HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-5280C
DOUGLAS LAW OFFICE
43 W. SOUTH ST.
POB 261
CARLISLE PA 17013
TELEPHONE 717-243-1790
Showers;
vs
Progressive Direct Insurance
Company
Plaintiff
Defendant
WILLIAM P. DOUGLAS, ESQ.
Supreme Court I.D. # 37926
In the Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County Pennsylvania
No. 08- S a 4o Civil Term
Civil Action Law
.ry Trial Demanded
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and
Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in
writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you.
You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a
judgment may be entered against you by the court without further notice for any money
claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiffs. You
may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH
BELOW. THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT
HIRING A LAWYER.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE
TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY
OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCE FEE OR NO
FEE:
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166 1
DATE: September 4, 2008 BY
?,/?J? MIA?
Complaint
1. Plaintiffs, David C. and Kim M. Showers, husband and wife, are adult
individuals residing at 65 Marilyn Drive, Carlisle, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant, Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Progressive), is a
corporation licensed to do business in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, with offices located throughout the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania with mailing address P.O. Box 31260, Tampa, Florida, 33631.
3. On or about November 25, 2005, at approximately 1:00 pm, Plaintiff Kim
Showers was the owner and operator of a 2002 Pontiac Grand Prix, in
which her husband David Showers was a passenger, traveling north on
North West Street in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
4. At that same time, underinsured motorist, Tammy J. Knouse was driving
a 1996 Mercury, which was owned by Defendant Donna K. Knouse,
heading west on "H" Street in Carlisle, Pennsylvania crossing North West
Street.
5. Underinsured Motorist, Tammy J. Knouse, (hereinafter referred to as
Knouse) was allegedly stopped at the stop sign at the intersection of "H"
and North West Streets, then proceeded through the intersection and
drove her vehicle into Plaintiffs' vehicle who were rightfully traveling
down North West Street.
6. Tammy Knouse failed to see Plaintiffs' vehicle, which had the right of
way, before entering the intersection and hitting Plaintiffs' vehicle.
7. Tammy Knouse's negligence consists of, among other things, the
following acts and/or omissions, which substantially contributed to and
were the proximate cause of the injuries suffered by Plaintiffs:
a. Failing to abide by speed limits and traveling at an unlawful speed
in violation of, among other things, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3361;
b. Failing to take evasive action to avoid an impact with Plaintiffs;
C. Operating her vehicle at an excessive rate of speed under the
circumstances;
d. Failing to have her vehicle under proper and adequate control;
e. Failing to apply the brakes in time to avoid the collision;
Failing to observe Plaintiffs' vehicle on the highway;
g. Failing to operate her vehicle in accordance with existing traffic
conditions and traffic controls;
h. Failing to exercise the high degree of care required of a motorist
entering an intersection;
I. Failing to properly observe traffic signals controlling Defendant's
direction of travel;
Failing to keep a reasonable look-out for other vehicles lawfully on
the road;
k. Attempting to enter an intersection when such movement could not
be safely accomplished;
1. Failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic already upon the road;
m. Failing to prudently proceed through the intersection so as to avoid
creating a dangerous situation for other vehicles on the highway;
n. Proceeding through an intersection when such movement could
not be made in safety;
o. Failing to keep a proper lookout for approaching vehicles;
p. Operating the vehicle so as to create a dangerous situation
for other vehicles on the roadway;
q. Failing to have her vehicle under proper and adequate
control;
r. Operating her vehicle in a careless disregard for the lives and
property of others in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3714;
S. Permitting or allowing her vehicle to strike and collide with the
vehicle operated by the Plaintiffs; and
t. Failing to keep a proper lookout and see Plaintiffs' vehicle lawfully
traveling on North West Street prior to the collision.
8. There was a policy of insurance in effect at the time of the accident, issued
by Progressive Direct Insurance Company and underwritten by
Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company, bearing policy number
52849027-0. The contract provided stacked Underinsured Motorist
Coverage, up to $500,000.00 per person and up to $1,000,000.00 per
accident. Pursuant to the terms of said contract of insurance, Progressive
is liable for damages that were caused by Knouse, in excess Knouse's
insurance policy limit ($50,000.00), up to the applicable limits of coverage.
Progressive granted, in writing, permission to the plaintiffs to settle any
and all claims they may have against Knouse and execute a general
release in favor of Knouse while preserving all the plaintiffs' rights under
the aforesaid insurance policy.
COUNTI
KIM M. SHOWERS
vs
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
9. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 8, inclusive, are incorporated
herein by reference.
10. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse as stated
above, Plaintiff suffered numerous serious and permanent physical
injuries, including, but not limited to pain in her lumbar and thoracic
spine, hips, legs, and knees, and fractured ribs.
11. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse, Plaintiff was
forced to incur medical bills and expenses for the injuries she has suffered
and she will continue to incur medical expenses in the future.
12. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse, Plaintiff has
suffered, or may suffer, a severe loss of her earnings and impairment of
her earning capacity, and the loss of income and impairment of earning
capacity will, or may, continue in the future.
13. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse, Plaintiff has
undergone, and may in the future undergo, great mental and physical
pain and suffering, mental anguish and humiliation, loss of life's
pleasures, and a severe limitation in her pursuit of daily activities, all to
her great loss and detriment.
14. Knouse had a duty to Plaintiff to act according to the rules of the road and
laws of the Commonwealth, but breached such duty through her
negligence as set forth above.
15. At all times material hereto, Plaintiff acted with due care and was not
contributorily negligent.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant in excess of an
amount requiring compulsory referral to arbitration, including costs of suit, and
any other relief this court deems appropriate.
COUNT II
DAVID C. SHOWERS
vs
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
16. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 15, inclusive, are incorporated
herein by reference.
17. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant as stated
above, Plaintiff suffered numerous serious and permanent physical
injuries, including, but not limited to pain in his back, right leg and knee,
and hips.
18. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff
was forced to incur medical bills and expenses for the injuries he has
suffered and he will continue to incur medical expenses in the future.
19. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff
has suffered, or may suffer, a severe loss of his earnings and impairment
of his earning capacity, and the loss of income and impairment of earning
capacity will, or may, continue in the future.
20. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff
has undergone, and may in the future undergo, great mental and physical
pain and suffering, mental anguish and humiliation, loss of life's
pleasures, and a severe limitation in his pursuit of daily activities, all to
his great loss and detriment.
21. Knouse had a duty to Plaintiff to act according to the rules of the road and
laws of the Commonwealth, but breached such duty through her
negligence as set forth above.
22. At all times material hereto, Plaintiff acted with due care and was not
contributorily negligent.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant in excess of an
amount requiring compulsory referral to arbitration, including costs of suit, and
any other relief this court deems appropriate.
COUNT III
KIM M. SHOWERS and DAVID C. SHOWERS
VS
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
23. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 22, inclusive, are incorporated
herein by reference.
24. David C. Showers and Kim M: Showers are husband and wife and were
married at the time of the accident.
25. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries sustained by the plaintiffs,
they have suffered from the loss of the aid, assistance, comfort,
companionship and society of their spouse.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant in excess of an
amount requiring compulsory referral to arbitration, including costs of suit, and
any other relief this court deems appropriate.
Respectfully bmitted,
William P. Douglas, Es .
Attorney for Plaintif
September 4, 2008
VERIFICATION
The foregoing Complaint is based upon information which has been gathered by
my counsel in the preparation of the lawsuit. The language of the document is
that of counsel and not my own. I have read the document and to the extent that
it is based upon information which I have given to counsel, it is true and correct
to the best of our knowledge, information and belief. To the extent that the
content of the document is that of counsel, I have relied upon counsel in making
this verification.
This statement and verification are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.
Section 4904 relating to unworn falsification to authorities, which provides that
if I make knowingly false averments, I may be subject to criminal penalties.
David C. Showers
Kim M. Showers
September 4, 2008
N +
r'{
(y Av `=T GO l TS
E err
`N
3?
C fi?
V,
l?
?i
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1 Filed 09/26/2008 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KIM M. SHOWERS
AND DAVID C. SHOWERS
Plaintiffs
VS.
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT
INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
:No. (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
NOTICE OF REMOVAL
NOW, comes Defendant, Progressive Direct Insurance Company ("Progressive"), by and
through its attorneys, Forry Ullman, and files this Notice of Removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441,
et. seq. Defendant submits that the United States District Court for the Middle District of
Pennsylvania has original diversity jurisdiction over this civil action and this matter may be
removed to the District Court in accordance with the procedures provided at 28 U.S.C. § 1446. In
further support of this Notice of Removal, defendant states as follows:
1. Plaintiffs, Kim M. Showers and David C. Showers, initiated this civil action
through the filing of a Complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania, on or about September 5, 2008.
2. The Complaint was received by Progressive on or about September 5, 2008.
3. A true and correct copy of the Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
4. Upon information and belief, the documents attached hereto represent all of the
pleadings filed in connection with the state court action.
5. Plaintiffs, Kim M. Showers and David C. Showers, are adult individuals and
reside at 65 Marilyn Drive, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1 Filed 09/26/2008 Page 2 of 3
6. Progressive is not a Pennsylvania corporation nor does Progressive have its
principal place of business in Pennsylvania. Rather, Progressive is an Ohio corporation with its
principal place of business in Ohio with an address of 6300 Wilson Mills Road, Mayfield
Village, Ohio, 44143.
7. Plaintiffs' Complaint alleges that Progressive has breached a contract and the
plaintiffs seek underinsured motorist benefits from Progressive arising form a motor vehicle
accident that allegedly occurred on or about November 25, 2005.
8. Because of plaintiffs' various claims for unliquidated damages arising out of
allegedly "permanent physical injuries... sever loss of earnings and impairment... great mental
and physical pain and suffering" which includes compensatory damages, attorneys' fees and
costs, and seeks an amount in excess of $75,000.00.
9. As plaintiff is a citizen of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania and Defendant is a
citizen of the state of Ohio and because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has original diversity
jurisdiction. over this matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
10. The District Court has original jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332, which confers jurisdiction over all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds
the sum or value of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs and is between citizens of
different states.
11. Defendant submits that this matter may be removed to the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 which permits
removal of any civil action for which the District Courts have original jurisdiction.
2
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Progressive Direct Insurance Company, hereby removes this
civil action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1441.
Respectfully submitted,
FOR ULLMAN
By:
CARY . BREON, ESQUIRE
Pa. I.D. NO. 61469
Walnut Hill Plaza, Suite 450
150 S. Warner Road
King of Prussia, PA 19406
(610) 977-2975
Attorneys for Defendant,
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
DATE: September 26, 2008
3
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1-2
Filed 09/26/2008 Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT A
DOUGLAS LAW OFFICE
43 W. SOUTH ST.
POB 261
CARLISLE PA 17013
TELEPHONE 717-243-1790
Showers;
vs
Progressive Direct Insurance
Company
Plaintiff
NOTICE
Defendant
Civil Action Law
iry Trial Demanded
You have been sued in court If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and
Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in
writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you.
You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a
judgment may be entered against you by the court without further notice for any money
claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiffs. You
may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH
BELOW. THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT
HIRING A LAWYER.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE
TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY
OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCE FEE OR NO
FEE:
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
WILLIAM P. DOUGLAS, ESQ.
Supreme Court I.D.# 37926
Cumberland County Pennsylvania
No. 08- 5280 Civil Term
DATE: September 4, 2008 BY
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/2008 Page 2 of 6
Complaint
1. Plaintiffs, David C. and Kim M. Showers, husband and wife, are adult
individuals residing at 65 Marilyn Drive, Carlisle, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant, Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Progressive), is a
corporation licensed to do business in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, with offices located throughout the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania with mailing address P.O. Box 31260, Tampa, Florida, 33631.
3. On or about November 25, 2005, at approximately 1:00 pm, Plaintiff Kim
Showers was the owner and operator of a 2002 Pontiac Grand Prix, in
which her husband David Showers was a passenger, traveling north on
North West Street in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
4. At that same time, underinsured motorist, Tammy J. Knouse was driving
a 1996 Mercury, which was owned by Defendant Donna K. Knouse,
heading west on "H" Street in Carlisle, Pennsylvania crossing North West
Street.
5. Underinsured Motorist, Tammy J. Knouse, (hereinafter referred to as
Knouse) was allegedly stopped at the stop sign at the intersection of "H"
and North West Streets, then proceeded through the intersection and
drove her vehicle into Plaintiffs' vehicle who were rightfully traveling
down North West Street.
6. Tammy Knouse failed to see Plaintiffs' vehicle, which had the right of
way, before entering the intersection and hitting Plaintiffs' vehicle.
7. Tammy Knouse's negligence consists of, among other things, the
following acts and/or omissions, which substantially contributed to and
were the proximate cause of the injuries suffered by Plaintiffs:
a. Failing to abide by speed limits and traveling at an unlawful speed
in violation of, among other things, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3361;
b. Failing to take evasive action to avoid an impact with Plaintiffs;
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1-2 Filed 09126/2008 Page 3 of 6
C.
d.
e.
f.
9.
Operating her vehicle at an excessive rate of speed under the
circumstances;
Failing to have her vehicle under proper and adequate control;
Failing to apply the brakes in time to avoid the collision;
Failing to observe Plaintiffs' vehicle on the highway;
Failing to operate her vehicle in accordance with existing traffic
conditions and traffic controls;
h. Failing to exercise the high degree of care required of a motorist
entering an intersection;
1. Failing to properly observe traffic signals controlling Defendant's
direction of travel;
j. Failing to keep a reasonable look-out for other vehicles lawfully on
the road;
k. Attempting to enter an intersection when such movement could not
be safely accomplished;
1. Failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic already upon the road;
m. Failing to prudently proceed through the intersection so as to avoid
creating a dangerous situation for other vehicles on the highway;
n. Proceeding through an intersection when such movement could
not be made in safety;
o. Failing to keep a proper lookout for approaching vehicles;
p. Operating the vehicle so as to create a dangerous situation
for other vehicles on the roadway;
q. Failing to have her vehicle under proper and adequate
control;
r. Operating her vehicle in a careless disregard for the lives and
property of others in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3714;
S. Permitting or allowing her vehicle to strike and collide with the
vehicle operated by the Plaintiffs; and
t. Failing to keep a proper lookout and see Plaintiffs' vehicle lawfully
traveling on North West Street prior to the collision.
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/2008 Page 4 of 6
8. There was a policy of insurance in effect at the time of the accident, issued
by Progressive Direct Insurance Company and underwritten by
Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company, bearing policy number
52849027-0. The contract provided stacked Underinsured Motorist
Coverage, up to $500,000.00 per person and up to $1,000,000.00 per
accident. Pursuant to the terms of said contract of insurance, Progressive
is liable for damages that were caused by Knouse, in excess Knouse's
insurance policy limit ($50,000.00), up to the applicable limits of coverage.
Progressive granted, in writing, permission to the plaintiffs to settle any
and all claims they may have against Knouse and execute a general
release in favor of Knouse while preserving all the plaintiffs' rights under
the aforesaid insurance policy.
COUNTI
KIM M. SHOWERS
vs
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
9. The : averments Df paragraphs 1 through 8, inclusive, are incorporated
herein by reference.
10. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse as stated
above, Plaintiff suffered numerous serious and permanent physical
injuries, including, but not limited to pain in her lumbar and thoracic
spine, hips, legs, and knees, and fractured ribs.
11. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse, Plaintiff was
forced to incur medical bills and expenses for the injuries she has suffered
and she will continue to incur medical expenses in the future.
12. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse, Plaintiff has
suffered, or may suffer, a severe loss of her earnings and impairment of
her earning capacity, and the loss of income and impairment of earning
capacity will, or may, continue in the future.
13. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Knouse, Plaintiff has
undiergone, and may in the future undergo, great mental and physical
pain and suffering, mental anguish and humiliation, loss of life's
pleasures, and a severe limitation in her pursuit of daily activities, all to
her great loss and detriment.
14. Knouse had a duty to Plaintiff to act according to the rules of the road and
laws of the Commonwealth, but breached such duty through her
negligence as set forth above.
Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/2008 Page 5 of 6
15. At all times material hereto, Plaintiff acted with due care and was not
contributorily negligent.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant in excess of an
amount requiring compulsory referral to arbitration, including costs of suit, and.
any other relief this court deems appropriate.
COUNT II
DAVID C. SHOWERS
vs
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
16. The averments of paragraphs 1 through 15, inclusive, are incorporated
herein by reference.
17. As direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant as stated
above, Plaintiff suffered numerous serious and permanent physical
injuries, including, but not limited to pain in his back, right leg and knee,
and ,hips.
18. As at direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff
was forced to incur medical bills and expenses for the injuries he has
suffered and he will continue to incur medical expenses in the future.
19. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff
has suffered, or may suffer, a severe loss of his earnings and impairment
of his earning capacity, and the loss of income and impairment of earning
capacity will, or may, continue in the future.
20. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff
has undergone, and may in the future undergo, great mental and physical
pain and suffering, mental anguish and humiliation, loss of life's
pleasures, and a severe limitation in his pursuit of daily activities, all to
his great loss and detriment.
21. Knouse had a duty to Plaintiff to act according to the rules of the road and
laws of the Commonwealth, but breached such duty through her
negligence as set forth above.
22. At all times material hereto, Plaintiff acted with due care and was not
contributorily negligent.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant in excess of an
amount requiring compulsory referral to arbitration, including costs of suit, and
any other relief this court deems appropriate.
• Case 1:08-cv-01791-TIV Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/2008 Page 6 of 6
COUNT III
KIM M. SHOWERS and DAVID C. SHOWERS
vs
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
r
23. The, averments of paragraphs 1 through 22, inclusive, are incorporated
herein by reference.
24. David C. Showers and Kim M. Showers are husband and wife and were
married at the time of the accident.
25. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries sustained by the plaintiffs,
they have suffered from the loss of the aid, assistance, comfort,
companionship and society of their spouse.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant in excess of an
amount requiring compulsory referral to arbitration, including costs of suit, and
any other relief this court deems appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
William P. Douglas, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
September 4, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KIM M. SHOWERS CIVIL ACTION
AND DAVID C. SHOWERS
Plaintiffs
vs. : No.
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT
INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant : (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 26`h day of September, 2008, Progressive
Direct Insurance Company's Notice of Removal was filed electronically and is available for
viewing on the Court's ECF system. I further certify that on September 26, 2008, I served a true
and correct copy of Progressive Direct Insurance Company's Notice of Removal upon the
Plaintiffs, by mailing the same to Plaintiffs' counsel of record, by First Class United States Mail,
postage pre-paid, addressed as follows:
William P. Douglas, Esquire
Douglas Law Office
43 W. South Street, P.O. Box 261
Carlisle, PA 17013
This statement is made subject to the penalties of 18 U.S.C. § 1621, relating to perjury.
FO ULLMAN
By:
CARY . BREON, ESQUIRE
Pa. I.D. NO. 61469
Walnut Hill Plaza, Suite 450
150 S. Warner Road
King of Prussia, PA 19406
(610) 977-2975
Attorneys for Defendant,
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
DATE: September 26, 2008
4
17
r, ! r
'