HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-6122PLAINTIFF
CORY A. CORMANY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
DEFENDANT
THOMAS KLINE,
ADMINISTRATION
STAFF OF
CUMBERLAND
SHERIFF
JEFFREY
WILLIAM
EDMUND
THE
COUNTY
THE
AND
THE
COUNTY
OFFICE,
FRANKS,
DIEHL AND
ZIGMUND OF
CUMBERLAND
DISTRICT
ATTORNEY
CASE
GRIEVANCE ACTION
JURY TRIAL/JUDGMENT
NOLTICE
You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set
forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after
the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally
or by attorney and by filing in writing with the Court your defense or objection to
the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case
may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court
without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO F1ND OUT WHERE
YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Court Administrator
Cumberland County Court House
1 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA. 17013
PLAINTIFF
CORY A. CORMANY
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
DEFENDANT
THOMAS KLINE,
ADMINISTRATION
STAFF OF
CUMBERLAND
SHERIFF
JEFFREY
WILLIAM
EDMUND
THE
COUNTY
THE
AND
THE
COUNTY
OFFICE,
FRANKS,
DIEHL AND
ZIGMUND OF
CUMBERLAND
DISTRICT
ATTORNEY
CASE NO. 09~-'¢1~12 ¢i''il
GRIEVANCE ACTION
JURY TRIAL/JUDGMENT
GRIEVANCE COMPLAINT
AND NOW comes, Cory Cormany; Plaintiff, and causes a civil action
against the above Defendants, whereof the following is set forth at length:
1. Plaintiff is Cory Cormany, an adult individual residing in
Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Thomas Kline and associates are adult individuals
employed with the Cumberland County Sheriff Office, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
3.
Defendants Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl and Edmtmd Zigmund are
d)
adult individuals represented through the Cumberland County District Attorney,
Pennsylvania, United States of America.
4. Plaintiff Cory Cormany is a high school graduate, academically
achieved through a university or universities, a taxpayer, a registered voter and a
citizen of the United States of America.
5. In and about the year 1985 and through and about the application
herein, Plaintiff Cory Cormm~y was subjugated criminal and civil allegation
unconstitutional a due process; hereto the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
6. Prior hereto and pertinent herein the foregoing statement, the
Plaintiff Cory Cormany was smnmoned and processed dependable the Defendant
Thomas Kline of the Cumberland County Sheriff Office.
7. Proceeding therein and preceding thereto the aforesaid ramifications,
the Defendants Jeffrey Franks, Williatn Diehl and Edmund Zigmund did remand
and omit a punishable indifference, contemptuously constituent the Plaintiff Cory
Cormm~y.
8. The case number 89-2068 procedurally dictates a criminal offense of
the felony degree, and is on file at the Cumberland County Court House in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
9. The case numbers 85-0722, 86-0358, 91-0505, 94-1222, 95-0375,
95-0376, 96-1584 and 97-1504 procedurally dictate criminal offenses of the
misdemeanor degree, and are on file at the Cumberland County Court House in
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
(2)
10. The case numbers 92-1252, 93-1078, 93-1079, 94-0973, 94-0974,
95-0027, 97-0174, 97-1443, 97-1444, 97-1445, 97-1446, 97-1447, 97-1448, 97-
1449, 97-1450, 97-1451, 97-1452, 97-1701, 01-0092, 01-0093, 01-0094, 01-
0095, 01-0096 and 01-0097 procedt~rally dictate criminal offenses of the
summary degree, and are on file at the Cumberland County Court House in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
ll. In and tlu:oughout the foregoing incidents, the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany did petition civil and criminal objects as in accordance with the
Common Pleas Court of the Cmnberland County and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
12. Prescient thereto and pursuant therein the aforesaid statement, the
Plaintiff Cory Cormany did petition civil and criminal objects as in accordance
with the Middle District Court of the United States of America and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
13. The case numbers 94-1679, 95-0310, 95-5222, 96-1730, 96-1969,
96-4435, 01-1727 and 03-1778 procedurally enstate assumptive labels of the
alias degree, and are on file at the Cumberland County Court House in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
14. The case numbers 1:CV-95-0844 and 1:CV-01-1803 procedurally
enstate assttmptive labels of the alias degree, and are on file at the Middle District
Court House in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
15. On October 22nd, of the year 2001, the D/strict Attorney's Office in
(3)
Cumberland County acquired a notarial criminal complaint culpable the Plaintiff
Cory Cormany, and proficient a procedure as in accordance with P.S.A. 42 R.C.P.
132, 133, 134 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 1513, 1514 and 1515.
16. On November 16th, of the year 2001, the District Attorney's Office
in Cumberland County acquired a notarial criminal report culpable the Plaintiff
Cory Cormany, and argumentative a procedure as in accordance with P.S.A. 42
R.C.P 132, 133, 134 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 1513, 1514 and 1515.
17. On November 26th, of the year 2001, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany
required an expensive civil complaint responsible the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, and sufficient a procedure as in accordance with P.S.A. 42 R.C.P.
205.2, 227.4, 239 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 5304, 5306 and 5307.
18. On December 24th, of the year 2001, the Disthct Attorney's Office
in Cumberland County acquired several notarial criminal issues figurative the
Plaintiff Cory Cormany, and proficient a procedure as in accordance with P.S,A.
42 R.C.P. 132, 133, 134 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 1513, 1514 and 1515.
19. On January llth, of the year 2002, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany
acquired a grievance complaint practical the United States District Court, as in
P.S.A. 61 P.C.I. 72, 511,751 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 5304, 5306
accordance with
and 5307.
20.
On February 1st, of the year 2002, the District Attorney's Office in
Cumberland County acquired several notarial criminal issues figurative the
Plaintiff Cory Cormany, mid argumentative a procedure as in accordance with
(4)
P.S.A. 42 R.C.P. 132, 133, 134 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 1513, 1514 and 1515.
21. On June 7th, of the year 2002, the District Attorney's Office in
Cumberland County acquired several notarial criminal issues justifiable the
Plaintiff Coty Cormany, and argtunentative a procedure as in accordance with
P.S.A. 42 R.C.P. 132, 133, 134 and P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 1513, 1514 and 1515.
22. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did proceed criminal allegations
slanderous a confliction of interest, and noncertified an official service, for the
case number 01-2091; naming the Plaintiff Coty Cormany a defendant substantial
a Patrol Officer Mathew Kennedy.
23. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did precede criminal
commitments malicious a prosecutorial conduct and noncertified an official
appearance; applicative the Defendants Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl and
Edmund Zigmund as in disaccordance with P.S.A. 42 R.C.P. 58, 65, 66, 101,
102, 110, 123 and 130.
24. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did proceed criminal
propaganda solicit a careful liability, and certified an official accusation, for the
case number 01-0494; naming the Plaintiff Coty Cormany a defendant substantial
a District Magistrate Paula Correal.
25. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did precede criminal hearings
conspiratorial an act of justice and certified an official position; applicative the
Defendants Thomas Kline and associates as in disaccordance with P.S.A. 42
R.C.P. 58, 71, 84, 85, 113, 122, 124 and 134.
(5)
26. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered public humiliation as
caused by the defamation of his character, pain and physical injury as a result of
the Defendants' malicious and prejudicial actions.
27. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered mental anguish, emotional
distress, imprisonment, loss of employment and inherent right as a result of the
Defendants' malicious and prejudicial actions.
28. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered lost wages, benefits, fees
and property in the amount or in the potential duplicative amount of Two
Hundred and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars (250,000.00) as a result of the
Defendants' malicious and prejudicial actions.
(6)
CORY A. CORMANY V. THOMAS KLINE AND ASSOCIATES
GRIEVANCE ACTION
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
29. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through twenty eight
(1-28) of the Grievance Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth as
a statement.
30. The prejudicial and malicious matters and actions are serious as
having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully
submissive the order of the court and exhibits A through I.
31, Preceding the situations and c/rcumstances defined in the
aforementioned statements, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany was not ever serviced with
the order of the court for the purpose of indictment, nor was he ever bonded with
an authentic warrant of probable cause for the purpose of an immunological
arrest.
32.
The Defendant Thomas Kline did implement policy and directive
within or throughout the incidents and issues in question, and does have
supervisory power unconstitutional an effective legislative, judiciary or executive
procedure.
33. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and
sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of inherent
(7)
right, loss of employment and properly, confinement and incarceration.
34. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has
suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss
of inherent right, loss of employment and properly, confinement and
incarceration.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in
an amount in excess of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars
(250,000.00) plus cost of suit.
(8)
COUNT TWO
CORY A. CORMANY V. JEFFREY FRANKS
GRIEVANCE ACTION
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
35. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through twenty eight
(1-28) of the Grievance Complaim are incorporated by reference as if set forth as
a statement.
36. The prejudicial and malicious matters and actions are serious as
having happened in the Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully
submissive the order of the court and exhibits A through I.
37. Preceding the situations and circumstances defined in the
aforementioned statements, the Plaintiff Coty Cormany was not ever depositioned
for the purpose of interrogation, nor was he ever treated with an arbitrary reason
of indifference for the purpose of an immunological warrant.
38. The Defendant Jeffrey Franks did implement policy and directive
within or throughout the incidents and issues in question, and does have
supervisory power unconstitutional an effective legislative, judiciaty or executive
procedure.
39.
sustained, memal anguish, public humiliation,
(9)
The Plaintiff Coty Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and
emotional distress, loss of inherent
right, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration.
40. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has
suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss
of inherent right, loss of employment and property, confinement and
incarceration.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant hn
an amount in excess of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars
(250,000.00) plus cost of suit.
(10)
COUNT THREE
CORY A. CORMANY V. WILLIAM DIEHL
GRIEVANCE ACTION
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
41. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through twenty eight
(1-28) of the Grievance Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth as
a statement.
42. The prejudicial and malicious matters and actions are serious as
having happened in the Cmnbefland County, Pennsylvania, respectfully
submissive the order of the court and exhibits A through I.
43. Preceding the situations and circumstances defined in the
aforementioned statements, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany was not ever depositioned
for the purpose of interrogation, nor was he ever treated with an arbitrary reason
of indifference for the purpose of an immunological warrant.
44. The Defendant William Diehl did implement policy and directive
within or throughout the incidents and issues in question, and does have
supervisory power unconstitutional an effective legislative, judiciary or executive
procedure.
45. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and
sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of inherent
(11)
right, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration.
46. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has
suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss
of inherent r/ght, loss of employment and property, confinement and
incarceration.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims from the Defendant in
an amount in excess of Two Htmdred and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars
(250,000.00) plus cost of suit.
(12)
COUNT FOUR
CORY A. CORMANY V. EDMUND ZIGMUND
GRIEVANCE ACTION
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
47. The averments set forth in Paragraphs one through twenty eight
(1-28) of the Grievance Complaint are incorporated by reference as if set forth as
a statement.
48. The prejudicial and malicious matters and actions are serious as
having happened in the Cumberland County, Peunsylvania, respectfillly
submissive the order of the court and exhibits A through I.
49. Preceding the situations and circumstances defined in the
aforementioned statements, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany was not ever summoned
with prima-facie cause for the purpose of service, nor was he ever dispositioned
for the pta-pose of an immunological indictment.
50. The Defendant Edmund Zignnund did implement policy and directive
within or throughout the incidents and issues in question, and does have
supervisory power unconstitutional an effective legislative, judiciary or executive
procedure.
51. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany did suffer pain for injuries felt and
sustained, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss of inherent
right, loss of employment and property, confinement and incarceration.
(13)
52. By reason of the aforesaid matter, Plaintiff Cory Cormany has
suffered pain, injury, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, loss
of inherent right, loss of employment and property, confinement and
incarceration.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany, claims f~om the Defendant in
an amount in excess of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars
(250,000.00) plus cost of suit.
(14)
VERIFICATION
I, Cory A. Cormany, Plaintiff in the above captioned action, hereby verify
and state that the facts set forth in the Grievance Complaint against Thomas Kline,
the Administration and Staff of the Cumberland County Sheriff Office, Jeffrey
Franks, William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund are true and correct to the best of
my information, knowledge, and belief. I understand that false statements herein
are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to
unsworn verification to authorities.
Dated ff/~t/~
Cory A. Cormany
(15)
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this _.a!..~ day of 7k)c,*.e~-~k-~ r 200~, I Cory A. Connany
foregoing the aforesaid matter on behalf of my Attorney, hereby certify that I
have served the foregoing document upon the following by depositing a copy of
same in the United States Mail, at Carlisle Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
Cumberland County Sheriff Office
Thomas Kline and Associates
1 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Cumberland County District Attorney
Jeffrey Franks
William Diehl
Edmund Zigmund
1 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Cory A. Cormany
1883 Douglas Drive
Carlisle, PA 17013
BALTIMORE CITY HEAI.,TH DEPAR. TMENT !
NOTIFICATION OF ~RTH REGISTRATION
~'~is certifies tha~---~er~ is on file in
~Z Or C~L~COry A~y
PZ,~$~ SEE o'r~l~.R SIDE; FOR RECORD OF
Istu~ 05/1412002
E~res 02128/2006
1883 DOUGLAS C~RIVE ~. ,!
CARLISLE PA 17013
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
09-2-01
PAULA P. CORREAL
A~ .....EAST WING COURTHOUSE
! COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA
T~,~o~-. (717) 240 - 6564 17013- 00.00
CORY A. COP~
1883 DOUGLAS DR.
CARLISLE, PA 17013
NOTICE OF TRIAL
SUMMARY CASE
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA
VS.
DEFENDANT:
r- ALLISTER
~ COR-~, cORY
1883 DOUGLAS DR.
CARLISLE, PA 17013
Docket No.: N'T-OOOO?27-9~
Date Filed: ~/~9/95
18 S2709 ~SA3 I{ARASSME:NT AIg'D STALKING
(Charge)
{Charge)
This court, has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above sum,mar{,' violation(s). The sum of $
.00
has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial.
Your trial has been scheduled as follows:
tD~e: 12/03/96
Time: 2:00 PM
Place:DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01
EAST WING - COURTHOUSE
1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000
You have the right to be represented by your attorney and have any witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify
your. attorney and/or witnesses of this trial date. and time.. .. . ..?. . .
Should you fail to appear, a trial may be held in your absence. If, after the evidence is presented, you are found guilty,
"'-- -- ~: ...... ~'~' - .~ oo.,~e,.=, w , uu [urTe ~eo an(3 a ~p eo ~he payment
,, ,~ ,~,o, ,,~o y ~u, ~ ~ posted ........ ' ...... · " ' toward of fines and costs imposed
as your sentence, and you will receive a notice of your conviction. You have the right to appeal to the Court of Common
Pleas within thirty days for a trial de novo. If you are found not guilty, your collateral monies will be returned to you.
If you have any questions, please call the above office.!mmediately.
If you are disabled and require assistance, please Contact the MagiSterial District office at the address above.
q//C'~'/Q (-~¢ Date ~J'L /~~ , District Justice
My commissi'on expires first Monday of January, 2ooo , SEAL
DATE PRINTED; 9/19/96 CITATION NUMBER: 2860O7
DATE ISSUED:
AOPC 611-96
5/29/96
CITATION No.
SUMMONS
~) ' ~ _ /~ C~ [18 PAC S. )4904) RE~TING lO UH~ICA~N TO
,,~,,~ 286007
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
09-2-01
PAULA P. CORREAL
~_~e~ EAST WING ~ COURTHOUSE
1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA
.T.!e~ ....... ¢7i7] 240- 6564
CORY A. COR.~
1883 DOUGLAS DR.
CARLISLE, PA 17013
17013-0000
NOTICE OF TRIAL
SUMMARY CASE
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA
VS.
DEFENDANT:
com AL ,ISTE
1883 DOUGLAS DR.
CARLISLE, aA .7013
[Date ~iied: 5/29/96
18 ~2709 §§A3 HARASSMEiTI' AND STALKING
(Charge)
· · (Chargel
This court has received your plea of NOT GUIL'CC te the above surrm~ary violation(s). The sum of $ .0 0
has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial·
Your trial has been scheduled as follows:
I Date: t2/03/96 Place:DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01
EAST WING ' - COURTHOUSE
Time: 2:00 PM i COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARL I S L__E.,____P_A___i,7013 - 0000
You have the right to be represented by your attorney and have any Witnesses present. It is your responsibility to notify
your attorney.aDd/or witnesses of this trial date and time; · ·
Should you fail to appear, a trial may be held in your absence. If, after the evidence is presented, you are found guilty,
the i'nonies you have Posted as collateraJ wti~ o~. ,orfeite,,.d and applied ~oward [he payment Of fines and cds~imposed
as your sentence, and you will receive a notice of your; conviction. You have the right to appeal to the Court of Common
Pleas within thirty days for a trial de novo. If you are-found not guilty, your collateral monies will be returned to you,
If you have any questions, please ca the above office immediately,' '::U
My commission expires first Monday of January, 2ooo . SEAL
DATE PRINTED: 9/19/96 CITATION NUMBER: 286009
DATE ISSUED:
AOPC 611-96
5/29/96
CITATION No.
............ ~: ......... ' ......... :~'~ ' ~"='"'""'""~ °~'~"~"~"""~ 286009
N
: ~v Ilt~ .......... ~- 7--~%-- - c~-~.~
~ ~,,,:? - .
~ ~.,.~ ,, ~ ,'~.'-L~ ~. f"~- ~'""~.~
o TOTAL
N DUE , .
· COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
;OUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
09-9.-01
PAULA P. CORREAL
^ca,ess: i COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA
(717) 240-6564
CORY A. CORMANY
!101 CLA_R~MONT .RD
CARLISLE, PA 17013
§5104
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA
17013-0000
VS.
FCORMANY, CORY ALISTER
1101 CLAREMONT
CAi{LISLE, PA 17013
iDocketNo: CR-0000574-0!/ ~
DateFiled: 10/02/01
OTN: H 424983-6
Charqe(s/:
RESISTING ARREST OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT
A complaint has been filed charging you with the offense(s) set forth above and on the attached copy of the
complaint, A preliminary hearing on these charges has been scheduled for:
Date: 12/07/01 Place: DISTRICT COURT 09-2-01
CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON
Time: 9: 30AM 1101 CLAREMONT ROAD
CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000
If you fail to appear at the time and place above, a warrant will be issued for your arrest.
At the preliminary hearing you may:
1. Be represented by counsel;
Cross-examine witnesses and inspect physical evidence offered against you;
3. Call witnesses on your behalf other than witnesses to testify to your good reputation only,
offer evidence on your behalf and testify;
4. Make written notes of the proceeding, or have your counsel do so, or make a stenographic,
mechanical or electronic record of the proceedings.
If you cannot afford to hire an attorney, one may be appointed to represent you. Please contact the
office of the district justice for additional information regarding the appointment of an attorney.
If you are disabled and require assistance, please contact the Magisterial District office at the
address above.
If you have any questions, please call the above office immediately.
10/10/01 Date
My commission expires first Monday of January, 2006.
DATE PRINTED:
AOPC 6~9-97
Defendant's Name:CORY ALISTER CORMANY
Docket Number: CR-574-01
POLICE
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
The acts committed by the accused were:
(Set forth a summary of the facts sufficient to advise the defendant of the nature of the offense charged, A citation to the statute allegedly violated, without more,
is not sufficient, In a sumrnaqz case, you must cite the specific section and subsection of the statute or ordinance allegedly violated.)
RESISTING ARREST OR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT: IN THAT CORY ALISTER CORMANY DiD WITH
THE INTENT OF PREVENTING A PUBLIC SERVANT FROM PERFORMING HIS DUTY, DID CREATE A
SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF BODILY INJURY TO THE PUBLIC SERVANT AND OTHERS WHICH REQUIRED
SUBSTANTIAL FORCE TO OVERCOME THE RESISTANCE. TO WIT: CORY ALISTER CORMANY DID
RESIST BEING HANDCUFFED AND REFUSED TO LISTEN TO OFFICERS COMMANDS FOR
TRANSPORTATION TO THE DISTRICT JUSTICE OFFICE.
all of which were against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and contrary to the Act of
Assembly, or in violation of
5104 of the TITLE 18 1
of the
of the
of the
I ask that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the defendant be required to answer the charges
have made. (In order for a warrant of arrest to issue, the attached affidavit of probable cause must be
completed and sworn to before the issuing authority.)
(Date) ~ (Sig~
ANDNOW, on this date, i0-02 , 200[ ic.,¢f~atth~omCaintha~
affidavit of probable cause must be completed i~/<frder~/,arra/~. ~ issu~
09-2-01
AOPC 412B - (8/00) 2-2
I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and
belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 PA C.S.§4904)
relating to unsworn falsification to authodties.0f~. O,Z; _~, .~t. [~ ~ ~ ~"'~ .~
~ant)
Defendant's Name:
Docket Number:
CORY ALISTER CORMANY
CR-574-0i
POLICE
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
AFFIDAVIT of PROBABLE CAUSE
AFFIDAVIT RIDER CONTAINING CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT OF ARREST FOR CORY
ALISTERCORMANY. DOB: 08.17.1966 SSN: 182.62.5623
ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2001, PTLM. MATTHEW KENNEDY OF THE CARLISLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT,
WAS ASSIGNED TO TRANSPORT CORY ALISTER CORMANY TO DISTRICT JUSTICE CORREAL'S OFFICE FOR
A COURT PROCEEDING, UPON CORMANY'S ARRIVAL TO THE INTAKE / TRANSFER AREA OF CUMBERLAND
COUNTY PRISON, PTLM, KENNEDY INSTRUCTED CORMANY TO PLACE HIS HANDS BEHIND HIS BACK FOR
HANDCUFFING. CORMANY REFUSED. ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL FROM THE PRISON WERE CALLED FOR
ASSISTANCE IN HELPING TO SECURE CORMANY. ONCE ADDITIONAL HELP ARRIVED CORMANY WAS AGAIN
ASKED TO PLACE HIS HANDS BEHIND HIS BACK. AGAIN, HE REFUSED. PTLM. KENNEDY THEN
APPROACHED CORMANY AND OP~BBED HOLD OF H~S F~IGI IT ARM IN AN A'FFEMPT TO HANDCUFF Hiivi.
CORMANY RESISTED AND PULLED AWAY AT THE SAME TIME THROWING HIS HEAD BACKWARDS AND
'HEADBUTTING' PTLM, KENNEDY IN THE FACE. AT THIS POINT PTLM. KENNEDY AND SEVERAL
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS HAD TO USE FORCE TO SUBDUE CORMANY IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET HIM TO
RESPOND TO COMMANDS.
1, DETECTIVE WILLIAM DIEHL , BEING DULY SWORN ACCORDING TO LAW,
DEPOSE AND SAY THAT THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE FOREGOING AFFIDAVIT ARE
TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF.
My commission expires first Monday of January, ~)~ . I
SEAL
OPC 4t2C- 11/24/99 3-3
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF:CUMBERLAND
09-2-01
PAULA P. CORREAL
Address:1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
EAST WiNG
CARLISLE, PA 17013
T.~,;hone: (717)240,6564
Docket No.: CR-574-01
Date Filed: 10-02-01
OTN: H 424983-6
COREY A. CORMANY
01.0897
POLICE
CRIMINAL COMPLAIN .
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
VS.
DEFENDANT:
NAME and ADDRESS
CORY ALISTER CORMANY
1101 CLAREMONT RD. (C.C.P.)
CARLISLE, PA
L27°13
Defendant's SoCial Security Number
8/17/66 182.62.5623 165.74.93,7
O45
District Attorney's Office [] Approved [] Disapproved because:
(The district attemey may require that the co~, arrest warrant affidavit,~r bnh be ap~ove, d,-D"~he attorney for the. Commonwealth prior to filin~. Pa R.Cr, P. 107.)
I, DETECTIVE WILLIAM D!EHL 4910 ~--
(Name of Affiant-P~ease Pnnt or Type)
of CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.A. / C,LD
do hereby state: (check appropriate box)
1.
PA021013A
01.0897
(Orfginating Agency Case Number (OCA})
[] accuse the above named defendant who lives at the address set forth above
[] accuse the defendant whose name is unknown to me but who is described as
[] I accuse the defendant whose name and popular designation or nickname is unknown to me and whom
have therefore designated as John Doe
with violating the penal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at 1101 CLAREMONT RD., MIDDLESEX
(Piece-Political Subdivisfon)
TWP., CARLISLE, PA 17013
in CUMBERLAND County on or about SEPTEMBER 12, 2001
Participants were: (if there were participants, place their names here, repeating the name of the above defendant)
CORY ALISTER CORMANY
AOPC 412A - (8/00)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
09-2-01
PAUI.~ P. CO~
1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000
COMMITMENT
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA
Docket No.:
Date Filed:
Date of Birth:
SSN:
Charqe(s):
To ANY AUTHOtR.4'ZIED PERSON of the above named County of this Commonwealth:
You are hereby commanded to convey and del(ver into the custody of the Keeper of the county prison the
above named defendant. You, the Keeper are required to receive the defendant iRto your custody to be
safely kept by you until discharged by due course of law for:
~-~ A PERIOD OF__ DAYS UNTIL
[~ AHEARINGAT
Date: Place:
Time:
E~] A FURTHER HEARING
Date: Place:
Tfme:
~F~coMMON PLEAS COURT ^,"T ,-,,.,
E~ OTHER: ·
CURRENT AMOUNT OF BAIL: "~
.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ~ · '~LTHE COURT~'OF.COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND;cOUNTY,..i~% jPENNSYLVANIA
/' o J_ ,a, failure to apuear
result in a bench warrant being issued for your arrest.
At that time you will receive a copy of the Criminal Information filed
against you and you must enter a plea to the charge(s). If a trial is
requested a pre-trial conference and trial date will be set.
Your attorney - private or public defender (if one is appointed for you at
arraignment) - must appear with you and private counsel must enter
appearance at this time.
Please report to the Clerk of Courts Office, Second Floor, Cumberland
County Courthouse, One Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania at 8:30 a.m.
on the date indicated above. Bring this notice with you.
If you have private counsel and wish to waive formal arraignment or
arrange for entry of a guilty plea to the criminal charge(s), your attorney
must make an appointment for you to appear with your attorney in the Clerk of
Ccurts Office ~efors the above date to sign a written waiver and obtain an
appearance date for pre-trial conference and trial, or entry of a guilty plea.
I accept service of the Subpoena TO Appear Fer Formal Arraignment.
Honorable President Judge i '% -q - ~'~ / ~ ;O~ '~
, ' '~ ':~ 'Wkit~ Clarkof ~ou~ · Oanaq- District A~orney · Pink- Defen~eA~rney · Goldenrod-
RE:
District Attorney
Cumberland County
Court House Square
Carlisle, Pa. 17013
Defendant:
Steve Calaman
Carl Heyward
Frank Teaney
Mathew Kennedy
William Diehl
Unidentified
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of
America, do hereby state and swear that at or about February, of the
year 1995, and through or about December~ of the year 2001, the above
named defendant did commit the following crimes:
1)
903. Criminal Conspiracy a person is guilty of conspiracy with
another person or persons to commit a crime if with the intent of
promoting or facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such
other person or persons that they or one or more of them will
engage in conduct which constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to
aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of
such crime or of an attempt or.solicitation to commit such crime.
2)
2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General rule a person is
guilty of involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the
doing of a lawful act in a reckless or grossly Negligent manner,
he causes the death of another person. (b) Grading - Involuntary
manslaughter is a misdemeanor of the first degree where the victim
is under 12 years of age and is in the care custody or control of
the person who caused the death involuntary manslaughter is a
felony of the second degree.
2706. Terroristic Threats - a person is guilty of a misdemeanor of
the first degree if he threatens to commit any crime of violence
with intent to terroize another or cause evacuation of a building,
place of assembly, or facility of public transportation, or other-
wise to cause serious public inconvenience or in reckless disregard
of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience.
2710. Ethnic Intimidation - a person commits the offense of ethnic
intimidation if, with malicious intention toward the race, color,
religion or national origin of another individual or group of
individuals, he commits an offense under any other provision of
this article or under Chapter 33 (relating to arson, criminal
mischief and otherproperty destruction) exclusive of section 3307
(relating to institutional vandalism) or under section 3503
(relating to crimina~ tresspass) or under section 5504 (relating to
harassment by communication or address) with respect to such
individual or his or her property or with respect to one or more
members of such group or to their property. (b) Grading an offense
under this section shall be classified as amisdemeanor of the third
degree if the other offense is classified as a summary offense.
Otherwise, an offense under this section shall be classified one
degree higher in the classification specified in section 106
(relating to classes of offenses) than the classification of the
other offense. (c) Definition - as used in this section "malicious
intention" means the intention to commit any act, the commission
o£ which is a necessary element of any offense referred to in
subsection (a) motivated by hatred toward the race, color, religio~
or national origin of another individual or group of individuals.
5)
2902. Unlawful Restraint a person commits a misdemeanor of the
first degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in
circumstances exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or
(2) holds another in a condition of involuntary servitude.
6)
2903. False Imprisonment a person co~its a misdemeanor of the
second degree if he knowingly retrains another unlawfully so as
to interfere substantially with his liberty.
7)
2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion
if; with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another
to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any
criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3)
expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt
or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official, or
cause an official to take or withhold action.
8)
3107. Resistance Not Required - the alleged victim need not resis~
the actor in prosecutions under this chapter. Provided, however,
that nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a
defendant from introducing evidence that the alleged victim
consented to the conduct in question.
9)
4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person
commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he
causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting
to affect or likely to affect the pecuniary interest of any person.
4501. Definitions "Harm" loss disadvantage or injury, or anything
so regarded by the person affected, including loss, disadvantage or
injury to any person or entity in whose welfare he is interested.
ii)
4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political
Matters a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful
harm to any person with intent to influence his decision, opinion,
recommendation, vote or other exercise of discretion as a public
servant, party official or voter.
12)
5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act
in a official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or
purporting capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if
knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to
arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession,
assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property
rights; or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or
enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity.
i3)
5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official A~tion or Information -
a public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in
contemplation of official action by himself or by a governmental
unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information
to which he has access in his official capactity and which has
not been made public he: (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any
property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by such
information or official action~ (3 aids another to do any of the
following.
903 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334,
2504 - 1972 Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
2706 - 1972 Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334,
2710 - 1982 June 18, P.L. 537, No. 154,
2902 - 1972 Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334,
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1) imd. effective.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
As amended 1974, Dec. 30, P.L. 1129, No. 361, 2, imd. effective.
2903 - 1972 Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
2906 - 1972
3107 - 1976
4114 - 1972
4501 - 1972
4702 - 1972
5301 - 1972
5302 - 1972
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
May 18, P.L. 120, No. 53, 2, effective in 30 days.
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in
the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information
and belief, and that any false statements herein are made subject to the
penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Continued In Review: Defendants Steve.Calamaa, C~rl Heyward, Frank
Tea~ey, Ma~hew~ Ke~nedy~ 'William Dieh! amd U~identified
Individuals to the District:'Att0rney':s Office, to wit.
the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, November 4, 2001.
i4)
i5)
16 )
270i. Simple Assaml% ,:~a person is~g~.~lty.of assault.if.he: (1)
attempts to cause or intentionally, k~owingly or recklessly causes
bodily injury to. anot,he~; (3) attempts by physical menace to put
another in fear of imminent bodily injury.
3126. tndeeent Ass~mtt - a,person who has.indecent contact with
another not his spouse, or. causes such. other to have indecent contact
with him is guilty of indecent assault a misdemeanor of the second
degree if: (~1) 'he,does so without the_consentL~of the other person;
(2) he 'knews:that~the other person !s~ffers from:a me~%al ~iSease or
defect which:'renders him or her incapable of appraising,~he~nat~me
of his.or her conduct; (3) he knows that the other person is unaware
that a indecent contact~is being committed; or (5)the ~other person
is in custody of law or detai~ned in a hospital or other institution
and the actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over him.
5726. Action for Removal from Office or Employment - any aggrieved
person shall have the right to bring an .~ction in Commonwealth Court
against any investigative or law enforcement officer, publ~ic official
or public employee seeking the 6fficer's, official's or employee's
removal from office or employment on th~ grounds that the officer,
offidial..~r employee has intentionally vio&ated the provisions of
this chapter. If the court shall conclude that such Lfficer, official.
or employee has infact intentionally violated the provisions of this
chapter, the court shall order the dismissal or'removal from office
of said officer, official or employee.
2701 - 1972~ Dec. 6, P.L.~1482, No. 33~ 1~. e£fective June S, 1973.
3126 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 33~, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
5726 - 1978, Oct. 4, P.L. 831, No. 164, 2, effective in 60 days.
I, Cory A.'lOormany, do hereby verify that the facts set: forth in the
above are true and correct to the bes~ of my knowledge or information and
belief, and that any false statements Rerein are made subject to the
penalties of Section 4904 of t~e Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated
SWORN STATEMENT
On or about May .., at approximately mid-afternoon, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was in his assigned cell napping
in Cumberland County Prison.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was
abruptly and aggressively attacked choked and beaten in and out
of unconsciousness while being repeatedly probed with electronic
shocking devices.
Proceeding the aforementioned described event the Defendant Steve
Calaman, as identified from a previous occurrence and accompanied
by Several unidentified individuals, did bondage the Plaintiff
and did tie him to a board and did punch and pinch and kick him.
o
On or about May 29th~ at approximately mid-afternoon or thereto,
the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was serviced with summary
citations while reading legal textes in his assigned cell at
Cumberland County Prison.
Proceeding the aforementioned servicing definition the Defendant
William Diehl, did proceed judiciary litigations corroborating
allegation with the Defendant Steve Calaman and another individual
without detecting a plaintiff's disposition or investigating a
defendant's deposition.
o
On or about August 28th, at approximately mid-afternoon, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was in the gymnasium exercising
pursuant therein a magisterial sentencing order at Cumberland
County Prison.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant Carl Heyward
did aggress and perpetrate a combative confrontation causing the
Plaintiff a reckless disregard potentated a solitary secluded
detriment.
Prior the aforementioned contended statement, the Plainti££
Cory A. Cormany was shot at while walking home preceding the
aforementioned sentencing commitment and did report such
ramifications to the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland
County.
The Defendant Carl Heyward did attempt to instigate a fight and
did procrastinate a nonapplicable disciplinary problem con-
sequential a Prison Officer Houser identified pursuant the
Defendant Frank Teaney.
10.
On or about September 12th, at approximately mid-morning, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was summoned out of his assigned
cell by a P.A. page in Cumberland County Prison.
11.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff did
respond to the foregoing P.A. page and did walk to the Intake
Transfer area of the Cumberland County Prison.
12.
Proceeding the aforementioned arrival to the aforesaid Intake
Transfer area of the prison the Plaintiff did ask question as
to why he was paged and did not receive any response or
documentation thereto his application,
13.
The Plainti££ Cory A. Cormany did recognize a Carlisle Police
Officer's uniform and does acknowledge that he did again inquire
as to a predisposition of proceeding in suspicion to a summary
matter depositive prior to his sentencing and commitment to the
county prison.
14.
The Defendant Mathew Kennedy, as identified in an affidavit and
assumptive the jurisdictional event described, did make verbal
and physical gestures towards the Plaintiff as in an implication
applying him to accompany the De£endant out of the C.C.P.
without the notice o£ a Security Bond.
15.
The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did inform the Defendant Mathew
Kennedy that "if" he was implying for him to leave the prison
for the aforementioned summary issue he could relay to the
District Justice Magisterial No. 07-2-01 that he did not wish
to attend and that she could and "may" make a determination
without him.
16.
Proceeding the communication~ described in the aforementioned
statement the Plaintiff did hot recognize a given question or
authorized warrant and did then turn back to the security
entrance way to the Intake/Transfer area and did ring the buzzer
"bell" so as to return to his assigned cell as in accordance with
policy, directive and central control and the prison officers
on duty.
17.
On or about September 12th, at approximately mid-morning or
thereto, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was proceeding to his
assigned cell through a security door in the Cumberland County
Prison.
18.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was
grabbed by the throat and arm and choked somewhat into a border
of unconsciousness and pulled and scratched from behind in a
violent grasping manner.
19.
Proceeding the aforementioned incident described in the aforesaid
statement the admission prison officer did conceivably recognize
an emergency code situation and did summons forth an aggression
in league with the acts implemented by the now identified
Defendant Mathew Kennedy.
20.
The Defendant Frank Teaney, as identified herein as a prison
officer and knowledgable the Plaintiff's circumstance, did
relay a series of aggressions protracting and bondaging the
Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, accompanied by several unidentified
individuals, while he was attempting to regain consciousness
hereto a Security Breach.
21.
The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany does powerfully recognize the
Defendant Frank Teaney as in accordance to the event defined
in the aforementioned statement and was continually bondaged
and aggressed upon, than carried around and about to a secured
prison cell in the Intake/Transfer area of C.C.P.
22.
Proceeding the foregoing the Plaintiff was given and granted
medical attention for scratches, bruises and minor abrasions
around his face, throat, back and arm areas, and was directed
and ordered to return to his assigned cell in Cumberland County
Prison as to witness other Prison Officers.
23.
On or about October 2nd, at approximately hereto and herein, the
Defendant, William Diehl, did instigate an affidavi~ and complaint
without depositioning a plaintiff or dispositioning a defendant
liable a detected investigation.
24.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A.
Cormany was not sequestered a Miranda or a Warrant of official
notice substantial a question or a Prima Facia of arrest
effective a procedure and pertinent thereto an entirety.
25.
Prior the aforementioned allegation prescribed within, the
Defendant William Diehl did enstate a writen exhibitionary medium
solicit the Defendant Mathew Kennedy and the District Justice
Magisterial No. 07-2-9t relevant an Order.
26.
On or about October 10th, at approximately whereto December 7th,
the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, has been delivered a letter by
certified mail noting a seal of approval and a signiture to
verify a year to date imposition.
27.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plainti£f has
questioned commitment at Cumberland County Prison and is not
petitioned or ordered under security or bond and is a sentenced
prisoner subordinate an Act and the Commonwealth Court of
Common Pleas, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
28.
The Defendants Steve Calaman, Carl Heyward, Frank Teaney, Mathew
Kennedy and William Diehl have violated constitutional provisions
regardless an electorial intiative and have influenced propaganda
and media costly the United States of America.
29.
Prior the aforementioned immunilogical ramifications and
preponderate a civil litigation the Plainti£f Cory A. Cormany
does acknowledge an orthodox of religion controversial a preferrable
practical Mosaical Masora.
30.
The Plaintiff has suffered and has sustained injuries, lack of
medical treatment ambitious an employable opportunity, stressful
and contradictive commands and obligations, loud and unnecessary
confinement and consummative condemnation during and throughout
these unconstitutional events.
I, Cory A. Cormany, d~"hereby verify that fhe facts set forth in
the above are. true ~nd correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.
C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Witnessed
Cory A. Cormany
~ Heien D,~, Nola~y Public
~ ~f fwl3,,'Cumbedand County
~; ~ion Exp r~ June 24 2002
;'~£' ~' ~ '
~: ~[~a~ Ass~iatio~ ot Notar~c,s
District Attorney
Cumberland Count'
Court House Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
Defendant:
Mathew Kennedy
Marie Hall
Jane Scott
Karen Edwards
Michael Carey
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do
hereby state and swear that at or about May 17, 2001, and through and about a
judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the following crimes:
1)
903. Criminal Conspiracy - a person is guilty of conspiracy with another
person or persons to commit a crime if with the intent of promoting or
facilitating its commission he: (1) agrees with such other person or
persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which
constitutes such crime; or (2) agrees to aid such other person or persons in
the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to
commit such crime.
2)
2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a
misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct
which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious
bodily injury.
3)
2902. Unlawful Restraint - a person commits a misdemeanor of the first
degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in circumstances
exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or (2) holds another in a
condition of involuntary servitude.
4)
2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if, with
intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment
of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse
anyone ora criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any
person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or ~vithhold action as an
official; or cause an official to take or withhold action.
5)
4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits
a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to
execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect
the pecuniary interest of any person.
6~
5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he
intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as
by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into
negotiable funds.
7)
5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in an
official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity
commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct
is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure,
mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of
personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the
exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity.
8)
5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a
public servant comm/ts a misdemeanor of the second degree if in
contemplation of official action by himself or by a government unit with
which he is associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access
in his official capacity and which has not been made public; he (1) acquires
a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be
affected by such information or official action; (3) aids another to do any of
the foregoing.
903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
2705 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
2902-1972,
2906-1972,
4114-1972,
5107-1972,
5301-1972,
5302-1972,
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
1482, No.
1482, No.
1482, No.
1482, No.
1482, No.
1482, No.
334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
334, 1, effective June 6, 1973.
I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true
and correct to the best of my kzmwledge or information and belief and that any
thlse statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the
Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unswom falsification to authorities.
Dated Ifft~/ol By (.~.'~-~. ~,~ ~
Cory A. Cormany° -'
INCIDENT REPOtkT
Criminal Conspiracy: In that Mathew Kennedy, Marie Hall, Jane Scott, Karen
Edwards and Michael Carey did solicit information pertinent to a conduct which
constitutes crime naming them Defendants. Reckless Endangering Another Person:
In that the Defendants did instigate an intentional reckless disregard for a judicial
or state procedure and a rule or statute of court engaging serious conduct
substantial a risk of bodily injury. Unlawful Restraint: In that the Defendants did
incarcerate and attempt to unlawfully restrain or cause restraint problematic a
directional servitude in the Cumberland County Prison and did not pe,nit
freedom unless provided an involuntary condition. Criminal Coercion: In that the
Defendants have accused or have caused accusation conclusive an appeal and have
subjected an individual to hatred and ridicule. Securing Execution of Documents
by Deception: In that the Defendants did not disclose requested public information
legitimate a rightful amended imposition demanded or regulated an authority that
did affect the likelihood of an individual liable an allegation. Aiding
Consummation of Crime: In that the Defendants did accomplish an unlawful
objective safeguarding an imposition relevant an intentional tort. Official
Oppression: In that the Defendants did subject an individual to arrest, detention,
assessment, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession and discrimination as well
as lying. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information: In that the
Defendants are public servants and have been subjected suit in a court of law
associated with a government unit and have deliberately pursued crime intentional
the case term 1:CV-01-1803 and the docket files NT-726-96, NT-727-96, NT-
777-01, NT~778-01, NT-779-01, NT-780-01 and NT-781-01 proceeding CR-574-
01 and the case numbers 01-92, 93, 94, 95, 96 and 97.
I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the
Defendants be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts
set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of
Section 4904 of the Crimes
falsification to authorities.
Dated
Dated
Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn
Signature
Signature
On May 17, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was babysitting in the 4th block of
North Pitt Street of Carlisle, Pennsylvania, for a female associate friend.
Proceed/_ng such action Mr. Mathew Kennedy did make frivolous and fraudulent
misallegation careless an objectional fact and an intentional fiction. The Defendant
Mathew Kennedy did suppress and submit information, costly a magisterial justice
number 09-2-01, slanderous an incident. I did receive such memorandum in the
marl noncertified an appearance.
On August 6, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was committed to the
Cumberland County Prison by Ms. Marie Hall, an Admissions Officer. I did
inform the Defendant Marie Hall that I did have a problem with commitment and
was filing a complaint, noting the colorful nature of the order of the court,
submissive a district justice. I was then directed to a prison cell proceeding this
inevitable problem.
On August 28, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, did submit a commissary order
through the accounts division of the Cumberland County Pr/son. Proceed/ng the
aforesaid date and rhetorical Ms. Jane Scott, my commissary delivery and request
was shorted a noticeable amount applicatory the transaction number 01-1403 and
CUM-91483 presidential the receipt number 91613. The Defendant Jane Scott did
not circumvent a merchandise or registered product and did also, prior to the
accounting dilemma, deny me meals and other items disproportionate a previous
commitment at the institution. Ms. Jane Scott is alleged to be the Deputy Warden
of Operation at Cumberland County Pr/son.
On September 12, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was coaxed and then attacked
and mistreated by the Mr. Mathew Kennedy in an attempt to remove my presence
from the Cumberland County Prison without an arrest warrant or security bond
thereafter and therefore a commitment summary. The Defendant Mathew
Kennedy did corroborate an event involving Ms. Marie Hall and a Corrections
Officer Teaney pursuant other prison officers and staffing associates and a
P.C.S.A. Title. Mr. Mathew Kennedy is alleged to be employed by the Borough
of Carlisle and the Cumberland County Prison is alleged to be located pursuant
and in Middlesex Township.
On October 19, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, did summons a request for a
prison "Status Sheet" in order to acknowledge a legal release date from the
institution. Pursuant the aforesaid date and on October 22, 2001, I did ask a Ms.
Karen Edwards for information regarding the said summary commitment. The
Defendant Karen Edwards did reply that she would not disclose such information
and did defer my request in writing. Ms. Karen Edwards is alleged to be the
Earned Time Case Manager at Cumberland County Prison.
On October 19. 2001, I. Cory. A. Cormany. did petition request for al
inmate "Handbook" in order to review necessary roles and regulations important a
treatment at the institution. Pursuant the aforesaid date and on October 22, 2001, I
did pursue the Warden Reitz of the Cumberland County Prison questionable both
a handbook and a status sheet causative a monetary object. Mr. Michael Carey did
recognize a written request and did defer the aforesaid and did not forward the
requested documentation. The Defendant Michael Carey also did not acknowledge
an additional petition I had submitted differentiating the foregoing release date. t
am not permitted to leave the county prison and return home and have yet to
receive a truthful answer or institutional document as to when I may. Mr. Michael
Carey is alleged to be the Deputy Warden of Security at Cumberland Count3,'
Prison.
I, CoryA. Cormany, onthis lto,Cx,, dayof .3, J..~,c-~ec- ,oftheyear
2001, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Commonwealth of the
United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Dated
Notarial Seal
Helen D. Sneed, Notary Public
Middlesex Tw~., Cumberland County
My Commission Expires June 24, 20(12
Member, Pennsylvania Association ot Notaries
PLAINTIFF
CORY A. CORMANY
~'. IN THE COURT OF COM,MON
PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
DEFENDANT
EARL RE1TZ JR., STEVE
CALAMAN, FRANK
TEANTY, CARL HEYWARD
OF THE CUMBERLAND
COUNTY PRISON, MATHEW
KENNEDY OF TIdE
CARLISLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM
DIEHL OF THE
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
D.A. AND PAULA CORREAL
CASE NO. 01-6467
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE
You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set
fbrth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after
the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally
or by attorney and by filing in writing with the Court your defense or objection to
the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case
may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court
without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THTE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE
YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Court Administrator
Cumberland County Court House
1 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA. 17013
CORY A. CORMANY
· IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
· CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
EARL F. REITZ, JR., ET AL.
: 01-6467 CIVIL TERM
AND NOW, this
ORDER OF COURT
day of November, 2001, the petition of CoryA.
Cormany to proceed without being required to pay fees, IS DENIED.
Cory A. Cormany, Pro se
1883 Douglas Dr.
Carlisle, PA 17013
and
Cumberland County Prison
1101 Claremont Road
Carlisle, PA 17013
:saa
TRUE COPY FROM RECO,~,D
In Testimony whereof, I here unto ~ ~ c'~y hand
aud the seal, of said Court at..grdi31e, Pa.
, o,
Prothonotary ' ~
RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT
Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office
Carlisle, Pa 17013
ReceJ.~i Date !1/28/200!
Recei~ Time ii:20;01
Receipt No. 119188
CORF=~NY CORY A (VS) REITZ EARL JR ET AL
Case Nusber 2001-0646'7
Received of PD CASH ROBERT CORMANY FATHER
JM
Total Check.,. + .00
Total Cash .... + 45.50
Change ........ - .00
Receipt total. = 45.50
Transaction Description
COMPLAINT
TAX ON CMPLT
SETTLEMENT
JCP FEE
DisTribution Of
Payment Amoun5
35.00
.50
5.00
5.00
Payment .............................
C~4BERLAND CO GENERAL FUND
BUREAU OF RECEIPTS AND CONTROL
C~4BERLAND CO GENERAL FUND
BUREAU OF RECEIPTS B2~D CONTROL
45.50
RE:
District Attorney
Cumberland County
Court House Square
Carlisle, Pa. 17013
Defendant:
Steve Calaman
Gary Sholenburger
Jeffrey Kurtz
Mathew Kennedy
Curtis Colbertson
Samuel Coover
Jeffrey Franks
Unidentified
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of
America, do hereby state and swear that at or about February, of the
year 1995, and through or about December, of the year 2001, the above
named defendant did commit the following crimes:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with
intent to commit a specific crime, he does any act which
constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that
crime.
2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General rule - a person is
guilty of involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the
doing of a lawful act in a reckless or grossly negligent manner,
he causes the death of another person. (b) Grading - Involuntary
manslaughter is a misdemeanor of the first degree where the victi~
is under 12 years of age and is in the care custody or control of
the person who caused the death involuntary manslaughter is a
felony of the second degree.
2701. Simple Assault - a person is guilty of assault if he: (1)
attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly
causes bodily injury to another; (2) negligently causes bodily
injury to another with a deadly weapon; or (3) attempts by
physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious
bodily injury.
2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits
a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in
conduct which places or may place another person in danger of
death or serious bodily injury.
2706. Terroristic Threats - a person is guilty of a misdemeanor
of the first degree if he threatens to commit any crime of
violence with intent to terroize another or cause evacuation of
a building, place of assembly, or facility of public transportation,
or otherwise to cause serious public inconvenience or in reckless
disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience.
2906. Criminal Coercion a person is guilty of criminal coercion
if; with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of
another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1)
commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal
offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to
hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as
an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action.
7)
8)
9)
lO)
ii)
i2)
13
14
3105. Prompt Complaint - prompt reporting to public authority
is not required in a prosecution under this chapter: Provided,
however, that nothing in this section shall be construed to
prohibit a defendant from introducing evidence of the alleged
victims failure to promptly report the crime if such evidence
would be admissible pursuant the rules of evidence.
3126. Indecent Assault - a person who has indecent contact
with another not his spouse, or causes such other to have
indecent contact with him is guilty of indecent assault a
misdemeanor of the second degree if: (1) he does so without
the consent of the other person; (2) he knows that the other
person suffers from a mental disease or defect which renders
him or her incapable of appraising the nature of his or her
conduct; (3) he knows that the other person is unaware that a
indecent contact is being committed; or (5) the other person is
in custody of law or detained in a hospital or other institution
and the actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over him.
4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person
commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he
causes another to execute any instrument affecting or purporting
to affect the pecuniary interest' of any person.
4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or
Political Matters - a person commits an offense if he: (1)
threatens unlawful harm to any person with intent to influence
his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other exercise of
discretion as a public servant, party official or voter.
4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action a person commits a
misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any lawful
act in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the later in the
capacity of public servant.
5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental
Function a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree
if he intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration
of law or other governmental function by force, violence, physical
inter£erence or obstacle, breach of official duty, or any unlawful
act, except that this section does not apply to flight by a person
charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to
perform a legal duty other than official duty, or any other means
of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference
with governmental function.
5121. Escape - a person commits an offense if he unlawfully
removes himself from official detention following temporary
granted for a specific purpose or limited period.
leave
5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act
in a official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or
purporting capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree
if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another to
arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession,
assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property
rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or
15
16
17
18)
enjoyment of any right,
privilege,
power or immunity.
5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information -
a public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in
contemplation of official action by himself or by a governmental
unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information
to which he has access in his official capacity and which has not
been made public he: (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any
property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by
such information or official action; (2) speculates or wagers on
the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids
another to do any of the foregoing.
5501. Riot a person is guilty of riot, a felony of the third
degree, if he participates with two or more others in a course of
disorderly conduct: (1) with intent to commit or facilitate the
c~mmissioh of a felony or misdemeanor; (2) with intent to prevent
or coerce official action; or (3) when the actor or any other
participant to the knowledge of the actor uses or plans to use a
firearm or deadly weapon.
5503. Disorderly Conduct - a person is guilty of disorderly
conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance
or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages
in fight or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior;
(2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene language, or makes
an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazard or physically
offensive condition by any act which serves no legitiment
purpose of the actor.
5726. Action for Removal from Office or Employment - any aggrieved
person shall have the right to bring an action in Commonwealth
Court against any investigative or law enforcement officer,
public official or public employee seeking the officer's, official's
or employee's removal from office or employment on the grounds
that the officer, official or employee has intentionally violated
the provisions of this chapter. If the court shall conclude that
such officer, official or employee has in fact intentionally
violated the provisions of this chapter, the court shall order the
dismissal or removal from office of said officer, official or
employee.
901 - 1972
2504- 1972
2701 - 1972.
2705 - 1972
2706 - 1972.
2906 - 1972.
3105 - 1972
Dec,
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
6, P.L. 1482, No.
6 P.L. 1482, No.
6 P.L. 1482, No.
6 P.L. 1482, No.
6 P.L. 1482, No.
6 P.L. 1482, No.
6 P.L. 1482, No.
334,
334
334
334
334
334
334
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
3126 1972,
4114 - 1972,
4702 1972,
4703 - 1972.
5101 - 1972
5121 1972
5301 1972
5302 1972
5501 1972
5503 1972
5726 1978,
Dec. 6
Dec. 6
Dec. 6
Dec. 6
Dec. 6
Dec. 6
Dec. 6,
Dec. 6,
Dec. 6,
Dec. 6,
Oct. 4,
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
P.L
1482
1482
1482
1482
1482
1482
1482
1482
1482
1482
831,
No. 334 1, effective June 6,
No.
NO.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
334
334
334
334
334
334,
334,
334,
334,
164, 2,
1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
effective in 60 days.
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in
the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.
C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated
Cory A. Cormany
S~ORN STATemeNT
On or a out
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was
Cumberland County Prison.
at approximately mid-day, the
in his assigned cell writing in
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was
abruptly and aggressively attacked and thrown to the floor,
then was probed with electronic shocking devices.
and
Proceeding the aforementioned described event, the Defendant
Steve Calaman, as identified from another occurrence and
accompanied by several unidentified individuals, did pillage
the Plaintiff and did ramshackle him causing a riskful and
harmful situation and circumstance.
On or about May 29th, at approximately mid-afternoon or thereto,
the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was serviced with summary
citations while reading legal textes in his assigned cell at
Cumberland County Prison.
Proceeding the aforementioned servicing definition, the Defendant
Jeffrey Franks, did proceed judiciary statutes corroborating
allegation with the Defendant Steve Calaman and another
individual without detecting a plaintiff's deposition or
investigating a defendant's disposition.
Prior thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications, the
Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was tied and fastened to a board,
probed and kicked repeatedly for an indefinite time period,
several occasions, litigating the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County Case No. 97-0174.
then
on
On or about September 6th, at approximately mid-morning, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was committed to the county prison
regarding a misdemeanor incident alleged in the Borough of
Carlisle.
Pursuant the aforementioned commitment status, the Plaintiff
was grabbed around the throat and choked close to
unconsciousness on two occasions, within a five minute time
spand, by the Defendant Gary Sholenburger prescient a
preliminary hearing.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant did push
the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany, by the neck into a corner area,
then into a secluded adjacent Cell while screaming and yelling
loud verbal obscenities verificative a Commitment Lieutenant
Over.
10.
On or about February 5th, at approximately early-morning, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was walking swiftly home down Irvin
Row in the Borough of Carlisle.
il.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A.
Cormany was grappled and pummeled in and out of an automobile
by several unidentified individuals, and then committed to the
Carlisle Hospital.
12.
Proceeding the aforementioned commitment process, the Plaintiff
was questioned and interrogated without constitutional warning
as to his injuries, and was then bondaged and secured without
warrant careless the Defendant Jeffrey Kurtz.
13.
On or about May 17th, at approximately mid-afternoon, the Plaintiff,
Cory A. Cormany, was summoned a series of allegations regarding
a subject matter collaborated in the Borough of Carlisle.
14.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A.
Cormany was issued five citations, relevant a babysitting detail,
and serviced noncertified through the U.S. Mail.
15.
Proceeding thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications, the
Plaintiff was grabbed again around the throat and choked by the
Defendant Mathew Kennedy, then tackled and pummeled in and out of
a secured location, nonconsensual an optional hearing, litigating
16.
17.
the Court
of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No. ~!-0~.
On or about September 12th, at approximately mid-morning, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was pummeled and grappled in and out
of an automobile pursuant a choking incident a~ the Cumberland
County Prison.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant Curtis
Colbertson, along with several unidentified individuals and a
Staffing Sergeant Teaney, did bondage and scratch and protract
the Plaintiff, putting him in a prison holding cell.
18.
Prior thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications, the
Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did consider a summary issue appeal
and did decide a contentional matter therein, communicative a
radical situation and circumstance, and did later seek medical
attention despite such enveloped caution.
19.
On or about October 2nd, at approximately early-afternoon or
thereto, the Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was bondaged and
forcibly intimidated, then escorted and stripped in a secured
holding area in the Cumberland County Prison.
20.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, numerous unidentified
individuals did proceed the actions described, and did not
service the Plaintiff with a court order as he did request
prescient such said scheduled activity.
21.
Prior the foregoing the Defendant Jeffrey Franks, did proceed
judiciary litigations provoking an intentional medium
conspiratorial the Defendant Mathew Kennedy and the District
Justice No. 09-2-01 relevant an Order.
22.
At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Defendant Jeffrey
Franks did investigate a complaint liable the county district
attorney; without depositioning a defendant or dispositioning a
plaintiff preponderate an instigation.
23.
Proceeding the aforementioned scheduled activity, the Defendant
Samuel Coover did inform the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany and
numerous other unidentified individuals, that there was to be a
training exercise using them differentiated an advisory.
24.
25.
Pursuant the foregoing the Plaintiff has questioned motive and
intent substantial a requisite criminal behavior, and political
the conspiratorial allegations enstated during and throughout
the eventful occasions defined, wherein the Plaintiff does feel
victimized as an individual residence of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
The Defendants Steve Calaman, Gary Shoienburger, Jeffrey Kurtz,
Mathew Kennedy, Curtis Colbertson, Samuel Coover and Jeffrey
Franks have violated constitutional provisions regardless an
electorial intiative and ~ave influenced propaganda and media
costly the United States of America.
26.
The Plaintiff has suffered and Las sustained injuries, abusive
and negligible treatment, stressful and constant condemnation
punishible other obligatfons and wrongful sctions pursuant
immunilogical criminal ramifications, and-preponderate further
civil litigat~mns constitutional a decisional consideration.
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in
the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.
C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
W it nes2~ '
Cory
Dar ed /-~/~q ~///
District Attorney
Cumberland County
Court House Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
Defendant:
William Diehl
Paula Correal
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do
hereby state and swear that at or about the said incidents set forth within, and
through and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant[s] did commit
the following crimes:
1)
901. Criminal Attempt - a person commits an attempt when, with intent to
commit a specific crime, he does any act which constitutes a substantial step
toward the commission of that crime.
2)
2502. Murder - murder of the first degree - a criminal homicide constitutes
murder of the first degree when it is committed by an intentional killing.
3)
2903. False Imprisonment ~ a person commits a misdemeanor of the second
degree if he knowingly restrains another tmlawfully so as to interfere
substantially with his liberty.
4)
2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if, with
intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment
of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse
anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any
person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an
official; or cause an official to take or withhold action.
5)
4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits
a misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to
execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect
the pecuniary interest of any person.
6)
4501. Definitions "Harm" - loss, disadvantage or injury, or anything so
regarded by the person affected, including loss, disadvantage or injury to
any person or entity in whose welfare he is interested.
7)
4952. Intimidation of Witness or Victims - a person commits an offense if,
with the intent to or knowledge that his conduct will obstruct, impede,
impair, prevent or interfere with the administration of criminal justice he
8)
9)
10)
intimidates or attempts to intimidate any witness or victim to: (1) Refrain
from informing or reporting to any law enforcement officer, prosecuting
official or judge concerning any information, document or thing relating to
the commission of a crime. (2) Give any false or misleading information
or testimony relating to the commission of any crime to any law
enforcement officer, prosecuting official or judge. (3) Withhold any
testimony, information, document or thing relating to the commission of a
crime from any law enforcement officer, prosecuting official or judge. (4)
Give any false or misleading testimony, information, document or thing,
relating to the commission of a crime to an attorney representing a
criminal defendant. (5) Elude, evade or ignore any request to appear or
legal process summoning him to appear to testify or supply evidence. (6)
Absent himself from any proceeding or investigation to which he has been
legally summoned.
5108. Compounding - a person commits a misdemeanor of the second
degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in
consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities
the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information
relating to any offense.
5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act in an
official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity
commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct
is illegal, he (1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure,
mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien or other infringement of
personal or property rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the
exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity.
5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a
public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in
contemplation of official action by himself or by a government unit with
which he is associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access
in his official capacity and which has not been made public; he (1) acquires
a pecuniary interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be
affected by such information or official action; (2) speculates or wagers on
the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids another to do
any of the foregoing.
11) 5125. Absconding Witness - a person commits a misdemeanor of the third
degree if, having been required by virtue of any legal process or otherwise
to attend and testify in any prosecution for a crime before any court, judge,
justice or other judicial tribunal, or having been recognized or held to bail
to attend as a witness on behalf of the Commonwealth or defendant, before
any court having jurisdiction, to testify in any prosecution, he unlawfully
and willfully conceals himself or absconds from this Commonwealth, or
from the jurisdiction of such court, with intent to defeat the end of public
justice, and refuses to appear as required by such legal process or otherwise.
5501. Riot - a person is guilty of riot, a felony of the third degree, if he
participates with two or more others in a course of disorderly conduct: (1)
with intent to commit or facilitate the commission of a felony or
misdemeanor; (2) with intent to prevent or coerce official action; or (3)
when the actor or any other participant to the knowledge of the actor uses
or plans to use a firearm or deadly weapon.
901
2502
2903
2906
4114
4501
4952
5108
5301
5302
5125
5501
- 1972, Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
~ 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
- 1972 Dec. 6,
P.L. '1482, No. 334,
P.L. 1482, No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.LJ 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482 No. 334,
P.L. 1482, No. 334,
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
I, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
i, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6, 1973.
I, Cory Connany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the
Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated /~/;)/~'l By
~ory Al
INCIDENT REPORT
Criminal Attempt: In that William Diehl and Paula Conceal did take substantial
steps toward the commission of a crime constitutional a Defendant. Murder: In
that the Defendants did intentionally plan a potential homicide problematic an
isolated statute that constituted a necessary riskful procedure. False Imprisonment:
In that the Defendants did knowingly attempt to unlawfully restrain and interfere
with the liberty of an individual. Criminal Coercion: In that the Defendants did
restrict freedom of action intentional a criminal offense and deliberate an
accusation exposing secrets and subjects contemptual an official hatred. Securing
Execution of Documents by Deception: In that the Defendants did deceive an
individual purporting a pecuniary interest likely the execution of a testimonial
instrument. Harm: In that the Defendants did proceed judiciary affectiveness
causing an individual a loss and a disadvantage substantial an important interest.
Intimidation of Witness or Victims: In that the Defendants did relate information
misleading a judicial object intimidating a person reportorial a testimony and
prosecutorial an official action. Compounding: In that the Defendants did refrain
the suspected commission of a crime considerate a pecuniary benefit reliant an
information. Official Oppression: In that the Defendants did knowingly deny and
impede an individual illegally purporting arrest, detention, search, seizure,
mistreatment, dispossession, assessment and personal right while taking advantage
of an official capacity. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or
Information: In that the Defendants are public servants and are associated with a
government unit and do transact interest informative an official action and did
access another in such speculation. Absconding Witness: In that the Defendants
did process an individual on behalf of the Commonwealth and did willfully
conceal a jurisdiction intentional the end of public justice refusing legal
obligations. Riot: In that the. Defendants did participate with one or more
individuals coercing the commission of a crime including the uses of firearms and
knowledgable an official action intentional the case term 1 :CV-01-1803 and the
docket files NT-767-96, NT-727-96, NT-777-01, NT-778-01, NT-779-01, NT-
780-01 and NT-781-01 proceeding CR-574-01 and the case numbers 01-92, 93,
94, 95, 96 and 97.
I petition that a warrant of arrest.or a summons be issued and that the
Defendants be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts
set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief. This
Section 4904 of the Crimes
falsification to authorities.
Datffd
Dated
verification is made subject to the penalties of
Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn
Signature
Signature
Notarial Seal
Helen D. S~eed, Notary Public
Middlesex Tw~,, CumDetland C~nly
My Commission ~ xpires Ju~e 24, 2002
Member, Pennsylvania Association of Notaries
AFFIDAVIT
On September 12, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was summoned and then
attacked and mistreated at the Cumberland County Prison in an attempt to remove
my presence pursuant thereafter and therefore a commitment summary. A Ptl.
Mathew Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department did forcibly and negligibly
corroborate an event without an arrest warrant or security bond including prison
officers and staffing associates. I was subjected an arms length contemptual Ms.
Paula Correal in Middlesex Township. The Defendant Paula Correal is alleged to
be a District Justice Magisterial Number 09-2-01 in Cumberland County.
Pursuant the incident described in the aforementioned paragraph ! did
witness a Corrections Officer Teaney solicit information reportorial the Ptl.
Mathew Kennedy, and directional other prison officers and staffing associates. I
was not informed or serviced with any information forthright a procedural
requirement and was bondaged and confined, against my will, for an indefinite
time period. Cumberland County Prison did compile multiple personnel
objectional my comprehension; that, did seem to constitute a "Security Breach"
functional an emergency situation or circumstance. I was ridiculed and allegated
purportionate a disadvantage and indifferent the commission of a crime which did
absent and abscond an evidence and a testimony for the Criminal Case Term 01-
2091.
On October 16, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, was delivered a certified letter
criminative Mr. William Diehl and affirmative Ms. Paula Correal. Prior to
October 2, 2001, and prescient May 29, 1996, the Defendant William Diehl did
prejudicially proceed an investigation pursuant a Det. Jeffery Franks, and the
Defendant Paula Correal. On both occasions Defendant Paula Correal did concur
Mr. William Diehl and did elude unlawful participation relative the Cumberland
County Prison, and orderly a public servant and an official action. Proceeding
justification and judgment for incident and issues stated within; I was shot at and
beaten out of malice knowledgable the District Attorney of Cumberland County.
The Defendant William Diehl is alleged to be a Detective for the District Attorney
in Cumberland County.
Prior the incident described in the aforementioned paragraph, I did perform
a baby-sitting task for a Ms. Nicole Jastron verifiable a Mr. Jerry Engle in the 4th
block area of North Pitt Street located in the Borough of Carlisle. I did proceed
official interlocutory consent to a Ptl. Patrick O'Leary of the Carlisle Police
Department, relevant a hearing, important the potentated outcome of an evidence
and an investigation. Cumberland County Prison did proceed multiple sentences
objectional my commitment; that, did seem to constitute a "Police Action"
colorful an emergency situation or circumstance. I was ridiculed and allegated
purportionate a disadvantage and indifferent the commission of a crime which did
substantiate and enforce a legality and an attorney for the Civil Case Term 01-
6467.
On December 7, 2001, 1, Cory A. Cormany, was interrogated and then
informed and accused at the Cumberland County Prison in an effort to collaborate
an official hatred intentional a lively endangerment and justifiably political a
departmental correction, denying me witnesses. An Attorney Dirk E. Berry did
acquire representation factual a prison policy and did remand specific instances to
a Corrections Officer Teaney prejudicial a documented pecuniary benefit. Mr.
William Diehl did sequester an affidavit intimate a prison directive for Ms. Paula
Correal. The Defendant William Diehl and the Defendant Paula Correal both did
knowingly interfere with my liberty constituting the suspected commission of a
crime. I was subjected detention, arrest, search, seizure, mistreatment,
dispossession, assessment and propaganda sufficient a privilege and important an
enjoyment.
Preceding the incident described in the aforementioned paragraph, I did
proceed courtesy letters to Ms. Paula Correal and Mr. William Diehl suspicious a
defendant, naming; Steve Calaman, Carl Heyward, Frank Teaney, Mathew
Kennedy and William Diehl allegory a criminal behavior and a supplemental
expectation, and relative a motive and an offense. The Defendant William Diehl
and the Defendant Paula Correal both did facilitate the exportation of deadly force
jurisdictional a public justice and did expropriate an official action liable a court
of law. The Corrections Officer Teaney, identified herein and hereto, did later
advise me that I was dismissed pursuant thereafter and therefore a commitment
summary, and did not express reason as to why I could not leave Cumberland
County Prison and return home to my place of residence. I do currently reside in
North Middleton Township and was employed with K-Mart Corporation previous
to being condemned to imprisonment. The Cumberland County Prison and the
State Correctional Institute of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania both proclaim
the ability to execute death upon leaving without valid consideration. I am
awaiting detrimental instruments deceptive the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County.
I, Cory A. Cormany, on this .8~day of {7)e-ce..~¼er- _, of the year
2001, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Commonwealth of the
United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Cory A. ~orman~'
-- Dated Witness
PLAINTIFF
CORY A. CORMANY
go
DEFENDANT
STEPI-IEN L. MARGESON,
TId~, ADMINISTRATION
AND STAFF OF THE
CARLISLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MARIE
HALL, JANE SCOTT,
KAREN EDWARDS AND
MICHAEL CAREY OF THE
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PRISON
1N THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA
CASE NO. 1:CV-02-0046
GRIEVANCE ACTION
JURY TRIAL\JUDGMENT
NOTICE
You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set
forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after
the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally
or by attorney and by filing in writing with the Court your defense or objection to
the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case
may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court
without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE
YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Court Administrator
U. S. District Court
228 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA. 17101
Case No: 1;02-cv-46
Document No: 8. 1 Copy Printed: Feb, 20, 2002 02:34 PM
Cory A. Cormany
CTY-CUMB
Cumberland County Prison
1101 Claremont Road
Carlisle, PA 17013
The U. S, District Court for the Middle District of PA has
established a Fax/Noticing Program effective 2/1/02.
To participate in the program, and receive notices of orders
and judgments by electronic means, please complete the
authorization form attached.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CORY A. CORMANY,
Plaintiff
V.
STEPHEN L. MARGESON, et al.,
Defendants
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-02-0046
(Judge Rainbo)
(Magistrate Judge Blewit0
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the undersigned has entered the foregoing
Report and Recommendation dated Febmaryo('~>~)2002.
Any party may obtain a review of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to
Rule 72,3, which provides:
Any party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings,
recommendations or report addressing a motion or matter described in
28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) or making a recommendation for the
disposition of a prisoner case or a habeas corpus petition within ten (10J
days after being served with a copy thereof. Such party shall file
with the clerk of court, and serve on the magistrate judge and all
parties, written objections which shall specifically identify the
portions of the proposed findings, recommendations or report to which
obiection is made and the basis for such objections. The briefing
requirements set forth in Local Rule 72.2 shall apply. A judge shall
make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection
is made and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings
or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge, however,
need conduct a new hearing only in his or her discretion or where
required by law, and may consider the record developed before the
magistrate judge, making his or her own determination on the basis
of that record. The judge may also receive further evidence, recall
witnesses or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with
instructions.
THOMAS M. BLEWITT
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: Februar~_~ 2002
RE:
District Attorney
Cumberland County
Court House Square
Carlisle, Pa. 17013
Def~endant~
Thbmas Kline, The
Administration and Staff of
the Cumberland County Sheriff
Office
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of
America, do hereby state and swear that in and about the actions and
incidents stated herein, and through and about a judgment stated hereto,
the above named defendant did commit the following crimes:
1)
902. Criminal Solicitation - a person is guilty of solicitation
to commit a crime with the intent of promoting or facilitating
its commission he commands, encourages or requests another person
to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime
or an attempt to commit such crime or which would establish his
complicity in its commission or attempted commission.
2)
2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General rule a person is
guilty of involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the
doing of a lawful act in a reckless or grossly n~gligent manner,
he causes the death of another person. (b) Grading - Involuntary
manslaughter is a misdemeanor of the first degree, where the
victim is under 12 years of age and is in the care custody or
control of the person who caused the death involuntary manslaughter.
is a felony of the second degree.
3)
2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits
misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in
conduct which places or may place another person in danger of
death or serious bodily injury.
a
4)
2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary ofiense when, with
intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes,
shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or
attempts or threatens to do the same; or (2) he follows a person
in or about a public place or places; or (3) he engages in a course
of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously
annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose.
5)
2902. Unlawful Restraint - a person commits a misdemeanor of the
first degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in
circumstances exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or
(2) holds another in a condition of involuntary servitude.
6)
2903. False Imprisonment a person commits a misdemeanor of the
second degree if he knowingly restrains another unlawfully so as
to interfere substantially with his liberty.
7)
2906~ Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion
if; with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of
another to the detriment of the other, he threatens to: (1) commit
any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3)
expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt
8)
9)
lO)
ii)
12)
or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official,
cause an official to take or withh~]d ~ctinn.
or
3503. Criminal Trespass - a person commits an offense if, knowing
that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he (i) enters,
gains entry by subterfuge or surreptitiously remains in any
building or occupied structure or seperately secured or occupied
portion thereof; or (ii) breaks into any building or occupied
structure or seperately secured or occupied portion thereof. (2)
An offense under paragraph (1)(i) is a felony of the third degree,
and an offense under paragraph (1)(ii) is a felony of the second
degree. (3) As used in this subsection: "Breaks into." To gain
entry by force, breaking, intimidation, unauthorized opening of
locks, or through an opening not designed for human access.
3923. Theft 'by Extortion - a person is guilty of theft if he
intentionally obtains or withholds property of another by
threatening to: (1) commit another criminal offense; (2) accuse
anyone of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to
subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; (4) take or
withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or
withhold action; (5) bring about or continue a strike or boycott
or other collective unofficial action, if the property is not
demanded or received for the benefit of the group in whose interest
the actor purports to act; (6) testify or provide information or
withhold testimony or information with respect to the legal claim
or defense of another; or (7) inflict any other harm which would
not benefit the actor.
5301. Official Oppression - a person acting or purporting to act
in a official capacity er taking advantage of such actual or
purporting capacity commits a misdemeanor of the second degree
if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he (1) subjects another
to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession,
assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property
rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or
enjoyment of any right, privilege, power or immunity.
5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information -
a public servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in
contemplation of official action by himself or by a governmental
unit with which he is associated, or in reliance on information
to which he has access in his official capacity and which has not
been made public he: (1) acquires a pecuniary interest in any
property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by
such information or official action; (2) speculates or wagers on
the basis of such information or official action; or (3) aids
another to do any of the foregoing.
5726. Action for Removal from Office or Employment any aggrieved
person shall have the right to bring an action in Commonwealth
Court against any investigative or law enforcement officer,
public official or public employee seeking the officer's, official's
or employee's removal from office or employment on the grounds
that the officer, official or employee has intentionally violated
the provisions of this chapter· If the court shall conclude that
such officer, official or employee has in
violated the provisions of this chapter,
the dismissal or removal
from office of
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334,
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334,
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334
Oct. 4, P.L. 831, No. 164,
fact intentionally
the court shall order
said officer, official
or employee.
902 - 1972,
2504 1972.
2705 1972.
2709 1972
2902 1972.
2903 1972
2906 1972
3503 1972.
3923 1972
5301 1972
5302 1972
5728 1978
1, effective June 6,
1, effective June 6
1, effective June 6
1, effective June 6
1, effective June 6
1 effective June 6
1 effective June 6
1 effective June 6
1 effective June 8
1 effective June 6
1 effective June 6
2, effective in
1973.
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
60 days.
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in
the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief, and that any false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.
C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated c~/] /f'~ ,:~. By
· Cormany
SWORN STATEMENT
1. On or about April 16, 1986, and pursuant thereto or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from the
Cumberland County Prison.
2. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline,
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
or
3. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions and unreliable incidents
unconstitutional a due process.
4. On or about June 19, 1987, and pursuant thereto or..therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from the
Cumberland County Prison.
5. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline,
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare.arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
or
6. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany was all~¢ated and accused of actions and unreliable incidents
unconstitutional a due process.
7. On or about June 7, 1988, and pursuant thereto or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from the
Cumberland County Prison.
8. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline,
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
or
9. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions and unreliable incidents
unconstitutional a due process.
10. On or about March 28, 1989, and pursuant thereto or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from the
Cumberland County Prison.
11. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline, or
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
12. At or about the aforesaid date and time,
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions
unconstitutional a due process.
the Plaintiff Cory
and unreliable incidents
13. On or about October 1, 1989, and pursuant thereto or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from the
Cumberland County Prison.
14. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline, or
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
15. At or about the aforesaid date and time,
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions
unconstitutional a due process.
the Plaintiff Cory
and unreliable incidents
16. On or about February 24/ 199I, and pursuant thereto or therein,
the Plaintiff, Cory cormany, was admitted and transported to or from
the Cumberland County Prison.
17. Prior the foregoing statement~ the De'fendant Thomas Kline, or
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
18. At or about the aforesaid date and time,
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions
unconstitutional a due process.
the Plaintiff Cory
and unreliable incidents
19. On or about June 21, 1992, and pursuant thereto or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from the
Cumberland County Prison.
20. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline,
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
or
21. At or about the aforesaid date and time,
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions
unconstitutional a due process.
the Plaintiff Cory
and unreliable incidents
22. On or about February 19, 1995, and pursuant thereto or therein,
the Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from
the Cumberland County Prison.
23. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline,
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
or
24. Prescient the aforementioned described event, the Defendant
Kenneth Gossert, a member of the C.C.S.O., did aggressively brutalize
and attack the Plaintiff, careless the Carlisle Police Department.
25. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions and unreliable incidents
unconstitutional a due process.
26. Preceding the aforementioned described event, the Defendant
Richard Smith, a member of the C.C.S.O., did confiscate private property
from with in private property, prescient the order of the court.
27. Pursuant the foregoing incident, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany was
not ever returned the said Private property (motorcycle); as per the
order of the court and the Carlisle Police Department.
28. On or about October 30, 1997, and pursuant thereto or therein,
the Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from
the Cumberland County Prison.
29. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline, or
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
30. Proceeding the aforementioned described event, the Defendant
Trevor Kent, a member of the C.C.S.O., did obfuscate a verbal
ramification Withgut a:?Dyescription of a miranda warning.
31. Pursuant the foregoing incident, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany did
correct an informative propaganda, prescient the order of the court,
and did recognize the Honorable Commonwealth Judge Bayley.
32. At or about the aforesaid date and time,
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions
unconstitutional a due process.
the Plaintiff Cory
and unreliable incidents
33. On or about August 6, 2001, and pursuant thereto or therein,
the Plaintiff, Cory Cormany, was admitted and transported to or from
the Cumberland County Prison.
34. Prior the foregoing statement, the Defendant Thomas Kline,
affiliated associate, did knowingly and willfully bare arms and
bondage the Plaintiff submissive a criminal intention.
or
35. Proceeding the aforementioned described event, the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany was forced into a wrongful situation and circumstance, against
the order of the court, negligible the Cumberland County Sheriff
Office.
36. Pursuant the foregoing incident, the Defendant Thomas Kline, an
elected official, did corroborate incident and action, and did exercise
nondiscretion admissive the county prison for the Court of Common
Pleas of Cumberland County Case Nos. 01-2091 and 01-0494.
37. At or about the aforesaid date and time,
Cormany was allocated and accused of actions
unconstitutional a due process.
the Plaintiff
and unreliable
Cory
incidents
38. The Defendants did cause a reasonable suspicion of doubt
deliberate a requisite criminal intention, and political the solicit
allegations enstated during and throughout the eventful occasions
defined, wherein the Plaintiff Cory Cormany feels victimized as an
individual residence of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
39. The Plaintiff has suffered and sustained injury, abusive and
wrongful treatment, stressful and constant condemnation punishible
other faults and prejudices involving also the uses of firearms,
wherefore additional filings include a Defendant Lyle Herr, Samuel
Coover, Dirk Berry, Edmund Zigmund and a Detective Diehl of the
Cumberland County.
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth
in the above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief, and that any false statements herein are
made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code
(18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated
Notarial Seal
Helen D. Sneed, Notan/Pubtic
Mi~4esex 'twp., Cumberland County
My Commission Ex,ires June 24, 2~02
MernDer, Pennsylvania Association ot Notaries
SERVICE RECEIPT
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that I delivered the
criminal matters invoiving Defendants Thomas Kline and associates
by depositing in the mail pursuant hereto and addressable herein
the District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County at Carlisle,
Pennsylvania.
'Dated Cory A. Cormany
Witness
Witness
SERVICE FILE
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that I petitioned the
criminal reports involving the D~fendants John Adams, John Porter,
Terry Darr, Greg Deihl, Pall] Green and Frank Teaney by depositing in
the mail pursuant hereto and addressable herein the District Attorney's
Office of Cumberland County at Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
Dated
- Cory A, Corm~ny~
Witness
N~r~ ~
Attorney General
U. S. District Court
228 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Defendant:
Jeffrey Franks
Edmund Zigmund
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do
hereby state and swear that at or about May 29th, of the year 1996, and through
and about a judgmental action, the above named defendant did commit the
following crimes:
1)
902. Criminal Solicitation - a person is guilty of solicitation to commit a
crime if with the intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he
commands, encourages or request another person to engage in specific
conduct which would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such
crime or which would establish his complicity in its commission or
attempted commission.
2)
2705. Recklessly Endangering Another Person - a person commits a
misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct
which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious
bodily injury.
2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent
to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1) he strikes, shoves, kicks or
otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the
same, or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3)
he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm
or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose.
4)
3105. Prompt Complaint - a prompt reporting of public authority is not
required in a prosecution under this chapter: Provided, however, that
nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from
introducing evidence of the alleged victim's failure to promptly report the
crime if such evidence would be admissible pursuant to the rules of
evidence.
5)
3126. Indecent Assault - a person who has indecent contact with another not
his spouse, or causes such other to have indecent contact with him is guilty
of indecent assault a misdemeanor of the second degree if: (1) he does so
without the consent of the other person; (2) he knows that the other person
suffers from a mental disease or defect which renders him or her incapable
of appraising the nature of his or her conduct; (3) he knows that the other
person is unaware that an indecent contact is being committed; or (5) the
other person is in custody of law or detained in a hospital or other
institution and the actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over him.
6)
4703. Retaliation for Past Official Action - a person commits a
misdemeanor of the second degree if he harms another by any unlawful act
in retaliation for anything lawfully done by the latter in the capacity of a
public servant.
7)
5101. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Governmental Function
- a person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he intentionally
obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law or other
governmental function by force, violence, physical interference or obstacle,
breach of official duty, or any other unlawful act, except that this section
does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to
arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any
other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative
interference with governmental functions.
8)
5107. Aiding Consummation of Crime - a person commits an offense if he
intentionally aids another to accomplish an unlawful object of a crime, as
by safeguarding the proceeds thereof or converting the proceeds into
negotiable funds.
9)
5108. Compounding- a person commits a misdemeanor of the second
degree if he accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit in
consideration of refraining from reporting to law enforcement authorities
the commission or suspected commission of any offense or information
relating to an offense.
10)
5121. Escape - a person commits an offense if he unlawfully removes
himself from official detention following temporary leave granted for a
specific purpose or limited period.
11)
5503. Disorderly Conduct ~ a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with
intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly
creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages in fight or threatening, or in violent
or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene
language, or makes an obscene gesture, or (4) creates a hazardous or
physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate
purpose of the actor.
12)
5726. Action for Removal from Office or Employment - any aggrieved
person shall have the right to bring an action in Commonwealth Court
against any investigative or law enforcement officer, public official or
public employee seeking the officer's, official's or employee's removal
from office or employment on the grounds that the officer, official or
employee has intentionally violated the provisions of this chapter. If the
court shall conclude that such officer, official or employee has infact
intentionally violated the provisions of this chapter the cottrt shall order the
dismissal or removal from office of said officer, official or employee.
902- 1972.
2705 - 1972
2709- 1972
3105- 1972
3126- 1972
4703- 1972
5101 - 1972
5107- 1972,
5108- 1972,
5121- 1972,
5503 - 1972,
5726- 1972,
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P,L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Dec. 6, P.L.
Oct. 4, P.L.
1482, No. 334,
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
1482, No. 334.
831, No. 164,
1, effective June 6, 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
1, effective June 6 1973.
2, effective in 60 days.
I, Cory Cormany, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief and that any
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the
Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unswom falsification to authorities.
Dated ,42/c~ 4/~c ~ By
Cory A. Corrnany r',J
INCIDENT REPORT
Criminal Solicitation: In that Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund did attempt to
command and request the commission of a crime intentional a specific conduct
encouraged a Defendant or establish a complicity promotional the Defendants.
Recklessly Endangering Another Person: In that the Defendants did solicit to
recklessly engage in conduct that seriously endangered or did endanger another
individual person. Harassment: In that the Defendants did attempt to contact and
solicit a course of conduct that seriously annoyed a person for no legitimate
purpose threatening further physical, mental and emotional harm. Prompt
Complaint: In that the Defendants did provide an evidence in which to pursue and
construe an authorized report. Indecent Assault: In that the Defendants did solicit
a knowledgeable intention capable of an indecent conduct applicative an
institution or a legal custody, and a mental illness. Retaliation for Past Official
Action: In that the Defendants did solicit a lawful act knowing that the capacity of
a latter is harmful a public service. Obstructing Administration of Law or Other
Governmental Function: In that the Defendants did obstruct a criminal
administration affirmative a governmental function. Aiding Consummation of
Crime: In that the Defendants did intentionally aid another to accomplish a crime
thereof an official action. Compounding: In that the Defendants did agree to
accept a pecuniary benefit considerate an official action, and did not report or
enforce a suspected offense. Escape: In that the Defendants did solicit to
unlawfully remove an individual from an official commitment pecuniary the order
of the court. Disorderly Conduct: In that the Defendants did annoy and threaten an
individual into fight, using gesture and documentation hazardous a physically
offensive condition which served no legitimate purpose. Action for Removal from
Office or Employment: In that the Defendants are public servants or official
employees and did investigate an aggrieved person deliberately violating
constitutional provisions intentional the case term 1 :CV-95-0844 and the docket
files NT-187-00, NT-188-00, NT-189-00, NTol90-00, NT-205-00, NT-748-00,
NT-770-00 and NT-839-00 proceeding CR-574-01 and the case numbers 97-0174
and 01-0432.
I petition that a warrant of arrest or a summons be issued and that the
Defendant be required to answer the charges I have made. I verify that the facts
set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of
Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
Dated
Signature
Dated
· Signature
AFFIDAVIT
On May 29, 1996, I, Cory A. Cormany, did receive a summons preceding
an investigation implemented by Mr. Jeffrey Franks, affirmative and pursuant
Mr. Edmund Zigmund, and aIlegary an indecent incident having occurred in
Cumberland County Prison. The Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund
did solicit to the conspiratorial actions of a C. O. Steve Calaman, and did criticize
and engage a reckless disregard for my life. The Defendants did annoy me and
service me with complaints, causing and requiring me to appear forcible a court of
law; also involving a Ptl. Mathew Kennedy of the Carlisle Police Department, less
be subjected and obstructed further incident and confinement. The Defendants
were employed through the Cumberland County District Attorney complicated
reliant a local payroll, and preponderant a governmental unit.
Proceeding the actions and events described in the aforementioned
paragraph, I did file a complaint with the common pleas court, civil case term
number 96-1969. Mr. Jeffrey Franks did pursue a hearing regarding an official
duty and did avoid criminal ramifications important the District Attorney's Office
of Cumberland County. The Defendant Jeffrey Franks did document issues for a
Der. William Diehl and did initiate judicial proceedings determinative a D. J.
Paula Correal. I had been subjected a differentiating condemnation prior to, and
pursuant to, the said judicious matter,
On June 21, 1997, I, Cory A. Cormany, did submit to an attack and other
criminative compulsions set forth against my person by a Ptl,Shane Cohick, a Ptl.
Karen Finkenbinder, and a Ptl. Joseph Hogarth also of the Carlisle Police
Department. The Defendant Jeffrey Franks did implement unconstiuent
presidential findings substantial the Cumberland County District Attorney costing
and causing a constitutional dilemma. I was beaten, gagged and bondaged by the
aforementioned individuals while I was attempting to throw away a small amount
of garbage into a trash dispenser. I did file a complaint in the common pleas court
purposeful a relief and a justification; for the criminal case term number 9%1504.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has not officially adjudicated or finalized a
decisional consideration pecuniary an interesting benefit or authorized report,
substantial the administrative findings set forth within.
Preceding the aforesaid litigation, a Ptl. David Tilden, again of the Carlisle
Police Department, did break-in; and attack me, in the middle of the night at my
house and home without warrant following an alleged criminal report; noteworthy
a deceptive informative evidence. Mr. Jeffrey Franks, nor the aforementioned Det.
William Diehl, would acknowledge the alleged incident forthright my contacting
and complaining of inaccurate facts and propaganda to the District Attorney or the
Public Defender's Office of Cumberland County; nor, by a Ms. Tracey Gibson
contacting and complaining of the said same situation and circumstance. An
Attorney William Gabaig did renounce judiciary issues in and before the defined;
"Patrol Officer" did investigate, and did assure on and about the occasion
pronounced that he was quote, "not responsible."
On October 2, 2001, I, Cory A. Cormany, did reconcile a certification to
the Cumberland County District Attorney concurrent to, and prior to, a
criminative incident having occurred in Cumberland County Prison on September
12, 2001. The Det. William Diehl did solicit to the conspiratorial actions of the
aforementioned Ptl. Mathew Kennedy; who did circumvent a reckless disregard
for my life pursuant the Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund. On
October 22, 2001, and December 24, 2001, I did approve notarial complaints to
the county district attorney questionable the civil case term number 01-6467 and
the said; criminal case term number 01-2536. The Defendants did annoy me and
did charge me with complaint causing and requiring me to appear again forcible a
court of law; also involving the D. J. Paula Correal of the Cumberland County,
less be subjected and obstructed further incident and confinement. The Defendants
did associate an affirmation through the Cumberland County Clerk of Court
responsive a surety issue, and calculated probable a governmental unit.
Prior the actions and events described in the aforementioned paragraph, I
did /lie a complaint with the district circuit court case term number i:CV-01-
1803. The Det: William Diehl of the Cumberland County D.A. did proceed an
affidavit illicit an official duty and did avoid criminal allegation and rule of court
important Mr. Edmund Zigmund. I had been subjected discriminatory
mistreatments reliable such said legal objects, evidentiary Mr. Jeffrey Franks. The
Defendant Edmund Zigmund did document issues liable Det. William Diehl and
did determine judicial allegation sufficient the Defendant Jeffrey Franks. I had
been segregated and confined an argumentative commitment prior to, and again
pursuant to, the said judicious matter.
The Defendants Jeffrey Franks and Edmund Zigmund both did solicit and
conspire with two official people compiling and attempting criminal behavior, and
justifications intentionally retaliatory an official action or incident, pursuant
December 7, 2001, and the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland County Case
Nos. 01-0494 and 01-2091. The Defendant's associates did schedule unlawful
movement and prosecution of my innocence and presence from an unlawful
detention or institution informative a deceptive benefit, and substantial a potential
criminal payment. I suspect an interference politically influential a civil litigation
and a criminal conviction costly a governmental function. I additionally safeguard
the possibility of a negotiable fund and a deceptive document obligatory a District
Justice and a Clerk of Court. Det. William Diehl did solicit the knowledgeable
commission of a judiciary procedure promissary a statute and intentional the
Declaration of the United States of America.
I, Cory A. Cormany, on this ~C4~ day of ~c~,c,~...~ , of the year
2002, do hereby swear as a citizen and a voter of the Corfimonwealth of the
United States that the above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Cory A. Corman3~- "'
Dated WitneSs
RE:
District Attorney
Cumberland County
Court House Square
Carlisle, Pa. 17013
Defendant[s]:
Samuel Coover
Mathew Kennedy
Edmund Zigmund
Brian McVitti
Paula Correai
Unidentified
I, Cory A. Cormany, being a citizen of the United States of America, do
hereby state and swear that at or about August, of the year 1995, and through or
about June, of the year 2002, the above named defendant did commit the following
crimes.
1)
902. Criminal Solicitation - a person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime
with the intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he commands,
encourages or requests another person to engage in specific conduct which
would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such crime or which
would establish his complicity in its commission or attempted commission.
2)
2504. Involuntary Manslaughter - (a) General rule - a person is guilty of
involuntary manslaughter when as a direct result of the doing of a lawful act
in a reckless or grossly negligent manner, he causes the death of another
person.
3)
2701. Simple Assault - a person is guilty of assault if he: (1) attempts to cause
or intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (3)
attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily
injury.
4)
2709. Harassment - a person commits a summary offense when, with intent
to harass, annoy or alarm another person: (1)he strikes, shoves, kicks or
otherwise subjects him to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the
same; or (2) he follows a person in or about a public place or places; or (3) he
engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which serve no
legitimatepurpose.
5)
2902. Unlawful Restraint- a person commits a misdemeanor of the first
degree if he knowingly: (1) restrains another unlawfully in circumstances
exposing him to risk of serious bodily injury; or (2)holds another in a
condition of involuntary servitude.
6)
2903. False Imprisonment- a person commits a misdemeanor of the first
degree if he knowingly restrains another unlawfully so as to interferer
substantially with his liberty.
(1)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
2906. Criminal Coercion - a person is guilty of criminal coercion if; with
intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of action of another to the detriment of
the other, he threatens to: (1) commit any criminal offense; (2) accuse anyone
of a criminal offense; (3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to
hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (4) take or withhold action as an official, or
cause an official to take or withhold action.
4114. Securing Execution of Documents by Deception - a person commits a
misdemeanor of the second degree if by deception he causes another to
execute any instrument affecting or purporting to affect or likely to affect the
pecuniary interest of any person.
4501. Definitions"Harm"-loss disadvantage or injury, or anything so
regarded by the person affected, including loss, disadvantage or injury to any
person or entity in whose welfare he is interested.
4702. Threats and Other Improper Influences in Official or Political Matters -
a person commits an offense if he: (1) threatens unlawful harm to any person
with intent to influence his decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or other
exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter.
5301. Official Oppression- a person acting or purporting to act in official
capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purporting capacity commits a
misdemeanor of the second degree if knowing that his conduct is illegal, he
(1)subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment,
dispossession assessment, lien or other infringement of personal or property
rights, or (2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any
right privilege, power or immunity.
5302. Speculating or Wagering on Official Action or Information - a public
servant commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if in contemplation of
official action by himself or by a governmental unit with which he is
associated, or in reliance on information to which he has access in his official
capacity and which has not been made public: (1)acquires a pecuniary
interest in any property, transaction or enterprise which may be affected by
such information or official action, (2) speculates or wagers on the basis of
such information or official action; or (3)aids another to do any of the
foregoing.
902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973.
2504 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973.
2701 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973.
2709 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973.
(2)
2902 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973.
As amended 1974, Dec. 30, P.L. 1129, No. 361, 2, ired. effective.
2903 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482, No. 334, 1 effective June 6, 1973.
2906 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482
4114 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482
4501 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482
4702 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482
5301 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482
5302 - 1972, Dec. 6, P.L. 1482
No. 334
No. 334
No. 334
No. 334
No. 334
No. 334
1 effective June 6, 1973.
1 effective June 6, 1973.
1 effective June 6, 1973.
1 effective June 6, 1973.
1 effective June 6, 1973.
1 effective June 6, 1973.
SWORN STATEMENT
1. On or about February 18th, of the year 1995, at approximately late-evening
or thereto, Plaintiff Cory A. Connany was pummeled and grappled out of house
and home at gun point.
2. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was
briefly hospitalized and than admitted to the Cumberland County Prison under the
supervision of a Warden Reitz Jr., deceptive a said probable cause, and a said
authentic warrant of arrest.
3. Proceeding thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications dictated, Defendant
Samuel Coover, a prison training official, and other associates did corroborate
criminal offenses pursuant a Ptl. Larry Kell of the Carlisle Police Department.
4. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff did file and petition
several criminal and civil issues within the Common Pleas Court of Cumberland
County, verificative the problematic intentions collaborated therein the Case Nos.
96-1730 and 96-1969.
5. Prescient the aforementioned prison commitment, the Plaintiff Cory A.
Cormany did summons a complaint, relevant illegal substance abuse and said
transactions, a child custody/visitation agreement, and alleged assaults, having
occurred in the Borough of Carlisle, litigating the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County Case No. 94-1679.
(3)
6. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany asserts herein that he did witness a Mr. John
Adams of the Cumberland County Community at or about the whereabouts of a
Mr. Raymond Motter, prior to the said; alleged complaint, associating suspicious
activities interested a factual situation circumstantial a Legal Adoption.
7. Pursuant therefor the foregoing procedural ramifications explained, the
Plaintiff did withstand a meeting with a Cumberland County District Attorney,
presiding Mr. William Gabaig, whom did imply in short; that he should provide
quote, "Assistance" for the problems identified and presented withal the Carlisle
Police Department.
8. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany did witness the aforementioned John Adams,
along with his said natural brother, in and about the month of June, of the year
2001, in and around the N. Pitt Street area of the Borough of Carlisle carrying on
and about continual activities in a blue mini-van; curious events described important
a Mr. Carl Heyward set forth in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County
Case No. 01-6467.
9. Pursuant therein the foregoing relations described, the Defendant Mathew
Kennedy did instantaneously invoke criminal incident regarding the Plaintiff,
causative a confusing situation and circumstance, enveloping minor and infant
children in the Borough of Carlisle and the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland
County.
10. On or about May 29th, at approximately mid-afternoon or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, did recognize an official obligation liable a criminal
allegation.
11. Prior the aforementioned official ramification expected, the Defendant Samuel
Coover did manage and administrate the staffing associates of the Cumberland
County Prison important said incidents described thereto the Carlisle Police
Department and the Courts of Cumberland County.
(4)
Department.
19. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany asserts herein that he did witness a Ms. Tracy
Gibson call and go to the dentist, and request to have, and did have several infected
molars extracted, then did proceed complaint pre-emptive a "Tenancy in
Common", litigating the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County Case No.
96-4435.
20. On or about June 21st, at approximately early-evening or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, was once again pummeled and grappled pursuant the
county prison, submissive an action and a series of lies.
21. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff was attacked and than
admitted to the Cumberland County Prison communistic a said probable cause, and
a said authentic warrant of arrest.
22. Prior herein and pertinent hereto the foregoing events defined, the Plaintiff
did file and petition criminal and civil relief serviceable the Common Pleas Court of
Cumberland County and the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office,
informative unconstitutional situations and circumstances dictated problematic;
therefore the Case No. 01-1727.
23. On or about August 6th, at approximately early-afternoon or thereto, the
Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany was committed to the county prison significant a civil
litigation and a statutory rule, timely the order of the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County.
24. Pursuant therein the aforesaid order of the court, the Plaintiff was summoned
and than omitted to the Cumberland County Prison excusable a said probable cause,
and a said authentic warrant of arrest.
25.
Proceeding thereto the foregoing procedural ramifications requested, the
(6)
Defendant Edmund Zigmund did corroborate criminal offenses substantial the
District Attorney's Office of Cumberland County, and pursuant the Defendant
Mathew Kennedy, allegorical a Der. Willimn Deihl, and other associates of the
Cumberland County Prison.
26. At or about the aforesaid date and time, the Plaintiff did file and petition
several criminal and civil issues within the United States District Court of
Pennsylvania, verificative the problematic intentions actecedented therein the Case
No.I:CV-01-1803.
27. Pursuant the aforementioned prison commitment, the Plaintiff Cory A.
Cormany was summoned a complaint relevant an illegal transport requirement and
assumed transactions, a child custody/visitation dilemma, and alleged conducts,
having occurred in the Borough of Carlisle, quoting the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County Case No. 01-209 I.
28. On or about October 2nd, at approximately mid-afternoon or therein, the
Plaintiff, Cory A. Cormany, did once again recognize an official obligation
enumerative a criminal conviction.
29. Prior the aforementioned official ramification forecasted, the Defendant
Samuel Coover did manage and administrate the staffing associates of the
Cumberland County Prison important said incidents described thereto the Carlisle
Police Department and the Courts of Cumberland County.
30. The Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany asserts herein that he did witness a Mr.
Jimmie Hernandez of the Cumberland County Community at or about the
whereabouts of a Mr. Carl Heyward, pursuant to his said; alleged commitment,
associating suspicious activities interested a factual situation circumstantial a Legal
Conviction.
31. Prescient therefore the foregoing procedural ramifications actuated, the
(7)
commitment at Cumberland County Prison and is petitioned or ordered without
security or bond and has been deprived of authentic rights and regulations on
previous occasions subordinate the District Justice Magisterial No. 09-~-01.
38. Prior the aforementioned immunilogical ramifications and preponderate a civil
litigation the Plaintiff Cory A. Cormany does acknowledge an orthodox of religion
controversial a preferable practical Mosaical Messiahship.
39. The Defendants Samuel Coover, Mathew Kennedy, Edmund Zigmund,
Brian McVitti and Paula Correal have violated constitutional provisions regardless an
electoral initiative and have influenced propaganda and media costly the United
States of America.
40. The Plaintiff has suffered and has sustained injuries, lack of medical treatment
ambitious an employable opportunity, stressful and contradictive commands and
obligations, loud and unnecessary confinement and consummative condemnation
during and throughout these unconstitutional events.
I, Cory A. Cormany, do hereby verify that the facts set forth in the above are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and belief, and that
any false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of section 4904 of the
Crimes Code (18 Pa. C.S. 4904), relating to unswom falsification to authorities.
Witnessed
THE
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS cUMBERLAND COUNTY
TI-~i COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CORY A .CORMANY
V.
COMMONWEALTH
OTN:H 424983-6
CASE NO. 01-0494
CRIMINAL LAW - CIVIL ACTION
JURY TRIAL
DOCKET FILE: CR-0000574-01
PETITION
AND NOW comes, Cory Cormany, by the Attorney Dirk E. Berry, and sets
forth causes of action against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, wherefore the
following is a statement:
1. Cory Cormany is an adult individual residing in the
CommOnwealth of Pennsylvania.
2. Marie Hal/is an adult individual empowered by the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.
3. Chris Durnin is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
4. Karen Edwards is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
5. Curtis Colbertson is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
6. Shannon Dunlap is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
7. Frank Teaney is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
8. Jane Scott is an adult individual empowered by the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.
9. Michael Carey is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
10. Helen Sneed is an adult individual empowered by the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.
1l. Earl Reitz, Jr. is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
12. Karen Finkenbinder is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
13. Shane Cohick is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
14. Joseph Hogarth is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
15. Jeffrey Kurtz is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
16. William Miller is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
17. Mathew Kennedy is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
18. Michael Guido is an adult individual empowered by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
19. Stephen Margeson
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
20. Jeffrey Franks is
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
21. William Diehl is
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
is an adult individual empowered by the
an adult individual empowered by the
an adult individual empowered by the
22.
Pennsylvania.
23. Edmund Zigmund
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
24. Patrick Lauer is
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Lyle Herr is an adult individual empowered by the Commonwealth of
is an adult individual empowered by the
an adult individual empowered by the
25. Cory Cormany is a high school graduate, a university undergraduate,
a taxpayer, a registered voter, and a citizen of the United States of America.
26. On May 29th, 1996, Det. Jeffrey Franks did petition a summary
complaint in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania allegary Mr. Cory Cormany and
determinative the Honorable District Magistrate Paula Correal.
27. On January 2nd, 1998, Mr. Cory Cormany did forfeit an employment
application contractual Morris-Knudson, mandatory I.B.M. and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections.
28. On December 29th, 1999, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Department of Corrections did omit Mr. Cory Cormany pursuant Ptl. Karen
Finkenbinder, Pti. Shane Cohick, and Ptl. Joseph Hogarth.
29. On March 22nd, 2001, the Honorable District Magistrate Paula
Correal did sentence Mr. Cory Cormany concurrent numerous summary issues
cited by Ptl. Jeffery Kurtz, Ptl. William Miller, and Sgt. Michael Guido.
30. On March 23rd, 2001, Mr. Cory Cormany did file a civil complaint
in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County against the Honorable
District Magistrate Paula Correal, et al.
3 l. On July 24th, 2001, the Honorable Commonwealth Judge Kevin Hess
did confirm the Honorable District Magistrate Paula Correal directional numerous
summary issues ordered by Mr. Cory Cormany.
32. On August 6th, 2001, the Cumberland County Prison did commit Mr.
Cory Cormany admissible a definite time period implemented by C.O. Marie Hall
and Cpl. Shannon Dunlap.
33. On August 14th, 2001, the Honorable Commonwealth Judge Kevin
Hess did dismiss the Honorable District Magistrate Paula Correal consensual a
prejudicial action enstated by Mr. Cory Cormany.
34. On August 21st, 2001, Mr. Cory Cormany did motion a sentence
modification in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County instructional
the Clerk of Court Denis Lebo.
35. On September 12th, 2001, Ptl. Mathew Kennedy did engage an
incidental arbitration reportorial D.W. Michael Carey, D.W. Jane Scott, Sgt.
Frank Teaney, Cpl. Curtis Colbertson, C.O. Chris Durnin, C.O. Marie Hall, and
Ms. Karen Edwards.
36. On September 21st, 2001, Mr. Cory Cormany did file a civil
complaint in the United States District Court of Pennsylvania against Warden Earl
Reitz, Jr., et al.
37. On October 2nd, 2001, Det. William Diehl did petition a criminal
complaint in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania allegary Mr. Cory Cormany and
determinative the Honorable District Magistrate Paula Correal.
38. On October 12th, 2001, Mr. Cory Cormany did appeal a summary
obligation in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County judicious the
Honorable District Magistrate Paula Correal.
39. On November 26th, 2001, Mr. Cory Cormany did file a civil
complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County against Warden
Earl Reitz, Jr., et al.
40. On November 26th, 2001, the Honorable United States Judge Silvia
Rainbo did dismiss Warden Earl Reitz, Jr. consensual a malicious action enstated
by Mr. Cory Cormany.
41. On December 7th, 2001, the Honorable District Magistrate Paula
Correal did subpoena Mr. Cory Cormany intentional various criminative offenses
entelechied by the Clerk of Court Denis Lebo.
42. On December 10th, 2001, Mr. Lyle Herr did remand a prior record
account noteworthy the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania requested by Mr. Cory
Cormany.
43. On December 24th, 2001, D.W. Helen Sneed did notarize an
evidential service receipt responsive the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
46. The
and suffering,
deprivation of constitutional right, confinement and incarceration prejudicial
Mr. Cory Cormany.
47. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did additionally cause Mr.
Cory Cormany lost wages and employment, benefits, expenses and property in the
foregoing amount duplicative an excessive potential mount of Two Hundred
and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars (250,000.00), respectfully submitted exhibits
A through P.
46. By reason of the aforementioned; Mr. Cory Cormany has suffered
pain, mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress, constitutional
deprivation, confinement, incarceration, loss of wages and employment, benefits,
expenses and property as a result of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
WHEREAS, Cory Cormany, claims from the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania relief in an amount in excess of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand
and 00 Dollars (250,000.00) plus release from prison.
petitioned by Attorney Edmund Zigmund.
44. On December 24th, 2001, Mr. Cory Cormany did approve a criminal
complaint to the District Attorney of Cumberland County against Chief Stephen
Margeson, et al.
45. On January 3rd, 2002, Mr. Cory Cormany did authorize a legal
action to the Attorney Patrick Lauer preparatory the Cot~ of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did maliciously invoke pain
mental anguish, public humiliation, emotional distress,
THE
CORY A .CORMANY
V.
COMMONWEALTH
OTN:H 424983-6
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND CO~UNTY
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CASE NO. 01-0494
CRIMINAL LAW - CIVIL ACTION
JURY TRIAL
DOCKET FILE: CR-0000574-01
NOTICE
You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claim set
forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after
the Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally
or by attorney and by filing in writing with the Court your defense or objection to
the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case
may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court
without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by Plaintift~ You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE; THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE
YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Court Administrator
Cumberland County Court House
1 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA. 17013
THE
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CORY A .CORNIANY
V.
COMMONWEALTH
OTN:H 424983-6
CASE NO. 01-0494
CRIMINAL LAW - CIVIL ACTION
JURY TRIAL
DOCKET FILE: CR-0000574-01
COMPLAINT
I, Cory A. Cormany, declare that I am the petitioner in the above titled
proceeding; that in support of my request to proceed without being required
to prepay fees, costs or give security thereof, I state that because of my
poverty, I am unable to pay the cost of said proceedings or give security
thereof; that I believe I am entitled to relief. The nature of my action,
defense, or other proceedings or the issues I intend to present on appeal
briefly stated as follows:
In further support of the application, I answer the following questions:
Are you presently employed? (No)
Have you received within the past twelve months any money
from any of the following sources?
(a) Business, profession or other form of self-employment?
(No)
(b) Rent payments, interest or dividends?
(No)
(c) Pension, annuities or life insurance payments?
(No)
(d) Gifts or inheritances7
(No)
-1-
(e) Any other sources?
(No)
Do you have any cash, or do you have money in checking/savings
accounts? (Yes) I have approximately twenty five and 00
dollars available in my checking/savings account.
Do you own or have any interest in any real estate, stocks,
bonds, notes, automobiles or other valuable property (excluding
ordinary household furnishings and clothing)? (No) Not at
present.
List the persons who are dependent upon you for support, state
your relationship to those persons and indicate how much you
contribute toward their support. I have an unsecured loan with
American General Finance Company for amounts required. I
have a biological daughter, however, is relevant to proceeding
Concerning financial obligation.
VERIFICATION
I, Cory A. Cormany, Petitioner in the above captioned action, hereby verify
and state that the facts set forth in the Complaint against the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania are true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge, and
belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties
of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unsworn verification to authorities.
Dated
Cory A. Cormany
-2-
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January 2002, I Cory A. Cormany foregoing
the aforesaid matter on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby
certify that I have served a copy of same in the United States Mail at Carlisle
Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
Clerk of Courts
Cumberland County Court House
I South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Cory A.
1101 Claremont Road
Carlisle, PA 17013
DEVLIN & DEVINE
William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire
Atty. I.D. # 42717
Suite 200, 100 West Elm Street
Conshohocken, PA 19428
(610) 397-4614
CORY A. CORMANY
Attorney for Defendants
Thomas Kline, The Administration
and Staff of the Cumberland County
Sheriff's Office, Jeffrey Franks, William
Diehl and Edmund Zigmund of the
Cumberland County District Attorney's
Office
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
THOMAS KLINE, THE
ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF OF
THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY
SHERIFF OFFICE, JEFFREY FRANKS,
WILLIAM DIEHL, EDMUND ZIGMUND
OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. 03-6122
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of Defendants, Thomas Kline, The Administration
and Staff of the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl and Edmund
Zigmund of the Cumberland County District A ' '
ttomey s Office ~n the above-captioned matter.
DEVLIN & DEVINE
William J.(Ibevlin, Jr., Esqui~re
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMEN~£
(Nu~t be ty~-~-itte~ a~d submitted in c~[~l-icate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUI~BERLAND COUNTY:
Please 3List ~e withi~ matter f~r ~he ~ A_rg~mnnt C~mJ~t.
CAPTION OF CASE
(~t~re ca~c~ .~t be stated ~n fu~l)
CORY A. CORMANY
vs.
THOMAS KLINE, THE ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF OF THE
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JEFFREY FRANKS,
WILLIAM DIEHL, EDMUND ZIGMUND OF THE CUMBERLAND
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
( Oe fendant )
No. 6122 Civ._ 19 2003
1. State matter to be a~ (i.e., piaint~ff,s mmti~x~ fo~ ~e~ trial, defemdant,$
Freliminar af ; homas Kiine, The Administration and Staff
of the Cumberland County Sheriff Office, Jeffrey Franks, Wiliam Diehl, Edmund Zigmund,
of the Cumberland County District Attorney to Plaintiff's Complaint
2. Identify oc~z~el ~owiJ_l a~eca~e:
~&] fo~ plaintiff: Plaintiff is Pro Se: Cory A. Cormany Address; 1883 Douglas Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013
fo~ defer~t: William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire
Ad~: Devlin & Devine, Ste. 200, 100 W. Elm Street,
Conshohocken, PA 19428
I ~1] ~otil~ a~X [~-t~ ~ ~riting ~ithin tuo d~/s tl~t thJ~ m ~
been ~i~ted f~c a~j~me~t.
4. Ar~J~ent ~
gated: 1/8/04
kttc~T~ fc~ De[endants ~
DEVLIN & DEVINE
William J. Devlin, Jr., Esquire
Atty. I.D. # 42717
Suite 200, 100 West Elm Street
Conshohocken, PA 19428
(610) 397-4614
Attorney for Defendants
Thomas Kline, The Administration
and Staff of the Cumberland County
Sheriff's Office, Jeffrey Franks,
William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund
CORYA. CORMANY
V.
COURT OFCOMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
THOMAS KLINE, THE
ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF OF
THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY
SHERIFF OFFICE, JEFFREY FRANKS
WILLIAM DIEHL, EDMUND ZIGMUND
OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
NO. 03-6122
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS~ THOMAS KLINE~
THE ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF OF THE CUMBERLAND COUh I'Y
SHERIFF[sic] OFFICE~ JEFFREY FRANKS~ WILLIAM DIEHL AND EDMUND
ZlGMUND~ TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Defendants, Thomas Kline, The Administration and Staff of the Cumberland
County Sheriff[sic], and Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund, of the
Cumberland County District Attorney's Office, by and through their attorney, William J.
Devlin, Jr., hereby file Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint and in support
thereof avers as follows:
1. Plaintiff Cory Cormany has filed a fifty-two (52) paragraph complaint
against various Defendants.
2. The Complaint names Thomas Kline and the Administration and Staff of
the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, as well as other Defendants of the District
Attorney.
3. Defendants Thomas Kline and the Administration and Staff of the Sheriff's
Office will be identified as the "Cumberland County Sheriff Defendants".
4. Defendants, Franks, Diehl and Zigmund, will be identified as the
"Cumberland County District Attorney Defendants".
5. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state any causes of action against the
Cumberland County Sheriff Defendants or the Cumberland County District Attorney
Defendants in a concise and summary form as required by the Pennsylvania Rules of
Civil Procedure. See PA.R.Civ. P. 1019 (a).
6. Plaintiff's Complaint contains paragraph after paragraph of nonsensical
sentences some of which contain English words and some which contain words that
appear to be wholly made up by Plaintiff.
7. For instance, in Paragraph 6 Plaintiff states:
Prior hereto and pertinent herein the foregoing statement,
the Plaintiff Cory Cormany was summoned and processed
dependable the Defendant Thomas Kline of the Cumberland
County Sheriff Office.
8. In Paragraph 15 Plaintiff alleges:
Proceeding therein and preceding thereto the aforesaid
ramifications, the Defendants Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl
and Edmund Zigmund did remand and omit a punishable
indifference, contemptuously constituent the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany.
9. In Count One, Plaintiff alleges that the Cumberland County Sheriff
Defendants were grossly negligent.
10. There is no plain and concise statement of what Thomas Kline or the
Sheriff's Office did that would warrant a cause of action being asserted against them.
11. In Counts Two, Three and Four, Plaintiff alleges that Franks, Diehl and
Zigmund were grossly negligent.
12. Plaintiff alleges in paragraphs 37, 43 and 49 that:
Preceding the situation and circumstances defined in the
aforementioned statements, the plaintiff Cory Cormany was
not ever depositioned for the purpose of interrogation, nor
was he ever treated with an arbitrary reason of indifference
for the purpose of an immunological warant.
13. Nonsensical words placed on paper next to the names of Cumberland
County Sheriff Defendants and Cumberland County District Attorney Defendants do not
state a cause of action, and the Court should dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint.
14. A demur will only be sustained where a Complaint or Pleading shows with
certainty that upon the facts averred, the law will not permit the Plaintiff to recover.
International Union of Operatin,q En,qineem v. Linesville Construction Co., 457 Pa. 220,
322 A.2d 353 (1974).
15. The court should grant Cumberland County Sheriff Defendants' and the
Cumberland County District Attorney Defendants' demur to Plaintiff's Complaint based
on Plaintiff's failure to plead in plain, clear and concise language a cause of action.
16. Plaintiff has not pled a cause of action for negligence. A negligence action
against the County is governed by the Pennsylvania Tort Claim Act, and the allegations
do not meet any of the eight (8) exceptions to the Act.
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Thomas Kline and the Administration and Staff of
the Cumberland County Sheriff[sic] Office and Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl and
Edmund Zigmund, respectfully request this Court to grant their Preliminary Objections
and to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint in addition to such other relief as the Court deems
appropriate.
Respectfully Submitted,
Wdl~am J. Devl~n, Jr~;-~squire /
Attorney for Defendants,
Thomas Kline and the Administration
And Staff of the Cumberland County
Sheriff Office, Jeffrey Franks,
William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund
of the Distdct Attorney's Office of
Cumberland County
CORY A. CORMANY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS KLINE, THE
ADMINISTRATION AND:
STAFF OF THE
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY SHERIFF
OFFICE, JEFFREY
FRANKS, WILLIAM
DIEHL AND EDMUND
ZIGMUND OF THE
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY,
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION--LAW
: NO. 03-6122 CIVIL TERIVl
IN RE: DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2004, upon consideration of
Defendants' preliminary objections to Plaintiff's complaint, and for the reasons
stated in the accompanying opinion, Plaintiff's comPlaint is dismissed.
BY THE COURT,
J?esley Olc~r., J. c,
Cory A. Cormany
1883 Douglas Drive
Carlisle, PA 17013
Plaintiff, pro Se
William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq.
Suite 200
100 West Elm Street
Conshocken, PA 19428
Attorney for Defendants
CORY A. CORMANY,
Plaintiff
THOMAS KLINE, THE
ADMINISTRATION AND:
STAFF OF THE
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY SHERIFF
OFFICE, JEFFREY
FRANKS, WILLIAM
DIEHL AND EDMUND
ZIGMUND OF THE
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY,
Defendants
1N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION--LAW
: NO. 03-6122 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
BEFORE HOFFER, P.J., and OLER, J.
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
OLER, J., March 25, 2004.
For disposition in this civil case in which a pro se Plaintiff has sued various
Cumberland County officials and employees are Defendants' preliminary
objections to Plaintiff's complaint. The preliminary objections are in the nature of
a demurrer and a motion to strike for failure to plead facts in a concise and
summary form in conformity with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a).
The basis of the preliminary objections has been expressed by Defendants
as follows:
Plaintiff's Complaint contains paragraph after
paragraph of nonsensical sentences some of which
contain English words and some [of] which contain
words that appear to be wholly made up by Plaintiff.1
~ Preliminary Objections of Defendants, Thomas Kline, The Administration and Staff of the
Cumberland County Sheriff Office, Jeffrey Franks, William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund, to
Defendants' preliminary objections were argued on February 4, 2004.2 For
the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs' complaint will be stricken.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff's complaint in the above-captioned matter was filed on November
21, 2003. Paragraph 1 of the complaint identifies the Plaintiff as "Cory Cormany,
an adult individual residing in Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania?
Paragraph 2 identifies "Defendant Thomas Kline and associates" as "adult
individuals employed with the Cumberland County ',Sheriff Office, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania.''4 Paragraph 3 identifies "Defendants Jeffrey Franks,
William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund" as "adult individuals represented through
the Cumberland County District Attorney, Peunsylvania, United States of
America?
Typical of the 51 paragraphs which follow are these:
5. In and about the year 1985 and through and
about the application herein, Plaintiff Cory Col'many
was subjugated criminal and civil allegation
unconstitutional a due process; hereto the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
6. Prior hereto and pertinent herein the
foregoing statement, the Plaintiff Cory Cormany was
summoned and processed dependable the Defendant
Thomas Kline of the Cumberland County Sheriff
Office.
7. Proceeding therein and precedintg thereto the
aforesaid ramifications, the Defendants Jeffrey Franks,
William Diehl and Edmund Zigmund did remand and
Plaintiff's Complaint, filed Jan. 12, 2004, at para. 6 (hereinafter Defendants' preliminary
objections, para. ).
2 Plaintiff did not submit a brief or appear for the argument.
3 Plaintiff's complaint, para. 1.
4 Plaintiff's complaint, para. 2.
5 Plaintiff's complaint, para. 3.
2
omit a punishable indifference, contemptuously
constituent the Plaintiff Cory Cormany.
10. The case numbers 92-1252, 93-1078, 93-
1079, 94-0473, 94-0974, 95-0027, 97-0174, 97-1443,
97-1444, 97-1445, 97-1446, 97-1447, 97-1448, 97-
1449, 97-1450, 97-1451, 97-1452, 97-1701, 01-0092,
01-0093, 01-0094, 01-0095, 01-0096 and 01-0097
procedurally dictate criminal offenses of the summary
degree, and are on file at the Cumberland County
Court House in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
13. The case numbers 94-1679, 95-0310, 95-
5222, 96-1730, 96-1969, 96-4435, 01-1727, and 03-
1778 procedurally enstate assumptive labels of the
alias degree, and are on file at the Cumberland County
Court House in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
15. On October 22nd, of the year 2001, the
District Attorney's Office in Cumberland County
acquired a notarial criminal complaint culpable the
Plaintiff Cory Cormany, and proficient a procedure as
in accordance with P.S.A. 42 R.C.P. 132, 133, 134 and
P.S.A. 42 J.J.P. 1513, 1514 and 1515.
22. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did
proceed criminal allegations slanderous a confliction
of interest, and noncertified an official service, for the
came number 01-2091; naming the Plaintiff Cory
Cormany a defendant substantial a Patrol Officer
Mathew Kennedy.
28. The Plaintiff Cory Cormany has suffered
lost wages, benefits, fees and property in the amount or
in the potential duplicative amount of Two Hundred
and Fifty Thousand and 00 Dollars (250,000.00) as a
result of the Defendants' malicious and prejudicial
actions.
32. The Defendant Thomas Kline did
implement policy and directive within or throughout
the incidents and issues in question, and does have
supervisory power unconstitutional an effective
legislative, judiciary or executive procedure.
37. Preceding the situations and circumstances
defined in the aforementioned statements, the Plaintiff
Cory Cormany was not ever depositioned for the
purpose of interrogation, nor was he ever treated with
an arbitrary reason of indifference for the purpose of
an immunological warrant.
49. Preceding the situations and circumstances
defined in the aforementioned statements, the Plaintiff
Cory Cormany was not ever summoned with prima-
facie cause for the purpose of service, nor was he ever
dispositioned for the purpose of an i~nmunological
indictment.6
DISCUSSION
As a general proposition, Pennsylvania courts are not required to entertain
submissions which are incoherent, incomprehensible or unintelligible. See, e.g.,
Commonwealth v. Albert, 522 Pa. 331, 561 A.2d 736 (1989); Commonwealth ex
tel. Swann v. Shovling, 423 Pa. 26, 223 A.2d 1 (1966). Thus, it has been said that
"[p]reliminary objections are certainly appropriate where a pleading
is... incoherent .... "Jackson v. Richards 5 & 10 Inc., 289 Pa. Super. 445, 451,
433 A.2d 888, 891 (1981).
More specifically, under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(a),
"[t]he material facts on which a cause of action or defense is based shall be stated
in a concise and summary form." Implicit within this rule is a requirement that the
pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Galexburg Nat'l Bank & Trust
Plmntlff's complaint, at 1 - 13.
4
Co., 18 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Where a portion of a pleading
fails to conform to the rule, it is susceptible to a preliminary objection. See Pa.
R.C.P. 1028(a)(2) (failure of pleading to conform to law or rule of court). Upon
consideration of such an objection, the court may properly strike the affected
pleading. See, e.g., Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v.
Zanella Transit, Inc., 53 Pa. Commw. 359, 417 A.2d 860 (1980).
Under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1028(a)(2), a pleading which
is legally insufficient to set forth a cause of action is also susceptible to a
preliminary objection. Implicit within this rule as well is a requirement that the
pleading be intelligible. See Allensworth v. First Ga,t, esburg Nat? Bank & Trust
Co., 18 Ill. App. 2d 608, 152 N.E.2d 890 (1958). Upon consideration of such an
objection, the court may properly sustain a demurrer mad dismiss the pleading. Id.
In this regard, it is well settled that "[p]leadings will be construed against a pleader
on the theory that he or she has stated his or her case,' as best he or she can." 2
Goodrich Amram 2d 1019:7, at 249 (2001).
In the present case, a careful reading of PlaintifFs complaint indicates that
Plaintiff's claim is not stated in a concise and summary form in the sense of being
intelligible, nor is any legally cognizable cause of action suggested anywhere in
the pleading. For these reasons, and based upon the foregoing principles of law,
the following order will be entered:
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 25~' day of March, 2004, upon consideration of
Defendants' preliminary objections to Plaintiff's complaint, and for the reasons
stated in the accompanying opinion, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed.
BY THE COURT,
/s/J. Wesley Oler, Jr.
J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J.
5
Cory A. Cormany
1883 Douglas Drive
Carlisle, PA 17013
Plaintiff, pro Se
William J. Devlin, Jr., Esq.
Suite 200
100 West Elm Street
Conshocken, PA 19428
Attorney for Defendants
6