HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-0907
DOUBLE GOLD. INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET NO: -:J-f' - tJ~7 ~
v.
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the
court your defense or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail
to do so, the case may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the court
without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the Plaintiff(s). You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Dauphin C'Ol1Jlty r ~wyer Refprrat ')t'fYil;e
213 H01lh front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylv<lnia 17101
717 232 7536
Cu..rv. ro-la....r-) d ~-t:.:1 fu.r- ASSn.
!3f2 S &:d fbrd Sf
c.WIISIe; l'A no 13
24Cl. 31lu\c
NOTICIA
LE HAN DEMANDADO A USTED EN LA CORTE. Si usted guiere defenderse de estas
demandas expuestas en las paginas siguientes, usted tiene viente (20) dias de plazo al partir de la fecha
de la demanda y la notificacion. Usted debe presentar una apariencia excrita 0 en persona 0 por
abogado y archivar en la corte an forma escrita sus defensas 0 sus objectiones alas demandas en contra
de su persona. Sea avisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte tomara medidas y puede entrar una
orden contra usted sin previo aviso 0 notificacion y por cualquier queja 0 aIivio que es predido en Ia
peticion de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero 0 sus propriendades 0 stros derechos importantes para
usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABROGADO IMMEDIATAMENTE. SI NO TIENE
ABOGADO 0 S1 NO TIENE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR TAL SERV1C10, VAYA EN
PERSONA 0 LLAME POR TELEFONCO A LA OFICINA CUY A DIRECC10N SE ENCUENTRA
EXCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PAUEDE CONSEQUIR ASSISTANCIA
LEGAL.
Bauphill Cuutlty Lawyer Itdc.uaI Service-
213 Nulll. froot Stroot
ftiluisburg, I\-.lu"ylvallia 17101
717 232 7536
tu.rntuLo...nd COu--i1~ 5()J As<;;n.
3'2. .:so Lclh 6eofOrCl ~-\...
~l;S\e1 PA n()(3
In 2--qt;. 3 \ \.p y
2
,
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET NO: 01 - '10/
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff, Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore Core, d/b/a Michael Goldberg, Contractor
("Plaintiff") is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania being duly registered to do business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in
accordance with the Act of Assembly so provided with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania
located at 2322 North Seventh Street. Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania 17110.
2. Dabise Camero ("Defendant") is an adult individual residing at 511 Erford Road,
Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
3. On or about September 8, 2002 Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a contract for
restoration services and construction repairs of the Defendant's property situated at 511 Erford
Road, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011. A true and correct copy of the
authorization is attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked as Exhibit" A" .
4. At the time of entering into the contract with the Plaintiff, Defendant was the owner
of the property located at 511 Erford Road, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
3
5. On September 8, 2002 Plaintiff entered into the performance of the contract and as
called for by the same.
6. In accordance with the contract the Plaintiff did perform the work and provided all
material necessary for the restoration/construction repair work in accordance with the contract
between the parties. Copies of Invoice worksheets showing cost of structural repairs, restoration
services, cleaning, supplemental repairs and credits are attached hereto, made a part hereof and
marked as Exhibit "B".
7 . The restoration/construction repair work to the Defendants' property located at 511
Erford Road, Camp Hill. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania was completed by Plaintiff on or about
January 16, 2003 at a cost of $11,082.52.
8. Plaintiff has repeatedly demanded payment of the amount due, but Defendant has
neglected and refused to pay the same or any part thereof.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant, Dabise Camero for the sum
of $11,082.52 with interest to date of $1.371.74 for a balance of $12,454.26 plus costs and
attorney's fees.
4
Date:
J ~J ~cp
Peters & Wasilefski
By:
1~ ~> ~~
William J. Peters, Esquire
Attorney ID #09983
2931 North Front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
717-238-7555
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore Core
Michael Goldberg Contractor
5
FIB 2 42004
VERIFICATION
I hereby affirm that the following facts are correct:
I am the Plaintiff and am authorized to make this Verification; the attached
Complaint is based upon information which I have furnished to my counsel and information
which has been gathered by my counsel in the preparation of the lawsuit. The language is that of
counsel and not of me. I have read the Complaint and to the extent that the same is based upon
information that I have given to my counsel, it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief. To the extent that the content of the Complaint is that of counsel, I have
relied upon counsel in making this Verification. I hereby acknowledge that the facts set forth in
the aforesaid Complaint is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
//IZ~ YI~)
Michael Goldberg (..~
~~
,,: ~
;;.
~
'''\\
~
'\S
"-
,,'
"{\.
~
~
--J
\,f'.
. '\
'.1\
"'~
\).
~
'"
~
'!"\ ~
~ i.f"l
~ \j
~~
~~
~~
~
o
c-
~
~/~?
-':"';,-.: '
D:;
f~\~---,
~~
;~'-~ ;::,'j
'-"'" -'
.-'-""-0"..
~--
,
w
.."
-,~
~
f :~)
.(..'-
Cr-\
\;:\
"-..".J
.....,
~-")
C'.:;;)
r-
-r;
=-:3
f{'j :!J
j'.-
:!;[2J
(.=~(~
::J:
;>>.
~
:;1:;
-------..-----
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2004-00907 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
DOUBLE GOLD INC ET AL
VS
CAMERO DABISE
RICHARD SMITH
, Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE
was served upon
CAMERO DABISE
the
DEFENDANT
, at 1911:00 HOURS, on the 3rd day of March
, 2004
at 511 ERFORD ROAD
CAMP HILL, PA 17011
by handing to
DABISE CAMERO
a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE
together with
and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Service
Affidavit
Surcharge
18.00
10.35
.00
10.00
.00
38.35
So Answers:
r~~'r.,
R. Thomas Kline
03/04/2004
PETERS & WASIL
Sworn and Subscribed to before By:
me this ,(k day of
~ ;l(}t>'f A.D.
n ,. (1 Jn/~ tt.#.
\. I'1"'prothonotary .
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a
Restore Core, Michael
Goldberg, Contractor,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAlro COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
.
.
v.
No. 04-907 CIVIL
:
Dabise Camero,
.
.
Defendant
NOTICE TO PLEAD TO NEW Ml~TTER
To: Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore Core, Michael Goldberg,
Contractor (plaintiff)
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the
enclosed new matter within twenty (20) daysl from service hereof or
a judgment may be entered against you.
-&-/ Iff~
Kent H. Patterson
Attorney for defendant
221 pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 238-4100
o
c
?:"'
..Di.-;
C.!)Lt'
,",,-_. :.
--:::;
~(.
'-
~;f~:-
)>~;
~
,...,
=
<=
.r
:!:
0;>"
-<
~
-I
rn~
-om
..jy
00
:'-~-"
():u
-."...(;
-c:-rn
9\
'"'"
::'j]
-,
N
U1
:E
..>..
.r:-
1')
N
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a
Restore Core, Michael
Goldberg, Contractor,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAllm COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
.
.
v.
:
: No. 04-907 CIVIL
:
Dabise Camero,
.
.
Defendant
.
.
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER WITH NEW ~TTER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
And now comes defendant, Dabis Camero, by his attorney, Kent
H. Patterson, and files this answer with new matter as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted but the correct spelliDLg of defendant's name
is Dabis Camero.
3. Admitted in part and denied in ];,art. It is admitted
that defendant authorized plaintiff to do restoration/construction
repair work to defendant's property but it~ is denied that Exhibit
A represents the authorization or a contr2Lct for the
restoration/construction repair work.
4. Admitted.
5. Denied. It is denied that plaintiff entered into
the performance of any contract for restol~ation/construction
repair work to defendant's property on Sel~tember 8, 2002.
6. Admitted in part and denied in I~art. Although it is
admitted that defendant performed restoral;ion/construction repair
- 1 -
work, it is denied that the work was done :in accordance with any
contract, that the restoration/constructiolo. repair work which
defendant requested plaintiff to perform WillS completed and that
copies of invoice worksheets attached to plaintiff's complaint
and marked Exhibit B show the cost of the
restoration/construction repair work and credits. By way of
further answer, it is averred that the restoration/construction
repair work was not completed and was not done in a good and
workmanlike manner.
7. Denied. It is denied that the restoration/construction
repair work was completed by plaintiff on or about January 16,
2003 at a cost of $11,082.52. By way of further answer, it is
averred that the costs and prices charged by plaintiff for labor
and materials are not fair and reasonable costs and prices.
8. Admitted in part and denied in J;lart. It is admitted
that defendant has not paid plaintiff, but; it is denied that
plaintiff has repeatedly demanded payment from defendant. It is
denied that defendant owes plaintiff the !~unts claimed due by
plaintiff for the reasons set forth in thiLs answer and new
matter.
NEW MATTER
9. The authorization signed by defl9ndant as alleged in
Exhibit A of plaintiff's complaint was no1: signed for the
- 2 -
restoration/construction repairs but was signed for authorization
to do cleanup work only and was not dated lJY defendant.
10. Defendant signed the authorizati'Jn identified as
Exhibit A in plaintiff's COlI\Plaint based Olo. the representation of
an agent for plaintiff that it had to be signed so that plaintiff
could do cleanup work but the agent did not: allow defendant to
read the form and did not give defendant a copy of it.
11. plaintiff did not supply proper :materials and did not
charge fair and reasonable prices for the materials and labor for
the restoration/construction repair work.
12. Plaintiff failed to give defendant a credit of $99.70
for materials supplied by defendant for wo,rk done by plaintiff
which credit plaintiff agreed to give defe,ndant.
13. Plaintiff failed to COlI\Plete the, work that it agreed
to perform and further failed to do the we,rk in a good and
workmanlike manner.
14. As a result of plaintiff's fail1:Lre to properly install
the toilet in the first floor bathroom, dElfendant incurred a cost
of $57.73 to reinstall the toilet.
15. As a result of plaintiff's failure to cOlI\Plete the work
in a good and workmanlike manner, defend~lt will be required to
expend the sum of $3,822.30 to correct thl! following deficiencies
in the restoration/construction work perfcJrmed by plaintiff:
- 3 -
A. Window jam and sill in kitchen were installed in a
poor and unworkmanlike manner with inq~roper materials, which
will require removal and replacement.
B. Kitchen light was improperl:1' installed which will
require reinstallation.
C. Kitchen door was not painted..
D. Upper kitchen cabinet door cannot be opened as a
result of installation of improperly sized cabinets and
defective installation which will require removal and
replacement of two upper kitchen cabinets.
E. Baseboard molding behind refrigerator in kitchen
was not installed which will require installation.
F. Countertop with backsplash in kitchen is defective
and was improperly installed in that the laminate is
separating and bubbling and the count:ertop does not fit
properly against the wall, which will require removal and
replacement of countertop and backspl.ash using existing sink.
G. Carpet strip between kitchEln and living room
floors was improperly installed and ~dll require replacement.
H. Nails are popping from the drywall and areas of
the drywall were not painted in the ;living room which will
require fixing nail pops and repaint:lng.
I. vinyl flooring and vinyl bllse cove were improperly
installed in the first floor powder l~Oom, which will require
- 4 -
removal of floor and underlayment and installation of new
vinyl floor, underlayment, vinyl base cove and carpet strip.
J. vinyl flooring and underlayrnent, vinyl baseboard
and toilet were improperly installed in second floor bathroom
which will require detaching and resel;ing of toilet, removal
and replacement of flooring and '10" uncierlayment, installation
of new vinyl baseboard and installati.:)n of new carpet strip.
16. The condition or need to replace the one half inch
underlayment (subfloor under theW' underlayment) in the second
floor bathroom cannot be determined until the existing vinyl
flooring and %" underlayment are removed during reconstruction and
if it needs replacement, there will be an additional cost of
$250.00.
17. Defendant has or will be required to expend a total of
$4,229.73 to correct the defective constru,ction work done by
plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, defendant requests that pl.aintiff's complaint be
dismissed.
L !..!.!{~
AttornE~y for defendant
221 pille Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 2:38-4100
- 5 -
VERIFICATION
I, Dabis E. Camero, verify that the statements in the
within answer and new matter are true a~1 correct to the
best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand
that false statements herein are made subject to penalties
of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
Date:
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a
Restore Core, Michael
Goldberg, Contractor,
plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAN!l COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
.
.
.
.
v.
: No. 04-90'7 CIVIL
.
.
Dabise Camero,
.
.
Defendant
.
.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
f"'1;:;. //1/
AND NOW, this,L.> day of F'l ~
hereby certify that I this day served
,2004 I, Kent H. Patterson,
the within answer with new
matter by depositing a copy of same in t;he United States mail,
postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, pennsylvanla, addressed to counsel
of record for plaintiff as follows:
william J. Peters, EsclUire
Peters & wasilefski
2931 North Front Stre.!!t
Harrisburg, PA 17110-:L250
_IC--f~
_'nt H. Patterson
JI.ttorney for defendant
~:21 pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 238-4100
o
c;
("--'
,-,:
~~
-<:
.....,
=
~:J
:r.-
::>::
:J;:;-
-<
,,-'
c..n
~
-t
:C,-"
np
-om
:vr
C~C)
)~~
'...:~
~;~
-<
::?
-:;..
.r-
r,)
I"
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF C MMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO TY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET NO:
04 907
v.
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO NEW MATTER OF DE ENDANT
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore ore, Michael Goldberg
Contractor, (collectively "Plaintiff'), by and through its attorney, Peters & asilefski and William J.
Peters and files this Reply to the New Matter of Defendants:
9. Denied. Plaintiff is advised by counsel and therefore avers t at said allegations state
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent and a r sponse may be required,
said allegations are specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demand d at the time of trial if
relevant.
10. Denied. After reasonable investigation Plaintiff is witho t knowledge or belief
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of said allegation. Strict proof thereo is demanded at the time
of trial if relevant.
II. Denied. Plaintiff is advised by counsel and therefore avers t at said allegations state
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent and a res nse may be required, it
is denied that Plaintiff failed to supply proper materials and failed to charge a air and reasonable price
for material and labor for the restoration/construction and repair work.
12. Admitted.
13. Denied. Plaintiff is advised by counsel and therefore avers that said allegations state
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent and a esponse may be required,
said allegations are specifically denied that Plaintiff failed to complete t work that he agreed to
perform or failed to complete the work in a workmanship like manner.
14. Denied. After reasonable investigation Plaintiff is with ut knowledge or belief
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of said allegation. Strict proof there f is demanded at the time
of trial if relevant.
15. Denied. Plaintiff is advised by counsel and therefore avers hat said allegations state
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent and a res onse may be required, it
is specifically denied that the Plaintiff failed to complete the work in a wor anship like manner or
that the Defendants needs to spend monies to correct the Plaintiffs work.
(a) Plaintiff was not requested nor did it replace w'
or sill in the kitchen.
(b) After reasonable investigation Plaintiff is without
knowledge or belief sufficient to form a belie as to the
truth of said allegation. Strict proof thereof is emanded
at the time of trial if relevant.
(c) Plaintiff was not requested nor required to aint the
kitchen door.
(d) The upper two kitchen cabinets were selecte by the
Defendant
(e) Admitted.
(f) If separation and bubbling in the laminate of th
countertop backsplash in the kitchen has oc urred, it is
due to improper maintenance on the p rt of the
Defendant. The rest of the allegations conta" ed in this
sub-paragraph are denied in that after reasonable
investigation Plaintiff is without knowledg or belief
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of said allegation.
Strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial if
relevant.
(g) After reasonable investigation Plaintiff i without
knowledge or belief sufficient to form a belie as to the
truth of said allegation. Strict proof thereof is demanded
at the time of trial if relevant.
(h) Plaintiff did not, nor was it required to r lace any
drywall on the walls in the living room area. A y defects
in the nature of nail popping or painting of dry all in the
living room is not the responsibility of the Plain iff.
(i) Defendant accepted the flooring.
(j) Plaintiff did not install the toilet in the sec nd floor
bathroom. Defendant was advised that the t1 shing for
the toilet was broken and the Plaintiff would ot install
the toilet unless the flashing was corrected. efendant
installed the toilet in the second floor bathroom.
16. Denied. After reasonable investigation Plaintiff is witho t knowledge or belief
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of said allegation. Strict proof thereo is demanded at the time
of trial if relevant.
17. Denied. After reasonable investigation Plaintiff is witho knowledge or belief
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of said allegation. Strict proof thereof' s demanded at the time
of trial if relevant.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands that judgment be entered in its fa or and against Defendant.
By:
Date: ;4fvUL S. 2005
Peters & Wasilefski
u
William J. Peters, Esq ire
Attorney ID #09983
2931 North Front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvani 17110
717-238-7555
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a estore Core
Michael Goldberg Contr tor
-..::\
VERIFICATION
I hereby affirm that the following facts are cOlTect:
I am the Plaintiff :md am authorized to make this Ve ification; the attached
Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants' New Matter is based upon information wI ich I have furnished to
my counsel and information which has been gathered by my counsel in the preparation of the
lawsuit. The language is that of counsel and not of me. I have read t e Plaintiffs Reply to
Defendants' New Matter and to the extent that the same is based upon i formation that I have
given to my counsel, it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, i formation and belief.
To the extent that the content of the Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants' ew Matter is that of
counsel, I have relied upon counsel in making this Verification. I hereby acknowledge that the
facts set forth in the aforesaid Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants' New Matter is made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to au horities.
Date:
i6
Michael Goldberg
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
PENNSYL VANIA
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF OMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND CO TY,
DOCKET NO:
04-907
v.
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoi Plaintiff's Reply to
New Matter, has been served on all parties of interest by placing the sa e in the United States
mail. first-class postage pre-paid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on this 5th d y of April, 2005, and
addressed as follows:
Kent Patterson, Esquire
221 Pine Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania l7l 0 1
Peters & Wasilefski
rYl Cv~c C'.OOtL
f~,
;'"
"
~; !
~~ -!
.....,
r.::,
(.~')
c.n
?-
A)
o
.."
-<
-,-
fi, :!l
r-
:p",TI
r5Y
_.,19
,''OJ :~,~
~";.-()
(--In
.>
""'
~o
...<..
I
en
--r-)
::.r:
~
o
CJ
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
PENNSYLVANIA
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
DOCKET NO:
04-907
v.
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
RULE 1312-1
form:
The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shall be substantially in the following
THE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
William J. Peters, counsel for the Plaintiff in the above action (or actions), respectfully represents that:
I. The above.captioned action (or actions) is (are) at issue.
2. The claim of plaintiff in the action is $12,454.26 exclusive of interest and costs.
3. The counterclaim ofthe defendant in the action is $4,229.73.
The following attorneys are interested in the case(s) as counselor are otherwise disqualified to sit as
arbitrators: William J. Peters, Esquire and Kent Patterson, Esquire.
WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3) arbitrators to whom the
case shall be submitted.
Respectfully submitted,
By:
Peters & W. aSilefs~
C A. /U ..~ "Q ----:::>
William J. Peters, Esquire
Attorney ID #09983
2931 North Front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
717-238-7555
wjp@pwlegal.com
Date: ?1tMd" 2006
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore Core
Michael Goldberg Contractor
,
"i\
-\PI-
-r-\ \") t;
fV 7'- .
1l i. B
- ":3 -tJ
~ --D D-
~r't:
-.n ---J:-
; ~
,"-,
;
.JII. _..
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
v.
DABlSE CAMERO,
Defendant
"-1 "
, ~ND NOW, '~' F'
. >. /vzu '
ij~'t~1 ht1l ;1 ~
(or actions) as prayed for.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET NO:
04-907
ORDER OF COURT
, 2006, in consideration of the foregoing petition,
Esq., and 71fc1..N/ <t<'5~wvi Esq., and
Esq., are appointed arbitrators in the above captioned action
BY~~'1~
L1t~' [tl /'J 1~,i~~liQR<;:H !JOfrfR. PJ
. j I
1/ f/
f'h
L
."....,
'\'...... ..:
. .
. -,--
:'-~,
.......
.&
.' .
DOUBLE GOLD, INe. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
PENNSYLVANIA
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
DOCKET NO:
04.907
v.
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
RULE 1312-1
form:
The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shal! be substantially in the following
THE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
William J. Peters, counsel for the Plaintiff in the above action (Dr actions), respectfully represents that:
I. The above.captioned action (or actions) is (are) at issue.
2. The claim of plaintiff in the action is $12,454.26 exclnsive of interest and costs.
3. The counterclaim of the defendant in the action is $4,229.73.
The following attorneys are interested in the case(s) as counsel Dr are otherwise disqualified to sit as
arbitrators: William J. Peters, Esquire and Kent Patterson, Esquire.
WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3) arbitrators to whom the
case shall be submitted.
Respectfully submitted,
By:
Peters & W. aSilef~.
{"!u ." ..... "Q .:=:>
William J. Peters, Esquire
Attorney ID #09983
2931 North Front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
717-238-7555
wip@pwlega1.com
Date: 'I1tMd ,. 2006
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore Core
Michael Goldberg Contractor
.......
~
:s
6""'-
"'-0
(~'l .~; r' ,
~"~ 'Ij J i : : _
iO
ti:.
n ~
'" .......
:ll .~
....... 8
~
....0 \J
[ P=
~
r
p~
-t:L
Double Gold, Inc. d/b/a Restore Core,
Michael Goldberg, Contractor,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: No. 04-907 CIVIL
Dabise Camero,
Defendant
:Civil Action - Law
ORDER
AND NOW, this ~ day of June, 2006, it is hereby ordered and decreed that the court
appointment of Lindsay D. Baird, Esquire, as Arbitrator in the above-captioned matter is vacated.
Stacy B. Wolf, Esquire, is hereby court appointed in her stead.
J.
Cc: H. Anthony Adams, Esq.
Lindsay D. Baird, Esq.
Stacy B. Wolf, Esq.
Kent H. Patterson, Esq.
William 1. Peters, Esq.
Michael Badowski, Esq.
"'"
C"-'
~
o
-n
f','
C'>
:r-n
12;~)
-. ,c.,
" I
'-", ,'--.
c
~
" ~'\l
f':?
<:~f.t~
~
~:Sl
01
C'tl
~'~~\L ~\~~~, &/~(D--
~€ ~e- ~\CI-) "" l c. \;C\<!? \
Gee,' 0 ~<>.r ~ C' "'^~C' \0 r
, Plaintiff
\)n..~\ ~e Qa. M~,()
Defendant
JIIV ·
..
ill The Court of Common Pleas of Cmnberland
County, Pennsylvania No..!i:L- g D-,
Civil Action - Law.
Oath
We do solemnly swear (or affirm) that we will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United
States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth and th!t e will discharge the duties of our office
_~Z~~ /[ /i-------
Signature
Signature
lM~LL( m$~JvW(4- &nr~u e. Wot-f
Name Name \
t~~;;; a .lJsAi/J Ju?! (( Ii- )0 If
l{q U) Dfn.,jP ~ "$q()7~1C<i 10 \lJfE~ WI~&J
;:l)e~\<.~.Q.l' ~}lj/ !q,)}1J/6 C:\~k rA \10\::'
~ z 't 7 JS 7 City, J Zip City, Zip
~ I DO.3~ :# I ~~~l it: ,,., 3Od.
We, the undersigned arbitrators, having been duly appointed and sworn (or affirmed), make the
following award: (Note: If damages for delay are awarded, they shall be separately stated.)
~ ~~ir1an ~~Cl 'MS
Name (Cha' )
~ \..~~
Law Firm
Date of Hearing: ~-~ ~ \o.~\ ~
Date of Award: ., / 10/ ~
f {
~:;:~~ (~s ~~~~t~~~ ~~~.~:~~;r\^~~~~:?;:~Q
\S ~~(?{;) i~ ~ ~~,,\ a.~\..l\."* 0+ 9ocO'o{)
. Arbitrator, dissents. (Insert name if applicable.) l
.' ,l
'. (Chairman) . ~
Now, the ~,ofh day of ~~v>..MhPr, 20 01., , at B:~q , -L.M., the above award was
entered upon the docket and notice thereof given by mail to the parties or their attorneys.
Arbitrators' compensation to be paid upon appeal: $ ~qD. DO
By:
Deputy
Prothonotary
,
. ~.~.
. . '" t
.,.., , ., "
ft,;
.. ~ "'," '.
~P' f...
. 'iI
. u)..to :
C<>I'~ ~ 1. re~~<I\-
~1'~ ~ q.a.~
~.
i'\ .
l' f .I
::t-~e.~6 b~
- . ",.
.'
t
-- ~~.
.;
()
c
<
'"'tJIT
r;' r"
i!.. ::.1,
~2~~ r
(J">; '.
r:'
::~"
"','';;'" 1~ '
~:~,;:
z
:)
...
f'ooo)
c::::t
c;:t
d""
(/)
r>i
V
N
-.J
~
~:D
g;
~6
r- -T",
a '(5"'1'1
-.. '20
cp Om
~
~
N
""
'~ J "\
'" ~ ..'
I: ,t,. \ " .r: ,""..'" '" ..'~
.;," , ..../ '" '. ,. 1"".~. .,"'.'
JUL -10-2006 MON 12: 42 PM PETERS AND WAS I Ui'SK I . L
...
FAX NO. 7172387750
P. 03
or I' . '. . " .. .
.~. : "
"
.f '~'''''''"''__:'''' '~'. ..,~." ;"rP"'....,. '_,....'
, " I. '
. --~"'1
. ..
, "
_ __r~ UL -1O-20~6 MON 12: 06 PM PETERS AND WAS [ LEFSK!
FAX NO, 7172387150
P. 01101
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RBSTORE CORBJ MIcaA'BL
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff'
IN THE COUR.T OF COMlvlON PLBAS
CUMBaRLAN'D COUNTY.
PENNSYLVANIA
v.
DOOKET NO: 0+907
DABlSE CAMwtOJ
Dert.'i~utBnt
(rlPULA TIOl"T
.
1. . Judgment shall be entered iu favor of Plaintiff in the total amount of $9,000.00
inC\UbivQ of etlsts.
2. The pi1ttiea request that the appointed aubitrators in the Bbove-Qlptiancd action i9UC! a
Report aM Award coDSistcn1 with this stipuJatiOJ1.
JUL-IO-2006 MON 12:42 PM PETERS AND WASILifSKI.-
t
FAX NO. 7172387750
P, 04
~L/I(j(1~ ~
Counsel for Defendant
..,.... ~'" .. . _.T .._.~ ,~, .,,,,,,,,,~~~....~'"',I''''''''''''I'+''' "0'.'" ...., .
..I "" '" '""'i"" "'~-'III\I.'''I'II'''''''''''Ir'''I''''~.' \~. . .~
DOUBLE GOLD, INC. d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
v.
DOCKET NO: 04-907
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
PRAECIPE TO ENTER JUDGMENT
ON COMPULSORY ARBITRATION AWARD
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY:
Please enter judgment on the award of arbitrators filed in the above matter on
September 27,2006, the time for appeal having expired, and assess damages in favor ofthe Plaintiff
and against Defendant, Dabise Camero, as follows:
Amount of Award:
Interest from September 27,2006:
Total:
$9,000.00~
$72.49
$9,072.49
Peters & Wasilefski
By:
~
Adam L. Seiferth, Esquire
Attorney ID #89073
2931 North Front Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
717-238-7555
Date: 11-") q - ~(}(}{e
Attorney for Plaintiff
Damages Assessed as Above:
Date: I J./J 1/ (){,.
~
p-'-
\ l:
&"'1'"
~ .-.
. ~
~
c ~
~ ~
j
". .
DOUBLE GOLD, INC, d/b/a
RESTORE CORE, MICHAEL
PENNSYLVANIA
GOLDBERG CONTRACTOR,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
DOCKET NO:
04-907
v.
DABISE CAMERO,
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe To Enter
Jud2ment on Compulsory Arbitration Award, has been served on all parties of interest by
placing the same in the United States mail, first-class postage pre-paid, at Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania on this ~day of November, 2006, and addressed as follows:
Kent Patterson, Esquire
221 Pine Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101
Peters & Wasilefski
_~m:f~
~ 0
c::> -1'1
t (J ~ cr'
~ Cl :t
\ ~ l" r"'"n
~ cJ 'c
~,,,\
C> - ..;JI:(-
- D 3q
r -- yo .~~121\
--
~ ...J0o.
"""" - ty'n
~ ~ '2 .--\
L:-"~ '?Q
~ ...\ c...n
......- o? ;.-<,
fU ..c; -< ~
- ()
~ - ~