above, the Defendant, Cody L. Strayer,
respectfully requests this Hon rable Court enter an Order striking this matter from the
May 2011 trial list, and continuing trial to the July 2011 term.
Respectfully submitted,
SUMMERS, McDON LL, HUDOCK,
GUTHRIE & L, P. O.
'Rabch, Esquire
Lucy, Esquire
sel for Defendant
SMIGEL, AND
& SACKS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Matthew Ridley, Esquire
Summers, McDonnell, Hudoc
100 Sterling Parkway, Suite 3
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
Re: Patricia A. Fa
Docket No. 07
Dear Matt:
I am writing in follow-t;
discussed listing the above-refc
me that you will not be ready f(
client's operative reports and of
Based on these representations,
2011 and, therefore, we will no
the case for the April/May 2011
to complete all additional disco
that time.
Rhn?_tlri vn>> hay. anv nn
J J
to contact me.
'JRSON
December 9, 2010
Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P.
JESSICA E. MERCY, ESQUIRE
PHONE: (717) 234-2401
TOLL FREE: 1-800-822-9757
FACSIMILE (717) 234-3611
EMAIL: jmercy@sasllp.com
www.sasllp.com
File No.
9816-1-8
tock and James R. Fahnestock v. Cody L. Strayer
i to our telephone conversation of today, during which we
enced case for trial. During that conversation, you represented to
- trial in January 2011 because you need to obtain copies of my
Lain a video deposition of your medical expert to be used at trial.
realize that you will oppose listing the case for trial in January
attempt to list the case for that term. However, we will be listing
trial list. We strongly believe that this will give you ample time
ery and obtain a video deposition of your medical expert before
or -nnP,rns rP?.,ruing this matter; please do not hesitate
Sincerely,
L?
Jessica E. Mercy
JEM
cc: Patricia & James F
A PENNSYLV
STEPHEN J. SUMMERS
THOMAS A. MCDONNELL
JOSEPH A. HUDOCK, JR
GReGG A GUTHRIE
PETER B. SKEEL
PATRICK M CONNELLY*
JEFFREY C CATANZARITE
KEVIN D. RAUCH
R ALSO ADMITTED IN W V
?'AL.SO ADMITTED IN NJ
S UMMEF
Gl
Via Email Only
Jmercy@saslip.com
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire
S, MCDONNELL, HUDOCK,
THRIE & SKEEL, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
HARRISBURG OFFICE: JASON A. HINES
Guy E. DLABS
100 STERLING PARKWAY MARK J. GOLEN
SUITE 309 RoReRT J. FIsHeR JR
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050 JOHN A. Lucy
PHONE: 717.901-5019 SETH T. BLACK"
FAX. 717-92019129 MATTHEW RIDLEY
GARyH A. GARTIN
JULIA A. PHILLIPS
DANIEL J. SAMMEL
MICAH T. SAUL
n/?
JanuaN 20 2011
20 ERIN M. SPRINGER
,
+ HEATHER A. GUIRAND
KRISTA M. CORABI
Smigel, Anderson & Sacks, LP
4431 North Front Street, 3rd Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
RE:
Our File No.
Dear Ms. Mercy:
16203
Enclosed please find copies of your client's January 9, 2004, and November 10,
2005, operative photographs. I have forwarded these materials to Dr. Sotereanos for an
addendum. I will be sure to provide you with a copy upon receipt.
In the meantime, should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to
contact me. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Matthew Ridley
MR:ces
Enclosures
PITTSBURGH
GU PITTSBURGH, PA 113219
TE OF
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing MOTION TO
STRIKE CASE LISTED FOR TRIAL has been mailed by U.S. Mail to counsel of record
via first class mail, postage pr -paid, this 24TH day of March, 2011.
Peter Good, Esquire
S igel, Anderson & Sacks, LLP
44131 North Front Street, 3`d Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
SUMMERS, ONNEL?, HUDOCK,
GUTHRI SKEEL, P.J9
nrK'auch, Esquire
i . Lucy, Esquire
nsel for Defendant
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
and JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENN SYLVANIA
Plaintiffs ;
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW ,
CODY L. STRAYER, ; rnw 3 =-n
Defendant NO. 07-3386 CIVIL TERM zm =a -,r
r-
. CO
?
<> a
c ,
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE
CASE LISTED FOR TRIAL
ORDER OF COURT ?
AND NOW, this 29 h day of March, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant 's
Motion To Strike Case Listed for Trial, a Rule is hereby issued upon Pl aintiffs to show
cause why the relief requested should not be granted.
RULE RETURNABLE within 7 days of service.
Peter Good, Esq.
4431 North Front Street
Third Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Attorney for Plaintiffs
? Kevin D. Rauch, Esq.
John A. Lucy, Esq.
100 Sterling parkway
Suite 306
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
Attorneys for Defendant
J,
M
'D
:rc
BY THE COURT,
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK AND
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Defendants
v
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUN'T'Y, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - :LAW
NO. 07-3386 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: CASE STRICKEN FROM LIST
ORDER OF COURT
c o
rr,
?
M Mr=
r- ?
r- ?o
o"
AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2011, u rv m
.. _
>
_4 C-n consideration of the call of the civil trial list, and fo-KoQcind?
a conference in chambers in which Plaintiffs were represented by
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire, and Defendant was represented by
John A. Lucy, Esquire, and it being represented by Mr. Lucy that
he has been attached in Cumberland County for another civil trial
during the forthcoming term of court, and Defendant's counsel
having requested a continuance to the July 2011 team of court for
that reason, and Plaintiffs' counsel having objected to the
continuance request, the Defendant's request for a continuance is
granted over objection, and counsel are requested to relist this
case for the July 2011 term of court.
By the Court,
/Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire
River Chase Office Center
4431 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
/ For Plaintiffs
? John A. Lucy, Esquire
100 Sterling Parkway
Suite 306
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
For Defendant
J. Isley 01 41-, Jr., J.
M0,s1eJ
C'OP ;?
Court Administrator -in bin :mae
CA/TL
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and CIVIL DIVISION
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs,
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant. (Jury Trial Demanded)
PRAECIPE TO REMOVE CASE FROM TRIAL LIST
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
t-?
7
77
-
r
Kindly remove the above-captioned case from the civil trial list for the July term.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: June 23, 2011
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
By: Peter M. Good, Esquire - ID #64316
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire - ID # 206405
4431 North Front Street, 3`d Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant
(Jury Trial Demanded)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jessica E. Mercy, attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter, hereby
certify that I this day served a true and correct copy of the Praecipe to Remove Case From Trial
List upon the person(s) indicated below by depositing a copy of the same in the United States
Mail, postage prepaid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and addressed as follows:
John Lucy, Esquire
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P.
100 Sterling Parkway, Suite 306
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, L.L.P.
Date: June 23, 2011 By: 4? -
Peter M. Good, Esquire - ID #64316
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire - ID # 206405
4431 North Front Street, 3ra Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
=1
Ir
r3 ,TRi O?JOTAk
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, LLP ' ` Peter M. Good, Esquire
River Chase Office Center
4431 North Front Street, 3`a Floor ., Paood asasllp com
Harrisburg PA 17110-1778 70 i 1 JUG- 2 Ali ! ! Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire
Hait 234-2401 COUNTY jmercy@sasllp.com
y;?. MBERLAND Attorneys for Plaintiff
2ENNSYl_ NIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. FAHNESTOCK and
JAMES R. FAHNESTOCK,
Plaintiffs
V.
CODY L. STRAYER,
Defendant
CIVIL DIVISION
NO. 07-3386
(Jury Trial Demanded)
PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE/DISMISS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please mark this action settled, dismissed, and discontinued with prejudice.
Respectfully submitted,
Date:
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, LLP
"7 J cS l? By: a Tukx--?
Pet . Good, quire ID #64316
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire ID 4206405
River Chase Office Center, 3rd Floor
4431 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire, hereby certify that a copy of the Praecipe to
Discontinue/Dismiss was served upon the following, by depositing a true and correct copy in the
first-class mail, postage prepaid in an envelope addressed as follows:
John A. Lucy, Esquire
Matthew Ridley, Esquire
Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel, L.L.P.
100 Sterling Parkway, Suite 306
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
SMIGEL, ANDERSON & SACKS, LLP
By
Date: EJ ? ?SI Pe M. Good, Esquire I.D. #64316
Jessica E. Mercy, Esquire I.D. #206405
River Chase Office Center, 3rd Flr.
4431 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 234-2401
Attorneys for Plaintiff