The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-4835I-r "(T?'-?,T^1 ()OT /'TT " 0 ?• 1..10' TT?. r 'T '. J.n•N II T,J. 21.',"!. TT ,1(.'TT"rT" m p TW1377: IT.C -T 11 (`JV 7S A. PALUGH, R. , V PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OP CORREOTIONS, Dei'e v Zi. l cr gin, E;5v,,n,rd Avers, a' -_le., Yo 11i, _c' ul)er, CO?_ T'lein, T'_^ eic'-cr, Dic: Soui,:1e7-s, ?7f ?,_ >y Cci,? T r,i 'as Lmv, Donlld L. ----------------------- N 0 T I r;i.'T. T' .%r;TTU -- -Im- L.AW i. 08 •yf36 J?TDGE: C E --------------------- - v ; L= '', ee-a Su°C 1n COUP t. If J'pu d,-Ii to C? e-!`-1? the 01 sci for t a in 1;11e olio .i..: . ,es, ''ot.j lay is 1 e ction ,.ri thi.iz is e gel sec, r _1- t, is C0 ?I-irit nc 70, U L t.ten ^ "1'l?p,r^.nCe ^e.. 0 _1 ^,7_1 ;1^i'tin? ',it._ i- 1c Co Uri, ;Tour 7-c e..-ice or o'- Jc-t.o a, -1o fill^ c j c? ct „r0 a. You are -:.rnet,' ^t, ii io do o i_le t;Ud? "^. e .: :^r0 ceed iii 10ut trou .ailc- fi - ?` - rJU by ie CO Uri 1ut far?rr.er notice ?o1 nor Sao--icy- cl:,i'1eCl in ?t.ie Cn - ?I-Lat of 'o_r- ot'rler cl,,i 1 or relief rec7ue .'-e(' ?- ? 1c P i 1._ a 10, C i10ne?r 07 nr0 ;D_ r r _ z its J_: t0 ''O a S' OT I Tf r' T'TIS P TrrR TO 'CZ?R I TT An OT`TCE. IT' VOLT DO -T() A L A.+T_'FR 0'? C--!'. TTvTO T _A +' FORD O"IE T GO 'i'0 OR TFT,-? DJTO T-7, O 1+ rI CE SET 7IORT'" 'FELO'N TO 7I°TT1 OTTm ":TTF'R?' `TOT- C.k7T GAT L ?".?L P. rc v cr aoa- c O ? i Ce oGo.'.ei` .l Coun -'al T.A Do 0' 0f "i c o Chiei el 5 17- ?T tl ey Drive _ T 7? (717) 731-D444 C :Lrtir R. Lon,-, Prot iozlot?,r;r O.n.c Court )oure Squp.re P.9 17013-337 ITT THE CO UTRT OF COT'TT?O `'? M AS CUTi??ET?I AI`ID COUr'?TY, P.ETTP?SYLVA?TIA JT'`ZS A. PALUCH , JR. , Plaintiff V. . PENNSYLVANIA DEPARMMT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defenc°_ants (all Defendants li ted in Section III belov are being sued in either their private capacities, official ca,paci.- ties,nc??or both a.s indicated) CIVIL ACTIO:11 - AT LAW CASE NO. t1 TJ DGE : JUT TRI U DEri.: ??J D: C O M P L A I N T I. Jurisdiction Piad Authori This civil action ^t lm,: is made purse^nt to the la,Frs of the Constitution of the Comnonwealth of Pennsylvania. (42 P,,:4. C. S. A. 9931; 42 P C.S.A. 95303, 953229 @5329) n!zd t lc la,,xs of the Constitt..tion o f the United States of Araeri.ce. (42 U. S. C. A. §1013, 919'5, -1 06; 4^ TT. S. C. A. 91331(0.) , @1343; 42 U. S. C. A. @19c7, et ceo. ; and 42 U. S. C. A. §12101, et sea. T'_ie Court's- a; .t'lori.ty to hear this civil .c-',ion a.t l?,? Co inl.i_?.t is pursuant to the Co_-?stitution of the Co:a _ o,:1;ae 1th of Penasylvani?. (1960, Art. V., Sec. 10) ; 42 Pa,. C. S. A. 66601, et sea. ; the Pemnsylvania ("PA") St^.te Rules of Court, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1001, et secs. ; ^.r -°:leli ^,s -7n ,,r of". cr applic- able cmthority at 1-im for purposes of effective liti,ation of the cl^.ims herein. II. Preli.nirna.r.V Statement M,, i.s is civil rights action filed by J,-,, es A. P 11uch, Jr. ("Plaintiff/Pltf.1% a. state prisoner under the c^re (--ad/or lads thereof), custody, a-,,--id control of the PA Depa,rtrnent of Corrections ( "DoC"), formerly confined in the Stf-,.te Correction-,-..l I_tictit,.Ition f7tt C:n Tyill, av.d presently confined in the State Correctional Insti- tution at Fayette (Le3 elle2 PA) 9 for. dam -,,,,,,es -nd injunctive relief pursuant to the jurisdiction aiZd aut'aor. ity previously involved, a.sser- tin,7 r,aC we-ring 'j^x?.ssment, retr.liation, clue process violations con- cerning confinement in disciplinary set;rec ation, cons=piracy to deny civil ri`hts, deliberate indifference, failure to protect, official o:o-^r. ession, < on?;st other pendent and/or ; u?)'nlenentol state and fed- erp.l jurisdictio'.1"'I claims aader 28 U. S.O. A. §1376 for violations of tlie First, Fifth, 7Ti41z'th2 and Fourteenth k:lener_Zents, of t'_le U. S. Con- stit Lion. The Pltf. also 11e<<;es lie l.i -ence. III. Parties The Pltf. , Ja:c..es A. Paluch, Jr., -,-a,^s in soli.tary co,zfine:,ze_-1t i, tile Sneci^.l tanagaiaent Unit ("MM") at the St,-%te Correctional In- stitutions at C :: n dill ("SCI-CM"') in Cu!berlald County, PA, during the events described in this Co nla.int. '-His present address is 50 Ovs_rloolc Drive, LaBelle, P.% 15450-1050. ?. Defendant PA Dena,rtlent of Corrections, is torpor^.tion .,Ad/or Uurer,ucracy of the Co?.T',io -r7p,_.1th of Pen-rolylvani.a, and oversees the ?lanc. e?ent of its e::ployees, ':rho are La charge o the custody, co_itrol, Ind care of the Pltf. as ?-rell as the hu=,an.e tre^tment there- of; incl_udinC, the oct.ablislanent of its nolici.er, -,-)roce(1ures, rules, regul?.tions, ,=ild (7,irectives. The P.A. DoC is bein•- cued in its offici- al c ^a.ci.ty. Locai-ec'. at: 2520 Li:_>burn Ro^d, Caa,l,) 17.1111 PA 17001. 3. ') efond^nta Dorek Zim- er--a.a:n Zim ,err1^::1") 'n=;on ("Si_;, so?i"), Ed:;?>.rd Ayers ("1yersll), Yu,tthew Yo 11 (nYO i?'?) A#am Tuber ( "T'u':?er") , a.zld ?rlein { "ILleil?") -re correctional officers e lnloyed a.t m?,eJ, -re being sued Lz t2.oir priv,-..te c?.,-)^.c1t1es. S CI-CgM. Def e c?..^11t Robert Kreider is trie correctional lieutenant c1_:1ar^;e of t',_e STAU at SCI-C11% Robe-rt 'reider is bein` 61_.'C:. i.n his offici=.1 ?.-nd priva.to c^.na.citie "Sou'rhsrs" is the unit m^.n` er 5. Ce__:el_a?:?.t Dic_ L Sout?.he ,,r?r ( o f the ST'U . 1 e-_1-)loye(7. at SCI-0:17 2 ?7nd is ? ener^.11 % r eFmo_n_F ibl e for Ove. rSCe1'I k-:; ttlr of both t1riP, ')11`70:x..,,_ 0 ,-u1Q .. t1.bOrdilllai e _ _. 1 "t1Ed to t.'2 S11ZT. 'TE 1 ueG iia bOt'1. his of_Li ci`.l and r`ri.- v;-te ca _.citi.es. ?. De e_ynts Bu-(,ne Rr .n?i"an ("]3ra.n?.i`^n") ^nd David Patt,)n ("Pattoi2") .re c'.e? t,r ctlnerintendEnts e;;1-?1c rec. ct (2) OvBr ceS ?l? is xeNpOnSiblE -for f11ciIittr `lrla Sec'.?1"it'•t '-q. `? ?' oment u P^t a 0Z1 O versees ?nd_ is Yes ?o_,ls+ible for ce_ltr ? i.ze t :services s??c], as, r.e .i c ,l ..e!1t^l health tre^ t:nent :1ca_ also ;eslenG .,tie 1. t?Otti. ?.re beivl-,' stle'. i._ t11^12- offici-'al '121C1 nri.v£'.te ?ci ies. 7 Z c_1,ry Most ?iL "1'To =1 : " i, heari_-? e--. j ..e? c_ lo?re_' r the P-11 . DoC -nd ^.SSigned 3"1-^UT. is rery_)onsible 0r 00ii u, _ cG1.n?1.=1"YVr he?.rin -s for 1TL 0:1e1" 1C'. 1 ° of }?Y'er.:- i1 ri oi1 rules. l e is scze;_ in offici°?l ?r iv?te c.-, citaies. s?. Do enc,.-nt 1? 171 -.vil ti r:i."L,ta='t A. oyes. t SCi-(IJ,41R. Ifi i ?zcle ,r ?," l?r c.:lnlo„rer i.s t"Zie P DoC or Pri; o,:l I e?lILh S ervices or both. S is r7.11\7 3'C' =;'?07. ibl? for CO i(a:aC? 7T1,?' ,'l1C' C?,?l_ P=?V1_C°S .:1C ''OI rc t.in`) '. ith -rovl r'i:1 : , ? i o -I C? ?;: 1i1?.ti0i1?' ,^, 1C z 1 fi' f'I1 'ry. S,- i'-'1 °,Li1- c L BCC La bOt ' i1P.r 0"77i_ci^.I t1? nriw,te C Oaciti°S. c. Defend^i1t Theres 7 Lm ,I ("T,`?':7") i t t.,e corrections he,,,Ith G<:.re ??4: i 1i tr for e_? ,7oy'ed t 01 1, L p?zc, ? re L o_?.< i')le f r e of 11 c, .lt-i_ care 5..1:: 1. ti: s1E1 .1:., ?;?,eC_ in 1b0 tt.1 her o :fioi 1 -:. car,7cities. 10. De ° 1C_',: it Doivlllj L. r11_elc iaer (17elc l.ler?') ?,S "the s 1 7er111- te ld ezt/f cilit?T ^"ryE,er eai.?loyec? ^. " c i ?^espo:,si')1.e fix illclvdl._1.?;, ;iut not i1. ".1-tec to revl e'I1. 1 ^11 i_1i i2- tive ;.n0, ?,_i sci-)IiA-1,71 ile ri.n.t,c ^?,n . t'.eir )1",e<<lsy revie yin for= 1 "rievn.nces "t1G t]ieir av. --._u? t -i? 1n °,1^,t1CE, ?- ,erv,?,tion, allC, r)rotec"ti.on of video s.urveill:`?nce c T-,Tel l as other evic°ncey ? 1G for t'1E' YlOni.tOriil?, i.nterce~ti;i0i1, ^11C, n1°eventicn of ctr,•ff -."base Of -,)i"iconerS. TTe it bei_a.-', rj-ed in b0i'h his official anC. 17riv Ite II. 911 De en .?ntS in r,^r^Mrnnilc t%lree (3) throw, 11 ten (10) ^.re ,.dint ci tize_1r of the Unitec' States, believed to be resident-- o f %'le of Pennsylv7u1i1,. `,.rld their 1i'.i+J4"lYl taddress is: 2500 Lip 0urw-i lopd, P.O. Box 200, C^, p 11i.ll, PA 17001-0200. 12. All Defendants 11"ve a.cted, co:.:.tiaue 11o act, an.c' er color of Stz--_tu :,,1-1c'._ Feder ,l authroitur .'.t ?-11 releva,_1t (3) to ,t li '' Col!i'^l ,-.int. 13. At ^.11 -a7teri^.l ti _aes, Defend-.nts ("Defn. ") Zi anerman, SL-a:pson, Ayers, vohn, Huber, Klein, Kreider, Sout'hers, Rr^nai`a.n, Pc-,,tton, r-?osla:'L, B:,.rba.cci, L-Av, and Kelc'uaer ",,ere indi.vidw9as °,ho .:^..t1E- Or ?`'1ou1d '1-.vc knoGVn ".bout the la.,;vr. of the Oo?1!..on, e?1 h of PA t'ie la., ;rs of the United States Constitution l-.t cries --ncl,,or civil ri; htc vioin.tions cucIh 2s ha.ra.ssment, ret??.i^- tion, dei-aa.l of c?_ue process, deli'Cerate indifference, failure to protect, official oppression, theft of funds, ac -,cell P.s conspi_r^.ey to co_rait r c , .-VronE;ful a.cts ..ere uml,-riful. 14. At, X11 :1,a ,erin.l -i,?eJ De?t,.?. per>Si).-son, ,;rer.?, Yo'lz,., 'T'uber, I77- 1 ei11- 1 I'reic?er7 S0atherSI Rr??I1i.Ma.nI Patton, T::T0 1 a.l>, Bnzb,,:?.cci., Lr;v, .ad Kelc'vzer ^,cted it _in the course ?nc? sco- e of t'leir e-aployment, a - dedlared ,?.nd indicated, as officers, cntr, -'-na C-Apervi sons pursuant to the cuctoras, p1licies, _?roce- dares, aja,? ?-r,.ctices of the PA DoC. IV. r-c'cs r:,nu Declerations 1r. In S epte-tuber 2003, Pltf. authored Vlie boo -1, A Life for a Life: Life I2nriconrlent - kmerictn.'s Ot'zer Death Pen!72ty, originally pWolis'led by Roxbury Publishing Coi-lnany. lam. Pltf. Ca..ctively en ':fed in educating; the public and. it,: la;?na:'sers about the realities or the pri son conditions in!ide li ht. the PA DoC, ^.ZC_ this cat ti-es pl^.ced t'te PA DoC in critical 17. Pltf. actively en-ages in frcel^nce 71,ritin` q being a political activist for both life-sentenced prisoners and nrisoner/ vic';i?i ri:,hts, filing le,Zi ti-gate fonan.l -;ri evances ag,-i.nst the PA DoC ^_1' its e--inloyees, and in enM< `ink; in civil liti pl tion .inst t',ic PA DoC and its a. ployees, ents, etc. lu. P"I_tf. , as a result of en,a ;ink, in lai,ful ^ctivities, hac bemae a. of 11n'rvss-aent, rei-'7?1i^tion, ^d_ti'Zins, 81C?. Ogler burdens by PA DoC e-raployees. l?. P1tf. ,,"as re,.lained in solitary confine:, nt ;since I!-,y 27, 200q-. 20. On September c., 2004, --771.ile 'Ao'used in t'he Rectricted (4) '7ousin Unit ("RTIU") at the State Correctional Institution in _'unting- don, Plt eras assaulted by his cellrzate due to ?IU staff•s to protect hire and by the encouragement of a R?U officer -.T'-Io are erani_oyees of the PA Do C. 21. Pltf. filed a Priv7..te Crktina.l Complaint a:.-, ai.nst hi^ for- -ter cell -1 ,te Roger H. Smith:??.d correctional officer Jo'?? D. Das:?son 7.7ith the PA Stpt:e Police. 22. Pit-f. f!as transferred to t1te State Correctionnl Institu- tio'n at SCI-So .ierset on Febru-.ry 1, 2005 at t7he request of the PA St--te Police due to a needed separation from SCI-huntin^;don st'a_Ff. 23. Pltf. ,aas eng ed i._z civil liti ^tion -?,-ainst T-7eti. , and Verizon Select Services, Intl. -° -iich provides contr--.ct telephone ser- vices for t'.e PA DoC from PTarch 2004 to June 2007 (Yount) et [?1. v. T *''ci;.LY_/VSSI PA PUC C-2004-2655). _ 24. Pltf. filed a State Nyrit of 'Tpbezar, Co-rr)us in the Co-cmmon Pleas Co.art of So -erset county pursuant to P a.:R. Ci.v.Proc. Rule 10un(b) a.-^.inct the nri_so^. officials of SCI-Somerset e .nllengin;; his confine- ent in t'ze MM (PalLac_ v. Rom-n, et al. So-.lersct Co. Tto. 2-09-CV-2-005). 25. In May 2005, SCI-Somerset prison officials ber, ^_-i st^.ffing the Pltf. for ?l .cenent into the SYM, ??,,hi ch Pltf. ^.cserts ,.nd =givers ?:as e.n or anized cona;oi_racy to fry-udulently I ilr?r retaliate Gl . a. ainst him -`or en aging in lPWfal activi..ties each s ut?ioring his book, Min,- le,itinate Erievances, an0_ civil liti cation, etc. 20. In November 2005, Plt-f. r:T?s tr,,nsferrec. to SCI-CAMI inhere he r.^ nl^.ced i lto the Sr.U. 27. Tlie SITU is an a.tynical and significant hardsb-Lp in i eln.- tion to the or i.r_.^:ry incidents of prison life. 2u. Pitf. -7 s placed into the S:?TT .,-chile on custody ("AC") . 2S,. The 3.5.1 Policy and Procedures Mp_r ual ^r.d the DC-A.DM 802 effective at the time of Ylovei-?iber 2005 governed the nrocedures, rule;, and regtalations for both S1_U and Administrative Cuatody nla.cel-,ent. 30. The STNU consists of five (5) phases as folloTis: P'.^.se five (5) is reserved for ST.TU pri goners on discipli.na.-r ;i custody ("DC") st,=.tus; P'_ a.se four (4) be,-;ins the initial AC glace;-,lent st,- e for STJU prisoners co u :fitted from RI Us; Phase three (3) is also AC olecel ent (5) -'ii ch be-gins ;Drivileg es such -,,s co u issa.ry avnd access to r?.di o; Ph'-, e tvjo (2) is the final sk. e of AC }-)lacenent in .l e S?TU ?hi_c?Z e-l- lo,as the additional nrivi.lere of access to a television. Phase one (1) , uOon .infor aa,tion and belief, is P. three (3) to six (o) month ,,D2^o- ba.tio ,r,,j period in any no-oulation of the PA DoC. 31. Pi tf. first began nreoarin- a civil , -,.ifi • ",^,1.11;?t correc- tio_zal officers anc 'ais for-naer cell r1ate concerni.n.- the Sera t a"_lber °, 2002, incident of assault in December 2004. 3 Pltf. believes t- a,t tic PA DoC and its e::a,,lo roes at SCI- So--a.erset -,mew that Pltf. vas nreoarinc 3. civil suit araiast the PA DoC e.;?loyees.t SCI-?u atinEdon. 33. On Februr r?,T 8, 2006, Pltf. was -dvanced fro:,a hip initial Phi-,,e for-.r (4) ("P411) to P'a-se three (3) ("p-zn). 3^. S. ortly there^.fter, Pltf. r.s intervi.ewed b - the Associ- ated Press con.cer in the PA Do C's ban on porno -rn',y in its state Orisons. 1 i-le the Pltf. does not -1_ecerca.ri.l4T co;a?_o^.e ; orno?ra.niiy, he cr.iticized the PA Do C's Dolicy o 1. ra_a._-ixa_; porno^;r^,phy bec,;u-e he relieved t'l, t it '':oald i.n.crease violer).ce and c , "^1.'r °'t r1. 10:aerN ?nc f0'1"l e staff. T'i° A_ '0'^1.`lteC': Press nL l_ 7 l.ed t ' Pltf., ?l co-Taents i:_. to pre?a-ri?l- hip civil -°uit, Pltf. c- e c? _ec Zu r(, tow--.tive ju tice "Life Blosso:_a, I' „T? f, -,, t7 v^rious ?,? to: lrors "'.tie _ s.col { { o ci ?,i e life _'?'_o°o_aswi_ Zfo) . }J. In e: rl„r A_?ril 2000, De,". Si?.nson the Pltf. if he co?.lci ee tic. Pl t: . * boo'A_, A Life _cor a Life (IIALT'LL"). Tie Pltf. told Siarson V,.,-A- he idea. Pl't-_. ?Dclie-ved th<^t S .^ o. • rec+ue,j t ??et_ ica.l. Si:n,?so?z ^.s: ec7 e P7_tf. , nvou n= Mo tilt°o _,^h the ;oro`ra,7a, I-'oaz't yo',:_'t Pltf. a,r,a.in told Si ,-)?°on ' i not 7, -00(-1- he dir alt S,' .1t t0 c'0 it. Simn- t -00(-1- ide ,r;-ve the Pit-% <.n order to Live him the boo'-. Pltf. reluct^ntly °rve Si:lr).eon ALFAL, fea.ri.n,- ret^.lil-lion. 37. Pltf. ^tched Sira1)^o_a t?.lie the booi. co?,.,n7,tairs. --laere he s .-,t 7it roor?en lwench pagin` fi':arou;;?= t'-_e boo! . 3? . Sa.rat-)son also gave, the boo to Def. Ayer-, t. Rio ?a ;ed t1i-ou;-h the book. Sinn-son ret"uran the boor.-, ^,,nnroim1f tely ", h,-,If- (6) 'lour lster. Si- pson -=:,sked the Pltf. 'io-a much rioney he a^s ettinr; from the book and the Pltf. resoectfuJ_ly told Sir.l-)son that ; uch in- for? q.ti.on '-"as o no concern to him. 39. An_1"ros 1 .-7 tely a ?veel-. 1?- ter, Si,-f, oson -,LLLed the Pltf. .:That he thou'_'.U .bout child-molester- ? d the Pltf. exnre^sed 'u s cisli _e of P do ohili ?.. 40. Si -vn,-on. tole' the Pltf. that, SMU prisoner Eric Lyon,; Ii-I,d r^ne yot?ld 'i1. e -ir , c h if the Pltf. coal -t Lyon^ to yell oL?t!iCe Ii- is 3oor, the Pltf. could ",o t'1roli;';h t'-n So,-Yam ism ch q ui c'_L e r" . 41. 'I tL. refused to e1 ^"'e 1_1 such uaet.'Iical beh^.vior .rid tole Si""1''So1, ttm'1^t• c O y^y. tt 42. Pltf. reported Sir.Osol1's ;,ronoci-tion to SITU cor.rectiol s S. D^o•:?er during outside exercise;a. 43. Pltf. ),(Iv" ced fro,,--' P3 to YIP,se tGvo (2) ("P2") on or :bout TM-,y 229 200' 44. Oa Ju<Ze 15, 20062 t'_ie th- ,,t SITU Pro,;rara Re- vie.7 CorL--i"ttee ("PRO") tole the Pltf. th"t 7'1e no l011.-er Drese1).ted are-y i^is ? i-o r,ntT me neral ?o ?u1^tion r,.ar?L choald e: "sect to be - r)roved S. uo,r 1p, e.,?e'11rO_- _ COi1C?.Ct?SrL ?Orit rt!:11': nett CPRC revj_F.T°,? t'iLe Pltf. • osae, s i A ? (to m/ ") no. A74,78--15 for "'L'Jliz1c; to for ti; ?1. . ?_"-nC" CO ?,1Y1 .". , 45. On June 21, 2006, Def. r?o: l<:: i founc'_ -?,e Pltf. "c',ailty" of r.1/c no. A-7478'5 and sr,,nctioned the P1tf. to fifteen (15) c -.ys cell- re triction. 46. On June 28, 2006, , lout any forrv,,l notice served unon the Pltf., Pl_tf. de.zoted from P2 to P3 for s. period of 60 d7-vs. -7. 011 Tiny 5, 2 ' , a ?? e d o S of his P2 St,t is OOc? Pltl. one, d t_ to Def. Yelcliner. 48. On July 18, 20069 Lelc'r:z.er denied, this Pltf.'r ap;.Deal. 49• On July 25, 20061 Pitf. npner-led the deci sion of l elch- ner to ! !- C'_ioL J- 11 n; E - xainer, Robert rt S. I3itn r ("CTiE/'?i.tner"). 50. From 6, 2006 to August 1, 20062 the Plt filed- sever-1 official irra-.te grievances (DC-804s) mostly cori?l:.inin,m about t.'ie h.ndlin^ end confiscation of his oerson? rroperty, inclu (7) dingy nos. 140723, 1440,11, 148663, 153834, 157407, and' 158444. 51. Ire. the aforementioned. r;ricvances, Pltf. did e ::press, his concern r^Dout ret^lir.tion, v,ri.i:h i;iie e.Lcention of no. 157407. 52. On. June 23, 2006, ir1--ed_i-rely follo,7in ; Def. Souther's decision to denote hire to P3, Def. Huber confiscated all of h.ir! ner- son:1 )roperty on the pretense of "cell reduction". 1rion,st the personal nro??erty that the Pltf. 7-o,-.t or he,d stolen were le,,,,Lc.1 notes i,1 nrenax^tion of t'ie civil suit `ainst the PA DoC e°11-11o Tees ?fi SCI-?Tuntin7don. 53. On July 18, 2006, Pltf.'s father, J<=.•1-er A. P^1uc.i, Sr., a le-ct-r ,-DA.dressed to Kelchner co:.nnlainin" -bout uber• con- fisc-T?ti.on ^:_--il' alt erinc ?s ;yell ^.s de,,, traction o" PItf.'s ?ercon^,1 oro?erty. Pltf.' father decl,-,red to Uelebner th^.t he ?,-,,oiL_d con.t,^.ct hi..r?- _atton ev and conjressm,n. 54. Pltf.'s f-?.tt ier's letter to Kelcl-mer South-Oro to r^ telephone call to Pltf. • ^ fat'?er. Southern told Pltf.' s e father t-,.at hi.s st,=,.ff ?cted pTofessionally, and t"at Plt,f. "needs to better :Za.n.Me his beLavior nroble;ns". 55. T elc Winer :71so iv. j.led a letter to Pltf.' ^ ^t'r!er dated Au,-;u7t 1, 2006. 56. F1ty. is not li ti.7,n.ting m/c no. A747835 or "ricw--:nce nor. 1407232 144;'11, 1486689 153834, 157407, ?nd 158444, '?o' ever, t! Cce c_ocu:!lents rill be used .s ti;un ?ortir_ evidence to su')ctmtiate the clr.ims for this civil suit. 70,vever, these i?.ctr :--i.ad decl^,r,? tions a.re asserted and -.verred as history. 57. On Au-act 4, 1,006, Def. Ziri-erm,--n i rs ueJ the Pltf. P. f_ ^,b- rica-ted l-d c retaort, no. A747864 ("747864") for of "9,SS?;.U.l..t" and "refusi.n,?; to obey an order" ( ""too") . 53. P1tf. di c'. not ss^ _zlt Zip ter ,a7.n nor .refuse to obey P-'ay of '. i.c orders. I_._ f^.ct, Pltf. obe<red 2.11 of Zi . er :1 .n'r orders ?,, ile ,. '"le ST.Tu. .. 5e Zir__Zerr1^n denied t'?Le Plt-f'. of his -.1.(7 - ic'?/c?.i.rrer) on Auc,u t 4., 2006. 21tf. filet' ;riev,.r._ce no. 15044 . It nr c?L! i.ed, r-,?) ealled, aac_ eYh, usted ^t all levels. 60. On Au--ast 4, 20069 Pltf. mubi-i.ttec_ a DC-14..1 Fart 2 A (8) "If--uaty Request L Represent .tion a:ld Witnesses" form "-lJ-1 2V) requesti.-ag that the video surveillance for EA Quad cm_1erC. -.nc_ tlc EA- 20 cell ^;?rr .t re `-e used as -k7itnesses a.ndl )Y c ri J.erice in su1)s-,ort of in locenoe oleo,. 51. Def. Mosla.1 co_lducted di sci,l_in:.r i0r^rin bated on 7 7 oa Au"ust „ 20 6. 52. [o -1?1. dried Pltf.'s requeE?t to in, sec the ,perra.ture of EA-20 cell ic` otzld 1,--ve nroven th?.t t71e -aloer?.ture i.s very 'if =icu1 to o,,aen.. ue also ?enied Pltf. • s reque : t. to La sped r :nc't revie.v t1le viClleo v--- .?.lce for EA Quad (recorCLec on Au;u,'- ;-, 20006) due to cl-.i 1 tLIat Def». SoatiLierc -.-1d Krei cer to'_,,i , no vi?_.eo cze_l ev ; cC o o . 0_,. A?_" :?-t 4., 20006, Z ;. J. Si i;ol:'_ t'ie P1?-f. V t vi;deo surves.? ?_ nce P.va11Cr0102 th"':t _ ---c! '_oilz a in the 0 e?ler<?.1 ?'Lirection of E9-20 cell, aiZd th:-t bot'1 the Security i., s._elchiler 11. cce».; to t liti ar J• i ce dG.r1 Vn.3r.r`ed'a0il '-Iii 111i E ily be LO."iil0'.C C??L O?ltO 11, 2, o _ t i _ 1C d..te, Pltf. to '-Kelcli?-ier recjue; ti_iig ,,0 nYeservc ;,ro ec r `C-iiio Video 6L . P! t . told ""?oslc 1i tl1 .t 11e to vc the he,-,r- so ti1`?t Ile could L-ive,-?tic.?Ae. t??i.s- =lc .rsay t;1:_`, no evidence of the video,, u1 cill:-.nce st=e(? coyicer Plti:. requeste?._ _ J ,D e7_i '.i'it l $''elC Ller 2.^ou' this so 1111-It, 110, 0001d L.IS'y?E;C I: he vi0_c0 2'UY-VCill;a,ace hi-aself in` (.ead o re1;T1.i1 ; Oil toile Ldloril,',tion of u r"os1,,1C denied Pltf.'s request Iiat Tile 111137'- in2i.D0ct the vio_co s-arveilll?-1ce colic ernia,- this incident. uv. ?'i_e vi 7_eo urveilla.nce ould h. v e sho-mL th-.t the Pltf. Clicy not CLas,Jc.'?lt by - i1e f Ood ra',1 1... s" r i i ii1" 111:1 `,.? t ?. ii, the r1 zilt i1c?1C" . - ;'. 'To 1«a denied tiie Pltf. C?ae ,rocess ,? -lot in-?Decting the vi c_eo ,surveillance of (-recoj-de(?_ o i A:u„us i. 4, 2006) :.: ? ci_ :h<_ s v,.il ,b le _or TTosl .i • s ills-)ection on .9til;u t , 2005. 7os12 - _"ouilc? the Pit ";-;uiltVr" of 7,17564 Card so,.Lictioned Go. hi,,i to 00 cl"ys DC ti_1e. Sr. As ro--mlt of Zk,- :1er.rmnxi's fabri.cf-rl Ed i,_:coilc'uct report protect Pltf * .? C.ae ??roceu ow ii1s 7 7 3, IF J-) ?? rho Ll' s failure to (c) i.'-Cray interests, Pltf. suffered the loos of his P3 status and cbil- ity to to P2 talus a-ad Nubsegaent antic;DzFted release fro tlp, SIr'-U. 70. Pl,L-f. ,as scheduled to be seen by the STET PRC on Aur'ust 10, 2006, in ,faich he <?.zticpated the ap )roval to -.dwa'ice to P2. _1aL's end r?Ov.1 ah ' S c.Ctions, Pltf. also 71• As a result of Z1 T1er' 1 Nu'fered the loss of nany otlier ?rivile? es he e^.rned on P3 stratus (e. . , r` dio, food cof"L.Iis?sexy, etc.). 72. ?1_,.rY_i2C) f brictted 747854 as deans to ret:-_ia,te a.-ctinst tie Pltf. fo t',c filin, of -riev aces, a 1:,,%'ful -ad ,protected 1i. ;ht, L,:.,"'.inst S?'TT staff, lore speci I ally, Def. 73. On 15, 2005, t-Le PT;C vacated r'io, 1 is decision due to a `_clr.y in service of 747864, any . the .z^t? cr -ms re:"Handed for a r e e _rin ;. 74. On Au"ust 21, 2006, Mosl:..t_ served the Pltf. -.;ith n ;)hoto- Copy of 7,1-705 r, a DC-141 2A, and. <?, "IrLlate Version <aid Witness State- :n'i s" f o r' a("DC-14"' 1 2011). 751. On 249 200;,, t 11e retxin , of "'V64 --as conducted , 1e? rTo l ?. by 76. Pltf. had submitted hi c DC-141 2A on _Nu"u=t 212 2006, .nd revue C ted s, ritne'sses: a) STTU C°0.j(, ) for E-Jnit, Quad A (Aug. 47 2006) ; b) PA DOC Policy 5.5.1 (ProceCureE) 1-0 7-b. (2)(3)(4); and c) 001 D. Zi=:, ;ter _aaaa. 77. At 'ci-e he ri.n`;, Pltf. sub--litted ;a DC-141 2C7 ?.11d "Relewult QUc: Posed for Witness 001 Z " (3 l ) 78. T°o slain denied all .°,,ri tness reque ;ts. 79, . Pltf. asserts nc;. avers t11.=.t T'roslak should not have relied anon the second-hcm-1 or "hearsay" infor..s ,lion of So ? tlhers t?i at "no vi(f1co evidence available for ]NEW this 7I,::?,,--.,_-.,ir.,e7.1s review." 30. Pltf. requested "Toll ,, to s)e-ith elc'n er concernin6 -hsther the vireo surveillance e.I"is ed for p?otil?, L's inspection. Pltf. t",at ie sent a DC-135A to 'Yelc'uaer re- told TTosl nT.- ti t, tie hearing questin" the video surveillance in question be preserved and pro- tected. MTosl2la refused tie Pitf. • s request. 'I. Pltf. asserts 1-ad avers t -at T o 1?.? c'id not cello; the Pltf. (10) to )ose relevant questions to ZL-L.1ermaa -:''iich were designed to sllo?r,r ?. ,?.t: ZL".a?aerr_ .=' s report Vas not credible. r'2 -- -'s decision not to i-i.s.?ect the video Lurvei.llance in question oil .9u`ust 99 2004 and on Au-;ust 249 2004, uafE.i.rly prejuCdced the Pitf. by de ,yiag him due process to s ubk?tciltiate his C1^lias of .ctaal innocence, tilus TTosl -.ii's cl L-a that Or nofi(Ierance of evidence e<rists to su")'Jox't the clla.r"es in 747864 is tsinted, thus i ?1Se. U3. 0.1 Au4ust 24, 2000', lRosl ... fours -,he Plt=. "L uilty" of 747- 83-4 =• u_ i 1, sonc-iioned_ hL-. to 60 days DC time. 3 . Para.-ra .?l1s 632 65-67, 69-72 are incorporated herein by ref- er once _'S f?.ets nd declarations. 35. Pltf. a,)De,a.lled 747064 at all ,ad 1ini.str:,tive levels r.nd ex- 11^.ustoE av^.i1aD'ie r,ezaedies. 30. 0_i Au, -t, v, 2005, Pltf. filed_ G1:iev. 7o. 160746 ^fter di - coverin4 tll t "iuber °,aroziMFully mailed v. rious "nc.rs;, ,1?er clippings -.aid lreroxes (thereof)" 'rithout3er-_ission of the Pltf. to Thor_Las Bern- =C., Ph.D. of Pei1.sylv,.ni a State University. 87. Pl+f. assertis avers that Kolchner ?.1-_o-- ed t:-,e 1?lt-`. to icel) tlies2 " le i'sOc.?Br clip 7in.,s" -a resolution to Griev. No. 144511, in his ertiorl,.l property. ':?o. Kslcilner, Southers, Huber, h :ve s ;?r ,cti ce of z1ot allowing t'_1e Pi ;f. to possess olio to co oies of ne,ss? .l)er cli. a Dins, a-rticies, llc ;e s of 00_i; nd ::1 ;a7,ines, as :;'ell Cs editori:'.l s. Pltf.';- Griev. No. 160746 was denied, and ex- haast ed ?t ^11 levels. 90. On A.t urt 0,1 2006, Pltf. filed. Griev. ?o. 1o0S141 ("150?,g1.") ;after 70cin` harassed arid denied his :Zeal by Defy.. Sr ;,;_)son r?.iid Ayers. cl. On Au,ust 0, 2006, as t'le '.ore ;,1_fast tr,y; were being passed out, kTe-ro thre-w into Pltf.' s cell (EC-15) a. n. or rn r e, a lf- ?in?: of end styrofo L;1 cup ic l 1 nf_ed on the cell floor. J2. As Pll,f. bent over to pici` these iter..is off ti._e cell floor, Siri son said to t'1e P1tf. , ri ;ht, bo-,-! down :aon! eu, lover." ?3. 0,n t ii_,`-., sai2.e date, as d.in_aer (lunch) ae".1 ? rc.yS -,,,,ere beini-, sassed out, A„rers ca-le to P-11--f.1 s cell door e:.-.d conti. .uously ;;,a,ve 11i-m orf_ers to b?:.c-L UP, even -.fter Pltf. h"c_ his b?.c1: to the call. (11) 94. A„rers then wal11: ed away refusin to dive Pltf. his ne<?.l tr??,?r. Kreider ms present, and desPi_te Pltf.'s ss in him to in- tervene, he refused. 96. Pl't,f. informed Kreider that, ?1e X-s Pn epileptic, and. that he nceC_cd Ilis nui t rition due to the prescribed. ",,,e; 3.i. cati ons he tia TTe ,-.lso told Kreider t'1cat he not'1in ' Iron; to be denied hi. '-1 ec.1. a-y, me- c7. The Grievance Officer, JEW:. Cole, cl,-.i.'"1s Ile interviec,aed Soutalerti, Yreider, Ayers, and Si ipson. 'Te never intervie,fed Pltf.I s messes cle tidy i.renti.fiec7. in 1u'0,41. S!3. Pltf. requested Yelc 'Mer to review the video ? uyveillance for this incident in question as :iell as to preserve and protect the video evidence for judicial revie-:I. 1 ^. Pltf. never refused 'fi r. me. 1 trp.y. 100. Or Au`ust 9, 2006, Si_?iPson issued the Pltf. 1/c 'To. A741- 7 3 ("71r773") cr.;i z '_:1i> ;'i tl1 "Thee .tenizig, ^.n F?nplolree or T1eir F ily" ( "TFTF") . 101. Pltf. never threatened any -)erson as reported in 747073 the reoort is fabricated. 102. On AuGu t )1 2006, Pltf. sub•7ittec? a. DC-1,1;1 2A reque sting two -,d.tnesse s: <a,) S177 Ca_.^er , C Quad; and, b) Y,31c ,.ner. The Pltf. l o submitted- Ia DC-141 2139 r,t the hey. in :;. 103. r!?or> 1 ` ?< C0110 ICted a ^'C l1e` rinE on Auust 16, 2003 ConCer- n n ' ?n 104. "o slam cxcepte(. the seco.d-11R.n.d. ^nC_ he<- rsomr C'.lle.-at l.ons of So t lets %'1 .t "there is no evidence a-,7ailable" fo-r the re- v1. e`:.'; . S out'lers not 1)-1e, erne --).t the hec -. ing .....LCL ach t er tiiiony :7as not orn to nor ifir^_Zed. 105. Yo.-1° 1 denied Pl't,f.' requeEt _. f,) r ':7i'?, .esses. 10S. Pltf. asserts an_C. avers, th .it Kelchner ?_1ov1:'_ '1r.ve been .,.,lade avail:,ble foi' questio,?in` Concp _a.in;; the vi.Ci_eo su.rve.illra.r,ce -,'t the Ile grin". 107. Pltf. Iso requested ATO .l 'i to sl?e,,:k riT'1 Yei c':u1er about !,.'J ht:'1c=.I- ^.n i viC_eo surveillance of 4-,"L i i s 1-'10iC1_eat, exi cte0C --r-'or T'i i s re- (12) aux. ?"ocl! ^7_s0 refused to do t'lis. 103. decision not to rll0?^ Pltf.'s --.Titnemryes, ,'hi.ch inc1L_des '717" 1r?.ble testir.iony fro-2 i elcllzler :Iio is _,:no' r? direct source 0 the video evidence in question, on, hic11 could be used. for tie ?T'i to irl,s_7ect on AuMust lo, 2006, unf:? rly prcj idice?, the Pltf. by d ^.,friP_ irn due `orocess to subStrnti. -te 11_ dlaims of innocence, t`lus T?oc,lc ?' s cl^i?_Z that a preponden-mce of evidence e,s sts to sup- port the charge in. 747873 is tainted, thus fr1se. 10P. On Aa,?-,ust 16, 2006, "Tool^:.,. fow,, the Pltf. ""ui.lty" of 74-7873 `?_nCL s,'?.netio_zec_ hi , to c_0 d--Ys consecutive DC ti-,,,e. 110. Pltf. ^sserts givers th .t '111c never to Si-anson nor A.,,r°rs, "Any chance I -et I will mill bot0ir0u" "ro you hc•c, better t Cl your b^ Cif s." 111. Pltf. -sserts Fnd ^vers t'l.t Sirnmson issued 74.7873 as 1"1e^rs to '1:?.rass, retolic!,te, and offici,- 1?,r O,)preSS ir.11 Pltf. _For 81=- erci-,-7-in ?lis legn.ll?r nrotectedz ri hts (e. ;., .atliorin.- AI,FAL cor_i- s +. pl^il41in" to Dar'hower about Simr)son's r?ro:;)os-.l concerning STT pri loner Eric L,7ons, for the filing; of le ;i til'.^.t E; r;r.i.evances a,Mainst STgTT s.t^ff, ^n6 for prep ri ;•,ir civil suit ?,;ainst P?? DoC e. ni_oyees). 112. Pltf. s.sserts and ^•vers th,-t the vid-ec surTreillance recor- ded on EC-Quad for Au, ust 0, 2006 `:could s'lo!x Si 'ir_,son. and :Ayers at- te to bloc',, the view o_" the ca._era while food 71ae.re being t'1ro?,n into the cell. It Trout d .lso sho,°.7 th2.t ';-,hen the bre^,1:ft-1-st tr?.y ?mere bei.n_, retrieved by Si.nj?son s.nd Ayers, they appro^ched Pltf.'ti; cell non-chn.l?.ntly anc. opened the pera.tu.re 1,,-i.thout my con- cern for t?Aeir ss>,fety. 113. 5 ^ result of Simpson' S S'.'.iDrLC2.tec3. ;':/c -re7ort ^.1d TTos!5:. .'s f^.ilure to protect, Pltf.'s due process ri;?'1tr nc'_ liberty i.n.tere.sts, Pitf. buffered the lW consequence of additional di.scinlLaary con- finat ent in the SMU, thus hi bility to pr0s;re?„ throu h the SIT for n rivile"es anC_ eventual rele-se to ?-ener->l poo-o.!?.tion anconstitu- sonr-llzr re .a-r eo. 11 ^ . Rpsed upon the 5CI-CA.T? fl,?.cili ty' s r ncl Kelchner' s fz-.ilure to Lr Verve ,protect t'_- e video surveill?.nce as re(7 Lle -ted. by the Plti. , Pltf. filed Griev. Yo. 1614S.3 ( "16149`3") on Au.rust 18, 2006. 1117. 747873 -- , ?-r)re?llec', denied-, end el?l?•ucted. ?,t -7.1 -.d., (13) stra.tive levels. 116. On Aumust 21, 20069 Def. Tp.ge,,-.rt rejected 1614 3. 117. On August 20, 2006, Pltf. app. o ,i led the rejection of 1014-S3 to Yelcliner. On September 25, 2005, Uelchner up:zeld deci- sion to reject 161493. 113. On Sent.eriber 27, 2006, Pltf. 1i)pe-iled T,,c-art's z nd Kel- chner's decisions to the PA DoC Secretary's Office of Inmate Griev- _.:ices,, Anneals ( "SOIGA") -nd on Nove;:iber 27, 2006 SOIGA un eld t'_ie .aci7_ity• s c ecisions. ' ?.'-:f. .ct 1 > 19. On Ati L st 23, 2009 -__ i.le brc meals, :-,,ere a.ssed 0tit, , :A ,crs cP.-,c to th,s Pltf.'s cell and iLgnor^ntly ordered to Pitf., "Ste; stun) d." Pltf. imnored the ,7,rassi,-,ent, then stepped bac'? . Ayer; '- yen orderer? tho Pltf. , "Sho -i your hando, st,ar,.d." Pitf. r'lo,:, ed lis hp.nds. A rers then w-I'(_ed ^:. Ta?r fro--i the cell c'oor. 1''0. Def. YolLn, T. ho Ayers -:?hile passi.n. out the :1e5n1 tr.vs, r_? IDv Pltf.' s cell and gelled, "Life b**ch. n 121. Pltf. T,-rar, denied hi c bre?.'r_f^st nie 1. 122. Pltf. requested in Griev. No. 151730 (1115l ?,30r') -T'ii.ch <,7ias i -..°.eui :tely filed, that the vi.deo Our-, eilla,nce for thi s incident be ,preserved rand protected. 123. At no ti_:ie did Pltf. refuse hi,- area. f_.st Ze^.l on t'iis date. 12 Griev. Officer Cole failed to intervie,T rl<<r ;ri.tnesses to this incident. Instead, he fri.vously bin-ies the Pltf. for resisting; to fol- los:,V orders, crei-,ti. i;- his o,rn nroblens, and uses _?s?rc'iolo ? c^l arfare by false Iv encou2^.4Ainm the Pltf. to ".ltteilr?t to or'_ itl_ the Unit nR 11 - erient S tp f-° i I_ t'rie SMU r7, tLer being conf;.ontation.a.l arie_ re- s i ti t^.nt to Verb^.l Oro-erS." 125. 161c 0 r?.c d :aiecl, nr?e,^llec , a.nc:: e;?'?a:u ec. at every s, dni- st.17.rt.ive level. 120. 011. Au.-ust 23, 2006, Yohn issued the Pit_". rI/C ',?o. A747877 (1174-72,77) r rtoo. In 747877, Yoh-i clai:zr t'ia.t Plt f. yelling out _i _7te (cell door) a,t Yohn a,nd other ?ri?oners, ..lid_ th^,t he - ^ve f o h 1-' e Plt°°. =our (4) ornery, one (1) of zT?^ic'l -»s c':.i.rcct order to "c _e ;r c1-oor9" but t1 ac" the Pltf. co:?ti.?Liec_ his loud heh^.?ii0r. 127. Pltf. asserts a_'.d avers th^.t on Au.Muct 231 2000, ^.t no time Jd C' tie Pltf. ever Drell out of ')is door, especi..l.ljr at Yo'in or other (14) nri so 1ei^ s. 123. On Au.,ust 23, ru.ested e folio :ia. !i 2006); 21-1e,; b) 001 Yohn. hii"1 ^t the 12 0n A a^uc 2>f 377. 20059 Pltf. su'Orlitted ? ,s D(33-141 2A ^.nc re- tn.esses: a) S7 TT, C,r?::nern F,-Unl t, C-Quad (.lug;. 23, TTe also requested th-.t Yelch-aer re nrcf,;a .t 2000', r?o rl^ . Cond.u ct e t--, ./c hearin on 717- 130. Prior to the hearin-^, Pltf. in the STTU libr,?.Ytr r.-,-,d did not. ipve 2.CCeSS to T11.S P_1/C doc,,a-feats. -I-Te requested bo'?Iil the escortin, officers ,,7ell ^s if he could ,fo b,-,01- to ilis cell to retrieve t'-ese docaments, but -ii.c reriuesto, ;?ere denied. 1 jl. At t=1e 1-9e7- rin3 Pitf. T'.F told thl-,t ._0 coL'_i_d. ell 111P, ',Ter- si.on of° ,ll,r. PIt.f. objected to this ,? i ri-u, thr.t ho 11,_,x?. ^ riMilt to Sub'?'11.t 11i.s ?Zritten. version. ?'[oslaTc bec? . an,mered and st,?-,ted_ th?t the Pltf. C11.C' f t h?.STe _1uc 1 choice in the L .ttC?Y. 132. Pltf. verb^.11-17 told version, lie Ycomected th,?t r?oslaiy i. _,l-nect VII video sLZrvei.11mce ;llic'r1 -!Oald Sho , t',,^.t '!_e never elled yt of '!.1iS ce1..1 door. T:7e it o re,.uested. to nor; relevc;: ?' questions for Yoi7-,a to ^ho`.'P th t '?is re ort -,,'`as not credible. 133• TJT0 1','`> Geli.eC. t1ie Pltf. his requests ''or ',-iitnesses. 1341-. Da-2- i,-, +he he:,.Yingq there :'ere sever-.l_ STTLT .Mu,7,rdS oat,ide of the i?c^rin, roo : (''Jil1i..m. Curtin 3'uildi.n ;) on B-Curd. At one t 01111 ?OS? ?'C ?rell_eCi =i,t t11E 1?ards to "Leen it 0o0:-1n. -=e l s, or i .nrecY°': to be dlStracted, t! t11e SITTJ co.a e_eC; tei.Y loud -.nd boi rterou f 7, 1) e'1r.vi.or, orcl^re( to : escort111 --;u^.rc? to clo>e t'Ie door. 135 • t? "1 _ .. 0 l1_. i d. the pl t f • 17 , ?_. fT of 747" I l7 ? r .i' C ? 1 0 1 r' to con,-ec_.ti.ve 30 d,rVrc DC 1 ?( P! i c n, t c n-I , -ve E Vl^.t Y 1 c17 74 77 i '` E? t r n ?7ct?t •1?'7? p avu o f 'd /+; -f -ova-} s (+? ?'^" p 10 - s''' V VI -xa o? aa?? ?rro? ,toy -S-00r -A-0-b8'tr 'QdV) sr?d?t©? saay^'tl 14 -flA("! 0 !ilcl ,odd ?• _. _ a-f?'-FS s!H pa5 -? ?o,tno? ?Hf aof pN? +L"Prs?ad 7?'l+ /SoO?' t$ ' t/ uQ rvur ?S'd'S 'Y7 fro,eos.+ad s;H J.o OU(-Arojap -?jj.{ .ON aau^Vna;aj 10101;d +u?w(d (SO 0r 'bc -?aro14 '"Q • u U-V w I `1a'cd p " iv ' s a.t ?v sJ r t ?'''? ? (, ?'`" r o p?p??(??? .?.R?aM .??. ?,? ?a ro? s.?.uropuaia4 2lWS -ZaS' ?'?'?N71 9'1-F Lt +1.4?1Mau'r-. uoT (-v ;(i ( s;+' b+4; ua+I?pyf Sv02` -/? -b 'o ? t/d A+IA„ oa f-as ?avu vs- .avg.. s-.a 1 d ao vin W o-d rt d_?o ,-? sra qro? ,?aaroyd u4 'U? +? -1;-'M a-1?'f•S ?' p-'I?'? ?f.'?'"r''Id SOON" (hr 177. Pltf. ^'?)e^ale?. ,47871 "_ez ..l, (?? 1 38. ?.zo .i l.Zd1 c^ e ; Z) nci 1.n^rv Ana in" e )or t" (rh>r_ 1?('_ s r,.l f` e (J ! J 1_i^iLlde?'_ oir 1:? G1iCCX .'b'1y'- 7 ;7ncl7• 1 ,?. ? 1 Cr'ul1T 0 n Yolin s :-,,br1.c_.? rer)o•T :1J o r. to -`Ot?Ct 7 Otil lis C'L'_E' )rOGeSN r1-, t "-n C. 1i? erty if_tetS, Pltf. °? a_• consequence ()_ ?' t='.dC_1 i:1 p'_; ] C_1. `C1`")? 1 .V, C0_' f_'. e 2C11t La t'_le n?TT } r 7 in TTT i7° i t 1 f'C P 1C,A S.._ ?.bili t;;, to -ro _res,? through ?_ Sl' .7 a-,, r l_G_ c;c a.0 ?e1° i^..1 n0 ? al"'.t1Oil .c y'U' t"lE " C Jc,Il ??. LL% - t.° ve?, 1_,`x.1'10 .2 c7 f., c (?M 1tJ P7 _t er`i n _a • 1 ? ? • `• i? .? . J.i J c ?C. ua.d .: 1 recorce;. on .?L?. ~C t -DOS, oa d ,,1^1ve ? 1 t 1`.t T!_i:.?• t:r yeliec'_ _ t, Yo:In o:r ot'1cr ??rl 'Oi1Cr ?? ?iT 1 10 ., ti:`1 ^.t _10 did YO':111 Urcct ny o2-= to or -t the ?itzl es? o d 141. To^_ -!_eci foil 11ot to ^llo -a P14 .,- to t_ie re .son for ,?, 11 ,, i. n-l .'..i?l: , i L^,ilure to i?1 ect TT i.1__I;IE V_','eo sarveili,n.co evi.-?_ence i"'1 ''=10 ?0^> e"S'Oc1 of O l i °.r` p `..c Seca1^itu, Of.],ioe, 7,1n(/ /o elcllaer on 25t i111 C11 ?. l° ^O CeE _ e ju-'iGec4 the P?_tf.9 by d^ 1,? r1 ;.>tE ^ i '-1 n'O eCt1.Ot1 of 111 l ibert?T Lltere,??t,^. Pit- ?. -,ouC_ <i .Ve bcOn amble to U? ;? 'L1t1-^tP, 1-iis Gi?:-1'.' O- ^rtu"?_ ianocc.ice aid. r'id',J t'1,`',t re)ort c?.ot crec'ible. Thas "?osl?'_',_ cli.r? '.-1r t nre;ond.er- e o f ^Vi c'_e-1ce e.;.i C,ts to su.,)°, ort th _ ch., r_?e in. 7"7877 itrrdnted., V-2. On Au-;ust 2_ ?, 20069 yeys iosaed the Pltf. : /c 17o. A747678 ( 1174-72;70") for !T1111PI? TTc`in` Abusive, Obscene, or ln-a-romri^ to Lai1^tl". e to '..l r 1 to ree ("TJAOILr") , ?.c_ rtoo. RC L!51in." to Obey ^r1 Orc er s''L^?_1 n.o -? be ("RT ") . 143. Pltf. a.s erts avers t?la.t on August 23, 2 0,05, at no time dial the Pltf. tllrea-,ten !dyers; nor did. he use ^bllsive, obscene, or in- ^.n ro^-riate 1a.1?L?.a.`E to r,7:..rds A?'ers; nor did 11e re-J'u e to o )eq azj of the orcers tj':?^t Ayers cla.i.rns to have rla,de. 144. Oft: Au-.ust 23, 20062 P1tf. sub::litted_ 1i.s DC-14-1 2:9. Rnd re- (16) quested t'rie follo 7i ,-,..7 ,witnesses: a)S"?r? Ca,,, era E-Uii.it, C-Qu^.d (A.ur;ust 231 '20005); b) Walter May, PA DoC Prisoner W-3424; and, c) C01 Ayers. 1Te -!so requested tl'apt, Yelchrier represent hi-_-.1 at the he lrin;-,. 145. On Aul-ust 252 2000, Drosl^. conducted 1,/c hearirir on 7?-7- 27C. 146. P^ra_,-,raj-)h 130 is incorporated herein ?,-.s referenced.. 147• At the hearing, Pltf. told thlt, he could sell his ver- sion orally. Pltf. again objected to this sr-,yin- th^.t Ise K CW hn,d. " ri.-ht to sub:lit his -r'ritten version. ?osl,"!:i .,g-in denied Vile Plt °.' s request. 144. Pltf. verbally told. his version, t'len reques t ec r'osla ' to inspect the vi.dco surveillance whic'ri -,7ou0_,3 rho?a th^.t .!dyers did open the aper:-cure a-fter d.i_rectin the Pltf. to "Ste-,? b :c _, stupid," etc. ^nd t1lat• the video :would sho, t'nat Ayer. s had no concern for his ncrsonal Na fety ju-t by :ion.i torinr Iii- behavior. . 14c,. Pltf. also tolCI TTona,l= th<?t he t-mnted to pose relevant questions to Ayers to show that his report «ras not cre(:ii)le. 150. ?'sonar denied the Pltyi"'. hi requests for ?ilit'nesses. zd dim':issed the 151. l'ola'L found the Pltf. "runty" of 74787u c1liar ;es of TFTF and RT00. Pltf. -,,ac san^,ti.oner. 4,5 1,?!?rs consecuti.ve DC 152. Pltf. asserts and.. avers that Ayers issued 747878 to the Pl t f. because the Pitf. had.. earlier filed a Yieva.nce ar-inryt hL'l for denyhi_1 a :iea.l (160941) and because when Ayers .si-ed.. Pit if he could read his boo! (ALFAL) a fear days before, Pit-f. told hi,1, "'To." 153• Pltf. a?)pealled 747478 a.t every ad_lin.stra,ti.ve level, but it was denied, ?.rld is exliausted. 154. did not indicate in the DC-141 2B ?`or bot" 7,17877 and- 747C70 t l t, P7_tf. had requested his °:7itnesses rio_r t ye re7.soiis as to why- they :-sere denies'. 155. "Focl-lk did not issue t':le Pltf. his yello;r cony of t"ie DC- lz'l 2A sox both747877 'n c' 747878 prior to Pltf. leavin, the hearin,;. 15J. Pltf., _.fter bein` escortec'_ to hie' assi-??et'. cell a,nd Cis- co veriil;that 77osir,111 dial not issue him the yello := copies of the DC-141 2A fox both 747877 -.nd It 747878, requested corrections officer Tobias (17) P?+f Q to i-lform. M0s19 t'irl.t did not receive the y e11o; copies of im ''is, (1 DC-14-1 2 As . 157. Tobias told the Pltf. t'in.t Tgosl^.'_L hn.cl nlre?.dr left, thn.t he sro ?e rJi th Soothers, and Sout'riers said, "Send a request sli-) (7)C-1350 to °Zosln?"-." 150'. Pitf. -_ant a DC-135A to Veslak rerue. ti rz his ,rello-.T co>>- ies of the DC-141 2As for 74-7877 anra 747378• Pltf. never recei.vec'. a res)onse fro a PRosln.i . 159. rRO?wl' -,Izo fniled to include i.n the DC-141 ? t'._^.t the Pltf. objected to not bein4 able to subai.t T-,,rit.ten version pursun.n t ,11 to the DC-AW 0'01 Policy, in both 747877 -,uzd 747873. 100. 7"1 l^.> i.ndic?-,ted in t'a_e DC-141 2B thn.i- no ^.nne.adices ruc', n s the DC-1,1-1 2A and DC-141 2C vere included or ').ttn.c zed -;-dth 747878• 151. r?osln.iL ?id not include nny rep-sons in t"lZ^ 77)C-141 2B for both 747377 nnd. 747373 as to ,.vhy he denied the Pltf. hi.s reque, is for c,i messes 'V. lter r. -,.,r, Ayers, and the STITJ Ca: sera I'd d ;o s a.rveillance. 162. As a result of k7ers' fabricated report n,.ad TTo?? >• r ?__ U.ro to rotect his due nrocess i,r?hts li'C)^rt,,T i.lter St S, Pltf* suffered. the Consecluence of adOition?ll d_iscl jr confi.r_enent i..n the SMU, thus his ability to nrorress throuMh the S-YU for pri.vi.l e-es eventua.l release to ?7,ener it no -)elation f lrther L -.constituti.on- ^.lly retarded. 103. Toll^..'r c!ecisi.on not to .llo r the Pltf.'s -.Titnesses and- f ,il-ire to e? ,lni.n the reasons for den?rin ther.1, inc _ud.i ,- 7--is f^i1- are to .ia-?ect aivailable video surveillance evi _e?ce in the posses- sion of Sout'ders, the Security Office, anc. Yelcil-Iner oa Ao u.rt 25, 2006, v.?r_f:.?irl,y nrejud.i.ced_ tI e Pltf. b`,r denyin:?~ }i 1 bot:- his due process ri-hts and- the protection of his liY_-erty i.nter? sts. Plt-'. -oair- Lave b^-.c:-?. <-bie to substr-ntia.te his clni.li of ?ct;.a.al i.nl-.oce:_ce ?.r_d that A;rers' re?,o-_rt roc not credible. Thus PRO S1 , _'s cl_?i , t'?.^.t a rnrenon- cl.er^_rce of evi d.e-ace e fists to su-noit t'le c'in.r.;e of UAOTLB in 747878 i t:ni. .tea, t;.Ius ial_se. 164. Pitf. asserts ,,,nd avers that T,itness 'Initer Tlaw- a.s d-i -i ?t Id.s; cell roor (EC-29) anc' --,ri_tnessed the fn,cts of the incident, n.n'_ te-:vou10.. hr-17e been able to `,ubstaitin,te t'lat it nr 11 (13) , e.rs -,ho ,'rs harassing an re, ,P,__1a tin` against he Pltf. , and thot P1tf. lc'? not threatened, used abusive or obscene izn'-'- n7c i o`d^r'?s, nor refused to obey an orders ;riven by Ayers. FurlAe-yno-re, the video curveillonce, although i is balieved cannot recor? audio, You! have been that established- Mays wa; s -and1nq _, t his door rs he n1.t11esSed the incident in ruestion. 165. Fro:-, Au"ust 4, 2005 to August 159 2006, Pitf.' s nersonpl pro7erty lli been confi sc ted. 156. Plt=. was not i-ssunirny fo'!"npl notice au, to ?T his sonrl nropertur ,7s confiscated, tne ite'S ,!ere confl Ecrted on. . 11 C-^- Au7a& Q-, 2005, nor tie reason(s) for the !clot in returnin7 his rer- so 7l oroperty to Aim. 167. On Au.7ust 15, 2006, Taber issued to the Pitf. one (1) box of _ ^rr n7 ;rovert,y along with n Per;oonn! Provelt,y Inventory for?l ("DO-153") No. A637315 7 d <a ConfiscnW Items Receiot for- ("Dr-15q.A") Yo. A854163. 153. The-, DC-153 TTo. A537315 is dated August 12, 2006. 16?. Other SMU nris o-ncrs ''TIlo hnf Veir fier "ona.l 'pro--ert`j con- f_ ccrted ,;ter Wast 4, 2006, '_•1<`1? tAvi r vF'yconrl 7ronort°* retvr?el to t to on A_ 3ast 102 2005. M. Soati?r'rs, Tub^r, Pn'_'-. Def. Ylein orr r^s2ing and rctr10- ti , in 1, the Pl tf. ? y r,^_ jr Z hi ._ rcceop to his =rso a -_ propertY7 fo of ten (10) dvys. ., Pl f ., sever .1 1tens 7___. .:al gs(l. 171 . inventory ; ':-hA to ii. ,'ere '"'1iscj_ , r.nd not Winded On the DC-154A 7o. A054163 roc-, .___-o aco.' 3 of 1e':iE RPer .r ;1cles, accFe lc ravions co__Cer_nin ALIAL, >rt1o:_1 1 Prd state nc'^ nper adrerser; -!hi.o::1 l7 le_n , rei i "'ions, ° l Ter sJazl notes; ,_..1]d le rl Socn'on 1 !Q "Doc! •.r7 fi on i Sunnor t of Bronson v. .ou echell" `.. ic.' 1uR r four (4) ''z e rffifrv1A _n.- exhibits in sun nor thereof. 172. The PA DoC 7!':i,0boo:1 well their Poli cup and Procedures nR:.a.u-rls coo not contr.i_n -ny which r1lows prisoners in Level Fire (5) o .:i.:sin Unit to be present ' lenever re Aso-i- ryonerty is con- f3 co ted. 173• The P'1 DoC nr7hoov rs well nc their Policy rnd Procedures , r ,. aa,lc jo not contain an lan uRae - 'li.ch rllot s yr i ro nery in Level (19) i.V° O li 111`> (5) Unit to be r,resen.t ?henever rr0'^ert?r 1 be i zi- inventoried. 174.. TI_e Pltf. :,rs not nresent ^,hen his nee soil .l rro;?ertjr ,c L CI co _fi I=cited on Au,- st 4, 2006. 175, m,,e Pit'. ^.^ not nresenc, 'iEn his ?-)e~rsongl Taro,,)ert,I inTre_ltoried bar Klein on Au Mint 122 2006. 1 6. PItf. sserts ? ,c< ?.vers tIl".t tie ri °h t. to be rblc fio _.._ e, ,rcn re, rnd :1 i.l a l E;-,r1 8edlaration for fi7_sn" rit'z t =e T7,li.ted St -tes Di-Ctrict Court or "nj other coL1rt of 1 177. P1tf. nsscYts a:ic' ^.vers tiliat he hq.d le„ r1 ri `"alt to be .ble -o Drenr.re, r^,1.1 le- ,,,-l 1Jecl-r^.t7.ori 1C:]. ii;.Cl"UdEd M .ffid^.vit ^.n. d_ e,: i'DitC in rur) )ort t_lereof2 to tha Uniter? State, Pic- L,rict Court of MWpW of and to serve as ritnes for -.lot'ler nrisoner' s civil suit. W 17P) . Plfif. filed- Griev. T?To. 162543 ? 152543") o=1 Au;^;ust 25, ?/ 2006 coacernin ?; 1E lricsizi -,-)er o L!,.l nro;?eri r "-,hiC11 ,,,,c.s C-iscovered on Auuu?- 15, ^OOu', r.1c s'lereafter. 17?'. T. .Mart fri.voloa-I r -rejectec' 152543 on A'arust 31, 2006. 180. P7_ ,_lEC'- rejection o? 16254? fio ':elc._ler on 5entc-iber v, 2006. l )l. ,elc' zer ur?held the rejection o•ti Oct6ber 3, 2006. 1On 2. P1tf. ne^11ed '"a.M.MrrtI rizd Itelchner' c:eCiCi.oZ_ to re- ?N jest 169_543 to 501G..A on Octo')er 12, ?005. 183. 40MM SOIGA denied the Pltf.'s -r o-11 on Nove- ber 27, 2006. 1 34. 21 - f. E - ::".:1 S : r`i'r`1 ti..re re;^_edi e.S i t,h rer-??Dect to 1'02543 nc, t-"Ic P.?. DoC wTo.s given their on?ortunity to resolve t'iis ter. 185. On Ati,,-usI- 10, 20061 Pltf. r-,s intervir:,ed n.t 'ic.- Call ( "S/C") bar Def. RL,,rb?-,cci. 186. Pltf., . rh_o is an eni7_enti.c ^.Zd take,: -lec_.icrti.on to control hi: seizures, lua.d boel). nrevio : ,l?r i,_astructeci by ? ^:?iclal nersoa? el to tr e li. _:ZE ic-.tionr with food ,=,n?, that q.i, .missed ?.Zen1s s'_aould be r. e- rorted, if ,t." I were den rind hi;_ 137. Pltf. fold R-.rb,.cei t'l,,-.t he d-.s c'eni_e ''is c?ilL?°!Er (Inch) reels on Auut q-, 2005 by Zi}err.n nd on August 9, 2006 by A.rers. ,-1 0 138. T?'-.rb-,cci told the Pitf., "I li-w- no control ov.^r i.t•s ec??ri.t;, issue. (20) 189. Pitf. ,sserts and avers that he sneci.fic^11y 7rote on the S/C req.uest forTn, "I •,-,,,as denied _,.y breakfast meal.... "no nutrition for ?er?Cn? 190. P11-f. ^,ssert?? and avers Vlaat ;hen he di_; ^ests hie <>.nti-con- vuls jat r_Zed_i cation-, ,-without food, it c,-.uses hir_1 to sniffer store,-ch 19'l. Pltf. ^.sserts and ^.ver th..t he .id not ryiC1i un for S/C to n^.y $4.00 just to tell medical lie a. denied a rical 192. Pltf. ao2erts a-ld -vers t'iat his epile'?tic condition is -, chroi,.u c d.i sabilitv. 193. Pitf. a-, serfs -,nd givers t'ary.t B^rb;i..cci never -Is-_ced 'che Pits. to si c?'-). Cash Sli ,O ("DC-136SA") a.utliori?iizr the PA DoC to de-act, r:- on- i e.:, fro .-l'iLs -.ccow t for :_ledical co-p,-1,y. 194. Pltf. a>sserts ..n6, avers that `!:^.rbn.cci never told 11-Jra tkla.t a, co-nay fee ,.:could be charged-, includi_,,-r; t7-l-- a,-lo-uzt to be ch-,-r-ed. 195. Pltf. -,sserts anc. ^.vers t'l t upon recei.n't- of 'iis rlonthly `?s- F,s nri z-Oaer account st2te.r"lent, it revealed- that Pitf.'s, ',cco-ant 'IV sensed $4.00 for S/C services o August 10, 2006. U?o 1 infor- 1^.ti.on -n('. belief, Pltf. received 'his Sri oner ,ecoumt st-te.ent on or ab0ut S e; t e--,ib er 1, 2006. 19v. Pltf. -cldressed_ DC-135A to Def. L-a,7 d-.te.c'. Se-nteilber 12 2006 ii-.for-- in;?, her that the P1tf. erroneousltr c i-?>r,7ed 34.00 for th^ a'?.:? ust 10, 11,006 S/C visit, -Md. requestec_ his .ccoimt be credited for t'zis s-,acLe ?.mount. 197. On Sente-lber 152 2006 , Plt f. recei.vec a res once to his DC- /•/Yty/?IJ/ 135A ressec?_ to LmV from Kurt T'ur tz nro?.-; dec?. frivolous re- J? s! onse. OVA 110. On S eD toaber do 18, 2005, Pltf. filed "-ri ev. No. 164375 cl ..lien, in t'le -Luiputhori zed deductior_ of $4.00 fro.:i hi nri.coner „c co uLnt cone e-rnin ; the ,Au,, ust 10, 2006 S/C visit. leg. B .rbacci, Yurtz, and L-7,w failec_ to follo °7 the nol_icy and. ,procedures of the DC-ADl? 820 "T ec{ic^i Co-P-.y" Directive conceri-iin?7 co-;?°y nroeec,_;_re _ to be follo?-Ved. 200. "T f," ? :.c.ili.t„r nolicy concerning the Croce-'..nres to be fo11o•7ed '_en cleductin ; monies fro_a a prisoner's -.ccount for :le('_ical !-04375 "-i r j:^_ ei11y i C'.entl.fithe ne"1 '?ci.n m_iSced/(_ei110d `?r ( cone) (?1) co-r,v .fees d') SC_ not sunercede either t'ie DC-ADM U020 no-r i ae Pri -con "Ie ic?1 Services Act (P.L. 290, Yo. 40). 201. B,_.-.7)acci cid not offer I,he Pltf. ilk any _ _ecaic l services on A.au.St 10, 2006. 202. Pltf. Cdd not authori7,e R rbacci, Furtz, LET- , o r the PA Do0 to deduct ?,.,Liy ,ionics fro-_1 his nr.i toner ecount -for S/C services on Au(--;u,-_,t 101 2006. 203. F"Urtz' r 11.Prnle a ? e. rs as the Gri ev. 0 ' icer -^,'io -Yovi_c ec'_ the 11i ti .1 Revie-: Rea ?onse ("In") to 154375, but T,,-,-., tii net. t1ii D ITiR c-if.ted 0 cto-,er 2, 2000. ffllli:ate (=r1°V',!1CC Sir ^.1" up ?'urtz 7--1c" Lair, byllW@y DC- T??R 0)04 Policy, -rere to recuse themselves from ns rvrin tee 1-)4375 d_.ze to the J?Q f^,ct th<,.t t-.ie-I -rere involved in Plt_F.' attie lnts to i_?.for: ^11tr resolve t?_e -,robl em Cr_> '?1^ined_ of. 205. I urtz tnc L<,,'r denied 104375 <-It the IrJR level. 200. Pit'. r?,.n2e ,lled Yurtz' c, -uin La;y• s IRR to Yeic?,1ner ol1 Octo- b--r 5, 2000. ?J'l, Ie1Ci"1'ler.enied the Pltf. ? ?ode a.l o--,r' 1054375 01,1 IToV 'r 17 c.vJV• 203. P! 14f. Yurtz,' s, Lrv-71 s, n,nc3. Kclcr zer'r ceci.sions to SOIG? on Nove_lber 3, 2000'. SOIGA denied Pltf.' r ?neI Dece.0)er 22, 2000. 20?,. On Se tarlber 1 , 2000, Souithers C'i.rectec, th%; Pltf. on be- _,rzI f of the Office of Chief Counsel, to cease I' q..17 -1,ctivI ties ;7ith the LB rojecfii<? t P1 tf. "1 en ?. ail 1.11 '?L1E'i.'^IeSS," -?ha he ?' nto Cep?. e ?_s tile Life 131or'7oms (flLB11) Project Tlrr ,-erffl tl,?-J he -.u.?7t "rerl.ove (his) na,-?ie fro- the LB t ebsite," to " 1n'ie ;e- -ents -I-,o _^.i.l 211 LR rlaterials out of the f-cility," and tiv^t if the Pltf. s-ras ,I[ en:ug" t i.t11 any L13 1?12terinl,_ in cell Southers . oulc' "r erson.all r i. ue n i 'conduct re,) oft and. r: I.-e cnrt^.in flit.' the only peo,,l i1o ui „i t (tile Plti. re trio y r?n t :^t tie plt f. 'f ill never be 11o,red to vi.Si t n.n_y nrofessors or " C-',vo-a,else! 2.10. Soutzers also told. the Pltf., "'VV have :n absolute zero- toler?-nce policy rit'1 1rou and_ if ,;rot, _reep up your Fi-dt, ?rou're ?C.6fi k7re,kf`',St Y°1eal . It. c?S ?ctur-Ily the la,-;C''1 _1C nl:? Oil ',Ot r O ,''''_1.C.1 f- a?tl?ilct 4-2 2313 AtlE?;U 7t (,, 200' (22) to be i.-:_ +, i s S"TU for n. lo:a^ dine! !'? 7.1. Plt?'. told Soothers 'ie ?;w-?.s^o?,erC.ti.n?; ?.; -riv<-.te basiness ?P - ' ?_Jr PA. DoC no,_icies, ' `, he ? ould- not rci ove his n,n.me in. v_. o t i o: o f,lo ._ t'ae LR :lebsi-te nor ce:? se hi-s n >:^ti cination ^.? 1`..e LR Project I'T,-n- "er, thy' he ovlti not ^ i.1 out any LI3 r-nd t. if any I,B to -i 7aere con.fisc-ted frog him that he roulc. file --riev^nce rlnst hir the SVTT stiff involved. 112. Pit-". reduestec' to see or ?)e Miwn '' eo"v, of the ,11e_;ed lei ter Sol'ttlers cla -,Flec, to l-?Te received -'ro'il the C ?.i.ef Coazical, but Sou.t hers 1^es o zl.ec in a belittlin,- tope, "You -,re Jou -.n orde--^ to cease X11 activities LIM 13. Pitf. told Sout'.iers, 1--i a cal-.i and nolite tone, "No." 014-. Pltf. tI'lon n,n rily ordered Sinnso.n Def. Du _ec to t^.ke b-clL to -.ssi.,, ned cell. ii 1" 1 ?1 A,') -- -?-.i-ely ten (10) 1 lutes the Pltf. to h1,,-a0si ,"aev cel7_ t7ae Pltf• Tlyq _ irrclci ff°d- ?-,ncI re' loved- to VD-O1 cell. 21. Plf;f. -- ;^rts £':1d -avers t'1-t ED-01 cell i ,1 rd.slii.n Cell C':1 ID ?_J-c Cold. c,lr i'1' ttii.(? cell, itl r E?PC''ii ":in,.O ' -f-,c?":?, C_irectly L-_ `o t _e ^ro ?i1d floor of the SIT ,. ennels, =1 ie vi.d.eo :°urvei1lance r_ 1;'. ob, tructed fro-i cle-r i o-" he ac iv- t'')e: front of ttili_s cell r711e to I-le i.libet,,veen. t'1e 117. So. t_..err :-^.d Kreider vt''0_•`; nnc- 471TIP c ell : ove fro- to -?,D-'Jl_. Frei der ,,'I y he " J !' JtTn?i !,o "1n l tf c G.. .• P.._ • l -? ? n?.r ,J V 1. t (' 1)-1.-i7 "BeC e feel oineer?_e d. p. _ O 14?:^?:.t. t1 _'or S-TT Y,ri -:0L1 ers -"D non nro -1-o ":"'ti ^ Li -'ic SI U ---id t,lle eTivi0"^.l (' ? _ 1 . . Ol'_C'2r CO - reu t 1 ?TTT r u^d ("i, R, C) . T -t f ro ccc_ tie Fltf. LLnr r s - O C'.i J ._ ? C' ^ 1 d ,i1,r 1 C^1 1 O r ST . _ i ._:011ei ti ...... _ ... ? . _ . ? "'1'1' r nn'1 'P1 .}_-=' Gri -v. Yo. 16440 I (1'164407") on (Office of), _o PA. Di oC 1.., 11 0 ?JJL',a_!rrS• frivolouC oy- cnn? to C'e,, -,e TIR . ( 23) SRR a,? s d.eni e: 'oy Cod e, eC.,_ to - e? Ler, c? e- ni d .? r Ire1c'1?er, ^_ l.r • ? -e^ led to SOTr'A. 22'2 SOSG_, cleter.line d LP, i r ao' re- ,voly^C, C 16 ,4C;7 i lt, ') ?rivoIoa c1 i'_C_ t 'ltf. -0,11,I not col.'I'Inaic,-.te th cri re vice i +i.°_ o -r t',eir ?_?? C ?Ers• 2.sserts <:''L: <,verS t'1£'.t i18 C^i1 "11 C0 1°'L1i11C .tE i th CY1:nE ViCti:'1s ?.11r_'.,/0r "th-ir Lr-lily ne"Dors so is lo.rig 3r tie Crirre vi cti_-?n or ny ne1^son r„resses a (lesi.re not to 'oe ^o:r_.ni-L icy, ed --pith. 2 '4. On. Se,)tember 7, 2000, the Unilc, . St-t::Ds Di tri.ci- Court for th^ h id.?.le District of PenlF.,,trly^ni receiveC'_ ??nd filed Pltf:s civil 9 :our (4) PA DOC e-anloyeer a?ad rt -: E Or for C1 1.1"-s 0 t SS` `,-diure to nrotec t, C?GIi?r":Y".'?.e incliffer'ence, etc. (Prluch v.rDy.?icon _t 1:06-CV-1751). J1 Irk 'F Th^ PA DOC hr s no Polic;;r "?Icl/or Proce 7-ay- - =?or its e:I-.)loTr- ses to folio.., in -reservin!,-f 1 _ ,protectin.7 recordeC. vi ?eo survei.llc-.nee ?r E`,rj C.ence for 111/c ?roceed.in s, J_ 220. y=ae PA DOC li,-s no Policy end/or Proce?._ares for its employ- eES to follow ',)risoner ? reoaes ` to ILnve recol c.ed vi C_eo carvei_ - l,°.!1cC 3"EF erv8d ", C} protected ar evi,'_ence ii]. I-.nc./or -' J_ 0 r i11/C ?rOCeec:.- ini anpe?-.ls, ,..._1 -d in a court of h<..'?lTe conF!ti tationrl 227 PA Don m t.i.on to nre crve r.nc_ protect video sarveills.nce be used ?-s ev-i?,_ence ?.inc f -?risoners or ? Procedures in 2?3. .?,r,.e Pa's DoC lias no - der, af- t?- Y , e Polio e-?fect -,',?__oh -iioulc_ orevent recorded video surveillC,.?1ce ^vi e_e11ce from ",c,L ,F. rec,cled, de stroyed., t,,mnered with, or other-;ise mpoli.?.teC. for n rioc? ac less: th^n: f?,) five (5) cl^.irs; I-)) se,,ren (7) d,-Ys; c) fifteen (15) d.ys; d) t_,_i.rty (30) d,-,Ys,; e) t,:,,o (2) ye?.rs; -nd-, (24) f) three ( 3) ye:r).rs. ^ ...ln 1 c?1.rect ,.?z:? nro7-1 1? ,e r ??:,,:,? o? t'?• ?e ?:,?or v?n -coned c , of Zi Her l jn, 51:?lnson, Ayerc, ^.Zd Yohr., P?_tf. Cu_"wGred ^.rl Undue end. retl-ii_^to-ry ,uni"' 1 en't of T)C 11 :? to ,,-,!'Lin,- 225 C-,ays, cue"l ir_ _ i.. he o 'Ortll.lt?i t0 be rel_cased frO-1 Mile TT, .1 ^t1C l "11C 1 i"i-11c",nfi 1,,ydchi,p of s.?)li.tary co _fLia.ient, bar ,,leans of 11 r?.s?:lent, offici<.l O it ??'O?;E 1.011, i2.1 si- uin? m/c re.»Or"ts, La re t .? i ;'l 1OYZ for PD_'tf.' N en- ?; in 1^.^?ful ?cti.vities protected by lav,7. 23J. A direct ^nci proXite result of >>e <?fors entioiled L,.Cts of S1 :r-on, Ayers, :nc_ Yolln, Pit-°. caflea ed the ll?,r?l of J? the continuin€; ?psyCilOlo, iC^,i e:iieGts 0 c0nf1112- r'e,rlt increased depression, t lou`llts of suicide, c- lotion<al di ;-troru na of _er disorders of t',e ;Hind., -11 of c.:1H cl1 the Pefc, i new oy _o U1 c- hrsc re^conably `.rloT<n Dole. contribute to ^.dverse ??'iyci.c^.l lent l lie lth ;problems. 2?l. As direct nc_ pro--is-,i- t, e re:sine of tl:e '-fore;:entioned ^.cts of Z1 Yrier;'1?;n, Simpson, ATers, ,nr_ Yo"Iin, Pit:% `u"fered :lu`1e1'Ollr injar- i.e;_, t0 record liberty in- t ^rB;tS in cec':1nm ''erl.tOr10U rele.se t?IrOU^:?1 file Clc:PnCy process ?Or parole co 1f1: r'tL0i1. It Pis0 :Cl?> (?s t'1 = Pitf• a ear to be a:_sc:j-l",i vP., te11ii1 , '_1 behrwiOrC <s.C'1 "o;aid -re-vent hi.---Ii fro'H u)e1:n, '7.i le t0 inter",ct ?nc'_ SOCi ? 1.7' `':pith risers in a ener l no )uiptiol2, i th civili n? (i.. e. to receive ro:^;r tin services bG a'?le to parta.cp^,te La t1le-1, ".n(`': 'o receive ^11 r f ?.vOr i.le reco :P; end'?ti-ons fol , ")"r0l e, or Oer ticl_p:^.ted rele,?.ce to society. As c, direct ^.nd- pro,rilulte result of the ?,forerientioned acts e 27 T"orl -d T' etc _.cr ?.i).?' the PA ?JoC, Pltf. ap.s ?re?;e=lted- frorH ba -1 able to cell ^v?.il .'rile =itaesses, inclu in,^ recoi^d,,od video survei.ii-nce, "1.::1ch -olil d hove ubctr nt ^-,.teG. t7-,le P1"tf. s Clc>i i of "Ctli^1 _L,)_-, ocomce to the fRbri c.ated I1/c reports issued by ZirL: er.lr.n, Si-apson, Ayers, ^nd Yo y?, liis li'?; rty interests in hero,, subjectec. to c?_iscir))_inayy co_-1.fiae_- ent in rile SITU ?-Tere not protected ''D,!?c`imse_ Pltf.'s cyu.e process ri -,hts to C-11 -'di.t-aesses ^t his -,H/C le°, 1 1 S w-,s c'e11ed. 27 3. "r a direct result of ?ROrlp.'_ • r c'eL ? ink PltP. I s (25) reruests to contact either the Security Office '1,_4/or Yelchner, both of li.Gi1 ha- r?.,CCesb to the recorded vi.aeo sa-rveillc.l--C0 ^C Y2G:?2 ?C'c in e .cis 3-esoect1ve ri/c ??roceedsn7, nen?ec?_ the Plt_P. due rrocess ?rotec- ti.o -,.,? 'li.c'L, lies con.sd:ifi,tion:llr entitlled to, tllu;_ c^.us._tion 4*41' Cf) ^i?_Lire to protect Pltf.' c d.ue ,rocesc rir'lts is -?f or I ec. 23?r. .A s -UYect ^.n1. nr07 il_ir.te resLtilt of t? ..fore ltio ?-ed acts Of SOUi_^_Cr , iT?1C'!rler, ^,-,aJ t1i PA DOC '.rd- an obli,--;?tlon to of ti-me to preserve 'nrOt?Ct te ^gCOr Cd V1C_eO ??i`fVei?l ^.nCe C reCtieSt@d by Pltf. in i_1 rPs;DeCtiVC /C )rOCeeoiTl;^, k? e?L-ile(L to -Dre?-e_Y ve .nrL ,)rotect evidence - Idc -i fnvo2 -ble to twle Pltf, S. Clh n.Ctio.ls Co-1c'titti'te lbo t`- ner;li-ence `?nd indi.F='c:reilce. 275. As ? direct -i1:,)r07- is^.te r°st,;l fi of tl-i-c acts o- -j17' 1 alc'i--aer, '"'?.e P.:1 Dol. 10 had .?Ll Obl1 ti,oLZ to _:?C7 rs--'soii!,' 1C ?:.1O11t1t of tiyge to -)reserve ?_1C protect. t- ,o- recorC?eb'_ vi_Cloo sL-_rveill^-ace %,.s recyuested b T the P1tf. concern.in- I'd; re-ective DC-2,04 griev^nces, t Deis. filed to nressrve -n . o7'o'tect Cvicence -!hich =^vorr'.ale to the Plt. ,.?f?_ such.ct one; con^titute ' othle,-li epee deliberate indif erence. 235. As cl.irect nromi-I pte result of ^,fore-ientioned acts ?Q of iiuber, Ylei.rl, Southers, ?rid Kelcrlner, 000 1P.r)c1. the Pia Do C, Pltf. to .t various ite{«c of hi.r per=o??? nronerty either 4lzr'./or de; troyed, some of T hicn T ere -Z il ecl ou' of SCI-CST" ;it'Lo ifi Ilis - n o or oer,.li '_ue . ,? ! c> i. ^n.i?_i, ?r.. to r to ,o__ ?i^ ?ies ? s,?ion, u d- .?? .?_?e PA Doc,_ i 1 e feci to s-a-f e-;u rd tiuc11 abuses. 2?7. ? s direct nd_ L roe is ^.te ref?,173-t of ',_le .fore}_.en?:ioned -.cts of Kre, i der, 3ola thersI =i_ld Kelclmer, PIt f. s-L, er' d 7_1^.rags 'an 't c?.lld re- t-lit,.tion t of t; .e ' e su;-ervisoru p id . -:Leis "',t?1?Orc?1. °.tc^S desp i to t Le Pltf.'s repeated reruestr-7 for int,eYVenti.on of t'11ese C, 1E)'fV1cOr`. t0 CA:^re si1(re c311.stiO_1 O1` T''jT 2o 1e Li?- to of co-i-, . tted by tl1eL3e Defs., Pl tf. Conti.l1,10 _ C, F? mftwm 3 rctof l,r .sc°?ent r.nc. retr?ition by deli .bex^.te i.ndi "fore-_lce, for failure to jprotect i. 1?Y ?a.1teC?. 23?'. a2 direct 2.::.i 1?ro`ii_'.'1?,te r? 1Lt of ).cts ? R^rb GCi C'.1C' Z?„, Pl-F red t '1e T i s of `4100 L. >t ttnlece o , o ff? o ".i1.?, i'Li C 1 Y '? der^011 .1 o eYtYJ! ?: C. ?i1i c.? lio (`iC not r u.thori z e (26) ,., '. e rl nYi o_zer :ccoL ilt t .tI c^.: r?.? io::z for i _left i.F ^seY ed. T_Z urn t i. ?i?li.c^hle. ^ro,1,i -a,- e r ?_ 0._ 1e .^:f01'° .°1`'iD ar?C Cf r -n ? ?'l?k?.n . i ?^s^rOQ i?lp ? loss - 1 0_' „ r. 1 ?!? O c .. T_ ;? Lt^ to i"e "11 1 @- aGI- aCI. -7017, Orc Yr:??.'_a ,sOi'? ? _.l:^,?L_YC, '.tie C_"Ili^l of ss^al]_fi -dnrlt fil"_e Pit-T. c c t Oy S ` pii, n 1 ', ill YO lil, t-le Il t'. ZTny.??,^._ -,!)USE) ea I12 'rT<?C rexer2'e1 to n.i't n 1f ;,'111_(?yl 1_,7?izrff ? ?1• ''_1.'.,1 1?1.1?L> ?r C ""F, n .. H . fl n 1 -• 1 7 e l? i ... i lefl.t11Y1z, ?'_ fib** otlff 71 o..1 For e- ti? J* 1 _,. n (".'. l 1 `?- i??I? C?::: ?.. ? •-, V Y C c' it, t r } _'_ _. _ •_ -- 1 ?" -".::? e "a. ? ??., oe'). e ' .:', ?'. 0- >T _ irA ^ l T'01 ?'=C1cr P7_t f . C?.et"err ca. __.CL ti e_ `C'oi_1 I d 0 nrVp ?n 1 tec,_- for PlllrCO_Li_ Rro_lson '_..,en Plt . l s G _ ,a i .1.0 T 1 rJLI ? ` O ?. O ?' ?? r 0 -7,`e( _! i"O:"1 oc(e1?, a _ZOd- ,lefiurnec_ fio fii1e __? t•ec? •o _ in _ Pl'i?f. to a i f„- freolt zlC' 1,rat-"fullj in FCC.er^7_ Coart. L a7_ t O C C't1 .:10 .r10 o, _ C s 7,, t O Tr`.', _1;lcr '1.(A sou, lerc ? O :'_'7V^ V% ?? };?• ''?"O:':i 103-1j "o Cell, ? _ ._-L14, x_1.:.:.1 ? 0 Col t.1C '1 l0 L1 G_ Y ,?1.C' _=01.•1. ,1" C?1V1.($r" .u pr '7 1 c i r'OY '?l . _ '??- 3 f `_, ? .C. O i•_ .^_r r? ;o ierS, ^u_l 1T ", 1; 11?, e of_ ic; 1 o ,!)rec _0 i1, '.'.ilur ? O rofiect, ".n c'_ (deli"T?erc.i'e iziC,ifferpncP.. ,. COUTTT I (D f,- . Zi-l-'_er : ? r., Si,il',soxrlq j cns, ^,nd v0 , l) q"? TT. S. C.lV 3 - RET..LI.ATSOI?, F.ILLTRE 'CO PRO 1, T 71 ITXRASS???II'?T, OFFICIAL OPPRESSION, F1?iL5IFYI? G OFFICIAZ DQ?T7TT_S, FIRST, rTr-" TIi, .A''?D 0TTP ET=TTIi _A,r"M?DP' EP?TS y ST,,, TE CL_A.TT°S: IC 03.S.R5"DI2 ?- 7 .C.S. FIJ270?, (?7) ?_ PLL. C.S.q-c 04 r. ?: Jll, 18 Pa. !:. S. X455:.9 1v PA. 0. S.4104?, 35 P.S. 91022r,.302, 51 P.S. §331.20, PA.. COTTSTH7J^IO.T ,,k-RT. 11 0 F-11 f 7 f f 13 f q.TD 20. 2 ?. P +,r s one (1) t:lrou;ii t >o -undrec', f,7-ty_t.,o (^1n) ire 1. 7-cor?0eC? 1er e1:1 1) v reference, l,s tlhou,,-h e^ch re srt forth hercLa 24-1-. J)e n^. _ ed in li-s 00"Llt ur11 7fully =r^ -l .i - i- er' fine P1tf. i'o -? -i11 1Ii:-11 f-,lsifi ed- Ii ,con.7,act r"norts i.l ic11 .re offic1-1 c!oClL'":'e_'1Gc of hs PA Do C b are^.u o 1t'1e Co 1`'.0• e. rof Pe_1n,`"vcani j,r_r_ t'1ey ..leec i;_ieir 1,uthority ^busively to o_ 1 ress tile Pltf. -ith ;-?.zch c1e1i.'?o to inJi_" rerlce t:c t i.t c u~c ' t':le "ltf. to Cuf??er ?uc'l "re pt o:Jces ':Dcabject to u1a-:'f=!lt:nd `".cal 1. i<r?'r 7 CQl1fln(?.':8i1'G 1.Y1 »? 1?i. ryt<?.tuS, C' Y1?1.?7 _11,_1 rel_P,re iT ?rJLT If C".ic_11n? y i;- ri on recorc? .1^el?r, t:-1e Plt . to cu-17_7702- the ii,telt.l01:?...^1 1-:.'lfli Cti on Of e 10 tiOn`,1 di?'tress, -vi',)'-'?t1.i1 - Civil r1 t._ unc? ej' 1"118 Pirst y Pourt-,ezit1? A _0_la ile; it to I,'le TJ. S• CO - t•1tu'-1011. Pltf. °1 0 e 1?oyeC? `?7.^.. rji,:"-ht J-() ',^ free f-"'o 0 1 V1.1 viol`.ti.onr? co._T- i tte(? by the Pe- s,. in Count r " r,'mt.ead b? the 1_..,'s a _-d r ie Con titatioa of i-1he Co: _lon_ e?1t::1 of PA. 5• 17, ^.'r OVC° e sCY1beCl C'4-ionS Oi° File T)e.E.-_ in Co'u-nt "iere `O _ ".11C10uS, 1.11t(iltlOn•.1, rec_ _e =s, ? l C1='?1 .y°?? _uch Yec_-l_ess -Ind 1e1 lb cr t int-ifference to the P1tf. r1.4i?t: ru-1:1 that the 1 :1s?O i. ,10_x_ of ptuaitive 1? '.'';f7?,,rr^nt0C'_. -RRYWOR73, ?ursur.,lt to 42 TT. S. C. 91903 -1c; .`' P^. C. S. 501, et sen. , P7_tf. der. ,nc s the follow LiL, r. eli ef: -) 'o'_'"Gnr`?.'i.Ory n.1d L1111t1Ve C?^.'_2^.rr 2.1t1S't; -mll the. JJe:. s. i-a t11i. Cou?1t illdividup.ily, jointly, or ^aver-ily in ^n ZOunt to be Cie i erilli.neG by jury; b) Inj :.active relief in 'he form of e)-_?u1 ;-jam c 7473?4f 7 ^7C7' f 74.7877, and 747873; c) Rel_ eas e fr:)- ^ e`,r e;gn.tion to ^.njT r,aner^l no ° ulr- t i on; (1) T)e for any court cosec or -fi.aes; anc, e) D)-fs. ?ZUSt rei._:bur e Plt nor co=sts Q-?, litin^.tion, ncludin •? t 7 Leesr, 1. 21 1,T7 (T ,: -' e ^ 11 t e r^F: t . tor.__ e g OOT? ?NT II ( 2v) (Deis. Mosl,nk a-rid Yelchaer) 42 TT. S. C. @1983 - FIFTH ATTD FO?TRT "7,TTii :U"ir,DT?FT:.?TS TO TTIE TT. S. C 0'TSTITUTIO., 7 DUE PROCESS, LIBERTY I"TTEIZESTS STATE CLAITTS: PA CONSTITUTIMT VRT. 12 P-91, 72 out 13, AND 20 - DUE PRO CFSS , LIBERTY 17 TRESTS , F-AILTJRE TO PRO TECT 2?v• ?'.1 4"i^ ii one (1) I,,o iun,`IreC -^orf'?r-:Give (24.5) -,re 1n?0Y70r^te!?. 'Ze?"eixl `bar reference, ac th101"''1 (? ,C':1 ''?re cet forth i?e="Gin 2A7. Deis. n ~lec' i-? this Cou??t unl?,:?`ully dcni.ed 4--ic Pltff. cue. `lrocess in 2dFi -m/c he.-1.ria,7s afi(! it;, proceedings ",)y _iot him t0 C 11 c^?i".Li .ble i+vitnesses to °stp'"'1is11 I'd,- Cl =r of --,Ctur^l lnno- cencc-2 i.;^.C _ lditi "ecordeJ video ^urveilic--ice '::'lick .^ i?:? t-he Josses- _ T?o «._L =ion of SJaty_ .or:"',, ''he Securit;:= Office, and Ye1clhzio^ ^.cce,Ted the testi..,iony of Lt. I reider rho .sated th^t Southern tol(I no v^.iIable video cnrveill-.zce of '-'e i1ci'-`C, conce_- -- 741-7864, 7__i ..._i i - +_> s cond-h< .na or n 1 : <? 1 i _• one P_ r a=1 1- L? ue .Tec TTo._l,:'r to I'elc' , er !,,,ad ins, ect t'_1e urveill,^._ice r- se?_f, 'gut 'Iosln; refused. PJ_ti. ?..1re ,cT J 1)ouc,e,'_ i._z fi71e SMU, an a- t si`-.ifi.c+ouit 't1?1"dtihi J, 0:1 `.C? 1111.1 °`,?:iVe cu to(:11 ( S) day - -- y fro-1 h?.vi.n" Iii.s P2 reinst.ted, releaoe `O'.._ tie VU in ^Ot'er j? CZ• fS. _ie e11j0?'ed pri"`riDeS. TT.oslry.IC 1=110,S t, ^.t -:7hen S"' U pri,.loner on AC str-.tu. ` t DC ti _ , i s?i oiler. uto- fi i c l' J Moe,, iJac = to Phase fiTre (aP511) ? nt' t"ien Zu t or_r his °iay C<'•: ? :'."t0 1e n la-es, .'i't`h e^c(1 "''_1<.se reruil i'_:,?; '?'.: 1Y1 'O"_1e1 to serve iini-.li mi of 67 T,izs the 60 d-:.1rs '_1e reCC1VeC? -. ouId le^i1 t 1 the Pltf. could '_,.ve to serve 240 d^:ys i t"_le SIiU `li:1i ')e-lore ^os ib1Ur bei_1 r,leis'•eC1. Pltf. 'Z .d -)rotectec_ lib -r .y interest, in not be .n? oubjected to the loss of his P3 ct?--,tus ^nc c_ubjected to w a- "fr( l1-er?. DC 5 "tus in the SiRJ. rRo- -, _ ^.?1' I'elcraler deni.ecz the Pltf. du r?rocess f^.ileci to protect his li.' ert,v interests. ZI. - i. TZ,- ".')OVe-Q.eSC"1??ed actions o e Def'". Lot "ii COuYIt 2 sere so ^l; cio>ts, i aficnti ;n^.1, rec lerc, n chi-.nl-.?re(? suc-,. a rec_r- less c. Cae iJer'.' e in lif fere;lce to the Pit-f. S Y1.` lfis ?.11c' 'Tell-IJeing fi ?t' lc 1?11?)o i loon o_f nuni.tive .a ?l•^.II;es is :?`?rr .?ntcd. Pltf.'s clue ( 2°) process ri p;Ltf-- liberty interests ?rotected bir bot,,_ the 1^,,-'s '_1C_ I-, e C0:1.c4-i-'CL? ions of tile Unl tad S t te,; ?C1 ,a t]no- Co 1-^o-n !e?.1th of PA ~ur^1lteed. ?Y?iT?REFORE, irra^_zt to 42 U.S. C. §1033 and 42 P<..C.S. X5601, et tier., P1T:f tla folio,,7i.n relief: Co e tor?r p-nc? pu:litive ill Def i_z this Co L -t j La.tlyq or severally i;, n'JaoUnt, to be cTe? . r: ine' by r, jury; b ) Iajl:t_lc'tive relief in tt'ar: for of e-> un,.i.n` lc dos. 747364, T-7 73, 747077, n t TP7378, C) Release from ',e-"reatlo-, to ^1].,,r gener,-,l -)01]_ ,t].0i1•y a) De_c. -nrij for ?ay co, rt, co,-,.,,,, oa.. -_7'iner; e) T,,? "c•.. ?? ; ?: _,ei -,i!D lrse Pitf_. for co^is o_? 11.'t1 ? ,lion, including fees, ? l > a c 't -0r:1 r f., C', !^?r COTPTT III (Deft. Southers, Yelchner, PA DcC) A? U. S. C. @10133 - U. S. CO"TSTITLTTIOTT - CIVIL TTZDMOIE, DUE PT30CESS, S??OLT.ATIOT'T Ow Ta''VITIET?CE, R.ILtTT3E TO PTiOTrrT, I\TEG- T I GT-T CE STATE C AI?TS: P3 007STITUTIO7 ART. 1, §§1, 7, 89 139 c 20 - DTTT', P'30CESS - CIVIL ETTIDETTCE - SPOLTATTOTT DOCTRIT'E - YAILURT; TO PROTECT - TTEGLIGTTCE 2I-?. Pp,r -r .ohs one (1) rou °'z t .o '?wzdrec?_ fort r- i Y~i (2Q-°) .re i.nC0r o e_`'eLll 1D,T reference, x"101`,:? Fe-,ch "sere `"_e'f, -'O1 h '1C3YP,ii1 25 Dei'?. ??-?.r1ed 1:1 ommt .-re for ,reserv- 2,110 la. '•. -?-c tec ion of civil evic1eace, iP_ t"1is case, t1le Video Sur- e i11?nce r -l ?vio?l,-ly ?. .C_ rer'7ec tivel,T -refero iced. T'-le e, ore, 2 :Cc^:__.7.j1,L'_C. X1.01 is 1•^.C_18^_ to OaYi? t. 0 OVe t l' Defy. to nres'erve civil <,Vi( ence or fevi.e,'7 ? ; ? 51. Defs.' -T-: ilu;^e -`o reserzre C. rotecf: 7ri..7eo 1 .. ce ?revi o rl or. a_ ! re ,uc-t, ?, e?^e lne^ 1 ^i n r co_ r t 1_., e cl"1 =r D' 17no?_1 , t 10i1 0. 1 -.' "_ '.V1 dei1Ce 1._ t 1 1 . 1017.. c.nr .- I P, e ??,1 r n ? r C1 TRTJ :11'x, l7r u a.''?i J 7,1 1,) 1 .'il Zvi. '. C2 C1 C.?.rel^r?t -- 1 i1 O_ orl C `' 1 G?( Yel'1CE? C'W-ynr e i.C a_',e b) Ig4au ic'i• 7r- relief in tii,; "on of i?i -' /c 70 7'?-7QJA, ?_r 741 7"-''73, 7^-7`-77, _n.,? 7!7'7' r0 _ p --`% _.Lo_l :^eC0 __,.. COUNT IV (D _ _ . -J',e-rI 1_l ein, S071t lex >, y ??..cnrr, c PA DoC) TT. S. C. §1°83 - TT. S. "?STTTTTITTO" -- T )77RTEDITTK A?1rET' D- TT•TT - DU3 PROCESS - FAILURE TO PRO T 4CT- PROPERT`-? IT'?TER- ESTS - TTrnT T(7-FY (M - RETALTATIOTT ST,A.TE CLAITTS: PA COTTSTITI?TIOTI !ART. 1_ t1 t 7t t-3,O - DUE PRO CES S - PRO PER7 TT'T TERES TS - F ; T,T7 TO P _ 710 T - NErLIG71TCE - -,R?,T ALIAr_'I0!,T 1.117"OL rl."70 ?1LLr]dYE'C?_ `? ri '-o:lE' I e 11^o rno i Gc,_ 'i1CIe111 bJ r^iC C;:).Ce, ?ls Ou ':i e',^'il ei^E' =sC't fOr.l 8re1,n 17, 7 C1.-t n. 5 De= r ed i.nhir Count e r :o iTJle _core ?;. ° Pl i1 2-0.cSTC ]^ it is no i in his. o p eecSjoa? prison o "fi.c1•`-,lS. After -'L1eC. 7n-7UG4- 02 ^I-ri1 ?.T l C^C'. i.11 FC- J ('211 l_. Pi f L ! crFlont??_ i7ro`?erty -,-,S' not Sr LT rt;.'_YC?S (,?:itereO_ Fg-? '? CFA-? t cec_ i i::?. t01- .`e. Ply f. !1E n0t i.sEMCd (-Cei.`)'- 0_ d 1 t1 i n J ^1 ?1'0 are n -- '.C d l t,. J nVie. On A i c?• 2?1 2005, inv _.-.torleC_ "i ii y ^o JCrt,1 0ut;-1 ale D Pit-7.1s i 1 _,: n_^c0. oae (l bov of per-onr".1 to t_:ze PIt-_F. 0x1 A ?..? ??-t 15, ?OOu ba. ?.ever,;.l items t f . ?cc,eri c _lc ?.vex^ a , je TT.S. ^11c:.. PA Con- ; onert P?. Fl' r. ' S r .. r. - "' L i.. J.:;lOi1 )".i^(1_ 1 in i-_1Zii.C ?,!.1? S Y tJll ?1 1? r) °?^ ec, , the Dc ?-. cal y, °0 ;ro- tcct 'r1-t7 YI 1?S• _,l ten (7-0) ,T Cel,-y L 1fii.:LJ? li.i1 t .?, P_tf'• c ?:. •c, ?•;'. , _. 't,: .? c,.. -, ., (; .?-^ :; "i' ;J=.. ':1. i 1-"i ?; Ct, con- - .. ? f? J"._ a_1 "1 ?. e.:_?" ,?i?01o,"1. ?•^ i_ iii i c l+ ; "a e, C. r .,i;?- Ij. t,i on. Tile Pil D o 0 nc °1i ciit _f. Jx _ 'i1 to 11^.ve (31) in effect ,hicli -.",'onlI CL 11-_. Fit-L., oz- 1 i;-joner confi._1cC? in f? L5 'ioa,Sin _ tLai r in. .' ory tl Jr e_ ro )grty 1.:1 _lreseilCe of tuff 1 ^°le ? 0 COl ('L?Cf tile 1.Y1V'2_1tOr r '^ ._° C--". l v1 C- t;.1e !DrOCeSS t0 ensuretctff are not Of ort•"_11' 1 t o. is OY to see i 71-c zi, coiiL'? scC--t er,, Lerel;+.'".`On lie c . 11 O 1-vet "ece11)t °or 'Llic ? yo0 er' y ^1n re'f'nrne 7 to hL'i °,n CC. "l receilit for those iteIas .,,hich ar- confisc,-.to . ml.e Pit:i% coate-t ', G 'C 1 '^ d lie i? o c s r e s s r+ion _ i to a n 1c_ i L_? 1 T n- 1 0 01 n ?'l ro 11 Y T r i_ co: I s cc oP' DOCi e.1-1oyees 2nJ t11e, the Pltf. i s 1.n L5 ho z1n a i t, 1 t, _1C Iu t he inventori e0 in +ir 're Bence v1ti ,) e it !Ie i :7 ?cr::i.tte i to =1 I.Ve '., e retunieca 7it.ai,_a one (1) to three (3) C<^+y,;. Defr. -..i.led to ".demaately s?,fe?-,u"rd PIt .' 1?er`oa,-.1 ?ronerty n, d t'.eir .ctio,1s -.re Lu11 T?rul. Ac f,, re2Llt, li c ?,a cT?d the loss o.. his i.r•ction.l?le. 5'.. T',?. cti-on;; of fil'_e Def-. L-1 Count. -:'ere e 1 .. .n n '10 ?Z, rGess, 7 clis Tl N '? y 0,(7_ LL4 "r, C'.=?.ecc ^.n C .. Ce1ib-e-rr,te in'i-_P_°eren.ce to the Pltf.' ri.M=its ?-.1C l„s ,ronerty inter- t , o { 1 } +..' 1 .. '.1 ( it i on _ of ,. ^ t ., P1ani.tive d_?.... n,, c' T -T ?? f rr,i it to 42 T7,. S. Cll. §!QS 3 1C 12 P-. r c & \1 ells sen Pity". .'e the fo11_o- dn. 7 relief: ^,) CO ,1 °"1 tort' ^.i1C? nuni'f ive C ;1 c;ec ?d_' `", all tae Def tip. in ti.11S Co,ant jointlor sever-,?17-fir -'.11 =.n ,;::ount to be d° t er by jury; c 1D) T junctiv : relief in the fora of _ (`r'_er cl.ireetia tie PA DoC 11t1 1 :',1 e:Ie11t olicic ^,.n ,,r?CeC' ?'°S ;here vir the Pit-,7o Or 'n`' ?1"i_rO iE?Y C0.,.1f1I18C?- t0 "ie L5 ?1CU"111 a nit ,be '?re- ;?l.t al iyi t^e L117entors, of Ids pen-,Oa,-_O_ 17-ro''e-rty, tit:°t _1e be //?/J? rccei.; is 10r itel:lsA? e conficcateC? ,: C ..'.i 1_ C''?'ems ?,re vI - -,'Y1 -' 1-i Y ^I" ?] 1;'rl? r; Y f??; {)re ?.u>>1c D t.:_ll_e ,"r1.,_.?;o_ier, _l,-_ .i_ 1 _.L,_ -)_ oc. ss , _ cone rs ;001'1 aF! Dos-Eible but no _1o1^c t :^n three (3) C?,.j s 1<.ter ; c) Defr.. t -+y "or ^.iL T coy Yt costs or fine s; d) De:' iu .t YeLabar,oe Pltf. for co?:t o ' 1i tL.`r +ti On, i.ncla,'in€ ttDar.-ac.r' S fees, -!-_17y in i erect. COU"T -T V ?.2 TJ.S.C. 91983 - ?J.S. CO'., TITUTIOIT - FOURTE 'T I Ai_T7,TET ?T DUE PROCESS - PE71SO-7A.L -PRPF"R 'TTFRTSTS ST..4,TE CIA IIS: PA COTTSTITUTIOT'T ART. 12 1997- , 7, 13, 20 - DUE PROCESS - THEFT OF FUNDS - 71OLATIO'7 OF PRISO-'T TFEDICAL SBRVICBS ACT - PrRSOT1L PROPBRT I'T^rR7, TS 25i. T-` ' ^'!S One (l? i'1r0U•"':1 '?`:".'0 1i111?,. 2Cl 1j2fy-:fi0llr (254) -re i_icor or^ted herein b ,-.,,r refere-ace, ^.s iii,-)a,;h e ^.? dM :11ere _Tull_y cep; lerei. 1^_a fi ii. is Count _^Z ?vi`1711f L1'e " 1e CleCl.uc- 2FJ. 7e0 :1")^.ed 11'1 't" ii CL i tion of 14,-. 00 rr0- t, le Pl'-P.' r1. ;C)ne "CC(?L11 11 Oll '- 1. r, {'LL ^n* ti on , ":li,-I violated Plfif.'s civil_ r1-^l? s uv)cer e Co lF,t .'ta i.ons 0 Uli.i ted sSt^.'i eE .. 1?- the, ?i0 i""O11 ,'C :lA l o' PA'. ?57. The _'i--,OVe-descri'?ec ?.CtiOilc o:? "he Defs. i# tLi;:? 001,L-it, -"ere ,0 i.nfi -t 0-a l 1_ delib. r_ te, n _ c_i l .rc._ ^ec `_7_e_ a. _J. J'. )e-, i ..'I-i-Pa- e'c 'to t:le PItJ . -i 1ts t h17,t 't;i1e, i-:-i )oCti'•'iozi of !Cu:?1-Ve C7ai c ; it , 1^ s^- `. L; - ..,, n _? TTY J. O. qlQ? 3 x..11 L,1 ?'-? P(-:_:. C. S. lse"., PI ''. cle1c,??.ds t,i,e ,=olio ;izr relief: ?•? r _•? ;rt 3 'a-n `_ ,ec of $4.00 !?•ccr it-?- i T e? i1 f .0 1 ,_ orb y , ..? _t n e c. ive f7^:1-.-es to be eten,li.aec,. oar jur,?ry 10) I:. r^.lief in t( 1:01 "1 Of ".--1 02c1e1 C?-1reC .i 1U file P Do(-', io "t0 c_edact 'ny lion1 es, 1r0,'- "t ]e Pla-f. ';- ^c _:ou_'ltt ,-it7iou't 11-1s an't.';.!Oj-i.zation or ?' due _,-roCess le ':, r1 _1,^y C Da=.,c. iLlc''F i7cur for "i] Jr L11? • t ^:i1_, .. T COllr't c071-1,--, rn:^c±. reimburse P7-tT. for cost- of _!1 t1 ^.t10P, 1]aCl?1C?1.i14J ? ,.Orri.';,rt^' :Fees, "n?_?•?* C%•^';1`?-?",ef?`, " ?_!? int-o,:-nst. COLTITT VI (Def:-. Kreider, So t.-er , '-elc:iner) 42 TJ. S. C. §1933 - U-9- CONSTITUTIOI? - FInST kYD KT," 7-1 A-771 TJI 1TTS - F-IILURB TO PROTECT - "TAR. SSTIEiTT - RTTALIATION DTM=7.RATE INDIFF71TITCE - SUPE?ZVISOR LIABILITY ST,IITE CLA.I"'?S: P!1 007STITUTIOT`T ART. 11 sal, 7, P, 137 (, 20 - 7,71TJRE TO PROTECT - TT 1RA.SSITET?T - R=ALI.V-110 : - DBI,? "'PI 31ZATE I DI F?RW CE - SUPERVIM SO R LI ARIL I TY - OFFICIAL OPPRESSION? - XW77FiVT-iWAL INf (,.rcr'lom oic EM0TLoWA4 DisrkC55 ( 3 3) 4 a ?f-n ^ Ff:,r._ `Y-1 'Is On(, (l !' , i ,,,^ a „ rl s 2V n ( 57) OL_,11 O 11ULndYeZ_t iT -c l? 7 J- 1QcoY ?Or-tl p-,1 herein ,Oar re erelce, a. l: _ou II ^-.^,ci.1 cet _ ort_1 259. Defy. __rr?rged in thi.F., Coant t_u1? ? ? ' t_1 f c°--1-.ibdted deliberate indif_°ere ice to,:,,^rd; the Plt-?. 71hen in DC-135Ar, DC-0'04s7 -t P. F^Yl.i1^S, ^.nJ 1''1 nclssiri?, requecteJ these i.ndiv-i '.7.,at7.1s to intervene on i Jell .lf to Orc --. t.'1ei suboYr"..1_n^tes to ce,'.re un.lr^ -T`i rnci•, of n , r n i^il 1i;. r -' t?1 ° 10T1, c,i`1C< t11i1Ot 0111 1'.. 1711e-- to -,Ljt?r o.o so, I)Ll-,L. -.62-.inst. 'c-- Plt-f' t set T^ S a ?, vi..soYs cr 1n I Held 1i_,7 4b1e i% tlle1r 1a-1o-.;.T ^boufi fc:.l c?-ion-s bit 1arevent therm lror. occurri.n`. T'l ei.r c t i o a corl?ti'I .?te n 11, _Y^ . izirl,.1 -.2-once t0 v o-?,-ess tl'Itf. ,aC ^S ?, re` alt, ? n r C7 1.1 ^ --c •,•, t .: ;e .? 1_'f' _ . eilt_1..onn1 iy'Flict.?'i0'1 r J "i "i0 ? [ 1. t '1^. I C_? j c ?- v n nc-- c^c p 1_ ,_._ `i- 1c1 cYuC, 1C:. !J-r-, 1??1 pL'111-c11,':2ntS ';ec E Pl i '. c ?_ lrnr ?'<?ni r filed ^1 i ev.^r1Ce? ` " t S`TT .st-f . = >1. ?tl? JOVe-C? 1. ?e(;7 ^c-I'i0'1: T)E- r'. 1.i F..11 .; C0,-mt ,ere i 1'r-?_ltio=1 > .__i cious, rec --less, ^.11Cd '_1 n1_?y e rec,letis ,nd de- li': GY .tom 1i1d1 f'_° rei1Ce t0 It--e Plt". • r 1.v1.1 i r'I tto 'J F, ire? fr0_'1 - t :.r?.c,, iY2 ant., o?-ici.a 1 0Y ,^ a? c0._1 0ea0t,ic)1^]._ d1. C;tress t'1C_er the 1-..-s 0_ P? C02- t. l'1, 1.7 2r_ _ !:11.F; ri h t s c c c fired fi_ '''re.in t117t t.hc 1, _,J 0 t?f 1-T.? ?2;, ,,, ?LF.nt to 4'.'. S. C.1 g? 2.la.i? ^'' P .. C. S. X71, et r . , P_' CO't i. -a ?17.7 c'a??17<9 t? f?- r c 1 o a J 1 a arl t T1 e, _ - r n ^Yc. c v > 11.0.1. i? =1 " - .l "? ?V ("1 9 'nn " r . ^_.17 ?: t s, V ' -- _o1 1 i 1i ^> of n", L-al-J v, r i :• ,?J' i d .O?1 1 ?_'_C.1::1 0,071-T VII .? -? • [J 1 ? ? 1,.,,? ., y 1. , ? ? _ l f Cl ii , "] `.T ?'''- r , .?1 !'•_ Y O i ?_ TT.S.r. RIP03 - U.S. W_-S TI77mIOT.T - ASSAY?TrT -- 'TARASSTT',T T'"77:,TR"TRA.TE IND1773'RF17CE ( 34) TA TF CLAIMS . T (I rr rn-r r, -MT TT A Pm • _I ? 7 31377137T R-A n J? • ?..,' -? -, •; -_ ? -1 ^ ? ?_) ?:._., ,? ,,':.?... ,?? ?11s1C?.' ., _' ` ? ? ( \? _ .tom ?? C r ,1.11}`r l 6i "Mill C ^'l 11 . --j-• T).?-i • _... _: nC."_ f (30 U,111 '_'?, (.?P PI -I- 7• O'1 t,7",0 f s10i1 ?1 1 1ti' CrOLL:11 ..°,:?-E !.01 a1G Au„il=' i f'1 .OcnUzi? '? rid: ? lE itsi' ?' 7c) 1.i'1C1,?F::7t • S1 vo_ln.r: ?1 o '1- •? ' it -. .-C'. ?°- 1.t ? ?i -- f n "?,,JI1 :E?`',]_ 1 , e '; 11. ?I tii1 -co . i„ ,c rJi1• _,..L !'. ?? ? n. .^"i i0-'12 V1. 0 ._. G ? --he -_ _?__ • „ i" ,.. _ 11.fi? ,...`__. i" ?i e rr '?- i" p •l „'rv _' is TT !.J __ ate _J_ "D ,7 • • _. P«r Lo11 t: '67 ..i . a __ _ ._ . ... ... Pit, f dd t '0 _.1 th 0 PA . ^CT 0-1 0 ^,,?ulF ??_i 'do i's o,].r? , ;-c 1°ec??- i . ?.^ ?1"e11C° to 1 11 t1.- - - -- 1v ._ 1.0 O1 ''1L1r_11 .. 1.?JC C7.1 ,.?,-. 1 FI)- r,_ cl, PT re-110f: ?.) - - ?a7in'.il0 c,1cl L1n11.STG ? 1 tiES 1.ti0 1 f y' ?c^ 1i1 tl i.r vouIlt i, fTi77i !_1 ,,114th jOit,^,'1•;, 0-- rCr-.D?-;r .10L1t1? 0 c_J'l; r 'i 1? b,.r jur r9 CoIjr COST;-; _q,"_ _?j 0s c) D^? onet?"2- c?.o_tioll 0 7.00.?(0 o^c, ('??0 0•n0 to t,',1) ,i-0 i e Lo ID by i s t Co-,,1i ""i0?1 FaaJ, i 0] - to )")Ie?, for i?r1S0i1^I -,ii 'Ji c -.,,I ri -it C, ?i,: I,C", 10? T'T• r??.i:l S•FreCt Tt^Eld, PA ?_?`4?'J-?x;15; n -, ?1. r E P?_ f i C Cost, ?. ?. , c 'i 10r1, 1.'1C]_U.rU-1 i1 olr__J es, .?_ J._.:. e , lc i.nt.c I" t _ r o -IT VIII (De-rs. 77_ei.n2 Sou.t?lcrs, T'_,?lc-..-I T, PA DOC) -2 TO . S. C'. K93 7, 01585, X15 6 - TT. S. _,OTTSTITTTTIoTI - FIRST, ?I74TIT2 ?_TD FoTTRT",q'MTr"" TTT?'T?`TTS - T.9r P, I-, -CT `PITH FFTaF AI, (35) C? fl'? jq r r,q +i-te, abusive- ?ri'soo 6c,1111' i,ovis ,try Ac. Ph c ,,?,14" /? d) erL,.a.ear+ h9 +he , ever t Pub11e- OLboc14 dLLuS,+ve 0 p r isc n do v, d i tJO ohs i r? +k e P A D i e, ; e, C6e&+1 n kvie,d - a, a-?f'cn+i on vhvi e?l? es -k? e- PA be " ir, " ha.-d er i,e a-+; ve l i?G?+" j ' bei'j a? lead Go--plain+JF +n +h,o. Youn-L v, T-tile.4-1"x T crLsa wlage-, eornflaivied off= -1-e ephone, d1'.5 - rz.p ne; es ri •1-ke PA Doe,; +-ke, .Fr -g vii -E-ke. 5fwf-c Wr0, l4ct be,,.s Corf4,:, o- a.in 5CS-SA4 .FenA + 6-aro..l? L. ` uvv, `e b,,? ilenq i nq ?r?s Ld ??,n?ine mGh '; CL 11 J J Y,) 6'f'?tC?'Wi5 E.ngGLglnc? iri li ?"t?Cd.1 A.C'?-I`?!` ?'IEsI all of wh?c 4, at Ye iaw°r-,,L1 Zd tons f; u¢lonally-pro ee l-ec( ?n a hle n`F-s racfiee:d •For- --he ,f?er 'If of iPJS+4 LA,4-ioncL/ 7-e ?•1 erSoh f avid c(, more, ?,Aknn n e- ct- ? C; vi 1r ,? e ? 5oC i E ?y• I 1o'. On Sepfernbe+- 15? A .F'i se44e-d c v?d ?nJen Far- ed Wajk'v?s in-favvvved PIai,1i f, 103, On Sep f tW,b?r.(?? a 1308473 LonCerrti?n9 0fr`eal ha 05•, SC2-S M9 KNU Kards C,on- a?iv, be.rscriatl p, oper+r, COS "I"?,c>`'?' ?e wle?5 1oe•;nq •Fr-c?ns?er?ecl 051 Plai11t1 FT -Piled rsv;C.vanee do ?s5ment a.nd -lande.r by J•ase-rh. `10y, On SiPflr„loeiYlo? ol.voS"?'. P?,t,`n},`Ff F,`le.d Gw,`e.?u.rtee ne'o- j-hogo,Y 0one.ern' Mi114s:nje roper. /1 5CS-SMR s-4-ole cL eapY of k, A '005', On Sr,?f-e;.?v??ber ate, ?.C?O5 , P1,a?'rL+? F?' Was in•?er?/i r,?e.d by Ae. PRd wh,g#A eas,sfe-d OF be-Aend t,,*s- G-a..fes, i-ose-FA, dnc( Snyder. -rh c R e- J'n Flo r- d Plain } ' Tf -f h o,-t k e w Os 6L C c ?° f e-d -PO f-- S M L4 Place-- meen f and et slC 40, P1a-1 v?+,' Pf `-F ke d -+o -F,' Ie a.n a prco -1 . P(&J ,4-i-FF 4-oldC +ha:F ke ?l;d fnte,?d o cyrea,1 his- SN1u ?laee- fvten tier re-c.e.tve?{ coin {or-v,•,c. d` hC}, ee +Adf ke vvo-s aL?pt-aved h? evil--a! OP it.e. it wdcs fiold' his lva-hsFer Wouid 6e cr haLcl. ;106. O s?pfe-mr e-r 9-41 -2005) Shjc1cr aJ`e t 1"" a, Cop/ 0-F a ?C- IqI P11-1 4 l ev`. S!{oS? a[o f•e.d Se-pf-e.wtber 1 , BOOS; Pla?`hf,' ?' in- Ft,rim2d Srtyde.v- +hck-f -f-k,s -Forrv, dr„( no+ Qor',f ct, h 6, 1dn ,.1 a-qe +ham 4,,ny Ff e, joo1. xce,,Y%t4 4- v,/cts d- proved by Gev,?-ra l OMeo- S?dj a 4 r-r ec1 'rh. s ,,IL,tl.1 Crct e- sI Sc'Cr2 fca Yl jctti/e- rule T?LAI w?A. YC?, OL l? [? l EITTDE 7 r?' A ?D !VIT'TJSSES - H??IR,4SST,'I'Fl - RET.9LI9T;0"T - DE"?I-4L OF ACCESS TO '`Ps COURTS 234. P"ra';r,^.-lae one (1) tilrou^'=1 fi ,0 1riildret' 1 _; -'(:hree (23?) re i..z0.0-- n n"tec? herein by re e-ronce, o t 1 e,-.c i re se nor i 235. De.'C. ^:1ed iir I' is 0ount l:^ve unl, °;fu?l?r confisc?,.ted Emd ei , e _ "ror_1 f il? Pl tf. le I_ Declr ;.f ioiz in ; he Pro?1-!on v. ?Ioudesi/el1 C-:se c 1 Pl,r c e a choice to cJeco ie itness in. e`1 i'll^S s, d 1I1 ?Yl_ s:. r,) 0 t l T; ? S fi d e e `i'0 y_1 s D^Cl?,Yt..fi J 0 (. .,, -t rric 1 Jwrf, o_ l_e ._-id;'.1c D_. ,_ ri- ct o __ P...L,1_ _u.• ?.l -f. "C . ;J_ ) `0 lnl" ;la c confl.l_c",tell fro-Q i11.:.": Oil Au,7ust, 4-, 2006 ? 1C?. '_len e1" ?7' '` `- ^e f't7_r:].8d Oii Ll UC 1r, 11006, til(' TJeCl^.r„rMIMF), sing. 1ner C_::.Lio,.alea6- th,-,t the; Decl,-n? tion Confi :c`,ted be- c ',use PItf. c i(l 3:10 1i've the ap!_?rov. l o-.1 the PA DOC to ca:i i-aic?lte Bronson. T':1 DeCl^r"T1.OI1 ? no ` 1^P.C =i VPC :'Pr0 1c0Y1, "'Du t vi-. tale. U.S. Mrdl. P1f '. r.e?rrl F.(? .;c1 ".re- Velllited fl,0'7^1..'1 '_'JlC FO ).'Ji111.T ili.E= DeG1?.r°,t10n 1 •e: in. file . .C:.cr`-'.l oL' fits. T'_11-c! cons t f'utes ^.:'1"?er1n --d t") F2. ?2=^^l Vy. eilGe ' nd t'if neSSe , tee:-l^1 of "Gees'" to ?''ei: e .1 (Court, ."_?Y",sti P_nt, ?i1C: re-1 11 f ..11 '. t io-n7 ".11 GiVi.1 r1 "'A E viol?)_ Lions 0'1' f". ? ]_ c 3f tile TT. S. (30--12, t i tu'tiol_0. `IM"REPORE, nursu^?n?' to 42 TT.S.C. 961903 ^.nd 42 p^.C.S. 96601, et sev, . , Plf _". de -anc s he folio-d.-1 reli cf: Co ?, 1r. a;er`r '711cl. 1.)unitd ve d ,1a, es - -P.in- t all f-l,_e Deis. i n "1i e 'OL11t j 0in"t1 r, or c,ever:?,lly 1. i `q,-,-lo at "to 'De 1e ,en a e d bir jury; 'o) Tile CoL.rt, raus;t of-??ici^11 r 2,cno2- t t rli s to " 1c Feder-1 Court n M ^.7i-'-"tr?lte JU e A.n?re'7 J. S lys0r; c) Tile Decl= tion in Sur)tDor' of Rr01 01 `T. ~Ttlu e;?ilell i.ti1 file ffs.d^.Vi": ^,nd a .',1':J1 t U'.f b s rr:•Ur'12 to the rZ_ tf. or "o :1,tf:orne,?,7, Andre^ P, so. (9) Def c. l7 E'.i' :>jr fOr ^, l r court cof:?'ts ?.21U :f: i rl.es; C:.nd, e) De"i^. -.-m2t rel:'1'Jurse Pitf. "ror Goc'ts of l i L1 ,:..'ti_On, i<1G? a .14"; -pvc r?n1?r In ?? 1c r,.' n ^ 0 'ZI ( 36) 266. Pa "rnphs OAe (1) through two j5) are i lcorporpted herein by reference as e^c'_. ''ere set forth herein st length. 267. De o. Brq.nnigan and Patton Rre "ro this action. 26$. Defs. PA DoC, Mier pan, Si iron, Ayers, Ylein, JOE '._'Oi i y T? i der, Southers, Mosl,` k, Kelchner, R" rI cci , Ind Law shall be collective. 17 !__10711 as "oppressors". 26S. Deft. n7ina in v r" . 267 un! Mull, subjected the Pltf. to -fo rensationed vibIntiOns of his civil riAt Pltt_ . h 7s both S t <'.'(e an Federal right to be free., from aEonenit, Ye'l'^11.<_'tion, the of ,;1 .1 ,_tnti o.?;?.?,1 1 li^?-1.u z e e?? otion!a <.1 d 1o•.; esr, off, ciq o wessi.on, Qc. ,Munyaatee by the U.S. mad PA Coastit a•ti.on.s. 270. Pl b-".r ,r erver his MUM to ANNE naend_ „?,rt of t^_•!i ;,> Co ,riaint pur7uzat to 42 Pa.C.S. 31033 And the Red.R.Civ.Proc. 271. Pltf. asserts ,nd aver and eaclares that he has established ovase of action ul ?r preserved action for all of his claims ^s and and za,- successfully :let t_li c Court's requirement to make a st-tenent of cinims for WcA relief can be granted. 972. Pltf. asserts d avers and declares t l .t he as sptisfi.ed the lagpi r. en ai rainnts of 42 U.S.C. 01997e(a. . VI . S u.' ilo r"'T P,_ is a o pressei ind.ividu^i as an inc? ycay7ted citizen of t?'_c^l Oo '!_''1a=e;?lth of PA.. Ze has been a victim of Ph use by ar1:^_.011 offici.als in the PA DoC for over four (4) years no? Las been :subjected to solitary confinaaen•tt ns continair1 ttaYli? L'ie?lt for the la.,Tful ac- '_.;",211fr?,ilc?lt.se(? and '_11_; Ot?1J hope 01 tivities he engages in. He is of relief fro the official oppression he is rider r'e'' ?i nm i l a court of low. he bring forth this civil suit against his oppressors, not to scok Ath : ilia t ion _nor revenge, but to restore justice for himself, his o nyessors, saa society. VII. Dedication Co:,.Ol.in.t is dedicated in the lo: t loving " a orv of Anitr? L. Pyluck (1972 - 2008). (37) VIII. Conclusion TTEREFORE, Pl,...iri sues: ^cco z `'_in:;l?r to the o _7f n s e s Tell as D .ire,0_: July 31, 2003 cc: file ally Co u.r - viol?,.tion li^ _li 0<"ressors be s. e-r °o Vae cri.?res n t'li s Co - 'Vi1?'l ' i zdnes °, J,y1es A. Pp.lulch--, Jr. , Pro Se ?/'7 S CI-F v c t i-, e BQ3,f 69 50 Ov°-^loo''. Drive L?R el7_ e, PA 15 ?-50-10 50 c a Q -Ci C-r, 7b. -n M < cn tiff resneci-f l Of, 't'his civil ri 'Il t;s ( 3 3) j T:T Trr? rl "-7m Oil r,Ol TR,/1- PL-7,Aq 'TT' :-R-,??,..;','r;l.,' TJ`_:,mY? a _?\TTS`?2??.T!?.''?IA C' .1, FC A. P '.!-j7?`i .:n, 7 -R. , : 'iT 1,7.1 .'?li ?..TOT'T - ?iT L?'?D P?,-.i_itiff g ? -n V. .? NCB . 0 8 K -V ct-. ?'' ? p,-,, ?T ? ? °T OF TT'{'`, T TI ? DrPA7 ?T TTT ?r C V ' s ? . . . . a.... , r , . ., D • r,., . - C0 "R- FrTTO ?S , ';T aL . t1? r N , , n D F.a , S f :,. ?! t-? 4m y c co 0 'TO T- E HO'W R-ARLE J77)GE ASSI s''M TO m'?IS CASs': ? un 35 cn '1=''>> "TOti , co p 1 _it.i ones, t ? =cF A. Pr'?_ac , °. , pro ?7 __,.? ,er,?,fully ro-Dreseats, t.--i fo? Io in ~: I. T_.i i? Pr?tiLion to Proceed In For-l-z? P .L, a- _• s_ ci'i .%1.0';:er 1S 1'rai oY.t ^.1CL Coilt''1 it _",i I e j ul-aaJI0 ?'o f ord t>>_e co, tr and fees n.ecess?r?r to ?_iti„ .? e '';. , _".i ?'2r. 7.0'.. i.i f f l r? ',?ri t ti'1 0';'di11 , i?1 yr 111 ?)J-7 i tu]' t J n ^, Jr i? e , co i -fee; o? i;'__i.; ?i.?i?:lion a?tEFt?Ar, e i.ifii_ol er ?,-?JrC tjj?t t':?i, ,To zor^," le C:,ur : i,?_I ?.+y.?... i.: ,o i. , _ ; it lte tl?is ^.cti.o ?- ^nd- '?rocc ec 17o _c teY- .i_ L; on t _? er ?o f I ?? Fo ^.., r, _ ?, r , . ?-.,. ?,. r . ,- -U_?.,yz,?, o_? ,1.?.._. ?, o??t ?.?_n ?. J i ?r~1e?_?, ,-;, ili- fe??; ^? ts, of ri ?,? M ,ec?_zrity ?i-erefo2,c Af`^c?..?;; t of Iii For-. q P?u?cri.s St^,tus I. I, ?i ?:: es .4. P ,?_ c. , Jr., i t P?_ i_?' i.f " i1:. tae ^.ove C ' i0 '_e ,t er ::^,_'1C_ UDC" .i'<.;C o:i 3- t7 i-a- .ci^I co?)ai.? i ?JYl x '. J.1^?.Ie 0 r t',? _'? co t?_ o:i DTosecu-h t is -,ct5_o_2. '. I ^..; Helier .11 T uYri.i?? e to o'. t.?in ft?i??r ,^o i;rone? r.nc?_ .?- C?-1 i i,^ .i1 ?r <^.1c_ ^.ssoci,?-.'Fec, to ?^ r t'l-c cost J ___1: 11on. 3. I re,,re;_;ent t__; tile: i ifor _-tior? '?e?_o.; ^.t, :?.:,° tC ~?J. Dlli.i to `?)'-T ti7e fce?' =,-?i costs ir' t U.e _-acl- Correct. I c, t`a.tC p2-i "o_2e'1 iii t 2G- C .r^, C'a 0 J, nC: n- ' Cb ti-ol o_l t7 !-A De .., • o Correct io :?.s { °'P9 DoC") : ? e, a .'_ T i ?_carcer- i. !_=e Sfi^t.c Corrcc,t, o i l_ T.?.^.t ulfi_o?? ^t t?. {1-) I ' ^T;e been ulo.er of"i.ci..^.I o)-)rer ;on rq ,`?, Tr?,.r -?' i o?_it r? co i:?in c Gent l^T.rc no c> ,_ ,=r li . I ..o recle ve 1 Y , 0T i n r_ ;.. _: -J .?.? ?_? 10:.itji 2?`). 1dle ??'. , ?Jtlt i,_,? ? -.11.°c'. ^,re ^ Y e.:c1 ?i-TC? ?r L,_ eCL'or ,cr? ?sc 1a ( c) T ,-.1 rose)-tly irl c,.C'bt to PA DoC ="or To<-i.'^.r te1 - ^0.00. I ,,-?ect t,•1> >, (?e-?t to increr.se. (c? I -_.1 _?t,;_,,- ?•_n;- fi; o _ Jfi"_?._.r c1 ,_1 ?, i.. i.ci1 ?i0LILY 't? '_.IIIT0 r- ,-1t°!'- i3e l e',,V- to D0 C _ ar_ 1i1 'Qi^'in ? nY1. ;^.V111" S. ( e) T o,n no s `o c or a_ f T y 77 y0 r??nC1( 1"tr _1^1: :OT. T tl C: _ t .1 111" t T C011t 1-01:1 ti7 1._1.0n_1 o . !, in _..ce s Ol'_? C_ !?r'i 11T 18 t0 ?atT t=1 COSt 1i1CvI C°,? YC__ J_ I 1 o r!. trio Court to cir^ct t_1e prot'?1)_1o'c'-r?T or 1s ,,c`-i.: ee t0 -'e, nhotoconi of C011.10]1S, ,J.C Jt_'LCT i {? '.C iit ?^ OT T d ' c. l a, -l,'?-- ° iL - r c• c r?C c ?! _? •c. (_.:11...i 'f:0 triC 7.t. c; . P1 P 1 1 h 1 0 CE t0 e CTVoC, Ut)o_-i C t r "`,_ C t i S 1 , f i•0 i0 t , L 1,?°r 'i,% C7 rC 1,1 ;t: is Cf", ;1^11 t0 ^e, :C` `11.118 T _ no _1C'V? i;'1r? 101:11e neces ^,.1^q t0 P rp- t_-i0t Sherlf , E?tC. 5• I 7 t'rC,;r?T til'..t t ho 1"Ctti e,?1 jii 11.13:1 1?n 1 1 P^ i"1- t 1711 ?. ,. i 1 r0T eCt to _ a' .. - , J_ r .1^.Je Sub- f- i Jii 1??_ ?J CT1 Cf, ^ 1:? ti1^ 7 f ,1 C t t e- c o ?eCt t0 fi 1' 11 .l t1.(?,i 0 1t ?•n.c'Dq, T2T^t.l.ii." t0 "UY1 ] f"711-if•i.C?'A o'1 '-0 ut"10ri.ti eS". 'I?, ?.tj FQ??, 111 b.,1._ .=T.-,1? .P.? E? Te •0 nrOcec_r' T_1 7o,ior:1!-)1c. Court ..,i11 drect t'_1e P0- Y;7 ,1^ 1 C??? 112., t0 e C(D r)—I_ J ?,'1.° CO 5, c a c e 1" Vi CO ';)7 c CtC. % IC _e 70 7" V IC- S C r __ I# :cinc?ne, P t, Jtil1 v 010,9 41i.1 e / ?0 8 50 OV'1'100-!.-. i_ Ve i c,-Re11e, P.I. 175`150-10F0 J?,,er !1 P?a1a_c'Jr S BQ-?i5 SCI-?'^4rettc (a) Og-y05 1?FCj, A RA TSON , ! -!- n 'l.LFin in '. n , ?Tn1. ?c4. P?.1L?., Jr., '?,1e P_'1 ..-: '.1:.'1??e 'f'?' .Ghed CO' I 7-,1.L2 c '."lereby clecl^re t'1^,t ^.11 of the infor-l.P.tion, i1r. CIeC?_->r .a 10i1S, 1:^,C?.B _1 re1t1 is "D l'.:1 a' 1; 2 ? 1C? "'orre^1? to Y1ir infor- -,1°...izd Ce7_ie 9 l „ ._1.x.1. lny false -1e to for perjury nun ^ 1t, to )_n Pr, ,C. S. §4x-04 llnl-lam- 'or_ to -i`].d 2 TT.S. `:. §1740. ,T) ec'_`'.-"ecl. la ,? T l3 ? or J .-:eS 1. P lu.C_., ter. Pro Se R Q- X76 5"D 07,7 e.^lo ?._._ give L,933 el _e, P." 1r^5- 0--1050 Ch. e d CC2 le 0 A o CX> 'bw rn3 X7'4 51 A ?_ ?? ? C.n ? Z A/ 7-H,6 6 o u E2 7- o f e o `r rn v,J /?[rc? i4 s D r' So41E?SET edGINTy, pEA1NSyLVA^11,4 ,1?#, me-s A. 1'A t-ttC14, J-r A+ LavC-- r NO c? . De f t P%4 ei w -S T - C:; m 2-1 a Ce2r=r-Ze -YFTC- of SeR\/;re,,5 TI,e Plain+t??i TA-mfsA.'PaI LAeA, Tr„4 thereby Gce+'Pr,s fko,+ ke s fki s ct a? dt?osi f1raj o,- 4ru& aLnc( covreC? ri q i ma.l C of +L?e C1v; I bw?Plct,iKf a?.s eap*iorzed above, .ria?.lfl?e_ Willi (30u RLde," ar?d vicL -Fi rst-e lkss U. S. P, 5, pos e.- rG Ovid MOL; I OLlovi.q wi`+A ctn ect 1n Forma Paw Wri pA i d a v f 1 a` N o + e. +-o D e.-pond a n d of ?,o .? er I re d-ttiu' ` oCa. -e ct' Au j usf ?-, ADO* +b +ke per-Too below 1 Anqq, 5?©na.,/ee. .S`a ,,,,?Q,rszl- ?C u ?w+y Pro f-In.or,o-'1'a,r`? III r-. Uni o? Sa'ree't StA ft 1 90 .Sdw+?rset 1 PA ISSo 1 D &J-c d ksk 3 4 0?-9-? d20 v ` J " . T" t e. e, e!5 111, 7a mes A. PaL 1"c-,, Tr. #,C?jC? 3 ? !v cJ S mss- Sv D?z?/ook ?e P. U, .box 9999 4.,13,e //e , IVA Is-'YS-.d-05-0 I Vcr,-9iuJ,oo ojsd e-vc,(Astcl, JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS 08-4835 CIVIL TERM AND NOW, this ORDER OF COURT Vs+- day of August, 2008, the petition of plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, IS GRANTED. The complaint shall be filed without a filing fee and the Sheriff is directed to serve it without cost to plaintiff. By the C , r Edgar B. Bayley, J ames A. Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769, Pro se SCI Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450-1050 Sheriff - 1?Ox sal ?a;,Fr ?ii i ? "- `'3?5i ?? x h ? ,.. _. i?j ??+{? 1 Ci Jlt? U??ir ?ta.LU?a ??- ?? SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon DL'WMT(ZVT.VAT\TTA T)F.AARTMF.NT np rnRRRCTTnNS the DEFENDANT , at 0930:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 55 UTLEY DRIVE CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 18.00 ql?l°0o 14.00 .00 10.00 .00 42.00 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of day So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By 1 Deputy Sheriff A. D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon ZIMMERMAN DEREK the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 41DI 6.00 Service 100 14.00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: .? c R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 Byf? p?`.S Y n day Deputy Sheriff A. D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon CTMnOn'KT MAVV the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 9?Ipg 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 So Answers: Sworn and Subscibed to before me this day of R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By Deputy Sheriff A. D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon AYERS EDWARD the DEFENDANT at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 6.00 9141°g .00 Oro .00 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: A R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 Byf? day Deputy Sheriff A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon YOHN MATTHEW the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: ? Docketing Service y'?'o8 Affidavit Surcharge Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: 6.00 .00 ??. .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By: day Deputy Sheri f A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon T.TTMT? R AnAM the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service 9I?'Da Affidavit A1(b Surcharge Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By - day Deputy Sheriff A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon KLEIN COL the DEFENDANT at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 BOB VOLCCAK, by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing / °g 6.00 Service 9141 .00 Affidavit 00 .00 Surcharge 10.00 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this day of So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By Deputy Sheriff A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon KREIDER ROBERT the DEFENDANT at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LIS13URN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing ? Service gj??DB Affidavit r, pll? Surcharge Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By day Deputy heriff A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon SOUTHERS DICK the DEFENDANT at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 BOB VOLCCAK by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service +? p$ .00 Affidavit QI ?? . 00 Surcharge 10.00 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this day So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 a???AE" By Deputy Sheriff of A. D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon BRANNIGAN EUGENE the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 BOB VOLCCAK, by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service 9I?Ip8 Affidavit 00 Surcharge Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By• day Deputy Sheriff A. D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon PATTON DAVID the DEFENDANT at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 BOB VOLCCAK a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 00 Service Affidavit Surcharge Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE So Answers: 6.00 00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By• 1 day Deputy Sheri f A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon MOSLAK ZACHARY the DEFENDANT , at 0930:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 55 UTLEY DRIVE CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to RANDELL SEARS, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge ql? 6.00 So Answers: 0% f„l OK6 .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of By 2-C4??? day eputy Sheriff A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon BARBACCI KRISTIN the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing ? Service 1p,10% Affidavit A Surcharge So Answers: 6.00 , .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this day By Deputy Sheriff of A. D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing ? Service Affidavit 9I?I08 Surcharge 0 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon LAW THERESA the So Answers: 6.00 _ .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By day Deputy Sheriff A.D. SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon KELCHNER DONALD L the DEFENDANT , at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August , 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing t'?Ioq Service 00 Affidavit Surcharge Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of So Answers: 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 By: f? day Deputy Sheriff A. D. 4 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. Plaintiff, No. 08-4835 V. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please enter my appearance as counsel on behalf of Defendants Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Derrick Zimmerman, Mark Simpson, Edward Ayers, Matthew Yohn, Adam Huber, Eric Kline, Robert Krieder, Richard Southers, Eugene Brannigan, David Patton, Zachary Moslak, Teresa Law, and Donald Kelchner in the above-captioned case. The Defendants also demand a jury trial on all issues. Respectfully submitted, Office of Chief Counsel By: R ymond W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Attorney I.D. No. PA-48148 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: September 12, 2008 2 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. Plaintiff, : No. 08-4835 V. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day depositing in the U.S. mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe for Entry of Appearance upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below. Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: James Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769 SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 .2, Shelly Holley Clerk Typist I U Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: September 12, 2008 -TI La n , ? C L ; CS'1 r? ? g £ _;4 ?- PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be state in full) JAMES PALUCH, JR., (Plaintiff) VS. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. f endant ) No. 08-4 5 Civil 1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) for plaintiff: James Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769 (Pro Se) Address: SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450-1050 (b) for defendant: Raymond W. Dorian, Assistant Counsel Address: PA Dept. of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. 4. Argument Court Date: Dated: September 15, 2008 Oral argument is not requested. for ey for Defendants Raymond W. Dorian Attorney ID No. 48148 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. Plaintiff, No. 08-4835 V. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of September, 2008, upon consideration of the Corrections Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time, it is hereby ORDERED that the Corrections Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and the Corrections Defendants are directed to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint within 30 days of the date hereof. BY THE COURT: J. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. : Plaintiff, No. 08-4835 V. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW, come the Corrections Defendants, Pa. Department of Corrections, et al., by and through his attorney, Raymond W. Dorian, Assistant Counsel, and pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1003, move this Honorable Court as follows: 1. This Civil Rights action was brought by Plaintiff James Paluch, Jr. ("Plaintiff'), who was formerly incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI-Camp Hill"). 2. The Corrections Defendants include past and present employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections at SCI-Camp Hill. Defendant Barbacci is employed by Prison Health Services, Inc. 3. On August 22, 2008, the Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint. In his Complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that he was confined in the Special Management Unit ("SMU") at SCI-Camp Hill. Complaint at T 26. The Plaintiff complains that he was given false misconduct reports while in the SMU. Id. at ¶¶ 57-58, 72, 100-101, 111, 126-127, 136, 142-143, and 152. He also asserts that he was denied due process by Hearing Examiner Moslak in connection with the misconduct hearings. Id. at ¶T 61-69, 78-83, 103-105, 107-108, 129-135, 139, 141, 145, 147-151, 154-163. The Plaintiff also claims retaliation, harassment, denial of meals and confiscation of personal property. 4. This matter was only recently assigned to the undersigned counsel. 5. The Corrections Defendants need additional time in which to respond or otherwise plead to the Plaintiff's Complaint. They also need additional time in which to confirm or deny the Plaintiff's and allegations and to locate relevant documents. 6. This motion is being made in good faith and not in order to unnecessarily delay this action or prejudice the Plaintiff. 7. This is the Corrections Defendants' first such request for an extension of time. WHEREFORE, the Corrections Defendants request that the Court grant their Motion for Extension of Time and grant them an additional 30 days in which to answer or otherwise plead to the Plaintiff's Complaint. 2 Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel By: Ray and W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Attorney I.D. No. 48148 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: September 15, 2008 3 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. Plaintiff, V. No. 08-4835 PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day depositing in the U.S. mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing Corrections Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below. Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: James Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769 SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 Dated: September 15, 2008 Kristen Barbacci c/o SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001-0200 Shelly Hol y Clerk Typist II Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 c 73 CO) --t k _ . PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court. CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be state in full) JAMES PALUCH , JR . , (Plaintiff) VS. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. (Defendant) No. 08-4835 Civil 1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) for plaintiff: James Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769 (Pro Se) Address: SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450-1050 (b) for defendant: Raymond W. Dorian, Assistant Counsel Address: PA Dept. of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. 4. Argument Court Date: Oral argumen is not requested. Dated: October 1, 2008 tto ey for Defendants Raymond W. Dorian Attorney ID No. 48148 O R+ 93 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR FAYETTE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES PALUCH, Plaintiff, No. 08-4835 V. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. Defendants. CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND NOW, come the Corrections Defendants, Pa. Department of Corrections, et. al., by and through their attorney, Raymond W. Dorian, Assistant Counsel, and pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1028, object as follows: 1. This Civil Rights action was initiated by Plaintiff James Paluch, Jr. ("Plaintiff'), an inmate formerly incarcerated at the State Corrections Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI-Camp Hill"). 2. The Corrections Defendants include the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, a Commonwealth agency, and past and present employees of the Department at SCI-Camp Hill. Defendant Barbacci is not a Department employee. 3. On August 22, 2008, the Plaintiff's initiated his action by filing a Complaint. In his Complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that he was confined in the Special Management Unit ("SMU") at SCI-Camp Hill. Complaint at ¶ 26. The Plaintiff complains that he was given false misconduct reports while in the SMU. Id. at T¶ 57-58, 72, 100-101, 111, 126-127, 136, 142-143, and 152. He also asserts that he was denied due process by Hearing Examiner Moslak in connection with the misconduct hearings. Id. at ¶¶ 61-69, 78-83, 103-105, 107-108, 129-135, 139, 141, 145, 147-151, 154-163. The Plaintiff also claims retaliation, harassment, denial of meals and confiscation of personal property. A true and correct copy of the Plaintiff's Complaint is attached and marked Exhibit "A." 4. The Corrections Defendants demur to the Plaintiff's Complaint for the follow reasons: (a) The Corrections Defendants cannot be sued in their official capacity; (b) The Plaintiff has not alleged personal involvement on the part of the Defendants; (c) The Plaintiff has improperly sued the supervisory Defendants, based on their supervisory positions only; (d) Defendant Kelchner cannot be liable, based merely upon his processing of the Plaintiff s grievances and appeals; (e) Hearing Examiner Moslak is entitled to quasi-judicial immunity as a hearing examiner for the Department of Corrections; 2 (f) Mere verbal harassment and threats do not constitute a violation of the Plaintiff's civil rights; (g) The Plaintiff received all the due process to which he was entitled in the context of an inmate misconduct proceeding; and (h) The denial of two food.trays to the Plaintiff constitutes a de minimis injury in the context of the Civil Rights Act. WHEREFORE, the Corrections Defendants request that their Preliminary Objections be granted and the Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel Rayn)6nd W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Attorney I.D. No. 48148 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: October 1, 2008 3 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. Plaintiff, V. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. : No. 08-4835 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day depositing in the U.S. mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing Corrections Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below. Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: James Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769 SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 Kristen Barbacci c/o SCI-Camp Hill P.O. BOX 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001-0200 -A&iWA W4- Shelly Holl Clerk Typist II Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: October 1, 2008 I: T. =E COUR01? CO: TAO ? T PT ?_^S CTT:`RERL A'T?D (Y1TT"m`'. PE"TNS`? Il.A"I!? A: 7'S _A. PALUCH, R. , V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF' CORREOTIONS, Dere1 Zi-rlerra^n, rR_Y _ Si:n-)ron, Edc,?rd .Ayers, Y'o ln, q.ci,i7a T''aber, C01 Klein, Robert "Bobby" Di c:: So atI ers, ??^r- _ cciT1=crew Lev, Dono.ld L. De-"enclnr.ts • ----------------------- N 0 T I CI':riT OTX` - A"_' LAW ? o. 09 • y?35 J UDGE: C E --------------------- Voc_ been saed in court. If you <i ?1 to c.'_e :---Ic! -.'7.i'11t the '41??fi t- :e _;,ction 'vit 1i.i1 Cl ?i_ls set fortll in the you (?0) y? ftm- thiw Co-;l.ol d _t ?.ncL T'otico .^.Yc servect, 1):r 'n-. 11 e i.n 1, 17. ritfien eP.r^.nce ^ers0_.?11;r o-r 1 to . ney ,=.1z., 1? i i.z ;1"11111` '1f._ 1:i?c COUI" ?TOI r"n'r en e or vE'C1.0117 t .in {']_ r_.?} r ."a -- -i. st you. You ?.re -.r11ec?_ ^t if ?roa f,,.i_!_ to clo 7,o 4'_1e c e ....?- :proceed .' tliout <rpu1 tjud??e_lt "y bO i1Cr0?' ?^.i let Vou by file Court ": '11='_Ou1 ?fartiler rlot.l.Ce nor ,-,.11?r i10 1C•;% cl"d-ied in t11e no •l-.i_nt 0-r 'o _t" _1•?r other cl ,..i?1 or relief reaues ?;e(' ) - '-hc P="in- t1._ f. -rcu lose Tlone? or -nro,-)e2-f:it ,3- 0'` .Cr ?"1 =t" l 0y 117rit to V v "0 J , 137 OTTJ ^4: T'TIS PAP:?R TO 7CUR L.A`Tf 3R Al .0?TCE. I" YOU T 1 %17 1--A "T"] A L:AIVER OR. 0217TNOT AFFORD OITE, GO TO OR TET?PHC.'? 7-R, OFFICE SET ?SORT" 'BE'LOW `!'0 FI°'?D OTTT "VIER:'; `TOT' W-71 GrT L73 =.AL ?:EI,P. o4ernor's 0ff1ce P.A. DoO Office o"' 55 Utley Drive of Ge_'e1"rl Coua?el Chit :i C%) ?L el C,1 '11, PA 17011-502' (717) 731-0444 Curtis R. Lon-, Prot ionot^ry 0ne Co ar t:ho w?a Square PA 17013-3387 TRUE COPY FROM RECORD In Testimony whereof, 1 here ulpto set my hand and the IIof said Cou a rliste, ft EXHIBIT is ........ • da f.. ... A Prothonota IN TIDE COURT OF COM?OT:T PLEAS CUM-BERM AND COUNTY, PRONSYLVAITIA J AYES A. PALUCR, JR., Plaintiff CIVIL ACTIO:T - AT LAW H V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPAET INT OF CORRECTIONS , ET AL. , Defend_nnts . (all Defendaizts li ted in Section III below are being sued in either their private capacities, official capaci- ties, end,/or both as indicated) • CASE 1`10. JLTDGE: JURY TRIAL D111. 7DED! s COMPLAINT I. Jurisdiction and Authori t, This civil action ^t lai!F, is made pursupnt to the lp.ws of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvenia. (42 P?..C.S.A. §931; 42 Pa.C.S.A. 95303, 95322, @5329) and the la,vs of the Constitution of the United States of Arierica (42 U.S.C.A. @1983, $1905, §1986; 42 U. S. C. _1. 91331(a), 01343; 42 U. S. C. A. 91997, et seo. ; Pad 42 U. S. C. A. 912101, et sect. Tie Court's., t'_zority to hear this civil action a.t la?;r Co_.z,)I,aint is made pursuant to the Constitution of the Co=?-17.,,e-1th of Pem-isylvanie. (1960, Art. V., Sec. 10) ; 4-2 Pa.. C. S. A. 06601, et seq.; the Pennsylvania ("PA.") State Rules of Court, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1001, et sect. ; as ;cell ^.s any ot"ier applic- able authority at la.w for purposes of effective liti ation of the claims herein. II. Preliminary Statement ^'?.i.s is civil rights action filed by Jawres A. P:alucL, Jr. ( "Plaintiff/Pltf. ") , a state prisoner under the care (-U-1d/or lac: thereof), custody, and control of the PA Departme-nt of Corrections ( "DoC"), formerly confined in the State Correctional Institution at Cp=fin 1ii11, and presently confined in the State Correction^1 Insti- tution at Fayette (LaBelle, PA) , for dazna.,,es -nd injunctive relief y pursuant to the jurisdiction and aut'hority previously invoked, asser- ting, ^nc,. averin ; '??.rassnent, retr.lia.tion, due process violations con- cerning confinement in disciplinary segregation, conspiracy to deny civil rights, deliberate indifference, failure to protect, officiel on-ression, -.-ongst other pendent anO,/or sunplemental state and fed- erol jurisdi ction^.1 claims uc.der 20 U.S.D. A. §1376 for violations of the First, Fifth, 13igh'th, aad Fourteenth kmenements of t'_he U. S. Con- stitution. The Pltf. also Plle?;es negligence. III. Pp.rties The Pltf. , Ja*?,.es A. Paluch, Jr. , -.a.^s in solitary confixe Zent i_1 the Speci^,l *Pnage vent Unit ("SMU") at the Str.-.te Correctional In- stitatims at Ca1n Bill ( "SCI-CAP.") in Cxi-berlamc' County, PA, during the events described in this Complaint. 'His present address is 50 Overlook Drive, LaBelle, P1 15450-1050• 2. Defendant PA Dena.rtlent of Corrections, is r. cornora.tion nd/or Uurerucracy of the Co?x'1o 1?ve?.lt;h of Perimryylvania, and oversees the aetlt of its e-Gployees, ;--!ho are La cihaxge of the custody, co Ltr.ol, c.nd care of the Pltf. a.s ?-iell as the 'nvs, ne tre^tment there- of; includi.nE, the esta'blislhzaent of its policies, nrocecaures, rules, reg ..la.tions, ?.nd ci receives. The PA DoC is be-in,,- sued in its offick- a.l ca.np.city. Locate. at: 2520 Lisburn Ro^d, Cazrp ?'ill, PA 17001. 3. Descendants Derek Zi».ler.~::aan ( "Zim.,.erma.n") , M7,r1-, SL-m lion ("Sil,ioson") , Td?.,a.rd Ayers ( "Ayers") , V.r tthevv Yohln ("Yo'vi") , ALtam Huber ( "?'u':per") , n.ad Yleiri ("Kleiil") nre correctional officers e ployed ^.t SCI-CAM. Vlhe y are being sued in :'heir priw,.te c^.n^.cities. 4. Defendant Robert Kreider is the correctional lieutenant La c'hare of t'he S??'iU at SCI-C_'T. Robert. Kreider ("T.reid_er") is beingg po:3 '_ iia his official mad private ca.nacities. 5. DefenO-mt Dic'4L Southers ("Soa.':-hers") is the unit m^.inn -er of the SY_U ail' ei_inloye(3. at SCI-C-4":1 Pnd is goner^.ll s respo_ rs ible for overseein- tiie °n-ce'ient of both tile, -)ri`"o lers nad sLiborOinaate Si ?.ff a.s ?i ?rieC to t_e SITU. 'Te is bei n sued in both !,Lis official and ori- v`,te ca?-_-.citi.es. G. De_?ens'.-nts 7lui-s-ne !3rnSLni,,Pn ("Bra.n .itan„) riid David Pa.t."on ( "Patton") riye de-)?.ty suneri:ltendents e,-Imnlo,red at SCI-C.-VT1. Rre 11i.mfln oversees and is re onsible for f^.cility `;-,id seci.-?ri ter n- -). 16;ement. P^.t' Dii ovexeees nO is respOalci.ble for centralize., services such a,s meci c--l -.?ici. -Zeztal health tre^t-?lent ^-nO also ner,'or_n,s f ?.cili ter a ,el?lsnt sties. Both are bein^ sues'. i.-1 their official and nri.vate c ci ties. Zachary Mo sl-k is a hearinr "_ ;loye;; u;r the P.11 DoC and ^ssigned SCI-OW. _-e is responsible foi- COAT UZC'%J _i` r7.i=cirlin^:ry hea.r.in ;s for prisoners of brC'% .:- i 1i,x- r?riso z rules. lie is In _ii- official r,..a-7. ;-riv,7 t-e c,,)acities. Deienc?.?nt 'Kri.oti:_._ B•:.rbacci s o. - -, .: i. _ _ It - ? 2...le r if 1r ,.3' anlo„ er i ? s ta^_t - oy-ec'. t SCI-(;.A1R. t?1e P.^-. DoC -or Pri: -o.i 11e,lth Services or both. S-1;.P is "en.er?aljr °e;:; ?o;_isible for co ?O.uctin,, ;:,ic_- Call r7-c'es ^..?d -for ^i -tin` --pith 77Lnn t're^.t-en .s. She is +J ,La-; ^L;.eC 1.n hot:_ ier offi.ci?31 nriv .te capacities. , ?'. Defend^At Theresa Lev: ("I,=?.w") is tt`?e corrections he;,. Tit e_ ;,loyed !,.t SCI-CV-1 is for t'he of , 118'.1 , .P. 1 L"1•",.:?c.; E;?lP1'l.'" O L t•i? care services. ,rJ?1E 1.c bc?1.?1,° c:,1.'_'_ .1.?1 iJO tit her nri ,77 to cpm,: Ci ties. 10. De_°e_1d.'::it Doarillct L. '"elc mer ("Yelclhnerl') ;.s the sanerin- terldent/f?cilit r ,lanager e;.1-ploye0. ?.t SCi-nA*T ?: C? it resL?or i.?Jle for ^;l I a.s: ects Jf . _. ,. :',L;E3 -i clV.din Fiat not 1L -titer to nevi -''T1.i1?`r -.3'] il. S 2-a C? t''.eiT nne"ls; ^l_1^.c' "i..1] ''i•r` five .?.ild di.sCi.nli11MXy hen revi.e ain" forrill s-rievmnces Pad their ap-)e^ls; the ,"V-,illtenrnce, „Ye- ervation, and. protection of video surveillance c, t-,rell as other evidence; ?. for Vie monitoring, intercession, ^--nd prevention of ctr,.ff ..^buse of nriconers. TTe it bei.n;_, - aed in both his official aaC'. nriv^>te c7.'-)acities. 11. 411 Defendants in tsar^, re.?? s three (3) t1irou^11 ten (10) a.re adult ci tizeil^ of the United St<.tes, believed to be residents of t'_se Co L.lonrealt'_1 of Pennsylv?.i1.i,,. ?:mad their address is; 2500 Lisburn Ro? d, P.O. Box 200, C%rip 11i.ll, PA 17001-0200. 12. All Defendants h-.ve acted, nd coz?.tizue to act, under color of State alifl. Federal la-.,s and authroity at •-.11 ti:-:is relevazlt (3) . a to t=di^ Co anlaint. 13. At ^11 :??a.teria.l times, Defendants ("Defy.") Zi-.rierm2.n, Si_-znson, Ayers, Yohn, Iluber, Klein, Yreider, Soothers, Rrfnniga.n, Patton, Mosle,.i•, B::71rbacci, L^V,, and Kelc1uler Pere individuals %%,11,1-0 or s_iould Iiave known ?'bout the la,,,is of the Co ?Y orse^lth of PA as °,ell as t`e la--:s of the United Stakes Cons titution crimes ,?.-)Aylor civil rights violations such as harassment, ret??.ia- tioal denial of due process, deliberate indifference, fri.lure to protect, official oppression, theft of funds, ac :Vail a.s conspi.rs.cy to co_?viit c'cil wrongful acts were unla.r-,ful. 14. At all materiel fines, Defs. Zinrlerrnar_, Sir:??son, Avers, Yo in, _ uber, Yleiz, Kreider, Southers, Aranni.;j-.a.n, Patton, ?'Toslal., B?.rb^.cci, Low, ,_ad Ke1CiLrl.er ?.cted %•Ti.tliin the co :; se !:I.nc scone of their esployment, as dedlared ;-),ad indicated, as >ctor,-, officers, ol;??;cnt i, f-x-d s'..lnerVi sons pursuant to the cuoto;-zs, p1licies, proce- dures, av? ,-.r,,.ctices of the PA DoC. IV. F,-,cts r?..1d Declexations 15. In S eotember 21-UU j, FIZI, aur.norea T 1?13 Doo.L, A ull e luau U Life: Life Imnrisoxmient - AL?nerica.'s Ot]aer Death Penalty, originally published by Roxbury Publishing Coy nany. 10'. Pltf. G;4.s e.ctivelf engaged in educatin, the public and. its latima:iers about the realities of the prison conditions inside the PA DoC, and this at times placed the PA DoC in critical 17. Pltf. actively engages in freelance :,ri Ling, tieing a political activist for both life-sentenced prisoners .lZd nrironer,/ victim runts, filing leFiti-;gate for:na.l ri evances a.ga.in-Ft the PA DoC ^_1« its employees, and in en%;a,ging in civil liti.?,ation a. ?.inst 11 * its emnloyees, agents, etc. the P4 DoC and 13. Pltf., as a result of engo, in., in la,rfLil activities, has beco:le a. "target" of ?11arassinent, retaliation, harelshins, and ot;:er burdens by PA DoC employees. 1c. Pltf. '^?.s remained in solitary confine-:aent .since Y4 ,y 27, 2004. 20. On S ep tamber O, 20049 r'.i.l e ::toizs ed. in the Restricted (4) 'Iousina Unit ("R?IU") at the State Correctional Institution in ='unting- don, Pits. e7as assaulted by his cellmate due to RiiU staff's failing, to protect hire and by the encouragement of a REM officer Tzo are employees of the PA Do C. 21. Pltf. filed a Private Cxi_=ii-1 Complaint against his for- =mer cellrnate Rod e-r H. Smith and correctional officer John D. Datason ?ith the PA State Police. 22. Pit'. ,°7a.s transferred to the State Correctiona..l Institu- tion at SCI-Somerset on FebruRry 1, 2005 at the request of the PA State Police due to z needed separation from SCI-H-Lu-itin ;don staff. 23. Pltf. .,ias ensr-ged i.;z civil litigation .ara.inrt T-iTeti.L and Verizon Select Services, Intl. -:Lhich ?)rovides contr..^.ct telephone ser- vice^ for the PA DoC from March 2004 to June 2007 (Yount, et C.1. v. m_'?e;;ix/VSSI PA PUC C-200 -2655) . 24. Plt . filed a State Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Cor_'Lmon Pleas Co.Irt of Somerset County pursuant to Pa.R. Civ.Proc. Rule 10UO(b) au^inst tale oriso_- officials of SCI-So-iierset cliallengin,_; confine- ment in the WIT (Paluch v. Rozwn L et al. Somerset Co. No. 2'0,-Cj1-2005) . 25. In May 2005, SCI-Somerset prison offi c.iGls be-;an cta.ffine, the Pltf. for ola.ce-nent into the SIM, ?,!Iiich Pltf. n:sse-rts 1.nd avers -:as an organized conspiracy to fraudulently ??rt retaliate tJ'n a--?ioring his ".inst ali.r? for en?;a.?;in;, in lawful activities such a.s aut . book, filin- legitiila.te grievances, and civil liti,vation, etc. 20. In November 20059 Pltf. ves transferred- to SCI-CAMI where he -ra.s placed Lato the SHTU. 27. The SIIM ie. an atypical m-id significant hardsbi.p in -rela- tion to t=1e ordin.p.ry incidents of prison life. 2U. Pitf. -gas placed into the SM 1.wkiile on a.d:--iini_strative custody ("AC"). 29. The 5.5.1 Policy and Procedures TARnual a.nd the DC-A.DM 802 effective at the time of i1lovember 2005 governed the procedures, rules, and regulations for both SI_'U and Administrative Cuptody pla=cement. 30. The SF.ZU consists of five (5) phases as follo.is; P'-.ase five (5) is reserved for SK U prisoners on discinli.narl(.i custody ("DC") status; P1.1s.se four (4) be"ins the initial AC nla.cemerit st<,.ge for SIM priso_zers cons itted from RI'Us; Phase three (3) is also AC ola.ce Pent (5) -ihi.cli begins Privileges such as co_?t::issa.ry and access to ,,radio; Ph2 e two (2) is the final stake of AC nlacellent in the ST"II which al- lo?.as the additional privilege of access to a television. Phase one (1), uoon infor,la.tion and belief, is P. three (3) to six (o) -month nro- ba.tionary period in any general population of the PA Doc. 31. Pltf. first began oreoaring a civil ,,,.it n.;7a.i-nst correc- tional officers and. his former cellmate concerni-n-; the Sen t erlber 200,1- incident of assault in December 2004. 32. Pltf. believes that the PA Doc a.nd its efl,-)lo Tees Pt SCI- So,- erset ,anew that Pltf. was nrenarin? a civil suit aMaizst the PA Doc e ployees at SCI-TTuntingdon. ( 33• On Febru?.-ry 8, 2006, Pltf. was advanced fro'.-.,I lu.s initial Ph:'.,,-.e four (4) ("P4") to P]1-se three (3) ("P-3)"). 3^. Shortly thereafter, Pltf. 1.-ms intervievied by the Associ- ated Press con.cer._ins; the PA Do C's ben on norno•^r.,.n"Ay in its state pri?ol- '!?i1-e the Pltf. doe: not necessarily cones`, porno-ro.nli?T, lie criticized the PA Doc* s )olicy oil ba_ti:?in•_; oorxio,Mra.phy bec?.l.1ce he believed it -,rould increase violence and sex_aal 'lams- ^e:Zt/ ^?"` ??t ' •"^1. ': t ')r1:7-.o--ler° 1n-,7. fe-1",le . T'lz_ Ar=o^1.f.teC. Press pt_bl_ ^'.ed t',e Pitf.'r conmrer_ts 3r. I:, ?0(.` _tion to pre,)--r.i.-L,,_:iF civil F°ui_t, Pltf. ??a.s <.c- ,,,? fl ^.C?.de.1C ?1Ci I?;_.tor".tiv- justice r)TO ;'r ;- !1, --Lee "Life Blosso r" (111-911) ,.:,,it.: v^rious n~ofcc.sors eocities.co ^L f )1 e_1 o- r o _i s_i-nfo) . l i ,-t De_". Simoson as red the Pitf. if he 36. In e-.ri r April ,".)O0 cof.ld _,ee t_le Plt--7. * ti book, A Life or a Life ("ALR L") . The Pltfe told Si_., pson tll<:.t he wr-.s thr?.t i de,-.. Plt--. believed th^.t ?r. r c • sac imethical Si:no?on a.s _ed 11 e Plftf. "You :m,n- na. ,Mo thro:..,r;h the progra 1, clon' t yo,_?" P1 tf. again told Si.- -oson it not -I, good. idea ?,nC_ tl=<?t he dir-al t t,!ant to ,-.o it. Simp- ro. ^pve the Pltf. ar,. order to give '.zip t'1e boo-"-. Pltf. reluct^ntly ,I've Sianson ALF_9L, fea.rin. ret^.li•?tion. 37. Pit-Ii. =;,,Ptched Si:7insoia tplke the boos: clo?.?z,ta.irs ,•:_lere he s^,t ,^t ,-,,ooden bench pagin" throu;_7,h t:'-_e book. 38. Si.?.lnson -lso gave the booms to Def. Ayer llo pe.ged tll-!-ou?ll the book. Sil-.vDson returned the boor a.nnrot-imptely I- half- (6) ?your later. Sinpson asked the Pltf. w'17 much money he ,??..^s ; ettin from the book and the Pitf. respectfully told Si^,n son that such in- fo r-c;".tion ,-as o" no concern to him. 39. Arprol;ir.-.ately a vvee!?: 1,.^.ter, Simpson -s=:ed the Pltf. r-rha.t he thou ;ht Pbout child-molesters and the Pltf. exnressec'. '•-j.i s. dislike of p e do -chili a. 40. Si.;?ntion tole... the P1tf. that SPIV nris.oner Eric Lyons hq..d r^ned a young w'._ite girl a-.e th.t if the Pltf. could et Dron to yell oatside 11-i s door, the Pltf. could " ;o tiirou;.-;h fi11o fro .,youn ! uch ouicicer". 41. I'ltf. refused to en 1.1 Such unetTJ cal ",eh vior and tole Si.-1?soil, ttm_,1^.tI c oixy. It 42. Pltf. reported Sirlpsoil'ti rronosition to ST'I corrections ser` e^_2 t S. D:-.-r ho?.-ver during outside exercises. 43. Pltf. adv^zlced fro,,-.' P3 to P p.se tivo ( 2) ( "P211) on or >bout "!I-.y 22, 2000. 44. Oa J1zZe 15, 20051 the s :i^ c?.s.,y t'_-^t Sr `U Pro;-_;rarn Re- vie-.r,, Co--L ittee ("PRC") tol-d the Pltf. t_ r1 .tt _1e no loslrer _n-resented a.ay rise to ^.ny .-er_eral ;)o_)-,;.lation ^ 1d 111oLld e:11-)ect to be -,nnroved for release from the ST -U at hiti next SsiU PRC revi ET, _1e ring, tine Pltf. tva issued iiscon0act report 41". ( "m/c") no. A747835 for "f -.ili-a" to st,ane_ for co.,ult". 45. On June 21, 2006, Def. ?".ori,-k found .he Pltf. "?-,iillty" of 1/c no. A7478_'15 ^nd sanctioned the Pltf. to fifteen (15) Days cell- r e tri ction. 46. On June 28, 2006, strithout any forri,-l notice served upon the Pltf. , Pltf. :eras denoted from P2 to P3 for a period of 0'0 d^.ys. ^.7. On JLiy 51 2006, Pltf. appealed the loss or hi P2 sta.tus to Def. Felchner. 48. On July 18, 20062 11 elchner denies' t?_e Pltf.'s ap )eal. 49. On July 25, 2006, Pitf. appealed the decision of I-.elch- ner to the Chief I':eering Ex-,-vainer, Robert S. Ditner (110T3E/13i.tner") . 50. From January 6, 2000' to August 1, 2006, the Plt fi.led several official inmate grievances (DC-804s) mostly cor nl?.ininm -bout 'he handling ?..nd confiscation or his oerconal rro erty, inclu- (7) din;; nos. 140723, 144911, 148663, 153334, 157407, and 158444- 51. In the aforementioned grieve.nees, Pltf. did e-Imr. ess his concern about ret,liation, vri.tr the excenti_on of no. 1574'07. 52. On June 28, 2006, 1=edi".tel1r fol7_o7.•ring Def. Souther' s decision to demote hip to P3, Def. Huber confiscated all o" i1i s p' er- sonal property on the pretense of "cell reduction". 1mon-st the personal property t--.t the Pltf. lo-,-.t or had stolen mere legal notes in. preparation of the civil suit a`ainst the PA DoC eni^loyees qt SCI-I'uatin-don. 53• On July 18, 2006, Pltf.'s father, J.-- es A. Pmluch, Sr., rnail?,d a letter e-Adressed to Kelchner co.nnlainini°, -bout -caber's con- fiscation ,^nd altering; ?s well a.s destruction of Pltf.'s nerso_ el nropert,r. Pltf.' c father declared to Kelckmer th -.t he ;-,ould con.t^,ct hic-, -,a.ttorneir and congressinm, 54. Pltf.'s f?7.ther•s letter to Kelc?uler ??rolqnted Southers to r1,^,-re telephone call to Pltf.'s father. Sout'hers told. Pitf.'s fat:? er t .at his staff ? ct ed professionally, and that Pltf. "needs to better :Zana.,re his beh?.vior problems". 55. I?elc_iner 7.lso ma^iled a letter to Plt-f. • r f-ther dated Au,-,uc7 t 1, 2006. 56. Pltf. is no-t litigating m/c no. A747835 or Crievemce nos. 1407237 144911, 148668, 153834, 157407, 9.nd 158444. '?o lever, there docu:!ients be used as upport.in^; evidence to subs-tnntia,te the cln.ims for this civil suit. 'sowever, these fa.cta :end c_ecl^.rations are asserted -nd averred as history. 57• On August 4, 2006, Def. Zimmerman i ^ ued. the Pltf. a. f-b- ricated m/c report, no. A747864 ("74786411) for ch?.rt es of "assF.-u.lt" and "refusi.ntto obey an order" ("rtoo"). 58. Pltf. di.c? not a.ss^.alt Zir? ?er:.?an nor refuse to obey a._ny 015" _,A.s orders. I.1 f^.ct, Pltf. obe.kred ^11 of Zimr- er:la-a'^ orders ?,.,hile in. the ST`TT. 5?. Zimmerrirn denied Vae Pltf. of his me,-.1 0 -xic'ic'_i.nner.) on Au ust 4, 2006. Pltf. filed r;riev^nce no. 150443. It Jenied, r 7:-ea-lled, anff,. exh,--usted a.t all levels. 60. 0.n 1u.,,- st 4, 20069 P1tf. cmbmittec_ a DC-14.1 part 2 A (8) Request - or Representation and Witnesses" forts ADC-141 2A") requesting that the video surveillance for EA Quad cni- er4• --nk". t'-Lc EA- 20 cell ^.per., Lure ?--e used as .1itnesses s.ndlor evidence in support of innocence }ilea. 61. Def. Mosl_k coaeacted a disciplinEz.,r lier.ring based on 7417?D + oa Au-u t 9, 2006. 62. NI051?.: denied P1ti.'s renjues t to ins-ect, the r',pera.ture of EA-20 cell .:°oiL1d "lave proven t.1ivi.t t"-,-e aoere.tur e i.,, very 'Iif- icult to o.,) ea. He .^1 so denied PItf.I s request to ir spect awaci revimv t1ie vireo :,rvei.' 1-uice for EA. Quad (recorde(fL on Au._;ust• , 2000) due to a cli 1 that 1) vf3. Soat111ers a,nd K r e i (Ier tole'. '1.i.11I 11:3 c is no vi :.eo evi ncs o.' tl;; s j,ncide:lt". 03. 0_. Aj- -,s,t 41 2006) R.'-iT L i,. J. Sir:; ::; Loli`1 Cie P11-f. t' t t here video sarve.i.ll??.nce avzilo?nle7 th2t t.i?- )Oiated in the ;ever,Ta1 direction of E_9-20 cell, Lund th:,_t Dot'1 the Security De -L". y-el cilner -L c acc e».; to this co LL1d e: w11;; be onto d il,?.rC?G.r1V8. -g.'-lsed --)o11 "LL of- .rAe d..ce, Pltl. DO-135A to Y.elc tier requesti-iig t,:.?i. ..a._,...i hi."i•o ;.resarve protect t 1iS video z4arv ill^,.Lc0. r.. plt . told TToslf?!, finat he ,.?E rillin. to viaivc the hear- iii., I so that ale could i._zve„tig -te t_?is 11,e .rsay t h::"o- no evidence o--,- the video; a vaill_aace e::istec,_ co icer.i.inL, ?u ia oident. Plt" If. requester" o:-:l??? o "j1)e.7? "ith ?`elciiner about this so th^.t the could ii•lspect "he vireo .urvcilla.ce ?lir self inste-d or relyiiig, on tale is or-.,,,tion of Sout_?rS <'.t1u. Tr:felC?.er. ii j. '_Ro s1:denied Pltf.'s request that the 1-7in ct the video survei.llLA..nce conceriling tihis Licident. u•3. Mie video surveillance ,,ould hove shoves, that the Pltf. di("- not a: ;a.u1 t Zi??:.?errzan by "l? t-'_ie food Ida, iii the rie'lat l1a.IC_ . ", 7. "RoslaL denied the Plt:i. dae ??rocess by not inspecting the vireo surveillance of EA-Qu•.d (recorded on Autust. 4, 2006) ???cL kv,1's F.v ilalb1e =or T7osl a..'s inspection on Au, ust C, 20001 • 6S. T"oslak fouled the Pltf. "guilty" of 7,+7064 -,nd szaaci,ioned him to 60 dl-ys DC tire. -,9. As result of Zi.,,:ier•Lzan's fabricated i;_:coaCact report (7473,S-l') -.n ?"0 1?L>'s failure to protect Pltf.'s (1:ae process o--'L' 'L)-Ls ( c) i' erty Literests, Pltf. suffered the loss of his P3 status aad abi7_- ity to ndv'.nce to P2 status .1d subsequent -antic-Dated release fro .n. the S'?U. 70. Pltf. .ms sched.LZled to be seen by the S7.2T PRO on August 10, 2005, in rllicl2 lie aaticpated the approval to ^.dvzraace to P2. 71. As a result of Zi.s.::erzman's and oslaL's zetions, Pltf. also saL-L d the loss of :pony other .Dr.ivile es he earned T_hi7_e on P3 status radio, food commissary, etc.). 72. Z1.:?;:er?1cn fabricc?ted 747864 as F. me'?.n5 to reta'Li?.te a,"ainst the Pltf. Lo-r the filing; of grieve..n.ces, a 1?Traful _:?.nd protected ri.L;ht, c;,-_;ainst SITT staff, .ore specifically, Del. Hubar. 73. On t lo, 2006, CL-Le PIC vacated r'!otil?uL's decision due ?u ?Lis -to a = in service of 74-7864, aa . the a?tter -r as re_--anded for a T etle .ri?i". 74. On August 21, 200ia, Moslak served the Pltf. -ith a ;.hoto- co?y of 74-7U6tr, DC-141 2A, and a "In.?,,te Version --ad Ifflitless Sta,te- C. as t s" f o r: a ("DC-141 2011). 75. 0-a A-a,.;u2,t 24, 260;,, the rehecarin" of 7<<7664 =--as conducted by "?o s1 -.1. 76. Pltf. had submitted hic DC-141 2A on .AuGuet 217 2006, Fn d. requested as 7itnesses: a) SITU Co sera for E-Unit, Quad A (Aug. 41 20006) ; b) PA DoC Policy 5.5.1 (Procedures) .??. 1-u 7.1). (2) (3) (4) ; and c) 001 D. Zi_.,11 er -san. 77. At t'L-e hearing, Pltf. submitted a D01-141 2C, and "Relevant Qae: do ?.s Posed for Witness 001 Zh:,i,er,1an" (3 P,-).). 78. ;"o:?lt-.k denied all witness reclue ;ts. 79. Pltf. asserts nd. avers tli t r!'oslak should not have relied upon the second-hand or "hearsay" iilfor: ation of Soothers that "no video evidence available for this F.car?iner's revie?,V." 80. Pltf. requested rToslslk to s;.,)eai-_ .-ith Kelclmer concerning ?-.?hether the video surveillance e.-Ii.s•i ed for T'oslek's inspection. Pltf. told !Ioslaiz. ai-. t;ie hearing t1--at he sent a DC-135A to Yelchner re- cuestin" that the video surveillance in question be preserved and pro- tected. Moslah, refused the Pltf.'s request. 01. Pltf. asserts : _zd avers that. Yo l-a' c'ic. not, ?.llo;? the Pltf. (10) to ;pose relevant questions to Z.i.miaerman mlldch were designed to sI.-io?v t. _at Zi-.-ivaer-ian's report aas not credible. 32. _o=l_.I's decision not to ias:pect the video surveillance in questioiz on August. 99 2004 and on August 24, 2004, unfairly prejudiced the Pitf. by de-ryinf hire due process to substantiate 1-ds claims of e.ctaal innocence, thus Yosl k's claim that Lire--o(Ierance of evidence ex_.i.sts to sup-port the charges in 747364 is tainted, thus a,lse. 03. On Auvust 24, 2006, Mo sla.'. foun,_' "t-he Plt-f. " ;ail ty" of 747- 864 end _,^.i _?, sent t ioned hi-in to 60 d,.ys DC time. 84. Pararrtaphs o 65-57, 69-72 are incor'l?or!3.ted herein by ref- erence t.s facts ^nd declarations. 35. Pltf. ai)pealled 747364 at all acInini.strative levels r.nd ex- hcx.st a(i av:^,i lable remedies. 30. 0.1 AuL;ust 31 20005, Plt filed (Iriev. No. 160746 after dis- covering that T=uber ,vron`fully mailed various "ne,:Jsi)'':per clippings and reroxes (thereof)" ?,iithout per-n.ission of the Pltf. to Tha _za.s Bern- ard., PIi.D. of Pennsylvania State University. 87. Pl-tf. asserts P-id avers that Kelchner al-_o-- ed t',e Pltf. to ,Veen these "nc .,s--),,.per clippinus'l as a resolution to Griev. No. 144511, in his er sona:.l property. 33. Kslcluler, Sout:^ers, Huber, h,:,.ve pra.cti ce of :Zot ;411owing tl e Pitf. to possess photocopies of ae-v,sp?.per cli1p:)i1iks, articles, pe:.`;2I of 1_00!iS and magazines, as .-,.,ell as editoric-Is. ?. Pltf. * '. Griev. No. 150746 was denied, a-.D?e 11ed., and ex- hausted at all administrative levels. 90. On Autnust 99 2006, Pltf. filed Griev. _To. 160941 ("1,5094-1") ;after beinu harassed P__nd denied his mea.] by Def-;. Si )son -..nd Ayers. al. On Aw-ust 9, 2006, as-, t'_le brez.1sfast trays ?;lere being, passed out, Ayer: threw into Pltf.'s cell (EC-15) of and styrofosm cup landed on the cell floor. °2. As Pitf. bent over to pick these itens off the cell floor, " Sirinson said to t'Ze Pltf. , "That's ri;.;ht, b0v.1 down :_Zon l-ey lover. ?3. On this same date, as dinner (lunch) .e?-.l tr,.y.s -:,ere lbein,r., Apassed oat, Ayers ce.:?1e to Pl'If.'s cell door end contij:?.uously gave 11.m orders to b-.cI? up, even after Pltf. ha(A hi-s bac1- to the ,-.all. (11) 94. Alrers then walked away refusing; to give 4110 Pltf. his ;ne,:l tray. 05. Kreider was present, and despite Pltf.'s ac''-in, 'iim to in- tervene, he refused. 96. Pltf. Liformed Kreider that he -.vas en epileptic, a_ld that he neec_ed his -auitrition due to the prescribed -Piedicat-ions he ,vas ta_ciag. He also told Kreider that he nothin,,,-;,ron- to be denied his -meal. 97. The Grievance Officer, Cole, cl,-J;as 'Lie intervie,,,ed Soa'Jl ersI Kreider, Ayers, and Simpson. '?e never intervie,red Pltf.'s . itnesses clearly icentified in 160:41. g3. Pltf. requested KelcIuier to revie?rr the video surveilia ice for this incident in question as ?-rell as to preserve and protect the video evidence for judicial revie?.--i. Co. Pltf. never refused his. trP.y. 100. Or august 9, 2006, Siy:ipson issued- tile Pltf. :1/c "?o. A747- 373 ("7417873") him, 1.}ith "Thret,.tenixig:, ^.A Employee or TI'iei-r. F, ily" ( "TE TF") 101. Pltf. never t ireaf.ened ailir person zas reported in 747373 the report is fabricated. 102. On Au"ust 9, 2006, Pltf. sub'mittec? a. nC-l,il 2A requestiag t-,ao ,?itnesses: a) SIM Ca_.^era, C Quad; and, b) Yelci?:ler. The Pltf. also su m- itted a DC-141 2B9 at the hearing. 103. Mool<Ic conducted a :n/c hearing; on Au ust 16, 1006 concer- nln? 7 17 _7_). 104. T'osla k accepter. the second-hamd and he^,rsa, -allegations of Soat"I±ers that "there is no evidence available" for the'TE'X's -re- vie-.°r. Southers %:Y^s not ;-)resent at the hearing ^_ld such te:~tii:zony 7ras not s•rror?z to nor affirmed. 105. N`o,:1• ?: denied Pltf.'s request,_, for ; it-nesses. .106. Pit f. asserts and. avers. that Kelchner oal'_ ^.ve been made available for questioning concer:yin-; the video surveillance at t'78 hearing.. 107. Pltf. -also reque;~ted Mo-.laic to speFdc o:ri.t' Kelc'z.1er about Prhei-'_.- r ;:^,nj vi?_eo cur-treillance of '!,.Cii.s incident existed "'-`or '^_i.s re- (12) 'aut T'osl^k 21so refused to do tlii s. 103. ?Tocl?.l_' s deci sion not to allow Pltf.' s .-ri.tnesses, ,hi.ch includes ^.v?.il?.ble testimony from. I:elchner .rho is .a .no,n1 direct source o t"he video evidence in question, ,Fhicli could be used for the ??"s'' to ias??ect on August 16, 2006, unfairly prejadicea ti :e Pltf. by 1. J:.L deny.in?; him due process to substC nti-.te :11-s d1aims of ^c aal innocence, tlias T'Oplakl s cl^ia that a preponder?once of evidence e7:.i.sts to sup- oort the charge in 747873 is tainted, thus false. 109. On Aa ust 169 2006, ?Toslals foux,.d. the Pltf. "guilty" of 747873 --nc_ s^nctioned hir:1 to 90 0.9- ys consecutive DC ti:ae. 110. Pltf. ?sserts cne, :-vers thp.t he never saic to Simpson nor Ayers, "A_iy chance I get I will izill bot - of you" "so you h,-.,CL better - ^. t c_l your b"CkS. " 111. Pitf. asserts =nd ravers CiRt Simpson issued 747873 as me ,r_s to retaliate, -nd offici?lly oppress t-he Pltf. for erci. in^ his set} liy protected rights (e. ,c;., n.uthori_.- ALFAL, com- pl^inpin- to i Darhos-lrer about Simpson's *)ro pos,-..1 concerning, STT. prisoner Eric Lyons, for tlhe filing; of levitira^.te rri.eva.nces against SMU otpff, ?laid for pren?rinc- hic civil suit against PA DoC e..nloyees). 112. Pltf. asserts and -':vers that the video surveillance recor- ded on EC-quad for Auk ust 9, 2006 would shoVu Simpson nnc_ :4.;rers at- te_: r- tin to block the vier o-r t1ie cep era. while food ite ar ?%lere being thro,n into the cell. It .would also show tha..t ;;hen the brec•kfast tra.;;rs ?riere bein` retrieved by Skia-ason and Ayers, they annropoled Pltf.'s cell non-cha,lantly ane, opened the anern.ture -,,i.thout any con- cern for t'-eir sC fety. 113. A^ result of Simpson's fRbricp.ted. ;,./c -report a.n.d "?or15-•k's fp.ilure to protect Pltf.'s due process rights anc' liberty interests, Pitf. cuffered the OW consequence of additional di,-cip=_inary con- fine_aent in the Sl'U, thus hic ability to nrocress through the ST-.?II for nrivileues anc':_ eventual rele^se to general nopuli Lion °?as unconstitu- tiona.ll;;r retarded. 112;. Based upon the SCI-CATT facility's and Yelcluzer's failure to nre,cerve protect the video surveillance as recuested b6r the P1tf., P1tf. filed Griev. No. 1614c,3 (11161493") on Au?,ust 18, 2006. 11-. 7 -787 .-a.: a,rjnea.llec'?, denied, end exhIr.ucted at, n7._1 <.dcli._1i- (13) s tra.tive levels. 116. On August 21, 0006, Def. Taggrrt rejected 161493- 117. On August 23, 2006, Pltf. appeotlled the rejection of 161493 to Kelchn.er. On September 25, 2006, I-elchner upheld deci- sioa to reject 161493. 113. On September 27, 2006; Pltf. a.ppe-'.lled Tp,?;-art's and Kel- chner's decisions to the PA DoC Secretary's Office of Inmate Griev- ances ?n. i Arpeal s ("SOIGA") and on November 27, 2006 SOIGA upheld the fo.cility's Clecisions. 119. On August 23, 2003, r':Zi.lE. brea:z.fn.st meals -Ier. e being passed out, ?A,Ters ca.-ine to t. he Pltf.'s cell end i morantly ordered to Pltf., "Step back, stuni.d." Pitf. ignored the ha..ra.ssrient, then stepped beicl . A,?ro-rs teen ordered the Pltf. , "Shp,^i your elands, stur i.d." Pitf. slaw--ied his he.nds. Ayers then wall•_ed !-:? y fro-:-. the ceJ_l door. 120. Def. Yol?.n, ?-!ho Ayers ,chile pa.ssin,, otzt the :-zeal tra.?rs, 3_ ed by Pltf.'s cell and yelled, "Life b**ch." 121. Pltf. l,-ras denied his brea?:fest me,,!. 122. Pltf. requested in Griev. No. 161930 ("1,J1930") -Lii.ch ,ias i-._ edia:tely filed, that the vi.deo eur-ieill^zice for this incident be preserved :a.nd protected. 123. At no tine did Pltf. refuse pis brew. >fr.st ;-Zeal on t'-iis date. 124. Griev. Officer Cole failed to intervie,%, ny `:litnesses to this incident. Instead, he frivously bla,.es the Pltf. for resisting to fol- 1w, orders, creatin,c- hie o •.-.z )roblergsj and uses rsycl?olo -ical °,:,arfare by falsely encour^."inthe Pltf. to "Attempt to •-,or1_ :Tits, fi„e Unit T4an-:-.:-:erlent S to f i.a the SMU rr ther _,an being confrontational ans. re- sistant to verb-.1 orders." 125. 151930 we-s denied, a. ?p°?llec?, a.nC. e;dhn,usec. at overy adliu.ni- st^:rtive level. 120'. On August 23, 2006, Yohn issuee the Pith'. r:,i/c ?To. A747877 f:,r rtoo. In 747877, Xoh,z clakns, tARt Pltf. -;,ac yelling out o-" his -Pte (cell door) a.t Yohn and otlier !-)riconers, ea that he g^ve t, e Pit_`'. =our (4) orders, one (1) of d`lr _ct order to 11c:'_e7-.r '_i?-. door," but that the Pltf. co.-iti nued. his loud beha.vior. 127. Pitf. asserts a-1d avers th?t on Au^7ust 23, 2000-7 ^.t no time di` th° Pltf. ever ;reel out of , is door, esoeci-Ily of `_ro'ln or other (14) + . nri so ner s. 108. Or Au:_st 23, 2005, Pltf. su?Orlitted _-is ?3C-141 2A ^.r.0 re- e s, messes: a) S TT C^-:!!era F-U-ni.t, C-Quad (Aug. 23, guest d ± . ,! e ?ol_ o ,. i n`. vi 2000) ; an.d, b) 001 Yohn.. TT_e also requested th".t Yelchner renre::?ent him ?.t the hearing. 129. On Au,?-ust 251 2006, 1Mosl^. conducted hearin, on 747- 877. 130. Prior to the hecarin7, Pltf. ??s in tllu S?"'U rii.ni-la??r library (".:111") and diet iZot have access to his m/c doca.mats. ?re requested both the escorting.; officers a. well 's Y'osl ak if he could `o ba..,cl to his cell to retrieve these doe- dents, but his requests ;;sere denied. 131. At the .-_e,-.ring Pltf. 'ra.s told that coi?O- ;-ell 7_1is. ver- ci on o-ra,.llv. Pi tf. objected to this sayr1 1 : th^.t he 11,7,0. ^ ri.^'ht to sub----,Zit 11is +-rritten version. Mosla.k bec?me am, erect and t,?.-.tec?_ thpt the Pltf. di.c n' t ila.ve ?uc11 choice in the .:.a.tter. 132. Pitf. verb^11y told hi version, then requested thl t ttosl.°.I. i ^ -^ect t'_e video surveillance ,;,deli •;!oLtld s11o:; t ,a.t 11- ,lures - elled o_.t of leis cell door. Le it -?o rerue,^ted to no-- relevant questions for YOILI-I to s'_lo?.-I- that llis renor'? .,as not credible. 133. r?Io^1 de liee. the Pltf. his requests 'Or %;-Titnesses. 134. the hearing, there were sever-- SYU ?a•^.rds oat^i.de of the Iic•^.sin;?; roo:i (William Curtis Buildi.n.?j on E-B-Qu,-d. At one point I?Tocla irelled at fide ,';uards to "I.een it 0o ?-1". He, ':'as, or r?.t ie r '.ny v :, r$?- to be Ltc tPCL c^.n e, distracted, hc,.7. . :Eter the ,.IT c,):ztir,:u-er?_ teir loud. mid boisterous be »vior, orc'_ered C'e, escort ilz" ; a^.rc'_ to close t11e door. 135• 0f:1^.': '0L;nd t1lIe PIt'f. `r11iIty 0f 74 7 ?77 _1id `,-nct?.0.1?C? '.1im to col!,-.•eo,,.t-ive 30 d•^.urs DC ti---,e. r 116. .Plt '. tiift Yo`I j c!r_1)e( 71,17`77 t a"_- 1 a: ^r_ev, _ce 1:?.50?^l_) irl,:,t• A-ers. 117• JIM Pltf. ^n?e^11e?. 747577 .,?. e<T^Y?r 'oval, ?o?a; it :. c denied, ?.Tel„' es;i Renort" (DC- ??I[ :i0 +1 n l!?1 Cec CUcli ?.c f;_?_ r1 e or rtf- ciied 74-78,77• of Y l c -i`n,?ir n . •}-??.. Z•et')O:Y`?, 0,``lcl.ii ? Jr"-' t0 -otect 'dot' lis C.ue -)rocess ri- is `.'_no libertNT Lltersts, Plt' .uffsreo. t'_e coaseq ence of <--ULition?71 L''1. C1r)li ?i co:.,'.r)e- '.'nt in the T T fc trlrough the STT.J o. r;,?Tile"24l < SORT , u? 'li.,, n.bili.ty to nroL,;rea, nd cj?o_± "1 L` Mc? c c;n to gealer^1 n0,IU1C'.t_l On Jf rtlle " unCO l? fi i ? L' i 1011` l l_(T 1"11T lc?0. Aft P1 t1 • ^'•?serts ;:.C.: p ,t ! ii(, -%y i 0 a 2,v, C:. Oa._ F-L lit ?i- U2•d •",S:'. recor( eC. oa Au.-ast 2,0,0J, 'JL'ld Ivwe {?0,:°1 t1a-t Plfi'." aclvn- yellec? "t YoL O" other '_)ri`oncr I? rill r:: , , t_1: t ^.t no ti.-1 slid Yol?ll (Urec?; ---%,r or,'ers to or ?.t the P1tf. 141. To^l.::L' ,_ _eei,sioii ,lot to alowi PI+-°. y. t Ye to e-T?l. in t le reason for C..en.t.j. _'., i. ?`l 'Li ^.ilure to V1.'e0 sLIrveilirl--100 eViC.ence 1:-1 '_i0, r)oSI er'slon of Soat_lers, '.lac Secaritu• Ofyice, ^a?c:i/or Yelc mer o. AL?_'i?n? 251 2005, - „ ... •,Ye-u?icec? the Pltf.9 by deny i_Z" 11ir? 1-ii - ,_.?ie ?,-^oceNs az_??.irl?r ts ^ni t-Ile -)-rotecti.on of 11i s liberty interests. P! t. •--JoaIC :l?-.ve ,?,.,,?1 ble to ub•.tntiate his ,? of -ctu.-=.I il•ZZOCence s}_o•a t1l;.,t bec o. ? C ^ cl 1? y0'__3.? _° report not cr, edible. Thus '?oslck9 c cl^i- t,-, nrerono.er- ?.,ace o sviJeace e.;ists to support the clan.".;e in. 7 =7877 i 142. On August 23, 2006, Ayers issaed the Pltf. -:-,i/c ".o. A747873 74707'") for TRTF , Using, Abusive, Obsc(-_ne, or Inurnr.o,)riote L-nf-uuiC,e "UAOIL E") , cfnc rtoo. Ru sin: to Obey ^n Or:,er ,l ,-11 to =1 ?. nloyee (_ no -a be ("R'1!00 ") . 113. Pltf. asserts ^:ld ^.vers t'l?t on Au7,u.ct 23j 2000557 at no tiaae did tl:.e`Pltf. threp.ten Ayers; nor did. he use ^.lbivsive, obscene, or in- ^.nnrorri?te l .n?-1? ce to ?,irr. ds 9gers; nor did le refuse to o"De; Cny of the oreers that Ayers cle.imG to have made. 144. 0ja Au ;ust 23, 2006, Pitf. sub:iittea lli.s DC-141 2A and re- aw (16) quested the follo d:,7 witnesses: a)STTTT Ca-.era ETJnit, C-Quad (A.u,,'-,ust 23, 2006) ; b) Walter May, PA DoC Prisoner DT9-3424; and, c) 001 Ayers. He also requested tai-.t Kelchner represent him at the hear.in`. 145. On Au-ust 25, 2006, Mosl-k. conducted ^.hearing on 747- 07G. 146. Paragra!)h 130 is incorpor?:ted herein as referenced. 147• At the Bearing, Pltf. -iaf- told ths.t he could tell his ver- sion orally. Pltf. again objected to this saying; th^.t '-le 6w had right to sub:iit his r,ritten version. 1"oslzalc again denied the Pltf.'s request. 148. Pltf. verbally told. his version, then requested to inspect the vi.deo surveillance 77.111ich :rould sho?.a that .'dyers did open the ,per?tur e after directing the Pltf. to "Step bac ., stupid," etc. end C12t, the video vlould show that Ayers had no concern for his personal safety just by zoni torin7 Iiis behexior.. 149. Pltf. also told 1'"os1, k_ thc,t he virmtec' to pose relevant questions to Ayers to sho ,, that his report t?ras n.ot cre?ible. 150. T?oslak denied the Pltf. his requests for v!itnesses. 151. Mosl?,°? found the Pitf. "guilty" of 747872, .nd disi::issed the ch gyr es of TFTF and RT00. Pltf. f-.,ac sa.:zctione?-_ 45 days consecutive DC 152. Pltf. asserts a.nr. avers that Ayers issue.-? 747878 to the Pi t f. because the Pitf. had earlier filed a rieva.nce a,?;^.inst hip for denyin" hiii a, :-ieal (160941) and because m hen Ayers .a i1ed. Pltf. if he could re?.d his book (ALFAL) a fe,-, days before, P1tf. told him, "'No." 153• Pltf. anoealled 747878 at every ad--1inistra,ti.ve level, bit it was denied, rind is exhausted. 154. r"oslak did not indicate in the DC-141 2'3 for bot'i 747877 and 747878 that Plt:1% had requested his .witnesses nor the rea.soiis as to whir they :ier e denied. 155. '"osl?.k did not issue t'.le Pltf. his yello--,,i copy of the DC- 141 2A 'or boil?747877 and 747878 prior to Pltf. leavin the herein;;. 156. Pltf., .-• ter bein7 eseortef to his assiMnec_ cell ?.nd dis- coveri__;_; that T.Tosl?kk did not issue him the yello..7 cordes of the DC-141 yV`' 2A for both 747877 and It 747878, requested corrections officer Tobias (17) 4 11 f14f. Q to ilfom Mosla,k that AV did not receive the yello:r% codes of ft 'ais Q DC-141 2As. 157. Tobias told the Pltf. trh-,t Moslz.-L had alr2?!.dr left, th?t he sno re Ni th Soothers, and Southers said, "Send a request slip (DC-135A) to loll"-," 158. Pltf. rent a DC-135A to Meslak reruesti ng his yello-:1 cop- ies of the DC-141 2As for 747877 anrl. 747878. Pltf. never received a response from Moslak. 159• tgo,l h r7.1--o failed to include in the DC-141 ?B tile Pltf. objected to not being able to subtiit ,lritten version pursuant to Cie DC-AW 301 Policy, in both 747877 and 747878. 100. i.nOics.ted in tike DC-141 2B thn.t no aone-adices such, as the DC-1^-l 2A ^.nd DC-141 2C were i-hcluded or ).tt!.ched 1;ri.th 747878. 151. Mosla11_ d.id not include any re^.sons in t_he D03-141 2B for both 747877 -nd 747878 as to -why he denied t'he P?_t 'Zis rerlue. is for r.ritnesses 'V:lter r'^.,,r, Ayers, and the SMTJ SrM^o surveillance. 102. As a result of Ayers' fabricated reeort !,_-Id lire to -rotect his due nrocess ri rhts f...cl libert,r i._htere=,ts, P1.tf. sufferecL the conseou.ence of adOi.tioml disci lina.ry confi.r..el,.ent in the SIM, thus his ability to nrorress tirout- the SNV for >>rivile yes on?1 eventual release to general no -?uJ_ .tion ? -.,as farther LLaconst.itution- ^.11y retarded. 163. ?' osl^-4:'s cLecision not to allo-117r the Pltf.'s -.:ritaesses and f -.i.l--aYe to explain the reasons for den?rin- there, i_ZCluain?- '?is fail- ure to ias,?ect available video surveillance evi Jence in the posses- Sion of Soat_zers, the Security Office, ane. Kelc'_vher on A..^u :t 25, 2006, unfairly -)rejadicecOl the Pltf. by denying hin bot'_ his due process rights and the :protection of his liberty interests. Pltf. :oulr'. have bee_7 -ble to substantiate his claim of a.ctu.al i.nnoce _ce ?.r_d sho.r that <?ver^r -e?,ort ,--!ns not credible. Thus T1os1,.i.._'s clai- thfn.t a nrepon- dera- ce of evidence exists to supootst t1he charge of UAOILB in 747873 i?? tr-l.iA. •ed, thus false. 164. Pitf. asserts and avers that .7itness Welter TMlay ;'as sta.n- t his cell door (EC-20 ant? -Vitnessed the f?.cts of the incident, alai. his ter-:ti__-ony -:could. have been able to subst,-Liztiate that it (18) Ayers riho '.,'?s hp.rassing and retsliatin` against the Pltf. , and th^t Pltf. ha.e. not threatened, used q:_asive or obscene nor refused to obey an orders given by Ayers. Fart'lier-more, the video sarveillpnce, although it is believed car-not record audio, ,oulc' 11=,ve beer, est.,blished t1iat Mays -;aaC standin. .-,.t 'tis door ^.s he ';i tnessed t11e incident. in iaestion. 165. From Au"ust 41 20053 to August 15, 2000, Pitf.'^ nersonal property haa been confiscated. 166. Pltf. r,I s not issued^nir forna.l notice a: to hi :ier- sonal nrot?ert= confiscated, t1,e ite,a ?,?ere co lfi.sc.^ted on. Au^;ust 49 2006, nor t'1e reason(s) for the delay in ret??rnin: his ner- so 1.-1 nronertzr to alm. 167• On Au:v st 15, 2006, Tuber issued to Vie Pltr. o;1e (1) box of ^CrCo_1?1 -)To-)erty alo_-i!-; '.,iith o, Per^onnl Pro-ze_-ty Inve^tory fors!: ( "DC-153") No. A637315 :7?,ad a Confisca.te?_ Items Receipt for-Ti ("n(13-1 54A11) No. A854163. 168. Tile DC-153 ITo. A637315 is d?.ted Au?uot 12, 2006. 169. O t'1er SMU nri ->o lers . ho ha(' V,ei r n er,co_l,?1 nro-_ erty con- f.i^c?.ted ., tee 9? <c?st 49 2006, 11R-. „erti011^?_ retur:ler' to t11e,:? on. .4_1., ust 10, 2005. 170. South---,s, ub._.;-, De f. I)-_ ein ^r• ?nf: an r r ti _aC --1-ast the Pltf. ,)?_ ccecc to ilic ,.i-, of ten (10) d.r.,;Ts. 17"1 . U -,on inventory b.: Plt?'. , -eve--%l .Lte_-?ls 1"e'! o11''- to hi.. :rere ?.ir. i. 1, and not inc1L:_dec?. oxi t1ie DC-3-5-4A 7o. A'54163 ^L.c-_ _otoco i e of co_lccr_1i.n ful AL??L, ^.nd st?.te ne-r^„n.;?er ?.cldrerser; 27??u c^?_eil`? `.r "rlll.cl'1 hid le~^?-, reli -'ious, -ersolln,l doter; ---.nd le".^l c1.oc?_kilt titles? 11 ? Cl ^ti^,^i'io=i il'1 SU'7"Ort of ?3ronco 2 V. Ioa('eshell„ '_11 C.? "_ ?,r7 c. _F'ou . (?I) n^?;e i?^via ^•_1C e`-libits in su-.V)o't t1lereo-_C. 172. TI).e PA DoC !i='.'..book ^.' '::•ell their Policy and Procedures V--_I ;;.^1 C'o riot Coi i ^.1.11. ^.P ?T is-ar- l^.L;e -i'11_ ch .r1lows 1)r1sorters in `?. L FV 2l_ Fire (5) Toaaia.-I Unit to be ?resent -..ienever ?,onert, i.s con- fi o0 ted. 173• Tile PA DoC =i,c.iic_booi? as well ^.s tleis Policy r.nd Procedures c.o not contain snir langua.,re lici'1 ri^o er Ln ?. Level (19) Pi. ve (5) ::rosin Ul?? t to be present %Alernever per on?1 n.ronerty is bo i _1M inventoried. 174.- T ±e Pitf. tvn.5 not present ,.,,hen his personal r.roperty !.-,7as conii c te d on AuZ=use 4, 2006. 175. T'2e Pltf. ;;as not present T;T?Zen his personq.1 oropert r •7.-a in-. e_ltori e d by Klein on August 12, 2006. 17 6. Pltf. asserts ?.nd -vers th.t he hrad'=-, level ri=;ht to be f-ble to _,. ?e, _,rcn^.re, cnd .fail a le ^.1 8edlaration for filin." viith t__e Uni.ted St,,.tes District Court; or any other court of lq.w. 177. Pltf. . serts .:!c ^.vers th- t, he had ^ le„?.l ri rht to be able- to prepare, and rapil a legal Decln.rati.on i c- i..-cluded ^n ^ ffida.vit Wort t;,ereof, to the Uniter? States Pis- 7.acI ey i.bits in Pur . trice Cour r t or! b8hlalf JMIIP" of and to serve as runes; for zots:er pr.iconer's civil suit. 178. Pltf. filed Griev. No. 1062543 $K ("1.5254 ") o_i Au:^ust 25, 2006 co ace ri-iLLC t_ie missi?l:; :personal pro-,Derty --rhich •;-&s ciscovered on A.u"u:=•t 15, ^OOu"", o?zc t,.lereafter. 17°. Ta.~,c-axt frivoloasl,r rejected 152543 on A- ust 31, 2005. 180. P1_tf. Tile rejection of 16251. to T. elcl__ier on S ente-Iiper U, 2006. 1c1. Uelc I, er u?-)held the re j ection o_z Octa-ber 2006. 1 Pi_tf. ^n,-?er ned Ta.? •~rs.rt's q.ad ikelchner, - c:eci'ior_ to re- ject 152-543 to 50IGA on October 12, 2006. 183. 4WMW SOIGA denied the Plt:'.'s ^.p )o l on November 27, 2006. 18) 4. Pltf. e7?-h^.astpd i_i s 1.ctnin? ;-tr-q.ti.ve re;=edi es •i t_i resnact to 15^543 P--1c' t;ie PA DOC -ias "iven their on-)ortunity to resolve this, ria.t- ter. 185. On Aug use 10, 2006, Pltf_. - --:,s intervi (-:red ?-.t 'ic"- Call ( "S/C") by Def. Barbacci. 186. Pltf., 1-11io is an epileptic r..zcl tales _-iec_ice.tion to control his seizures, had been previously instructed by ma,'-i cal person -lel to t? ke =1i^ :le:,.ications with food and that any .Hissed ::ieais should be r. e- nor. ted, esoeci w11 r if staff were den-irin-; hi;. rle?? s. 187. Pltf. told Bn.rbacci th^.t he c'eniedl his clicmer (larch) :aeE;,ls on August 4, 2006 by Zimmer,.-am ^nd on August 9, 2006 by Ayers. 1S8. 73p.rbacci told the Pltf. , "I hive no control ov^r V is, it" s a ?,ecLITit;r isL-,ue." (20) 189. Pltf. asserts and avers that he snecific^11y wrote on the S/C request form, "I was denied my breakfast meal...."' "no nutrition for _1eis". 190. Pltf. asserts and avers that when he Jilests his anti-con- vulsant medications without food, it causes him to staffer stcrnsch n n ios. 1S'l. Pltf. s..sserts and avers that he lid not sign uo for S/C to pTy $4.00 just to tell medical he wRs denied a meal. 192. Pltf. aseerts and avers that his eDileptic condition is chronic disability. 193. Pltf. asserts and avers that BarbRcci never ?sked the Pitf. to sign a Cash Slip ("DC-13SA") a.uthorizinF the PA DoC to deduct mon- ies M2 _Zis nccou t for medical co-pay. 194. Pitf. asserts and avers that lorbneci never told him that a. co-pay fee -would be charged, including the amount to be chi r4ed. 195. Pltf. s,sserts anc Avers that upon receipt of his monthly nri„oner account statement, it revealed that P1tf.'s sccount was as- aoll-` ' sessed $4.00 for S/C services on August 10, 2005. Upon infor- _1ati.on as belief, Pltf. received his prisoner sccoLuit st7.te_ en.t on or about September 1, 2006. 196. Pltf. addressed a. DC-135A to Def. Law a7ted September 1, 2006 i formin7 her that the Pltf. wns erroneously char;ed $4.00 for the An gust 10, 2006 S/C visit, and requested that his a.ccoqnt be crcc'ited for this same amount. 197. On Septeilber 15, 2006, Pltf. received a response to his DC- 135A ^dc'resser? to Law from ? Kurtz. I"ur. tz nrovided ^, frivolous re- Nancy p s?ponse. a p On September Al 18, 2006, MO. filed Or.iev. No. 164375 ckallenging the unauthorized deduction of $4.00 from hi prisoner necount co_zcernin ; the August 10, 2006 S/C visit. 199. Ba.rba.cci, I'urtz, and Law failed to follow the golicy and. procedures of the DC-AIE 820 "TTedic^l Co-PQ.y" Directive concerning co-pny nyoceinye- to be followed. 200. SCI-WIT. facility policy concerning the procejures to be followed --hen deducting; monies from a prisoner's account for 4e0cal 1154375 ni =kr= enly i c? entified. the mesl ,ei.r_7 missed/denied 2s (cone) (21) co-_p .yr fees does not sunercede either the DC-ABF_ 820 nor fine Pri, on ;'rtewic^1 Service: Act (P.T,. 220, No. 40). 201. Barb cci did not offer the Pltf. AM any ; .e:ri cal services on A°a--ust 10, 20060 202. Pltf. did not authorize B ?rb?cci, Kurtz, La,, 71 or tha PA Dog to deduct any monies frol_i his prisoner account for S/C services on Auast 10, 2006. 203, :urtz•s n?i_Ze acne xs as the rriev. Of `'icer -"Iho ^r.ovidec' the Initi?.l Reviet.! Res,,?onse ("IRR") to 1:54375, but La signet' t_lo IRR dn.ted Octo:De-r 2006.' Lip 204. >'urtz aad Law, by DC-ADr! 304 "Irrn?te Gri ^v. slcc Sy te: " Policy, j ere to recuse themselves fro. ans-!arin-? t ze 154375 due to the fact that tier ,-sere involved in Pltf.' ^ attre,nnt^ to in-"or,: :-.1Dr resolve t --)roblem co.-,r l,.ined of. 205. Kurt? and Law denied 164375 ??- the !'RR level. 206. Pit f. Rn e-I.lled Kurtz' s and Lm-il 9 IRR to Yelc?uier on Octo- b cr 51 ''_006 0 207. K.elcimer.enied the Pltf.'s anpel o" 1064375 on '?ove.aber 1, c0 203. Pi 11f. anpeRlled Kurt^'s, L `r•s, anc9. Kelcrlizer's decisions to SOIL.4 on Nove_ioer 3, 10-006. SOIGA denied Pltf.'r anreai o Dece:iber 22, 2006. 20?-. On Septe__2ber 1Q, 2006, Southers directed the Pltf. on be- h<zlf of the Office of Chief Counsel, to cease "all ?.ctivi ties -:pith the LB -project.," t ";"at Pltf. enn?•ging in q. llnriwn" e -11US1ne .s t11at he pto cease o_,era.tin::- as t,ie Life Blossoms ("L7311) Project 'thp.t he -,uct "re-love (his) ns:.-?ie fro-:,i the M j:.ebsite," to arr`n e- r eats to :_?iil r,,11 LB m?terials out of the f?.cility," ^nd tivit if the Pitf. was J12M caught .,,ith spy LB mP_ teri^.ls in --Zi s. cell Southers ,.ould f'nersonallr is,->ue a ?i sconduct report and certain tho.t the only neolDle ?.-aho visit (the Pltf.) are strictly i--°-edi-,,.te f.iiJ _ r'?ers" end t-1-1^t the Pltf. never be allowed to visit ?:?.y nrofessorc or ...ayone else! " 210. Southers also told the Pltf., "We have an a.bso7_ute zero- tolers,Iice policy ,ldtii ?rou antl if ?rou 4_eep up your sliit, you're ;-oi.ng Tcoil' t a -. e-.r f^st rieal. It :"!as .ctur--lly the 11.,'-i.Ci1 on both At.-L-,`ast 4-, 20'13 2__1 Au[,;ust ,, 2000 :"tc ff acl lo-leQ"e. (22) e to be i_1 this SIT for a long time::" nod 211. Pltf. told Soothers t'1at 'le was?o»erati.n^; buSIn(?ss in v-.ol^ti o L o ? 1y PA DoC policies, t'i?t he _ro ulc_ not re ove I? s n.arie ?.c '.e LR Project M-.n- f1 O1! tl,e LB re'osite nor cease his oarticination t ^:"er, t l ti lie '.V0U13d not .1i-ii out a:ay LB =.ateri.ls, 2,_ d ,"zt i.f 2.n I?B ???.tei?i^ls Trrere confiscq.ted fror. him that he :oulC file ?;r..Lev-nce a`a.i_nst hir. c-r? _ the MM staff involved. ?1L_'. Pltf. requested to see or )e ?iviq?n ?!. cony of the alleged letter Soi thers claimed to have received fro,.i the Chie-_T Counsel, but Soothers res")ondeC in a belittlin; tone, "You are ^n. irr. ate! I'°.-:i v- in-,,-, yoL? rn order to cease 111 activities LB <13. Pltf. told Sout iers, ii1 a cal-_i and no7_i to tone, ITTo." 214. Pltf. t'-,en an7rily ordered Simpson ^c, De-f. DLit_es to t ke lliri b?c c to hi , n.ssi."ned cell. 21r. A~??ro--i:_..te1y ten (10) :.mutes the Pltf. r .s t-..'.en to hi_s a s s i .zec cs17_ (-9 C-lo') , the P1tf. etas 71^.??j c,affed ? nc'_ _ emovec_ t o ED-O1 cell. ?_7.5. P1tf. w^^^r s a.nd avers t't FD-01 cell i s L: rdslliya cell _.. C'.? blc-,°is colc?_ air ina-D tl:e cell, it's bpclr, f?.ces r'.irectly i_,'o ty e -round floor of the SMU r ennels, and rho vi.r?.eo "urvoillance c,^. ,eya is ob.c.tructed fro- r' cle.^r a_uO_1 i s=,t o-F, the aCti_v- ittr i:,. 'lie front of this cell ji?e to fine st^.ir?;r boL_, i.izbet;.leen t 1e 217. So?_t:;_er -.^.d Kreider ^.ut'_,_o -Yized the cell .love fro--i '9C-15 to ED-O1. ?:. i. 14 1 Pltf. aged Kreider °:'iy he ,,as ?TTe . to FD-01 1- T:- F ('.er tole. '!1.1i, "BeC^:.L,?e ,,e feel oL needed n;, i_ D,,rL.en. FD'-Qii,A i^ r,:!-rrved nor S77' )ri-.oners _ o t nrob t i C Li `_±e SIM I ^nd the env1 1 -,,)3- c __o l_C:;1 cOi:1n,.reu t„ V _r u" 9` ? ds ( ",, R, C) . It l Cti -_'__'.ceC_ the Plt:". t; i`;_ ^r r1 O1 'C'•1O1^ pild "jk7siC?1 4;O _i r S" ?' "Y1 o11erS f?. fil e'. Gri?v. Yo. 1064497 (11164,107") Olt Se. 1-1: ber 1?, ^00;, L-1 S`C Soot?? ^-r; , '-ne Ciii of 01 L-n; e1 ( 0 f f I c e of) , l.se. P'-1 'HOC c_ _-7_?_n,1?,:;_L1n Sou':'ers' frivolous order, to ce-se .-11 ^.c`i- i 1-i es i t'_i T,9. ( 2 3) c_,?zer, c?.e- SRR ,:rP.s denies by Cole,-e,,ec to el nied 'Jr Y(-.lc'_goer, ^?1t ^n_'elled to SOYA. SOICA deteriinect t _ t LP, i s, .10 " ?riv to ;_ur:iness" re- wolvec,. the oJE 1644 7 La -? :rt, but upheld rrivolou^ cl'?.,.i'r it tf. co ,ld not coiri-.i- nicr.te ',-!ith cri,-t.e, victL,i- o-!'. their f,? 2"3 TItf. 2.Sserts ,:_1d -.v,-rs that 11a c'-11 ^Zi r co:'_. u.,1.icate 7.7 th crir e victims r-nd/o r t.astir r^mily me-abors so !:?s long as t1? e crime vi c'ti_: or _,.ny ;)erson exr)resses a d.esi.re not to be 1o:.1_:.il1licc.ted ''i.th. 4. On Seotember 7, 20067 The Unites'. St-A.?s D3.Ftri.ct Court for the Mid'i'le District of Pemns`riwini received and filed Pltf:s civil _?-IsI; Four (4) PA Do0 e:inloyees and c.tate ; ri.r.o_aer for cl ims of ass^.titlt, failure to -,rotect, deli.beYp.te indifference, etc. (P^luch v._Da-ison, et ^l., 1:06-CV-1751) . J? lk ^z5. The PA DoC has no Policy "Ad/or Proce'u-res for its e__--_)loY- ees to folio,! in nreservinn ?aa protectin.7 recorded) video surveills.nce e-%i c.ence for m/c proceediwrs, ilenriil-Of n2J. Ze PA DoC has no Policy "nc/or Proce:"._u.res f'o-r its employ- ees to follow ,.1en prisoners reoues-1: to li-ave reeorc.od vi O.eo ourveil- 1?.nce cre._c_.ved ^nd oroteeted as evi.ence in ^.n?_/or for :?/c -)roceeC,- in s, he:?ri.n6s, n??e•=.ls, end in a court of 227. ii ° PA Do C emc? its e11ployees h?,ve constitutional obli_ ?- Lion to -)res,-erve .T.n6 rrotect video surveillance 'rich c? i be used as ev-i dense orisoner s or staff. 2Iu. The PA DoC has no a..deeuq.te Policy r.n.O./or Procedures in effect -".-Lich would prevent recorded video s- rveillance nvi Jence fro-m rec;,cled, dcctroyed, tr=rapered lNith, or other-rise sY)olia.tec, for p e r i o d no less than: a) five (5) da.Ys; b) seven (7) de.;Ts; c) fifteen (15) days; d) t1irty (30) dz^ys; e) t,.---,,o (2) ye^rs; and, (24) f ? f) three (3) years. As Oirect ,._1C?. -ro,--i. te result of t Le cs OrO:': nf101ed "C! u of Zi : !er?aan, Simpson, Ayers, ^nd Yohn, Pit-P. Cu:--Bred aa, Landue Ana ret^li ntory nuzi it ent of DO ti-le totcalln7 225 c.eT Js, de_i _ im ,, 1_e in;, ? '?? o _? o_^ttu,ity to be released from the STM, ;?uZ ^ty_,ic' l ^n?' ^i`;nific?.nt c.rd hip of solitary confi,iazient, by means of l arascment, o.L.L al On')Yes?s:ion, falsifying m/c renorts, in retali.,-Lion for P?-tf.'s en- gagi.n - in 1^?^rfLL activities protected by lave 23D. 9s a c?srect and nrovimn.te rest.1-t of tl,e afore_:,entioned ^.cts of Si,nn^on, Ayers, and Yo11n, Pitf. suf--'cred the harm of J? the continuing psychological effects of r. olit^ry confine- ,:ent ccnisin" increased. depression, tl,ou`hts of suicide, e lotion, l distress !---id other OLLsorders of t'e mind, a.ll of ?:•llich the Defs, ,cnevr or s_10LLC_ =1" vc, re^.sona.bly '_Cno-m ,vould_ contribute to adverse physical ^YLr_ ._,enta:l health ;problems. 2?l. As a direct r, nd nroxci:,,ate result of tl,e .fore:.,. entionea acts o f Zirir er:ian, Si_npson, Ayers, fnn? To 1m, Plt r. ^u_"-f er ed nu-Pro as in j ur- iew to ? i e nri soy, record ''rlliC"I 3i,71-1ifica-l tly cts _?iti; lil,arty in- terest s in see _.i.ng -.-?eritorious. release tlhrou;-i1 the cle..ency rrocess parole corer i,9.eration. It -lso i1`? Les Vi:? Pit-P. to be t?.,^-,s .-i1 ti Ve, 'i,'.'.re,-.teniilg, of^?r':';'i bel1•°..ViOr ..?_ic, o;ald -)revent i1i1 fror., beino- a.1-;le to inter.^.ct an C'- soci`l ize '',!ith ri soners in a "everri no oLL?.ti.on, -Atli civili-..xis (i.e., f?;.cilNr), to receive services an( be ?'ble to parti cn^•te i?-, t1aem, ?.n(7 1 o receive ^.ny falvorable rem.,..r,end:.ti.ons -for clesme.-ic,fj, nnrole, or other release to society. 2J2. AS e, direct ^_nd nroi,?a.te result of the .-.foYeieationed acts o i ._osl; .?- ._Zd T`elc.h,:ier a..o.d the P_A DO C, Pl f . "DreventeA, frol-I being able to c^1l ^va.ilable ?Alitnesses, incliatir1,7.recorded v.idco surveill?nce, rr rich have cubst^.nti^.ted the Pltf.'s claims of pct, l i _mocence to the fal i crated m/c reports issued by Zirv,erm?-_a, Simpson, Ayers, r nd Yo n., t_-,,at his liberty interests in bein^ subjectec. to discini_inary co,lfine_?ent in the STM ?Nere not nrotected because Pltf.'s due process r ii -hts to c•?1? •.•ritnesses ?t his _n/c hearings was denied. 2?3. -Is a direct a- :-)roYi-n.a.te result of M0C1L-?c's c'e ,gins P7 tf. * s (25) reouests to contact either the Security Office q.=_C_/or Yelchuer, both of - ,I"-ich had access to the recorded video surveillance no recueste('_ in e-.ch res;3nct.i ve n/c proceeding, ?_eni se the Pltf. due Process -)rotec- ?Q tions he -,,,as coastitationall r antitlied to, tI1 ?. c^.usation dIF4r d '^lilure to protect Pltf.'s due nroceso rights is ?.sserted. 234. Ns ?'irect n.nd pro_?i .?.te result of th-- .'.fors: a 1tioned acts of Sout_aer;;, Yeicl2ner, ^.nd the P9 DoC fno ^d an ob?_iL;^tion to n.nd re^son.^ble ^._iount of time to -preserve .^nd o otect tie recorded video ;,i,rveill.r-.nce P.s requested by Pltf. in the respective i-?/c )Yoceedi,nt;r, , ?Q x, ?tlailed to )rer-erve end protect evidence -IIii_c_1 °;^c _F".voY,-_.ble to t1le. Pltf, F:_ne-_ s. cl? c.ctions co-lstitute bot.': neeli-once -1:fid c?e?_i'?er^.? e indi.f"'erence. 2_7,5. 4s a. direct f-?nc_ fro°i.late result of tILe acts o' Soat'_Er-, Ke C'Lner, an'_ t"?_e PA Do' ;71o had an oi?litioa to a re^.sonnble .nount of time to oreserve a_nd protect t'-ie -recorded video st_rveili^-ice -s requested 'o„T the Pltf. co?zcc:rlliil_; 'tis rec?ecti ve PC-804 nriev^,nces, t_ e Defs. f-.iled to 2-reserve -nc Protect cvic_ence .-!hich f^von-.ble to the P1 tf. , Rnd such f,?cti one; conotitute '-oth ne?1igence anew celiberate indifference. 235. As ci_irect ry,nd rromia:.ate result of tl.le c.fJra-iont.ioned acts of Huber., Yiein, Soothers, end_ Kelc?in.er, *Me ?-1. the PA DoC, P7_tf. to-;t various i_teu,s of his oersonai nroPerty !hicl). ?,-re either -..is-2in anel/or destroyed, wou.e of -.,Lich •.-..ere i, ed out o: SCI-CA:" °:!it'lout his ??1o;,l dn;e or iper.J.ssion, due to the PA. Do C' fn.ilure to '_-_E.we .-soli ci.es in effect to safe,,uard such abuses. provi-m,-,te refiiult of t=ie 7-forementioned ^.cts 2?7. As ,, direct and of Krei der, Soothers, and Kelchn.er, Flsuffered 'ip.rass::.ent and re- t,.li?,tion -t '-1_e hc,.n.o.- of these su;'er.visors :'nd °l.ei.r subordinates, x,Z. de-6ni to tl.e Pltf.'s repe 3ted reruests for intervention of these su"ervi sors to Ce,-se and retalia.tio-1 Of S"`'jT etc^.lf, ^Oie of :rhic;i t-as co,,zi.tted by these Defs., Pltf. conti.lnzec, to IMMOM suf- for ^.cts of harasc.-rent Inc, retaliation by deliber^.te i.ndiffereace, ti u a eaur^.ti.oa7. for failure to Protect i c .:, -I nazlteo.. 238. As c. direct _-?ro. jn,-te re suit of t'-e c.fore_.:cntioraed acts of L rb CCl 1C`. L ''', P^•F F n .o n ,I, 1_unneces:?,,:!--r loos of $4.00, l.'_o.?i_°.: ^•ro 11ic »ersoIl^.1 "-ro-,erty, -r C .?hi c'_l Ile (IIC_ -not "U:thori Ze ( 2 b) to Ibe r7.ee'ac't p-? fro 1 .1- priEoner account, t_-a ' C :'.- "t10 1 for V-left i_r i.s::erted. I_Zterec?: is ..?rlicwble. 3 C` As a `? direct an o e .., .11_ l% _ ' c_ ro:1i apt r c ' .:1 e- - e r a -for _?. ioAec_ ?.ct 01 Sig)=on, Ayer,, Yol?n, <'.z-0. Zi ler qPitf. af °ered t_le locs It. of -i,i-i on t lat, e_-.t t,:) r`T a"it Wit, i'- ni c_. eccs^^rir "e to e r.:ati-co_ t -, s? c^1%10.1 il,e i s tat e- cri sec?. m,,' .:? c+ sere set "._i ?.tor;;r i t .1e.tUre , '_ e c.e?li-1 of ?:e .ln c?_l ' itc?te ^.z ^ssr.alt C nndnr.t t' le Pltf. 2-40. .._ < e a n -L -ate fir resul t o.. _L . r ? r.'..ionec? the Pltf. cu"-^red rt i0'r 7.nd Yohn cts of Si r2 - C: ? oil , , . . . , verb l -.bun 17'.iea he :;Tc^ refen e-' to ^.;'. ---a`- ?Ie-ie aning ?. -01-) _?, ,._ v.^1111-• e_.i? or e- ? ?1_ eC L ? 0:a.`-..tC' ec L? R ? "Or• ei1o 1e " Ctr . Sou+ltrs? I"lei. ? ^tl'_ ?'ele.>szer, PIt.F. :..^ deterred. . _,.c -, _ re_ztec. fro . ':?e1?1•': ?. )?1 to serve ?.? .-. tness for -ri.?or er Purcell Rro_Z-on :., c.- Pltf.' Or R? ;)i;r,;?_1%• :r?lC?e °?_? ;'r C?llfl ` r ^. ,%C-C?. ?'s"Oi":: Iii y. . n, e1 c, . 0 iv-1 ?r0 ^_ 'a .0CL1'"^.G:1t °..?_O iG -_•. T 1C. _ -Y •- ty il d t il ° { - e-ere not ^eturl1p-C. i-.o tine P1tf. , _._as co_iroir?.cy Cted to h r ti-l' tl 1 t Pl t f n= Zl ' 'i '1 J nr0n 3 er 7•: S .1 i1.1C01i° 1? 0n2 - ? . .11• " O : 1 . o tccLifF, freel'(' trut:llfulij in Fec.er^.l Ooa-rt. c'4.2. .?`..; C: i.l^vC't 1C_ ?"0':i:'_?.tE J" ,.;alt of A•iiC: .^.Ct?? of Yreidcr ;---id Southers to ..lov^•^ Vie Pit :• r7-0;'a 730-1 to ED-01 cell, r.;b,?c^ i.I . ili_a to sole,. te;??^r^.trtre^, ^, ach loan?,or ?.r ;_oi.si.er envi.©r.?. l, .^...1C_ _..t ?. __1•`;11P.r r1.r:? _Or',):'.` ^.. J it^rr i.C. 0 i• 1^r )ri.,'0.1erS, .^.?n? tlt..1%LL 1:° ,?"et^11.:'.10 1, Off1Ci^,l 0''`?re^'i.0 1, f^1?U1'e to protect, r nC, deliiben:,.te ind.if ± ereace. V. S COUNT I ( Deis. Zi..: era? :r.., Si::2nsonI _kyer a, ^,nd vol1l) 42 U.S.C. R10183 - RETALIATIOIT, FAILURE TO PROTECT, HA TLkS SMWT T, OFFICIAL OPPRESS ION t FALS I F=.. G OFFICIAL DO CUP"M I TS , FIRST, '?T.G''TIi, ACIDC?TJR'!'EE='TTH 9"'?F??I'Et?TS y STATE CLAr7S: 1C) P .C•S•§5 .01, 1^ N.C.S. 92709, ( ?7) 13 PA. C.S. "§§4904 ?4511, l8 Pa. !:. S.4S53, lu P4. C.S. 94104, 35 P.S. 910225.302, -1 P.S. 0331.20, PA.. COTTSmITUTIOTT ART. 1, i,q§l, 7, 3, 13, A :1D 20. 243. P r `;r7p.hs one (1) t1lrowrh t°-,o !_vndren f32-ty-t-o (^?2) xe i.lcor'?oa .tec '1e eia by reference, o.s t?loush er ch --"ere set forth herCli.n 24-1.. De=^. n^-:ed in t- i s Count uz1 ; fLLly rcpt-J_i ^.te,' the Pitf. ')y itisai11:?: 11im falcifi.ed ?aisconduct reports ?,rr:aic' re offi.ci.^-l doex-rents of the PA Do C, bare---:,.a of Vie of Pezinsrr1wailia, i:,nCl. t_iey asec; t_leir authority !,busively to o_?!,ress t3ae Pitf. -1th such ^.e1i.1 e?-::te li1!1 * rference t »t it c-^uce,7 the Pltf. to stiffer suc31 -:,re.^.t lo:-,se, 1DC-i2L- "abject to an.=-.a.rrrntod soli- ^•ry confi-riei:^eiat i.n ",.isci- t]1 L? ?rf status, Cieay•inil.l?''•1 rel ease fro'.t1 tire STTIT r0"r'1:1, :?! in.- L) X11 ')"1.°_011 resort- --1^el j, f'art _er C?.t)-lt:l i _le pl_t t0 cLlf-'Cr the intp-ition^.1 infliction of e:aotion?.l distress, ti._1?: :--i;- ci-vi1 Li-rar?.er t1l-e First, Eighth, ,Iad Fourt,-ent l to the U.S. Co_i.ctituv'-ion. Pitf. PI-so enjoyed thn ri`ht to 1.e free civil ri__;hts viol-,ti.oas Co-IT7"i.ttec by the Defs. in t:.i., Count r -x7r.xite2Cl by tie 1^-:,,s a.11d the Constitution of the o_,' PA. ?4-5. ` ale ''...'Cove-described actions Of the De.r^. in t ?1 S Count ",Tare so _1=11 cious, inte_ntion2.1, reci;less, ?.i1 Ci x'11.=.y°(l ^aCli ' eC -l_E'sS .nd d_eliber^te indif-i_erence to the Pitf.'s rights :,na ell-'aein;T, that the 11 l.: 10 iX10_1 of nomitive da..naLes is .1 .rr^ntef. 111 EREFORE, )ursuant to 42 U.S.C. @1933 and -40- P,-,.(,.S. 96501, et sery. , Pitf. de m-ds the following relief: ^) .O °_`'6n? ? i•Ory .i-id )mitive da---a -e ixa-, t; 211 the 'Defs. in t'Zi,s Count iladividua.lly, jointly, or -evar_?.Jiy in ..^n to lme Celte-rlained by ? jury; b) Injcunctive relief in the form of ej_nun,-.-i.Y1 /c "Top. 74730'4, 747873, 747877, and 747873; c) :Release from rez-,,,;reL-;ation to Rny eneral ?onL.l?tiOil; d) Deis. ::lust -sy for any court costs or fines; and, e) D-efs. must rei?_.'JUrse Pitf. 'or costa of litio, Lion, -including, ,ttor_aey's 'Lees, del2.,r aa,__a,.-,es, a.nL'L interest. 0OUNT IT ( 2u) . ( Defs. Moslak •Knd Yelchner) 42 TJ. S. C. @10183 - FIFTH A.TD FOTJRTEF`TT1. .41T Ei?1F-ET?TS TO 'r E TJ. S. 00-. STITUTIOT?, DUE PROCESS, LIBERTY INTERESTS STATE CLAITTS: PA COTISTITUTION .ART. it @@l, 7, u, 139 AI`TD 20 - DIE PRO CFSS , LIBERTY I"_T TvRES TS , FAILURE TO PROTECT 2d,5. Pp.yr?gr,..-ho one (1) 11andred forty-five (24.5) are incor-?or,,ited herein by reference, ac t1n-oa3h eac'a --:ere set =ortil herein at, le-IaCth. 24.7. Defs. mined. in this Count anl- ,dally denied t.ie Pltf`'. c?.ue process in iii.r m/c hearin s Pull, its proceedings by no llo :lnm hits to csll .vgiln.ble witnesses to est:??_.lish hi?:_ cl .i .s of actual inno- ce_?ce, i.r.c _:tdin ; -recorded vi-c?-eo rurveill :ice :rich vac if, Elie posses- sion of Sout.iers, '.'-e Securi.t,r Office, and Kelch?ler I`ocl,11C ^.cce_-,ted the teEti Tony of Lt.. Ereidex 7,Tho :stated tli?t Southern told .ii_1 t• sere no .v^.iia"Dle video clirveill-?.-zce of. 1.11n i ici'c_at conce-- =i z?. 4 f 8.64 17 ica i-,7- -Jr, nd or HIl' ?.r " ?ei:ti__1ont. Pit-7. re- 1 co_zd ,.;fir ,; r-ue :tee. to sneer- y'elcTiner r-,,.ad ins7nect E.-e Curveillance self, but refused. P7_tl. :t^.^ r.lre^.dtr hot:?e?'- i._z fi.ie SMU, an a- t.-rnic,^l ?:id sib aificant h°rdship, on custodir - six release ( G) days fro-.1 h-.xinc, his P2 reinstated, ' Fmti cp^ting f_on tie SITU in 2--iothex 60 days. =:e enjoJed privileges. T'.o 5l ^,k '}'loos .!?:71ien ^S'TU nri^oner on AC st:=.fiu.s Lets DC ti ie-, 1?ri ?;o_ier ?.ato- t i cal I o e:::, ba c:_ to Php c e five ("P511), -1d glen -gust -:or`- his way c_: tf0::.:;ice the ilc3°,eS, 5-ith each n'_ qse reruirin,7, t'?? ;-)ri so"ner to serve a of vO days. T.ius the oO drays he received ro?_d -,.-.le ,-n t.1- t t?1e Pltf. °iould have to serve 240 ds?vs in t'ie ST.T -: ini I-mi before not- o?ibly released. Pltf. had . -orotectec_ 1ib,:-3r'1Y interest in not bei.a" subjected to the loss of his P3 stp.tus . nd subjected to un- ^rr^_ztc DC _t? tl s in the STM. f-ad I elclaner denied the P1tf. da-z process :?nd f^.iled to protect his li?per. fi r inteYests. ?4-U. The -Bove-desc--ibed actions o_° Vie ?refo. in, t'ii.s Count 7?Tere SO _i^ii cious, i itention.pl, rec':aese, 1Ci di nt ?`rn-,?7 Suc-_. ? reck- less de l ibarate i. rl.iff erenCe to the Plty. • s ri ^;hts and -::Tell-being i 11-)osition of punitive c?.a:a es is ,r^rroxli ed. Pltf.'s due ( 2c) process ri -,hts and liberty interests -re )rotected ')?r bot.'_ the 1?x,s C_ the Co--istit- Lions of the Unitod State. 2nd the ro:??on°'?e'?.1 th of PA Mu^r^.nteed. X TREFORE, c,.?rru ?.nt to 42 U. S. C. @1583 anal 42 Pr,. C. S. §55011 et seq., P1tf. r'e=?_ c?^ the follo ring relief: a) Co:.,e. s<tor,y end punitive dex.ite,es ^il Defs. Li this Co1int i..- di-7i.du^.11*r, j -) int1y, or severally i.n (.2 -.riount. t;o be detnn ined by a, jury; D) Injk.i-zctive relief in Vie or..?i of ev?un?;i_n? _r. c Kos. 747u04, 7 ^ 7 73, 747877, an,' 717878; c) Release 'rocs seereatio-i to .^..ay general no1,ulp.tion; d) Dr"c. ust pay for a7ny m rt col us or fineC=; ?,nd, e) Dnfs:. -,:L:,t _,.eir-iburse Pltf_. for cor?tc o.? li ti. ?^.tiozi, including c^.ttOYrl.e?'T0 fees, del--t (ac_Iia?:es, q-acl in' eye, t. COU'?TT III (Def.-,. Southers, Yelc!Lner, PA DoC)- CCTS A"? U. S. C. @1083 - U. S. ". TITUTION - CIVIL EITED`tCE, DUE P-90 CESS, SWOLIATIO7T OF PJfIDBrTCE, F-4TLU'RE TO PW.. T'!"CT, T EG- LI GMT CE STATE CLA.I-TS: PA 00NISTITUTION ART_. 1, §§1, 7, 8, 13, 20 - DTTB PTt,D rESS - CIVIL F?tIDEr?CE - SPOM9'PTn?'? - CTRIP'E - FAILURF TO PROTECT - NEGLIGMTOE ^?-0 Per^,;rt:.#hs one (1) t?7rou?;h t--:-o huizd-idfor ?r i "Ylt (248) re t_ , . incoroor- ?,'. 1,.erein by reference, n.c each iere cet forth hereiri at le??ftY?. 250. Defy. nai-ied in t'li s Count -.Ye re a go ?sible for ' _ie Dreserv- ? ion --)Motection of civil evidence, La t-ii case, t1i-- video sur- vei.llesice ^2 ,re-??iou sly -nC resoectivelir refere:lced. Therefore, 2 f..... Preli :in^r I_zju_-eti.on is -ttachcr to (:o:.;?lp.int - o_ (;oLir` to -:ove t le Defy-. to -oreserve ")ro'tect '`is civil rr7i eace for -,ev?.ew s_^• F. t 251. Def s. 1 .! f'r' , -o "?r r':^ ? t 71_i r eo , _ _rt - _ ..i u. e .es .?erva ? rot-.pc ?-.,, ?;i' ve ,il 1p 1 ' n ,ac 1'?revi 0„^l .. `7.r_? res_') ect1-z'^ clf?'i: fDr s^olin.tion o-7 vidence if, VJ ti on. P e s o -. '.-7.i5.7 T;.S. C. ?n3?2c?. J l l_., ?_l_?• n.._i ?. 1T_':^ n?i,, C7 '?_A', rc2e1i to yT /1 ...) ,._1` it l ril e7i.'_e_-_ce a _ re: ec t ` o --Ili J ,. ?. 5' i_L,• ? ?. \l 1, i._i 1CmrClr('., 1o:=:t, "l oSe C' 1^ -e. C, oa o_ evi' ^_•::1C'_' erence cho.r"e to 4-1-e u) I_1?tL1C`•iJe ?-ellef in t' 10r1 Of 1/C 0... 747273, 74'-7 77, '•?r' 74.7370 frY.J:^ Pit-P. ' _ , o_i CCJ `? :. 000NT IV (D^_f?. T'a'per, Ilein, Soat.'nerE:, PA Doc) !' 2 7. S. C. &10-83 - IT. S. COT?S'ITT?iTIO'''', - F(? TRTEMITIT Ai''E'_-D- rR' 7TT - DLTE PROCESS - FAILURE TO PROmECT- PROPERTY I1-TTER- ESTS - TI GLIG!7TCE - 'RETALIATIO_.T STATE CL.A.I?TS: PA COTTSTITUTIOTT .4RT. 1, € @1, 7, 3, 20 - DUE PRO CES S - PROPERTY I"T TERES TS - P I TT.UR•? TO PRO T_73 C T - NEIIL•IGMTCE - RETALIATLION ^r '• F^- '= 011^ (l) 'bill ol_"i'1 •-;o hLL+ldleC' =i"t? -o-l e i?1COTJJY .?GCi herein by r0fere,:?.ce, ^s 11'lol .h each ""'ere set forth herein De r~. n?-..ied in this, i Count for i:_le of th.(f Pl tf. '`?_leaeVer it is ot. in his fosse si.on, 1C. eonfi.^c-.ted by prison off_ici=.ls. After neif 7472`4 01 A'u=,U°t ?, ` 776, ??l a,,_ :'11 11• 11C CL?f:?eC .. _ t^7=en to P5 '.`,ere lie l C'.e. La EC--1J Call. Pltf.'s personrl oro`)ert`T not. 1'en T,SPIU fit?^;rds efltereC. EA-20 cell,..^c:Le a neY-01 nro;,ert?', it i._1 for^<`e. Pit_". ?s :1ofi issued ?^P.Cel )t o -f '.ny? _.?ind 11. 1:7 i_' _ j c' cOi?nl nronert? i?:e:"_i^ ?i11.^i1 '.'ore jr, rtOl '.` e'. On :ill ;ust. 12, 2005, inure.-j.torieC. the ,Iop_-rty outEi rl_e o- l' Plt-f.' S 'a:• er returned o11e (1 boy of e o11,,,I 0 0__ .;• ? to i;11e Pltf. on Aur.ust 15, 0006 but severrl its 1s ,Ylere -:Y011 Mile a f1 S n @ tsr U1 t .f. -? ' o -a;1c: ' e1's 'he r, S. ".n:. PA Con- Fl_ . r 0 r . , )r ,v tl ,.Cl 1nC1I_ ?j f S i.iit-`.-_-e?•.'r., i _. , :1't•1 O?'1 ._.. Zi.._ .r C.. _ C?.i.1:.1 _.i._1lCa rl•- the T'J tf. I s c.i'?.:_ t'the De "•. 1it 4-'1i i r Ca `,T O- t^ct Vioce li;-hts. A. ten (101) C''vy' eeloy ir1. P'_tf.'r f in ???`e:1t P. ,ei101o•:?_C^? iiltareCt o. 1-,?1.i 1:'1 3C?r Coil- -i.?-,>a Tile Pa Doe i.. Lie`ll;:.e11'l _for to IlFwe (31) ^oli.cie::? Pi,,(" nrocedures in effect ?..?hicli .-,,o -.ld ,.^llo i Pltf., or 0--ay "r1.; ,xaer confiiled in 1. L5 I sin._ afti.t '-)?"o,)erty in the presence of stn.ff amsi.r, ae?, to conduct t'Re inve_htory ;o 1.= a^YZ vie-.-,,, tzie process to ensure staff are not of i..- _n or t, at ite V.is or to see %--vrh t. is '?ei??? coi?fi sc?te , .Lcreu --on lie c .n be ;i.ve.h recei. )t "or the nro_?erty bei??7 retarnec. to hL-i ^.nd. rece.ilit for those itens .Jhich are confi.sc-.t(d.. m _,,:? Pit. contests th?t i.8 .CV°1^ °)er soaal r.)ronert,r is confiscated q-Ylc'•_ iii tale :?osses+sion of P's DoC e.lnloyees and the the Pi tf. is in L5 l_o.z >inry ?,uii t, it luFt be Ift invontoriec? in hir. .'resexice ".Tact .`;',ia"cvl'r l'._0.. .ble ltf:'_ls he i. S `per.. i.tted to ih?.ve be returnee? Jit''liTl one (1) to Three ( 3) C_azxs- Defs. ^iled to adeauately s?fec,,.ur r0. PI ti.0 s 1,ersolz^1 ?ronerty ruad t'.eir ?:ctoihS ?.ro. cu11s.7 ,?rul. Ac re-i.zlt ho :.u-FcrsO t' e loss o._ his ,1ro"?ertr ?;hie i is actionable. ^5 -. T'_- ???o•r=-c1???.cribet. ^ction of i-j e Def'7;. L-i Col-it r-ere .-I-1 ious, izite_,Acion?l, rec!:1ess, cUsn]_,^-..y(?c. -uc..'1 -ec :less .f._d dtc-liberate incif-Lerence to the Pltf. 's ri._'?'Tts this ;lr onerty inter- osts, t'it? i_:i-+ocition of punitive do-z(R-CFI is J-.r> ante( . T"71TA)TE, nu_rsua nt to 42 U.S.C. §1983 sen . , t'ic Plt1". 'e. iands the follo--,i7.r relief: ^) Co::-ir)onsa.tory ^nd r.)umi.tive o'.:!-,_n?.!ceS ?1l t:1e Defs. in this COI-U--It i11?iVi.r7_tz?.ll , jointly, or sever a.ll?T in n rF,-,ount to be deter ;iasc- bar jury c r) I_. junctive: relief in the form SM of a_h Crc'_er (Ti recti.ng tie PA DoC to i:a ale ie?-it ^oliciec -n J :,roce _u_ es -:herebir the Pit_'. or --Lai- ,r i.soner coafiiieJ to t'_1F L5 u:.1it ? r be ore- Fe )_t, c: aril the inventory of :his ,erco.zr ?_ , ro,.,e~'ttyti1:° t '1e be w. - recei -)ts for ite as?o.'A're confiscated ^._a I-dc7i items ire etlr_? 1 _: e?; _ to tl_e ,ri soaer, -nd that i;hi 2 )ro cess 1h e done e as ,. soon as possible, but no :":lore t _r;n three (3) cl.^yc 1, .ter; c) Dei'-. _,y for %iy coart cosfic or fines; ?.«(7., d) De :..u=t reiaabarse P1tf. .for COF't Oi' li. t i;_??-.i;i on, i.ncluoin€; ^.ttor.ie r• s fees, Biel^y do,:,,,aEes, ^i-ad i.nt?rest. COU=? T V 32) D° R::rb-,.cc1 L -v,, 4.2 T?. S. C. 91983 - U. S. CO"TSTITUTION - FOURTE PT'T_'H J"_IM31'.7TT DUE PROCESS - PERSO 'TAL ' PRPERTY IY TE ES TS ST9,TE CLA ITS: PA 007STITUTION _VRT. 1, M, 7, 39 13, C1 20 - DUE PROCESS - THEFT OF FUNDS - VIOL_ TIOU OF PRIS07 VIEDICAL SERVICES ACT - PERS07.AZ PROPERT I7TTMES TS ''S5. one (1) through t,-,,o hL ad.red fifty-four (254) are i_icor°)or^.ted 12.etei.a by reference, ^.s thoa-h a-.c'.i dm 1vere "Tully set - oyt''1 he.1'el-l 255. 7e ?c? i1?;.^_E'd 111 111.1.5 Count }u l??wflilly t11e C1edL1C- tion of 14.00 rro_A tie Pltf.' - -ri: oner ^ccomit i t;lout '_.i. s -.uthoriz,-* Lion, violated FTtf.'s ci-vril ri=-;hts LuaCcr Co_1Ftitutions of t ht? United St, t es ;,,--ni. the C0=t1 '011`. ;'C":l? l of PA. 257. Tho -Bove-descri P.C :a.cti.ono of the Defs. i# t_ds CoLuit: '%,ere so intc,lti o 1 1 .`anc? celiberr, te, c_ic-,1`a je( Yec -1eS-,' n _' dC=i.be= ate .n . i!.zc`_1f e_`hcC' tJ the Pl tr1. I s ri "'1is that, the ? cu_ ?i. . _ ve ' a , ? :, ? i.oaz o f a . i.? ir. r,,pn ,?, TT n 4 ?.ar,r. _u<. ..1t to C:2 _ 7. S. .i. X19 3 and ?,-e. Pik.. V. J. F,"Jl, nt sew., Plt de..iaads the --Pollo-dar-, relief: ^.f (,0 _' .ilS2:tory CZ?ri?. ,eS oi $4.00 ,il-.h accrLied iateref;t '?_2d nLL_"ii- ;:i,7e res to be ?,.eterr_.iaeJ 'by ? ju.r,?r; 'o) I.1j ,__1ci:i_-rc relief in tale for-.1 of ,zi Or(1er c'_ireC .i g tjhe PA DoC not to dedact r..ay noni e: fro-.,'-' t'le Plq c-;owat i t1iout his authorization or ? due Drocess he ri_hM; c) Dew's. :iuCt `r for ^ny coL.rt cot o?" c?.) De °s. iLt, t reimburse Pl tf. for costs of l i.ti.-^.tion., i4ciading fees, d^?;i??!-e^, ??1c? inte-^st. COUNT VI (Deft. Kreider, Sout11ers, Irelc_lner) 42 U.S.C. 91983 - U. S. CONSTITUTION - FI-r'ST AYD FIrT`_TIi AI7EPT31"MI.TS - FAILURE TO PROTECT - _TAR_ SSR4EPTT -RETALIATION D?MIBERATE INDIFFE3ENCE - SUPvRVISOR LIABILITY STATE CLAI?`"_S: PA. 007STITUTION ART. 11 9017 7, 8, 13, (?, 20 - FAILURE TO PROTECT - TTARA.SSPtMT - RETALIA"_'IO'_`- - DMjI'?ER.4TE I ,iDIFFERWCE - SUPERVOSOR LIABILITY - OFFICIAL OPPRESSION - IN7F1j7-1dNA[ ZNf Clcrrom oor SMOT zoWA4 01srR{Ss (33) 4 d F %- r^ is one (1) t' You^h two hundrea fi.-ftir ^even (257) -1- =1- e incor_?oY:=tecl herein by refere_ace, as though 2?ch were cet -Forth hel-cin •.t l earth. 250. Defs. _1,•med in thi_;- Count i_u11. wftL_ly c.-:111bited cLeliberrte indif "ere.ace to,::,nrds the Pltf. when in DC-135A,, DC-004s, Pt P",R,.c e)e•^rin :s, -.,ad i_z passing;, requested these indi.vi.'.':u?.ls to intervene on t)eil^..lf to orO-- their subor{'.in^.tes to cecS`•e t=_cir unl^`7fial F+.cts of 1.?r;=.rs_ic?lt u retaliation, ai(' t}le;?' not or_l?r'^ilc,:'. in their duty to do so, 1) Lit partl.cpf-,ted in h r^.rsing Pad ret^.li-"t.i_i- :11Ue,inst t':ie Pltf. t _a:,se1v-_s. Su'.)ervisors cc--n be held liable if they ^bout ?"G1 -cti.ons but. ;prevent t11er_1 fror.,, occurrin`. Their ?.ction^ con:,tii-,te, lr' 1 f"f( 1._i!'i ? °erenee to cf-fi-cl.^llv on-ares s t'''_:. rltf. re.-alt x)17f_nrc^', t'-_e tiOn<'a.1 in_ flic?hi.o.. .l o c_ l1. }.Csr '7S ?'? P. ° i ten ' i 1 ^r Ll ?" 7'al cl ? s'. ^`.? r^f?'. t;l(?1 _ic:j L r?u ?i_ ._l.. eats 'c;eC :azwc P_-' ?Ll1.V8 l.i i_Cr1t?r c?ncl filed nr1CV nC°s ^1..1^ S" T :, ^! I. The ove-d escri.be(' ^ctionN- of t'•.e ne_'^. La CoUlmt •.-!ere i 1t?..ltion,1, li.cious, rec-_les , 7.Lc -1^n1y c!. re-c'.1ess :,.nd d(-,- ?_i''-rc.t_ 1_1C1"ferelce is f o br.. - r? fr e- ?? to e Pl _ re o_Z r official oppression, --1C' ±'_! in- c-'. 0_' o .ZOtion^1 ri:>tress t?nd_cr t_ ;e F. ),-'_e ". S. x.11:' P.!? Con- ^ii ._`i.0 _1,- 'ai.s° riglits -lccured t'._c,rein th-t the of "IT S FOR?, to 4.01 T_-.S.C. E-10a_n0. A, Pr'.. C. S. r 1, e cc . , Plt t;lY folio°:d relief: r4r nLl.1i ive c1? ,? -eti ?•?; ,1rt l ?' DE_? .. 2-1 ?..-.j r0?'?7t i.i1 i17 i.?J..'.lI f jrDintl;;r 7°t['l1? to ??p r <y.I•Pr:?;???{?. br <^. jury; n to ,7i1 ''?_-i'nY•?"1 -1t7 i)n 9 .1Li:t ^•_-v for ool rt _'•octs o- ??:in;=1 ..._'?•?) :J.:.:lf"• ..1?1"t '"' '1.1 'LLr ^A Pltf. for cort?~ c7-? ti.. .1-do.1, ?.nnl C-l n- C]OUT T VII i?.5. C. 193 - U. S. CO 'STI'TY'JTIQT? - ASSA??S?T -- AMASS""' `'T n IWSIRNTE INDI ±" TRETTCE (?4) STATE, MUMS: PA CO ;5TI ; 71077 ART. 1, ^0 - _ASSAULT (7_`_P^..r.S. -----) - '. ",RASS..Tl T (l? Pn.n.S. ?Lj7_• ? J. ?oY.i. _-oar: (? > t?!;i i?•,f'.1 t'. `o iils,?1C i^n' `1. '?v ( •?\ -YV 1?^ , 1r C'o" e :iii bir reference, ,f, '_ou:-il °' _ _ .i. 25n• '),_l-.l. i:i• _.. .._. 0, e% is t.ii1. C- lloant y P1_? • ?j 4 0.1 O co 'O1.c?i1?. Z1 .. .? .i '?1 10, ]_ '. ^.CCourit-lble for AL;i' i1^ ^ , ?n`? J 1s1^i C, an i . 9.; 'er. .01 ro r' the ?.. -a2 t c 200.' 1. aci.,,uc -it. Si 1^:,.a. I , -_n _ vo_ia are to bn llnld. 1 ! ?J zTrr::)^ 1 71 ea;? T p/`. 1 n l,- f. o _?l; _ ., Oil ,-f.',. _ 0". 1 ....,., ?:1 0 I.- ?,... 1_;. __, .1 f+JZ mil se nn, ' the P_ •,ii -7? -1.` J1 t 7 4- -g t? i--' X1 1 C. the U.S. .'1 01'12 , r t - e P. _ U of 4-ll e Pi t f. t11--n Co. ,- ioi1-- r •,,:}_th of PA . ot' T m_in Jo %e3- Y 1) a ; y .e G. 1. e._ Ct._.0.1,_ .: S J ?L.1 1. .. ,1 ^li cio?is, i.,,+:^n;-.io_1.^1, rr;,,-?_?.:.., _•?zr'. ,_;-;,•e(< <^:. -recl_- l La?aif"?rei'ice to t--_r P1 t E 1v ti .ti.0o `^Ui.1it 1Ve, s C? -.1??.`?e• . i .^.rr'7'.i1t e??j ,{. 'f1173 -L!1 .;•V LLCJ, IT. S• J• § _.O3 P? • ?• S. s e r,,. , Pli- tle fo7_lo-. .in`; relief: es ?t' t, t'iF: Cowit i rldJ_vi r'.:aal ,r, joi.iltl:,, or ri 'a'.10unt to c_aA--er _ined by jury; D_:'^. :L ?fo2" .aiir court cost Y e;3; c) De:"s. ust al. e ^ nonetary do_tioil 0f ;7.00.00 e^c:_i ( 4-00.00 toti-;l) to tTle Lobbyist Con.l]_"tion Farad, a or- ` oil "iii..ch lObl)ieC> for t?ri Soi1E?T i1 t' 'T1-Cti.'11°? rl`i?t? t: LCIFI 103 IT. ?! i_i Street, ?;.^.t i.eJe, PA J-?":10; -n?1., D:r_ r'ei-_.'Dur 3e P7_t for cost., of 7.i i.,?? i zc7_ud.in?, t o-r-_ey• s fees, d^l°y d,.:.i,, res, --..Ld interest. ri0 MIT Y 1 I 1 (Deis. Tlein, Sout_aers, 7-21cliilr.r, PA DoC) 2 t-1. S. C. 91983, 01985, 010,86 - U. S. CO"TSTITUTIOF - FIRST, I?, ??_TD FOtT??!?;^'!tTMT _.:'TjtTS - TAT'PFRI'"G WITH FFDFAI, (35) EZTIDE MEET, .' A"iD '?VIT?:r SES - HARAS. T.!E"?T - RET_4LIATI07 - Dr'?I 4I, OF ACCESS TO T''_r COURTS 20'4.. P ra;ra,».ls one (1) t l.rou^-li t-,o '-Dlidrec ^i?r?:;;r-three (2v?) ^re i.zcor?;ai:sted herei_1 by reference, ^n V-.oi r='1 e'-c re set 'o-th 2?5. De c. anmed in tliis Count Have u3?1'^-'Tfull?r confisca.te6 aazd sei.^c?. fro-: the Pltf. a lee-31 Declrmtion is the ?Yo'11. Oa V. I.Loucleshell c,:se ?; '? Ch Pltf. m! de a choice to beco-.ie :? °?loao_ tia" --itaess in. Pltf. tree irn:"tech. -a -.ffidl.-vi.t -a.df-'_l en-hila-itC ^s <.tt, clL =i-Js .ad inten- cte._. "co t1;is Declnrcl.tion (w/ f tta.ch: nts) to t'ie U_lite'.. St^tes DLrtr.ict Courfi cor .he T!iOL'1e District of PelMs,rlva._zi..^., '.^ut 7-11 1.'s er: 0.7^.l ?1°0 (1171,,r -la-.. conf.i-tc .,te?1. fr o-:a 11i:.•: 031 A:a-ust 4-, 2006 10_ ,lien hi,. --)ro pertj '.72.^ ret=7.ned on Auguct 157 2006, the Decl^r.tioa -•ra.s nis- rink;. "el_c;iae.r ?'c__?ZO'.llec<<^;ec_ that the Decl,.rc..tion confi. -;cr:?ted be- c-l:use Pltf. ('lc not have the approval o' the PA DoC to cox"'luaic?te fi_ Bronson. T',r Decl,.ration -r-.s not i^P.C?1 V!'Ca Bro:iton, 'Dut i ,-.n -l.for:ae;T, via. the t?.S. TRni?. Plfi-f. c.eterr.ec -re- veated fro-: '-)ei_ - ^ble to c?abitlit hi.;? Decla.r-.tion ,r,., te:: ti :oay i._q the FcC,_.er.'.l Coarts. This co.nsti.tates tamnerin-l- it z Fc'eral ?vide_lce ^.nd ' itnesses, denial of access to t1ie Feuer .1 !:Dort, _1-r:=sr ent, and re- f fi ° t W tar _l'e l s 3 he U. S. RVIM t:_li ^11 civil rights violations o t ? l - t 1; C 0 a 1 •1cJa?. VHEREFORE, nUrsL;.-_Ylt to 42 U.S.C. 01Q83 an.(a 42 Pa_. C. S. 06601, et seq. , Plt ". d c-.1a;.z(!s the follo%iing relief; ?) Co :??eis.tory a.nd puzitive d^:.la es a.r?.inrt all t'-,e Defs. in t_ZiC ?ot??t in..ividU,:11ir, jointl;r, or severcllly i_7 ?. _ alount to be ' eter ined by P. jury; '.o) The Court must of icia.L„r report this to irl e Feder, -l Court aaZd M.-,.git?trc!te JuJ e Andre-11 J. S"lyser; c) The Declamation In Support of Rroaso.a v. :t,)U.e. S- 011 !:i.t11 the :?i'fic?.vit• ^.nc1 exdbitc be rCtur_ze0t to the Pltf. or to Rro_1ro * c a.ttor_a ey, Andrea. i'ri. e lry.n, S(1, . ; d.) Deco. for ^.n?r court costs end inec; a.nd, e) Deis. :.lust reimburse P1ti'. :for cost? of li ti,M..tion, i_zcl i?.in .r r_ e • s fees, d.ela.y and Li-Retest. (36) 2055. P -- r ? z s 0 , 1 o t_iro u ^,Ii fi,. o ' _u ie,rea si`,i??r-.live J (1) ( ^ 5 ) ^re i::icor;):or,-?.ted 'herein by reference as c--^c', ,-lore ,et '9,,D-YtIl herein Ftt l en; t'_l. 267. De_' . Drgnnir,,a•1 snO Patton are -::it?ler^;;n fro:: this action. 260. Ders. PA DoC, Zij-i.:ler.-,ian, Si.??:mson, Ay(-,rs, ''i01)er, Yleitl, 'ro' 1, Southers, Vool.-).k, Kelc?7_o.er, P-r'o^cci, -.nc? Lm,--r shall be collecti.velir -as "oppressors". 26 q.. Deft. n.^.:1ec? La 267 un1?.. fully subjected. the Pltf. to ti ?fOr%=iellti.OneC? vi.blati.ons or "'is civil ri,-ht s. Pl '?f. 'CO.-.h •`-'. St,-.t^ 9-ad Federal right to be. free from, r. et^li:-tion, tl!e ?i1°1i Ctioa of e:1O 1Ori .1 (Hotre,mss, ofs-i cirl o.1?t?"ession, bir the, U.S. rt1d PA Co_lc.tit ,_tion^. 270. Pltf. r=serves his ri,-.i1t to ot !i"s Co:,.I_^.i.nt ;ur: u?.:1t to 42 Pa.C.S. 51033 Vie Fed.R. Civ.Proc. 071. Pltf. csserts •,.nd -.vers ceclo.res t_A?.t he >>ac est^'blished c?-.t?se o` action for all of his Cl?.i ?ti and 11rm`3 "llcces."full" nreservec. ^....c'.. -•-et =i Coy"trt• s requirement to ^t?.te~lent of c7_sia.s for 'li c's relief can be 172. Pltf. asserts r.n,w avers a.1d declares he ilas c .tis-F ied the le sl renuira- 3xits of 42 U.S.C. §1997e(a.). VI. S I'L i1L ry P?_'_?. i.S `t Oo-)re.ssel indivi(Itu c.s X11 i.nc£'.rCer".ted citizen of ti' c^ of PA. _ e '1?.s been Vi.C `i Of -ruse 4),T n ri ^on officiC11s in the PA DoC for over four (4) ues.rs ?nc.. iUas been cubjected to -soli.t:?a,ry confine-:lent as '. Contin.. in;? mu-ii siL-ient for ',he 1?,t'?fUl tivi ties le eizMa` es in. He is ci^.enfr°.nchi.se(9 'li.s only rio-)e of relief fro~' the official ootiression. '_le is ttader re .?i is L.-i a court of law. :_e brie„ forth this civil suit against his oppressors, not to S°E. J1t_111 .1 lOn nor revenge, but to restore jl:,.E'ti ce for 11 ii self, ills o;onres^ors, society. VII. Dedication TliF: Co.1o1?.int is dedicated in the lost lovin- -:1o-".ory of Anita L. P^lucil (1 72 - 20,08) . (37) . . .. VIII. Coaclusion ?V`TL'RF.FORE, PIP-intiff res»ectfaIly -r. yc thnt '_lis O )nressorti be ?u^C?. ?CCOs :_iri ;ly to t21e la,`is of this Court- me r,"l S'. el "o'_' t'he cri es :ZC._ o=fe}uses ?.s e? I as civil ri ?;ht= viol .ti one e"e0 in t its Co ^l,?.il?t . Ivi t'? 7i1i1C?Yle ?" f /s/ J-li.ec A. P,,-?.Iucli, Jr -o4( J,.:aes A. Pa.luc 7 Jr. , Pro Se /'??? SCI-F ?rette 893}69 50 Overloo"ir Drive LaBelle, PA 1550-1050 D;.i:ed.: Ju;?r 31, ?003 cc: it e 0C C , v uc m = a C r;; M Fn E 5> C p p C11 cn ? ( 33) IT TIT,, r'0'TRR' 0? ')0'.,90 PL ,AS rTr P'?RL_i"'? ?'J". TY, PJ TNS?r .11. TTA J!V- F-3 A. P.A.ii7?C_: , I.I. , Pla.i_i if f V. iP731 -1 T ST::'L?T 1'TI.." DNP.ARTTT-M T OF 00R7LFCTIOI;S, ET U , nefe:z(?ayits ^IVI. I• AC:'IOT'T - A?L" - n? • a Q C a? o • NCB ? . -vtx M rT-1 C JUDGE: zc__ C Co G O J m m '!'0 'PIT in HOavOR.ARLE JUDGE ASaIT.'TED TO T?=IS CASE: cn A-70 NOW, coati: t=?e P?t-it.i.oner, J r.+nes A. P^1ach, J;° , pro sc, rer,-ectfully re-)resents the foilo,,ins;: 1. T'lis is .. Petition to Proceed Ia Fon-if:i. ?. Peti':ioner is i_z?ir ent ?? ? coiit^-idc lle i r unable -o L, L ^.s=ord the costs and fee-, iiecess,,?try t0 e ?'COVe C:L?t1v! EC r ?1.i c n?;r 1 n * •J ;?i,, 1 - 0 U e co-J,o fees of tinic litiss.ti.on. ''Y'TDREFORE, FetltloYiE?I fir,^yrc tllr't t?1i.S ?.'_0110r?'.:?lE: ?i!iL'?Yt: ,-?i.ll 11J' _!1.: J Ll-. itute this r,ctioi.?. ^nc! -(occ@C'. to i-__C cr 1.,? .i:i.on t"ley of, I.1 For Pru IG.Yi S, or V i t'_:out, t.ae of f;? i ii, fec , A fac?nvit of Iia Fords Ppuocris Status 1. A. Ps,luch, Jr., ^-i t;,e Pl-i_i-It:i.ff iii. thr. ^.bove caption ec. -,a ,2't-ter ^.nc' becau,e of mr =ia, ci^l condition to `1^.y trig fee- of C?rosecuti-.L --"; this ^ct].o- ''. I -enerall?r uyiable to o' t.^.in funds :?ro; .. <::rl ronc', i-nc7_u- C?.ln? .1C. associ,'.tec-, to nf^ j the costs .:?_ ? i t•i ?' tion. 3. I represent t1:;-A the irlfon--tion belo- to my 2bto pa, the fees costs it true Inc?. correct:. (a) I a st-1,te priEorer in t"Ze care, cu.-Itoc.y, cor- t1 ol._ o-1 t',ie PA De-- '17. of Correctio.-is ("PA DoC"), i ?icarcer- l:t? 1..i. t"_e St^te Correcti o l 1 In.-. t= T Ll 1.oi_ ? 0) I '•1-va been iind.er Of:^i.ci.^1 o;?nres si,D.-i ^i::,or? M,-(r 97, irolith.r?r confin&e-ient fnr-I Iimre no c- -70-o;rm^nt. I 7o receiv^ ?',' "O`er._1^.t 10.50 pr^r lo:it l in idle '7^y, bi_t is ? r ._ 2i.er -.re r e::C1'::` 1 7c_t' usea for poSt ge ozid ')'"totocop ri,fi,7 e- -)e.l es. ( c) T e.I _,)?^ese.ltl; in debt. to te PA. PoC "or nnro •- .-,rtely - 20.00. T S-'-ct thi de-,t to incre,?.se. ( ?) I ^'.l 11t1? r. ln,_7 t" 0 Ot_le2 ci' i 1 .eS 1;1 u- ich -.7c '0?rt- il??Te 7'Rt?et T}e le?,VC t0 111 'Orl" ( e) I 0:'.'(i no assets, ctoc :.S, accoazit=sj or m-viri7S. l f) I `i, -; no Vie, encl.e_1t s `=?^t T for. ( °? I LL C r^ t '.1C? thfIt Conti X1.011 A. 0 i:a . _. i.^-?of ?:_ Te";:le"It in M!r -?o, ?i rou1c_ y?rr:it ;-1e to -),%r t'_z^ costs incurred herein. I .,lso r the Court to c'.i.rect t'1?, 1^ot?'??1?0'i rlr or de.-,T-,nee to _. ._. C' oil0t0cowLe1' Of t1a? ,,,ttaC'"T'".Valt,_ _Jr`.'c'.rt11 .1 O ,{!i CJU_ S O':Cice to '.e `'erve?,. uooR t.hc- Befe_1c1?a1ts. PI(a.1:i^ '1 ^C't t '. Sale "if to Rt:i, t11i?3r -iu ci.rcLllst a_aces, :1^11 t2C- to '•^e, ':e''n.,ase T 110 S1 Vv t;'1n 110-110s r_ecessary to sai e--,i '- `"o +'-.e Pro-- t Sherif , etc. ?. I 7 _iLrc `r eri-c:l t 1 .t t}_^ :iOCt ti' '•e', .? __? ] _1 _?. :iti11n P' i 1.t1+7 i1 r t ^"-ad core eCt to tli be _-t i:) 1 1(l beiief, n- th,,t ^nvr f .i,-..d.e sub- Ject to +.,L-. nen1 .Ifie,i O% lU a.C.`7. 940.D4, r21^t.l.il."" to "L111r1 f .l ifi cr t i o_1 ' o ut'lori. ties". 711". I?O'REj Re t)roceec?. I.1 For-if-> R:,uneris, t':1i s'. Jo_1or ???le Court ---i11 t:irect the Fro- is .. o? r the i•=_t..'_Ot - 1 ?T D,- ..11 C._; ; i .-nee to la^,?ie CO f1it'^ 0 _. 8 11°, m.:.. for rervice y. --tc. r?,,dl. i -.L;e the s^TMe _. 1?v V-e Sherif;° 14 -Lindnesti , ~.1 /s, ILT . ' A. P,.luc'1-,, Jr. BQ-3769 / S(,'I-F!,.;ret:te ?/3 6 O 8 50 Overloo_!_.?)rive I,:-.-Re1"_e, PA 154-50-1.050 D -to Jj?2:j 31, 2008, file (a) DECLARATION 0g-qf.3,5 I, J^.-i.er A. Paluc'L, Jr. , beizl_ t;1e Pil-d-a'ti.ff i.n tai e r-,tt?.ched Co-,-2nlai.nt2 does ' ereby declare t'i^.t ^.ll of the infoon, _°acts '.n ,_ decl•3.rat10i1S, 1-'1^.d.e t'ierein is b'Jt'2 t, tz2 '.t1C COrre^?% t0 TM?r l-,for- Q?.ti.O:1, _._10t:"? eC' e, .nd bel? ef; i1d t_ic-t any false Sf2 i !':'_1C_LtS iiic,de ;abject e 1-o nen..ltie^ lOr Perjury nurs!,Pn't '%o 18 P....C.S. 04 f,. si.fic ati.on to ut:1o_ _ti e. and 28 U.S... P ,1740"e Dccl_,,.red. D=-. t ^r'_: Jul Y 31, 2003 ^ch.ed CC. °l.le Q-_7_: SCI-Fa °i-t 50 Drive LaBelle, P" 1?^FO-1050 J . _es A. P'luch, Jr. Pro se R _Q C -o CZ* O CMZI c c -? FAM C_ 1V C:) b 3 ? ? e z co c m r lk, Zn/ THE 6oU,2T Or- e-0"7 DA) /JLLZ3-*S o/-- .somelfSEr L°fJUNTy) PEA1Ais / -vA^11,4 za woes A. FA U4 C 14, J-r . ? n ? ? o ?la?n4i ' tiv; I Ae+i ors - A+ L&,u ? -0W /..:' 00 7" G7 . . Z rn o o CeRr1.Ft( '_IETr-- of Sr-RV;re,E Tke plain?i??? T&mcs,4, PAJIAcl,, Tr„j Hereby tee+I-P,'e,s +I,o,+ ke is 4-k i's cta do ostVn9 a 4ruaaLnc( CovreC-F 0riiHa1 Co y of +tit- Clv; l e?PFj' 1Kf Jas ea +,onec, above, ul&34-Ae of?i0.? 1 04Do ( Rule," ar?d vice first-e lVs U. S. P, S, po e.- re-Oci d rnai I ao"?? wi +jj -ct.n a,?c+o .l,ed In Forma. paw iS p? i d av i t a- N e f P?t a #-o D e-Fend a rti d a? e,o v r r I +e..r' cCa? Au? usf A77, ADO* -fa +ke person be-low: AKq;G SAO&I ave Soi1,.srsc.?- 'Cukw+y Pra+4?ono•?ar? III ?. Uni`oH S+reet Su+ +e. 0 I ?0 $cr,?crSet PA 1 SSo I ao o4 l " . -V ( e. e, es 111) 1!u-i ?i esL? i on 0-15'a e-rxAs Sect , Spy- So o?ev/ook D?-i ?e P-0, box 9999 4.,13eIle. I PA /SyS"o-pso 0 ?? rn w D ? ? ?. I `Tri lt{ ! '`t7l C)jql JOT d, Ct)) j .t?VLTrIS?T?.19lT Uy?l -t J i, ES A'*' PAhU Ii , JR. . Planri f f CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-4835 PA DEPT;.; OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. p (HOPI. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) PLA .'TTIFF" MOTIO??T rkOR ENLAtiG011111IT PB'. S ?3RI ?l '_'.'0 :?Eta'E ?11?iTITS' rRELI? "Z ; ???' G ?Jr?CTIO??S i comes he" Arles _?. FaiU:011, Jr. . ttj him. an oxtension-and/ or enlP4,-&aent. of time to :file his response brief to y_, P ! i.711 `„r O ID j ecti_ons, ann_ reoresen"!.1- follo',ving: Pitt`. _ i:,s _a. "1'nat2 _ T OYIeT X77 f?IH C Y'8? _ custody- -2nd -c0-ntrol o theA. D_e.p t. o. _Gerxec t o_ns_ ("Dfs-. ")presently confined in the Restriated Housing; Unit at SCI-Fayette in LaBelle, PA, under offi.ci al o Dnressx.on. P!t-f. z:C t tl?r unf---rrili^,r -lilt-h the P'_ :2r,1 ,c o Court, esp. ,jEGfl.ons'r• i:? e La7Ot,?.( ar_ Tt?Y l'V1Y14 i'O TeS'Ond 0 riPrPl1i.1'1'?Y,t,T O?J 3. to condiwt research on Prel.i.rninq.ry Obj ec- ions ^,nd '' e is?iues raised by the Defs. rias been signifi c?7ntly re- _ -duced: d-ae...h-vin-c, lim-i-tad "c-css.__to- the--RHU-'s-qin -la,w lii? teary.. The ' :?. ,-1m ( Jest' s Prem.ice mini-l,aw li ??ra rir in t ho -11U computer ,prot° _r 4.0) a'_"kich is frequently inaccessible due to burdensome restrictions which make it easy for both P I?C staf {-o "s''lutdown". PI.---_'. nuTgerous '.rievances comlylainin.F of this problem since 2007. 4. Pltf. is I1,"mill? c.n effort to see?L 'i.he 1; i;:"t ?t3.^,e of pro bono counsel to help Iiiiii re.,_?ond to t-'Ze Dofs.' i'r li:inp.ry Objections. -5. l t , , who is. tin--ap-ilept.ic, also suffers, from concu?--sion- -- lire mint toms and cilronlc he,---id aches/pains which makes it difficult for hin to concentrate and comore send. Pltf. also suffers from chronic Sri c I-, c c;a:rneI t i?r?n.e sy-n6rome i'n ,i : rl ft t-{ wri t;ing)--h- rnd which reduce; hi -to IN "'rite n tir alt ." is. ,oresently awaiting surgery to relieve the pain --ad it, may take 4-6 weeks aftercare for the to ze-1. 7. Pltf. is requesti-ng ns1 enl:,.rgement, of tine of 60 r'_ajs to re:7?r)ond-to the 3efs.-I _Prcl ;air?ar= Objections. It i-s better to sib Court '-o„gr,nt 60 ct,:rs nog,:, -!)ec;.u e he a;i r nokt De .Dle. to office `,?e h., tl c ?,l:?r ery. `l''z:At- is, e rna:?r no,!- be le to for , __o t .- 30 -zr X11' _ ,t?rn lt" '',Jr to pJe __i C.-,,l 11.ic .? ^i t .lion. t11r`St, rec+'lest ter t3 Y3 PYtI,`-?roer,lf?,-:'f. o 7 time. re. ae,?r, is in 0,. The ;;r<anti.n: oic' this Motion will not unduly prejudice the Defs. .Iov ever, if tt1he Court :,,!ere to deny the Motion, it would greatly pr. ejudi?ee the Pltf. frorrr- being able to litigate the merits of the suit. 10. A supporting, brief is being submitted. Pltf. c, Ls the Court to advise hii-i if supporting l,ri.e_fs !-ire requi.rect_ for for a' r;`T G O Fi'ae_ 111 1t11E: Nederc Courts t ;7 re i- (-)t Too if zor tale enl.?r;,cai-rent sire .soecifics,ll1r outl.i.n.el,, ii-,. tAae Motion. Excuse the Pltf., speci-ficall;r, it is the for the !diddle Dis- trict of Pennsylvania that allows this Local Hale. It's good rule `r.nd 7ould s ve the Pltf. time, energy, an,:?- resources aliic . ;,.re severe- ly limited. NHEREFORE, tlt.e ,.Dove rea-,)oas, r'li.f. res,?e .tL z?? y re- ciue;_t.s ?'onorable Court to grant, him ?in e.nla me? t of tilae for 60 ,1-)-rs, or 1-,,,'r_,-t fihe Court deems proper, to answer t 'e ref .' Preliminary Objection, and enter- -an Order for the same. In in /s J s A. ch Jam a , r., ro Se BQ-3 SCI-F?ye e 50 Ove look. Drive LnBelle, PA 15450-1050 ._ Dated: .. O ctobe.r 14: _2008 CC" Zt:,i!10 ?r_ i)Or1.t?.n, LSD • ?S• ;/ t ) file .?? N •• ?-?; ;?_. c? ,- ?- 4 ? t y'? ?. i.? .j ;. i._'t _ ;? ? JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., PLAINTIFF : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS 08-4835 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this Z"-day of October, 2008, defendants are granted until December 1, 2008, to plead to plaintiffs complaint. By the Edga' 'B. Bdyley, J` "James Paluch, Jr, BQ 3769, Pro se SCI Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 aymond W. Dorian, Esquire Pa. Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Defendant, Department of Corrections sal t6Pa E.8 rr? d c l £.?1? rv`ati?o8 •' co .P`.d. w V L?r ?Y.i '^ t?Fj? CDC V Please be advised that you have twenty (20) days in which to respond to the New Matter GOLD & FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD ATTY. ID. NO. 23400 261 OLD YORK ROAD, SUITE 526 JENKINTOWN, PA 19046 (215)885-1118 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, KRISTEN BARBACCI JAMES A. PALUCH : V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 08-4835 ANSWER AND NEW MATTER OF KRISTEN BARBACCI TO THE COMPLAINT OF JAMES A. PALUCH COMES NOW Kristen Barbacci (`Barbacci"), a named defendant in the above referenced lawsuit, and file this, her Answer to the Plaintiffs Complaint as follows: 1. Jurisdiction and Authority This paragraph is a statement of law to which no response is necessary II. Preliminary Statement Barbacci admits that Plaintiff was an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill. Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of remaining allegations; therefore, they are denied. III. Parties Paragraphs 1 - 7 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations; therefore, they are denied. Parajraph 8 Barbacci admits she is a physician's assistant employed by Prison Health Services, Inc., at SCI Camp Hill. Barbacci further admits that she provides medical care to inmates at that facility. All remaining allegations in this paragraph are denied. Paragraphs 9-11 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations; therefore they are denied. Paragraph 12 To the extent the allegations contained in this paragraph are directed toward Barbacci, such allegations are denied. Paragraph 13 To the extent the allegations contained in this paragraph are directed toward Barbacci, such allegations are denied. Paragraph 14 -2- To the extent the allegations contained in this paragraph are directed toward Barbacci, such allegations are denied. IV. Facts and Declarations Paragrrgh 15-184 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 185 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore they are denied. Barbacci admits she provided treatment to Plaintiff on several occasions. Paragraph 186 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 187 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 188 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. -3- Paragraph 189 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 190 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 191 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 192 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Barbacci further states that to her understanding Plaintiff was always appropriately charged his co- pays for medical care. Paragraph 193 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 194 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. -4- Paragraph 195 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Para rah 196 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore they are denied. Paragraph 197 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 198 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 199 Barbacci denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 199. Paragraph 200 Barbacci admits that a policy exists for charging inmates co-pays for medical services. All remaining allegations contained in this paragraph are denied. Paragraph 201 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. -5- Paragraph 202 Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations in this paragraph; therefore, they are denied. Paragraphs 203-42 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. V. Claims Count l: Paragraphs 243-45 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore they are denied. Count 2: Paragraphs 246-48 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Count 3: 249-51 -6- The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Count 4: 252-54 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Count 5: 255-257 Barbacci denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs 255 to 257. Count 6: 258-60 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Count 7: 261-63 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. -7- Count 8: 264-65 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 266-67 The allegations in these paragraphs are not directed to Barbacci; therefore, no response is required. To the extent such allegations are directed toward Barbacci, Barbacci is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of these allegations; therefore, they are denied. Paragraph 268 Barbacci denies that she is an oppressor. Paragraph 269 Barbacci denies the allegations contained in this paragraph. Paragraph 270 This paragraph contains a statement of law to which no response is required. Paragraphs 271-72 Barbacci denies the allegations contained in these paragraphs. VI. Summary Barbacci denies the allegations contained in the "summary." -8- VII. Dedication This paragraph requires no response. VIII. Conclusion Barbacci denies that Plaintiff may receive the relief he seeks in his Complaint and in his Conclusion. Any allegations not heretofore specifically denied are denied herein. NEW MATTER 1. The Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343. 2. Barbacci denies that the Plaintiff has been denied any rights protected by the United States Constitution, any portion of the United States Code, or under the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 3. The Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against Barbacci. 4. Barbacci denies that the Plaintiff has suffered any cognizable injuries or damages as a result of any acts or omissions on the part of Barbacci. 5. Barbacci avers that any injury, damage, or loss alleged by the Plaintiff was the result of pre-existing incidents that occurred prior to or subsequent to any act or conduct of Barbacci. 6. Barbacci avers that the Plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. -9- 7. Barbacci is entitled to the defenses of qualified and/or sovereign immunity and it is clear from the face of the Complaint that the Plaintiff has not alleged specific facts indicating that Barbacci has violated any clearly established constitutional right. 8. Barbacci cannot be held liable on the basis of respondeat superior, agency, or vicarious liability theories. 9. Barbacci pleads the affirmative defense that the Plaintiff has failed to mitigate his own damages. 10. The Prison Litigation Reform Act amendment to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c) mandates the dismissal of Plaintiff's claims herein as this action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks money damages from Barbacci. Barbacci is entitled to immunity from such damages. 11. The Plaintiff s claims are barred by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. 12. Barbacci asserts that the Plaintiff's Complaint is frivolous and filed in bad faith solely for the purpose of harassment and intimidation and requests this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, to award Barbacci reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the defense of this case. -10- 13. Barbacci reserves her right to amend her affirmative defenses and to add new affirmative defenses in the event future discovery reveals the existence of or need for such. 14. Plaintiff s claims are barred by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Plaintiff does not allege a physical injury. 15. Barbacci incorporates by reference as if set forth herein in full all limitations on damages and attorneys' fees imposed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e et seq. WHEREFORE, Kristen Barbacci requests that the action against her be dismissed with prejudice and that she recover her costs and attorneys' fees expended in defense of this action. In the alternative, she demands a trial by jury. Respectfully submitted, & FERRANTE P.C. BY: ALAN S.-GOLD Attorney for Defendant, Kristen Barbacci - 11 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have sent a true and correct copy of Answer And New Matter Of Kristen Barbacci to Plaintiff's Complaint via U.S. First Class Regular Mail on this date to the following individuals: Raymond W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Governor's Office of General Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 James Paluch, Junior BQ-3769 SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 DATE: October 28, 2008 -12- 0 { Qa fTI - L a GOLD & FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD ATTY. ID. NO. 23400 261 OLD YORK ROAD, SUITE 526 JENKINTOWN, PA 19046 (215)885-1118 JAMES A. PALUCH V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, KRISTEN BARBACCI COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 08-4835 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please enter my appearance on behalf of defendant, Kristen Barbacci, in connection with the above-captioned matter. A panel of twelve (12) jurors is hereby demanded. BY: FERRANTE, P.C. ALAN S. GOLD Attorney for Defendant, Kristen Barbacci [? o ? a JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PEl V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS 08-4835 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of November, 2008, the order e October 24, 2008, granting defendants until December 1, 2008, to plead to complaint is vacated as improvidently entered. Defendants filed preliminary to plaintiffs complaint on October 2, 2008. -James Paluch, Jr, BQ 3769, Pro se SCI Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 ?aymond W. Dorian, Esquire Pa. Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Defendants, Department of Corrections :sal IT t `ex ^2t LL 1VA41OS *?'-l the Edgar B. Bayley, J. S OF VANIA on ns 1F .Z)ZI L?? L -?- ;y JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., PLAINTIFF V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS LEAS OF IN THE COURT OF COMMON ?SYLVANIA CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PEN 08-4835 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of November, 2008, defendants h brief on their preliminary objections to plaintiffs complaint, plaintiff is al additional days from this date to file a response brief in this judge's preliminary objections will then be decided on the briefs. Edgar B. Bayley, J. ?James Paluch, Jr, BQ 3769, Pro se SCI Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450 V/Raymond W. Dorian, Esquire Pa. Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Defendants, Department of Corrections :sal I?k/o8 filed a sixty (60) The yn O l? J V r?^ q^ y e F ce) Y o L.3 C? ? IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION- LAW James A. Paluch, Jr. Plaintiff, No. 08-4835 V. : Pa. Department of Corrections, et al Defendants. NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO PA. R.C.P. 4009.22 Defendant Kristen Barbacci intends to serve a subpoena identical to the one that is attached to this notice. You have twenty (20) days from the date listed below in which to file of record and serve upon the undersigned an objection to the subp791" o obj ection is made, the subpoena may be served. Date: December 9, 2008 Z X ,/ L/ ALYXS. GOLD, ESQUIRE attorney for Defendant Kristen Barbacci CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that he has served the attached Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoena Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4009.22 via First Class U.S. Mail on the following individuals: James A. Paluch, Jr., BQ3769 SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Dr. LaBelle, Pa. 15450 Raymond W. Dorian, Esquire Pa. Dept. Of Corrections 55 Utley Dr. Camp Hill, Pa. 17001-0200 Date: December 9, 2008 ALAN S.MLD, ESQUIRE attorney for Defendant Kristen Barbacci COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND James A. Paluch V. File No. 08-4835 Pa. Dept. of Corrections, et al SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS OR THINGS FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22 TO: Custodian of Medical Records, SCI-Fayette (Name of Person or Entity) Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to produce the following documents or things: Complete medical chart of inmate James A. Paluch, Jr., inmate # BQ3769 from July 1, 2004 to the present Nall & Miller, 235 Peachtree St., St. 1500, Atlanta, Ga. at (Address) 36363 You may deliver or mail legible copies of the documents or produce things requested by this subpoena, together with the certificate of compliance, to the party making this request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sought. If you fail to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena within twenty (20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order compelling you to comply with it. THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOLLOWING PERSON: NAME: Alan S. Gold, Esquire ADDRESS: O York Rd St. 526 Jenkintown, Pa. .9001 TELEPHONE: (21b)b8b-1118 SUPREME COURT ID # 2 3 4 0 0 ATTORNEY FOR: Defendant Rargcci BY THE COURT: Prothonotary, Civil Division Date: Seal of the Court Deputy t ID C? ? C7 r ?-? rr 1 "S7 L T61 E C. © u k7 o r' c v /N 070 IV /?GEi4s -O,AZ p c:v Q -rAnil es ,4. ivAL lito-a..Te. rri T !f[ . PA OF GoRRE?TIOi?S? w rr? -? D co 1V1,41nJ7-1FF1S n'/oTlo/? T-oQ k1v4-,q,?GF/n6;n/7-of T <nI E Tv R FSPoIVD To 6Aoq SAeC i `.r AfEW M4 7'TEl? AWo /,/ oiA/, e- s- the f'Ic, 'nl?`Ael j-,r#e-s ,4, r4CI-IL-c.4, fr, C',014-f. ')/ Pre set of rl of ac FS cc a n -E fo Iqu /e / O Q3 E 7F ?/i e n r ai R, v, f'r-6 4 • ? ?6 ?rl 4 v e L' o ec r IL QS ?a??Ot'''S , Lr4,'l1 e??v,'/r???s aef,oh ocfl ftie P/fP. ?u?-- ?(.( aYl TO I 01 U, a, 9 8 3 d P,4 5 7 tote ?O I? ?R w ?Oi'1 C t 1?h 1, n9 v" O /q c? S ,,,/ A c,4 ocC,,.rrcJ of SCy -?amP /t/// rte, I-he. V`Oe:Cr o.` Met klej wze,zt a, C TAe ?tf2no[aK?s C"De:-ps,'> ine?udePasf Qnul pre- stk?YL e f, /aye<s o? ftie p/F Dcpf F L'o,-rec ff,6hS C``P!} ?SoL' "?• bef', $arfaccrr : s em- b,Y Prr?s°t,ea/fJ7 sCr,t,`e@s l.?pflS??,s LmC, TA e e6ny /a? n' was e- 0/ on , 4°O? nc e'ur?- bCrlaY+d Coc.tK?l slacr4f, Ser cd --r,c C7ov?p`a/n av? •gar6acc; ar A-upusf• a(*/ A007 . 1?dr 6acu? resonded Fa f?tc C o r,t r I a ,,v* Q 11of r-cc' sc J I\ e--v M awe r o et (? cf o l6 e.- Z ?', Z06 $ W Tti t P l4-•F. re c c. V e j Avid S; 1 ? cJ ?a r :B a r b a <-e A ii j W er a na( e MP,-4 er oP7 /I/ova.n•4r- 3) Aod8' ° y, P144, 40,s a?,1j f weln 4 Jays -'o res 6,vtwf'o MoL+4e-c-. ?e ne eofs add 1' 4-1 a N0.1 IV wle, -'o prov? e a rrSpohSe 'f-o ljar 6 ci?ci' ?s ge-vJ Mai--4er ctncl re9uE' s f s Q>? 2n (4 qe rvtev?-? o! ?1 inG o ?'? r -??/ (30) d a s f a d o SAY, G I s i S p 14?, (s? -F?`r s "f re g u e s f 5• b ar?acci ,A,, I' fl 64 b ? i `e p?Q Ll c((C E ? 61 44,e Co Lt r -('s- r,,4; h ?J[k?. t?,o s Me{ ?6N. Pfowevcr, Pl P, wo?14 be SeVere17 1 m dereY -Fro ?? b t wg a b I o I ?` 0. 4-e- f kP- wi.e r; f s a4? k i s 0-4-se- If f L1 c r' 6+ Q n 16 n4D gra h fed, T'ke N4c4l oh i S ivtao?° I h good 14, awd N6_` !h b ` J,- v- -1-6 1APIre-C eSS A,F-i ?? e>!e day ?t 1 s owe ??rov? . 815 A.2d 1094,.Oxford.Presbyterian Church v. Weil-McLain Co:, Inc., (Pa.Super. 2003) prejudice SICO suffered as a result. As the church and the trial court observe, the church made available to SICO photographs and videotapes of all of the physical evidence. Nevertheless, we must agree with SICO that looking at tWo-dimensional photographs of the hurch organ, the blower motor, the wiring, the kitch appliances, the wood joists, and the kitchen subflo ' g, all of which the *1105. church had preserve s relevant to determining the cause and origin of th ire, could not possibly provide the same degree of in rmation that examining the three- dimensional ob cts would provide. SICO was 11 therefore prejudic by its inability more effectively to cross-examine the hurch's expert, and also by its inability to establish a eparate theory of cause and origin. (FN5)..... ¶ 28 Finally, we note that a trial court employed the least restrictive" sanction' ssible by giving the adverse inference instruction. As e Schroeder court observed, an adverse inference ' struction is a common penalty 'for, spoliation, hereas other sanctions, such as striking the pta `tiffs expert testimony, are much more extreme. Schr der, supr at 250, 710 A.2d at 26-27. We fmd no buse f discretion in the trial court's decision to g the instruction. See Mount Olivet, 781 -A.2d a 269 (opining that when reviewing a court's -de ion to grant :or deny a spoliation sanction, a mu determine whether the court abused i discretion) (citations omitted). urch claims the [26] 129 I/e trial, courterrverdict slip by asking the juSICO's breach of duty causehether SICO's breach was a using the fire. We agree wicourt that the church did nfor review oir appeal becaushe verdict slip, ask the court to the court's charge on this urt's, reading ,all of the'que,stiocharge. (Notes of testimony; See Takes v. Metropolitan 98, 695 A.2d 397, 400 (19 ,.r to preserve a ti3a1 objecli for review, °trial coift*61 is required to make a f ely, specific objection during trial, citing Dilli ' ` le v. Lehigh Valley Truss: Co., 457 Pa. 255, 260; - 22 A:2d ,114, 117 (1974) (other citations omitted)). [27][28] ¶ 30 We turn then to SICO's cross-appeal, in which it claims trial court error in denying its motion for a 'non-suit or directed verdict. against; the Page 11 church. We agree with the church that this cross- appeal must be quashed because ICO is not an aggrieved party. See Pa.R.App.P 501, 42 Pa.C.S.A. ("any party who is aggrieved an appealable order ... may appeal therefrom As this court opined, Generally, a prevailing p is not 'aggrieved,' and, therefore does not hav standing to appeal an order which has been enter in his or her-favor. Clairton Corp, v. Chicago T le lns:, 438 Pa.Super. 488, 652 A.2d 916, 921 ( 95), appeal denied, 542 Pa. 631, 665 A.2d 466 ( 95). ¶ 31 J gment in favor of SICO is affirmed. SICO's oss-appeal is quashed. Jurisdiction is 2 F?dl.) Pyrolysis is a process by which wood is converted into a substance like charcoal, which can be readily ignited. For the process to'occur, the wood must be exposed to heat over a prolonged period; the lower the temperature, the longer the exposure required for ignition. (Notes of testimony, 1/23/01 at 217-218; 1/25/01 at 159-173.) (FN2.) The trial court observed that portions of, Brown's testimony were limited either by agreement or because. they addressed cause and origin.' (Notes of testimony, 1/25/01 at 97.) (FN3.) "This Court may affirm the order of the court below -if.the result reached is correct without regard . to th oulids relied upon by that court." C. B. ex rel. 'M v. Com., Dept of P hhe Welfare, 567 a. 141, 143 n. 1„786 -A.2d 176, 178 n., l (2001), ci ' g Ma6rhead v: Crozer Chester Medical Cen X154 Pa. 456, 159 n. 2, 765 AN 786, 787 n. 2 ( 01) (other citations omitted). (FN4.) 1 1 e: ote additionally that Clyde Prigg,- the church text and the only party the church. called knowledgeaintenance of the church to testify, s \Kavach, not responsible for or boilers; 'rathers of the churchproperty committee sponsibility. (Notes of testimony, 1-131.) Their testimony. -would theren both relevant and non- cumulative.= at 8-9-.(citation omitted). (FN5,) The trial- court did t allow Dr. Allen to testify as to his theory of bau and origin because his report only identified the p babble cause 'of the fire, without indicating Dr. Al 's opinion to a reasonable degree of scientific cc ty. (Notes of testimony, 1!25104' at 174-175.)' a agree with 0 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No claim to original U1 S. Govt. works. Wl+ER E FDRj5) pI --T, res f ec+-Vc.A 11 y relL, es +s ??a? ?Vi? ran {- I 5 ?(a f .6 16 Ct1 12r q fMbEn `?' b 6 ?"+G n Y ?t7' h'l m g addrY!CnAll TLir? ?3b Jda?s ih ?., c?. ?6 CtnS er ?e7. a? r ) /slew AA4.f-Ae-l-. (?ar 6a-?? s ZY, k• r,al mess Se a??lo$ G? la VVIe ?4 - lea l ucl,. jr,-- ?Q3-449 s e? - S ?,eld 1 020 Pr ke Sf retf Box D749 Alt DOB LCD R&t nlLonal Wr ,)(-ri`gsn wle-In C-f / /* 1 cti n ?` v D ! ? ? ?S [ ` C ?l Cep' (G.•?S`> (a) •s3pom •lnoD 'S-fl leut2uo of untlo .oN 'IsaM/s.Iainag uosutoLLL 80OZ s,unoo aqj of loafgo lo `li I3auo3 of unoo aqj )isle `digs I3tp-Ian atp a8ualleg3 lou pip 4omg3 aqj aaagnn `an3 aql 8utsngo ut .Iol3e3 lleiluoisgns a seen goua.Iq s,Auedtuoo iotpoq n tmgl .Iatpe.I `aig otll pasnuo ,clnp 3o g3eatq s,Auedtuo3 aaltoq .zaglogm ouiuuolop of ,{.In f aqj But)isle %ol Paan Canf aqj Butaudaad ui Pam unoo lew m 3o onsst agl Matnaa olelladde ao3 an.Tasaattu3 g3ango `2tu Itnq gwng3 paxo usop ut PotHInsns sassoj ao3 aano3aa of Xgedwlstaegr uotl3e -s,goango ul 03UQSIISO14 (ti)Z'81Z)i0£ 8utpu13 ao :CzojUSoualu o a.mmtlq (£)Z•81Z)i0£ s8utpt td puu sataole8o Iul lut3adS,Z.BIZ)iO£_ tlnf Cq s8utpu11 uu IVIOA 81Z)i0£ uoalagl, duiln-H pue `suotlalrg,pue-su l3afg0 (U)AO£ nnalna-13o spuno . 3oynoD aaMo-I ut uOguAla$a21'`pue uotitlti 3314 Ak ---- 0£ (b)Z•8IZ.=:J zoug puu?pddd [9Z] 3314 aqi ao3 algtsuodsaa Iou seen ,Cued o .taltoq Iugl puno3 ?Canf agl aaagnn `ssoluueq suns ao g3ns `aug oql 3o uISIJO put asnt3 3O WOT sag of se tlsal of `8utpimq g3ang3 pa/,oalsap leLli an3 u! pout nS sassol ao3 aano3aa of ftmduto3 aaltoq Isuiegn uoil s,goang3 ui `ssauum uadxo luungat s,Xuedutoo lotto molle of 8utsnjaa ut pauo lino Ietal gSnogl uan •uouputuumajo 1333314 7 9S0i)i0 130333 ltt3tpnfaad 9SOI)i a3uaptna3o uotsnloxg i I(f)IA A£ aoaag ssaluu8H (f)I 0£ nnatna'd IA £ ---- Of b'9SOI C& aoaa, ue lleoddd [SZ] • Ctuttuao ogguams 3o aaa8ap olgeuosuaa a of oitndo uu 8utisotput lnotgtnn `lag atp 3o asnuo a goad oql pagtluopt Xluo uodaa stq g2nogi uana ` 3 atp 3o tuSiao put asneo 3o ,t.Ioagl stq of a 4 al of palipua stns 12tu I!nq g3mg3 pa,Coalsap it aag ut pauttlsns sassol ao3 aano3aa of Xutdut 3 aaltoq Istu ft, uotloe s,goango ut `ssaultnn uadxo? Itlingai s,Xuedutoo ialtog •lelaulo ul VD131W0£ suoilaueS `.,CldutoD of amltu3 9(g)IIVLO£ Purl uo Aalug put s8utgl, puu sluaumao(I 3o uoil3npoad (g)IIVLO£ ,C.Iano3stQ pue suotlisodaQ IIVLO£ ---- VLO£ l,£l,c:::& ainpaooid letuazd [t?ZI 'algtssod uotloun anil3tASa.I Isual agl Senn uOllanusut aauO.IOJM as,I npe pue °apino Id plnom sloa fqo Ieuotsuaunp-aa a aqj 8ututumxo ltgl uoileuuo3ui 3O aaa$ap atu 3141 aptnoid Xlgtssod lou plnoo /Cuuduio3 aaltoq paptnoad sgdle ologd `uotienaasaad slt ;Iutmsua ou 103 IInt3 it, fll3aaipui SUM pue a3uaptna agI utnaasaad ao3 algisuodsaa seen gomg3 `gotngo a 3o pud aqi uo gite3 peq 3o aMaptna ou slum as gSnogl uana `8utpltnq g3ango pa,Cousop Ilegl an ui pautleisns sassol 103 lan,o3aa of Kueduto3 .tall IsuteBe uatl3e s,g3ang3 uI a3uaptna leoisXgd 3o tlan Asap aqi 8atpatft uotlmilsut a3uaaa3ut asa nple of pailtluo sent Cuedtuao aaliog •aauaptng oonpoad ao ssatu% 1112D JO lsa.L of ,CIIed 3o aanlterl (ZZ)ZSZ)i88£ a3uapin3 pue sI3e3 ZSZ)i88£ of suotionalsu13o uotle3tlddd 6tTZl88£ a3saptng s81Hpeald of A4tltge3tlddd (Q)IIA88£ ,`Jnf 61 suO"Onrlsul HAW ---- 88E (ZZ)ZSzc=.) im-11 [£Zj -ogngo aqj suoddns 33uaptna otp aagiagm inq.an8ae of sumld Aawoov ut legnn Iou st uotlsanb atp `loguoo P601* IN so 5114 UITI + 03uaptna aagio 10 M14!M V Ileo of amltu3 s,,44nd 8utsoddo oql uo paseq anwojui saanpu ire nneap of Amf a 2tnu!ttuod uoilmusut ue of p IUuo o st ,Cold t iaglogm of sle uopvuttuulap a ul aauaptng Mpoad ao ssauuM IIUD of `?o X3llsoL of XUvcl 3o amtted I IZ3188£ aa*W-13ofgnS pue ?MSQOaN (S)IIA88£ ,i.Inf of suoponAsul IIA88£ ---- 88£ I I Z.:* Ie1a1 [ZZI 'Masai of pagtlunb aaann sassauutnn aqj goigm Inoqu ansst uo otp uo g3ango 3o aonle3 to I3lp.tan a pou.miat Ainf a a1214m `ssaluueq slenn aoaaa guns `8utpltnq g3mg3 paA sap llegi aai3 ui pautnlsns sassol ao3 Ianooat of Cued o aaltoq isutt8u uotl3t s,g3mg3 ui sassaulim utuuoo ft, o of ainpe3 s,goang3 uo paseq almg3 uotiellods p1m ssouitnn 8ulssttu amaaa3ut asaanpe BttInIB ut pa.ua I.ixlo3 Ieu4 3i sang •11muao uI (089011O£ . luamSpnf 10131P.10A fq pain toaug 89013t0£ suoti3n4sul 81(f )IAXO £ S alud (£OOZ •aadnS•ed) `•3ul "oD utu?low-paM •n goangD uutaalXgsoid Pa03xo `t7601 PZ'd 918 S Al T ff g e, o U,( T o f C o ,*"m 4 Al P4 ZA J Pole DEC 15 20M CumA RL/?n/b dDur/Tl, P /JNSyLvAN'/A -?IRn?FS PAL rce1?, PLAIAITlf?' VII • PA 2)&P7: oF ©Z) 4 t,6 day o-P 72 7-6 vtnoo eok'75%cerm,I-lo h o rhd-n-l L• ,?+ /., /yl o ?- y e n i s /din?iT f' ?S Alp- r?by,q?a`7 ?e y e?3 D) la-Is f a re Sfcn cl n 7 /ew rnA_ ¢74-tr yo arclered Zy Yon, ,*',4 eon of "In A e t V-3 02ZtLff4 I l e 169 ?021'a? OF - LIF5 o, 485,5' e l vl l- !dDN, BAyG,C- Y., .7!088, ?olio v? for k-ts lq r-4e_ ?c?rGa_ccilsJ ` el' Q N a. ? i? i O n a_ e?. 23a- r- AQCCi s Freon jlleo--v e r/&r)cl d.0 un-17 V 933 A.2d 1081, Bailey v. Wakefield, (Pa.Cmwlth. 2007) *1081 933 A.2d 1081 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Demetrius BAILEY, Richard Sutton, Josh .Gr #ft; Jk l Johnson, Appellants V. David WAKEFIELD, M,W. Harlow, Deputy Lawlerj,Major Glunt, Lt. } 0% ?Ewing, Lt. Walter, Mary Lou. ?.-Showalter, Angina Auman. Ali6tted on Briefs Sept. 7, 2,007. ecided Oct. 4, 2067. B ?.- rod Inmates seeking to ch lenge prison on us ' writ of mandamus and I to file ctior? pauperis (IFP). The . ourt of mr n P Huntingdon County, No. 71-613, Kurtz, J., denied leave and dismissed acti as frivolous. Inmates appealed. Holdings: The Commonwealth Court, No. 1084 C.D. 2007, Pellegrini;.J., held that (1) mandamus was not the proper form of action to challenge alleged constitutional violations, and (2) action was properly dismissed as frivolous. Affirmed. West Headnotes [1] Mandamus ". 1 250---- 2501 Nature and Grounds in eneral 250k I Nature and Scope of R edy_ in General. [See headnote text below? [ I ] Mandamus G? 12 , / 250 ---- 250I Nature *d Grounds in General 250k 12 Natuxi of Acts to Be Commanded. A writ of rndamus is an extraordinary remedy designed tq/ compel official performance of a ministeria?lact or mandatory duty. [2] Mandamus 4*= 1 250 ---- 250I Nature and Grounds in General 250k1 Nature and Scope of Remedy in Page I In order to obtain a writ of mandamus, a etitioner must demonstrate: (1) a clear legal t in the respondent; petition; (2) a corresponding duty in fli Appropriate 'or and (3) the absence of any other adequate remedy. [3] Appeal and Error 8 30 ---- 30XVI Review 30XVI(A) Scope; General 30k838 Que ons 30k840'' iew' Particular Deci ons Standards, and Extent, in Considered of Specific. Questions and ) Review of Constitutional Questions. text below] [3] Appeal and Error 0949 30 ---- 30XVI Review 30XVI(H) Discretion of Lower Court \ 30k949 Allowance of Remedy and Matters of o&dure in General. When\reviewing the decision of a trial court, appellate' ourt's scope of review is limited to a determinati of whether constitutional rights have been violate or whether the trial court abused its discretion or coinmitted an error of law. [4] Costs 8; 128 102 ---- 102VI Security'-(or Costs; Proceedings in Forma Pauperis ' 102k127 Action or Def"se in Forma Pauperis 102k128 Nature and Grounds of Right. An action is "frivolous," for purposes of statute governing leave to file an action irl., forma pauperis (IFP), if, on its face, it does not set form a valid cause of action. Rules Civ.Proc., Rule 240(j),42 Pa.C.S.A. [5] Mandamus X80 250 ---- 250II Subjects and Purposes of Relief 250II(B) Acts and Proceedings of Public 0 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No claim to original U.S. Govt. works. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMIE A. PALUCH, J 1ki Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION j V. NO. 09-4635 i PA D?PT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., (NON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) Defendants PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER AND MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT BARBACCI' S NEW MATTER COMBS NOW James A. Paluch, Jr. ("Pltf. ") , and pursuant to Us A Rules of Civil Procedure and all applicable laws, to file his #swer and Motion to Strike Defemant Barmacc 's Now Matter as follows: I. ANSWER TO DEF. KRISTEN BARBACCI'S NEW HATTER 1. This paragrapk is a statement of law to which no re- spon0e is necossary. To the extent that Defenadent Kristen Bar- l.ac4 ("Barbace ") avers it, it is denied. 2. (Sane Answer as Paragraph one (1) above). 3. Pltf. asserts and avers that he has indeed stated a claim for which relief can >,e granted against Barl.acci. 4. Pltf. asserts and avers that he has indeed suffered cogni zalANUT4116s, and damages which were caused by Barbacc . By wisy of further Answer, Pltf. is without sufficient knowledge at is time to determine if Bartiacc •s participation was due to ker cts or omissions which caused. Pltf.'s cognisable injuries, loses, and. usages. 5. Pltf. is without sufficient information at this time to rs a belief as to the allegations in tkis paragraph; there- for they are denied. ? ' 6. Pltf. asserts and avers that he is not rewired to ex- haust his administrative remedies as required by 42 USC 81997e as is mew matter applies to Barbacei. By way of farther re- spo se, Pltf. asserts that ke has satisfied the exhaustion of hill' :dainistrative remedies as rewired by the Federal and Pen- • • • neylvania Prison Litigation Reform Acts. To the extent that Bar- baect makes this new matter claim, proof is demanded. 7. Denied. Barbacci is being sued in her personal eapa- city?l The Complaint clearly establishes the specific facts and decl rations are sufficient to show that Barbacci has violated estat1fisket constitutional ridhtsq laws, and policies* 9. (Some Answer as Paragraph one (1) above). 9. Denied. By way of further response, any failure on the dart of the Pltf. to mitigate his own damages was caused by Bar cei, Defendant Teresa Law, as well as the customs, policies, rule , regulations, and orders of the Pennsylvania Dept. of Cor- reo ona ("PA DoC"), Prison Health Services ("PH-B"), and their ZT rate supervisors, immediate supervisors# agents, and co- l yeas. 10. (Same Answer as Paragraph one (1) above). .ii. (Baas Answer as Paragrapk one (1) above). 12. Denied. Pltf. does not file frivolous lawsuits and tke civil action 'being taken. against Barbacci was filed in good fai . Sather, it was Barbacci who was given the opportunity to res ve this matter informally without the intervention of Us Count and refused to restore justice to the Pltf. By way of far- tke response, Pltf* does not believe in nor practice retributive jus ice. His sole intent is to seek relief for his cognizable inj ies, lasses, and damages in the fora of restorative justice. To he extent that Pltf. is harassing and intimidating Barbbaacci, it Is dew, and proof is demanded. By way of further response, Bar cci's roouests for any attorney's fees and costs incurred in Us defense of her case is denied. eg.. Any attorney's fees and costs inc re& by Barbacc was caused by her own failure to mitigate the a costs and fees as well as other expenses through. 37 Pa. Cod 593.9, 37 Pa. Code ?f93.12, et see. and the PA DoC Policy DC- $20 and by failing to comply with established constitu do rights, laws, and applicable policies. To the extant that Plt?. may be heist liable for any attorney fees and costs incurred by *arbacci, he demands due process protections and a jury trial. (2) 13. Denied. Pltf. asserts and avers that Barbacci has • WAIVED any rights she had to amend her affirmative defenses and to add new affirmative defenses in future discovery matters due to the untimeliness of her Answer to Pltf.'s Complaint. Pltf. assents and avers that Barbacci had only twenty (20) days from the time the Sheriff served her with a copy of the Complaint and its summons to Answer the Complaint and raise New Matter issues. Barbacci never timely responded nor did she ask for an onlarge- ment of time to make her Answer, etc. 14. (Same as Paragraph one (1) above). 15. (Same as Paragraph one (1) above). 16. Any New Matters or allegations not heretofore raised or ptreserved.by Barbacci are hereby deemed waived!. 17. Pltf. incorporates his OBJECTION to Barbacc's Now Matt Or in paragraphs one (1) through fifteen (15) above as being untiely raised and thin prejudicial to Pltf. Barbacci was ser- ved with a copy of Pltf.'s Complaint and its attached Summons by Deputy Sheriff Robert Bitner on August 26, 2008. This means that • Bar cci's Answer to Pltf.'s Complaint and the raising of New Matter was due on or before September 15, 2008. Barbacci did not answer the Complaint nor raise New batter until October 28, 2008. Therefore, Pltf, asks the Court to consider striking Barbacci's New atter as being untimely filed, and thus prejudicial to the Pltf?. 18. Pltf. has invoked his right to a jury trial in his Complaint. 19. Pltfe invokes his immunity from being sued under 42 USC 81983 as a state prisoner and asserts his rights to appeal any decision by the state court to award any attorney's fees or cos is to Barbacci as unconstitutional and in violation of his Fir t, Fifth, Seventh, and Fourteenth Amendments' rights. Me res rues his right to amend this claim. 20. Pltf. asserts and avers that Barbacci's claims under New *atter Paragraph Fifteen (15) are equally applicable as to • lilt tations on damages and attorney's fees to Barbacci. He pre- (3) serves his rights to raise this as an issue for appeal, if neces- serf'.. II. NOTION TO STRIKE l.' Pltf. filed this action pursuant to 42 USC 819839 the PA Bales of Civil Procedure for state tort laws, and both the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions. 2. Pltf. asserts and avers that Barbacci's New Matter claims were untimely filed, thus the Court should strike theta as being prejudicial and WAND. 3. The "Sheriff's Return" fora for Barbacci clearly indi- catee that she was served with a copy of Pltf.'s Complaint and its Summons on August 26, 2008. 4. Deputy Sheriff Robert Bitner delivered the Complaint and its Summons to Barbacci at her workplace, SCI-Gaup Hill, 2500 Lisburn Bead, Camp Hill, PA 17011 (sic) by handing it to Bob Volecak (adult in charge). See attached Exhibit "A". 5. Pursuant to Pa.B.Giv.Proc. Rule 1018.1 and its statu- tory authority, Barbacci had twenty (20) days to file her Answer to the Complaint and to raise New Matter on the Pltf. and with the Court. In other words, Narbacci's Answer and the raising of Now Matter issues were due on or before September 15, 2008. 6. Barbacci served her Answer to Pltf.'s Complaint and raised New Satter on October 28, 20089 approximately 43 days aftdr the deadline. 7. Barbacci did not ask the Pltf. for an extension of timi to respond to Pltf. • s Complaint or to raise New Matter. 8. Barbacci did not file with this Court a Notion for an Enlargement of Tine to Aaswer Pltf.' s Complaint and to raise Now Sager. 9. New Matter issues were required to 'be served on the Pltt. and filed with this Court on or before September 15, 2008. 10. Violations of the PA Rules of Civil Procedure and its parent statutory authority constitute prejudice to the Pltf., with-'the exception that the procedures and its governing laws -AAkY U -liberally construed. ( 11. Barbacci made no good faith effort to notify either . the Pltfe nor the Court that she needed an extension of time to raise Now Matter issues. 12. Barbacci failed to explain why her Now Matter issues were untimely filed in her Answer to Pltf.'s Complaint and New Matter. 13. Barbacci failed to request liberal construity=, thus it is deemed WAIVED.. 19. Pltf. requests this Honorable Court to strike all of Barbacci' s Now ]tatter issues as being uatisely served and filed an the 2ltf# and with this Court. 15. Not striking tke Now ]tatter raised by Barbacci would severely prejudice the Pltf. 16. Pltf. also requests the Honorable Court to strike and/ or dismiss any Now flatter issues which are frivolous by law or court rules. 17. Pltf. incorporates the following addendum as Para- graph No. 21 to Section I above: "Pltf. asserts that any Answers • or allegations which are not heretofore specifically denied are d_bd herein.' WHEREFORE, Pltf. requests this Honorable Court to consider Pltt.'s Answer and Motion to Strike Defendant B+arbacciI s Now Matter along with the attacked Supporting Brief, and strike Bar- bacc!L' s Now Matter as being untimely filed, prejudicial to Pltf., and tkus WAIVED. He also asks the Honorable Court to consider d amusing any frivolous Now Matter issues raised by Barbacci as applicable to law or court rules if tke Court allows Barbacci's New Matter to stand, and order for further discovery proceedings; and that the Pltf. recover for his personal injuries, losses, damages, and other fees and expenses incurred as a result of litigating this action. • cc: Raymond W. Dorian, Bsq. +? c+?thi ?a Ar1J j ,.. 0*149 Itsq. file In kindness, /s/ James A. 4ch, Jr. Janes A. Paluch, dr., Pltfe sCi-smithfiel d 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 (5) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF . CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUGH t JR., Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION : V. s NO. 08-4835 s PA DiMPT. OF CORBEt.."fIONS, BT AL. 9 (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) ?efe?dants PLAINTIFF" S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIAE DEFENDANT BARBACCI'S ITEM MATTER I. ; STATEMENT OF THE CASE State prisoner dames A. Paluch, Jr. ("Pltf.") brought this civill action at law against the Defendants ("Defs. ") pursuant to 42 *C 819839 PA Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 1001, et seq., as wel1? as the laws of bath the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions forjvarious due process violations, lass of personal property, andother cognizable injuries and losses. The Defs. are employ- ed 4t the State Correctional Institution - Camp Hill, PA ("SCI- Hill"). Pltf. is seeking justice and relief for his injur- ies land losses. Def. Kristen Barbacci ("Barbacci") is employes at 301- Can* Hill as a Physician's Assistant("P.A."), but is an employee of *rison Health Services ("PAS") which provides health care services for the Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections ("PA DoC") at SCI4Camp Hill. Barbacci wrongfully charged Pltf, for co-pay me0cal fees in violation of state law, PA Cade (37) 893.129 and PA ?oC Policy DC-AEI[ 820 without his authorization along with. Deft Teresa Law (" Law") . II. STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED 1. SHOULD THE COURT DISMISS BARBACCI'S NEW MATTER AS BEING UNTIMELY FILED AND PREJUDICIAL TO THE PLTF.? Suggested Answer: Yes. 2. IF BARBACCI'S NEW MATTER IS DEEMED TIMELY FILED BY THE COURT, SHOULD THE COURT DISMISS THU AS BEING FRIVOLOUS? j Suggested Answer: Yes. III. ARGUMENT • 1. Barbacci' s New batter should be dismissed and stricken as being untimely filed, prejudicial to Pltf., and thus WAITED. Attached to the Motion and this Supporting Brief'is the Sheriff's Return indicating that Barbacci was served with a copy of Pl tf.' s Complaint and Notice (Summons) by Cumberland County Deputy Sheriff Robert Bitner on August 26, 2008. Pursuant to the PA Rules of Civ.Proc, and its parent statutory authority, Barbacci was required to server on the Pltf. and file with this Court her Answer to Pltf.'s Complaint and accompanying New hatter within twa*ty (20) days after 'being served by the Sheriff or his desig- nowo. Not counting the actual day of service, Barbacci was re- qui*ed to serve both her Answer and any New batter issues on or Uefore September 15, 2008. Pltf. is challenging both Barbacci's timely response of kis ;Complaint and the raising of her New Matter as prejudicial. Pltf. asserts and avers that even if the Cowart finds that Ba0acci' s Answer to Pltf.' s Complaint has been timely filed, the New katter should still be stricken because it was not pleaded. i with in the prescribed time limit by law. The New batter is liken to the fruit of a poisonous tree. It is raised after the Answer to a Complaint. In this case, Barbacci raised New Matter on OctAer 28, 2008, approximately 96 43 days after the Answer. was initially due. To allow Barbacci to proceed with low Matter is like rewarding her for violating the ? PA R.Civ.Proc., its part statutory authority, and applicable laws. Pltf. preserves hslobjections to Barbacci's New Matter issues as being untimely filed and served, prejudicial to his, and thus WAIVED. By way of further argament, Barbacci never contacted tke pit'. seeking an informal concurrence for an extension of time to ile her Answer and New Matter. Neither dial Barbacci contact the Court by Motion requesting an 4niargement of time to file ker Answer or New Matter. I There is no indication in either Barbacei's Answer or the • New Tatter explaining why these documents were untimely filed or i (2) wky they should be considered as being timely filed. Nor did • Barbacei request liberal construity. All in all, Barbacei•s atteyapts to raise. New Matter issues were not done in good faith.. Plt?. requests the court to strike Barbacci's New Matter claims andlissues as being untimely filed, prejudicial to Pltf., and thus WAIVED. The Pltf. would be greatly prejudiced if the Court did not strike Barbacci's New Matter. No party should be rewarded for violating statutory law, the PA B.Civ.Proc., or Court rules abs t a good faith showing as to how or why the Court should app y liberal construity. 2. Even if the Court were to rule that Barbacci's New Matter is not in violation of any laws or court rules, the Pltf. requests the Court to strike and/or dismiss certain New Matter cla*s and issues which are frivolous by applicable laws. The Plti. was recently released to general population at SCI-Smith- field (Huntingdon, PA) after being officially oppresseet in soli- tary confinement for four (4) years, six (6) months, and twenty- twej(22) days. He must be placed on a "Call-Out" list to use thelaw library and is therefore unable to cite any applicable case} law, etc* in support of his arguments. Pltf. requests lib- eral4 construity and the protections afforded by the Court con- cer?ing these argument matters. IV. VERI FI CATION Pltf. hereby verifies that all the information contained in Y is Answer to Barbacci' s New #atter, his Motion to Strike Def. Barbacci's New Matter, and this Supporting Brief are both trui and correct to the best of his information and belief; and that tke attached "Exhibit A" is a photocopy of the Sheriff's Sett rn fors received by the Cumberland County Sherif:r s Office; purOuant to 19 Pa.C.S. 64904 concerning "unsworn falsification to 4uthorities," subject to penalties for perjury. • V. I CONCLUSION (3) WNMPO88, Pltf. requests this Honorable Court to consider . granting Pltf.I s Motion to Strike Defendant Berbacci's Now latter as being untimely filed, prejudicial to Pltf., and thus WAND. He also asks the Court to . consider striking the Answer of Barbac- ci to Pltf.'s Complaint to being untimely filed. Should the Cour-# rule that Barbacci' s Now latter has been timely filed, Pltf. requests the Court to strike and/or dismiss those Now Mat- ter *aims and issues which are deemed frivolous by law or court ruleot to issue an Order for further discovery proceedings, and alloy the Pltfo to litigate his case in pursuit of recovery and restoration for his personal injuries, losses, damages, and other feesrand expenses incurred as a result of litigating APis action. In kindness, ?a,3?loa /s/ James A. Paluch, Jr. James A. Paluch, Jr., Pltf. BQ-3" 69 SCI-Saithfield Dated: December 31, 2008 1120 Pike Street P.O. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 . Pro So cc: 'Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. (w/ encls. ) !Alan Gold, Bsq./Def. Barbacci (w/ encls.) file • (4) y » » a LIJ i _i IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLARD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. , ; Plaintiff ; CIVIL ACTION V. ; NOS. 08-4835 s PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., ; QION. EDGAR I. BAYLEY) PLAINTIFR' S MOTION TO STRIKE CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS wr 0 • AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, James A. Paluch, Jr., pre so, and pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.roc. Rule 1028, et al. to strike the i Corrections Defendants' preliminary objections as follows: 1. This civil action at law was in.tiated by the Plain- tiff, James A. Paluch, Jr. ("Pltf. ") , a state prisoner former- ly ? onfined in the Special Management Unit ("SKU") at the Stale Correctional institution at Camp Hill ("SCI-Camp Hill"), punt to 42 USC 81983, Pennsylvania state tort law (Pa.R. Civ»Proe. Rule 1001, et set,., and ether applicable laws of the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of` P sylvania. 2. The Corrections Defendants ("Defs.") include the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections ("PA D®C"), a Common- we th corporation, bureau, and agency; as well"as employees of (the PA DoC at SCI-Camp Hill. 3. On July 31, 2008, pursuant to the Prisoner' s Mail- belRule, the Pltf. initiated Civil Action No. 08-4835 by fi34.ing a Complaint. In summary, Pltf. asserts and avers that he was issued a false misconduct report for which he was found 'lty due to Def. Moslak's denying him of due procesa.to his do stitutionally protected liberty interests. 08-4835 at pa as. 57-85, 100-1139 126-164• Pltf. also assert and avers th4t Defs. Simpson, Ayers, and Yohn were verbally harassing and threatening kin. Id. at paras. 36-42, 91-969 100-112, 119- 1219 126-1399 142-1529 165-1719 209-216, 57-59• In addition, Defs. Huber and Kline confiscated Pltf.'s personal property as a means to harass him. Id. at 86-89, 165-170. Personal prop- erty was not returned to Pltf. or lost or destroyed. Id. at paras. 171-177• 4. On September 23, 20089 pursuant to the Prisoner's Mailbox Rule, the Pltf. initiated Civil Action No. 08-6175 by filing a Complaint. In summary, Pltf. asserts and avers that Def. Ayers continued to verbally harass him. 08-6175 at paras. 15-18, 20. Ayers' harassment turned to threats. Id. at paras. 19. Ayers battered the Pltf. by gripping and pushing his ex- tremely roughly. Id. at paras. 20-21. Def. Yohn joined in on verbally karassing Pltf. Id. at para. 22. Yohn issued Pltf. a fabricated misconduct report to Pltf. Id. at para. 25. Def. Noslak denied Pltfo due process protections during his miscon- duct hearing which harmed Pltf.'s liberty interests in not be- ing confined to disciplinary status in the SIFT. Ian. at paras. 27-43• P1tf. discovered that personal property was missing from his stored property. Id. at paras. 44-50. Def. Simpson sex- ually harassed Pltf. in the presence of other SKU prisoners. I de at paras. 51-56. Defs. Ayers and Yohn created a danger to Pltf. to be assaulted by other prisoners when they openly spoke shout Pltf.' s criminal caso in an effort to incite "black" prisoners in the SMU. Id. at para. 58. 5. The PA DoC Defso have attached what appears to be a true and correct copy of Pltf.'s Complaint which is marked as Exhibit "A". For all intents and purposes, Pltf. refers to Exhibit "A" as attached to Defs.' Preliminary Objections for this Court's review. 6. Pltf. is having problems comprehending what the word "demur" means as it cannot be found in the Black's Law Diction- ary because that particular page is missing. At the present, Pltf. is awaiting approval to use the facility's law library. (2) To this extent, Pltfo is without sufficient knowledge to formu- late, a belief or opinion as to how to respond to to the Defs.' deer pleadings on page two (2) of their Preliminary Objections to Olaintiff's Complaints. He is requesting; the Court, if ne- cessary,, to allow him an additional thirty (30) days to compre- hend the meaning.of demur to provide a more informed response. However, for purposes of the Defs.' demur Td. at para. 4 (a)- (h) in both 08-4835 and 08-6175, P1tf* responds as follows: (a) The PA DoC is not entitled to sovreign immunity with respect to any state law claims. To the extent that the PA DoC Defs. are entitled to sovereign immuni- ty, it only applies to money damages.. The remaining Defs. who are persons have been sued in both their pri- vate and official capacities. To the extent that the persons named as Defs. have been sued in their private capacities, they are directly liable for any state law and tort claims; . (b) The Pltf. has indeed alleged personal involve- ment on the part of all the Defs. named in the Complaints. To the extent that any "specific" involvement was inad- vertently left out of the Complaints, it is likened to minor, excusable neglect, and Pltf's Complaints along with their Facts and Declarations should be liberallyr construed as prisoner pro se pleadings for the effective litigations thereof; (c) The PA DoC is being sued in its official capacity and any supervisory Defso are sued in both their private and official capacities. Respondeat superior is not an absolute immunity and supervisory Defs. can be held di- Tectly liable for either their personal involvement or when there is a sufficient casual connection between supervisor's conduct and constitutional violation, which Pltf: asserts that certain supervisory Defs. in I?ltf.'s Complaints are prima facie liable for; • (d) Def. Selchnea,was responsible for the care, cus- (3) tody, and control of the Pltf. Kelchner is being sued • because he failed miserably in his legal obligations to intervene and protect the Pltf. from the ongoing harass- ment and retaliation and other forms of official oppres- sion that he was being subjected to by the MW staff he supervises. Kelchner failed to intervene and protect the Pltf, and is therefore directly liable pursuant to the Civil Bights Act as well as state law claims; (e) Def. IToslak is not entitled to quasi-judicial immunity as a hearing examiner for the PA DoC;' (f) Verbal harassment-, sexual harassment, threats, battery, loss of personal property, and being subject to receiving false misconduct reports as well as the in- tentional infliction of emotional and psychological dis- tress amounts to a "campaign of harassment" and collec- tively add up to create an overall effect that is uncon- stitutional; (g) The Pltf. did not receive all of the due process • protections which are guaranteed to his and to which he is entitled to in the context of a prisoner misconduct hearing proceeding as well as on appeal with respect to his liberty interests while housed in an atypical and significant hardship (SITU); and, (h) The denial and loss of meal trays, personal pro- 3 pertyr, legal aateri.alo, etc. does not constitute a de minimis injury in the context.of the Civil Rights Act because multiple losses in addition to the campaign of i ! karassuent that Pltf. was subjected to by the Defs. add up to create a single, identifiable hare. 7. Pltf. also asserts that the PA D®C Defso have not included an affidavit verifying the statements made in their respective Preliminary Objections and Memorandums of Law for 08-4835 and 086175 which are not part of the record. Unveri- fie statements not part of the record must be disregarded and. • str'ekes?. Pltf. requests the Court to disregard and strike all statements made in ? the Defs.' Preliminary Objections as i (4) unverifiable and thus prejudicial to Pltf. An OBJECTION is be- ing made and preserved that ? all statements made in the PA SoC Defs.' Preliminary Objections (Id.), and those specifi- ca1 y detailed in Pltf.'s attached supporting brief are not verified by law and Court rule (Pa.R. Civ.Proc. Rule 206-3). 8. Pursuant to law and Pa. B. Civ.Pro c. Rule 1028(b), all preliminary objections not raised by the PA DoC Defs. in both 08-4835 and 08-6175 are deemed WAIVED. Pltf.'s Complaints and their respective Facts and Declarations are thereby deemed as unopposed and should be accepted as true by the Court and/or oth4r factfinder. • 10 0p WHERMRN9 the Pltf. respeefully requests this Honorable Cou?t to grant his lotion to Strike Corrections Defs.' Preliai- nar* Objections with respect to Civil Actions Nos. 08-4835 and 08-4175, farther granting the relief Pltf. requests therein./ her in, and enter an Order for the same. In kindness, *2&" i /s/ Janes A. Paluch, Jr. James A. Paluch, dr., Pro Se BQ-3769 SCI-Saithfield 1120 Pike Street P.O. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 Pro Be Plaintiff cc: ? Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. (w/encls.) (PA DoC Defs. ) Alan Gold, Esq. (w/encls.) ( Def. Barbacci) { file Dat?d; December 31, 2008 at4ckments P (5) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,, PENN:5TLTTANIA JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION V. NOS. 08-4835, 08-6175 PA SEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) Defendants PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO S TRIK E CORRECTION DEFENDANTS' PULIMINARy OBJECTIONS I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Plaintiff, James A. Paluch, Jr. ("Pltf. ") is a state pri- sen?r, formerly confined at SCI-Camp Hill in tke Special Manage- men? Unit ("SMMU"), and presently confined at SCI-Smitkfield in Hun"ingd n, PA. Pltf. mrougkt tkis action against numerous on- plo*oes at SCI-Camp Hill pursuant to 42 USC 819839 Rule 10019 et soq? of the PA R.Civ.Prec., and all laws and rights under the Centitutions of the United States of America and the Common- wo4tk of Pennsylvania. In Pltf.'s Complaint, he asserts and avers tkat tke Defendants ("Defs. ") leave violated many rights secured to kin in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1983 as well as applicable tort laws of Pennsylvania sack as tke trans- gre?sion of due pree*ss, retaliation, harassment, the loss of per nal property, and other cognizable claims. Pltf* is seek- ing the Court's intervention for tke restoration of justice in tke form of compensatory, punitive, declatory, and injunctive rel.ef amongst other remedies available at law. II. QUESTIONS INVOLVED. 1. SHOULD THE COURT STRIKE THE CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OwBCTIONS AS BEING FRIVOLOUS FOR EACH OF THEIR STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED? Suggestet Answer: Yes. 2. AS TO EACH OF THE STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTER' BY THE CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS IN THEIR SUPPORTING ME- MORANDUM OF LAW FOR 08-4835 AND 08-6175 THE PLAIN- TIFF ANSWERS IN THE NEGATIVE. I III. HISTORY • This is Pltf.'s first state civil suit since Paluch v. Bead, at al. (Civil No. 830) was filed in S®merset County in 2007. Per Order of the Court, this responsive pleading in the fora of a Notion to Strike the Corrections Defendants' Prelim- inary Objections, is due on January 39 2009, or thereabout. This Notion (id.) is a consolidated response of both 08- 4835 and 08-6175 for all intents and purposes of good faith litigation of the claims therein. A third Complaint will be filed (Writ of Summons issued per Order of Court on November 14, 2006) and Pltfe will thereafter move to consolidate all three (3) civil actions to ease: related difficulties. On December 189 2008, after serving four (4) years, six (6) months, and twenty-two (22) days in solitary confinement under official oppression of the Pennsylvania Dept. of Correc- tions ("PA DoC"), Pltf. was released to general population. He has since been waiting to be placed on an approved "Call-Out" to utilize the law library and has been denied meaningful time to prepare this Notion. Pltf. will attempt to address only the claims and issues which the Defs. raise in their Preliminary Objections as they apply to both 08-4835 and 08-6175 in similarity. Pltf. suffers from acute carpel tunnel syndrome and complications from what he believes are brain-related injuries which interferes with his ability to concentrate. IV. ARGUMENT/FACTS 1. The Court should strike the PA DOC Defs.' Prelimi- nary Objections as being frivolous for each of their statement of issues presented in both 08-4835 and 08-6175. Pltf. will attempt to address the issues in the order as the PA DOC Defs. preg3ent them. A. KELCHNER/SUPERVISORT DEFENDANTS Pltf. concedes that Defs. Brannigan and Patton • shoix1d be dismissed from 08-4835• See: 08-4835 Para. 267. As (2) to D fs. Kelchner, Southers, and Kreider who act under color of stag law, Pltf. has properly alleged facts to establish a pri- ma cie that their "lack of care" towards Pltf. still renders then subject to direct liability, "even if not subject to respon- dea superior. Pltf. isn't suing Kelcbner for failing to pro- ces prisoner grievances or misconduct appeals as the Defs. ab- sur y claim. For example, in Count III of 08-4835 (p• 30), Plt . properly raises that Kelchner violated Pltf.'s rights by failing to preserve and protect video surveillance evidence for a zisconduct hearing proceeding whisk would have proved his innocence and would have substantially prevented his from losing ri is and privileges he had while on Phase Two (2) (11P2") and bei g subject to disciplinary custody status on Phase Five (5) ("P?") while in the SNUt an atypical and significant hardship in elation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. Kelcbner had a duty to protect Pltf.'s civil rights by allowing his to calf witnesses on his behalf which Sandin v. Conner (S.Ct. 1990 in support of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U. S. 539 (1974) was . designed to protect. Even if negligence is not cognizable under 42 USC 819839 Kel?kner is also being sued pursuant to state tort laws as pro- perly raised by the Pltf. See: 08-4835 Count III (p. 30), count I® (p. 31) ; 08-6175 Count I (p. 8). and Count V (p. 12) . Per?onal involvement is not only properly alleged in the Pltf'.'s Facts and Declarations, but more specifically in 08-4835 Paras. 2471 2509 253-549 2599 and 256; 08-6175 Paras. 669 and 77-79• The same, as likewise, applies to Defs. Southers and Kreider. Geite1 v. PA State Board of Funeral Directors, 755 A.2d 7509 755+56 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2000) (Defs. negligent or at fault because of s "failure to supervise properly" his employee). The st"dards for "negligence" can be found at Geisel at 756 f. 40 quoting, Colston v. Southeastern PA Transp. Aut_ho,, 679 A.M.299 (Pa. Cawlth. 1996). Pltf. has properly shown that K elc]aner, Soothers, and. Kreider were made aware of the harass- ment and retaliation he was being subjected to by SMU guards i (3) and yet failed to intervene to prevent these abuses, thus in • both their private and official capacities are liable for the claims being made agas.nst thee. Also, Pltf. is not an attorney and should not be kel d to any strict rules which rewire every Court rule and procedure to be followed. Rewiring that the Pltf, indicate if Kelckner, Southers, and Kreider were present at the time of the violations when they occurred is not whollyr necessary because Pltf, properly asserts their involvement in the ;grievances (DC-804s) and misconduct (DC-141) as well as their appeals. Because the Pltfe has properly identifie& these documents in his Complainta, the Court should consider tkem as supporting evidence. After all, they will be considered by a fac?findearin determining whether or not liability exists. Pltf1 i . asks the Court to excuse such a minor technicality, ex cus?ble neglect, and in the kindness of liberal construity.. Lilowise, this should apply to any claims of the Defs. that the Plti. doesn't indicate how they would be aware of the actions of tke other Defso which Pltf. asserts is frivolous. B. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS • Pltf. is very such confused as to why or how the Defso raised this as an issue. The Defs. apparently either did not read the Complaints or are attempting to manipulate tke truth-determing process of this Court. The PA DoC is being suer. in its "official" capacity. (08-4835 at para. 2; 08-6175 at jara. 2.)_ The remaining Defs. as persons are being sued in either their "official" and "private* capacities, or both. In 08-4835 Counts III, IV VIII, and 08=6175 Counts I and V. Pltf. is either requesting punitive, declatory, or injunctive relief forwhick the PA DoC can be held accountable for. Therefore, thi$ issue as presented by the Defs.. is frivolous. What's mare, the PA DOC as a Def. is not entitled to any Bleienth Amendment immunity. They waive such immunity because the1PA DoC is a state agency which receives and accepts Federal funds. See: Miller v. Texas Tack Univ. Health Sciences Center, • 421' F.3d 342 (C.A.5-Tex.-2005) . The Defs. claim is, frivolous. (4) C. MOSLAK/QUASI-JUDICIAL IMMUNITY The United States Supreme Court has clearly ruled in Cleavinger v. Saxner, 106 S.Ct. 4969 474 U.S. 193 (U.S.Ind. 1985).that disciplinary hearing officers in prisons are not quasi-judicial officers whom are entitled to absolute immunity. Def. Yoslak is a hearing examiner of the PA DoC and whom is em- ployed by that state agency. Yoslak began his employment in the PA DoC as a guard and was eventually promoted to the position of intelligence captain whose assignment was to oversee institution security. _ He enjoys a special relationship with the other Defs. named in these Complaints as "co-workers". Any credibility de- terminations Moslak makes with regards to the misconduct charges brought against Pltf. by his fellow co-workers were all exclus- ively in favor of the SNU staff named in these Complaints. As the Supreme Court ruled, Yoslak's position is rather akin to that of an "adjudicator in the school disciplinary process" whose re- spo4sibilities.were to "judge whether there have been violations of Ockool regulations and, if so, the appropriate sanctions for i the 'violations," Id* at 502, quoting, mood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 3089 95 S.Ct. 992 (1975). Moslak is not licensed to practice law nor are his respon- sibilities to :decide constitutional matters for which he has no trained experience. He is not an "officer of the Court" by any meaajs and presents no evidence that he is. Moslak's ability to serve as a prison hearing examiner cannot be equated to service upon a traditional parole board. The (parole) board is a "neu- tral,': detached" hearing body. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 4719; 489 (1972). The parole board member has been described as an *partial professional serving essentially "'as an arm of the sentencing judge.'" Cleavinger at 502, quoting, Sellars v. Pro- cunier, 641 F.2d at 1302, n. 15. See also: Wolff, supra. at 561.; Cleavinger and Ponte v. Real, 471 U.S. 491 (1985) remain as precedent cases of the Supreme Court. The Defs. present no pergiuasive authority arguing otherwise. They simply try to de- (5) ceive the Court by attempting to manipulate the language of the law. Defs. are hanging on the word "hearing examiner" which is and can be a term used to for both the PA DoC and the Parole Board. Upon closer inspection, the Third Circuit cases which the Defs. rely upon are only applicable to the Parole Hoard, and those rulings are not extended to the PA DoC, regretably for Moslpk. The Defs. merely try to persuade the Court that the PA DoC and the Parole Board are "administrative cousins," but once again fail to present any evidence to the same. To equate that Moslak is situated very similarly to an "ad4nistrative law judge" is ridiculous. The Defs. claim that Mosl?k does not "work with the fellow employees who ledges the c'haroe against the inmate (sic) upon whoa they sit in judgment" is W?olly debatable. Again, Moslak presents no evidence in sup- portof his claims. Moslak is not entitled to quasi-judicial immity by law. It has also been alleged by the Pltfo in his Comptaints that Moslak had the opportunity to review valuable videp evidence which would have favored the Pltf. If Moslak in- . deedlwas a quasi-judicial officer, he would not have relied on the Unworn second-hand testimony of Def. Kreider and since the spoliation of the video surveillance was a key factor, Pltf. more likely than not would have been exonerated of the charges against him. Instead, Moslak conspired w?' his De is co-worker fs;•) employees by choosing to disregard due process pro- tections tections thereby causing Pltfe to suffer the loss of privileges and being subject to atypical disciplinary status in the SMU. Mos14k's attempts to present himself as a quasi-judicial officer is wally frivolous. D. DUE PROCESS/MIS CONDUCT PRO(MEDINGS Pltf., while at SCI-Camp Mill, was confined in the SMU, where the prison conditions are designed to oppress prisoners whom the PA DoC and its prison officials dei6m as dan- getftisq either physically or intelli,gentlyp utilizing the con trot aechanism of solitary confinement. Prisoners in the state (6} prison. general population, and the Restricted Housing Units • ("NUB") are not subject to the atypical and significant hard- ships that the SKU,presents. The SKU can best be described as a de y-by-day assault on a prisoners' physical and mental well- bei#g. It is a place where most prisoners and guards exchange crud. games of intimidation, threats, and violence, although the lather has a much greater force of resources to oppress the prisoners in their (lack of) care, custody, and control. It is a place where guards steal, damage, alter, destroy, and lose prisoners' personal property. It is a place that the good people of Pwmaylvania need to close down in order to reduce the danger of the "revolving door of victimization" which awaits them. The Defs. quote the Wolff case, but forgot to mention the San 4n v. Conner case (115 S. 0t. 2293) which applies to Wolff as it applies to the Pltf. In this case, Pltf. was denied both his rigbJt to call witnesses (who were of no danger or consequence to either Pltf., Moslak, or SMII staff) and to present documentary, evidence (video surveillance, etc.) in his defense. Also, as Pltfli. intends to show the factfinder, Moslak also failed to pro- vide! Pltf. with a written statement (or rationale) by Moslak of the bvidence relied upon and the reasons for the disciplinary action. At best Moslak's rationale was ambiguous. Pursuant to the PA DoC Policy DC-AID 801, Moslak was in- deedrequired to determine a finding of guilt in the context of prisoner misconduct based upon a "preponderance of the evidence" (DC- 801 OVI.I.1, effect. December 14, 2006). Moslak' s argu- ment?that he was free to base his decision on other evidence be- side the video surveillance is also frivolous. The eye of the came a is impartial to both parties and both the Third Circuit and ?he PA Courts have ruled that when video surveillance is avaiXable as evidence, it is relevant, even inside the prisons. By way of further argument, the video surveillance used by *a SCI-Camp Hill facility is believed to be recorded on a digital video recorder system which recycles itself every five (7) (5) days. Def. Southers was not the only person who had access • to the video surveillance evidence being called as a witness in the respective misconduct hearing proceedings. Pltf. asserts and avers that both the Security Office and Def. K elchner had access as well. The misconduct hearings were either held before the five (5) day recycling period or on the fifth (5th) day be- fore it was in danger of being recycled. Moslak made no effort to contact either the Security Office # or K elchner to ensure that the video surveillance in question 'would be preserved and downloaded onto a discs per the Pltf.'s request at the hearings. P1tf* also requested Kelchner to preserve the video evidence in question through the use of an "Inmate's Bequest to Staff [ember" (DC-135A) fora separately, but his request was denied. So such for a so-called quasi-judicial officer, eh? Pltf. doesn't expect a full panoply of rights to which a crimpn.al defendant is entitled to, but he does have a constitu4 tionial right to the basic protections and safeguards of due pro- Go seti when charged with a misconduct report, esp. when he is claming actual innocence, and Moslak and his co-workers were f"ul.l.y aware of the consequences Pltf. would be subjected to upon a fil ding of guilt. Moslak, Kelehner and other Defs. violated Pltf'.'s due procesa rights, that is, by law. Therefore, Defs.' alai* that they did not violate Pltf.'s due process rights is frivolous. B. HARASSMENT, THREATS, & PERSONAL PROPERTY The Defs. claim that their use of offensive and racist language toward-':him as well as other verbal taunts such as dosing and other inappropriate: language is deminimis.' They claim that Simpson's sexual harassment of Pltf. is de minimis.. They claim that the loss of Pltf.'s photographs (which he was giv4n permission to possess but did not own) is de minimis. Thei further claim that such actions do not violate the Civil Rights Act. Pltf. has been unable to research the cases that thejDefs. cite. Even if these forms of harassment, threats, and • j (8) loss or destruction of Pltf.'s personal property does not con- stitute a Civil Rights Act violation, they still violate the laws of the Commonwealth pf Pennsylvania by statute and the Defs. have been sued according to tort law claims. However, Pltf. asserts that the respective Defs. can be sued on a "totality of conditions" theory pursuant to the Eighth (8th) Amendment. Collectively, Pltf. has established that the Defs. have acted in a "campaign of harassment" against him. Even if these viola- tions may not be unconstitutional on their own, they add up to. creaate an overall effect that is unconstitutional. See: Palmer v. dlohuson, 193 F.3d 356 (5th Cir. 1999). The U.S. Supreme Cou:k has also recognized that multiple conditions add up to cre0te a single, identifiable harm. Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. at 305 (1991). Both 08-4835 and 08-6175 substantiate the "to- talalty of conditions" theory with precendential law. Therefore, the Defs. claim is frivolous. e ? e • v. OTHER SUPPORTING FACTS "It is not necessary that Complaint(s) identify the spe- cific legal theory of the ,underlying claim, but rather it must agr se the defendant of the claim being asserted and summarize the essential facts to support that claim." Grossman v. Barke, 868 A.2d 5619 568 (Pa. Super. 2005). Pltf asserts that if any i spe ific information was not included with his legal theories in the Complaints, it was not intentional.. Interestingly, the Defi. never argued as to how they were prejudiced by Pltf.'s me4 ect. The Complaints are pro se filings by a prisoner and sho:?].d be liberally construed as such.. It is well known that state prisoners have a liberty in- terest protected by the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment's Due Pro- ces? Clause in avoiding assignment to (a,) state's superman pri?ou, as such assignment imposes an atypical and significant hardship on a prisoner in relation to ordinary incidents of pri0on life. See: Williamson v. Austin, 125 S.Ct. 23849 2394 (9) (2000 . Pltf. asserts for the record and avers that if William- son applies to prisoners who may be considered for superman plat meat, such as the SMII, the ruling should also apply when pris3ners housed in and under such atypical and significant harsl?ips are being considered in misconduct hearing and demotion pros e.dings.since the consequenc* of a prisoner being sent back to P involves a more severe sanction than a general population or prisoner would normally receive. When Pltf. lost his P2 stn s and was sent back to P5, he just didn't suffer being sanc- tion d to 60 days of disciplinary program, but an additional 180 ys in solitary confinement (minimum) since Pltf. would be alsoibe required to serve a minimum of 60 days.on Phase Four ("P4 ) , 60 days on Phase Three ("P3"), and 60 days on P2 before, being considered for release from the SMII. Prison officials are eing given too much authority by the Courts to abuse the unbr'dled discretion in determining the fate of prisoners in the Without more appropriate safeguards and protections, these abuses will continue much to the detriment of not only • pri +ners,, but to the staff who work in the SKU, and society. "In a 81983 action, Pltf. must prove two (2) essential elejoentd: (1). that conduct complained of was committed by per- son Acting under color of state law, and (2) that conduct de- prived party of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of the U.S." Atwell v. Lavan 2008WL822110, 200*WL822110*4 (M.D.Pa. 2008), quoting,,Parratt v. Taylor, 101 S. C# . 1908 (1981) ; Kost v. Kozakiewicz, 1 F. 3d 176, 184 (3rd Cir.j 1993). See also: Oatess v. Dorris, 637 A.2d 627, 629 (Pa. Sup?r. 1994)(seeks injunctive relief). Also: Johnston v. Leh- man; ; 609 A.2i 880 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1992) ( prisoner may properly state 8_MWelain if such discretionary decision was made by reason of paiooner•s exercise of his constitutional rights). State law retaliation claims are also cognizable for cause of action and for punitive damages. Maylie y. National Raikoad Passenger Corp., 601 A.2d 308 (Pa. Super. 1991) (alle- (10) gatiOn of systematic retaliation constitutes "prima facie tort" . in sate court). See also: Field v. Phila. Elec. Co., 565 A.2d • r ? U 1170'i(Pa. Super.)(ye.ar unknown). Preliminary objections should only be sustained when it is c rtain that the law will not permit recovery. Harris v. Horn 747 A.2d 1251 (Pa. Cswlth. 2000). When ruling upon preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, the Court must accept as true all well-pleaded alle- gations of material fact as well as all reasonable inferences dedu ible therefrom. Yount v. PA DoC, 886 A.2d 1163, 1167 (Pa. Crawl h. 2005) . Personal injury Pltfs. have right to file preliminary ob- ject?ons raising any appropriate defense or objections Pltf. may havelhad to Defs.' preliminary objections. Ambrose v. Cross. ft e_* Condominiums, 602 A.2d 864, 8(6 (Pa. Super. 1992) ; Gale v. t sti C iv Def to be in W Catholic Medical Center Tastwick, Inc. ,. Fitzgerald Morey 698 A.2d 647, 649 (Pa. Super. 1997); American Future Sys- Inc. v. BBB, 872 A.2d 12029 1215 (Pa. Super. 2005). "Supervisor may be held liable under 91983 only upon 'ng either that supervisor personally was involved in con- tional violation or that there is sufficient casual connee- between supervisor's conduct and constitutional violation." Ft v. DBTNTIFF, 330 F.3d 6819 689 (C.A.3-Tex.-2003)., quoting, pkins v. Belt, 828 F.2d 298, 303-04 (5th Cir. 1987). (Em- Is mine.) Pltf. has established a prima facie for both a 1 Rights Act and state tort law violation with regard to . K elchner, Southers, and Kreider and will further be sub- .tiated through discovery proceedings, should the Court allow. Pltf. also OWECTS to the PA DoC Defs.' failure to verify s that are not part of the record. No affidavit is attached he preliminary objections asserting that statements were under penalty of perjury, thus they are unverified and must tricker. hltf. requests that the Court all statements made heir preliminary objections to 08-4835 and 08-6175, but (11) specifically and especially in their Supporting Memorandum of Law as follows: A. 0_84835,. 1. "As a Department hearing examiner, Def. Moslak's position is relatively independent and impartial...". (p. 5); 2. "In this case, the Department's hearing examiners are riot part-time adjudicators and they do not hold any other positions." (p. 7); 3. "While (hearing examiners) are employees of the (PA)+ DoC, their sole right function is to hear testimony and ad- Judi cate inmate disciplinary charges." (p. 7); 4. "(Dearing examiners) are not subordinates of the Supgrintendent of the institution. Bather, they report to the Chiof Hearing Examiner in Camp Hill." (p. 7); 5. "(Hearing examiners) (Moslak) do not (does not) 'wo* with the fellow employee who lodges the charge against the inmate (sic) upon whom they sit in Judgment."' (p. 7) ; ?i. "Pennsylvania's hearing examiners are 'profession- al hearing officers' and are situated very similarly to admini- str4tive law judges." (p. 7); 7• "...hearing examiners perform a similar function to That of their administrative cousins on the Board of Probation and Farole." (p. 7) ; 8. "Further, a finding of guilt in the context of an inmate (sic) misconduct need not be based on a preponderance of tkeevidence, but merely on some evidence." (p. 8); and, 9. "...Moslak is free to base his decisions on the misconduct reports or any other evidence, so as long as there is some evidence to support his findings of guilt." (p. 9). B. 08-6175 1. "Moslak is immune from suit with respect to any decision he made in the context of an inmate (sic) misconduct hewing." (p. 6) ; • 2. (same as Sec. V.A.1 above) (p. 6) ; (12) • 3. "In this case, the Department's hearing examiners are not part-time adjudicators and they do not hold any other positions." (p. 7) ; 4. (same as Sec. V. A. 3 above) (P. 7) ; 5• (same as Sec. V.A. 4 above) (p. 7) ; 6. (same as Sec. V. A. 5 above) (p. 7-8) ; 7. (same as Sec. V. A.6 above) (p. 8) ; 8. ( same as Sec. V.A.7 above) (p. 8) ; 9• (same as See. V. A. 8 above) (p. 9) ; and, 10. (same as Sec. V. A. 9 above) (p. 9). Since none of these statements are No included as part of the record, an affidavit asserting that these statements must be viade under penalty of perjury. 4allman v. Martins 889 A.2d 6499! 652 (Pa. Cawlth. 2005). (Defs. need a verification for facts that do not appear in the record). The PA DoC Defs. have also waived their preliminary ob- S I jections to any claims, issues, facts, and declarations made: by the?P1tf. in his Complaints which were not properly raised in bot? their Preliminary Objections and Memorandum of Law. Be- caule Pltfo verified the Facts and Declarations of both 08-4835 and 1 08-6175 the Court should accept tken as being; true. VI. ' VERIFICATION Pltf. verifies that all statements, facts, and informa- tio contained herein are both true and correct to the best of his., knowledge and that any falsehoods may subject me to the pen4ties for perjury, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. 84904 concerning "unworn falsification to authorities". VII} CONCLUSION WHM8MPORB, for all the above reasons, Pltf. respectfully req?ests this Honorable Court to grant his Motion to Strike the Corrections' Defendants' Preliminary Objections, and enter an Order for the same. i I (13) • Dated.: December 319 2008 attachments In kindness, t1311 66 /s/ James A. Paluch, Jr. James A. Paluch, Jr. , Pro So BQ- 3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street P.U. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 cc: Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. (w/encls.) (PA DoC Defs. ) Alan Gold, Bs4. (w/encls.) ( Def. Barbacci) file • • (14) . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAME$ A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff V. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. 9 Defendants CIVIL ACTION (Nos. o8-4835 (HON. EDGAR B. BAILEY) PLAINTIFF' S VERIFICATION FOR MOTION AND SUPPORTING BRIEF TO STRIKE CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS I. James A. Paluch, Jr*, being the Plaintiff, do hereby rerit'y that all statements, facts, and information contained in =the aforementioned and attached documents are both true and cor- reet! to the best of.my knowledge; that I am, due to my indigency, una* a to attach any documents in support of the aforementioned • and ttached documents unless the Court provides me an alterna- tiv means to; and that any falsehoods may subject me to the pe ties for perjury, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. 84904 concerning "un worn falsifileation to authorities". 3o verified, on this 31st day of December 2008, in the City of Huntingdon, Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, as executed by: /s/ !James A. Paluch, Jr. Janos A. Paluch, Jr. BQ- 769 SCI-Smithfield 112 Pike Street, P.O. Box 999 Hun ingdon, PA 16652-0999 Pro Ise Plaintiff att4chments oc: Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. (w/encls.) (PA DOC Defs. ) Alan Gold, Esq. (w/encls.) ( Def. Barbacci) file 1 _, ??? b w .? ?.: c e .. U • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James A. Paluch, Jr. 9 hereby certify that I an this 31st, day of December 2008, pursuant to the Prisoner's `Mailbox Rule' (Thomas v. Slash, 781 A.2d 1709 176 (Pa.Super. 2001) and _Reichard-Copestakes, 925 A.2d 874, 875 (Pa.Super. 2007), depos- itink into the prison mailbox, via first-class postage prepaid mailo the following legal documents with the Cumberland County Pro*onotary, to the persons so named below: Plaintiff's Praecipe for Signature Authorization; Plain- tiff? s Answer and Motion to Strike Def. ftrbaeci• s New Matter; Plai?tiffl s Motion to Strike Corrections Defendmnts' Preliminary Obje tions with Brief and Memorandum of Law; Proposed Orders; and Perification. i i Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. Alan Gold, Esq. Asst. Counsel - PA DoC Gold & Ferrante, P.C. 55 Utley Drive 261 Old York Road Camp Hill, PA 17011-8028 Suite 526 Jenkintown, PA 19046 In kindness, 6K'&-.e /s/ James A. Paluch, Jr. James A. Paluch, Jr. BQ- 3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street P.O. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 cc: j R. Dorian, Esq. (w/encls) (PA DoC Defs. ) A. Gold, Esq. (w/encls) ( Def. Barbacci) file U t ? J'- r ?g.. .... IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF • CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. , Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION V. : NOS. 08-4835 s PA D? PT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL, : (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) Defendants PLAINTIFF" S NOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE SUPPORTING DO CUKENTS AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, James A. Paluch, Jr., pro se, and moves the Court pursuant to Pa.R.CiV.Proc. Rule 248, re- queAing an extension of time to file photocopies of documents in s pport of his Answer and Motion to Strike Def. Barbacci•s New atter as well as his Notion to Strike Corrections Defs.' Prel' inary Objections, and presents the following in support 1. Pltf. filed 08-4835 and 08-6175 pursuant to 42 USC 61983, Pa.R.Civ.Proe. Rule 10010 et seq. for state tort claims, and the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions and their laws. 2. Pltf. is a former state prisoner confined in tke Spe al Management Unit in SCI-Camp Hill. Pltf. is now confined in SCI-Smithfield, The PA DoC Defs. are both a PA state bureau and agency; the remaining Defs. are persons employed at SCI- Cam Hill. 3. By order of this Court dated November 3, 2008, P1tf. wa.s'granted sixty (60) days to file his response to Defs.' pre- limi?n r" objections in the Judge's Chambers (Hon. B-ayl ey) . 4• Pltf. was released from long-term solitary confinement on } ecember 18, 2008. He has attempted to secure photocopies of leg eXhibits in support of his Answer and Motion to Strike Def. Ba0accits New Matter as well as his Motion to Strike Corrections DefO.' Preliminary Objections to no avail. For example, 'Pltf. wanied to attach a copy of the Sheriff's Return., a grievance form, etc 5. Pltf. is uncertain of whether supporting documents are abs lately necessary, but if so, at the discretion of the Court, Plt . requests fifteen (15) days to make photocopies and file them wit this Court in support of the aforementioned Notions. NHBRMRE9 Pltf. respectfully requests that this Court gra4t this Notion for Enlargement of Time to File Supporting Doc- umeots. Affidavit a Itagbed. No supporting brief file . In kindness, 141311031 Dated: December 31, 2008 6c:` R. Dorian, a Alan Gold, file Esq. (PA DoC Defs. ) Esq. (Def. Barbacci) /s/ James A. Paluch, Jr. James A. Paluch, Jr.?? SG (address on record) , -_.sh • IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMS A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff j V. 4 PA l EPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL, Defendants • CIVIL ACTION NOS. 08-4835 & 08-6175 • (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INCAPACITY Plaintiff, Janes A. Paluch, Jr., hereby declares and re- prelents that he: 1. Made several attempts to secure photocopies of sup- por is?g documents for both his Answer and Notion to Strike De- fen , t Barbacci's New Batter as well as Notion to Strike Cor- rec?ions Defendants" Preliminary Objections with accompanying f Brief and Memorandum of haw from the facility library; and, 2. That the facility library to date has denied his re- pealed requests to use the leisure library for photocopies; and, 1 3. That he has been waiting to be approved to be placed an scheduled Call-Out to utilize the facility's main law li- bra? for photocopies to no avail; and, 4. That the facility, as of the scorning of December 31, 2009 has been under an "emergency lockdown," further incapaci- tat' g the Plaintiff from securing photocopies of his supporting do ents. This affidavit is both true and correct to the best of Plaintiff's knowledge, subject to penalty of perjury for any fal ehoods, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. 194904, concerning "unsworn fal ification to authorties". Executed this 31st day of Decen- berJ2008 in the City of Huntingdon, Huntingdon County, PA. In kindness, /a/ James A. Paluch, r. James A. Paluch, Jr.,, Pro Be cc: Dorian, Esq. (PA DoC Defs.) (address on record) • Gold, Esq. (Def. Barbacci) it e • J A% S IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NOS. 08-4835, V. PA ?RPAROIENT OF 0ORRBCTIONS9 BT ?L., : Defendants : (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE FOR NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS: TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF THIS COURT: I, James A. Paluch, Jr., being the Plaintiff in the abe a captioned matter concerning Civil Actions Nos. 08-4935, 08- 1759 and 0"588, hereby notify this Honorable Court of my i xe change of address from SCI-Fayette, I! Overlook Drive, La- Bel e, PA 15450-1050 to the following: James A. Paluch, Jr. BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street P.0. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652 Be advised that when the Court communicates with the Pla6tiff, the Court MUST mark the outside of the envelope "Leal bail" to ensure that it is treated as privileged com- M=i cation. Thank you for respecting mar privacy. i Counsel for the Defendants have been advised of the new change of address under separate assistance in this matter. Da?ed: December 29, 2008 cover. Thank you for your In kindness:, 4U?" )alag107 /s/ James A. Paluch, J re James A. Paluch, Jr., Pro Be BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652-4999 • cc: file i'. •?. w ., s ? ? ''? _ .t ,.? ' .. JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., PLAINTIFF V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 08-4835 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this -'ZI1 day of January, 2009, IT IS ORDERED that defendants' preliminary objections to plaintiffs complaint shall be decided by this judge on briefs only. dames A. Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769, Pro se SCI Smithfield P.O. Box 666 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652 Raymond W. Dorian, Esquire For Defendants an S. Gold, Esquire 261 Old York Road Jenkintown, PA 19046 For Defendant Kristen Barbacci Court Administrator :sal 0 Edgar B. Bayley, J. r- Ls LLS C+J • INt THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAME§ A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff t PAD ARTMENT OF : COR CTIONS, ET AL., j Defendants CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-4835 (HON. EDGAR B. BATLEY) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT DARBACCI' S NOTICE OF SUBPOENA NUNC PRO TUNC i • AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, James A. Paluch, Jr.,, ("Pltf.") pro pop pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.Proc. Rule 248, and moves this Honor- abl e!Gourt for an enlargement of time in which to present his ob- jectess to ¦ Defendant Kristen Barbacci ("Def. Barbacci") and ?er attorney's Notice of Subpoena to acquire Pltf.'s medical records. This Notion is being filed nunc ;pro tune and for the reasons that follow, Pltf. requests an enlargement of time to file his objections: 1 1. Pltf. initiated this civil action at law against Def. Barbacci pursuant to state tort laws as well as the laws of the Cons*itution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and applicable laws;. 2. Def. Barbacci while employed at SCI-Camp Hill as a Physician's Assistant, violated both state and PA Dept. of Cor- rect? ons' policies, etc. when she and co-Defendant Teresa Law ("Der. Law") charged Pltf. for a co-pay medical fee in violation S of both state laws (61 P.S. §10119 et sea.), PA DoC policies, etc. 3. Pltf. offered Def. Barbacci through her attorney, a "preliminary settlement offer" which was liberally reasonable in an attempt to resolve this matter amicably. Def. Barbacci and her attorney have not responded to that proposal, and it is there- fore; deemed denied. A ? ? a E '; ,•7 4. Def. Barbacci mailed a Notice of Intent to Serve Sub- poena with this Court which the Pltf* received in the U.S. Mail on December 16, 2008. 5. Due to other legal matters, many of which involved pre- pariog documents with this Court, and other disruptful events at SCI-Smithfield, Pltf. has been unable to file his objections to Def.'Barbacci's Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoeana. 6. Pltf.'s intent to object involves matters pertaining to the Vrivacy Act as well as the laws of the Commonwealth of PA. 7. Pltf. does not authorize the PA DoC nor its contractors, agen?s, co-employees, affiliates, including Prison Health Services to Zauthorized ease his medical records without his written consent or via an Court Order. 8. Pltf. requests thirty (30) days in which to file his objections to Def. Barbacci's Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoena. 9. The granting of this Lotion would not prejudice any of the Iarties in this case. However, denying the Motion would • Brea ly prejudice Pltf.'s privacy rights. 10. No Supporting Brief or Memorandum of Law is attached. WHEREFORE, Pltf. respectfully requests this Honorable Court to grant the herein Motion and issue an Order permitting him thir- ty (30) days in which to object to Def. Barbacci's Notice of Sub- po en 3,. In kindness, Y? /s/ James A. Paluc?09 James A. Paluch, Jr., Pro Se BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Dated:; January 9, 2009 Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 cc: !Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. (PA DoC Defs. ) Alan Gold, Seq. (Def. Barbacci) file • (2) ?: a :' ? • IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. , Plaintiff V i FA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants 19t? day of January 20090 depositing into the U.S. Mail via the. "Prisoner's Mailbox Rule" (Thomas v. Elash, 781 A.2d 170, 1761 (Pa. Super. 2001)) and first-class postage prepaid, true andj correct copies of the legal documents filed with this Court as indicated to the persons below: Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. (Motion for Enlargement of CIVIL ACTION NOS. (see below) (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLEY) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James A. Paluch, Jr., hereby certify that I am this • PA DoC - Asst. Counsel Office of General Cnsl. 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 Alan Gold, Esq. Gold & Ferrante, P.C. 261 Old York Road Suite #526 Jenkintown, PA 19046 cc Dirian (above) Gold (above) file Time to File Objections to Def. Barbacci's Notice of Subpoena Nunc Pro Tune w/ Order (No. 08-4835) ; and Second Praecipe to Reinstate Writ of Summons (No. 08-6598)) (Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Objections to Def. Barbacci' s Notice of Subpoeana Nunc Pro Tune w/ Order) (No. 08-4835) In kindness, ' ??? ? 1909 /s/ James A. Paluch, Jr. James A. Paluch, Jr. BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 Plaintiff, pro se 0 co •i... . .nib _ ? - .. GOLD & FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD, ESQUIRE ATTY ID NO. 23400 261 OLD YORK ROAD, SUITE 526 JENKINTOWN, PA 19046 (215)885-1118 JAMES A. PALUCH V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, KRISTEN BARBACCI COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 08-4835 RESPONSE OF KRISTEN BARBACCI TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE COMES NOW Kristen Barbacci (`Barbacci"), a named defendant in the above referenced lawsuit, and files this, her Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Answer of Barbacci. Plaintiff argues that as Defendant did not file her answer within twenty days of service on August 26, 2008, her answer should be struck as untimely. Plaintiff further argues that Barbacci's answer is frivolous. Plaintiff's motion should be rejected because (1) Barbacci quickly filed a response once she became aware of the lawsuit; (2) Plaintiff was not prejudiced by the delay; and (3) Barbacci's response is not frivolous. 1. BACKGROUND On August 26, 2008, a copy of the summons and complaint addressed to Barbacci was delivered to Bob Volccak, the "adult in charge" at SCI Camp Hill. (Ex. 1, Sheriffs Return of Service on Barbacci.) Barbacci, however, is not an employee of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections or of SCI Camp Hill. (Ex. 2, Barbacci Affid. at 1-2.) Instead, Barbacci is an employee of Prison Health Services, Inc., ("PHS"). 1 PHS employs Barbacci as a part time physician's assistant at SCI Camp Hill. Id. at 2. In October of 2008, she was only at the facility on Monday, Tuesday, and Friday. Id. She has a mailbox at SCI Camp Hill, which she would check regularly. Id. On or about October 8, 2008, Barbacci found an opened unmarked interoffice envelope in this mailbox. Id. The envelope contained a copy of the Complaint and Summons addressed to Ms. Barbacci. Id. This was the first notice to Barbacci that she had been named in the suit. Id. Barbacci immediately turned the documents over to her supervisor, Natalie Skyes, for delivery to PHS. Id. PHS retained counsel in Pennsylvania, the undersigned, who then filed an answer to Plaintiff's complaint which was docketed on October 30, 2008. Id. II. STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED 1. Should Barbacci's answer be struck as untimely? Answer: no. 2. Should Barbacci's answer be struck as frivolous? Answer: no. III. BARBACCI'S ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRUCK AS UNTIMELY Plaintiff offers two reasons why Barbacci's answer should be struck. First, the answer is untimely, and, second, Plaintiff would be prejudiced by the late filing. Even if the answer was untimely, based upon a service date of August 261", Plaintiff cannot identify any prejudice in his complaint as a consequence of the delay. In fact, Plaintiff never even moved for a default judgment against Barbacci. When a party moves to strike a pleading based on untimeliness, the party filing the document, Barbacci, must demonstrate just cause for the delay. Gale v. Mercy Catholic Medical 2 Center Eastwick. Inc. Fitzgerald Mercy Division, 698 A.2d 647, 650 (Pa. Super. 1997). Barbacci can clearly show just cause for her delay. Someone at SCI Camp Hill, who is not even her employer, was dilatory about delivering the document to Barbacci. Not only does this render appropriate service questionable (Barbacci did not challenge service in her answer), it also offers just cause for Barbacci's delay. As soon as Barbacci had the document in her hands, she immediately forwarded it to her employer, PHS. PHS then retained counsel in Pennsylvania who filed an Answer on her behalf. In DU v. Wilkie Buick Co., the Court reversed a default judgment entered against the Defendant because the Defendant was tardy in filing its answer. 239 Pa. Super. 71, 361 A.2d 823 (1976). The secretary of Defendant's authorized agent received a copy of the complaint, but the secretary failed to forward the complaint and summons in a timely manner. Id. at 73-74, A.2d at 824-25. The Court held, "[w]hile it is regrettable in view of legally-sufficient service of process, that this employee may have been ignorant as to proper procedure and the need for prompt action, the excuse is plausible. It is not that type of excuse, such as dilatoriness by an attorney or failure to act by one who knows its implications, which we would consider inadequate." Id. at 74, A.2d at 825. Moreover, Plaintiff has identified absolutely no prejudice from the delay. All Plaintiff argues is that, "The Pltf. would be greatly prejudiced if the Court did not strike Barbacci's New Matter." (Pl.'s Mot. Strike at 3.) This begs the question of "how"? In Gale, the Court held that as the plaintiff in that case had not demonstrated any prejudice - "any substantial diminution [in Appellant's ability] to present factual information in the event of trial" - the late pleading should not have been struck. 698 A.2d at 650. Plaintiff never moved for default judgment against Barbacci. No discovery has occurred yet in this case. He will in no way be prevented from presenting the necessary facts for trial. This case is on par with Ambrose v. Cross Creek Condominiums, where the Court held: Pa.R.C.P. 1026 provides that a pleading shall be filed within 20 days after service of a preceding pleading. This rule is not mandatory but permissive. We have held that late pleadings may be filed "if the opposite party is not prejudiced and justice requires. Much must be left to the discretion of the lower court." Fisher v. Hill, 368 Pa. 53, 81 A.2d 860 (1951). (Emphasis added.) Paulish v. Bakaitis, 442 Pa. 434, 441-42, 275 A.2d 318, 321-22 (1971). This court has recognized that it is within the sound discretion of the trial court to permit a late filing of a pleading where the opposing party will not be prejudiced and justice so requires. Boarts v. McCord, 354 Pa. Super. 96, 100-101, 511 A.2d 204, 207 (1986), Louis v. Clark, 227 Pa.Super. 547, 550, 323 A.2d 298, 299-300 (1974). Where possible, the rules of civil procedure, including filing rules, should be liberally construed in order to effect equitable results. Pa.R.C.P. 126, Boarts v. McCord, 354 Pa.Super. at 101, 511 A.2d at 207. 412 Pa. Super. 1, 9-10, 602 A.2d 864, 868 (1992). Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Strike should be denied on these grounds. IV. BARBACCI'S NEW MATTER SHOULD NOT BE STRUCK AS FRIVOLOUS Plaintiff states, he "is...unable to cite any applicable law, etc., in support of his arguments" because he has not gained access to the law library but requests that the Court, nonetheless, strike "certain" unidentified matters which are frivolous. (Pl.'s Mot. Strike at 3.) As Plaintiff admits he has no basis for his argument that Barbacci's New Matter is frivolous, the Court should deny Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. 4 V. CONCLUSION Defendant, Kristen Barbacci respectfully requests that the Court deny Plaintiff s Motion to Strike. submitted, FERRANTE, P.C. BY: S. GOLD Attorney for Defendant Kristen Barbacci CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have sent a true and correct copy of Response To Plaintiffs Motion To Strike via U.S. First Class Regular Mail on this date to the following individuals: James Paluch, Jr. BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street P. O. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652 Raymond W. Dorian, Esquire Assistant Counsel Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Governor's Office of General Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 DATE: January 28, 2009 ALAN S. GOLD 6 SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-04835 P. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PALUCH JAMES A JR VS PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL ROBERT BITNER Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon BARBACCI KRISTIN the DEFENDANT at 1000:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of August 2008 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011 by handing to BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit pyb .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscibed to before me this day of gy. Deputy Sher ff A. D. So Answers:i R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 Ex • L IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUCH, Plaintiff, V. ; PENNSLYVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET. AL. Civil Action File No.: 08-4835 Defendants. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF AFFIDAVIT OF KRISTEN BARBACCI PERSONALLY APPEARED before the undersigned officer, duly authorized by law to administer oaths in the state and county aforesaid, KRISTEN BARBACCI, who first being duly sworn, states on oath and deposes as follows: 1. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years, suffer from no impairment and am otherwise legally competent to make this Affidavit. The matters stated in this Affidavit are made from my own personal knowledge. 2. My name is Kristen Barbacci. I am employed as a Physician's Assistant by Prison Health Services, Inc. ("PHS") and am currently stationed at SCI-Camp Hill. cx . 2 3. I am not an employee of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections or of SCI Camp Hill. 4. In October of 2008, I was employed by PHS to work as a Physician's Assistant at SCI Camp Hill on Monday, Tuesday, and Friday. I was not at the facility on Wednesdays or Thursdays. On the days that I worked, I would regularly check my mailbox at SCI Camp Hill for items needing my attention. 5. On or about October 8, 2008, I found an unmarked interoffice envelope in my mailbox at SCI Camp Hill, which contained the complaint of Paluch v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al., Civil Action File No.: 08-4835. I immediately delivered the complaint to my superior, Natalie Sykes, Program Manager for PHS. My understanding is that Ms. Skyes promptly forwarded the complaint to PHS's corporate offices to address. -2- 6. October 8, 2008 is the first date that I received notice that Mr. Paluch had filed any claims against me. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. This the ( (per day of January. 2009. KRI EN BA ACCI Sworn to and Subscribed Before e this the day of _ .2009. JARKKMIC W My Commission Expires: 0MMONWIEALT? H OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTARIAL SEAL PAMELA KLINGER, Notary Public Mechanicsburg Foro, Cumberland County My Commission Expires Oct. 15, 2010 -3- `,rv zkz 77 A ryry ' j,;N 2 9 2009 6 d IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAM93 A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION V. NO. 08-4835 PA bEPARTMENT OF COECTIONS, ET AL., ; (HON. EDGAR B. BAYLBY) Defendants : p B A S R AND NOW, upon this day of January 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Notion for Enlargement of Time to File Objections to Defendant (Kristen) BArbacci's Notice of Oubpoena Nune Pro Tunc, it is hereby ORDBRBD that Plain- tiOf's Notion is GRANTBD. Plaintiff" will be granted thirty (30) days in which to ;file any objections he may have to Defendant Barbacei'a NDUce of Intent to Serve Subpoena from the `date of this Order. If no objections are filed, -Defendant Barbacei's Su'poena may be served accordingly. So ordered. BY COURT- Hon. Edgar B Bayley Court of Common Pleas Judge Cumberland County, PA • y i? . LLJ ! :.i Ls- GOLD & FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD, ESQUIRE ATTY ID NO. 23400 261 OLD YORK ROAD, SUITE 526 JENKINTOWN, PA 19046 (215)885-1118 JAMES A. PALUCH V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, KRISTEN BARBACCI COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 08-4835 RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO OBJECT TO BARBACCI'S SUBPOENA FOR MEDICAL RECORDS COMES NOW Kristen Barbacci (`Barbacci"), a named defendant in the above referenced lawsuit, and files this, her Response to Plaintiff's Request for Enlargement of Time to Object to Barbacci's Subpoena for Medical Records. 1. BACKGROUND Plaintiff James A. Paluch ("Plaintiff') filed a complaint against Defendant Barbacci alleging that he was wrongfully charged four dollars ($4.00) for a visit with Barbacci, a Physician's Assistant, on August 10, 2006. (Pl.'s Compl. ¶¶ 185-202.) Plaintiff specifically alleges that "Barbacci did not offer the Pltf. any medical services on August 10, 2006), and that Plaintiff did not authorize the deduction of four dollars for such visit. Id. ¶¶ 201-202. As Plaintiff is claiming he did not receive any medical services and, thus, Barbacci wrongfully charged the copay on August 10, Barbacci issued a subpoena to obtain Plaintiff's medical records from July 1, 2006 until September 30, 2006 to see when she treated Plaintiff, what services she provided Plaintiff on what date, and what, if any, record of authorization exists concerning the co-payment. II. ISSUES PRESENTED Should the Court quash Barbacci's subpoena to obtain the medical records of Plaintiff on privacy grounds. Answer: No III. ANALYSIS: THE INMATE HAS WAIVED HIS RIGHTS TO PRIVACY IN HIS MEDICAL RECORDS WHEN HE PLACED THE MEDICAL CARE HE RECEIVED AT ISSUE IN THIS CASE. Plaintiff states that he intends to object to Barbacci's subpoena because of the "Privacy Act" and Pennsylvania Law. This case both involves questions of federal and state law. Under federal law, the courts do not recognize a general doctor/patient privilege. Sarko v. Penn-Del Directory Co., 170 F.R.D. 127, 131 (E.D.Pa. 1997). Moreover, Plaintiff has placed his medical treatment at issue in this case. He has contended that he did not receive any medical treatment on a certain date from Barbacci. Barbacci has every right to review Plaintiff's medical records around the time at issue to see what, if any treatment, she provided to Plaintiff. In such a situation, Plaintiff has waived his right to prevent Barbacci from gaining access to Plaintiff's medical records for three months: July, August, and September of 2006. Id. at 13 1 ("[m]oreover, even if we applied Pennsylvania's statutory physician-patient privilege, 42 Pa.Cons.Stan.Ann. § 5929, we would find this privilege waived for similar reasons. Plaintiff alleges that her mental condition necessitated anti-depressant medication that made it difficult to wake up in the morning. Plaintiff may not now claim that records reflecting her need for this medication and whether it had the side effects she alleges to be privileged."); O'Boyle v. Jensen, 150 F.R.D.519, 521 (M.D.Pa. 1993). 2 IV. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, Defendant Barbacci requests that this Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Object to the Subpoena and allow the Subpoena to issue. Respectfully submitted, FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD Attorney for Defendant, Kristen Barbacci 261 Old York Road, Suite 526 Jenkintown, PA 19046 Phone: 215-885-1118, Ext. 201 E-mail: asg@goldferrantelaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have sent a true and correct copy of Response to Plaintiff's Request for Enlargement of Time to Object to Barbacci's Subpoena For Medical Records via U.S. First Class Regular Mail on this date to the following individuals: Raymond W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Governor's Office of General Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 James Paluch, Jr BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street P. O. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652 DATE: February 9, 2009 4 ALAN S. GOLD TM rr ? fl...f ,? 4 W YA, ti c * _. _W" • • HOTIUZ: You have twenty (24) days in which to file an Answer or Response to the claims herein and any failure to do so may result in the Court, making a ruling against you or your client. IN THE GWRT OF 001WON PLIAS 07 C DER LAND MUNTY 9 PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUCK9 JR., : CIVIL ACTI i Plaintiff : r. = NO. 09-4$35 PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ; 117 AL. , Defendants (LION. EDGAR N. BAYLEY) S OzJXC 'S LqPVENA AND NOW, domes the Plaintiff, Xames A. Paluch, J.r. ("Pltf."), and moves this Court pursuant to Pa.E.Civ. Ptoc. RRle 44120 etc. to present the following objections rni; :to seek - a protective other concerning Defendant liar- .bacci's ("Narbacci") subpoena for Pltf.'s medical records, offering the following in support there-of: 1. Pltf. commenced this civil action against emm- pleyees of the. PA Department of Corrections ("PA:DW) and one Prison Health Services ("Pl S") employee whom are-em- ployed at SCI-Camp-.Zil'l (-"SCIC") "pursuant to 42 USC 01993, Pa-#R.Civ.rrod. -Rule 16419 'et seq., and other applicable state laws. 2. Defendants Sarbaeci and Teresa Law ("Law") un- lawfully charged the Pltf. a co-pay fee. for treatment that was not only unrenderei but Zone so without his autheri- satiom in violation of state laws and policies. 3. liarbacci is attempting to seek a subpoena for Pltf:'s medical records from July 1, 2004 to the present. See attached Exhibit "A". 4.. Pltf._objects to the release of all his medical records fromm July 1, 2004 to the present because such re- cordmmare net only irrelevant, but would be burdensome to "ft "2W`1M-C to produce, and extravagantly costly. 5. Pltf. is willing to allow the suUpeena. to tie served on two (2) conditions: 11 (a) That the medical records tie limited to the Non-Pbysieian ftogress vve' Ut6eq Physician's Orders, ,and. any-1106.500 ("Sick l.. Pi-rms!R) during the p eris # of Asst 19 2"6 to August - 31 2406; and, (1i) That the medical records released to Def. Marlacci be-maintained under a Court Protective Order to enabre the privacy- protections afforded to -hior in order to avoid'the disclosure of such personal mattera. G. That the Court, if necessary, conduct an "in camera" 'review -o'f Pltf.' a medical records to determine which de csments are . relevant for release- and 'be suloject to a Court Protective Orden. 7. The olo j ections and request for privacy protec- tions horein are very reasonal?Ie in comparison to weighing A'Orbacci• s jvlill'?: ' 'L9 i. nm to grdnt n h: ant motion interests, and. that _Barbaect will not be pre- the granting of this Ution. A Supporting Br elf is attached hereto. Pltf. respectfully requests this ' ffoner"le Court Ls.Olrjeetf?ng<-to:;:?tafe?Aant Barl?tccls: Suhpeena for Protective Drier. In kindnesm, S/ James A. Palucht d James A. Pal.uchv Jr. -OC3pw BQ-3769 SUI-Smithfield ao9 Dated; Ear 11?9Pike street P.O. Bon »9 Euntingilon,. PA 161652-0999 .Plaintiff, pro as cc: a. Bor an, B". (PA DoO Defs. ) A. Gold Raq. (Def. Barltacci) file ., - JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS 08-4835 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this ?p day of April, 2009, the preliminary objections of all defendants, ARE SUSTAINED. The complaint against all d9bndants, IS DISMISSED. By Cu, Edgar l. Bayle , J. mes Paluch Jr., BQ 3769, Pro se SCI Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652-0999 Raymond W. Dorian, Esquire For Defendants :sal UJ D es t ? fe l?. a Ul °rt ?1 CL o LL (MIN t C CV G 3 GOLD & FERRANTE, P.C. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT BY: ALAN S. GOLD, ESQUIRE KRISTIAN BARBACCI. ATTY ID. NO. 23400 261 OLD YORK ROAD, SUITE 526 JENKINTOWN, PA 19046 (215)885-1118 JAMES PALUCH COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY V. NO. 08-4835 PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al. ; MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF KRISTIAN BARBACCI COMES NOW Kristian Barbacci (`Barbacci") defendant in the above styled case, and moves for summary judgment and states in support thereof the following: 1. Paluch is a former inmate in custody of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections at the State Corrections Institution at Camp Hill ("Camp Hill"). 2. Paluch filed a Complaint against Barbacci, as well as several others, on August 22, 2008. (Pl.'s Compl. at 2-3.) 3. Paluch raises numerous claims such as retaliation, harassment, denial of meals and confiscation of personal property. Id.at 27-28. 4. Against Barbacci specifically, Paluch only raises one claim: Paluch contends he did not receive any medical treatment during an appointment with Barbacci, a physician's assistant; therefore, Barbacci violated Paluch's Fourteenth Amendment rights when Paluch was charged a $4.00 co-pay for the visit. Id. at 1 20-21. 5. Paluch states he requested the appointment on August 10, 2006, to complain that he did not receive a meal, which he needed in order to take his epileptic medication. (Pl.'s Complaint at 20-21, ¶¶ 184-189) 6. Paluch requested that someone at "medical" intervene to stop the interference with his meals. (Barbacci Aff. ¶¶ 4, 7.) 7. The Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has established a policy requiring inmates provide a copay for the receipt of medical services in certain circumstances. Id. 15.; Ex. B, Policy DC-ADM-820. 8. Neither Barbacci nor Barbacci's employer PHS established Policy DC-ADM-820. (Barbacci Aff. ¶ 6.) 9. According to Policy DC-ADM-820, an inmate pays a co-pay fee for: "any non- emergency medical service provided at the inmate's request." (Barbacci Aff., Ex. B, Policy DC-ADM-820(A)(1)(a).) A medical service is defined as "[t]he diagnosis, evaluation, treatment or preservation of the health of the human body .... The term `medical service' includes, but is not limited to, ... any other type of treatment or preventative care...." Id. 10. If an inmate requests to see a medical professional for a non-emergency issue, as Mr. Paluch did, the copay would be charged. (Barbacci Aff. ¶ 8.) 11. Mr. Paluch filed a grievance and appeal of the copay charge by Ms. Barbacci. The grievance officers upheld the copay charge as in compliance with Department of 2 Corrections policy. Id. 19, Ex. C. 12. Plaintiff's claims against Barbacci should be dismissed on the basis of the Statute of Limitations. The Court adopts the statute of limitations for a personal injury claim of the forum state for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. In Pennsylvania, that statute of limitations is two years. Bougher v. University of Pittsburg, 882 F.2d 74, 78 (3d. Cir.1998); Doughtery v. Township of Lower Merion, 1996 WL 273675 * 3-4, C.A.No. 96-1589 (E.D. Pa. 1996). Plaintiff is complaining about conduct that took place on August 10, 2006. He did not file this Complaint until August 22, 2008, over two years later. Therefore, his claims should be dismissed. 13. In addition, Plaintiff cannot show that Barbacci caused the injury to Paluch's constitutional rights. "A § 1983 defendant's conduct must have a close causal connect to plaintiff's injury for liability to attach." Pearson v. Vaughn, 102 F. Supp. 2d 282, 289 (E.D. Pa. 2000). Plaintiff is attempting to hold Barbacci responsible for the execution of policy over which she has no control. 14. Summary judgment should be granted because it is undisputed that Plaintiff signed up for sick call specifically to speak to medical, which meets the definition of Policy DC-ADM-820; therefore, the copay charge was appropriate. 15. Summary judgment should be granted because Plaintiff cannot show a violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by the seizure of the copay. Plaintiff can assert a violation of his Fourteenth Amendment rights for seizing inmate's funds wrongfully if he shows (1) that the state deprived him of a 3 protected property interest and (2) that the deprivation occurred without due process of law. Burns v. Pa. Dent of Corrections, 544 F.3d 279, 285 (3`d Cir. 2008). 16. Plaintiff cannot demonstrate that he was deprived of money absent due process. Plaintiff was allowed to both grieve the copayment and appeal the denial of that grievance. 17. The only other matters ruled on by the Court in this case have been the preliminary objections of the Pennsylvania Dept of Corrections by the Honorable Edgar B. Bayley, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. WHEREFORE, Defendant Barbacci respectfully requests that their Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that the complaint be dismissed. Respectfully submitted, & FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD Attorney for Defendant Kristian Barbacci 261 Old York Road, Suite 526 Jenkintown, PA 19046 Phone: 215-885-1118, ext 201 E-mail: asg@goldferrantelaw.com 4 GOLD & FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD, ESQUIRE ATTY ID. NO. 23400 261 OLD YORK ROAD, SUITE 526 JENKINTOWN, PA 19046 (215)885-1118 JAMES PALUCH V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT KRISTIAN BARBACCI. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 08-4835 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES NOW Kristian Barbacci (`Barbacci"), defendant in the above styled case, and moves for summary judgment on the claims of Plaintiff James Paluch ("Paluch"). Paluch contends that Ms. Barbacci violated his constitutional rights when she wrongfully charged Paluch a copay of $4.00 for non-medical services. It is undisputed, however, Paluch signed up for sick call to see a medical professional so that such medical professional would ensure he received meals. Therefore, the charging of the copay was appropriate and not in violation of Plaintiff's constitutional rights. 1. BACKGROUND Paluch is an inmate that once was incarcerated at the State Corrections Institution at Camp Hill ("Camp Hill"). (Ex. 1, Pl.'s Compl. at 5.) Paluch filed a Complaint against Barbacci, as well as several others, on August 22, 2008. Id. at 2-3. In his complaint, Paluch raises numerous claims such as retaliation, harassment, denial of meals and confiscation of personal 1 property. Id. 27-28. However, against Barbacci specifically, Paluch only raises one claim: Paluch contends he did not receive any medical treatment during an appointment with Barbacci, a physician's assistant; therefore, Barbacci violated Paluch's constitutional rights by charging a $4.00 co-pay for the visit. Id. at 20-21. It is undisputed that Paluch placed himself on the sick call list specifically to speak with someone in the Camp Hill medical department on August 10, 2006, to complain that he did not receive a meal which he needed in order to take his epileptic medication. Id.; Barbacci Aff. ¶¶ 4, 7; Barbacci Aff. Ex. C. Paluch requested that someone at "medical" intervene to stop the interference with his meals. (Barbacci Aff. ¶¶ 4, 7.) Barbacci saw Paluch, but determined that the issue was for security to resolve, not medical. Id., Ex. A. The Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has established a policy requiring inmates provide a copay for the receipt of medical services in certain circumstances. Id. ¶ 5_; Ex. B, Policy DC-ADM-820. Barbacci and Barbacci's employer, PHS, did not establish Policy DC-ADM-820. Id. ¶ 6. According to this policy, an inmate pays a co- pay fee for "any non-emergency medical service provided at the inmate's request." Id., Ex. B, Policy DC-ADM-820(A)(1)(a). Medical service is defined as "[t]he diagnosis, evaluation, treatment or preservation of the health of the human body .... The term `medical service' includes, but is not limited to, ... any other type of treatment or preventative care...." Id. Thus, if an inmate requests to see a medical professional for a non-emergency issue, as Mr. Paluch did, the copay of $4.00 is charged. Id. ¶ 8. If the inmate disagrees with the assessment, he may grieve the issue. Mr. Paluch did so; he filed a grievance and appeal of the 2 copay on August I Oth. The grievance officers upheld the copay charge as in compliance with the Department of Correction's policy. Id. ¶ 9, Ex. C. II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD BE GRANTED TO BARBACCI The standard of summary judgment appears at Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035.2. That rule states in relevant part that summary judgment is granted when, "an adverse party who will bear the burden of proof at trial has failed to produce evidence of facts essential to the cause of action ...which in a jury trial would require the issue to be submitted to a jury. The explanatory comment to Rule 1035 clarifies this language stating, "the essential of the revision set forth a new rule 1035.2 is that the motion for summary judgment encompasses two concepts: (1) the absence of a dispute as to any material fact; and (2) the absence of evidence sufficient to permit a jury to find a fact essential to the cause of action defense." The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Ertel v. Patriot News , 544 Pa. 93, 101-02, 674 A.2d 1038, 1042 (1996) indicated that it had adopted the federal standard for summary judgment and indicated that according to that standard that in order to survive a defense summary judgment motion the non-moving party must present sufficient evidence on an issue essential to his case on which he bears the burden of proof such that a jury could return a verdict in his favor. There are three grounds to grant Barbacci's Motion for Summary Judgment. First, Plaintiff's claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Second, Plaintiff cannot establish a violation of his constitutional rights. Third, Barbacci did not cause Plaintiff any injury because she followed the policy, which neither she nor her employer established, correctly. In a 42 U.S.C. §1983 claiml91 3 the Court adopts the statute of limitations for a personal injury claim of the forum state. In Pennsylvania, that statute of limitations is two years. Boucher v. University of Pittsburg, 882 F.2d 74, 78 (3d. Cir.1998); Doughtery v. Township of Lower Merion, 1996 WL 273675 * 3-4, C.A.No. 96-1589 (E.D. Pa. 1996). Plaintiff is complaining about conduct that took place on August 10, 2006. He did not file this Complaint until August 22, 2008, over two years later. Therefore, summary judgment should be granted to Barbacci. Second, Plaintiff has not established a violation of his constitutional rights as a matter of law. The Courts have held that it is constitutionally permissible under the Eighth Amendment to impose copayments for medical care. Remolds v. Wagner, 128 F.3d 166, 174 (3`d Cir. 1997). However, wrongful seizing of funds from an inmate's account may constitute a violation of that inmate's rights to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Burns v. Pa. Dept. of Corrections, 544 F.3d 279, 285 (3`d Cir. 2008). To succeed on a due process claim, Plaintiff must show (1) that the state deprived him of a protected property interest and (2) that the deprivation occurred without due process of law. Id. In this case, Plaintiff cannot, as a matter of law, show that his deprivation happened without due process of law. First, Plaintiff requested to see a medical professional so that the professional would intervene to ensure Plaintiff received certain meals to aid with his epileptic condition. Thus, Plaintiff's request falls squarely into Policy DC-ADM-820. Id., Ex. B, Policy DC-ADM-820(A)(1)(a))(an inmate pays a co-pay fee for: "any non-emergency medical service provided at the inmate's request.") Second, when Plaintiff disagreed with the assessment, he could grieve the issue and appeal, which he did. The grievance and appeal officers determined 4 that Barbacci had appropriately assessed the copay. Therefore, clearly, Plaintiff was provided due process in the assessment of the copay. Finally, Plaintiff cannot show that Barbacci caused the injury to Paluch's constitutional rights. "A § 1983 defendant's conduct must have a close causal connect to plaintiff's injury for liability to attach." Pearson v. Vaughn, 102 F. Supp. 2d 282, 289 (E.D. Pa. 2000). Plaintiff is attempting to hold Barbacci responsible for the execution of policy over which she has no control, Policy DC-ADM-820. This was established by the Department of Corrections, not Barbacci or her employer, PHS. The copay was appropriately charged according to that Policy. Therefore, as a matter of law, Barbacci did not cause a violation to Plaintiff's constitutional rights. III. CONCLUSION Barbacci respectfully requests that the Court grant her Motion for Summary Judgment. Respectfully submitted, GO D FERRANTE, P.C. BY: ALAN S. GOLD Attorney for Defendant Kristian Barbacci 261 Old York Road, Suite 526 Jenkintown, PA 19046 Phone: 215-885-1118, ext 201 E-mail: asg@goldferrantelaw.com 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have sent a true and correct copy of MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF KRISTIAN BARBACCI, along with supporting Brief and Exhibits via First Class U.S. Regular Mail on this date to the following individuals: Raymond W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Governor's Office of General Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 James Paluch, Jr. BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street P. O. Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652 DATE: May 6, 2009 6 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES A. PALUCH, Plaintiff, ; V. Civil Action File No.: 08-4835 PENNSLYVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET. AL. Defendants. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF AFFIDAVIT OF KRISTEN BARBACCI PERSONALLY APPEARED before the undersigned officer, duly authorized by law to administer oaths in the state and county aforesaid, KRISTEN BARBACCI, who first being duly sworn, states on oath and deposes as follows: 1. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years, suffer from no impairment and am otherwise legally competent to make this Affidavit. The matters stated in this Affidavit are made from my own personal knowledge. 2. My name is Kristen Barbacci. I am employed as a Physician's Assistant by Prison Health Services, Inc. ("PHS") and am currently stationed at SCI-Camp Hill. 245064v.1 3. I understand that the Plaintiff James A. Paluch, has filed a claim against me asserting that I violated his federal constitutional rights because he was charged a $4.00 copay for medical care on August 10, 2006 when he did not receive any medical care on that date. 4. On August 10, 2006 at 11:55 am, I saw Mr. Paluch. The progress note of August 10th is attached as Exhibit A to this Affidavit. Mr. Paluch requested that "medical" intervene to stop interference of some type with his meals. 5. It is the policy of the Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to require copayment for medical services. This Policy, DC-ADM-820, is attached as Exhibit B to this Affidavit. This Policy is the same policy that was in effect on August 10, 2006, except that the copay has now increased to $5.00. 6. Policy DC-ADM-820 is not a policy established or implemented by my employer, Prison Health Services, Inc. 7. Mr. Paluch signed up on sick call to see someone in medical to address the fact he was not receiving meals as he would like. (Ex. C, Grievance and Appeal). 8. -2- 245064v.1 If an inmate specifically requests to see a medical professional, as Mr. Paluch did, for a non-emergency issue the copayment is charged. 9. Mr. Paluch grieved the copayment charge and my decision to charge the copayment was upheld by the grievance officers. (Ex. C, Grievance and Appeal.) FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. This the d 1 4*?-- day of April, 2009. Sworn to and Subscribed Before me thi the ?- da of , 2009. AR P IC My Commission Expires: COMMONWEALTH OF PEMjVLVgW NOTARIAL SEAL PAMELA KLINGER, Notary PubMc Mechanicsburg 3oro, Cumberland em 1My Commission Expires Oct. 15, 20111 -3- KRIS EN BA ACCI 245064v.1 APWJV ' , . ti i I7 t i i I i DAW pcob DO NOT USE THIS SHEET Military # UNLESS A RED .NTMEER SHOWS Time l Z . 4 f? -MAAl- 0;;4e too, 1w %11 v 0 Assistant Madic Director It risrl'''t NI" A Plid, v-, 42 s ?- l f r?g», Ww" Q .iii; ,? : •r?'t?'y j.. ' ? u.;i ?7G?E ify PLEASE NLY ,--, W? leg, slst ?? ,f? , {k. rr,? t 94 P R ;Ich 0 ? y ` r- ? V d` ^ V 1 b o a on a a ,L44 L•, P M C9ro rq r? H • to dim m rm ro Ntv HHp1 kon to w cl f-< H H t+] ?! Q „ r H W H !-3 9 ? K Kro C) H ?? G7 n I ro y 1? 4 . to In m r , , x N ?. I n, t r b e ! y s ^u O7 Ch . J - 'y FF o .= K ^e ? I t. P rmtrz `. sic ? •sY,^ F ,•??' ' . 21 m i 0 m O O Z O v r 4• 1 v o° ?v ro ?A W m N A. EE ff f \ ' ?' . .?.?., ? . ,' ? . r sob ?. • _ •:.• 1 •t ? ' z - c m y • _ o ? r w ?T s o O .?Q 4A 0 ...- j Q ' PM - _ t BipRqfim= 1 D SCI-CAMPHILL(GBN POP) /PAS . 0 2500 LISBURN ROAD 0 T CAMPHILL, PA 17001 0 A (P0136-4) Bio-Net Print -FINAL- Original Report 08/17/2006 PALUCH, JAMES MTIENT IJ1! ROOM NO. BQ3769.67162 BARBACCI, KRISTEN 102346321 a` rIT?12006 w=006 23:34 r06:34 Y M Com4fit` FASTING - ---L-.-_------. ty,J,•:+1:? -?: i--rv.?fF..?71u14?1??Y`h,r *. j-rrZlFrr., rr-e,Sr%:`• ST.-rTa?4V? ----__ -.i ?J• ti•. `.1: ::9:' ...?ia 1?{_I:':,,,-r.,:' .N :'+'•.hrrV •.fY?,;^ •;.+Itti 'u^.•'t'r ?'t: _ "rt'?'S?•; 't.. ' •'i .• _ S:.L f t,y °}; . . y .•,.yy:x. .: , J.,>.:: ', i' A r , •i L •{.a •r'•: ' 3' '., '.7 •, •''lili{?, ..Q•. ?,ir.." ,:,L:,,y t; .•, a. :?:,rw• .?ti ': C.$,,•}L ^a•i "''•! 1::.1• L ..l' '':t _'1:• :,. :S: ,.'t%!'•_ a;r, ?.,ii•7:, %J', .::+. iA ••... at:•: i,.'4`•t'i't••.• ..x: z:i"a •• .y.. •;';s. 'ut:: tia':. r;},: - -': f::.i?:•;?. •..T•.1:: `Srgl;t:ir?`` 'r.::':I. ,?y,): ?tha..s.., ???:':ia7., :n rra -:}: ;u ':r i' t' ! ,;. • { ,.L• ,..•• :ktfy'; : 1? y '.r,.:.G., t' 'Y ?•? /rte rte,, •.1t. ,F ;i:i::.'ra. I?,.t, :r+!? t'q. ,•r ,. .r•.?.r .'(':; rA Ls i r. %:r?tF,s'r,.1 'e. k. .;, :{Lf•vt<;•., ..,;1.•L F ; i.4i ct; a,. q. fi; _ 4'r ' ••'•"?". ?J•. a?04:A'1? i r ••L71:?r'+?.'n,'• .. g. r-`:irii:.?;:t _(t*?$7,; >',:: ?. r•,'. s4'<i-; 1• :..a r X?!y; :.';+11't: .?'. Albumin 4.4 3.2-5.2 gm/dl globulin 2.4 A/Q,Ratio ,. 1.7-3.7 gm/dL .8 9 r'Lf?4s'i2,' !.. +' '" i:tii'4?.b:a'`L ?1+: ;, :{y,i .'Yifr'elh a:,, °'r?'".•.:: ,.. t:t •+r'":}t'.;,.. :_ti'• Sr•'s:'....t,tt '•i.•`•. S .x f,:r .a .r,YYj. t'.::'. Lt±'::i'•'. •' ' ?'• "J?'' •r •''•t'?a•• . t.::?' " .•i ':. 1: yy,, S' r-, ri. rZ' .; ,'i'• ,?•r:.?,r7 ',.. :•.:?. :ry -•f:??[o' t• ,,yytf?,???????? rr,, ??,trt v ;,. •'.'':`W J!'•tiri• 't-`•+••?•. ,7:, .... ...'.r. li irG?pp'pl'?KAL-• 's .. . ' .. 1:, .. :',(?,'nl,.::' ,.??.... ;k•i x':,,+dX`H:` ••• •:1,.• y ?J; ,y •t ?{'r? I•, •e T Chloride 101 96-108 mmol/L ?CjT0?2T 25 21-29 MMOI /L .Di}rtyl t._r.•"y.,1 Fi5'?: •lY;' itr. l;..ii S.,irv r. •. SiGi ii'. ,•.:1.' t r' .`•:F.xC'CL:?S?''?'„t.`, - :y.r is ',' ,r. i' ' i•t . i t; .v'"' 4:.: •rj?, •,S .. '•f ' !f °V'.i•„•4e S•;i<:y??:'x••:??1.; l.,.,1? ;?s•...:.i S-.,t.:fiitF'.1i tt;i??." ?1{?,t:.'/?•L•y '{?^.i',y?p?,'?',''?.":SL.{.?, !•}?/?1,, r??, ,r: 'i?ytpL.?,••yYy,,,,? .:\• ``'s r,?`.i..?•ir•::i••:F 1! a.+. '?' ''';''i'?; ?:?L;i•'' '?•.'a iL r' .s. ?:•: ? }. `.,}, 7't'f. ,.P 7:._• - '•`?/"^!'c'i•' P •IrY:[:?.:, • t '`• ?,': t'?{:` • ..5 1^?3+?• •??. l ?i ;.t .. ^. •GGlY .t., t:'n• :.4. t:t?-.w"t t?f.,': s?}, ;',n + `ii:{, )„ '{CGL•G:G•Qyr' r`• .•.M t'::ti ,?;•5i: 7•t ,., .t t. sr..? Y,`,}; ?n ?•'.: . .. 9, t}'?f Y•..".? t:••. 1,?,F.; ??}}??yy .; :'•}.- .?}; ..I'`y y,,.;.. ;:..•,. , Are ,t',:'t i ,,,,, • $ ,a;• ."•l.`61-'?'3`'.?.'''1L?- ' .rt-i•.: •'? '! :1k 1. ,.' t,'. :•t 6,Fi at..Y'7 4 .1t z- -r- a:• ! di 't•' , !'• •r 'f .7. v?tpxr `.? ;, }rl.ir•: •'r? P :,,'';?-• :w.;tt: ?a•'-'"::?:.:-.:??•'•+_7•?i 3;_..t ;.t:l;. n,g°.Y?2 ?il.•C•,:.:.: •if•'t. t,. : 6 !•"?i:ro:t'-:Y^ f.• Uric Acid ,,. • .:g,.•4,?-3t?j•,,:i??:ra:..:::./??I?•.:•.?.',. 4.7 2.4-7.0 mg/dl Iron h 175 HI 30-160 mcg/dl ,WU **???? t..'a•. "t Li: Wit-' i:r, _ L..V.p?.: : r i•. n,•,.J'w OS-1;. ?r /dl 'i.'LL1?'} _ r7;? y??i •:7i.:e /5?¢'.:..1.Y7 ?'•."t :' i:,.y.:;. C r,.0r ,... =...•Cy?•/'.., ' .t :',:. •?;.', '••r .. a ':•t` ,?y%:Ti+.i.i3; Yr ,:?:J',. ..: ?.!...t:. ,•7:'?.}•"' •:, :ir?py}c 5 ?"• ti:.".M..?',{? ?•{ ?' err 1. r`i',",>i: W: =:.tY,.'p?,•' M1.,, V'.i:pp°?',yy?,rc .. F??:L. TT ,,?}{{?•4?•?. 'i.• ':•r':.5.. :.S:ti Y7y it: :JL:i •. T;?,•..: ,;•,; !::Si-1: .. 'f????;:1.1.1??:" j• "v.i•a .:.' (s.•k'. .,,.'?.,;a.; .;.:r•'? j::.;'•a r n. t'.44'r.': X 912 401 Phosphorous • 4 ? • ??7•. ' •1 2.6-4.5 mg/dl ALT (SGPT) 22 < 40 u/L •?G ,??P.. 4 •!?,..a. ,.;Y :i• ::.,: ,`f.' '?.,.;.:: ,]"]?':',?• :,., }'•: .7-?1, .?. r,•;t< •? •i.;u' L ,. ..:'?T?O;?Sti?:@?Ol,? •.; 4:' :?;.i?' i:."1:1'•; ,r?i ?7?'•F• Li .:2;x'4;'. •St'.:.•.{^/"'.-'r?.?1C/?hr15r LS :tryrt _:t ;:, ;,'• / r:: ' x alt. ?l_ i•.i J 5,' M1: ;t' .'lr _..... !?'h ii ;, i?44b1''t', 'i' •T:•.G:\J'A/: r 4 ,r+• ' iLM :?... •+, :;wr ..L ,• .•r. r ri..••G?•i'S„ ;.'•1•:"'ji welt t'?•:'"•'`.. ••t, t.a L. ,•, ' .? ? ? ,ft7 ?'• t :"37?.5??:.{;,;, . 1??,?• ? :.v::•:-• yY !??L f:••?:n'='`??y':,?: '?•:yy{Ly?.?: --{{??r,?x..,,??.. ??}}//?????? ?n??: Ir•! '.: ,?`'"u .'•',* is '.r.. .i:l.+ ai. ;'.•T`:r,?•? "?. `^•Y .fp •.' _'".?S •'x ?'•.LS39J7r••]CAVyy-.•.:a -'?.?1L:•i'r•• `)': r•''ri• . ,'?A•rT_.__:,'i'y1?i':-x .y ,r1 ri,' 7, ., e.•?L..i':. a•I+:". ?•• ..: ;`, t?L"•:? .;y ;.:.5 :.•i: .,:I..;taY?i1?.. Lt.? ..!r:... •....:'tirt}!Glir:St `i? -?' }` ""• `!r%" HDL as of Cholesterol 20 SH E BE?.a:.:;r:;,•; BELOW $ Chol/HDL Ratio 4.98 SEE-BELOW ?t{ HDL.. ? o . .,• _.3.32..... Q;?.3r. t' •; L'??:J: /t y'?,?,p tow r"', '.?.:w::..•'. ., :':t r•.,, .: '': r il• ,(?=':T." ,L `•'. •]':', •:r :' '•L. - .'.1.?`Y•F?L'..G3yV?'+ 'rt.. ?: '' r t L :.'j!i_' ? r' +t K,:r?.'H.T,.1.L y,:s a?, .? .? •a•,w J .?,'.. .•, •:L;. , • •L :r1'?r''? y ..::u :•t, Y..' 4• r' }yam r;}'??}r:.. ?. l'abi(-`,••';ryyt '?tl,T•Ti''?^+i,?,j gi' }' :r. tit= {, .. .:;.i ;,1: :+!•le t.,? :,..»i,, ::5=?"?i :.: t?".?, ..??:. ?.t .?.::.r'?.'e L.r_: i;.:,tu-,:?•?/`Y,';Mt y•? „?.i•,..•• ,'.. ?i.•rryn. "'Y:•a' .,.. ?!4., '.?t:ib.:jr'• •;:r.'I:??3,?;,•;;,. ?:. ,,p1 ???.>.?:: ,. `f.. . Contiziired'i '!J•rPae '.'?'`' :M 5."{ 'J?' ?.:L:. :?.. ..?:i n!'' Y, Page'3 I UTAIM5 5TAMP ?s: :;,',i:•. .,., :•.i.<'i•:"'i' •i%ft,.r: 'i! - `?h::?•s,:::? .?,• .,1}7:? 'lst: :i+, t..:':?..-..? ,. :'`•'j t,,?'=:,:: •i•• `_T'•: ".s.t• n:• •` ice" f l::. .r' _ .•.,, : ? ,;.•. ' is ??..-- 't I• :•a:.•L:.,: S ;,!a: 'hLt.i.,+r2':?,+ (r L^.}iw: .}.. .:.. iSS•'' _ .:L ?': t FL'.?•:: 'b' r. ,•,; •E, 'I it T:,`:•:try,.:;.:r 't' ', a7.? o; K+i?r ."i' : j.'• :i _ .'!., a.i:'.?.?,`'.x.'r; • Ste',' ..+Y",:y...,''?.?L2(.r• _M.E:i.? .. -":°... 'i.:r%:• ?:a:'d•' ^'?••? `:'%.? 1': ... .. .. .. ... ... a,t L3L t. ,a 't a .`f . v .. •' t.yum:afl ?l,S S1''itr riit ?•, •?•':t .q Sj- '+4"f'"•. _ ... ti::. . SYw:. j1` 6 w f iy aitj ?'?'Iy;?z, AON +I AL 481 EDWARD H. ROSS OR. J00fiA YWer. MD. Won . wr D PARK, NJ 07407 NOTq 1-800-229-LASS 4299 PAW 1109 i t $lUCe LAf)ORA7OR?1l3 I e D SCI-CAMPHILL(GEN POP)/PHS 0 2500 LISBURN ROAD 0 T CAMPHILL, PA 17001 0 R (P0136-4) Bio-Net Print -F`TNAL-' Original Deport 08/17/2006 NAMA txn®arIDlFC1CMN0, D0OTORlu5 NAM6 PALUCH, JAMBS BQ3769.67162. BARBACCI, KRISTEN LMIa W 102346321 ' ??f 006 23:34 T 9T 72 06 06:34 5` Y sIXM Test Description Result Abnormal Reference Range ir:•:U'x+?t w+**yr*'iet,r:t•it:*.'?eF eF,'#'i sFl?; aF?t. k'.rkw.* It?rt israF •... ;l, •i. 15-25 4.2-7.3 3.9-5.7 9-15 7.4-11.5 5.8-9.0 i'Y' 5''?:?•-' 't` - i> .i, •y4,1 a4',Z {31•'s.,s?r T^°?ait?' -.ty?%ie•?,+. y}.'[.•hi ..•Y•'•-?rr,t•,*i''?„• it'?.:..:,:::.:' •: H`'b`.' ;'•T: "?4.', MT,;,;: L•?;?:•:. .r: •a. S' '• :!• •Y:'•.1 '3,'nl?iF:?k;,?•SNiFaid' ,#r , •*;};"''' ,{,?.?vi,=y?,?' ,'.: ? r f5"- bS` z•• , .ti :. • :t: S;? : ^:'k.TM•?•tt ,• bi•4 ! I•• r 4r)g??(? )"' j t ?ti'S!'•!•w'n,t` .1: ?: 1'• :;•:•r?r • `.?t "?`{y'?`, •E,£??1?' ?'.??`' ?'' •8•Vi•. p15S • l•'r{I13rIU"a:rr:'?'' •tt1?`+', .:: , .. ' S+: AVEWS RISK ABOVE AVG. (MODERATE) rdr: 'V' 'fist -lt'?A"v;w:.•-. •-•'i"t- *w,kw*w*w**'k*w*ww*******w***#*****w*w*wwwwwwwwwwwww,rwx'www?wwww*w?ewwww*•*w,rww*** Program.) ***** Male/Female reference range: >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ***** Xp?tye ;, ,AF. cp1c14j4,o.:,r (; f of 0,. st c11 .. a di e r4a 41 o. ey,, s:F!'ly'", _p• r :.. ?11S4n. i. • • • `. ,•',t }•.{?• `•?:t•.=',: f.o 7 a•S""?f'ix „ . ?,''i?''t?l?. ?'•(?*,?.ti'4?'?'.'.L{IFj','1'3:*'G"b ???}., .@Id3?_', rr,r'f,:: ,, r 5,:. t• . 1 •,A??; ?tili .. ,,. ?: .• .t •: .: ,. ..• .': :,, •. 'r,;t?}.:,•p l^k'•''i+ .•{:. •!,4• ?. ?,r •;,1J?'• ;r: •. :t=''^•?+''•5 •, ~r1•i..I .iP.'J; -------------------------------* HEMATOLOGY *--------- :•;?? ', •; h7F117??? •.,:.t.'r.., r?:?? ?' : • , , .,,•,', • `r •'; ;:,? t,?• c•??•:M:-,. ;:?.? 4??'j:??•I• ? ' ia` fi ?'•. a'G?}? '•' .t/h'•• ,.l,?,. .,.y.; :r,':4 :'t: .1• J.r l;. .t?•'(... ,:i i?w•.?r S?i???y',+•R :•k?7?t?• •'??¦ryl,??',•.•??: ,";;i,•<:.,'4:,?d:•.(,j.? ??.ji :'; v::. :: •• •,?::•.: fit' -? ' ;.;,'?'/'?+?y??i;T 1J;?:l ?. ?y ••y1 •;A,r!?t?f. •,[ 7 .r -!"'.',` r. .•J tt. ,.: ?'Y "C?•O-''"?'•L'••'i"•??,. •: f.?`.eM,i,f1.?.1i( ':f ? ??raER•:- "u??5f?'.:• . ''t• :_„;'••'. r,?:'??: 3?=`1'"?'•:'t3'-. ...t'?c?[•7"??::. HCT DATE 46.6 39.3-52.5 $ MCV 'nME _ , s o 9615 80.0-100.0 FL MPH- A t=''MCA. :NCS:: al_?r.,,., . r,,.t. 25x.0:3.4,;1....:..?? :t ,Mr1'QI14yk •?---+"t.y:.1t? ,"3?.,r„O :M •:?I.?:?`'?•' '•:. ; br47}•94yp :i,-?'y:?iS:A;:.':'•5V;'j'd?'•?,?•r%?..4?J1':iG?} treLi:s:d-1-t:C id1.711FS•k::.. :; ,`,?i?l•. .7?'^J??'t',;:;,.ia'!S,!" .?{:i S •?. - •' ?I.;,.•?• I!I uy. 'xi.'?,•, , , , i ".:. ., 7,+: S,. 4 err' 1 t.: iwt' ,zF,. ?t .,. „•?.,?? ?';;:• •>::2 •t. ? d., :i.:?.i'•'?'A.?.?Y' O'.:tr• :,}.? .,`?t f,,,4?, .. ?4 Npry) . .r L•t..: :i r•>f•:;i.?. a r'?7}'?T . ` r'..,. t.?•_ti•.. i 'j,.ra'S?'•'??S}(._'.1c: %Yr* •:•tr•.w?"¢7::}i:•???"1'?:,'; ?..:.;, :y::.. ,, rY:-i;;•,"%S"r^: POLYS - COUNT,ABS 2401 1224-9204 LYMPHS 32 12-48 $ LYM??HS - COLW,- BS 7,5b,8, x„08-5.664,? .YQYi•., •t,.. t'. •t ,'?,, t; :t, 'tJ:? •f 'C:'?•,tIJ 1:F."' C ' }}??: •! •• "•1•:;,,': l•!r s rt. 1•' _;:t•..r "•'L,. ?'..''?'•t, ;?:...: 't,.^.Sn ?: '•.-:;•• '•i:s?• h}, l,a ""n ??ii,'{•:i•t,•..s•.1 ,,j,,t •4, .. r,s i:,4;jL•.?. A;y...t••..}, 'j;n tJ:i'I'.F,? .I ..}h17:; .t.. ''v .+;?: _ SnS:7 :,, ? !. -t: ;! .•?.•1?iJ111:.1 •1:??••.:'?. ••`-. .t.,?•1;3F,!it?" '.t:. :i. :{9re„r•; .r3??'?.9?'':? -? Y.•i' :'v;: ;,t '•'#i;i. rrrr??w,,77???r d• ''r:: 'i' ..r. vY?+-!?r'?. •'ti•?. !.:•?.:w,. de ,n?1. 't' ..(?, ?:7,' .?'s'. ?'•, .. n.£7tl?`.?A:I•'7•.. ... ... ... .. ..:?', •`ys:;.-:(;'r.y r '';J1 .at.~ .., 't.:::?;:1:?;,:;: .;?• BASOS - COUNT,ABS 49 0-236 MONOS 11 0-13 $ MONO$ - COUNT,ABS„ 70-141 ,:?tk????:E'?.+.Y?Q?.}' .;i;S=7;,.•''t X94,:. i.:1:',:.;?;,• .?,..;,7+,i':d?•.,%:.,',ia.`rla.ti; t?rt,.y? ?[-a _1, ?+q" t . Y`, ? ? ?, .[' :.?2.?i', y. .. ? a. ?.•rl:?••?., '?6:: '"• ?•• •'4'i7£ •l7: • '•'t z'? ;i fit, ?„? .•:k. Y.,. +?t'„•i... ? , •"r'?:,:.;'l,:y. t:*?'F:t".!:,.y:;? .'•;T.•, ;, 1': 1.s : .:T?^j•-.;? - •?'w?:?t 4 my-ii:. ... _ '.`r ;t•1"-r-•:":• ;;•- ?y is r:,+'{Y,".d a• r. •.0 ?t '- A_ \i - .... .. .. . , ,, t .:.t '. .. ,. .. •.;`.i ', c.. tt sr.. ., .: ?r '• , k? . •' "•.'.:. •Y,'i e r Jwnoe wow ber9ar,M.D. Itilr?. 481 EDWARD H. ROSS M 6.MN1000 PARK, 2 07407 y.425.?g•? LOOR.AMMMIECYGR 4 ? NY 1/05 *BbReir= LABORATORIES 5 1 Q SCI-CAMPHILL(GM POP)/PHS 0 2500 LISBURN ROAD C 7 CAMPHILL, PA 17001 Q R (P0136-4) Bio-Net Print -FINAL- Original Report 08/17/2006 NAMB PALUCH, JAMES PATW 1.11 / ROOM NO. BQ3769:67162 DOCTOR f OF1" NAME BARBACCI, KRISTEN 102346321 "HYT2006 RI 006 23:34 19'M7M6 06241 5% Y 'Tesz Lescrip?ian xesuit Abnormal Reference Range TSII 3.020 0.27-4.2 uIU/mL THYROXINE(T4) 3.9 LO 4.5-12.0 ug/dL VALPROIC ACID, SER. 9 LO 50-100 ug/mL *********** *wwww***?•**5!r#**+t *,t***w*w,rww******,r*tr,t*tt+?,t***?ta,t**,t*+?,t*,t,t**>F* ***+rww N,o7E.r, ?T-MM, apecim_gA ? ?°. aA T?Ua.xV,S:kffe. x?tsults.i .>•:+, ..v;r..t f., r.a rr;: r.r •t t..; "'ti ..t: .."t,.•, ,.-?7y„y,,::t•...'„?,:y??•••„??, lit" ;.r; i .: is ?•r.if :, : !: n ': r Jy t •: e•?: { 1: ..'. •ii Y .. t, t. ?y,?, ;..r. .. ?:, 1{r;• r1;.: w-t•j!',r ,{:.,•j f {i'rCti`': i'I::,:f':' •t' F ti'•ti a :?i i. i y.it"t ' T ', •tA T. b;.t{y^I y.•? i:? .y..•..SRPt '('t;r ";? .`p'1„y .. .. ;N:yp.. ' ?''' '•t. :t•j•i.. ,y.r'•r• ,? 87•?..i`Yist?'I 7' t. ip wat•* ,4yt* *4* ?eiF ?+k C +?r ?r='? + + +? ?k,?? i ,?!! ?* ?f:* ?e rr^kl Yr ri'r +? .y??u?i?j, ?y^; } r ... ..i• t a,t 1?r,. y ..,{,. Jr y{ }•;• 1 ..?1• ,?, i.., ,{? ,. "t ? ?;.. t?t•°S°rT;t•:• , "::i;.••,rit?".'re'sh,t?'t • ?'CYl+"''?'?a?2.'?"'?-?'-??'".?S''i??i;:,d1?'rtif.'iii.tnit??!7'"W.'?r';c?rb'>I'?C{'' ?.1?='."1!L•'fiilF.lEUi1_:i?..'.'' r::;t'•':•+':r: ?' w*w*w?r•?w?r*zF,ttrtk**?*?4***wwww*w?r*t*?,t*re********?rww?rwwwwwtkww*wwwwwwttwtwrrwt*f***** rpauIt fop.> IN,? ??'„ ?s s • ?o/y.,?? ? ''Sr:? ?••• ?•:y,p•E?; J93;;y r: S:'w.'i+' ' :C^:d :,..?"•r`%. ::. Fnu• • wa':P ?, w•. ?i?,,;>•+.?{,r:.}4''r'S:4t:..`tJA'?:'!,F•?•:.,'•-;? t t.. , .•1?•,n .:. 'I•+4' ':?. {•, r.7.: ayq'.• •a; : F,,t::.y ;? 7, !'M..;. '' .,rt" t[?t":?'??? ._ .7.:' t:; ?.. ?..}r...,ff:,ynf,"u7w: .„„?.fy•ta, Y. .,?;;??'i•'8:i;:?+ te?:?%! r i•: ?0i.'i .,:. ;??+'_ ';fit, ,:3;y,,c: ;a.. ,T;, ?•r•:3.'•j ?'+ F•. ??:. :;x, :•i ••. '?' .ci., .'' ..5: i,A'a ''^_ ..Jit;:...t• •, ?'?''?Y'.• `'•r?t??b': L?'4't':.t:. •?'b+t+,;:5;r,•i?.' •:55,:'L1:J:; ,.,y '?i„ ?.F?';?';$•?'' '•t ..'!•'.Y .':,•. .•, r •.ir.. ;p•., '•p:•?• t e r r?' 7T ?' +x4;,1 ,{ ::?`.:• `r. Y,Mt.S4i,:t ?, f•, y ;;?+1.l#tYl***wsr*w•,Y1ai,'t?,F[k'**;,tr,*;xe.*'i?ti*'.?;?;'*k;a!#W+?#t?+¢s?f'" DOTE: The result for VALPROIC ACID has been confirmed by repeat analysis. r;• ?'(. :`•t •' ..'lLt i• "''-"t,S..ry.Y',?.t• `l: t,;. }.:::v"y.X'•': :::?y,rr,.,,•??,.?.?.J. - •' t`y^,'"{, t'.: y' 't:' :4n:`4 •?•u' y'r ii 1.t .! ', ^':: ''?'+'Y?' +'`y'" ,:'1'. 'CS ?•a rl.t 't •• 'F'•.S^?•7??r???•'{°F}:•ll lay .t,...:`c}..: ':•'+r.:.5'i•s, ?:t?. .R'• .?i 5..?. :: ... . t::t•• ;..? :,; of .t. •?' r:,,: a?, F :::5" ° t' i•i;? _ .. >}y:''t .;{4-•. •rx.:'-fF?,i•?,•? Jamesw4baw M,D. LADOPATOW OPOClgt 451 EDWARD K ROSS DR• eLMV=D PARK, NJ 57407 1-WO.220-LUS 4266 Rav 1J06 Date/ Time Prob # Discipline Abbreviation (remarks? Subjective, Objective, Assessment, plan . ?13,`i i brl ,ICH ' VWE2 , s Y Q; f i i 0% ?i l? VWf ICe$ A /M A1-- elAd .,? . ell -CI L'r `'CMG PROGRESS•NOTES f 1 Outpatient f i Inoatient Date/ The Prob # Discipline Abbreviation Remarks Subjective, Objective, Assessment, plan j?b 4 ? t•• ,., S ? q6 ! a s I ?rb ? fro • . A ?.?,i_ . b; ffI f 01? /I J t(Q7 A?er , .? MVLI S C, Y,C? Progress Notes Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections DC-472 Revised 4/2005 I Name: I, ' . Number 1'ktvCN, .tti11wS DOB: : tom. 603769 Facility: } 5./24/1.97 1 The Authority of the Secretary of Corrections to direct the operation of the Department of Corrections is established by Sections 201, 206, 506, and 601-B of the Administrative Code of 1926, 71 P.S. §§81, 68, 186, and 310-1, Act of April 9, 1929, P.L. 177, No, 175, as amended. Ill. APPLICABILITY This policy is applicable to all staff, inmates, and contract staff at facilities under the jurisdiction of the Department. Ill. ]DEFINITIONS A. Co-Pay Fee The portion of the actuh.l cost of a medical service that Is charged_to the inmate B. Health Care Protesslonal Any physician, physician assistant, nurse proaddoner, nurse (registered or practical), dentist, optometric professional, or other person licensed-to provide health care under the laws of the Commonwealth. C. Medical Emergency Any injury or ofher medical problem that requires infirmary care, facilify or outsfds emergency room care or hospital admission. D. !Medical Service The diagnosis, evaluation, treatment or preservation of the health of the human body, DC-ADM 820, Co-Payment fear Medical Servlcs Page 3 including its organs, structures, and systems. The term "medical service" includes, but is not limited to, diagnostic testing, prescribing and administering medication, surgical procedures, dental care, eye care, the furnishing of prosthetics and any other type of treatment or preventive care, whether performed on an inpatient or outpatient beefs, E. OTC (Oyer-the Counter) Medication Medications that can be obtainedlpurchased without a prescription; may be available through the commissary. F. Sick Call Sick cog is the process used by inmates who experience non emergent medicalldental problems to access medical services; an examination by a physician, physicians assistant; nurse practitioner, or nurse. G. Chronic Medical Disease/ lliness Chronic Medical flts"seslillness are defined as. Asthma, Congestive Heart Failure, CoronarryArtery Disease, Diabetes, Disllpidemle, Hepatitis C, HIV, and Hypertension IV. POLICY It is the policy of the Department to require a co-payment fee whereby an inmate will share In the cost of his/her medicai services... V. PROCEDURES 1. An inmate shall pay a $5.00 co-pay fee for: a. any non-emergency medical service provided at the inmate's request; b. any medical service, including emergency medical service, provided to an inmate in the following situations: (1) when the injury or Illness is self inflected; (2) when the injury or illness arises from the inmate's participation In a sport; or (3) when the Inmate is found guilty of a misconduct for the assault or injury of another inmate. c, initial medication prescription except as provided in Section V.A.2, (b), (n), (r), and (s) below; and T DC ADM 820, Co-Payment for Medical $ervice Page 3 d. any medical service provided to determine whether the Inmate's physical condition Is suitable for participation in a sport; work, housing or medical status; unless such medical service Is provided as part of an Inmate's routine medical screening/physical examination scheduled by the Department. a. physical, dental or mental health screening provided to an Inmate upon intake; b. immunizations, tuberculosis testing, and other treatments instituted by the Department for public health reasons; c, facility transfer screening; d. routine physical, dental end mental health screening performed at the request of the Department; f, mental health treatment; g, medical treatment for a chronic disease or illness that requires return or regular visits as specified by the medical provider; h. infirmary care In a Department facility; i. hospitalization outside a Department facility; j. long-term care for an inmate who is not in need of hospitalization, but whose needs are such that they can only be met on a long-term basis or through personal or skilled care, and who needs the care because of age, illness, disease, Injury, convalescence or physical or mental Infirmity; I. medical service provided to an inmate during a medical emergency, unless the medical emergency resulted from a self-inflected Injury or illness as determined by the health care professional providing the medical service; m, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, dressing change or other treatment ordered by a health care professional employed by the Department or its contractors; n. prenatal cars; 6 COMMONWEALTR OF PENNEYLVM 09PARTMKNT OR OORANOMONg 2120 LISBURN ROAD, P.O. BOX gal CAMP HILL, PA 17001-ONs December 22, uch, Rill Re: DC-ADM 4 Final Review Grievance 2.182375 Paluch: -his is to a knowledge receipt of your appeal to fl, ew of tho 8bove numbered in acoordan with the provisions of DO-ADM X04 d the errti , record of this grievance; including yo response, ur appeal from initial review and the I 'efully revie ed the Issues you raise to final review. Jpon compl Lion of this review, It Is the deciaion of t -by ateif at the ineltitutional Javol. A review -of the irged in ac once with DC-ADM 820, Co-Payment I were wron i charged $4.00 for medical services YOU Werme t ated by meldic>al staff. It was a non-an 4ving appro t 'ate medical care. Thera Is no evidenc It you hav problems with your medication, It is staff to res ve it. -he respon s provided at the Institutional level are t tent of Corr ctlons' policies and procedures, Accor senlea. Sincerely, Sharon M. Burks Chief Grievance ve January 3, 2008, 1 have ti grievance, the grievance tendent's response, I have ce to uphold the resportass shows that the co-payment 11C&1 SvrviceB. Your claim is Iver, you signed up for slck Iy visit. It appears that you liberate Incilf erence to your fended that you work with late and in accordance with your appeal to finer review Grievance office Centrel pile 7MMO . U?M OF P SYLVANX,A, Doputmeat of Corrections State C al Xwtituu m at Camp Hill SuporituemdCW5 office November 1, 2006 peal to Supexiutende z Oa No. 164375 1wh.,aMts, BQ3764 100?01- d L. Keiobazer Opt of your peal to Supwsinftadeut of Gzievaoe No. 16 7 is aclmawledged. IM wing d2is onse, I bane reviewed your origiaal gdlevan t"srtavanoe OfG cu's Loge, and y appeal to this office. je w tbi =ttar and the sick Call alip in quesfiion. I . Lay's respome is ae z matter, which was discussed d xdQ your 8i vxsxt, was the issue of the =0 10 food by the SIv1t7 staff. Therefore, the Physt Assistant in this matter did r beat to add :bss the issue they were proefted With aRd dz o you ware aorreody oh"goe xw-dollar cal co-paymol fOrthe vi$IL ,A,s 1`os your t about W. Law and/or Emu b dai aadvely involved is the matter of yotiar imtttat a G4 sAd therefore Ms. Law 12 . b?.ve bee 2 deluded from rwontiiag, Z disc w- The ct that you, may have %cted Nib. w via a ravest slip doer not nett to the level P ludo M9. r..aw from oxrdiag to eemm. In additim its reviewW Your i ?i evaACe you did not mentian Ms. Kurtz iavolved in this matter so again tltl s is no 1 of the AC-ADM-$04, We title System," by baviug Ms. Kurtz reviow fts tt and have Ms. Law, as the ectifts x 1x Care Admi istrate; sign the tram Is resp anae bLdi her review and coacttrrettee. rauir allegat or reason for Sick Call was adequately sd s by the Medical Aapar w?atttn t tbas respon is appropu letq your request for raimbmsem o the four-dollar Xtlediosl co- rant is de ' . Ms. La Griev c>?a'le 164375E AG15 Pile Ltr mission is proted the public by confining persons co 'tt to our custody in safe, secure facilities„ au to provide opportunWa for inmates to aequhr th dd4s. gad values Amnsaty to bccozxk productiv?law•abidixig citizens; while rasp 8 tb?* xxghts ofthe victims. Do La L. rt .sc f?rr I41 k .0 IF - K 'q; D TE : D racs,¢ G, a aa? T 0 / f7'ffL gkV SW ?f F fPOAIJ (".le) S ?f NAWf y A'u r-f:R&sA f AMJ 7, AV r/Ik R VLF SUO;rAa7' IFr'r PC tt1RS /Q?S f??'b aN D67C L, aao1, r ArmV'e Ofewa -r & K, Do--m am raD, Da-Aor+a roy, AN,Amy Mc Ie i- 7r11E.SR4 IsA F O IVo VOS RSS APSE II?.O 9G 40'00601- rftl r MA7'T6 OR V040Z lrfVf&?? AlV.0 'ro IF&P Al r r#.g R ? MO, 1?er W a orS f-*.o IN ' ifE-, GR f* VA G F. 1, T!f t'rR/6VR?? ERR XR47cel-0 5,- /QEmANO EO ra E 40-MY O q .Y'r4I p m45l ,6ArlQ u &9 rlfAN M. OKr,3 0&0 r, 4.010. Bd:H VP rue, E r'Af000 Inn( Ad46019S VJ CAE I N PIOP !A/ F Gyr?/??R???E ?S P*/A% 40"/n/tfO4 E " /n/ T, ,d PROt?.3S G 'f f $ . onfP L itf fJ' r d S ?i :C 8 6, c4DfnP4R I r? D OF Ytf/S Ir7 E q r-o ! A. T. 4 /fW It .f,, ?lBla/6r?R 7/ffr D?-l3SA RNb 4.r Ipr rv N. kffRre FQR P ' fZ4? /a?.YB', N}Rvif 7'#Ar 9e_-1W.4 IM Tir//s /4 RMO /r IS *V*14^94.6 r R cf?2 /nfSp ??-io.v. ;r 9G4op I4ur(r'a fs R-csPo .Y oN .SEJs7' I?•? .2 04. /&v- K0 , 14`{3 S L?R.r ?/cen OAI 3'907- Ir, 7'96 T lFSS'1xM?d 77?lE ¢r?Ctsv' Ta 7', LIB WHO EV/Daf?r•L}I HAO RuNr R SPOW10 ro IT, r-, 4-4K/ 'a IffA 3 9 C?JVrf rct4r, On/ r#c- .Z'R.R. Rdlr/f AYE r-w,s i1tn?,q7?3 O"" $C)`f .Yee-JIM 0, .5" AN -rcc 3y WArA OR r. c?W Is E uAIC1,44 ,*CAWTO % I. /?/FO?t?frJ?t? f-CSO / roN' /WgW.T IprrE.,fP7-eD f/4 VrM Or- AA&5,' srRAW /?'lf /+71d?RS #,ZVX, ' R U-10 W,-f4- 0 ?N1lyd ? d Afl-r W 9.9-V-00 SO-7 eerW-'k''nf A-4eAra TOAD 4 :nJ m*NIP4 r.*q es rift Rf& 4,07-'S drMT rV R FilrR /aN0 Jin/*AR'r11f1. R V46w Or- rt/e O*nwv4 1A"'r. aR IEO R&*.s PJS J"7rAreO 1+Qov&, A ,p F/ AV4 r /?? /fssit:N tnlr I S EQ mss. ?. E "rRR / PR/V04.OUS BEfAWTE- R"agirra/4 b/O /Vo7- ?f04R?SS 7-'/{E E+C ND Cam } IsS4fE OP 7't?l•E' GRIL-VANC. eG7'? /r' 4&7-#$' O-C4.J466A- .! e y /tW*O A? oGBy'/? ,p? d¢N'o itFE aC- o 'PAC! P40COOdW4RS A WE' 774W 011$0 'S OF 77/ c& PrRF?,r?>•(?? , Om yedv r 4. . $. s'Y'ivrc- s /J1/ p/FR7 7 r: '`r?f= Al R??po h/JCLUIJ f }? p f0 AG Sua= f y' C4K9 an/S w/A JFd, / // T'A4 O f?tbCwlD 7'O LV TA+,? S3'fJ+ff' ,?' R? ?l?N7" dG 1e4?/ 9K?4?'7^RwJTIf?T'?J ?'HrFr K R' &/Z.Aw .0.01kft 'ro DG ?? v??lr ff ' R?By Rr?quasr.s .4vor k?cc R 7- Ott CfPOAW A6friff?A n G /{1?VA ¢? o??,? 6R f 7-a 064)94F /s r,rc-ee^. uP DonJ, 4 O L.. /<'E LeN%veR fib •r?r+yS /'/?L«Cff,.$??frir? PAC, E ?'"Mro U?• oex? G? pZo4? w ,vrs ma,0 4,44 ro ro Yrol. .re r 6 1/Jdr wl r /:?»Aft r, •. 7mGSC- 14Rer /tfo7• C • y rvAlevA C8 MAkE'S ^/v marNrla/--/ r#,4 d y"? InJ,f'rR ??'? NsyS?tl=' 7'o NariF?r T? 6-4 4 . A M q r'J'"m OP F'R CT! x NA E ?J,p !?F yS. ? rar. /g.Y s?. ? ? ko CK crlEo+.?, s-e - C •,?DMa R &r /MS71C"CL7 We Tb AL&A P f.Y0D A• Af iFK![.. X#V A4f:r, , X W4s A/ C; --To Mae: .5 i t or e-,14 1 *AID P/tzy v, ,4 s' ffp AGERr?D /QI?u S rfJ F itlo7' ro .{JAM y m 00 ), w, rH,6? 4tjr cc rmlr is m , Or Ao s 'r ?lnilN/S F/ T/f,? ??Rjrs• aG N+ OU D m O / R c ri4Fr yavZ- .4 /1"& 7-0 , /fA /FNyWA ? .2 r'.9 4ranamarJ J;anlsE -r 7 iF /J !N!i/ /'+Ga t? 4R /JEIryQ, J r'/ G N . ?'ifeE N B o &4, JGA L-S 3'ra I=FS /JCtT ?WO, I I uo-S'r ,wy r7E'dsorl FaR S14A/14V A o-?* rl4ZK e4L.IL a//,7 p GRS R irl cJ rHF- 5/ k C,444 n swe5rarerT d an! A1W usr 9! ,2Lp6• ? ?LSr#R4j? GOrr?rL?! 5 rt/?r : ",t y?r?s E Hy K?Jf.C?KS7 rntFL ..., r' "/Jo NurRl !d t*OiQ mb°43"'? M o'r'A me cw, X'ni "&,r -Oinr? rb St?ti? ap Y. 00 bus r ro {6?r.L ?o feR•4 .Z' wtv-S ,A,Q,V/A 'A 's 0 Ss k aJ?nt?vc c f WE.B 1 0, RNd ffNy N ? s l.? EPr 6•PS?r wr4G .srtr? 7'rr?lrr 'fPJrfg..J, y4 Rr 7 y'rmG?' was ,t3?inldF #Vl?lb4.71 C trolly EN Cax -S?rr?P.SVN t3E?i,CJ&/2Rri kP"JiS7" Jet W. .?'' Wl! s /wtpaR 7 rt n!T' Ti5hR7 P7 t".r Ira 4,.P 6.40cefie . ,w 7'Hqr 6A'?A6 ?/f d r r 'rR,'o/- , 0 CROrY7 rNr Vrt'« / lrR N r",7 141404.0 .F. -yd ox e,, z (. .41va )'PAY 'T"rt,C- PdPyrl -- 1404OLe-Tr Aro •st,6C!- J•ro Vts o /w. o-. o,* .06:Nlep Ine m2 PPAVOR lFGRar.?.0 /A/ 0drn/16:a 14 1n?•.r+L. MR /yrLl. /Mali 1 eAf- A'D 40ru PJ-1yS'1a1gAJr A '? FolL A• -)l&^4 A7" ?dsm N rn4.,A M-4 lWa 761?rC.rt'G?? h'EC4RD? KCr AAI49rrrAy 0?J P/•,'FnN y'rbri,/ /,r ro 546 y 681772 y Tl.fo c• I-D V49 RNi" DOE S VCir lfa"Je T'#45 .'rch' 6,4LL }I •rC-n7, rM6- OAIJ .,/ ,ri7 Z WAY 00,90-re l Ao,q sl4rk CaLL WAr Ey .9430.7 c.Ul6/ Ab = •jEx- ?,o Ad' J010777Cs Fo,Q A cys; oN M lqb?. ,= 49LL u'vow kyS, AMr. NE Fle4b 4-f• !? u?In.'tsS.s Ti4,4T /P 4 yy' SiOk' e-14L VIS1 ',V Re ro4Lorv uP-v Foe ErP1L6FTm rv4rr e' 'f" A,V'p r,'?r#r Z u.SiC frr sys7 JN ?oclJ ,,?!¢r7-. 64 ? " ?rl+nlT /5 r • o Ygvc r n P¢e. oeg D r E d /N 7 ' • ° I & !'7?74[.r,tjT- r • ? ' f f o t ? t D T ? f / s ! n R 8 i : a R ? o r o R C a U ?¢ r OP ?' ? f'`'? 8 y ll?tr•??/? Tft? R?'4t,?1? ,4y?p u s ?v? 7`n r,? ? G aroE S, .0©rpo A R &.4Gff .s''rITre4Rw vloc-krld'v N : y ro0. oo -09 64a41 nor-4 runro/og F4;orsg4,- dvAlp,r?rccr1cn1,f1- yr ? rtb•+J pcu9 or,?f?R :0 Po V,7R R x AMP Pa vl77 vc- dJ /ffn,*4w-F /i R ,?$ G ? uKV Ere t Ar cc7 , e.Ct =ICE $Of l CAW aptA ? GWH# Attpcflmer?t B - r 2 H OF EN S trt YL ANNA N P -- DEPARTMENT OF ' ON R CT 1 CO RE S I ©$:FICI Li INiTIAt A GRIEVANC 2 SSRONGLI- -+ r• ?•••- --- RIEVANCE 194376 A T erre , ,..,y: , TO: (Innm iJ9 a CSC NO.) RACIIJTY USSIIRWLC T K N GRIEVANCE DATE Tito followl p is a uerus y Of My HrtdrrV$ f ogaaing your odavanm Accordi g to our madi i record you did sign up for sick line on 81 i)1 . You were seen bjecause wants medfoAl to in ervens to st p SMII staff' from Interfering with meals," Th PA explained to you that the meals eta. are so city issue. There was no mention of missing a meal, I , g bypassed for a meal, refusing a meal, to ? mu or too littl food, hot or cold trays, just interfering h sal. Further, i rea back thro h the whole year of sick Gne Issues. Ttl i not one entry from a PA or physician advising you report to edlcai If you missed a meal. In fact the is my one entry about meals and that is when u w ted a high aforle diet There four dollar Ick line charge is within the DOC policy, Cc: a part tendent Ke chner (puff s 0-XL > tx'xa 3 >C 1 n am e an e of G , ante oar -SIGNATURE OF 0RI ce OFFICER t)ArE Npnoy Ku RN pcrvisor?l j? TiC'E 2009 KAY -8 Pl912. w) j CA'E' 1-Y i?c INVIVY 2010 MAR -4 PM 4: 20 i?Ty Buell, David D. Prothonotary Cumberland County Courthouse 1 Courthouse Square Carlisle, PA 17013 AOPC 1013 Rev.03/03/2010 1 Karen Reid Bramblett, Esq. Prothonotary Milan K. Mrkobrad, Esq. Deputy Prothonotary RE: Paluch v. PaDoc No. 9 MDM 2010 Trial Court Docket No Dear James Paluch Middle District March 3, 2010 CV-4835 and CV-6175 Pennsylvania Judicial Center P.O. Box 62435 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 1600 Harrisburg, PA 17106-2435 (717) 772-1294 www. superior. court. state, pa. us Enclosed please find a copy of an order dated March 3, 2010 entered in the above-captioned matter. Respectfully, Milan K. Mrkobrad, Esq. Deputy Prothonotary /tp Enclosure cc: The Honorable Edgar B. Bayley, President Judge Buell, David D., Prothonotary Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. James Paluch V. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA (C.P. Cumberland County Nos. CV-4835; CV-6175) No. 9 MDM 2010 Filed: March xd - 2010 ORDER Petitioner has filed an application for relief in this Court describing (without documentation) his attempts to file a notice of appeal from the dismissal orders of April 16, 2009. Petitioner asserts that the trial court refused to docket his notice of appeal and returned that document to him un-filed. Petitioner's application for relief is GRANTED to the following extent: To the extent the petitioner has been attempting to file a notice of appeal, the trial court is DIRECTED to accept and docket such document if submitted to the Cumberland County prothonotary for filing. The trial court shall then transmit any such notice of appeal to this Court, which will ultimately make a determination as to the validity of the appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. 902. Per Curiam 13 5 r-441Wr-Z"?.C'5" M©T,ZDN Fyf2 c? Al 7 7, /5/oW ?041Es Jr-44/A/74., t ?/1rv?C- t9, nr?luC?, SR.? ?r./o?Tf . P/?n. 7T, P?/ sup lr?f lCR ? PA Clv/. ?^h? VPPEG:Lr9TE o Gc', ? !? 4.F.S / ??F fED?l2/{L AA1?ss1C y/???7" OF 19 ?/ /h' 3' RI?!J FG>Gr,YTfl 9/'Y7?!?/?MF_NTSt /?J?1} 1` rte, S, G. !o la Jd/1 ET .ter€!? r'4.-neW, A//7 V i A/s , F! G' _ F / y +' /> ,c E 11 T/ V A11 NG' T.H. 0 UV T IS ln1 T?,C V4 Al T'/n Al f fJh° Tlr? ? r^ L.! G LUfin/L c Td Dry ? TiW,4'4-X"OS-Q..6r s. /h,A4 6 /-/ 3, C / D Ci?G1 E? f 1 v,6 PK+ 07C r r T/r,E /U CG) f N/S ? aA/,- s cl-A? 7-,So l?IJ? 3rDk'E ? c 33 X?G7'1- ?L-" -1-,!5011. a/ZaP f-' P/<Ti I-rr ?Dw1R/C, !r? ..SvPrn/ ' Q T JGI d< a. -/E. A4Z6 G E - ..c v u SPEGJfiL ,?% ifrF/9E/?T C[/?/7 0,5,1;1G! %JFlroll-i -,?0G,1" toy- (foolf'i_,q//?k.,o arc VIM''; oas f-/ f!!J L"f.P S r/ f fii/ /?'T rr lGr !?L f(t 6,1,17"S V/OL 47-16 1/S /S' y' F"/G /A/[r f+ 5??/' L/. S, C. Y l'IVIL !C'NTS Dm L F _ `?c F °an rur/D/rls`l?nl;? l7S 7P-7,01- n CES-:7 417 114.50 AI W1440 qS A 1)c1-=?,?Llas/ aEr-s, i/v?. a, ? r`c?lsT?',???t? .?trc? : v< P?/sor./ ?,?<.??.7-? s?r??fec.s. Gf',?,?'>?'is r?:=?el..?sT /.?.? :? .arse rr/?r_/iF:°,c!.>f?I ?s? /n..»rrssil? f?k rF?T ° f ?L SJ?t%} fJ'I/??`?i?d u a7 /;EPt/?` ;,I?(Y (1 L•<'!.'7 !^h,' •rr_,.._ ?tf lr:.4 l;GC L Fs, ?G D ?rr41J i1t-1A < y o13,7-ce 7-10,AI r W /7XV, T/f-' _Lek ?f/C c'°.•-Cl/p r a/_>'tr7/S_S'E/Y 60 J? OF PZ 'S t'JrnP'L.A/.J7'S ?LTF. =tLc17 Q %lon, L .... _ ?..: /Vo rl c: C' i ; ? ,r',? n -?"1-. . -.,... ...,--i, it -r S?C-/ . i, I-.?.•.r.. , ?;i/?C' P e' " ^t,/1 7- 41,E RA' 60 e- P, ,CS, i.ll? # ? e rM , , ',`e '? / C^l - / 1r 4 /i t ?! ,nor r n , ni ?% TR r ?/ ?? ? -i ? c= : ? .u r ?- %F. ? s IFfO ri !' E r L. PI: k- Su G ! L' J n c+ 5 d- T1, G;ti? N?STa? ,. -,--ti /:?--? ?=-/->k" `? /? -! i..-:_ •!. .r' ,G`h^ ??%/ Yi ,f?J_ Fr/L?/'?+' l/? 1J/ rIJ /?) < lr 7s" / N /, , '?/i l /' TPI3? s 17 «? S / 47 ,4l c 1 f L' S f`-/r". M 7f-4- U"' Mr /?rJ UC/ /' . y .%?i s??' To/,N iv C u rJTk'U L ,YAI _ < < 16?Ep 6. IL-1,6 V/T 6c. ?7'c •j. I ITL. Mo7'jol.,! /A/ST'TUT/O/ FrF4 S[- fir; L y !P/If I2A? H 7-Lr-P !AI 7/-1-c -5 7,47 vG,1/' :"/tlI?yd sN' j'/?ra ?.4rFGtAdc T ?M 1L Fl64rv rrun'T/JUe /6O/J /,i} 7D Hr v 11? A+ ', ?'uksur?,?+ ,o f%t? ;?r?c o?J?? , y .. r' ,<sUA'Ac PPoAEkry? " r?L7?, ; S on/-; y i?c c-n :rrEr? %'o s t"SS/onr r.! TCl r mar/!/ 14J? 6L)XAS `vF 1?'c E SD/?AL !?/ZD/?F_,FT W1411-`c !N e,,F o,,Z4L ?H'tr1R"7/UI? d /!»r U i > O J1Jfr/G-t CO,Lr I ?p TD r//G ,??S'?/?rG'rci? Jt'ods,,/G i?IVI.- "?//u'<I/ PGTF. !S OA/-,y p ?G C r1 F`o y of P C.snn?9G P,?oPEr?? I'Y /TEms, Lax 'E_sS I d 7-, Ve .L LC-.vL .}rrr rER 1,4Z s JP1T/ XT 7-,411 'I PL r G ass r ¦.rr -?:. - iwrl?i w??rwiMM6Wirwl?wrrrriM? - r?r.rrwri %r l GOES A1&- 7- ee? JS 7Z' / C !?. a/,eS Qf,'O//FL"b FIS A ?E": ENOr9t?7. )T //Ai/< ?G'CESS //I.S LAC./,'G hr,7'S.:'Igt.S r>?/ irirs c //S? /I?i" 'r,u1'J7 4 07t Sf'SrIFI?' D r/T?S, /11/ d d /N?O STO?A? E. L- xC?SS LrtJt1L M/17'EElA[S C7lvX? 0/< /1V1le--71VE, AeZr d0A1YC1- mop a .. ?. .S'rv1 Z ?O!?r 4 7EL` , -1-:/O 1',') ?fO ES Ci/= AG 7"1 t/-c x Z/? J clJE C),e ;; uG.y' d ?C?>' , 11,1C4 UVIV& rl V, 1-?4 r? cr 4 u avo9, d GTF. /t9 FILE A 71AI C.X i?bTiCE Of AP!/?A? F?'arn ?h'E nlSrnrsSri!_ a ,.S'OF NDS, V - 41,P-7-c'4- A O / Y IA11714 7"' P12,4 7 D /ZEruRNEb W,5 f Pp r?z -rc /?L7F, ctrJF/G ?L? ??,CC411SE NlS 4,0PE4X i?/fts rr,l?ftEa /A/ Tr-/, 515004R'4 "6 Ef?IlELOFES cVcnJ 7-1VOa6'/-f f F,.:L?U ??.?/? S.4,9,7-- !? l r 71911.60 %sfE L=.N7'if;Z / /r?EAG blfcr4+.' T:) rr'LTf.? 14/0,V, BetyLEY r26j of ?% GT ,- /N ! o !C6 001- / t (?74iWz cv fiC.L!/rrc3• '• lni. /// 9WO $F_f'r?/ExITE NVCL0FCS A,1 y.>fyC 7-/r7-a6• l ?rA reJ? j7r{DTl?ra?0 0 7- 77 7-OX 77-L- fY / ?7(1 ! h// f // uf?F/z ED 4 7-0 L? h7 fL ? , P trc VXYZMY, TfO?'!T Tye p4n?//,oIvo7-.49 LilyS AEPUSI.uC.- 7V r14E AILS AlUT/G"L• D/= 4lf='FNG 70 AA.SaPE+C10'Q " ocrr<3" r?N 2 14 q 7rfA? 7'!?E ti!?'t=?+c /s i?GEr.?tU ,""/LE <tfv:lA < ?f T -R :.SOL ?,Eo. %}'cr? l?til fJ N CilS 1'c (: 7-lvf?S1 TD ,4 rl . 14D VIS L, ) 04 DC L° •1-)E FS, '"47- IF ?. ;p P ?' DEF5. ?ERV ltf?, r /+!/ri?cri _) .iC"C iiD/!S iu i L_rFf:5 Al 07- - IW,47- l//S 7 7 Di/C6 0 4l?PEfrt ri ICED t r G'/?/G -7-11141- ! 7/I_ !Z 4 i c v !; ? t , _.J . , ., i-'!9 X D CaJ C-LL /!f?Jr , .n. 1 f- mfr" ;> ?" X GJ ?1 ! ` f:(?'cl /" ,r,, _ - ,?, , Y? r.. N?? . "L Fc o z 1,. ''JX ??li [.• ? ?'f% / !.. .:j_S N" T > i r`l . ?LL •?l? ,-? 7' IWc (LD/Ji'LuS!J/? fJrF ???Gr !A/Vl M7-04/cb STOPcd EY'L°E _ Lct?/$G t f;`JpF_fi'7 G'!? N:, V. 7n ?wTf 72) ;-;ff1'E.-6-444 !,, r 1 fr}.4-L G, ,.v _.:1.1 fT Y.. .! L,,. ,.:.(,-fl...i"tiG _, t f?.L_•.S T.i F/`j=i :ri,?C. 7?NF17` -,r' " /? G / N14 C /_`i : /..17•"',G; C4.7.. O&C/-/ rrND eel: -Cg0XIE" t?f,J/EA L/ I , 0 5w -A - . Q?, 7/G "?k f cvz7L.../r7Gfc'RTjI ?t??.S :r% t3 .5 ?O':E iFtCy' fsG <varN%c"_IJ rcG fi-'s /<tju?ST TU j%l o t/ / PE 5u 0 X G L -OCl r °f S /{ ? f E / r rb'l wr 7',4 rR zL - IS' / A -C G,V r ljC i+- rE e 176 /fl ,.. t, ..> .:> ?. I / n ? / ' f-? :... i?SV /J 1'?,G: j P! _? .. i /=i (.'. ?' L. G7 N f? :. 1 L.'. i! / .-% f ?l 4') i'?"i /^ ?.. Tf -' V f `/ f./ (.j . Co , - .7 b [ r S'A// /(FJIE w/ cj.y? /A Ii?JCf t es/,i'l / ?. J, ,'/:•c. <.1 (-1.`iE J?#N"tuc` /+/OT 3 !/J L l:: = 7T,CJ finl{J e?c:,lv"S 7-1<6w,`'11 ? c ?; ?.? ra, - ? l? 07- A P 4 ? r-?,r /= uTU ? ? Pu `/?osES rF tcF? k ~ r, c C e? 02 Q u o r E a, Z _T fS L'x -7 2) . , r`l ry 1: r U . iJAIJt! c S Ufa /C=" :IEr-/iZS- IF, 9 or' /'4 ?F.' s 4. EG /TiMA TE C,-'q IS 7 7-0 F.2; _ L_ -'`O/o J ?/??_SuPEP/a?E' c'ac<RT1.ITE/1E0 r?7N OIeaER,?/AEC / pn/ /?r'fIkCH 3 / -:. E [/GtNt7(f. 1' tal+ ) JT,} ./ G rAC, C , c-L? N/' -t}7 ... /1'47A10-rloG AL r?U/: /?DS. p8- /? ?5 A -1b Q _ -7 11144 f/? f?/5 >???.0 X , .s?jEGf+4 %/ZOI%'Er171ES r9rii /+f (a! !JO , / O/J /U'!i/C t1r /0 O O pLTF. W4S E5-COX-r--,S 71S Jl"-r"S R144L i4& N?/?FfAJ(,' f 0 0 M SF, 7C -, flTV4, Cl G SOX i _ r v'CRz sl N /JD t' GT C b•?cE; ` 'T /-"t FF- -.:iE .A L G :.? f!!, G Tr/C Sc''AG._S C ELF /? 6y IC, Ti?lS c?/?s Al Trq [Or: :>,:1 T 1'1+6 ? -43 /'H s, /AlVC-WTa,C'Y 94e7' RATy/E.p !1 G iS'T sAlV4/lITO,Q/ - n , W</!CH /lE i2DEk3 ff!? /??i %rSEJ?T /!? Wf!!G'fN /'L 'F' A rrc vuoreD --no QL-Tx.I Ev/- F"/c v/v'I lfJS s7iPE.=L` /?," / DUIE EQ, 7-,14E 6bx rf?r ICrD "3Ti?TE •` wIllaN- e-anrTA/NS 7/{E OI SES AOR NbS, ?....?:. _ - ;,,? ..... .:,._. /. f^??_ iyr?/a;fi ..,y.,. ?.;?1? , u,ift /L?:y f?/.9 5 • /? 1. JQ' $'<iL9Y 'G?P?,IYrE,1? ?` /.:; Lt///S C!:4P-TU OA/ /?,hCaI? B .Yt/?E.O.?Ok? rr1!!?c'C'F/ /f), O/D,,7/rE .?APE S-r-445 ul?P Cg h' J? '?. Ef 14W /I TF, ?S rdN _/)OC'ury9t'nJiS w',EkE /?ErY16VEdJ m/ SSI /LSE O, fa' LpS7, .7114E C:&,OX fJF /01 r ` /!// ' GtJ f G ?^ ? r- TLr 1<? !' - of T/•F O CULlLD IJD /s? FDU/.It?. ?f%fF? FIJf-4 11 Tom, 1G'.??.SEd <J/J?/ ?a,?%I/E.Q ..sEq?PC;q DF hJS F%C6Rf -,c7 7 /4 A -r - r- r - . ! _. 2-n / Nv 7, L v C?i••pt. ? :E?? 4Tu?tC? 1'/.•G?c"r:" ?1 r0? Lv?.??S? ? ?-C:? .:Li" JS EV/DE/J':"-!-!_ pn/ ' r? , r - .-,•./ ?`,'- ;J'' ''47r.1 /..$ 4f6nlw&k'n4Eb Jv74y 4 ;rE VALi?i4 6LE EV/DGAICEJ f'L7F.'3 STan"a:D c- xCESS L "6,14 P,? k7"/E_sCO/VT/? &/ Je'AIL ??DJ/F/a N?I L__; %j 1'T!?/'N? C'.tiEhlT.t`.' GrVrr'i)GLh-'/C?F7/.O?.!! rr i Ts:r?:w'w ?- GI.J.E/?T' Y?ak?i? P?pc7Du c'.i:-? ,j??cU S,E .ti/DAc'..?'. rJr'p }uLT V/oZ od w ,'e t{ /? , H/'ni?4'c !//? L 4ILPF7cI -ro Ffr i't7L' t/YFFL.:o Er.S rL- t, r?tT Nlai/vN?D%hE cr,,n.C'. i// !/fknr??a Jr?=. %a /nl:Er?VhJF ?O OF.r?n r1c. !'f'or ' r1oiv c7F ,qls S-ro4'Z-41=:<_ E- -5 ?C= A? /'% oPEA, Jas /i^/? A' Lots F4; To r?- ?G?. ;l.=: 1.176 Ry) h"` i?i 4 ,L. v: /"T";y }?? /S ?•Jr=r ,v, ? ! T` 4-:?-A , w.6 U. S, 6, C , :7 a 1) G 4 f)-7 L (? J1 ti/ I iJ ISL. 7 !=. '-S i`?7 o 7 ! o Al 0A) r ? 6, :A./1 7 .._ .:. , 1 _Z77 rV7/,>S?.Q ? /ti,C'NEAL /!? L)Pty? G/J ?e.Suf'J<A'.J?? .IFLrU/fV?r-.k'.r ? L y"f'-. l= L c:l• 6,' ,,: D`; mow' .`"G? ) /2A'T1 _ L'0AlS J ruT/Gr 44 p'?,,?:, ..?1J r-° ./I'?u ??,: r,!/..S ti unJJiF:ri t4•yG? Jt / ri .a: / .,, !' ? ,": G J..' L.• . `-1 f /-1 ! ? i.i!~ % /,'? ... ? tom'...'., h',= 7-% 7-N - 'n -:J !it r1 f'-%?" /`-=) ! ., ;/ f ?= : /: ?, ?'? ? N /? r- ,J ?..' r;' % h' ?? y .._. p T rl ,.. y'/ /C a !"/?: , v/?<.:' Y /-i C_. :?1 .:? : Ti-Y' ti ?-i?: J'. u/'?u/ P? L ? l-i .:,/= /'C /?-'? i y4 \/fr .Aii ?Cf "7-0 RA h V-6 NT ? r??? f C?k?"N•Gj2 iilii iv?r°ttL CF4c-5. 41/G `/ zu!<'?3 Ci.C q /X S reg"c C, L.'AC ES_5 l ? t1L AT/?S 1 ?'?,.?/.!„ 7/=. 7-0 /v'E_ti/TarLy /!_! U? I? /S .S'!Ok'ED xt cS5 LL" yL ` ? /rte 5 ' _ , c"" `;- •= ' F?crr, .'•s/a ?' ,;; , "'??? 71 D,r' s-,Qryithl fi'/??' ,'?i ?C ,,rrrJt nJ%. CJI? . :.,H ! ti!,y, VJI?E!-reE mAy ! E JyJJSS1?(r/ LesT, 0A/917,46-d-D/ 14LT ,end! ETC. ? /yi/-t t;k'cj /?TTCJ2/??Y-CtI,F_-"?T CorJF/Q?nlT/qL W><1.2E ?'.r2UK?nl? i 1 / IAIA 14,AJX SOX.-S V9 i ALT MItTc`RJa`1 fj?ih flGLnb? iJ'-, To JJfAAJR' 7-1yW sLfi _- JVi-r!r A//S -S-I&WA74WI', /N/ 7-1-19 LS D lJ T? f1 7^.E ` .?lac:.°-N ,SE'.r,*G /NCr AI?D t -AL X LNAPJc 'p'r!_iCr?7?t.f;lnJTlFr TC ?F- PA?kS"An/7- TO 0 /3sE,QVt /;r?ySE4eCHJ?_c fo I > d tw,CIAJ / F Sunl7t -5 ,5 J2 CHE S CrL ?I??T C.r: t'A ,r -<- %POi' k i!E U/ffJC i/ NQ? S?HG. 7/-lE 'I7 h ! FAt?D/I/JTS- /l V!I i?.'/A/!! !? P- E r,^ f',! n ? ? 5 f ?l r7 y /•/OT o FE1? 1-?A/Y Ti¢ PE - S E FI L S U != ALA/ n/ 7 i AF ! S i '7u R E l? °c.5S /_.r_`•?/=tL ;UXGJ Ol.?%'S/.t?t?' Nl.i /?k'E: ?NC6 W/:H04JT /? V,f??? ?ikl)"?-I?,' ?'nr?rn s N, fS Cauk'7'% "/{• F"u ('?I-/E/z; ,z!_T,-. k' f_ ??JUE 575 ,f1 i E,rt?f'oi',J9,c:.?J S ; "f.' ?/ JF T"r/-EP? SuFrE,e/O?e A T ' ? c /' ? d' s"9'J !• t ?' ; t ;/ D / ?j 1.-t A) !°/ L S !.t " /-' T/.,Y7 E P L Ti C ry N J c C. u A: E % 1W E 8 jt"TF'S !. . :SanJAL LFv.4L IA,:Vc%/774,A7i 4IS7% 9 ?- £ ''C [' Er/<olJcuu.SG 1Z) m/SSED !-'GYf=.'S 4tJ0-6-AL, S F; tuC,1 ?, 1)/!u/SD S!-'AW4, A7- jjOG', ?/y.. •%7"t. H/?•.S I-?//_EG ?? r'rTc?r /O/'J TZJ ..5'?T :iS/,?'E G?GE.p, 5 a OOA1 7VE Cact,¢'rts ORbEE G:@ANriA/r- P,4 -rF 's r- ?DcoS" / E V.c 7"/V f?L`TF ?uR EE' fcECJ?a E sT.s Tf{F f/onIDQt{ QG.E Cou,?r Ta !?/REC?" T/-/ P.R DaC -b'E "ENpAt?T.s AND TF,'E1R ?D_.En/t/'?D 45 -V 7"0 /j???KE /?Y7sYt£1J/q 7-. FIRI ?1?r rr/Ei?TS U/Z 7`YZ• I Al V-/j7'0 OF P?TF, / S.TDR.EO ExCESs.,LEG/?L F?Fc dF'Ek Ti?S ,5.s .TN?1?` f/•E _rr?q ,CoC?T6 /fl,S No7 !?? ARP6 L : D,< exs', U ;7'fl? G?uinBE2LtgtJDcut?Ty Comn7o??,PL EAS C r7S .1 Utr t.5 ./C71/p D u/?T ; ,: 9,,4R AAvL , b. „. , uT<1Gh'tt? PLT /S 1q Eq%aE.5T ,4--OR i/En/TtD -SZ-e 9uSW..7'A?,c Cam t9, A.17 - " " r ? a,??F''l ?Ei+f7 ?? .7f?/ s .?.` DuR 7'!S' ST?r?I.L> >N? _ !?l A R C {"J ..? j_ 0/0 C:•?G f't E vJiT1.i/l,)714E 01' T,{/S r/arJr> Rr.?L..E tau 7. .. 9 77LVJ / a r,vi44)E' O0 17-1- TG Pt207"EC7 7-,YS !on?S?JTG{ t 0 e7- 'At.lr„J ffF Allb7?: 01, cr?iLi t/J n1o WA f'R?TuDr?E ?t9E .??r=? `at,.fr?, -r?:?c-t?:7 'w?-E:,?t?LO?'EES", ?xZ G/o.:??-,cp:-ntsE ?::;? P?tiD<oG?c?? f •T,???srs of f?R/S6 ? OcF/CAA s, A/07 ,eA/.1-r rwE. ,p-ri.nnJ ?'ou>???/? Jc1OfW-Z-.n fJ, 40 ,C ,?A?D I-IAA A^Jololz /tJr >2y :v i,?rs 6!4s4- /qs AI&4 ,,AS". r-OCG4 cXc,E? S. LE(f- a/- rt-.s q7- Z/-S dF Lass 57-C. % %/!.5' /t70 i i Jn/ CaN i l?/s j? ! T l:t N? '.' %s`<f Key /Nl vFls?t?.T /!?/? tn/+t/ t L!/ T !.f /-/QtJt??RBc. trT aul?T /?E??•s f=?r? h'L ?/E'u! ; f='?k'?Fuk',c/ fit?.b Tyr/z/..???'- /??%r Gv,c15?:?.?riTla,? r /''? 7?j'. ./ v k' t y f. , ....-• ! / t ? F" L. i ? /'." N C K ? : ? _ G ..., .;1 ! !' r. v+i t .J C• -> Srr?TED,-y 5... 477 Rl?)Y-lr r4: _ INFa, ,??,l7vu?I C-? ?/ ?' / t!E'.a7 !1/t R?/ ,? L/,3,?"E e7^ t'-1 //<' . rU l?EP???.:'' y ?'GS,e T',=!?..%c.//( 5/ /--'tr.!/Z S/h.??n1T ?C? HrE ?rGO?E f'L7t: /^h 5"!EC_TFULL j kff?/S ?<r:i7'"'Jr/• K?ttld. .xf3LE C'oakr" ?t f?NT n' 5, A Gyi<',v rn,,? c: j'iLlk' ;.J C t) F? ,°c]? ",4 .Y7 na ._ j-W,we -5 A, /ate>3?G,r SCS_ ;;t'r`rtT;-Fr";F_c"b b OR, rf,4TF,,, t^fa ?.c" *0rr,` OAI ePlA i- AND P1-16.47-4 eoP>E.s'ACjr pH?TOC[rP'l?G. r;'ti t ? 7,.J my _ 1:y y ?J ..Zt_ •TAm?s'.?9._P?4?-u?/¢, Tom.` . ?,?_k??3? ??ieT?F?!__Z"Ef.4_sr .? ?4/m--'rbll?S_ ??, ST/?!. /N-?F.,°dSITaNG /.?7'C> rlfA-- Z-4 -uN/T/-'/t<sv.?/P7A/G,6OX+ TSG'I- 5???"HF<E?-? r? f?u??T<N!rDa.?/? P4 / &5v p ,Q 7.4i Pkt?}o.??R!S m.4i?Box s2a? E ?. T lE ??'? .CO/dEGalN!'s <'P? /trn/?!F/l `s /?'7G P"ioitl FOR <NTE-Q VeNTiO<? "' ,vI 7- ?. <rr r?.? r' yr??? Piz c>/?o s ?0 6 R D R GN rW-,C Fa«c w?.vG 10ER.SO/? 4" I AI r*,C AM nINC=K Fik'ST C L.4S A174,,e Po3'7-46-E PR,6 F,4 .1 6 P-4 e40- b' F 2 ?EGEn/?. A/-7-_.T ll t? P<&k S77 __ PL ?G,/ n2c SE" I ?` IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR Plaintiff ; C- a ' , No. 08-4835 V. - PA DEPARTMENT OF -° CORRECTIONS et al. , , G.. c ryr ? Defendants. DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INTERVENTION AND NOW, come the Defendants, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al., by and through their attorney, Raymond W. Dorian, Assistant Counsel, and answer as follows: 1. BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CASES ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. ADMITTED that the Plaintiff was formerly incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI- Camp Hill"). It was also ADMITTED that Plaintiff filed Civil Rights actions in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, which actions were dismissed by the Court. The rest of this statement is DENIED and proof thereof is demanded. II. OTHER HISTORY DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. It is specifically DENIED that the Plaintiff is disabled. III. MOTION 1. ADMITTED that the Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at SCI- Smithfield in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania. 2. ADMITTED that under Department Policy DC-ADM 815, inmates in the Restricted Housing Unit ("RHU") are only allowed to have one records box of personal property in their cells. Any excess material is kept in storage. It is also ADMITTED that inmates in general population are permitted to have four records center boxes of personal property in their cell at any one time. By way of further answer, RHU inmates can request to have additional boxes in their cell. In June of 2009, the Plaintiff was permitted to have one extra box of material in his cell after he returned to general population. 3. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. By way of further answer, the Plaintiff had many property exchanges, including on August 24, 2009 and August 27, 2009. 4. ADMITTED that on April 16, 2009, Judge Bayley dismissed the actions filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County at docket nos. 08-4835 and 08-6175. 2 5. ADMITTED only that the Plaintiff filed Notices of Appeals in the actions at docket nos. 08-4835 and 08-6175. The rest of this averment is DENIED and proof thereof is demanded. 6. After reasonable investigation, the Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a reasonable believe as to the truth or accuracy of this averment and proof thereof is demanded. 7. After reasonable investigation, the Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a reasonable believe as to the truth or accuracy of this averment and proof thereof is demanded. 8. ADMITTED that the Defendants did not file any documents in response to the Plaintiff's respective Notices of Appeal. 9. ADMITTED that on October 26-27, 2009, a jury trial was conducted before Judge Rambo in the Federal Court matter of Paluch v. Dawson, et al. at docket no. 06-cv-1751. 10. ADMITTED that on November 6, 2009, the Plaintiff's personal property was inventoried by staff at SCI-Smithfield. 11. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. ADMITTED that the Plaintiff asked to sign the tape seals on the boxes of his personal property, which request was denied. The rest of this averment is DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. 3 12. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. ADMITTED that the Plaintiff asked to sign the tape seals on the boxes of his personal property, which request was denied. The rest of this averment is DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. By way of further answer, the Plaintiff was not entitled to sign the tape seals. The Plaintiff also refused to sign the personal property inventory sheet. 13. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. ADMITTED that the Plaintiff filed inmate grievance no. 298211-09 concerning his personal property. The rest of this averment is DENIED and proof thereof is demanded. By way of further answer, the Plaintiff's final appeal of this grievance was denied. 14. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. ADMITTED that the Department's Central Office denied the Plaintiff's appeal of grievance no. 298211- 09. The rest of this averment is DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. 15. ADMITTED that the Superior Court issued an Order on March 3, 2010, directing that the lower Court accept and docket the Plaintiffs Notices of Appeal. 16. After reasonable investigation, the Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a reasonable belief as to the truth or accuracy of this averment and proof thereof is demanded. 17. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. By way of further answer, the Plaintiff had a property exchange on March 24, 2010. 4 18. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. 19. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. 20. After reasonable investigation, the Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a reasonable belief as to the truth or accuracy of this averment. Proof thereof is demanded. 21. ADMITTED that the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Court Intervention with Judge Rambo in the Federal case of Paluch vs. Dawson, et al. 22. ADMITTED that on February 22, 2010, Judge Rambo denied the Plaintiff's Motion for Court Intervention, except that she ordered that the Plaintiff would be permitted to go through one box of legal materials at a time in order to pull any medical documents to support his upcoming trial against Defendant Smith. It is also ADMITTED that the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Judge Rambo's Order. 23. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. By way of further answer, the Plaintiff is permitted to keep one extra box of legal material in his cell. The request to re-inventory his property and to tape seal any boxes is unnecessary and excessive. 24. This is a conclusion of law to which no response is necessary. 25. This is a conclusion of law to which no response is necessary. 26. This is a conclusion of law to which no response is necessary. 5 27. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. 28. DENIED. Proof thereof is demanded. 29. No response is necessary. WHEREFORE, the Defendants request that the Plaintiff's Motion for Intervention be denied. Respectfully submitted, Office of Chief Counsel By Ray and W. Dorian Assistant Counsel Attorney I.D. No. 48148 PA Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: May 20, 2010 Fax No. (717) 975-2217 6 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. Plaintiff, V. No. 08-4835 PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., ; Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day depositing in the U.S. mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Motion for Intervention upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below. Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: James Paluch, Jr., BQ-3769 SCI-Smithfield P.O. Box 666, 1120 Pike St. Huntingdon, PA 16652 s/ Shelly R. Holley Shelly R. Holley Legal Assistant 1 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 Dated: May 20, 2010 XA/ - T,ri- 6fJUat T _OF "dtm ON *vL &* s )wVA 0_44A16-EX LA'NY ?,au ?•ry, PFN/vSYL.vANSA Ps. rf. OS A.4 6 - PLA Ar 'A A"& o ?.r .. Tli/S 6OU9 URsuoNTTo RuL(r /033 OA ZAW .04-4, ci?. Agoe- To +WRAIO M/S P"OrioN Aoo;' //VT I AVENT'/opv *-r FoI-1-0 /s: n F T V- IN" T i - C7« pp p liG St/17G ?ronn t' t Or?;ina./ ?/?r,'S NJO?+'en Tpr ?o,.a•rf' Sn}?CrNtn?/on w.f f{e e..q?i t it T ' aA j be invty?+o I lea( CLhcl Processed W,+L " 7-a1 {•?owrs upor+ (?;s recep4ior, in4-o t 4e- Rids.(. 32. T e - pYVI Irls- o 7 eyan rote •yeres Manwa s4oL s +/nov+ a_ wr?'sov?tr `a i O e- 1 12 #-A e i lr i r n -?O ?? a R. 0 u , I, 33 , PA DOG > 1 aCi l ? y eeu?-+ y ' o ? ey ar. roc tyros wrt?? 1 ec on., -pa r- PC n So ` o f ? 0. ?? -+ ?'o ?e ` ven?e 'c -26:kZA rOGtSSGd l+ ?? ?+ ?!? y?o wrs t?pv4 jt 1'5 reCe f +l on 'K'+- - ke- R14u , 33 S Z !i 14U o i'ders c(d - nod- rnven+cry n.er process .'s en -SOMCO or ' ? ' a er 17` .s tccpfion in?-o l-!+t R14U). S. T moty 9, o20 /O ?nvtnfory o 41',AvO, eJe? ProPtrffy, y Al¢/trs . Betrm?-7?? ' a ua/ D t?I a?CO i'? ?O r? / 1+4nd- hG/a r'? l"lAx"Ce ca.nernt.., 3lv. Was A-0eo/Permiss/on 1? f t Pro iavr? av"ew apwo", Vc V"R ae ?wt?r t /lea R ?ranCi or e-d'p*" A. Liecvt fwo ) (saxes o-.0 ae fi ve 1 Jw / Inw.?Criw,/s r`rs !i is Ce //, On r,&braa4-y 11, Z0/O, Od't "A*Vu d,, i I'Ou/?/?L ! TGMS" in his Gel/ pGr /OGst- 3p, d ,21 ? ,'ter a,rne -.4? a A -AA P/ o l1 P/ 4? A 440,1( , 'S net you le of ale yQNL! a., a fuse PR c' d , I c3 q. CF .?p AkC +?r+?e PRC era?tr ..?r?tt. 844"_6 do&& Ad d?SG+?'+/ -f' i ? . /oRN•?s or' f'a.e/+!I ?y ?Q-n?er ?,s @or?stn'?. y0. PI 10 X4 r`s c +?,+ p re vt ., f mac,( a a ees s to !t 1: s 4ceesr Lo. ro?er + es Se. ?r + AA J4 A6wA,./,o d 7"ir?ae? orr nR.! Gef?ie,S & PC .Mere/ ?ivr s t.lpekee/r/n? tece?asa Pr/:as, evo a/n.?s 'o--f Smz ,. L e S/NtZ e[+'-t dtrrYI'.j Rn1? wro-n ado la / ltewcver p?,f,f. /sRs ?r?ae ' o,i fo s•?l.xi Vf? s Ckc+^t, At wok!d irre fs cr.?1?r a&v" t Iis's 0-/dt/mx 4.0 44'0 1.2AIaa &PAPI-c vl I rieJ 60*14 09"4n1 fJ,e ?! sae r lrw &X /on 0%e Ise s I eJ?! r?+-slvcr re s, I i ay? , AOlO, if dots r.of eve- aL y mess a .s re ? o-r- o ?+?•- /ret,1E o-' A/s /t?e/ Yj S Af" 4, IN1101 )oli-001 ott not 41Y-C any aee.Css fo any s-4 /$ -KC4/Ve_ 'Vf - - 316 Joao ge c swm as Am #oJ &r Jen "141 ton le j-90 MAJFCr1els, whe.. 101 ;1#1 is in +-4-L Jkel 4"J /4L Yy. _ s or ' 04-Ate- doeuwpe,"fs A-c Piece& qfa,- *r/R/ exA161, s Ar*v, Ao.0 Seboxca in - + ©i-d c.6, de. or rtZwes is . It ld ewKS -6 wCee" ?Wl Ifu 4AIS A4 e., f"#-Jlk?M^4 4-0 a o , MC.S t Marie a:,t„ P, a1r, J?T_ A. EX p?ts.e it" Awls x v, /t?rwd,"Al, PA t r.GSZ RA O Adr is n ` attee:s {pis It a/ w,etrfer/w1s /h f!,/s eese , See ; 91 vs. V Est 1 .0/6,01rtoA/ :r, ?i A?1ES .?. MA"d#, Ole., #,eg Y V-"Cloy R"R'f'4*dr 7r'O /Q/.ttE IO&V OJW T,f/E pA, R, C/?, ivae-. #nM if PA, e.,s. 1119oS/ 77mr roe ?FOR?'IrtEN?'/Ort/RO pi.Al^!r/fe/s A~**" AW7.0N ~ Lltsrtr ivrmvoo-trtoi/ /s ,6#-r / TAME *,WO -Co+t,tKa 7r0 rAV QESVOR Altx llN-o+?t toO-ff MAtiXW 1vXgwj itry AF A=KTa,Q y, ?ERT<i/GAFTE O? 3fR'V/CE ?C', ?A?tn Fs A?. Pat ?c?, ?iP., /,fExiAly vFa y an? rals "rM a*l of MOVE .10 to., filcRJcrx,vr To pa.?, aw, PA'oe, Rrst.E'VYo 44A4 -mz "I°C1s#A& mAfkiISox RtKtE, ?? = A>» DEQas /r/NO- /wra rmc m*Ajbs Of PktsoN oFoia/A?fs of sdz- s^'J,7wF1Et.O TMF ,Aftx'F - A490ftoNt,D bpe4t*tEµr.S wt-r&k Pko-Pos" o",w a o,c1 TIKE 1RCCt.owta6 p?ERso? ?Ltow I NI 'r*t p4RMN61t 30 J0D few-rho FIRS4=CLASS U. S. MA! L PCSTA?.rrZc PRhP?l11! "3Z"^4 #n?b boRi.4,i l 6sq, A.ss,r, eO"#r.SFZ- P-4.boc Ss ur4.t y bA, Q„A,M P M 1 L4, PA 6'+o t t- T O 2-W 1>??d : 3?'u? t1, ?o?v EM L, u : Imax Sr.t KJabrJ6 ss / Zk"".gs 4. t'?Ka6t, ??e. aR 3 ??9 SC.z-Sh,t?4't+RIELA I l s.o ?c rt,F sv--, l?ua?=rrs?,?a.r ? P a ? Lb say PL:rr;./ PPo S= JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 08-4835 CIVIL NO. 08-6175 CIVIL PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants IN RE: PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION nR T)FR AND NOW, this Z8' day of June, 2010, the Court being satisfied that the plaintiff's complaints concerning a violation of the order of the Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo are more properly directed towards the federal court, his amended motion for court intervention is DENIED. BY THE COURT, 4 .xq A / Kevin Hess, P. J. - James A. Paluch Jr. BQ3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652 Plaintiff r? - -? aymond Dorian Esquire r , Assistant Counsel - PA DOC r r 55 Utley Drive _ ` Camp Hill, PA 17011-8028 - l :r m - i ? CC3 c e LL n. s c ? silty tz/71 ZN -r MA douAT OF t0n%4*" P pL+*AS ioA e,ur,,13E'RLSNO 6OU.u7'Y, PE'?NSY6VR,?.ZA PZVZL A T'loN A-r LAw a , ShAs6f A. 00AL1440, Tit,, C> r PLA,ArriFV NOS, 0 S- y61s, cn ?i#orJ• >??ESS, P.T.) ?' "° ? PA Dot, E'r,AL•, pEFB DA ? --? 7 yA11.1rjFF's 14071-00 Poll 1.EAVf To PAO&Fe0 ow APPe,9 L 1111 FORMA PAuftP p N PO+.?N, Ta. ("Pvn.'?), /Ao Si, 11R?.,Jd Wtt,irf, T1?& CowcT O wt,3P4? r _ P1.AINr,ryc, 'Tii,r,l,S A. MAT-r" OF PLTP,'S N40'Tro,J P042 J Jrfah/E,vnQt1 gVjJ ER1+'NG T11iS eoKaTJS OADAC &f rM ?0 ?-rgv 7-'8+ Cie ,Tl.113k 20161 MOVES T/li C'ouAT P"As,,tAW TO P4.9, A•PP.OAva. Ru"s 532, &r sE-e. *#J8 641 R R9titf-0 MO&fi" IN FAtraA PAuPLRIS, k,JO SfATJrS 7#1B Fd4X&t0sA)G U-ArDER7111.6 PE ZT1frS 1026vib" BY It &e S, ¢H9oy (°IWt--Lf"r1 FA1-SIF8Qkr101J70 AwrWa41TIES°)Ti1A'T : ', % Am TMs PL.'rF. I,J Ti1L *ac%lo Ao--TioN A,..o [3E0-* ".So a>s My F1NANCrAL l,0a0' JON A'JA u.04AA-t'rd PRy -r14A Fow-ow1#16 FEES ANa chars; PIL311L F&fs; &osrs of Plcooµe,06- RECO 'Osi $RIRFS, APb OTA&A bceum6pJTSy WlrNfcS.S A,YO1vC W&EAos FFeS; SNBA'Awlr S6Rvle,G FEEsA COSrf; NLy#J6 OF SUPER St?DEAS SJiCt1R,TY I P 1 Ajt&P*AA9LQ NORM Wdu" A55" .Y f f: NOT WA IVED ,4 A' kNy OrMER F ev-5 OR C.osrr op 71415 6v&AJ T,% OTC, 2. f?y AEfPoNSts To ALL QuE5S/0Ns AEtA'T1" IN fAy 46IL4ry ro pky TW1< *&S A,vD l.oSTs DP PRoSEe"-rime, /4711 APPEAL ARE Tkt4E AiJD 60XIE90-T ; A) 3: AM NOT ffpApLoy*b,. S) Z 14,&V ? ,r61* "A « P4091SOIJ A5si6NMEw-r SING MAy t, %ooq (Z /AM uNDEA Off/CiAI. 0PP,¢OS51oIJ By THE PA Doe. 's e) t R&CEIVE Na OTWE,t WCOME CA BENEFITS WITIJ 7kfi EXlEPriar14P B/AT#fbAy &tPrs (usuALL11 410. p Ot LBss?? D) Z OWA/ ND .SAVINGS CA CJfEt#C1jJd Ate-awirs ; Z-) Z Do owr OWN ,{,.,y AEAt ESfATE•, `TocKs' Bombs, NOTes, AwT"j oA ori#EQ VALKAZIL.fi PAOPAATY OR ASSETS (4709A77(A#J PfaswA 1TEA4ssuaJ4 AS A rELEy/5101.i, /}- PFEw BoaKS, A• I3RoK6N TypEwR?fe>e., ,¢nM k ?1coKtiJ,Q.AD/O us D Iso,e ,NCaacrrrQ,- ArloJ.I PUIRPOSOs)? P)'X #400 NO oEPPwJp?N s y AND' Z• okIC 40P19O.Y. Ib.00 IN BFBr-S To 7"14E U.S. D/ST.Ct?r,fND 7r1IR0 ?{lRevcis L'OK?¢TS. . eERSTAND liffi4T q F,aLS? SY, nlreaJT 04 ANSw?4 7O ?r g4eks w?00 iv -rwir Vf-R/- rEA STrltEnoGNT +.?Y[.t SccBS?e-rAo, To rrfO J04"JA6T/AS 400A0V10 41A ay LAw ? SOkJrtE,svtlR C? T/ia ,St?o??D D E era€!? . X& VERsFZEO AWScc.a.JT 70 A'Kl & /a g y ejogAj, e, e?V, poede) APIA It Pq. c!, S f'V'fdV taNe C40f N«er u6411r1V491,tN r--"rPr"rr0a/sro ,au-rH404.1 rrf.SvOW Tars 90 T# 4161#y of14" gsr Iola i,? ?rtZ ¢«y 00 #a.4r1AJ9-eo.1 , .#f! 11u„r7-1,vc-40o,v "uNTy, P6NAlJyL?.4Nip S Sa4-K1,10710E S. DA-rEO : A.cc?us> 30, Z.o/a "d?,?-mks .¢-. P?c.?cct{. , ?D P1KE STREET - p, o, BOx 9 99 PA• /4 'i0-<Z - Of 9 9 1.4 rw c ew"r of Gong +J Pt-6tiks 04 ?u, ????>?D ?•wu?y, pJE),fAISyzVal,J:r-+ C T+e,?l;t q E s so?1 fir 4A r,? XMIS .4- pz ? lilYsF,C N`o, 0 8 - G / ?S v. `yoN. ?F ss, P ?1 a? f+edlzLGr?o?/s, Fr za. PA POr, D ?PC?,dla??rS /10 T? C F AA APP L ?ctr1C t?R d Tcc,s G ? /' "S"O dr Te Add A'&,pw , v. Swi-s j -7.3/ 4 , ZD 6 Z P p G a D ? 3 ? /YOTSCE .45 MERCeY &;vk v rAt THE gdovf #r*MZO Pt,4,N7,FF, f{fR&tjy ,¢PPt4LS 7,,0 7A1g SI R/oR &0"r OF PkN?JyLv,401l14 P, EN'rfrA&D 1,V 'e#,,E Ms*frf4 OF P"I.WritF ?f Nlareol/ male 610"a r y"iiE 1 rlr D /tr o f .?u.,,jC 2O / o . 7'hiD D D Piny nie o r? a ?!o rA Xt y ate' CaPIEs /,<!To THE hd$KEr oN Tulle 4ksOf9r1v-E DarES 6y CoK?cr . Ff0 s Ale ?CNocti/G E o4.8 !F fNY rR,a.vSGR/ps's OA Cv"xr PRoCO'6ol??s +C .?P1 1 , '? UG N ?t 04. J"PE4, /'99), bsss ,4. ?i?LU c?1, 7a,? a1H y"?1.? Oae?R UT-AA J&Nr1orJ O,?l tk 40 7AO& 4416.14Mzo c.6L , PA'acNrioO aF Rv,?rtRaL?. PL AUNT 1 FF A4PPB,44S 40 G.oo A PAtTIr, 4W r-,W &000 C14usg ? qNA W<LL PR SENT 0 VIA Nd ? -rAp,RT Su4" N?SJ AFoRF,n?,d7'/O?/ir0 ()ROD,¢ ?=D.? >S l?/?tNOl ou A.J AStGSaf d? rup/G/AZ- D1Sd4ET/o?/` /{,Je PRf?"uorC?AL -ro P?A?,vr??F`s Srftr? ,?o PGD6R.?iL ?figr'KTOR?y ?t1?,4/!3, Co^ls'?'t?urlo?l,4L As WS4 t AS 'u?47rtE.e, PLAi.rr?PF 14*X QE•EA/ &4*^t r9V 11V '0&9* WO 14.4 xrw rus e y , Er'SAp. THIS G10tcitT ?4ND IQE1t't.4lnlt * P1FuAE,I. /'ui2safNr 7,40 28 u, J. C, 711-lfllq "Tiijls i}Pp1FftL !.S >nRFtlcN7Ed SO its TO PRES.?dLY6 ?4LC B.fr,vFfi?t3, R/D,V!rr -r,4,c4El,J, AtexoiI•/, jo-" Zoirgs-ro pttRSU*N7 "fe ltAPLtdAi©`?i L1FWS' NO da"A7' IQ NLES. ?o /a-PPE.4 c F? , Sv N`a . l fr! Ed . /,?DTIX s5 1 bArc-p ; Augu.s-r 30! Zo/ o ut ; R, boa 1, 0, EsQ . (Ds-rs.) FIi..E ?AMPS A-. PA L uC 6.F J"Q , 13Q3?-4 $ i II Zo AjuE ?,reE?r p,D. ,Soat 999 ? ul?T/u?D oar P.4- 1G pl-411Jr/Ff1 PI OD sE l99 /PtA/NYlGF?SuFFERtlj 4 375tOK.E 0.,, r4loiutr 11, 2&11* ASP BAs ?OlyifffFD Td Zrd.BLAi4 Nose!>Ar /,? ?u?vYi?l `D D,v, PA . l?iE W,hf R E4,? s E0 O wJ a ?e 6r f 3 RN?D WA J 1/' L D /iV ?iO PRtroN's m40j6Aa dEPr. Gt?ctl/c. .4"0, 25, PYNS_1 Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office Page 1 Civil Case Print 2008-06175 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF COR Reference No... Filed......... 10/16/2008 Case Type...... COMPLAINT Time. 11.23 Judgment..... .00 Exec utio Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: Jury Trial. ... Disposed Desc.: DISMISSED Disposed,Date. 1 i h 4/09/2009 ------------ Case Comments ------------- .: H g er C t 2 Hi h C .: g er t General Index Attorney Info PALUCH JAMES A JR PLAINTIFF PRO SE SCI SMITHFIELD 1120 PIKE STREET PO BOX 999 HUNTINGTON PA 16652 PENNSYVLANIA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W CORRECTIONS 2520 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 598 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0598 AYERS EDWARD DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 YOHN MATTHEW DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 KLINE ERIC DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMO D W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 HUBER ADAMS DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 SIMPSON MARK DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 KREIDER ROBERT DEFENDANT SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 SOUTHERS RIBCHARD DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 MOSLAK ZACHARY DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 KELCHNER DONALD L DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 8837 CAMP HILL PA 17001 8837 , * Date Entries - - - - - - - - - - - - - FIRST ENTRY - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - 10/16/2008 COMPLAINT - CIVIL ACTION FILED BY PLFF ----------------------------------------------------j---------------- PYE'5iw Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office Page Civil Case Print 2008-06175 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF COR Reference No... Filed......... 10/16/2008 Case Ty e JudgmeR . ..... . COMPLAINT .... .00 Time.... Execution Date 11.23 0/00/0000 Judge Ass Disposed --------- 10/16/2008 igned: Jury Trial.... Desc.: DISMISSED Disposed Date. --- Case Comments ------------- Higher C t 1.: Higher C t 2.: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA AUPERIS 4/09/2009 - BY JAMES PALUCH R PLFF PRO SE 10/27/2008 ------------------------------------------------- ------- ORDER OF COURT - 10/24/08 IN RE: MOTION OF PLFF T '.PROCEE ---------- D IN FORMA PAUPERIS - MOTION IS GRANTED MAILED 10/24/08 ----------------------------------- - BY EDGAR B B YLEY J --------------------- - COPIES ---------- 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. gg Liteigahte: COMPLAINT & Address..: 55 UTLEY DRIVE Ctyy/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: ROBERT J VOLCIAK, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDAN Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1555:00 Costs....: $42.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Litigant.: AYERS EDWARD ---------------------- Type.: Regular ---------- Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Ctyy/St/Zp • CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hna To: STACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/Time: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs....: $30.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 --------------------------------------------------i------- --------- 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigaht.: YOHN MATTHEW Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Zp CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hnd To: uTACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 -------------------------------------------- 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular) Litigaht.: KLINE ERIC Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hna To: TACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D/Tty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Dateime: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 - - - - - ------- -- - - - - - - 10/31/2008 - - -- --- ----- - - - - - - SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. ----------- ----- - ---------- Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: HUBER ADAMS Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hnd To: TACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. ---------------------------------------------- Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular! Litigant.: SIMPSON MARK Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hna To: TACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ----------------------------------------------- - - -- - 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. - - ------- ---- - 2 PYS5ll Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office Page Civil Case Print 2008-06175 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF COR Reference No... Filed......... 10/16/2008 Case Ty e..... . COMPLAINT Time. .. 11.23 Judgment..... .00 Executio Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: Jury Tri l.... Disposed Desc.: DISMISSED Disposed,Date. 4/09/2009 ------------ Case Comments ------------- Higher C t 1.: H' her Cft 2.: Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: KREIDER ROBERT Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Ctyy/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hnd To: TACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regula Litigant.: SOUTHERS RICHARD Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Ctyy/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Hnd To: TACY SENTZ, ADMIN OFFICER, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: GERALD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1550:00 Costs..... $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 -------------- ---------------------------------------------------- 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: MOSLAK ZACHARY Address..: 55 UTLEY DRIVE Ctyy/St/Z : CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: ROBERT J VOLCIAK, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTI Shf/D ty.: GERLAD WORTHINGTON Date/ Time: 10/29/2008 1555:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/31/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Not Fou6d Litigant.: KELCHNER DONALD L Address..: SCI CAMP HILL 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Zp: CAMP HILL, PA 17001-8837 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 Service Attempts: 1st: 0/00/0000 2nd: 08,00/0000 DEFENDANT IS RETIRED. -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 11/12/2008 PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFTS - BY RA OND W DORIAN ES Q 11/12/2008 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL - BY RAYMOND W DORIAN ATTY F iR DEFTS --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 11/18/2008 DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS - BY RAYMOND W ORIAN ATTYF OR DEFT PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 11/18/2008 PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT - DEFTS PRE ?TMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT - BY RAYMOND W DORI ATTY FOR DEFT PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -------------------------------------------------- -------------- 1/07/2009 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE CORRECTIONS DEFTS PRE MINARY OBJECTIONS - BY PLFF -------------------------------------------------------- 1/07/2009 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGMENT OF TIME TO FILE UPPORTING DOCUMENTS - BY PLFF ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/07/2009 PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE FOR NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRE 8 - BY PLFF -------------------------------------------------- :---------------- 4/09/2009 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT --4/9/09 IN RE: PRELIMI RY OBJECTIONS OF DEFTS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY OBJECTIO AR SUSTAINED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY ?T - COPIES MAILED 4/9/09 3/04/2010 ORDER - PETITIONER HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR REI IEF IN THIS rt COURT DESCRIBING (WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION) HIS ATTEM TS TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE DISMISSAL ORDERS OF APRI '16, 2009 - PETITONER ASSERTS THAT THE TRIAL COURT REFUSED TO OCKET HIS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RETURNED THAT DOCUMENT TO HIM -FILED - 3 PYS:5]1-1 Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office Civil Case Print 2008-06175 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF COR Reference No..: Filed.... Case Tyyppe..... . COMPLAINT Time. Judgmeh?...... : .00 Executioe Judge Assigned: Jury Trio Disposed Desc.: DISMISSED Disposed ------------ Case Comments ------------- Higher C Higher C PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR RELIEFF IS GRANTED T EXTENT: TO THE EXTENT THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN ATT NOTICE OF APPEAL THE TRIAL COURT IS DIRECTED TO A SUCH DOCUMENT IF SUBMITTED TO THE CUMBERLAND COUN FOR FILING - THE TRIAL COURT SHALL THE TRANSMIT APPEAL TO THIS COURT WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY MAKE A TO THE VALIDITY OF THE APPEAL - SEE PA RAP 902 - -------------------------------------------------- 4/28/2010 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INTERVENTION - BY JAMES A F -------------------------------------------------- 5/21/2010 DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLFFS MOTION FOR INTERVENTION DORIAN ATTY FOR DEFTS --------------------------------------------------- 6/17/2010 PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION PALUCH JR PLFF PRO SE -------------------------------------------------- 7/01/2010 ORDER - DATED 06-28-10 - IN RE: PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COURT INTERVENTION - THE COURT BEING SATISFIED THA COMPLAINTS CONCERNING A VIOLATION OF THE ORDER OF SYLVIA H RAMBO ARE MORE PROPERLY DIRECTED TOWARDS COURT, HIS AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION I KEVIN A HESS J - COPIES MAILED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LAST ENTRY - - - - - ------------------------ ------------ .00 .00 .00 Page 4 10/16/2008 1:23 Date 0/000000 Date. 4/09/2009 t 1.- t 2 .THE FOLLOWING MPTING TO FILE A CEPT AND DOCKET PROTHONOTARY SUCH NOTICE OF ETERMINATION AS R CURIAM ----------------- ALUCH JR - - - BY RAYMOND W ----------- - BY JAMES A ---------------- MOTION FOR THE PLAINTIFFS HE HONORABLE HE FEDERAL DENIED - BY * End of Case Information TRUE COpY QIr In TestlmM "` ``' 'ate and thY YMrtlgrof I hec s<,t rnq i2and OiMid C Urt ?i C:? liSE; c , Tra Qf '? C/ 20 ID Karen Reid Bramblett, Esq. Prothonotary Milan K. Mrkobrad, Esq. Deputy Prothonotary Oupertor QCourt of jkntlOpfbattia Middle District November 24, 2010 Pennsylvania Judicial Center P.O. Box 62435 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 16(X) Harrisburg, PA 17106-2435 (717) 772-1294 www..'"Perior.court'state.pa.us RE: James Paluch Appellant V. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Edward Ayers, Matthew Yohn, Eric Kline, Adam Huber, Mark Simpson, Robert Kreider, Richard Southers, Zachary Moslak, Donald Kelchner, Derek Zimmerman, Eugene Brannigan, David Patton, Kristin Barbacci, Theresa Law 1910 MDA 2010 Trial Court Docket No: 2008-4835 Dear James Paluch Enclosed please find a copy of the docket for the above appeal that was recently filed in the Superior Court. Kindly review the information on this docket and notify this office in writing if you believe any corrections are required. Appellant's counsel is also being sent a Docketing Statement, pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 3517, for completion and filing. Please note that Superior Court Dockets are available on the Internet at the Web site address printed at the top of this page. Thank you. Respectfully yours, Milan K. Mrkobrad, Esq. Deputy Prothonotary /vsl Enclosure C-) o p cc: Buell, David D., Prothonotary Court Reporter m r° rrn- Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. ---0 C-* - -t, r"' The Honorable Kevin A. Hess, President Judge ' ?+ C Z D -Ct; N_ y i?? '-i C) b 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 1 of 7 November 24, 2010 CAPTION James Paluch Appellant Superior Court of Pennsylvania Secure v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Edward Ayers, Matthew Yohn, Eric Kline, Adam Huber, Mark Simpson, Robert Kreider, Richard Southers, Zachary Moslak, Donald Kelchner, Derek Zimmerman, Eugene Brannigan, David Patton, Kristin Barbacci, Theresa Law CASE INFORMATION Initiating Document: Notice of Appeal IFP Case Status: Active Case Processing Status: November 24, 2010 Awaiting Original Record Journal Number: Case Category: Civil Case Type(s): Civil Action Law CONSOLIDATED CASES RELATED CASES Docket No / Reason Type 1909 MDA 2010 Related Similar Issue(s) SCHEDULED EVENT Next Event Type: Original Record Received Next Event Type: Receive Docketing Statement COUNSEL INFORMATION Appellant Paluch, James Pro Se: Yes Appoint Counsel Status: Not Represented IFP Status: Yes Pro Se: Paluch, James Address: BQ 3769, SCI Smithfield 1120 Pike St. PO Box 999 Huntingdon, PA 16652--0999 Next. Event Due Date: November 8, 2010 Next Event Due Date: December 8, 2010 Phone No: Fax No: Receive Mail: Yes Receive EMail: No 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 2 of 7 November 24, 2010 Superior Court of Pennsylvania Secure COUNSEL INFORMATION Appellee Zin Pro Se: No IFP Status: No Attorney: Bar No: Law Firm: Address: imerman, Derek Appoint Counsel Status: Represented Dorian, Raymond W. 048148 PA Department of Corrections PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Yohn, Matthew Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Simpson, Mark Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 3 of 7 November 24, 2010 COUNSEL INFORMATION Appellee Ribchard, Southers Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Superior Court of Pennsylvania Secure Appellee Patton, David Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Moslak, Zachary Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 4 of 7 November 24, 2010 COUNSEL INFORMATION Appellee Law, Theresa Pro Se: No IFP Status: Attorney: Bar No: Law Firm: Address: Appoint Counsel Status: Represented Dorian, Raymond W. 048148 PA Department of Corrections PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Superior Court of Pennsylvania Secure Appellee Kreider, Robert Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Kline, Eric Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 5 of 7 November 24, 2010 Appellee Kel Pro Se: No IFP Status: No Attorney: Bar No: Law Firm: Address: COUNSEL INFORMATInN chner, Donald Appoint Counsel Status: Represented Dorian, Raymond W. 048148 PA Department of Corrections PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Department of Corrections Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: Yes Receive EMail: No Superior Court of Pennsylvania Secure Appellee Brannigan, Eugene Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 6 of 7 November 24, 2010 Superior Court of Pennsylvania Secure COUNSEL INFORMATION Appellee Barbacci, Kristin Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Ayers, Edaward Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No Appellee Adams, Huber Pro Se: No Appoint Counsel Status: Represented IFP Status: No Attorney: Dorian, Raymond W. Bar No: 048148 Law Firm: PA Department of Corrections Address: PA Dept of Corrections 1920 Technology Pkwy Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 Phone No: (717) 728-7763 Fax No: Receive Mail: No Receive EMail: No AGENCY/TRIAL COURT INFORMATION Court Below: Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas County: Cumberland Division: Order Appealed From: Judicial District: Documents Received: November 24, 2010 Notice of Appeal Filed: Order Type: OTN(s): Lower Ct Docket No(s): 2008-4835 Lower Ct Judge(s): Hess, Kevin A. President Judge Cumberland County Civil Division 09 September 7, 2010 4:29 P.M. Appeal Docket Sheet Superior Court of Pennsylvania Docket Number: 1910 MDA 2010 Page 7 of 7 Secure November 24, 2010 ORIGINAL RECORD CONTENT Original Record Item Filed Date Content Description Date of Remand of Record: BRIEFING SCHEDULE None None DOCKET ENTRY Filed Date Docket Entry / Representing Participant Type Filed By November 24, 2010 Notice of Appeal IFP Docketed Appellant Paluch, James Comment: awaiting proof of service of appeal upon t/c judge, crt reporter, crt admin & opposing counsel. November 24, 2010 Docketing Statement Exited (Civil) Middle District Filing Office November 24, 2010 Application for Relief Appellant Paluch, James Comment: and appointment of counsel. JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff vs. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 08-4835 CIVIL IN RE: APPEAL OF PLAINTIFF ORDER AND NOW, Nib 3, 2010, in accordance with Rule 1925 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Plaintiff having filed a notice of appeal, the appellant is directed to file of record, within twenty-one (21) days hereof, and serve upon the undersigned a concise statement of the matters complained of on the appeal. Any issue not properly included in the concise statement timely filed and served pursuant to Rule 1925(b) shall be deemed waived. BY THE COURT, -,, lames A. Paluch, Jr. BQ3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652 Plaintiff aymond Dorian, Esquire Assistant Counsel - PA DOE 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011-8028 ?D t 9's trtaV-t Kevin . ess, P. J. „ Am LC c MM rJ ?'Y4 r QCj o cn «. j3 `ro 4vr +,? J JAMES A. PALUCH, JR., Plaintiff VS. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 08-4835 CIVIL NO. 08-6175 CIVIL ?-rM i e-n IN RE: OPINION PURSUANT TO RULE 1925 BEFORE HESS, P.J. -o c.a O In the above-captioned matters, the plaintiff filed complaints against the Department of Corrections and several of its employees alleging mistreatment. The plaintiff is an inmate in the State Correctional System. In both cases, the plaintiff has submitted a bewildering number of filings and sorting out the history of this case has not been an easy task.1 12 F C-D Our review of both files indicates that Judge Bayley sustained preliminary objections and dismissed both complaints in April of 2009. To the extent that the plaintiff now appeals from those orders, we rely upon Judge Bayley's opinions, docketed with his orders, and incorporate same herein by reference. We are unclear, however, as to what matters the plaintiff complains of on appeal. On March 4, 2010, an order was entered by the Superior Court indicating that it had received an application from the plaintiff describing his unsuccessful attempts to file a notice of appeal from Judge Bayley's April 2009 orders. This court was directed to accept and docket an ' Until the end of 2009, this case was dealt with by former, and now retired, President Judge Edgar B. Bayley. The author of this memorandum has dealt with the matter since April of 2010. .j*_ , . , . 41 appeal if submitted to the Prothonotary for filing. Appeal documents were not filed and, instead, the plaintiff filed a document entitled "Motion for Intervention" which we eventually dismissed by order of July 1, 2010. On September 7, 2010, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Superior Court nunc pro tunc. Having reviewed the file and again being uncertain as to the grounds for the plaintiff's appeal, we served upon him a direction to file a concise statement of matters complained of. He was given twenty-one days within which to do so. The twenty-one- day period has expired. We are satisfied that any claims that the defendant has are now waived. See Commonwealth v. Lord, 719 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1999). James A. Paluch, Jr. BQ3769 SCI-Smithfield 1120 Pike Street Huntingdon, PA 16652 Plaintiff /Raymond Dorian, Esquire Assistant Counsel - PA DOC 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011-8028 cop ff :rlm BY THE COURT, CERTIFICATE AND TRANSMITTAL OF RECORDS UNDER PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 1931 (C) To the Prothonotary of the Apellate Court to which the within matter has been appealed: Superior Court of Pennsylvania The undersigned, Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, the said court being a court of record, do hereby certify that annexed hereto is a true and correct copy of the whole and entire record, including an opinion of the court as required by PA R.A.P. 1925, the original papers and exhibits, if any on file, the transcript of the proceedings, if any, and the docket entries in the following matter: James A. Paluch, Jr. Vs. PA Department of Corrections Et. al. 2008-4835 Civil 1910 MDA 2010 The documents comprising the record have been numbered from No.1 to 285, and attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the documents correspondingly numbered and identified with reasonable definiteness, including with respect to each document, the number of pages comprising the document. The date on which the record has been transmitted to the Appellate Comrt is 01/11/2011 ra ?W - David . 1, Proth notary Regina Lebo, Deputy An additional copy of this certificate is enclosed. Please sign and date copy, thereby acknowledging receipt of this record. Date Signature & Title Commonwealth of Pennsylvania County of Cumberland ss: 1, David D. Buell , Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas in and for said County, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the whole record of the case therein stated, wherein James A. Paluch, Jr. Plaintiff, and PA Deparment of Corrections et.al. Defendant, as the same remains of record before the said Court at No. 2008-4835 of Civil Term. In TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Court this 11 day of January A. D.. 2011 Prothonotary 1 Kevin A. Hess President Judge of the Ninth Judicial District,,Som B agVeuellthe County of Cumberland, do certify that by whom the annexed record, certificate and attestation were made and given, and who, in his own proper handwriting, thereunto subscribed his name and affixed the seal of the Court of Common Pleas of said County, was., at the time of so doing, and now is Prothonotary in and for said County of Cumberland . to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, duly commissioned and qualified to all of whose acts as such full faith and credit are and ought to be given as well in Courts of judicature as elsewhere, and that the said record, certificate and attestation are in due form of law and made by the prop officer. President Judge Commonwealth of Pennsylvania County of Cumberland ss: David D. Buell , Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas in 1, and for the said County, do certify that the Honorable Kevin A. Hess by whom the foregoing attestation was made, and who has thereunto subscribed his name, was, at the time of making thereof, and still is President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, Orphan' Court and Court of Quarter Sessions of the Peace in and for said County, duly Commissioned and qualified, to all whose acts as such full faith and credit are and ought to be given, as well in Courts of judicature as elsewhere. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto sgtlmv hand and affixed the seal of said Court this of January A. p2011 Prothonotary No. Term 19_- No 2008-4835 Civil Term 1910 MDA 2010 James A. Paluch, Jr. Versus PA Department of Corrections et. al. From EXEMPLIFIED RECORD Cumberland County Debt, . . . $ Int, from Costs Entered and Filed Prothonotary. Among the Records and Proceedings enrolled in the court of Common Pleas in and for the Cumberland county in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 2008-4835 to No. 1910 MDA 2010 Term; 19 is contained the following: COPY OF Appearance DOCKET ENTRY James A. Paluch, Jr. vs. PA Department of Corrections et. al. **SEE CERTIFIED COPY OF DOCKET ENTERIES** ?-uuujey -Lcuiu yours:y rro7-n.on.ora.r_y, s uzrice Civil Case Print 2008-04835 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL Page 1 Reference No... Filed......... 8/12/2008 Case Type ..... . COMPLAINT Time. 8.55 Judgment..... .00 Execution Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: HESS KEVIN A Jury Trial.... Disposed Desc.: Disposed Date 0/00/0000 ------------ Case Comments ------------- Higher Crt 1.: : 191OMDA2010 Higher Crt 2.: General Index Attorney Info PALUCH JAMES A JR PLAINTIFF 1120 PIKE STREET P O BOX 999 HUNTINGDON PA 16652 PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W 2520 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL PA 17001 ZIMMERMAN DEREK DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD P 0 BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 SIMPSON MARK DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 AYERS EDWARD DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 YOHN MATTHEW DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 HUBER ADAM DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 KLEIN COL DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 KREIDER ROBERT DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 SOUTHERS DICK DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 BRANNIGAN EUGENE DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 PATTON DAVID DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 MOSLAK ZACHARY DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 l-UU1JJeL1a11U 1-UUUII•y r: v?uvuv?a?ry • e ULL1C;e rage Civil Case Print 2008-04835 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL Reference No..: Filed........: 8/12/2008 Case Type.....: COMPLAINT Time. .....D. 8:55 Judgment..... .00 Execution ate 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: HESS KEVIN A Jury Trial.... Disposed Desc.: Disposed Date. 0/00//0000 ------------ Case Comments ------------- Higher Crt 1.: 191OMDA2010 Hi Crt .: BARBACCI KRISTIN DEFENDANT DORIA NhRAYMOND2W SCI-CAM GOLD ALAN S 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 LAW THERESA DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 KELCHNER DONALD L DEFENDANT DORIAN RAYMOND W SCI-CAM 2500 LISBURN ROAD PO BOX 200 CAMP HILL PA 17001 0200 ******************************************************************************** * Date Entries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L/41 8/12/2008 COMPLAINT - FILED BY JAMES AIPALUCHTJR PLFF PRO SE ------------------------------------------------------------------- a - s 8/12/2008 AFFIDAVIT OF IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS - BY JAMES A PALUCH JR PRO ------------------------------------------------------------------- / 8/21/2008 ORDER OF COURT - 8/21/08 - THE PETITION OF PLFF TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED - THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE FILED WITHOUT A FILING FEE AND THE SHERIFF IS DIRECTED TO SERVE IT WITHOUT COST TO PLFF - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 8/21/08 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 8/27/2008 SHERIFyFp'S FILE RETURNED FILED. gg Litigant.: PENNSYLVANIANDEPARTMENTtOF-CCORRECTIONS Address..: 55 UTLEY DRIVE Ctyy/St/Z CAMP HILL PA 17011 Hnd To: RANDELL SEARA ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 0930:00 Costs....: $42.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: ZIMMERMAN DEREK Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $30.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------------- 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret T!?pe.: Regular Litigant.: SIMPSON MARK Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 --------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y? 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S-FILE-RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: AYERS EDWARD Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Zp• CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT•IN CHARGE Shf/Dpty.: ROBERT BITNER PPYsSl:_ c:umnerlana county rrotnonotary, s v::=: ce rz.ge Civil Case Print 2008•-04855 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL Reference No... Case Type ..... . COMPLAINT Judgment..... .00 Judge Assigned: HESS KEVIN A Disposed Desc.: ------------ Case Comments ------------- Filed........: 8/12/2008 Time. .... : 8.55 Execution Date 0/00/0000 Jury Trial.... Disposed Date. 0/00/0000 Higher Crt 1.: 191OMD 2010 Higher Crt 2.: Date/Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ?J 8/27/2008 ------------------------------------- -- SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type Litigant.: YOHN MATTHEW --------------------------- .: Regular Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Q /St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BiTNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------•--- -------------------------- jb 8/27/2008 ------------------------- SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type Litigant.: HUBER ADAM Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Ctyy/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BiTNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ---------------------- .: Regular ------------------------- sr 8/27/2008 ------------------- SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type Litigan : KLEIN COL Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Ctyy/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000/0 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00000 ---------------------- .: Regular ------------------------- ?a 8/27/2008 ------------------- SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret T,?rpe Litigant.: KREIDER ROBERT Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BiTNER Date/Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ----------------------- .: Regular ------------------------- 8/27/2008 ------------------ SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type Litigant.: SOUTHERS DICK Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St%p• CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 -------------------- .: Regular ------------------------- ?(? 8/27/2008 -------------------- SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type Litigant.: PATTON DAVID .: Regular Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BiTNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ----------------------- .sS 8/27/2008 ---------------------------------------- SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type Litigant.: MOSLAK ZACHARY Address..: 55 UTLEY DRIVE Cty/St/Zp: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 --- N .: Regular N N N PXss it cumberiang county Protnonotary,S vrrlce rage 4 Civil Case Print 2008-04835 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL Reference: No... Filed. 8/12/2008 Case Tyyppe...... COMPLAINT Time. 8.55 Judgment..... .00 Execution Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: HESS KEVIN A Jury Trial.... Disposed Desc.: Disposed Date. 0/00/0000 ------------ Case Comments ------------- Higher Crt 1.: 191OMDA2010 Hnd To: RANDELL SEARS, ADULT IN CHARGE Higher Crt 2.: N Shf/Dpty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 0930:00 N Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 N ------------------------------------------------------------------- N ?(p 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigan : BARBACCI KRISTIN Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Zp• CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - - j7 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S-FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: LAW THERESA Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ----------------------------------------------------- - - - -- - - - - - - - - sg 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S-FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: KELCHNER DONALD L Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/ Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- JlG? 8/27/2008 SHERIFF'S FILE RETURNED FILED. Case Type: COMPLAINT & NOTICE Ret Type.: Regular Litigant.: BRANNIGAN EUGENE Address..: 2500 LISBURN ROAD Cty/St/Z • CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Hnd To: BOB VOLCCAK, ADULT IN CHARGE Shf/D ty.: ROBERT BITNER Date/Time: 08/26/2008 1000:00 Costs....: $16.00 Pd By: 00/00/0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ?Q spa 9/16/2008 DORIANPESFOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR ALL DEFTS - BY RAYMOND W ------ ------------------------- -------------------------- ?_(pa 9/16/2008 DEMAND-FOR JURY TRIAL - BY RAYMOND W DORIAN ATTY FOR DEFTS - - - - - -- - - ------------------------------------------------------- l 9/16/2008 -FOF TIME ITO RESPOND R - ABY RAYMOND D W F DORIAN I -ATTY ---------- EXTENSION FOR DEFTS ----------------------------------------------- ?s N FOR EX ENSION TO TI 9/16/2008 COMPLAINTN- BYFRAYMONDOW DORIANTATTY FOR ALLMDEFOSRESPOND TO PLFFS ----------------------------------- ?p 9 10/02/2008 PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT - DEFTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT - BY RAYMOND W DORIAN ATTY FOR DEFTS ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/02/2008 CORRONDIONS DEFTSAPRELIMINAEFTSBJECTIONS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT - BY ------------------------------------------------------------------- jjg?_ja© 10/27/2008 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF TO DEFTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS - BY JAMES A PALUCH JR PLFF PRO SE ------------------------------------------------------------------- /a! 10/27/2008 ORDER OF COURT - 10/24/08 - DEFTS ARE GRANTED UNTIL 12/1/08 TO PLEAD TO PLFFS COMPLAINT - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 10/27/08 C1J_j1-L l.. Utt U-JC110.11U \.V Ull%.y r.L V l.llvlly L-411y-o v.LL ,cLj ;-, Civil Case Print 2008-04835 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL Reference No..: Filed........: 8/12/200E Case Type.. COMPLAINT Time.........: 8:5E Judgment......: .00 Execution Date 0/00/000C Judge Assigned: HESS KEVIN A Jury Trial.... Disposed Desc.: Disposed Date. 0/00/000C ------------ Case Comments ------------- Hi er Crt 1.: 191OMDA2010 Higher Crt 2.: ------------------------------------------ -------------- /aD-/33 10/30/2008 ANSWER AND NEW MATTER OF KRISTEN BARBACCI TO THE COMPLAINT OF JAMES A PALUCH - BY ALAN S GOLD ATTY FOR DEFT KRISTEN BARBACCI -------------------------------------•---------------------------- /3 y 10/30/2008 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFT KRISTEN BARBACCI - BY ALAN S GOLD ESQ ------------------------------------------------------------ /,3tf 10/30/2008 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED - BY ALAN S GOLD ATTY FOR DEFT KRISTEN BARBACCI /J7S 11/03/2008 ORDER OF COURT - 11/3/08 - THE ORDER ENTERED ON 10/24/08 GRANTING ------------------------------------------------------------------- DEFTS UNTIL 12/1/08 TO PLEAD TO PLFFS COMPLAINT IS VACATED AS I MPROVIDENTLY ENTERED - DEFTS FILED PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLFFS MAILEDCOM4 DINT ON 10/2/08 - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES 134, 11/03/2008 O ----- -- ----- - ------- -- --- ----------- ---------- -- ----- RDER OF COURT - 11/3108 IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT - DEFTS HAVING FILED A BRIEF ON THEIR PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT - PLFF IS ALLOWED 60 ADDITIONAL DAYS FROM THIS DATE TO FILE A RESPONSE BRIEF IN THIS JUDGES CHAMBERS - THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS WILL THEN BE DECIDED ON THE BRIEFS - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 11/4/08 ---------------------------------- - /P-/X12/11/2008 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO PA RCP 4009.22 - BY ALAN S GOLD ATTY FOR DEFT KRISTEN BARBACCI -------------------------------- ------------------------- /1// /.312/12/2008 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFT 12/16/2008 ORDER - 12/16/08 IN RE: PLFFS MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ------------------------------------------------------------------- RESPOND TO DEFT BARBACCIS NEW MATTER - IT IS ORDERED THAT PLFFS MOTION IS GRNATED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 12/16/08 ------------------------------------------------------- /Lf 1/07/2009 PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER AND MOTION TO STRIKE DEFT BARBACCIS NEW MATTER - BY PLFF ---------------------------------------- --------------------------- j-j -/ 7x"1/07/2009 PLAINTIFF S-MOTION TO STRIKE CORRECTIONS DEFTS PRELIMINARY ---------------------------------------------------------- 1/07/2009 P LAINTIFF'S MMOTIIONFFOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS - BY PLF -------------------------------------------- / 79 1/07/2009 PLAINTIFF'S PRACIPE FOR NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS - BY PLFF -------------------------------------•------------------------------ / ?D 1/22/2009 ORDER OF COURT - 1/21/09 - IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLFFS COMPLAINT SHALL BE DECIDED BY THIS JUDGE ON BRIEFS ONLY - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILEDI/22/09 -------------------------------------•---------------- -------------- 1/28/2009 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMNET OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO DEFT BARBACCIS NOTICE OF SUBPOENA NUNC PRO TUNC - BY PLFF -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/30/2009 RESPONSE OF KRISTEN BARBACCI TO PLFFS MOTION TO STRIKE - BY ALAN S GOLD ATTY FOR DEFT BARBACCI --------------------------------------• -- ------------ -- 194_/g 7 2/02/2009 ORDER - 1/30/09 IN RE: PLFFS MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO DEFT BARBACCIS NOTICE OF SUBPOENA NUNC PRO TUNC - PLFFS MOTION IS GRANTED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 2/2/09 --------------------------------------- /9?_.20,;Z2/11/2009 TO PLFS MEDICAL ENLARGEMENT BY ALAN S TO OBJECT ATTY OFOR DEFT BARBACCI ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3/09/2009 PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFT BARBACCIS SUBPOENA AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER - BY PLFF ------------------------------------------------------------------- o?? a/D 4/16/2009 ORDER OF COURT - 4/16/09 - IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF ALL DEFTS ARE SUSTAINED - COMPLAINT AGAINST ALL DEFTS IS DISMISSED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J - COPIES MAILED 4/16/09 17l Y551- uumberlana county rrotnonozary-s uz=ice rage Civil Case Print 2008•-04835 PALUCH JAMES A JR (vs) PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL Reference No... Filed......... 8/12/2008 Case Type ..... : COMPLAINT Time.........: 8:55 Judgment......: .00 Execution Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: HESS KEVIN A Jury Trial.... Disposed Desc.: Disposed Date. 0/00/0000 ------------ Case Comments ------------- Higher Crt 1.: 191OMDA2010 Higher Crt 2.: ------------------------------------------------------------------- o -ayf 5/08/2009 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF KRISTIAN BARBACCI - BY ALAN S GOLD ATTY FOR DEFT KRISTIAN BARBACCI ------------------------------------------------------------------- 0[fa.aV1,3/04/2010 ORDER ER HAS COURT DESCRIBING (WITHOUT FILED DOCUMENTATI DOCUMENTATION) HIS F ATTEMPTS RELIEF TO N S FILEA NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE DISMISSAL ORDERS OF APRIL 16, 2009 - PETITONER ASSERTS THAT THE TRIAL COURT REFUSED TO DOCKET HIS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RETURNED THAT DOCUMENT TO HIM UN-FILED - PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR RELIEFF :LS GRANTED TO THE FOLLOWING EXTENT: TO THE EXTENT THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN ATTEMPTING TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL THE TRIAL COURT IS DIRECTED TO ACCEPT AND DOCKET SUCH DOCUMENT IF SUBMITTED TO THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROTHONOTARY FOR FILING - THE TRIAL COURT SHALL THE TRANSMIT ANY SUCH NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THIS COURT WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY MAKE A DETERMINATION AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE APPEAL - SEE PA RAP 902 - PER CURIAM ------------------------------------------------- --------- 4282010 PLAINTIFF'S -MOTION-FOR-INTERVENTION-- -BY-JAMES -A-PALUCH-JR ?J?a aS? 5/21/2010 DEFEND NTS ANSWER TOSPLFFS MOTION FOR INTERVENTION - BY RAYMOND W FOR ------------------------------------------------------------------- ?(?_a 6/17/2010 PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION - BY JAMES A PALUCH JR PLFF PRO SE -------------------------------------•------------------------------ 7/01/2010 ORDER - DATED 06-28-10 - IN RE: PLAINTIFFS AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION - THE COURT BEING SATISFIED THAT THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINTS CONCERNING A VIOLATION OF THE ORDER OF THE HONORABLE SYLVIA H RAMBO ARE MORE PROPERLY DIRECTED TOWARDS THE FEDERAL COURT, HIS AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION IS DENIED - BY KEVIN A HESS J - COPIES MAILED -------------------------------------•------------------------------ o?&! a7&'9/07/2010 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS - BY JAMES A PALUCH JR PLFF PRO SE -------------------------------------------------------------------APPEAL 0&4,J 2 9/07/2010 NOTICEALUCH OR PLFF PRO SSUPERIOR COURT - NUNC PRO TUNC - BY JAMES A ------------------------------------------------------------- ------- 73_x/12/02/2010 SUPERIOR COURT OF PA NOTICE OF APPEAL DOCKETING TO # 1910 MDA 2010 ,;?12/03/2010 ORDER - 12/3/10 IN RE: APPEAL OF PLFF - BY KEVIN A HESS PJ - ,21 COPIES MAILED 12/3/10 ?2 f3•o2611 1/05/2011 INCRE: OPINION P1RSUAN?T TO RULE 1925 1/5/11 - BY KEVIN A HESS PJ LED 5/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/11/2011 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRIES MAILED TO RAYMOND DORIAN ESQ AND JAMES A PALUCH JR yy? - - LAST ENTRY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * Escrow Information * Fees & Debits Beg Bal Pmts/Ad End Bal SUBPOENA 3.00 3.00 .00 ------------------------ ------------ 3.00 3.00 .00 ******************************************************************************** * End of Case Information TRUE COPY FROM RECORD M Testimony wheroof. I hero unto set my hand and the a" of said at Cadisb, Pa. This --(,(-day of 20 Prothonotary a CERTIFICATE AND TRANSMITTAL OF RECORDS UNDER PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 1931 (C) To the Prothonotary of the Apellate Court to which the within matter has been appealed: Superior Court of Pennsylvania The undersigned, Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, the said court being a court of record, do hereby certify that annexed hereto is a true and correct copy of the whole and entire record, including an opinion of the court as required by PA R.A.P. 1925, the original papers and exhibits, if any on file, the transcript of the proceedings, if any, and the docket entries in the following matter: James A. Paluch, Jr. Vs. Received in Superior Court PA Department of Corrections JAN 11 2011 Et. al. 2008-4835 Civil 1910 MDA 2010 The documents comprising the record have been numbered from No.1 to 285, and attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the documents correspondingly numbered and identified with reasonable definiteness, including with respect to each document, the number of pages comprising the document. The date on which the record has been transmitted to th ppellate Court is 01/11/2011 David thou ary Regina Lebo, Deputy An additional cony of this certificate is enclosed Please sign and date copy, thereby acknowledging receipt of this record. Date Signature & Title Karen Reid Bramblett, Esq. uperfor (Court of i3enugp1ban%o Prothonotary Milan K. Mrkobrad, Esq. Middle District Pennsylvania Judicial Center Deputy Prothonotary 601 C P.O. Box 62435 ommonwealth A venue, Suite 1600 HarrisburgPA 17106-2 (71'?j2-129 CERTIFICATE OF REMITTAUR www. supe?rier?court.slete. pa: T-J -71 1711 EMAND OF RECORD =70 rn TO: David D. Buell ,. -a . co Prothonotary RE: Paluch, J. v. PA Dept of Correctio mac, ? ?__ t'1 ns 1910 MDA 2010 Trial Court: Cumberland C s ~ ounty Court of Common Pleas Trial Court Docket No: 2008 -4835 Annexed hereto pursuant to Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedu the entire record for the ab 2 r ove matter. e 571 and 2572 is Original Record content s: Item Filed Date Part Description January 11, 2011 1 Additional Item(s): Also enclosed is a certified copy of Superior Court order d 2011. ated Febr uary 17, Remand/Remittal Date: 02/17/2011 ORIGINAL RECIPIENT ONLY - Please acknowledge receipt by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed copy of this certificate to our office. Copy recipients (noted below need not acknowledge receipt. 9, nd Respectfully, 4,6 Milan K. Mrkobrad, Esq. /wjt Deputy Prothonotary Enclosure cc: Raymond W. Dorian, Esq. The Honorable Kevin A. Hess, President Judge James Paluch Paluch, J. v. PA Dept of Corrections 1910 MDA 2010 Letter to: Buell, David D. Acknowledgement of Certificate of Remittal/Remand of Record (to be returned): Signature Date Printed Name In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania Paluch, J. v. PA Dept of Corrections 1910 MDA 2010 QRDER The above-captioned appeal is dismissed for the failure of the appellant to comply with Pa. R.A.P. 3517. Date: JAN 10 2011 Per Curiam TRUB Copy FROM4 RWORD Ath*q_ FEB 1 7 2011 De" Prothouotuty Supedor Court of PA - Mile