Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-4884¦¦rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr? JAMES T. STINE, IN THE COURT OF COMMON Plaintiff PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY V NO. (l 9/ - y??y G c`v, +c r r. HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, CIVIL ACTION-LAW Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ¦â€¢rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr¦rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrri NOTICE TO DEFEND You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this complaint and notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the court without further notice for any money claimed in the complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW. THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER. IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE. CUMBERLAND COUNTY LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE 32 SOUTH BEDFORD STREET CARLISLE, PA 17013 717-249-3166 ¦¦¦rr¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦rrr¦r¦¦â€¢¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦â€¢¦¦¦¦¦¦¦rr¦rr¦¦r¦¦r¦¦r¦r¦¦¦¦r¦¦¦¦¦¦¦r¦r¦¦. JAMES T. STINE, Plaintiff v HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 0 CIVIL ACTION-LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ¦¦¦¦¦r¦¦¦¦¦r¦r¦¦¦¦¦r¦¦¦¦r¦¦r¦¦r¦rr¦rr¦rrrrr¦¦¦¦¦rrrrrrr¦¦¦r¦¦rr¦¦¦¦¦rrr¦rrrr¦r? COMPLAINT AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, James T. Stine, by and through his attorney, Richard Koch, and avers the following: 1. Plaintiff is James T. Stine, an individual residing at 221 Cornman Road, Carlisle, PA 17013. 2. Defendant is Hoss's Restaurant Operations (Hoss's), headquartered at 170 Patchway Road, Duncansville, PA 16635. 3. Plaintiff was employed by Hoss's for fifteen years. 4. On June 26, 2008, he was fired by Hoss's after a comment he made to Beth Debiase, corporate trainer for Hoss's, concerning her destruction of company property. 5. Two weeks prior to his discharge, Plaintiff received an evaluation lauding him for exceeding work expectations. 6. Hoss's employee, Greg Kilnefner, the General Manager of the location Plaintiff was assigned, and Plaintiffs supervisor, delivered the review and promised Plaintiff a raise in pay effective the following month. 7. That review, coupled with Plaintiffs fifteen years of work at Hoss's without any reprimands from Hoss's during that time, led Plaintiff to hold a reasonable expectation of continued employment. 8. Defendant never warned Plaintiff that his workplace conduct, behavior, or language could lead to his discharge. 9. Defendant stated no reason for Plaintiffs discharge. 10. Plaintiff paid for private healthcare insurance through Hoss's. 11. That healthcare insurance ceased to be effective after Plaintiff's discharge. 12. Plaintiff paid $175.00 per month for insurance through Hoss's. 13. Plaintiff pays $384.80 per month for government insurance. 14. Ross's offered Plaintiff the opportunity to buy continuing health insurance through the program popularly known as COBRA for $863.54 per month. 15. Hoss's discharge of Plaintiff meant that he was forced to pay either $384.80 or $863.54 per month for health insurance. 16. Plaintiff logically did not choose COBRA and enrolled in Medicare. 17. Plaintiffs enrollment in the Medicare program ensures additional expense for Pennsylvania. 18. Hoss's was aware that Plaintiff has an aneurysm. 19. Plaintiff is scheduled for an operation on that aneurysm in September of 2008. 20. Hoss's was aware of the impending operation. 21. The operation and associated costs will now be paid for by Medicare, a program funded jointly by the Federal government and the Pennsylvania state government. 22. Plaintiff is sixty-five years old and eligible for Medicare assistance. 23. Sound public policy dictates that costs should not be bome by the state if they can reasonably be paid for through other means. 24. Hoss's unwarranted discharge of Plaintiff resulted in his forced retirement on less than the full Social Security benefits he would have been eligible for fourteen months later, a loss of at least $125 per month. 25. The difference between the amount Plaintiff earned at Hoss's and his Social Security benefit, less the cost of health insurance in each case, is $1,072.60 per month. 26. Hoss's wrongful discharge of Plaintiff resulted in his forced enrollment in Medicare, resulting in additional expense for Pennsylvania. WHEREFORE, James T. Stine, because sound public policy supports an action for wrongful discharge that results in unnecessary financial burdens on the state, despite Pennsylvania's employment at will doctrine, requests this Court to enter judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $12,871.20, costs, reasonable attorney fees and for any other relief the Court deems just and appropriate. Respectfully Submitted, A:kt,A 4 A I4.icF/d-Kbe'fi, Es-q-We of ;4 Law Offices of Richard Koch 710 South Market Street Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 VERIFICATION I, JAMES T. STINE, hereby verify that the statements made in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. JAMES U. STINE DATE: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Complaint, upon the defendant, by depositing same in the United States Mail, first class mail, postage prepaid, on the 14th day of August 2008, from Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows: Hoss's Restaurant Operations Operations Manager 170 Patchway Road Duncansville, PA 16635 RESPECTFULLY 10 1 South Market Street Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 691-1882 IN 92956 C? ? ? ? ` a ? "T.? t- .? ?? r ? ? S ,?; ,. ? ? ? ? ? .... ?' ?" ? i `. . t. tea: ,? .? _-- ? _ % C ) ?;,. ? ? ?:? ? ? ? ?? O\ JAMES T. STINE, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA. V. NO. 08-4884 Civil Term HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Filed on Behalf of Defendant, Hoss's Restaurant Operations Counsel of Record for Filing Party: Michael J. Wagner, Esquire Pa. I.D. No. 39364 WAGNER & FINN 107 Lakemont Park Boulevard Altoona, PA 16602 (814) 944-4700 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES T. STINE, NO. 08-4884 Civil Term Plaintiff V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of Michael J. Wagner, WAGNER & FINN, 107 Lakemont Park Boulevard, Altoona, Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602 in the above-captioned matter on behalf of Defendant, Hoss's Restaurant Operations. Dated: August 26, 2008 WAGNER & FIN r ? By: Michael J. e , E!iqbinV_ PA I.D. No. 39364 107 Lakemont Park Boulevard Altoona, PA 16602 (814)944-4700 . _I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES T. STINE, NO. 08-4884 Civil Term Plaintiff V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Michael J. Wagner, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Defendant's Entry of Appearance has been served on the following parties of record by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid on this 26th day August, 2008. Original to: Curt Long Cumberland County Prothonotary Cumberland County Courthouse One Courthouse Square Carlisle, PA 17013-3387 One (1) copy: Richard Koch, Esquire 101 South Market Street Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 WAGNE INN 1 By: Michael J. Wagner, Esq ire PA I.D. No. 39364 107 Lakemont Park Boulevard Altoona, PA 16602 (814)944-4700 =;v 77- z { CT) : ia JAMES T. STINE, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA. V. NO. 08-4884 Civil Term HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO CIVIL COMPLAINT Filed on Behalf of Defendant, Hoss's Restaurant Operations Counsel of Record for Filing Party: Michael J. Wagner, Esquire Pa. I.D. No. 39364 WAGNER & FINN 107 Lakemont Park Boulevard Altoona, PA 16602 (814) 944-4700 A. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES T. STI N E, Plaintiff V. HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, Defendant NO. 08-4884 Civil Term CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO CIVIL COMPLAINT AND NOW, comes the Defendant, Hoss's Restaurant Operations, by and through their attorney, Michael J. Wagner, Esquire, and files the foregoing Preliminary Objections to Civil Complaint averring as follows: 1. The Plaintiff initiated this matter with the filing of a Civil Complaint on or about 8/14/08. 2. The Plaintiff appears to be attempting to assert a claim on behalf of Medicare on the premise that his discharge from employment "forced" the Plaintiff to enroll in Medicare in order to receive continuing healthcare coverage. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION I CAPACITY TO SUE 3. James T. Stine appears to have filed the Complaint in his capacity as an individual. 4. The Plaintiff asserts no legal support or authority for his capacity to sue on behalf of Medicare, the United States government, or the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests that its Preliminary Objections be granted and any claim on behalf of Medicare, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or the United States government be dismissed. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION II INSUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY IN A PLEADING 5. The Defendant hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 4 of its foregoing Preliminary Objections as if the same were set forth herein. 6. To the extent that the Plaintiff is making a claim for wrongful discharge, the Complaint lacks sufficient specificity for the Defendant to ascertain the legally identifiable "public policy" that the Plaintiff alleges to have been violated by the Defendant. WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests that its Preliminary Objections be granted and the Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION III DEMURRER 7. The Defendant hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 6 of its foregoing Preliminary Objections as if the same were set forth herein. 8. To the extent that the Plaintiff asserts that his discharge "forced" him to enroll in Medicare, thereby constituting a violation of public policy, the Plaintiff has failed to set forth any legal theory or legally recognizable claim in support of his alleged public policy violation. WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests that its Preliminary Objections be granted and that the Complaint be dismissed. Respectfully submitted, WAGNER & FINN Dated: August 26, 2008 By: Micha J. Wagner, Es ire 107 Lakemont Park Boulevard Altoona, PA 16602 (814) 944-4700 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES T. STINE, Plaintiff NO. 08-4884 Civil Term V. HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED RULE RETURNABLE AND NOW, this day of , 2008, upon consideration of Defendant's Preliminary Objections to Civil Complaint, a Rule is hereby granted upon the Plaintiff, James T. Stine, to show cause as to why the relief set forth in the Defendant's Preliminary Objections to Civil Complaint not be granted. Said Rule Returnable on the day of , 2008 before Judge in Courtroom # at the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania at a.m./p.m. BY THE COURT: J. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JAMES T. STINE, NO. 08-4884 Civil Term Plaintiff V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this 26th day of August, 2008, serving a copy of the foregoing Preliminary Objections to Civil Complaint via First Class Mail on the following persons: Original to: Curt Long Cumberland County Prothonotary Cumberland County Courthouse One Courthouse Square Carlisle, PA 17013-3387 One (1) copY.' Richard Koch, Esquire 101 South Market Street Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 co ?v ? PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: (List the within matter for the next Argument Court.) CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be stated in full) JAMES T. STINE, Plaintiffvs HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, Defendant No. 08-4884 , civil Term 1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiffs motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): Prpl i mi nang 01:4 ecti aw to riyi 1 C a=1 a i nt 2. Identify all counsel who will argue cases: (a) for plaintiffs: Richard Koch, 'Er s ,i ", 01 Seuth Ma kat St-sat, MachaW csburcj., PA 17055 (Name and Address) Michael J. Wagner, Esquire, Wagner & Finn, 153 Lakemont Park Boulevard, (b) for defendants: Altoona, PA 16602 (Name and Address) 3. 1 will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. 4. Argument Court Date: Michael J. Wagner, Esquire Print your name Defendant Date: September 17, 2008 Attorney for INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Two copies of all briefs must be filed with the COURT ADMINISTRATOR (not the Prothonotary) before argument. 2. The moving party shall file and serve their brief 12 days prior to argument. 3. The responding party shall file their brief 5 days prior to argument. 4. If argument is continued new briefs must be filed with the COURT ADMINISTRATOR (not the Prothonotary) after the case Is relisted. a JAMES T. STINE, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 08-4884 CIVIL HOSS'S RESTAURANT OPERATIONS, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS BEFORE HESS AND GUIDO, J.J. ORDER AND NOW, this 7 - day of November, 2008, it appearing that the plaintiff s complaint fails to identify any legally cognizable public policy exception to Pennsylvania's well- recognized employment at-will doctrine, the preliminary objections of the defendant are SUSTAINED and the complaint of the plaintiff DISMISSED. BY THE COURT, Richard Koch, Esquire For the Plaintiff v/ Michael J. Wagner, Esquire For the Defendant :rlm c? A. Hess, J. C3, 1; 7 Est r . ;;'Ill Y