HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-6279AREA AGENCY ON AGING,
Petitioner
VS.
RUTH I. BRANT,
Respondent
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
: SERVICES ACT
PETITION FOR ACCESS TO PERSON AND RECORDS
AND NOW, this [5'M' day of November, 2001, comes the Area Agency on
Aging, in and for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, by its solicitor, Anthony L.
DeLuca, Esquire, and files this Petition based upon the following:
1.
Petitioner is the Area Agency on Aging, in and for Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania, with its principal office at 16 West High Street, Carlisle, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania.
2.
Ruth I. Brant, is an older adult, 81 years of age, who resides at 108 No~h Enola
Drive, Enola, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17025.
3.
Around the beginning of April, 2001, an individual by the name of William Smith
came to live at the residence of Ruth I. Brant and, while living there, performed work on
her property.
4.
William Smith resided there until approximately, October 2, 2001, when an
individual known as Vera Petrina, aka Tina Petrina arrived at the residence of Ruth I.
Brant along with her son, George Petrina.
While at the residence of Ruth I. Brant on October 2, 2001 together with Tina
Pet'dna and George Petrina, William Smith abruptly left allegedly as a result of a threat
from George Petrina.
6.
Petitioner believes and, therefore, avers that William Smith and Tina Petrina and
George Petrina were acquainted before October 2, 2001 and that Respondent had met
Tina Petrina and George Petrina through William Smith sometime during the summer of
2001.
7.
Petitioner has been advised that a number of checks were issued on the account of
the Respondent made payable to Vera Petrina, aka Tina Petrina during August-
September of this year.
8.
The Respondent, Ruth I. Brant, has been under the direct and exclusive control of
Tina Petrina since October 2, 2001.
9.
The checking and/or savings accounts of Ruth I. Brant were closed on or about
October 9, 2001 by the Respondent at the direction of Tina Petrina.
10.
Petitioner believes and, therefore, avers that on or about October 9, 2001 a new
checking account was opened.
11.
On or about August 29, 2001, a Power of Attorney was prepared by Steven P.
Miner, Esquire wherein the son of the respondent, Donald Brant, and William Smith were
appointed attorneys-in-fact for Ruth I. Brant.
12.
Said Power of Attorney was subsequently revoked and a new Power of Attorney
was prepared by Herbert Goldstein, Esquire on or about October 8, 2001.
13.
This, second Power of Attorney, appointed Petitioner's son and his wife, Donald
Robert Brant and Georgia Jean Brant or the Cumberland County Office of Agency and
Community Services as respondent's attorneys-in-fact.
14.
Petitioner has been advised that between September 24, 2001 and October 22,
2001 approximately $12,000.00 has been withdrawn from Respondent's savings account
at Allfirst Bank either in cash or transferred to her checking account wherein checks
were written resulting in no balance in said account.
15.
Petitioner, since approximately October 9, 2001, has attempted to obtain direct
access to Ruth I. Brant.
16.
Direct access to Ruth I. Brant and to her records by Petitioner is necessary in
order to complete Petitioner's investigation and her assessment as required by The Older
Adults Protective Services Act, 35 P. S. 10225.101
17.
Tina Petrina and others have interfered with Petitioner's completion of the
investigation and assessment of Ruth I. Brant by refusing to allow Petitioner to speak to
her without someone else being present.
18.
Petitioner believes and, therefore, avers that Ruth I. Brant is afraid to speak to
Petitioner because of the undue influence of Tina Petrina and others.
19.
On or about October 24, 2001, Petitioner determined that $2,505.00 had been
withdrawn from the new account of Ruth I. Brant that had been opened on October 9,
2001.
20.
On or about October 25,2001, Petitioner, concerned about Respondent's situation
and pursuant to the Power of Attorney wherein Petitioner was appointed Attorney-in-fact
on October 10,2001, closed Respondent's savings account at Allfirst Bank and opened a
new checking account at another bank in the name of Ruth I. Brant C/O Office of the
Aging.
21.
On or about October 26, 2001, Peter Foster, Esquire contacted Priscilla Whitman
and advised that he was now representing Ruth I. Brant and that the Power of Attorney
dated October 10, 2001 had been revoked on that date, October 26,2001.
22.
On or about October 26, 2001, Peter Foster, Esquire contacted Anthony L. DeLuca,
Esquire, Solicitor for Petitioner and advised that the Power of Attorney had been
revoked.
23.
During the course of the discussion with Peter Foster, Esquire, Anthony L.
DeLuca, Esquire advised Mr. Foster that the revocation of the Power of Attorney would
not be recognized because of concerns for the welfare of the Respondent, including her
mental capacity, and that the revocation issue should be decided by a Court.
24.
Petitioner has been in contact with Respondent's son on October 30, 2001 and he
advised that he was frustrated with the situation, that his mother was being manipulated
by nearly every outsider that comes along and he wanted his mother back home.
25.
Respondent takes a number of medications, including Dilantin for seizures, and
appears to be easily influenced by others.
26.
Petitioner believes and, therefore, avers that Respondent has short term memory
deficits evidenced by her inability to take her medications daily as prescribed, and her
inability to manage her finances and home environment.
27.
Petitioner believes and, therefore, avers that Respondent is in need of a geriatric
assessment to determine how to best meet her needs in a least restrictive environment.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an
Order pursuant to the Older Adults Protective Services Act providing relief, including but
not limited to, to immediately directing Tina Petrina, George Petrina and others deemed
appropriate by the Court to cease and desist from having any contact with Ruth I. Brant;
that the Petitioner have immediate direct access to the person of Ruth I. Brant, without
interference from any other party; that the Petitioner have immediate access to all of the
financial records of Ruth I. Brant; that Ruth I. Brant be returned to her home with
appropriate protective services; and that Ruth I. Brant be directed to have a geriatric
assessment by an appropriate professional selected by Petitioner without interference.
DATED :/~'0/O°~6dr,~( ~oe~ !
Respectfully submitted
Anthony L. D0t~uca
P.O. Box 358
113 Front Street
Boiling Springs, PA 17007
Attorney for Petitioner
(717) 258-6844
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify that the facts and information set forth in the foregoing Petition for
Access to Records are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and
belief. I understand that any false statements contained herein are subject to the penalties
of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to unswom falsification to authorities.
Priscilla Whitman
RUTH I. BRANT,
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY OFFICE
OF AGING AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO.J01-6195 CIVIL TERM
AREA AGENCY ON AGING,
Petitioner
V.
RUTH I. BRANT
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 01-6279 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2001, this interim
order is entered pursuant to the Court filing a final order
following this adjudication. It is ordered that the Office of
Aging shall issue checks from the current account that it
controls on behalf of Ruth I. Brant at the Orrstown Bank to
United Healthcare in the amount of $415.00 to bring her
supplemental insurance up-to-date and in the amount of $225.00
due for the next payment.
By the Court,
Peter Foster, Esquire
For Plaintiff
Anthony L. DeLuca,
For Defendant
prs
Esquire
~key, J.
RUTH I. BRANT,
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY OFFICE
OF AGING AND COMMUI~ITY
SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COM~ON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
N0.~01-6195 CIVIL TERM
AREA AGENCY ON AGING,
Petitioner
RUTH I. BRANT
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 01-6279 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2001, the motion
for a preliminary injunction and permanent injunction filed by
Ruth I. Brant at 01-6195, and the petition of the Office of
Aging for access to records filed at 01-6279, are consolidated.
Peter Foster, Esquire
For Plaintiff
Anthony L. DeLuca,
For Defendant
prs
Esquire
By the Court,
ley,
AREA AGENCY ON AGING,
PETITIONER
V.
RUTH I. BRANT,
RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
01-6279 CIVIL TERM
RUTH I. BRANT,
PETITIONER
CUMBERLAND COUNTY OFFICE
OFTHE AGING AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES, INC.,
RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
01-6195 CIVIL TERM
AND NOW, this
day of November, 2001, the motion of Ruth I.
Brant for an injunction, IS DENIED. The motion of the Area Agency on Aging that it
have immediate direct access to Ruth I. Brant, without interference from any other party,
and that it have immediate access to all financial records of Ruth I. Brant, and that Ruth
I. Brant be returned to her home with appropriate protective services, and that Ruth I.
Brant have a geriatric assessment by a professional selected by it, IS GRANTED.
Peter B. Foster, Esquire
For Ruth I. Brant
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esquire
For the Office of Aging
Edgar B. Bayle J./
:sea
VN~'I,~SNN~d
SU :~] l!~J 8- AOX I0