HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-5427IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
230R Spring Lane
Enola, PA 17025
PLAINTIFF
V.
FILE NO.: D~`l -.S'1,1Z'1' l.1 c~~ 1. i ~ e
`~" ' t
CIVIL ACTION:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
6085 Parkland Blvd., E P 3
Mayfield Heights, OH 44124 .
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
5165 Campus Drive
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1135
DEFENDANT
PRAECIPE FOR SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF SAID COURT:
Issue summons i~`tTie above captioned actin hick arises from a contract dispute.
~--
_~ Writ of Summons shall be Yssued and forty to Attorney/Sheriff.
Date: _~'d1 __4 ly~ ".
D an Bratic, Esq., ID 19249
~:
' Bratic & Portko
~, 101 South US Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
(717) 432-9706
SUMMONS IN CIVIL ACTION
TO: Progressive Northern Insurance Company Progressive Insurance Company
6085 Parkland Blvd., E P 3 5165 Campus Drive
Mayfield Heights, OH 44124 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1135
YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED PLAINTIFF HAS COMMENCED AN
ACTION AGAINST YOU.
Date: ~ 0'r
- -r -.,
~ ~
.,p ''"
}}~~..
IN
fit`..
en ~:
~~ ~ ~
~~
.~-
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
230R Spring Lane
Enola, PA 17025
PLAINTIFF
V.
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil Term
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
6085 Parkland Blvd., E P 3
Mayfield Heights, OH 44124
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
5165 Campus Drive
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1135
DEFENDANT
PRAECIPE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please reissue the Writ of Summons in the above captioned matter.
Date: 0 3b a7
Dusan Bratic, Esq.
101 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
(717) 432-9706
Supreme Court ID: 19249
.?~- 1
/~/ ~
~ ~.
O
p
j ' ` ~ ~< ~.
~
A_
n
Y
~~
~~
_a
r:-.~
4
i
T~
-.-.y
~. J
~~r
!^
rl
~~~yy ~E~.
~L
+ SHERIFF'S RETURN - OUT OF COUNTY
CASE NO: 2007-05427 P
~~COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
HAKE STEPHEN M SR
VS
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INS CO
R. Thomas Kline
Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff who being
duly sworn according to law, says, that he made a diligent search and
and inquiry for the within named DEFENDANT to wit:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY AKA PROGRESSIVE INS CO
but was unable to locate Them in his bailiwick. He therefore
deputized the sheriff of MONTGOMERY County, Pennsylvania, to
serve the within WRIT OF SUMMONS
On November 27th 2007 this office was in receipt of the
attached return from MONTGOMERY
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing 18.00
Out of County 9.00
Surcharge 10.00
Dep Montgomery Co 33.00
Postage .75
70.75 ~/
11/27/2007
BRATIC & PORTKC
So answers-:
~.>
~i"~_
R. '~homas Kline
Sheriff of Cumberland County
/~ ~j o~D 7
Sworn and subscribe to before me
this day of
A.D.
..
In The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
Stephen M. Hake Sr.
VS.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
No . 07-5427 civil
Now, November 8, 2007 , I, SHERIFF OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA, do
hereby deputize the Sheriff of Montgomery County to execute this Writ, this
deputation being made at the request and risk of the Plaintiff.
Sheriff of Cumberland County, PA
Please mail return of service to Cumberland County Sheriff. Thank you.
Affidavit of Service
Now, __ , 20 , at
within
upon
at
by handing to
a
and made known to
So answers,
the contents thereof.
Sheriff of
Sworn and subscribed before
me this day of , 20
copy of the original
COSTS
SERVICE _
MILEAGE _
AFFIDAVIT
o'clock M. served the
County, PA
SHERIFF'S RETURN
PROTHONOTARY D- 4115
DEFENDANT: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
DOCUMENT SERVED: Civil
INDIVIDUAL SERVED: Laurie Pellicore
RELATIONSHIP TO DEFENDANT: Person In Charge
DATE AND PREVAILING TIME: 11-14-04 @ 13:00
LOCATION: 5165 Can ~~ u~, :eeting, PA
The above document was serves
the County of Montgomery, Coy
ormation listed above in
a.
Affirmed and subscribed before
11-16-07
tary Public
.-
r~o~.wr:~;~ stns
py~21CG1 A. G~,~,BRONE
Notcuy Pic
M~GpME~`f COt1Nn
~pi-es pec.13.2008
John P. Durante
Sheriff of Montgomery County
Deputy Sheriff
Case
,_~DEC-11-2007 09 ~ 46
SH RAF S RETURN
~a~
PROT~IONOTARY D- 4115
DEFENDANT: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
DOCUMENT SERVED: Civil
IN:DNIDUAL SERVED: Laurie Pellicore
F
RELATIONSHIP TO DEFENDANT: Person In Charge
DATE AND PREVAILING TIME: 11-14-07 @ 1.3:00
LOCATXON: 5165 Campus Drive, Plymouth Meeting, PA
The above document was served on the defendant as per information listed above in
the Cuuoty of Montgomery, Commonwealth of PennsyWania.
Affirmed and subscribed before me on this day so answers.
12-10-07
Notary Public
John P. Durante
Sheriff of Montgomery County
Deputy Sheriff
Case
P.01i01
TOTAL P.01
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil Term
STATEMENT OF INTENTION TO PROCEED
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
The Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hake, Sr., by and through his attorney, Dusan Bratic, Esquire,
intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Please remove it from the proposed
termination list.
Date:??
R
Dusan Bratic
I.D. # 19249
101 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Attorney for Plaintiffs
N ??
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V.
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil Term
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Statement of Intention
to Proceed was furnished by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid on this day of September
2010, to:
Esther V. Tyson, Medical Claims Rep.
Progressive Insurance
5165 Campus Drive, Suite 100
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462
Dated:_L
BRATIC & PORTKO
r
Dusan Bratic
I.D. # 19249
101 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Attorney for Plaintiffs
e
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNT a
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
vs.
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Defendant Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdapperkd3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtwillaAd3bk.com
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling
& Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, 10th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
r
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
vs.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
TO: Prothonotary
Kindly enter my appearance for Defendant Progressive Northern Insurance Company
aWa Progressive Insurance Company with regard to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
By:
DAPPER, ??D ARE, BENSO, BEHLING
& KA /l _--71,/
Daniel J. T<villa
Pa. I.D. # 93797
dtwillana,d3bk.com
Four Gateway Center, 10th Floor
444 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
(Counsel for Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the within PRAECIPE
FOR APPEARANCE was forwarded by U.S. First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, this 24th day of
June, 2011, upon the following:
Dusan Bratic, Esquire
1010 South U. S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
-A
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
VS.
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE '
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Defendant Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdapper@d3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtwilla(iW3bk.com
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling
& Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, 10th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
vs.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
TO: Prothonotary
Kindly enter my appearance for Defendant Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company with regard to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
DAPPER, ALDASARE, BENSON, BEHLING
& KAN ,
By:
Rob rt E. Da er, Jr.
PA I.D. #46378
rd a pperna,d3bk.com
Four Gateway Center, 10th Floor
444 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
(Counsel for Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the within PRAECIPE
FOR APPEARANCE was forwarded by U.S. First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, this 24t' day of
June, 2011, upon the following:
Dusan Bratic, Esquire
1010 South U. S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
obert apper, Jr.
Daniel J. Twilla
t
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY% .;
PENNSYLVANIA ?
_ _
..,
Stephen M. Hake, Sr. = .. -.?
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
VS. En
FOR RULE TO FIL + -
Progressive Northern Insurance Company COMPLAINT
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Defendant Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdapper(a,d3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtwillagd3bk.com
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling
& Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, I Otn Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff
NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
vs.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant
PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
TO: Prothonotary
Kindly issue a Rule upon Plaintiff in this matter to file a Complaint within twenty (20)
days.
Respectfully submitted,
DAPPERWBAALLDASARE BEHLING
& KANE
By:
obePA I.D. #46378
rdappera,d3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
dtwilla ,d3bk.com
RULE
To THE k AIINTT Pr
Iba are kereby d i reefed qo pie Oofiplaiq
0jPnS+ the De?ndof t, - in coo days 4 Sere i&*
or seer judgnnenl non roS
Four Gateway Center, 10'h Floor
444 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
(Counsel for Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the within
PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT was forwarded by U.S. First Class Mail,
postage pre-paid, this 24th day of June, 2011, upon the following:
Dusan Bratic, Esquire
1010 South U. S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
obert E. apper, Jr.
Daniel J. Twilla
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff
V.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
CIVIL DIVISION
No. 07-5427 Civil Term
o
c
rr.. s u?_.
C?o
NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE!',, .ca
OF REMOVAL n '
.
Defendant
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company aWa
Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdappernd3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtwillaka d3bk.com
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling, &
Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, 10th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.,
Plaintiff
CIVIL DIVISION
No. 07-5427 Civil Term
V.
Progressive Northern Insurance
Company a/k/a Progressive Insurance
Company,
Defendant
NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL
AND NOW comes the Defendant, Progressive Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company, by and through its attorneys, Dapper, Baldasare, Benson,
Behling & Kane, P.C., and states that a Notice of Removal has been filed with the United States
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq. A
true and correct electronically time-stamped copy of the Notice of Removal is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
Respectfully submitted,
DAPPER, BALDASARE, BENSON, BEHLING &
KANE, P.C.
BY
Daniel Twi a
Counsel for Defendant Progressive Northern
Insurance Company a/k/a Progressive Insurance
Company
Exhibit A
Case 1:11-c\1650-YK Document 1 Filed 09/01 Page 1 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.,
No.
Plaintiff,
vs.
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN
INSURANCE COMPANY a/k/a
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
NOTICE OF REMOVAL
NOW, comes the Defendant, Progressive Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company ("Progressive"), by and through its attorneys,
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling & Kane, P.C., and files this Notice of
Removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, et seq. Progressive submits that the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has original diversity
jurisdiction over this civil action and this matter may be removed to the District
Court in accordance with the procedures provided at 28 U.S.C. § 1446. In further
support of this Notice of Removal, Progressive states as follows:
1. Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hake, Sr., filed a Complaint in the Court of
Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania on August 4, 2011. A true
?Q 0
S
Case 1:11-c\ l650-YK Document l Filed 09/01 7 Page 2 of 6
and correct copy of Plaintiff's Complaint and Notice to Defend are attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
2. Progressive received a copy of the Complaint on August 8, 2011.
3. In addition to the Complaint, the following documents were filed in
connection with the State Court action:
• Praecipe for Summons and Summons in Civil Action;
• Praecipe to Reissue Writ of Summons;
e Sheriff's Return of Service;
• Statement of Intention to Proceed;
• Praecipe for Appearance of Daniel J. Twilla;
a Praecipe for Appearance of Robert E. Dapper, Jr.;
Praecipe for Rule to File Complaint and Rule to File
Complaint.
(Collectively attached hereto as Exhibit B.)
4. Upon information and belief, the documents attached hereto as
Exhibits "A" and "B" constitute all of the pleadings, process, and Orders filed in
connection with the state court action.
5. Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hake, Sr., is an adult individual residing in
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Both at the time Plaintiff initiated this action
and this removal, Plaintiff was a citizen of Pennsylvania.
Case 1:11-m )650-YK Document l Filed 09/01. Page 3 of 6
6. Progressive Northern Insurance Company is not a Pennsylvania
corporation, nor does Progressive Northern Insurance Company have its principal
place of business in Pennsylvania.
7. Progressive Northern Insurance Company is an Ohio corporation with
its principal place of business in Ohio with an address of 6300 Wilson Mills Road,
Mayfield Village, OH 44143.
8. Both at the time Plaintiff initiated this action and this removal,
Progressive Northern Insurance Company was a citizen of Ohio.
9. Progressive Insurance Company is not a legal or corporate entity
capable of being sued.
10. Plaintiff alleges that Progressive has breached an insurance contract
which provides coverage for first party medical expenses in the amount of
$100,000.
11. In addition, Plaintiff claims entitlement to attorneys' fees for breach
of contract pursuant to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility
Law 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701, et seq.
12. Furthermore, Plaintiff alleges that Progressive acted in bad faith and
Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on all medical benefits terminated and/or
delayed and/or denied, punitive damages, and counsel fees and costs.
Case 1:11-c% )650-YK Document l Filed 09/01. Page 4 of 6
13. Plaintiff also claims that he is entitled to treble damages and
attorneys' fees for Progressive's alleged violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and
Consumer Protection Law ("UTPCPL").
14. Accordingly, because Plaintiff seeks damages for breach of contract in
the amount of $100,000, plus treble damages, attorneys' fees, and punitive
damages for bad faith, the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional
requirement of $75,000.
15. Since Plaintiff and Progressive are citizens of different states, and
because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has original jurisdiction over this
matter. See 28 U.S.C. §1332.
16. Section 1332 confers original jurisdiction over all civil matters where
the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of
interest and costs, and is between citizens of different states.
17. Progressive submits that this matter may be removed to the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1441, which permits removal of any civil action to the District Courts that have
original jurisdiction.
Case 1:11-c% )650-YK Document l Filed 09/01 Page 5 of 6
18. All Defendants, including Progressive Northern Insurance Company
and Progressive Insurance Company, consent to, and join in, this Notice of
Removal.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Progressive Northem Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company hereby removes this civil action to the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§1441.
Respectfully submitted,
DAPPER, BALDASARE, BENSON,
BEHLING & KANE, P.C.
By: /s/ Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
PA I.D. #46378
rdapper(a,d3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
dtwillaa,d3bk.com
Four Gateway Center, 10'' Floor
444 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
(Counsel for Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company)
Case 1:11-c\, )650-YK Document 1 Filed 09/01. Page 6 of 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned does hereby certify that on September 1, 2011, the within
NOTICE OF REMOVAL was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be
sent to all Parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may
access this filing through the Court's system.
/s/ Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Daniel J. Twilla
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 1 of 42
EXHIBIT A
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 ) Page 2 of 42
Dusan Bratle, Esq. ID: 19249
Bratic & Portko
101 South US Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Tel: 717-432-9706
Fax: 717-432-9220
Attorney for Plaintiff
F1LE0-OFFICE
C r THE PROTHONOTAN {
7011 AUG -I+ AN 10' 3S
CUMBERLAND COUNT'
0ENNSYLVANI A
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V.
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
AWA Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set
forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this
complaint and notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by
attomey and fling in writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set
forth against you. You are warned that 9 you fail to do so the case may proceed without
you and a judgment may be entered against you by the court without further notice for any
money claimed in the complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff.
You may lase money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 LIBERTY AVENUE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(7117) 240-3166
r)
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 2 of 42
Dusan Bratic, Esq. ID: 19249
Bratic & Portko
101 South US Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Tel: 717-432-9706
Fax: 717-432-9220
Attorney for Plaintiff
HLED-OFFICE ,
rF THE QROTHONOTAR f
7911 AUG -I+ AM IC- 35
CUMBERLAND C011NTf
IOENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set
forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this
complaint and notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by
attorney and ling in writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set
forth against you. You are warned that 9 you fail to do so the case may proceed without
you and a judgment may be entered against you by the court without further notice for any
money claimed in the complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff.
You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 LIBERTY AVENUE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(M) 249-3166
r)
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 , Page 3 of 42
AVISO
Le han demandado a usted on is corts. Si usted quiere dokr4erse de estas
demandas expuestas on law paginas siguiantes, usted tiene veinte (20) dias de plaza ai
partir de la fecha de la demand& y la noWicadon. Hace falta aserrtar una compar+encia
escrits o en persona o con un abogado y entregar a la torte on forma escrita sus
de%nsas o sus objeciones a las demandas en contra de su persona. Sea avisado que si
usted no se deflende, is torte tomara medidas y puede continuer ia'demanda an contra
suya sin previc aviso o notificacion. Ademas, la corte puede decidir a fever del
demandante y requiem quo usted cumpla con torus law provlsiones de esta dernanda.
Usted puede perder dinero o sus propledades u otros derechos importantes para usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABOGADO INIIEDIATAMENTE. SI NO TIENE
ABOGADO O SI NO TIENE ELDINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR TAL SERVICO,
VAYA EN PERSONA 0 LLAME POR 'IELEFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA DIRECCION
SE ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE
CONSEGUIR ASISTENCIA LEGAL
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 LIBERTY AVENUE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 ) Page 4 of 42
Dusan Brartic, Esq. ID: 19249
Bratic & Portko
101 South US Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Tel: 717-432-9706
Fax: 717-432-9220
Attorney for Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V_
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/K!A Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, by and through his attomeys, Dusan Bratic, Esquire of
Bratic & Portko, and hereby files the following Complaint against the above-named
Defendants and avers as follows:.
1. Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hake, is an adult and competent individual who
currently resides at 230R Spring Lane, Enola, Cumberland County, PA 17025.
2. The Defendant, Progressive Northern Insurance Company is believed to be
an Ohio corporation, with principal offices at 6085 Parkland Blvd., E P 3, Mayfield Heights,
OH 44124.
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 5 of 42
3. The Defendant Progressive Northam Insurance Company has a non-
resident insurance license to conduct business in Pennsylvania.
4. The Defendant Progressive Insurance Company is believed to be a
Pennsylvania Corporation, that is a subsidiary or affiliate of Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company {both companies, individually and/or combined, hereinafter
referred to as Progressive and/or "INSURER', with principal offices at 5165 Campus
Drive, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1135.
5. The Defendant Progressive Insurance Company is licensed to conduct
business in Pennsylvania.
6. Both Defendants regularly conduct business in Pennsylvania and as such
are subject to Pennsylvania Law.
7. Defendants are identified on documents related to the below-referenced
policy of insurance, specifically on the policy of insurance itsefF and correspondence
relating to the same.
8. Defendants are identified on documents related to the below-referenced claim
made on the policy.
9. It is believed and averred that the Defendants, aged as Plaintiff's insurer
at all times relevant to Plaintiffs claims discussed below.
10. Defendant Progressive Insurance Company, licensed to do business within
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, did in fact at all times relevant to this complaint,
conduct business activities, to wit selling policies, adjusting claims, accepting
premiums and conducting other insurance activities in Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 6 of 42
11. At all times material hereto, INSURER acted by and through their agents,
ostensible agents, servants and employees, acting in the course and scope of their
agency and/or employment, for whose conduct INSURER is liable, vicariously or
otherwise.
12. Defendant INSURER, Progressive violated their statutory, common law
and/or contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing to provide Plaintiff with a fair,
reasonable, timely and competent evaluation and payment of Plaintiffs first party and
I
wage loss claims.
13. Defendant INSURER, Progressive had a duty to give Plaintiff's interests, at a
very minimum, the same faithful consideration that they gave their own interests.
14. At all times material hereto, Defendants INSURER, Progressive maliciously,
intentionally and in bad faith, put their own interests far above the interests of Plaintiff.
15. Defendant INSURER, Progressive focused upon said Defendants' own
economic considerations to limit or delay payment on Plaintiff's claims causing
damages to Plaintiff, as discussed herein, inter alia, by delaying any recovery on
Plaintiffs claims and by subjecting Plaintiff to unnecessary expenses as well as causing
delays in treatment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
16. Plaintiff herein incorporates by reference all of the averments of this
Complaint as if same were set forth at length herein.
17. On or about September 16, 2002, Plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle
accident in which he sustakied personal injuries, hereinafter referred to as "accident". At
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 7 of 42
that time Plaintiff was then forty-nine (49) years of age, in fair health, with none of the
infirmities or maladies he sustained in this accident.
18. Prior thereto, Defendant INSURER issued a policy of automobile insurance
to the insured, with policy number 56006587-0 (the Policy"). The Policy was in effect
from 4/8/2002 through 10/8/2002, which includes the date of accident of September 16,
2002. The Plaintiff was a covered driver on said policy.
19. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Policy, Plaintiff was an insured
on a full tort option. The Policy provided for $100,000 in medical benefits, $25,000 in
wage loss benefits. (A copy of the policy is in the possession of Defendant INSURER).
A copy of the declaration sheets is attached as Exhibit A.
20. At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was the operator of a 1987 Chevrolet
Cavalier, which he owned and which was insured under the Policy.
21. The accident occurred as Plaintiff was driving his automobile on Wertzville
Road near Ores Bridge Road, Hampden Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania,
when Thomas F. Manning, III crashed into the rear of Plaintiffs vehicle, pushing Plaintiffs
vehicle into the vehicle in front of it.
22. The proximate cause of the accident was the negligent operation of the
vehicle by Thomas F. Manning, Ill.
23. Mr. Manning was 100% liable for the foregoing accident.
24. Plaintiff bears no legal liability for the foregoing accident.
25. Plaintiff's vehicle was severely damaged and was totaled as a result of the
accident.
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 8 of 42
26. Shortly after the accident, Plaintiff began treating with Dr. Dow Brophy for the
injuries he suffered in the auto accident.
27. Thereafter Dr. Brophy ordered x-rays and diagnosed the Plaintiff with back,
neck and left shoulder injuries.
28. Upon the recommendation of Dr. Brophy, Plaintiff underwent a series of
physician referrals for injuries sustained in this accident, including:
a) Dr. John H. York, who diagnosed Plaintiff with inter alia, lumbar and
cervical hemiations and who performed a lumbar discectomy.
b) Dr. Nelson Hendler, Director of the Mensana Clinic, who diagnosed the
Plaintiff with cervical, thoracic and lumbar injuries as well as injuries to his shoulder and
bilateral thoracic outlet syndrome.
c) Dr. Mark Holenclk, who diagnosed Plaintiff with substantially the same
problems as Dr. Hendler.
d) Dr. Avraam Karas, who diagnosed Plaintiff with severe bilateral thoracic
outlet syndrome.
e) Dr. Marcell Reisher, M.D., who diagnosed chronic changes in C6-7
distribution bilaterally.
f) Dr. Edward Violago, who diagnosed acute C6-7 radiculopathy.
g) Non-Invasive Vascular Associates, who diagnosed bilateral vascular
compression.
h) Dr. Garcia Etienne, who diagnosed Plaintiff with spine injuries, left shoulder
impingement and AC joint disfuncion.
i) Dr. Reginald Davis who diagnosed cervical disc herniations.
Case 1:11-cv-C b0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 9 of 42
29. Upon the recommendation of his treating physicians, Plaintiff has undergone
multiple forms of treatment in an effort to treat his injuries and symptoms resulting from
the accident, including a home exercise program, massage therapy and chiropractic
therapy, thoracic outlet syndrome surgery, and including the taking of medications to
ameliorate his pain.
30. As a result of September 16, 2002 accident described above, Plaintiff suffered
numerous serious injuries and aggravation thereof, including but not limited to:
a) extension flexion injuries;
b) back strain;
c) Injuries to his back, with left leg pain and tingling;
d) neck injuries;
e) left shoulder injuries;
f) left arm injuries;
g) back pain;
h) headaches;
i) muscle spasms;
j) trigger points;
k) limitation of cervical range of motion;
i) loss of strength in his left arm and left shoulder pain;
m) sleep difficulties;
n) cervical discogenic syndrome;
o) thoracic radiculkis;
p) such other injuries as reported in the medical records.
Case 1:11-cv-0, 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01/ Page 10 of 42
MEDICAL PAYMENT COVERAGE
31. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the averments of this
Complaint as if same were set forth at length herein.
32. The Plaintiff believes that his health care providers all submitted their
medical bills, relating to their care of Plaintiff for injuries sustained in the auto accident, to
Progressive promptly after services were rendered.
33. INSURER has failed to pay medical bills promptly in accordance with the
MVFRL and its regulations after the bills were submitted to it.
34. The Defendant INSURER lacked a reasonable basis to refuse to pay
Plaintiffs first party medical benefits and knowingly and recklessly disregarded the
payment of said bills in violation of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
35. It is believed and averred that INSURER has an improper policy and
practice to look for and, in fact, devise ways to deny coverage when insureds make
claims for first party medical benefits against policies that include higher amounts of first
party benefits, including policies such as Plaintiffs that include $100,000 in first party
benefits.
36. The Defendant knowingly and intentionally failed to pay for Plaintiffs pain
medications when it knew or should have known that to do so would cause the Plaintiff
great pain, anguish and discomfort.
37. There was no bona fide controversy as to the nature of Plaintiffs injuries.
39. During the course of Plaintiffs treatment, he received reasonable and
necessary medical treatment from the health care providers listed in the preceding
paragraphs and other health care providers and throughout his treatment, the health care
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/011 Page 11 of 42
providers, in accordance with the requirements of Act 8 Amendment to the Pennsylvania
Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, submitted bilk on a timely basis for medical
services to Defendant INSURER.
39. The treatment Plaintiff has been forced to undergo since the time of the
accident is and has been medically reasonable and necessary; was causally related to
the accident; and the His generated from such treatment have been fair and
reasonable.
40. Defendant INSURER initially only paid some of the medical bills associated
with Plaintiffs treatment and refused to pay for other treatments and medical care that
were deemed necessary by his treating doctors.
41. Defendant INSURER continuously denied and delayed payment of medical
bills submitted by Plaintiff and his medical providers for treatment for injuries sustained in
the September 16, 2002 accident, even though payment was due under the
aforementioned policy of insurance. Said denials were improper in that the denials were
untimely, without foundation and contrary to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial
Responsibility Law and insurance regulations and the INSURER policy.
42. Defendants INSURER had no reason to believe that Plaintiffs treatment was
not medically necessary, but instead were intentionally trying to cut off payment of
Plaintiffs medical bills for which insurance coverage Plaintiff paid the requested and
appropriate insurance premiums.
43. As a result of the aforementioned automobile accident, Plaintiff was deprived
of medical services for a substantial period of time, including surgery for bilateral TOS
and for cervical discectomy and fusion.
Case 1:11-cv-0 )0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/011 Page 12 of 42
44. As a result of INSURER'S refusal to pay the benefits justly due and owing
under the policy of insurance it issued to the Plaintiff, Plaintiff has been forced to
expend his own monies to pay for some medical treatment at a time he was not able to
work and during which period he had little income, as well as delay treatment causing
him great pain and suffering.
45. As a result of INSURER'S refusal to pay for Plaintiffs medical treatment
related to the September 16, 2002 accident, Plaintiff had to forgo necessary medical
procedures and do without pain medications.
46. INSURER and/or ADJUSTER'S delay and refusal to pay for Plaintiffs
treatments on a timely basis has caused Plaintiff severe emotional distress,
inconvenience, financial burden and aggravation.
47. As a result of Defendants' improper refusal to pay Plaintiffs medical bills as
aforesaid, Plaintiff was forced to hire the services of an attorney to collect for medical bills
due and owing and to restore payment for medical bills. Therefore, pursuant to §1716 of
the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibirdy Law, Plaintiff is entitled to
attorney fees (in the event the insurer is found to have aged in an unreasonable manner
in refusing to pay the benefits when due) and Defendant INSURER must pay 129
interest per annum from the date the benefits became due.
48. It is further avenged that under §1798 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle
Financial Responsibility Law, in the event that an insurer is found to have acted with "no
reasonable foundation," it is also liable for attorney fees.
49. Defendant INSURER has undertaken a course of action that is wanton and
reckless, and designed to unilaterally and without proper justification refuse to pay for
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/011 Page 13 of 42
Plaintiffs claim for medical benefits and caused Plaintiff to become personally responsible
for medical bias arising out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle in contradiction
of the terms of the contract, the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law
and the case law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
50. Defendant INSURER failed to follow the Peer Review process of the
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, including but not limited to
§1797 and 31 Pa. Code 69.52(b) by not paying Plaintiff's medical bills within 30 days of
the receipt of the bills and/or not timely requesting the Peer Review within 90 days after
receipt of the provider's bills and/or after receiving sufficient documentation supporting the
bill.
51. Defendant INSURER falled to follow Peer Review process of the
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, including but not limited to
§1797 and 31 Pa. Code 69.52(c), by failing to have the Peer Review request
documentation from the provider and affording the provider the opportunity to discuss the
case with the reviewer prior to the final determination and/or in the altemadve to use a
peer review organization that had a history of stacking such reviews in favor of the insurer
and in not following legal protocols for peer review work.
ADDITIONAL GENERAL AVERMENTS
52. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the averments of this Complaint
as if fully set forth herein at length.
53. Plaintiff paid all premiums associated with the aforementioned policy of
insurance.
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 ) Page 14 of 42
54. Plaintiff purchased automobile insurance with a significant amount of first
parry medical and wage loss benefits, so that, in the event he was involved in an
accident, his medical bills and wage losses resulting from the accident would be paid.
55. Plaintiff purchased automobile insurance with a significant amount of first
party medical and wage loss benefits to gain the peace of mind that his medical bills
and wage losses would be covered financially in the event of an accident.
56. Defendant INSURER represented to Plaintiff, inter alla, that INSURER would
pay up to $100,000 in first party benefits for accident related injuries and $25,000 in
wage loss benefits as part of the coverage available under the aforementioned policy of
insurance.
57. Plaintiff relied upon INSURER's promise to provide up to $100,000 in first.
party medical benefits and $25,000 in wage loss benefits when he purchased the
aforementioned policy of insurance, and submitted payment of the premiums for said
policy.
58. INSURER'S representations to Plaintiff were material to the agreement
between INSURER and Plaintiff, in that Plaintiff would not have purchased and paid
premiums for the policy of insurance if said coverage, inter alia, was not included
therein, or if Plaintiff believed INSURER would not honor its obligations under the policy.
59. Plaintiffs reliance on the representations from INSURER was justified.
60. Contrary to the terms of the automobile insurance policy issued by
INSURER to Plaintiff and in violation of the law, statutes, and regulations of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania INSURER, AND ADJUSTER:
a) Failed to pay Plaintiff's submitted medical billis contrary to the Motor
Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and regulations;
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/011 Page 15 of 42
b) Fair to promptly pay Plaintliffs submitted medical bills contrary to
the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and regulations;
c) Failed to pay Plaintrff's submitted medical bills within thirty (30) days
after INSURER's receipt of same contrary to 75 Pe.C.S.A. §1716;
d) Acted in an unreasonable manner in refusing to pay and/or delaying
payment of Plaintiffs submitted medical bills when due, contrary to 75
Pa. C.S.A. §1716;
e) Acted with no reasonable foundation in refusing to pay and/or
delaying payment of Plaintiffs submitted medical bills when due,
contrary to 75 Pa. C.S.A. §1798;
f) Failed to properly challenge Plaintiffs requested payment of medical
bills by PRO process within ninety (90) days of INSURER's receipt of
Plaintiffs medical bills, contrary to 75 Pa.C.S.A. §1797(b);
g) Failed to properly make payment on Plaintiff's submitted medical bills
after the 30s' day, when sold medical bilk were not properly referred
to a PRO within thirty (30) days of Defendants' receipt of said bills,
contrary to 31 Pa. Code § 69.52(b);
h) Failed to provide the Peer Review reports to Plaintiff and the medical
providers within the firm frame set forth in 75 Pa. C.S.A. 1797 and 31
Pa.Code 69.51;
i) Violated 75 Pa.C.SA. § 1797 and the corresponding regulations at
31 Pa.Code 69.51 et seq. governing Pear Review procedures and/or
improperly attempting to circumvent these requirements;
j) Excessively delayed the processing and payment of Plaintiffs
submitted medical bills and wage loss benefits without reasonable
justification;
k) Made a frivolous and/or unfounded refusal to pay Plaintiffs submitted
medical bills;
1) Denied and/or improperly delayed payment of Plaintiffs submitted
medical bills without a reasonable basis and knew of or recklessly
disregarded their lack of a reasonable basis in denying and/or
improperly delaying payment of said medical bills;
m) Failed to comply with the terms of the automobile insurance policy
that INSURER issued to Plaintiff with regard to the payment of first
party medical benefits;
Case 1:11-cv-0 ?)0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, " Page 16 of 42
n) Intentionally put Plaintiff's health and financial status in jeopardy by
improperly denying and/or improperly delaying payment of Plaintiffs
submitted medical bills;
o) Failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation before denying
and/or improperly delaying payment of Plaintiffs submitted medical
bills;
p) Misled Plaintiff as to the insurance coverage (medical benefits)
availlable and owed to her under the aforementioned automobile
insurance policy;
q) Failed to objectively and fairly evaluate Plaintiffs first party medical
benefit claims;
r) Acting affirmatively and in bad faith so as to deny and/or improperly
delay payment of Plaintiffs submitted medical bills and in delaying his
wage loss benefits;
s) Failed to adequately investigate Plaintiffs claim for first party benefits
prior to denying the same;
Q Failed to give equal consideration to paying Plaintiff's first party
medical benefits as to the consideration given to not paying said
benefits;
u) Failed to timely investigate, evaluate, and pay Plaintiff's first party
medical benefits claims;
v) Engaged in dilatory and abusive claims handling practices with
regard to Plaintiff's medical benefits claims;
w) Assumed a fiduciary obligation and then failed to carry out the
performance of said fiduciary obligation in good faith;
x) Breached their duties of good faith and fair dealing;
V) Placed their interests over their insured;
z) Engaged in an effort to delay, dissuade, and obfuscate Plaintiff's
rightful first party medical benefits claims;
aa)Acted in a manner that was frivolous and motivated by self-interest
and ill-will with respect to Plaintiff's first party medical benefits claim;
bb)Ignored the multiple and corroborating diagnoses and opinions of
Plaintiff's treating physicians in denying and/or delaying Plaintiffs first
party medical claims and treatments;
Case 1:11-cv-0 )O-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 17 of 42
cc) Made intentional and/or negligent misrepresentations concerning
Plaintiffs entitlement and/or non-entitlement to first party medical
benefits and the reasons for terminating or improperly delaying
payment of Plaintiffs first party medical benefits;
dd) Denied paying medical bills and denied Plaintiff medical treatment,
despite medical corroboration from Plaintiffs treating physicians that
Plaintiffs injuries and treatment were reasonable, necessary and
related to the accident, without any competent contrary medical
opinions and without conducting a reasonable, proper and fair
investigation;
ee)Misrepresented pertinent facts or policy or contract provisions relating
to coverages at issue, in violation of 40 P.S. 1171.5;
ff) Failed to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt
investigation of Plaintiffs first party medical benefits claims, contrary
to 40 P.S. §1171.5;
gg)Refused and/or improperly delayed payment of Plaintiffs submitted
medical bills without conduc Ping a reasonable investigation based
upon all available information, contrary to 40 P.S. §1171.5;
hh)Delayed investigation or payment of claims by requiring Plaintiff and
his physicians to submit information containing substantially the same
information, in violation of 40 P.S. 1171.5;
ii) Failed to promptly provide Plaintiff with a legally justifiable explanation
of the basis in the insurance policy in relation to the facts or
applicable law for their denial of and/or delayed payment of Plaintiffs
first party benefits claim, contrary to 40 P.S. §1171.5;
jj) Failed to fully disclose to Plaintiff the benefits, coverages or other
provisions of the insurance policy under which a claim is presented
and/or which are pertinent to a claim, in violation of 31 Pa.Code
146.4;
kk) Failed to complete their investigation of Plaintiffs first party medical
benefits within thirty (30) days, contrary to 31 Pa. Code §146.6;
II) Failed to properly notify Plaintiff in writing that INSURER's
investigation of her first party medical benefits and/or wage loss
claims would not be able to be completed within thirty (30) days, and
failed to provide such notice in writing every forty-five (45) days
thereafter, with a reasonable explanation for the delay and a
statement as to when a decision on the claim could be expected,
contrary to 31 Pa. Code §146.6;
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 18 of 42
mm) Improperly denied and/or improperly delayed payment on
Plaintiffs first party medical benefits claims on the grounds of a
specific policy provision, condition or exclusion in contravention of
Pennsylvania Law,
nn)Failed to provide Plaintiff with written notification initially within thirty
(30) days and every forty-five (45) days thereafter that additional tires
was needed for their investigation as to Plaintiffs first party medical
benefits claims and further failing to state their reasons therein as to
why additional time was needed and when a decision on the claim
could be expected, all contrary to 31 Pa. Code §146.7;
oo)Caused likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding as to the source,
sponsorship, approval or certification of goods or services, in violation
of 73 P.S. 201-2(4)(ii);
pp)Caused likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding as to the
affiliation, connection or association with, or certification, by another,
in violation of 73 P.S. 201-2(4)(iii);
gq)Represented that goods or services had sponsorship, characteristics,
or benefits that they do not have, in violation of 73 P.S. 201-2(4)(v);
rr) Represented that goods or services are of a particular standard,
quality or grade when they are of another, in violation of 73 P.S. 201-
2(4)(vii);
ss) Advertised goods or services with the intent not to sell them as
advertised, in violation of 73 P.S. 201-2(4)(1x);
ft) Failed to comply with the terms of a written guarantee given to
Plaintiff in the automobile insurance policy contract, contrary to 73
P.S. 201-2 (xiv);
uu)Engaged in fraudulent and/or deceptive conduct, which created a
likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding, contrary to 73 P.S.
§201-2 (4) (xxi).
61. INSURER knowingly, willfully and/or recklessly refused and failed to comply
and/or violated not only the terms and conditions of the automobile insurance policy
issued to Plaintiff, including, but not limited to the policy's implied covenants of good
faith and fair dealing, but also the duties imposed by virtue of the statutes of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Including, but not limited to, the Pennsylvania Unfair
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 19 of 42
insurance Practices Act, 40 P.S. § 1171, at seq; the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade
Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. § 201, at seq; and the regulations of
the insurance department of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, including but not
limited to 31 Pa. Code §141.6, et seq; the bad faith statute, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8371 and/or
otherwise violated the fiduciary, contractual and statutory duties that said Defendants
are required to comply with under Pennsylvania common law in dealing with Plaintiff.
62. As a result of the conduct described above, Plaintiff has unnecessarily
incurred legal expenses, costs and lost interest otherwise available, together with
related physical discomfort, emotional distress, embarrassment and humiliation
associated with INSURER's failure to pay and/or promptly pay Plaintiffs submitted
medical bills and wage loss.
63. Defendant INSURER denied and/or delayed payment of Plaintiffs first party
medical benefits, thereby allowing INSURER to enjoy the time value of said funds and
despite the fact that Defendants knew, or should have known, that said benefits should
have been paid.
64. The conduct of INSURER was wanton, rec idess, malicious and in bad faith.
65. Defendant INSURER had and have fiduciary, contractual, common law
and/or statutory duties towards the Plaintiff to handle his claims in good faith, fair
dealing and with due care in order to arrive at a prompt, fair and equitable settlement of
the claims.
66. At all times material hereto, INSURER maliciously, intentionally and
consistently put their interests and objectives over the interests of Plaintiff, all to his
great detriment and loss.
Case 1:11-cv-0 \0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, ) Page 20 of 42
67. Defendant INSURER denied payment of Plaintiff's first party medical
benefits, delayed payment of Plaintiff's first party benefits and failed to pay all benefits
due and owing, despite the fact that Defendant INSURER had information in their
possession and/or the ability to acquire information at the time such first party benefits
were due and owing.
68. Defendant INSURER violated its statutory, common law and/or contractual
duty of good faith and fair dealing to pay Plaintiffs first party benefits.
69. Defendant INSURER were obliged to and had undertaken the responsibility
for making a reasonable and fair evaluation of Plaintiff's first party claims in good faith
and fair dealing and breached this duty by failing to make a reasonable, timely and/or
fair evaluation of Plaintiffs first party claims.
70. Defendant INSURER had a duty to give Plaintiffs interests, at a very
minimum, the some faithful consideration that they gave their own interests.
71. At all times material hereto, Defendant INSURER maliciously, intentionally
and in bad faith, put their own interests far above the interests of Plaintiff.
72. Defendant INSURER focused upon said Defendants' own economic
considerations to limit or delay payment on Plaintiff's claims causing damages to
Plaintiff, as discussed herein, inter alia, by denying and/or delaying Plaintiffs first party
medical benefits claims and by subjecting Plaintiff to unnecessary expenses.
73. In violation of the policy and the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
Defendant INSURER without legal justification, unreasonably and unfairly denied
and/or delayed payment of first party medical benefits otherwise justly due and owing.
74. As a result of the conduct described above, Plaintiff has also unnecessarily
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 21 of 42
incurred legal fees, costs and lost interest otherwise available together with related
economic loss, financial hardship, physical discomfort, emotional discomfort and
humiliation, as well as the time, expense, aggravation and distress of litigation and out-
of-pocket damages, and ruination of his credit rating as a result of unpaid medical bills
being turned over to credit bureaus and/or collection agencies, associated with the
Defendants' delay and/or refusal to pay first party medical and wage loss benefits,
caused by Defendants' unwarranted, unreasonable and bad faith delay.
75. The foregoing conduct by the Defendant INSURER evidences a reckless
disregard to the rights of Plaintiff herein.
76. Plaintiff has fully complied with all of the terms and conditions of the subject
policy of insurance and all conditions precedent and subsequent to the Plaintiffs right to
recover under the policy have been performed or have occurred, yet the Defendant has
refused, without legal justification or cause, and continue to refuse and/or delay the
payment of first party benefits due and owing to Plaintiff, as a result of the September
16, 2002 accident.
COUNTI
BREACH OF CONTRACT
77. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all the averments of this Complaint as if same
were set forth at length herein.
78. Pursuant to the terms of the foregoing automobile insurance policy, Defendant
INSURER was obliged to provide first party medical and wage loss benefits to Plaintiff in
Case 1:11-cv-0 )O-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 22 of 42
accordance with the provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial
Responsibility Law, 76 Pa. C.S.A. §1701, et seq.
79. INSURER'S refusal to pay Plaintif'f's first party medical benefits constitutes a
breach of contract.
80. INSURER'S delay and failure to make payment of Plaintiffs first party medical
benefits and failure to fully approve medical benefits due and owing, including ongoing
medical benefits, constitutes a breach of contract.
81. As an expressed or implied term within this agreement, Defendant INSURER
was required to exercise the utmost good faith and fair dealing in its handling of
Plaintiffs claims under this insurance contract.
82. Defendant, in the performance of said contract, owed Plaintiff a fiduciary
duty to act in good faith and to use due care in the processing of Plaintiffs claim.
83. Defendant did not use or exercise good faith, fair dealing or due care with
regard to Plaintiffs claim.
84. Defendant failed to properly or fairly evaluate Plaintiffs claims in breach of
the foregoing contract.
85. The foregoing conduct by INSURER constitutes a breach of the contract of
insurance with the Plaintiff by failing to honor the applicable coverage under the policy
as required under Pennsylvania statutes and applicable case law and denying and/or
delaying Plaintiffs claims submitted under the policy, as described at length above.
86. The foregoing conduct by INSURER also constitutes a breach of the policy's
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and a material breach of contract.
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 23 of 42
87. The failure of INSURER to abide by the contract caused Plaintiff to incur
expenses, suffer unnecessary delay and hardship in obtaining medical treatment, and
otherwise sustain damages as further outlined herein that would have been avoided if
INSURER had propedy and reasonably honored and complied with their statutory and
contractual obligations.
88. Plaintiff has satisfied all of his legal obligations under this policy, including but
not limited to conditions precedent and oondltlons subsequent required in the process of
his first party benefit claim involving medical payment coverage.
89. As a result of INSURER'S breach of contract, Plaintiff was required to retain
the services of an attorney to collect the medical benefits due and owing and to secure
future medical treatment. Therefore, pursuant to §1716 of the Pennsylvania [Motor
Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees in the event that
the insurer is found to have acted in an unreasonable manner in refusing to pay the
benefits when due. It is also averred that the Defendant INSURER must also pay 12%
interest.
90. it is further averred that under §1798 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle
Financial Responsibility Law, in the event that Defendant INSURER is found to have
acted with "no reasonable foundation," it is also liable for Plaintiffs attorney fees incurred.
91. By their actions described herein, Defendants have undertaken a course of
action which has been designed to unilaterally and without justification delay and refuse
claims for medical treatment to Plaintiff so as to force Plaintiff in a position of extreme
financial hardship and with the intention to cause the health care providers to stop
rendering treatment to Plaintiff and thus not incur further medical services for which
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 24 of 42
Defendants would be liable for, in contradiction of the terns of the insurance contract, the
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and the case law of the
Commonwealth of Pemsylvania.
92. The breach of contract by INSURER was of such a kind that serious
emotional disturbance, which was caused by his Inability to treat in a timely manner and
to obtain pain medications. The INSURER also failed to pay his medical bills in
accordance with the contract and law, which caused damage to his credit rating, and
created economic detriment, all of which should have been foreseeable to the
INSURER.
93. As a result of the Defendanfs breach of its duty under the foregoing
automobile insurance policy and Pennsylvania law, Plaintiff has suffered actual and
consequential damages.
94. The aforesaid described conduct engaged in by Defendant was wanton,
reckless, malicious and in bad faith.
95. The Defendant has breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing
implied in every contract that neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of
destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of their contract.
96. The conduct, practices and activities of Defendant described herein
constitute a material breach of their agreement to pay the benefits justly due and owing
under the policy of insurance, and, further, constitute a material breach of the
representations, statements and undertakings set forth hereinabove, and made
expressly or implicitly a part of said agreement for which breach Plaintiff is entitled to
recover damages.
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, ) Page 25 of 42
97. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant INSURER has
violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the insurance policy, in reckless
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff, resulting in damages set forth above for which
Defendants are liable.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff seeks judgment against the Defendant INSURER for
compensatory damages, consequential damages and emotional distress and bad faith
in an amount in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), together with interest,
costs, attorneys fees and such other relief as is deemed necessary and proper.
COUNT 11
BAD FAITH - 42 Pa. C.S.A. 66371
98. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all the averments of this Complaint as if same
were set forth at length herein.
99. On or about February 7, 1990, the Governor of Pennsylvania signed into law
42 P.S. §8371, effective July 1, 1990, entitled "Actions on Insurance Policies" which
provides a private cause of action for bad faith against insurance companies as follows:
In an action arising under an insurance policy, if the Court
finds that an insurer has acted in bad faith toward the insured,
the Court may take al the following actions:
1. Award interest on the amount of the claims
when the basic claim was made by the insured
in an amount equal to the prime rate of interest
plus 3%;
2. Award punitive damages against the insurer;
3. Assess costs and attorney fees against the
insurer.
100. By virtue of the foregoing conduct, outlined at length above, Defendant
INSURER knew or should have known it lacked reasonable basis to contest Plaintifrs first
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 26 of 42
party medical benefits, and persisted in a course of conduct designed to deny and/or
delay Plaintiffs entitlement to first party medical benefits. As a result of Defendant's bad
faith conduct and actions, Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on all medical benefits
terminated and/or delayed and/or denied; punitive damages against Defendant;
reasonable counsel fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff in prosecuting this action.
101. By virtue of the foregoing conduct, outlined at length above, Defendant
INSURER knew or should have known It lacked reasonable basis to contest Plaintiffs
benefit claim, and persisted in a course of conduct designed to deny and/or delay
Plaintiffs entitlement to first party benefits. As a result of Defendants' bad faith conduct
and actions, Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on said benefits; punitive damages
against Defendants; reasonable counsel fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff in
prosecuting this action.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant, INSURER
Progressive in an amount in excess of fifty thousand ($50,000.00) dollars, including
punitive damages, interest, attorneys fees, costs, and such other relief as is deemed
necessary and proper.
COUNT III
76 P.S. 92014 st am.
102. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all the averments of this Complaint as if same
were set forth at length herein.
103.The purpose of the Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. 201-2 et seq., is to
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 27 of 42
"benefit the public at large by eradicating among other things, unfair or deceptive
business practices.
104. At all times relevant hereto, each party hereto was a "person" as defined
in Section 201-2(2) of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer
Protection Law, 73. P.S. Section 201-1 at seq. (hereinafter "CPL").
105. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff was an insured under the Policy and in
privity with the Defendant INSURER and Defendant specifically intended Plaintiff to rely
upon the fraudulent conduct or whose reasonable reliance was specially foreseeable.
106. The afomseld automobile policy covered two vehicles and the insurance
declaration sheet noted $100,000 in medical benefit coverages.
107. Plaintiff purchased the above described insurance coverage for the 1987
Chevrolet Cavalier, which vehicle he was using as his own vehicle and for personal and
household purposes.
108. After Plaintiff was an insured under the policy, as set forth in greater detail
above, which allegations are incorporated herein by reference, Defendant INSURER
made misrepresentations, including affirmative misrepresentations and/or
nondisclosures, that included each and/or all of the following:
a) failing to disclose Defendants own economic interests and/or incentives with
respect to denying Plaintiffs medical bills and/or wage loss;
b) failing to disclose Defendant's policy of scrutinizing medical bills more closely
and/or performing peer reviews and/or medical examinations more frequently in
cases involving higher amounts of first party benefits such as those purchased by
Plaintiff;
c) failing to disclose Defendants motivations with respect to denying Plaintiffs first
party medical benefits claims in order to cause Plaintiff to stop or restrict
treatment;
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 28 of 42
d) representing that they needed additional information to process Plaintiff's first
party medical claims when said information was already known and/or available
to them;
e) misrepresenting their intentions with regard to payment of first party medical
benefits and reasons for the denial of the same;
f) representing that Defendants needed peer reviews and/or medical examinations
with respect to Plaintiffs medical treatment; and/or conducting peer reviews with
non-quak ied medical reviewers and/or medical reviewers that lacked the
credentials to perform the medical procedures Plaintiff required;
g) failing to disclose Defendants' motivations with respect to denying Plaintiffs first
party medical benefits claims in order to cause Plaintiff to stop treatment or delay
treatment;
h) representing that they needed additional information to process Plaintiff's first
party medical claim when said infomnation was already known and/or available to
them;
i) misrepresenting Plaintiff's entitlement and/or non-entitlement to first party medical
benefits and the reasons for improperly terminating and/or delaying payment of
the same;
j) failing to pay for medical services in the timely manner provided for under the
MVFRL or in the absence thereof to follow the remedies provided to INSURERS
under the MVFRL
109. As set forth in greater detail above, which allegations are incorporated
herein by reference, Defendant INSURER, by and through their agents, ostensible
agents, servants and employees, made misrepresentations, including affirmative
misrepresentations and/or nondisclosures, that included making misrepresentations
concerning the requirements of the INSURER Policy.
110. The foregoing representations and omissions were material to Plaintiffs
entitlement to have his medical bills paid under the first benefits in accordance with the
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 29 of 42
111. The above representations and/or non-disclosures by Defendant were false,
and Defendant knew or should have known of their falsity at the time said
representations were made and/or made the same with recklessness as to whether the
representations were true or false, with the intent of misleading Plaintiff into relying
upon them in order to induce Plaintiff to maintain insurance policies with Defendant
and/or to cause Plaintiff to believe his benefits were being denied and/or delayed
properly in order to keep Plaintiff from asserting his rights under the policy and
Pennsylvania law and/or to cause Plaintiff to forego his right to first party benefits.
112. The conduct and actions by Defendant INSURER as outlined more fully
above and incorporated herein by reference constitute unfair or defective practices
including:
(a) representing that the Plaintiff purchased $100,000 in first party benefits,
$25,000 in wage loss benefits, when in fact, said promise was wholly
illusory;
(b) charging a premium based upon $100,000 in first party benefits, $25,000
in wage loss benefits, when in fact, Defendants would use any excuse or
rationale, justified or not, to avoid fulfilling the contract with the Plaintiff;
(c) representing that Plaintiff had $100,000 in first party benefits, $25,000 in
wage loss benefits, when in fact, Defendants, without justification, refused
to pay said benefits;
(d) Passing off goods or services as those of another in violation of 73 P.S.
201 at seq;
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01. Page 30 of 42
(e) Causing likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source,
sponsorship, approval or certification of goods or services in violation of
73 P.S. 201 et seq;
(f) Causing likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to affiliation,
connection or assoclation with, or certification by, another in violation of 73
P.S. 201 at seq;
(g) Representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval,
characteristics, benefits, or quantities that they do not have or that a
person has sponsorship, approved, status, affiliation or connection that
they do not have in violation of 73 P.S. 201 et seq;
(h) Advertising goods or services with intent not to sell them as advertised in
violation of 73 P.S. 201 at seq;
(i) Failing to comply with the terms of a written guarantee or warranty given
to the buyer at, prior to or after a contract for the purchase of goods or
services in violation of 73 P.S. 201 et seq;
(j) Engaging in fraudulent or deceptive conduct which created a likelihood of
confusion or of misunderstanding in violation of 73 P.S. 201 et seq.
113. At all times pertinent hereto, Plaintiff justifiably relied upon the
representations of Defendant as detailed at length above.
114. The misrepresentations of Defendant led to the damages sustained
by Plaintiff as described above.
115. The Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. 201-9.2, specifically provides for a
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 31 of 42
private cause of action to be brought by Plaintiff, who made a purchase primarily for
personal, family, or household purposes and who suffered an ascertainable loss as a
result of the use or employment by Defendant of a method, act or practice declared
unlawful by the UTPCPL.
116. As a result of the conduct of INSURER, Plaintiff is entitled to maintain a
private cause of action against Defendants pursuant to §201-9.2 of the Unfair Trade
Practice and Consumer Protection Law.
117. Pursuant to §201-9.2(a) of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer
Protection Law, Plaintiff is entitled to recover all of the damages set forth in the preceding
paragraphs which are hereby incorporated by reference, plus treble damages, attorney
fees, and costs and other such additional relief as is deemed necessary and proper.
WHEREFORE, PWntiff demands judgment against Defendant INSURER for
compensatory damages in an amount in excess of fifty thousand ($50,000.00) dollars
plus treble damages, attorney fees, costs, interest and such other relief as is deemed
necessary and proper.
118. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation of this Complaint as if same
were set forth at length herein.
119. At all times mentioned herein, INSURER acted by and through their actual or
apparent authorized agents, servants, workmen, employee and/or ostensible agents,
including insurance adjusters, supervisors and defense counsel. INSURER is therefore
vicariously liable for the gross negligence, recklessness and/or intentional conduct of
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 32 of 42
these agents, servants, workmen, employees and/or ostensible agents who, at all times,
were furthering their interest of INSURER and were acting within the scope of their actual
employment/agency or ostensible agency with INSURER.
120. Alternatively, at all times relevant herein, INSURER authorized, acquiesced
and otherwise ratified the conduct and activities of its agents, employees, servants
and/or ostensible agents including insurance adjusters, supervisors and defense counsel,
in that they never sought to change, alter or amend their handling of the first party claim.
Accordingly, said Defendant did therefore accept and retain the benefits of the wrongful
and tortious conduct and acts of their agents. INSURER is, therefore, vicariously liable
for said conduct.
121. As a consequence of the foregoing, Plaintiff was caused to sustain damages
as more fully described -herein above.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment in her favor and against Defendant,
INSURER Progressive Northern Insurance Company a/Wa Progressive Insurance
Company in an amount in excess of $50,000.00, plus interests, costs, attorney's fees,
compensatory damages, consequential damages, and punitive damages and such other
relief as is deemed necessary and proper.
By Submitted:
Date: l1
Ddsan Bratic, Esq., ID 19249
Bratic & Portko
101 South US Route 15
DiNsburg, PA 17019
(717) 432-9706
Attorney for Plaintiff
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/010 Page 33 of 42
Dusan Bratic, Esq. ID: 19249
Bratic & Portko
101 South US Route 15
Diilsburg, PA 17019
Tel: 717-432-9706
Fax: 717-432-9220
Attorney for Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/KIA Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above Complaint was
furnished by first dass mall, posbW prepaid on this _day of August 2011, to:
Daniel J. Twilla, Esq.
Dapper, Beldasare, Benson, Behling & Kane, PC
4 Gateway Center,1 OP Fl.
444 L.rberty Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-1225 ,
BRATIIC & PORTKO
Dated: q
Dusan Bratic, Esq. ID # 19249
101 South U.S. Route 15
DiNsburg, PA 17019
(717) 432-9708
Attorney for Plaintiff
Case 1:11-cv-0' 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01/ Page 34 of 42
VERIFICATION
1, Stephen M. Hake, Sr., hereby acknowledge that I am the Plaintiff in the
foregoing Complaint, that I have read the foregoing, and the facts stated therein are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
I understand that any false statements herein are made subject to penalties of 18
Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unworn falsification to authorities.
?C-
Step . Hake, Sr.
Date: 8/3/11
:o6RESSIVE NORT jAp -fy ment 1-1 Filed 09/01 ,. Page 35 of 42
0. BOX 91825 i'f?g dE'p?A/?7TON DOES NOT SWEMEDE ANY CANCEL rw1TICES
_EVELANQ, ON 44101-4825 " T19 DECLARATION REPLACES DECLARATION EMCTNE aamm -
MECHANICSOURO IN
73 W MAIN ST BOX 2430
NECHANICSOURG PA 17055
STEPHEN h HAKE SR
526 2ND STREET
WESTFAIRVIEW PA 17025
24 Now Policy Service 1-800-828-7704
24 HKIR BILLIMB INQUIRY 1-800-800-9721
24 HOUR CLAIMS SERVICE 1-800-776-4737
PERSONAL AUTO POLICY DECLARAT14CWs PAGE
FOR NAMED INSURED:
gaitap "STREET
WESTFAIRVIEW PA 17028
POLICY NUMBER: 56006 S S7-0
POLICY PERIOD: 04M M TO ION 02
Tics pow? iwepts des low at.
1. the twos Nis VON' I'm for Utwrsnos is QMCU sd an the One
Met ft pd - paerkA or
4. SAL en Iket o of tlts
7w Posey" ONO* at Im san. on tiw be of the poky
Coded. oo?raps logo* d- d
whlaN tltotws emis I s in the p
enders ribleot b"twrs.OO"md I n" 3oaMWflsa W-"
ut?no?.
PO weaftle P Bruno. "m""
WZ MMTSON NU Mft 1274N LrrU7
:ASON FOR IBKMNCE: POLICY cmum, NO pWIB! IN I III
A1M9ES 111111E REQUESTEM BY MUSE AT NlCiNANIIAMBIUi I OP NECHANICSININ i IN ON 10/01/02 AT 10:47 AM EST
FECTTIVE ON 08/23/02: PLEASE REVIEW FOR POLICY CHANGES.
YOU BUY COLLISION COVERAGE. IT DOESN'T APPLY TO VEHICLES RENTED FOR BUSINESS OR FOR 8 MONTIM OR MORE.
:H# YR MAKE - MODEL SERIAL NUMBER STATED AMT VIP LISTED DRIVERS E)CCLUDEDSR22 RATE
1087 CHEVR CAVALIER C940 1Q1JMB117HJ200014 1 STEPHEN M HAKE SR NO No YES
I ? Ric I?011A1'eG?J 4
t C 5
COVERAGES AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY PREMIUM S
E COVERAGE IS APPLICABLE ONLY IF A PREMIUM IS INDICATED. VEH Art VEN 12 VEH 113 VEN N4 TOTAL
OILY INJURY a PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY $210 $216
$50,000 EACH PERSON - :100,000 EACH ACCIMENI
OPERTY MAIN9E LZAMILITY - $50,000 EACH ACCIDENT
11ASUND II I ORIST BODILY INJIRY - MONSTACKED $18 $18
50,000 EACH PERSON - $100,000 EACH AOCIBENT
DERINSURED WTOUST BODILY I1MIU1W - NONSTAI]CEM $25 $25
50.000 EACH PERSON - $100.000 EACH ACCIOENT
RST PARTY 1101WITS
EDICAL BENEFITS $100,000 PER PERSON $177 $177
VCOME LOSS $1.500 MONTH / $25,000 MAXS151M $37 $37
4
DefL,AFp.. fi*
'
R
?
Y fi6iG
FULL TORT
SEE REVERSE PREMIUM BY VEHICLE $473
4C HK119M MENI94M BY FORMA No. TOTAL POLICY PREM IUM 1473
MITERSIONED: MECHANICS84m IN
Authorised Re"eelsiive
etc
?,?.'t
a"aaa t a mm r rmcm A natrt alw6r. Syr,. -Vv
V. BOX 44825 Cag 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1
.EVELAND. OH 44101- 25
ItECFANIC85LNA IN
73 W MAIN ST BOX 2486
MEC"MICSKM PA 17055
STEPHEN M HAKE SR
526 2ND STREET
WESTFAIRVIEW PA 17025
-"* N FOR ISSUANCE: NEW BUSINESS
Filed 09/01) Page 36 of 42
24 Four Policy Service 1-900-986-7764
24 HOLM BILLING INWIRY 1-900-ft1-9781
24
HOUR CLAM SERVICE 1-900-776-4727
PEFISONAL AUTO POLICY
FOR NAMED DECLARATIONS PAGE
NaWRED:
STEPHEN N MAKE SR
0=8 2ND STREET
WESTFAIRVIEW PA 17025
POLICY Numm: 56006587-0
POLICY PERKMk 04/08/ 2 TO 101)8102
This policy kmpb the Ww oU
1. dN One rte 1a kwuram it enecuted on the first
der of the pokey or
2. 1291 im on the GO dty ai the policyy Pwbd.
llft poky 8W wake at t"t W n. GO the bet day of the policy
71w lalbwkq osrwpes and Nntits apply to so* daewibed
taditde ae akown bNew. Caataeaa?a» fn thi
=dt t:
and era @W *d M site Mane aandd
w?be? ekft ?i?i prier tb
altwtoae we
requested.
YOU WN COLLISION COVERABE, IT DOESN'T APPI.T TO VEHICLES RENTED FOR BUSINESS OR FOR 6 NoNINS OR MORE.
T n 17U9gC - FA%MEL arivAL retold Ft
1690PONTI GUM AN LOW 14?14UOLMISM
1 STEPHEN N FAKE SR
2
3
4
5
NO NO YES
t
I
COVERAGES AND LM11T8 OF LIABILITY
E OOVERM IS APPLICABLE ONLY IF A PREMIUM IS INDICATED.
DILY INtIMUY Ut PROPERTY DANW LIABILITY
$00.000 EACH PERSON - S18O,O00 EACH ACCIDENT
OPWIN DAMW LIABILITY - $50.000 EACH ACCIDEIT
II/ 11 MOTORIST BODILY INJW - NIONETACN M
80,000 BACH PERSON - $105,000 EACH AOCIOW
OERINBUMIED MOTORIST BODILY I*AW - NONSTACKED
00.000 EACH PERSON - $100,000 EACH ACCIDENT
00 PARTY BENEFITS
WICAL BENEFITS $100,000 PER PERSON
14CONE LOSS $1,500 NMTH / $25.000 NAXIIEM
PREMILM
VEH #1 VEH N2 YEH A Vol M TOTAL
$s 12 S2112
$23 1 I (
$23
1 $,7
FULL TORT
SEE REVERSE PREMIUM BY VEI*CLE
AC * BfP WONTIFEp BY FORM NO.
113 03911
POLICY PREMIUM $425
I9ITERSIfiNED: MECMANICSBURG IN
Auth, I - ' PA pmswdallm
rM No. 1113 f6-971 INSURED COPY PMNE1 02401 1 205L1113
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 37 of 42
.110 SUMMARGE FOR MOTOR VEHICLE RECORD CITATION(S) HAS BEEN ADDED TO
THIS PREMIUM
ANY LOSS UNDER PART IV IS PAYABLE TO NAMED INSURED AND UENHOLDER:
LIEN14OLDER
VEH N1 VEH N2
VEH 03 VEH 04
ADDITIONAL INTEREST INSURED
YCH CL TIER ISO LIAR COMP CDLL PI ?
1 00 ZIP
04 05 07 07 17025
2
3
4
DRIVER DRIVER
+F AOE SEX S
1 48 M S
2
3
4
PC
=WANY 05
MAWMT STANK O
LEVEL CLASSIC
PAY PLAN NQ
R/R 0111
FACTOR % 1.000
FORM DOMPA
ED. 0501
AQENT CODE OC 26314
PREY POL N
PRORATER
04 000000 02094 120
s
.j
e
s
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/011 Page 38 of 42
Notice of !M!M ft Daoislon & Information Practhcas
Dear Progressive Customer,
When we quote, issue, service or renew an insurance policy, we require certain information about the people or
property being insured. Some of this information is obtained from you, and confirmed or sup lariwaoted through
information obtained from various consumer reporting agencies, which provide motor vehicle reports, claim reports,
and credit reports.
This information is used to undoranfta and mvico your insurance policy and its renewals. Any kcreased charge or
other adverse action may be atblouisbls to use of-this information. No consumer reporting agency made any
decision to take an adverse action with respect to your insurance and will be unable W confirm whether or provide the
specific reasons why any such action was talcan.. Therefore, if you have questions about our Information practices or
their impact on your inmurance, call us at 1-sea-ass-7va4.: At your request, we w81:
• c or irn whether a consurrrer report was requested;
• provide the spec Nic reasons for, and supporting information related to, any change to your policy;
• identify which of the consumer repo" agencies, listed below, provided the information;
• provide you more detain information regarft our collection, use, and disclosure of information about
you, and your rights to access and am, such intarmafion: and
• identify others to whom we may have disclosed this intomnatinm.
The blowing consumer reporting agencies were used by us:
Ddw History R@*=ts (NIotor Vehicle and Credo Report
Claims History Reports):
ChoicePoint, Inc. S perian (Fa nMy TRW)
P.O. BOX 105106 P.O. Boo 2002
Atlanta, GA 959'48-5108 Allen, TX 75013
1-800-456.6004 1-888-397-3742
For 60 days after you receive this notice. you may obtain a free copy of any consumer report resulting in any adverse
action. Also, you may:
• learn about the natrue and substance of recorded information about you;
• access this kdonnation;
• dispute the accuracy or completeness and request the correction of this irformadon; and
• file a statement setting fcdb what you think is the correct inforruatiom, and why you disagree with any
refusal to correct the information.
To do so, simply call us at t -soo-sss-rm4, or the appropriate consumer reporting agency kMn uad above.
In some cases, information about you that has or wii be collected by us may, without your aulhorizatron, be disclosed
to third par0es who perform services for us or appear to have a legirti nM need for the information. These may
include, for example, our group of underwriting cairga les, claims a*mters and investigators, your agent or broker,
actuarial consultants, insurance support organizations, courts. government agencies. and parties requesting such
information through legal process.
Form No. 0090 (04-00) PMNEWD910212022605L W
Case 1:11-cv-0 10-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, ? Page 39 of 42
PRIVACY POLICY
Last Updated May 9, 2001
Your prhraey Is Important to us. At Progressive, we are committed to protecting your privacy and earning your
trust. We respect your night to key your personal infamffiion confidential and to avoid unwanted solicitations.
Pieast read this to kam how we will handle yaw personal kwon n otlon.
Types of Inbrmadon We Collect and Dlsdoes.
We coped infoaTraatiora about people and property to quote and service insurance poicies and provide comparison
rates. Some of this is called door c Persoraad Iglonnalion.' which generally means iniorrnaation that is
provided by you. obtained by us, or tlcat results from your transactions with us. It does not include information
avaihWe to the ,mail, pubic. We collect this information from the following sources (examples under each source
are not necessarily a complete list):
• InMbeataMbn: This is infonnati9on we receive from you on sppicatiorus or oather form. by phone,
aaine. It 1idudes your now, address. and number, drover's soer-me number, soc.;ied security
number, date of bkth. length d Qs er?inaasosoifal stars, pdor insurance Inf madon, horns
finning fafatoryApptlatlon Informadori my in as described below. use, other drivers, and
• Transaetlon InilamseftL This is information about ?rocir transea ins with us, our etiistes, or others. p
includes Your iasuranpe coverage sekctiotrs and prsrnour payment and claims history. and kAmnadon we
deem r?seemery for bilk and payment. it may also include addatioraet hime aabona obtained while adjusting,
irnuaasebigatirg. and settling Insurance claims. Tranaactlott Information may be deed as described bellow.
• Consuauer Rorport kdarn atlon: This is infomaation.we receive from a consumer reporting %Wlcy. k is used
In confirm o r supplerrwnt AppMgtlon Infonnaflorst Io that wo may underwrite your ihouraraoe and pro an
accurate premium quote for one of our insurance underwriting Companies. It Includes motor vehicle reports,
claims history reports, and credit report kaformaio L We will duc?oee Consumer Report Information only as
we deem necessary to quote or service your trourenx a pricy, and as perrrdtlrad or required by law.
• Web SM Inf melon: This is Infomadon we receive from your computer when you visit our web sloe that is
unique b emcon nwm transactions. It icludes the Web silt you Wail aid before ours, your intemet a-ma
addraare and apsrating system. and stelisiicwl kdormadon on Web traffic and usege pone a. We also store
out your compuw to save information entered during the kauarance quoting and comparstive rate
process, and collect technical dote, such as your isle, protocol (ip) address. system, and
seareion ID. We will not dloclose your a-m>eal address to nonallilliated
third
11qFft external vardore for prooeasing our *-am maeeaagea, but
to keep your *-mail adds their for future sae. We will not diadose -titer peraortaNy will not Web She
hforassimn Will your consent. For addiliorrd kfounuaf;on concerning our Web site privacy practices,
please visit us at progressive.com.
Parties to Whom We Disdose Information.
Nonpubtio Personal Information about you may be disclosed to others as permitted by law. Generally, this
kududes d Kbsw= to third posies that we feel are necessary to M194 adrnknidw or enforce your transaction with
us, or in connection with servicing your iarleunrarlce poky. These parties may include our group of af9W9d insurance
tired c npenias. clairrls repreaerl VGM* independent contractors. kaatraaraoe 8 port orgenteadons, insurance
agents brokers, and courts and verriment , agenacres. We oleo disclose this itformation to to following
types of third parties (these are ocrntpanues at woomw 911191W you us ? have a relationship with you),
but you will have the opportunity tooptout ooff suucchhd Cy
• Nor ed financ:ial service providers, such as banks, credit card companies, and other insurance
companies; and
• Non*wncial companies, such as motor vehicle manufacturers, dealers, and parts suppliers, and dubs and
associations of which you may be a member.
We may also disclose Ap"cation Information and Transau tton Inhwmallon about you to companies that perform
marketing services on our behalf or to financial institutions with whom we have joint marketing agreements.
Continued on back
PMNEWD970530012SOSL2835
Case 1:11-cv-0' 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 40 of 42
contift*al ty & Security.
We restrict access to Nonpublic Personal Information about you to those employees and other parties who we feel
must use that information to provide products or services to you. Their right to further disclose and use the
information is limited by our employee code of conduct, applicable law, and nondisclosure agreements where
appropriate. We also maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations to guard your Nonpublic Personal Information.
Parties to Whom This Privacy Polley Applies.
This Privacy Policy applies to current and former customers of Progressive Casualty Insurance Cony and its
family of insurance and financial services companies in the United States. This replaces all previous Privacy Policies
that we have made available to you as of the date noted above for personal use motor vehicle. boat, eaowrnobae, and
homeowners insurance products. For different products, you may receive other privacy policies from us. These
other policies will apply only to the products in connection with which they are provided.
The Progressive fancily of insurance and financial services cotnpwft as of the date of fts Privacy Policy itdudes
the foilowing: Halcyon insurance Company, Mountain laurel Assurance Company, National Continental Insurance
Company, Progressive American Insurance Company, PrbgiIva American IN Insurance Company, Prognsearye
Auto Pro hairance Company, Progressive Baycide Insurance Company, Progressive Casually Insurance CwVwW,
Progressive. Classic insurance Company, Progressive Co WMWS kl5AMM Company. Progressive OouMy Mutual
insurance Company, Progressive Express k>surance Company, Progressive GAN hence COWWW, Proms
Hawaii Insurance WP.. Progressive Hone kwuranxe Company, Progressive Home Underwriters kwunince
Company. Progressive Life insurance, ltd., Progressive Marathon Insurance Company, Progressive Max InnCe
Company, Progressive Wigan Insurance Company, Progressive Mountain Insurance Company, proggiWssive
Northeastern Insurance Company, Proprasaive Northern harxw Company. Rgye3ai" Nail Mreatem Insurance
Company. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, Progroaoive preferred kowance ma y. Progn lve
Premier Insurance Company of Wmm, Progromm Preavum Budget. Inc., Progressive Security Insurance Cry.
Progressive Souther Insurance Company, Progrew" Specialty Insurance Company Progressive Uniaversd
Insurance Company of NWs. Progrwdit West Insuranci Company, Specialty FV* Insurance may. tAgied
Financial Casualty Company.
Continued °s
S
PMNEWD97053001260BL9835
11 Case 1:11-cv-0 10-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01, Page 41 of 42
Opt.Out Rights.
H you do not want your Nortpr*k Personal IMormation cNsciosed to nonafBNated thkd partla% you may
"opt OW of those disdosures, MesnNtg that you may tell us not to make ft" diadoaures (other than
disdosures that are permitted by low even K you opt out). H you opt out, we will not disclose this information to
nonaffiliated third parties to independently market products or services to you, but we may Include their offers in
billing statements and other routine communications that we send to you in connection with servicft your insurance
policy.
To opt out, simply detach the fort at the bottom of this page and mail it t0 the address indicated. An opt out election
by you or others insured under your Poky will be effectlve for all of you for that policy and its renewals. Once you
opt out, there is no need to do so again for the same poky or its renewals. You may also visit
personal.prowassive.oom and use our Personal PropresshraO feature to opt out.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = MAN. TO tM ADDRESS LISTED BELOW - = = = _ = _ _ = _ = = =
PoNMft ft Opt Out Form
Phme correct any Maccursa k damstlon sp jresaing below. If you have akeady *em an Opt Out Form for
this Insrrrsnob pWq, there Is no rmW Io and another.
I wish to sterciss my opt out rights desalbad in progressive's privacy poky.
Name: STEPHEN M HAKE SR
Address: 528 2M STREET
WESTTFAIIMEY PA 1 T02S
Policy Number: ssooew - o
Mall to: Progressive Marketing Opt Out, P.O. Box MM27, tatevelanai, OH 44101-6427
PMMEWDwoMwi2wsL2s3a
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-1 Filed 09/01 Page 42 of 42
Pennsyhranla Surcharge Dlsclosure Stabanhsrrt
In compliance with 75 Pa C.S. Section 1793(b), we provide this surcharge disclosure plan to explain our system of
driving record points. This statement provides an overview, more detailed informesion is available on request
Driving record points are assigned to operators for chargeable accidents and violations. All accidents and vidations
occurring in the 35-month period prior to policy inception are considered in developing a driver's poor premium. If
a driver is added mid-term, accidents and violations well be charged for the entire w4nonth period prior to the driver
being added to the policy.
Point surcharges follow the driver. To determine if the accident or violation took place in the chargeable period, we
use ft occurrence dais instead of the conviction date. We charge for accidents and violations occurring while a
driver is operating a private paesorW automobile, commercial vehicle, motorcycle, or recreational vehicle.
Ac*W ts. We assess a surcharge of dmalgy 25% for each at fauk accident charged to an operator.
AC r'derhts are dale if, as a result of the accident, the insurer inure at least 5950 in bases in excess of any
dedhactible for personal injury or damage to Property, indudi g the Insureds.
Each accumulation of $W) in aggregate boo from Mordents not otherwise charged represents an at4" accident.
If the insured can demOr1*0116 that any of the fact's of loss described in 31 Pa. Code Section 67.33 (raj-charge"
accidents) appiy to an accident the accident will riot be charged to the operator.
Minor M101ma. We assess a surcharge of approximatel? 2D% for the second and each subsequent conviction
of routine traffhc infractions ft speeding or failure to yield. Most of these infractions are listed in 75 Pa C.S.
Section 1535.
Mapr Vkftdona. We assess a surcharge of apprwdmntely 26% for each conviction of a violcion which suggests
the presence of a materially ehcraased risk in a motorist. Such major violations include vefi Jor homictide, living
the scene of an accident irwohft death or injury, or fleeing a poke officer.
Driving While kdOWcatad. We assess a surcharge of approximately 15% for each Driving While khtohdcated
infraction for conviction under Section 3731 (Driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance), notice
of Section 1534 (Acceptance of Accelerated gehabNitatin Disposition). or any similar Infraction.
This form supersedes Form 1996 (11/86).
Form No. 1996 PA (01/00) PMNE0207002803LIMSA
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 Page 1 of 18
EXHIBIT B
Case 1:11-cv-C )50-YK
Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 Page 2 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CiJMMMLAND COUNTY, Pll MMYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR
2308 Spring Lane
Enola, PA 17025
PLAINTIFF
V.
Piowip ive Northern Iusursmce Company
6085 Parkland Blvd., E P 3
Mayfield Heights, OH 44124
AIB/A Progressive ice Company
5165 Campus Drive
Plymouth Mee&S PA 19462-1135
DEFENDANT
FIIB N0.• O''r -tiCl/l' i.. f rya C
CIVIL ACTION:
PRALCW FOR-SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF SAID COURT:
Issue summons iwft above;catptiaw wines fi+onk a contract dispute.
C _ Writ of Summoo shall boisswCand 11D Anamay/S erff
-y
Date: -?? -? ?.
Bratic, Esq., ID 19249
Bratic & Poldw
101 South US Raft 15
Dille m'g, PA 17019
(717) 432-9706
SUMMONS IN OPAL ACTION
TO: Prngresdve Nordum Insurance Company Prograaaive Lmauawe company
6085 Pacidand Blvd., E P 3 5165 Campus Drive
Mayfield H*W, OH 44124 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1135
YOU ARE NOTWIED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMW PLARaW HAS COMMENCED AN
ACTION AGAINST YOU. J0
Date: 0'r 1,
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 Page 3 of 18
-0 d'
4Ci
r
r
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01. Page 4 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMWRLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR
230R Spring Lane
Enola, PA 17025
PLAINTIFF
V.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
6085 Parkland Blvd., E P 3
Mayfield Heights, OH 44124
AWA Progressive Insurance Company
5165 Campus Drive
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1135
DEFENDANT
CIVM ACTION: 07.5427 Civil Term
PRAECIPE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please reissue the Writ of Summa®s in the above captioned matter.
Date: ALAIM-)
Dusan Bratic, Esq.
101 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
(717)432-9706
Supreme Court ID: 19249
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 _ Page 5 of 18
4
f?
w
*.
O
D
ry
C•
Ci
V
C
1
W
461 Case 1:11-cv-C 3 EKIFFQ99f' -2 O cbP _. Page 6 of 18
CASE NO: 2007-05427 P
.,•COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
HAKE STEPHEN M SR
VS
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INS CO
R. Thomas Kline , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff who being
duly sworn according to law, says, that he made a diligent search and
and inquiry for the within named DEFENDANT , to wit:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY AKA PROGRESSIVE INS CO
but was unable to locate Them in his bailiwick. He therefore
deputized the sheriff of MONTGOMERY County, Pennsylvania, to
serve the within WRIT OF SUMMONS
On November 27th , 2007 , this office was in receipt of the
attached return from MONTGOMERY
Sheriff's Costs: So answers
Docketing 18.00
Out of County 9.00
Surcharge 10.00 R. Thomas Kline
Dep Montgomery Co 33.00 Sheriff of Cumberland County
Postage .75
70.75
11/27/2007
BRATIC & PORTKO
Sworn and subscribe to before me
this day of ,
A. D.
Case 1:11-cv-C 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 Page 7 of 18
w
In The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
• Stephen M. Hake Sr.
VS.
Progressive Northern Insurance C'icngwly
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company No. 07-5427 civil
Now, Novwt)sr 8 , 2007'
_ , I, SHERIFF OF CLMMERL,AND COLM Y, PA, do
hereby deputize the Sheriff of
Montgomery
County to execute this writ, this
deputation being made at the request and risk ofthe Plaintiff.
T ?.
Shu ff of C=bmind Ca 4, PA
Please mail return of service to Cumberland County Sheriff. Thank you.
Affidavit of Service
Now, , 20----, at o'clock A served the
within
upon
at
by handing to
a copy of the original
and made known to
So answers,
the contents thereof.
Sheriff of County, PA
Sworn and subscribed before
me this day of . 20
COSTS
SERVICE $
hGLEAGE
AFFIDAVIT
S
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 Page 8 of 18
y
SHERIFF'S RETURN
PROTHONOTARY D- 4115
DEFENDANT: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
DOCUMENT SERVED: Civil
INDIVIDUAL SERVED: Laurie Peilicore
RELATIONSHIP TO DEFENDANT: Person In Charge
DATE AND PREVAILING TIME: 11-14-04 (x313:00
LOCATION: 5165 Can :ectings PA
The above document was serves ormation listed above in
the County of Montgomery, Col v.
Affirmed and subserlbed•before
11-16.07
Public
iaPvcouw
WXWCWWWk'0t= 13,00
NOW
wwwwwwomw
John P. Durante
Sheriff of Montgomery County
% Deputy Sheriff
iJy! 1J Can
_XC_li-2&0sqaj:Ad-cv-C t0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01 Page 9 of 18 P,e1,ei
A otew,lu(.
RIMS RETURN
PROTHONOTARY D- 4115
DEFENDANT: Prosrenke Northern Issumnee Company
DOCUMENT SERVED: Civil
INDIVIDUAL SERVED: Laurie PelBeore
1 ,
RELATIONSHIP TO DEFENDANT: Person In Charge
DATE AND PRE'V'AILING TIME: 11-14-07 @ 13:00
LOCATION: 3165 Campus Drive, Plymouth Meeting, PA
The Am doeument wes served on the defendant w per ittormtition lisbd above in
the County of Montgomery, Ces enwealft of PeaasylveuiL
Affirmed and sabaMbed before me on tW day w nuvw61%
124W John P. Dal<raute
Nobly Public sheriff of 1Vlon410mery County
Do" Sheriff
cam
TOTAL P.01
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document -2 Filed 09/01: Page 10 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V. CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil Term
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
STATEMENT OF INTENTION TO PROCEED
TO THE PRO17140NOTARY:
The Plaintiff, Stephen M. Hake, Sr., by and through his attorney, Dusan Bratic, Esquire,
intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Please remove it from the proposed
termination list.
Date: 1-_ --?
Dusan Bratic
I.D. # 19249
101 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Attorney for Plaintiffs
'o
ty In
N
C4
ase 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01: Page 11 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
STEPHEN M. HAKE, SR.
PLAINTIFF
V. CIVIL ACTION: 07-5427 Civil 'T'erm
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
A/K/A Progressive Insurance Company
DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
[ HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Statement of Intention
i
to Proceed was furnished by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid on this day of September
2010, to:
Esther V. Tyson, Medical Claims Rep.
Progressive Insurance
5165 Campus Drive, Suite 100
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462
Dated:-
BRATIC & PORTKO
I
Dusan Bratic
I.D. # 19249
101 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Case 1:11-cv-0 40-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01, ) Page 12 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNT11m ,
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
±s. C ?'J Ri
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
VS.
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Defendant Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdap»errald3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtv&IaWbk.com
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling
& Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, 10* Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01. ) Page 13 of 18
e
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
VS.
Progressive Northern Insmwee Company
a/k/a Progreessive I awinoe company
Defendant
PRAECE FOR APPEeRA_NQ
TO: Prothonotary
Km&y enter my appearance for Defendant Progressive Northam Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company with regard to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
DAPPER, D AP
By:
BEHLING
Daniel J. WHa
Pa. I.D. # 93797
dbwAUkWbLcom
Four Gateway Center, I e Floor
444 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412)456-5555
(Counsel for Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company)
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01. , Page 14 of 18
CERTIFICATE F SERVICE
The undersigned dots hereby certify that a true and correct copy of tho within PRAECIPE
FOR APPEARANCE was irwarded by U.S. First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, this 20 day of
June, 2011, upon the following;
Dusan Bratic, Esquire
1010 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01. Page 15 of 18
4&
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA `
-r
Stephen M. Hake, Sr. M--"
r rv rn
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
VS. PRABCIPE FOR APPEARANCE
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company a/k/a
Defendant Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdad3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtw1l Wbk.com
Dapper, Baldasare, Benson, Behling
8t Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, 16' Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412} 456-5555
Case 1:11-cv-0 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01, Page 16 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTYC a 1
PENNSYLVANIA -03 = -y
rncb
2rn
c-
?
Stephen M. Hake, Sr. N M
-4 M
?
Plaintiff NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
ter
?-
,
c; ,?
x;_ -'
VS.
f7}
PRANCIPR FOR RULE TO Fa
Progressive Northam Insurance Company COMPLAINT
aAda Progressive Insurance Company
Filed on behalf of Defendant Progressive
Defendant Northam Insurance Company a/k/a
Progressive Insurance Company
Counsel of Record for this Party:
Robert E. Dapper, Jr.
Pa. I.D. # 46378
E-mail: rdapperldld3bLoom
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa. I.D. # 93797
E-mail: dtwilla(a'Ahk.com
Dapper, Bald==, Benson, Behling
& Kane, P.C.
Four Gateway Center
444 Liberty Avenue, I e Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412)456-5555
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01. Page 17 of 18
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Stephen M. Hake, Sr.
Plaintiff
NO. 07-5427 Civil Term
VS.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a/k/a Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant
PRAECiPE FOR RULE TO FILE
COMPLAINT
TO: Prothonotary
Kindly issue a Rule upon Plaintiff in this matter to file a Complaint within twenty (20)
days.
F
To THE At om
" 6ro1Dy direelad io pie 000AW
acp t?s? W#rdW wdhik dod&Ap oPService
or soffer jut o rwq ton roes .
Respectfully submitted,
DAPPER, BALDASARE, BEN , BEHLIIVG
tit KANE
By:
obert , Jr.
PA I.D. #46378
EdxWmS3bk.com
Daniel J. Twilla
Pa I.D. # 93797
dtail bk.com
Four Gateway Center, 10& Floor
444 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 456-5555
(Counsel for Defendant Progressive
Northern Insurance Company art
Progressive Insurance Company)
4 ? *
Case 1:11-cv-G 0-YK Document 1-2 Filed 09/01. Page 18 of 18
The undersigned does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the within
PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT was forwarded by U.S. First Class Mail,
postage pre-paid, this 20 day of June, 2011, upon the following:
Dusan Bratic, Esquire
1010 South U.S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
SF, r.
Daniel J. Twilla
4, 1 .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the within Notice of
Filing Notice of Removal was forwarded by U.S. First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, this
day of September, 2011, upon the following:
Dusan Bratic, Esquire
1010 South U. S. Route 15
Dillsburg, PA 17019
Couns