Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-27-02IN RE: APPOINTMENT Of A IN THE COURT Of COMMON PLEAS OF GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA MILDRED J. GERBER NO. 21-01-92 ORPHANS' COURT ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this ~-{~'~ day of July, 2002, the within motion, IS DENIED without a hearing.~ Edgar B.--Bayl~, J ' The guardian, Frederick E. Gerber, III, who is responsible to provide Marilyn Gerber the visitation with her mother under the order of March 25, 2002, and the two sisters, should take note of the Sanders & Warren report of July 15, 2002: It is my opinion that these visits would be less stressful for Mrs. Gerber if they were shorter. However, Marilyn does travel a long distance to see her. It might be helpful if there were breaks, quiet down time for Mrs. Gerber during the visits. The most upsetting element of the visits is the tension between the two sisters. The sisters need to refrain from talking to one another or need to be better at modulating their tone of voice and controlling their frustrations. It is a documented fact that people with AIzheimer's Disease recognize emotional tones and cues far longer than they remember language or facts. They will react to very subtle emotions even if they do not understand the complete context of the conversation. (Emphasis added.) When the order of visitation was entered it was obvious that the family members involved, including Marilyn Gerber, would make it difficult, that the last person they would put at the top of their priority was their mother, and their mother would suffer some distress as a result. Thus, the visitation is limited. The order stands. .-,rd C. Rupp, Esquire ,~r Frederick E. Gerber, II Jacqueline M. Vemey, Esquire For Mildred J. Gerber Stanley J.A. Laskowski, Esquire For Marilyn J. Gerber :sea